JP2001117773A - Method for searching discrete optimal solution - Google Patents

Method for searching discrete optimal solution

Info

Publication number
JP2001117773A
JP2001117773A JP29596599A JP29596599A JP2001117773A JP 2001117773 A JP2001117773 A JP 2001117773A JP 29596599 A JP29596599 A JP 29596599A JP 29596599 A JP29596599 A JP 29596599A JP 2001117773 A JP2001117773 A JP 2001117773A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
search
solution
order
searched
vicinity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP29596599A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Kotaro Hirasawa
宏太郎 平澤
Katsuhiro Inoue
勝浩 井上
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Seiko Electric Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Seiko Electric Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Seiko Electric Co Ltd filed Critical Seiko Electric Co Ltd
Priority to JP29596599A priority Critical patent/JP2001117773A/en
Publication of JP2001117773A publication Critical patent/JP2001117773A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method and a device to solve a discrete optimization program so that an optimal solution does not fall into a local solution when the optimal solution on a discrete set is searched. SOLUTION: In this searching method to find a solution of the discrete optimization problem by performing random search, plural searching vicinities of low-order and high-order and defined, the solution is searched by using the vicinities, a low-order vicinity is intensively searched when possibility that many improved solutions exist in the vicinity of the present solution is high and a wide area is searched when the possibility that the improved solutions exist in the vicinity of the present solution is low. In this method, the vicinities to be searched are found by defining distance in a searching space, the vicinities to be searched of the solution are switched depending on success/failure information on the search, the high-order vicinity is searched when the search of the solution is successfully performed, the high-order vicinity is searched when the search of the solution fails, the search of the low-order vicinity is focused on at a point of time of an early stage of the search, after completion of the early stage, the search of the low-order vicinity and the high-order vicinity are switched depending on the success/failure information on the search of the solution.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、離散集合上の最適
解を求める離散値に対する適応的ランダム探索方法(Ra
ndom Search method with Intensification and Divers
ification-Discrete:以下RasID−D)に関する。
The present invention relates to an adaptive random search method (Ra) for a discrete value for finding an optimal solution on a discrete set.
ndom Search method with Intensification and Divers
certification-Discrete: hereinafter referred to as RasID-D).

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】何らかの方法で得られた可能解xに対し
て、その近傍N(x)(つまり、少し変更を加えること
で得られる解の集合)を定義し、N(x)中の可能解の
中で目的関数値を改善できるものがあれば、近似解をそ
れに置きかえるという方法を近傍探索法という。ここで
N(x)の定義としては、現在の解xとその他の解x’
との間に、問題に応じて適当に定義された距離d(x,
x’)に基づいた第l次近傍 Nl(x)={x’|d(x,x’)=l}・・・・・(式1) というものがよく用いられる。
2. Description of the Related Art For a possible solution x obtained by some method, a neighborhood N (x) (that is, a set of solutions obtained by making a small change) is defined, and a possible solution in N (x) is defined. If there is a solution that can improve the objective function value, a method of replacing the approximate solution with the solution is called a neighborhood search method. Here, N (x) is defined as the current solution x and other solutions x ′
And a distance d (x, x) appropriately defined according to the problem.
x ′) based on the l-order neighborhood N l (x) = {x ′ | d (x, x ′) = l} (Equation 1) is often used.

【0003】この近傍探索法を改善が得られなくなるま
で反復するアルゴリズムを局所探索法という。つまり現
在の解xに対してその近傍N(x)から選ばれる解x’
∈N(x)を生成し、その解が現在の解より良い解f
(x’)<f(x)(最小化の場合)であれば、その解
へ改善(x=x’)し、その近傍における解の改善がで
きなくなるまでそのプロセスを繰り返すというものであ
る。またこの改善には、現在の解より少しでも良い解が
見つかればすぐにその解へと移行するfirst改善
と、近傍内のすベてを探索したときにその中で最も良い
形へと移行するbest改善とがある。アルゴリズムと
しては以下のようになる。
An algorithm that repeats this neighborhood search method until no improvement can be obtained is called a local search method. That is, for the current solution x, a solution x ′ selected from its neighborhood N (x)
∈N (x) is generated and its solution is better than the current solution f
If (x ′) <f (x) (in the case of minimization), the solution is improved (x = x ′), and the process is repeated until the solution in the vicinity cannot be improved. In addition, this improvement includes a first improvement in which a solution that is slightly better than the current solution is found, and a transition to that solution as soon as the solution is found, and a transition to the best shape when all the neighbors are searched. There is best improvement. The algorithm is as follows.

【0004】[ステップ0(初期解)]初期可能解xを
求める。k=l0 [ステップk(改善)]xの近傍N(x)内で、xより
良い目的関数値をもつ可能解yを探索する(近傍探
索)。そのようなyが見つかれば、x=y,k=k+1
としてステップkへ戻る。そうでなければ今のxを解と
して出力して停止する。
[Step 0 (initial solution)] An initial feasible solution x is obtained. k = l 0 [Step k (improvement)] Search for a possible solution y having an objective function value better than x in the neighborhood N (x) of x (neighborhood search). If such a y is found, x = y, k = k + 1
And return to step k. Otherwise, output the current x as a solution and stop.

【0005】この局所探索法の進行の様子を円近傍を用
いて図1に示す。ただし、この図でxkはk番目の可能
解である。探索が停止するとそのときの解xkは近傍N
(xk)内にxkより良い解がないという意味で、局所最
適解(準最適解)であるといえる。
FIG. 1 shows the progress of the local search method using the vicinity of a circle. However, in this figure, x k is the k-th possible solution. When the search stops, the solution x k at that time is the neighborhood N
In the sense that (x k) there is no better solution is x k in, it can be said to be a local optimal solution (quasi-optimal solution).

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】この局所探索法では近
傍内を探索するため、一般的に良い初期解から出発する
と良い局所最適解が得られる傾向がある。また局所探索
法では、末探索の領域にさらに良い解が残っている可能
性を否定できない。そのための対策として初期解をいろ
いろ試みたり、探索に確率的動作を導入したりすること
が挙げられる。
In this local search method, since a search is made within the neighborhood, generally a good local optimal solution tends to be obtained by starting from a good initial solution. Also, with the local search method, the possibility that a better solution remains in the region of the last search cannot be denied. As a countermeasure for this, various initial solutions may be tried, or a stochastic operation may be introduced into the search.

【0007】本発明が解決しようとする課題は、離散集
合上にある最適解を探索する際に局所解に陥らないよう
に解く方法と、この方法を利用した探索プログラムを実
行する探索装置を提供することである。
The problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method for solving a local set when searching for an optimal solution on a discrete set, and a search device for executing a search program using this method. It is to be.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】前記課題を解決するた
め、本発明の離散最適解の探索方法は、離散集合上の最
適解を求めるにあたって、現在の解の近傍に多数の改善
解が存在する可能性が高い場合には、近傍の探索を集中
的に行い、現在の解の近傍に改善解が存在する可能性が
低い場合には、広域の探索を行うことにより解が局所解
に陥ることを回避するものである。
In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, a method for searching for a discrete optimal solution according to the present invention includes a number of improved solutions near a current solution when finding an optimal solution on a discrete set. If the probability is high, the search for the neighborhood is intensively performed, and if the possibility that an improved solution exists near the current solution is low, the solution falls into a local solution by performing a wide area search. Is to avoid.

【0009】RasID−Dは速続値に対する最適化手
法(Random Search method with Intensification and
Diversification:以下RasID)を拡張したもので
ある。まずRasIDの基本概念を述べていく。Ras
IDは、探索の集中化と多様化を統一した枠組みで取り
扱う最適化手法である。探索成功であれば改善解が近傍
に存在する可能性が高いと考え、探索範囲を限定し、探
索が成功した方向を重点的に探索する(集中探索)。こ
れによりパラメータの探索をきめ細かく行い評価指標の
改善を行い、かつ探索の速度の向上を図っている。一
方、探索不成功であれば、近傍に改善解が存在する可能
性が低いと考え、探索を広範囲でランダム的に行う(広
域探索)。以上により評価指標の確実な改善と探索速度
の向上、ローカルミニマムからの脱出が可能となる。R
asID−Dはこの概念を離散事象に拡張したもので、
(式2)の離散最適化問題目的関数f(x) →最大も
しくは最小化 制約条件x∈X⊆Zn・・・・・・(式2) を解くための局所探索法である。特徴として、式1で定
義される第l次近傍 Nl(x)={x’|d(x,x’)=l} を使用して、(1)現在の解の近傍に多数の改善解が存
在する可能性が高い場合には、lが小さい低次の近傍の
探索を集中的に行い、(2)現在の解の近傍に改善解が
存在する可能性が低い場合には、lが大きい高次の近傍
の探索、言い換えると、広域の探索を行う。ということ
が挙げられる。つまり最初は今ある解の近くを集中的に
探索して近くに改善解が多くあるからうまくいくのだ
が、しばらくすると当然今ある解の近くに改善解が見つ
かりにくくなってしまう。このようなときに探索する範
囲を大きくして、新たな改善解を見つけ、またその解の
近くを集中的に探索していくということである。局所探
索法ではひとつの解xkについての近傍はN(xk)で固
定されていたのに対して、RasID−Dの探索を行う
とひとつの解について近傍が広がっていく。
[0009] RasID-D is an optimization method for random values (Random Search method with Intensification and
Diversification (hereinafter referred to as RasID). First, the basic concept of RasID will be described. Ras
ID is an optimization method that handles search centralization and diversification in a unified framework. If the search is successful, it is considered that there is a high possibility that an improved solution exists in the vicinity, and the search range is limited, and the search is performed with focus on the direction in which the search was successful (intensive search). In this way, the parameter search is finely performed to improve the evaluation index, and the search speed is improved. On the other hand, if the search is unsuccessful, it is considered that there is a low possibility that an improved solution exists in the vicinity, and the search is performed randomly over a wide area (wide area search). As described above, it is possible to surely improve the evaluation index, improve the search speed, and escape from the local minimum. R
asID-D extends this concept to discrete events,
This is a local search method for solving the objective function f (x) of the discrete optimization problem of (Equation 2) → maximum or minimization constraint x∈X⊆Z n (Equation 2). As a feature, using the l-th order neighborhood N l (x) = {x ′ | d (x, x ′) = l} defined by Equation 1, (1) many improvements to the neighborhood of the current solution When there is a high possibility that a solution exists, the search for low-order neighborhoods with small l is intensively performed. (2) When there is a low possibility that an improved solution exists near the current solution, l Search for a high-order neighborhood having a large value, in other words, search for a wide area. That is mentioned. In other words, at first, it works intensively near the existing solution and there are many improved solutions nearby, but after a while it is naturally difficult to find an improved solution near the existing solution. In such a case, the search range is enlarged, a new improved solution is found, and a search near the solution is intensively performed. In the local search method, the neighborhood of one solution x k is fixed at N (x k ), whereas the search of RasID-D expands the neighborhood of one solution.

【0010】このように、RasID−Dでは探索の効
率化のための集中探索と広域探索が基本構成となってい
る。RasID−Dを用いることによって改善される点
として「ローカルミニマム」からの脱出というものが考
えられる。図2はその方法を示すものである。このロー
カルミニマムからの脱出は、次の手順によって行う。 A:現在の解の近くを集中探索し、 B:ローカルミニマムに落ちて解が改善されなくなった
ため、 C:広域探索を行ったところ新たな解が見つかり、 D:その解の近くをまた集中探索して、 E:グローバルミニマムへと落ち着く。
As described above, the RasID-D has a basic configuration of a centralized search and a wide area search for improving the search efficiency. One of the points that can be improved by using RasID-D is to escape from “local minimum”. FIG. 2 shows the method. The escape from the local minimum is performed by the following procedure. A: Intensive search near the current solution B: Because the solution has not improved because it has fallen to the local minimum, C: A new solution is found when performing a wide area search, D: Intensive search near that solution again E: Settle down to the global minimum.

【0011】このような方法を用いることにより、集中
探索Dだけでは図2におけるローカルミニマムからの脱
出が困難になってしまうが、これに広域探索Cを加える
とローカルミニマムからの脱出が可能となり、よりグロ
ーバルミニマムEに近づいていくことになる。これによ
りこれまでローカルミニマムにひっかかってそれ以上解
が改善されなくなっていた場合にもそのローカルミニマ
ムから脱出し、さらなる解の改善を行っていくことにな
るのである。
By using such a method, it is difficult to escape from the local minimum in FIG. 2 using only the centralized search D. However, if the wide area search C is added to this, it is possible to escape from the local minimum. It will be closer to the global minimum E. As a result, even if the solution has not been improved anymore because of being caught by the local minimum, it will escape from the local minimum and further improve the solution.

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明の実施の形態を図3に示す
ような簡単なフローチャートで説明する。RasID−
Dのアルゴリズムの流れとを以下に示す。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to a simple flowchart shown in FIG. RasID-
The flow of the algorithm of D is shown below.

【0013】[ステップ100]初期条件を決める。 ・全体の探索回数を決めておく。 ・近傍の最大次数を決めておく。 ・ひとつの近傍を探索する回数を決める。 ・何らかの方法で初期解を求める。[Step 100] Initial conditions are determined.・ Determine the total number of searches.・ Determine the maximum order in the vicinity.・ Determine the number of times to search one neighborhood. -Find the initial solution by some method.

【0014】[ステップ101]その解の一番低い近傍
を探索する。 (a)ステップ102で解が見つかったら、ステップ1
03でその解を新たな解としてステツプ101へ戻る。 (b)ステップ105でひとつの近傍を探索する回数を
越えても解が見つからなかったらステップ106へい
く。
[Step 101] The lowest neighborhood of the solution is searched. (A) If a solution is found in step 102, step 1
At 03, the solution is returned to step 101 as a new solution. (B) If a solution is not found even if the number of times of searching for one neighborhood is exceeded in step 105, go to step 106.

【0015】[ステツプ106]近傍の次数をひとつ上
げて同様に探索する。 (a)解が見つかったらその解を新たな解としてステッ
プ101へ戻る。 (b)ひとつの近傍を探索する回数を越えても解が見つ
からなかったらステツプ106へいく。 (c)ステップ105で始めに決めた近傍の最大次数を
越えたらステップ101へ戻る。ステップ105で始め
に決めた探索回数を越えたらステップ104に進んで終
了する。このように、アルゴリズムが簡単であるため、
RasID−Dのアルゴリズムをプログラムし、ノート
型パソコンにてRasID−Dを使用した探索を実現で
きる。
[Step 106] A similar search is performed by increasing the order in the vicinity by one. (A) When a solution is found, the solution is set as a new solution and the process returns to step 101. (B) If a solution is not found even if the number of times to search for one neighborhood is exceeded, go to step 106. (C) If it exceeds the maximum degree in the vicinity determined first in step 105, the process returns to step 101. If the number of searches exceeds the number of searches initially determined in step 105, the process proceeds to step 104 and ends. Because of this simple algorithm,
The algorithm using RasID-D can be realized by programming the algorithm of RasID-D and using a notebook personal computer.

【0016】[0016]

【実施例】本発明の実施例として、電力系統における復
旧系統の探索を挙げる。この実施例は、電力系統にて事
故が発生して、設備の過負荷や供給支障(停電)が発生
した場合、それらを解消した系統を探索するもので、過
負荷条件や復旧電源容量等を制約条件に供給支障量等を
目的関数として、RasID−Dを使用して事故復旧系
統を探索している。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS As an embodiment of the present invention, a search for a restoration system in a power system will be described. In this embodiment, when an accident occurs in the power system and an overload of the equipment or a supply failure (power failure) occurs, a system in which these are eliminated is searched for. The accident recovery system is searched using RasID-D with the supply disturbance amount and the like as the objective function as the constraint condition.

【0017】図4及び図5は評価関数f(x)を最小と
するためのx(最適解)を求める探索方法を具体的に表
したフローチャートである。 ステップ300:全体の探索(計算)回数、近傍の最大
次数、同一次数近傍を探索する最大回数をそれぞれR、
L、Qに入力 ステップ301:全体の探索回数のカウント値をrと
し、1を代入 ステップ302:全体の探索範囲Xからランダムに選択
した値を初期解、評価関数により求められる値を比較対
象値としてそれぞれx1、f1に代入 ステップ303:探索の範囲(近傍の次数)をlとして
1を代入 ステップ304:探索処理により改善解が見つかったか
どうかを判定。Flag=1で改善解有り、=0で改善
解無し。 ステップ305:x1にx2を代入し、改善解の交換を
行う。 ステップ306:探索回数チェック ステップ307:探索の範囲(近傍の次数)lに1加
算。 ステップ308:近傍次数チェック ステップ309:改善解フラグFlagに0を代入。 ステップ310:同一次数近傍内探索のカウンタqに1
を代入。 ステップ311:次数lによって表される範囲で解をラ
ンダムに選択し、x2に代入する。 ステップ312:全体の探索回数カウンタrに1加算。 ステップ313:x2を使って評価関数f(x2)を計
算し、評価値f2に代入する。 ステップ314:前回の評価値f1と今回の評価値f2
を比較する。f(x2)<f(x1)で改善解有、f
(x2)≧f(x1)で改善解無。 ステップ315:改善解フラグFlagに1を代入 ステップ316:同一次数近傍内探索のカウンタqに1
加算 ステップ317:同一次数近傍を探索する回数をチェッ
ク ステップ318:x1を最適解として出力する。
FIGS. 4 and 5 are flowcharts specifically showing a search method for finding x (optimal solution) for minimizing the evaluation function f (x). Step 300: The total number of searches (calculations), the maximum order of neighbors, and the maximum number of searches for neighbors of the same order are R,
Input to L and Q Step 301: Set the count value of the total number of searches to r and substitute 1 Step 302: Initially select a value randomly selected from the entire search range X, and compare the value obtained by the evaluation function with the value to be compared Step 303: Substitute 1 for the search range (order of neighborhood) as l. Step 304: Determine whether an improved solution is found by the search process. There is an improved solution when Flag = 1, and there is no improved solution when Flag = 0. Step 305: Substitute x2 for x1, and exchange an improved solution. Step 306: Search number check Step 307: One is added to the search range (order in the vicinity) l. Step 308: Check neighborhood degree Step 309: Assign 0 to the improvement solution flag Flag. Step 310: 1 is added to the counter q of the same-order neighborhood search.
Substitute. Step 311: A solution is randomly selected within the range represented by the degree l, and substituted into x2. Step 312: 1 is added to the entire search number counter r. Step 313: Calculate the evaluation function f (x2) using x2 and substitute it for the evaluation value f2. Step 314: Previous evaluation value f1 and current evaluation value f2
Compare. improved solution if f (x2) <f (x1), f
(X2) ≧ f (x1), no improvement solution. Step 315: Substituting 1 for the improved solution flag Flag Step 316: 1 for the counter q in the same-order neighborhood search
Addition Step 317: Check the number of times of searching for the vicinity of the same order Step 318: Output x1 as the optimal solution.

【0018】[0018]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明によれば、
以下の効果を奏する。 (1)現在の解の近傍に多数の改善解が存在する可能性
が存在する可能性が高い場合には低次の近傍の探索を集
中的に行い、現在の解の近傍に改善解が存在する可能性
が低い場合には、広域の探索を行うことにより、求める
最適解が局所解に陥ることを回避し、より以上の改善解
を求めることができる。 (2)アルゴリズムが簡素化されているため、プログラ
ムの容量も小さくできノートパソコン等の小型コンピュ
ータでの実現が可能となる。 (3)このように本発明を用いれば、離散集合上の最適
解を求める手法が適用される分野において、即ち、数百
点を扱う基盤配線、運送会社の配送計画、スケジューリ
ング、交通監視等様々な産業分野における実用的効果を
上げることができる。
As described above, according to the present invention,
The following effects are obtained. (1) If there is a high possibility that there are many improved solutions near the current solution, the search for low-order neighborhoods is intensively performed, and there is an improved solution near the current solution. If it is unlikely that the best solution will be obtained, a wide area search can be performed to prevent the optimum solution to be obtained from falling into a local solution, and a further improved solution can be obtained. (2) Since the algorithm is simplified, the capacity of the program can be reduced, and it can be realized on a small computer such as a notebook personal computer. (3) By using the present invention as described above, in a field to which a method for obtaining an optimal solution on a discrete set is applied, that is, various wirings such as a base wiring that handles several hundred points, a delivery plan of a transportation company, scheduling, traffic monitoring, and the like. Practical effects in various industrial fields.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】 局所探索の進行の様子を示す説明図である。FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing the progress of a local search.

【図2】 ローカルミニマムからの脱出方法を示す説明
図である。
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a method of escaping from a local minimum.

【図3】 RasID−Dのフローチャートである。FIG. 3 is a flowchart of RasID-D.

【図4】 評価関数f(x)を最小とするためのx(最
適解)を求めるフローチャートである。
FIG. 4 is a flowchart for obtaining x (optimum solution) for minimizing an evaluation function f (x).

【図5】 図4のフローチャートの探索処理のフローチ
ャートである。
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a search process in the flowchart of FIG. 4;

Claims (5)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 離散最適化問題の解をランダム探索して
求める探索方法において、低次と高次の複数個の探索近
傍を定義し、この近傍を用いて解の探索を行い、現在の
解の近傍に多数の改善解が存在する可能性が存在する可
能性が高い場合には低次の近傍の探索を集中的に行い、
現在の解の近傍に改善解が存在する可能性が低い場合に
は、広域の探索を行うことを特徴とする離散最適解の探
索方法。
In a search method for finding a solution of a discrete optimization problem by random search, a plurality of low-order and high-order search neighborhoods are defined, a solution search is performed using these neighborhoods, and a current solution is searched for. If there is a high possibility that there is a possibility that many improved solutions exist in the vicinity of, search for lower-order neighborhoods is intensively performed,
A method for searching for a discrete optimal solution, characterized by performing a wide area search when there is a low possibility that an improved solution exists near the current solution.
【請求項2】 探索近傍を探索空間に距離を定義するこ
とによって求めることを特徴とする請求項1記載の離散
最適解の探索方法。
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the search neighborhood is obtained by defining a distance in a search space.
【請求項3】 解の探索近傍を探索の成功・不成功情報
によって切りかえることを特徴とする請求項1記載の離
散最適解の探索方式。
3. The method for searching for a discrete optimum solution according to claim 1, wherein the search neighborhood of the solution is switched according to the success / failure information of the search.
【請求項4】 解の探索が成功する場合には、低次近傍
を探索し、解の探索が失敗する場合には高次近傍を探索
することを特徴とする請求項1記載の離散最適解の探索
方法。
4. The discrete optimal solution according to claim 1, wherein if the solution search is successful, a lower-order neighborhood is searched, and if the solution search fails, a higher-order neighborhood is searched. Search method.
【請求項5】 探索の初期時点で、低次近傍探索を重点
的に行い、初期時点終了後、低次近傍探索と高次近傍探
索を解の探索の成功・不成功情報により切りかえること
を特徴とする請求項1記載の離散最適解の探索方法。
5. A low-order neighborhood search is intensively performed at an initial point of the search, and after the end of the initial point, the low-order neighborhood search and the high-order neighborhood search are switched based on success / failure information of the solution search. 2. The method for searching for a discrete optimal solution according to claim 1, wherein
JP29596599A 1999-10-18 1999-10-18 Method for searching discrete optimal solution Pending JP2001117773A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP29596599A JP2001117773A (en) 1999-10-18 1999-10-18 Method for searching discrete optimal solution

