JP2000112980A - Display device for reference relation of electronic document - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain the easy-to-see details of arguments which are made by the electronic documents and also to trace these details in the order of time elapsed by providing a display means which inserts and displays in steps the parts following a area quoted in a reference document into each relevant area included in a referred document when a button is operated. SOLUTION: This display device basically consists of a display 1, a keyboard 2, an electronic article storing part 4 which stores the electronic articles, a reference analysis/display processing part 3 which reads the electronic articles out of the part 4 and analyzes the reference relations among these articles to display these relations on the display 1, a common answer expression dictionary 5 and an infelicitous expression dictionary 6. In such a constitution, the reference relations of electronic documents are analyzed and a button is placed at the termination of an area quoted in a referred document to display the analyzed reference relations. When the button is operated by a user, the parts following an area quoted in a reference document are inserted in steps into each relevant area of the referred document and displayed at the part 3.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an apparatus for analyzing and displaying a reference / quote relationship between digitized documents.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Recently, on a wide area electronic network called a personal computer communication, a workplace LAN, or the Internet, each topic (hereinafter referred to as a news group) called electronic mail or net news is posted on the topic. Discuss work consultations, current affairs, hobbies, etc. via a computerized network using a mechanism for publishing documents (hereinafter referred to as news articles or posts) via a computerized network. Is increasing.

[0003] A user reads and saves an electronic mail or a news article using dedicated software, and in some cases, cites a part of the read article and creates a reply electronically. In the case of electronic mail, the special software is generally called mail software, and in the case of net news, the special software is generally called a news reader.

[0004]

However, the only way to follow the history of the discussions that have been made in a series of articles by current mail software and news readers is to follow the previous article referred to. Therefore, contrary to the flow of the discussion, he was forced to read back. In addition, when different parts of one article are referred to separately, it has been difficult to keep track of each discussion.

[0005] In view of this situation, the present invention makes it easier to see the history of discussions made by digitized documents exchanged on an electronic network, that is, how the contents of the discussions branch and evolve. It is an object of the present invention to provide an electronic document reference relation display device that can be sequentially traced.

[0006]

In order to achieve the above object, an electronic document reference relation display device according to a first aspect of the present invention includes an analyzing means for analyzing the reference relation of the electronic document, and the analyzing means. When displaying the reference relationship analyzed by
Button arranging means for arranging a button at the end of the cited part in the referenced document; and when the button arranged by the button arranging means is operated, a part after the cited part in the reference document is referred to. Display means for hierarchically inserting / displaying the relevant portion in the document.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the electronic document reference relation display device according to the first aspect, a line hierarchically inserted in the referenced document is located next to the relevant citation of the reference document. From the line until the citation starts separately.

Further, in the electronic document reference display device according to the third invention, in the first invention, when there is another document referring to the inserted document portion, the reference relationship is displayed. Is also displayed at the same time.

Further, in the electronic document reference display apparatus according to the fourth invention, in the first invention, when displaying the reference relation, a reference document name is added to an end of a cited portion in the reference document. When a button is arranged and the button is operated, all references to the reference document in the referenced document are inserted and displayed.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the electronic document reference relation display device according to the first invention, when displaying the reference relation, a button is arranged at the end of a cited portion in the referenced document, and the button is displayed. Is operated, the portion after the cited portion in the reference document hierarchically inserted into the corresponding portion in the referenced document is deleted.

Further, the electronic document reference relationship display device according to a sixth aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect, specifies one of the senders of the reference article citing the original document, Insert and display all places where the caller and the identified caller mutually reference and cite each other.

According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, in the electronic document reference relationship display device according to the first invention, when displaying the reference relationship, there is a reference document indicating cancellation of a certain part in the referenced document. In this case, the corresponding part in the referenced document is deleted and displayed.

According to an eighth aspect of the present invention, in the electronic document reference display apparatus according to the first aspect, there is provided a dictionary in which specific words and expressions are registered. Informs the user.

According to a ninth aspect of the present invention, in the electronic document reference relationship display device according to the first aspect, a document group located in each partial tree structure is compared with a tree structure of a reference relationship having a hierarchical structure. Words that are included in a large number are extracted and displayed as keywords at the corresponding locations.

Further, in the electronic document reference relation display device according to the tenth aspect, in the first aspect, the reference portion of the newly arrived article is displayed to the user by changing colors or fonts. Show.

Further, the electronic document reference relation display device according to the eleventh invention is characterized in that, in the first invention, when the referenced article does not exist and the article referred to by the referenced article exists, , Hierarchically insert reference articles at the end of this article
indicate.

The electronic document reference relation display device according to the twelfth aspect is provided with an analyzing means for analyzing the reference relation of the electronic document, and a display unit for displaying the reference relation analyzed by the analyzing means. Button arranging means for arranging a button at the end of the quoted part in the display, and display means for displaying a part after the cited part in the reference document when the button arranged by the button arranging means is operated. Is provided.

That is, in the present invention, first, the reference relation of the digitized document is analyzed, and when displaying the analyzed reference relation, a button is arranged at the end of the cited place in the referenced document. Then, when this button is operated by the user, the portion after the cited portion in the reference document is hierarchically inserted and displayed at the corresponding portion in the referenced document.

In the present invention, first, the reference relation of the digitized document is analyzed, and when displaying the analyzed reference relation, a button is arranged at the end of the cited place in the referenced document. Then, when this button is operated by the user, the portion after the cited portion in the reference document is displayed.

[0020]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an electronic document reference relation display apparatus according to the present embodiment. Basically, a display 1, a keyboard 2, and an electronic article storage unit 4 for storing electronic articles are shown. And a reference analysis / display processing unit 3 that reads out the electronic articles stored in the electronic article storage unit 4, analyzes the reference relation between the articles, and displays them on the display 1. Further, according to the embodiment, the idiomatic response expression dictionary 5 and the inappropriate expression dictionary 6 are added.

In describing the operation of the present embodiment,
First, some examples of articles of net news used in the present embodiment are shown below. In the following articles, the numbers on the left are line numbers given for explanation. There are some sentences that extend over a plurality of lines, but here, they are regarded as one line. The number following the leading circle indicates the article number. Usually, at the head of an article, there is an area indicating information such as the sender and title (Subject) of the article and the name of the newsgroup to which the article was posted, and is called a header. Usually, an article is given a unique symbol to the article called a message ID, and this information is also included in the header.

○ 2526 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Cilab-news.rdc.toshiba! News.tsurumi.toshib a! Pjh22022! Hq10! Tis2! Inet-tsb! Spin-hsd0-tky! Inetgw.melco! Meims ! m spc200! newsgate.melfans.or.jp! news.tcp-net.ad.jp! niq0! newssinet! paris! alps! cryst! escargot! t-server! news.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp! tkyex1.phys.su-tokyo.ac.jp! news.tisn.ad.jp! news.nips.ac.jp! news.ecip.n agoya-u.ac.jp! sakai 2 From: sakai@avocet.nucl .nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Message-ID: <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya- u.ac.jp> 6 Date: 16 Jan 96 06:43:50 GMT 7 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 8 Distribution: fj 9 Organization: Education Center for Information Processing, Nagoy a Univ., Japan. 10 Lines: 74 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 133.6.95.47 12 Mime-Version: 1.0 13 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 15 X-Newsreader : mnews [version 1.18] 1994-05 / 16 (Mon) 16 17 <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp> 18 nishida@etl.go.jp's wrote.

19 20 >> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 21 >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote : 22 >> I asked first, but I evaluated the difference in risks depending on the nuclides 23 >> and said, "There is radioactivity in your body." Is it? 25 >> 26 I am sorry if you have not understood this from the contents so far.

27 28 >>> After all, it is possible to evaluate including the effects specific to each nuclide, and since those 29>> effects are radiation-derived, it may be natural radioactivity. Regardless of man-made radioactivity 30 >>> whether it is radiation from gargle or external exposure, those risks can be managed with the same scale 31 >>>, and natural radioactivity and medical exposure can be measured on such scale. The main point is that you have a squirrel 32 >>>

33 >> 34 >> Is it intentionally blurred? 35 >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

[0027] 36 >> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai has evaluated.

[37] I wanted to say that the discussion in the field of radiation health physics is based on the results evaluated in this way.

[40] Regardless of the kind of expert such as Mr. Nishida in the flow of these discussions, those who are not, 42, are among the figures that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe. 43 I wrote it because I could be taken as if I didn't consider this.

[0035] 45 46 >> How much is actually expected to be affected by the radioactivity emitted from the nuclear power plant? 48 If we add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident 49 (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this), all 50 of the country's electricity is supplied by nuclear power. A risk of 0.07 days due to exposure in case of exposure is based on the assumption that the exposure includes internal exposure of 0.08 mSv in 151 years. Exposure from natural radioactivity is about 2.4 mSv per year (although it is actually less than 52 0.001 mSv). 53 Assuming natural exposure to radiation inside the body, the risk is 2.1 days.

54 55 #The calculation of one-year exposures naturally includes the effect of the biological half-life, 56 and also includes the differences in risks depending on the nuclides.

57 58 On the other hand, the life expectancy is reduced to 29 days, taking into account the internal exposure 59 of the local residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) due to the Chernobyl accident.

Based on this figure, based on this figure, the risk of considering internal exposure due to a nuclear accident based on the frequency of nuclear accidents 62 63.

64 65 Although detailed contents were also written before, please see pages 17 to 66 of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41, No. 12, 1995.

67 68 By the way, if you rely on oil-fired power for all the power, the life expectancy is reduced to 0.28 days.

69 70 After all, the risk of 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days (actually 71 is currently about 30% of this in 71 days) in exchange for the supply of power from the nuclear power plant, or else, I guess it would be a good idea to switch to a power supply that has a lower risk (and is more cost-effective).

74 75 Of course, it is also a problem to think about the risk of shortening the lifespan of a 29-day accident in the event of a major accident. However, climate change due to global warming due to carbon dioxide emissions77 I think it should be included in the thermal power.

78 79 >> Would you like to see the results of the quantitative evaluation, including the differences in risks depending on the nuclides?

81 >> 82 I would like to see quantitatively how Mr. Nishida himself was evaluated.

83 84 85 ----- 86 Hirotaka Sakai 87 Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University 88 Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year 89 Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u .ac.jp 90 h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp ○ 2527 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! cilab-news.rdc.toshiba! news.tsurumi.toshib a! pjh22022! hq10! tis2! inet-tsb! spin-hsd0-tky! spinnews! wnoc-tyo-news! etlnews.etl.go.jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! nishida 3 From: nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (Y / n) 5 Message-ID: <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> 6 Sender: news @ etl. go.jp (News System) 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: etlca0 8 Organization: ETL 9 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac. jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 08:23:00 GMT 12 Lines: 18 13 14 In article <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 15 SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: 16> Sa Nishida Also we would like to quantitatively ask be that your own has been evaluated how.

17 18 That's where you said that quantification was needed.

19 Well, I understand that Mr. Sakai's quantification is to that extent.

20 21 Life shortening is said to be 29 days, but I think it would be better to use the imagination of what the number of 29 days actually causes in Ukraine (Belarus) 23 .

24 25 Now, back again, what does the statement “There is radioactivity in your body” 26 mean? 27 At least, "radioactivity in the body" does not provide an extra 28 short lifespan.

29 30 Kenji Nishida @ Research Institute 31 ○ 2541 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Cilab-news.rdc.toshiba! News.tsurumi.toshib a! Pjh22022! Hq10! Tis2! Inet-tsb! Spin-hsd0- tky! inetgw.melco! meims! m spc200! newsgate.melfans.or.jp! news.tcp-net.ad.jp! niq0! newssinet! paris! alps! news.nacsis.ac.jp! sinetnews! eclnews! news .ipc.chiba-u! news.tj.chiba-u! train.ad.jp! news.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp! tkyex1.phys.s.u-tokyo .ac.jp! news.tisn .ad.jp! news.nips.ac.jp! news.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp! sakai 2 From: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 Newsgroups: fj .soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Message-ID: <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 6 Date: 17 Jan 96 04:01 : 15 GMT 7 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 8 <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 9 <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> 10 Distribution : fj 11 Organization: Education Center for Information Processing, Nagoy a Univ., Japan.12 Lines: 62 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 133.6.95.47 14 Mime-Version: 1.0 15 Content-Type: tex t / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 16 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 17 X-Newsreader: mnews [version 1.18] 1994-05 / 16 (Mon) 18 19 <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> 20 nishida@etl.go.jp wrote in the article.

21 22 >> In article <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 23 >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: 24 >>> I would like to see quantitatively how Nishida himself was evaluated.

25 >> 26 >> That's where you said that quantification was needed.

[0048] Are you confused with anyone? Sure, I've been working hard to write quantitatively, but at least in your interactions with me, Mr. Nishida has asked you to quantify and explain 29 first.

30 31 And in the article on 1/15, Mr. Nishida asked Mr. Kusakari 32 33 >> In quantification, please come out.

34 >> Quantification is not the same as before, where the effects are equal if the dose equivalents are equal. Instead, the quantification is based on the artificial radioactivity actually discharged from the nuclear power plant and the reprocessing facility. 36 >> Please indicate what the amount (effect) is, or what the dose equivalent (effect) was due to artificial radioactivity released by the Chernobyl accident 37 >> 38 >> That's right.

You say 39.

[0052] Because of this, I would like to clarify that it is not possible to quantify it to some extent, or that quantification is impossible.

