JP2003216805A - Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method - Google Patents

Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method

Info

Publication number
JP2003216805A
JP2003216805A JP2002047155A JP2002047155A JP2003216805A JP 2003216805 A JP2003216805 A JP 2003216805A JP 2002047155 A JP2002047155 A JP 2002047155A JP 2002047155 A JP2002047155 A JP 2002047155A JP 2003216805 A JP2003216805 A JP 2003216805A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
boundary
boundary area
value
worlds
attribute
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2002047155A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Shigeto Yoshikawa
成人 吉川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2002047155A priority Critical patent/JP2003216805A/en
Publication of JP2003216805A publication Critical patent/JP2003216805A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a technique which is usable for a search for a solution, great inspiration to a solvent, creation, and further relative problem arrangement, prediction, evaluation, learning, etc., as to problem finding and problem solution by description and analysis of an object problem. <P>SOLUTION: The object problem is qualitatively and definitively described and rearranged as a border area. Analysis of the problem is made minute and a problem point is found as its process or result to find a solution plan. When a new idea is needed, hints are obtained from personal or other wide worlds and fields and analyzed for inspiration. Consequently, closer analysis and examination are enabled to make the technique high in level, minute, and substantial into numerical examination, examination for optimization, combination with an evaluation method as other methods, and solution by macroviewing, thereby developing the application of the method. A model for analysis of the problem can be developed into a model for calculation of a solution as it is. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2003,JPO

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】この発明は、対象問題の記述
と分析による、問題発見や問題解決に関わるものであ
り、対象問題の解の探索から、飛躍的な解決策への発
想、創造、さらに、関連した問題整理、予測、評価、学
習等などに使える技術に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to problem finding and problem solving by describing and analyzing a target problem. From the search for a solution of the target problem to the idea, creation, and further development of a dramatic solution. , Related to related problems, prediction, evaluation, learning, etc.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】問題解決技法や創造力開発技法として膨
大な数の技法が開発されている。代表的なものとして、
ブレーンストーミング法、NM法、KJ法、クラスター
分析、ワークデザイン法、シナリオライティング法、デ
ルファイ法、ISM分析、AHP法、超整理法などがあ
る。これらの内、発想法や創造力開発技法については発
散的か収束的かで分類できる。問題解決技法もその3段
階、問題発見、構造分析、問題解決の内、前2段階は創
造力開発技法と共通と見なせる。
2. Description of the Related Art A huge number of techniques have been developed as problem solving techniques and creativity development techniques. As a typical one,
Brainstorming method, NM method, KJ method, cluster analysis, work design method, scenario writing method, Delphi method, ISM analysis, AHP method, super-arrangement method and the like. Among these, ideas and creativity development techniques can be classified as divergent or convergent. The problem solving technique can be regarded as common with the creativity development technique among the three stages, problem finding, structure analysis, and problem solving.

【0003】既存の手法はそれぞれ優れたものであり、
コンピュータソフトの形でシステムが実現される例も多
い。ただ一般的傾向として、対象問題が単純な構造で単
純な変化、単純な観点のもの場合は有効に分析できて
も、対象問題が複雑な構造を持ったり、複雑な変化をし
たり、幾つかの観点での評価が必要な時などには、十分
に対処出来ない場合が多い。あるいは適用困難なり不可
能と言える事もある。こういう複雑な問題の場合、時間
をかけたり、戦略的に対処するとか、目標を定めて効
率、達成度を評価しながらの問題解決を図る事などが現
実的、有効であろう。上述の多くの技法が単体で、その
まま解決まで役立つ事はよほどの幸運な事例以外はあり
得ない。上述の技法から最適な技法を選び連続的に、組
み合わせ的に適用する事での対処に期待が持たれる。
Each of the existing methods is excellent,
In many cases, the system is realized in the form of computer software. However, as a general tendency, even if the target problem has a simple structure and a simple change, and if it can be effectively analyzed if it has a simple viewpoint, the target problem has a complicated structure, a complicated change, or some In many cases, it is not possible to deal with it sufficiently when evaluation from the perspective of is necessary. Or it can be said that it is difficult to apply and impossible. In the case of such a complicated problem, it may be realistic and effective to take time, deal with it strategically, or set a goal to solve the problem while evaluating efficiency and achievement. Many of the techniques mentioned above can be useful as a solution without any exception. It is hoped that the optimum technique will be selected from the above techniques and applied continuously and in combination.

【0004】複雑な問題の例として、対象が組織や構造
に関する場合に頻繁に見うけられるが、特に構造や定義
に関する混乱や誤解が問題を起こす真の原因である事が
ある。経営や管理に属する問題であるが、企業の組織、
体制の最適化の問題だけでなく、国や地方公共団体の行
政組織の縦割り弊害に見られるような効率化や行政の需
要に対する最適化の問題など、組織が存在するところに
は必ずこのような課題が存在する。
An example of a complex problem is often found when an object is related to an organization or structure, but confusion or misunderstanding regarding the structure or definition is the true cause of the problem. Although it is a problem related to management and management,
Not only the problem of system optimization, but also the problem of optimization such as efficiency and optimization to the demand of government, which is seen in the vertical division of administrative organizations of national and local governments. There are various challenges.

【0005】このような問題では対象をトップダウンに
把握できる事と同時にボトムアップ的な分析も可能な事
が必須である。又、収束的な分析だけでなく、発散的な
アイデア生成も必要である。また質的、定性的な分析に
定量的な検討がある程度柔軟に扱える事が有効である。
最適化の観点や逆問題を解く形での求解の発想も場合に
よれば必要である。他の事例での解や幾分単純な問題で
の解を参考にしての比較や検討も有効である。従来の技
術の中で、そのままで以上の要求を満たせるものは無い
と思われる。
In such a problem, it is essential that the object can be grasped from the top down and at the same time, the bottom up analysis can be performed. In addition to convergent analysis, divergent idea generation is also necessary. In addition, it is effective to be able to handle quantitative examination to some extent in qualitative and qualitative analysis.
In some cases, it is necessary to have an idea of optimization and a solution to solve an inverse problem. Comparisons and examinations with reference to solutions in other cases and solutions for somewhat simple problems are also effective. It seems that there is no conventional technology that can meet the above requirements.

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】複雑な問題に対する分
析や問題解決では対象をトップダウンに把握できる事と
同時にボトムアップ的な分析も可能な事が必須である。
又、収束的な分析だけでなく、発散的なアイデア生成も
必要である。また質的、定性的な分析に定量的な検討が
ある程度柔軟に扱える事が有効である。最適化の観点や
逆問題を解く形での求解の発想も場合によれば必要であ
る。他の事例での解や幾分単純な問題での解を参考にし
ての比較や検討も有効である。こういう要求を満たす事
を考える。
In analysis of complex problems and problem solving, it is essential to be able to grasp the target from the top down as well as the bottom up.
In addition to convergent analysis, divergent idea generation is also necessary. In addition, it is effective to be able to handle quantitative examination to some extent in qualitative and qualitative analysis. In some cases, it is necessary to have an idea of the solution in the form of solving the inverse problem and the viewpoint of optimization. Comparisons and examinations with reference to solutions in other cases and solutions for somewhat simple problems are also effective. Consider meeting these requirements.