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP29596599A JP2001117773A (en) 1999-10-18 1999-10-18 Method for searching discrete optimal solution

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001117773A true JP2001117773A (en) 2001-04-27

Family

ID=17827388

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP29596599A Pending JP2001117773A (en) 1999-10-18 1999-10-18 Method for searching discrete optimal solution

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2001117773A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009265867A (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-11-12 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Combined optimum solution calculation device
JP2010003004A (en) * 2008-06-18 2010-01-07 Denso Corp Learning device and fuel injection system
EP3869362A1 (en) 2020-02-18 2021-08-25 Fujitsu Limited Information processing method, information processing system, and program
EP4131084A1 (en) 2021-08-06 2023-02-08 Fujitsu Limited Program, data processing method, and data processing apparatus

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009265867A (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-11-12 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Combined optimum solution calculation device
JP2010003004A (en) * 2008-06-18 2010-01-07 Denso Corp Learning device and fuel injection system
JP4631937B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2011-02-16 株式会社デンソー Learning device and fuel injection system
US8306719B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2012-11-06 Denso Corporation Learning device and fuel injection system
EP3869362A1 (en) 2020-02-18 2021-08-25 Fujitsu Limited Information processing method, information processing system, and program
EP4131084A1 (en) 2021-08-06 2023-02-08 Fujitsu Limited Program, data processing method, and data processing apparatus

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Tessema et al. A self adaptive penalty function based algorithm for constrained optimization
Padhye et al. Empirical comparison of mopso methods-guide selection and diversity preservation
RU2007143321A (en) MANUFACTURER OPTIMIZER FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
CN103914506A (en) Data retrieval apparatus, data storage method and data retrieval method
JP7003753B2 (en) Search point determination program, search point determination method and search point determination device
KR100217887B1 (en) Method, program and apparatus of correcting pattern proxomity effect
Yeh et al. Modified l-shade for single objective real-parameter optimization
EP1701299A1 (en) Parameter adjustment device
Brizuela et al. No-wait and blocking job-shops: Challenging problems for GA's
US11593381B2 (en) Re-computing pre-computed query results
JP2001117773A (en) Method for searching discrete optimal solution
CN117271101B (en) Operator fusion method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
Zdánský et al. Combination genetic/tabu search algorithm for hybrid flowshops optimization
JP7283318B2 (en) Optimization device, optimization program, and optimization method
JP2010250599A (en) Method and apparatus for data processing for obtaining optimum combination solution
JP2019219741A (en) Learning control method and computer system
Käschel et al. Algorithms for the job shop scheduling problem: A comparison of different methods
JP2009194628A (en) Link band extension amount calculating method and system, and program
JP7172706B2 (en) Arithmetic processing device, Arithmetic processing program and Arithmetic processing method
Phillips et al. An adaptive large neighbourhood search matheuristic for the ITC2021 sports timetabling competition
JP2006072820A (en) Device for analyzing combination optimization problem
JPH10293756A (en) Combination optimizing method
JP2006040220A (en) Optimal value searching method and system
JPH0944471A (en) Solution of combination optimizing problem and production plan determining device in production line
Azizi et al. Hybrid simulated annealing in flow shop scheduling: a diversification and intensification approach