JP2004183416A - Wear-resistant composite cutting edge - Google Patents

Wear-resistant composite cutting edge Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2004183416A
JP2004183416A JP2002354667A JP2002354667A JP2004183416A JP 2004183416 A JP2004183416 A JP 2004183416A JP 2002354667 A JP2002354667 A JP 2002354667A JP 2002354667 A JP2002354667 A JP 2002354667A JP 2004183416 A JP2004183416 A JP 2004183416A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wear
cutting edge
hard
resistant composite
resistant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2002354667A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4190271B2 (en
Inventor
Takanori Nagata
貴則 永田
Masaharu Amano
昌春 天野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Komatsu Ltd
Original Assignee
Komatsu Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Komatsu Ltd filed Critical Komatsu Ltd
Priority to JP2002354667A priority Critical patent/JP4190271B2/en
Publication of JP2004183416A publication Critical patent/JP2004183416A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4190271B2 publication Critical patent/JP4190271B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02FDREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
    • E02F9/00Component parts of dredgers or soil-shifting machines, not restricted to one of the kinds covered by groups E02F3/00 - E02F7/00
    • E02F9/28Small metalwork for digging elements, e.g. teeth scraper bits
    • E02F9/2808Teeth
    • E02F9/285Teeth characterised by the material used

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Shovels (AREA)
  • Component Parts Of Construction Machinery (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To constitute a wear-resistant composite cutting edge to have effective excavating performance to a situation where the crack development of a rock bed cannot be expected by changing a viewpoint from conventional cutting edges. <P>SOLUTION: This wear-resistant composite cutting edge 1 for excavating sediment, a rock, or the like has an upper face 2, a bottom face 3 and opposed side faces 4, a cutting edge tip 5 formed at the tip part, and a fitting part 6 mountable to a working machine, on the proximal end side. In this case, hard wear-resistant layers 7 are formed only at the bottom face 3, at both side end parts in a cross direction in a required range. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO&NCIPI