【0007】[0007]

【課題を解決するための手段】境界域法の全体のアウト
ラインをまず説明する。境界域法は、対象問題を質的及
び定義的に記述する事により、境界域として整理し、問
題の分析を精緻化する。その過程又は結果として、問題
点を発見する。解決案を見出す。あるいは新規のアイデ
アが必要な時、自己の分析なり、他の幅広い参考になる
世界や分野からのヒントを得る、それを分析して発想に
役立てる。さらにより深い分析や検討として数値的な検
討、最適化の検討などを行うものである。又、分析をさ
らに進めて、他の手法なり評価法との組み合わせや、大
きく眺めた時の境界域法のコンセプトを活かした問題の
分析へと、高度化、精細化、本質化へと手法の適用をよ
り発展させる事が可能である。問題の分析のモデルが、
そのまま解決の計算のモデルに発展できる機能を持つ。
以降に境界域法の各論を記述する。
First, an outline of the entire boundary area method will be described. The boundary area method categorizes the target problem qualitatively and definitively to organize it as a boundary area and refine the analysis of the problem. As a result of that process or result, a problem is discovered. Find a solution. Or, when a new idea is needed, it is self-analyzed, and it gets hints from a wide range of other useful worlds and fields, and it is analyzed and used for ideas. As a deeper analysis and examination, numerical examination and optimization examination will be conducted. In addition, by further advancing the analysis, it is possible to combine it with other methods or evaluation methods, and to analyze problems that take advantage of the concept of the boundary area method when viewed from a large scale, It is possible to further develop the application. The model of problem analysis is
It has a function that can be directly developed into a solution calculation model.
The following describes each theory of the boundary area law.

【0008】(イ)境界域法の基本的な概念について説
明する。既存又は未知の対象を記述するのに単数又は複
数の属性や部分世界を連続して指定して用いる。属性は
対象を修飾なり定義するが、傾向としては質的な記述に
向く。部分世界は世界に関連する用語として用いる。世
界は一般的な範囲や定義の指定に用語として用いるが、
この世界を全体と部分の構造化をして見た場合、部分世
界は全体から見たら、その構造の下位の構造であるが、
部分は他の部分を下位に持つ事もできるし、全体の全て
にも成り得る概念である。ここでは部分世界は部分であ
れ全体であれ、ある決める事のできる範囲であるとす
る。そしてこの部分世界は定義的な記述に向く。この連
続した指定の列に対して、AND処理とOR処理を中心
とした論理処理を施して、対象範囲を特定する。通常は
連続した記述はANDを意味する。ORの場合はそれと
判る明示的な記述を行う。但し補属性とN分割属性は連
続した記述の内、対応する属性か補属性かあるいはN分
割属性の、2個め以降はOR処理となる。ここでの連続
とは、間を置かずに連続して記述と言う意味ではなく、
間に他の記述が入ってもよい。属性と補属性の連続記述
はOR処理となり、1、即ち全体となるが、1個めの記
述の前までの指定の全体となり、属性の記述は消える。
ここで補属性とは、集合に対する補集合が両方の和で全
体となり、しかも両方には共通部分が無いのと似た概念
である。属性と補属性の和が全体であり、共通部分は無
い。属性も補属性も指定される前の状態を全体とした
時、その全体の中での属性の否定が補属性である。次
に、N分割属性が全て連続記述されると、これもOR処
理となるが、同様に1、即ち全体となるが、これはN分
割前の統合した属性となり、属性の記述はこの統合した
属性1個に置き換わる。例えば全ての男性について成り
立ち、続けて全ての女性についても成り立つならば、全
ての人間について成り立つ。N分割属性とはここでは男
性と女性の2個であり、2分割と言う事であり、統合し
た属性は人間である。この属性や部分世界は境界域の境
界を特定する境界線でもある。この境界線で囲んで境界
域を作る。前もって何の定義も拘束もない白紙の上から
始めるか、既に何らかの定義などがある上から始めるの
か、のいずれに対しても、属性や部分世界による連続し
た指定が成され、対象がより思い通りに正しく表現され
て行くが、その過程でより端的、確からしい記述に進
む。場合によれば最小の手間による表現にも進む。その
過程で新しい発想、より正しい対象の把握、認識がで
き、問題の発見、問題の構造の記述ができ、問題解決に
繋がり、新しい見方ができる事もある。異なる境界域の
比較、同じ境界域の異時点間の比較、同じ境界域の別の
主体による表現の比較なども可能である。これにより根
本的な解決が図られ、真の問題が理解できる事もある。
新たに記述する属性や部分世界は対象そのもの、又は他
の世界や分野、又はひらめきから持って来る。そして創
造的な概念や手段などが考案され作られる。
(A) The basic concept of the boundary area method will be described. To describe an existing or unknown object, one or more attributes or partial worlds are consecutively specified and used. Attribute defines the object as a modifier, but tends to be qualitative. The subworld is used as a term related to the world. The world uses it as a term to specify general scope and definitions,
When this world is structured by looking at the whole and the parts, the subworld is a subordinate structure to the whole structure,
A part can have other parts in the lower level, and it is a concept that can be all of the whole. Here, the partial world is a range that can be decided, whether it is a part or the whole. And this partial world is suitable for definitive description. A logical process centered on the AND process and the OR process is applied to the continuous designated column to specify the target range. Usually, the continuous description means AND. In the case of OR, an explicit description is used to identify it. However, the complementary attribute and the N-divided attribute are ORed after the second attribute of the corresponding attribute, the complementary attribute, or the N-divided attribute in the continuous description. Continuity here does not mean continuous description without a gap,
Other descriptions may be inserted in between. The continuous description of the attribute and the complementary attribute becomes an OR process, which is 1, that is, the entire description, but the entire description up to the description before the first description is made and the attribute description disappears.
Here, the complementary attribute is a concept similar to that the complementary set for a set is the sum of both and has no common part. The sum of attributes and complementary attributes is the whole, and there is no common part. When the state before both the attribute and the complementary attribute are specified is the whole, the negation of the attribute in the whole is the complementary attribute. Next, when all N division attributes are continuously described, this is also an OR process, but similarly it is 1, that is, the whole, but this is an integrated attribute before N division, and the description of the attribute is this integrated. Replaced by one attribute. For example, if it holds for all men and then all women, then it holds for all humans. Here, the N-divided attribute is two, male and female, and is divided into two, and the integrated attribute is human. This attribute and the partial world are also the boundary lines that specify the boundaries of the boundary area. A boundary area is created by enclosing this boundary line. Whether you start with a blank sheet that does not have any definitions or constraints in advance, or if you already have some definition etc., continuous designation by attributes and partial worlds will be made, and the target will be as desired It is expressed correctly, but in the process it goes to a more straightforward and certain description. Depending on the case, it is possible to proceed to the expression with the minimum effort. In the process, new ideas can be grasped and recognized more accurately, problems can be discovered, problem structures can be described, which leads to problem solving and new perspectives. It is also possible to compare different boundary areas, compare different areas of the same boundary area at different points in time, and compare expressions of different entities in the same boundary area. This provides a fundamental solution and may help you understand the real problem.
The attribute or subworld to be newly described comes from the object itself, or another world or field, or inspiration. Then, creative concepts and means are devised and created.

