GB2558289A - Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers - Google Patents
Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2558289A GB2558289A GB1622202.8A GB201622202A GB2558289A GB 2558289 A GB2558289 A GB 2558289A GB 201622202 A GB201622202 A GB 201622202A GB 2558289 A GB2558289 A GB 2558289A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- value
- average
- dependence
- traceability
- gnss
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/01—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/03—Cooperating elements; Interaction or communication between different cooperating elements or between cooperating elements and receivers
- G01S19/07—Cooperating elements; Interaction or communication between different cooperating elements or between cooperating elements and receivers providing data for correcting measured positioning data, e.g. DGPS [differential GPS] or ionosphere corrections
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/01—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/13—Receivers
- G01S19/20—Integrity monitoring, fault detection or fault isolation of space segment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S19/00—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
- G01S19/01—Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
- G01S19/13—Receivers
- G01S19/21—Interference related issues ; Issues related to cross-correlation, spoofing or other methods of denial of service
Abstract
Determining the traceability or accuracy of Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) by receiving a first signal from a first GNSS 203, a second signal from a second GNSS 209. A first and second value is calculated in dependence on data in the first and second signals respectively. One or more of an average and a measure of traceability is then determined based on the first and second values. The first and second values are preferably location values and the average is calculated as a mean or median of the first and second values. Preferably an alert is issued if the traceability exceeds a traceability threshold which is determined based on a long term average of a measure of traceability.
Description
(71) Applicant(s):
Hoptroff London Limited
Trinity Street, London, SE1 1DB, United Kingdom (72) Inventor(s):
Richard George Hoptroff (56) Documents Cited:
US 20160216378 A1 US 20100328150 A1 (58) Field of Search:
INT CL G01S Other: WPI, EPODOC
G01S 19/07 (2010.01)
US 20150293230 A1 (74) Agent and/or Address for Service:
Richard George Hoptroff
Trinity Church Square, LONDON, SE1 4HT,
United Kingdom (54) Title of the Invention: Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers Abstract Title: Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers (57) Determining the traceability or accuracy of Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) by receiving a first signal from a first GNSS 203, a second signal from a second GNSS 209. A first and second value is calculated in dependence on data in the first and second signals respectively. One or more of an average and a measure of traceability is then determined based on the first and second values. The first and second values are preferably location values and the average is calculated as a mean or median of the first and second values. Preferably an alert is issued if the traceability exceeds a traceability threshold which is determined based on a long term average of a measure of traceability.
Figure 2
w
214 '217 ’16
1/8
Figures
Figure 1
2/8
Figure 2
214
3/8
Figure 3
4/8
Figure 4
GPS
Glonass
5/8
Figure 5
509
6/8
Figure 6
7/8
Figure 7 \|Z
Ψ
t Ot
8/8
Figure 8 \1Z
V
Splitter
GPS | Glonass | |
Receiver | Receiver |
Ψ Ψ
L oL
816
Multi-GNSS Method for Measuring Traceability in GNSS Receivers
This invention relates to detecting when the location and timing data reported by Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) receivers are incorrect, for example due to signal jamming, spoofing (the deliberate transmission of an incorrect signal) or an inaccuracy in the data transmitted by the satellites, and for demonstrating that they are correct. It relies on the reception of signals from more than one GNSS system.
For clarity, the term traceable is used to mean there is an unbroken chain of comparisons relating a clock’s reported time to a known standard such as NPL (Teddington), NIST (Boulder, CO), or Rosstandart (Moscow).
The state of the art for determining location and time with reference to a highly accurate source are GNSSs. Referring to figure 1 and using GPS as an example, the correct time is intermittently transmitted 102 from standards institute NIST 101 to a constellation of satellites 103. The satellites 103 maintain on-board high-accuracy clocks which are ‘disciplined’ (their frequency is steered to ensure a near-exact relation to the definition of the second) and ‘traceable’ by reference to the primary source 101. At the same time their ephemerides (their positions over time) are computed using a combination of additional means, including the laws of gravitation, previous ephemeride measurements and the timing of propagation delays between the satellites and NIST.
Each satellite 103 then broadcasts 104 its location and the current time back to earth where it is received and decoded by receiver 105. Multi-satellite triangulation of the propagation delay is used to determine the receiver’s location L (106) and the current time t (107). While only two satellites are shown in figure 1, a minimum of four are required to complete the triangulation in both time and space.
A limitation of the approach is that it is a rather fragile path of traceablity to the reliable 5 source. Changes in the earth’s mass distribution, atmospheric effects, signal jamming and/or spoofing from a terrestrial source 108, software errors and clock physics can all potentially cause drift.
The state of the art in measuring such drift, and thus loss of traceability, is to measure any sudden drop in signal to noise ratio in the received signal, which only really covers matters relating to signal degradation.
An improvement would be to have multiple unbroken chains of comparisons relating a clock’s reported time to multiple known standards, and to quantify traceability as the variance between those multiple unbroken chains of comparisons. Such a measure would allow the degree of error in traceability to be measured.
Accordingly, and with reference to figures 2 and 3, the present invention is as follows:
1. As described above in the state of the art, a first source 201 transmits time to a satellite system 203 which then broadcasts the time to receiver 205 which then outputs a location value 206 and a time value 207 (figure 2)
2. At least one further independent source 208 transmits time to a different satellite system 209 which then broadcasts the time to a different satellite receiver 210 which outputs location value 211 and a time value 212.
3. Independent location values Li (206), L2 (211), etc, and time values ti (207), t2 (212), etc, are sent to computer 213.
4. Computer 213 computes a middle value of independent location values Li (206), L2 (211), etc, such as the mean or median, and outputs this value L (214).
5. Computer 213 computes a middle value of independent time values ti (207), t2 (212), etc, such as the mean or median, and outputs this value t (215).
6. Computer 213 computes a variance of the independent location values Li (206), L2 (211), etc, such as the standard deviation or maximum absolute difference, and outputs this value cL (216).
7. Computer 213 computes a variance of the independent time values ti (207), t2 (212), etc, such as the standard deviation or maximum absolute difference, and outputs this value ct (217).
8. Optionally, computer 213 computes a long term average ctL of ct (217).
9. Optionally, as shown in figure 3, one or more highly accurate clocks (318) are disciplined with reference to time values ti (307) and/or t2 (312), etc, and/or some middle value derived from them to provide additional time value(s) tc (319) to computer 313 in addition to independent time values ti (307), t2 (312), etc. Computer
313 computes middle value t (315) and variance value ct (317) of the time values ti (307), t2 (312), tc (319) etc.
10. Optionally, computer 313 raises an alarm if the variance value ct (317) exceeds a threshold level ctA.
11. Optionally, computer 313 determines threshold level atA relative to the long-term average atL of variance value ct (317).
12. Optionally, as shown in figure 4, if the receiver’s location is known to be fixed, a long term moving average of location values Li (406), and/or L2 (411), etc, and/or some middle value derived by averager (420) that computes additional location value(s) Lc (421) for computer 413 in addition to independent location values Li (406), L2 (411), etc. Computer 413 computes middle value L (414) and variance cL (416) of the location values Li (406), L2 (411), Lc (421) etc.
13. Optionally, computer 413 computes a long term average cLl of cL (416).
14. Optionally, computer 413 raises an alarm if the variance value cL (416) exceeds a threshold level cLa.
15. Optionally, computer 413 determines threshold level cLa relative to the long-term average aLi_ of variance value cL (416).
Users may interpret t (215/315) as the correct time value.
Users may interpret ct (217/317) and/or atL and/or cL (216/416) and/or cLl as measures of the traceability of the time from the sources to the satellite receiver antenna(e), since they are computed from independently derived sources. It does not, of course, protect against any systematic error introduced after signal reception, for example antenna cable length.
Users may interpret L (214/414) as the correct location.
Users may interpret ct (217/317) and cL (216/416) as measures of the traceability of the location of the satellite receiver antenna(e), since they are computed from independently derived sources.
The introduction of a local clock 318 in step 8 provides for some measurement of traceability, which is independent in the short term, in the event of any rapid drift of any time values ti (206), t2 (210), etc.
The use of location averager 320 in step 9 provides a short term measurement of traceability loss in the event of drift of location values Li (406), L2 (411), etc, provided the receivers’ (205/210) location is fixed. The assumption that the location is fixed means that the measurement cL (216/316) is not particularly useful in assessing the traceability of the location L (214/414), but it remains useful in assessing the traceability of the time t (215/315), and for triggering alarms indicating that the GNSS signal is unreliable. This step involves prior art disclosed in patent application GB1622184.8.