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、主としてリッパーポイントなどに使用される掘削用切刃に関するもので、詳しくは岩盤が軟岩層のようなリッピング時に切刃を貫入しても亀裂が発生し難い地盤を掘削するのに優れて、寿命が長められる機能を備えた耐摩耗複合切刃に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
従来、ブルドーザなど土砂の掘削を行う建設機械において、例えばリッパ装置の先端部にはリッパポイントとして掘削用の切刃が着脱可能に装着されている。このような切刃は、地面や岩盤などに貫入させて掘削・破砕などの作業に用いられるので、土砂や岩石との摩擦が激しくて、摩耗による損耗でしばしば交換が必要となり、消耗用品として取り扱われている。そのために、交換頻度が高くなると、作業能率を低下させると同時に、部品代が嵩むことから、耐久性能の高いものを開発する試みがなされている。
【0003】
このような掘削用切刃としての先行技術については、低合金鋼を焼き入れ焼戻しした切刃の刃先部の刃先から中間部に両側を残して幅方向の中間部分で硬化肉盛などによる耐摩耗層を配置した切刃が知られている(特許文献1)。また、切刃の上面中央部分にその掘削刃先から後方に延びるような硬質粒子を分散させて肉盛した耐摩耗層を設けるようにした掘削用切刃が知られている(特許文献2)。さらに、本出願人の先願になる特願2002−255002号に開示されたものもある。
【0004】
前記特許文献1および特許文献2あるいは先願による技術では、掘削用切刃の摩耗寿命の向上と優れた作業性能(貫入性)の維持を目的として、切刃が摩耗するとともに尖鋭化させるように硬質耐摩耗層を配置している。それら先行技術において共通していることは、図6(a)に模式図で表わされるように、掘削用切刃50の中央部の摩耗を抑制し、刃52の手前側から見て尖った形状に摩耗形状を制御することにある。そのために、前(上)面51の中央部に硬質耐摩耗層53を配置している。すなわち、前(上)面51の中央部を残して、その周りを優先的に摩耗させることで、接地面積の増加を抑制して貫入性を維持しようとしている。
【0005】
【特許文献1】
特表平6−501076号公報
【特許文献2】
特開平8−53860号公報
【0006】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかしながら、掘削作業現場が軟岩層である場合、前述の先行技術による切刃では問題点がある。軟岩とは、一般に一軸圧縮強度が20MPa程度以下で、▲1▼堆積土が密度化・続成作用により硬岩になる過程にある堆積軟岩、▲2▼乾湿繰返しによるスレーキングや断層・褶曲作用により弱化した堆積軟岩、▲3▼断層・褶曲作用や風化・熱水作用等により土になる過程にある風化硬岩や熱変成した硬岩(地盤工学ハンドブックによる)である。このような軟岩地盤をリッピングするのに、硬岩の地盤をリッピングするのに採用されて機能性(貫入性)を高める前述の先行技術による切刃(リッパポイント)では、実用上機能性が劣る。
【0007】
すなわち、岩盤が硬い場合は、一旦切刃が貫入すると亀裂がある程度広がるので、以後は牽引により比較的容易にこの亀裂を拡大しながらリッピング作業が進行し、岩を破砕することができる。このために、接地面積の増大を抑制して貫入性を維持することさえできれば作業効率が保たれる。しかしながら、軟岩層のように岩盤が弱くて切刃が貫入しても亀裂が広がらないところでは、前記技術の切刃は不向きであると考察できる。
【0008】
また、一般的にリッピング作業で使用される掘削用切刃50は、図6(b)に模式図で示されるように、横から見て概略楔型になっているので、摩耗が進行するにつれてその厚みが著しく増大してしまう。このことに対して前記先行技術による切刃では、幅を小さくすることで接地面積の増大を抑制しているが、接地面の幅が狭いと1回のリッピング作業で切刃接地面が掻く面積が小さくなって破砕効率が悪くなる。したがって、作業性が著しく低下するという問題点がある。
【0009】
本発明は、このような問題点を解決するために、従来の切刃と着目点を変えて岩盤の亀裂の広がりが期待できない状況に対して有効な掘削性能を備えるように構成された、耐摩耗複合切刃を提供することを目的とするものである。
【0010】
【課題を解決するための手段および作用・効果】
前述された目的を達成するために、本発明による耐摩耗複合切刃は、
上面と底面および対向する側面と、先端部に形成される刃先と、基端部側に作業機に取付け得る嵌合部とを有する耐摩耗複合切刃であって、底面にのみ硬質耐摩耗層が形成されていることを特徴とするものである。
【0011】
本発明によれば、硬質耐摩耗層を切刃の底面にのみ配置されることにより、掘削作業によって切刃の上面が先に摩耗して幅方向には底面に配された硬質耐摩耗層が維持されるので、切刃を鍬のように幅広く薄い状態で掘削できて、軟岩地盤でのリッピング作業の破砕効率を高めることができる。また、底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は母材である前面側から次第に摩耗することになるので、使用によって剥離することがなく、摩耗寿命を延長させ得る効果を奏する。なお、本発明において、上面は使用時における前面となる部分に、また底面は使用時における後面となる部分に、それぞれ対応する。
【0012】
前記発明において、底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は、前記底面の長さ方向の刃先から少なくとも摩耗限界長近傍までの範囲であるのがよい。こうすると、自己摩耗特性を制御して、上面が先に摩滅されて以後掘削許容限まで刃幅が広い状態で鍬状の形状維持がなされ、掘削機能を確保して有効に使用できるという効果が得られる。
【0013】
また、前記発明において、底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は、前記底面の幅方向の両側端部に沿った領域に形成されるのがよい。こうすることによって、刃先が摩耗しても両側端部に硬質耐摩耗層が存在するので、幅広形状の切刃を維持することができ、1回のリッピング作業で切刃接地面が掻く面積が広くなり、より多くのストレスを岩盤に与えることができるので、破砕効率が最大限に維持できるという効果を得ることができる。
【0014】
また、前記発明において、底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は、前記底面の先端部領域および幅方向の両側端部に沿った領域に形成されるのがよい。こうすると、摩耗しても幅広かつ薄い形状の切刃を維持でき、さらに刃先部の摩耗をより遅らせることができるので、摩耗寿命をより一層延長させ得る効果が得られる。
【0015】
【発明の実施の形態】
次に、本発明による耐摩耗複合切刃の具体的な実施の形態につき、図面を参照しつつ説明する。
【0016】
図1には、第1実施形態のリッパポイントを示す側面図(a)と平面図(b)および底面図(c)が示されている。
【0017】
本実施形態の耐摩耗複合切刃は、ブルドーザに付設されるリッパ装置のリッパポイントに用いられるものについて説明する。
【0018】
このリッパポイント1は、図1(a)〜(c)によって示されるように、その上面2と底面3と、その両側に対向する側面4と、上面2と底面3が交わって形成される刃先5と、その刃先5と反対側の基端部にブルドーザの作業機部材であるシャンク(図示せず)への嵌合部6を形成される構造である。その刃先5から、底面3の先端部3aの所要領域全幅と、その底面3の先端部3aから両側に所要寸法幅で基端部方向に所要範囲とで、それぞれ硬質耐摩耗層7が配置されてなるものである。図中符号8は取付ピン孔である。
【0019】
前記硬質耐摩耗層7は、例えばアーク電極による溶接材の溶融池に粒径0.5〜4mm程度の硬質粒子を供給して肉盛りされる。この場合の硬質耐摩耗層7の厚さは6mm程度となるように肉盛りされている。前記硬質耐摩耗層を形成するのに用いられる硬質粒子としては炭化物を主成分とするものが好ましい。その炭化物としては、TiC,ZrC,HfC(IVB族)VC,NbC,TaC(VB族)Mo2C,W2C,WC(VIB族)などが挙げられる。
【0020】
また、前記底面3に配置される硬質耐摩耗層7の両側領域は、リッパポイント1として通常使用される場合の接地面Aに対する軸線aの傾斜角θがほぼ45°で使用されているので、この状態での初期状態における被削面に対する摩耗限界長Laに相当する位置までとなるように設定される。前記摩耗限界長Laは、図1に示される形状のリッパポイント1において、その全長Lにおける刃先からほぼ1/2L程度である。ただし、前記摩耗限界長については、前記数値に特定されるものではない。
【0021】
前記摩耗限界長Laを設定するにあたっては、リッピング作業に際して、摩耗によって上面2(使用時の前面)が後退した際に嵌合部6が露出することになり、これより長い範囲に硬質耐摩耗層7を配置しても無駄になる限界を規定している。
【0022】
また、底面3(使用時の後面)における両側に沿って配置される硬質耐摩耗層7,7の幅寸法wについては、実務的にみて刃幅寸法Wの1/4〜1/3程度であるのが好ましい。そして、その配置長さについては、前述のように、刃先から摩耗限界長Laとして設定される位置までの長さ、ほぼL/2とされている。
【0023】
このように底面3の先端部3aと両側端部に沿ってそれぞれ帯状に硬質耐摩耗層7を配することで、掘削作業時において前記硬質耐摩耗層7が配される底面3以外の部分(上面2)は早く摩耗され、次第に底面3側の硬質耐摩耗層7部分を残して薄い形状になる。言換えると、前記上面2が削ぎ落とされた状態に、摩耗形状の制御がなされるのである。したがって、切刃(リッパポイント1)の刃先5部はその刃幅Wのままで薄くなり、ちょうど鍬のように形成されることになって、貫入性を維持しつつ軟岩地盤に対してストレスを与え、破砕効率を高めることができる。
【0024】
やがて摩耗が進行して先端部3aが摩滅しても、両側端部に帯状に硬質耐摩耗層7,7が配置されているので、図2に鎖線b〜eによって摩耗状態の変化を付記されるように、前面(上面2)側が優先的に摩耗されても、刃幅全体が後面(底面3)側に配置されている硬質耐摩耗層7,7によって維持されるので、前面が薄くなって鍬状に保たれ、次第に摩滅するも後面が遅れて摩耗されることになる。したがって、摩耗限界長位置まで破砕効率が維持されるのである。
【0025】
