IE930248L - Method and apparatus for preparing a high strength sheet¹material - Google Patents

Description

72521 1 Method for preparing a fnfgih strength sheet material This invention relates to a method of preparing a high strength sheet material comprising forming a laminate comprising at. "kpast two layers of a thermoplastic polymer material, each layer having a fibrillar grain structure providing a predominant direction of split-tabf\ity in said layer, the layers being bonded to one another with the s^id predominant directions of splittability transverse to each other, <»,nd biaxially orienting the molecules of said layers by stretching the layers in substantially uniaxial steps, the transverse stretching being effected by applying pressure to the surface of the laminate along lines extending substantially in the .longitudinal direction of the laminate to impact thereto a waved configuration.

British patent specification No. 1.526.722 describes the manufacture of a laminate by a method comprising extruding at least two layers, each consisting of a blend of polymers which are incompatible to such a degree that tf\e blend on solidification forms a dispersion of particles of one polymer to a polymeric matrix melt, attenuating each layer to obtain a fibrillar grain structure having a predominant direction of splittability after solidification into a film, bonding the two layers to one another with the £aid predominant directions transverse to one another and biaxially stretching the solidified laminate in substantially uniaxial steps, the stretching being conducted at a temperature sufficiently low to maintain the predominant direction of splittability in each layer.

The specification of British patent No. 1.526.724 describes the manufacture of a laminate comprising at \east two films of a polymeric material by a method which comprises pressing the film together along lines extending substantially in the longitudinal direction of the films and simultaneously stretching the films in tire transverse direction thereby forming a laminate having a waved configuration in its transverse direction.

The latter method may advantageously be utilized to bond the two layers together and to effect the transverse stretching of the laminate in the method described in the British patent specification No. 1.526.722. However, the laminates thus produced ordinarily exhibit longitudinal striations which impart to the laminate thickness variations in the transverse direction and consequently an unsatisfactory rigidity, low temperature tear strength and sealability.

The object of the invention is to provide a laminate having 72521 2 an improved low temperature tear strength and improved sealability. id Another object of the invention is to provide a laminate which is suitable for use in the manufacture of heayy duty sacks, e.g. sacks for Portland cement.

These objects and other objects which will become clear from the following description are obtained by the invention.

Another aspect of the invention relates to an advantageous niaterial composition which in particular exhibits a high low temperature performance and which is readily stabilized against ultra-violet light.

The invention comprises forming a laminate comprising at least two layers of a thermoplastic polymer blend comprising polyethylene, each■ Saver having a fibrillar grain structure providing a predominant direction of splittability in each said layer, the layers being bonded £b one another with the said predominant directions of splittability transverse to each o'her, and biaxially orienting the molecules of said Savers by stretching the layers in substantially uniaxial step6 to convert the grain of polymer into a zig~zagging micropattern 3 said blend being composed of high molecular weight high density polyethylene and low density polyethylene having significantly lower molecular weight, said low density polyethylene being selected from the group of copolymers and/or branched polyethylenes which a) ex/hibit substantially the same or higher elongation at break than the said high molecular weight high density polyethylene when tested £t room temperature under slow stretching, b) are capable of distinctly segregating, while forming a distinct microphase, from said hi£h molecular weight high density polyethylene on cooling of a molten homogeneous blend of the said components.

The term "High mo/ecul^r weight high density polyethylene" ("HMHDPE") comprises HDPt having a melt flow index of about or lower than 0.2 according to ASTM D 1238, condition E.

As regards tbie low density polyethylene, it may advantageously be LLDPE (s^e explanation of this term above).

By the CQinbination of polymers which chemically are so closely related and -blend homogeneously in the melt but still, i.a. due to the different molecular weights, clearly segregate from each other on cooling, one obtains a particularly fine and regular grain of polymer consisting of highly crystalline and relatively stiff microfibrils in a less crystalline and softer matrix. This structure has been observed in an electron microscope after selectively dissolving the matrix material. As mentioned above the grain thus produced was particularly regular and the distance between adjacent fibrils (from centre to centre") was in the order of magnitude 1/10s000 mm (1/10 urn). The regular and fine structure, and the good bonding between the stiffer fibrils and softer matrix is of importance as far as the strength properties are concerned. The crystalline nature of the soft matrix gives the material low tendency to cold-flow.

The blending rSTTo iretween ctrc fWIH"DFE and tne LDPE (preferably LLDPE) may conveniently be in the range of from 25:75 to 75:25.

HMHDPE exhibits a high tendency to molecular melt orientation. Such melt orientation (except when weak) generally has been found a drawback in connection with the present invention. In this connection one must distinguish between the morphological "orientation" (grain of polymer) which is essential in the present invention, and the molecular melt orientation, which i.a. reduces the elongation of break and thereby the energy absorption.

Therefore, it is advisable to use low air cooling at the exit of the extruder so that the molecular melt orientatKin can be practically minimized.

Further improvements in this respefct, and other essential improvements, can be obtained when the bt^nd further contains polypropylene of a molecular weight significantly lower than said high molecular weight high density polyethylene.

During draw-down at the exit from the extrusion die the HMHDPE will be molecularly orieryted and will thereby "carry" the film, so that the polypropylene xs protected against any strong molecular orientation, and after crystallization of the polypropylene the latter will "carry" the film so that the HMHDPE has the opportunity to loose part of its molecular orientation again.

The ratio in the blend between the polypropylene and the HMHDPE + LDPE can .conveniently be in the range of between 0 and 70/30.

The blend may further contain minor amounts of an alloying agent, e.g. a copolymer of propylene and a polyolefin with 4 or more carbon atoms.

The sheet is preferably allowed to shrink at least 7% in at least one direction, and the stretch ratio in any direction and determined after shrinkage preferably does not exceed 2.5;1.

High-strength laminates manufactured according to the invention can conveniently be made with the angles and other features described in claims 6 to 8.

The invention will be further described with reference to Fig. 1 of li>e drawings which schematically illustrates an apparatus for effecting the transverse stretching and heat treatment steps of the 10 method of the invention.

Fig. 1 illustrates a roll 1 of a laminate 2, and 3 is a set of grooved rollers. The set of grooved rollers 3 are mounted adjacent to an oscillating roller 4 mounted so close to a hot roller 5 that the laminate 2 is pressed against the surface of the hot roller 5 during short 15 intervals. A cooling roller 6 is also mounted adjacent to the heated roller. The apparatus further comprises a set of take-off rollers 7 and a roll 8 of transversely stretched and heat treated laminate 9.

The operation of the apparatus illustrated is as follows: Laminate 2 is unwound from the roll 1 and is passed through 20 the nip of the set of grooved rollers 3 in which the laminate is stretched in its transverse direction so gs to impart thereto a waved configuration. Following the transverse stretching the laminate is contacted with the oscillating roller 4 and subsequently contacted with the hot roller 5. Due to the oscillating movement of the roller 4 25 relative to the hot roller 5 the heated laminate is free to shrink longitudinally. After leaving the hot roller 5 the laminate is cooled on cooling roller 6 and is subsequently wound so as to form a roll 8 after having passed through the nip of the set of take-off rollers 7.

The invention will now be described in further detail with 30 reference to the following examples.

EXAMPLE 1 A series of 3-lavered tubular films are extruded. Each film has a main layer in the middle, a layer for improved heat sealing on one surface and a layer for improved Samination on the other surface. 35 The three layers form 75%, 15% and 10%, respectively, of the total film.

The main layer consists of a blend (intimately pre-blended in a planetary screw extruder) of 1) a so-called "block-copolymer" of propylene and ethylene sold under the trade name "Hostalen 1022", 2) an ethylene-propylene rubber sold under the trade name "Nordel 1500% 3) a high molecular weight high density polyethylene sold under the trade name "Hostalen 9255 F".

Component 1 has melt flow index of 0.4 according to ASTN1 D 1238 condition L and analysis shows that it contains about 80% homo-polypropylene, about 10% polyethylene and about 10% ethylene-propylene rubber. A true block-copolymer is hardly detectable by the analysis, but it is very likely that there are undetectable segments of polyethylene on the polypropylene which segments assist in forming a good polymer-in-polymer dispersion.

Component 2 contains about 20% ethylene and exhibits some ethylene crystallinity and a melt index of about 0.3 measured at 190°C but otherwise under the same conditions as in the above mentioned ASTM specification (i.e. at "condition E" instead of "condition L").

Component 3 has a density about 0.95 and melt index of about 0.05 measured under the same conditions as component 2.

The blending ratios appear from the following table 1 : 7 TABLE 1 * Code.

AMD fiEfffiKKS. % 11 & ■S 1 | 1 CP ■Q i P/A/tfL 5T/?£TC// P/pr/o (/?£££/?S///?/M/?G£, Jf 3MW/ZX) <N cp §* X £P/?/A/tr ■ % % % % % % % 7V£ CJ>. °e.

/ZD.

CD. a. 245,4 90 72 46 49 0 9 .1 .50:1 1 .50:1 435) 6. 24S00 90 72 to 49 0 9 1.38:1 1 .38:1 80 46 c. 247,4 ?£ 60 40 47 45 23 1.44:1 1.56:1 (35) 6^. 247,86 75 60 46 47 23 1.44-.1 1.36:1 80 46 s2 &. 255,4 65 52 SO 46 32 1.46:1 1.54 :1 (35) /■ ✓ - £5580 65 52 SO 46 52 1.36:1 1.36:1 80 46 1 /5 2574 45 36 SO 44 65 50 1.54 : 1 1.50: 1 635J / n. 25780 45 36 40 4# 45 50 V. 34 : 1 1.44:1 80 * 24 L 253, 4 4-piy. 45 36 so 44 45 50 1.60:1 1.60: 1 635) / -/ • 2 5a 80 4 PLY. 45 36 40 44 45 50 1 .42:1 1.44:1 80 48 46 k. 255, S3 45*6/?/?;#. 65 52 40 ■46 32 1 .64 : 1 1.64:1 .. 635) L 2S5j8t33 45° G/?/?//4. 65 52 SO S6 32 1.46:1 1.40:1 80 48 (6 m. 255,50 65 £2 40 46 32 1.60:1 1.50:1 50 8 9.6 n. 255.60 65 52 40 46 32 1.56:1 1 .46:1 60 12 i // O. £>,70 65 52 40 46' 32 1.40:1 1.40:1 70 16 44.6 ft' W9,4 mr.vHDPl, 64 0 8 UOP£ £0 28 1,56:1 1.50:1 (35) 425,80 u//r//u/)P£. 80 6: 0 8 UflPE 20 23 1.40:1 1.40:1 80 46 42,5 K 255,802 65 52 16 2.5 32 ca.1.40:1 ca. 1.40:' 80 ca. 1 6 ca - 3 8 TABLE 1; (continued) 1 i WEIGHT yfjELDPo/Atr /A'A/£H/rOfJ £/J£J?6y/?r£/?£/?/£.

A'iWW/Pm. oirirwre 7~£A/S/l£.Sr/&//67// /A/A/£l'/7~0// £i£>A'$j?r/as/ /?rJdJ?S/?J£, % g/s<?.m. m. a# 7>M CD.

P/D. ca pfj). | CD. 71 27 12 * 14,9 3,9 59 67 554 \ 421 32 36 26 .9 ,1 55 563 533 76 34 m 16,9 96 71 596 ■ 507 87 36 '26 w * 13,5 37 53 vi 637 | | 64/ j SO 32. ' 12 2(0 m 54 I 705 \ 410 j 90 39 23 17.9 14,7 34- 65 635 ! < 65o I 7^ 27 14 ,8 3,5 33 57 565 \ 467 j 39 26 27 m Z3 52 50 450 391 ' ; S6 39 1.'9 23 J A2,7 125 SO 653 497 120 42 33 26,1 14,1 114 75 756 « 533 ! 67 29 3 12,2 0.0 SO 49 502 392 i ' M i 33 ,5 12,2 36 ■6, ' 730 368 3/ 1'6 14,5 3.0 3/ ■ 51 t 577 ' 470 1 79 31 •19 199 99 38 54 609 • 543 i 92 33 23 16,2 ,6 33 53 : 703 588 , 1 33 40 MS 11.6 120 86 541 422 f {00 49 38 14,8 12.3 95 77 439 j7'4& CfJ.100 31 31 12,0 ,7 77 62 jiftf ¥78 '■ The layer for improved heat sealing consists of 70% "Hostalen 1022" and 30% "Nordel 1500".

The layer for improved lamination consists of 50% "Hostalen 1022" and 50% "Nordel 1500".

The extrusion temperature is 250°C and the blow ratio 1:1.

Each of the tubular films is cut helically under an angle of 30° and two such films, each having a width of about 20 cm, are laminated and stretched with the layers for improved lamination facing one another. Initially, the lamination ana simultaneous transverse stretching are effected by passing the films six or seven times through the nip between a set of grooved rollers of the type shown in British patent specification No. 1,526,722, Fig. 7. The division on each roller is 1.8 mm, the width of each tip is 0.4 mm and the tip is circularly rounded. The intermeshing between the tips is 0.9 mm. The stretching is carried out at 35°C.

Subsequently, each sample is stretched longitudinally at the same temperature by means of rollers.

Stretch ratios are determined by printed marks.

During the longitudinal stretching, the width is reduced significantly.

Those samples (as will be described below) which are subjected to heat treatment are over-stretched in the longitudinal direction and finally further stretched in the transverse direction. The aim is that the heat treated samples should end at the same stretch ratios and square meter weight as those which are not heat treated. The pleated configuration created by this last transverse stretching is maintained in the film.

Heat treatment is then carried out at various temperatures on 60 cm long and 10 cm wide specimens which are carried forward and backward over a reciprocating heated roller during a period of 120 sec. and under a tension of 300 g. Different temperatures are tried. The specimens are brought in contact with the roller while they still have the pleated configuration but the pleats gradually disappear while the material shrinks.

Samples k and I deviate from the above by being cut under an angle of 45° instead of 30°.

Samples i and j deviate in being 4-layered. The angles are as follows: -5-45°, +30°, -30°, -45°.

Samples p and q deviate by also being 4-layered materials, with the same directions and further by the composition of the main layer, which is: 80% "Hostalen 1022" 20% linear low density polyethylene of melt index 1.0 and a density of 0.92.

The melt index is measured according to ASTM D 1238 condition L except that the temperature is 190°C, Sample r is a 2-ply sample similar to sample f regarding composition, angles and heat-treatment temperature, but deviates by not being subjected to the last transverse stretching and therefore not being in a pleated configuration when it is brought in contact with the hot roller. It is heat treated without any essential transverse 15 contraction, but with longitudinal contraction similar to sample f. mm samples are cut in the machine and cross machine directions of each sample.

Stress-strain diagrams are taken at a velocity of 15 cm per minute and an initial distance of 50 mm between the clamps. 20 The results obtained will appear from the table and from the diagrams in Figures 2 and 3. The diagrams in Fig. 2 compare samples e, f, m and o which all have the same composition and which are treated in the same manner, except that the annealing temperature varies.

The diagrams in Fig. 3 compare samples b, d, f and h which contain different percentages of polyethylene, but otherwise are identical, the annealing temperature of this series being 80°C. In the diagrams of Figures 1 and 2 the values of force and energy are 2 corrected to a gauge of 80 g/m .

As regards the comparison between the sample r which, in essence, was not allowed to shrink transversely, and the similar sample f, which was allowed a significant shrinkage, the table shows that the shrunk film has essentially higher transverse elongation at break and transverse energy absorption, while the two samples have 35 about the same yield point in the transverse direction.

EXAMPLE 2 The procedure described in example 1 is carried out on a number of film compositions, described in table 2 below, however with the last transverse stretching step and the subsequent heat-treatment 11 taking place in continuous manner on a pilot machine. During this stretching step, the intermeshing of the grooved rollers with each other is adjusted to obtain such a degree of pleating that there will be practically no transverse tension in the film during the heat treatment, but also so that all.pleats produced by this stretching disappear due to the transverse shrinkage.

The extrusion temperature is in all cases 200°C with a blow ratio of 1:1 and a moderate air cooling.

The high-strength laminate are in all cases made from two spirally cut extruded tubular films. Different angles of cutting have been tried, see table 2.

All steps of stretching are carried out at 35°C/ and the heat treatment is effected on a roller heated to 80°C. The heat treatment takes about 10 seconds. The laminate is held practically tension-free while being fed in between the last pair of grooved rollers (those which immediately preceed the roller for heat treatment). This measure causes the laminate to shrink about 5-10% in the longitudinal direction during the transverse stretching between the grooved rollers. After this stretching, the laminate follows the surface of one of these rollers and is then directly transferred from this surface to the surface of the hot roller, the distance between these, surfaces being only about 1 cm. This guided transfer secures that the fine pleats, produced by the stretching between the grooved rollers, remain fine and even so as to cause an even transverse contraction on the hot roller.

The latter is driven at a circumferential velocity which is about 10% lower than the circumferential velocity of the last set of grooved rollers. This measure, and a minimum tension at the take-off from the hot roller, gives the laminate a high freedom to shrink longitudinally.

When leaving the hot roller, the laminate is transferred to a cooling roller, after which it is wound up.

The (longitudinal and transverse stretch ratios are measured after each step of the process by measuring the deformation of circles, which have been printed on the film before the first stretching step. The aim is a final stretch ratio (i.e. after the heat treatment) of 1.40:1 in both directions.

The adjustment of the transverse ratio takes place by the number of transverse stretching steps, which have been varied be 12 tween 5 and 7 (to which comes the last one before the. heat treatment). The adjustment of the longutidinal stretch ratio takes place by variation of the relative velocities of the rollers in the unit for longitudinal stretching. A proper adjustment of the stretch ratios is a complicated matter, and variations between 1.35:1 and 1.45:1 have been tolerated.

The different laminates thus produced are tested for: a) Elmendorf Tear Propagation Resistance according to BS 308 B (43 mm tear), b) Beach Puncture Resistance according to BS 4816:72, c) Falling Dart Impact Strength according to ASTM 1709.

Description of the raw materials: The melt flow index (m.f.i.) refers to ASTM D 1238 condition L (in case of polypropylenes) or condition E (in the case of polyethylenes or EPDM).

LLDPE of density 0,920 and m.f.i. = 1.0 HMHDPE of density about 0,95 and m.f.i. = about 0.05. homo-PP of m.f.i. = 0.4. co-PP of m.f.i. = 0.4 (further description see example 1). gas phase-polymerized PP with about 20% contents of atactic PP, partly forming a block-copolymer with the isotactic PP.

EPDM of m.f.i. = about 0.3.

An EVA containing about 20% vinylace-tate and of m.f.i. = about 5.

"Dow I ex 2045": "Hostalen 9255": "Hostalen 1050". "Hostalen 1022": "Novolen 1300 E": "Nordel 1500": EVA: TABLE. 2 Film Code So.

Composition Direction of ply degrees Film weight g/sq m Falling Dart Impac t Strength crams Elmendorf tear Strength 3 •mm.tear) Beach Puncture Resistance, J Qjj-rfei inner layer (for improved lamination), 10% of total Middle layer 75% of total Outer layer (for sealing), 15% of total MD CD MD CD Ri02 70% "Dowlex 2045" 30% "Nordel 1500" 80% "Hostalen 1022" 20% "Dowlex 2045" 100% "Dowlex 2045" 45 75 75 500-800 600-800 2160+ 1480 70 1 100 1340 920 1 I .0 14.2 9.4 13.3 R404 1 80% "Novolen 1300 F," 20% "Dowlex 2045" I I 45 71 74 600-700 600-S00 2910+ 2790+ 14 50 1830 17 70+ 1280 6.4 9.9 9. 1 13.8 ! R407 i It % "Hostalen 9255" 35% "Hostalen 1022" 30% "Dowlex 2045" 11 45 78 85 400-700 400-600 1620 3030+ 1870 2110 2400+ 2270+ 11.1 7.9 7.0 7.5 i | i [ R414 II 50% "Hostalen 1022" 20% "Hostalen 9255" % "Dowlex 204 5" 10% "Nordel 1500" 70% "Hostalen 1022" 30% "Nordel 1500" 45 60 79 73 71 600-900 600-800 600-800 1410 1460 1660 1430 1400 2750+ 2210 990 1050 13.7 11 .9 (aver MD a 11.9 12.4 .3 age of nd CD) R41 7 tt 50% "Novolen 1300 E" 20% "Hostalen 1022" 20% "Dowlex 2045" 10% "Nordel 1500" it 45 60 77 82 80 600-900 800-900 800-900 1280 1990 1780 1250 1460 2490+ 2040+ 750 650 11 .9 13.3 12.1 12.6 14.0 13.6 R4 1 9 II 50% "Hostalen 1050" 20% "Hostalen 9255" 20% "Dowlex 204 5" 10% "Nordel 1500" II 45 74 71 500-700 500-800 1670 2020 1520 1 120 2050 1360 .2 11.3 8.5 10.5 R420 11 11 100% "Dowlex 204 5" 45 75 500-800 24 50 1620 1850 8.7 7.4 R4 21 II 60% "Hostalen 1022" 20% "Hostalen 9255" 20% "F.VA" II 45 77 700-900 500 2190+ 800 12.9 9.9 R422 II 50% "Hostalen 1022" 20% "Hostalen 9255" 20% "Dowlex 2045" 10% "Nordel 1500" H 45 84 700-900 2460+ 1420 2160+ 13.6 .2 Low density polyethylene (200 ym) Ordinary sack quality film for comparison 184 500-600 840 1300 1700 .0 (average of ! MD and CD) | + = higher than, and* indicates that one or more of the single tests exceeded the maximum of the apparatus.

Several of the samples were further tested for EJmendorf Tear Propagation Strength at -15°C. For the samples of composition R 407, R <414 and R 419/ this gave the same results (within the ranges of accuracy of this method) as the test results at 20° C shown an table 2. This high performance at low temperatures is surprising in view of the high contents of polypropylene, but explicable by the microstruc-ture, which comprises the microscopical to submicroscopical fibrils of stiff polypropylene which are almost entirely embedded in re!atively soft poiyethyiene.

A study of the tear resistance values in relation to the lamination angles (see table 2) gives the result that the 45° laminates show a significant weakness (relatively speaking) in their 45° directions, i.e. parallel to the direction of grain in one of the layers .

The same is not true for the 30° laminates, which generally show significantly higher all-over tear values, considering that the weakest direction generally determines the value of the laminate with respect to tear propagation resistance.

An exception to the rule that the 45° laminates exhibit a relatively low tear propagation resistance along the 45° direction, is found in the composition R 407. The main layer (middle layer) of this composition consists of HMHDPE and LLDPE in combination with a PP of significantly lower molecular weight than the HMHDPE, cf. claim 18. It is believed that the improved 45° tear strength in this case is due to the advantageous effects explained in the general description in connection with this claim.

Finally, the compositions containing 100% LLDPE in the layers for sealing (i.e. R 402, 404, 407, 420, 421, 422) have been found to form an adequate seal by ultrasonic sealing. The seal resists shear forces up to about 5-6 kp/2.5 mm and peel forces up to about 2 kp/2.5 mm. In this connection it is of importance that the seal layer and the matrix in the middle layer consist of essentially the same material, namely both of a low-density polyethylene type, while the fibrillar, discontinuous, embedded phase of the middle layer consists of the much higher melting polypropylene.

EXAMPLE 3 High-strength, laminates were produced from two compositions, both entirely consisting of HMHDPE and LLDPE, except for minor amounts of EPDM in the layer for improved lamination. The procedure was identical to that explained in example 2, except that a prototype machine for full technical scale operation was used.

In both cases, the extrusion temperature was 240°C, the angle of cutting 45°, the temperature of stretching 35°C, the temperature of the rollers for heat treatment 80°C, the time of heat treatment about 10 sec. Two heated, rollers were used, one after the other, and subsequently two cooling rollers. The final stretch ratio, measured after heat treatment, was about 1.4:1 in both directions.

The entire itretching/lamination process including the heat treatment was operated in-line, the line comprising five transverse stretching stations, one longitudinal stretching station, and the last stretching station supplying the laminate with pleats for the "free-shrinkage" heat treatment. Between the last pair of grooved rollers and the first roller for heat treatment, and in close proximity to both, was an idle roller serving to keep the pleats fine and even.

The transverse stretching ratio was controlled by adjustment of the intermeshing between the grooved rollers in each of the first five pairs of grooved rollers.

As in example 2, the intermeshing between the last pair of grooved rollers was adjusted to minimize the transverse tension during the heat treatment.

The lineary velocity of the laminate at the exit from the stretching/lamination line was about 30 m/min.

The composition of the films and the results of the laboratory testing appear from table 3.

The polymer designations and the test methods for impact, tear and puncture resistance are explained in example 2 above. The other mechanical properties were determined from strain/stress curves taken for 15 mm wide specimens, the initial distance between the draw-clambs being 50 mm.

Strain/stress curves were taken as a modestly low velocity, namely 150 mm/min. and at a very low velocity, namely 15 mm/min. The latter was tried in order to study the creep strength. 2 The yield tension (in Newton/mm ) therefore was determined at each of the two velocities, while elongation at break (in %) and ul- 2 timate tensile tension (in Newton/mm ) were determined only at the velocity 150 mm/min.

The laminate prepared from composition R 1 was further converted to open-mouth sacks on commercial sack-making machinery. It was first folded to a flat tube while being side-seamed by use of a 16 commercial hot-melt adhesive, then cut into lengths while being heat-sealed transversely to form the bottom of the sack. This seam was made by simple impulse sealing (without any kind of folding or over-taping) but with the conditions of sealing optimized to allow maximum shrinkage in the longitudinal direction. The dimension of the sack was about 100 cm x 50 cm. About 30 of such sacks were filled, closed by overtaping and drop-tested at minus 20°C in competition with sacks of similar size made from a 185 g/sq m low density polyethylene film of standard quality for sack production. By these tests the high-strersgth laminate was found to be clearly superior in spite of its much lower gauge. The weight of the high-strength laminate used for these bag tests was 80 g/sq m, in other words almost 2^ times as light as the ordinary polyethylene sack material.

TABLE 3 F i lrr. Code No.

Composition Inner layer (for improved lamination) 10% of total Middle layer 75% of total Outer layer (for improved sea Iing) 15% of total Film we i.gh t g/sq m Elniendorf Tear Strength (43 mm tear) MD CD 451- Beach Puncture Re s i s t a n c: e , Jou j e s MD CD 45l Yield point tension N/mm^ MD CD 45 Ultimate Tensile Tens ion N/mm^ MD CD Elongation at break 45l MD CD 45l 70% "Dowlex 2045" % "Nordel 1500" 50% "Ho stalen 9255" 50% "Dowlex 2045" 100% "Dowlex 2045" 74 70% "Hostalen 9255" % "Dowlex 2045" 73 2020+ 2360+ 1350 32no+ 300(7+ 2220 + .4 13.1 4 , 5 6,3 .1. 12.2 6,7 150 mm/ min. 19,5 T5 mm/ min. 16,2 150 mm/ min. 19,3 mm/ min . 17,3 150 mm/ min. 20,3 mm/ min. 17,8 150 mm/ min . 19,7 mm/ min. 18, 1 150 mm/ min. 20,3 mm/ min. 17,3 150 mm/ min. 21,6 mm/ min. 18,8 51 43.9 ,'0 603 536 49,7 48,5 26,9 536 540 + = higher than, and indicates that one or more of the single tests exceeded the maximum of the apparatus.

Claims (10)

CLAIMS - 18 -

1. A method of preparing a high strength sheet material comprising forming a laminate comprising at least two layers of a thermoplastic 5 polymer blend comprising polyethylene, each layer having a fibrillar grain structure providing a predominant direction of splittability in each said layer, the layers being bonded to one another with the said predominant directions of splittabi1itv transverse to each other, and biaxially orienting the molecules of said layers by stretching the 10 layers in substantially unaxial steps to convert the grain of polymer into a zig-zagging micro-pattern, characterized by said blend being composed of high molecular weight high density polyethylene and low density polyethylene having a significantly lower molecular weight, said low density polyethylene being selected from the group of 15 copolymers and/or branched polyethylenes which a) exhibit substantially the same or higher elongation at break than the said high molecular weight high density polyethylene when tested at room temperature under slow stretching, and b) are capable of distinctly segregating, while forming a distinct 20 microphase, from said high molecular weight high density polyethylene on cooling of a molten homogeneous blend of the said components.

2. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that said blend 25 further contains polypropylene of a molecular weight significantly lower than that of said high molecular weight high density polyethylene.

3. A method according to claim 2, characterized in that said blend further contains minor amounts of an alloying agent, e.g. a copolymer 30 of propylene and an olefin with 4 or more carbon atoms.

4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized by subjecting the sheet to shrinkage by at least 7% in at least one direction. 35

5. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the stretch ratio in any direction and determined after shrinkage does not exceed 2.5s1. - 19 -

6. A method as in claim 1, characterized in that the direction of splittability in each layer of said layers of the laminate to be biaxially oriented forms an angle of between 10 and 35 degrees with the machine direction of the laminate. 5

7. A method as in claim 1, characterized in that the stretch ratio in any direction and determined after shrinkage is between 1.3:1 and 1.9:1.

8. A method as in claim 1, characterized in subjecting the biaxially 10 oriented laminate to a heat treatment while allowing at least 7% shrinkage of the laminate to take place in at least its transverse direction.

9. A method as claimed in claim 1 substantially as described herein 15 with reference to the Examples.

10. A high strength sheet material whenever prepared by a method as claimed in any preceding claim. 20 TOMKINS & CO. 25 30 35