GB2558937A

GB2558937A - Anti-roll mechanism for road vehicle

Info

Publication number: GB2558937A
Application number: GB1701068.7A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Garcia Vazquez Antonio
Original assignee: Nissan Motor Manufacturing UK Ltd
Current assignee: Nissan Motor Manufacturing UK Ltd
Priority date: 2017-01-23
Filing date: 2017-01-23
Publication date: 2018-07-25
Also published as: EP3351409A1; GB201701068D0; EP3351409B1; ES2894280T3

Abstract

A vehicle anti-roll mechanism 32 includes an anti-roll bar 34 having a central, transversely mounted section (36, Fig. 4) and a pair of longitudinal lever arm sections (38L, 38R). Said arm sections are operatively coupled to the vehicle via sliding bushes 42, so that their effective lengths are varied automatically in response to suspension movement. Compression of one wheel suspension reduces the effective length of its lever arm section, increasing the effective stiffness of the anti-roll bar on that side; whereas extension of the suspension has the opposite effect. In a preferable embodiment, the vehicle has a rigid axle 24; the central section 36 of the anti-roll bar is mounted to the axle 24; and the sliding bushes are pivotally mounted to the vehicle body. Furthermore, the sliding bushes may comprise a transverse slot in which a respective lever arm is slidably engaged.

Description

(71) Applicant(s):

Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Ltd (Incorporated in the United Kingdom)

Nissan Technical Centre Europe, Moulsoe Road, Cranfield Technology Park, CRANFIELD, Bedfordshire, MK43 0DB, United Kingdom (56) Documents Cited:

GB 2351951 A WO 1993/024340 A1 JPS59179415 JPS59179416

WO 2008/054265 A1 (58) Field of Search:

INT CL B60G Other: EPODOC, WPI (72) Inventor(s):

Antonio Garcia Vazquez (74) Agent and/or Address for Service:

Nissan Motor Manufacturing (UK) Ltd Nissan Technical Centre Europe, Moulsoe Road, Cranfield Technology Park, CRANFIELD, Bedfordshire, MK43 0DB, United Kingdom (54) Title of the Invention: Anti-roll mechanism for road vehicle

Abstract Title: Variable response anti roll bar with sliding mounts (57) A vehicle anti-roll mechanism 32 includes an anti-roll bar 34 having a central, transversely mounted section (36, Fig. 4) and a pair of longitudinal lever arm sections (38L, 38R). Said arm sections are operatively coupled to the vehicle via sliding bushes 42, so that their effective lengths are varied automatically in response to suspension movement. Compression of one wheel suspension reduces the effective length of its lever arm section, increasing the effective stiffness of the anti-roll bar on that side; whereas extension of the suspension has the opposite effect. In a preferable embodiment, the vehicle has a rigid axle 24; the central section 36 of the anti-roll bar is mounted to the axle 24; and the sliding bushes are pivotally mounted to the vehicle body. Furthermore, the sliding bushes may comprise a transverse slot in which a respective lever arm is slidably engaged.

At least one drawing originally filed was informal and the print reproduced here is taken from a later filed formal copy.

1/4

1204 17

1Ω

2/4

1204 17

FR.^·

3/4

1204 17

4/4

1204 17

Anti-Roll Mechanism for Road Vehicle

Technical Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to an anti-roll mechanism for a vehicle;

and more particularly to a variable response anti-roll mechanism for a vehicle. The 5 invention also relates to a vehicle comprising a variable response anti-roll mechanism.

Background to the Invention

An anti-roll bar, also known as a torsion stability bar or sway bar, is commonly used as a part of the suspension system in many road vehicles to reduce body roll during cornering and over road irregularities. Known anti-roll bars are typically constructed from a cylindrical steel bar formed generally into a U shape to define a central section which is mounted transversely across the vehicle, and a pair of longitudinal lever arms. In a typical arrangement for a vehicle having independent suspension, the central transverse section is mounted to the body of the vehicle by a means of a pair of spaced supports; and each lever arm is attached to a suspension member supporting the wheel on its respective side of the vehicle.

This arrangement can also be used with a rigid axle. Where a vehicle has a rigid axle, there is also the option of mounting the central transverse section to the rigid axle; and for the lever arms to be operatively attached to the body on respective sides of the vehicle. In either arrangement, where the suspension on one side of the vehicle is compressed or extended relative to the suspension on the other side; say during cornering, or when going over uneven terrain; the bar is subjected to torsion, and the central section is twisted. The anti-roll bar resists this torsion through its stiffness, resulting in a partial connection between the movements of both wheels, with a shorter compression of the compressed side and a shorter extension of the extended side, so that the roll angle of the vehicle is reduced.

The effective stiffness of a conventional anti-roll bar is predominantly determined by its geometry, and by the mechanical properties of the material from 5 which it is constructed. The geometric characteristics of an anti-roll bar which affect its stiffness include the length between the spaced supports of the central transverse section; the length of the lever arms; and the geometry of the cross-section of the stabilizer bar. Since a simple anti-roll bar has substantially constant material properties and geometry, the effective stiffness of the anti-roll bar remains substantially constant.

It has been found that the performance of a conventional anti-roll bar mechanism with constant effective stiffness can adversely affect the rebound behaviour of the vehicle suspension; resulting in poor comfort, and reduced tyre grip on uneven surfaces. This can be more pronounced in no-load or low-load conditions of the vehicle. With a conventional anti-roll bar arrangement, the torsional moment at any given instant is constant along the central transverse section. This means that with a conventional anti-roll bar arrangement of identical arm lengths on both sides, the antiroll moment is shared 50/50 between both wheels.

Accordingly, when a vehicle with a conventional anti-roll bar corners; and the suspension on the outside compresses causing the anti-roll bar to twist; the bar resists this torsion and applies a downward force on the outside suspension, and an equal upward force on the inside suspension, to reduce body roll. The downward force applied on the outside tends to bias the outer wheel downwards relative to the body; whilst the upward force applied on the inside tends to raise the inner wheel. This is not favourable for the inner wheel when turning, as it reduces adherence of the inner wheel to the road.

Active anti-roll systems have been developed for vehicles to address the limitations of the conventional anti-roll bar arrangement. For example, EP 2,719,557 5 Al discloses an active anti-roll bar in which the spaced supports for the central transverse section are mounted on a motorized linear guide, so that the spacing between them can be actively varied whilst the vehicle is in motion. This alters the geometry of the anti-roll bar; and so modifies its effective stiffness. However, such active systems tend to be complex, and are more expensive than conventional anti-roll bar arrangements; requiring additional components and appropriate control technology.

There is a need for an alternative anti-roll mechanism for a vehicle which overcomes, or at least mitigates, some or all of the drawbacks of known anti-roll mechanisms.

There is also a need for an alternative anti-roll mechanism for a vehicle, which is capable of providing variable response; but which is simpler and less expensive than known active anti-roll systems.

Summary of the Invention

Aspects of the invention relate to an anti-roll mechanism for a vehicle; and to a vehicle.

According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided an anti-roll mechanism as claimed in claim 1.

Further optional features of the anti-roll mechanism are set out in claims 2 and

3.

According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a vehicle comprising an anti-roll mechanism, as claimed in claim 4.

Detailed Description of the Invention

In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, an embodiment thereof will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:

Figure 1 is a side view of a motor vehicle comprising an anti-roll mechanism in accordance with an aspect of the invention;

Figure 2 is a perspective view from the rear and to one side of part of the rear axle region of the vehicle of Figure 1, illustrating an embodiment of an anti-roll mechanism in accordance with an aspect of the invention;

Figure 3 is a view from the rear of the rear axle region shown in Figure 2;

Figure 4 is a schematic plan view of the anti-roll mechanism in Figures 2 and 3;

Figure 5 is a view from the side of Figure 4 taken in the direction of arrow F5;

Figure 6 is a perspective view of a sliding bush forming part of the anti-roll mechanism of Figures 2 to 5;

Figure 7 is a perspective view of an anti-roll bar forming part of the anti-roll mechanism of Figures 2 to 5; and

Figures 8 to 10 are a series of views similar to that of Figure 5, illustrating operation of the anti-roll mechanism of Figures 2 to 5.

Figure 1 illustrates a road vehicle 10 in the form of a pick-up truck having a body 12 supported via a suspension system on a pair of front wheels 14 and a pair of 5 rear wheels 16. This Figure also shows a longitudinal axis X-X of the vehicle; and a vertical axis SM-SM of the vehicle.

The term “vehicle body” is used herein to refer generally to the main structure of the vehicle which is mounted on the wheels through the suspension system; and can include any chassis or structural frame which is incorporated in, or forms part of, the main structure.

The vehicle body 12 includes a ladder frame chassis having a pair of longitudinal chassis frame members 18, 20 and one or more transverse cross members 22 (Fig. 3). The longitudinal chassis frame members 18, 20 are spaced apart laterally and extend generally in a longitudinal direction of the vehicle, which is to say in a direction from the front to the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle has a rigid rear axle 24 mounted to the vehicle body 12 by means of a leaf spring suspension system which allows for relative movement between the vehicle body 12 and the rear axle 24/rear wheels 16. The leaf spring suspension system includes leaf springs 26F, 26R mounted on either side of rear axle 24. Each leaf spring 26 is attached at either end to a respective one of the longitudinal chassis frame members 18, 20; with the rear end of each leaf spring being connected with the longitudinal chassis frame member 18, 20 through a short swinging arm 27. The leaf spring suspension system also includes a pair of hydraulic dampers 28 operative between the axle 24 and a cross member 22 of the ladder frame chassis. Figures 2 and 3 only show the leaf spring 26 and damper 28 arrangement in detail on the left hand side of the vehicle; but it will be appreciated that a similar leaf spring and damper arrangement is provided on the right hand side.

The vehicle 10 has an anti-roll mechanism 32 in accordance with an aspect of 5 the invention operative at the rear axle line. The anti-roll mechanism 32 includes an anti-roll or torsion bar 34. The anti-roll bar is generally U shaped, having a central transverse section 36 (Fig. 4) and longitudinal lever arm sections 38L, 38R (Fig. 4) at either end, which extend at an angle (typically around ninety degrees) to the central section 36. The anti-roll bar can be made of any suitable material; and could be a solid bar, or tubular. Suitable materials from which the anti-roll bar can be formed include but are not limited to: metals, such as spring steel; composite material; and fibre reinforced plastics.

The central section 36 of the anti-roll bar extends transversely in a lateral direction of the vehicle 10; and is mounted along a rear face of the rear axle 24 by means of two laterally spaced supports 40L, 40R (Fig. 4). The supports 40 can be of any suitable type, including any known supports used for mounting the central section of an anti-roll bar in a vehicle. Each support 40 typically includes a bush mounted in a housing attached to the axle casing. The bushes may comprise an elastic material for absorbing shocks. The central section 36 of the anti-roll bar is able to rotate about its axis within the bushes.

The lever arm sections 38 of the anti-roll bar 34 extend rearwardly in a generally longitudinal direction of the vehicle 10, and are operatively connected to the vehicle body chassis frame by means of respective sliding bushes 42L, 42R. Each sliding bush is mounted to a respective one of the longitudinal chassis frame members 18, 20;

and has an aperture 44 in which the respective lever arm section 38 is received, so that the lever arm section can slide longitudinally relative to the bush. Typically, the direction of relative movement between each lever arm section 38 and its respective sliding bush 42 is substantially coincident with the longitudinal direction of the vehicle; but it will at least have a component that is in a longitudinal direction of the vehicle.

Figure 6 shows one of the sliding bushes 42 in more detail. The bush has a metallic housing having a main body 46 formed into an elongate, flattened hollow oval shape. A pair of longitudinally extending mounting flanges 48 project upwardly from the upper surface of the main body 46; and are spaced apart for location on either side of a corresponding mounting flange 49 (Fig. 5) on the respective longitudinal chassis frame member. Aligned apertures 50 in the flanges receive a fastener for attaching the housing to the corresponding mounting flange or chassis frame member so that the bush 42 can pivot about an axis Z-Z (Fig. 4; this axis is transverse to the longitudinal vehicle axis X-X in Fig. 1). A liner 52 of bearing material is located about the interior surface of the main body. The liner 52 may be made of nylon; or of any other suitable hard wearing bearing material.

The aperture 44 is in the form of a transverse slot having a height which is slightly larger than the corresponding dimension of the lever arm section 38 and a width a which is significantly larger than the corresponding dimension of the lever arm section 38. This results in a small vertical clearance d between the lever arm section 38 and the inner surfaces of the liner which define the aperture 44; but a much larger transverse clearance. The large transverse clearance allows for lateral movement of the lever arm section 38 within the bush 42 in order to accommodate changes in transverse projection when the wheels move in different directions and to compensate for elastic deformation within the suspension system during cornering. This helps to ensure that the lever arm sections 38 are able to slide freely within the bushes whilst the vehicle is in motion.

The anti-roll bar 34 itself is illustrated schematically in Figure 7 prior to assembly to the vehicle. As shown, in its natural resting condition there is a small vertical off-set e between the horizontal centre lines of the two lever arm sections 38.

The off-set e and the vertical clearance d are configured so that when the anti-roll bar is mounted to the vehicle, one of the lever arm sections 38 is resiliently biased into contact with the upper surface of a bush lining 52; and the other with the lower surface of the corresponding bush lining. This arrangement takes up any free play between the lever arm sections 38 and the bushes 42, so that the lever arm sections 38 do not rattle freely in the bushes 42; whilst the clearance d allows for a degree of tolerance in manufacturing and mounting of the anti-roll bar and sliding bushes.

Each sliding bush 42 is mounted to its respective longitudinal chassis frame member 18, 20 such that it can tilt upwardly and downwardly to accommodate rotation of the lever arm sections 38, as the axle 24 moves relative to the body 12 during compression and rebound of the leaf springs 26, substantially along axis SM-SM in Figure 1. In the present embodiment, each sliding bush 42 is mounted for pivotal movement about the axis Z-Z (Fig. 4), which extends in a horizontal plane perpendicular to the direction of relative movement between the lever arm section 38 and the sliding bush 42. Thus, where the lever arm sections 38 extend rearwardly parallel to a longitudinal axis X-X (Fig. 1) of the vehicle 10, the sliding bushes 42 pivot about an axis Z-Z extending horizontally in a transverse direction of the vehicle.

Operation of the anti-roll mechanism 32 will now be described with reference to Figures 8 to 10 in particular, which show the lever arm section 38L on the left hand side of the vehicle.

Figure 8 illustrates the anti-roll mechanism 32 in a static condition for the 5 nominal design load of the vehicle (that is, a laden condition; but neither cornering, nor in bump or rebound). In this condition, the lever arm section 38L has a nominal effective length Yn, measured along the longitudinal direction of the lever arm section between the axis A of the central portion 36 of the anti-roll bar, and the pivotal axis Z of the sliding bush 42L where it is attached to the longitudinal chassis frame member

18.

Figure 9 illustrates a static condition when the leaf spring 26L on the left hand side of the vehicle 10 is fully compressed. This may be due to an increase in the vehicle load; to the wheel on that side hitting a bump; or due to the vehicle taking a right hand turn hard so that the body on the left hand side, which is on the outside of the turn, is pressed down; compressing the suspension. Whilst the movement of axle 24 relative to the body 12 as the leaf spring compresses is predominantly vertical, the lever arm section 38 rotates to become more parallel to chassis frame member 18, sliding through the bushing 42L to bring axes A and Z closer together. As a consequence, and as lever arm 38 moves from being a hypotenuse of a triangle to a horizontal position, the effective length Ys of the lever section is shorter than the nominal effective length Yn.

Figure 10 illustrates a static condition when the leaf spring 26L on the left hand side of the vehicle 10 is in a fully extended, or full rebound state. This may be due to a decrease in the vehicle load, to the wheel on that side entering a hole or depression in the road, or due to the vehicle taking a left hand turn hard; so that the body on the inside of the turn rises up, extending the suspension. In this condition, the central section 36 of the anti-roll bar has moved further away from the sliding bushing 42L as compared with the nominal position (Fig. 8), with the lever arm section sliding in the bushing 42 to accommodate this movement. As a consequence, the effective length Yl of the lever section is longer than the nominal effective length Yn.

It can be seen then that the effective length Y of the lever arm section 38 on either side of the vehicle 12 varies as the suspension on that side of the vehicle compresses and extends; and the axle and wheel move relative to the body. Changing the effective length of the lever arm section 38 varies the effective torsional rate or stiffness of the anti-roll bar 34. In the condition illustrated in Figure 9 where the effective length Ys of lever arm section 38L is reduced compared to the nominal effective length Yn, the mechanical advantage provided by the lever arm section is reduced. A further effect of reducing the effective length Ysof the lever arm section

38L is that the amount of rotation of the central portion 36 resulting from a given amount of suspension movement (i.e. compression or extension of the suspension as the wheel moves relative to the body) is increased. Both of these factors have the effect of increasing the effective torsional rate or stiffness of the anti-roll bar.

Conversely, in the condition as illustrated in Figure 10 where the effective length Yl is increased compared to the nominal effective length Yn, the mechanical advantage provided by the lever arm section 3 8L is increased and the amount of rotation of the central portion 36 resulting from a given amount of suspension movement is decreased. Both of these factors have the effect of decreasing the effective torsional rate or stiffness of the anti-roll bar 34.

The ability of the anti-roll mechanism 32 to automatically vary the effective length Y of the lever arm sections 38 in response to suspension movement has a number of benefits in comparison with conventional anti-roll bar arrangements. Increasing the effective torsional stiffness of the anti-roll bar 34 when the suspension is compressed improves anti-roll performance, say when cornering. Additionally, decreasing the effective torsional stiffness of the anti-roll bar on spring extension improves comfort and tyre-ground adhesion. For example, decreasing the effective torsional stiffness of the anti-roll bar will allow the suspension to react more quickly in keeping a wheel in contact with the road when the wheel enters a hole or depression.

A particular feature of the anti-roll mechanism 32 according to an aspect of the invention is that the effective lengths Y of the lever arm sections 38 on either side are varied independently of one another, allowing the bar to apply proportionally different forces on either side of the vehicle under certain circumstances. For example, when a vehicle 10 fitted with the anti-roll mechanism 32 corners, the suspension on the outside compresses and the effective length Ys of the lever arm section 38 on that side is shortened, increasing the effective torsional stiffness of the anti-roll bar on the outside.

In contrast, the suspension on the inside extends, increasing the effective length Yl of the lever arm section on that side; and so reducing the effective torsional stiffness on the inside. As a consequence, the downward force applied by the bar 34 to the axle on the outside is higher than the upward force applied by the bar to the axle on the inside. The higher downward force applied to the outside reinforces the action of the suspension spring on that side, and reduces body roll; whilst the lower upward force applied on the inside means that there is a reduced tendency for the inner wheel to lift and to lose adhesion with the road surface. Thus the inner suspension is not adversely affected to the same degree as with a conventional anti-roll bar, improving road wheel adhesion.

A further advantage of the anti-roll mechanism 32 in accordance with an aspect of the invention is that the effective stiffness of the anti-roll bar mechanism is automatically varied in dependence on the load of the vehicle. If the load of the vehicle is increased, this compresses the suspension; resulting in a reduction of the effective lengths Y of the lever arm sections 38, and an increase in the effective torsional stiffness of the anti-roll mechanism 32; whilst a reduction in the vehicle load will have the opposite effect.

In the anti-roll mechanism 32, the lever arm sections 38 are inclined at an angle a to the horizontal (Fig. 8) over the majority of the suspension travel. In an advantageous embodiment, the mechanism 32 is configured so that the angle of inclination a is maximised when the suspension is fully expanded as illustrated in Figure 10; and is reduced as close as possible to zero (e.g. horizontal) when the suspension is fully compressed as illustrated in Figure 9.

Various parameters of the sliding bush 42 can be adjusted or tuned to any specific suspension set up. These include the longitudinal offset b (Fig. 6) from the axis

Z to a rear end of the bush; and the vertical offset b’ from the axis Z to the centre of the aperture 44.

It should be appreciated that whilst the anti-roll mechanism 32 has been described for use with a vehicle 10 in the form of a truck having a rigid rear axle, the mechanism can be adapted for use in other types of vehicle having a rigid axle. The anti-roll mechanism 32 can be also be adapted for use in vehicles without a rigid axle, which may have independent suspension on either side. Furthermore, anti-roll mechanisms 32 in accordance with an aspect of the invention can be adapted for use on a front wheel axle of a vehicle as well as at the rear. Although leaf springs are shown in the Figures, the suspension may use other springing media; such as coil springs, torsion bars, or air springs.

In alternative embodiments where the vehicle has a rigid axle, the central transverse section 36 of the anti-roll bar can be mounted to the body of a vehicle, with each of the lever arm sections received in a sliding bush operatively connected to the axle. Alternatively, especially where a vehicle has independent suspension on either side, the central transverse section 36 of the anti-roll bar can be mounted to the body of the vehicle and each of the lever arm sections can be received in a sliding bush operatively connected to a movable suspension member supporting a wheel on its respective side of the vehicle.

The anti-roll mechanism 32 in accordance with an aspect of the invention 15 provides a variable response anti-roll mechanism which is simple and effective; and which does not require the use of motors or actuators to move components of the system, nor use of an electronic control system to vary the response.

The above embodiments are described by way of example only. Many 20 variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims

1. An anti-roll mechanism for a vehicle, the mechanism including an anti-roll bar having a central section and a lever arm section at either end of the central section, the central section being mounted in a transverse direction of the 5 vehicle via a pair of spaced supports and the lever arm sections each being operatively coupled to a mounting on the vehicle by means of a sliding bush.

2. An anti-roll mechanism as claimed in claim 1, wherein the mechanism is configured such that, in use, the effective length of each lever arm section is varied in response to longitudinal sliding movement of the lever arm section

10 relative to its respective sliding bush.

3. An anti-roll mechanism as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the lever arm sections are each arranged substantially perpendicularly to the central section.

4. A vehicle comprising an anti-roll mechanism as claimed in any previous

15 claim, wherein the vehicle has a body supported on a pair of laterally spaced wheels via a suspension system which allows relative movement between said wheels and the body, the effective length of each lever arm section being independently variable in dependence on suspension movement on its respective side of the vehicle.

20

5. A vehicle as claimed in claim 4, wherein the lever arm sections of the anti-roll bar are inclined to the horizontal over the majority of the range of travel of the suspension.

6. A vehicle as claimed in claim 5, wherein the mechanism is configured such that the angle of inclination of each lever arm section is at its maximum when the suspension on its respective side of the vehicle is fully extended and is at its minimum when the suspension is fully compressed.

5

7. A vehicle as claimed in claim 6, wherein the angle of inclination is at or approaching zero (horizontal) when the suspension is fully compressed.

8. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 7, wherein each of said laterally spaced wheels is mounted to the vehicle body by an independent suspension arrangement, the central section of the anti-roll bar being mounted to the body

10 via the spaced supports and the sliding bushes each being mounted to a suspension member on a respective side of the vehicle.

9. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 7, wherein the wheels are mounted to a rigid axle, the central section of the anti-roll bar being mounted to the rigid axle via the spaced supports, each of the sliding bushes being

15 mounted to the body on a respective side of the vehicle.

10. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 7, wherein the wheels are mounted to a rigid axle, the central section of the anti-roll bar being mounted to the body via the spaced supports, each of the sliding bushes being mounted to the axle on a respective side of the vehicle.

20

11. A vehicle as claimed in claim 9 or claim 10, wherein the suspension system comprises a pair of laterally spaced leaf springs mounted between the rigid axle and the vehicle body.

12. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein the sliding bushes are mounted to a chassis forming part of the vehicle body.

13. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 12, wherein each sliding bush is mounted for tilting movement.

5

14. A vehicle as claimed in claim 13, wherein each sliding bush is pivotally mounted to the body or suspension member for pivotal movement about an axis extending generally perpendicular to the direction of relative sliding movement between the sliding bush and the respective lever arm section.

15. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 14, wherein each sliding bush

10 defines a transverse slot in which a respective lever arm section is slidably engaged.

16. A vehicle as claimed in any one of claims 4 to 15, wherein each sliding bush comprises a housing defining an aperture in which a respective lever arm section of the anti-roll bar is received, the aperture being lined with a bearing

15 material.

17. A vehicle comprising an anti-roll mechanism, the vehicle having a pair of laterally spaced rear wheels mounted to a rigid axle and a body mounted to the rigid axle by a suspension arrangement, the mechanism including an anti-roll bar having a central section and a lever arm section at either end of the central

20 section, the central section being mounted in a transverse direction of the vehicle to the rigid axle by a pair of spaced supports and the lever arm sections each being mounted to a sliding bushing pivotally connected on a respective side of the vehicle body.

Intellectual

Property

Office

Application No: GB1701068.7