このように構成された本実施形態の切刃の有効性を確認するために、本実施形態のリッパポイントと従来品の他に二種類の形態のリッパポイントを用いて実車テストを行った結果が、図3(a)(b)にグラフで示される通りである。このテストで使用した他の形態のリッパポイント(テスト品1およびテスト品2)は、その外形寸法、母材など本実施形態の切刃と同じものである。テスト品1としては、図4(a)に示されるように、リッパポイント1aの上面2aには刃先部5aとそれに連なるセンター部分に、また下面3a’の刃先部5aとそれに連なるセンター部分に、それぞれ硬質耐摩耗層7’を配置したものとされ、テスト品2としては、図4(b)に示されるように、リッパポイント1bの上面2bの刃先部5bから基端部側へ所要領域で刃幅全体に硬質耐摩耗層7”を配置したものを、それぞれ使用した。このテストにあたっては、一般的なリッピング作業として行われている。なお、一回のリッピング作業距離は約30mである。
【0026】
この比較テストにおいて、従来品は摩耗速度が速く短時間で使用不能の状態となるのに対し、テスト品1は、摩耗寿命は非常によいが、作業性(掘削性)が悪く途中で使用に耐えなくなりテストを中断した。また、テスト品2は、途中で硬質耐摩耗層に剥離が発生したため従来品との摩耗寿命に大差はなかった。しかも、摩耗が進行するにつれて、貫入性には問題がないものの、掘削性が悪かった。本実施形態のリッパポイント1は、この比較テストからみて耐久性において、従来品に較べて摩耗速度が低下して、硬質耐摩耗層の剥離は発生せず、従来品に較べて約2倍の耐久性(耐摩耗性)が認められ、摩耗が進行しても先端部は薄くかつ幅広に維持され、掘削性も良好で、平均作業効率もそれに比例して向上し、著しく良好であることが判る。
【0027】
また、本実施形態のリッパポイント1は、図3(b)に表される平均作業効率のグラフから見て、従来品ならびにテスト品1,2と較べても掘削性を確保しての有効作業時間が格段に良好であることがわかる。要するに比較テストに用いられた本実施形態のリッパポイントに対して、従来品ならびにテスト品1,2がおしなべて短時間で効率1を割ってしまうのに、本実施形態のリッパポイントではそれらの2倍以上の作業時間で有効に持続するという優れた機能を所有することがわかる。なお、この平均作業効率(回/分)は、各作業時間区間の平均リッピング作業回数を表わし、1回あたりのリッピング作業距離は約30mである。
【0028】
なお、上述の実施形態では切刃の幅方向で中央部に長いリブを形成されたものについて記載しているが、下面3に設けられたセンタリブがない状態のものに適用することも可能であり、必要に応じて作業性が良くなる範囲(掘削性が良好である限界長さまで)内であれば前面に硬質耐摩耗層を配置してもよい。
【0029】
上述したように、本発明の耐摩耗複合切刃によれば、リッパポイントとして有効であり、このようなリッパポイントのみならず、例えば図5に例示されるようなリッパバケット20の切刃21として使用することができる。あるいは、必要に応じて掘削バケットのツースに活用することも可能である。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】図1は、本実施形態のリッパポイントを示す側面図(a)と平面図(b)および底面図(c)である。
【図2】図2は、本実施形態のリッパポイントの使用状況の説明図(a)および摩耗状態を説明する平面図(b)である。
【図3】図3は、従来品およびテスト品と本実施形態との比較テスト結果の耐摩耗性を表わすグラフ(a)と平均作業効率を表すグラフ(b)である。
【図4】図4(a)(b)は、比較テストに用いたテスト品を示す図である。
【図5】図5は、リッパバケットとその切刃を示す図である。
【図6】図6は、従来のリッパポイントの平面を表す模式図(a)と摩耗進行に対して厚みが増大する態様を表す模式図(b)である。
【符号の説明】
1 リッパポイント
2 上面
3 底面
3a 底面の先端部
5 刃先
6 嵌合部
7 硬質耐摩耗層
a 軸線
A 接地面
[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a cutting edge mainly used for a ripper point and the like, and more particularly to excavating a ground where a crack hardly occurs even when a rock penetrates the cutting edge during ripping such as a soft rock layer. And a wear-resistant composite cutting edge having a function of extending the life.
[0002]
[Prior art]
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, in a construction machine for excavating earth and sand such as a bulldozer, a cutting blade for excavation is detachably mounted as a ripper point, for example, at a tip of a ripper device. Since such cutting blades are used for excavation and crushing work by penetrating the ground or rock, etc., they are intensely rubbed against earth and sand and rocks. Have been. For this reason, when the replacement frequency increases, the work efficiency is reduced, and at the same time, the cost of parts is increased.
[0003]
Regarding the prior art as such a cutting edge for excavation, wear resistance due to hardfacing etc. in the widthwise middle portion leaving both sides from the cutting edge of the cutting edge of the hardened and tempered low alloy steel to the middle portion. A cutting blade in which layers are arranged is known (Patent Document 1). There is also known an excavating cutting blade in which a hard particle that extends rearward from a cutting edge of the cutting blade is provided at a central portion of an upper surface of the cutting blade to form a hardened wear layer (Patent Document 2). Further, there is another one disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-255002, which is a prior application of the present applicant.
[0004]
In the techniques disclosed in Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2 or the prior application, the cutting edge is worn and sharpened for the purpose of improving the wear life of the cutting edge for excavation and maintaining excellent work performance (penetration). A hard wear-resistant layer is provided. What is common in those prior arts is that as shown in the schematic diagram of FIG. 6A, the wear of the central portion of the cutting edge 50 for excavation is suppressed, and the pointed shape when viewed from the near side of the blade 52 is shown. The purpose is to control the wear shape. For this purpose, a hard wear-resistant layer 53 is arranged at the center of the front (upper) surface 51. In other words, by leaving the central portion of the front (upper) surface 51 and wearing it around preferentially, it is intended to suppress the increase in the contact area and maintain the penetration.
[0005]
[Patent Document 1]
Japanese Patent Publication No. 6-501076 [Patent Document 2]
JP-A-8-53860
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, when the excavation work site is a soft rock layer, there is a problem with the cutting edge according to the above-mentioned prior art. Soft rocks are generally sedimentary soft rocks with a uniaxial compressive strength of about 20 MPa or less, and are in the process of becoming hard rocks due to densification and diagenesis of sedimentary soils. Weak sedimentary soft rock; (3) weathered hard rock or thermo-metamorphic hard rock in the process of becoming soil due to faulting, folding, weathering, hydrothermal action, etc. (according to the Geotechnical Engineering Handbook). The above-described cutting edge (ripper point) according to the prior art, which is used to rip hard rock ground and rips hard rock ground to enhance the functionality (penetration), is inferior in practical use. .
[0007]
In other words, when the rock is hard, once the cutting edge penetrates, the crack spreads to some extent, and thereafter, the rip work proceeds while the crack is relatively easily expanded by traction, and the rock can be crushed. For this reason, work efficiency can be maintained as long as penetration can be maintained by suppressing an increase in the contact area. However, where the rock is weak and the crack does not spread even when the cutting edge penetrates, such as a soft rock layer, it can be considered that the cutting edge of the above technique is not suitable.
[0008]
In addition, as shown in a schematic diagram of FIG. 6B, the excavating cutting blade 50 generally used in the ripping operation has a substantially wedge shape when viewed from the side. Its thickness is significantly increased. On the other hand, in the cutting edge according to the prior art, an increase in the contact area is suppressed by reducing the width. However, when the width of the contact surface is small, the area where the cutting edge contact surface is scratched by one ripping operation. And the crushing efficiency decreases. Therefore, there is a problem that workability is significantly reduced.
[0009]
In order to solve such a problem, the present invention is configured to provide an effective excavation performance in a situation in which crack propagation in a rock mass cannot be expected by changing a point of interest from a conventional cutting edge. It is an object of the present invention to provide a wear composite cutting blade.
[0010]
[Means for Solving the Problems and Functions / Effects]
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the wear-resistant composite cutting edge according to the present invention comprises:
A wear-resistant composite cutting blade having a top surface, a bottom surface, opposed side surfaces, a cutting edge formed at a distal end, and a fitting portion that can be attached to a working machine at a base end side, wherein a hard wear-resistant layer is formed only on the bottom surface. Are formed.
[0011]
According to the present invention, by disposing the hard wear-resistant layer only on the bottom surface of the cutting blade, the hard wear-resistant layer arranged on the bottom surface in the width direction by excavation work wears the upper surface of the cutting blade first. Because it is maintained, the cutting edge can be excavated in a wide and thin state like a hoe, and the crushing efficiency of ripping work on soft rock ground can be increased. Further, since the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface is gradually worn from the front side which is the base material, the hard wear-resistant layer does not peel off by use and has an effect of extending the wear life. In the present invention, the upper surface corresponds to a portion to be a front surface in use, and the bottom surface corresponds to a portion to be a rear surface in use.
[0012]
In the above invention, the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface is preferably in a range from a cutting edge in a longitudinal direction of the bottom surface to at least a vicinity of a wear limit length. In this way, the self-wear characteristics are controlled, the upper surface is worn first, and the hoe-like shape is maintained with the blade width wide up to the excavation limit, and the excavation function is secured and it can be used effectively. can get.
[0013]
Further, in the above invention, the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface is preferably formed in a region along both side edges in the width direction of the bottom surface. In this way, even if the cutting edge is worn, since the hard wear-resistant layers are present on both side edges, a wide cutting edge can be maintained, and the area where the cutting edge contact surface is scratched by one ripping operation can be reduced. Since it becomes wider and more stress can be applied to the bedrock, the effect that the crushing efficiency can be maintained to the maximum can be obtained.
[0014]
Further, in the above invention, the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface is preferably formed in a front end region of the bottom surface and a region along both lateral ends in the width direction. In this case, even when worn, the cutting blade having a wide and thin shape can be maintained, and the wear of the cutting edge can be further delayed, so that the effect of further extending the wear life can be obtained.