42 43 And then 44 >> Well, I understand that Mr. Sakai's quantification is to that extent.

Please tell us that 45 >> 46.

47 And if you say so far, do we need to scientifically demonstrate the dangers of nuclear power by ourselves instead of just criticizing human data? 49 At least nuclear power has 30 years of experience. The accident during that time has been improved with 50 lessons. Wouldn't it be necessary to prepare some concrete rebuttal against current nuclear technology in order to oppose this? 52 53 If not, that's what Nishida's opposition to nuclear power is about.

55 56 >> The life expectancy is said to be 29 days, but the figure of 29 days actually 57 >> what caused the situation in Ukraine (Belarus) 58 >> I think it is better.

59 >> 60 On the contrary, the opposition generally feels that the image is running 61 ahead just by imagination convenient to the opposition.

62 63 >> Well, back again, what does the statement “There is radioactivity in your body 64 >>” mean? 65 >> At least, "radioactivity in the body" doesn't lead to an extra 66 >> shorter lifespan.

67 >> 68 Radiation or radioactivity is not a “risk never experienced by mankind” 69 and at least from a nuclear facility in operation unless a major accident occurs. Isn't there a 71 to let you know that the effect of the radioactivity is not great? 72 And if you already know these things, like Mr. Nishida, there are many who do not.

74 75 ----- 76 Hirotaka Sakai 77 Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University 78 Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year 79 Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u. ac.jp 80 h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp ○ 2543 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! cilab-news.rdc.toshiba! news.tsurumi.toshiba ! pjh22022! hq10! tis2! inet-tsb! spin-hsd0-tky! spinnews! wnoc-tyo-ne ws! etlnews.etl.go! jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! etl.go! From: nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (Y / n) 5 Message-ID: <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> 6 Sender: news@etl.go .jp (News System) 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: etlca0 8 Organization: ETL 9 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp > <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> <4d hsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 06:51:56 GMT 12 Lines: 67 13 14 In article <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.j p>, 15 >>> That's where you said you needed quantification.

[0061] 16> Are you confused with anyone? Sure, we have been trying to write quantitatively 17>, but at least in your interactions with me, Mr. Nishida has asked you to quantify and explain 18>.

19 20 Indeed, Mr. Sakai's “I can compare” was not a quantitative comparison 21.

If so, you can understand why you made a meaningless statement, such as “There is radioactivity in your body.”

24 25> In the article on 1/15, Mr. Nishida asked Mr. Kusakari 26> 27 >>> Then, please come out after quantifying.

28 >>> The quantification is not the same as before, where the effects are equal if the dose equivalents are equal, but the artificial radiation actually emitted from the nuclear power plant and the reprocessing facility is not 30 >>> What is the dose (effect) or what was the dose equivalent (effect) due to artificial radioactivity released by the Chernobyl accident 31 >>>? 32 >>>

You said 33>.

34 35 Mr. Kusakari says that quantification is necessary.

36 37> From this, I would like to clarify that it is not possible to quantify it to some extent by itself, or that quantification is not possible.

39 40 How do people intending to argue, rather than trying to show quantitative data, when they say they need it?

42 I have never requested quantitative data or have said that quantitative data is needed, except for those who have said that it is necessary (or need to be compared). 44

45 46> And if you say so far, do you need to scientifically demonstrate the dangers of nuclear power in your own 47> rather than just criticizing human data? 48 49 Repeat. Do you know the value of the doubling dose in the Mankuzo report? 50 51> At least, nuclear power has 30 years of experience. The accidents during that time have been improved as lessons. To oppose this, shouldn't it be necessary to have some kind of specific rebuttal against current nuclear technology? 54 55 I have not heard of the fact that Japanese reactors have improved since Chernobyl.56 What kind of improvements have been made to Japanese reactors that have been operating before the Chernobyl accident? Is not it.

58 59 Myself, in this series of flows, as one of the specific rebuttals, I have shown a direction to society that can be managed without the nuclear power plant.

Also, it is not necessary to disprove nuclear technology in general 63 just to point out the meaninglessness of the statement that “radiation is present in your body”.

It may not be considered that adding criticism to Mr. Sakai's article is equivalent to criticizing nuclear technology in general 65.

66 67> Unless the risk from radiation or radioactivity is “a risk never experienced by mankind” 68> and, at least, if a major accident does not occur, it must be an operating nuclear facility 69> Isn't there any way to let you know that the effect of the released radioactivity is not significant? 71 72 He says that it is a lie that it is not big. Or they say that such comparisons are meaningless, even if they are not large (based on some ideas).

75 76 Say it again. At least, the value of the doubling dose reported in the Mankuzo report was suppressed. If I have time, I'll give you some value.

78 79 Kenji Nishida ＠ Denshi Research Institute 80 ○ 2549 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Venus.sun.com! Cs.ut exas.edu! Howland.reston.ans. net! vixen.cso.uiuc.edu! newsfeed.inte rnetmci.com! news.dacom.co.kr! usenet.seri.re.kr! news.imnet.ad.jp! ripspost.aist.go.jp! news .tisn.ad.jp! news.nips.ac.jp! news.ecip.na goya-u.ac.jp! sakai 2 From: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (Y / n) 5 Date: 17 Jan 1996 12:37:30 GMT 6 Organization: Education Center for Information Processing, Nagoy a Univ., Japan. 7 Lines : 52 8 Distribution: fj 9 Message-ID: <4diqia$c21@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 11 <4dfhf7 $ 539 @ sunglow .eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 12 <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> 13 <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 14 <1996Jan17.065156.25670 @ etl.go.jp> 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 133.6.95.47 16 Mime-Version: 1.0 17 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 18 Conten t-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 19 X-Newsreader: mnews [version 1.18] 1994-05 / 16 (Mon) 20 21 In the article of <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> 22 nishida@etl.go.jp Wrote.

23 >> In article <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 24 >> >>> That is where you mentioned that quantification was necessary.

[0079] 25 >>> Are you confused with anyone? Indeed, I've been working hard to write quantitatively, but at least in my communication, Mr. Nishida has asked you to quantify and explain 27 >>>.

28 >> 29 >> Indeed, Mr. Sakai's "I can compare" was not a quantitative comparison 30 >>.

31 >> If so, you can understand why you made a meaningful statement such as "There is radioactivity in your body."

33 >> 34 It is not strictly me who started to say this, but well, it would be.

35 36 >> Repeat. Do you know the value of the doubling dose in the Mankuzo report? 37 >> 38 Yeah. Because there is "Health Physics" in the library.

39 In addition, the ICRP recommendation value may be indicated in consideration of these values.

40 41 >>> Risks due to radiation or radioactivity are not “risks that humanity has never experienced before” 42 >>> 43 >>> Is there any way to let them know that the radiation emitted from the facility is not significantly affected? 45 >> 46 >> He says that it is a lie that it is not big. Or they say that such comparisons are meaningless, even if they are not large (based on the idea 47 >>).

[0086] 49 >> 50 This is already a matter of personal subjectivity.

[0087] 51 52 >> I say it again. At least, the amount of the doubling dose reported in the Mankuzo report was suppressed. 53 >> If I have time, I'll introduce the values.

54 >> 55 It seems that the mankuzo report, the doubled dose, and the memorial statue are repeated 56, but indeed, without considering these values at all, the radiation of nuclear facilities 57 Do you think you are? 58 59 And without knowing the Mankuzo report or the doubling dose, wouldn't it be enough to know the recommendations 60 and the reference values that incorporate the idea? 61 62 Conversely, at first, those who opposed the nuclear power plant at least studied the elementary theory of nuclear reactors in Lamarsh 63 (upper) and (lower), and discussed the stability of reactors after understanding about two-group theory 64 Are you doing it? 65 66 67 ----- 68 Hirotaka Sakai 69 Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University 70 Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year 71 Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac. jp 72 h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp ○ 2551 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! tsb-wide! wnoc-sfc-news! venus.sun.com! cs.ut exas.edu! howland.reston.ans.net! newsfeed.internetmci.com! news.da com.co.kr! usenet.seri.re.kr! news.imnet.ad.jp! wnoc-tyo- news! etlne ws.etl.go.jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! nishida 3 From: nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Message-ID: <1996Jan17.135848.17618@etl.go.jp> 6 Sender: news@etl.go.jp (News System) 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: etlca0 8 Organization: ETL 9 References: <1996Jan15 .144435.17812 @ etl.go.jp> <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> <4diqia$c21@sunglow.eds.ecip .nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 13:58:48 GMT 12 Lines: 11 13 14 In article <4diqia$c21@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 15 SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: 16> Have you learned at least Lamarsh's "Elementary Theory of Reactors" 17> (upper) and (lower) level and have discussed about two-group theory and discussed reactor stability 18>? 19 20 Who was talking about reactor stability? ? 21 You seem to be confused with a discussion somewhere else.

22 23 Kenji Nishida @ EIST 24 ○ 2566 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Yilnws! Hamamatsu-pc! News.tcp-net.ad.jp! Niq0! Newssinet ! paris! alps! cryst! escargot! t-server! news.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp! tkyex1.phys.su-tokyo.ac.jp! news.tisn.ad.jp! news.nips. ac.jp! news.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp! sakai 2 From: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (Y / n) 5 Date: 18 Jan 1996 03:53:34 GMT 6 Organization: Education Center for Information Processing, Nagoy a Univ., Japan.7 Lines: 25 8 Distribution: fj 9 Message-ID: < 4dkg7u$ggk@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 11 <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac. jp> 12 <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> 13 <4diqia$c21@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 14 <1996Jan17.135848.17618@etl.go.jp> 15 NNTP-Posting -Host: 133.6.95.47 16 Mime-Version: 1.0 17 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 18 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 19 X-Newsreader: mnews [version 1.18] 1994-05 / 16 (Mon) 20 21 In the article <1996Jan17.135848.17618@etl.go.jp>, 22 nishida@etl.go.jp wrote.

23 24 >> In article <4diqia$c21@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 25 >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote : 26 >>> Conversely, at least in the first place, the opposition to the nuclear power plant had at least Lamarsh's "Elementary theory of nuclear reactors" 27 >>> (upper) (lower) Discussing the stability of products 28 >>> Do you? 29 >> 30 >> Who was talking about reactor stability? ? 31 >> You seem to be confused with a discussion somewhere else.

32 >> 33 34 I didn't really read it, but he said that it was a similar statement that Mr. Nishida had read Mankuzo's Report 35.

37 38 39 40 ----- 41 Hirotaka Sakai 42 Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University 43 Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year 44 Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya- u.ac.jp 45 h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp ○ 2553 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! tsb-wide! wnoc-sfc-news! venus. sun.com! nntp-hub2.barrnet.net! news.Stanford.EDU! agate! usenet.kornet.nm.kr! new s.kreonet.re.kr! usenet.seri.re.kr! news.imnet.ad .jp! wnoc-tyo-news! etlnews.etl.go.jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! nishida 3 From: nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) 4 Subject: Re : Nuclear Energy? (Y / n) 5 Message-ID: <1996Jan17.143559.19639@etl.go.jp> 6 Sender: news@etl.go.jp (News System) 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: etlca0 8 Organization: ETL 9 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> <4diqia $ c21 @ sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 14:35:59 GMT 1 2 Lines: 45 13 14 Let me point this out.

15 16 In article <4diqia$c21@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 17 SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: 18 >> >> Risk due to radiation or radioactivity is not a “risk that humanity has never experienced before” 19 >>>> and, at least, unless a major accident has occurred, a nuclear facility in operation 20 >> >> Is there a way to let you know that the effect of the emitted radioactivity is not great? 22 >>> 23 >>> It's a lie that it's not big. Or they say that such comparisons are meaningless, even if they are not large (based on an idea 24 >>>).

26 >>> 27> This is already a matter of personal subjectivity.

It is not a matter of personal subjectivity.

30 It is meaningless because the comparison target is wrong.

31 32 Based on the common advantages and disadvantages and the fact that the merits of nuclear power should be greater than the disadvantages 33 (I do not think this kind of thinking is appropriate) 34 Being able to maintain the current system makes it easier to survive, one of the disadvantages is the danger to survival due to artificial radioactivity released from nuclear power.

In this case, there are two risks to compare: the danger to survival if the current system cannot be maintained, and the danger to survival from artificial radioactivity. The decision as to where to make a compromise can be quite 40 "political".

41 42 Natural radioactivity, or the risk of natural radiation, exists whether or not the current system is maintained, so even in the case of the controversy 44 it is not a comparison.

45 46 In terms of whether the effects of radiation from the nuclear power plant are large or small, 47 is a sort of “statistical lie” 48 when the effects are averaged for the entire population. . There is no need to say more about this, since others (like Hirono 49) have already mentioned it.

51 52 In addition, the ICRP's recommendations or standards, as well as the standards themselves, have been determined to be “political” in consideration of the economic situation at the time, so they must be followed. Is not safe.

55 56 Kenji Nishida Denshi Research Institute 57 58 ○ 2570 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Venus.sun.com! Nntp-hub2.barrnet.net! Newsfeed.internetmci. com! news.dacom.co.kr! news.kreonet.re.kr! usenet.seri.re.kr! news.imnet.ad.jp! ripspost.aist.go.jp! news.tisn.ad.jp ! news.nips.ac.jp! news.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp! sa kai 2 From: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc. tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Date: 18 Jan 1996 07:00:14 GMT 6 Organization: Education Center for Information Processing, Nagoy a Univ., Japan.7 Lines: 64 8 Distribution: fj 9 Message-ID: <4dkr5u$h8l@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 References: <1996Jan17.143559.19639@etl.go.jp> 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 133.6.95.47 12 Mime -Version: 1.0 13 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 14 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 15 X-Newsreader: mnews [version 1.18] 1994-05 / 16 (Mon) 16 17 <1996Jan17 .143559.19639 @ etl.go.jp> 18 nishida@etl.go.jp It was.

19 20 >> Not a matter of personal subjectivity.

21 >> It is meaningless because the comparison target is wrong.

22 >> 23 >> What is good or bad, if the merits of the nuclear power plant outweigh the demerits 24 >> What do I do (although I do not think this kind of thinking is valid) 25> > Based on this, the merit is that the current system can be maintained 26 >> and that it is easier to survive, and one of the disadvantages is the danger to survival due to the 27 >> emitted artificial radioactivity from the nuclear power plant.

28 >> In this case, the risks to be compared are the risk of survival if the current system cannot be maintained 29 >> and the risk of survival due to artificial radiation 30 >> . The decision as to where to make a trade is 31 >> "political".

32 >> 33 Isn't it necessary to discuss radiation safety, including social factors at that time, on the basis of some disadvantages and disadvantages? 35 36 >> Natural radioactivity or natural radiation risks are present 37 >> whether or not the system is maintained, so they are not comparable in the pros and cons 38 >> .

39 >> 40 >> In terms of whether the effects of radioactivity from the nuclear power plant are large or not large 41 >>, when the effects are averaged for the entire population, "statistical lies" 42 >> It will be similar to. This has already been mentioned by others (Hirono 43 >> bu, etc.), so I don't need to mention any more.

45 >> 46 Radiation damage is a statistical event. I don't think it's the 47 statement of the person who read the Mancuzo report.

48 Of course, you know that standards are set for each exposure condition such as gender, age, etc. 49.

50 51 >> In addition, the ICRP recommendations or standards, themselves, are also determined 52 52 "politically" in consideration of the economic situation at the time. 53> > Therefore, it is not safe because we keep it.

[0112] 54 >> 55 It sounds bad when it comes to politics, but it's true that the standards are generally accepted according to the social situation at that time.

57 58 Not surprisingly, there is a standard that is not so good.

[0114] Even in ICRP recommendations, etc., the concept of ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) is stated. Even in each business establishment, it is almost impossible to expose to the order that must be compared with the reference value. None, 63 and if such a person comes up, the chief radiation officer has created a radiation damage prevention rule that will give a health check even if it is below the standard.

In the first place, in the process of calculating the recommended values, a number of calculations were performed at a number of places that were considerably safer.

68 69 I think it's not safe because we keep it, but at least we don't have a big problem 71 at least as long as we manage RI as it is currently done. Let's go. In particular, the greater the size, the more strict the inspection of radioactive materials, and the stricter the rules for preventing radiation hazards.

73 74 75 ----- 76 Hirotaka Sakai 77 Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University 78 Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year 79 Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u .ac.jp 80 h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp ○ 2588 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! tsb-wide! wnoc-sfc-news! wnoc-tyo -news! etlne ws.etl.go.jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! nishida 3 From: nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? ( y / n) 5 Message-ID: <1996Jan19.025426.16439@etl.go.jp> 6 Sender: news@etl.go.jp (News System) 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: etlca0 8 Organization: ETL 9 References: < 1996Jan17.143559.19639@etl.go.jp> <4dkr5u$h8l@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 02:54:26 GMT 12 Lines : 18 13 14 I have no time today, so I will just point out here.

15 16 In article <4dkr5u$h8l@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 17 SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: 18> Isn't it necessary to discuss radiation safety, including social factors, based on some disadvantages? 20 21 Some may think it is necessary, but 22 23 >>> Natural radioactivity, or the risks of natural radiation, exist 24/7> with or without maintaining the current system. Smell 25 >>> But it is not a comparison.

26 27 There is still no point in comparing natural and artificial radioactivity.

29 30 Kenji Nishida @ Research Institute 31 ○ 2558 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Fgw! Fdmnews! Pine! Gs gw! Volga! Itou 2 From: itou @ volga. mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech, fj.soc.environment 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Date: 18 Jan 96 11:24:33 6 Organization: FUJITSU Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan 7 Lines: 47 8 Distribution: fj 9 Message-ID: <ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> 10 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp > 11 <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 12 <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> 13 <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac. jp> 14 <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: volga-gw.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp 16 In-reply-to: nishida@etl.go.jp′s message of Wed, 17 Jan 1996 06: 51:56 GMT 17 Xref: isl.rdc.toshiba fj.soc.tech:2558 fj.soc.environment: 3988 18 19 Ito is Kawasaki city. Regarding the reliability of citation / speech of the material.

20 21 In article <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) writes: 22 23> If you say this, do you want to quantify yourself to some extent? Or quantification 24> is not possible.

25 26 How would a human being who wants to discuss not want to give quantitative data, but 27

28 I have never requested quantitative data, and have said that it is necessary, except for those who have said that quantification is necessary (or that comparison is necessary). not.

31 32> And if you say so far, do you not just need to criticize human data but scientifically demonstrate the dangers of nuclear power by yourself? 34 35 36 Again. At least, the amount of the doubled dose reported in the Mankuzo report was kept at a minimum 37. If I have time, I'll introduce the values.

38 39 Kenji Nishida @ Dentsu Research Institute 40 41 42 It is a fair attitude to show not only "Read XX" but also "XX is written like this".

44 45 Previously I could read about "Plutonium Fear" and was scolded by someone else. 46 I wonder if it's worth spending some time and reading it over time. is. Because it might be a ton demo book, right? For example, if I cited the kinetic and fuel liability editorial “I'm not afraid of nuclear power” (unreal, of course :-) 49 as the basis for the defense of nuclear power, 48, “What are you saying, you're not doing it?” People will get angry 50. I feel the same stupidity as saying, "Read the fear of plutonium." 51 "Do you know the Mankuzo report?"

52 53 # Mr. Takagi who is the author of "Pult" is the director of the nuclear power information office, 54 #, who is the anti-nuclear organization. If you want to trust it unconditionally as an objective material, 55 # is unreasonable in the first place? I don't mean to say he's a liar, but it's more natural to think at least 56 # biased.

57 58 The contents are indicated as “This is written in XX, this is also written”, and if they are satisfactory, then, for the first time, “I see, indeed, this book seems to be reliable. Let's read it. " In other words, showing the contents also indicates the credibility of the cited material itself.

62 63 In that sense, I think Mr. Sakai's quote is fair. Mr. Nishida's attitude is irresponsible in that he does not show anything, even though he demands evidence from others.

○ 2561 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech, fj.soc.environment 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Venus.sun.com! Nntp-hub2.barrnet. net! newsfeed.internetmci.com! news.dacom.co.kr! news.kreonet.re.kr! usenet.seri.re.kr! news.imnet.ad.jp! news.join.ad.jp! wnoc- tyo-news! etlnews.etl.go.jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! nish ida 3 From: nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Message-ID: <1996Jan18.033940.16951@etl.go.jp> 6 Sender: news@etl.go.jp (News System) 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: etlca0 8 Organization: ETL 9 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> <ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd .cs.fujitsu.co.jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 03:39:40 GMT 12 Lines: 38 13 Xref: isl.rdc.toshiba fj.soc.tech:2561 fj.soc. environment: 3989 14 15 It seems that Mr. Ito has no idea what the problem is. Whether but I absolutely do not mind, such as it looks.

17 18 In article <ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp>, 19 <itou@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> wrote: 20> Again. At least, the value of the doubling dose reported in the Mankuzo report was> 21>. If I have time, I'll introduce the values.

22> Kenji Nishida @ Institute of Electrical and Electronics Research 23 24> It is a fair attitude to show not only "read XX" but also "XX is written like this".

26 27 It does not say "read".

28 Without knowing the value of the doubled dose reported in the Mankuzo report, there is no point in talking about the safety of radiation exposure (low-dose exposure) 29. Does the person himself know it? I am checking.

[0135] The reason why I have not yet published the value in the Mankuzo report is that it is reasonable for the value that Mr. Sakai gives as "safe". 34 to verify that As mentioned above, he states that if time allows, he will introduce 35.

36 37> In that sense, I think Mr. Sakai's quote is fair. Mr. Nishida's stance is 38> I'm not irresponsible in that I don't show anything but ask for evidence 39>.

40 41 According to Sakai, one must read a textbook on nuclear reactor design in order to describe the concept of radiation exposure as I do here. 43 It is so. It's a fairly fair attitude.

44 45 As I wrote earlier, I only need evidence for those who say "needs comparison / is possible" 46 or "needs quantification".

47 How do those who say "necessary" do not do that, but will proceed with the discussion? 49 50 Kenji Nishida Electrification Research Institute 51 52 ○ 2576 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech, fj.soc.environment 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Venus.sun.com! Nntp -hub2.barrnet.net! newsfeed.internetmci.com! news.dacom.co.kr! usene t.seri.re.kr! news.imnet.ad.jp! wnoc-tyo-news! etlnews.etl.go. jp! et linn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! trc.rwcp! rwc-tyo! news.iij.ad.jp! vcmei! c ed.mei! chorus.mei! graf! ryuk 3 From: ryuk@ics.cpd.mei.co.jp () 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Message-ID: <DLDHtr.Mo3@chorus.isl.mei.co.jp> 6 Followup-To : fj.soc.tech, fj.soc.environment 7 Sender: news@chorus.isl.mei.co.jp 8 Nntp-Posting-Host: 132.182.9.25 9 Organization: Matsushita Electric IND. Co., Ltd., Osaka , Japan 10 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] 11 References: <ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> 12 Distribution: fj 13 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 10:44:15 GMT 14 Lines: 33 15 Xref: isl.rdc.toshiba fj.soc.tech:2576 fj.soc.environment: 3993 16 17 Hidaka "I see. Mr. I Why "primary opponents are opposed to emotional" it was melted question or have received 20 in the wind that.

21 22 23 itou@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp wrote: 24: It's Kawasaki city. Regarding the reliability of citation / speech of the material.

25 26: Previously I could read about "Plutonium Fear" and was scolded by someone else. 27: I don't know if it's worth spending some time and reading it over time 28 : That's why. Because it might be a ton demo book, right? For example, if I cite the kinetic and fuel liability editor "I'm not afraid of a nuclear power plant" (it's non-existent, of course :-) 30: as an argument for the defense of nuclear power plant 29: "What are you talking about? The 31 will be angry. The same ridiculousness is felt by saying, "Read the fear of plutonium." 32: "Do you know the Mankuzo report?"

33 34: # Mr. Takagi who is the author of "Pult-" is the director of the nuclear energy information group "35: #". If you want to trust it unconditionally as an objective material, 36: # Is it unreasonable in the first place? I don't mean to say he's a liar, but it's more natural to think that at least 37: # is biased.

38 39 In other words, Mr. Ito just doesn't understand the problem about nuclear power.

40 41 Or, in the past, Ito-san was so awkwardly aware of it (or was it broken?) 42 The opposition may have become emotional :-P.

43 44 Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж Ж 45 Noriyuki Hidaka ＠ Matsushita Electric Industrial IEDC. Peripheral Product Development Department 46 # Your email address has changed. Please be careful.

47 ryuk@dc.cpd.mei.co.jp 48 Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж △ Ж 49 ○ 2596 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Wnoc-tyo-news! Wased a.ac.jp! Cfi.waseda! News! G2j024 2 From: g2j024 @ cfi. waseda.ac.jp ("Tsuyoshi Ohnuki") 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech, fj.soc.environment 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Followup-To: fj.soc.tech, fj .soc.environment 6 Date: 19 Jan 1996 09:10:31 GMT 7 Organization: Center for Informatics, WASEDA University 8 Lines: 33 9 Distribution: fj 10 Message-ID: <G2J024.96Jan19181031@cosmos02.cfi.waseda.ac .jp> 11 References: <ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> 12 <DLDHtr.Mo3@chorus.isl.mei.co.jp> 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: g2j024 @ cosmos02. cfi.waseda.ac.jp 14 Mime-Version: 1.0 15 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = ISO-2022-JP 16 In-reply-to: ryuk@ics.cpd.mei.co.jp′s message of 18 Jan 1996 19: 44:15 +0900 17 Xref: isl.rdc.toshiba fj.soc.tech:2596 fj.soc.environment: 4019 18 19 20 In articl e <DLDHtr.Mo3@chorus.isl.mei.co.jp> ryuk@ics.cpd.mei.co.jp () writes: 21 22>: # Mr. Takagi, author of "Pluto ~" Group “Nuclear Resources Information Room” 23>: # 24>: # Is it unreasonable to trust it as an objective material unconditionally? I'm not saying he's a liar, but it's more natural to think that at least 25>: # is biased.

26 27 I think the Nuclear Resources Information Room is fairly neutral and objective. Of course, he says that he is in the opposite position, but he does not resort to feelings of emotion like a certain anti-nuclear instigator.

30 31 I wonder why the opposite is said to be "anti-nuclear." For example, as I do, is the idea that "nuclear energy should be promoted only for safety and develop another energy in the meantime" 34 "anti-nuclear"? Is it "promotion"? 35 36 And if you say that, it means that you can't trust the books of the people concerned, and you can only trust the layman's thinking. Isn't it correct to read through books in various positions? In that sense, "Reading XX" is not wrong. If you read only the book on the biased side (everyone sees everyone as biased 41), it's natural to be biased.

43 44 I intend to hear both opinions. I have visited the 45 nuclear facilities in Tokai Village.

46 47-48 Waseda University Faculty of Science and Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Endo Lab. 4 Go Tsuyoshi Onuki 49 g2j024@cfi.waseda.ac.jp 50 51 Citation and reprint of the text are permitted.

○ 2599 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech, fj.soc.environment 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Wnoc-tyo-news! Tokyo net.ad.jp ! pm1-19! k-nakat 3 From: k-nakat@gemini.bekkoame.or.jp (Koichi Nakatani) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: pm1- 19.harajuku.egg.or.jp 6 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 7 Message-ID: <k-nakat-1901961814380001@pm1-19.harajuku.egg.or.jp> 8 Sender: news@TokyoNet.AD.JP 9 Organization: Bekkoame 10 X-Newsreader: NewsWatcher-J 2.0J16 11 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya- u.ac.jp> <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> <4d hsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1996Jan17.065156.2567 0@etl.go.jp> < ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp> 12 Mime-Version: 1.0 13 Distribution: fj 14 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:14:38 GMT 15 Lines: 27 16 Xref: isl.rdc .toshiba fj.soc.tech:2599 fj.soc.environment: 4022 17 18 Nakatani @ Bekkoame. I'm sorry to follow "#".

19 20 In article <ITOU.96Jan18112433@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp>, 21 itou@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp wrote: 22 23> The author, Takagi, is certainly the chief of the anti-nuclear organization, Nuclear Resources Information Room. If you want to trust it unconditionally as an objective material 25> # In the first place is it unreasonable? I don't mean to say he's a liar, but it's more natural to think at least 26> # biased.

27 28 It looks like a response to my article.

29 It is unknown what kind of action "trust unconditionally as objective material" refers to, but does it mean 31 "no need to read critically"?

32. If so, I did not do so.

[33] In addition to the fact that there is no material that does not need to be read critically, it is necessary to dismiss unnecessary misunderstandings.

35 36 I will once again introduce “Fear of Plutonium” as a material that can withstand critical reading.

38 39 Not only from Mr. Ito, but from the perspective of someone promoting _ If you can introduce the material _ 40 that can withstand critical reading, it will be 41 that this thread was not completely barren. .

42-43 Nakatani @ Bekkoame 44 # I would like to discuss the debate somewhere.

○ 2562 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Yilnws! Hamamatsu-pc! News.tcp-net.ad.jp! Niq0! Newssinet! Sinetnews! Eclnews! News. ipc.chi ba-u! news.tj.chiba-u! train.ad.jp! news.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp! race-serv er.race.u-tokyo.ac.jp! race- server-atm! chutzpah 2 From: chutzpah@race.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Koji ANDO) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Date: 18 Jan 1996 03:25:58 GMT 6 Organization: Design Science Lab., RACE, the Univ. Of Tokyo.7 Lines: 24 8 Distribution: fj 9 Message-ID: <CHUTZPAH.96Jan18122558@cygnus.race.u-tokyo.ac. jp> 10 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 11 <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> 12 <4dhsab $9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 13 <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> 14 Reply-To: chutzpah@race.u-tokyo.ac.jp 15 NNTP-Posting- Host: cygnus-atm.race.u-tokyo.ac.jp 16 In-reply-to: nishida@etl.go.jp′s message of Wed, 17 Jan 1996 06: 51:56 GMT 17 18 This is Ando.

19 20 In article <1996Jan17.065156.25670@etl.go.jp> nishida@etl.go.jp (NISHIDA Kenji) writes: 21 22> Then, "Your body also has radioactivity." 23> I can understand why I made a meaningful statement.

24 25 It is me who made this statement. Not Sakai. Please correct it.

26 Please judge for yourself whether this statement is meaningless. There is no mistake in this sentence. Mr. Nishida seems to have interpreted it in his own background and mentioned it as meaningless, but that's fine.

29 30 My argument was to suppress the theory of emotions, but it seemed to be counterproductive.

[0165] 31 Sorry.

32 33 34 35-36 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------- --- 37 Koji ANDO <chutzpah@race.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Stoppt die Atomtests! 38 RACE , the Univ. of Tokyo Ich protestiere gegen die Atomte sts. 39 URL: http://www.race.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~chutzpah/ 40 71060,1300 @ compuserve.com LL2K-ANDU @ asahi-net .or.jp 41 Phone: + 81-3-5453-5882 FAX: + 81-3-3467-0648 ○ 2563 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! tsb-wide! wnoc- sfc-news! wnoc-tyo-news! tokyo net.ad.jp! pm1-21! k-nakat 3 From: k-nakat@gemini.bekkoame.or.jp (Koichi Nakatani) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: pm1-21.harajuku.egg.or.jp 6 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 7 Message-ID: <k-nakat -1801961330580001@pm1-21.harajuku.egg.or.jp> 8 Sender: news@TokyoNet.AD.JP 9 Organization: Bekkoame 10 X-Newsreader: NewsWatcher-J 2.0J16 11 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go .jp> <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <1996Jan16.082300.129@etl.go.jp> <4d hsa b$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 12 Mime-Version: 1.0 13 Distribution: fj 14 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 04:30:58 GMT 15 Lines: 20 16 17 Nakatani @ Bekkoame. (I'm against nuclear development.) 18 19 In article <4dhsab$9qs@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, 20 sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) wrote: 21 22> The risk from radiation and radioactivity is “a risk that humanity has never experienced before” 23>, not [...] 24 25 However, plutonium-loaded trucks are being used throughout Japan The risk of running around the 26 has never been experienced by us.

27 28> Conversely, opponents generally feel that the image is ahead of the other just by imagination that is convenient for the opposition.

30 31 Is that so? I feel that proponents generally lack the imagination for 32 risks.

[33] Otherwise, I don't think there is any explanation for leaving the "fear of plutonium" without refuting for 14 years.

35-36 Nakatani @ Bekkoame ○ 2531 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Cilab-news.rdc.toshiba! News.tsurumi.toshib a! Pjh22022! Hq10! Tis2! Inet-tsb! Spin-hsd0- tky! spinnews! wnoc-tyo-news! etlnews.etl.go.jp! etlinn.etl.go.jp! etl.go.jp! trc.rwcp! rwc-tyo! news.iij.ad.jp! sranha .sra.co.jp! sran265.sra.co.jp! hironobu 2 From: hironobu@sra.CO.JP (Hironobu SUZUKI) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n ) 5 Date: 16 Jan 1996 10:48:01 GMT 6 Organization: Software Research Associates, Inc., Japan 7 Lines: 378 Distribution: fj 9 Message-ID: <HIRONOBU.96Jan16194801@sran265.sra.CO.JP> 10 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: sran265.sra.co.jp 12 In- reply-to: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp′s message of 16 Jan 96 06:43:50 GMT 13 14 15 In article <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u. ac.jp> sakai @ av ocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) writes: 16 >> Of course, once a major accident occurred It is a matter of thinking about the risk of shortening the life expectancy of the 29th of the 17th, but it is also a problem, but I think it is important to consider the change in climate due to global warming due to carbon dioxide emission 18 >> .

19 20 There is no point in statistically shortening the lifespan of 29 days. It is a magic of statistics of the kind drowned in the river even if the average water depth is 15c 21m.

22 23 Then, if you call for global warming due to carbon dioxide, there are many things to do, such as protection of the rainforest and coral reefs. It only sounds like a self-contained sophistry.

26 27 Large amounts of nitrogen oxides and soot and large quantities of volcanic gas from Moromoro blow out in large-scale volcanic explosions. It is said to be equal to the annual amount emitted in 29 years. For this to return, the earth must be in a healthy environment.

No matter how much a nuclear power plant is built, it doesn't make any sense that the rainforests, coral reefs, and forests 33 are being destroyed more and more.

34 35 In theory, increasing carbon dioxide should lead to more active photosynthesis in plants.

36 In the case of global warming, photosynthesis of plants should be increasingly promoted. That should keep some equilibrium (in theory). However, if the plant's place of growth is deprived, carbon dioxide will only increase.

39 40 Unfortunately, research on the global carbon cycle does not seem to be so well-established. So I've never heard anything that simulates all 43 carbon cycles, such as rainforests, marine coral reefs, 42 tonnes of marine plant blankets, and forested areas in the Northern Hemisphere. .

44 45 Well, the story has shifted, but “nuclear power reduces carbon dioxide emissions” 46 is not at all a lie, but it is only a sophistry to give me 47 I can't hear you. In addition, nuclear garbage that cannot be processed accumulates more and more, so it can only be evaluated as subtractive or negative.

49 50 Hironobu ○ 2607 1 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 2 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Yilnws! Hamamatsu-pc! News.tcp-net.ad. jp! niq0! newssinet! hakata! kudpc! kuis-news! kurims! wakamatu 3 From: wakamatu@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (Wakamatsu Kazuhiro) 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 In -Reply-To: hironobu@sra.CO.JP's message of 16 Jan 1996 10: 48: 0 1 GMT 6 Message-ID: <WAKAMATU.96Jan19211743@hakobe.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> 7 Sender : news@kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp 8 Nntp-Posting-Host: hakobe 9 Organization: Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyot o, Japan.10 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 11 <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 12 <HIRONOBU.96Jan16194801@sran265.sra.CO.JP> 13 Distribution: fj 14 Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 12:17:43 GMT 15 Lines: 22 16 17 This is Wakamatsu.

18 19 In article <HIRONOBU.96Jan16194801@sran265.sra.CO.JP> hironobu @ s ra.CO.JP (Hironobu SUZUKI) writes: 20> And if you call out global warming due to carbon dioxide, There are many things to do, such as protection of the reefs and coral reef protection, but bringing nuclear power to the theme immediately can only be heard in a coherent manner.

23 24 I think so too. That said, 25 26 The other day (I know anyone who knows about criticism of the occult) I read Ansai-sensei's 27 Kamogawa booklet. 28 In the case of a nuclear power plant in Japan, it faces the sea. They use seawater as secondary cooling water, and they warm the seawater and indirectly increase carbon dioxide emissions.

31 32 We also often hear that oil is also used in the construction of nuclear power plants, and that it does not mean that it does not reduce carbon dioxide much.

34 35 Because it is an amateur's knowledge, you may be writing a lie. What about? 36-37 One day until fj.soc.politics is established 38 ○ 2539 1 Path: isl.rdc. Toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc-sfc-news! Wnoc-kyo-news! Aist- nara! Odins-suita ! odins-sci! usenet 2 From: taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Date: 16 Jan 1996 19:50:48 +0900 6 Organization: Faculty of Science, Osaka University 7 Lines: 53 8 Sender: taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp 9 Distribution: fj 10 Message-ID: <tyybr82z1y.fsf@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp> 11 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 12 <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac. jp> 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp 14 In-reply-to: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp′s message of 16 Ja n 1996 06:43:50 GMT 15 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.0.4 16 17 Hello, this is Yoshino.

18 19 In article <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 20 Mr. Sakai: 21> On the other hand, internal exposure of nearby residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) from the Chernobyl accident 22 > The shortening of the service life is 29 days.

23 ::: 24> For more details, please refer to pages 17-25 of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41, No. 12 (1995), which I wrote earlier.

26 27 Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? 28 Where did Sakai read this? I'd like to look it up once, so let me know.

30 31> By the way, the life expectancy is reduced to 0.28 days when relying on oil-fired power for all power.

32> In the end, 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days of risk (actually 33> is currently about 30% of this) in exchange for the supply of electricity from the nuclear power plant, or else, I think it would be a good idea to switch to a power supply with less risk 34> (and well worth the cost).

36 37 I also read Sakai-san's December article that I did not read.

38 I am not interested in comparisons that simply compare average numbers.

39 Even if the overall risk is lightly scattered or the risk is concentrated in a part, the same result will be obtained.

41 #The average of # 49 and 51 is the same as the average of 100 and 0.

42 # There are at least two types: distribution by time and distribution by region.

43 44 If we calculate socially meaningful “costs” using numbers, I think there is a need to weight the risk of 245 9 described below. Is there a total of 46? 47 48 Of course, because of that aspect, Mr. Sakai 49>> Of course, what is the risk of shortening the lifespan of a 29-day accident in the event of a major accident? And climate change due to global warming 52> should be considered in thermal power.

I think 53 54 was added.

55 56 By the way, the above 29 days is probably the average of 57 within 400km from the above analogy. 58 Data on the difference in risk depending on the distance from the nuclear power plant location is provided in the above document. 60 61 The average risk of a nuclear accident, including its frequency, is said to be 0.011 days. 62 What is the difference in risk depending on the distance from the nuclear power plant location? 63 In order to persuade the opponents on the ground, I think it is necessary to estimate the risk of nuclear power in the town.

65-66 67 Taro Yoshino 68 taro@godzilla.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp 69 Department of Science, Osaka University 2567 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! Tsb-wide! Wnoc- sfc-news! wnoc-tyo-news! spinn ews! spin-hsd0-tky! inetgw.melco! meims! mspc200! newsgate.melfans.or .jp! news.tcp-net.ad.jp! niq0! newssinet! sinetnews ! eclnews! news.ipc .chiba-u! news.tj.chiba-u! train.ad.jp! news.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp! tkyex 1.phys.su-tokyo.ac.jp! news.tisn.ad.jp! news.nips.ac.jp! news.ecip .nagoya-u.ac.jp! sakai 2 From: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (Y / n) 5 Message-ID: <4dkh0v$ggk@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 6 Date: 18 Jan 96 04:06:55 GMT 7 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 8 <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 9 <tyybr82z1y.fsf@therm.phys.sci .osaka-u.ac.jp> 10 Distribution: fj 11 Organization: Education Center for Information Processing, Nagoy a Univ., Japan. 12 Lines: 32 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 133.6.95.47 14 Mime-Vers ion: 1.0 15 Content-Type: text / plain; charset = iso-2022-jp 16 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 17 X-Newsreader: mnews [version 1.18] 1994-05 / 16 (Mon) 18 19 <tyybr82z1y. 20 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp wrote in the article of fsf@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp>.

[0198] 21 22 >> Hello, this is Yoshino.

23 >> 24 >> In article <4dfhf7$539@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> 25 >> Mr. Sakai: 26 >>> On the other hand, residents in the vicinity of the Chernobyl accident (1560 within 400 km) The reduction of life expectancy is 29 days, taking into account internal exposure 27 >>> of all people.

[0200] 28 >>::: 29 >>> For details, please see pages 17-30 of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41 No. 12 (1995), p.

31 >> 32 >> Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? 33 >> Where did Sakai read this? I want to look it up once, so I teach you 34 >>

35 >> 36 It was in the library room of the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Nagoya University.

37 This can be found by searching in the main building of the Nagoya University Library. 38 Since the Nagoya University Library (room) is open to the general public, 39 should be viewable by ordinary people. is.

40 41 At Osaka University, why not see it in the library room of the Faculty of Engineering, Department of Nuclear Engineering? 42 And since the Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun is available, I think it's relatively easy to get an order if you have 43.

44 45 ----- 46 Hirotaka Sakai 47 Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University 48 Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year 49 Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u. ac.jp 50 h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp ○ 2619 1 Path: isl.rdc.toshiba! tsb-wide! wnoc-sfc-news! wnoc-kyo-news! aist- nara! odins- suita! odins-sci! usenet 2 From: taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () 3 Newsgroups: fj.soc.tech 4 Subject: Re: Nuclear Energy? (y / n) 5 Date : 20 Jan 1996 12:41:46 +0900 6 Organization: Faculty of Science, Osaka University 7 Lines: 31 8 Sender: taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp 9 Distribution: fj 10 Message-ID : <tylon3y1l1.fsf@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp> 11 References: <1996Jan15.144435.17812@etl.go.jp> 12 <4dkh0v$ggk@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u. ac.jp> 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp 14 In-reply-to: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp′s message of 18 Ja n 96 04:06:55 GMT 15 X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.0.4 16 17 Hello, in Yoshino .

18 19 In article <4dkh0v$ggk@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp> sakai @ av ocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp (SAKAI Hirotaka) writes: 20 Mr. Sakai: 21 >>> For details, please refer to pages 41 to 22 of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41, No. 12 (1995).

23 Yoshino: 24 >> Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? 25 >> Where did Sakai read this? I want to look it up once so teach me 26 >>

27 Mr. Sakai: 28> There was a library in the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Nagoya University.

29> This can be found by searching in the main building of the library of Nagoya University. 30> The library (room) of Nagoya University is open to the public, so even ordinary people can read it. 31> Should be able to.

32> Why not see Osaka University in the library room of the Faculty of Engineering, Department of Nuclear Engineering? 33> And since the Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun is out, it's relatively easy to place an order 34>.

[0211] Thank you. Suita (the campus where Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University) is far! So I can't find out immediately 37, but I'll try later. Thank you very much.

38 39 By the way, if you look at the places where there is no follow-up of the other parts, it seems that the risk assessment described here does not have the time / regional density distribution after all. ? 42 43-44 45 Taro Yoshino 46 taro@godzilla.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp 47 Department of Science, Osaka University . In this article, lines 1 through 15 are headers. After that is the text.
The second line of the header contains the caller's account name.
Some articles have information on their names. The tenth line of the header is the message ID of this article.

In this article, from the 19th line to the 25th line,
Alternatively, if the message ID is <4dfhf7 / $ 539 in the portion from the 31st line to the 35th line or from the 50th line to the 52nd line
@ sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>. This corresponds to the 58th to 66th lines, the 68th to 73rd lines, and the 75th to 77th lines of the article with the article number 2526.

Also, from the 26th line to the 30th line in the article,
Lines 36 to 49 and lines 53 and on are comments for the first, second, and third citations, respectively. That is, until the next citation begins, it is often a comment on the previous citation. by the way,
Article 2526 is also quoted from article 2531 and article 2527.

[0215] Such a cross-reference relationship corresponds to the above-mentioned reference numerals 2526, 2527, 2541, 2543, 254.
9, 2551, 2566, 2553, 2570, 258
8, 2558, 2561, 2576, 2596, 259
9,2562,2563,2531,2607,253
9, 2567, 2619 occur in each other.

If it is possible to analyze which part of an article is cited and where in another article as described above, the referenced article (original article) may include the other article that cites the article. Inserting the part after the quoted part (comment part) can make the flow of discussion easier to see.

Such a cross-reference analysis algorithm 1
The algorithm for analyzing the citation / reference relationship of each article will be described with reference to FIG.

First, in step S1, the text
The citation part (start line and end line) of another article and the message ID of the article to which the citation is cited are detected.

Here, the quoted line usually begins with “>” or
Since a symbol such as ":" is inserted, a portion where such a symbol continues is detected and counted as one citation.
The message ID of the quoted article in the line before the quoted part in the text
Is described, it is quoted message ID
Otherwise, the last message ID among the message IDs listed in the reference line of the article header is used as the quoted message ID. Also, in the article header
Refer to the Sender field to detect the name of the author of each article.

Next, in step S2, based on the result analyzed in step S1, for each article, the article (child article) referencing it and the article (parent article) referencing it.
Create a list of. That is, the message ID of the reference destination
Is registered as the parent article of the article, and the article having the message ID of the article as the message ID of the quotation destination is registered as a child article. For one article, there is one parent article. If there is no article, give a temporary article number.

Next, in step S3, based on the result analyzed in step S2, for each line of each article, if it is the last line of the citation location of the child article, the file name of the child article and the citation of the child article The line number of the line ending with is added as attribute information of the line.

If the last line of the child article's citation is in the citation of another article in the body of the parent article, that is, if it is a citation of a grandfather article, the line attribute of the corresponding line of the grandfather article is Add the file name of the child article and the line number of the line where the citation of the article ends. This means that the citation relationship from the child article to the parent article is exchanged from the child article to the grandfather article.

If the corresponding line in the grandfather article is also in the quoted part, the above information is added as attribute information to the corresponding line in the great-grandfather article. That is, the citation relation rerouting routine is realized as a recursive function. If this is not done, some articles will not be displayed in the inline expansion display of the algorithms 3 and 4 described later.

Next, in step S4, for each article, an article whose child article has not been identified in the processing in step S3 is listed as an indirect reference article.
This is due to the absence of the above-mentioned parent article, the use of non-standard bullets to indicate the quotation, or the fact that the quotation in the child article is different from the parent article (such as changing the line break). This is an article for which the reference analysis in S3 has failed.

Next, in step S5, an article without a parent, that is, the oldest article (root article) of each thread is detected.

The above-described reference analysis algorithm mainly includes four processes.

Article numbers 2526, 2527, 2541,
2543, 2549, 2551, 2566, 2553,
2570, 2588, 2558, 2561, 2576,
2596, 2599, 2562, 2563, 2531,
The processing results of each processing for the articles 2607, 2539, 2567, and 2619 are shown in FIGS. 11 to 18 as the intermediate analysis result 1, the intermediate analysis result 2, and the intermediate analysis result 3.

The interim analysis result 1 shown in FIGS.
It is a processing result of step S1 in the above-mentioned algorithm 1. At the start of the quote, the message I to which the quote is cited
D information is marked "end-ref" at the end of citation, which is the detection result of the citation. If the citation is on one line, the message ID and "end-ref" are marked on the same line.

The interim analysis result 2 shown in FIGS.
It is a processing result of step S2 in the above-mentioned algorithm 1. The second column is the article number of the parent article, the third column is the number of child articles, the fourth column is the article number of the child article, and the fifth column is the poster of the child article. The second column is the message ID
Those that remain are articles that are referenced but do not exist. The line starting with a ☆ sign is "num1;num2;num3;num4; num
The format is 5 ", which is the target of the citation-related rerouting routine described in the processing in step S3.

That is, the quoted portion of the child article is a portion that is also a quoted portion in the parent article. Child article num4
A citation ending in num5 lines cites num3 lines in parent article num2, indicating that this is a citation to grandfather article num1. When the same line of num4 and num5 is continuous, it indicates that the renewal of the citation relationship extends not only to the grandfather article but also to the great-grandfather article, the great-grandfather period, ...

As shown in the intermediate analysis result 2 shown in FIGS. 11 to 13, if the processing in step S2 has been completed, the reference relationship can be represented by a tree structure based on this result. The interrelationship between articles is as follows.

(Reference relationship 1) ==================================== ○ <1996Jan15.151926.20309 @ etl.go.jp> 1 2526 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 3 2527 (NISHIDA Kenji) 1 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 2 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) 3 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 2 2551 (NISHIDA Kenji) 1 2566 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 2553 ( NISHIDA Kenji) 1 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 1 2588 (NISHIDA Kenji) 2558 itou@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp 3 2561 (NISHIDA Kenji) 2576 ryuk@ics.cpd.mei.co.jp () 1 2596 ("Tsuyoshi Ohnuki") 2599 (Koichi Nakatani) 2562 (Koji ANDO) 2563 (Koichi Nakatani) 2531 (Hironobu SUZUKI) 1 2607 (Wakamatsu Kazuhiro) 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp ( ) 1 2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 1 2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ========================= ====================== In the above correlation, multiple identical article numbers appear, but this is because there are multiple citations in the article. is there.

When the above-mentioned mutual relations are arranged and the reference relations are cited instead of articles, they are as follows.

(Reference relationship 2) ○ <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp> 1 | ○ 2526 (SAKAI Hirotaka) [Indirect reference] | | ○ 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac. 2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | | 2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | | 2626 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka- u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ ○ 2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () 2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | 2525 (Hironobu SUZUKI) ○ 2607 (Wakamatsu Kazuhiro) ｜ ｜ ○ 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ ○ 2527 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ 2 ○ 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ taka 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ ○ 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 255 8 itou@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2561 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2576 ryuk@ics.cpd.mei.co.jp () ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2599 (Koichi Nakatani) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2596 ("Tsuyoshi Ohnuki") ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ A 2561 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2558 itou@volga.mfd.cs.fujitsu.co.jp ○ 2561 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 2 2576 ryuk@ics.cpd.mei.co.jp () ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 2 2599 (Koichi Nakatani) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 2 2596 (" 2561 (NISHIDA Kenji) | | | | 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) | | | 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | | | 2563 (Koichi Nakatani) | | | 2541 ( ○ 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 2 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 25 2553 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 2 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2588 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ 588 N 588 588 588 588 588 588 588 588 549 ○ 549 549 549 549 570 549 549 549 549 570 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 549 570 549 549 549 570 549 570 549 570 570 549 570 570 570 549 570 570 570 549 549 570 570 570 570 549 549 570 570 570 570 549 549 570 549 570 549 570 549 570 570 570 570 570 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 2551 (NISHIDA Kenji) | | | | | | | | 2566 (SAKAI Hirotaka) The same article number appears only once in this reference display.

Step S2 in the above algorithm 1
The algorithm for performing the display such as the reference relationship 2 using the processing result of (1) can be realized by a recursive function as shown in step S4. The algorithm for displaying the reference relation 1 may be such that after displaying the reference relation 3 described later, only the line containing the symbol “記号” is extracted.

The intermediate analysis result 3 shown in FIGS. 14 to 18 is the processing result of step S3 in the above algorithm 1. This is the result of adding the article number and the number of lines of the child article as attributes to the line cited in the child article (the line corresponding to the last line of the child article). When the same line is cited in a plurality of child articles, a plurality of attributes are added (to be exact, when the line is the last line of the citation of a different child article).

An article display method which is realized based on the citation / reference relation analyzed as described above and which makes it easy to grasp the development of the discussion will be described below.

First, a display method according to the first embodiment will be described. First, an algorithm (algorithm 2: simple HyperText) for this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG.

First, in step S10, a root article is displayed. That is, each line of each article is displayed, and if another article (number) and the number of lines are added as attributes of the line, the article number and the number of lines, the name of the poster of the article, A button consisting of

The buttons are displayed with one indent from the beginning of the line. If there is an indirectly referenced article, a button composed of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the name of the poster is arranged after the last line of each article by indenting one from the beginning of the line.

Next, it is determined in step S11 whether or not the button has been pressed, and if so, it is determined whether or not the pressed button is a button for an indirectly referenced article (step S12).
If NO here, the article number and line number of the pressed button,
Along with the poster name, the number of indents at the position where the button is located is acquired (step S13). Then, the article with the article number acquired in the next step S14 is displayed. In other words, if each line of an article is displayed and another article (number) and the number of lines are added as attributes of that line, the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster of that article are added after that line. Button. Buttons are arranged one indent from the beginning of the line.

If there are indirectly referenced articles, a button consisting of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the name of the poster is arranged after the last line of each article. Adjust the scroll position so that the acquired line number is in the center of the screen, and
Fly to one.

On the other hand, if YES in step S12,
The article number and poster name of the pressed button are obtained, and the number of indents at the position where the button is located is obtained (step S15).

Next, the article with the article number obtained in step S16 is displayed. In other words, if each line of an article is displayed and another article (number) and the number of lines are added as attributes of that line, the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster of that article are added after that line. Button. Buttons are arranged one indent from the beginning of the line. If there is an indirectly referenced article, a button consisting of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the name of the contributor is arranged behind the last line of the article. Then, after adjusting the scroll position so that the top line is at the top of the screen, step S11 is repeated.

A display example at this time is shown below as a display example 1.

○ 2526 In the article of <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp>, ni
shida@etl.go.jp wrote.

>> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: >> I asked first, but after evaluating the difference in risks depending on the nuclides, >> and saying, "Your body also has radioactivity">> Is it right? >> Now I'm sorry if you haven't understood this yet.

[0248] >>> Evaluation including effects specific to each nuclide is possible after all. >>> Because the effects are radiation-derived, natural radioactivity or artificial radioactivity may be used. >>> Whether it is radiation due to gargle or external exposure, those risks can be managed by the same scale >>>, and natural radioactivity and medical exposure are also subject to risks measured by such a scale >>> That is the main purpose.

>> >> Is it intentionally blurred? >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

>> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai has evaluated.

>> In other words, I wanted to say that in the field of radiation health physics, we are discussing based on the results evaluated in that way.

In the course of these discussions, if you are not as familiar as Mr. Nishida, those who are not, consider these facts in the numbers that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe. I wrote it because it could be received as if it were not.

>> Actually, how much effect is expected from radiation emitted from nuclear power plants >> What do you think? If we add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this), when all domestic power is covered by nuclear power The exposure risk of 0.07 days is based on the assumption that the exposure includes internal exposure of 0.08 mSv per year. Exposure to natural radiation is about 2.4 mSv per year (although it is actually less than 0.001 mSv), so the risk of internal exposure to natural radiation is 2.1 days.

# These one-year exposure calculations naturally include the effect of biological half-life, and also include the differences in risks between nuclides.

On the other hand, the life expectancy is reduced to 29 days considering the internal exposure of the local residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) due to the Chernobyl accident.

Also, based on this figure, the risk of considering internal exposure due to a nuclear accident based on the frequency of core melting accidents when all domestic power is provided by nuclear power is 0.011 day.

[0257] For details, please refer to pages 17 to of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41, No. 12 (1995).

○ 2539: 10 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) By the way, the life expectancy is reduced to 0.28 days when relying on oil-fired power for all power.

At the end of the day, the risk of 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days (in fact,
About 30%. ), Or if it does not, switch to other low-risk (and cost-efficient) means of supplying power.

○ 2539: 20 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) Of course, it is also a matter of thinking about the risk of shortening the life of 29 days once a major accident occurs, but including thermal changes such as climate change due to global warming due to carbon dioxide emissions I think you should think.

○ 2539: 37 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp) ○ 2531: 6 (Hironobu SUZUKI) >> Results of quantitative evaluation including the difference in risk depending on nuclides >> by all means.

>>I'd like to see how Nishida himself was evaluated quantitatively.

○ 2527: 4 (NISHIDA Kenji) ----- Hirotaka Sakai Nagoya University Graduate School of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Measurement Engineering (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya- u.ac.jp h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp As shown in this display example, the name of the referenced article and the referenced line at the end of the referenced location, and the transmission of that article A button with information on the person is attached.
The portion up to line 77 is quoted in two articles, so there are two buttons.

Here, for example, “○ 2539: 10 (taro@therm.p
hys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp) ", the article 2539 is displayed around the 10th line.
When the article 2539 is quoted from another article, it goes without saying that a button is similarly arranged at the relevant quoted portion. In this example, the child article (reference article) is described as being displayed on the same screen. However, it is also possible to generate a separate window and display the reference article there.

Next, a display method according to the second embodiment will be described. The algorithm for the second embodiment (algorithm 3: inline expansion (one stage)) will be described with reference to FIG.

First, a root article is displayed in step S20. Here, each line of each article is displayed, and if another article (number) and the number of lines are added as attributes of that line, it is composed of the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster after that line Place a button. Buttons are arranged one indent from the beginning of the line. If there is an indirectly referenced article, a button composed of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the author's name is arranged behind the last line, indented by one from the beginning of the line.

Next, it is determined in step S21 whether or not the button has been pressed, and if so, it is determined whether or not the pressed button is a button for an indirectly referenced article (step S22).
If NO here, the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster of the pressed button are obtained, and the number of indents at the position where the button is located is obtained (step S23). Then, in step S24, a line from the line following the line number of the acquired article number to the start of another citation is inserted into the original text at the place where the button was located. Each line is indented and inserted by the acquired number of indents. If you have another article (number) and row count as row attributes,
After the line, a button including the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster is arranged. The button is indented and displayed by the acquired number of indents + 1.

If there is an indirectly referenced article, a button consisting of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the name of the poster is arranged behind the last line. The button is indented and displayed by the acquired number of indents + 1.

On the other hand, if YES in step S22, the article number and poster name of the button pressed in step S25 are obtained, and the number of indents at the position where the button is located is obtained. Then, all lines of the article with the article number acquired in step S26 are inserted at the end of the original text. Each line is indented and inserted by the acquired number of indents. When another article (number) and the number of lines are added as attributes of the line, a button including the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster is arranged after the line.

The button is indented and displayed by the acquired number of indents + 1. If you have indirectly referenced articles,
After the last line, a button consisting of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the name of the poster is arranged. The button is indented and displayed by the acquired number of indents + 1. Thereafter, the process jumps to step S21.

In the display example 1 described above, when the button is pressed, it is conceivable that a comment for the pertinent part of the reference article is directly inserted into the original article. In this case, the result of pressing the button is displayed as follows (display example 2).

○ 2526 In the article of <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp>, ni
shida@etl.go.jp wrote.

>> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: >> I asked first, but after evaluating the difference in risks depending on the nuclides, >> and saying, "Your body also has radioactivity">> Is it right? >> Now I'm sorry if you haven't understood this yet.

In the end, it is possible to evaluate including the effects specific to each nuclide. >>> Because the effects are derived from radiation, they may be natural or artificial. >>> Whether it is radiation due to gargle or external exposure, those risks can be managed by the same scale >>>, and natural radioactivity and medical exposure are also subject to risks measured by such a scale >>> That is the main purpose.

>> >> Is it intentionally blurred? >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

>> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai has evaluated.

>> In other words, I wanted to say that in the field of radiation health physics, we are discussing based on the results evaluated in that way.

In the course of these discussions, if you are not as familiar as Mr. Nishida, those who are not, consider these facts in the figures that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe. I wrote it because it could be received as if it were not.

>> Actually, how much effect is expected from radiation emitted from nuclear power plants >> What do you think? If we add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this), when all domestic power is covered by nuclear power The exposure risk of 0.07 days is based on the assumption that the exposure includes internal exposure of 0.08 mSv per year. Exposure to natural radiation is about 2.4 mSv per year (although it is actually less than 0.001 mSv), so the risk of internal exposure to natural radiation is 2.1 days.

# These one-year exposure calculations naturally include the effect of biological half-life, and also include the differences in risks due to nuclides.

On the other hand, the life expectancy is reduced to 29 days in consideration of the internal exposure of nearby residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) due to the Chernobyl accident.

Also, based on this figure, the risk of considering internal exposure due to a nuclear accident based on the frequency of core melting accidents when all domestic power is provided by nuclear power is 0.011 day.

For details, please refer to p.17 ~ of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41 No. 12 (1995).

2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? ｜ Where did Sakai read this? I want to find out once so let me know |

2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) By the way, the life expectancy is reduced to 0.28 days when relying on oil-fired power for all power.

At the end of the day, the risk of 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days (actually,
About 30%. ), Or if it does not, switch to other low-risk (and cost-efficient) means of supplying power.

○ 2539: 20 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) Of course, it is also a matter of thinking about the risk of shortening the life of 29 days once a major accident occurs, but including thermal changes such as climate change due to global warming due to carbon dioxide emissions I think you should think.

○ 2539: 37 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) ○ 2531: 6 (Hironobu SUZUKI) >> I would like to see the results of the quantitative evaluation, including the difference in the risks depending on the nuclides >>.

>> I would like to see how Nishida himself was evaluated quantitatively.

○ 2527: 4 (NISHIDA Kenji) ----- Hirotaka Sakai Nagoya University Graduate School of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Measurement Engineering (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya- u.ac.jp h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp As you can see from the display example 2 above, add "|" at the beginning of the line and add indentation so that the inserted part is easy to understand. I have.

The insertion of such a comment portion of the reference document into the referenced document is hereinafter referred to as inline expansion.

[0292] In the display example 2, a button is attached to the portion expanded inline, because the corresponding portion of the article with the article number 2539 is cited in another article. When this button is clicked, the following display (display example 3) is displayed.

○ 2526 In the article of <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp>, ni
shida@etl.go.jp wrote.

>> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: >> I asked first, but after evaluating the difference in risks depending on the nuclides, >> and saying, "Your body also has radioactivity">> Is it right? >> Now I'm sorry if you haven't understood this yet.

[0295] >>> Evaluation including effects specific to each nuclide is possible after all. >>> Because the effects are radiation-derived, natural radioactivity or artificial radioactivity may be used. >>> Whether it is radiation due to gargle or external exposure, those risks can be managed by the same scale >>>, and natural radioactivity and medical exposure are also subject to risks measured by such a scale >>> That is the main purpose.

>> >> Is it intentionally blurred? >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

>> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai has evaluated.

>> In other words, I wanted to say that in the field of radiation health physics, we are discussing based on the results evaluated in that way.

In the course of these discussions, if you are not as familiar as Mr. Nishida, those who are not, consider these facts in the numbers that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe. I wrote it because it could be received as if it were not.

[0300] >> Actually, how much effect is expected from the radioactivity emitted from nuclear power plants? >> If you add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this), if all domestic power is covered by nuclear power The exposure risk of 0.07 days is based on the assumption that the exposure includes internal exposure of 0.08 mSv per year. Exposure to natural radiation is about 2.4 mSv per year (although it is actually less than 0.001 mSv), so the risk of internal exposure to natural radiation is 2.1 days.

# These one-year dose calculations naturally include the biological half-life effect and also include the differences in risks between nuclides.

[0302] On the other hand, the life expectancy is reduced to 29 days in consideration of the internal exposure of the local residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) due to the Chernobyl accident.

[0303] Based on this figure, the risk of considering internal exposure due to a nuclear accident based on the frequency of core melting accidents when all domestic power is provided by nuclear power is 0.011 days.

[0304] As for the detailed contents, please refer to p.17- of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41 No. 12 (1995).

[0305] | ○ 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? ｜ Where did Sakai read this? I want to find out once so let me know |

| | | 2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | There was a library in the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Nagoya University.

| | This can be found by searching in the main building of the library of Nagoya University. | | Since the library (room) of Nagoya University is open to the general public, you can also read | | Should be able to

│ ｜ ｜ ｜ Isn't Osaka University even found in the library room of the Department of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Engineering? Also, since the Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun has been issued, it will be relatively easy to place an order if you order it.

2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ ｜ ----- ｜ ｜ Sakai Hirotaka ｜ Nagoya University Graduate School of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering | Nuclear Instrumentation Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year | | Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp | | h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp By the way, all The life expectancy of relying on oil fired power is 0.28 days.

After all, the risk of 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days (actually,
About 30%. ), Or if it does not, switch to other low-risk (and cost-efficient) means of supplying power.

○ 2539: 20 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) Of course, it is also a matter of thinking about the risk of shortening the life of 29 days once a major accident occurs, but including thermal changes such as climate change due to global warming due to carbon dioxide emissions I think you should think.

○ 2539: 37 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) ○ 2531: 6 (Hironobu SUZUKI) >> I would like to see the results of the quantitative evaluation, including the difference in the risks depending on the nuclides >>.

>> I would like to see how Nishida himself was evaluated quantitatively.

○ 2527: 4 (NISHIDA Kenji) ----- Hirotaka Sakai Nagoya University Graduate School of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya- u.ac.jp h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp In display example 3 above, there is a button at the inline-expanded part. .

○ 2526 in the article of <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp>
shida@etl.go.jp wrote.

>> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: >> I asked first, but after evaluating the difference in risks depending on the nuclides, >> and saying, "Your body also has radioactivity">> Is it right? >> Now I'm sorry if you haven't understood this yet.

>>> After all, it is possible to evaluate including effects specific to each nuclide. >>> Because the effects are derived from radiation, natural radioactivity or artificial radioactivity may be used. >>> Whether it is radiation due to gargle or external exposure, those risks can be managed by the same scale >>>, and natural radioactivity and medical exposure are also subject to risks measured by such a scale >>> That is the main purpose.

[0318] >> >> Is it intentionally blurred? >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

>> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai evaluated it.

>> In other words, I wanted to say that in the field of radiation health physics, we are discussing based on the results evaluated in that way.

In the course of these discussions, if you are not as familiar as Mr. Nishida, those who are not, consider these facts in the figures that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe. I wrote it because it could be received as if it were not.

>> Actually, how much effect is expected from radiation emitted from nuclear power plants >> What do you think? If you add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this), if all domestic power is covered by nuclear power The exposure risk of 0.07 days is based on the assumption that the exposure includes internal exposure of 0.08 mSv per year. Exposure to natural radioactivity is about 2.4 mSv per year (although it is actually less than 0.001 mSv), so the risk of internal exposure to natural radioactivity is 2.1 days.

# These one-year dose calculations naturally include the biological half-life effect and also include the differences in risks depending on the nuclide.

On the other hand, the life expectancy is reduced to 29 days in consideration of the internal exposure of nearby residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) due to the Chernobyl accident.

Based on these figures, the risk of considering internal exposure due to nuclear accidents based on the frequency of core melting accidents when all domestic power is provided by nuclear power is 0.011 days.

For details, please refer to pages 17 to of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41, No. 12 (1995).

● 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? ｜ Where did Sakai read this? I want to find out once so let me know |

○ 2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ It was in the library room of the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Nagoya University.

| | This can be found by searching in the main building of the library of Nagoya University. | | Since the library (room) of Nagoya University is open to the general public, || Should be able to.

│ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ Isn't it possible to see it in the library room of the department of nuclear engineering at Osaka University? Also, since the Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun has been issued, it will be relatively easy to place an order if you order it.

| 2626 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | How do you do? Suita (the campus where Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University) is far! ｜ ｜,, which cannot be checked immediately, but will be checked later. Thank you ｜ ｜ ｜

|||| By the way, looking at places where there is no follow-up other than this, the risk distribution described in this || Does that mean you haven't? | Taro Yoshino | | | taro@godzilla.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp | | | | Department of Science, Osaka University | | | ----- | | Hirotaka Sakai | | Department of Nuclear Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University | | Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year | | Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp | eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp By the way, the life expectancy is reduced to 0.28 days when relying on oil-fired power for all power.

At the end of the day, the risk of 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days (in fact,
About 30%. ), Or if it does not, switch to other low-risk (and cost-efficient) means of supplying power.

○ 2539: 20 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) Of course, it is also a matter of thinking about the risk of shortening the life of 29 days once a major accident occurs, but including thermal changes such as climate change due to global warming due to carbon dioxide emissions I think you should think.

○ 2539: 37 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.
ac.jp) ○ 2531: 6 (Hironobu SUZUKI) >> I would like to see the results of the quantitative evaluation, including the difference in the risks depending on the nuclides >>.

>> I would like to see how Nishida himself was evaluated quantitatively.

○ 2527: 4 (NISHIDA Kenji) ----- Hirotaka Sakai Nagoya University Graduate School of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya- u.ac.jp h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp For the article part expanded inline in Display Example 4 above, there is no button since there is no quote from other articles.

By the way, in the above description, in the original article
The part of the child article expanded to line is the part of the child article from the line following the quoted part to the start of another citation.
On the other hand, the child article part expanded inline in the original article is limited to three lines: the line following the quoted part, the line consisting of the symbol indicating "omission", and the line before the next citation starts The format is also conceivable. Alternatively, it is also conceivable that the child article part expanded inline in the original article is limited to the next sentence of the quoted portion, a symbol indicating "omission", and one sentence before the start of the next quote. .

It is also conceivable that the sub-article part to be expanded inline into the original article is limited to the next paragraph following the citation.

The algorithms for these displays can be easily obtained by modifying the algorithm 3 described above, and therefore the description is omitted.

By the way, as shown in the display examples 1 to 4 above, there is a case where a reference relation occurs successively such as a comment for a comment and a comment. Therefore,
If there is a citation to the comment part to be expanded inline, it is also conceivable to devise a way to expand it inline at the same time.

For example, by devising the buttons, in the first display example, the first button may be changed to “○ ◎ 2539: 10 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp)” When the part of “部分” is clicked, only the article that directly refers to that part is expanded inline as in display example 2, and when “◎” is clicked, it is displayed at a stretch as in display example 4. It may be displayed.

Algorithm 4 (inline expansion (recursive)) for this will be described with reference to FIGS.

First, the root article is displayed in step S30. In other words, each line of each article is displayed, and if another article (number) and the number of lines are added as attributes of that line,
After the line, a button including the article number, the number of lines, and the name of the poster is arranged. The button is displayed with one indent from the beginning of the line.

If there is an indirectly referenced article, a button composed of the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the name of the poster is arranged indented from the beginning of the line after the last line of each article.

Next, in step S31, it is determined whether or not the button is pressed. When the button is pressed, the article number and the number of lines of the pressed button are obtained, and the indent number of the position where the button is located is obtained. (Step S32). And
In step S33, the subroutine of FIG. 6 is called using the obtained article number, line number, and indent number + 1 as arguments. Also,
If the button is an indirectly referenced article button, the subroutine in FIG. 7 is called with the acquired article number and indent number + 1. Thereafter, the process jumps to step S31.

In the subroutine of FIG. 6, first, the article number, the number of lines, and the number of indents are obtained (step S4).
0). Next, in the article with the acquired article number, the line from the line after the acquired line number to the start of another citation is indented from the beginning of the line by the number of acquired indents, at the position where the original text button was Insert (Step S41).
If another article (number) and the number of lines are added as line attributes, the acquired article number, number of lines, and number of indents +1 are added for the number of sets of the added article number and number of lines. The subroutine of FIG. 6 is called as an argument, and the comment part of the child article is inserted after the line to which the attribute is added (step S42). If there is an indirectly referenced article, the subroutine of FIG. 7 is called with the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the number of indents +1 as arguments, and the entire text of the child article is inserted after the last line of the original article. Then return.

In the subroutine of FIG. 7, first, the article number and the number of indents are obtained (step S50). Next, all lines of the article with the obtained article number are inserted after the last line of the original text. Next, indent the number of obtained indents from the beginning of the line and insert it into the original text (step S
51). Next, if another article (number) and the number of lines are added as line attributes, the number of found article number, number of lines, number of indents + 1 is the number of sets of the added article number and number of lines Is called as an argument (step S52). If there is an indirectly referenced article, the subroutine of FIG. 7 is called with the article number of the indirectly referenced article and the number of indents +1 as arguments, and the entire text of the child article is inserted after the last line of the original article (step S53).

In addition, such cross-referencing frequently occurs in many cases where two persons have a discussion close to a talk or a fight. Therefore, if you devise the button and press the name part, all comments on the article from the person with the clicked name will be inli
By expanding the inline expansion of all the comments from the sender of the original article among the comments on the ne expanded and inline expanded parts, Can be displayed all at once. The algorithm for this display can be easily obtained by modifying the algorithm 4 and will not be described.

At the time of implementing this algorithm, it is sometimes referred to as a self-follow, and the article itself is quoted in another article to supplement or correct. If the authors of an article are the same, it can be inlined.

[0351] In order to display only the interactions between specified persons instead of two persons, a means for designating a plurality of names and accounts is provided. It is also conceivable to innovate inline.

By the way, after reading the inline expanded part, when trying to read the subsequent part of the original article, the inline expanded part may become an obstacle. It is also important to be able to make inline-expanded parts the state before being expanded. For example, inline
If you click the button you clicked to expand it again, you can make the inline expanded part disappear. The algorithm for this display can be easily obtained by modifying the algorithm 4 and will not be described.

By the way, the article of article number 2539 is commented by citing this article (article number 2526) at three places. Multiple such citations from the same article at once
It is convenient if it can be expanded inline. Therefore, for example, if the button is devised and the “○” of the button “○ 2539: 10 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp)” is clicked, the inline expansion of only that part is performed. When the article number is clicked, it is considered that all citations from the article are expanded inline.

In this case, the display is as follows (display example 5).

○ 2526 In the article of <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp>, ni
shida@etl.go.jp wrote.

>> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: >> I asked first, but after evaluating the difference in risks depending on the nuclides, >> and saying, "Your body also has radioactivity">> Is it right? >> Now I'm sorry if you haven't understood this yet.

>>> Evaluation including effects specific to each nuclide is possible after all. >>> Because their effects are radiation-derived, they may be natural or artificial. >>> Whether it is radiation from gargle or external exposure, those risks can be managed with the same scale >>>, and natural radioactivity and medical exposure are subject to risks measured by such scale >>> That is the main purpose.

>> >> Is it intentionally blurred? >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

>> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai evaluated.

>> In other words, I wanted to say that in the field of radiation health physics, we are discussing based on the results evaluated in that way.

In the course of these discussions, if you are not as familiar as Mr. Nishida, those who are not, consider these factors in the numbers that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe. I wrote it because it could be received as if it were not.

>> Actually, how much effect is expected from radiation emitted from nuclear power plants >> What do you think? If we add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this), when all domestic power is covered by nuclear power The exposure risk of 0.07 days is based on the assumption that the exposure includes internal exposure of 0.08 mSv per year. Exposure to natural radiation is about 2.4 mSv per year (although it is actually less than 0.001 mSv), so the risk of internal exposure to natural radiation is 2.1 days.

#The calculation of the one-year exposure dose naturally includes the effect of biological half-life, and also includes the difference in risk depending on the nuclide.

On the other hand, the life expectancy is reduced to 29 days in consideration of the internal exposure of nearby residents (15.6 million people within 400 km) due to the Chernobyl accident.

Based on this figure, the risk of considering internal exposure due to a nuclear accident based on the frequency of core melting accidents when all domestic power is provided by nuclear power is 0.011 day.

For details, please refer to p.17 ~ of Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41 No. 12 (1995).

| 2539 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp) | Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? ｜ Where did Sakai read this? I want to look it up once, so let me know |

By the way, the life expectancy is reduced to 0.28 days when relying on oil-fired power for all power.

After all, the risk of 0.011 + 0.07 = 0.081 days (actually,
About 30%. ), Or if it does not, switch to other low-risk (and cost-efficient) means of supplying power.

| 2539 ($taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp) | I also read Sakai-san's December article that I did not read.

| I am not interested in comparisons that simply compare average numbers.

[0372] Even if the risk is scattered in the whole, or the risk is concentrated in a part, the same result is obtained.

| The average of # 49 and 51 is the same as the average of 100 and 0.

| # There are at least two types: distribution by time and distribution by region.

If you calculate socially meaningful "costs" with numbers, I think that there is a need to weight the risk on the following | 29 days, but such | Is there? Of course, because of this aspect, Mr. Sakai, of course, also thinks about the risk of shortening the lifespan of a 29-day accident once a major accident occurs. I think that the change of heat should be considered in the thermal power.

039: 37 (taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp) | I think that it was added.

|| By the way, the 29th day is probably the average within 400km from the above analogy. | Data on the difference in risk depending on the distance from the nuclear power plant location is in the above material | The average nuclear accident risk, including frequency, is said to be 0.011 days. | What is the difference in risk depending on the distance from the nuclear plant location? I think it would be necessary to estimate the risk when there was a nuclear power plant in the town to persuade the opposition |

|-| | Taro Yoshino | taro@godzilla.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp | Department of Science, Osaka University ○ 2531: 6 (Hironobu SUZUKI) >> Including risk differences depending on nuclides We want to see the results of the quantitative evaluation >>.

>> I would like to see how Nishida himself was evaluated quantitatively.

○ 2527: 4 (NISHIDA Kenji) ----- Hirotaka Sakai Nagoya University Graduate School of Engineering Department of Nuclear Engineering Nuclear Measurement Engineering Course (Mori Lab) Master's Program 1st year Email: sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya- u.ac.jp h952413m@eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp The algorithm for the above display example 5 can be easily obtained by modifying the algorithm 4, and will not be described.

In some cases, the sender of the original article cites a part of the original article and later posts an article that the user wants to delete the part. In this case, when the original article is displayed, it is conceivable to delete the relevant portion of the original article and delete the arrangement of the button indicating the location of the cited article at that location. For the algorithm for this, see Algorithm 4
Can be easily obtained by modifying.

Now, it is conceivable to devise a method of displaying articles by providing a dictionary in which specific words and expressions or their conditions are described, and displaying portions corresponding to dictionary registration in reverse video.

For example, if a specific keyword group is displayed in reverse video, it becomes easy to grasp who these words appeared in, at what stage of the discussion, and how.

Also, for example, if the discussion becomes a fight,
Words similar to abusive may be used,
Register expressions that are inappropriate for discussion in the dictionary,
If it is displayed in reverse video when it is displayed, it will be a material for grasping the characteristics of the parties involved in the discussion from the viewpoint of a third party, and it will be a good material for some parties to reflect on later. As a result, it contributes to and contributes to the quality of discussions. Examples of expressions to be registered in the inappropriate expression dictionary include "foolish", "meaningless", "after reading about *. *", "What is it?", "Bokeh", and "intentionally". , "Where (when | who)""(that | you | name). *
From (to |) (to | said). * (Da |)) ”. In this example, the description using a regular expression is adopted. Since the algorithm for detecting and displaying a portion where such an expression appears is easy, the description is omitted. I do.

By the way, as the number of articles cited and referred to increases, it becomes difficult to grasp the flow of the entire discussion.

Reference numbers 2526, 2527, 2541,
2543, 2549, 2551, 2566, 2553,
2570, 2588, 2558, 2561, 2576,
2596, 2599, 2562, 2563, 2531,
The following reference relation 3 shows all the reference relations between articles 2607, 2539, 2567, and 2619.

○ <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp> 1 | ○ 2526 (SAKAI Hirotaka) [Indirect Reference] | | In the article of <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp> | nishida@etl.go. jp wrote.

│ │ >> In article <4d511j$f92@sunglow.eds.ecip.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, │ >> SAKAI Hirotaka <sakai@avocet.nucl.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote :> >> I asked first, but after properly evaluating the difference in risk depending on the nuclide, | >> and saying, "Your body also has radioactivity" | >> runo Is it? | >> | I am sorry if I have not understood this yet from the contents so far.

>>>> After all, it is possible to evaluate including the effects specific to each nuclide, and it is natural radioactivity as long as the effects of these are derived from radiation. Radiation | >>> Regardless of whether radiation or radiation due to external exposure, those risks can be managed on the same scale, and even natural radiation and medical exposure can use such a scale | >>> The main point is that you are at risk.

| >> | >> Is it intentionally blurred? | >> I haven't asked if it can be evaluated.

[0391] >> I'm asking if Mr. Sakai evaluated.

[0392] I would like to say that in the field of radiation health physics, we are discussing based on the results so evaluated.

|| Anyway, if you are not as familiar as Mr. Nishida in the flow of such discussions, then | If not, some of the numbers that people who promote nuclear power say that nuclear power is safe | I wrote it because it would be accepted as if you did not take this into account.

>> >> How much is actually expected to be caused by the radioactivity emitted from the nuclear power plant | >>? | If we add a little to the numbers given in late December, if there is no accident | (accidents that are not so-called accidents are included in this) | All domestic power is covered by nuclear power In this case, the risk of exposure 0.07 days is assumed to be 1 | annual exposure including 0.08 mSv internal exposure. (In fact, it is less than 0.001mSv) Is exposure to natural radioactivity about 2.4mSv a year? | Based on this assumption, the risk of internal exposure to natural radioactivity is 2.1 days.

| | # Calculations of this one-year exposure naturally include the biological half-life effect, and also include the differences in nuclide risks.

| | On the other hand, the life expectancy of the local residents (15.6 million people within 400km) due to the Chernobyl accident is | shortened to 29 days considering the internal exposure.

|| Based on this figure, core melting when all domestic power is provided by nuclear power | Based on the frequency of accidents, the risk of considering internal exposure due to nuclear accidents is 0.011 | day .

For details, please refer to p.17 of the Nuclear Power Industry Vol. 41, No. 12 (1995).

| | | 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | Is this a magazine likely to be placed in a university or public library? | | Where did Sakai read this? I would like to check it once.

2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ It was in the library room of the Department of Nuclear Engineering at Nagoya University.

│ │ │ This can be found by searching in the main building of the library of Nagoya University. ｜ ｜ ｜ The library (room) of Nagoya University is open to the public, so it can be viewed by ordinary ｜ ｜ Should be able to.

|||||| At Osaka University, can you see it in the library room of the Department of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Engineering? Also, since the Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun is available, you can easily get a comparison |

| | | 2626 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | | Suita (the campus where Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University) is far! │ │ │, so I can't check it soon, but I'll try to check it soon. Thank you ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ Thank you.

|||||| By the way, when there is no follow-up of other parts, ||||, and the risk described in this section is still time / regional density |||||| Does that mean there is no distribution? │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ｜ Taro Yoshino ｜ ｜ ｜ taro@godzilla.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ Department of Science, Osaka University The reference relationship described above is more convenient than reading each article in article number order, but the total volume is enormous. Therefore, it is conceivable to display the sentence immediately before and after the quoted portion, while omitting the other portions. An example in which this processing is performed on the reference relation 3 is a reference relation 4 in FIGS.

As a result, it is possible to roughly understand the details of the disputed part. The abbreviations "omitted" and "abbreviated" are used, and a certain in
When displaying a line expansion part, "abbreviation" is used when reference from the child article to the part is behind, and "rearrangement" is used when there is no reference. The algorithm for this can be easily obtained by modifying the algorithm 4, so that the description is omitted.

[0406] By detecting a word that appears in the quoted part and a comment part of the quoted part and a topic or word newly appearing in the comment part, the comment is a comment for any content of the referenced document. ,
On the other hand, it is possible to understand to some extent what new content has been added. In particular, these tendencies can be grasped by analyzing words appearing in the first sentence of the comment part.

[0407] By extracting this, for example,
This is useful for understanding the details of the discussion and the outline of the process of branching. Further, it is convenient to provide an idiomatic response expression dictionary in which expressions of affirmation / negation and thanks are registered, and determine and display whether the comment is a positive opinion or a negative opinion for the referenced part.

[0408] The result is displayed as follows.

○ <1996Jan15.151926.20309@etl.go.jp> 1 | ○ 2526 (SAKAI Hirotaka) [indirect reference] | | ○ 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () | | 2567 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ Osaka University, Faculty of Engineering ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2619 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ THANKS ｜ 2539 taro@therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ 29th ｜ ｜ ○ 2531 (Hironobu SUZUKI) ｜ ｜ ○ 2607 (Wakamatsu Kazuhiro) ｜ ｜ ｜ YES ｜ ｜ 2539 taro @ therm.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp () ｜ ｜ Quantification ｜ ｜ ○ 2527 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ Quantification ｜ ｜ ○ 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ Quantitative ｜ ｜ ｜ 2 ○ 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ taka 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ ○ 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ YES ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ Improvement, accident ｜ ○ 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) ｜ ｜ Imagination ｜ ｜ ｜ 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2563 (Koichi Nakatani) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ NO ｜ ｜ Radioactivity ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2541 (SAKAI Hirotaka) 2543 (NISHIDA Kenji) | | | | | 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | | | 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | | | | | | | required | | | | | | | | | 2588 (NISHIDA Kenji) | | | | | | 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | | 2570 (SAKAI Hirotaka) | | | | | Mankuzo report, doubled dose | ○ 2549 (SAKAI Hirotaka) ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ Reactor stability ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ｜ ○ 2551 (NISHIDA Kenj i) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ○ 2566 (SAKAI Hirotaka) In this example, words duplicated with the previous article are inserted in the line before the article number. In addition, the judgment result of the expression of affirmation / negation and thanks is inserted in the line next to the article number. An example of registration of an idiomatic response expression dictionary is shown below as idiomatic-reply.

○ idiomatic-reply YES Yes.

[0411] YES Agree (Yes | Yes).

[0412] YES Same? Opinion

[0413] NO No.

[0414] NO No.

[0415] THANKS Thank you.

[0416] WHO? ^ Who WHAT? ^ What WHERE? ^ Where WHEN? ^ When WHICH? ^ Which BOOK? ^ Where is the *. *?

[0417] BOOK? ^ Is the source. *? BOOK? Please tell us the source.

[0418] QUESTION? $ Algorithm to realize this expression (Algorithm 5: ke
yword extraction) will be described below with reference to FIGS.

First, in step S60, the root article is displayed, and the article number (article number 1) of the root article and the name of the poster are displayed. Then, for each line of the root article, the article number of another article (article number
If there is a line (line 1) with 2) and the number of lines (line 2) added, it will be described later with article number 1, line number 1, article number 2, line number 2, indent number = 1 as arguments The subroutine of FIG. 10 is called (step S61). Further, a subroutine of FIG. 9 described later is called with the article number 2, the line number 2, and the number of indents = 1 as arguments (step S62). If there are a plurality of root articles, the above processing is performed for each of them (step S63).

[0420] Hereinafter, the subroutine of Fig. 9 will be described.

First, in step S70, the article number 1 and the number of lines
0, get the number of indents. Next, the article number and the contributor name acquired in step S71 are displayed at the indented portion from the beginning of the line by the acquired number of indents. Next, when one sentence starting from the line obtained in step S72 matches the expression registered in the idling response expression dictionary, the response classification (Yes / No / Thanks / etc.) Is displayed according to the dictionary registration.

[0422] The line from the line following the acquired line to the beginning of another citation in the article with the acquired article number. The attributes of the line include the article number (article number 2) and the number of lines (article number) of another article. If there is a row (row 1) to which row 2) is added, article number 1,
The subroutine of FIG. 10 is called with the line number 1, the article number 2, the line number 2, and the number of indents + 1 as arguments, and then the subroutine of FIG. 9 is called with the article number 2, the line number 2, and the number of indents + 1 as arguments ( Step S73). The above processing is performed for each row to which the attribute is added (step S
74).

Next, the subroutine of FIG. 10 will be described.

First, in step S80, article number 1, line 1,
Get article number 2, line 2, indent number. Next, a morphological element analysis is performed on the line 1 of the article of the article number 1 and a morphological element analysis is performed on the line 2 of the article of the article number 2 (step S8).
1). Next, words that appear in common in lines 1 and 2 are extracted (step S82). Next, the extracted words are displayed at the positions indented from the beginning of the line by the acquired number of indents (step S83).

As described above, in the above-described embodiment, an example of application to a news article has been described. However, the present invention can be easily applied to a plurality of electronic documents having a mutual reference relationship, for example, a group of stored electronic mails. Needless to say.

[0426]

As described above, according to the present invention, it is easy to see the history of discussions made by digitized documents exchanged on an electronic network, that is, how the contents of the discussions diverge and evolve, In addition, they can be traced in time order.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an electronic document reference relation display device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing steps of algorithm 1.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing steps of algorithm 2.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing steps of an algorithm 3;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing steps of an algorithm 4;

FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a first subroutine in Algorithm 4.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a second subroutine in Algorithm 4.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing steps of an algorithm 5;

FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a first subroutine in Algorithm 5;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a second subroutine in Algorithm 5;

FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a part of the interim analysis result 2.

FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a part of the interim analysis result 2.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a part of the interim analysis result 2.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a part of the intermediate analysis results 1 and 3.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a part of the intermediate analysis results 1 and 3.

FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a part of intermediate analysis results 1 and 3;

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a part of the intermediate analysis results 1 and 3.

FIG. 18 is a diagram showing a part of intermediate analysis results 1 and 3.

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 20 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 21 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to reference relation 4;

FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 24 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 25 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to reference relation 4;

FIG. 26 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to reference relation 4;

FIG. 27 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 28 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

FIG. 29 is a diagram showing a part of a display related to a reference relation 4;

[Explanation of symbols]

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Display, 2 ... Keyboard, 3 ... Reference analysis / display processing part, 4 ... Electronic article storage part, 5 ... Conventional response expression dictionary, 6 ... Inappropriate expression dictionary.

 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page F term (reference) 5B075 ND02 PP02 PP13 PQ02 PQ22 PQ70 5B082 EA01 FA11 5B089 GA11 GA21 GB04 HA01 HA06 JA01 JA40 KA01 5K030 GA18 HA06 JT06 JT10 KA06 LD17

Claims (12)

[Claims] 1. An analyzing means for analyzing a reference relation of an electronic document, and a button arranging means for arranging a button at the end of a cited part in a referenced document when displaying the reference relation analyzed by the analyzing means; Display means for hierarchically inserting and displaying a portion after the cited portion in the reference document at a corresponding portion in the referenced document when the button arranged by the button arranging device is operated. Reference display device for digitized documents. 2. The computerized electronic system according to claim 1, wherein the line to be hierarchically inserted into the referenced document is from the line following the relevant citation point of the reference document until another citation is started. Document reference display. 3. The display of the reference relationship of an electronic document according to claim 1, wherein, when another document that refers to the inserted document portion exists, the reference relationship is also displayed at the same time. apparatus. 4. When displaying a reference relationship, a button with a referenced document name added to the end of a cited location in a referenced document is arranged, and when the button is operated, a reference location in the referenced document to the referenced document is displayed. 2. The electronic document reference relationship display device according to claim 1, wherein all of the information are inserted and displayed. 5. When displaying a reference relationship, a button is arranged at the end of a cited part in a referenced document, and when the button is operated, a button in the referenced document hierarchically inserted at a corresponding position in the referenced document is displayed. 2. The electronic document reference relationship display device according to claim 1, wherein a portion after the quoted portion is deleted. 6. Specifying one of the senders of the reference article citing the original document, and determining a place where the sender of the original article and the specified sender are mutually referencing / quoting each other. 2. The electronic document reference relation display device according to claim 1, wherein all the information is inserted and displayed. 7. When displaying a reference relationship, if there is a reference document indicating that a certain part in the referenced document is to be canceled, the corresponding part in the referenced document is deleted and displayed. 1. A reference display device for an electronic document according to item 1. 8. A reference relation of an electronic document according to claim 1, further comprising a dictionary in which specific words and expressions are registered, and when displaying the reference document, the user is notified of the relevant part by reverse display or the like. Display device. 9. A method according to claim 1, wherein a word included in a document group located in each partial tree structure is extracted from a tree structure of a reference relation having a hierarchical structure, and displayed as a keyword of a corresponding portion. 1. A reference display device for an electronic document according to item 1. 10. The electronic document reference display device according to claim 1, wherein a reference portion of the newly arrived article is indicated to the user by changing a color or a font. 11. When there is no referenced article and there is an article referred to by the referenced article, the referenced article is hierarchically inserted and displayed at the end of this article. Item 1. A display device for displaying a reference relation of an electronic document according to Item 1. 12. An analyzing means for analyzing the reference relation of the digitized document, and a button arranging means for arranging a button at the end of the cited place in the referenced document when displaying the reference relation analyzed by the analyzing means; Display means for displaying a portion after the cited portion in the reference document when a button arranged by the button arranging means is operated, wherein a reference relation display of the digitized document is provided. apparatus.