IE55374B1 - Athletic type shoe for tennis and other court games - Google Patents

Description

ο ά 7 4 This application has been divided from patent no.55 37 3 , The present invention relates to athletic shoes of the type which are especially designed for tennis 5. and other court games involving similar footwork.

In this specification (including the claims) the term "rearfoot" is used to identify the heel portion of the foot containing the heel bone (the calcaneus) and the talus, the' term "forefoot” is used to· 10. identify the portion of the foot containing the meta-. tarsals and the phalanges (the toes), and the term "midfoot" is used to identify the foot portion lying between "the· forefoot and rear foot-as defined above. The midfoot' therefore "lies rearwardly-'of the’ 15. proximal facets of the‘metatarsals"and forwardly of the calcaneus and contains the cuboid,'the navicular and the cuneiforms. & conventional present day. tennis shoe is typically constructed with a thick outsole/midsole 20. unit of moulded rubber and/or foamed polymer material, which extends throughout the full length of the shoe for cushioning the foot and protecting it against impacts. In addition, the midsole unit usually embodies a cushioning heel wedge extending 25. along the midfoot and rearfoot regions. The heel wedge provides the heel lift which is desired for running.

Be'cause of its thick cushioning, the foregoing ‘ sole construction amply meets the wearer's comfort -2- 30. requirements. However, this construction has now been found -to have certain significant drawbacks for playing tennis and other court games involving similar footwork.

. First of all, the foregoing sole construction abnormally restricts the natural foot motions required to perform various tennis manoeuvers which involve more than just straight ahead running. For example, the tennis player frequently springs or 10. crouches on the balls or toes of his feet, makes abrupt stops-after pushing off and sprinting short distances, pivots or turns sharply on the ball of one foot-or the other, skips or runs sideways, and makes abrupt changes.in direction'of movement. The 15. wide,variety.of,foot motions required to.Execute these manoeuvers is ..hampered, by the foregoing · sole construction mainly because it stiffens the shoe significantly in the midfoot region to inhibit the extent to which the forefoot and rearfoot can act 20. independently of each other.

Additional problems arise from the fact that the foregoing sole construction places the foot at a significant height (usually one inch or more at the heel) above the ground surface. For example, the 25. higher the foot is above the ground the more difficult it is for the player to balance himself and to maintain his stability in executing the tennis manoeuvers mentioned above. Furthermore, the forces acting on the foot and also the force moments 30. about the foot joints are increased as the height of -3- the foot .above, the ground is increased.

• In .addition,; the likelihood of jamming or twisting the foot during a stopping manoeuver Is increased as the height of the foot above the ground 5. is increased, especially with shoe constructions having sharp outsole edges. If the forces are applied to the foot joint before full foot support is attained in a stopping manoeuver, unnatural conditions tend to arise and may lea., to injuries. 10. For example,.upon stopping a lateral motion, the outer edge of the shoe may catch on the court, pausing the shoe to roll over, thereby increasing the;likelihood of ankle sprains. In stopping a :forward -motion, .a .high heel, especially.one having 15. relatively-sharp.edges, tends to catch.on the cpurt surface to increase.the impact of the .forefoot on the court.surface. Finally, increasing the height of the heel above the ground Increases the angle through which the wearer must lean in a forward 20. direction to lift the heel and to lock the midfoot for propelling himself. If the player attempts to pivot while his heel is down on the ground, the resulting heel traction causes the foot to lock up and to apply an objectionable torque to the knee. 25. Aside from the thickly cushioned sole construction described above, other shoe parts contribute to the restriction of natural foot movements. For example, medial longitudinal arch supports and lateral edges tend to increase the 30. stiffness of the shoe in the midfoot region. 4- In addressing the*;foregoing problems,· it was recognized -that the natural foot motion required for tennis and other court games are best achieved with bare feet without introducing any artificial constraints on the foot motions and without elevating the foot above ground level. Therefore, the optimum solution to the foregoing problems is to eliminate the shoe altogether and to play barefooted. However, the obvious drawback to such a solution is that playing barefooted on hard court surfaces for any prolonged period of time 'is uncomfortable and hard on the feet.

’ In the invention the subject of patent no> 53373, the tennis shoe comprises a foot-receiving upper, separately formed forefoot and rearfoot sole units, the'said upper having a flexible bottom underlying the wearer's foot and extending throughout the region underlying at least the wearer's midfoot and rearfoot to define a spliplasted upper construction in at least the wearer's midfoot and rearfoot regions, the said sole units being spaced apart from each other and being connected together only through the said upper.

According to the present invention, the shoe comprises a foot-receiving upper and a sole unit underlying the wearer's heel, the said sole unit comprising a ground-engaging outsole and a midsole lying between the said upper and the said outsole and formed from a compressible, energy-absorbing, foamed polymeric material, the said midsole being divided into upper and lower layers, the said lower layer being adhered to the said outsole and the said upper layer being affixed to a bottom portion of the upper, and means forming a part of the said sole unit for enabling-, the-thickness ot the said nidsole to be reduced without correspondingly-reducing energy which the said midsole is capable of absorbing, the said means comprising a heel plate extending through-5- out the interface between the said layers and being sufficiently stiff-to spread the wearer's heel load on the said upper layer, the said upper layer being sufficiently thin and the said plate.being sufficiently flexible that the said plate will deflect in 10. the region underlying the-wearer's calcaneus.under a heel load of 375 lb (170.5 kg), provides a reduced sole thickness, thus placing the wearer's heel very close to the ground at.'about the same level as the forefoot, so that. the-:wearer .has the feeling of being 15. as flat-footed ,as-he.W9uld.if he were barefooted.

The reduced height,of the. heel above the ground in turn reduces the impacts on the forefoot, thus allowing a reduction in the thickness of the shockabsorbing midsole in the forefoot sole unit without 20. creating discomfort.

The invention may be put into practice in various ways and one specific embodiment will be described to illustrate the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings in which: 25. Figure 1 is a side elevation as viewed from the medial side of the shoe of a right foot tennis shoe incorporating the principles of this invention; Figure 2 is a side elevation as viewed from the lateral side of the shoe of the shoe shown in Figure 30. 1; Figure 3 is a bottom plan view of the shoe shown in Figures 1 and 2; Figure 4 is a longitudinal section taken along the line 4-4 of Figure 3; -6- 35 .

Figure 5 is a transverse section taken along the line 5-5 of Figure 1; Figure 6 is another transverse section taken along the line 6-6 of Figure 1; 5. Figure 7 is yet another transverse section taken along the line 7-7 of Figure 1; Figure 8 is a section taken along the line 8-8 of Figure 4; and Figure 9 is a section similar to Figure 7, but 10. showing the rearfoot midsole unit in its loaded, deformed state.

Referring to the drawings and particularly to Figures 1 to 4; the tennis shoe of the present invention mainly comprises a·flexible upper 10 and 15. separate, spaced apart forefoot and rearfoot sole units 12 and 14. As best shown’ in Figure 3, the tennis shoe is soleless in the midfoot region v/hich lies between sole units 12 and 14. The soleless midfoot region provides a highly flexible, universal 20. coupling 15 which couples the sole units 12 and 14 together in a manner to be described in detail later on.

The upper 10 is formed from any suitable, pliable materials and is of the sliplasted type 25. which extends completely around the wearer's foot like a slipper to form a closed bottom 16 underlying the foot. In the illustrated embodiment, for example, the upper 10 comprises a pair of fabric panels 17 and 18, a pair of leather panels 17a and • 30. 18a, a leather toe cap 19 and leather foxing 19a.

As shown, the panels 17 and. 18 may- be a laminated construction having inner and outer fabric layers separated by a soft intermediate sponge layer.

As shown in Figures 6 to 8, the fabric panels 17 5. and 18 are sewn together along Che bottom 16 of the upper as indicated at 19b in Figures 6 to 8. The panels 17 and 18 define the main layer of the bottom 16 and extend upwardly from the boctom to define the opposite sides of the upper. The panels 17a and 10. 18a, the toe cap 19 and the foxing 19a lie exteriorly of the fabric panels 17 and 13 and are sewn or otherwise suitably attached to the panels 17 and 18. ...

The leather panels;17a and 18a extend along 15. opposite sides, of the upper. 10 and have bottom' portions 17b and 18b (see Figure 6) underlying the bottom portions of the fabric panels 17 and 18. The toe cap 19 and the foxing 19a also have bottom portions underlying the bottom portions of the 20. fabric panels 17 and 18 as shown in Figures 4 and 7. From this description it will be appreciated that the bottom 16 of the upper is formed by the bottom portions of the panels 17 and 18 and the underlying bottom portions of the panels 17a and 25. 18a, the toe cap 19 and the foxing 19a. It is understood, however, that the bottom and other parts of the upper 10 may be of any suitable construction.

As best shown in Figures 4 and 8, the bottom 16 is cut away just in the forefoot region to define a 30. single opening 20 in the toe region. The opening 20 -8- is delimited by a straight rear edge 21, a curved front edge 22 and generally parallel side edges 22a and 22b. A thin, stiff, flat-sided toe plate 24 is interfittingly positioned in the opening 20 to fill 5. the opening. The upper 10 is therefore completely closed along its bottom. The toe plate 24 underlies the wearer's three middle toes forwardly of the metatarsal heads.

A flat-sided forefoot insole board 25 is 10. disposed in the upper 10 and overlies the toe plate 24 and part of the bottom 16. An insole board 25. spans the interior width of the upper- in the forefoot region and extends from the toe end of the upper 10 to the region just rearwardly of the 15. metatarsal heads of the wearer's foot..:By this construction, the board 25 underlies part of the wearer's forefoot, but terminates forwardly of the midfoot so that it does not impair the flexibility of the midfoot coupling 15. The board 25 overlies 20. the portion of the bottom 16 lying between the toe plate 24 and the toe end of the upper 10. In addition, the board 25 overlaps the portion of the bottom 16 lying just rearwardly of the toe plate 24 under the ball of the wearer's foot.

. The toe plate 24 and.the insole board 25 may each be formed from a suitable, non-resiltent, substantially incompressible fibreboard. The thicknesses of the plate 24 and the board 25 are about equal, each being less than about 0.062 inches 30. (1.57 mms). -9- A soft, pliable sponge sockliner 28 is disposed in the upper 10 and extends the full length of the upper. The shoe may optionally include a soft, pliable heel pad 29 (see Figure 4) in Che rearfoot 5. region. In the illustrated embodiment, the heel pad 29 overlies the sockliner 28. Alternatively, the heel pad 29 may lie between the sockliner 28 and the bottom 16 in the rearfoot region of the shoe.

As shown in Figure 4, the sockliner 28 overlies 10. and is adhered to the board 25 and the portion of the bottom 16 lying rearwardly of the board 25. The board 25, in turn, is adhered to the opposing surfaces of the.toe plate 24 and the bottom portions of the,-panels 17 and,18, The board 25 is therefore 15. sandwiched between the sockliner 28 on one side and the toe plate.24.and the bottom 16 on the other side.

Hard, hot melt glue is used to adhere the board 25 throughout the bottom portions of the panels 17 and 18 lying forwardly of the rearward edge of the 20. toe plate 24. Upon solidifying, the hot melt glue forms a stiff, thin, continuous layer 24a lying at least approximately in a plane containing the toe plate 24 and covering the entire fabric bottom area lying forwardly of the edge 21 of the opening 20.

. The plate 24 and the layer 24a therefore cooperate to define a continuous, stiff, flat-sided layer or plate structure underlying Che board 25 and covering the entire forefoot bottom area of the upper from the Coe end of the upper 10 back to a vertical, 30. transverse plane containing the edge 21 of the -10- opening 20.

The layer 24a'is the only region of the shoe in which hard hot melt glue is used. All other shoe parts requiring gluing are adhered to adjacent 5. surfaces by a suitable non-stiffening glue or adhesive (such as ati elastomeric or rubber-based glue) which remains flexible in its final adhesive state so as not to'- impair the flexibility of different parts of the shoe.

. It will be noted that the shoe is devoid of any longitudinal medial arch support. The upwardly facing foot-supporting surface of the sockliner 28 is therefore generally flat and lies close to the ground throughout the region'underlying the wearer's 15. arches. ;"· r As shown in Figures 1,'2 and 4, the upper 10 is formed with a soft,' pliable heel cup 30 which is devoid of a functional heel counter or any ocher similar heel constraining device. The heel cup 30 20. is formed from soft, pliable layers which do not constrain the natural movement of the wearer's heel. The heel cup 30 is smoothly contoured to comfortably fit the wearer's heel. The heel cup 30 may include a narrow stiffening finger 30a (see 25. Figure 4) having a width of about 3/4 inches (1.9 cms) and extending just along the back of Che heel to keep the back of the heel cup 30 from sagging.

It will be appreciated that the stiffening finger 30a is used only for cosmetic purposes.

. As shown in Figures 1 to 4, the upper 10 is -11- provided with·an exterior·, .onerpiece, wrap-around saddle 31 having a bottom portion .33. and side portions 35 and 37. The bottom portion 33 underlies and is adhered or sewn to the bottom portions of the 5. panels 17 and 18 in the shoe's midfoot region. By this construction, the bottom portion 33 of the saddle forms-an exterior layer of the bottom 16 in the midfoot region and bridges the sole units 12 and 14. The flexible midfoot portion of the bottom 16, 10. which contains the bottom portion 33 of the saddle and which interconnects the sole units .-12. and 14, is soleless to define the unsoled flexible coupling 15 between the sole units 12 and 14. The side portions 35 and 37 of · the saddle expend .along opposite sides 15. of the shoe, terminate at their.:upper ends of .the shoe eye stay portiohs'-'and; are· stitched or otherwise fixed to the panels 17-,and 18, respectively. The saddle 31 is formed -from any suitable flexible material such as vinyl or, leather. -,.

. As best shown in Figure 4, the forefoot sole unit 12 underlies just the forefoot region below the bottom 16 and comprises a flexible, ground-engaging outsole 32 and a relatively thin, flexible, resilient midsole 34. The forefoot sole unit 12 is 25. comparable to a half-sole and terminates at the interface between the wearer's forefoot and midfoot.

Still referring to Figure 4, the midsole 34 lies between and is adhered to the outsole 32 and the composite of the hottom 16 and the toe plate 24.

. The midsole 34 extends rearwardly from the toe and of -12- the shoe and terminates rearwardly- of. the board 25 at the'interface between.the forefoot and midfoot regions.

The midsole 34 is formed from a suitable, shock-5. absorbing, foamed, closed cell polymeric material. Preferably, the midsole 34 is formed from ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) having a low shear modulus to enhance the shear property of.the midsole.

As shown in Figures 1 to 4, the outsole 32 10. extends upwardly along the front toe portion of the shoe and also upwardly along the lateral and medial sides of the shoe.i All of the corners of the outsole 32 are smoothly rounded to eliminate any sharp corner»edges which would tend to catch on a 15. court surface.;.

The rear edges'of .'.the outsole 32 and the midsole 34 are tapered to smoothly marge with the unsoled midfoot portion of the bottom 16. Except for these tapered ends, the midsole 34 and the underlying 20. portion of the outsole 32 are each of uniform thickness.

As shown in Figure 4, the taper at the rear end of the outsoles 32 forms a thin, flexible lip 36.

The lip 36 extends a short distance beyond the 25. midsole 34 and is adhered to the overlying forward end region of the saddle bottom 33.

The forefoot midsole 34 performs two major functions. Firstly, it cushions the wearer's forefoot and absorbs shock due to impact of the foot 30. on hard court surfaces. Secondly, because of -13- its low shear modulus, it. will shear in all directions in a plane parallel to the court surface, allowing relative horizontal movement in all directions between the outsole 32 and the board 25 5. and, hence, between the outsole 32 and the wearer's foot. The outsole 32 is therefore capable of moving relative to the board 25 and the sockliner 28. Tnis built-in shearing action of the midsole 34 has two significant benefits.

. Firstly, it reduces the extent of sliding on the court surface, which, in turn, reduces wear-producing abrasion to increase the functional life of the shoe. Secondly, the foot has less tendency to jam in the shoe especially when the wearer makes an 15. abrupt stop on the court surface.

The forefoot board 25 also performs a number of important functions. Without it, the soled, footsupporting bottom of the shoe may curve or curl up in the forefoot region so that in cross-section the 20. shoe's forefoot portion assumes an unstable oval configuration which increases the likelihood of foot roll about the shoe's longitudinal axis. As a result, the wearer encounters difficulty in balancing himself while making the previously 25. mentioned tennis manoeuvers, especially those requiring the player to be upon the balls· or toes of his feet.

In avoiding the foregoing problem, the forefoot board 25 opposes deformation of the shoe into the 30. unstable oval configuration and is sufficiently -14- stiff to maintain the shoe's forefoot support portion flat or at least substantially flat in transverse cross-section throughout the full interior width of the shoe as seen, for example, in Figures 5 5. and 6. The board 25 thereby maintains a stable shoe configuration which resists foot roll to enhance the wearer's balance. Furthermore, by keeping the shoe's forefoot support portion flat or straight across its width, the wearer's toes are allowed to 10. spread naturally within the limits imposed by the maximum width’of the shoe, making it easier for the wearer'to balance himself when he is up on the balls or toes of his feet.

The forefoot board 25 also is sufficiently stiff 15. to distribute the load of the wearer more uniformly throughout the midsole 34.' This load distribution enhances the cushioning and shock-absorbing properties of the midsole and allows the thickness of the midsole 34 to be reduced by a significant extent 20. without any significant trade-off in the cushioning and shock-absorbing properties of the midsole. On the other hand, the board 25 is not so stiff as to make the shoe feel uncomfortably hard.

The toe plate 24 is stiffer than the board 25.

. It and the layer 24a reinforce the board 25 in the region underlying the wearer's toes to provide extra firmness which prevents the wearer's toes from digging into the midsole 34. The toe plate 24 and the layer 24a also provide additional protection to 30. the entire forefoot during dragging of the foot and -15- Coe bumps. Instead of being brittle or rigid, the plate 24, the layer 24a and the board 25 are each somewhat flexible transversely of the shoe's longitudinal axis.

. The rearfoot sole unit 14 underlies just the wearer's rearfoot or heel below the bottom 16 and comprises a ground-engaging outsole 40, a resilient, shock-absorbing midsole 42, and a flat-sided heel plate 44. The midsole 42 is horizontally divided 10. into upper:and lower flat-sided layers 46 and 47 which are formed from closed-cell foamed EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) or other suitable elastically .deformable shock-absorbing foamed closed-cell polymeric material.. The outsoles .32 and 40 are 15. formed from any..suitable.tough, elastically deformable wear-resistant, material.

The heel plate 44 lies between and is adhered to che opposing flat surfaces of the midsole layers 46 and 47 so that the plate is confined in place 20. between the two midsole layers. The midsole layer 46 is adhered to the bottom 16 of the upper, and che outsole 40 is adhered to the midsole layer 47. The midsole and heel plate unit (42, 44) is therefore sandwiched between the bottom 16 and the outsole 40. 25. The place 44 extends throughout the interface between the layers 46 and 47 and is formed from any suitable, substantially non-stretching stiff material. For example, it may be a stiff sheet formed from polyester resin and woven or chopped 30. fibreglass in which the amount of fibreglass present -16- is equal to approximately 25¾ by weight of the sheet.

As shown in Figures 4 and 8, the outsole 40 extends upwardly along the back of the heel and also upwardly along the lateral and medial sides of the 5. heel, the bottom corners of the outsole 40 lying along both sides and at the rear of the heel are smoothly rounded to eliminate any sharp corner edges which would tend to catch on a court surface. The bottom corners of the midsola layer 47 may be 10. squared so that when the midsole 42 is compressed they deform to interfit with the rounded corners of the outsole 40.

As shown in Figure 4, the forward end portions of the midsola layers 46 and 47 and the heel plate 15. 44 are tapered to smoothly merge with the coupling 15 which is defined by the unsoled midfoot region of the bottom 16. The outsole 40 also terminates "at its forward end in a flexible tapered lip portion 52 which extends slightly beyond the raidsole layer 47.

. The lip portion 52 underlies and is adhered to the rearward end region of the bottom portion 33 of the saddle. The lip portion 52 is very thin so that it does not impair the flexibility of the coupling 15. Except for the tapered end portion 52, the thickness 25. of the outsole 40 underlying the midsole layer 47 is substantially uniform. Except for its tapered end, each of the midsole layers 46 and 47 is also of uniform thickness.

Upon impact of Che heel on Che ground, the 30. closed foam of the midsole 42 compresses to absorb -17- Che impact energy. Tne configuration of the human heel is such that without the plate 44, the midsole's central region udder the calcaneus will become highly compressed before the rest of the mid-5. sole begins to compress. Most of the energy will therefore be absorbed in the midsole's central region, and very little energy will be absorbed in the rest of the midsole. Without the plate 44, a greater compressible midsole thickness is 10. consequently required to absorb a given amount of energy as compared with a condition where the midsole is uniformly compressed by the load. The non-uniform compression of the midsole also has the objectionable effect of causing the highly 15. compressed midsole region to degrade more than the rest of the midsole.

In this invention, the heel plate 44 is stiff enough to more uniformly distribute Che heel load over the midsole 42 so that the midsole 42 will 20. compress more uniformly upon impact. As a result, the plate 44 enables the thickness of the midsole 42 to be reduced to place the wearer's heel closer to the ground without diminishing the amount of energy absorbed by the midsole compression and, 25.’ consequently, without causing discomfort due to impact. By more uniformly distributing the heel load on the midsole 42, the plate 44 also reduces the extent of localized degradation in the midsole region under the calcaneus.

. In this invention, the heel plate 44 is somewhat -18- flexible so that upon impact, it will deflect under the heel load to conform to the configuration of the wearer's heel (see Figure 9) to make the shoe feel comfortable. If the plate 44 is made so stiff as to 5. be unflexible, the midsole 42 would feel uncomfortably hard, especially where the impact is great enough to cause the heel to bottom out on the heel plate. The desired stiffness of the plate 44 therefore lies between two extremes, one being where 10. the plate is so stiff that it will not deflect to any appreciable extent under the heel load, and the other being where the plate is so flexible that it approaches the condition which arises when the heel plate is removed.

. Figure 9 shows Che compression of the midsole 42 and the deflection of the plate 44 for a typical dynamic heel load. In this figure, the uncompressed configuration of the midsole 42 and the undeflected state of the plate 44 are shown In phantom lines.

. Referring to Figure 9, the radius of curvature of the plate 44 in Its deflected condition is about 8.0 inches (20.3 cms) for a normal peak heel load of about 375 lbs (170.5 Kgs). Because of this deflection, the midsole 42 will deform to cup the 25. wearer's heel for the wearer's comfort. Furthermore, the midsole 42 will be compressed throughout its entire width, although the extent of compression in the central region 51 under the calcaneus is somewhat more than the midsole compression in the 30. regions 53 adjacent to the side edges of the sole -19- unit 14.

The desired, stiffness of the plate 44 may be obtained by varying either the plate's thickness or the plate's modulus of elasticity, or both, within certain limits. Increasing the heel plate thickness and/or the modulus of elasticity obviously increases the stiffness of the plate 44. The same stiffness of the plate 44 can be achieved with different combinations of values for the plate thickness and modulus of elasticity. Thus, an increased heel plate thickness may be offset by decreasing the plate's modulus of elasticity, and an increased modulus of elasticity may be offset by decreasing the plate's thickness.

To provide the plate 44 with the desired stiffness, the.heel plate's modulus of elasticity or bending modulus, as it is also called, is requited to lie in a range extending from about 500,000 psi (34,500 kg/sq cm) to about 10,000,000 psi (690,000 kg/sq cm) for a minimum plate thickness of about 0.020 inches (0.5 mms). Decreasing either the plate thickness or the modulus of elasticity below the foregoing minimum values results in a plate which is too flexible and which therefore does not adequately distribute the heel load over the entire area of the midsole.

A. heel plate having a thickness of about 0.060 inches (L.5 mms) and a modulus of elasticity not exceeding about 10,000,000 psi (690,000 kg/sq cm) may also be acceptable. Increasing the plate thick- ness above 0.060 inches (1.5 mms) for a plate having a modulus'of elasticity of about 10,000,000 psi (690,000 kg/sq cm), however, makes the heel plate too stiff, causing a discomforting concentration of pressure under the calcaneus. Increasing the modulus of elasticity above 10,000,000 psi (690,000 kg/sq cm) for a plate thicness of about 0.060 inches (1.5 mms) also makes the plate too stiff.

For a low modulus of elasticity of about 500,000 psi (34,000 kg/sq cm), the plate thickness may be as much as approximately 0.100 inches (2.5 mms). Increasing the plate thickness above 0.100 inches (2.5 mms) while reducing the modulus of elasticity is counterproductive because the total thickness of the midsole’/heel plate unit (42, 44) becomes unacceptably thick and thereby places' the wearer's heel· too high above the ground.

Although the plate thickness can be increased to about 0.100 inches (2.5 mms) for a low modulus of about 500,000 psi (34,000 kg/sq cm), the preferred · thickness range extends from about 0.020 inches (0.5 mms) to about 0.080 inches (2 mms).

For the previously described heel plate construction, the plate 44 has a preferred thickness of about 0.040 inches (1 ram) and a preferred modulus of elasticity of about 1.5 million psi (103,500 kg/sq cm).

From the foregoing description it will be appreciated that the plate 44 enables the thickness of the midsole 42 to be reduced significantly to reduce the height of the wearer's heel above the ground without causing discomfort. .Ια contrast to the raised, thickly cushioned heel of a conventional tennis shoe, the heel support surface in the shoe of the present invention is considerably lower and is 5. at least approximately on the same level as the forefoot support surface as described in greater detail below.

The maximum, overall thickness of the rearfoot sole unit 14 extending from the bottom of the 10. outsole 40 to the upwardly facing side of the mid sole layer 46 is preferably equal to or closely equal to the maximum, overall forefoot thickness extending from the bottom of the outsole 32 to the upwardly facing .side of the.,board .25.. The sockliner 15. 28 and the neel pad , 29 are· highly compressible .and thin when compressed so that' they.do not add to the above-ground height of the wearer's forefoot and rearfoot to any.significant extent.

The sockliner's forefoot and rearfoot support 20. regions therefore lie in or at least approximately in a common plane which, in turn, extends parallel to or at least approximately parallel to the ground surface on which the shoe is placed. By this construction it will be appreciated that the 25. wearer's forefoot and rearfoot are placed at or approximately at a common level which is parallel or at least closely parallel to the ground surface.

The heel pad 29, when used, does not lift the wearer's heel above the forefoot to any noticeable 30. or significant extent.

By keeping Che wearer’s rearfoot 'low to the ground along with the wearer's ‘forefoot, the wearer has more stability and balance. Furthermore, by reducing the thickness of the rearfoot sole unit 14 5. through the utilization of the plate 44, the loading exerted by the wearer is transferred or shifted forwardly. The lowness of the heel in the tennis shoe of this invention thus induces the tennis player to stay up on the balls of his feet in a 10. preferred tennis-playing posture.

The reduction of the thickness of the sole unit 14 through the use of the stiffening plate 44 has the additional, significant advantage of shortening the moment arm & (Figure 4) lying between the 15. wearer's ankle jointvand the point P (see Figure 4) at the rearward edge of the' heel sole unit 14 by effectively moving the point P up towards the ankle. Under conditions where the player steps out and strikes the court surface first at point P, he 20. pivots about point P to slap his forefoot down on the court surface. By shortening the moment arm R, the forefoot slaps less hard than it would in the case of a conventional shoe having a raised heel and hence a longer moment arm. Shortening the moment 25. arm therefore reduces the shock due to slap-down of the forefoot. Reduction of the shock on Che forefoot, in turn, permits the thickness of the forefoot midsole 34 to be reduced without causing discomfort. The low foot support surface in the shoe of the 30. present invention also advantageously reduces -23- the angle. through which the wearer must lean in a forward..direction to transfer his load to the ball of his foot and to thereby lock up his midfoot in order to propel himself.

. In one example of the tennis shoe described above, the overall thickness of the rearfoot midsole 42 and t'ne plate 44 is preferably about 9/32 inches (7.1 mms), the thickness of each of the midsole layer 46 and 47 is preferably about 1/8 inches (3.2 10. mms), and the thickness of the rearfoot outsole 40 is preferably about 1/8 inches (3.2 mms) so that the overall·thickness of the rearfoot sole unit 14 is relatively, small and is of the order of 13/32 inches (10.3 mms). At. the. forefoot region,;:the thickness of 15. the midsole 34is preferably about 1/8 inches (3.2 mms) and the thickness of the outsole-32 is preferably about 3/16 inches (4.8 mms). The thicknesses of the insole board 25 and the toe plate 24 are relatively small so that the overall 20. thickness of the composite of the insole board 25, the toe plate 24 and the sola unit 12 is also about 13/32 inches (10.3 mms). The sum of the compressed thickness of the sockliner 28 and the heel pad 29 is less than 1/8 inches (3.2 mms) so that in the 25. illustrated embodiment the height of the foot above the ground is less than about 17/32 inches (13.5 mms) and preferably does not exceed 5/8 inches (15.9 mms) .

From the foregoing description it will be 30. appreciated-that in order to place the wearer's heel· -24- close to the ground in accordance with a major aim of the present invention,· the thickness of each of the midsole layers 46 and 47 is required to be relatively small and is preferably about 1/8 inches (3.2 mms). Because of the small thickness of the upper midsole layer 46, it is important that the plate 44 be deflectable to an extent that enables the midsole/plate unit (42, 44) to cup the wearer's heel so that the shoe feels comfortable.

The extent to which the plate 44 is deflectable under a given load depends not only on its stiffness, but' also on the thickness of the upper raidsole layer 46. In this regard, decreasing the thickness of the midsole layer 46 increases the load concentration under'the heel, which in turn increases the extent of deflection of the plate 44. Conversely, increasing the thickness of the midsole layer 46 decreases the load concentration to decrease the extent of. the heel plate deflection.

If, for example, the thickness of the midsole layer 46 were increased to about 3/8 inches (9.6 mms) and the plate 44 were made relatively stiff (such as one having a thickness of about 0.060 inches (1.5 mms) or more and a modulus of elasticity of about 1,000,000 psi (690,000 kg/sq cm) or more, the plate 44 would not deflect to any significant extent under a normal heel load. Aside from the effect on the plate 44, it is evident that an upper midsole layer thickness of about 3/8 inches (9.6 mms) makes the midsole/heel plate unit (42, 44) unacceptably thick -25- because ic places the heel too high above the ground.

From the foregoing description it is clear that the stiffness range throughout which the plate 44 is deflectable to an acceptable extent depends on the 5. thickness which is selected for the upper midsole layer 46. The upper limits of the ranges sat forth above for the thickness and modulus of elasticity of the plate 44 are based on an upper midsole layer thickness of about 1/8 inches (3.2 mms).

. Because of the deflection of the plate 44 under the wearer's heel load, both of the midsole layers 46 and 47 will operate to cushion the wearer's heel in the sense that they can be compressed to a greater extent in .the .region underlying the wearer's 15. calcaneus as shown in. Figure 9. 3ecause of the soleless· midfoot coupling construction between the sole units 12 and 14, the two sola units are interconnected oaly through the upper's highly flexible midfoot region of the bottom 20. 16 which is formed by the pliable bottom portions of the panels 17 and 18 and the pliable bottom 33 of the saddle. When the shoe is laced up, the saddle 31 provides a secure girth-like grip around the foot in the midfoot region and flexibly hugs the foot 25. just in the midfoot region without constraining the natural motions of the different parts of the wearer's foot. Preferably the lacing lying fowardly of the saddle 31 in the forefoot region is looser than the lacing adjacent to the saddle's side 30. portions 35 and 37 to avoid constraints on the -26- forefoot.· This may be accomplished with a dual lacing system.

From the foregoing description it also will be appreciated that the flexible coupling 15 removes 5. the constraints which exist in conventional tennis shoes between the forefoot and rearfoot. The coupling 15 thus allows virtually unrestrained relative motion between the wearer's rearfoot or heel and the forefoot so that the rearfoot and 10. forefoot are free to act independently of each other in the manner that they do when the person is barefooted.

Because the thicknesses of the sole units 12 and 14 are very small, the soleless, flexible midfoot 15. coupling 15 is also'very low to the ground. This feature together with the lack of any longitudinal medial arch support in the shoe places the shoe's midfoot load-bearing region under the long outside arch much lower to the ground as compared with 20. conventional tennis shoes. This construction significantly reduces the chances of ankle sprain and enhances the wearer's stability and balance.

Instead of being flat-sided as shown, the plate 44 may be contoured.

. It will be appreciated that the construction of the left foot athlete shoe is the mirror image of the illustrated right foot shoe. It also will be appreciated that the plate 44 is springy in the sense that it will return to its illustrated 30. undeflected state when deflecting forces are removed.

Claims (5)

1. 3. A shoe as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 in which the sole unit is of uniform thickness under the wearer's calcaneus. 5. 4. A shoe'as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 3 in which the thickness of each of the said layers is uniform in the region underlying the wearer's calcaneus.' 10. 5. A shoe as claimed in Claim 4 in which the thickness of the said upper layer under the wearer's calcaneus is about 1/8 inches (3.2 mm).

2. 5. A shoe as claimed in Claim 5 in which the 15. thickness of the said lower layer under the wearer's calcaneus is about 1/8 inches (3.2 mm).

3. 7. A shoe as claimed in Claim 5 or Claim δ in which the thickness of the said plate is at least 20. 0.020 inches (0.5 mm) and has a modulus of elasticity in a range extending from 5000,000 psi (3.45 x 109 Pascals) to 10,000,000 psi (6.90 x 10u Pascals), in which the thickness of the said plate does not exceed 0.060 inches (1.5 mm) and in which 25. the modulus of elasticity is about 10,000,000 psi (6.90 x loll Pascals).

4. 8. A shoe as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 7 in which the said plate has a thickness of about 30, 0.040 inches (1 mm) and a modulus of elasticity of about 1.5 million psi (1.03 x 10l2 Pascals). Dated this 2nd day of April 1990. BY: TOMKINS SCO., Applicants' Agents, (SIGNED):

5. , Dartmouth Road, DUBLIN 6.