[0015]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Next, specific embodiments of the wear-resistant composite cutting blade according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
[0016]
FIG. 1 shows a side view (a), a plan view (b), and a bottom view (c) showing a ripper point of the first embodiment.
[0017]
A description will be given of a wear-resistant composite cutting blade according to the present embodiment that is used as a ripper point of a ripper device attached to a bulldozer.
[0018]
As shown in FIGS. 1A to 1C, the ripper point 1 has a top surface 2 and a bottom surface 3, side surfaces 4 opposed to both sides thereof, and a cutting edge formed by intersecting the top surface 2 and the bottom surface 3. 5 and a fitting portion 6 is formed at a base end opposite to the cutting edge 5 to a shank (not shown) which is a working machine member of the bulldozer. Hard wear-resistant layers 7 are arranged from the cutting edge 5 to the entire required area of the distal end portion 3a of the bottom surface 3 and to the required width in both directions from the distal end portion 3a of the bottom surface 3 to the proximal end direction. It is. Reference numeral 8 in the figure is a mounting pin hole.
[0019]
The hard wear-resistant layer 7 is built up by, for example, supplying hard particles having a particle size of about 0.5 to 4 mm to a weld pool of a welding material using an arc electrode. In this case, the thickness of the hard wear-resistant layer 7 is increased so as to be about 6 mm. As the hard particles used for forming the hard wear-resistant layer, those mainly containing carbide are preferable. Examples of the carbide include TiC, ZrC, HfC (group IVB), VC, NbC, TaC (group VB), Mo2C, W2C, and WC (group VIB).
[0020]
In addition, since both sides of the hard wear-resistant layer 7 disposed on the bottom surface 3 are used at an inclination angle θ of the axis a with respect to the ground plane A of about 45 ° when normally used as the ripper point 1, The initial state in this state is set so as to reach a position corresponding to the wear limit length La relative to the work surface in the initial state. The wear limit length La is about 1/2 L from the cutting edge in the full length L at the ripper point 1 having the shape shown in FIG. However, the wear limit length is not specified by the numerical values.
[0021]
In setting the wear limit length La, the fitting portion 6 is exposed when the upper surface 2 (the front surface in use) is retracted due to abrasion during a ripping operation. It defines the limit at which the arrangement of 7 is useless.
[0022]
The width w of the hard wear-resistant layers 7, 7 arranged along both sides of the bottom surface 3 (rear surface when used) is practically about 1/4 to 1/3 of the blade width W. Preferably it is. As described above, the arrangement length is substantially L / 2 from the cutting edge to the position set as the wear limit length La.
[0023]
By arranging the hard wear-resistant layer 7 in a strip shape along the front end portion 3a and both side end portions of the bottom surface 3 in this way, a portion other than the bottom surface 3 where the hard wear-resistant layer 7 is arranged during excavation work ( The upper surface 2) is rapidly worn and gradually becomes thinner, leaving the hard wear-resistant layer 7 on the bottom surface 3 side. In other words, the wear shape is controlled in a state where the upper surface 2 is scraped off. Therefore, the edge 5 of the cutting edge (the ripper point 1) becomes thinner with its edge width W, and is formed just like a hoe, and stress is applied to soft rock ground while maintaining intrusion. To increase the crushing efficiency.
[0024]
Even if the abrasion progresses and the tip portion 3a wears out, since the hard abrasion resistant layers 7, 7 are arranged in a belt shape on both side ends, the change of the abrasion state is additionally shown in FIG. As described above, even if the front surface (upper surface 2) side is preferentially worn, the entire blade width is maintained by the hard wear-resistant layers 7, 7 disposed on the rear surface (bottom surface 3) side, so that the front surface becomes thinner. It is kept in a hoe shape, and gradually wears out, but the rear surface is worn with a delay. Therefore, the crushing efficiency is maintained up to the wear limit length position.
[0025]
In order to confirm the effectiveness of the cutting edge of the present embodiment configured as described above, a result of an actual vehicle test using two types of ripper points in addition to the ripper point of the present embodiment and the conventional product is shown. 3 (a) and 3 (b). The other types of ripper points (test product 1 and test product 2) used in this test are the same as the cutting edge of the present embodiment, such as the outer dimensions and base material. As shown in FIG. 4 (a), as the test product 1, the upper surface 2a of the ripper point 1a has a cutting edge 5a and a center portion connected thereto, and the lower surface 3a 'has a cutting edge 5a and a center portion connected thereto. Each of the test pieces 2 has a hard wear-resistant layer 7 ′, and as shown in FIG. 4B, a required area from the cutting edge 5 b of the upper surface 2 b of the ripper point 1 b to the base end side is required. A hard wear-resistant layer 7 "arranged over the entire blade width was used. In this test, a general ripping operation was performed. The distance of one ripping operation is about 30 m.
[0026]
In this comparative test, the conventional product has a high wear rate and becomes unusable in a short period of time, whereas the test product 1 has a very good wear life, but has poor workability (excavation property) and cannot be used on the way. I became intolerant and stopped the test. In addition, the test product 2 did not have a great difference in the wear life from the conventional product because the hard wear-resistant layer peeled off in the middle. Moreover, as the wear progressed, the excavation was poor, though there was no problem in the penetration. The ripper point 1 of the present embodiment has a durability which is about twice as large as that of the conventional product in terms of durability because the abrasion rate is lower than that of the conventional product and the hard wear-resistant layer does not peel off. Durability (abrasion resistance) is recognized, and even if wear progresses, the tip is kept thin and wide, excavation is good, average work efficiency is improved in proportion to it, and it is remarkably good I understand.
[0027]
In addition, the ripper point 1 of the present embodiment is effective work that ensures the excavation ability as compared with the conventional product and the test products 1 and 2, as seen from the graph of the average work efficiency shown in FIG. It turns out that the time is much better. In short, the efficiency of the conventional product and the test products 1 and 2 are less than 1 in a short time in comparison with the ripper point of the present embodiment used for the comparison test, but the ripper point of the present embodiment is twice as large as those. It can be seen that it possesses an excellent function that it effectively lasts for the above working hours. The average work efficiency (times / minute) indicates the average number of times of ripping work in each work time section, and the ripping work distance per time is about 30 m.
[0028]
In the above-described embodiment, a long rib is formed at the center in the width direction of the cutting blade. However, the present invention can also be applied to a case where there is no center rib provided on the lower surface 3. If necessary, a hard wear-resistant layer may be provided on the front surface within a range where the workability is improved (up to the limit length where excavation is good).
[0029]
As described above, the wear-resistant composite cutting edge of the present invention is effective as a ripper point. Not only such a ripper point, but also as a cutting edge 21 of a ripper bucket 20 as illustrated in FIG. Can be used. Alternatively, it can be used for the tooth of the excavation bucket as needed.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a side view (a), a plan view (b), and a bottom view (c) showing a ripper point of the present embodiment.
FIGS. 2A and 2B are an explanatory diagram (a) of a usage state of a ripper point of the present embodiment and a plan view (b) illustrating a worn state.
FIGS. 3A and 3B are a graph (a) showing abrasion resistance and a graph (b) showing average working efficiency of a comparison test result of a conventional product and a test product with the present embodiment.
FIGS. 4A and 4B are diagrams showing test products used for a comparison test.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a ripper bucket and its cutting blade.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram (a) showing a plane of a conventional ripper point and a schematic diagram (b) showing a mode in which the thickness increases with progress of wear.
[Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Ripper point 2 Top surface 3 Bottom surface 3a Bottom end portion 5 Cutting edge 6 Fitting portion 7 Hard wear-resistant layer a Axis A Ground plane

Claims (4)

上面と底面および対向する側面と、先端部に形成される刃先と、基端部側に作業機に取付け得る嵌合部とを有する耐摩耗複合切刃であって、底面にのみ硬質耐摩耗層が形成されていることを特徴とする耐摩耗複合切刃。A wear-resistant composite cutting blade having a top surface, a bottom surface, opposed side surfaces, a cutting edge formed at a distal end, and a fitting portion that can be attached to a working machine at a base end side, wherein a hard wear-resistant layer is formed only on the bottom surface. A wear-resistant composite cutting blade characterized in that a cutting edge is formed. 前記底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は、前記底面の長さ方向の刃先から少なくとも摩耗限界長近傍までの範囲である請求項1に記載の耐摩耗複合切刃。The wear-resistant composite cutting blade according to claim 1, wherein the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface ranges from a cutting edge in a longitudinal direction of the bottom surface to at least a vicinity of a wear limit length. 前記底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は、前記底面の幅方向の両側端部に沿った領域に形成される請求項1または2に記載の耐摩耗複合切刃。The wear-resistant composite cutting blade according to claim 1, wherein the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface is formed in a region along both side edges in the width direction of the bottom surface. 前記底面に配置される硬質耐摩耗層は、前記底面の先端部領域および幅方向の両側端部に沿った領域に形成される請求項1または2に記載の耐摩耗複合切刃。The wear-resistant composite cutting blade according to claim 1, wherein the hard wear-resistant layer disposed on the bottom surface is formed in a front end region of the bottom surface and a region along both side ends in the width direction.
JP2002354667A 2002-12-06 2002-12-06 Drilling blade Expired - Fee Related JP4190271B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002354667A JP4190271B2 (en) 2002-12-06 2002-12-06 Drilling blade

