JP2001079683A - Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding - Google Patents

Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding

Info

Publication number
JP2001079683A
JP2001079683A JP29867899A JP29867899A JP2001079683A JP 2001079683 A JP2001079683 A JP 2001079683A JP 29867899 A JP29867899 A JP 29867899A JP 29867899 A JP29867899 A JP 29867899A JP 2001079683 A JP2001079683 A JP 2001079683A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
data
heat
quality
values
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP29867899A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Eizo Nakade
英三 中出
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP29867899A priority Critical patent/JP2001079683A/en
Publication of JP2001079683A publication Critical patent/JP2001079683A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials Using Thermal Means (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve the reliability of the welding quality, and to certify the appropriate quality realized under an appropriate condition of execution to a third party by combining the data on the welding output side with the heat data measured at a plurality of positions on the welding input side, and objectively evaluating the combined data by the comparative analysis of the theoretical values and actual values. SOLUTION: A groove 5 is welded in the advancing direction 2 using a backing 1. The data on the welding output side (a welding machine side) is measured at appropriate time intervals over the whole time during the welding work, and the heat data on the welding input side (a base metal side) is measured by a plurality of heat sensors A and B to understand the speed, the position, etc., other than the temperature at the same time. The data is combined with each other, and compared with the theoretical and actual values for analysis to objectively evaluate the combined data by the numerical values in the summary sheets, graphs, etc. The welding output condition can be corrected on the real time basis making use of the data. The input, comparative analysis, summation, graphing and evaluation of the data are achieved by making use of computers.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】建築や橋梁、造船、土木、機
械、設備等に使用される鋼等の金属の溶接構造物の熱管
理の必要な部位に対する電気溶接部の品質管理に関する
ものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to quality control of an electric welded portion of a welded structure of a metal such as steel used for construction, bridges, shipbuilding, civil engineering, machinery, equipment, etc., for heat management required parts.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】金属の電気溶接部の品質管理は金属の種
類や材質により実施細目に若干の差異は有るが、下記の
項目で実施している。 1.開先等の溶接部の母材側形状 2.溶接出力側の溶接出力条件 3.パス間温度管理 4.溶接完了後の検査
2. Description of the Related Art The quality control of an electric welded portion of a metal is carried out according to the following items, although there are some differences in implementation details depending on the type and material of the metal. 1. Base material side shape of welded part such as groove 1. Welding output side welding output conditions 3. Temperature management between passes 4. Inspection after welding is completed

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】[Problems to be Solved by the Invention]

【0004】1. 電気溶接は溶接作業が完了してしま
えば外観からは施工状態が不明となり、その施工報告は
手書きであり施工中の客観的バックデーターが不足であ
る。手溶接は溶接作業者が人間で有る為、溶接管理者は
口頭や文書さらに必要な場合には立合で溶接作業作業確
認する等の手法で「作業者がいかに溶接部の形状を判断
し適正な溶接条件とパス間温度を守ってくれるか」指導
する事の繰り返しである。溶接管理者により溶接方法は
溶接作業者に指示指導されているが溶接作業は溶接作業
者の技能に依存し、その溶接途中のデーターは個人の報
告でありその記録は客観性という面から見ると問題が多
い。
1. In the case of electric welding, when the welding work is completed, the construction state is unknown from the outside, and the construction report is handwritten, and there is insufficient objective back data during construction. In manual welding, the welding operator is a human being, so the welding manager verifies the welding work by verbal or document, and if necessary, confirms the welding work by saying ``How the operator determines the shape of the welded part It is a repetition of the instruction to protect the welding conditions and the temperature between passes. Although the welding method is instructed and instructed to the welding operator by the welding manager, the welding operation depends on the skill of the welding operator, and the data during the welding is an individual report and the record is from the viewpoint of objectivity. There are many problems.

【0005】2. 自動溶接のコンピューター制御のも
のは溶接出力側の記録性は高く客観性については十分と
言えるが、溶接部の形状や精度を考えた場合それに追従
しきれず溶接品質に不具合が発生しても検出出来ない場
合が多い。よって、溶接施工が適正に終了もしくは不具
合が発生したか、判別する機能が必要となる。
2. Computer-controlled automatic welding has sufficient recordability on the welding output side and can be said to have sufficient objectivity, but when considering the shape and accuracy of the welded part, it is not possible to follow it and it can be detected even if a defect in welding quality occurs. Often not. Therefore, it is necessary to have a function of determining whether the welding work has been properly completed or a defect has occurred.

【0006】3. 最近迄、溶接は作業速度と溶接内部
欠陥及び外部欠陥が存在しないものが求められ来たが、
溶接の熱履歴が溶接金属や被溶接側の母材の総合的性能
に大きな影響を及ぼしている事が指摘され、熱管理と言
えば予熱、後熱だけで有ったが、さらに入熱管理(単位
溶接長当たりの入熱量)やパス間温度管理(溶接が始ま
る時の母材温度)が行われる様になってきた。これは母
材側から溶接入熱状態を監視しすれば可能な事である
が、1台の熱センサーでは特定位置の温度の上下しか測
定出来ない、この情報だけで母材側から見て適正な溶接
施工がなされたか判定出来ない自動溶接では入力側の位
置等を含む各種データーは入手可能で有るが、手溶接で
は入力の電圧電流等の単純電気データーに限られてい
る。一般的には入熱計測と言えば入力側データー以外に
試みられなかったが、入熱された母材側の熱履歴よりそ
の適正度合いを評価出来ないだろうか。
3. Until recently, welding has been required to have no work speed and no internal or external defects.
It was pointed out that the thermal history of welding has a great influence on the overall performance of the weld metal and the base metal on the welded side. Speaking of heat management, it was only preheating and postheating, but further heat input management (The amount of heat input per unit welding length) and the temperature control between passes (base metal temperature when welding starts) have come to be performed. This is possible if the welding heat input state is monitored from the base metal side, but one thermal sensor can measure only the temperature above and below a specific position. Only this information is appropriate from the base metal side. Various data including the position on the input side are available for automatic welding, in which it is not possible to determine whether or not various welding operations have been performed, but manual welding is limited to simple electrical data such as input voltage and current. Generally speaking, when it comes to heat input measurement, no other than data on the input side has been tried, but is it possible to evaluate its appropriateness from the heat history on the side of the heat-treated base metal?

【0007】4. 製造物は、適正な品質を作る為の製
造手順が適正になされ、その結果製作された製造物が適
正品質で有る事を書面で証明する事を求められている。
溶接工作物もこの例外では無いのだが、コンピューター
制御の自動溶接でさえ溶接出力側の記録のみで有り、製
造手順の適正性を証明しても適正品質を証明する書類と
言える物では無い。しかし、溶接も適正施工がなされそ
の品質が適正である事を書面で客観的に証明しなければ
ならなく成って来ている。
4. It is required that the manufacturing procedures for manufacturing products should be properly performed and that the products manufactured as a result should be of proper quality in writing.
Welded workpieces are no exception to this rule, but even computer-controlled automatic welding only records on the welding output side, and even if the manufacturing procedure is proved to be proper, it is not a document that proves proper quality. However, welding has also been properly constructed, and it has become necessary to objectively prove in writing that the quality is proper.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決する目的】[Purpose of solving problems]

【0009】溶接作業中の全時間を適当な時間間隔で溶
接出力側データー計測し同時に、従来試みられなっかた
被入力側(母材側)の熱データーを温度以外の速度・位
置等を把握する為に複数位置で計測、これらを組合わせ
て理論値や実務値(欠陥が発生しない経験値とその範
囲)と比較分析し集計表やグラフ等数値で表現、溶接施
工の適正度合いを数値で客観的に評価し溶接品質の信頼
性を向上させ、適正な施工に依り作られた適正品質で有
る事を第3者に証明する事を目的とする。これらのデー
ターの入力及び比較分析、集計、グラフ化、評価は電子
計算機を利用して行う。
All the time during the welding operation is measured at appropriate time intervals on the welding output side data, and at the same time the input side (base material side) thermal data, which has not been attempted in the past, is grasped for the speed and position other than temperature. In order to do so, measure at multiple positions, combine these and compare and analyze with theoretical values and practical values (experience values and range in which defects do not occur), express them numerically such as a spreadsheet or graph, numerically indicate the appropriateness of welding construction The objective is to objectively evaluate and improve the reliability of the welding quality, and to prove to a third party that the quality is the proper quality created by proper construction. Input of these data, comparative analysis, tabulation, graphing, and evaluation are performed using an electronic computer.

【0010】[0010]

【課題を解決する手順】[Procedures for solving problems]

【0011】手順の説明は、溶接施工をガスシールドア
ーク手溶接を例として採用し手順は下記の通りとする。 手順1 固定要素情報の入力 a日時、作業者名 b作業部位名、母材材質、溶接形状、溶接材質及び棒
径、シールドガス、その他 c溶接手順(順序、工法等) 手順2 溶接出力側の変動要素情報の計測 a溶接出力条件(電流、電圧、溶接材送給速度等) bシールドガス圧力及び流量、その他 手順3 被入力側(母材側)の溶接線近傍に配置した複
数の熱センサーからの熱情報の計測 手順4 データーの比較分析、集計、グラフ化、評価
In the explanation of the procedure, the welding procedure is adopted as an example of gas shield arc manual welding, and the procedure is as follows. Procedure 1 Input of fixed element information a Date and time, operator name b Work site name, base metal material, welding shape, welding material and bar diameter, shield gas, etc. c Welding procedure (sequence, construction method, etc.) Step 2 Welding output side Measurement of variable element information a Welding output conditions (current, voltage, welding material feed rate, etc.) b Shield gas pressure and flow rate, etc. Procedure 3 Multiple thermal sensors placed near the welding line on the input side (base metal side) Measurement of thermal information from the procedure Procedure 4 Data comparison analysis, tabulation, graphing, evaluation

【0012】[0012]

【各手順の電子計算機に対する入力等の検討】[Examination of input etc. to computer for each procedure]

【0013】手順1 固定要素情報の入力 溶接部位の基本要素で有り項目を設定すれば、入力、記
録、活用する方法は確立された技術である。 手順2 溶接出力側の変動要素情報の計測 電気信号データーとして出力し電子データーに変換、入
力、記録、活用する方法は確立された技術である。 手順3 被入力側(母材側)の溶接線近傍に配置した複
数の熱センサーからの熱情報の計測 この計測データーは電気信号データーで有るからこれを
電子データーに変換、入力、記録、活用す方法は確立さ
れた技術である。 手順4 データーの比較分析、集計、グラフ化、評価 比較分析する為のバックデーターの作成は当然の事で有
るが、この分野は電子計算機の最も得意とする分野で有
るから、この為のプログラムソフトを製作する事は難し
い物ではない。
Procedure 1 Input of fixed element information A method of inputting, recording, and utilizing a basic element of a welding site is a well-established technique. Procedure 2 Measurement of variable element information on the welding output side The method of outputting as electric signal data and converting, inputting, recording and utilizing it as electronic data is an established technology. Procedure 3 Measurement of thermal information from multiple heat sensors arranged near the welding line on the input side (base metal side) Since this measurement data is electrical signal data, it is converted to electronic data, input, recorded and utilized. The method is an established technology. Procedure 4 Data comparative analysis, tabulation, graphing, evaluation It is natural to create back data for comparative analysis, but since this field is the best field of the computer, it is a program software for this. It's not difficult to make.

【0014】[0014]

【溶接出力側の出力状態と被入力側(母材側)の溶接線近傍に複数の熱センサーを配置し熱を同時連続記録する事の効果】[Effect of placing multiple heat sensors near the welding state on the welding output side and the welding line on the input side (base metal side) and recording heat continuously at the same time]

【0015】溶接履歴を明らかにするため、溶接出力側
の変動要素情報を溶接開始から終了まで連続的に適当な
時間間隔で計測し、同時に被入力側(母材側)表面の溶
接線の片側もしくは両側に複数の熱センサーを溶接線近
傍の所定の位置に配置し溶接開始から終了まで適当な時
間間隔で溶接により入力された熱データーを連続的に計
測する。(用途・目的により配置する面は表面、裏面、
両面いずれの面を使用しても良い。) 下記の説明は、図1により行い、熱センサーは溶接線の
表面の片側に2カ所配置し、溶接は矢印方向に行うもの
とする。
In order to clarify the welding history, variable element information on the welding output side is continuously measured at appropriate time intervals from the start to the end of welding, and at the same time, one side of the welding line on the input side (base metal side) surface is measured. Alternatively, a plurality of heat sensors are arranged on both sides at a predetermined position near the welding line, and the heat data input by welding is continuously measured at appropriate time intervals from the start to the end of welding. (Depending on the application/purpose, the surface to be placed is the front surface, the back surface,
Either side may be used. ) The following description will be given with reference to FIG. 1. The heat sensors are arranged at two positions on one side of the surface of the welding line, and welding is performed in the direction of the arrow.

【0016】1.安定溶接速度の計測 溶接速度は溶接スタートから終了までの平均速度で表示
するが、実際には区間L1は溶接始端部で有り区間L3
は溶接終端部のため、それぞれの処理作業が有り安定溶
接速度とは言えない。このL2区間はたとえ手溶接で有
っても安定した速度で溶接されるので計測誤差は少な
い、溶接速度の安定した区間L2間の距離を熱センサー
A、Bにより計測されたピーク温度間の経過時間で除し
たものが安定溶接速度となる。よって、複数熱センサー
を配置する事により安定溶接速度の計測が可能となる。
1. Measurement of stable welding speed The welding speed is displayed as the average speed from the start to the end of welding, but the section L1 is actually the welding start end section and the section L3.
Since it is the welding end part, there is each processing work and it cannot be said that the welding speed is stable. Since the L2 section is welded at a stable speed even by manual welding, the measurement error is small. The distance between the sections L2 where the welding speed is stable is the peak temperature measured by the thermal sensors A and B. The stable welding speed is obtained by dividing by the time. Therefore, a stable welding speed can be measured by arranging a plurality of heat sensors.

【0017】2.始端終端部の端部処理時間帯の特定 端部処理作業以外の時間帯は安定溶接速度で溶接されて
いるとすれば、 L1の端部処理時間=L1−L2÷安定溶接速度
となるる。L1の端部処理時間が算定可能となり端部処
理部分の溶接出力側の電流電圧変動時間帯が特定できそ
れが集計表やグラフで明解になれば、不具合の発生率の
高いこの部分の作業方法改善、標準化も容易になる。
2. Specifying the end processing time zone of the start end terminal If the time zone other than the end processing work is welded at a stable welding speed, the end processing time of L1 = L1-L2 / stable welding speed
Will be If the end processing time of L1 can be calculated and the current/voltage fluctuation time zone on the welding output side of the end processing part can be specified and it becomes clear in the summary table or graph, the work method of this part where the failure rate is high Improvement and standardization also become easy.

【0018】3.適正溶接作業の確認と溶接後検査への
影響 金属は熱伝導と共に熱拡散の性質を持っている。図2と
図3の溶接では距離と熱集中部分が異り感知するピーク
温度と伝導時間は異なったものとなる。感知されるデー
ターは直前の溶接の熱影響があり多少の誤差やズレが発
生するが、同一形状開先断面を所定の手順で適正に溶接
したもののデーターと比較すれば溶接ねらい位置、順
序、運棒方法、溶け込み深さ等が適正で有るか推察でき
る。複数の熱センサーによる計測は溶接の進行方向が簡
単に解り、たとえば安定溶接速度で適正溶接出力条件下
で有っても温度差が熱センサーAとBのピーク温度に発
生すれば溶接のねらいに不具合が発生した事が推察され
以後の溶接作業改善の資料となり、かつ溶接後の検査対
象選別の大きな指標で有り溶接後の検査の合理化へ繋が
る。
3. Confirmation of proper welding work and influence on post-welding inspection Metal has the property of heat diffusion as well as heat conduction. In the welding shown in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the peak temperature and the conduction time, which are sensed differently depending on the distance and the heat concentrated portion, are different. The data to be sensed may have some errors or deviations due to the heat effect of the immediately preceding welding, but if compared with the data of the same shape groove cross section properly welded by a predetermined procedure, the welding target position, sequence, operation It can be inferred whether the stick method, penetration depth, etc. are appropriate. With multiple heat sensors, the direction of welding can be easily determined. For example, if a temperature difference occurs at the peak temperature of heat sensors A and B even under appropriate welding output conditions at a stable welding speed, it is possible to aim at welding. It is inferred that a defect has occurred, which serves as data for improving the welding work after that, and is a large index for selecting inspection targets after welding, which leads to rationalization of inspection after welding.

【0019】4.溶接不具合部分の位置推察 溶接の不具合は溶接出力側の電気、ガス、溶接材供給等
の出力状態が不安定状態となっている事が多いが入力側
からその発生位置を特定する事は難しい。複数の熱セン
サーの配置により溶接の特定位置の算定が可能であるか
ら、溶接入力側の変動要素情報と被入熱側の熱センサー
情報と組み合わせる事により高い精度で不具合位置を特
定出来る、
4. Prediction of position of welding failure part In welding failure, the output state of electricity, gas, welding material supply, etc. on the welding output side is often in an unstable state, but it is difficult to identify the occurrence position from the input side. Since it is possible to calculate the specific position of welding by arranging multiple heat sensors, the defective position can be specified with high accuracy by combining the variable element information on the welding input side and the heat sensor information on the heat input side.

【0020】5.溶接部適正施工の確認と不具合防止 たとえコンピューター制御による溶接で溶接出力側情報
が明らかであったとしても溶接部の開先(断面)状況の
微妙な組立誤差や溶接熱による溶接部位の熱収縮の影響
を吸収し施工されたか確認不能のため、溶接品質確認の
検査は手溶接の場合と同様に実施されている。よって、
被入力側(母材側)から適正な溶接施工がなされた事を
確認出来れば検査の手法は簡略できる。さらに、溶接過
程の不具合発生しても熱伝導により時間差は発生するが
その位置はリアルタイムで判明するので、その時点で作
業の中断補修や溶接出力条件変更等を行う事が可能とな
る。この事は、今までの様に溶接完了後検査の結果によ
り補修したり、不適正な溶接施工の結果不具合溶接部位
が連続発生する等、リアルタイム情報が無い結果発生発
生している不具合処理を未然に防止する事も可能とな
る。
5. Confirmation of proper construction of welds and prevention of defects Even if the information on the welding output side is clear by computer-controlled welding, there are subtle assembly errors in the groove (cross-section) of the weld and heat shrinkage of the welded part due to welding heat. Since it is not possible to confirm whether the work has been performed after absorbing the influence, the inspection for confirming the welding quality is carried out in the same way as in the case of manual welding. Therefore,
If it can be confirmed from the input side (base material side) that proper welding work has been performed, the inspection method can be simplified. Further, even if a defect occurs in the welding process, a time difference occurs due to heat conduction, but the position is known in real time, so that it is possible to perform work interruption repairs and welding output condition changes at that point. This is due to the fact that there is no real-time information, such as repairs based on the results of inspections after completion of welding as in the past, or the occurrence of defective welding sites that result from improper welding work. It is also possible to prevent it.

【0021】6.溶接部の総合評価 溶接の検査は非破壊検査と破壊検査に分かれ、非破壊部
検査は溶接完了後抜き取りもしくは全数検査に依り実施
されている。溶接部位の施工情報は溶接出力データーと
被入力側の熱センサーに依るデーターを利用する事で信
頼性の高い客観的数値情報として表現出来るので、この
数値の信頼を性確認する確認試験と異常数値を示した部
位の検査のみとなる。これは、非破壊検査の内の溶接内
部検査が簡略され経済効果は大きい。溶接外観検査は、
溶接完了後の外観上の不具合の有無を目視や計測器具を
用いて行うが、この分野も電子計算機利用し表面の凹凸
を数値化して評価する技術分野が溶接外観検査に利用出
来る様に成って来たので、これを合せて利用すれば、溶
接部の数値に依る総合評価が可能となる。
6. Comprehensive evaluation of welds Welding inspections are divided into non-destructive inspections and destructive inspections, and non-destructive inspections are performed by sampling after welding or by 100% inspection. The welding site construction information can be expressed as highly reliable objective numerical information by using the welding output data and the data from the heat sensor on the input side, so a confirmation test and an abnormal numerical value to confirm the reliability of this numerical value. It is only the examination of the part that shows. This has a large economic effect because the welding internal inspection of the nondestructive inspection is simplified. Weld visual inspection
After welding is completed, the presence or absence of defects on the appearance is checked visually or by using a measuring instrument.In this field as well, the technical field of numerically evaluating the surface irregularities using a computer can be used for welding appearance inspection. Since it came, if this is used together, comprehensive evaluation based on the numerical value of the welded part becomes possible.

【0022】7.溶接履歴(母材形状、溶接出力側、被
入力側、非破壊検査、破壊検査等) の計測データーを電子計算機で理論値や経験値と比較さ
せ評価する利点aプログラムに従い客観的に評価でき
る。 b発生する書面は、データーとして信頼性が高い。 c第3者に対して作業が適正に施工された事を証明でき
る。 d発生する書面を元に、溶接品質が適正である事を保証
したり、さらには金銭的保障も可能となる。
7. Welding history (base material shape, welding output side, input side, non-destructive inspection, destructive inspection, etc.) measurement data is compared with theoretical values and empirical values on a computer. b The generated document is highly reliable as data. c It is possible to prove to the third party that the work was properly constructed. d Based on the generated document, it is possible to guarantee that the welding quality is proper, and also to guarantee financially.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】溶接される部位の溶接線近傍の所定の位置に熱
センサーを2台配置した場合の平面図である。
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a case where two heat sensors are arranged at a predetermined position near a welding line of a portion to be welded.

【図2】溶接部位に熱センサーを溶接線の片側に配置
し、熱センサー側に溶接した場合の断面図である。
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a case where a heat sensor is arranged at one side of a welding line at a welding portion and the heat sensor is welded to the heat sensor side.

【図3】溶接部位に熱センサーを溶接線の片側に配置
し、熱センサーの反対側に溶接した場合の断面図であ
る。
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a case where a heat sensor is arranged at one side of a welding line at a welding site and the other side of the heat sensor is welded.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 裏当て金 2 溶接進行方向 3 熱センサー 3 溶接された部分 5. 開先面 1 backing plate 2 welding direction 3 thermal sensor 3 welded part 5. Groove face

Claims (4)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 被溶接入力側(母材側)に複数の熱セン
サーを配置し得られたデーターと溶接熱出力側(溶接機
側)のデーターを組み合わせ、理論値や実務値と比較分
析し集計表やグラフ等数値で表現、溶接施工の適正度合
いを数値で客観的に評価し適正な施工条件下で作られた
適正品質で有る事を第3者に証明する手法及びこれらの
データーを利用し溶接出力条件をリアルタイムで修正す
る手法
1. The data obtained by arranging a plurality of heat sensors on the input side of the welding target (base metal side) and the data on the welding heat output side (welding machine side) are combined and analyzed in comparison with theoretical values and practical values. Use numerical values such as a spreadsheet and graphs, objectively evaluate the appropriateness of the welding construction numerically, and use a method to prove to a third party that the quality is proper under the proper construction conditions and these data Method for correcting welding output conditions in real time
【請求項2】 前項の手法と溶接終了後の非破壊溶検査
や破壊検査等のデーターを合わせて溶接を総合的に評価
する手法
2. A method for comprehensively evaluating welding by combining the method described in the preceding paragraph and data such as nondestructive melting inspection and destructive inspection after welding.
【請求項3】 請求項1又は請求項2項で発生する書面
を元に、溶接品質が適正である事を保証したり金銭的に
保障する行為
3. An act of guaranteeing that the welding quality is proper or monetarily guaranteeing it based on the document generated in claim 1 or claim 2.
【請求項4】 請求項1又は請求項2項で発生する書面
を元に、溶接作業者の溶接技術が適正である事を証明す
る行為
4. The act of certifying that the welding technique of the welding operator is appropriate based on the document generated in claim 1 or 2.
JP29867899A 1999-09-14 1999-09-14 Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding Pending JP2001079683A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP29867899A JP2001079683A (en) 1999-09-14 1999-09-14 Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP29867899A JP2001079683A (en) 1999-09-14 1999-09-14 Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001079683A true JP2001079683A (en) 2001-03-27

Family

ID=17862869

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP29867899A Pending JP2001079683A (en) 1999-09-14 1999-09-14 Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2001079683A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007054845A (en) * 2005-08-22 2007-03-08 Ito Yoshihiko Welding data display device in welding apparatus, and computer program
JP2011125899A (en) * 2009-12-17 2011-06-30 Daihen Corp Stitch pulse welding controller and stitch pulse welding equipment
JP2021516160A (en) * 2018-05-07 2021-07-01 フロニウス・インテルナツィオナール・ゲゼルシャフト・ミット・ベシュレンクテル・ハフツングFronius International Gmbh A method for automatically determining the optimum welding parameters for performing work piece welding

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007054845A (en) * 2005-08-22 2007-03-08 Ito Yoshihiko Welding data display device in welding apparatus, and computer program
JP2011125899A (en) * 2009-12-17 2011-06-30 Daihen Corp Stitch pulse welding controller and stitch pulse welding equipment
JP2021516160A (en) * 2018-05-07 2021-07-01 フロニウス・インテルナツィオナール・ゲゼルシャフト・ミット・ベシュレンクテル・ハフツングFronius International Gmbh A method for automatically determining the optimum welding parameters for performing work piece welding
US11815877B2 (en) 2018-05-07 2023-11-14 Fronius International Gmbh Method for automatically determining optimum welding parameters for carrying out a weld on a workpiece

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ulewicz et al. Quality management systems in special processes
US8176793B2 (en) Method to estimate the effect of weld location on weld strength
Hyde et al. Creep crack growth data and prediction for a P91 weld at 650 C
JP5263178B2 (en) Nondestructive inspection method for steel rails for tracks
KR101872998B1 (en) Method and system for welding process quality management
US20080302773A1 (en) Arc Welding Robot
JP6041794B2 (en) Stress analysis system and stress analysis method for piping welds
JP2001079683A (en) Method for objectively evaluating welding execution by utilizing heat input temperature by welding
JP2012020336A (en) System for unitary control and inspection in spot welding
Shinde et al. Reduction in TIG welding defects for productivity improvement using Six Sigma
JP6764369B2 (en) Join monitoring system and join equipment
JP4202065B2 (en) Rivet quality monitoring device, rivet quality monitoring method and rivet quality monitoring program
Raujol‐Veillé et al. Rapid method for low cycle fatigue properties: thickness effect on the fatigue crack initiation life of welded joints
CN111745320B (en) Evaluation method and system for improving reliability and applicability of pipeline welding circular seam process
US20040094516A1 (en) Method for real time dynamic diagnosis and decision assistance, for an electric direct spark butt electric welder and its weld seams
Dogan et al. Code of practice for high-temperature testing of weldments
Fairchild et al. Full-Scale Testing for Strain-Based Design Pipelines: Lessons Learned and Recommendations
JP7046365B2 (en) Welding equipment and plate thickness inspection method for welding equipment
Cox et al. Concise process improvement definition with case studies
JP3151682B2 (en) Small bore pipe fatigue strength evaluation system
JP2540630B2 (en) Method of evaluating remaining life of ferritic heat resistant steel
French et al. Advanced real-time weld monitoring evaluation demonstrated with comparisons of manual and robotic TIG welding used in critical nuclear industry fabrication
CN111595569B (en) Detection method for steam pipeline without stopping
Fairchild et al. Observations on the design, execution, and use of full-scale testing for strain-based design pipelines
KR101229311B1 (en) A Welding method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20040805

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20061128

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20061205

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20070403