JP2001084276A - Failure-monitoring system - Google Patents
Failure-monitoring systemInfo
- Publication number
- JP2001084276A JP2001084276A JP25763999A JP25763999A JP2001084276A JP 2001084276 A JP2001084276 A JP 2001084276A JP 25763999 A JP25763999 A JP 25763999A JP 25763999 A JP25763999 A JP 25763999A JP 2001084276 A JP2001084276 A JP 2001084276A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- failure
- failure occurrence
- data
- database
- occurrence prediction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は市場における複数の
製品の稼働状況を監視し、障害発生を予測し、障害の未
然防止及び障害が発生した場合の拡大防止を行う障害監
視システムに関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a fault monitoring system for monitoring the operating status of a plurality of products in a market, predicting the occurrence of a fault, and preventing the fault before it occurs and preventing the expansion when a fault occurs.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来、製品を上市した後、その製品が正
常に稼働しているか、またはなんらかの障害発生要因が
潜在しているか、既に顕在化しているかは、主として定
期的な巡回点検や、顧客からの障害やクレ−ム等の連絡
により監視していた。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, after a product has been put on the market, whether the product is operating normally, or whether any failure factors are latent or already apparent, is mainly determined by periodic patrol inspections and customer inspections. Monitoring was made by contacting the operator with a failure or claim.
【0003】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】上市した製品に潜在し
ている障害要因の監視には、多数の顧客に納入されてい
る多数の同一製品または類似製品の日常の稼働状況に関
する情報やデ−タを障害監視者が収集分析しなければな
らないので、多大な労力と時間とを要するという問題点
があった。The monitoring of trouble factors that are latent in a product put on the market is based on information and data on the daily operation status of many identical products or similar products delivered to many customers. However, since the trouble monitor must collect and analyze the problem, there is a problem that a great deal of labor and time are required.
【0004】本発明は日常の稼働状況に関する情報やデ
−タを収集し、解析して障害が顕在化する前に予め特定
した監視者に通知する障害監視システムを提供すること
を目的としている。It is an object of the present invention to provide a fault monitoring system that collects and analyzes information and data relating to daily operating conditions and notifies a specified monitoring person before a fault becomes apparent.
【0005】[0005]
【課題を解決するための手段】上記目的を達成するため
に本発明の障害監視システムにおいては、製品稼働状況
デ−タを蓄積するデ−タベ−スと、障害発生予測アルゴ
リズム、障害発生予測条件をパラメ−タとして配列した
パラメ−タテ−ブルと、パラメ−タテ−ブルを参照して
選択した障害発生予測アルゴリズムにより、デ−タベ−
スから障害デ−タ件数を収集し、障害発生予測条件を満
たしているかを判別する障害発生予測部と、障害デ−タ
件数が障害発生予測条件を満たした場合に障害発生予測
部から警告メッセ−ジ発信通知を受け、パラメ−タテ−
ブルを参照して警告メッセ−ジを警報通知先に発信する
メ−ル発信部とを備える。In order to achieve the above object, a fault monitoring system according to the present invention comprises a database for accumulating product operation status data, a fault occurrence prediction algorithm, and a fault occurrence prediction condition. The data table is obtained by a parameter table in which the parameters are arranged as parameters and a fault occurrence prediction algorithm selected with reference to the parameter table.
A failure occurrence prediction unit that collects the number of failure data from the data and determines whether the failure occurrence prediction condition is satisfied, and a warning message from the failure occurrence prediction unit when the number of failure data meets the failure occurrence prediction condition. -Receive notification of page
A mail sending unit for sending a warning message to an alarm notification destination with reference to the table.
【0006】[0006]
【発明の実施の形態】本発明の実施の形態について図面
を参照しながら説明する。尚、各図面に共通な要素には
同一符号を付す。図1は本発明の障害監視システムの構
成図である。障害監視システム1は、稼働情報デ−タベ
−ス2(以後デ−タベ−ス2と記す)とパラメ−タテ−
ブル3と障害発生予測部4とメ−ル発信部5とを備え、
障害発生予測部4がパラメ−タテ−ブル3を参照して選
択した障害発生予測アルゴリズムにより、デ−タベ−ス
2から障害デ−タ件数を収集し、障害発生予測条件を満
たしているかを判別し、障害デ−タ件数が障害発生予測
条件を満たした場合には通知メ−ル発信部5に警告メッ
セ−ジ発信の通知を出力し、メ−ル発信部5がパラメ−
タテ−ブル3を参照して警告メッセ−ジを警報通知先に
発信する。Embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Elements common to the drawings are denoted by the same reference numerals. FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of the fault monitoring system of the present invention. The fault monitoring system 1 includes an operation information database 2 (hereinafter, referred to as database 2) and a parameter database.
Cable 3, a failure occurrence predicting unit 4, and a mail transmitting unit 5,
The failure prediction unit 4 collects the number of failure data from the database 2 by using a failure prediction algorithm selected with reference to the parameter table 3 and determines whether the failure prediction condition is satisfied. If the number of fault data satisfies the fault occurrence prediction condition, a notification of a warning message is output to the notification mail transmitter 5, and the mail transmitter 5 receives the parameter.
A warning message is transmitted to the warning notification destination with reference to Table 3.
【0007】本実施の形態では、デ−タベ−ス2をハ−
ドディスク6で構築し、パラメ−タテ−ブル3をメモリ
7に格納し、障害発生予測部4、メ−ル発信部5をCP
U8で構築する。メモリ7にはパラメ−タテ−ブルのパ
ラメ−タに対応した障害発生予測アルゴリズム、警告メ
ッセ−ジ、警報通知先も格納されてある。In the present embodiment, the database 2 is hard-wired.
And the parameter table 3 is stored in the memory 7, and the fault occurrence predicting unit 4 and the mail transmitting unit 5 are connected to the CP.
Build with U8. The memory 7 also stores a failure occurrence prediction algorithm, a warning message, and an alarm notification destination corresponding to the parameters of the parameter table.
【0008】図2は障害情報デ−タベ−ス形式の説明図
である。ハ−ドディスク6には、図2に示す納入先顧客
名、製品名称、モデル番号、製造番号、製造年月日等の
製品履歴に関する情報、及び保守点検を実施した場合の
点検項目、問題点、処置等の保守履歴に関する情報、障
害が発生した場合の発生年月日時刻、障害分類、現象、
処置等の障害履歴に関する情報等と対応づけて、予め決
められた書式に則り、言語デ−タまたはコ−ドデ−タが
蓄積してある。FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a fault information database format. The hard disk 6 has information on product history such as the customer name, product name, model number, serial number, date of manufacture, etc. shown in FIG. 2, and inspection items and problems when maintenance and inspection are performed. , Information on maintenance history such as actions, date and time of occurrence when a failure occurs, failure classification, phenomenon,
Language data or code data is accumulated in accordance with a predetermined format in association with information relating to a trouble history such as a treatment.
【0009】図3はパラメ−タテ−ブルの説明図であ
る。メモリ7には、図3に示す項目の情報、例えば、障
害発生予測アルゴリズム、監視開始年月、監視終了年
月、製品種別、納入先、エラ−コ−ド、障害発生予測条
件としての係数、警報メッセ−ジ形式、警報通知先等に
それぞれパラメ−タを割り当て、行方向の全パラメ−タ
をレコ−ドするファイル形式でパラメ−タテ−ブル3が
格納してある。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of the parameter table. The memory 7 has information on items shown in FIG. 3, such as a failure occurrence prediction algorithm, monitoring start date, monitoring end date, product type, delivery destination, error code, coefficients as failure occurrence prediction conditions, The parameters are assigned to the alarm message format, the alarm notification destination, etc., respectively, and the parameter table 3 is stored in a file format for recording all the parameters in the row direction.
【0010】次に動作について図4を参照して説明す
る。図4は障害監視システムの動作を示すフロ−チャ−
トである。Next, the operation will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the fault monitoring system.
It is.
【0011】ステップS1 でCPU8はパラメ−タテ−
ブル3を参照し、障害発生予測アルゴリズムを選択す
る。例えば、図3に示したレコ−ドNO1の障害発生予
測アルゴリズム「P1 の月にP2 の機種・P3 の納入先
で、P4 のエラ−が前月と・・・・」を選択したとす
る。In step S1, the CPU 8 sets the parameter
Referring to Table 3, a failure occurrence prediction algorithm is selected. For example, it is assumed that the failure occurrence prediction algorithm for record NO1 shown in FIG. 3 is selected, "P2 error in P1 month / P3 delivery destination, P4 error in previous month ...".
【0012】ステップS2 でCPU8は障害発生予測ア
ルゴリズムにより、パラメ−タテ−ブル3を参照し、障
害デ−タをハ−ドディスク6からメモリ7に収集する。
例の場合、障害発生予測アルゴリズムには「P1 の月に
P2 の機種・P3 の納入先で、P4 のエラ−が前月と・
・・・」とあるので、パラメ−タP1 〜P4 に対応する
項目に当てはまるデ−タを図2に示したデ−タベ−スか
らメモリ7に収集する。パラメ−タP4 に対応する項目
に当てはまる障害デ−タは、図2では「エラ−コ−ド」
件数である。In step S2, the CPU 8 collects failure data from the hard disk 6 into the memory 7 by referring to the parameter table 3 by a failure occurrence prediction algorithm.
In the case of the example, the failure occurrence prediction algorithm includes “P2 model / P3 delivery destination in P1 month, P4 error in previous month.
.. ", The data corresponding to the items corresponding to the parameters P1 to P4 are collected in the memory 7 from the database shown in FIG. The fault data applicable to the item corresponding to the parameter P4 is "error code" in FIG.
The number of cases.
【0013】ステップS3 でCPU8は、収集した「エ
ラ−コ−ド」件数がパラメ−タP5の障害発生予測条件
を満たしているかを比較する。In step S3, the CPU 8 compares whether the number of collected "error codes" satisfies the failure prediction condition of the parameter P5.
【0014】ステップS4 でCPU8は「エラ−コ−
ド」件数が障害発生予測条件を満たした場合には、ステ
ップS5 に分岐し、否の場合には処理を終了する。In step S4, the CPU 8 executes the "error
If the number of "C" satisfies the failure occurrence prediction condition, the process branches to step S5; otherwise, the process ends.
【0015】ステップS5 でCPU8はパラメ−タテ−
ブル3のパラメ−タP6 、P〜P9を参照して警報メッ
セ−ジと警報通知先(予め特定した監視者)とを読み出
し、警報メッセ−ジをLAN9を通じて発信し、処理を
終了する。In step S5, the CPU 8 sets the parameter
With reference to the parameters P6 and P to P9 of the cable 3, the alarm message and the alarm notification destination (previously specified monitor) are read out, the alarm message is transmitted through the LAN 9, and the process is terminated.
【0016】本実施の形態によれば、障害監視システム
は、毎日定時刻に起動され、365日24時間運転する
ことで、継続的な監視が可能となり、障害発生の早期予
測ができる。According to the present embodiment, the fault monitoring system is started at a fixed time every day and is operated 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, thereby enabling continuous monitoring and early prediction of fault occurrence.
【0017】[0017]
【発明の効果】本発明は、以上説明したように構成され
ているので以下に記載される効果を奏する。製品稼働状
況デ−タを蓄積するデ−タベ−スを備えたことにより、
情報収集の労力・工数を削減することができる。Since the present invention is configured as described above, it has the following effects. By providing a database for storing product operation status data,
Labor and man-hours for information collection can be reduced.
【0018】障害発生予測条件をパラメ−タ化したこと
により、ソフトを変更しなくともパラメ−タを変更すれ
ばよいので、柔軟な障害予測ができる。Since the failure occurrence prediction condition is made a parameter, the parameter can be changed without changing the software, so that a flexible failure prediction can be made.
【0019】障害発生予測のための稼働情報の分析及び
障害発生予測処理を自動化することで、分析・処理の労
力・工数を削減することができる。By automating the analysis of the operation information for predicting the occurrence of a failure and the processing of predicting the occurrence of a failure, labor and man-hours for analysis and processing can be reduced.
【0020】障害発生予測条件を満たした場合には、警
告メッセ−ジを自動的にメ−ル発信するようにしたこと
により、速やかな障害発生予防策を講ずることができ
る。When a failure occurrence prediction condition is satisfied, a warning message is automatically sent by e-mail, so that prompt failure prevention measures can be taken.
【図1】本発明の障害監視システムの構成図である。FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of a fault monitoring system according to the present invention.
【図2】障害情報デ−タベ−ス形式の説明図である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a failure information database format.
【図3】パラメ−タテ−ブルの説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a parameter table.
【図4】障害監視システムの動作を示すフロ−チャ−ト
である。FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the fault monitoring system.
1 障害監視システム 2 稼働情報デ−タベ−ス 3 パラメ−タテ−ブル 4 障害発生予測部 5 メ−ル発信部 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Fault monitoring system 2 Operation information database 3 Parameter table 4 Fault occurrence prediction part 5 Mail transmission part
Claims (1)
−スと、 障害発生予測アルゴリズム、障害発生予測条件をパラメ
−タとして配列したパラメ−タテ−ブルと、 該パラメ−タテ−ブルを参照して選択した障害発生予測
アルゴリズムにより、前記デ−タベ−スから障害デ−タ
件数を収集し、障害発生予測条件を満たしているかを判
別する障害発生予測部と、 障害デ−タ件数が障害発生予測条件を満たした場合に前
記障害発生予測部から警告メッセ−ジ発信通知を受け、
前記パラメ−タテ−ブルを参照して警告メッセ−ジを警
報通知先に発信するメ−ル発信部とを備えたことを特徴
とする障害監視システム。1. A database for accumulating product operation status data, a parameter table in which a failure prediction algorithm and a failure prediction condition are arranged as parameters, and the parameter table. A failure occurrence prediction unit that collects the number of failure data from the database and determines whether the failure occurrence prediction condition is satisfied by a failure occurrence prediction algorithm selected with reference to FIG. Receives a warning message transmission notification from the failure occurrence prediction unit when the failure occurrence prediction condition is satisfied,
A failure sending system for sending a warning message to an alarm notification destination by referring to the parameter table.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP25763999A JP2001084276A (en) | 1999-09-10 | 1999-09-10 | Failure-monitoring system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP25763999A JP2001084276A (en) | 1999-09-10 | 1999-09-10 | Failure-monitoring system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2001084276A true JP2001084276A (en) | 2001-03-30 |
Family
ID=17309044
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP25763999A Pending JP2001084276A (en) | 1999-09-10 | 1999-09-10 | Failure-monitoring system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2001084276A (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003009631A1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2003-01-30 | Kyohei Imai | Mobile security system, advanced mobile security system and superior mobile security system |
US7024411B2 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2006-04-04 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | Method, system and computer program product for providing backup data for use in studying claims |
KR100774856B1 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2007-11-08 | 루센트 테크놀러지스 인크 | Method of data communication using a control message |
US8073706B2 (en) | 2002-01-24 | 2011-12-06 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Examination reserve system, maintenance service system, medical imaging apparatus, examination reserve method, and maintenance service method |
-
1999
- 1999-09-10 JP JP25763999A patent/JP2001084276A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003009631A1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2003-01-30 | Kyohei Imai | Mobile security system, advanced mobile security system and superior mobile security system |
US7024411B2 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2006-04-04 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | Method, system and computer program product for providing backup data for use in studying claims |
US8073706B2 (en) | 2002-01-24 | 2011-12-06 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Examination reserve system, maintenance service system, medical imaging apparatus, examination reserve method, and maintenance service method |
KR100774856B1 (en) | 2002-09-13 | 2007-11-08 | 루센트 테크놀러지스 인크 | Method of data communication using a control message |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7051244B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for managing incident reports | |
US6684121B1 (en) | Real time work-in-process (WIP) system | |
JP5283905B2 (en) | Automatic remote monitoring and diagnostic service method and system | |
US7058860B2 (en) | System and method of automatic parameter collection and problem solution generation for computer storage devices | |
US6651034B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for performance and fault data analysis | |
US7051044B1 (en) | Method and system for remotely managing communication of data used for predicting malfunctions in a plurality of machines | |
US6324659B1 (en) | Method and system for identifying critical faults in machines | |
CN113836044B (en) | Method and system for collecting and analyzing software faults | |
EP3663919B1 (en) | System and method of automated fault correction in a network environment | |
CN101419448A (en) | Production line real time acquiring and data accounting system and method | |
JPH01243135A (en) | Problem processing system | |
US20030093516A1 (en) | Enterprise management event message format | |
CN108182134A (en) | A kind of general-purpose interface monitoring method, device and equipment, storage medium | |
CN114201201A (en) | Method, device and equipment for detecting abnormity of business system | |
JP4842738B2 (en) | Fault management support system and information management method thereof | |
JP2004178296A (en) | Knowledge based operation management system, method and program | |
JP2001084276A (en) | Failure-monitoring system | |
US20050005202A1 (en) | Proactive support of a healthcare information system | |
CN110619572A (en) | Method for monitoring high fault tolerance growth of enterprise public data | |
CN112969151B (en) | Short message monitoring method, device and equipment | |
JP2004164271A (en) | Job execution monitoring method and program | |
EP1214655A1 (en) | A method and system for handling errors in a distributed computer system | |
JP2000056823A (en) | Data monitoring system | |
JP2003296141A (en) | Fault pre-detection system, fault pre-detection method, fault pre-detection server and fault pre-detection terminal | |
JP2002323997A (en) | System, method and program for monitoring fault history |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20060207 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20060606 |
|
RD01 | Notification of change of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7421 Effective date: 20060923 |
|
RD02 | Notification of acceptance of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422 Effective date: 20060929 |
|
RD04 | Notification of resignation of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424 Effective date: 20061013 |
|
A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20061024 |