【0009】(ロ)基本境界域法について説明する。こ
れは上述(イ)の境界域法の基本的な概念の具体化、機
能の明確化に進むと言う事である。まず省略機能を持
つ。連続した指定の列に対して、記述の省略機能で表現
の簡略化や短縮化を果たし効率化を果たす。これによ
り、境界域の長い記述が分かりやすく整理される。多数
の境界域を扱う場合、似た記述部分を持つ多数の境界域
の表現が整理される。ある基準となる境界域に対する追
加分や変更分のみの記述で用が済む。次に当面の話題や
関心をある範囲に集中させる焦点化機能を持つ。次に、
多数の境界線と多数の境界域に関して、境界線と境界線
の関係、境界線と境界域の関係、境界域と境界域の関係
と言う各観点から必要な機能を眺める。連続した指定の
列に対して、各指定即ち、属性や部分世界又は境界線の
優劣、強弱、拘束、順番、意味合いや価値は測れる。そ
の線を加えた時の境界域の変化、あるいはその線を動か
した時の変化で測れる。感度又は価値感度などである。
また指定並び、例えば、k1、k2、k3の順番も条件
によっては、最適化が可能である。個数が3つで固定と
するなら、指定順即ち、ルートに独立であるなら、例え
ば最大変化の大きい順に指定する方法が最適化の一例と
なるだろう。3つがルートに独立でなく、前の指定に依
存する場合は制約に従う必要がある。各指定の効果から
判断した最小の指定数の確定や、最適化の基準を記述の
効率などに設定しての記述順番の最適化機能を持つ。指
定即ち境界線の追加や消去や更新などの操作と境界域の
変動の関連を把握して使用する機能、境界線並びの並び
替えや修正の機能を持つ。以上は境界線と境界域の関係
とそれを用いた境界線と境界線の関係に関したものであ
るが、境界域と境界域の関係では、多数の境界域間の距
離や順番などの関係を求める機能や関係を変更させる機
能、複数の境界域から新たな部分世界をつくる機能があ
る。このような機能を用いると、対象問題の記述から、
新たな問題発見や問題解決に有効となる。発想、創造、
問題整理、評価、探索、学習等などに有効となる。
(B) The basic boundary area method will be described. This means that the basic concept of the boundary area method described in (a) above will be embodied and the functions will be clarified. First, it has an abbreviated function. For consecutive specified columns, the description omission function simplifies and shortens the expression and improves efficiency. As a result, the description with a long boundary area is organized in an easy-to-understand manner. When dealing with a large number of boundary areas, expressions of a large number of boundary areas with similar description parts are arranged. It is sufficient to describe only the additions or changes to a certain boundary area. Next, it has a focusing function that focuses the current topic or interest in a certain area. next,
With respect to many boundary lines and many boundary areas, we will look at the necessary functions from the viewpoints of the relationship between boundary lines, the relationship between boundary areas, the relationship between boundary areas, and the relationship between boundary areas. With respect to consecutive designated columns, each designation, that is, superiority or inferiority, strength, weakness, restraint, order, meaning, and value of an attribute, a partial world, or a boundary line can be measured. It can be measured by the change in the boundary area when the line is added, or the change when the line is moved. Sensitivity or value sensitivity.
Also, the designated arrangement, for example, the order of k1, k2, and k3 can be optimized depending on the conditions. If the number is fixed at three, if it is independent of the designation order, that is, if it is independent of the route, for example, the method of designating in the order of the largest change will be an example of optimization. Constraints must be obeyed if the three are not root independent and depend on the previous specifications. It has a function to determine the minimum specified number judged from the effect of each specification and to optimize the description order by setting the optimization criteria to the efficiency of description. It has a function of grasping and using the relation between the operation of designation, that is, addition, deletion, and update of the boundary line and the fluctuation of the boundary area, and a function of rearranging and correcting the boundary line arrangement. The above is the relation between the boundary line and the boundary region and the relation between the boundary line and the boundary line using it. In the relation between the boundary region and the boundary region, the relations such as the distance and the order between many boundary regions are There are functions required, functions to change relationships, and functions to create new partial worlds from multiple boundaries. With such a function, from the description of the target problem,
It is effective for discovering new problems and solving problems. Idea, creation,
It is effective for problem sorting, evaluation, search, learning, etc.

【0010】(ハ)数値境界域法について説明する。境
界域を指定する属性などの列で、属性などを加える時
に、意味を持つ変数又は数値を属性などに付加して指定
するのが基本である。基本境界法で述べた境界線の感度
又は影響度や価値感度、あるいは創造感度、創造影響度
などユーザーが設定した意味に対応するものを付加する
事も可能だし、よく使われる指標、例えばプライオリテ
ィーの設定なども可能である。変数又は数値の数は任意
である。多様な使い方が可能かつ自由である。もう一
つ、変数のまま又は、数値をそれなりの拘束に基づく手
順に従い、指定して行き、最適計算なり逆計算で値を確
定させてから、その数値を戻すやり方もある。上述
(ロ)の基本境界域法の説明では、数値の扱い方は述べ
ていない。任意と言う事になるが、基本境界法の中に
も、この変数や数値付加の方法が有効性を発揮する場面
は多い。又、後述(ニ)の応用境界域法でも同様である
が、その中にはこの方法が必須に近いものもある。基本
境界域法が質的、定性的な面が主であるのに対して、数
値境界域法は数値的で具体的であるが同時に理論的なの
が特徴であるとも言えるが、同じ問題を基本境界域法で
扱った後に、分析を継続してより深化させる方法である
とも言える。基本境界域法で述べた、境界線と境界域に
関して、境界線と境界線の関係、境界線と境界域の関
係、境界域と境界域の関係と言う各観点からの各機能に
おいて数値の扱いも多く、数値境界域法の有効な場面は
多い。
(C) The numerical boundary region method will be described. Basically, when adding an attribute or the like in a column such as an attribute for designating a boundary area, a variable or numerical value having a meaning is added to the attribute or the like and designated. It is possible to add the sensitivity or value sensitivity of the boundary line described in the basic boundary method, value sensitivity, or creation sensitivity, creation impact, etc. that correspond to the meaning set by the user, and commonly used indicators such as priority. It is also possible to set. The number of variables or numerical values is arbitrary. It can be used in various ways and is free. Another method is to specify the value as a variable or to specify a numerical value according to a procedure based on some kind of constraint, determine the value by optimal calculation or inverse calculation, and then return the numerical value. In the description of the basic boundary region method in (b) above, how to handle numerical values is not mentioned. Although it is optional, there are many situations in which the method of adding variables and adding numerical values is effective even in the basic boundary method. The same applies to the applied boundary area method described later in (d), but some of them are almost indispensable. While the basic boundary region method is mainly qualitative and qualitative, the numerical boundary region method is numerical and concrete, but at the same time it can be said that it is theoretically characteristic. It can be said that it is a method of continuing and deepening the analysis after treating it by the boundary area method. Regarding the boundary line and the boundary region described in the basic boundary region method, the numerical value is treated in each function from the viewpoints of the relationship between the boundary line, the boundary line, the relationship between the boundary line and the boundary region. There are many, and there are many cases where the numerical boundary method is effective.