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002354667A JP4190271B2 (en) 2002-12-06 2002-12-06 Drilling blade

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2004183416A true JP2004183416A (en) 2004-07-02
JP4190271B2 JP4190271B2 (en) 2008-12-03

Family

ID=32755587

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002354667A Expired - Fee Related JP4190271B2 (en) 2002-12-06 2002-12-06 Drilling blade

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4190271B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9009996B2 (en) 2012-10-10 2015-04-21 Komatsu Ltd. Excavating tooth and body for excavating tooth

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9009996B2 (en) 2012-10-10 2015-04-21 Komatsu Ltd. Excavating tooth and body for excavating tooth

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4190271B2 (en) 2008-12-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7757778B2 (en) Ripper boot
WO1996004097A1 (en) Method of forming wear-resistant padding layer and wear-resistant composite material
JP5373169B1 (en) Drilling nails and body for drilling nails
CA2956142C (en) Wear component for ground engaging tool
US9556595B2 (en) High performance implement wear member
CA2683749A1 (en) Ripper excavation tool
AU755886B2 (en) Method for working through ground and rock layers with dredgers or excavators and apparatus operating according to this method
CA2956083C (en) Wear component for ground engaging tool
US20040060208A1 (en) Excavator teeth, apparatus and methods
JP4190271B2 (en) Drilling blade
JPS624492B2 (en)
KR100263532B1 (en) A wear proof bucket of an excavator
JP4439238B2 (en) Cutting blade for excavation
JP2004092208A (en) Wear-resistant composite cutting blade
JPH0417647Y2 (en)
AU2006284527A1 (en) An improved ripper boot
JPH0853860A (en) Wear-resistant composite material
AU2010201243A1 (en) An improved ripper boot
JP2003147812A (en) Structure and method for reinforcing worn-out part of metal
EA010765B1 (en) Method for restoring work member of earth-moving machinery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20051108

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070517

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070522

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070720

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20071120

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080118

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080603

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080731

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080916

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20080916

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110926

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4190271

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110926

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120926

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120926

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130926

Year of fee payment: 5

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees