GB2624810A - Prediction of dewar failure - Google Patents
Prediction of dewar failure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2624810A GB2624810A GB2403123.9A GB202403123A GB2624810A GB 2624810 A GB2624810 A GB 2624810A GB 202403123 A GB202403123 A GB 202403123A GB 2624810 A GB2624810 A GB 2624810A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- shipper
- failure
- sensor
- prediction system
- likelihood
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims 7
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 claims 5
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims 4
- 238000003066 decision tree Methods 0.000 claims 2
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
- G06Q10/0832—Special goods or special handling procedures, e.g. handling of hazardous or fragile goods
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F17—STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F17C—VESSELS FOR CONTAINING OR STORING COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED OR SOLIDIFIED GASES; FIXED-CAPACITY GAS-HOLDERS; FILLING VESSELS WITH, OR DISCHARGING FROM VESSELS, COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED, OR SOLIDIFIED GASES
- F17C3/00—Vessels not under pressure
- F17C3/02—Vessels not under pressure with provision for thermal insulation
- F17C3/08—Vessels not under pressure with provision for thermal insulation by vacuum spaces, e.g. Dewar flask
- F17C3/085—Cryostats
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N20/00—Machine learning
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
- G06N5/01—Dynamic search techniques; Heuristics; Dynamic trees; Branch-and-bound
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
- G06Q10/0835—Relationships between shipper or supplier and carriers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Method, system, apparatus, and/or device for predicting the failure of a shipper. The failure prediction system includes a first sensor configured to detect or measure first sensor data. The failure prediction system includes a memory configured to store a dewar failure model that models a failure of various shippers given one or more constraints. The failure prediction system includes a processor coupled to the memory and the first sensor. The processor is configured to estimate or predict a probability or a likelihood that a shipper will fail before or during a subsequent shipment of the shipper based on the first sensor data and the dewar failure model. The processor is configured to provide the estimated probability or likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper.
Claims (20)
1. A failure prediction system, comprising: a first sensor configured to detect or measure first sensor data; a memory configured to store a dewar failure model that models a failure of various shippers given one or more constraints; and a processor coupled to the memory and the first sensor and configured to: estimate or predict a probability or a likelihood that a shipper will fail before or during a subsequent shipment of the shipper based on the first sensor data and the dewar failure model, and provide the estimated probability or likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper.
2. The failure prediction system of claim 1, further comprising: a display configured to output the estimated probability or likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper.
3. The failure prediction system of claim 1, further comprising: a user interface configured receive user input that indicates whether the shipper failed before, during or after the subsequent shipment of the shipper; wherein the processor is configured to: update the dewar failure model based on the user input and the sensor data in real-time.
4. The failure prediction system of claim 1, wherein the sensor includes at least one of a temperature sensor, a shock or vibration sensor, or a pressure sensor and the sensor data includes at least one of a temperature within the shipper, shocks or vibrations to the shipper or a pressure within the shipper.
5. The failure prediction system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during a subsequent shipment of the shipper using a machine learning algorithm.
6. The failure prediction system of claim 5, wherein the machine learning algorithm is a boosted decision tree algorithm.
7. The failure prediction system of claim 1, wherein to estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper the processor is configured to estimate or predict a probability or a likelihood that a dynamic holding time of the shipper is less than a threshold amount.
8. The failure prediction system of claim 1, further comprising: a second sensor configured to measure or detect second sensor data, wherein the first sensor is a temperature sensor and the first sensor data is a temperature within the shipper and the second sensor is a pressure sensor and the second sensor data is a pressure within the shipper.
9. The failure prediction system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to: obtain user input that indicates a type, model or identifier of the shipper; obtain maintenance information related to the type, model or the identifier of the shipper; and estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper further based on the maintenance information and the user input.
10. The failure prediction system of claim 9, wherein the maintenance information includes a number of thermal or temperature cycles that the shipper has undergone.
11. A failure prediction system, comprising: a processor configured to: obtain at least one of maintenance information or sensor data, estimate or predict a probability or a likelihood that a shipper will fail before or during a subsequent shipment of the shipper based on the at least one of the maintenance information or the sensor data and using a machine learning algorithm, and provide to a user the estimated probability or likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper; and a display configured to output to the user the estimated probability or likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper.
12. The failure prediction system of claim 11, further comprising: a memory configured to store a dewar failure model; wherein the processor is configured to estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper further based on the dewar failure model.
13. The failure prediction system of claim 12, further comprising: a user interface configured receive user input that indicates whether the shipper failed before during the subsequent shipment of the shipper; wherein the processor is configured to: update the dewar failure model based on the user input in real-time and the at least one of the maintenance information or the sensor data in real-time.
14. The failure prediction system of claim 11, further comprising: a sensor configured to measure or detect the sensor data, wherein the sensor includes at least one of a temperature sensor, a shock or vibration sensor, or a pressure sensor and the sensor data includes at least one of a temperature within the shipper, shocks or vibrations to the shipper or a pressure within the shipper.
15. The failure prediction system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during a subsequent shipment of the shipper using a machine learning algorithm.
16. The failure prediction system of claim 11, wherein the machine learning algorithm is a boosted decision tree algorithm.
17. The failure prediction system of claim 11 , wherein to estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper the processor is configured to estimate or predict a probability or a likelihood that a dynamic holding time of the shipper is less than a threshold amount.
18. The failure prediction system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is configured to: obtain user input that indicates a type, model or identifier of the shipper; and estimate or predict the probability or the likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper further based on the user input.
19. The failure prediction system of claim 11, wherein the maintenance information includes a number of thermal or temperature cycles that the shipper has undergone.
20. A method for predicting failure of a shipper, comprising: obtaining, by a processor, a dewar failure model that models a failure of various shippers; detecting or measuring, by a sensor, sensor data that relates to a failure of the shipper; estimating or predicting, by the processor, a probability or a likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during a subsequent shipment of the shipper based on the sensor data and the dewar failure model; and displaying, by the processor and on a display, the estimated probability or likelihood that the shipper will fail before or during the subsequent shipment of the shipper.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/477,381 US20230082374A1 (en) | 2021-09-16 | 2021-09-16 | Prediction of dewar failure |
PCT/US2022/043431 WO2023043774A1 (en) | 2021-09-16 | 2022-09-14 | Prediction of dewar failure |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB202403123D0 GB202403123D0 (en) | 2024-04-17 |
GB2624810A true GB2624810A (en) | 2024-05-29 |
Family
ID=90941570
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB2403123.9A Pending GB2624810A (en) | 2021-09-16 | 2022-09-14 | Prediction of dewar failure |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP4381446A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2624810A (en) |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20140015045A (en) * | 2012-07-27 | 2014-02-06 | 한국철도기술연구원 | Management method of dangerous article transport car and management apparatus of dangerous article transport car using the method |
WO2017000014A1 (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2017-01-05 | Fixingbits Pty Ltd | Improved delivery systems and methods |
JP2020135483A (en) * | 2019-02-20 | 2020-08-31 | 慎平 大杉 | Artificial intelligence system, artificial intelligence device, display control device, artificial intelligence system control method, information processing method, artificial intelligence program, and program |
US20210158284A1 (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2021-05-27 | Carrier Corporation | Interactive system for planning future shipments |
KR20210074258A (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2021-06-21 | 쿠팡 주식회사 | Computerized systems and methods for facilitating package redelivery |
-
2022
- 2022-09-14 EP EP22870594.3A patent/EP4381446A1/en active Pending
- 2022-09-14 GB GB2403123.9A patent/GB2624810A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20140015045A (en) * | 2012-07-27 | 2014-02-06 | 한국철도기술연구원 | Management method of dangerous article transport car and management apparatus of dangerous article transport car using the method |
WO2017000014A1 (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2017-01-05 | Fixingbits Pty Ltd | Improved delivery systems and methods |
US20210158284A1 (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2021-05-27 | Carrier Corporation | Interactive system for planning future shipments |
JP2020135483A (en) * | 2019-02-20 | 2020-08-31 | 慎平 大杉 | Artificial intelligence system, artificial intelligence device, display control device, artificial intelligence system control method, information processing method, artificial intelligence program, and program |
KR20210074258A (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2021-06-21 | 쿠팡 주식회사 | Computerized systems and methods for facilitating package redelivery |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP4381446A1 (en) | 2024-06-12 |
GB202403123D0 (en) | 2024-04-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11573877B2 (en) | Distributed architecture for fault monitoring | |
US20190220345A1 (en) | Forecasting workload transaction response time | |
US11650557B2 (en) | Learning apparatus, learning method, computer readable medium having recorded thereon learning program, determination apparatus, determination method, and computer readable medium having recorded thereon determination program | |
US20180348269A1 (en) | Abnormality diagnosis apparatus and abnormality diagnosis method | |
RU2009139055A (en) | METHOD FOR MONITORING AND / OR DETERMINING THE STATE OF THE POWER MEASURING DEVICE AND THE POWER MEASURING DEVICE | |
US20210278830A1 (en) | System and method for diagnosing pneumatic control valve online | |
JP2013016162A (en) | Method, monitoring system and computer program product for monitoring health of monitored system utilizing associative memory method | |
WO2016195092A1 (en) | Anomaly sensing device | |
GB2589468A (en) | System for determining the status of a gas cylinder | |
US20170306726A1 (en) | Stuck pipe prediction | |
EP3904987B1 (en) | Control support apparatus, control support method, control support program, computer readable medium with control support program recorded thereon and control system | |
CA3156834A1 (en) | Method for leakage detection | |
CN109598382B (en) | Service life prediction method and device | |
GB2624810A (en) | Prediction of dewar failure | |
Heikes et al. | Alternative process models in the economic design of T2 control charts | |
Gabda et al. | Discussion of" statistical modeling of spatial extremes" by ac davison, sa padoan and m. ribatet | |
JP2015133115A (en) | remaining useful life determination method | |
JP7222344B2 (en) | Determination device, determination method, determination program, learning device, learning method, and learning program | |
KR20210087373A (en) | Apparatus for diagnosing plant failure and method therefor | |
JP6742014B1 (en) | Abnormality discrimination method for structure and abnormality discrimination system | |
Laermann | Assessment of structural integrity and durability—a task of experimental mechanics | |
JP2021096842A5 (en) | ||
KR101561015B1 (en) | Optimal vibration control system based Embedded Software Technology for maintenance of smart structure | |
US20230046709A1 (en) | Prediction apparatus, prediction method, and program | |
KR102319386B1 (en) | Apparatus and method of calculating failure intensity |