The computation of the long term moving average of variances c,L and cLl provide longer term measures of traceability.
An embodiment of the invention is as follows, with reference to figures 5 and 6, which combined represent the embodiment but are separated for clarity:
1. Antenna 501/601 receives multiple GNSS signals.
2. Signal splitter 502/602 feeds the signal to multiple GNSS receivers.
3. First receiver 503/603 decodes the GPS signals to derive a first 1 Pulse Per Second (1PPS) time signal 507, and location data 606 in the form of NMEA serial messages output once per second.
4. Second receiver 509/609 decodes the Glonass signals to derive a second 1PPS time signal 512, and location data 611 in the form of NMEA serial messages output once per second.
5. The resulting 1PPS signals, being pulses at the start of each second, are captured by network interface card 522 with 1 PPS time capture capability 523, such as Intel i210 or Solarflare SFN7322F.
6. Captured time values 524 and 525 are sent to computer 513 that compares them and computes a mean value t (515) which it designates as the start of the second.
7. Computer 513 compares the captured time values 524 and 525 and computes their absolute difference ot (517), which it designates as the measured degree of traceability of the time signal.
8. NMEA location data 606 and 611 are sent to computer 513/613 that compares the reported locations and computes mean values of latitude, longitude and altitude to determine a mean value L (614) which it designates as the antenna location.
9. Computer 513/613 compares NMEA location data 606 and 611 and computes their absolute difference oL (616), in meters, which it designates as the measured degree of traceability of the received signal.
In an alternate embodiment, computer 513 calculates otL, the long term moving average of the absolute difference oL, which it designates as the measured degree of traceability of the received signal.
In an alternate embodiment, computer 613 calculates oLl, the long term moving average of the absolute difference oL, which it designates as the measured degree of traceability of the received signal.
In an alternate embodiment, if oL exceeds a threshold level oLa, an SNMP alert is generated.
Ola is calculated as ten times the long term moving average of the absolute difference oL (616).
In an alternate embodiment, if ot exceeds a threshold level otA, an SNMP alert is generated. OtA is calculated as ten times the long term moving average of the absolute difference ot (517).
In an alternate embodiment, with reference to figure 7, a second computer 726 computes tm, the mean of ti and t2, which is used to discipline atomic clock 727 to obtain a disciplined time signal tc, which is additionally captured by network card 722 and sent to computer 713 and used to calculate t (715) and σ (717).
In an alternate embodiment, with reference to figure 8, computer 813 calculates a long-term moving averages of latitude, longitude and altitude to derive Lm (820), the mean of Li and L2, which is additionally used to calculate L (814) and oL (816).
An alternate embodiment might use multiple antennae, possibly from different manufacturers, rather than a signal splitter, in order to avoid any systematic error induced by the antenna.
An alternate embodiment might, in order to reduce cost, use a single receiver that sequentially decodes signals from successive satellite systems.
An alternate future embodiment might independently decode and compare three satellite systems such as GPS, Glonass and Galileo, and then designate the median values as the time and location, thus protecting against the failure of an individual satellite system.
An alternate future embodiment might independently decode and compare all four anticipated global satellite systems: GPS, Glonass, Galileo and BeiDou-2.
In an alternate embodiment, satellite receivers 503 and 509 might convey the time signals
507 and 512 via the PTP (IEEE 1588) or NTP protocols rather than 1PPS signals.
Claims (22)
1. A method for determining traceability of signals received from satellites, the method comprising the steps of:
receiving a first signal from a first global navigational satellite system (GNSS);
receiving a second signal from a second GNSS;
determining a first value (ti, Li) in dependence upon data in the first signal from the first GNSS;
determining a second value (t2, L2) in dependence upon data in the second signal from the second GNSS; and determining one or more of an average (t, tm, L, Lm) and a measure (ct, ctL, cl, συ J of traceability, in dependence upon the first value (ti, Li) and the second value (t2, L2).
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein one or more of the first value and the second value is a location value (Li, L2) including a longitude, a latitude and/or an altitude.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the average (t, tm, L, Lm) comprises a mean or a median of at least the first value (ti, Li) and the second value (t2, L2).
4. A method as claimed in claim 1,2 or 3, wherein the average (t, tm, L, Lm) comprises a long-term moving average.
5. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the average (t, tm, L, Lm) is determined in dependence upon an additional value (tc, Lc) determined based upon the fact that a receiver is positioned in a fixed location.
6. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the measure (ct, ctL, aL, aLi_) of traceability comprises: a variance; a standard deviation; an absolute difference; a long-term average of variance; a long-term average of standard deviation; or a longterm average of absolute difference.
7. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, additionally comprising disciplining one or more clocks (318) in dependence upon the first value (ti, Li), the second value (t2, L2) and/or the average (t, tm, L, Lm).
8. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, additionally comprising initiating an alert if a measure (ot, otL, oL, cLl) of traceability exceeds a traceability threshold (Cia, Ola).
9. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, additionally comprising determining a traceability threshold (OtA, gla) in dependence upon a long-term average of a measure (ot, otL, oL, oLl) of traceability.
10. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, additionally comprising receiving a third signal from a third GNSS and determining a third value (t3, L3) in dependence upon data in the third signal from the third GNSS, wherein the average (t, tm, L, Lm) and/or the measure (ct, ctL, aL, cLl) of traceability is determined in dependence upon the third value (t3, L3).
11. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, wherein the first value is a first time value (ti), the second value is a second time value (t2) and the average is an average time value (t, tm) determined in dependence upon the first time value (ti) and the second time value (t2), the method additionally comprising the steps of:
determining a first location value (Li) in dependence upon data in a signal from the first GNSS;
determining a second location value (L2) in dependence upon data in a signal from the second GNSS; and determining an average (L, Lm) location value in dependence upon the first location value (Li) and the second location value (L2).
12. An apparatus for determining traceability of signals received from satellites, the apparatus including a processor arranged to:
process a representation of a first signal received from a first global navigational satellite system (GNSS);
process a representation of a second signal received from a second GNSS;
determine a first value (ti, Li) in dependence upon data in the representation of the first signal received from the first GNSS;
determine a second value (t2, L2) in dependence upon data in the representation of the second signal received from the second GNSS; and determine one or more of an average (t, tm, L, Lm) and a measure (ct, otL, oL, oLl) of traceability, in dependence upon the first value (ti, Li) and the second value (t2, L2).
13. An apparatus as claimed in claim 12, wherein one or more of the first value and the second value is a location value (Li, L2) including a longitude, a latitude and/or an altitude.
14. An apparatus as claimed in claim 12 or 13, wherein the average (t, tm, L, Lm) comprises a mean or a median of at least the first value (ti, Li) and the second value (t2, L2).
15. An apparatus as claimed in claim 12, 13 or 14, wherein the average (t, tm, L, Lm) comprises a long-term moving average.
16. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 15, the processor additionally being arranged to determine the average (t, tm, L, Lm) in dependence upon an additional value (tc, Lc) determined based upon the fact that a receiver is positioned in a fixed location.
17. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 16, wherein the measure (ct, ctL, aL, cLl) of traceability comprises: a variance; a standard deviation; an absolute difference; a long-term average of variance; a long-term average of standard deviation; or a long-term average of absolute difference.
18. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 17, arranged to discipline one or more clocks (318) in dependence upon the first value (ti, Li), the second value (t2, L2) and/or the average (t, tm, L, Lm).
19. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 18, arranged to initiate an alert if a measure (ct, ctL, aL, cLl) of traceability exceeds a traceability threshold (atA, Ola).
20. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 19, the processor additionally being arranged to determine a traceability threshold (atA, cLa) in dependence upon a longterm average of a measure (ct, ctL, aL, cLl) of traceability.
21. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 20, the processor additionally being arranged to process a representation of a third signal received from a third GNSS and to determine a third value (t3, L3) in dependence upon data in the representation of the third signal received from the third GNSS, wherein the processor is arranged to determine the average (t, tm, L, Lm) and/or the measure (ct, ctL, cL, cLl) of traceability in dependence upon the third value (t3, L3).
22. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 12 to 21, wherein the first value is a first time value (ti), the second value is a second time value (t2) and the average is an average time value (t, tm) determined in dependence upon the first time value (ti) and
5 the second time value (t2), the processor additionally being arranged to:
determine a first location value (Li) in dependence upon data in a representation of a signal received from the first GNSS;
determine a second location value (L2) in dependence upon data in a representation of a signal received from the second GNSS; and
10 determine an average (L, Lm) location value in dependence upon the first location value (Li) and the second location value (L2).
Intellectual
Property
Office
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1622202.8A GB2558289A (en) | 2016-12-23 | 2016-12-23 | Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1622202.8A GB2558289A (en) | 2016-12-23 | 2016-12-23 | Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB201622202D0 GB201622202D0 (en) | 2017-02-08 |
GB2558289A true GB2558289A (en) | 2018-07-11 |
Family
ID=58360696
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB1622202.8A Withdrawn GB2558289A (en) | 2016-12-23 | 2016-12-23 | Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2558289A (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100328150A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | O2Micro Inc. | Navigation system with error-detection on doppler frequencies of satellite signals |
US20150293230A1 (en) * | 2014-04-15 | 2015-10-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground-based system and method to extend the detection of excessive delay gradients using dual processing |
US20160216378A1 (en) * | 2012-10-05 | 2016-07-28 | Sagem Defense Securite | Inertial navigation system using hybrid navigation via integrated loose coupling |
-
2016
- 2016-12-23 GB GB1622202.8A patent/GB2558289A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100328150A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | O2Micro Inc. | Navigation system with error-detection on doppler frequencies of satellite signals |
US20160216378A1 (en) * | 2012-10-05 | 2016-07-28 | Sagem Defense Securite | Inertial navigation system using hybrid navigation via integrated loose coupling |
US20150293230A1 (en) * | 2014-04-15 | 2015-10-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground-based system and method to extend the detection of excessive delay gradients using dual processing |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB201622202D0 (en) | 2017-02-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11709280B2 (en) | Correction information integrity monitoring in navigation satellite system positioning methods, systems, and devices | |
CN106093978B (en) | A kind of anti-spoofing formula interference signal processing method of GNSS time service type satellite receiver | |
Du et al. | Vulnerabilities and integrity of precise point positioning for intelligent transport systems: Overview and analysis | |
US5748651A (en) | Optimum utilization of pseudorange and range rate corrections by SATPS receiver | |
KR101749371B1 (en) | A method of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) reference station integrity monitoring and a GNSS reference station integrity system | |
Dana | Global Positioning System (GPS) time dissemination for real-time applications | |
US7576690B2 (en) | Position determination with reference data outage | |
US8593342B2 (en) | Utilizing SBAS signals to improve GNSS receiver performance | |
US8610624B2 (en) | Satellite navigation system fault detection based on biased measurements | |
JPH10508686A (en) | Differential GPS ground station system | |
JP6262248B2 (en) | Method and associated apparatus for estimating error level in satellite geolocation measurement and monitoring reliability of said estimation | |
EP1862809A1 (en) | GNSS signal integrity indicator | |
EP2418515A1 (en) | Integrity method for differential corrections | |
Rodríguez-Pérez et al. | Inter-satellite links for satellite autonomous integrity monitoring | |
WO2013177152A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining position in a global navigation satellite system | |
US9638806B2 (en) | System and method for detecting ambiguities in satellite signals for GPS tracking of vessels | |
Krawinkel et al. | Benefits of chip scale atomic clocks in GNSS applications | |
WO2009130305A1 (en) | Method of positioning using satellites | |
US20130135144A1 (en) | Synchronized measurement sampling in a navigation device | |
Gioia et al. | Estimation of the GPS to Galileo Time Offset and its validation on a mass market receiver | |
Joardar et al. | Analyses of different types of errors for better precision in GNSS | |
GB2558289A (en) | Multi-GNSS method for measuring traceability in GNSS receivers | |
KR101705882B1 (en) | Apparatus for detecting cycle slip using position information of receiver in reference station environment and the method thereof | |
EP3748401A1 (en) | System and method for position determination of a stationary gnss receiver using a distributed time signal | |
Preston | GPS multipath detection and mitigation timing bias techniques |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
COOA | Change in applicant's name or ownership of the application |
Owner name: HOPTROFF LONDON LIMITED Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RICHARD GEORGE HOPTROFF |
|
WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |