JP2003216930A - Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration

Info

Publication number
JP2003216930A
JP2003216930A JP2002011883A JP2002011883A JP2003216930A JP 2003216930 A JP2003216930 A JP 2003216930A JP 2002011883 A JP2002011883 A JP 2002011883A JP 2002011883 A JP2002011883 A JP 2002011883A JP 2003216930 A JP2003216930 A JP 2003216930A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
value
discoloration
feature
inspection
green
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2002011883A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Atsuhiro Ota
篤宏 太田
Katsuhiro Sasada
勝弘 笹田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Electric Works Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Works Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Works Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Works Ltd
Priority to JP2002011883A priority Critical patent/JP2003216930A/en
Publication of JP2003216930A publication Critical patent/JP2003216930A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Image Analysis (AREA)
  • Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration enabling efficient inspection for discoloration while reducing the number of parameters used in determining discoloration errors. <P>SOLUTION: The discoloration inspection apparatus comprises an illuminating means 1 for applying white light to a workpiece 7, an image pickup means 2 consisting of a color television, a determining process part 3 consisting of a computer, an output part 4 consisting of a CRT outputting the result of an inspection process, and the like. The determining process part 3 includes a comparison operation part 9 for judging whether the workpiece is good or bad according to the object feature quantities, a reference feature quantity, and a threshold r, and an automatic threshold setting part 11 for automatically setting the threshold r. The automatic threshold setting part 11 has a threshold setting part 13 which, using images obtained from good and bad products determined by visual inspection, sets the threshold r according to two feature quantities with a great degree of separation between the good and bad products, e.g. the feature quantities extracted by a feature quantity extracting part 12 and a feature quantity extracting part 12 which automatically extract G/B (green/blue) values and R/G (red/green) values. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2003,JPO

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明が属する技術分野】本発明は、変色検査方法及び
変色検査装置に関する。具体的には、製品の良否判定に
際し、製品の変色度を画像処理にて判断する変色検査方
法及び変色検査装置に関する。
TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a color change inspection method and a color change inspection apparatus. Specifically, the present invention relates to a discoloration inspection method and a discoloration inspection apparatus that determine the degree of discoloration of a product by image processing when determining the quality of the product.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来から人の視覚に頼っていた各種の目
視検査を正確に、高速かつ自動的に行なわせる画像検査
装置が開発されている。この画像検査装置として、例え
ば特開昭62−127617号公報に検査対象物の形状
を認識させて製品の良否を判定する装置が開示されてい
る。
2. Description of the Related Art An image inspection apparatus has been developed which can perform various visual inspections that have hitherto relied on human vision accurately, at high speed and automatically. As this image inspection apparatus, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 62-127617 discloses an apparatus which recognizes the shape of an inspection object and determines the quality of the product.

【0003】ところが、例えば電子部品であるリレーの
端子検査においては、製造工程上人手の介在によって接
点バネの変色不良が発生し、製品クレームとして処理さ
れる場合がある。このような変色異常を生じる場合にお
いては、上記のようなモノクロ画像による画像処理では
製品の良否を判定できない。
However, in a terminal inspection of a relay, which is an electronic component, for example, a discoloration failure of a contact spring may occur due to human intervention in the manufacturing process, and it may be processed as a product complaint. When such a color change abnormality occurs, the quality of the product cannot be determined by the image processing using the monochrome image as described above.

【0004】一方、近年においては、検査対象物の色の
判別や特定の色の抽出等カラー画像を用いた検査のニー
ズが高くなり、カラー画像の中から検査対象物を抽出す
る画像処理が行なわれるようになっている。例えば特開
平11−110552号公報では、撮像領域における各
画素のR値、G値及びB値に加えてR値及びG値の差分
値、B値及びR値の差分値、B値及びG値の差分値を演
算しておき、抽出対象となる画素に対応する前記差分
値、R値、G値、B値に基づいて前記差分値、R値、G
値及びB値の閾値を各別に設定し、閾値内の画素を抽出
対象となる領域と同一色として抽出する試みがなされて
いる。
On the other hand, in recent years, there is an increasing need for inspection using a color image such as color discrimination of an inspection object and extraction of a specific color, and image processing for extracting the inspection object from the color image is performed. It is supposed to be. For example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-110552, in addition to the R value, G value, and B value of each pixel in the imaging region, the difference value between the R value and the G value, the difference value between the B value and the R value, the B value, and the G value. Of the difference value, the R value, the G value, and the B value corresponding to the pixel to be extracted.
Attempts have been made to set thresholds for values and B values separately and to extract pixels within the thresholds as the same color as the area to be extracted.

【0005】しかしながら、当該方法では各画素毎にR
値、G値、B値及びR値とG値の差分値、B値とR値の
差分値、B値とG値の差分値という6つのパラメータに
基づいた閾値を設定する必要があり、変色不良の判定に
適用した場合どのパラメータを用いて判別するのが最も
効果的なのか把握しにくい。また、変色判別時における
閾値設定も効率よく行えないという問題点があった。
However, in this method, R for each pixel is
It is necessary to set a threshold value based on six parameters, namely, a value, a G value, a B value, a difference value between the R value and the G value, a difference value between the B value and the R value, and a difference value between the B value and the G value. When applied to the defect determination, it is difficult to understand which parameter is most effective for the determination. In addition, there is a problem that the threshold value cannot be set efficiently at the time of color change determination.

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は上記従来技術
の問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、変色不良の判
定において用いるパラメータ数を少なくして、効率よく
変色検査が行える変色検査方法及び変色検査装置を提供
することを目的としている。
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the above problems of the prior art, and a color change inspection method capable of efficiently performing a color change inspection by reducing the number of parameters used in determining a color change defect. And a discoloration inspection device.

【0007】[0007]

【課題を解決するための手段】請求項1に記載の変色検
査方法は、白色光を発する照明手段を点灯し、ワークの
ほぼ真上に配置したカラー画像撮像手段で撮像して得ら
れた画像の赤・緑・青成分の組合せによる複数の特徴量
のうち、良品・不良品間の分離値が一定値以上である1
又は2以上の特徴量を用いて色の相違を判定することを
特徴としている。
An image obtained by illuminating an illuminating means for emitting white light and picking up an image by a color image pick-up means arranged almost directly above a work. Among the multiple feature quantities of the combination of red, green, and blue components, the separation value between good and defective products is a certain value or more 1
Alternatively, it is characterized in that the color difference is determined by using two or more feature amounts.

【0008】請求項2に記載の変色検査方法は、請求項
1に記載の変色検査方法において、前記特徴量として、
赤・緑・青成分の比率である赤/緑値、緑/青値、赤/
青値を用いることを特徴としている。
A discoloration inspection method according to a second aspect is the discoloration inspection method according to the first aspect, wherein the characteristic amount is
The ratio of red / green / blue components: red / green value, green / blue value, red /
It is characterized by using the blue value.

【0009】請求項3に記載の変色検査方法は、請求項
2に記載の変色検査方法において、次の式1を用いて得
られた分離度の大きな特徴量を用いることを特徴として
いる。
A discoloration inspection method according to a third aspect is characterized in that, in the discoloration inspection method according to the second aspect, a feature amount having a large degree of separation obtained by using the following expression 1 is used.

【0010】[0010]

【式1】 [Formula 1]

【0011】請求項4に記載の変色検査方法は、請求項
1〜3のいずれかに記載の変色検査方法において、前記
特徴量から選択される2つの特徴量を用いて良品・不良
品間の分離値を設定することを特徴としている。
A discoloration inspection method according to a fourth aspect is the discoloration inspection method according to any one of the first to third aspects, in which two characteristic quantities selected from the characteristic quantities are used to determine whether the quality is good or bad. It is characterized by setting a separation value.

【0012】請求項5に記載の変色検査方法は、請求項
1〜4のいずれかに記載の変色検査方法において、前記
分離値を、良品平均座標と前記良品平均座標に最も近接
する不良品座標間の距離の半分とすることを特徴として
いる。
The discoloration inspection method according to claim 5 is the discoloration inspection method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the separation value is a defective product coordinate closest to the good product average coordinate and the good product average coordinate. The feature is that it is half the distance between them.

【0013】また、請求項6に記載の変色検査方法は、
請求項5に記載の変色検査方法において、良品平均座標
を原点にした座標上に、検査対象品の画像から得られた
特徴量を配置することを特徴としている。
The color change inspection method according to claim 6 is
The discoloration inspection method according to claim 5 is characterized in that the feature amount obtained from the image of the inspection object product is arranged on the coordinates having the good product average coordinates as the origin.

【0014】請求項7に記載の変色検査装置は、ワーク
を照明する白色光照明手段と、ワークのほぼ真上に配置
されたカラー画像撮像手段と、得られた画像の赤・緑・
青成分の組合せによる複数の特徴量のうち、良品・不良
品間の分離値が一定値以上である1又は2以上の特徴量
を用いて色の相違を判定する判定処理部を備えたことを
特徴としている。
According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, there is provided a discoloration inspection apparatus in which white light illuminating means for illuminating a work, color image pick-up means arranged almost directly above the work, and red, green, and green images of the obtained image are displayed.
Among a plurality of feature quantities based on the combination of blue components, a determination processing unit that determines a color difference using one or more feature quantities in which the separation value between the good product and the defective product is a certain value or more is provided. It has a feature.

【0015】請求項8に記載の変色検査装置は、請求項
7に記載の変色検査装置において、赤・緑・青成分の比
率である赤/緑値、緑/青値、赤/青値を用いることを
特徴としている。
The discoloration inspection apparatus according to claim 8 is the discoloration inspection apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the red / green value, the green / blue value, and the red / blue value, which are the ratios of the red, green, and blue components, are calculated. It is characterized by using.

【0016】請求項9に記載の変色検査装置は、次の式
1を用いて得られた分離度の大きな1又は2以上の特徴
量を選択抽出する特徴量抽出手段を備えたことを特徴と
している。
A discoloration inspection apparatus according to a ninth aspect is characterized in that it is provided with a feature amount extraction means for selectively extracting one or more feature amounts having a large degree of separation obtained by using the following expression 1. There is.

【0017】また、請求項10に記載の変色検査装置
は、請求項9に記載の変色検査装置において、前記特徴
量抽出手段により選択抽出された特徴量を用いて、良品
平均座標と前記良品平均座標に最も近接する不良品座標
間距離を算出し、当該2つの座標間距離の半分を分離値
として設定する閾値設定部を備えたことを特徴としてい
る。
Further, the discoloration inspecting apparatus according to claim 10 is the discoloration inspecting apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the feature quantity selected and extracted by the feature quantity extracting means is used to determine the good product average coordinates and the good product average. It is characterized by including a threshold value setting unit that calculates a distance between defective product coordinates closest to the coordinates and sets half of the distance between the two coordinates as a separation value.

【0018】さらに、請求項11に記載の変色検査装置
は、請求項10に記載の変色検査装置において、前記判
定処理部は、前記良品平均座標を原点にした座標上に、
検査対象品の画像から得られた特徴量を配置して判定す
ることを特徴としている。
Further, in the discoloration inspection device according to claim 11, in the discoloration inspection device according to claim 10, the determination processing section is arranged on a coordinate having the non-defective item average coordinate as an origin,
The feature is that the feature amount obtained from the image of the inspection object product is arranged and determined.

【0019】[0019]

【発明の実施の形態】図1は本発明の一実施形態である
変色検査装置の概略構成図である。変色検査装置は、ワ
ーク7に白色光を照射する照明手段1、カラーテレビか
らなる撮像手段2、コンピュータからなる判定処理部
3、検査処理結果を出力するCRTやプリンタなどから
なる出力部4、撮像手段2で撮像された画像を映し出す
モニタ5及びキーボードやマウスなどからなる入力手段
6とを備える。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a color change inspection apparatus which is an embodiment of the present invention. The discoloration inspection apparatus includes an illumination unit 1 that irradiates a work 7 with white light, an image pickup unit 2 that is a color television, a determination processing unit 3 that is a computer, an output unit 4 that is a CRT or a printer that outputs an inspection processing result, and an image pickup. A monitor 5 for displaying an image picked up by the means 2 and an input means 6 including a keyboard and a mouse are provided.

【0020】撮像手段2はワーク7の真上から対象領域
を撮像し、画像データを判定処理部3へ送出する。図1
ではリレーの接触端子が検査対象とされており、撮像手
段2は当該接触端子の真上に配置される。照明手段1
は、検査対象を照明し、対象手段のほぼ真上に配置され
る。照明手段1は、検査対象に陰影や色むらができない
ように配置される。
The image pickup means 2 picks up an image of the target area from directly above the work 7 and sends the image data to the determination processing section 3. Figure 1
In this case, the contact terminal of the relay is an inspection target, and the image pickup means 2 is arranged directly above the contact terminal. Lighting means 1
Illuminates the object to be inspected and is arranged almost directly above the object means. The illuminating means 1 is arranged so that the inspection target does not have shading or color unevenness.

【0021】判定処理部3は、良品として判断される基
準特徴量及び閾値が記憶される記憶部10と、画像デー
タから対象特徴量を算出する特徴量算出部8と、対象特
徴量と基準特徴量及び閾値とから良品・不良品の判断を
行う比較演算部9とを備える。
The determination processing unit 3 stores a reference feature amount and a threshold value determined as non-defective products, a storage unit 10 for calculating a target feature amount from image data, a target feature amount and a reference feature. A comparison calculation unit 9 is provided for judging whether the product is a good product or a defective product based on the amount and the threshold value.

【0022】本発明においては、比較演算の対象となる
特徴量には、画像データとして得られたR値、G値、B
値がそのまま用いられるのではなく、これら3成分値の
組合せによる値であって、特に良品・不良品間の差(=
分離度)が大きくなる組合せ値が用いられる。この組合
せ値として、例えば各値の差(R値とG値との差分、G
値とB値との差分、B値とR値との差分)や各値の比
(R値とG値の比(R/G値又はG/R値)、G値とB
値の比(G/B値又はB/G値)、B値とR値の比(B
/R値又はR/B値))、各値の積(R値とG値の積
(RG値)、G値とB値の積(GB値)、B値とR値の
積(BR値))などが挙げられ、検査対象品によって適
切な組合せが選択される。本発明においては、接触端子
の変色検査に用いられるため、その分離度が大きくなる
組合せとして、各値の比、より好ましくは6つの比のう
ちで、次の3つの比、すなわち、R/G値、G/B値、
R/B値が選択され、さらに望ましくはこの3つの比の
いずれか一つ以上が特徴量として選択される。この特徴
量は、経験的に良品・不良品の判別に際して良好と考え
られるものが選択され、接触端子の変色においては、上
記R/G値、G/B値、R/B値が選択されたものであ
る。また、各値の比を特徴量とすることにより、光量変
動に対しても安定した判定を行える。これら3つの特徴
値の中で任意の一つを選択して、良品、不良品の判定を
行うことも考えられるが、端子の変色判断では、判断の
確実さから少なくとも2つ以上の値が特徴量として選択
される。
In the present invention, R, G, and B values obtained as image data are used as the characteristic amounts to be compared.
The value is not used as it is, but it is a value obtained by combining these three component values, and especially the difference between the good product and the defective product (=
A combination value that increases the degree of separation is used. As this combination value, for example, the difference between the values (the difference between the R value and the G value, G
Difference between value and B value, difference between B value and R value, ratio of each value (ratio of R value and G value (R / G value or G / R value), G value and B
Value ratio (G / B value or B / G value), ratio of B value and R value (B
/ R value or R / B value)), product of each value (product of R value and G value (RG value), product of G value and B value (GB value), product of B value and R value (BR value) )), Etc., and an appropriate combination is selected depending on the inspection target product. In the present invention, since it is used for the discoloration inspection of the contact terminal, the combination of increasing the degree of separation is the ratio of each value, more preferably the following three ratios among the six ratios, namely R / G. Value, G / B value,
The R / B value is selected, and more preferably, any one or more of these three ratios is selected as the feature amount. As the characteristic amount, one which is empirically considered to be good when discriminating between a good product and a defective product is selected, and the above-mentioned R / G value, G / B value, and R / B value are selected for the discoloration of the contact terminal. It is a thing. Further, by using the ratio of each value as the feature amount, stable determination can be performed even with respect to the light amount variation. It is conceivable that any one of these three characteristic values may be selected to determine whether it is a good product or a defective product. However, in the terminal color change determination, at least two or more values are characteristic because of the certainty of the determination. Selected as quantity.

【0023】選択される分離度の判断基準にも種々の基
準が考えられ、例えば良品と不良品との差が大きいもの
や次の式1で算出される分離度が用いられる。
Various criteria can be considered as the criteria for determining the degree of separation to be selected. For example, the one having a large difference between the non-defective product and the defective product or the separation factor calculated by the following equation 1 is used.

【0024】[0024]

【式1】 [Formula 1]

【0025】特徴量算出部8は、得られた画像データか
ら検査対象品の特徴量を算出する。算出には、予め入力
手段6から設定された撮像領域の画像データが用いら
れ、当該画像データに基づき上記で選択された特徴量が
算出される。撮像領域には、経験的に変色が発生すると
認められる領域が部分的に選択される(図1では破線円
内で示される)。また、特徴量の算出に用いられるR
値、B値、G値は各画素における値の合計値あるいは各
画素の平均値が用いられる。
The characteristic amount calculating section 8 calculates the characteristic amount of the inspection object product from the obtained image data. For the calculation, the image data of the imaging region set in advance by the input means 6 is used, and the feature amount selected above is calculated based on the image data. For the imaging region, a region in which it is empirically recognized that discoloration occurs is partially selected (indicated by a dashed circle in FIG. 1). In addition, R used to calculate the feature amount
As the value, the B value, and the G value, the total value of the values in each pixel or the average value of each pixel is used.

【0026】比較演算部9は、算出された対象特徴量と
記憶部10に記憶された基準特徴量とを比較し、その差
が一定の閾値r(=分離値)内であると判断した場合に
は良品として判断し、閾値rを越えたと判断した場合に
は不良品として判断して、良否判定結果を出力部4に出
力する。基準特徴量及び閾値rには、良品であると予め
目視確認で判断されたものを用いて算出した値が用いら
れ、例えば入力手段6から入力される。図2に、2つの
特徴量を用いた場合の判定概念図を示す。図2では上記
特徴量のうち、良品と不良品とにおける分離度が大きい
2つの特徴量、G/B値及びR/G値が用いられてお
り、閾値rは良品である基準特徴量を中心とする円の半
径として描かれる。すなわち、当該方法においては、判
定に用いられる2つの特徴量を個別的に大小それぞれ判
断するのではなく、基準特徴量(座標で表わされる)と
対象特徴量(座標で表わされる)間の距離で判断するこ
とにし、当該距離が一定値(=閾値r)よりも大きいの
か小さいのかで判断する。2つの特徴量は平面座標上で
表わすことが可能であり、良品・不良品の判断は距離R
という一つの値で判断される。従って、比較演算数は個
々の値で判断する場合に比べて少なくて済む。また、図
2では、2つの特徴量を用いているため2次元で表わさ
れてはいるが、もちろん、3つの特徴量を用いても同様
に判断することもできる。この場合、閾値rは基準特徴
量を中心とする球の半径として表わされ、より確実な変
色判断を行うことができる。
When the comparison calculation unit 9 compares the calculated target feature amount with the reference feature amount stored in the storage unit 10 and determines that the difference is within a certain threshold value r (= separation value). Is judged as a non-defective product, and when it is judged that the threshold value r is exceeded, it is judged as a defective product and a non-defective judgment result is output to the output unit 4. As the reference feature amount and the threshold value r, a value calculated by using a product which is previously judged to be a non-defective product by visual confirmation is used, and is input from the input means 6, for example. FIG. 2 shows a determination conceptual diagram when two feature amounts are used. In FIG. 2, among the above feature amounts, two feature amounts having a high degree of separation between a good product and a defective product, G / B value and R / G value, are used, and the threshold value r is mainly the reference feature amount that is a good product. Is drawn as the radius of the circle. That is, in this method, the two feature amounts used for the determination are not individually judged to be large and small, but the distance between the reference feature amount (represented by coordinates) and the target feature amount (represented by coordinates) is used. The determination is made based on whether the distance is larger or smaller than a fixed value (= threshold r). The two feature quantities can be represented on a plane coordinate, and the distance R is used to judge whether the product is good or bad.
It is judged by one value. Therefore, the number of comparison operations can be smaller than that in the case of making a judgment using individual values. Further, in FIG. 2, since two feature quantities are used, they are represented two-dimensionally, but of course, the same determination can be made using three feature quantities. In this case, the threshold value r is represented as the radius of a sphere centered on the reference feature amount, and more reliable color change determination can be performed.

【0027】次に、図3に示すフロー図に基づいて当該
検査方法について説明すると、検査が開始されると、撮
像手段2によって撮像され、検査対象品たる接触端子の
一定領域が画像データとして取り込まれる(S21)。
なお、記憶部10には入力手段6から基準特徴量及び閾
値rが予め設定されているものとする。次いで特徴量算
出部8により、例えばR/G値及びG/B値の2つの値
が対象特徴量として算出される(S22)。そして、比
較演算部9において、算出された対象特徴量(座標)と
基準特徴量(座標)間の距離Rが算出され、閾値rと比
較される(S23)。その結果、両者間の距離Rが閾値
rを越えていた場合には不良品として判断され、それよ
りも小さい場合(あるいは同じ場合)には良品として判
断される。こうして、数少ないステップによって、良品
不良品の判断が確実かつ効率よく行なわれる。特に、分
離度の高い特徴量を選択していることにより、高い精度
で不良品検査が行え、しかも数少ない2つの特徴量で確
実な変色検査を行える。
Next, the inspection method will be described with reference to the flow chart shown in FIG. 3. When the inspection is started, an image is picked up by the image pickup means 2 and a certain area of the contact terminal as the inspection object is taken in as image data. (S21).
It is assumed that the reference feature amount and the threshold value r are preset in the storage unit 10 from the input unit 6. Next, the feature amount calculation unit 8 calculates two values, for example, R / G value and G / B value, as target feature amounts (S22). Then, the comparison calculation unit 9 calculates the distance R between the calculated target feature amount (coordinates) and the reference feature amount (coordinates) and compares it with the threshold value r (S23). As a result, if the distance R between the two exceeds the threshold value r, it is determined as a defective product, and if it is smaller than that (or the same), it is determined as a good product. In this way, the determination of non-defective products and defective products can be made reliably and efficiently with a few steps. In particular, by selecting a feature amount having a high degree of separation, defective product inspection can be performed with high accuracy, and reliable discoloration inspection can be performed using only a few two feature amounts.

【0028】図4は第2の実施形態である検査装置の概
略構成図である。当該検査装置は、判定処理部3に閾値
rを自動設定する閾値自動設定部11を備えている。こ
の自動設定部11は、目視検査により判定された良品と
不良品とから得られた画像データを用いて判断対象とす
る特徴量を選択抽出する特徴量抽出部12と、該特徴量
抽出部12で選択抽出された特徴量に基づいて閾値rを
算出する閾値設定部13を備える。
FIG. 4 is a schematic configuration diagram of the inspection apparatus according to the second embodiment. The inspection apparatus includes a threshold automatic setting unit 11 that automatically sets the threshold r in the determination processing unit 3. The automatic setting unit 11 includes a feature amount extraction unit 12 that selectively extracts a feature amount that is a determination target using image data obtained from a good product and a defective product that are determined by visual inspection, and the feature amount extraction unit 12 A threshold value setting unit 13 that calculates a threshold value r based on the feature amount selected and extracted in step S1 is provided.

【0029】特徴量抽出部12には、算出に用いる3成
分の組み合わせ、例えば上記例では、R、G、B各値の
比(R値/G値、G値/B値、R値/B値)を特徴量と
して用いることが予め入力手段6から設定される。特徴
量抽出部12は、この3つの特徴量から良品・不良品の
判断を確実に行える2つの特徴量を選択抽出する。この
判断基準には、例えば上記式1によって求められる分離
度が用いられる。この選択抽出は、目視確認にて予め良
品及び不良品として判断された検査対象品を撮像、画像
処理することにより行われる。
A combination of three components used for calculation, for example, in the above example, a ratio of R, G and B values (R value / G value, G value / B value, R value / B) is applied to the feature amount extraction unit 12. It is preset from the input means 6 to use (value) as a feature amount. The feature amount extraction unit 12 selectively extracts two feature amounts from which the non-defective product / defective product can be reliably determined. For this criterion, for example, the degree of separation obtained by the above equation 1 is used. This selective extraction is performed by imaging and image-processing an inspection target product that has been previously determined as a non-defective product and a defective product by visual confirmation.

【0030】閾値設定部13は、特徴量抽出部12で選
ばれた2つの特徴量を用いて、判定基準に用いる閾値r
を求め、記憶部10に記憶する。閾値rの設定方法とし
ても種々の方法が考えられる。例えば、良品の平均値と
その分散から閾値rを設定する方法、良品の平均値(座
標)と不良品の平均値(座標)間の距離から任意に閾値
rを設定する方法、あるいは図5に示したように良品の
平均値(良品平均座標)と当該平均値に最近傍にある不
良品の値(最近傍不良品座標)との距離Rから閾値rを
設定する方法などが考えられる。図5の例によれば、良
品の平均値と前記最近傍値間の距離(2r)の半分が閾
値rとして設定される。
The threshold value setting unit 13 uses the two feature quantities selected by the feature quantity extraction unit 12 to determine a threshold value r used as a criterion.
Is stored in the storage unit 10. Various methods can be considered as a method of setting the threshold value r. For example, a method of setting a threshold value r from the average value of good products and its variance, a method of arbitrarily setting the threshold value r from the distance between the average value (coordinates) of good products and the average value (coordinates) of defective products, or FIG. As shown, there may be a method of setting the threshold value r from the distance R between the average value of non-defective products (non-defective product average coordinates) and the value of the defective product closest to the average value (nearest neighbor defective product coordinates). According to the example of FIG. 5, half of the distance (2r) between the average value of non-defective products and the nearest neighbor value is set as the threshold r.

【0031】この検査装置における検査方法を図6に示
すフロー図に基づいて説明すると、まず、幾つかの良品
及び不良品(好ましくはN=10以上)を用いて、撮像
手段2から画像データを取り込む(S31)。次に選定
されたR/G値、G/B値、R/B値3つの特徴量が算
出される(S32)。この3つの特徴量のうち、分離度
の高い2つの特徴量、例えばR/G値とG/B値が、特
徴量抽出部12によって選択抽出される(S33)。こ
の2つの特徴量に基づいて、良品の平均座標が求められ
る(S34)。次いで、座標上において不良品の中で最
も良品の平均値に近い最近傍点が求められ(S35)、
閾値rが閾値設定部13によって設定される(S3
6)。そして、閾値設定部13は全体の座標系を良品の
平均座標が原点となるように移動する(S37)。この
結果、図7に示す如く、良品と判断される領域は原点を
中心とする半径rの円内とされ、原点から円外の距離R
の位置にある検査対象品は不良品として判断されること
になる。
The inspection method in this inspection apparatus will be described with reference to the flow chart shown in FIG. 6. First, image data is obtained from the image pickup means 2 by using some non-defective products and defective products (preferably N = 10 or more). Capture (S31). Next, three feature amounts of the selected R / G value, G / B value, and R / B value are calculated (S32). Of the three feature quantities, two feature quantities having a high degree of separation, for example, R / G value and G / B value, are selectively extracted by the feature quantity extracting unit 12 (S33). The average coordinates of non-defective products are obtained based on these two feature quantities (S34). Next, on the coordinates, the nearest point closest to the average value of the good products among the defective products is obtained (S35),
The threshold r is set by the threshold setting unit 13 (S3
6). Then, the threshold value setting unit 13 moves the entire coordinate system so that the average coordinates of non-defective products are the origin (S37). As a result, as shown in FIG. 7, the area judged to be non-defective is within the circle of radius r centering on the origin, and the distance R outside the origin is R.
The inspection target product at the position of is judged to be a defective product.

【0032】こうして、閾値rが記憶部10に記憶され
ると、検査対象品のカラー画像が順次取り込まれ(S3
8)、算出された特徴量(座標位置)と当該閾値rとの
比較により良品・不良品の判定がなされる(S39、S
40)。なお、図6のフロー図では、1つの検査対象品
についてのみ示してある。
In this way, when the threshold value r is stored in the storage unit 10, the color images of the inspection object are sequentially captured (S3).
8) The non-defective product / defective product is determined by comparing the calculated feature amount (coordinate position) with the threshold value r (S39, S).
40). In the flow chart of FIG. 6, only one inspection target product is shown.

【0033】この検査装置においては、良品・不良品判
断に用いる特徴量の選択抽出及び閾値rの設定を自動的
に行えるので、パラメータ設定を簡単に行える。また、
良品の平均座標を座標上の原点へ移動するようにしてい
るので、検査対象品の良否判定に必要な演算量が少なく
なり、高速なデータ処理が行え、検査速度が向上する。
In this inspection apparatus, the selection and extraction of the characteristic amount used for the determination of non-defective product / defective product and the setting of the threshold value r can be automatically performed, so that the parameter setting can be easily performed. Also,
Since the average coordinates of non-defective products are moved to the origin on the coordinates, the amount of calculation required for determining the quality of the product to be inspected is reduced, high-speed data processing can be performed, and the inspection speed is improved.

【0034】このように良品不良品の判断を1又は2以
上の色成分の組み合わせによる特徴量を用いて行ってい
るので、効果的なパラメータの設定が容易になる。ま
た、分離度が大きな特徴量を2つにすることにより、検
査対象値を2次元の座標上に表わすことができるので、
判定パラメータが一つになり判定プロセスが簡単にな
る。また、良品不良品間の分離度が大きい特徴量を用い
ることにより、精度の高い検査が実現され、検査の高速
化も図ることができる。
As described above, since the non-defective product is determined to be a defective product by using the characteristic amount obtained by combining one or two or more color components, effective parameter setting becomes easy. In addition, since the inspection target value can be represented on a two-dimensional coordinate by using two feature quantities having a large degree of separation,
The single judgment parameter simplifies the judgment process. Further, by using a feature amount having a high degree of separation between non-defective products and defective products, highly accurate inspection can be realized and the inspection speed can be increased.

【0035】また、上記実施の形態においては、リレー
の接触端子の変色検査について説明したが、リレーの接
触端子のみならずその他の電子部品など、変色検査が必
要なあらゆる製品に適用することができるのは言うまで
もない。この場合、検査対象に合わせて特徴量を選択
し、閾値rを設定すればよく、また、閾値自動設定部1
1の利用により、良品不良品が判断された数少ないサン
プルを用いて簡単に特徴量を選択し、閾値rを設定でき
る。
Further, in the above embodiment, the color change inspection of the contact terminals of the relay has been described, but the present invention can be applied to all products requiring the color change inspection such as not only the contact terminals of the relay but also other electronic parts. Needless to say. In this case, the feature amount may be selected according to the inspection target and the threshold value r may be set.
By using 1, the feature amount can be easily selected and the threshold value r can be set by using the few samples that have been determined to be non-defective and defective.

【0036】[0036]

【発明の効果】本発明の変色検査方法は、得られた画像
の赤・緑・青成分の組合せによる複数の特徴量のうち、
良品・不良品間の分離値が一定値以上である1又は2以
上の特徴量を用いて色の相違を判定することとしてい
る。このため、判定パラメータとして分離値一つで判断
を行うことができ、効果的なパラメータの設定が容易に
なる。また、判定プロセスも簡単になる。
According to the discoloration inspection method of the present invention, among a plurality of feature quantities of combinations of red, green and blue components of the obtained image,
The color difference is determined by using one or two or more feature amounts in which the separation value between the good product and the defective product is a certain value or more. For this reason, it is possible to make a judgment with one separation value as a judgment parameter, and it becomes easy to set effective parameters. Also, the determination process is simplified.

【0037】このとき、請求項2に記載の方法によれ
ば、前記特徴量として、赤・緑・青成分の比率である赤
/緑値、緑/青値、赤/青値を用いることとしているの
で、光量変動による影響が少なく、安定した判断を行え
る。
At this time, according to the method of claim 2, as the feature amount, red / green values, green / blue values, and red / blue values, which are ratios of red, green, and blue components, are used. Therefore, there is little influence of fluctuations in light quantity, and stable judgment can be performed.

【0038】また、請求項3に記載の方法では、式1に
示すように良品内の分散及び不良品内の分散並びに良品
・不良品間分散を用いて得られた分離度の大きな特徴量
を用いることとしているので、より精度の高い検査を行
える。
Further, in the method according to claim 3, as shown in the equation 1, the characteristic amount having a large degree of separation obtained by using the dispersion in the good product and the dispersion in the defective product and the dispersion between the good product and the defective product is obtained. Since it is intended to be used, more accurate inspection can be performed.

【0039】さらに請求項4に記載の方法では、前記特
徴量から選択される2つの特徴量を用いて良品・不良品
間の分離値を設定することとしているので、分離値設定
用のパラメータが2つで済み、パラメータ算出のための
演算数が少なくなり処理時間が少なくて済む。例えば、
当該分離値として、請求項5に記載の如く、良品平均座
標と前記良品平均座標に最も近接する不良品座標間の距
離の半分とすることができる。
Further, in the method according to the fourth aspect, since the separation value between the good product and the defective product is set by using the two feature values selected from the feature values, the parameter for setting the separation value is set. Only two are required, and the number of calculations for parameter calculation is reduced, and the processing time is reduced. For example,
As the separation value, as described in claim 5, it can be set to half the distance between the good product average coordinate and the defective product coordinate closest to the good product average coordinate.

【0040】また、請求項6に記載の方法では、良品平
均座標を原点にした座標上に、検査対象である特徴量を
配置することとしているので、検査対象品の座標位置に
より原点からの分離値が直ちに算出され、演算数をより
少なくできる。
Further, in the method according to the sixth aspect, since the feature quantity to be inspected is arranged on the coordinates having the good product average coordinates as the origin, the feature quantity to be inspected is separated from the origin by the coordinate position. The value is calculated immediately and the number of operations can be reduced.

【0041】本発明の変色検査装置は、ワークを照明す
る白色光照明手段と、ワークのほぼ真上に配置されたカ
ラー画像撮像手段と、得られた画像の赤・緑・青成分の
組合せによる複数の特徴量のうち、良品・不良品間の分
離値が一定値以上である1又は2以上の特徴量を用いて
色の相違を判定する判定処理部を備えたことを特徴とし
ている。当該検査装置においては、得られた画像の赤・
緑・青成分の組合せによる複数の特徴量のうち、良品・
不良品間の分離値が一定値以上である1又は2以上の特
徴量を用いて色の相違が判定されるので、効果的な判定
パラメータの設定が容易になる。また、判定プロセスが
簡単になるため、検査スピードが向上される。
The discoloration inspection apparatus of the present invention uses a combination of white light illuminating means for illuminating the work, color image pickup means arranged almost directly above the work, and red, green and blue components of the obtained image. A feature is that a determination processing unit for determining a color difference is provided by using one or two or more feature amounts in which the separation value between the non-defective item and the defective item is a certain value or more among the plurality of feature amounts. In the inspection device,
Of the multiple feature quantities based on the combination of green and blue components,
Since the color difference is determined by using one or two or more feature amounts in which the separation value between defective products is a certain value or more, it is easy to set an effective determination parameter. Also, the inspection process is improved because the determination process is simplified.

【0042】このとき、請求項8に記載の変色検査装置
では、前記特徴量として、赤・緑・青成分の比率である
赤/緑値、緑/青値、赤/青値が用いられているので、
光量変動による影響が少ない判断が行える。
At this time, in the discoloration inspection apparatus according to the eighth aspect, the red / green value, the green / blue value, and the red / blue value, which are the ratios of the red, green, and blue components, are used as the characteristic quantities. Because
Judgments can be made that are less affected by fluctuations in light intensity.

【0043】また、請求項9記載の変色検査装置では、
式1に示すように良品内の分散及び不良品内の分散並び
に良品・不良品間分散を用いて得られた分離度の大きい
1又は2以上の特徴量を選択抽出する特徴量抽出手段を
備えているので、予めパラメータの設定入力が不要とな
り、前持って目視判定された良品及び不良品を検査装置
にかけることで自動設定が行える。
Further, in the discoloration inspection apparatus according to claim 9,
As shown in Expression 1, a feature quantity extraction means is provided for selectively extracting one or more feature quantities having a high degree of separation obtained by using the variance in the good product, the variance in the defective product, and the variance between the good product and the defective product. Therefore, it is not necessary to input the parameter setting in advance, and the automatic setting can be performed by applying the good product and the defective product which are visually judged by holding them to the inspection device.

【0044】さらに、請求項10記載の変色検査装置の
ように、前記特徴量抽出手段により選択抽出された特徴
量を用いて、良品平均座標と前記良品平均座標に最も近
接する不良品座標間距離を算出し、当該2つの座標間距
離の半分を分離値として設定する閾値設定部を備えるこ
とにより、分離値(閾値)も自動で設定され、変色検査
作業をほぼ自動化できる。
Further, as in the discoloration inspection apparatus according to the tenth aspect, by using the feature amount selected and extracted by the feature amount extracting means, the good product average coordinate and the defective product coordinate distance closest to the good product average coordinate. By including a threshold value setting unit that calculates the distance and sets half of the distance between the two coordinates as a separation value, the separation value (threshold value) is also automatically set, and the discoloration inspection work can be almost automated.

【0045】また、請求項11に記載の変色検査装置で
は、前記判定処理部は、前記良品平均座標を原点にした
座標上に、検査対象である特徴量を配置して判定するこ
とにしているので判定に要する演算数がより少なくな
り、検査の迅速化がより一層図られる。
Further, in the discoloration inspection apparatus according to the eleventh aspect, the determination processing section determines by arranging the feature amount to be inspected on the coordinates having the good product average coordinates as the origin. Therefore, the number of calculations required for the determination is further reduced, and the inspection can be further speeded up.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明の一実施形態に係る変色検査装置の概略
構成図である。
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a color change inspection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】図1の変色検査装置における良品・不良品の判
定概念図を示す。
FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram of determination of non-defective / defective products in the color change inspection device of FIG.

【図3】図1の変色検査装置における検査方法を示すフ
ロー図である。
3 is a flow chart showing an inspection method in the discoloration inspection apparatus of FIG.

【図4】本発明の別な実施形態に係る変色検査装置の構
成図である。
FIG. 4 is a configuration diagram of a color change inspection device according to another embodiment of the present invention.

【図5】図4の変色検査装置における閾値設定方法を示
す説明図である。
5 is an explanatory diagram showing a threshold value setting method in the color change inspection apparatus of FIG.

【図6】図4の変色検査装置における検査方法を示すフ
ロー図である。
6 is a flow chart showing an inspection method in the discoloration inspection device of FIG.

【図7】図4の変色検査装置における良品・不良品の判
定概念図である。
7 is a conceptual diagram of determination of non-defective products / defective products in the color change inspection device of FIG.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

2 撮像装置 3 判定処理部 7 ワーク 8 特徴量算出部 9 比較演算部 11 閾値自動設定部 12 特徴量抽出部 13 閾値設定部 2 Imaging device 3 Judgment processing unit 7 work 8 Feature quantity calculator 9 Comparison operation part 11 Automatic threshold setting unit 12 Feature Extraction Unit 13 Threshold setting section

フロントページの続き Fターム(参考) 2G020 AA08 DA05 DA22 DA31 DA34 DA35 DA66 2G051 AA90 AB20 CA04 EA17 EB01 EC02 ED21 5B057 AA01 BA02 CA01 CA12 CA16 CE16 DA03 DB02 DB06 DC25 DC36 5L096 AA02 BA03 CA02 FA15 FA33 GA40 JA11 Continued front page    F-term (reference) 2G020 AA08 DA05 DA22 DA31 DA34                       DA35 DA66                 2G051 AA90 AB20 CA04 EA17 EB01                       EC02 ED21                 5B057 AA01 BA02 CA01 CA12 CA16                       CE16 DA03 DB02 DB06 DC25                       DC36                 5L096 AA02 BA03 CA02 FA15 FA33                       GA40 JA11

Claims (11)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 白色光を発する照明手段を点灯し、ワー
クのほぼ真上に配置したカラー画像撮像手段で撮像して
得られた画像の赤・緑・青成分の組合せによる複数の特
徴量のうち、良品・不良品間の分離値が一定値以上であ
る1又は2以上の特徴量を用いて色の相違を判定するこ
とを特徴とする変色検査方法。
1. A plurality of characteristic amounts of a combination of red, green, and blue components of an image obtained by turning on an illuminating unit that emits white light and picking up an image by a color image pick-up unit arranged almost directly above a work. Among them, a discoloration inspection method characterized by determining a color difference by using one or two or more feature amounts in which a separation value between a good product and a defective product is a certain value or more.
【請求項2】 前記特徴量として、赤・緑・青成分の比
率である赤/緑値、緑/青値、赤/青値を用いることを
特徴とする請求項1記載の変色検査方法。
2. The discoloration inspection method according to claim 1, wherein red / green values, green / blue values, and red / blue values, which are ratios of red, green, and blue components, are used as the characteristic amounts.
【請求項3】 次の式1を用いて得られた分離度の大き
な特徴量を用いることを特徴とする請求項2に記載の変
色検査方法。 【式1】
3. The color change inspection method according to claim 2, wherein a feature amount having a large degree of separation obtained by using the following expression 1 is used. [Formula 1]
【請求項4】 前記特徴量から選択される2つの特徴量
を用いて良品・不良品間の分離値を設定することを特徴
とする請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の変色検査方法。
4. The discoloration inspection method according to claim 1, wherein a separation value between non-defective products and defective products is set by using two feature quantities selected from the feature quantities.
【請求項5】 前記分離値を、良品平均座標と前記良品
平均座標に最も近接する不良品座標間の距離の半分とす
ることを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれかに記載の変
色検査方法。
5. The discoloration inspection according to claim 1, wherein the separation value is half the distance between the good product average coordinate and the defective product coordinate closest to the good product average coordinate. Method.
【請求項6】 良品平均座標を原点にした座標上に、検
査対象品の画像から得られた特徴量を配置することを特
徴とする請求項5に記載の変色検査方法。
6. The discoloration inspection method according to claim 5, wherein the feature amount obtained from the image of the inspection object product is arranged on the coordinates having the good product average coordinates as the origin.
【請求項7】 ワークを照明する白色光照明手段と、ワ
ークのほぼ真上に配置されたカラー画像撮像手段と、得
られた画像の赤・緑・青成分の組合せによる複数の特徴
量のうち、良品・不良品間の分離値が一定値以上である
1又は2以上の特徴量を用いて色の相違を判定する判定
処理部を備えたことを特徴とする変色検査装置。
7. A white light illuminating means for illuminating a work, a color image pick-up means arranged almost directly above the work, and a plurality of feature amounts of a combination of red, green and blue components of the obtained image. A discoloration inspection apparatus comprising a determination processing unit that determines a color difference using one or two or more feature amounts in which a separation value between a good product and a defective product is a certain value or more.
【請求項8】 前記特徴量として、赤・緑・青成分の比
率である赤/緑値、緑/青値、赤/青値を用いることを
特徴とする請求項7記載の変色検査装置。
8. The discoloration inspection apparatus according to claim 7, wherein red / green values, green / blue values, and red / blue values, which are ratios of red, green, and blue components, are used as the feature quantities.
【請求項9】 次の式1を用いて得られた分離度の大き
な1又は2以上の特徴量を選択抽出する特徴量抽出手段
を備えたことを特徴とする請求項7又は8のいずれかに
記載の変色検査装置。
9. The feature quantity extraction means for selectively extracting one or more feature quantities having a large degree of separation obtained by using the following expression (1) is provided. Discoloration inspection device described in.
【請求項10】 前記特徴量抽出手段により選択抽出さ
れた特徴量を用いて、良品平均座標と前記良品平均座標
に最も近接する不良品座標間距離を算出し、当該2つの
座標間距離の半分を分離値として設定する閾値設定部を
備えたことを特徴とする請求項9に記載の変色検査装
置。
10. The non-defective item coordinate distance closest to the non-defective item average coordinate and the non-defective item average coordinate is calculated using the feature amount selected and extracted by the feature amount extracting means, and half of the inter-coordinate distance is calculated. The discoloration inspection apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising a threshold value setting unit that sets the color separation value as a separation value.
【請求項11】 前記判定処理部は、前記良品平均座標
を原点にした座標上に、検査対象品の画像から得られた
特徴量を配置して判定することを特徴とする請求項10
記載の変色検査装置。
11. The determination processing unit arranges and determines the feature amount obtained from the image of the inspection target product on the coordinates having the good product average coordinates as the origin.
Discoloration inspection device described.
JP2002011883A 2002-01-21 2002-01-21 Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration Pending JP2003216930A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002011883A JP2003216930A (en) 2002-01-21 2002-01-21 Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002011883A JP2003216930A (en) 2002-01-21 2002-01-21 Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003216930A true JP2003216930A (en) 2003-07-31

Family

ID=27649256

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002011883A Pending JP2003216930A (en) 2002-01-21 2002-01-21 Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2003216930A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006155595A (en) * 2004-11-05 2006-06-15 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd System and device for image processing
JP2007327848A (en) * 2006-06-07 2007-12-20 Omron Corp Inspection control device, inspection control method, inspection system, control program and recording medium
JP2011059059A (en) * 2009-09-14 2011-03-24 Seiren Co Ltd Computer color matching method, and computer readable recording medium recording computer color matching program
JP2015198890A (en) * 2014-03-31 2015-11-12 富士フイルム株式会社 Medical image processing apparatus, operation method therefor, and endoscope system
JP2017203674A (en) * 2016-05-11 2017-11-16 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Change degree derivation device, change degree derivation method, and program
JP2019109834A (en) * 2017-12-20 2019-07-04 株式会社日立製作所 Manufactured product nondefectiveness/defectiveness determination system and manufactured product nondefectiveness/defectiveness determination method

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006155595A (en) * 2004-11-05 2006-06-15 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd System and device for image processing
JP2007327848A (en) * 2006-06-07 2007-12-20 Omron Corp Inspection control device, inspection control method, inspection system, control program and recording medium
JP2011059059A (en) * 2009-09-14 2011-03-24 Seiren Co Ltd Computer color matching method, and computer readable recording medium recording computer color matching program
JP2015198890A (en) * 2014-03-31 2015-11-12 富士フイルム株式会社 Medical image processing apparatus, operation method therefor, and endoscope system
JP2017203674A (en) * 2016-05-11 2017-11-16 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Change degree derivation device, change degree derivation method, and program
JP2019109834A (en) * 2017-12-20 2019-07-04 株式会社日立製作所 Manufactured product nondefectiveness/defectiveness determination system and manufactured product nondefectiveness/defectiveness determination method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107305190B (en) Defect inspection method and defect inspection system
US11680909B2 (en) Automated inspection of foreign materials, cracks and other surface anomalies
CN111261079B (en) Method for detecting abnormal phenomena of bright and dark spots
JP4492356B2 (en) Substrate inspection device, parameter setting method and parameter setting device
JP4539355B2 (en) Substrate inspection device, parameter setting method and parameter setting device
CN112819844B (en) Image edge detection method and device
JP2005265661A (en) Image processing method and image processing device
JP2003216930A (en) Method and apparatus for inspecting discoloration
JP2015004641A (en) Wafer appearance inspection device
JP4506395B2 (en) Substrate inspection device, parameter setting method and parameter setting device
JP4453503B2 (en) Substrate inspection device, substrate inspection method, inspection logic generation device and inspection logic generation method for substrate inspection device
KR101993654B1 (en) Inspecting apparatus mura of display panel and method thereof
JPH09264856A (en) Article appearance inspection device
TWI655412B (en) Light source detection system and method
JP3584507B2 (en) Pattern unevenness inspection equipment
JP4507785B2 (en) Substrate inspection device, parameter setting method and parameter setting device
JP2004286708A (en) Defect detection apparatus, method, and program
KR20000050719A (en) Automatic inspection system for quality of connection cable
US12025564B2 (en) Automated inspection of foreign materials, cracks and other surface anomalies
CN111757002B (en) Image processing method, output control method, image acquisition device and display device
JP4419778B2 (en) Substrate inspection device, parameter setting method and parameter setting device
JP2013108879A (en) Defect inspection method for periodic pattern and defect inspection device for periodic pattern
JP4858227B2 (en) Inspection parameter setting support device, control program and control method thereof
KR102028196B1 (en) LED module examine apparatus for using image processing
JP5402182B2 (en) Appearance inspection method and appearance inspection apparatus