JP2004288503A - Residual lifetime evaluation device of high pressure breaker, and document prepared by it - Google Patents

Residual lifetime evaluation device of high pressure breaker, and document prepared by it Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2004288503A
JP2004288503A JP2003080041A JP2003080041A JP2004288503A JP 2004288503 A JP2004288503 A JP 2004288503A JP 2003080041 A JP2003080041 A JP 2003080041A JP 2003080041 A JP2003080041 A JP 2003080041A JP 2004288503 A JP2004288503 A JP 2004288503A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
input
remaining life
numerical value
circuit breaker
screen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2003080041A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4201628B2 (en
JP2004288503A5 (en
Inventor
Naoya Yamada
直也 山田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Building Solutions Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd
Priority to JP2003080041A priority Critical patent/JP4201628B2/en
Publication of JP2004288503A publication Critical patent/JP2004288503A/en
Publication of JP2004288503A5 publication Critical patent/JP2004288503A5/ja
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4201628B2 publication Critical patent/JP4201628B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a residual lifetime evaluation device of a high pressure breaker, whereby the lifetime of the high pressure breaker including maintenance time can be evaluated. <P>SOLUTION: This residual lifetime evaluation device of the high pressure breaker has a personal computer to perform input of numerical numbers for items specified in advance based on investigation results at the site of the high pressure breaker and to perform calculation of residual lifetime based on the input numerical values. Once the numerical numbers based on the investigation results at least under the present circumstances are input, a document (figure) on which at least either one of the numerical values relative to the residual lifetime with a plurality of reliability factors or a graph is printed is prepared by using the residual lifetime evaluation device. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、ビル等で稼動している高圧真空遮断機(VCB)等の高圧遮断機について、メンテナンス時等の現場での調査結果に基づく現状での残存寿命、並びにその高圧遮断機をオーバーホールしたことによって残存寿命がどれほど延びたか、また、今後の長期更新計画に必要な統計的な残存寿命について、これらを定量的に評価することができる高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
従来から、ビル等で稼動している高圧真空遮断機(VCB)等の高圧遮断機にあっては、その運転経過年数に加えて、メンテナンス等において高圧盤本体から高圧遮断機を取り外して、この高圧遮断機を構成する各種部品の経年使用に伴う劣化・破損状態を点検すると共に、遮断機として具備すべき所定の物理的性能を維持しているか否かを試験し、その点検及び試験結果を踏まえて調査者が高圧遮断機の更新判定を判断していた。
【0003】
尚、このような更新判定の判断には、遮断機の劣化判定の減点評価に関する基準(例えば、非特許文献1参照。)に基づいて行われ、現場での調査により個々の遮断機の評価点を採点している。
【0004】
図10及び図11は、このような減点評価に関する基準を示し、図10(A)は遮断機の取換基準の図表、図10(B)は図10(A)の取換基準の対象となる減点項目と減点数との関係を示す図表、図11は劣化判定例の図表である。
【0005】
図10(B)では、例えば、経過年数が10年を超えれば19年までの各年に付き1点づつ減点し、20年を超えれば各年に付き2点づつ減点することを示す。また、障害要因としては外観上の汚損・破損・発錆などの損傷の程度に応じて減点するほか、同種事故対策については欠陥度の大小を判断して減点し、劣化判定については絶縁抵抗や遮断機コンタクト(接触子)の磨耗及び投入・開極等の駆動操作の特性からそれぞれ減点し、点検等の履歴として事故歴や異常などから減点をする。
【0006】
図10(A)は、これら図10(B)で示した各種減点項目に基づいて加算された減点合計を、新品状態での遮断機設備点数(100点)から減じ、その残りの数値が61点〜70点の場合には遮断機の取り換えを促し、60点以下の場合には半強制的な取り換えを促すことを示している。
【0007】
また、図11は、図10(B)で示した劣化判定を行うに際して、細項目毎の要注意とすべき判断基準並びに不良とすべき判断基準を示している。
【0008】
また、図10(B)の欄外には、各項目毎の最大減点値を示し、例えば、経年数が24年の場合には減点値が30点となるが、25年以上の場合でも30点で頭打ちとなることを示している。
【0009】
図9は、受変電設備(8台のVCB(20年経過)について実施)を年次点検した際の劣化判定後の評価を示し、上述した要因別の減点評価に基づいて、経年・損傷・磨耗・欠陥の5つの要素から採点し、これらの合計点を集計したもので、下段がオーバーホール前、上段がオーバーホール後を示す。
【0010】
この図表に示すように、オーバーホールすることによって劣化点数が10点程度軽減されていることを認識することができる。
【0011】
【非特許文献1】
電気学会技術報告II部 290号、表10
【0012】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
ところで、上述した高圧遮断機の更新判断は、減点評価基準に基づいて調査者が人為的に行っており、オーバーホール後における高圧遮断機のメンテナンス時期等の更新を含めた意味での高圧遮断機の残存寿命を評価することができなかった。
【0013】
即ち、上述した更新判定基準では、2つの更新レベルに閾値を設定し、更新の検討段階にあるのか、即更新すべきものであるのかを判定することができるが、図9に示したように、多面的な指標から評価減点値を集計して定量的な評価をしたにも関わらず、更新の実施時期を何年後に設定すべきかについての具体的な推定結果を知ることはできなかった。
【0014】
このようなメンテナンス時期等の更新判断や高圧遮断機の残存寿命の評価は、ビル等の使用者にとっては、建物全体の保守管理(例えば、建物全体の補修時期の検討や建物全体の建替検討等)の観点から知り得ると非常に便利であるうえ、余計な時期のメンテナンスやそのメンテナンス時における余計な点検作業や部品交換等の無駄を抑制することができる等の経費的な観点からも知り得ると非常に便利である。
【0015】
尚、上述した減点評価基準は、受変電設備の過去の事故統計、即ち、遮断機の開閉機構の動作不良や高圧機器の絶縁劣化に起因した事故統計を考慮しており、特に、主遮断機の事故にあってはビル全館の停電やそのビル周辺地域を巻き込んだ大掛かりな波及停電となってしまうおそれがあることから、その基準は、現状設備についての厳密且つ信頼性の高い基準であるといえる。
【0016】
本発明は、上記問題を解決するため、メンテナンス時期を含めた高圧遮断機の残存寿命の評価を可能とすることができる新規な高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置を提供することを目的とする。
【0017】
【課題を解決するための手段】
その目的を達成するため、本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置は、高圧遮断機の現場での調査結果に基づいて予め規定された項目の数値を入力する入力手段と、該入力手段によって入力された数値に基づいて残存寿命を算出する算出手段と、該算出手段によって算出された残存寿命を帳票として出力する出力手段とを備えていることを特徴とする。
【0018】
また、本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置は、前記入力手段に入力される項目毎の数値は、現状での調査結果に基づく数値であることを特徴とする。
【0019】
さらに、本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置は、前記入力手段に入力される項目毎の数値は、現状での調査結果に基づく数値と、オーバーホール後の調査結果に基づく数値であることを特徴とする。
【0020】
また、本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置によって作成された帳票は、高圧遮断機の現場での調査結果に基づいて予め規定された項目の数値を入力する入力手段と、該入力手段によって入力された数値に基づいて残存寿命を算出する算出手段と、該算出手段によって算出された残存寿命を帳票として出力する出力手段とを備えた高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置を用い、少なくとも現状での調査結果に基づく数値が前記入力手段によって入力されることにより複数信頼度の残存寿命に関する数値若しくはグラフの少なくとも一つが標記されていることを特徴とする。
【0021】
さらに、本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置によって作成された帳票は、高圧遮断機の現場での調査結果に基づいて予め規定された項目の数値を入力する入力手段と、該入力手段によって入力された数値に基づいて残存寿命を算出する算出手段と、該算出手段によって算出された残存寿命を帳票として出力する出力手段とを備えた高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置を用い、現状での調査結果に基づく数値とオーバーホール後の調査結果に基づく数値とが前記入力手段によって入力されることにより複数信頼度の残存寿命に関する数値若しくはグラフの少なくとも一つがオーバーホール前後で比較可能に標記されていることを特徴とする。
【0022】
【発明の実施の形態】
次に、本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置の実施の形態を図面に基づいて説明する。
【0023】
尚、本発明の残存寿命評価のための高圧遮断機等の設備そのものは特に限定されるものではないため、その説明は省略する。
【0024】
図1は本発明の残存寿命評価装置の基本構成の斜視図である。
【0025】
この図1に示すように、本発明の残存寿命評価装置では、検査現場にてデータの入力が可能なモバイル形式やノート形式のパーソナルコンピュータ1と、このパーソナルコンピュータ1にて入力されたデータに基づいて帳票2を出力するプリンタ3とを備えている。
【0026】
尚、パーソナルコンピュータ1は、所謂デスクトップ型でも良いし、モバイル形式やノート形式のものとでネットワークを構築したもの等、キーボード等の入力手段と、この入力手段による入力操作に基づく演算機能とを総合的に備えているものであれば、その使用環境は特に限定されるものではない。また、ここでの演算機能とは、必要なソフトウエアや後述する登録データ等を格納するハードディスク等の記録媒体や、算出に必要なRAM等のメモリを含めた算出手段である。
【0027】
図2は、プリンタ3によって印字される帳票2の説明図である。この図2に示すように、帳票2は、被診断VCB等のビル設備名・調査年月・調査対象VCB台数等が記載されたタイトル欄11、調査VCB(例えば、8台)の場合において現地オーバーホールの実施前と実施後について、上述した図9と同様の判定基準と同じ方法で減点評価した点数を各VCB欄の下段と上段にそれぞれ記入されるVCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価表記載欄12、劣化度の分布表記載欄13、劣化度の進展予測表記載欄14、残存寿命推定表記載欄15、所見欄16が区画印字される。
【0028】
図3は、これら各欄11〜16を作成・確認する際の画面表示に関するパーソナルコンピュータ1の操作上の展開図、図4〜図7は各操作における詳細な画面表示状態の説明図である。
【0029】
図3において、診断プログラムを起動させてメインメニュー画面21を表示させると、その画面内に『1.診断データ入力』『2.単独処理』『3.スキップ処理』『4.報告書出力』の各項目が表示される。
【0030】
この各項目に対応した数字のテンキー入力、或いは画面直接操作やカーソル選択等の適宜操作により項目選択することにより、『1.診断データ入力』用の診断データ画面22、『2.単独処理』用の診断データ入力画面24、『3.スキップ処理』用の診断データ入力画面26、『4.報告書出力』用の報告書出力画面28が表示される。
【0031】
尚、これら各入力画面22,24,26,28の具体的な画面表示状態は図4(A)〜図4(D)に示す。
【0032】
上述した被診断VCB等のビル設備名・調査年月・調査対象VCB台数等が記載されたタイトル欄11と調査VCB(例えば、8台)の場合において現地オーバーホールの実施前と実施後のVCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価表記載欄12の作業プロセスは、『診断データ入力』用の診断データ画面22とその下位画面である『VCB/VCS劣化度の配点入力画面単独処理』用の診断データ入力画面221にて入力処理される。
【0033】
また、メインメニュー画面21から『2.単独処理』を選択し、その診断データ入力画面(図4(B))で該当する(又は、新規の)ファイル名を入力すると単純処理出力メニュー画面241が表示される。
【0034】
同様に、メインメニュー画面21から『3.スキップ処理』を選択し、その診断データ入力画面(図4(C))で該当する(又は、新規の)ファイル名を入力すると『スキップ処理』用の所見文書確認画面261が表示される。
【0035】
尚、これら各サブ画面221,241,261の具体的な画面表示状態は図5(A)〜(C)に示す。
【0036】
単純処理出力メニュー画面241では、図5(B)に示すように、『1.劣化度の分布グラフ出力』『2,劣化進展予測グラフ出力』『3.残存寿命推定表出力』『4.所見文書確認』『5.報告書プリンタ出力』『6.ファイル(報告書データ)保存』『7.終了』の各項目が表示され、これら各項目に対応した数字のテンキー入力、或いは画面直接操作やカーソル選択等の適宜操作により項目選択することにより、『1.劣化度の分布グラフ出力』用の劣化度の分布グラフ出力画面2411、『2.劣化度進展予測グラフ出力』用の劣化度進展予測グラフ出力画面2412、『3.残存寿命推定表出力』用の残存寿命推定表出力画面2413、『4.所見文書確認』用の所見文書確認画面2414が表示される他、帳票2の印字出力、入力データの保存、一切の処理終了をこの画面で操作する。
【0037】
尚、これら各画面2411〜2414の具体的な画面表示状態は図6(A)〜(D)に示す。また、図7は図6(A)で示した劣化度の分布グラフ出力画面2411の詳細な拡大説明図、図8は図6(B)で示した劣化度進展予測グラフ出力画面2412の拡大説明図である。
【0038】
上記の構成において、診断プログラムを起動させてメインメニュー画面21を表示させた後、診断データ入力画面22とその下位画面であるVCB/VCS劣化度の配点入力画面221にて被診断VCB等のビル設備名・調査年月・調査対象VCB台数等を入力すると共に、オーバーホールの実施前と実施後のVCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価の入力を済ませたのち、一旦メインメニュー画面21へと戻る。
【0039】
次に、メインメニュー画面21から『2.単独処理』を選択し、その診断データ入力画面でファイル名を入力して単純処理出力メニュー画面241を表示させた後、劣化度の分布グラフ出力画面2411、劣化度進展予測グラフ出力画面2412、残存寿命推定表出力画面2413、所見文書確認画面2414の処理を行う。
【0040】
即ち、単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『1.劣化度の分布グラフ出力』を選択して劣化度の分布グラフ出力画面2411を表示させると、画面上には、図7に示すように、横軸に劣化評価点、縦軸に累積発生確率で表した調査対象台数分のVCBについての劣化度の分布(累積ワイブル確率分布)グラフが表示されるので、この統計的分布の確認を実施する。
【0041】
ここで、確認が終了して単純処理出力メニュー画面241に戻ると、例えば、『1.劣化度の分布グラフ出力』の背景色や文字色が変わっていたり、チェックボックス(図示せず)にチェックマークが入っていたりなど、劣化度の分布グラフの確認処理が終了していることを認識することができる。
【0042】
単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『2.劣化度進展予測グラフ出力』を選択して劣化度進展予測グラフ出力画面2412を表示させると、画面上には、図8に示すように、劣化評価点の稼動年数依存性の進展予測グラフが表示される。
【0043】
この進展予測グラフは、現在の稼動年数(O/H実施年)が中心に位置し(二点鎖線の縦軸)、それよりも左側を始点とするオーバーホール前における3つの信頼度(例えば、98%、90%、50%)に対応した3本の線分と、現在の稼動年数を始点とするオーバーホール後における3つの信頼度(例えば、98%、90%、50%)に対応した3本の線分とが表示される。
【0044】
この予想グラフ上には、同時にVCBの更新実施レベルと更新計画レベルの二つの評価レベルが水平線で示され、オーバーホール前後の各3本の統計的予測線分と2本の評価レベルとが交差する年数から残存年数が算定される。尚、図8では更新実施レベルの評価点を60点、更新計画レベルの評価点を40点としている。
【0045】
単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『3.残存寿命推定表出力』を選択して残存寿命推定表出力画面2413を表示させると、各信頼度についてオーバーホール前とオーバーホール後のそれぞれについて年数表示されるので、この確認をすることができる。
【0046】
単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『4.所見文書確認』を選択して所見文書確認画面2414を表示させると、予めパーソナルコンピュータ1内に記憶された残存寿命の長短等に応じた複数パターンの所見文書のうち、最適と思われる所見パターンが自動表示され(例文は図2の16に表示)、その表示を確認すると共に、加筆・修正等を行う。
【0047】
そして、このような4つの基本的な単独処理メニューを消化したのち、単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『5.報告書プリンタ出力』を選択し、プリンタ3から帳票2をプリントアウトすることによって、上述した図2に示した状態の印字結果を得ることができる。
【0048】
尚、プリントアウトされた帳票2において、例えば、所見内容を変更したい場合には、メインメニュー画面21のスキップ処理を行い、該当するファイル名を指定すれば所見文書確認画面261が表示されるので、この寿命推定表を同時に表示した所見文書確認画面261においてその変更を容易に実施することができる。
【0049】
最終的に納得し得る帳票2を作成することができたのち、単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『6.ファイル(報告書データ)保存』を選択し、作成時と同一のファイル名、若しくはそれとは別の最終結果データである旨の識別等を付したファイル名にてデータ保存する。単純処理出力メニュー画面241で『7.終了』を選択して帳票2の作成・確認作業を終了する。
【0050】
これにより、後日に報告書のファイル検索を行うことにより、『4.報告書出力』用の報告書出力画面28が表示され、任意の現場ビルの最終的な調査報告の閲覧並びに帳票2の出力が可能となる。
【0051】
尚、上述した入力・確認作業は、現場にてパーソナルコンピュータ1に必要事項、即ち、診断データ画面入力22とその下位画面であるVCB/VCS劣化度の配点入力画面221にて被診断VCB等のビル設備名・調査年月・調査対象VCB台数等を入力すると共に、オーバーホールの実施前と実施後のVCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価の入力を済ませた後、パーソナルコンピュータ1を作業者の会社等に持ち帰って行っても良いし、別途の報告書等のみを作業現場に持ち込んでオーバーホールを行った際にその報告書に必要な数値を手書きで記載し、パーソナルコンピュータ1での一切の作業を作業者の会社等で行っても良い。
【0052】
このように、本発明の残存寿命評価装置にあっては、電気学会等から提示されている遮断機の劣化判定の減点評価に基づいて、現場調査にて個々に得られたVCBの評価点を採点した後、これらを統計的分布として扱うことによって、その時点での残存寿命を推定することができる。
【0053】
また、VCBの残存寿命についての評価が統計的に定量化して得られるうえ、現場でのオーバーホールによってVCBの延命年数を定量評価することができるので、遮断機が事故を起す以前の最も合理的且つ適切な更新時期を指摘することができる。
【0054】
したがって、受変電設備の予防保全において、大きな経済的貢献をもたらすことができるばかりでなく、信頼性を向上させることができる。
【0055】
ところで、上記実施の形態では、オーバーホール前後の二つのデータを入力する場合を示したが、現場によっては(例えば、経年数が短い等により)オーバーホールを行わない場合もある。
【0056】
このような場合には、VCB/VCS劣化度の配点入力画面221にてオーバーホールを行わない状態でのVCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価のみを入力すれば、オーバーホール後に相当する欄が空欄となる。
【0057】
また、オーバーホール後の数値が入力されないので、当然に、帳票2の劣化度の分布表記載欄13と劣化度の進展予測表記載欄14のグラフ、並びに残存寿命推定表記載欄15のオーバーホール後の推定年数はブランクとななる。
【0058】
尚、所見欄16に関しては、オーバーホールを行わなかった場合についてのパターン文章がパーソナルコンピュータ1に記憶されているため、オーバーホールを行わない状態での入力数値に対応した最適な所見が自動選択されて表示されると共に、オーバーホールを行わない状態でのVCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価に基づく被診断VCBについての現時点での統計的な残存寿命が残存寿命推定表記載欄15のオーバーホール前の欄に定量的に明示される。
【0059】
【発明の効果】
本発明の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置にあっては、以上説明したように構成したことにより、メンテナンス時期を含めた高圧遮断機の残存寿命の評価を可能とすることができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の実施の形態に係わる高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置の基本構成の斜視図である。
【図2】本発明の実施の形態に関わる高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置で出力された帳票の説明図である。
【図3】帳票を作成・確認する際の画面表示に関するパーソナルコンピュータの操作上の展開図である。
【図4】図3に示した展開図のうち、メインメニュー画面で選択された各項目に対応する画面の表示例を示し、(A)は『1.診断データ入力』用の診断データ画面の説明図、(B)は『2.単独処理』用の診断データ入力画面の説明図、(C)は『3.スキップ処理』用の診断データ入力画面の説明図、(D)は『4.報告書出力』用の報告書出力画面の説明図である。
【図5】図3に示した展開図のうち、サブ画面に相当する画面の表示例を示し、(A)は『VCB/VCS劣化度の配点入力画面単独処理』用の診断データ入力画面の説明図、(B)は『単独処理出力メニュー』用の単純処理出力メニュー画面の説明図、(C)は『所見文書確認』用の所見文書確認画面の説明図である。
【図6】図3に示した展開図のうち、単純処理出力メニュー画面で選択された各項目に対応する画面の表示例を示し、(A)は『1.劣化度の分布グラフ出力』用の劣化度の分布グラフ画面の説明図、(B)は『2.劣化度進展予測グラフ出力』用の劣化度進展予測グラフ画面の説明図、(C)は『3.残存寿命推定表出力』用の残存寿命推定表出力画面の説明図、(D)は『4.所見文書確認』用の所見文書確認画面の説明図である。
【図7】図2の帳票の一部を構成する劣化度の分布の確認画面の説明図である。
【図8】図2の帳票の一部を構成する劣化進展予想グラフの確認画面の説明図である。
【図9】従来の高圧遮断機を年次点検した際の劣化判定後の評価表の説明図である。
【図10】電気学会から提示されている高圧遮断機の減点評価に関する基準を示し、(A)は遮断機の取換基準の図表、(B)は図10(A)の取換基準の対象となる減点項目と減点数との関係を示す図表である。
【図11】劣化判定例の図表である。
【符号の説明】
1 パーソナルコンピュータ(入力手段、算出手段)、2 帳票、3 プリンタ(出力手段)、11 タイトル欄、12 VCB/VCS劣化度の配点評価表記載欄、13 劣化度の分布表記載欄、14 劣化度の進展予測表記載欄、15
残存寿命推定表記載欄、16 所見欄。
[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention overhauls the remaining life of a high-pressure circuit breaker such as a high-pressure vacuum circuit breaker (VCB) operating in a building or the like based on the results of an on-site investigation at the time of maintenance or the like, and the high-pressure circuit breaker. The present invention relates to an apparatus for evaluating the remaining life of a high-voltage circuit breaker, which can quantitatively evaluate how much the remaining life is prolonged due to the above and statistical remaining life required for a long-term renewal plan in the future.
[0002]
[Prior art]
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in a high-pressure circuit breaker (VCB) such as a high-pressure vacuum circuit breaker (VCB) operating in a building or the like, in addition to the number of years of operation, the high-pressure circuit breaker is removed from a high-pressure panel body for maintenance and the like. In addition to checking the deterioration and damage of various components that compose the high-voltage circuit breaker due to aging, it also tests whether the specified physical performance to be provided as the circuit breaker is maintained, and checks and tests the results. Based on this, the investigator had decided whether to renew the high-voltage circuit breaker.
[0003]
The determination of such an update determination is performed based on a criterion relating to the deduction of the determination of the deterioration of the circuit breaker (for example, see Non-Patent Document 1). Is scored.
[0004]
10 and 11 show the criteria for such a deduction evaluation. FIG. 10 (A) is a chart of the circuit breaker replacement criteria, and FIG. 10 (B) is the table of the replacement criteria of FIG. 10 (A). FIG. 11 is a chart showing the relationship between the deduction items and the number of deduction points, and FIG.
[0005]
FIG. 10 (B) shows that, for example, if the number of elapsed years exceeds 10 years, one point will be deducted for each year up to 19 years, and if it exceeds 20 years, two points will be deducted for each year. In addition, points are deducted according to the degree of damage such as stains, breakage, and rust on the exterior.Furthermore, for measures against similar accidents, points are deducted by judging the degree of defect. Points are deducted from the characteristics of the drive operation such as wear of the breaker contacts (contacts) and closing and opening, and points are deducted from the history of accidents and abnormalities as the inspection history.
[0006]
FIG. 10A shows that the total deductions added based on the various deduction items shown in FIG. 10B are subtracted from the breaker equipment score (100 points) in a new state, and the remaining numerical value is 61. When the score is between 70 and 70, replacement of the circuit breaker is urged, and when the score is 60 or less, semi-forced replacement is urged.
[0007]
Further, FIG. 11 shows a judgment criterion that requires attention and a judgment criterion that should be determined to be defective for each small item when performing the deterioration judgment shown in FIG. 10B.
[0008]
The margin of FIG. 10B shows the maximum deduction value for each item. For example, when the age is 24 years, the deduction value is 30 points. Indicates that it will peak off.
[0009]
FIG. 9 shows the evaluation after the deterioration judgment at the time of annual inspection of the substation equipment (implemented for eight VCBs (20 years passed)). Scores are taken from the five elements of wear and defects, and the total points are totaled. The lower row indicates before overhaul, and the upper row indicates after overhaul.
[0010]
As shown in the chart, it can be recognized that the number of deterioration points is reduced by about 10 points due to overhaul.
[0011]
[Non-patent document 1]
IEEJ Technical Report II, Section 290, Table 10
[0012]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
By the way, the update judgment of the high-voltage circuit breaker described above is artificially performed by the investigator based on the deduction evaluation criteria, and the high-pressure circuit breaker in the sense including the update of the maintenance time of the high-voltage circuit breaker after the overhaul is included. The remaining life could not be evaluated.
[0013]
That is, in the above-described update determination criterion, a threshold value is set for two update levels, and it is possible to determine whether the update is in the examination stage or should be updated immediately. However, as shown in FIG. Despite the fact that the evaluation penalties were compiled from multifaceted indicators and quantitative evaluation was performed, it was not possible to know specific estimation results about how many years later the update should be performed.
[0014]
Such a decision to update the maintenance time and the like and the evaluation of the remaining life of the high-voltage circuit breaker are performed by the user of the building or the like for the maintenance and management of the entire building (for example, the examination of the repair time of the entire building or the examination of the rebuilding of the entire building). Etc.) is very convenient to know from the viewpoint, and also from the viewpoint of cost, such as being able to suppress unnecessary maintenance work and unnecessary inspection work and replacement of parts during such maintenance. Very convenient to get.
[0015]
The above-mentioned deduction evaluation criteria take into account past accident statistics of substation equipment, that is, accident statistics due to malfunction of the switching mechanism of the circuit breaker and insulation deterioration of the high voltage equipment. In the event of an accident, there is a risk of a power outage of the entire building or a large-scale spillover involving the area around the building, so the standard should be strict and reliable for current facilities. I can say.
[0016]
It is an object of the present invention to provide a new apparatus for evaluating the remaining life of a high-voltage circuit breaker, which can evaluate the remaining life of the high-voltage circuit breaker including the maintenance time, in order to solve the above-mentioned problem.
[0017]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to achieve the object, the remaining life evaluation device for a high voltage circuit breaker according to the present invention comprises: an input unit for inputting a numerical value of a predetermined item based on a result of an on-site investigation of the high voltage circuit breaker; It is characterized by comprising calculating means for calculating the remaining life based on the input numerical value, and output means for outputting the remaining life calculated by the calculating means as a form.
[0018]
Further, in the apparatus for evaluating the remaining life of a high-voltage circuit breaker according to the present invention, the numerical value for each item input to the input means is a numerical value based on a current survey result.
[0019]
Furthermore, in the remaining life evaluation device for a high voltage circuit breaker of the present invention, the numerical value for each item input to the input means is a numerical value based on a current survey result and a numerical value based on a survey result after overhaul. Features.
[0020]
Further, the form created by the remaining life evaluation device of the high voltage circuit breaker of the present invention includes an input means for inputting numerical values of predetermined items based on a result of an on-site investigation of the high voltage circuit breaker, and the input means. Using a remaining voltage evaluation device for a high-pressure circuit breaker including a calculating means for calculating the remaining life based on the input numerical value, and an output means for outputting the remaining life calculated by the calculating means as a form, at least in the current state The numerical value based on the result of the investigation is input by the input means, and at least one of a numerical value or a graph relating to the remaining life of the plurality of reliability levels is marked.
[0021]
Further, the form created by the remaining life evaluation device of the high voltage circuit breaker according to the present invention includes input means for inputting numerical values of predetermined items based on a result of an on-site investigation of the high voltage circuit breaker, and the input means. A calculating means for calculating the remaining life based on the input numerical value, and an output means for outputting the remaining life calculated by the calculating means as a form, using a remaining life evaluation device for a high voltage circuit breaker, By inputting the numerical value based on the inspection result and the numerical value based on the inspection result after overhaul by the input unit, at least one of the numerical values or the graph relating to the remaining reliability of the plurality of reliability is marked so as to be comparable before and after overhaul. It is characterized by.
[0022]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Next, an embodiment of a remaining life evaluation device for a high voltage circuit breaker according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
[0023]
In addition, since the equipment itself such as a high-pressure circuit breaker for the remaining life evaluation of the present invention is not particularly limited, the description thereof is omitted.
[0024]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the basic configuration of the remaining life evaluation device of the present invention.
[0025]
As shown in FIG. 1, in the remaining life evaluation apparatus of the present invention, a personal computer 1 in a mobile format or a notebook format capable of inputting data at an inspection site, and a personal computer 1 based on the data input by the personal computer 1 are used. And a printer 3 for outputting the form 2.
[0026]
The personal computer 1 may be of a so-called desktop type, or may have a network such as a mobile type or a notebook type, and may include an input means such as a keyboard and an arithmetic function based on an input operation by the input means. The use environment is not particularly limited as long as it is provided. Further, the arithmetic function here is a calculating means including a recording medium such as a hard disk for storing necessary software and registration data to be described later, and a memory such as a RAM required for calculation.
[0027]
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of the form 2 printed by the printer 3. As shown in FIG. 2, the form 2 has a title column 11 in which the names of building equipment such as a VCB to be diagnosed, a survey date, the number of VCBs to be investigated, and the like are described. Before and after the overhaul is performed, the points deducted by the same method as the above-described determination criterion in FIG. 9 are entered in the VCB / VCCS deterioration degree score table, which is respectively entered in the lower and upper sections of each VCB section. 12, a column 13 for describing the distribution table of the degree of deterioration, a column 14 for describing the prediction table of the progress of deterioration, a column 15 for describing the table for estimating the remaining life, and a finding column 16 are sectioned and printed.
[0028]
FIG. 3 is an operational development view of the personal computer 1 relating to screen display when creating and confirming each of the columns 11 to 16, and FIGS. 4 to 7 are explanatory diagrams of detailed screen display states in each operation.
[0029]
In FIG. 3, when the main menu screen 21 is displayed by activating the diagnostic program, “1. Diagnostic data input ”[2. Single processing ”[3. Skip processing "[4. Report output ”is displayed.
[0030]
By selecting the item by inputting a numeric key corresponding to each item, or by performing an appropriate operation such as a screen direct operation or a cursor selection, “1. Diagnostic data screen 22 for "input of diagnostic data", "2. Diagnostic data input screen 24 for "single processing", "3. Diagnostic data input screen 26 for "skip processing", "4. A report output screen 28 for "report output" is displayed.
[0031]
The specific screen display states of these input screens 22, 24, 26, 28 are shown in FIGS. 4 (A) to 4 (D).
[0032]
In the case of the title column 11 in which the names of the building equipment such as the diagnosed VCB, the name of the survey, the number of the surveyed VCBs, etc. are described, and the VCBs before and after the site overhaul in the case of the survey VCB (for example, 8), The work process of the VCS degradation degree score evaluation table entry column 12 is a diagnostic data screen 22 for “diagnosis data input” and a diagnostic data input for a lower level screen, “VCB / VC degradation degree score input screen independent processing”. Input processing is performed on the screen 221.
[0033]
Also, from the main menu screen 21, "2. "Single processing" is selected, and a corresponding (or new) file name is input on the diagnostic data input screen (FIG. 4B), a simple processing output menu screen 241 is displayed.
[0034]
Similarly, from the main menu screen 21, “3. When "Skip processing" is selected and a corresponding (or new) file name is input on the diagnostic data input screen (FIG. 4C), a finding document confirmation screen 261 for "Skip processing" is displayed.
[0035]
The specific screen display states of these sub-screens 221, 241 and 261 are shown in FIGS.
[0036]
In the simple processing output menu screen 241, as shown in FIG. Output of deterioration degree distribution graph "," 2, Output of deterioration progress prediction graph "," 3. Output of residual life estimation table "[4. Confirmation of observation documents ”[5. Report Printer Output ”,“ 6. File (report data) storage ”“ 7. The items "1. End" are displayed, and the items are selected by numeric keys corresponding to these items, or by selecting the items by an appropriate operation such as a screen direct operation or a cursor selection. Degradation degree distribution graph output screen 2411 for “Degradation degree distribution graph output”, “2. Deterioration progress prediction graph output screen 2412 for “Degradation progress prediction graph output”, “3. Output screen for remaining life estimation table 2413 for “Output remaining life estimation table”, “4. In addition to the display of an observation document confirmation screen 2414 for “confirmation of observation document”, print output of the form 2, storage of input data, and termination of all processing are operated on this screen.
[0037]
The specific screen display states of these screens 2411 to 2414 are shown in FIGS. FIG. 7 is a detailed enlarged explanatory view of the degradation degree distribution graph output screen 2411 shown in FIG. 6A, and FIG. 8 is an enlarged explanatory view of the degradation degree progress prediction graph output screen 2412 shown in FIG. 6B. FIG.
[0038]
In the above configuration, after the diagnostic program is activated and the main menu screen 21 is displayed, the diagnosis data input screen 22 and its lower screen, the VCB / VCCS degradation score input screen 221, are used to display the building of the diagnosed VCB or the like. After inputting the equipment name, the survey date, the number of VCBs to be surveyed, etc., and inputting the evaluation of the VCB / VCCS deterioration degree before and after the overhaul, the process returns to the main menu screen 21 once.
[0039]
Next, from the main menu screen 21, "2. "Single processing" is selected, a file name is input on the diagnostic data input screen, a simple processing output menu screen 241 is displayed, and then a deterioration degree distribution graph output screen 2411, a deterioration degree progress prediction graph output screen 2412, a residual The processing of the life estimation table output screen 2413 and the finding document confirmation screen 2414 is performed.
[0040]
In other words, “1. Deterioration degree distribution graph output ”is selected to display the deterioration degree distribution graph output screen 2411. On the screen, as shown in FIG. 7, the horizontal axis indicates the deterioration evaluation points, and the vertical axis indicates the cumulative occurrence probability. A distribution (cumulative Weibull probability distribution) graph of the degree of deterioration of the VCBs for the number of surveyed objects shown is displayed, and this statistical distribution is confirmed.
[0041]
Here, when the confirmation is completed and the display returns to the simple processing output menu screen 241, for example, “1. Recognition that the process of checking the distribution graph of the deterioration degree has been completed, such as that the background color and character color of the “Degradation degree distribution graph output” have changed, or that a check box (not shown) has a check mark. can do.
[0042]
On the simple processing output menu screen 241, “2. Deterioration progress prediction graph output ”is selected and the deterioration progress prediction graph output screen 2412 is displayed. On the screen, as shown in FIG. Is done.
[0043]
This progress prediction graph is centered on the current operating years (O / H implementation year) (vertical axis of the two-dot chain line), and has three reliability levels (for example, 98) before overhaul starting from the left side. %, 90%, and 50%) and three lines corresponding to three reliability levels (for example, 98%, 90%, and 50%) after overhaul starting from the current operating years. Is displayed.
[0044]
On this forecast graph, two evaluation levels of the VCB update execution level and the update plan level are indicated by horizontal lines at the same time, and each of the three statistical prediction lines before and after the overhaul intersects with the two evaluation levels. The remaining years are calculated from the years. In FIG. 8, the evaluation point at the update execution level is 60 points, and the evaluation point at the update plan level is 40 points.
[0045]
On the simple processing output menu screen 241, “3. When "Remaining life estimation table output" is selected and the remaining life estimation table output screen 2413 is displayed, the years are displayed for each reliability before and after overhaul, and this can be confirmed.
[0046]
On the simple processing output menu screen 241, “4. When "find document check" is selected and the find document check screen 2414 is displayed, among the plurality of patterns of find documents according to the length of the remaining life and the like stored in advance in the personal computer 1, a finding pattern considered to be optimal is obtained. It is automatically displayed (example sentences are displayed at 16 in FIG. 2), and the display is confirmed, and additions and corrections are performed.
[0047]
After digesting the four basic single processing menus, the simple processing output menu screen 241 displays “5. By selecting "report printer output" and printing out the form 2 from the printer 3, the print result in the state shown in FIG. 2 described above can be obtained.
[0048]
In the printed form 2, for example, if the content of the finding is to be changed, the skip processing of the main menu screen 21 is performed, and if the corresponding file name is specified, the finding document confirmation screen 261 is displayed. The change can be easily performed on the finding document confirmation screen 261 which simultaneously displays the life estimation table.
[0049]
After the finally acceptable form 2 can be created, the simple processing output menu screen 241 displays “6. Save file (report data) ”and save the data under the same file name as when the file was created, or under a file name with identification indicating that the data is final result data different from that. In the simple processing output menu screen 241, "7. "End" to end the creation and confirmation work of the form 2.
[0050]
As a result, by performing a file search of the report at a later date, “4. A report output screen 28 for "report output" is displayed, and it becomes possible to browse the final investigation report of an arbitrary site building and output the form 2.
[0051]
The above-described input / confirmation work is necessary for the personal computer 1 at the site, that is, the diagnosis data screen input 22 and the lower-level screen VCB / VCCS degradation degree scoring input screen 221 are used to check the VCB to be diagnosed and the like. After inputting the building equipment name, the survey date, the number of VCBs to be surveyed, etc., and inputting the evaluation of the VCB / VCS deterioration degree before and after the overhaul, the personal computer 1 is transferred to the worker's company, etc. You can bring it back to the work site, or if you bring only a separate report etc. to the work site and overhaul it, write the necessary numerical values in the report by hand and do all the work on the personal computer 1 May be performed at the company of the person.
[0052]
As described above, in the remaining life evaluation device of the present invention, the evaluation points of the VCB individually obtained in the field survey are evaluated based on the deduction evaluation of the deterioration judgment of the circuit breaker presented by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. After scoring, by treating these as a statistical distribution, the remaining life at that point can be estimated.
[0053]
In addition, the evaluation of the remaining life of the VCB can be statistically quantified and obtained, and the life extension of the VCB can be quantitatively evaluated by overhaul at the site. It is possible to point out an appropriate update time.
[0054]
Therefore, in the preventive maintenance of the substation equipment, not only can a great economic contribution be brought, but also the reliability can be improved.
[0055]
By the way, in the above-described embodiment, the case where two data before and after the overhaul are input is shown. However, overhaul may not be performed depending on the site (for example, due to a short age).
[0056]
In such a case, if only the VCB / VCS deterioration degree score evaluation without overhaul is input on the VCB / VCS deterioration degree score input screen 221, the corresponding field after the overhaul becomes blank.
[0057]
In addition, since the numerical value after the overhaul is not input, naturally, the graph of the column 13 for describing the distribution of the deterioration degree of the form 2 and the column 14 for describing the prediction table of the progress of the deterioration, and the column 15 for describing the remaining life estimation table after the overhaul are described. The estimated years are blank.
[0058]
As for the finding section 16, since the pattern sentence in the case where the overhaul is not performed is stored in the personal computer 1, the optimum finding corresponding to the input numerical value without overhaul is automatically selected and displayed. At the same time, the statistical remaining life of the VCB to be diagnosed based on the evaluation of the VCB / VCS degradation degree without overhaul is calculated in the column before overhaul in the remaining life estimation table entry column 15 at the present time. Explicitly.
[0059]
【The invention's effect】
In the apparatus for evaluating the remaining life of a high-voltage circuit breaker according to the present invention, it is possible to evaluate the remaining life of the high-voltage circuit breaker including the maintenance time by configuring as described above.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a basic configuration of a device for evaluating the remaining life of a high-voltage circuit breaker according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a form output by the remaining life evaluation device of the high voltage circuit breaker according to the embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is an operational development view of a personal computer relating to screen display when creating and confirming a form.
FIG. 4 shows a display example of a screen corresponding to each item selected on the main menu screen in the development view shown in FIG. 3, (A) showing “1. (B) is an explanatory view of a diagnostic data screen for “diagnostic data input”. Explanatory drawing of a diagnostic data input screen for "single processing", (C) of "3. Explanatory drawing of the diagnostic data input screen for "skip processing", (D) of "4. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram of a report output screen for “report output”.
5 shows a display example of a screen corresponding to a sub screen in the development view shown in FIG. 3, and FIG. 5 (A) shows a diagnostic data input screen for “single processing input screen of VCB / VCCS degradation degree”; FIG. 7B is an explanatory diagram of a simple processing output menu screen for a “single processing output menu”, and FIG. 7C is an explanatory diagram of a finding document confirmation screen for “a finding document confirmation”.
6 shows a display example of a screen corresponding to each item selected on the simple processing output menu screen in the development view shown in FIG. 3, (A) showing “1. Illustration of Deterioration Distribution Graph Screen for Degradation Degree Distribution Graph Output ”, FIG. Illustration of Deterioration Progress Prediction Graph Screen for Degradation Progress Prediction Graph Output ”, FIG. FIG. 4D is an explanatory diagram of a screen for outputting a remaining life estimation table for “Remaining life estimation table output”, and FIG. It is an explanatory diagram of a finding document confirmation screen for "finding document confirmation".
FIG. 7 is an explanatory view of a confirmation screen of a distribution of the degree of deterioration constituting a part of the form in FIG. 2;
FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram of a confirmation screen of a deterioration progress prediction graph which forms a part of the form of FIG. 2;
FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram of an evaluation table after a deterioration determination when a conventional high-pressure circuit breaker is inspected annually.
10A and 10B show criteria for evaluation of deduction of a high-voltage circuit breaker, presented by the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. FIG. 10A is a chart of the criteria for replacing the circuit breaker, and FIG. It is a table | surface which shows the relationship between a deduction item and the number of deductions.
FIG. 11 is a table of a deterioration determination example.
[Explanation of symbols]
Reference Signs List 1 personal computer (input means, calculation means), 2 forms, 3 printers (output means), 11 title column, 12 VCB / VCCS degradation score entry table, 13 degradation distribution table entry column, 14 degradation degree Column of progress forecast table of
Columns in the remaining life estimation table, 16 columns.

Claims (5)

高圧遮断機の現場での調査結果に基づいて予め規定された項目の数値を入力する入力手段と、該入力手段によって入力された数値に基づいて残存寿命を算出する算出手段と、該算出手段によって算出された残存寿命を帳票として出力する出力手段とを備えていることを特徴とする高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置。Input means for inputting a numerical value of a predetermined item based on a result of an on-site investigation of the high-voltage circuit breaker; calculating means for calculating a remaining life based on the numerical value input by the input means; Output means for outputting the calculated remaining life as a form. An apparatus for evaluating the remaining life of a high-pressure circuit breaker. 前記入力手段に入力される項目毎の数値は、現状での調査結果に基づく数値であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置。2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the numerical value of each item input to the input unit is a numerical value based on a current survey result. 前記入力手段に入力される項目毎の数値は、現状での調査結果に基づく数値と、オーバーホール後の調査結果に基づく数値であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置。2. The remaining life of the high-voltage circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein the numerical value of each item input to the input unit is a numerical value based on a current survey result and a numerical value based on a survey result after overhaul. Evaluation device. 高圧遮断機の現場での調査結果に基づいて予め規定された項目の数値を入力する入力手段と、該入力手段によって入力された数値に基づいて残存寿命を算出する算出手段と、該算出手段によって算出された残存寿命を帳票として出力する出力手段とを備えた高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置を用い、少なくとも現状での調査結果に基づく数値が前記入力手段によって入力されることにより複数信頼度の残存寿命に関する数値若しくはグラフの少なくとも一つが標記されていることを特徴とする高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置によって作成された帳票。Input means for inputting a numerical value of a predetermined item based on a result of an on-site investigation of the high-voltage circuit breaker; calculating means for calculating a remaining life based on the numerical value input by the input means; Output means for outputting the calculated remaining life as a form, using a high-voltage circuit breaker remaining life evaluation device, at least a numerical value based on the current survey results is input by the input means, thereby providing a plurality of reliability values. A report created by a remaining life evaluation device for a high voltage circuit breaker, wherein at least one of a numerical value or a graph relating to a remaining life is marked. 高圧遮断機の現場での調査結果に基づいて予め規定された項目の数値を入力する入力手段と、該入力手段によって入力された数値に基づいて残存寿命を算出する算出手段と、該算出手段によって算出された残存寿命を帳票として出力する出力手段とを備えた高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置を用い、現状での調査結果に基づく数値とオーバーホール後の調査結果に基づく数値とが前記入力手段によって入力されることにより複数信頼度の残存寿命に関する数値若しくはグラフの少なくとも一つがオーバーホール前後で比較可能に標記されていることを特徴とする高圧遮断機の残存寿命評価装置によって作成された帳票。Input means for inputting a numerical value of a predetermined item based on a result of an on-site investigation of the high-voltage circuit breaker; calculating means for calculating a remaining life based on the numerical value input by the input means; Using the remaining life evaluation device of the high voltage circuit breaker having an output means for outputting the calculated remaining life as a form, the numerical value based on the current investigation result and the numerical value based on the investigation result after overhaul are calculated by the input means. A report created by a remaining life evaluation apparatus for a high voltage circuit breaker, wherein at least one of numerical values or graphs relating to the remaining lives of a plurality of reliability levels is entered so as to be comparable before and after overhaul by being input.
JP2003080041A 2003-03-24 2003-03-24 High pressure circuit breaker remaining life evaluation device and form created by the remaining life evaluation device Expired - Fee Related JP4201628B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003080041A JP4201628B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2003-03-24 High pressure circuit breaker remaining life evaluation device and form created by the remaining life evaluation device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003080041A JP4201628B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2003-03-24 High pressure circuit breaker remaining life evaluation device and form created by the remaining life evaluation device

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2004288503A true JP2004288503A (en) 2004-10-14
JP2004288503A5 JP2004288503A5 (en) 2005-08-18
JP4201628B2 JP4201628B2 (en) 2008-12-24

Family

ID=33294004

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003080041A Expired - Fee Related JP4201628B2 (en) 2003-03-24 2003-03-24 High pressure circuit breaker remaining life evaluation device and form created by the remaining life evaluation device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4201628B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006302293A (en) * 2005-04-21 2006-11-02 General Electric Co <Ge> Method and system for diagnosing machinery
JP2007149458A (en) * 2005-11-25 2007-06-14 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The Contact wear monitoring system for circuit breaker, circuit breaker maintenance assisting method, and program
JP2007226774A (en) * 2006-02-22 2007-09-06 General Electric Co <Ge> Method, system, and computer program product for providing inference/asset management service
JP2012043708A (en) * 2010-08-20 2012-03-01 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Method for diagnosing lifetime of power switching device, and diagnosis system and diagnosis program therefor
KR20190108434A (en) * 2018-03-14 2019-09-24 엘에스산전 주식회사 Management system for switchboard

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006302293A (en) * 2005-04-21 2006-11-02 General Electric Co <Ge> Method and system for diagnosing machinery
JP2007149458A (en) * 2005-11-25 2007-06-14 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The Contact wear monitoring system for circuit breaker, circuit breaker maintenance assisting method, and program
JP4721882B2 (en) * 2005-11-25 2011-07-13 中国電力株式会社 Circuit breaker contact wear monitoring system, circuit breaker maintenance support method, and program
JP2007226774A (en) * 2006-02-22 2007-09-06 General Electric Co <Ge> Method, system, and computer program product for providing inference/asset management service
JP2012043708A (en) * 2010-08-20 2012-03-01 Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The Method for diagnosing lifetime of power switching device, and diagnosis system and diagnosis program therefor
KR20190108434A (en) * 2018-03-14 2019-09-24 엘에스산전 주식회사 Management system for switchboard
KR102030697B1 (en) 2018-03-14 2019-10-10 엘에스산전 주식회사 Management system for switchboard
US11677880B2 (en) 2018-03-14 2023-06-13 Ls Electric Co., Ltd. Switchboard management system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4201628B2 (en) 2008-12-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4967430B2 (en) Defect management device, defect management program, and recording medium recording the same
JP3972989B2 (en) Method and system for automatic repair design of damaged blades of a compressor or turbine
JP2005011327A (en) Repair plan making support device and method
US7853848B2 (en) System and method for signature-based systematic condition detection and analysis
JP4967426B2 (en) Work instruction system and method
JP2004274844A (en) Support method and system for planning maintenance program
JP4822166B2 (en) GUI evaluation system, GUI evaluation method thereof, and recording medium on which GUI evaluation program is recorded
JP2004288503A (en) Residual lifetime evaluation device of high pressure breaker, and document prepared by it
JP2009512036A (en) Computer system and computer-based method for safety assessment of process industry plants
US20220163246A1 (en) Maintenance recommendation system
Park et al. The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures: measure verification
JPH06149346A (en) Support device for collection of working site data
JP4312789B2 (en) Business continuity analysis program and business continuity analyzer
JP4848266B2 (en) Software quality evaluation apparatus and method
US20050251302A1 (en) System and method for managing vehicle inspections
CN111832972A (en) Distribution network field electrical operation ticket machine generation method and computer storage medium
JP2004178059A (en) Failure handling support maintenance db device
JPH11175144A (en) Maintenance supporting device for plant equipment
JPH07271758A (en) Fault diagnostic device
JP4363240B2 (en) Vehicle inspection management system
Anokhin et al. Development of a prototype overview display for Leningrad nuclear power station
Knowles et al. Models, measures, and judgments in system design
JP2001042926A (en) Method and system for evaluating manufacture workplace
Fogarty et al. The role of individual and organisational factors in aviation maintenance
JP2024039749A (en) Inspection management system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050131

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050131

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20071227

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080108

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080229

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080930

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20081007

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4201628

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111017

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111017

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121017

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121017

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131017

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees