JP2000199524A - Rolling device - Google Patents

Rolling device

Info

Publication number
JP2000199524A
JP2000199524A JP13749399A JP13749399A JP2000199524A JP 2000199524 A JP2000199524 A JP 2000199524A JP 13749399 A JP13749399 A JP 13749399A JP 13749399 A JP13749399 A JP 13749399A JP 2000199524 A JP2000199524 A JP 2000199524A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
rolling
bearing
steel
hardness
ball
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP13749399A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Susumu Tanaka
進 田中
Manabu Ohori
學 大堀
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NSK Ltd
Original Assignee
NSK Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NSK Ltd filed Critical NSK Ltd
Priority to JP13749399A priority Critical patent/JP2000199524A/en
Publication of JP2000199524A publication Critical patent/JP2000199524A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve silence and durability against impact and vibration in transportation and fretting while the equipment is being operated and eliminate the problems of impact resistance and pre-load dropping in a hybrid bearings. SOLUTION: At least one of an external member, internal member and roller body of a rolling device such as a rolling bearing is made of steel, and a nitriding layer of Hv800 or more or desirably Hv900 or more is given to the one made of steel, and the surface is finished to 0.1 μmRa or less in surface roughness. In addition, the diameter of nitriding particles containing Cr, Mo, V, Nb, W, Ti, Al, Si, etc., is made smaller, and the hardness at a depth of 2%Da (means 2% of diameter) is made Hv653 or more. The thickness of the nitriding compound layer on the surface of the rolling body is made 3 μm or more and 2%Da or less.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、工作機械や食品機
械或いはハードディスクドライブ装置(HDD)やビデ
オテープレコーダー(VTR),ディジタルオーディオ
テープレコーダー(DAT)等に組み込まれる玉軸受を
はじめとする転がり軸受やリニアガイド、ボールねじ等
の転動装置に関し、特にそれらの高機能化や耐久性向上
を図るものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a rolling bearing including a ball bearing incorporated in a machine tool, a food machine, a hard disk drive (HDD), a video tape recorder (VTR), a digital audio tape recorder (DAT), and the like. The present invention relates to rolling devices such as a linear guide, a ball guide, a ball screw, etc., in particular, to enhance their functions and improve durability.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】転がり軸受をはじめとする転動装置は、
その構成部品として外方部材と内方部材と両者に接触し
ながら転動する転動体とを備えており、当該転動体を含
み、外方部材並びに内方部材と転動体とが接触しながら
転動している面を転動面という。また、外方部材とは、
転がり軸受にあっては外輪、リニアガイドにあってはス
ライダ又は案内レール、ボールねじにあってはナットを
示し、内方部材とは、転がり軸受にあっては内輪又は軸
体、リニアガイドにあっては案内レール又はスライダ、
ボールねじにあってはねじ軸を示す。従って、外方部材
の転動面とは、転がり軸受にあっては外輪の軌道面、リ
ニアガイドにあってはスライダ又は案内レールの軌道
溝、ボールねじにあってはナットのねじ溝を示し、内方
部材の転動面とは、転がり軸受にあっては内輪の軌道
面、リニアガイドにあっては案内レール又はスライダの
軌道溝、ボールねじにあってはねじ軸のねじ溝を示す。
2. Description of the Related Art Rolling devices such as rolling bearings include:
As its constituent parts, an outer member and an inner member are provided, and a rolling element that rolls while being in contact with both of them is included. The rolling element is included while the outer and inner members and the rolling element are in contact with each other. The moving surface is called a rolling surface. Also, the outer member is
In the case of a rolling bearing, the outer ring, in the case of a linear guide, a slider or a guide rail, in the case of a ball screw, a nut is shown, and in the case of a rolling bearing, the inner ring or shaft, and in the case of a linear guide. Guide rail or slider,
In the case of a ball screw, the screw shaft is shown. Therefore, the rolling surface of the outer member refers to the raceway surface of the outer ring in the case of a rolling bearing, the raceway groove of a slider or guide rail in the case of a linear guide, and the thread groove of a nut in the case of a ball screw. The rolling surface of the inner member refers to the raceway surface of the inner race in the case of a rolling bearing, the raceway groove of a guide rail or a slider in the case of a linear guide, and the thread groove of a screw shaft in the case of a ball screw.

【0003】一般に、転がり軸受をはじめとする転動装
置は、転動体である玉ないしころ、外方部材並びに内方
部材である外輪、内輪、軸体、スライダ、案内レール、
ナット、ねじ軸等の材料として、主として軸受鋼であれ
ば日本工業規格のSUJ2が、ステンレス鋼であれば日
本工業規格のSUS440C或いは13Cr系のマルテ
ンサイト系ステンレス鋼が、肌焼鋼であれば日本工業規
格のSCR420相当の鋼材が使用されている。また、
このような転がり軸受その他の転動装置は、前述した転
動面において、高面圧下で繰り返し剪断応力とすべりを
受けて使用されるため、その剪断応力に耐える転がり疲
労寿命とすべりに対する耐摩耗性を確保できるように、
軸受鋼には焼入・焼戻、肌焼鋼にはAc1以上のオース
テナイト領域で浸炭又は浸炭窒化後に焼入・焼戻を施し
てHRC58〜64の硬度としている。
Generally, rolling devices such as rolling bearings include balls or rollers as rolling elements, outer members and inner members as outer rings, inner rings, shafts, sliders, guide rails, and the like.
As materials for nuts, screw shafts, etc., SUJ2 of Japanese Industrial Standards is mainly used for bearing steel, SUS440C or 13Cr-based martensitic stainless steel of Japanese Industrial Standard for stainless steel, and Japan for case-hardened steel. A steel material equivalent to the industrial standard SCR420 is used. Also,
Since such rolling bearings and other rolling devices are used by repeatedly receiving shear stress and slip under high surface pressure on the above-mentioned rolling surface, the rolling fatigue life to withstand the shear stress and the abrasion resistance to slip. To ensure that
The bearing steel is quenched and tempered, and the case hardened steel is quenched and tempered after carburizing or carbonitriding in the austenitic region of Ac1 or more to have a hardness of HRC 58 to 64.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、転がり軸受
のうち、特にHDDやVTR等の情報機器或いはファン
モータ等に使用される玉軸受にあっては、トルクや音
響、騒音の低減等に対する要求が非常に厳しいため、極
めて高精度に仕上げ加工されている。これらに用いられ
る軸受材料には、高炭素クロム軸受鋼であるSUJ2又
はマルテンサイト系ステンレスであるSUS440Cや
0.7C−13Crステンレス等の材料が使用されるこ
とが多く、必要とされる硬さや耐磨耗性を得るために焼
入・焼戻しが施され、軌道輪の硬さはHRC58〜64
とされている。また、転動体は、特殊な場合を除き、基
本的には軌道輪或いは外輪,内輪の何れか一方と同一の
材料で構成されることが多い。
Among rolling bearings, in particular, in ball bearings used for information equipment such as HDDs and VTRs or fan motors, there is a demand for reduction of torque, sound, noise, and the like. Because it is very severe, it is finished with extremely high precision. Materials such as SUJ2, which is a high carbon chromium bearing steel, or SUS440C, which is a martensitic stainless steel, or 0.7C-13Cr stainless steel, are often used as bearing materials for these materials. Quenching and tempering are performed to obtain abrasion resistance, and the hardness of the race is HRC 58-64.
It has been. Except in special cases, the rolling elements are often basically made of the same material as the raceway or one of the outer and inner rings.

【0005】従来より、これらの軸受を構成する材料に
はSUJ2が使用されることが多かったが、錆びが問題
となることが多く、ステンレス鋼が多く採用されるよう
になっている。しかし、SUS440C等の従来のステ
ンレス鋼では、凝固過程で粗大な共晶炭化物を生成し、
熱処理後もそれが内在するため、SUJ2より静粛性に
劣り、比較的静粛性が要求される軸受には幾分適用限界
があった。
[0005] Conventionally, SUJ2 has often been used as a material for forming these bearings, but rust often poses a problem, and stainless steel is often used. However, conventional stainless steels such as SUS440C produce coarse eutectic carbides during the solidification process,
Because it is present even after the heat treatment, it is inferior to SUJ2 in quietness, and there are some limits to the application of the bearing that requires relatively quietness.

【0006】そこで、本発明者等は鋭意研究を行い、特
開平9−287053号公報に開示されるように、従来
のステンレス鋼に見られるような粗大な共晶炭化物の生
成を防止し、優れた静粛性と耐食性を兼ね備えた軸受用
ステンレス鋼を開発した。しかしながら、近年、機器の
小型化による可搬性が高まったことで、搬送中の落下や
輸送中に振動にさらされる機会が増え、機器に組み込ま
れた玉軸受の転動面表面がフレッチング損傷して機器の
性能を劣化させる場合があり、更なる耐久性向上の要求
が高まっている。つまり、機器に衝撃荷重が加えられた
場合、特に小型の玉軸受においては、接触楕円が小さい
こともあって、比較的小さな衝撃荷重でも軌道面が永久
変形し、音響劣化や回転トルクむらの発生等が生じ、玉
軸受を組み込んだ機器の性能が劣化するのである。この
問題は、鋼中に内在する残留オーステナイト等の軟質成
分の降伏応力が低いために発生すると考えられており、
玉軸受に必要な硬さを保持しながら、且つ残留オーステ
ナイトを低減化するために、SUJ2を焼入後、サブゼ
ロ処理するか、或いは220〜240℃程度の比較的高
い温度で焼戻しするなどして、衝撃荷重による音響劣化
等を防止するような対策が施されている。しかし、機器
の振動や動作等で生じるフレッチングに対しては、これ
まで、材料面では対策がなされていない。
Accordingly, the present inventors have conducted intensive studies and, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 9-287053, prevented the formation of coarse eutectic carbides as in conventional stainless steel, and We have developed a stainless steel for bearings that has both quietness and corrosion resistance. However, in recent years, the increased portability due to the miniaturization of equipment has increased the chances of falling during transportation and being exposed to vibration during transportation, and the rolling surface of the ball bearing incorporated in the equipment has fretting damage. The performance of the device may be degraded, and there is an increasing demand for further improvement in durability. In other words, when an impact load is applied to equipment, especially in small ball bearings, the contact ellipse is small, so even a relatively small impact load causes permanent deformation of the raceway surface, which causes sound deterioration and uneven rotation torque. And the like, and the performance of the device incorporating the ball bearing is degraded. This problem is thought to occur due to the low yield stress of soft components such as retained austenite inherent in steel,
In order to maintain the hardness required for ball bearings and reduce residual austenite, SUJ2 is quenched and then subjected to sub-zero treatment or tempered at a relatively high temperature of about 220 to 240 ° C. In addition, measures are taken to prevent acoustic degradation and the like due to impact load. However, no countermeasures have been taken so far in terms of materials with respect to fretting caused by vibration or operation of equipment.

【0007】また、工作機械やその他の転がり軸受にお
いても、使用環境が益々、高温、高速化の傾向にあり、
転がり疲労寿命はもとより、耐熱性、耐焼付性等の特性
も非常に重要になってきた。また、リニアガイドやボー
ルねじ等の転動装置においても例外ではなく、構造上、
玉軸受に比較してすべりが生じ易く、更に微小揺動又は
超低速で使用されることが多いため、転動面における潤
滑状態が悪くなる傾向にあり、このため、摩耗の進行が
早く、転動体と外方部材並びに内方部材との間の隙間が
大きくなって、結果として早期に予圧が抜けて、例えば
機械の精密な位置決めができなくなってしまうという問
題もある。
[0007] In addition, the use environment of machine tools and other rolling bearings has been increasing, and the temperature and speed have been increasing.
In addition to the rolling fatigue life, properties such as heat resistance and seizure resistance have become very important. Rolling devices such as linear guides and ball screws are no exception.
Sliding is more likely to occur than ball bearings, and in addition, it is often used at minute swings or at very low speeds.Therefore, the lubrication state on the rolling surface tends to be poor. There is also a problem that the gaps between the moving body, the outer member, and the inner member are increased, and as a result, the preload is released early and, for example, precise positioning of the machine cannot be performed.

【0008】本発明は前記諸問題を解決すべく開発され
たものであり、疲労寿命はもとより、フレッチング耐久
性や耐摩耗性或いは耐焼付性などの諸特性に優れる転動
装置を提供することを目的とするものである。
The present invention has been developed to solve the above-mentioned problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a rolling device which is excellent in not only fatigue life but also various characteristics such as fretting durability, abrasion resistance and seizure resistance. It is the purpose.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】前述のような問題に対し
て、例えば玉軸受では、転動体に窒化珪素等のセラミッ
クスを採用するケースが増えている(以下、転動体にセ
ラミックスを使用した転がり軸受をハイブリッド軸受と
称する)。セラミックスは高価であるが、転動体のみで
あれば、コストの増大を最小限に抑えることができ、同
時に転動体をセラミックスにすることで、接触面での凝
着摩耗が抑制されて、前述のような諸特性が大幅に向上
する。しかし、ハイブリッド軸受でも、転動体に占める
コストの割合が非常に大きいだけでなく、弾性係数や線
膨張係数が鋼と比較して著しく異なるため、例えば静粛
性に対する要求の高い情報機器用玉軸受では、軸受に衝
撃荷重が加わった場合に、軌道輪に圧痕形成が生じて音
響劣化し易いとか、また疲労寿命の観点では、面圧が大
きくなるため、寿命低下の傾向にあり、また温度変化に
伴って予圧が変化してトルク変動が生じ、著しい場合に
は剛性が著しく損なわれるといった異なる諸問題があ
る。
In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, for example, in ball bearings, the use of ceramics such as silicon nitride for the rolling elements has been increasing (hereinafter, rolling using ceramics for the rolling elements). The bearing is called a hybrid bearing). Ceramics are expensive, but if only rolling elements are used, the increase in cost can be minimized.At the same time, by using rolling elements as ceramics, adhesive wear on the contact surface is suppressed, and Such characteristics are greatly improved. However, even in hybrid bearings, the cost ratio of the rolling elements is not only very large, but also the elastic coefficient and linear expansion coefficient are significantly different from steel, so for example, ball bearings for information equipment with high demand for quietness However, when an impact load is applied to the bearing, indentations are formed on the raceway and the sound is likely to deteriorate, and from the viewpoint of fatigue life, the surface pressure increases and the life tends to decrease. Along with this, there is a different problem that the preload changes to cause a torque fluctuation, and in a severe case, the rigidity is significantly impaired.

【0010】本発明者等は、基本的には鋼の特性をその
まま利用し、転動装置の構成部品の表面のみ適当な改質
層を形成させることによって、疲労寿命はもとより、フ
レッチング耐久性、耐摩耗性、耐焼付性等の諸特性を改
善することができないか検討を重ねた。表面改質法に
は、PVD法やCVD法等の蒸着或いはめっき法等があ
るが、これらにより得た改質被膜は所謂デポジットした
ものであり、摺動性には優れるものの、複雑形状部品の
表面に均一な改質層を形成させること非常に困難で、且
つ高い剪断応力がかかる転動部材としては、母材と皮膜
との界面強度が不足して、容易に皮膜の脱落が生じる恐
れがあり、信頼性に欠けるという問題がある。
The present inventors basically utilize the characteristics of steel as it is, and form an appropriate modified layer only on the surface of the components of the rolling device, so that not only fatigue life but also fretting durability, Investigations were made to see if various properties such as wear resistance and seizure resistance could be improved. The surface modification method includes a vapor deposition method such as a PVD method or a CVD method or a plating method. The modified film obtained by these methods is a so-called deposited one and has excellent slidability. It is extremely difficult to form a uniform modified layer on the surface, and as a rolling member subjected to high shear stress, there is a possibility that the interface strength between the base material and the film is insufficient and the film may easily fall off. And there is a problem of lack of reliability.

【0011】そこで、本発明者等は、拡散性改質処理で
ある窒化処理の適用可否を検討した。窒化処理は、塩浴
窒化、ガス窒化、イオン窒化処理等があり、古くから機
械部品の表面処理法として利用されているが、基本的に
は摺動性を付与することを目的に実施されるのであっ
て、これまで高い剪断応力を受ける転がり軸受等の転動
部品に適用されるケースは少ない。
Therefore, the present inventors examined the applicability of a nitriding treatment, which is a diffusion modifying treatment. The nitriding treatment includes salt bath nitriding, gas nitriding, and ion nitriding, and has been used as a surface treatment method for machine parts for a long time, but is basically performed for the purpose of imparting slidability. Therefore, there are few cases in which the present invention is applied to rolling parts such as rolling bearings which receive high shear stress.

【0012】例えば特開平10−131970号公報で
は、一般軸受鋼からなる構成部品の一つに窒化処理を施
し、耐食性改善を図ると共に、表面層における窒化物の
平均粒子径を1μm以下とすることで耐焼付性を向上さ
せ、自動車のエンジンのウォーターポンプ等の補機に好
適な転がり軸受が提案されているが、この公報では窒化
層表面に関する記述のみで、転がり寿命への考慮が不十
分である。例えば表面に窒化層が形成された場合には、
下地は非常に高い温度で焼戻しされることになるので、
硬度が非常に低下する。転がり軸受やその他の転動装置
においては、高い剪断応力を受けるため、下地に十分な
強度が確保されていないと、表面の窒化層が容易に破損
し、結果として疲労寿命の低下を招く。また、表面に形
成された窒化物粒子の大きさを限定するだけで、その表
面粗さの規定がないので、単に窒化したままでは表面が
粗く、静粛性が要求される情報機器用の玉軸受などには
到底使用できない。
For example, in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Hei 10-131970, one of the components made of general bearing steel is subjected to a nitriding treatment to improve corrosion resistance and to reduce the average particle diameter of nitride in the surface layer to 1 μm or less. Rolling bearings that improve seizure resistance and are suitable for auxiliary equipment such as water pumps of automobile engines have been proposed, but this publication only describes the surface of the nitrided layer, and the rolling life is not sufficiently considered. is there. For example, if a nitride layer is formed on the surface,
Since the substrate will be tempered at a very high temperature,
The hardness is greatly reduced. Rolling bearings and other rolling devices are subject to high shear stress, and if the base is not sufficiently strong, the nitrided layer on the surface is easily damaged, resulting in a reduction in fatigue life. In addition, since the surface roughness is not specified only by limiting the size of the nitride particles formed on the surface, a ball bearing for information equipment that requires a rough surface and quietness as it is simply nitrided It cannot be used at all.

【0013】而して、本発明に係る転動装置は、外方部
材と内方部材との間に転動体を配設し、当該転動体は外
方部材及び内方部材に接触しながら転動する転動装置に
おいて、前記外方部材及び内方部材及び転動体の少なく
とも一つが軸受用鋼で構成され、且つその完成品表面に
Hv800以上、好ましくはHv900以上の窒化層を
有し、且つその少なくとも転動面表面は表面粗さ0.1
μmRa以下に仕上加工されていることを特徴とするも
のである。
Thus, in the rolling device according to the present invention, a rolling element is provided between the outer member and the inner member, and the rolling element contacts the outer member and the inner member while rolling. In the moving rolling device, at least one of the outer member and the inner member and the rolling element is made of bearing steel, and has a nitrided layer of Hv800 or more, preferably Hv900 or more on the surface of the finished product, and At least the rolling surface has a surface roughness of 0.1
It is characterized in that it is finish-processed to a value of μmRa or less.

【0014】また、Cr、Mo、V、Nb、W、Ti、
Al、Siの少なくとも1種以上を総含有量で2%以上
25%以下含有する鋼を母材とし、2%Da(直径の2
%の意)深さにおける硬さが少なくともHv653以上
であることが望ましい。また、転動体表面に窒化層を形
成した場合、その窒化層は化合物層と拡散層とからな
り、そのうちの化合物層の厚さが3μm以上2%Da以
下であることが望ましい。
Further, Cr, Mo, V, Nb, W, Ti,
A steel containing at least one or more of Al and Si in a total content of 2% or more and 25% or less is used as a base material and 2% Da (diameter of 2%).
% Means that the hardness at the depth is at least Hv653 or more. When a nitrided layer is formed on the rolling element surface, the nitrided layer is composed of a compound layer and a diffusion layer, and the thickness of the compound layer is desirably 3 μm or more and 2% Da or less.

【0015】また、転動装置が玉軸受である場合にあっ
ては、外輪及び内輪及び複数の転動体から構成される
か、又は外輪及び軸体及び複数の転動体から構成される
玉軸受において、前記転動体を除く、構成部品の少なく
とも何れか一方が、HRC58以上で且つ残留オーステ
ナイトが4%以下の軸受鋼からなり、前記転動体が鋼製
で且つ表面層にHv900以上の表面硬化層を備えるこ
とが望ましい。
In the case where the rolling device is a ball bearing, the ball bearing is composed of an outer ring and an inner ring and a plurality of rolling elements, or a ball bearing composed of an outer ring, a shaft and a plurality of rolling elements. At least one of the constituent parts except the rolling element is made of bearing steel having an HRC of 58 or more and having a retained austenite of 4% or less, and the rolling element is made of steel and has a surface layer having a surface hardened layer of Hv900 or more. It is desirable to have.

【0016】以下に臨界的意義について説明する。 [材料について]母材となる軸受用鋼としては、高炭素
クロム軸受鋼の他に、浸炭鋼、耐熱鋼、ステンレス鋼、
合金工具鋼、高速度工具鋼、クロム鋼、クロムモリブデ
ン鋼等を使用し、表面層にはHv800以上、好ましく
はHv900以上の窒化層を形成する。また、好ましく
は、Cr、Mo、V、Nb、W、Ti、Al、Siの少
なくとも1種以上を総含有量で2%以上、好ましくは5
%以上25%以下含有する鋼を使用して、表面に窒化層
を設けると、当該窒化層には、これらの元素を含む微細
な窒化物が析出して、フレッチング耐久性、耐焼付性、
耐摩耗性が向上する。また、窒化処理は通常、400〜
600℃程度の比較的高い処理温度で実施されるため、
母材に十分な耐熱性がない場合には、窒化層を支える下
地の強度が不足して、容易に表面窒化層の破損を招く。
従って、最大剪断応力位置でもある2%Da深さにおけ
る硬度を少なくともHv653以上確保する。具体的に
は、前記合金元素添加によって耐熱性を向上させるか、
或いは窒化層(拡散層)をより深く設ける。また、窒化
処理前に浸炭、浸炭窒化処理を行って耐熱性を確保して
もよい。また、マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼或いは高
速度工具鋼等であれば、十分な耐熱性があり、窒化処理
後においても十分な硬度を保持できるため、より好まし
い。また、窒化処理温度が高い場合には、母材の耐熱性
が不足して、十分な下地の硬度が得られない場合もある
ため、窒化処理温度は好ましくは500℃以下、更に好
ましくは460℃以下とする。 [表面粗さについて]窒化処理後の表面粗さは、0.5
〜2.0μmRa程度と大きいため、このままでは、静
粛性が要求される情報機器用玉軸受或いは各種ファンモ
ータ用の玉軸受等には適用できない。また、表面の窒化
物或いは酸化物粒子が転動時に脱落するなどして装置の
信頼性を低下させるため、少なくとも転動面は窒化処理
後に仕上加工されていることが必要である。また、その
粗さが大きい場合には、転動面において相手材への攻撃
性が強まる傾向にあり、例えば境界潤滑下で寿命が短く
なる傾向にある。従って、これらの問題を回避して十分
な特性を引き出すために、少なくとも転動面は0.1μ
m以下に仕上加工する。 [窒化層が化合物層と拡散層とからなり、化合物層厚さ
が3μm以上2%Da以下であることについて]窒化層
は一般的には化合物層と拡散層とからなるため、被膜と
母材との密着性が強く、剥離しにくい。但し、転がり軸
受のように、窒化層よりも深い位置で、大きな剪断応力
を受けると、やはり剥離の問題を伴うことになるので、
前述したように下地の硬度も考慮する必要がある。ま
た、化合物層は,(Fe、Cr)2, 3or4N、CrN、C
2 N、Mo2 N、VN等の緻密な窒化物から構成され
ており、優れた表面特性を有する。また、化合物層厚さ
が大きくなると、処理コストが嵩むだけでなく、本来、
鋼が持っている物性を損ない、例えば情報機器用の玉軸
受にあっては耐衝撃性が低下する。従って、信頼性を考
慮すると、化合物層厚さは3μm以上2%Da以下とす
るのが好ましい。 [玉軸受を構成する軌道輪の材料について]前記玉軸受
を構成する軸受鋼とは、JIS G 4805記載のS
UJ2はもちろんのこと、SUS440Cや0.7C−
13Crステンレス、或いはM50や浸炭鋼等、軸受に
使用される一般的な鋼を示す。しかし、玉軸受はハウジ
ング又は軸に接着剤で固定されることが多く、防錆油が
付着していると接着強度が低下したり、防錆油がこれと
反応して錆びの原因となったり、更にはアウトガスが発
生して、これが例えばハードディスク表面に付着してH
DD装置の信頼性を低下させるなどの問題もあるため、
完全脱脂されることが多く、機器の信頼性の点でステン
レス鋼の方が好ましい。但し、従来のSUS440Cの
ような高炭素マルテンサイト系ステンレスの場合には粗
大な共晶炭化物を多数含有するため、軸受の静粛性の点
でSUJ2に劣る。そこで、軌道輪には静粛性、耐食性
に優れる下記の諸元を満たす材料を使用することが望ま
しい。
The critical significance will be described below. [Materials] As bearing steel used as base metal, in addition to high carbon chromium bearing steel, carburized steel, heat-resistant steel, stainless steel,
Alloy tool steel, high-speed tool steel, chromium steel, chromium molybdenum steel, or the like is used, and a nitride layer of Hv800 or more, preferably Hv900 or more is formed on the surface layer. Preferably, the total content of at least one of Cr, Mo, V, Nb, W, Ti, Al and Si is 2% or more, preferably 5% or more.
% And 25% or less, when a nitrided layer is provided on the surface of the steel, fine nitrides containing these elements are precipitated on the nitrided layer, resulting in fretting durability, seizure resistance,
The wear resistance is improved. In addition, the nitriding treatment is usually 400 to
Since it is performed at a relatively high processing temperature of about 600 ° C.,
If the base material does not have sufficient heat resistance, the strength of the base supporting the nitrided layer is insufficient and the surface nitrided layer is easily damaged.
Therefore, the hardness at the depth of 2% Da, which is also the maximum shear stress position, is at least Hv653 or more. Specifically, the heat resistance is improved by adding the alloy element,
Alternatively, a nitride layer (diffusion layer) is provided deeper. Further, heat resistance may be ensured by performing carburizing or carbonitriding before nitriding. Further, martensitic stainless steel or high-speed tool steel is more preferable because it has sufficient heat resistance and can maintain sufficient hardness even after nitriding. Further, when the nitriding temperature is high, the heat resistance of the base material is insufficient and the base may not have sufficient hardness in some cases. Therefore, the nitriding temperature is preferably 500 ° C or lower, more preferably 460 ° C. The following is assumed. [Surface Roughness] The surface roughness after nitriding treatment was 0.5
Since it is as large as about 2.0 μmRa, it cannot be applied to a ball bearing for information equipment or a ball bearing for various fan motors that require quietness as it is. In addition, in order to reduce the reliability of the device because the nitride or oxide particles on the surface fall off during rolling, it is necessary that at least the rolling surface be finished after nitriding. Also, when the roughness is large, the aggressiveness to the counterpart material on the rolling surface tends to increase, and for example, the life tends to be short under boundary lubrication. Therefore, in order to avoid these problems and draw out sufficient characteristics, at least the rolling contact surface is 0.1 μm.
m or less. [Regarding that the nitrided layer is composed of a compound layer and a diffusion layer, and the thickness of the compound layer is not less than 3 μm and not more than 2% Da] Since the nitrided layer generally consists of a compound layer and a diffusion layer, the coating film and the base material And strong adhesion, making it difficult to peel off. However, if a large shear stress is applied at a position deeper than the nitrided layer, as in a rolling bearing, the problem of peeling will also be involved.
As described above, it is necessary to consider the hardness of the base. Further, compound layer, (Fe, Cr) 2, 3or4 N, CrN, C
It is made of a dense nitride such as r 2 N, Mo 2 N, VN, etc., and has excellent surface characteristics. In addition, when the thickness of the compound layer increases, not only does the processing cost increase,
The physical properties of steel are impaired. For example, impact resistance of a ball bearing for information equipment is reduced. Therefore, in consideration of reliability, the thickness of the compound layer is preferably 3 μm or more and 2% Da or less. [Regarding Material of Bearing Ring Constituting Ball Bearing] The bearing steel constituting the ball bearing is defined by S described in JIS G 4805.
Not only UJ2, but SUS440C and 0.7C-
It shows general steel used for bearings, such as 13Cr stainless steel or M50 or carburized steel. However, ball bearings are often fixed to the housing or shaft with an adhesive, and if rust-preventive oil is attached, the adhesive strength is reduced, or the rust-preventive oil reacts with this to cause rust. And further outgas is generated, which adheres to, for example, the surface of the hard disk and
Because there are problems such as lowering the reliability of the DD device,
It is often completely degreased, and stainless steel is preferred in terms of equipment reliability. However, a conventional high carbon martensitic stainless steel such as SUS440C contains a large number of coarse eutectic carbides, and thus is inferior to SUJ2 in terms of quietness of the bearing. Therefore, it is desirable to use a material that is excellent in quietness and corrosion resistance and satisfies the following specifications for the race.

【0017】Cは、基地をマルテンサイト化することに
より焼入・焼戻し後の硬さを向上させて強度を増加させ
る元素であるが、耐食性の面からは少ないほどよい。多
量に加えると製鋼時にCrが粗大な共晶炭化物を形成
し、その結果、基地中のCr濃度が不足して十分な耐食
性が得られなくなるだけでなく、転動寿命、静粛性を低
下させる。従って、炭素含有量は0.5重量%以下とす
る。
C is an element that improves the hardness after quenching and tempering by converting the matrix into martensite to increase the strength, but the smaller the better, the better the corrosion resistance. When added in a large amount, Cr forms coarse eutectic carbide during steelmaking, and as a result, not only is the Cr concentration in the matrix insufficient but sufficient corrosion resistance cannot be obtained, but also the rolling life and quietness are reduced. Therefore, the carbon content is set to 0.5% by weight or less.

【0018】また、NはCと同様にマルテンサイトを強
化して耐孔食性を向上させる作用があり、更に粗大な1
次共晶炭化物の形成を抑制するため、0.05重量%以
上好ましくは0.08重量%以上添加される。しかし、
多量の窒素を添加しようとすると、大気圧下では、凝固
過程で気泡が生じてインゴットに多量の気孔が導入さ
れ、素材の健全性を損なうため、Nの含有量は0.2重
量%未満、好ましくは0.18重量%以下とした。
N has the effect of strengthening martensite and improving pitting corrosion resistance in the same manner as C.
In order to suppress the formation of hypoeutectic carbides, 0.05% by weight or more, preferably 0.08% by weight or more is added. But,
If an attempt is made to add a large amount of nitrogen, under the atmospheric pressure, bubbles are generated in the coagulation process and a large amount of pores are introduced into the ingot, thereby impairing the soundness of the material. Therefore, the content of N is less than 0.2% by weight. Preferably, the content is 0.18% by weight or less.

【0019】また、十分な焼入・焼戻し後の硬さ(HR
C58以上)を確保し、疲労や磨耗に対する損傷を避け
るためには、C+Nの総含有量が0.45重量%以上必
要である。また、Mnは製鋼時の脱酸剤として必要な元
素で0.1重量%以上添加されるが、多量に添加すると
鍛造性、被削性を低下させるだけでなく、焼入れ後に多
量の残留オーステナイトが生成して衝撃荷重によって静
粛性が劣化し易くなる。そのため、Mnは1.0重量%
以下、好ましくは0.5重量%以下とした。
Further, the hardness after sufficient quenching and tempering (HR
(C58 or more), and the total content of C + N is required to be 0.45% by weight or more in order to avoid damage due to fatigue and wear. Mn is a necessary element as a deoxidizing agent in steel making and is added in an amount of 0.1% by weight or more. However, when added in a large amount, not only decreases forgeability and machinability but also causes a large amount of retained austenite after quenching. Generated and the silence tends to deteriorate due to the impact load. Therefore, Mn is 1.0% by weight.
Or less, preferably 0.5% by weight or less.

【0020】また、SiはMnと同じく製鋼時の脱酸剤
として0.1重量%以上必要である。更に、焼戻し軟化
抵抗性を高め、転動疲労寿命を向上させるのに有効な元
素であるが、多量に添加すると靱性、加工性等を低下さ
せるため、上限を1.0重量%以下とした。また、Cr
は鋼に耐食性を与える最も必要な元素であるが、10.
0重量%に満たないと良好な耐食性が得られない。ま
た、Cr含有量が増加すると、耐食性は向上するが、必
要以上に添加すると、δフェライトが生成して脆化した
り、Ms(マルテンサイト変態開始温度)が低下し、多
量の残留オーステナイトが生成して硬さが低下したりす
ることがあるので、16.0重量%以下とした。但し、
好ましくは11.5重量%以上13.5重量%以下とす
る。更に、C含有量との関係がC%≦−0.05Cr%
+1.41を満足しなければ、粗大な共晶炭化物が生成
して、静粛性、耐食性を共に低下させる。
Further, Si needs to be 0.1% by weight or more as a deoxidizing agent at the time of steel making like Mn. Further, it is an element effective for increasing the tempering softening resistance and improving the rolling fatigue life. However, if added in a large amount, the toughness and the workability are reduced, so the upper limit was made 1.0% by weight or less. In addition, Cr
Is the most necessary element to impart corrosion resistance to steel,
If it is less than 0% by weight, good corrosion resistance cannot be obtained. When the Cr content is increased, the corrosion resistance is improved. However, when added more than necessary, δ ferrite is formed and becomes brittle, Ms (martensite transformation start temperature) is reduced, and a large amount of retained austenite is formed. Therefore, the hardness may be reduced, so the content is set to 16.0% by weight or less. However,
Preferably, it is 11.5% by weight or more and 13.5% by weight or less. Further, the relationship with the C content is C% ≦ −0.05Cr%
If +1.41 is not satisfied, coarse eutectic carbides are formed, and both silence and corrosion resistance are reduced.

【0021】また、残留オーステナイトは軟質で降伏応
力が低く、軸受が損耗したり、僅かな衝撃荷重を受けた
場合には転動体との接触部位に極めて小さな永久変形が
生じて音響劣化の原因となるため、4%以下、好ましく
は2%以下とする。 [玉軸受の転動体について]前記玉軸受に使用される転
動体は、グリースや潤滑油等に保護されて耐食性が問題
になることは殆どないため、耐フレッチング性等の耐久
性を向上させるべく、表面にHv900以上の窒化層を
付与する。これにより、表面磨耗を抑え、耐久性が飛躍
的に向上する。また窒化層を付与したことによって、自
体の損傷だけでなく、接触する相手部材の損傷をも抑制
する傾向にあり、耐フレッチング性を著しく高めること
ができる。また、転動体に窒化層を付与することによっ
て、組立時のボールキズが極端に減少し、不良率低減に
も効果がある。
Retained austenite is soft and has a low yield stress. When bearings are worn out or subjected to a slight impact load, extremely small permanent deformation occurs at a contact portion with a rolling element, causing acoustic deterioration. Therefore, the content is set to 4% or less, preferably 2% or less. [Regarding Rolling Elements of Ball Bearings] Rolling elements used in the ball bearings are protected by grease, lubricating oil and the like, so that corrosion resistance hardly causes a problem. Therefore, in order to improve durability such as fretting resistance. A nitride layer of Hv900 or more is provided on the surface. Thereby, surface wear is suppressed and durability is dramatically improved. In addition, the provision of the nitride layer tends to suppress not only damage to itself but also damage to a mating member that comes into contact with the nitride layer, so that fretting resistance can be significantly improved. In addition, by providing the rolling element with a nitride layer, ball flaws during assembly are extremely reduced, which is also effective in reducing the defective rate.

【0022】一般に窒化処理は400℃〜600℃、好
ましくは400℃〜480℃の範囲で実施されるが、窒
化処理した後には芯部は焼戻し作用によって軟化し、硬
度が著しく低下する場合がある。通常、窒化処理後に
は、表面に化合物層が形成され、それよりも深いところ
では、窒素の拡散による拡散硬化層を有する。窒化処理
は、この拡散硬化層を有するため、皮膜と母材との密着
性が強く、剥離し難い。しかし、軸受が作動したとき
に、窒化層よりも深い最大剪断応力位置で大きな剪断力
を受けると、その部分に十分な強度がない場合には、塑
性変形を伴って表面硬化層の破損を招く恐れがある。従
って、転動体に使用される材料には、窒化処理後でも剪
断応力に耐えられるだけの十分な硬度を有する材料であ
ることが必要である。具体的にはマルテンサイト系ステ
ンレス鋼、高速度工具鋼或いは合金工具鋼等を使用し、
表面から2%Da深さまではHRC58以上とするか、
もしくは芯部硬さを窒化処理後にHRC58以上とす
る。
Generally, the nitriding treatment is carried out at a temperature in the range of 400 ° C. to 600 ° C., preferably 400 ° C. to 480 ° C., but after the nitriding treatment, the core may be softened by tempering and the hardness may be significantly reduced. . Usually, after the nitriding treatment, a compound layer is formed on the surface, and a deeper portion has a diffusion hardened layer by diffusion of nitrogen. Since the nitriding treatment has this diffusion hardened layer, the adhesion between the film and the base material is strong, and the nitriding treatment is difficult to peel. However, when the bearing is operated and receives a large shear force at the maximum shear stress position deeper than the nitrided layer, if the part does not have sufficient strength, it causes plastic deformation and damage of the surface hardened layer. There is fear. Therefore, it is necessary that the material used for the rolling element has a sufficient hardness to withstand the shear stress even after the nitriding treatment. Specifically, using martensitic stainless steel, high-speed tool steel or alloy tool steel,
HRC 58 or more at 2% Da depth from the surface,
Alternatively, the core hardness is HRC 58 or more after the nitriding treatment.

【0023】[0023]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実施の形態につい
て説明する。まず、図1に示す二円筒摩耗試験により、
表1に示す供試材の摩耗試験を行う。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. First, a two-cylinder wear test shown in FIG.
A wear test of the test materials shown in Table 1 is performed.

【0024】[0024]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0025】この二円筒摩耗試験は、上下に対向する一
対の円筒10に供試材を装着し、上から荷重Pを負荷し
ながら互いに接触状態で、逆方向に低速で回転させ、上
下の円筒試験片の摩耗量を求めた。また、試験片作製に
あたっては、まず所定の形状に加工した後、焼入硬化
し、研削仕上加工を施した。更に引き続き、下記の何れ
かの条件で窒化処理を施した。 条件1: 300〜380℃×1時間フッ化処理(90%N2 −1
0%NF3 混合ガス)後、400〜480℃×24〜4
8時間窒化処理(50%N2 −50%NH3 混合ガス) 条件2: 480〜560℃×3〜8時間窒化処理(50%N2
50%NH3 混合ガス) 条件3: 480〜560℃×3〜8時間軟窒化処理(シアン酸塩
(KCNO及びNaCNO)を主成分とする塩浴窒化) このうち、条件1は前処理としてフッ化処理を施した場
合の例であり、フッ素系ガスのクリーニング作用によっ
て、窒化を阻害する表面酸化層が除去されるため、より
低温で均一な窒化層を形成させることができ、高合金系
では特に有効な手法である。また、条件2は従来のガス
窒化、条件3は軟窒化(タフトライド)の例である。試
験は、窒化処理のまま(黒皮)のもの及び仕上加工を施
したものについて実施した。完成品品質及び試験結果を
下記表2に示す。なお、表2中には、上下に対向させた
一対の円筒試験片の摩耗量の平均値を示す。また、表面
硬さは、荷重100gでサンプル数n=10回測定した
平均値を用いた。また、化合物層厚さは、ピクラール又
は塩化第二鉄塩酸溶液でエッチングした後、光学顕微鏡
によりサンプル数n=10回観察し、明瞭に観察される
表面窒化層と下地との境界から化合物層の厚さを求め、
その平均値を記載した。
In this two-cylinder abrasion test, a test material is mounted on a pair of upper and lower cylinders 10 which are opposed to each other and rotated at a low speed in opposite directions while contacting each other while applying a load P from above. The wear amount of the test piece was determined. In preparing the test pieces, the test pieces were first processed into a predetermined shape, then quenched and hardened, and subjected to a grinding finish. Further, a nitriding treatment was performed under any of the following conditions. Condition 1: Fluorination treatment at 300 to 380 ° C. × 1 hour (90% N 2 −1)
0% NF 3 mixed gas), then 400-480 ° C × 24-4
8 hours of nitriding (50% N 2 -50% NH 3 mixed gas) Condition 2: 480-560 ° C. × 3-8 hours of nitriding (50% N 2
50% NH 3 mixed gas) Condition 3: nitrocarburizing treatment (salt bath nitriding mainly composed of cyanate (KCNO and NaCNO)) for 3 to 8 hours at 480 to 560 ° C. This is an example of a case where a nitriding treatment is performed.Since the surface oxide layer that inhibits nitriding is removed by the cleaning action of the fluorine-based gas, a uniform nitride layer can be formed at a lower temperature. This is a particularly effective technique. Condition 2 is an example of conventional gas nitriding, and Condition 3 is an example of soft nitriding (tufftrid). The test was carried out on the as-nitrided (black scale) and the finish-finished one. The quality of the finished product and the test results are shown in Table 2 below. Table 2 shows the average value of the wear amount of a pair of cylindrical test pieces vertically opposed to each other. The surface hardness used was an average value obtained by measuring the number of samples n = 10 times with a load of 100 g. Further, the thickness of the compound layer is determined by observing the sample number n = 10 times with an optical microscope after etching with a picral or ferric chloride / hydrochloric acid solution, and clearly observing the compound layer from the boundary between the surface nitrided layer and the base. Find the thickness,
The average value is described.

【0026】摩耗試験条件は以下の通りである。 (二円筒摩耗試験) 荷重 :50kgf 回転数 :10rpm すべり率:10% 潤滑 :鉱油 試験時間:100時間 試験温度:常温The conditions for the wear test are as follows. (Two-cylinder abrasion test) Load: 50 kgf Revolution: 10 rpm Slip rate: 10% Lubrication: Mineral oil Test time: 100 hours Test temperature: normal temperature

【0027】[0027]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0028】表2からも明らかなように、本発明の前記
諸条件を満足する各実施例A−1〜A−8は、比較例A
−9〜A−13に比較して、非常に良好な耐摩耗性を有
する。これに対して、比較例A−9はSUJ2に窒化処
理を施した場合の例であり、窒化処理していない比較例
A−13と比較するとやや耐摩耗性は向上しているが、
表面硬さも表面粗さも前記諸条件を満足しておらず、各
実施例に比較すると、効果が小さいことが分かる。ま
た、比較例A−10及びA−11はSUJ2を窒化処理
後、仕上加工を施した場合の例であるが、化合物層が僅
かしか生成されないため、表面仕上げの際に、化合物層
が全て除去されてしまい、表面硬さ及び化合物層厚さの
点で前記諸条件を満足せず、前記比較例A−9と比較し
てやや劣る結果となった。但し、拡散層は存在している
ので、前記比較例A−13と比較すると、幾分耐摩耗性
に効果が確認される。また、窒化処理の違い、つまり前
記窒化処理条件の違いによる差はあまり認められない。
As is clear from Table 2, Examples A-1 to A-8 satisfying the above-mentioned conditions of the present invention are comparative examples A
It has much better wear resistance than -9 to A-13. On the other hand, Comparative Example A-9 is an example in which nitriding treatment was performed on SUJ2, and although the abrasion resistance was slightly improved as compared with Comparative Example A-13 without nitriding treatment,
Neither the surface hardness nor the surface roughness satisfies the above conditions, and it can be seen that the effect is small as compared with the examples. Comparative Examples A-10 and A-11 are examples in which SUJ2 is subjected to a finishing treatment after nitriding treatment, but only a small amount of the compound layer is formed. As a result, the above conditions were not satisfied in terms of the surface hardness and the thickness of the compound layer, and the result was slightly inferior to that of Comparative Example A-9. However, since the diffusion layer is present, the effect is somewhat confirmed on the abrasion resistance as compared with Comparative Example A-13. Also, there is little difference in the nitriding process, that is, the difference due to the difference in the nitriding condition.

【0029】次に、図2に示すボールロッド寿命試験機
により寿命試験を行った。一般に、市場での軸受寿命
は、潤滑不良などが原因となって表面から材料が損傷
し、破壊に至る場合が多い。そこで、潤滑油には低粘度
油であるS10(40℃−10cst)を用い、更に転
動体はSUJ2製のボールをバレル加工によって粗さ
0.27μmRaとしたものを使用し、下記1式で表さ
れる油膜パラメータΛが1以下になるようにして、つま
り境界潤滑状態として、試験を実施した。作製した試験
片の完成品品質及び評価結果を下記表3に示す。なお、
表3の2%Da深さにおける硬さは、荷重500gでビ
ッカース硬度をサンプル数n=10回測定し、その平均
値を記載した。
Next, a life test was performed using a ball rod life tester shown in FIG. In general, the life of a bearing in the market often results in damage to the material from the surface due to poor lubrication and the like, leading to destruction. Therefore, S10 (40 ° C.-10 cst), which is a low-viscosity oil, is used as the lubricating oil, and a rolling element made of SUJ2 balls with a roughness of 0.27 μmRa by barrel processing is used. The test was performed such that the oil film parameter Λ to be performed was 1 or less, that is, a boundary lubrication state. Table 3 below shows the quality of the finished product and the evaluation results of the prepared test pieces. In addition,
The hardness at a 2% Da depth in Table 3 was obtained by measuring the Vickers hardness under a load of 500 g and measuring the number of samples n = 10 times, and described the average value.

【0030】 Λ=hm/(σ1 2+σ2 21/2 ……… (1) hm:最小油膜厚さ σ1 :ボール表面粗さ σ2 :ロッド表面粗さ (ボールロッド寿命試験) 試験片 :φ26mm×80mm、27/32インチボ
ール 回転速度:7800rpm 面圧 :45kgf/mm2 潤滑油 :S10
[0030] Λ = hm / (σ 1 2 + σ 2 2) 1/2 ......... (1) hm: minimum oil film thickness sigma 1: Ball surface roughness sigma 2: Rod surface roughness (ball rod life test) Test piece: φ26 mm × 80 mm, 27/32 inch ball Rotation speed: 7,800 rpm Surface pressure: 45 kgf / mm 2 Lubricating oil: S10

【0031】[0031]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0032】表3より、前記諸条件を満足する実施例B
−1〜B−5は、何れも比較例B−6〜B−11と比較
して長寿命であることが分かる。これに対して、比較例
B−6、B−8はSUJ2の表面に窒化層を形成した場
合の例であるが、何れも表面硬さが前記諸条件を満足せ
ず、比較例B−8は黒皮のままで表面粗さも前記諸条件
を満足しないことから、各実施例に比較して表面損傷が
著しく、合わせて2%Da深さにおける硬さも十分でな
いため、短寿命である。また、比較例B−7は表面損傷
は軽微であるが、2%Da深さにおける硬さが十分でな
いため、結果として短寿命である。また、比較例B−9
は窒化処理後に仕上加工を施しておらず、表面状態が悪
く、表面を起点とした剥離が生じた結果、短寿命となっ
た。また、比較例B−10はSUJ2の例であるが、窒
化処理しておらず、表面損傷が著しくて短寿命である。
また、比較例B−11はSUS302を窒化処理した場
合の例であるが、表面損傷は軽微であるものの,2%D
a深さの硬さが十分でないため、短寿命となった。以上
のように、表面硬さ及び2%Da深さの硬さが前記諸条
件を満足する実施例は転がり疲労の点で優れている。
From Table 3, it can be seen that Example B satisfying the above conditions was used.
It can be seen that -1 to B-5 all have a longer life than Comparative Examples B-6 to B-11. On the other hand, Comparative Examples B-6 and B-8 are examples in which a nitride layer was formed on the surface of SUJ2, but the surface hardness did not satisfy the above-described conditions, and Comparative Example B-8 Since the surface roughness is still black and does not satisfy the above conditions, the surface damage is remarkable as compared with each of the examples. In addition, the hardness at a depth of 2% Da is not sufficient, so that the life is short. In Comparative Example B-7, the surface damage was slight, but the hardness at a depth of 2% Da was not sufficient, and as a result, the life was short. Comparative Example B-9
No finish processing was performed after the nitriding treatment, the surface condition was poor, and peeling occurred starting from the surface, resulting in a short life. Further, Comparative Example B-10 is an example of SUJ2, but is not subjected to nitriding treatment, and has a remarkable surface damage and a short life.
Comparative Example B-11 is an example in which SUS302 was subjected to a nitriding treatment. Although the surface damage was slight, 2% D
a) The hardness was short, and the life was short. As described above, Examples in which the surface hardness and the hardness at a depth of 2% Da satisfy the above conditions are excellent in terms of rolling fatigue.

【0033】また、表4には耐焼付性を評価した結果を
示す。評価は図3に示す4球式焼付限界試験により行
い、固定側にはSUJ2球を使用し、油浴潤滑下(ジェ
ットオイルII)、回転数6000rpm一定で、荷重を
変化させ、焼付限界荷重、つまりPV値を求めた。表4
より、前記諸条件を全て満足する実施例C−1〜C−5
は各比較例と比較して耐焼付性に優れる。一方、表面硬
さが不十分で且つ黒皮のままで表面粗さの大きな比較例
C−8、黒皮のままで表面粗さの大きな比較例C−9、
窒化処理を施しておらず、表面硬さも不十分な比較例C
−10は何れも耐摩耗性が各実施例に劣る。
Table 4 shows the results of evaluation of seizure resistance. The evaluation was carried out by a four-ball type baking limit test shown in FIG. 3. Using a SUJ2 ball on the fixed side, the load was changed under oil bath lubrication (jet oil II) at a constant rotation speed of 6000 rpm, and the baking limit load was determined. That is, the PV value was determined. Table 4
Examples C-1 to C-5 satisfying all the above conditions
Is superior in seizure resistance as compared with each comparative example. On the other hand, Comparative Example C-8 having an insufficient surface hardness and a large surface roughness while maintaining the black scale, Comparative Example C-9 having a large surface roughness while maintaining the black scale,
Comparative Example C not subjected to nitriding treatment and having insufficient surface hardness
-10 is inferior to each example in abrasion resistance.

【0034】[0034]

【表4】 [Table 4]

【0035】次に、情報機器用の玉軸受を例に評価した
結果を以下に示す。なお、評価は玉軸受695(JIS
呼び番号)で行い、コストを考慮して、転動体表面にの
み窒化層を付与した。軌道輪には、SUJ2を使用し、
焼入後、220〜240℃で2時間焼戻し、残留オース
テナイトを4%以下とした。保持器にはプラスチック製
保持器を、軸受の潤滑については鉱油系グリースを使用
した。
Next, the results of evaluation using a ball bearing for information equipment as an example are shown below. The evaluation was performed using a ball bearing 695 (JIS
No.), and in consideration of cost, a nitride layer was provided only on the rolling element surface. For the race, use SUJ2,
After quenching, it was tempered at 220 to 240 ° C. for 2 hours to reduce retained austenite to 4% or less. A plastic cage was used for the cage, and a mineral oil grease was used for lubrication of the bearing.

【0036】まず、前記表1に記載した材料を用いて粗
球を成形した後、焼入硬化し、目標寸法まで研削してか
ら、窒化処理を施し、更にラップ仕上げを行って、φ2
mmの転動体を、JIS B 1501記載の等級3
(G3)以上の高精度に仕上加工した。なお、窒化処理
前に高精度に仕上加工しておくと、窒化処理による粗さ
や形状の崩れが少なく、ややラップ仕上げの取り代を少
なくして製造することが可能となるが、窒化処理前の精
度がG100程度であっても、例えば真球度2.5μ
m、表面粗さ0.125Raという高精度に仕上る場合
のラップ仕上げの取り代は数μm〜十数μmと十分であ
ることから、どちらを先に行ってもよい。つまり、窒化
層厚さが十分でない場合には前者が、窒化層厚さが十分
である場合には後者が好ましいことになる。
First, after forming a coarse sphere using the materials described in Table 1 above, quenching and hardening, grinding to a target size, nitriding treatment, and lapping are further performed.
mm rolling element, grade 3 described in JIS B 1501
(G3) Finish processing was performed with high precision as described above. In addition, if the finish processing is performed with high precision before the nitriding treatment, the roughness and shape collapse due to the nitriding treatment are small, and it is possible to manufacture with a little reduction in the lap finishing margin. Even if the accuracy is about G100, for example, sphericity 2.5μ
In the case of finishing with high precision of m and surface roughness of 0.125 Ra, the margin of lap finishing is several μm to ten and several μm, whichever is sufficient, so whichever may be performed first. That is, the former is preferable when the thickness of the nitride layer is not sufficient, and the latter is preferable when the thickness of the nitride layer is sufficient.

【0037】この方法により作成した転動体の完成品品
質を表5に示す。このうち、表面硬さは、表面下5μm
位置の硬さを荷重50gでサンプル数n=10回測定し
た平均値を用いた。また、化合物層厚さは、ピクラール
又は塩化第二鉄塩酸溶液でエッチングした後、光学顕微
鏡によりサンプル数n=10回観察し、明瞭に観察され
る表面窒化層と下地との境界から化合物層の厚さを求
め、その平均値を記載した。また、2%Da深さにおけ
る硬さは荷重50gでビッカース硬度をサンプル数n=
10回測定し、その平均値を記載した。また、表面粗さ
については、テーラーホブソン社製のタリサーフ6型ボ
ールユニットを用い、サンプル数n=10回測定してそ
の平均値を記載した。
Table 5 shows the quality of the finished product of the rolling element produced by this method. Among them, the surface hardness is 5 μm below the surface.
The average value obtained by measuring the hardness of the position at a load of 50 g and the number of samples n = 10 was used. Further, the thickness of the compound layer is determined by observing the sample number n = 10 times with an optical microscope after etching with a picral or ferric chloride / hydrochloric acid solution, and clearly observing the compound layer from the boundary between the surface nitrided layer and the base. The thickness was determined, and the average value was described. The hardness at a depth of 2% Da was determined by measuring the Vickers hardness under a load of 50 g with the number of samples n =
The measurement was performed ten times, and the average value was described. The surface roughness was measured using a Talysurf 6-type ball unit manufactured by Taylor Hobson Co., and the number of samples was measured n = 10 times, and the average value was described.

【0038】軸受の機能評価については、初期音評価、
音響耐久性評価、フレッチング耐久性評価、及び耐衝撃
性評価を実施した。評価結果を前記表5に合わせて示
す。初期音評価は前記玉軸受を予圧1.2kgf、回転
数1800rpmで作動させたときの音圧測定を行うこ
とで行い、表中にはサンプル数n=10回測定した平均
値を求め、SUJ2製軸受である比較例D−12の測定
平均値を1としたときの比で示した。
The function evaluation of the bearing includes the initial sound evaluation,
Sound durability evaluation, fretting durability evaluation, and impact resistance evaluation were performed. The evaluation results are shown in Table 5 above. The initial sound evaluation was performed by measuring the sound pressure when the ball bearing was operated at a preload of 1.2 kgf and a rotation speed of 1800 rpm. The results are shown as ratios when the measured average value of Comparative Example D-12 as a bearing is set to 1.

【0039】また、音響耐久性評価は、予圧1.2kg
f、回転数7200rpm、温度70℃で500時間回
転作動させた後、再度、予圧1.2kgf、回転数18
00rpmで音圧測定を行うことで評価し、同様にサン
プル数n=10回測定した平均値を求め、SUJ2製軸
受である比較例D−12の測定平均値を1としたときの
比で示した。
The acoustic durability was evaluated with a preload of 1.2 kg.
f, after rotating at 7,200 rpm at a temperature of 70 ° C. for 500 hours, again applying a preload of 1.2 kgf and a rotating speed of 18
The evaluation was performed by measuring the sound pressure at 00 rpm, and similarly, the average value obtained by measuring the number of samples n = 10 was obtained, and the average value of Comparative Example D-12, which is a SUJ2 bearing, was shown as a ratio when the average value was set to 1. Was.

【0040】また、フレッチング耐久性評価は、下記の
条件でサンプル数n=10回測定し、再度、予圧1.2
kgf、回転数1800rpmで音圧測定を行い、サン
プル数n=10回測定した平均値を求め、SUJ2製軸
受である比較例D−12の測定平均値を1としたときの
比で示した。また、耐衝撃性評価は、玉軸受に1.2k
gf、5kgf、それ以後は0.5kgf毎の順にアキ
シャル荷重を負荷し、試験前に比較して音圧が30mG
上昇したところを耐衝撃荷重とし、SUJ2製軸受であ
る比較例D−12の耐衝撃荷重を0として、それより低
下した荷重を記載した。 (フレッチング耐久性評価) 予圧 :1.2kgf 揺動条件:2°、27Hz 揺動回数:30万回
The evaluation of fretting durability was carried out by measuring the number of samples n = 10 times under the following conditions, and again applying a preload of 1.2.
The sound pressure was measured at kgf and a rotation speed of 1800 rpm, and an average value obtained by measuring the number of samples n = 10 was determined. The average value of Comparative Example D-12, which is a bearing made of SUJ2, was shown as a ratio when the average value was set to 1. The impact resistance was evaluated for ball bearings at 1.2k.
gf, 5 kgf, and thereafter, an axial load is applied in the order of 0.5 kgf, and the sound pressure is 30 mG compared to that before the test.
The rise was defined as the impact resistance load, and the impact resistance load of Comparative Example D-12, which is a SUJ2 bearing, was set to 0, and the load reduced therefrom was described. (Evaluation of fretting durability) Preload: 1.2 kgf Oscillation condition: 2 °, 27 Hz Oscillation frequency: 300,000 times

【0041】[0041]

【表5】 [Table 5]

【0042】表5からも明らかなように、前記諸条件を
満足する各実施例D−1〜D−8は全て表面にHv90
0以上の窒化層を有しており、諸特性において格段に優
れている。これに対して、比較例D−9及びD−10
は、転動体表面に形成された窒化層が非常に厚く、その
厚さが2%Daよりも大きいため、本来、鋼が備えてい
る物性を損ない、耐衝撃性が各実施例に比較して劣る結
果が得られた。また、比較例D−11は、SUJ2に窒
化処理を施した場合の例であるが、表面硬さが前記諸条
件に比較して低く、化合物層も殆どないため、諸機能に
おいて各実施例に劣っている。また、比較例D−12
は、従来のSUJ2鋼球の場合の例であるが、前述のよ
うに音響耐久性、フレッチング耐久性の点で不十分であ
る。また、比較例D−13及びD−14は窒化処理した
ままのボールを組み込んだ場合の例であるが、表面粗さ
が低く、直径相互差等が大きいため、初期音が非常に大
きく、その後の評価を省略した。また、比較例D−15
は参考用としてセラミックス球(Si3 4 )を使用し
たハイブリッド軸受の例を示したが、音響耐久性、フレ
ッチング耐久性については非常に優れているものの、耐
衝撃性の点では非常に劣っている。
As is clear from Table 5, all of Examples D-1 to D-8 satisfying the above conditions have Hv90 on the surface.
It has a nitride layer of 0 or more, and is remarkably excellent in various characteristics. In contrast, Comparative Examples D-9 and D-10
Is because the nitrided layer formed on the rolling element surface is very thick and the thickness is larger than 2% Da, so that the physical properties inherent in steel are impaired, and the impact resistance is lower than that of each of the examples. Inferior results were obtained. Comparative Example D-11 is an example in which SUJ2 was subjected to nitriding treatment. However, the surface hardness was lower than the above conditions, and there was almost no compound layer. Inferior. Comparative Example D-12
Is an example of a conventional SUJ2 steel ball, but is insufficient in acoustic durability and fretting durability as described above. Further, Comparative Examples D-13 and D-14 are examples in which a ball that has been subjected to nitriding treatment is incorporated. However, since the surface roughness is low and the diameter difference is large, the initial sound is very large. Was omitted. Comparative Example D-15
Shows an example of a hybrid bearing using ceramic spheres (Si 3 N 4 ) for reference, but it has very good acoustic durability and fretting durability, but very poor impact resistance. I have.

【0043】次に、前記実施例D−5及び比較例D−1
2、D−15の線膨張係数の違いによる予圧に及ぼす影
響を、母材の線膨張係数を用いて計算により求めた結果
を表6に示す。なお、ハブの材質はフェライト系ステン
レス鋼(10.4×10-6/℃)と仮定し、20℃にお
ける予圧0.8kgf、残留ラジアル隙間は16.5μ
mとして、0℃〜70℃の範囲で計算した。
Next, the above-mentioned Example D-5 and Comparative Example D-1
Table 2 shows the results obtained by calculating the influence of the difference in the linear expansion coefficient of D-15 on the preload by using the linear expansion coefficient of the base material. The hub material is assumed to be ferritic stainless steel (10.4 × 10 −6 / ° C.), the preload at 20 ° C. is 0.8 kgf, and the residual radial gap is 16.5 μm.
m was calculated in the range of 0 ° C to 70 ° C.

【0044】[0044]

【表6】 [Table 6]

【0045】表6から明らかなように、母材に鋼を使用
し、表面のみ改質を図った実施例では、予圧荷重に及ぼ
す温度の影響が小さく、予圧抜けによる剛性低下の点で
も,SUJ2製軸受の比較例D−12同様、非常に優れ
ている。これに対して、セラミックス球(Si3 4
を使用したハイブリッド軸受である比較例D−15で
は、やはり70℃で完全に予圧抜けが生じる結果となっ
た。
As is clear from Table 6, in the embodiment in which steel was used as the base material and only the surface was modified, the effect of temperature on the preload was small, and the SUJ2 was also reduced in rigidity due to preload loss. As in Comparative Example D-12 of the bearing made, it is very excellent. On the other hand, ceramic sphere (Si 3 N 4 )
In Comparative Example D-15, which is a hybrid bearing using the same, the preload loss was completely generated at 70 ° C.

【0046】次に、直動部品であるボールねじで、その
耐久性を評価した結果を以下に示す。評価は、ねじ軸2
0mm、リード4mmのボールねじ装置を用いて摩耗試
験を行った。また、この場合もコストを考慮して転動体
にのみ窒化層を付与したもので評価した。また、転動体
には前記表4に記載した転動体C−1〜C10を用い、
ねじ軸及びナットには,JIS鋼種SCM420Hを焼
入・焼戻処理したものを使用した。試験条件は以下の通
りである。 (ボールねじ耐久試験) 初期予圧荷重:490N(外部荷重は無負荷) 回転数用 :1rpm(超低速) 潤滑剤 :鉱油系グリース(40℃での基油粘度3
7cst) なお、評価としては、前期試験条件にて走行距離2.5
kmの耐久試験を行い、試験前に対する試験後の予圧動
トルク残存率(初期予圧時のトルクを100%としたと
きの、摩耗による予圧の変動で低下したトルクの割合
%)の比較により、摩耗の進行度合いを比較することで
実施した。試験結果を表7に示す。
Next, the results of evaluating the durability of the ball screw which is a direct acting component are shown below. Evaluation is screw shaft 2
An abrasion test was performed using a ball screw device having a lead of 0 mm and a lead of 4 mm. Also in this case, in consideration of the cost, the evaluation was performed by providing a nitride layer only on the rolling elements. In addition, rolling elements C-1 to C10 described in Table 4 were used as the rolling elements,
The screw shaft and the nut used were JIS steel type SCM420H that had been quenched and tempered. The test conditions are as follows. (Ball screw durability test) Initial preload: 490 N (no external load applied) For rotation speed: 1 rpm (ultra low speed) Lubricant: Mineral oil-based grease (base oil viscosity at 40 ° C: 3
7cst) The evaluation was performed under the conditions of the test in the first half of the test.
km durability test, and the preload dynamic torque remaining rate after the test before and after the test (percentage of torque reduced by fluctuation of preload due to wear when the initial preload torque is 100%) This was performed by comparing the degree of progress. Table 7 shows the test results.

【0047】[0047]

【表7】 [Table 7]

【0048】表7から明らかなように、実施例E−1か
らE−5は何れも、相手材との凝着摩耗が生じにくくな
ったため、非常に良好な耐摩耗性を示す。これに対し、
比較例E−8及びE−9は表面粗さが非常に大きく、ア
ブレッシブ摩耗により、比較的早期に予圧抜けが生じ
た。また、比較例E−10は,SUJ2鋼球を組み込ん
だ場合の例であるが、窒化層がないため、摩耗の進行が
早く、予圧動トルク残存率が最も小さい結果となった。
As is clear from Table 7, Examples E-1 to E-5 all show very good abrasion resistance because cohesive wear with the mating material is less likely to occur. In contrast,
In Comparative Examples E-8 and E-9, the surface roughness was very large, and preload loss occurred relatively early due to abrasive wear. Comparative Example E-10 is an example in which the SUJ2 steel ball was incorporated. However, since there was no nitrided layer, wear progressed quickly and the preload dynamic torque residual ratio was the smallest.

【0049】次に、軸受軌道輪の熱処理品質を変えた場
合の品質及びフレッチング耐久性と耐衝撃性の評価結果
を表8に示す。なお、転動体には、前記表5に示すD−
5を使用した。また、軌道輪はSUJ2製とし、軌道輪
の硬さ及び残留オーステナイト(γR)量は、熱処理温
度を830〜870℃に30分保持した後、焼入し、1
80〜240℃で焼戻を行うことにより、種々調整し
た。また、表中の実施例F−1〜F−3はサブゼロ処理
を実施した場合であり、表中比較例であるF−6〜F−
8はサブゼロ処理を実施しなかった場合の例である。ま
た、表中のF−1は、前記表5に記載したD−5と同一
である。耐衝撃試験は、前記条件と同一条件で実施し、
実施例F−1の音圧が試験前に比較して10mG上昇し
たところの荷重で、夫々の音圧を測定し、実施例F−1
の音圧の比(F−1を1.0として)で示した。また、
フレッチング耐久試験は、前記条件と同一条件及び評価
方法で実施し、実施例F−1を1.0としたときの比で
示した。
Next, Table 8 shows the evaluation results of the quality when the heat treatment quality of the bearing race is changed, and the evaluation results of the fretting durability and impact resistance. The rolling elements include D-
5 was used. The race was made of SUJ2. The hardness of the race and the amount of retained austenite (γR) were determined by maintaining the heat treatment temperature at 830 to 870 ° C. for 30 minutes and then quenching.
Various adjustments were made by performing tempering at 80 to 240 ° C. Examples F-1 to F-3 in the table are cases where the sub-zero treatment was performed, and F-6 to F- which are comparative examples in the table.
8 is an example when the sub-zero process is not performed. Further, F-1 in the table is the same as D-5 described in Table 5 above. The impact resistance test was carried out under the same conditions as above,
Each sound pressure was measured at a load where the sound pressure of Example F-1 was increased by 10 mG as compared with before the test, and the sound pressure of Example F-1 was measured.
(F-1 is assumed to be 1.0). Also,
The fretting durability test was carried out under the same conditions and the same evaluation method as those described above, and the results were shown as ratios when Example F-1 was 1.0.

【0050】[0050]

【表8】 [Table 8]

【0051】表8から明らかなように、残留オーステナ
イト量が多いものほど、耐衝撃性の低下が認められる。
特に、残留オーステナイト量が4%を超えたものでそれ
が顕著であり、実施例の耐衝撃性が優れていることが確
認できる。但し、残留オーステナイト量を低減したもの
は硬さが低くなる傾向にあり、フレッチング耐久性にお
いては、やや劣る傾向にある。そこで、表中には、SU
J2にMoを1%添加することで焼戻抵抗性を高め、残
留オーステナイト量を4%以下とした材料“X”で軌道
輪を構成し、それを実施例F−4、F−5として示し
た。なお、熱処理は実施例F−1〜F−3と同一条件で
実施した。表から明らかなように、実施例F−4、F−
5は硬さが大きく、残留オーステナイト量が少ないた
め、良好な耐衝撃性とフレッチング耐久性とを共有して
いる。
As is evident from Table 8, the higher the amount of retained austenite, the lower the impact resistance.
In particular, when the amount of retained austenite exceeds 4%, this is remarkable, and it can be confirmed that the impact resistance of the examples is excellent. However, when the amount of retained austenite is reduced, the hardness tends to be low, and the fretting durability tends to be slightly inferior. Therefore, in the table, SU
Addition of 1% of Mo to J2 increases the tempering resistance, and the orbital ring is made of material "X" in which the amount of retained austenite is 4% or less, which are shown as Examples F-4 and F-5. Was. The heat treatment was performed under the same conditions as in Examples F-1 to F-3. As is clear from the table, Examples F-4 and F-
5 has high hardness and a small amount of retained austenite, and thus shares good impact resistance and fretting durability.

【0052】以上の結果より、これらの諸特性を両立さ
せるためには、硬さが大きく(フレッチング耐久性)、
残留オーステナイト量が少ない(耐衝撃性)方がよいこ
とは明らかである。また、好ましくは、硬さをHv75
0以上確保し、残留オーステナイト量を4%以下、好ま
しくは完全に0にするとよい。なお、ここでは、Moを
1%合金化したものを例示したが、例えば、Si或いは
Cr等により焼戻軟化抵抗性を高めてもよい。
From the above results, in order to make these various properties compatible, the hardness is high (fretting durability),
It is clear that a smaller amount of retained austenite (impact resistance) is better. Preferably, the hardness is Hv75.
0 or more is ensured, and the amount of retained austenite is 4% or less, preferably completely 0. Note that, here, an example in which Mo is alloyed by 1% is illustrated, but tempering softening resistance may be increased by, for example, Si or Cr.

【0053】次に、本発明の玉軸受の実施の形態につい
て説明する。実施形態として作成された実施例と比較例
との軸受の静粛性及び耐久性評価はすべて玉軸受695
(JIS呼び番号)で行った。
Next, an embodiment of the ball bearing of the present invention will be described. The evaluation of quietness and durability of the bearings of the example and the comparative example created as the embodiment are all ball bearings 695
(JIS call number).

【0054】[0054]

【表9】 [Table 9]

【0055】表9に、軌道輪に使用した材料の化学成分
を示す。表中、No.1が前記玉軸受の諸条件を全て満
足するものであり、No.2〜No.4は従来品であ
る。No.2は従来の13Crマルテンサイト系ステン
レス鋼、No.3はSUS440Cであり、No.4は
SUJ2である。全ての材料を旋削加工した後、後述の
熱処理を行い、研削仕上げ加工して軌道輪を作成した。
No.1については980℃〜1020℃、No.2及
びNo.3については1020℃〜1060℃に30分
間保持した後、焼入れし、−75℃〜−95℃で1時間
サブゼロ処理し、引き続き150℃〜170℃で1.5
時間焼戻しを行った。また、No.4については830
℃〜870℃に30分間保持した後、焼入れし、−80
℃〜−120℃で1時間サブゼロ処理し、引き続き22
0℃〜240℃で1時間焼戻しを行った。
Table 9 shows the chemical components of the materials used for the bearing rings. In the table, No. No. 1 satisfies all the conditions of the ball bearing. 2-No. 4 is a conventional product. No. No. 2 is a conventional 13Cr martensitic stainless steel. No. 3 is SUS440C; 4 is SUJ2. After turning all the materials, the heat treatment described below was performed, and the finishing was finished by grinding to produce a bearing ring.
No. No. 1 is 980 ° C. to 1020 ° C .; 2 and No. 2 For No. 3, after holding at 1020 ° C. to 1060 ° C. for 30 minutes, quenching, sub-zero treatment at −75 ° C. to −95 ° C. for 1 hour, and then 1.5 ° C. at 150 ° C. to 170 ° C.
Tempering was performed for an hour. In addition, No. 830 for 4
C. to 870 C. for 30 minutes, then quenched,
Sub-zero treatment for 1 hour at
Tempering was performed at 0 ° C. to 240 ° C. for 1 hour.

【0056】また、窒化処理に供した転動体には、前記
表9に記載するNo.1及びNo.4の材料を使用し、
粗球を成形した後、焼入・焼戻し、荒研削を行った。更
に引き続き410℃〜530℃で24時間〜48時間の
ガス窒化処理を行い、最終的にJIS B 1501記
載の等級3以上の精度に仕上げ加工した。次に、前記軌
道輪と転動体とを組立てて軸受として各種評価を実施し
た。なお、保持器にはプラスチック保持器を、軸受の潤
滑については鉱油系グリースを使用した。軌道輪及び転
動体の完成品品質を表10に示す。軌道輪については、
A−1〜A−3が残留オーステナイト4%以下、好まし
くは2%以下の実施例であり、その他のB−1〜B−6
が比較例になる。転動体についても、A−1〜1−3が
表面硬さHv900以上の窒化層を有する実施例であ
り、その他のB−1〜B−6が比較例になる。
The rolling elements subjected to the nitriding treatment include No. 1 and No. 1 Using the materials of 4,
After forming the coarse spheres, quenching / tempering and rough grinding were performed. Further, gas nitriding treatment was further performed at 410 ° C. to 530 ° C. for 24 hours to 48 hours, and finally finished to an accuracy of grade 3 or more described in JIS B1501. Next, the bearing ring and the rolling element were assembled and subjected to various evaluations as a bearing. Note that a plastic cage was used for the cage, and a mineral oil-based grease was used for lubrication of the bearing. Table 10 shows the finished product quality of the bearing ring and the rolling elements. For races,
A-1 to A-3 are examples in which retained austenite is 4% or less, preferably 2% or less, and other B-1 to B-6.
Is a comparative example. As for the rolling elements, A-1 to 1-3 are examples having a nitrided layer having a surface hardness of Hv900 or more, and B-1 to B-6 are comparative examples.

【0057】[0057]

【表10】 [Table 10]

【0058】次に、表11には、前記実施例及び比較例
の玉軸受各500個を音響検査したときの玉キズに起因
する音響不良率(H.B.アンデロン値4.0以上)を
示す。本発明の実施例の玉軸受では、比較例に比べて不
良率がよくなっていることが確認できる。
Next, Table 11 shows the acoustic defect rate (HB Anderon value of 4.0 or more) due to ball flaws when acoustically inspecting each of the 500 ball bearings of the embodiment and the comparative example. Show. In the ball bearing according to the example of the present invention, it can be confirmed that the defect rate is higher than that of the comparative example.

【0059】[0059]

【表11】 [Table 11]

【0060】次に、軸受の機能評価については、静粛性
評価とフレッチング耐久性評価及び外輪単体での耐食性
評価等を実施した。評価結果を表12に示す。静粛性評
価は前記実施例及び比較例の玉軸受をサンプリング数n
=20個についてアンデロンメータでM.B値,H.B
値を測定し、その平均値を求め、前記表9に示す材料S
UJ2の玉軸受の平均値を1としたときの夫々の平均値
の比を示す。また、フレッチング耐久性評価は後述の条
件でサンプリング数n=4個について実施し、試験後の
アンデロン値を測定して平均値を算出し、試験前のSU
J−2(B−5,B−6)を1としたときの比で示す。
また、耐食性評価は、軸受の外輪を完全にアセトン脱脂
した後、JIS規格Z2371に準拠して、35℃、5
%NaCl水溶液を用いた塩水噴霧試験を2時間行い、
発錆なしをA、一部発錆をB、著しい発錆をCとして3
段階評価した。
Next, regarding the function evaluation of the bearing, a quietness evaluation, a fretting durability evaluation, a corrosion resistance evaluation of the outer ring alone, and the like were carried out. Table 12 shows the evaluation results. For the evaluation of quietness, the ball bearings of the above-described embodiment and the comparative example were sampled n times.
= 20 with an Anderon meter. B value, H. B
The values of the materials S shown in Table 9 above were determined.
The ratio of the respective average values when the average value of the UJ2 ball bearing is 1 is shown. In addition, the fretting durability evaluation was performed on the number of samples n = 4 under the conditions described below, and the anderon value after the test was measured to calculate the average value.
J-2 (B-5, B-6) is shown as a ratio when 1 is set.
The corrosion resistance was evaluated at 35 ° C. and 5 ° C. in accordance with JIS Z2371 after completely degreased the outer ring of the bearing with acetone.
% NaCl aqueous solution for 2 hours.
No rusting A, partial rusting B, marked rusting C
It was rated on a scale.

【0061】(フレッチング試験) 与圧:1.5kgf 外輪揺動条件:8deg,30Hz(内輪は固定) 揺動回数:10万回 鉱油系グリース封入(Fretting test) Pressurization: 1.5 kgf Outer ring swing condition: 8 deg, 30 Hz (inner ring fixed) Number of swings: 100,000 times Mineral oil-based grease enclosed

【0062】[0062]

【表12】 [Table 12]

【0063】表12中の内輪、外輪、転動体は全て前記
諸条件を満足する材料で構成した場合の例であり、B−
5に示すSUJ2と同等以上の静粛性を有しているが、
A−1〜A−3に示す本発明の実施例に比較して耐フレ
ッチング性において劣っている。また、B−2はSUJ
2を窒化処理した転動体を使用した例であるが、ステン
レスに比べて窒化後の硬さが低く、耐フレッチング性が
本発明の実施例に比較して劣っている。また、B−3は
従来用いられている13Cr系ステンレスのものである
が、3〜5μm程度のやや粗大な炭化物が存在するた
め、B−5に示すSUJ2製の軸受や本発明の実施例よ
り静粛性において劣っていり、十分な耐フレッチング性
も得られない。また、B−4はSUS440Cの例であ
るが、前記B−3より炭化物が大きく、最大で30μm
程度の炭化物も含有しているため、静粛性において最も
劣っている。また、B−5に示すSUJ2の例では、静
粛性は良好であるものの、十分な耐食性、耐フレッチン
グ性が得られない。本発明の実施例は静粛性において
は、軌道輪、転動体を全てSUJ2で構成したB−5と
同等であり、耐フレッチング性については著しく良好で
ある。また、前記諸条件を全て満足する材料からなるA
−1とSUJ2からなるA−3を比較すると、耐食性、
耐フレッチング性共にA−1の方が良好な結果となって
おり、少なくとも軌道輪には前記No.4記載のSUJ
2よりはむしろ、No.1記載のものを使用することが
好ましい。
The inner ring, the outer ring, and the rolling elements in Table 12 are examples in which all the materials satisfying the above-mentioned conditions are used.
Although it has quietness equal to or higher than SUJ2 shown in Fig. 5,
It is inferior in fretting resistance compared to the examples of the present invention shown in A-1 to A-3. B-2 is SUJ
This is an example using a rolling element obtained by nitriding No. 2; however, the hardness after nitriding is lower than that of stainless steel, and the fretting resistance is inferior to the examples of the present invention. Further, B-3 is a conventionally used 13Cr stainless steel. However, since coarse carbide of about 3 to 5 μm exists, the bearing made of SUJ2 shown in B-5 and the embodiment of the present invention are not used. It is inferior in quietness, and sufficient fretting resistance cannot be obtained. B-4 is an example of SUS440C, but has a larger carbide than B-3 and has a maximum of 30 μm.
It also has the lowest degree of quietness because it also contains a certain amount of carbide. In the example of SUJ2 shown in B-5, although quietness is good, sufficient corrosion resistance and fretting resistance cannot be obtained. In the embodiment of the present invention, the quietness is equivalent to B-5 in which the race and the rolling elements are all made of SUJ2, and the fretting resistance is remarkably good. Also, A made of a material satisfying all the above conditions is used.
Comparing A-1 consisting of -1 and SUJ2, corrosion resistance,
The result of A-1 is better in both the fretting resistance and the above-mentioned No. SUJ described in 4
No. 2 rather than No. 2 It is preferable to use those described in 1.

【0064】また、転動体にセラミックスを使用した場
合と本発明の実施例との耐衝撃性比較を行った。耐衝撃
性は前記軸受に5kgfから35kgfまでの5kgf
毎のアキシャル荷重を負荷した後、アンデロン値を測定
し、前記B−5の初期アンデロン値を1としたときの比
で評価した。なお、比較例には軌道輪、転動体を全てS
UJ2で構成したB−5及び軌道輪はSUJ2で構成
し、転動体のみSi3N4を使用したB−7を使用し
た。試験結果を図4に示す。本発明の実施例では、B−
5とほぼ同等の耐衝撃性を有しており、耐衝撃性が良好
であることが分かるが、転動体にセラミックスボールを
使用したB−7では耐衝撃荷重は低い結果となった。
A comparison was made between the case where ceramics were used for the rolling elements and the example of the present invention. Impact resistance is 5kgf from 5kgf to 35kgf on the bearing.
After applying an axial load for each time, the anderon value was measured and evaluated by the ratio when the initial anderon value of B-5 was set to 1. In the comparative example, all the races and rolling elements are S
The B-5 made of UJ2 and the bearing ring were made of SUJ2, and the rolling element used was B-7 using Si3N4. The test results are shown in FIG. In the embodiment of the present invention, B-
It has almost the same impact resistance as that of No. 5, and it is understood that the impact resistance is good. However, in the case of B-7 using ceramic balls for the rolling elements, the impact load was low.

【0065】[0065]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明の転動装置
によれば、表面に高硬度な窒化層を付与し、同時に転動
面の粗さを小さくしたことにより、輸送時の振動或いは
作動時のフレッチング耐久性を向上でき、同時にハイブ
リッド軸受で問題視される耐衝撃性の低下を抑制し、予
圧抜けなどの問題も解消できる。また、その用途は情報
機器、ファンモータ等にとどまらず、耐摩耗性、耐焼付
性の求められるボールねじ、リニアガイド等の直動部
品、工作機械などにも好適に使用できるという多大な効
果を奏する。また、玉軸受では、生産上問題となる玉キ
ズに起因する不良率も低減できるなど、多大の効果を奏
する。
As described above, according to the rolling device of the present invention, a high-hardness nitrided layer is provided on the surface and the roughness of the rolling surface is reduced at the same time. The durability of fretting during operation can be improved, and at the same time, the decrease in impact resistance, which is regarded as a problem in hybrid bearings, can be suppressed, and problems such as preload loss can be eliminated. In addition, its use is not limited to information equipment and fan motors, but also has a great effect that it can be suitably used for ball screws, linear guides and other linear motion parts that require wear resistance and seizure resistance, and machine tools. Play. In addition, the ball bearing has a great effect, such as a reduction in the defective rate due to a ball flaw which is a problem in production.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】二円筒摩耗試験の説明図である。FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of a two-cylinder wear test.

【図2】ボールロッド寿命試験の説明図である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram of a ball rod life test.

【図3】4球式焼付限界試験の説明図である。FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram of a 4-ball type baking limit test.

【図4】玉軸受の耐衝撃性を示す説明図である。FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing impact resistance of a ball bearing.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

10は円筒試験片 10 is a cylindrical test piece

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 外方部材と内方部材との間に転動体を配
設し、当該転動体は外方部材及び内方部材に接触しなが
ら転動する転動装置において、前記外方部材及び内方部
材及び転動体の少なくとも一つが軸受用鋼で構成され、
且つその完成品表面にHv800以上の窒化層を有し、
且つその少なくとも転動面表面は表面粗さ0.1μmR
a以下に仕上加工されていることを特徴とする転動装
置。
1. A rolling device in which a rolling element is provided between an outer member and an inner member, and the rolling element rolls while contacting the outer member and the inner member. And at least one of the inner member and the rolling element is made of bearing steel,
And having a nitrided layer of Hv800 or more on the surface of the finished product,
And at least the rolling contact surface has a surface roughness of 0.1 μmR.
(a) A rolling device characterized in that the rolling device is subjected to finish processing below.
JP13749399A 1998-10-28 1999-05-18 Rolling device Pending JP2000199524A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP13749399A JP2000199524A (en) 1998-10-28 1999-05-18 Rolling device

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP30742898 1998-10-28
JP10-307428 1998-10-28
JP13749399A JP2000199524A (en) 1998-10-28 1999-05-18 Rolling device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000199524A true JP2000199524A (en) 2000-07-18

Family

ID=26470790

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP13749399A Pending JP2000199524A (en) 1998-10-28 1999-05-18 Rolling device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2000199524A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002206617A (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-07-26 Nsk Ltd Ball screw
JP2004197806A (en) * 2002-12-17 2004-07-15 Nsk Ltd Ball screw device
DE102006020078A1 (en) * 2006-04-29 2007-10-31 Schaeffler Kg Roller bearing for dry running or medium lubricating applications, has bearing rings formed from rustproof steel and with roller bodies e.g. needle roller, held in cage, where roller bodies are made of corrosion resistant steel
JP2014020490A (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-02-03 Nsk Ltd Roller bearing and pump device for liquid gas

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002206617A (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-07-26 Nsk Ltd Ball screw
JP2004197806A (en) * 2002-12-17 2004-07-15 Nsk Ltd Ball screw device
DE102006020078A1 (en) * 2006-04-29 2007-10-31 Schaeffler Kg Roller bearing for dry running or medium lubricating applications, has bearing rings formed from rustproof steel and with roller bodies e.g. needle roller, held in cage, where roller bodies are made of corrosion resistant steel
JP2014020490A (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-02-03 Nsk Ltd Roller bearing and pump device for liquid gas

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2001074053A (en) Rolling bearing
JP4423754B2 (en) Manufacturing method of rolling shaft
US6422756B1 (en) Rolling bearing apparatus
JPH09287053A (en) Rolling bearing and other rolling devices
JP4442030B2 (en) Method for manufacturing rolling support device
EP1143018B1 (en) Rolling bearing
JP3509803B2 (en) Rolling bearing
JP4998054B2 (en) Rolling bearing
JP2002364648A (en) Rolling bearing
JP2002147467A (en) Rolling support device
JPH11303874A (en) Rolling member
JP2004052997A (en) Rolling device and manufacturing method
JP2008151236A (en) Rolling bearing
JP2001289251A (en) Rolling bearing and method of manufacturing the same
JP3391345B2 (en) Rolling bearing
JP2000199524A (en) Rolling device
JP2007127263A (en) Rolling member and rolling device
JP2005232543A (en) Ball screw
JP2003222142A (en) Angular contact ball bearing
JP2001323932A (en) Rolling support device
JPH1068419A (en) Rolling bearing
JP2001295847A (en) Rolling device
JP2002349581A (en) Roller
JP2001032048A (en) Rolling bearing
JP2002276680A (en) Rolling support device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Effective date: 20060419

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080610

A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20080612

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A521 Written amendment

Effective date: 20080729

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

A02 Decision of refusal

Effective date: 20090324

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02