【0011】(ニ)応用境界域法について説明する。上
述(ロ)の基本境界域法の連続する属性や部分世界の並
びの一つずつは一つずつの属性や部分世界であるが、属
性や部分世界からなる関数をこの並びの属性や部分世界
に置き換えて用いて、対象を記述すると、より複雑な対
象も扱う事ができる。複数の境界線で囲まれた範囲な
ど、指定がペアなり複数で意味を成す場合もある。これ
も纏めて扱えるなら、全体としてより複雑な対象を扱う
事ができる。また基本境界域法で用いる評価値又は計算
値や上述(ハ)の数値境界域法で用いる幾つかの変数値
なり評価値を他の評価手法なり問題解決手法の計算値や
評価値と置き変えたり、組み合わせたり、参照し合う事
でより多様な応用が可能となる。また同じタイプの問題
には同じ方法が使える、大きく見たら同じ解が使える。
この事を活かす方法もあり得る。また境界域法のコンセ
プトをさらに発展又は徹底させて、連続的に属性や部分
世界を加えて行く事で厳密化させるとか、新たな世界や
状況に入る問題又は表現も応用境界域法に入る。また境
界線の定義を緩めて、境界線を中心線と巾指定で指定し
ても境界域法と同様の扱いができる、また線が途中まで
として、その先を未定義としても、境界線の扱いを工夫
する事で境界域法と同様の扱いができる。これは応用境
界域法の範疇である。問題の記述や分析の進行に従っ
て、自動的に部分世界や、境界域や、部分世界のグルー
プや、重み付けや、境界域が変動や連合した時の価値
分、などを計算、生成して行く、この過程で問題の姿が
見え、解決のプランも見える、モデルが見える、解決が
成される。これはコンピュータ上のシミュレーションで
主に実現できる。
(D) The applied boundary area method will be described. The sequence of continuous attributes and partial worlds of the basic boundary method described in (b) above is one attribute and one partial world, but a function consisting of attributes and partial worlds can By describing the target by replacing it with, it is possible to handle more complicated targets. In some cases, a pair of specifications, such as a range surrounded by multiple boundaries, makes sense. If you can handle this as a whole, you can handle more complicated objects as a whole. Also, the evaluation value or calculated value used in the basic boundary area method or some variable value or evaluated value used in the numerical boundary area method described in (c) above is replaced with the calculated value or evaluated value of another evaluation method or problem solving method. By applying, combining and referencing each other, more diverse applications are possible. Also, the same method can be used for the same type of problem, and the same solution can be used in a large scale.
There can be a way to take advantage of this. In addition, the concept of boundary zone law will be further developed or rigorously refined by continuously adding attributes and partial worlds, and problems or expressions that enter a new world or situation will also fall into the applied boundary zone law. Also, if you loosen the definition of the boundary line and specify the boundary line with the center line and width specification, you can treat it in the same way as the boundary area method, or if the line is halfway and the destination is undefined, the boundary line The same treatment as the boundary zone method can be performed by devising the treatment. This is a category of applied boundary zone law. As the problem is described and analyzed, sub-worlds, boundaries, groups of sub-worlds, weights, values when boundaries change or associate, etc. are automatically calculated and generated. In this process, the problem can be seen, the solution plan can be seen, the model can be seen, and the solution can be made. This can be achieved mainly by computer simulation.

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】境界域法は、対象問題を質的及び
定義的に記述する事により、問題の分析を精緻化して、
その過程又は結果として、問題点を発見し、解決案を見
出す。あるいは新規のアイデアが必要な時、自己の分析
なり、他の幅広い参考になる世界や分野からのヒントを
得る、それを分析して発想に役立てる。さらにより深い
分析と検討として数値的な検討、最適化の検討などを行
うものである。又、分析をさらに進めて、他の手法なり
評価法との組み合わせや、大きく眺めた時の境界域法の
コンセプトを活かした問題の分析へと、高度化、精細
化、本質化へと手法の適用をより発展させる事が可能で
ある。問題の分析のモデルが、そのまま解決の計算のモ
デルに発展できる。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The boundary area method refines the analysis of a problem by describing the target problem qualitatively and definitively,
In the process or as a result, a problem is discovered and a solution is found. Or, when a new idea is needed, it is self-analyzed, and it gets hints from a wide range of other useful worlds and fields, and it is analyzed and used for ideas. As a deeper analysis and examination, numerical studies and optimization studies will be conducted. In addition, by further advancing the analysis, it is possible to combine it with other methods or evaluation methods, and to analyze problems that take advantage of the concept of the boundary area method when viewed from a large scale, It is possible to further develop the application. The problem analysis model can be directly developed into a solution calculation model.

【0013】[0013]

