IE84181B1 - Improvements in and relating to biofiltration - Google Patents
Improvements in and relating to biofiltration Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- IE84181B1 IE84181B1 IE1994/0832A IE940832A IE84181B1 IE 84181 B1 IE84181 B1 IE 84181B1 IE 1994/0832 A IE1994/0832 A IE 1994/0832A IE 940832 A IE940832 A IE 940832A IE 84181 B1 IE84181 B1 IE 84181B1
- Authority
- IE
- Ireland
- Prior art keywords
- nodules
- peat
- biofiltration
- medium
- fraction
- Prior art date
Links
- 206010054107 Nodule Diseases 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000003415 peat Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 6
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 5
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002912 waste gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000031018 biological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- ZMANZCXQSJIPKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N triethylamine Chemical compound CCN(CC)CC ZMANZCXQSJIPKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001412 amines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003139 buffering Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005342 ion exchange Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004301 light adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002823 nitrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000006213 oxygenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003467 sulfuric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
- B01D53/74—General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
- B01D53/84—Biological processes
- B01D53/85—Biological processes with gas-solid contact
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A50/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
- Y02A50/20—Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
Description
The invention relates to a biofiltration medium and in
particular to a biofiltration medium based on peat.
Biofiltration is a method of treatment for cleaning gas
streams originating from a number of industrial and waste
treatment activities. The removal of odorous components
from the gas takes place by the activity of micro-
organisms
(mainly bacteria) which are present on an
organic carrier material or medium.
Waste gases are passed via ducting into a space located
beneath or above the filter medium. As the gas passes
through the filter the odorous compounds are absorbed onto
an aqueous layer and are degraded by microorganisms which
reside within the organic filter material. The end-
products of the oxidation process are odourless compounds,
mainly carbon dioxide, water, nitrates and sulphates.
Oxidation restores the absorption capacity of the filter
material and provides the microorganisms with the
nutrients necessary for their survival and growth. Thus
the entire biofiltration process is self generating.
One of the main advantages of biofiltration in comparison
with other techniques is that many chemically different
compounds can be eliminated with a high degree of
efficiency due to the adaptation of the microorganisms to
the compounds present in the gas stream. Biofilters
little
requirements.
require maintenance and have low energy
The running costs of biological odour
treatment technologies have been found to be 2-10 times
lower than for other treatment methods. As there are no
secondary disposal problems, biofiltration is the most
"environmentally friendly" option for odour control.
Biofiltration is a proven odour control technology for a
number of applications as described in the VDI guideline
of biofilters 3477 (1991).
Biofiltration of gases is a result of physical, chemical
and biological processes. The main physical process are
adsorption and absorption. Malodorous
compounds are
adsorbed onto the filter medium and absorbed onto the
layer of water surrounding the medium. The chemical
reactions that take place on the surface of the
biofiltration medium include precipitation, ion exchange
and chemisorption. The biological processes are the
breaking down of waste gases by microorganisms.
The efficiency of a biofilter depends on a large number of
factors. One of the main factors is the biofiltration
medium that is used in the biofilter.
there is
According to the invention
provided a
biofiltration medium comprising peat nodules formed from
high density fuel peat, the nodules having a bulk density
at 50% moisture content of at least 400 Kg/m3 and at least
50% (w/w) of the nodules having an average dimension of
between 10 mm and 20 mm.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, at least 60%,
most preferably 70% and especially approximately 72% (w/w)
of the nodules have an average dimension of between 10 and
mm.
Preferably less than 10% of the nodules have a dimension
greater than 20 mm.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention less than 15%
of the nodules have a dimension between 5 and 10 mm.
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention,
the bulk density’ of the nodules is at least 450 and
preferably greater than 475 Kg/m3.
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention,
high density fuel peat from which the nodules are formed
has a density from 400 to 500 Kg/m3.
Preferably the peat from which the nodules are formed is
well decomposed sod peat or lump peat.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention the peat has a
von Post number of from 6 to 10.
The invention also provides a method for producing a
biofiltration medium comprising crushing high density fuel
peat to produce crushed sod turf and screening the crushed
sod turf to produce the peat nodules.
Preferably the method includes the steps of:-
screening the crushed sod turf to provide a fines
fraction, an on-size fraction, and an over-size
coarse fraction;
eliminating the fines fraction;
chopping the coarse fraction; and
screening the chopped coarse fraction to provide
further on-size fraction peat nodules having the
desired density and size range.
In a preferred embodiment the crushed sod turf is screened
in a double deck screen base having two screens.
Preferably to produce the desired size range the screens
are 22mm and 12 mm screens.
In one embodiment of the invention oversize fraction from
the double deck screen base is recycled for chopping and
subsequent re-screening.
The invention will be more clearly understood from the
following description thereof given by way of example only
with reference to the accompanying drawing which is a
schematic view of a method for producing a biofiltration
medium according to the invention.
Specialised high density well decomposed sod (lump) fuel
peat is tippled into a receiving hopper 1 and delivered by
a conveyor 2 to a conical pin crushing drum plant 3 which
produces crushed sod turf. The fines from the crushed sod
turf are extracted and discarded. The coarse size
fraction is delivered by a conveyor 4 to a double deck
finger screen box 5 fitted with 22 mm and 12 mm wire
screens. On-size fraction 10 from the screen box 5 is the
desired peat nodule product which is delivered by a
conveyor 6 for storage. Fines 11 are eliminated.
Oversize crushed sod turf that does not pass through the
screen box 5 is recycled along line 7 to a flail/chopper
unit 8 from which it is delivered again to the conveyor 4
for delivery to the screen box 5.
Nodule P e t'es
The peat nodules produced by this processing technique
have the following distinctive properties for
biofiltration purposes:
Bulk Density (average) 2 475 Kg/m3(at 50%1noisture)
Moisture Content 5 37%
Particle Size (w/w) 90% S 20 mm
82% 2 10 mm
96% 2 5 mm
The well decomposed sod fuel peat is highly degraded peat
having von Post numbers of from 6 to 10. It is
specifically selected to
produce nodules
which are
characteristically hard and consequently resistant to
abrasion and load deformation and which will undergo
minimum expansion when absorbing water.
The peat nodules according to the invention provide a
suitable environment for microbial growth and create
sufficient voids to achieve a low pressure loss, small
specific
filter resistance, low mass
and low energy
requirements for good drainage and oxygenation.
The structure of the nodules is relatively regular and
even resulting in uniform penetration by waste gases at a
low pressure drop in biofiltration systems.
The nodules provide a large surface area for physical,
chemical and biological reactions to occur. They also
provide good buffering against pH fluctuations in the
material being treated in the hiofilter.
Because of the relatively low density of the nodules, they
exhibit low back pressure characteristics and can
therefore be used to construct biofilters of up to 3
metres high.
Using the peat nodules described above, a biofilter was
assembled with the following results.
Application:
Source of foul gas:
Pretreatment of
non-condensable gases:
Air Flow Rate:
Biofiltration Medium:
Biofilter volume:
Depth of Biofilter
bed:
Chemical Analysis
CHEMICAL
Hydrogen Sulphide (ppm)
Mercaptans (ppm)
Ammonia (ppm)
Amines Present
Triethylamine (ppm)
Olfactometric Analysis
Biofilter Inlet
Biofilter Outlet
Inlet odour
concentration (after
pretreatment)
Animal By—product Rendering
Factory ventilation air
Non-condensable process gases
Cyclones for removal of
particulates Packed tower acid
scrubber
,039m3/hr
Nodules having the properties
given above.
m’
lm
INLET OUTLET
1.5 not detected
0.5 not detected
7 not detected
+ not detected
32 not detected
,839 OU/m3
158 ou/m3
,000 - 50,000 OU/m3
Performance:
Date
At installation
months after installation
9 months after installation
Mean odour removal efficiency
across filter bed*
it
98.7
98.5
.5
* determined by Forced Choice Dynamic Olfactometry
Application:
Bed Size:
Air Flow Rate:
Chemical Analysis
CHEMICAL
Hydrogen Sulphide (ppm)
Mercaptans (ppm)
Ammonia (ppm)
Sewage Treatment
55m3 at 3m depth
,5003/hour
INLET OUTLET
.5 not detected
2.1 not detected
2.0
The invention is not limited to the embodiments
hereinbefore described which may be varied in both
construction and detail.
Claims (1)
- CLAIMS A biofiltration medium comprising peat nodules formed from high density fuel peat, the nodules having a bulk density at 50% moisture content of at least 400 Kg/m3 and at least 50% (w/w) of the nodules having an average dimension of between 10 mm and 20 mm. A biofiltration medium as claimed in claim 1 wherein at least 60% (w/w) of the nodules have an average dimension of between 10 mm and 20 mm. A biofiltration medium as claimed in claim 1 or 2 wherein at least 70% (w/w) of the nodules have an average dimension of between 10 mm and 20 mm. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein approximately 72% (w/w) of the nodules have an average dimension of between 10 mm and 20 mm. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein less than 10% (w/w) of the nodules have a dimension greater than 20 mm. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein less than 15% (w/w) of the nodules have an average dimension of between 5 mm and 10 mm. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the bulk density of the nodules at 50% moisture content is at least 450 Kg/m3. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the bulk density of the nodules at 50% moisture content is at least 475 Kg/m3. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the peat from which the nodules are formed has a density of from 400 to 500 Kg/m3. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the peat from which the modules are formed is well decomposed sod peat or lump peat. A biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the peat has a von Post number of from 6 to 10. A biofiltration medium substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawing and example. A method for producing a biofiltration medium as claimed in any preceding claim comprising crushing high density fuel peat to produce crushed sod turf and screening the crushed sod turf to produce the peat nodules. A method as claimed in claim 13 including the steps of:- screening the crushed sod turf to provide a fines fraction, an on—size fraction, and an over—size coarse fraction; eliminating the fines fraction; chopping the coarse fraction; and screening the chopped coarse fraction to provide further on-size fraction peat nodules having the desired density and size range. A method as claimed in claim 14 wherein the crushed sod turf is screened in a double deck screen base having two screens. A method as claimed in claim 15 wherein the screens are 22mm and 12 mm screens. A method as claimed in claim 15 or 16 wherein oversize fraction from the double deck screen base is recycled for chopping and subsequent re-screening. A method for producing a bio—filtration medium as claimed in any of claims 1 to 12 substantially as with hereinbefore described reference to the accompanying drawing.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IE1994/0832A IE84181B1 (en) | 1994-10-18 | Improvements in and relating to biofiltration |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IEIRELAND18/10/19931993/0785 | |||
IE930785 | 1993-10-18 | ||
IE1994/0832A IE84181B1 (en) | 1994-10-18 | Improvements in and relating to biofiltration |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
IE940832A1 IE940832A1 (en) | 1995-04-19 |
IE84181B1 true IE84181B1 (en) | 2006-04-19 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Barbusinski et al. | Biological methods for odor treatment–A review | |
Wei et al. | Environmental challenges impeding the composting of biodegradable municipal solid waste: A critical review | |
Swanson et al. | Biofiltration: fundamentals, design and operations principles, and applications | |
Nanda et al. | Microbial biofiltration technology for odour abatement: An introductory review | |
KR19990008460A (en) | Effluent treatment system | |
Cao et al. | Control of odor emissions from livestock farms: A review | |
Morral et al. | A review of biotechnologies for the abatement of ammonia emissions | |
Lan et al. | Evaluating the performance of biofilters for composting odor control | |
EP0648525B1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to biofiltration | |
IE84181B1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to biofiltration | |
KR20120047295A (en) | Deodorizing material and deodorizing device | |
GB2282828A (en) | Extracting peat fibre for use in biofiltration | |
Miller et al. | Application of biological deodorization methods in the aspect of sustainable development | |
DE4341467C2 (en) | Process for biological exhaust gas / exhaust air purification | |
Gałwa-Widera | Reduction of odors from composting processes using an ecological method | |
Nanda et al. | Microbial biofiltration technology for odour abatement | |
Kurc et al. | The prevention of harmful gases and odours dispersion by biofiltration in the animal farm. | |
KR100633533B1 (en) | Microorganism for removal of hydrogen sulfide and process for production thereof | |
Kwarciak-Kozłowska et al. | Biofiltration as an ecological method of removing sewage sludge odors by solar drying | |
Wang et al. | Review of biofiltration-effect of support media on biofilter performance | |
Ullman | Remedial activities to reduce atmospheric pollutants from animal feeding operations | |
IE80457B1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to biofiltration | |
Yang et al. | A review on efficient operation technology of compost depot | |
JP3848958B2 (en) | Deodorization device | |
KR100481287B1 (en) | Odor treatment equipment using vermiculite and process using thereof |