IL129872A - Method for identifying translationally regulated genes - Google Patents

Description

129872/2 Method for identifying translationally regulated genes QBI Enterprises Ltd.

C. 122894 METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING TRANSLATIONALLY REGULATED GENES - - - BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Technical Field The present invention relates to a method for identifying genes that are translationally regulated. More specifically, the present invention relates to the rapid isolation of differentially expressed or developmental ly regulated gene sequences through segregation of mRNAs into translated and untranslated pools and comparing the relative abundance of the mRNAs found in these pools by differential analysis.

Background Art The identification and/or isolation of genes whose expression differs between two cell or tissue types, or between cells or tissues exposed to stress conditions, chemical compounds or pathogens, is critical to the understanding of mechanisms which underlie various physiological conditions, disorders, or diseases. Regulation of gene expression has been shown to play an important part in many biological processes including embryogenesis, aging, tissue repair, and neoplastic transformation. Gene regulation at the level of translation has been shown to be of critical importance. For example, it has been demonstrated that a group of mRNAs are stored in an egg as a pool of untranslated mRNAs which, following fertilization, shift into the pool of translated mRNAs. Another example of a change in the translation^ state of mRNA is a subgroup of mRNAs which code for heat shock proteins which are not translated under normal physiological conditions. These mRNAs begin to be translated following exposure of cells to high temperatures.

A number of methods have been developed for the detection and isolation of genes which are activated or repressed in response to developmental^ physiological, pharmacological, or other cued events. One particular method is described in United States Patent Number 5,525,471 to Zeng, is subtractive hybridization. Subtractive hybridization is a particularly useful method for selectively cloning sequences present in one DNA or RNA population but" absent in another. The selective cloning is accomplished by generating single stranded complementary DNA libraries from both control cells/tissue (driver cDNA) and cell/tissue during or after a specific change or response being studied (tester cDNA). The two cDNA libraries are denatured and hybridized to each other resulting in duplex formation between the driver and tester cDNA strands. In this method, common sequences are removed and the remaining non-hybridized single- stranded DNA is enriched for sequences present in the experimental cell/tissue which is related to the particular change or event being studied. (Davis et al., 1987).

Currently used methodologies to identify mRNAs encoding proteins which are being induced/reduced following a cue or stimulus rely on changes in the mRNA levels following transcriptional induction/repression via screening of differentially expressed mRNAs. One such method for the identification of differentially expressed mRNAs is disclosed in United States Patent Number ,459,037 to Sutcliffe et al. According to this method, an mRNA population is isolated, double-stranded cDNAs are prepared from the mRNA population using a mixture of twelve anchor primers, the cDNAs are cleaved with two restriction endonucleases, and then inserted into a vector in such an orientation that they are anti-sense with respect to a T3 promotor within the vector. E. coli are transformed with the cDNA containing vectors, linearized f agments are generated from the cloned inserts by digestion with at least one restriction endonuclease that is different from the first and second restriction endonucleouseases and a cDNA preparation of the anti-sense cDN A transcripts is generated by incubating the linearized fragments with a T3 RNA polymerase. The cDNA population is divided into subpools and the first strand cDNA from each subpool is transcribed using a thermostable reverse transcriptase and" one of sixteen primers. The transcription product of each of the sixteen reaction pools is used as a template for a polymerase - chain reaction (PCR) with a 3'-primer and a 5'-primer and the polymerase chain reaction amplified fragments are resolved by electrophoresis to display bands representing the 3 '-ends of the mR As present in the sample. This method is useful for the identification of differentially expressed mRNAs and the measurement of their relative concentrations. This type of methodology, however, is unable to identify mRNAs whose levels remain constant but their translatability is variable or changes.

Schena et al. developed a high capacity system to monitor the expression of many genes in parallel utilizing microarrays. The microarrays are prepared by high speed robotic printing of cDNAs on glass providing quantitative expression measurements of the corresponding genes (Schena et al., 1995).

Differential expression measurements of genes are made by means of simultaneous, two color fluorescence hybridization. However, this method alone is insufficient for the identification of translationally regulated genes.

The use of a known inhibitor of hypusine formation, mimosime, was used to reversibly suppress the hypusine-forming deoxyhypusyl hydroxylase in cells while differentially displaying their polysomai versus non-polysomal mRNA populations. (Hanauske-Abe! et al.. 1995) Utilizing this method, several species of mRNA were discovered which disappear and reappear, respectively, at polysomes in connection with inhibition and disinhibition of hypusine formation and which are thought to code for translationally controlled enzymes. This method only teaches the use of a known stimulating element (i.e., inducer or repressor) to identify translationally regulated genes. This method does not provide a mechanism for the detection and/or identification of translationally regulated genes where the stimulating element is unknown.

Generally, the translation of eukaryotic mRNAs is dependent upon 5' cap-mediated ribosome binding. Prior to translation, the ribosome small sub-unit (40S) binds to the 5 '-cap structure on a transcript and then proceeds to scan along the mRNA molecule to the translation initiation site where the large sub-unit (60S) forms the complete ribosome initiation site. In most instances, the translation initiation site is the first AUG codon. This "scanning model" of translation initiation accommodates most eukaryotic mRNAs. A few notable exceptions to the "scanning model" are provided by the Picornavirus family.

These viruses produce non-capped transcripts with long (600-1200 nucleotides) 5'-untransiated regions (UTR) which contain multiple non-translation initiating AUG codons. Because of the absence of a cap structure, the translational efficiency of these R As is dependent upon the presence of specific sequences within the untranslated regions (UTR) known as internal ribosome entry sites (IRES).

More recently, IRES containing mRNA transcripts have been discovered in non-viral systems such as the mRNA encoding for immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein, the antenapedia gene in Drosophila, and the mouse Fgl-2 gene. These discoveries have promoted speculation for the role of cap-independent translation in the developmental regulation of gene expression during both normal and abnormal processes.

The discovery of the above-mentioned non-viral IRES containing mRNAs implies that eukaryotic IRES sequences could be more wide spread than has been previously realized. The difficulty in identifying eukaryotic IRES sequences resides in the fact that they typically cannot be identified by sequence homology.' [Oh et al., 1993; Mountford et ai., 1995; Macejak et al., 1991 ; Pelietier et al., 1988; Vagner et al. 1995] It would, therefore, be advantageous to have a method for identifying IRES containing mRNA in order to identify translationally controlled genes operating via 5'-cap independent translation in order to ascertain and assess their association with both normal and abnormal processes.

Therefore, it would be desirable to have a rapid, reliable, and reproducible method for the identification and cloning of clinically and therapeutically relevant differentially expressed genes which will overcome the inherent problems associated with the prior art methods.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to the present invention, there is provided a method for identifying translationally regulated genes in an organism including the steps of selectively stimulating translation of an unknown target mRNA with a stress inducing element, the target mRNA being part of a larger sample of mRNA, dividing the sample of mRNA into pools of translated and untranslated mRNA and differentially analyzing the pools of mRNA to identify genes translationally regulated by the stress inducing element. The stress inducing element can include pathologic, environmental including chemical and physical stressors or other stimulus that induces mRNA translation. Also, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method for identifying gene sequences coding for internal ribosome entry sites. The method includes inhibiting 5 'cap-dependant mRNA translation in a cell, collecting a pool of mRNA from the cells, and differentially analyzing the pool of mRNA to identify genes with sequences coding for internal ribosome entry sites.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Other advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein: Figure 1 A is an absorbance profile of a fractionation of cytoplasmic RNA on a sucrose density gradient wherein the absorbance (at 254nm) is plotted against the sedimentation rate of the cytoplasmic RNA; Figure IB is a photograph of purified RNA electrophoresed on an agarous gel and stained with ethidium bromide illustrating the fractionation of RNA; Figure 2 is a photograph of a 5% acrylamide gel illustrating a differential translation analysis of mRNA from sucrose density gradients according to the present invention; Figure 3 A-C are schematic representations of plasmids that contain the Polio virus 2A genes (A) in plasmid pTK-OP3-WT2A, (B) in the plasmid miniTK-WT2A, and (C) in a plasmid containing a hygromycin selectable marker; Figure 4 is graph illustrating the induction of Polio virus 2A protease leading to cell death after induction of the 2A protease; " Figure 5 is a photograph of a gel illustrating the presence of Polio virus 2A protease expression in transformed HEK-293 cells (293-2A) following induction with IPTG and the absence of the Polio virus 2A protease in HEK-293 (293) parental cells following treatment with IPTG; and Figure 6 is a photograph of a Western blot illustrating the activity of the Polio virus 2A protease in cleaving the p220 protein component of the 40S ribosomal subunit demonstrating that clones which were induced for Polio virus 2A protease generated cleavage products of the p220 protein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method for identifying translationally regulated genes in an organism by selectively stimulating translation of an unknown target mRNA with a stress inducing element, the target mRNA being part of a larger sample. The organism may be any organism which provides suitable mRNA. The mRNA sample is divided into pools of translated and untranslated mRNA which are differentially analyzed to identify genes which are translationally regulated by the stress inducing element. This method is designed for identifying and cloning genes which are regulated at the translational level. That is, the present method is designed for identifying and cloning genes which are either up- or down- regulated including identifying genes responsive to a specific pathology or stress condition.

The method of the present invention provides a novel approach to the identification and cloning of genes that are involved in fundamental cellular functions and which are regulated at the level of translation in an organism. The basic underlying theory for this method relies on the assumption that an mRNA encoding a protein required for a quick response to an external cue is generally stored as an untranslated mRNA. Following the appropriate external cue, the mRNA is translated and the encoded protein quickly appears. By comparing mRNA populations that are "active" or "non-active" at a given time, genes that are regulated by a mechanism referred to "as the "shift mechanism" can be identified.

The method can also be applied to identify in addition to genes regulated at the translational level; genes regulated at the transcription level; genes regulated by RNA stability; gene regulated by mRNA transport rate between the nucleus and the cytoplasm; and gene regulated by differential splicing. That is, genes whose expression in part, is controlled/regulated at the mRNA level can be identified.

The method will identify genes encoding secreted and membrane proteins; genes encoding for nuclear proteins; genes encoding for mitochondrial proteins; and genes encoding for cytoskeletal proteins. In addition, any other gene whose expression can be controlled at the mRNA level can be identified by this method.

As used herein, RNA refers to RNA isolated from cell cultures, cultured tissues or cells or tissues isolated from organisms which are stimulated, differentiated, exposed to a chemical compound, are infected with a pathogen or otherwise stimulated. As used herein, translation is defined as the synthesis of protein on an mRNA template.

As used herein, the term stimulating translation of unknown target mRNA or stimulating element includes chemically, pathogenicaily, physically, or otherwise inducing or repressing an mRNA population from genes which can be derived from native tissues and/or cells under pathological and/or stress conditions that are regulated by the "shift mechanism." In other words, stimulating the translation of mRNA with a stress inducing element or "stressor" can include the application of an external cue, stimulus, or stimuli which stimulates or initiates translation of a mRNA stored as untranslated mRNA in the cells from the sample. In addition to stimulating translation of niRNA from genes in native cells/tissues, stimulation can include induction and/or repression of genes under pathological and/or stress conditions. The present method utilizes a stimulus or stressor to identify unknown target genes which are translationally regulated by the stress inducing element or stressor.

The method of the present invention integrates two previously known methodologies which were- otherwise used separately. The firsfmethod is the division of an mRNA sample into separate translated and untranslated pools of mRNA. The second methodology involves the simultaneous comparison of the relative abundance of the mRNA species found in the separate pools by a method of differential analysis such as differential display, representational difference analysis (RDA), gene expression microarray (GEM), suppressive subtraction hybridization (SSH) (Diatchenko et ah, 1996), and techniques such as chip technology exemplified by United States Patent No. 5,545,531 to Rava et al. assigned to Affymax Technologies N.V. and direct sequencing exemplified by WO 96/17957 patent application to Hyseq, Inc.

Briefly, subtractive hybridization is defined as subtraction of mRNA by hybridization in solution. RNA that are common to the two pools form a duplex that can be removed, enriching for RNAs that are unique or more abundant in one pool. Differential Display is defined as reverse transcription of mRNA into cDNA and PCR amplification with degenerated primers. Comparison of the amounts amplification products (by electrophoresis) from two pools indicate transcript abundance. RDA, GEM, SSH, SAGE are described herein above.

The specific cells/tissues which are to be analyzed in order to identify translationally regulated genes, can include any suitable cells and/or tissues. Any cell type or tissue can be used, whether an established cell line or culture or whether directly isolated from an exposed organism.

The cells/tissues to be analyzed under the present method are selectively stimulated utilizing a physiological, chemical, environmental and or pathological stress inducing element or stressor, in order to stimulate the translation of mRNA within the sample tissue and identify genes whose expression is regulated at least in part at the mRNA level. Following the stimulation of the translation of RNA, the RNA from the cells/tissues is isolated or extracted from the cells/tissues. The isolation of the RNA can be performed utilizing techniques which are well known to those skilled in the art and are described, for example, in "Molecular Cloning; A Laboratory Manual" (Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1989). Other methods for the isolation and extraction of RNA from cells/tissue can be used and will be known to those of ordinary skill in the art. (Mach et al., 1986, Jefferies et al., 1994).

Following the isolation of the pool of translated and untranslated mRNA, the mRNAs which are actively engaged in translation and those which remain untranslated can be separated utilizing a procedure such as fractionation on a sucrose density gradient, high performance gel filtration chromatography, or polyacrylamide gel matrix separation (Ogishima et al., 1984, Menaker et al., 1974, Hirama et al., 1986, Mechler, 1987, and Bharucha and Murthy, 1992), since mR As that are being translated are loaded with ribosomes and, therefore, will migrate differently on a density gradient than ribosome-free untranslated mRNAs. By comparing mRNA populations that are active or non-active in translation at a given time, genes that are regulated by the "shift mechanism" can be identified.

Polysomal fractionation and specific analysis can be facilitated by treatment of target cell/tissue with drugs that will specifically inhibit or modulate transcription or translation. Examples of such drugs are actinomycin D and cyclohexamide, respectively.

The fractionation can be completed to create polysomal subdivisions. The subdivisions can be made to discriminate between total polyribosomes or membrane bound ribosomes by methods known in the art (Mechler, 1987). Further, the mRNA sample can be in addition fractionated into one or more of at least the following subsegments or fractions: cytoplasmatic, nuclear, polyribosomal, sub polyribosomal, microsomal or rough endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrial and splicesome associated mR A by methods known in the art (see also Table 1).

Following isolation and division of the total mRNA population into separate translated and untranslated pools of mRNA, the relative abundance of the many mRNA species found in these pools are simultaneously compared using a differential analysis technique such as differential display, representational difference analysis (RDA), GEM-Gene Expression Microarrays (Schena et al., 1995, Aiello et al., 1994, Shen et al., 1995, Bauer et al., 1993, Liang and Pardee, 1992, Liang and Pardee, 1995, Liang et al., 1993, Braun et al., 1995, Hubank and • · - - Schatz, 1994) and suppressive subtraction hybridization (SSH). The RNA isolated from the fractions can be further purified into mRNA without the ribosomal RNA by poly A selection. It should be noted that multiple pools can be analyzed utilizing this method. That is, different cell aliquots subjected to different stressors can be compared with each other as well as with the reference sample.

Labeled mRNA (in a cDN A or PCR product form) from polysomal, non-polysomal or mRNPs (pools or individual fractions) can be used as probes, to identify clones of cDNA, genomic clones, and mRNA species that are fixed onto a solid matrix-like microarrays such as (GEM), that shown in United States Patent Number 5,545,531 to Rava et al. and W096/17957 to Hyseq, Inc., and membranes of any kind where clones can be either blotted after electrophoresis or directly loaded (dot blot) onto the membrane. The label can be radioactive, fluorescent, or incorporating a modified base such as digoxigenin and biotin.

Comparison between the fractions derived from the polysomal or poiyribosomal fraction or other fractions to-the total unfractionated material is essential to discriminate between differentials in expression levels that are the result of transcription modulation from those that result from modulation of translation per se. The polysomal fractions or groups can include membrane bound polysomes, loose or tight polysomes, or free unbound polysome groups.

The importance of utilizing the polysomal sub-population in order to identify differentially (translationally) expressed genes is shown in Example 2 where a number of genes were not detected as translationally expressed under heat shock inducement when total mRNA was used as the detection probe but, however, when polysomal mR A was used as a probe, a number of genes were identified as differentially expressed. These genes were previously thought to be non-differentially expressed when total mRNA was used as a probe. That is, as shown in Example 2, a number of genes that were not detected as translationally expressed under heat shock inducement with total mRNA were detected when probed with polysomal mRNA fractions.

The present method for identifying translationally regulated genes is not limited by the source of the mRNA pools. Therefore, the present method can be utilized to clone genes from native cells/tissue under pathological and/or stress conditions that are regulated by the "shift mechanism," as well as genes that are induced/repressed under pathological and/or stress conditions. Pathologies can include disease states including those diseases caused by pathogens and trauma. Stress conditions can also include disease states, physical and psychological trauma, and environmental stresses. Following analysis by the selected method of differential analysis, the genes which have been identified as being regulated by translation can be cloned by any suitable cloning methodologies known to those skilled in the art. (Lisitsyn and Wigler, 1993).

Differential comparisons can be made of all possible permutations of polysomal vs. non-polysomal RNA where the definition of the fraction type is done, for example, by absorbance profile at 254nm, density of the sucrose gradient as shown in Figure 1 A (or another size standard if high pressure liquid chromatography or gel systems are used) and types of RNA that are stained with ethidium bromide after electrophoresis of the fractions on agarous gels are completed, as shown in Figure !B. In Figure 1 A, the polysomal fractions are those that have mRNA with more than two ribosomes loaded. The materials and methods for this comparison are set forth below in the experimental section.

Differential comparisons can also include polysomal vs. non- polysomal fractions in each condition. By "condition" it is meant that cells from the same source, such as a cell line, a primary cell, or a tissue that undergoes different treatment or has been modified to have different features or to express different sets of genes. For example, this can be accomplished by differentiation, transformation, application of the stress such as oxygen deprivation, chemical treatment, or radiation. Permutations can include, for example: 1. polysomal fractions between conditions individually (migrating in the same density) or in a pool; 2. non-polysomal fractions between conditions individually (migrating in the same density) or in a pool; 3. non-polysomal to polysomal between conditions and within each condition individually (migrating in the same density) or in a pool; and 4. each of the fractions being polysomal and non-polysomal ~ individually (migrating in the same density) or in a pool that can be compared to total RNA that is unfractionated.

The method described above for the identification of translationally regulated genes has a number of applications. A particular application for this method is its use for the detection of changes in the pattern of mRNA expression in cells/tissue associated with any physiological or pathological change. By comparing the translated versus untranslated mRNAs, the effect of the physiological or pathological cue or stress on the change of the pattern of mRNA expression in the cell/tissue can be observed and/or detected. This method can be used to study the effects of a number of cues, stimuli, or stressors to ascertain their effect or contribution to various physiological and pathological activities of the cell/tissue. In particular, the present method can be used to analyze the results of the administrations of pharmaceuticals (drugs) or other chemicals to an individual by comparing the mRNA pattern of a tissue before and after the administration of the drug or chemical. This analysis allows for the identification of drugs, chemicals, or other stimuli which affect cells/tissue at the level of translational regulation. Utilizing this method, it is possible to ascertain if particular mRNA species are involved in particular physiological or disease states and, in particular, to ascertain the specific cells/tissue wherein the external stimulus, i.e., a drug, affects a gene which is regulated at the translational level.

A further embodiment of the present invention provides a method for identifying gene sequences coding for internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) and includes the general steps of inhibiting 5' cap-dependant mRNA translation in a cell, collecting a pool of mRNA from the cells, and differentially analyzing the pool of mRNA to identify genes with sequences coding for internal ribosome entry sites.

As described above, it is known that an exception to the standard 5'-cap dependent translation initiation exists. Sequences exist within untranslated regions (UTRs) of RNAs which can include the presence of specific sequences known as internal ribosome entry sites (IRES). (Ehrenfeld 1996) These internal ribosome entry sites have been shown to support translation initiation for several prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems as set forth above. However, in order to identify translationally controlled genes via 5'-cap independent translation mechanisms and their association with both normal and abnormal processes, it is necessary to inhibit 5'-cap initiated translation so that 5'-cap independent mRNA~ translation can be selected for . This inhibition is necessary since IRES sequences are difficult, if not impossible, to identify by sequence homology.

In order to inhibit 5'-cap dependent translation and thereby select for the presence of 5 '-cap independent translation, cells or tissues which are to be analyzed for the presence of internal ribosome entry sites must be treated in some manner to prevent or discourage the 5'-cap translation initiation mechanism. The mechanism(s) of standard scanning-type translation initiation should be substantially, if not totally, turned off or shut down to, in essence, shift the translation equilibrium in favor of IRES initiated translation. That is, recognition of the 5'-cap structure is inhibited by disrupting the normal mechanism for 5'-cap mediated initiation. The mechanism for inhibiting the 5'-cap translation can include any known means or mechanisms for preventing the initiation of 5 '-cap mediated translation. One such mechanism for inhibiting 5'-cap mediated translation is the expression of Polio virus 2A protease into a cell, cell system, or tissue to be analyzed for the presence of IRES sequences. The use of the Polio virus 2 A protease inhibits 5 '-cap-dependent mRNA translation by inactivating the cellular 5'-cap-dependent translation machinery. This enables the identification of cellular IRES containing genes which may be translationally controlled and play a critical role in the immediate response of the cell following the application of a stress inducing element/stressor such as heat shock, hypoxia, or other stress inducing elements as set forth above, prior to gene activation. The Polio virus 2A protease prevents 5 '-cap-mediated translation by cleaving the large sub-unit of elF-4γ (p220) of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 (eIF-4) which is involved in the recognition of the mRNA 5'-cap.

In order to inhibit the 5 '-cap-mediated translation, the Polio virus 2 A protease must be incorporated into the cell or cells being analyzed for the presence of gene sequences coding for internal ribosome entry sites and/or for identifying translationally regulated genes. One such method for incorporating the Polio virus 2A protease into a cell involves the transformation of a target cell with an expression vector containing the gene which codes for the Polio virus 2A protease. Because the Polio virus 2 A protease is deleterious to living cells when it is constitutively expressed, the expression vector containing the Polio virus 2A protease gene is coupled with a bacterial Lacl inducible system wherein a Lacl repressor is constituitively expressed under a CMV promoter. The Polio virus 2A protease may be expressed under a number of suitable promoters including the RSV, the TK, or the mini-TK promoter coupled at their 3' end to the Lacl repressor binding sites. By transforming the target cells with an expression vector containing the Lacl repressor and the Polio virus 2A expression vector, the expression of the Polio virus 2 A protease can be induced upon treatment of the cells with isopropyl-p-D-thiogalatopyranoside (IPTG). Treatment of the target cells with IPTG relieves the binding of the Lacl repressor molecules bound at the repressor binding sites thus enabling transcription of the Polio virus 2A protease. By coupling the expression of the Polio virus 2A protease to an inducible system, such as the Lacl system, this mechanism allows for the establishment of control of the expression of the gene coding for the Polio virus 2A protease.

Examples of an embodiment of the present invention for identifying gene sequences coating for internal ribosome entry sites are set forth below in the examples.

Following induction of the expression of the Polio virus 2 A protease in the target cells, RNA, presumably containing internal ribosome entry sites, can be collected and analyzed utilizing the methods described above to identify genes whose translation is up-regulated by the effects of the Polio virus 2A protease.

EXPERIMENTAL DIFFERENTIAL TRANSLATION MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . . .

General Scheme a. Total mRNA-organic extraction of all RNA from the source tissue or cell, (additional selection for pol A+ mRNA can be included). b. Nuclear RNA-lysis of cells (from a tissue or a cell line) by homogenization in hypotonic buffer. Collection of nuclei by centrifugation and organic extraction of the RNA. c. Organic extraction of the RNA from the supernatant from 2 above. d. Polyribosomal/subpolyribosomal fractionation. Lysis of cells by homogenization hypotonic buffer, removal of nuclei and fractionation of polyribosome on linear sucrose gradients and organic extraction of the RNA from each fraction of the gradient. e. Secreted and membrane encoding transcripts. 1. Isolation of RER on Percol gradients (after homogenization of cells). 2. Preparation of microsomes containing the RER 3. Isolation of membrane-bound polyribosomes by successive treatment of cells with detergents. f. Nuclear proteins. Isolation of cytoskeletal associated polyribosomes by treating cells lyzates with different detergents. g. Mitochondrial genes. Isolation of mitochondria on Percoll gradients. i. Alternative splicing. Separation of nuclei and isolation of splicsosome (proteins and RNA complex) on linear sucrose gradients.

Preparation of cell extracts Cells were centrifuged. The pellet was washed with PBS and recentrifuged. The cells were resuspended in 4x of one packed cell volume (PCV) with hypotonic lysis buffer (HLB: 20mM TrisHCL pH=7.4; lOmM NaCl; 3mM MgClj). The cells were incubated five minutes on ice. lxPCV of HLB containing 1.2% Triton X-100 and 0.2M sucrose was added. The cells were homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer (five strokes with B pestle). The cell lysate was centrifuged at 2300g for ten minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube. HLB containing lOmg/ml heparin was added to a final concentration of lmg/ml heparin. NaCl was added to a final concentration of 0.15M. The supernatant was frozen at -70°C after quick freezing in liquid N2 or used immediately.

Sucrose gradient fractionation A linear sucrose gradient from 0.5M to 1.5M sucrose in HLB was prepared.

Polyallomer rubes (14X89mm) were used. 0.5 to 1.0ml of cell extract was loaded on the gradient. The cells were centrifuged at 36,000 RPM for 1 10 minutes at 4°C.

An ISCO Density Fractionator was used to collect the fractions and record the absorbance profile.

RNA purification SDS was added to 0.5% and Proteinase K to O.lmg/ml and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Extract with an equal volume of phenol+chloroform (1 : 1). The aqueous phase was extracted with one volume of chloroform and the RNA was precipitated by adding Na-Acetate to 0.3M and 2.5 volumes of ethanol and incubating at -20°C overnight. Centrifuged ten minutes, the supernatant was aspirated and the RNA pellet was dissolved in sterile, diethylpyrocarbonate (hereinafter referred to as "DEPC") DEPC-treated water.

DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS Differential display: Reverse transcription: 2 g of RNA were amealed with Ipmol of oligo dT primer (dT)!g in a volume of 6.5μ1 by heating to 70°C for five rninutes and cooling on ice. 2μ1 reaction buffer (x5), Ιμΐ of lOmM dNTP mix, and 0.5μ1 of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (GibcoBRL) was added. The reaction was carried out for one hour at 42°C. The reaction was stopped by adding 70μ1 TE (lOmM Tris pH=8; O.lmM EDTA). Oligonucleotides used for Differential display: The oligonucleotides were essentially those described in the Delta RNA Fingerprinting kit (Clonetech Labs. Inc.). There were 9 "T" oligonucleotides of the structure: 5' CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTITTTITrXY 3' (SEQ ID No: 1 ). The 10 "P" oligonucleotides were of the structure: 3' ATTAACCCTCACTAAA "TGCTGGGGA" 3' (SEQ ID No: 11) where the 9 or 10 nucleotides between the parenthesis represent an arbitrary sequence and there are 10 different' sequences (SEQ ID Nos. 12-21), one for each "P" oligo.

Amplification reactions: each reaction is done in 20μ 1 and contains 50μΜ dNTP mix, Ι μΜ from each primer, lx polymerase buffer, 1 unit expand Polymerase (Beohringer Mannheim), 2μΟΊ [a-32P]dATP and Ι μΐ cDN A template. Cycling conditions were: three minutes at 95°C, then three cycles of two minutes at 94°C, five minutes at 40°C, five minutes at 68°C. This was followed by 27 cycles of one minute at 94°C, two minutes at 60°C, two minutes at 68°C. Reactions were terminated by a seven minute incubation at 68°C and addition of 20μ1 sequencing stop solution (95% formamide, lOmM NaOH, 0.025% bromophenol blue, 0.025% xylene cyanol).

Gel analysis: 3-4μ1 were loaded onto a 5% sequencing poiyacrylamide gel and samples were electrophoresed at 2000 volts/40 milliamperes until the slow dye (xylene cyanol) was about 2 cm from the bottom. The gel was transferred to a filter paper, dried under vacuum and exposed to x-ray film.

Recovery of differential bands: bands showing any a differential between the various pools were excised out of the dried gel and placed in a microcentrifuge tube. 50μ1 of sterile H20 were added and the tubes heated to 100°c for five minutes. Ιμΐ was added to a 49μ1 PCR reaction using the same primers used for the differential display and the samples were amplified for 30 cycles of: one minute at 94°C, one minute at 60°C and one minute at 68°C. ΙΟμΙ was analyzed on agarous gel to visualize and confirm successful amplification.

REPRESENTATIONAL DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS Reverse transcription: as above but with 2μξ polyA+ selected mRNA.

Preparation of double stranded cDNA: cDNA from previous step was treated with alkali to remove the mRNA, precipitated and dissolved in 20μ1 H20. 5μ1 buffer, 2μ1 l OmM dATP, H20 to 48μ1 and 2μ1 terminal deoxynucleotide transferase (TdT) were added. The reaction was incubated 2-4 hours at 37°C. 5μ1 oligo dT ( Ι μ μΙ ) was added and incubated at 60°C for 5 minutes. 5μ1 200 mM DTT, 10 μΐ 1 Ox section buffer ( 1 OOmM Mg C 1 900 mM Hepes, pH 6.6) 16 μΐ dNTPs ( 1 mM), and 16 U of Klenow were added and the mixture was incubated overnight at room temperature to generate ds cDNA. ΙΟΟμΙ TE was added and extracted with phenol/chloroform. The DNA was precipitated and dissolved in 50μ1 H20.

Generation of representations: cDNA with Dpnll was digested by adding 3μ1 DpnII reaction buffer 20 V and Dpnll to 25 μΐ cDNA and incubated five hours at 37°C. 50μ1 TE was added and extracted with phenol/chloroform. cDNA was precipitated and dissolved to a concentration of lOng/μΙ.

The following oligonucleotides are used in this procedure: R-Bgl-12 5' GATCTGCGGTGA 3' (SEQ ID No: 22) R-Bgl -24 5' AGCACTCTCCAGCCTCTCACCGCA 3' (SEQ ID No:23) J-Bgl-12 5' GATCTGTTCATG 3' (SEQ ID No: 24) J-Bgl-24 5' ACCGACGTCGACTATCCATGAACA 3' (SEQ ID No:25) N-Bgl-12 5' GATCTTCCCTCG 3' (SEQ ID No:26) N-Bgl-24 5' AGGCAACTGTGCTATCCGAGGGAA 3' (SEQ IDNo:27) R-Bg 1-12 and R-B g 1 -24 oligos were ligated to Tester and Driver: 1 μξ Dpnll digested cDNA. 4μ1 from each oligo and 5μ1 ligation buffer XI 0 and annealed at 60°C for ten minutes. 2μ1 ligase was added and incubated overnight at 16°C. The ligation mixture was diluted by adding 140μ1 TE. Amplification was carried out in a volume of 200μ 1 using R-Bg 1 -24 primer and 2μ1 ligation product and repeated in twenty tubes for each sample. Before adding Taq DNA polymerase, the tubes were heated to 72°C for three minutes. PCR conditions were as follows: five minutes at 72°C, twenty cycles of one minute at 95°C and three minutes at 72°C, followed by ten minutes at 72°C.

Every four reactions were combined, extracted with phenol/chloroform and precipitated. Amplified DNA was dissolved to a concentration of Ο.δμξ/μ Ι and all samples were pooled.

Subtraction: Tester DNA (20μg) was digested with Dpn I as above and separated on a 1.2% agarous gel. The DNA was extracted from the gel and 2μg was ligated to J-Bgl-12 and J-Bgl24 oligos as described above for the R-oligos. The ligated Tester DNA was diluted to l Ong/μΙ with TE. Driver DNA was digested with DpnII and repurified to a final concentration of 0.5μ§/μ1. Mix 4C^g of Driver DNA with O^g of Tester DNA. Extraction was carried out with phenol/chloroform and precipitated using two washes with 70% ethanol, resuspended DNA in 4μ1 of 30mM EPPS pH=8.0, 3mM EDTA and overlayed with 35μ1 mineral oil. Denatured at 98°C for five minutes, cool to 67°C and 1 μ 1 of 5M NaCl was added to the DNA. Incubated at 67°C for twenty hours. Diluted DNA by adding 400μ1 TE.

Amplification: Amplification of subtracted DNA in a final volume of 200μ1 as follows: Buffer, nucleotides and 20μ1 of the diluted DNA were added, heated to 72°C, and Taq DNA polymerase was added. Incubated at 72°C for five minutes and added J-Bgl-24 oligo. Ten cycles of one minute at 95°C, three minutes at 70°C were performed. Incubated ten minutes at 72°C. The amplification was repeated in four separate tubes. The amplified DNA was extracted with pheiiol/chloroform, precipitated and all four tubes were combined in 40μ1 0.2XTE, Digested with Mung Bean Nuclease as follows: To 20μ1 DNA 4μ1 buffer, 14μ1 H20 and 2μ1 Mung Bean Nuclease (10 units/μΐ) was added.

Incubated at 30°C for thirty-five minutes + First Differential Product (DPI).

Repeat subtraction hvbridization and PCR amplification at driver: differential ratio of 1 :400 (DPII) and 1 :40,000 (DPIII) using N-Bgl oligonucleotides and J-Bgl oligonucleotides, respectively. Differential products were cloned into a Bluescript vector at the B AM HI site for analysis of the individual" clones.

EXAMPLE 1 ' - - Differential Translation Analysis of mRN A From Sucrose Density Gradients C6 glioma cells were grown under normal conditions (Normoxia) or under oxygen deprivation conditions (Hypoxia) for eight hours. The cells were then harvested and cytoplasmic extracts were applied onto sucrose gradients. RNA was extracted from the fractions obtained from the sucrose gradient and pooled into polysomal and non-polysomal samples. Following reverse transcription, the differential display technique was applied using the primers Tl and PI O as set forth in Table 2. The PCR products were separated on a 5% acrylamide sequencing gel. The gel was then dried and exposed to X-ray film. The results are shown in Figure 2 wherein "A" shows an mRNA species apparent only in a non-polysomal fraction of cells after eight hours of hypoxia. This represents a potentially transcriptionally induced mRNA species which was still translationally repressed but which could be actively transcribed after prolonged hypoxia. "3" represents an mRNA species found in the non-polysomal fraction of cells grown under normal oxygen levels which was transferred into the polysomal fraction following hypoxia.

The materials and methods were performed as set forth above. This example demonstrates the utility of the present invention for identifying translationally regulating genes which are regulated by a stress inducing element EXAMPLE 2 Representative Heat Shock GEM Differential Expression Analysis Materials and Methods The experimental cells were grown under both normal temperature (37°C) and heat shock temperature (43°C) for four hours. The cells were then harvested and cytoplasmic extracts were obtained and RNA extracted theref om. Then, the extracted RNA was analyzed utilizing GEM technology as disclosed above.

Tables 3 and 4 demonstrate the utility of utilizing polysomal probes versus total mRNA probes in differential expression analysis to identify genes which are differentially expressed in response to a stimulus such as heat shock.

These Tables illustrate that fibronectin, pyruvate kinase, protein disulfide isomerese, poly(ADPribose) polymerase, thymopoietin, 90Kd heat shock protein, acylamino acid-releasing enzyme, β-spectrin, and pyruvate kinase were all identified as being differentially expressed utilizing a polysomal probe whereas, with the exception of fibronectin, the other proteins were not identified as being differentially expressed when a total mRNA probe was utilized. This example demonstrates the utility of the present invention for identifying translationally or differentially regulated genes which are regulated by a stress inducing element. Additionally, in Table 3, the results of heat shock differential gene expression analysis with both polysomal probes and total mRNA probes is provided. Table 3 illustrates that a number of differentially expressed genes were identified using a polysomal probe whereas when a total mRNA probe was used, these genes were not necessarily identified as being differentially expressed. Table 4 statistically illustrates the number of differentially expressed genes identified utilizing either total mRNA or polysomal mRNA as a probe. Table 4 clearly illustrates that polysomal mRNA probes yielded between two and greater than ten fold increases in the number of differentially expressed genes versus total mR A probes.

EXAMPLE 3 Identification of IRES Containing Genes Establishment of mammalian cells expressing 2 A protease HEK-293 human (ATCC CRJL-1573) cells were used as a model system for Polio virus 2A protease induced expression, since preliminary study indicated that 2A protease enhances expression of IRES containing genes in this cell line. HEK-293 cells were co-transfected with CMV-LacI - (constructed by applicant using techniques known to those skilled in the art) in combination with either one of the Polio virus 2A protease expression vectors PTK-OP3-WT2A, miniTK-WT2A, on PCIbb-LacI-Hyg (constructed by applicant on basis of vectors from Stratagene) as shown in Figures 3 A-C, respectively. The Lad expression vector contained ahygromycin selectable marker, and the Polio virus 2A protease expression vector contained a neomycin selectable marker which enabled the isolation of clones resistant to both markers, presumably expressing both Lacl repressor and Polio virus 2A proteins.

Analysis of Polio virus 2A protease expression Death assay: - Resistant clones which grew after selection on hygromycin (5(^g/ml) and neomycin (50(^g/ml), were treated with IPTG (5mM for 48h + 5mM for further 48h). Cells were then monitored for their viability and the clones that showed full mortality upon Polio virus 2A protease induction, presumably expressing the deleterious effect of the Polio virus 2 A protease, were selected for further analysis. Two such clones were isolated, HEK-293 cells expressing Polio virus 2A protease under the control of a TK promotor (clone #14) and HEK-293 cells expressing the Polio virus 2A protease under the control of a miniTK promoter (clone #1) as shown in Figure 4.

Analysis of 2A protease expression: - Direct analysis of the Polio virus 2A protease expression in HEK-293miniTK#l clones and HEK-293TK#14 clones after IPTG induction was not performed due to the lack of antibodies against the protein. Several currently available techniques can be used to measure changes in gene expression including Northern blot analysis, RNase protection assay, in situ hybridization, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR is a very sensitive method, and was used to monitor the induction of the mRNA encoding for Polio virus 2 A protease in HEK-293miniTK#l clones following IPTG treatment. mRNA was prepared from HEK-293 parental cells and HEK-293miniTK-2A clones following treatment with IPTG at different time points. The RNAs were subjected to the RT-PCR reaction using Polio virus 2A protease specific oligonucleotides: ' GC AACT ACC ATTTGGCC ACTC AGGAAG3 ' , (SEQ ID No:28) and 'GCAACCAACCCTTCTCCACCAGCAG3' and (SEQ ID No: 29):"" " Polio virus 2A protease mRNA was not detected in HEK-293 parental cells, however it was induced following IPTG treatment and reached its highest level after 48 hours of IPTG treatment as shown in Figure 5.

Analysis of 2 A protease activity - p220 cleavage: - A well characterized function of Polio virus 2A protease is the cleavage of the p220 protein (4Fy translational factor), a component of the 40S ribosomal subunit. Cleavage of p220 yields three N-terminal cleavage products of 100-l20KDa molecular weight due to post-translational modification. p220 and its cleavage products were identified by 7% SDS PAGE and Western blot analysis using polyclonal anti-p220 antibodies specifically directed against the N-terminal region p220 as shown in Figure 6. Figure 6 demonstrates such an analysis in which HEK-293 miniTK2A#l clone and HEK-293TK2A#14 clone were induced for Polio virus 2A protease expression to generate cleavage products of p220. As control, HEK-293 cell lysate was treated with Polio virus 2A protease produced by in vitro translation, and was found to generate identical cleavage products with the same mobility on 7% SDS PAGE as in the HEK-293 2A clones.

This system was used as the source of mRNA for polysomal fractionation. RDA analysis was performed using the protocol described above to identify genes whose translation was up-regulated by the effects of the Polio vims 2A protease. Table 5 summarizes the results of analyses performed according to the above-described method and genes isolated thereby.

Throughout this application various publications are referenced by citation and patents by number. Full citations for the publication are listed below; The disclosure of these publications in their entireties are hereby incorporated by reference into this application in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which this invention pertains.

The invention has been described in an illustrative manner, and it is to be understood the teiminoiogy used is intended to be in the nature of description rather than of limitation.

Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, it is to be ~ understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.

TABLE 1 FRACTIONATION MEASURES AND IDENTIFIES R A associated with: no fractionation changes of transcript abundance Total RNA Nuclear Measures denovo synthesis of mRNA Cytoplasmatic Changes of transcript abundance Cytoplasmatic/Nuclear transport of mRNA from the nucleus to the Nuclear/Cytoplasmatic cytoplasm, increased or decreased stability of mRNA Polyribosomal/subpoly translationally controlled genes ribosomal Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum differences in the abundance of Microsomes transcripts encoding membrane and membrane bound polysomes secreted proteins Cytoskeletal polyribosomes differences in abundance of transcript encoding for nuclear proteins mitochondrial differences in the abundance of mRNA encoding mitchondrial proteins Splicesome differences in alternative splicing TABLE 2 Primers used in differential" Display analysis T Primers: ' Tl CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTTTTTTTTAA (SEQIDNo: 2) T2 CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTTTTTTTTAC (SEQIDNo: 3) T5 C ATT ATGCTGAGTG AT ATCTT 1 " Π 1" Π TCC (SEQ ID No: 6) T6 CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTTTTTTTTCG (SEQ ID No: 7) T7 CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTTTTTTTTGA (SEQ ID No: 8) T8 CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTTTTTTTTGC (SEQ ID No: 9) T9 CATTATGCTGAGTGATATCTTTTTTTTTGG (SEQ ID No: 10) P Primers: ' PI ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCTGGGGA (SEQ ID No: 12) P2 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCTGGAGG (SEQIDNo: 13) P3 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCTGGTAG (SEQIDNo: 14) P4 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCTGGTAG (SEQIDNo: 15) P5 ATTAACCCTCACTAAAGATCTGACTG (SEQIDNo: 16) P6 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCTGGGTG (SEQID o: 17) P7 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCTGTATG (SEQIDNo: 18) P8 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGGAGCTGG (SEQIDNo: 19) P9 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGTGGCAGG (SEQIDNo: 20) P10 ATTAACCCTCACTAAATGCACCGTCC (SEQIDNo: 21) TABLE 3 Heat Shock Differential Gene Expression Analysis with Polysomal Probes clone Gene Total Polysomal 13h04 Pyruvate kinase No Change Induced »10 5b08 Saposin No Change Induced >10 9(11 Na,K-ATPase a-1 subunit No Change Induced x4 la04 Thymopoietin a No Change Induced x4 13hl0 Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase No Change Induced x5 7c09 p 5 Reduced x2 Induced >6 14ell Ubiquitin Induced x2 Induced x4 10c06 Initiation Factor 4B No Change Induced x4 lb09 90-kDa heat-shock protein No Change Induced »10 lc06 Acylamino acid-releasing enzyme No Change Induced »10 le09 β-spectrin Reduced x2 Induced x5 3b04 Elongation factor-l-gamma No Change Induced x4 13al2 Fibronectin Induced x2 Induced xlO 7hl2 Cytochrome C reductase core I No Change Induced >10 9dl2 Cytoskeletal γ-actin No Change Induced >6 13f09 Protein disulfide isomerase Reduced x2 Induced >10 9gl2 DAP5 Induced x5 TABLE 4 Statis ics Srs s. Number of differentials Total mRNA 4hrs HS 2 Polysomal RNA lhr HS 14 8 37 Polysomal RNA 4hrs HS 13 6 18 37 TABLE 5 Translationaily controlled genes are identified by the 2A protease system A. Ribosomal proteins or proteins directly Involved In translation encoded by mRNAs containing 5' TOP# S17 gbM13932 S9 gb U14971 EF-2 gbM19997 L27a gb U14968 L37a gbL06499 (Meyuhas et al. , 1996 ) B. Proteins encoded by mRNAs containing 5TOP in their 5' UTR Laminin binding receptor βΐ-tubulfn gb J00314 C. Gene with GC rich 5'UTR that regulates their translation spermidine synthase gbM34338 retlnol binding protein 5'UTR X00129 D. Unknown genes potenlaly regulated by translation EST gb1059051 EST gb AA043162 EST gbW76915 EST gbT54424 EST gb AA025896 D 45282 EST gbH15523 EST gb R073S8 EST gbW95821 EST gb H83477 EST gbW99369 EST T34436 Known genes that are potentiaify regulated by translation (and may conatin (RES (n their 5', UTR). mitochondrial hinge protein gbS61826 gp25L2 mitochondrial protein gp25L2 mRNA encoding a protein related to lysyl t-RNA synthetase emb Z31711 SAP14 human spilcesoeome gb U41371 REFERENCES CITED Aiello et al., "Identification of multiple genes in bovine retinal pericytes altered by exposure to elevated levels of glucose by using mRNA differential display" Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91 , pp. 6231-6235 (1994).

Bauer et ai., "Identification of differentially expressed mRNA species by an improved display technique (DDRT-PCR)" Nucleic Acids Research. Vol. 21 , No. 18 (1993).

Bharucha and Ven Murthy, "Characterization of Polysomes and Polysomal mRNAs by Sucrose Density Gradient Centrifugation Followed by Immobilization in Polyacrylamide Gel Matrix" Methods in Enzvmology, Vol. 216, pp. 168-179 (1992).

Braun et al., "Identification of Target Genes for the Ewing's Sarcoma EWS/FLI Fusion Protein by Representational Difference Analysis" Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 4623-4630 (1995).

Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. 1989 Davis et al., " Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts." Cell 51 :987-1000, 1987.

Diatchenko et al., "Suppression subtractive hybridization: A method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries" Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.. Vol. 93, pp. 6025-6030 (1996).

Ehrenfeld, "Initiation of Translation by Picomavinis RNAs", Translational Control Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 549-573, 1996.

Hadman et al., "Modification to the differential display technique reduce background and increase sensitivity" Analytical Biochemistry 226:383-386 (1995).

Hanauske-Abel et al., "Detection of a sub-set of polysomal mRNAs associated with modulation of hypusine formation at the Gl-S boundary. Proposal of a role for EIF-5A in onset of DNA replication." FEBS Letters 386 pp. 92-98 (1995).

Hirama et al., "Direct Purification of Polyadenylated RNAs from Isolated Polysome Fractions" Analytical Biochemistry. 155, pp. 385-390 (1986).

- - - - · - Hubank and Schatz, "Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA" Nucleic Acids Research. Vol. 22, No. 25, p. 5640-5^48 (1994).

Jefferies et al, "Elongation Faction- l a mRNA Is Selectively Translated following Mitogenic Stimulation" The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 269, No. 6, pp. 4367-4372 (1994).

Liang and Pardee, "Differential Display of Eukaryotic Messenger RNA by Means of the Polymerase Chain Reaction" Science, Vol. 257, pp. 967-971 (1992).

Liang et al., "Distribution and cloning of Eukaryotic mRNAs by means of differential display: refinements and optimization" Nucleic Acids Research. Vol. 21 , No. 14, pp. 3269-3275 (1993).

Liang and Pardee, "Recent advances in differential display" Current Opinion in Immunology. 7:274-280 (1995).

Linskens et al, Cataloging altered gene expression in young and senescent cells using enhanced differential display" Nuc. Ac. Res. 23: 3244-3251 (1995).

Lisitsyn and Wigler, "Cloning the Differences Between Two Complex Genomes" Science, Vol. 259, pp. 946-951 (1993).

Mach et al., "Isolation of a cDNA Clone Encoding S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase" The Annual of Biological Chemistry. Vol. 261 , No. 25, pp. 1 1697-1 1703 (1986).

Macejak et al., "Internal inition of translation mediated by the 5' leader of a cellular mRNA" Nature, Vol. 353, pp. 990-94 (1991).

Mechler, "Isolation ofmessenger RNA from Membrane-Bound Polysomes" Methods in Enzvmology, Vol. 152, pp. 241-253 (1987).

Menaker et al., "A Method for the Isolation of Rat Submandibular Salivary Gland Polysomes on Linear Sucrose Density Gradients" Analytical Biochemistry 57, pp. 325-335 (1974).

Meyuhas et al., "Translational Control of Ribosomal Protein mRNAs in Eukaryotes" Translational Control, pp. 363-388 (1996).

Mountford et al., "Internal ribosome entry sites and dicistronic RNAs in mammalian transgenesis" TIG, Vol. 1 1. No. 5, pp. 179-184 (1995).

Ogishima et al., "Fractionation of Mammalian Tissue mRNAs by High-Performance Gel Filtration Chromatography" Analytical Biochemistry. 138, pp. 309-313 (1984). -Oh et al., "Gene regulation: translational initiation by internal ribosome binding" Current Opinion in Genetics and development, pp. 295-300 (1993).

Pelletier et al., "Internal initiation of translation of eukaryotic mRNA directed by a sequence derived from poliovirus RNA" Nature, Vol. 334, pp. 320-325 (1988).

Schena et al., "Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray" Science, Vol. 270, pp. 467-470 1995).

Shen et al., "Identification of the Human Prostatic Carcinoma Oncogene PTI-1 by Rapid Expression Cloning and Differential RNA Display" Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 92, pp. 6778-6782 (1995).

Vagner et al. "Alternative Translation of Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 mRNA Occurs by Internal Entry of Ribosomes" Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol. 15, No. 1 , pp. 35-44 (1995).

Welsh et al., "Arbitrary primed PCR fingerprinting of RNA", Nuc. Ac. Res. 20:4965-4970 (1992).

Zhao et al., "New primer strategy improves precision of differential display" Biotechniques 18: 842-850 (1995).

Any subject matter disclosed in the instant application but not specifically claimed is not within the scope of the instant invention as claimed.

SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Luria, Syl ie Einat , Paz Harris, Nicholas Skaliter, Rami Grosman , Zehava (ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING TRANSLATIONALLY REGULATED GENES (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 29 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: (A) ADDRESSEE: Kohn & Associates (B) STREET: 30500 Northwestern Hwy. , Suite 41 (C) CITY: Farmington Hills (D) STATE: Michigan (E) COUNTRY: US (F) ZIP: 48334 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk (B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS -DOS (D) SOFTWARE: Patentln Release #1.0, Version (vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA: (A) APPLICATION NUMBER: (B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION: (viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME : Kohn, Kenneth I.

(B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 30,955 (C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 0168.00021 (ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATIO : (A) TELEPHONE : --(248 ) 539-5050 (B) TELEFAX: (248) 539-5055 INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "Primer" ._ - ( (xxii)).- --SSEEQQUUEENNCCEE.- DDEESSCCRRIIPPTTIIOONN:: SSEEQQ IIDD NNOO..vvll:: -- -- (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 2 : ■ (i)-- SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION : /desc = "Primer (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 2 CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTAA (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 3 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS : (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 3 CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTAC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 4 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 3a base pairs (B) TYPE : nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTAG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO-.5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 5 CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTCA (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 6 : (i). SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (3) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 6 : CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTCC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 7 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 7 : CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTCG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 8 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE : other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : Θ : CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTGA (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 9 : CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTGC (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 10 CATTATGCTG AGTGATATCT TTTTTTTTGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 26 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE : other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 11 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAANNNN NNNNNN (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO : 12 : (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS : (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 12 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAATGCT GGGGA (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 13: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 13 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAATGCT GGAGG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 14: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) S RANDEDNESS : single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO : 14 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAATGCT GGTAG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 15: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 15 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAATGCT GGTAG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 16: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS : (A) LENGTH : 26 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single {D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 16 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAAGATC TGACTG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 17: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: other nucleic acid (A) DESCRIPTION: /desc = "primer" (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO: 17 ATTAACCCTC ACTAAATGCT GGGTG (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 18 (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH : 25 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS : single

Claims (20)

CLAIMS What is claimed is:

1. A method for identifying genes which can be translationally regulated by a stress inducing element, said method comprising the steps of: selectively stimulating translation of an unknown target mRNA with a stress inducing element, the target mRNA being part of a larger sample of mRNA; dividing the sample of mRNA into pools of translated and untranslated mRNA; and differentially analyzing the pools of mRNA to identify genes translationally regulated in response to the stress inducing element. 129872/2

2. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the stress inducing element is further defined as a stressor of unknown relationship to gene translation.

3. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the stress inducing element is a toxin.

4. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the stress inducing element is a chemical.

5. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the stress inducing element is a pharmaceutical. 129872/2

6. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the stress inducing element is an electric current.

7. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the stress inducing element is a pathogen.

8. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step is further defined as differential display analysis.

9. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step is further defined as representational difference analysis. 129872/2

10. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step is further defined as performing a gene expression microarray.

11. A method as set forth in claim 1 , including the further step of cloning genes identified as being translationally regulated.

12. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said step of stimulating translation is further defined as chemically treating the cells.

13. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said step of stimulating translation is further defined as irradiating the cells. 129872/2

14. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said step of stimulating translation is further defined as depriving the cells of oxygen.

15. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the cells are stimulated to differentiate.

16. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the mRNA sample includes cells that have undergone different treatments to stimulate mRNA translation in at least one pool of mRNA. 129872/2

17. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step distinguishes between poiysomal fractions that migrate in the same density on diffuse gradients or in a pool.

18. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step distinguishes between nonpolysomal fractions individually or as a pool.

19. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step distinguishes between stimulated poiysomal and nonpolysomal fractions individually or in a pool. 129872/2

20. A method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein said analyzing step distinguishes between each of the polysomal and nonpolysomal fractions individually or in a pool compared to an unfractionated total RNA pool. ON BEHALF OF QUARK BIOTECH, INC. Patent Attorney