【実施例】実施例1 ある分譲住宅団地の駐車場増設の問題がある。この団地
では総戸数に対する自前の駐車場の数が4割りであっ
た。外部の駐車場を借りる事で、1家に1台以上の保有
をしていた。車の利用者から自前の駐車場の増設の希望
が従来から強くあった。たまたま、団地が優先的に借用
していた近辺の外部の駐車場が無くなると言う話があ
り、団地住民はパニックになった。これを機会に団地用
地内の緑地を削って自前の駐車場を増設しようと言う声
が高まった。工事費用はそれまでの積み立て金があり、
工事後は駐車場の使用料の収入が得られる事から、団地
及び駐車場の経営には何の問題もない。問題は、既存の
駐車場の内、総戸数の1割分は専用使用権付きで分譲さ
れており、このタイプの住戸の住民には増設工事は利点
が無い。また車を保有しない住戸もあり、この住民にも
利点が無い。さらに緑地を削り駐車場に替えるとして、
緑地のそばが気に入って購入した環境重視の住民もいる
が、駐車場への転換は明らかな環境悪化であり、マイナ
スである。さらに交通量が増える、騒音が増す、遊び場
が無くなると言うマイナスがある。以上が主な問題点で
ある。団地の管理組合ではプラン1をまず考えた。殆ど
の緑地を駐車場に変更するもので、総戸数の11割りの
駐車場が確保される。専用使用権付きの住戸は2台使用
できる。他は1台使用できる。但し、環境悪化は激し
い。この案はマイナス面が大きいと判断され、否決され
た。その後、管理組合は専門の委員会を作り、3年かけ
てプラン2を考えた。なるべく緑地のイメージを残しな
がら駐車場に変更すると言うもので、総戸数の9割の駐
車場が団地内部に確保される。後の1割は恒久的に外部
に借りる。専用使用権付きの住戸は2台使用する権利が
与えられる。他は1台使用の権利がある。この権利未使
用の住戸の数を凡そ予測して、若干の余裕を見て、その
分をゲスト用駐車場とする。この案はほぼ全戸の賛成で
承認された。緑地は減少して、駐車場に替わったが、駐
車料金を稼ぎ、これが、利点が無いと思われていた、専
用使用権付き住戸の住民にも、また車未所有の住戸の住
民にも益をもたらした。その後、団地は経営的には順調
であり、残った緑地の樹も年数とともに大きく茂り、環
境悪化は感じられない。この問題を境界域法で記述して
みる。境界域で各戸の立場を表す事にする。境界域を記
述する属性として、専用駐車場有りp、無し*p。車使
用c、未使用*c。増設で迷惑を受けるm、受けない*
mとする。尚、*はここでは補属性の意味で用いる。各
戸の立場は次のようになる。 立場1:[p、c、m]:反対か中立。 立場2:[p、*c、m]:反対か中立。 立場3:[*p、c、m]:賛成か中立か反対。 立場4:[*p、*c、m]:中立か反対。 立場5:[p、c、*m]:反対か中立。 立場6:[p、*c、*m]:反対か中立。 立場7:[*p、c、*m]:賛成。 立場8:[*p、*c、*m]:中立。 プラン1ではmの影響が大きい為、殆どの立場で反対が
主流となった。プラン2ではmの影響が幾分か小さくな
った。また、新たな属性として、増設で利益を受ける
r、受けない*rを設定して、この認識が3年間の間に
広まった。例えば、賛成が殆ど考えられない、立場1で
もrの大きさによって賛成が得られた。 立場1:[p、c、m、r]:賛成か中立か反対。 同様に他の全ての立場で、賛成が可能となり、rの大き
さ次第で、ほぼ全立場が賛成に成る事が可能となった。
尚、*rはここではあり得ない。この例ではプラン1で
は指定は3項で、プラン2では指定は4項である。最初
から4項を用いて、しかもmを小さく、rを大きくすれ
ば、全戸の賛成が早く得られたと思われるが、問題の最
重要なポイントは当初は判らないものである。この問題
の場合、プラン1の否決があったからこそ、プラン2に
進む事が出来た。この問題では全会一致を目指してい
る。
Example 1 Example 1 There is a problem of adding a parking lot in a condominium housing complex. In this housing complex, the number of own parking lots was 40% of the total number of units. By renting an external parking lot, I owned more than one car per house. There has always been a strong desire from car users to build their own parking lot. It happened that the residents of the housing complex panicked because there was no longer any outside parking lot that the housing complex had preferentially rented. Taking this opportunity, there was a growing voice calling for the removal of the green space in the estate and the addition of an own parking lot. The construction cost has a reserve fund until then,
There will be no problems in the management of the housing complex and the parking lot, since the income from the parking lot will be earned after the construction. The problem is that of the existing parking lots, 10% of the total number of units are sold with exclusive use rights, and the residents of this type of residence have no advantage in the additional construction. In addition, there are dwelling units that do not own cars, so this inhabitant has no advantage. Further shaving the green space and replacing it with a parking lot,
There are some residents who like the green area and bought it because they liked the environment, but the change to the parking lot is a definite environmental deterioration, which is a negative factor. There are also the negatives of increased traffic, increased noise, and no playground. The above are the main problems. The estate management association first considered Plan 1. Most green spaces will be converted into parking lots, and 11% of the total number of parking lots will be secured. Two dwelling units with exclusive use rights can be used. The other one can be used. However, environmental deterioration is severe. This plan was judged to have a big downside and was rejected. After that, the management union formed a specialized committee and spent three years thinking about Plan 2. The plan is to change to a parking lot while leaving the image of a green area as much as possible, and 90% of the total number of parking lots will be secured inside the complex. The other 10% will be permanently rented outside. The right to use two dwelling units with exclusive use rights is given. Others have the right to use one. Approximately estimate the number of dwelling units that do not use this right, allow some room, and use that amount as a guest parking lot. This proposal was approved by almost all the families. Green spaces have decreased and replaced with parking lots, but parking fees have been earned, which is beneficial to residents of private units with exclusive use rights and those who do not own cars, which seemed to have no advantage. Brought. After that, the housing complex is in good business condition, and the trees in the remaining green areas grow over the years, and no environmental deterioration is felt. Let us describe this problem by the boundary area method. The position of each house will be expressed in the boundary area. As an attribute that describes the boundary area, there is a dedicated parking lot p, and there is no dedicated parking lot * p. Car used c, unused * c. No, not bothered by additional expansion *
m. Note that * is used here to mean a complementary attribute. The position of each house is as follows. Position 1: [p, c, m]: Opposite or neutral. Position 2: [p, * c, m]: Opposite or neutral. Position 3: [* p, c, m]: Yes, no, or against. Position 4: [* p, * c, m]: Neutral or opposite. Position 5: [p, c, * m]: Opposite or neutral. Position 6: [p, * c, * m]: Opposite or neutral. Position 7: [* p, c, * m]: Yes. Position 8: [* p, * c, * m]: Neutral. In Plan 1, the influence of m is large, so the opposition became the mainstream in most positions. In Plan 2, the effect of m was somewhat smaller. Also, as new attributes, we set r to receive profit from expansion and * r not to receive profit, and this recognition has spread over three years. For example, even in the case of Standing 1, almost no approval was obtained, and approval was obtained depending on the size of r. Position 1: [p, c, m, r]: Yes, no, or against. Similarly, all other positions can agree, and depending on the size of r, almost all can agree.
Note that * r cannot be here. In this example, in Plan 1, the designation is 3 terms, and in Plan 2, the designation is 4 terms. It seems that if all four units were used from the beginning, and m was made small and r was made large, the approval of all the households was quickly obtained, but the most important point of the problem is not known at first. In the case of this problem, I was able to proceed to Plan 2 because there was a rejection of Plan 1. This issue aims to be unanimous.

【0014】実施例2 ある分譲住宅団地の駐車場増設の問題でさらに進んだ検
討の例がある。実施例1は全会一致を目指しているが、
法的にはこの問題の場合は過半数の賛成が得られれば工
事が可能である。ここでは最初から立場は4項で指定す
る。全体の中での各立場の割合を考慮する。立場nはX
nパーセントであるとする。 立場1:[p、c、m、r]:反対か中立か賛成。 立場2:[p、*c、m、r]:反対か中立か賛成。 立場3:[*p、c、m、r]:賛成か中立か反対。 立場4:[*p、*c、m、r]:中立か反対か賛成。 立場5:[p、c、*m、r]:反対か中立か賛成。 立場6:[p、*c、*m、r]:反対か中立か賛成。 立場7:[*p、c、*m、r]:賛成。 立場8:[*p、*c、*m、r]:中立か賛成。 この問題の場合X7が元々多く、次がX3である。X7
にX3の全部を足せば十分に過半である。X3の内、賛
成を増やし、賛成の合計が過半となるまでrを上げれば
工事可能と言う事になる。以上は立場7と立場3のみ考
慮しているが、全ての立場を考慮する事もできる。rを
上げれば全ての立場で賛成は増える、rを増加させなが
ら、全ての立場での賛成の合計を求めて行き、合計が過
半となるrが、工事可能な最低の増設の利益である。
尚、法的に4分の3や、5分の4を必要とする事項もあ
るが、同様の方法で適用が可能である。
Example 2 There is an example of further study on the problem of adding a parking lot in a condominium housing complex. Although Example 1 aims for unanimity,
Legally, in the case of this problem, construction is possible if a majority of the people agree. From the beginning, the position is specified in item 4. Consider the proportion of each position in the total. Position n is X
Let it be n percent. Position 1: [p, c, m, r]: Opposite or neutral. Position 2: [p, * c, m, r]: Opposite or neutral. Position 3: [* p, c, m, r]: Yes or No. Position 4: [* p, * c, m, r]: Neutral or opposition. Position 5: [p, c, * m, r]: Opposition or neutral. Position 6: [p, * c, * m, r]: Opposite or neutral. Position 7: [* p, c, * m, r]: Yes. Position 8: [* p, * c, * m, r]: Neutral or agreeable. In the case of this problem, X7 is originally large, and next is X3. X7
If you add all of X3 to, it is enough half. It can be said that construction is possible by increasing the approval of X3 and increasing r until the total of the approval is more than half. Although only the positions 7 and 3 are considered above, all positions can be considered. If you increase r, you will get more approvals from all positions. While increasing r, you will seek the total of approvals from all positions, and the total r will be the majority.
It should be noted that although there are matters that legally require three-fourths and four-fifths, the same method can be applied.

【0015】実施例3 ある分譲住宅団地の団地祭りの問題がある。ある団地で
は住民相互の親睦の為に管理組合主催で毎夏、団地祭り
を開催しているが、年を経るにつれ形骸化している。参
加する人は毎年同じ顔ぶれで、参加しない人は全く参加
しない。普段会話をしない人同士の親睦はこれでは図れ
ない。毎年、準備を手伝う人が、参加しない人や手伝わ
ない人の文句を言い、仲が却って悪くなる面もある。祭
りに熱心な人は組合員全員に積極的な参加を呼びかけ、
参加の記録を取ってもいる。多くの住民は付き合いでほ
んの少し参加したあと、直ぐ家に帰っている。法的に
は、管理組合が団地祭りなどのレクレーション行事を主
催する事は問題はない。マンション管理の専門書によっ
ては、コミュニケーションを図る事は奨励されている面
もある。一方、別の専門書だと、管理組合は、建物など
の共有財産の保全や環境の維持が目的の組織であり、管
理費も理事の業務もその目的に適うべきであり、それ以
外の目的は極力遠慮すべきとの主旨の記述も成されてい
る。また、この種のイベントを行う場合、任意参加が必
須と言う事である。この論点から見ると、この団地の場
合、祭りの費用を管理費から出費しており、これは強制
参加と同じだから違法と言えなくも無い。また、祭りで
はお酒を飲むのが楽しみになっており、管理費でこれを
負担しているが、これは問題がありそうである。尚、こ
の団地は既存の周辺の自治会には入っていない。今後も
続けるか、違法性を問われない形に改めるか、あるいは
取り止めるかの判断が必要になっている。この問題を境
界域法で検討してみる。共有財産を持ち、法的にも参加
が強制されている管理組合と、共有財産を持たず、参加
も強制されない自治会又は町内会の目的、機能、業務内
容などを境界域で記述する。なお*は補属性を示す。 管理組合:[強制加入、強制権、共有財産の維持、環境
の維持、管理費の徴収、組合の法的義務と責任、組合目
的にかなう業務内容、組合目的にかなう管理費の使
用]。 自治会:[*強制加入、*強制権、*共有財産の維持、
*環境の維持、自治会費の徴収、自治会の法的義務と責
任、自治会目的にかなう業務内容、自治会目的にかなう
自治会費の使用]。 この記述から検討する。管理組合は自治会や町内会とは
性格が大分違う。この点の認識が一般に薄いのがまず問
題だろう。管理組合は、強制参加であり、多くの業務は
強制力を持つ。しかしその強制の及ぶ範囲は組合の本来
の目的に適う部分にのみ及ぶべきであろう。例えば、大
規模修繕や建て替えである。親睦をはかる事は必要であ
るし、管理開始時点などは有効であるが、それでも強制
は問題があるだろう。理事の業務として祭りの準備や運
営にあたったり、管理費をお酒の費用に当てるのは問題
だろう。祭りの性格上、どうしてもある程度派出になっ
たりするが、管理組合の行事としては、せいぜい、お
茶、お菓子が出るミーティングぐらいが限度であろう。
従って、祭りを行いたいならば、管理組合では無くて自
治会か町内会かクラブを別途作る必要があるだろう。こ
の団地の現行の行事は厳密には違法性が強いと言えるだ
ろう。最低限、参加したくない人の参加しない自由と権
利が保証されなければならないだろう。以上が厳密解と
言う事になると思われるが、管理組合はお互いをよく知
らないと上手く運営できない事も事実である。別途自治
会を作っても参加しない人は参加しない。管理組合とし
て上述のミーティング程度を奨励するしくみも必要だろ
う。これが管理組合の境界域であろう。
Example 3 There is a problem of a housing complex festival in a condominium housing complex. In a housing complex, a management union sponsors a housing complex festival every summer for the sake of fellowship among the residents, but it has become a mere corpse over the years. Participants have the same face each year, and non-participants do not participate at all. This is not enough to build a relationship between people who do not normally talk. Every year, people who help with preparation complain of people who do not participate or people who do not help, and there is also the side that it gets worse when it gets worse. Those who are enthusiastic about the festival urge all members to participate actively,
I also keep a record of participation. Many residents go home soon after a little social interaction. Legally, there is no problem for the management union to host recreational events such as housing complex festivals. In some condominium management books, communication is encouraged. On the other hand, according to another technical book, the management union is an organization whose purpose is to protect shared property such as buildings and to maintain the environment, and management expenses and the duties of the directors should meet that purpose. There is also a statement to the effect that it should be avoided as much as possible. In addition, voluntary participation is mandatory for this kind of event. From this point of view, in the case of this housing complex, the expense of the festival is spent from the administrative cost, and since it is the same as compulsory participation, it can be said that it is illegal. Also, I'm looking forward to drinking alcohol at the festival, and I'm paying for it with administrative expenses, but this seems to be problematic. This complex is not part of the existing neighborhood association. It is necessary to decide whether to continue, to revise it to a form that does not question illegality, or to cancel it. Let us consider this problem by the boundary area method. Describe the purpose, function, work content, etc. of the management association that has shared property and is legally forced to participate, and the association or neighborhood association that does not have shared property and is not forced to participate in the boundary area. Note that * indicates a complementary attribute. Management union: [compulsory enrollment, compulsory right, maintenance of shared property, maintenance of environment, collection of management costs, legal obligations and responsibilities of the union, business contents that meet the purpose of the union, use of management costs that meet the purpose of the union]. Neighborhood Association: [* compulsory joining, * compulsory right, * maintenance of shared property,
* Maintenance of environment, collection of residents' association fees, legal obligations and responsibilities of residents' associations, business contents that meet the residents'association's purpose, use of residents'association's expenses to meet the residents'association's purpose]. Consider from this description. The management union has a very different character from the residents' association and neighborhood association. The first problem is that the recognition of this point is generally weak. The management union is a compulsory participation, and many operations are compulsory. However, the scope of the coercion should only extend to the part that serves the original purpose of the union. For example, large-scale repair and rebuilding. It is necessary to get close to each other, and it is effective at the start of management, but still compulsory may be a problem. It would be a problem for directors to prepare and run festivals, and allocate administrative expenses to the cost of alcohol. Due to the nature of the festival, it will inevitably come out to a certain extent, but the events of the management union will be limited to meetings where tea and sweets are served at most.
Therefore, if you want to hold a festival, you will need to create a neighborhood association, neighborhood association or club instead of a management union. Strictly speaking, it can be said that the current events at this estate are highly illegal. At a minimum, the freedom and the right not to participate will be guaranteed for those who do not want to participate. The above may be said to be an exact solution, but it is also true that management unions cannot operate well without knowing each other well. People who do not participate even if they create a community association will not participate. As a management union, it is necessary to have a mechanism to encourage the above meeting level. This would be the border of the management union.

【0016】[0016]

【発明の効果】境界域法を使用すると誰でもテーマを限
定せず幅広い対象、特に複雑な問題に対して解の探索か
ら、飛躍的な解決策への発想、創造、さらに、関連した
問題整理、予測、評価、学習等などについての支援を受
ける事ができる。
[Effects of the Invention] When the boundary area method is used, anyone can limit the theme and search for a solution to a wide range of objects, especially complex problems, to create ideas for dramatic solutions, create them, and sort out related problems. You can get support for prediction, evaluation, learning, etc.

Claims (4)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 既存又は未知の対象を記述するのに単数
又は複数の属性や部分世界を連続して指定して用いる。
この連続した指定の列に対して、AND処理とOR処理
を中心とした論理処理を施して、対象範囲を特定する。
この指定の並びは、それぞれが境界線でもある。この境
界線で囲んで境界域を作る。これを作る過程でより端
的、確かな記述に進む。同時に、分析を経て、新しい発
想、より正しい対象の把握、認識ができ、新しい問題解
決に繋がる事もある。また異なる境界域の比較、同じ境
界域の異時点間の比較、同じ境界域の別の主体による表
現の比較などの分析が可能である。新たな発想を試す為
の新らしい属性や部分世界は、対象そのもの又は他の世
界や分野又はひらめきから持って来る。そして創造的な
概念や手段などが考案され作られる。以上に説明される
境界域法の基本的な概念。
1. A single or a plurality of attributes or partial worlds are consecutively specified and used to describe an existing or unknown object.
A logical process centered on the AND process and the OR process is applied to the continuous designated column to specify the target range.
Each of these specified sequences is also a boundary line. A boundary area is created by enclosing this boundary line. In the process of making this, I proceed to a more straightforward and definite description. At the same time, through analysis, it may lead to new ideas, more accurate understanding and recognition of objects, and new problem solving. It is also possible to analyze different boundary areas, different time points of the same boundary area, and expressions of different actors in the same boundary area. New attributes and sub-worlds for testing new ideas come from the subject itself or other worlds or fields or inspirations. Then, creative concepts and means are devised and created. The basic concept of the boundary zone method explained above.
【請求項2】 請求項1の境界域法の基本的な概念の具
体化、機能の明確化に進む。まず連続した指定の列に対
して、記述の省略機能を持つ。これにより、境界域の長
い記述が分かりやすく整理される。次に当面の話題や関
心をある範囲に集中させる焦点化機能を持つ。次に連続
した指定の列に対して、各指定即ち、属性や部分世界即
ち境界線の優劣、強弱、拘束、順番、意味合いや価値は
測れる。その線を加えた時の境界域の変化、あるいはそ
の線を動かした時の変化で測れる。感度又は価値感度な
どである。また指定並びの順番も条件によっては、最適
化が可能である。各指定の効果から判断した最小の指定
数の確定や、最適化の基準を記述の効率などに設定して
の記述順番の最適化機能を持つ。指定即ち境界線の追加
や消去や更新などの操作と境界域の変動の関連を把握し
て使用する機能、境界線並びの並び替えや修正の機能を
持つ。以上は境界線と境界域の関係とそれを用いた境界
線と境界線の関係に関したものであるが、境界域と境界
域の関係では、多数の境界域間の距離や順番などの関係
を求める機能や関係を変更させる機能、複数の境界域か
ら新たな部分世界をつくる機能がある。このような機能
を用いると、対象問題の記述から、新たな問題発見や問
題解決に有効となる。発想、創造、問題整理、評価、探
索、学習等などに有効となる。以上に説明される基本境
界域法。
2. The present invention proceeds to embodying the basic concept of the boundary zone method of claim 1 and clarifying its function. First, it has a function to omit description for consecutive specified columns. As a result, the description with a long boundary area is organized in an easy-to-understand manner. Next, it has a focusing function that focuses the current topic or interest in a certain area. Next, for each successive designated column, each designation, that is, the superiority or inferiority, strength, weakness, restraint, order, meaning, value of each attribute or partial world, that is, the boundary line can be measured. It can be measured by the change in the boundary area when the line is added, or the change when the line is moved. Sensitivity or value sensitivity. Also, the order of the designated arrangement can be optimized depending on the conditions. It has a function to determine the minimum specified number judged from the effect of each specification and to optimize the description order by setting the optimization criteria to the efficiency of description. It has a function of grasping and using the relation between the operation of designation, that is, addition, deletion, and update of the boundary line and the fluctuation of the boundary area, and a function of rearranging and correcting the boundary line arrangement. The above is the relation between the boundary line and the boundary region and the relation between the boundary line and the boundary line using it. In the relation between the boundary region and the boundary region, the relations such as the distance and the order between many boundary regions are There are functions required, functions to change relationships, and functions to create new partial worlds from multiple boundaries. The use of such a function is effective for finding a new problem and solving a problem from the description of the target problem. It is effective for thinking, creation, problem sorting, evaluation, search, learning, etc. The basic boundary zone method described above.
【請求項3】 境界域を指定する属性などの列で、属
性などを加える時に、意味を持つ変数又は数値を属性な
どに付加して指定するのが基本である。基本境界法で述
べた境界線の感度又は影響度や価値感度、あるいは創造
感度、創造影響度などユーザーが設定した意味に対応す
るものを付加する事も可能だし、よく使われる指標、例
えばプライオリティーの設定なども可能である。変数又
は数値の数は任意である。多様な使い方が可能かつ自由
である。もう一つ、変数のまま又は、数値をそれなりの
拘束に基づく手順に従い、指定して行き、その後、最適
計算なり逆計算で値を確定させてから、その数値を戻す
やり方もある。以上に説明される数値境界域法。
3. Basically, when adding an attribute or the like in a column such as an attribute for designating a boundary area, a variable or numerical value having a meaning is added to the attribute or the like and designated. It is possible to add the sensitivity or value sensitivity of the boundary line described in the basic boundary method, value sensitivity, or creation sensitivity, creation impact, etc. that correspond to the meaning set by the user, and commonly used indicators such as priority. It is also possible to set. The number of variables or numerical values is arbitrary. It can be used in various ways and is free. Another method is to specify the value as a variable or a numerical value according to a procedure based on a certain constraint, and then to determine the value by optimal calculation or inverse calculation and then return the numerical value. The numerical boundary region method described above.
【請求項4】 請求項2の基本境界域法の連続する属
性や部分世界の並びの一つずつは一つずつの属性や部分
世界であるが、属性や部分世界からなる関数をこの並び
の属性や部分世界に置き換えて用いて、対象を記述する
と、より複雑な対象も扱う事ができる。複数の境界線で
囲まれた範囲など、指定がペアなり複数で意味を成す場
合もある。これも纏めて扱えるなら、全体としてより複
雑な対象を扱う事ができる。また基本境界域法で用いる
評価値又は計算値や請求項3の数値境界域法で用いる幾
つかの変数値なり評価値を他の評価手法なり問題解決手
法の計算値や評価値と置き変えたり、組み合わせたり、
参照し合う事でより多様な応用が可能となる。また同じ
タイプの問題には同じ方法が使える、大きく見たら同じ
解が使える。この事を活かす方法もある。また境界域法
のコンセプトをさらに発展又は徹底させて、連続的に属
性や部分世界を加えて行く事で厳密化させるとか、新た
な世界や状況に入る問題又は表現も応用境界域法の範疇
に入る。また境界線の定義を緩めて、境界線を中心線と
巾指定で指定しても境界域法と同様の扱いができる、ま
た線が途中までとして、その先を未定義としても、境界
線の扱いを工夫する事で境界域法を同様に扱う事ができ
る。これも応用境界域法の範疇である。問題の記述や分
析の進行に従って、自動的に部分世界や、境界域や、部
分世界のグループや、重み付けや、境界域が変動や連合
した時の価値分、などを計算、生成して行く、この過程
で問題の姿が見え、解決のプランも見える、モデルが見
える、解決が成される。これはコンピュータ上のシミュ
レーションで主に実現できる。以上に説明される応用境
界域法。
4. The sequence of continuous attributes and partial worlds of the basic boundary region method of claim 2 is one attribute and one partial world, but a function consisting of attributes and partial worlds is If you describe an object by replacing it with an attribute or a partial world, you can handle more complicated objects. In some cases, a pair of specifications, such as a range surrounded by multiple boundaries, makes sense. If you can handle this as a whole, you can handle more complicated objects as a whole. In addition, the evaluation value or calculated value used in the basic boundary area method or some variable value or evaluated value used in the numerical boundary area method of claim 3 may be replaced with the calculated value or evaluated value of another evaluation method or problem solving method. , Combination,
By referencing each other, more diverse applications are possible. Also, the same method can be used for the same type of problem, and the same solution can be used in a large scale. There is also a way to take advantage of this. In addition, the concept of boundary zone law will be further developed or rigorously refined by continuously adding attributes and partial worlds, and problems or expressions that enter new worlds or situations will also fall under the category of applied boundary zone law. enter. Also, if you loosen the definition of the boundary line and specify the boundary line with the center line and width specification, you can treat it in the same way as the boundary area method, or if the line is halfway and the destination is undefined, the boundary line The boundary region method can be treated in the same way by devising the treatment. This is also a category of applied boundary law. As the problem is described and analyzed, sub-worlds, boundaries, groups of sub-worlds, weights, values when boundaries change or associate, etc. are automatically calculated and generated. In this process, the problem can be seen, the solution plan can be seen, the model can be seen, and the solution can be made. This can be achieved mainly by computer simulation. The applied boundary region method described above.
JP2002047155A 2002-01-18 2002-01-18 Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method Pending JP2003216805A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002047155A JP2003216805A (en) 2002-01-18 2002-01-18 Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002047155A JP2003216805A (en) 2002-01-18 2002-01-18 Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003216805A true JP2003216805A (en) 2003-07-31

Family

ID=27655397

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002047155A Pending JP2003216805A (en) 2002-01-18 2002-01-18 Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2003216805A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11612332B2 (en) 2005-10-11 2023-03-28 Impedimed Limited Hydration status monitoring

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11612332B2 (en) 2005-10-11 2023-03-28 Impedimed Limited Hydration status monitoring

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mills Racial exploitation and the wages of whiteness
Hyra The new urban renewal: The economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville
Dembski Structure and imagination of changing cities: Manchester, Liverpool and the spatial in-between
Menegazzi Rethinking think tanks in contemporary China
Arnold Spatial practices and border SEZs in Mekong Southeast Asia
Lu et al. Organizational network evolution and governance strategies in megaprojects
Ehrich et al. The film festival sector and its networked structures of gender inequality
Hutchinson et al. Asia and the middle-income trap
Lichfield Settlement planning and development: a strategy for land policy
JP2003216805A (en) Boundary area method consisting of basic boundary area method, numeric boundary area method, and application boundary area method
Roth Reset and restoration. The looming conservative turn of management theory: An extension of Foss et al.
Harrison et al. Arguing with megaregions: Learning from China’s chéngshì qún
Gato Adding value to urban spaces. Two examples from Lisbon
Lamond 13 Zones of Connection: Common Reading in a Regional Australian Library
Wang et al. A triangulation approach for design research
Legeby et al. Towards just cities: An architectural approach to mapping unequal living conditions
Chu et al. Fragmented or engaged pluralism in economic geography?
Cleveland Urban intercurrence: The struggle to build walkable downtowns in car-dependent suburbia
Özcan An critique of housing classes approach: the case of Şentepe-Ankara
Stoica et al. Perspectives for the Development of Sustainable Cultural Tourism. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5678
Benninger Pune Metropolis: Unlivable Cities Within a Livable Metropolis
Ruan Loft living in Hangzhou: fitting in an inclusive and affordable practice
Volkova Accounting as an academic discipline: Paradigmatic limits and research programs
Bruch et al. Glossary of Methodological Approaches
Brown The Role of Governance in the Building of Arenas for Popular Music in France and England 1980-2019 [Online]. Leeds Beckett University