GB2554763A - Improvements to contact lenses - Google Patents

Improvements to contact lenses Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2554763A
GB2554763A GB1617189.4A GB201617189A GB2554763A GB 2554763 A GB2554763 A GB 2554763A GB 201617189 A GB201617189 A GB 201617189A GB 2554763 A GB2554763 A GB 2554763A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
lens
zone
central
contact
contact lens
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB1617189.4A
Other versions
GB201617189D0 (en
Inventor
David Cantor Brian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to GB1617189.4A priority Critical patent/GB2554763A/en
Publication of GB201617189D0 publication Critical patent/GB201617189D0/en
Priority to PCT/GB2017/052601 priority patent/WO2018069665A1/en
Publication of GB2554763A publication Critical patent/GB2554763A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02CSPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00Optical parts
    • G02C7/02Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/04Contact lenses for the eyes
    • G02C7/047Contact lens fitting; Contact lenses for orthokeratology; Contact lenses for specially shaped corneae
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02CSPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00Optical parts
    • G02C7/02Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/04Contact lenses for the eyes
    • G02C7/048Means for stabilising the orientation of lenses in the eye
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02CSPECTACLES; SUNGLASSES OR GOGGLES INSOFAR AS THEY HAVE THE SAME FEATURES AS SPECTACLES; CONTACT LENSES
    • G02C7/00Optical parts
    • G02C7/02Lenses; Lens systems ; Methods of designing lenses
    • G02C7/04Contact lenses for the eyes
    • G02C7/041Contact lenses for the eyes bifocal; multifocal

Abstract

A contact lens 10, suitable for use by a patient with keratoconus of the cornea, comprises a continuous arcuate anterior surface 12 and a posterior surface 11 comprising at least three distinct zones. These are a circular outer zone 13 with a consistent arcuate surface, a central domed zone 15 with smaller radius of curvature than the outer zone which would be suitable for accommodating a corneal protrusion, and an arcuate intermediate region 14 connecting the central and outer zones. The lens and/or the central zone may be rotationally asymmetric due to the central zone being offset from the centre, the circumference of the central zone not being circular and/or the apex of the central zone being offset from the centre of the zone. The lens may also have an unbalanced element ensuring that the lens maintains its angular orientation when in use and this element may consist of truncated portions of the outer zone at upper and lower peripheries of the lens.

Description

The invention relates to contact lenses, and more specifically to contact lenses adapted to correct for the eye condition, keratoconus of the cornea.
Contact lenses have been used to treat a wide variety of eye conditions since at least the 1970s. The most common lenses are designed to incorporate positive or negative meniscus lens shapes, to correct refractive error conditions such as long or short sightedness (myopia and hypermytropsa). As light passes through the Corrective outer surface of the lens, it is refracted to a greater or lesser extent than the underlying cornea, ensuring correct optical power for dear vision.
More recent advances have sought to correct for the condition known as astigmatism. This is where a deviation from spherical curvature, caused by a defect in the cornea or lens, results in distorted and blurred images at all distances. In these esses, the cornea or lens is curved so that the refraction of the eye differs between the vertical and horizontal planes.
Spherical lenses, as described above, bend light evenly in every direction, making them suitable for the correction of hypermetropia qr myopia. The >-"~erently inconsistent deformation associated with astigmatism, however; requires different refractive powers on the vertical and horizontal orientations. As a result, corrective lenses for astigmatisms, known as Tone lenses', must have a greater radiur of curvature in one axis than the other. Those skilled in the art will realise that the loss of rotational symmetry caused by this inconsistent curvature, creates the need to maintain the correct orientation of the lens relative to the eye, whilst in use. Several solutions to this problem have been developed, such as having thicker ballasting zones or truncated portions of the lens, which create a weight imbalance in the lens that ensures correct orientation, keratoconus, is a disorder of the eye in which the normally round dome-shaped cornea progressively thins causing a cone-like bulge to develop. The loss of correct corneal refraction associated with keratoconus, can cause blurring distortion of vision and Increased sensitivity to light. Traditional treatment for this disorder, utilises rigid, gas permeable (RGP) lenses, With an anterior face which covecrs the visual acuity and a posterior surface which is specifically designed to permit the diseased portion of the cornea to conform itself to the lens surface; The hard lenses are designed to rest on a layer of tears, limiting the po nts of contact between the lens and the users eye, Many hard lenses have regions of the posterior surface so shaped to put pressure on the underlying cornea to conform to a normal shape. The design of these zones and the deviance from the current level of corneal curvature creates varying amounts of pressure on the cornea. The limitation of such designs is that the pressure created on the cornea can become painful for the user, in addition, although designed to limit contact between the contact lens and the surface of the eye, continual use of hard lenses often causes discomfort or even corneal scarring, (EP0235328) describe a soft contact tens, with an arieupr surface of radius of curvature required for dear vision, and posterior surface with distinct zones suitable for accommodating the conical shape of the cornea. Unlike, the RGP lenses, the distinct zones are designed to overlay the conical corneal region without making contact, in this way, they can correct the vision of the user without creating the discomfort associated with RGP lenses. However, the lenses described do not account for the asymmetrical nature of the condition. The apex of the ectatic cornea is often not centred, rather it is displaced to an off-centre location, and often with an inferior protrusion. As a result the central dome! zone of such lenses would not adequately match the specific topology of the corneal protrusion and would create regions of discomfort.
The current invention provides a contact lens for use in correcting the vision of users with the condition keratocanus which seeks to overcome the limitations of the prior art as set forth.
In a first broad independent aspect; the invention provides a contact lens for a patient with keratoconus of the cornel the lens having a substantially continuous arcuate anterior surface and a posterior surface comprising at least three distinct zones: a substantially circular outer tone with a consistent arcuate surface, a central domed zone with greater radius of curvature than said outer zone, said central domed zone of dimensions suitable for accommodating the patient's corneal protrusion, and an arcuate intermediate region connecting said outer zone with said central zone.
This is particularly advantageous because the desigpedzenes allow the lens to overlay the outer surface of the user's eye without making contact with the surface of the eye. The domed region of the lens is designed to have a diameter slightly greater than the diameter of the diseased portion of the cornea with the same radius of curvature, The outer zone will rest on a thin layer of tears raising the lens from the surface of the eye and causing the central domed region to enclose the diseased conical portion of the cornea Without making contact with the eye, in practice, by removing the points of contact between tie lens and the surface of the user's eye, the current tens can limit the levels of discomfort that the user experiences, in addition, the intermediate zone provides a gradual transition in the angle of curvature between the outer zone and the central domed zone which further increase comfort,
Preferably» least one of the lens and/or the central domed zone is rotationsily asymmetrical, due to one or both of: the central domed zone is offset from the centre of the lens in the horizontal and/or vertical axis, the circumference of the central domed zone is not spherical, the apex of the centra! domed zone is offset from the centre o? the circumference of the dome, defining a shorter semi-meridian and a longer semi-meridian.
This is particularly advantageous because by understanding that the diseased protrusion is often asymmetrical and recording its topology accordingly, it is possible to provide a lens with posterior surface of greater similarity to the outer surface of the eye. The result of this increased synergy between the contours of the eye and the zones of the lens, is an increase in commit for the user.
Preferably, with an unbalanced element to the lens ensuring that the lens maintains its angular orientation relative to the eye whilst in use. This is particularly advantageous because it enables the asymmetrically designed lens to maintain correct orientation on the eye of the user.
Preferably, said unbalanced element is one or more truncated portions of the outer zone, intended in use to occupy, the upper and lower peripheries of the lens creating a weight imbalance.
Preferably, the contact lens is one or more of: a rigid gas permeable {RGP} lens, a hard or soft contact lens, or some combination thereof, made of a plastics, polycarbonate, hydrophilic material, and/or hybrid material, pressed, formed, moulded milled or otherwise cut on a lathe.
Preferably, the anterior surface of the lens incorporates one or more zones for bifocal or multifocal correction.
Preferably, the lens i a comeo-sderal lens of diameter within the range of from about 13 mm to about 1.5 mm. This is advantageous because the increased surface area of the outer zone provides a greater area of support for the central domed zone and improves comfort for the user. imiodimerils of the invention will now be described in detail, with reference to the figures, of which:
Figures 1a and lb show a diagram of a first, eye with keratoconus of the cornea, in front and cross sectional side views.
Figures 2a and 2b show a diagram of a second eye with keratoconus of the cornea; in front and cross sectional side views.
Figure 3 is a first embodiment of a contact lens in vertical cross section.
Figure 4 is a second embodiment of a contact lens in front and side views.
The figures illustrate a contact lens for correcting the vision of a user suffering with the condition keratoconus of the cornea. Keratoconus, is a disorder of the eye in which the normally round dome-shaped cornea progressively thins causing a cone-like bulge to develop. By mapping the topology of the eye using known techniques such as photokeratoscopy or videpkeratography, the disclosed contact lens will provide a posterior surface with distinct regions so shaped to accommodate the contours of the eye without making contact, and an anterior surface of required curvature to produce dear vision at all distances.
To provide clarity, the components of the system which are common to different F igures have retained identical numerical references throughout all figure descriptions.
Figure la shows an eye with keratoconus of the cornea in cross-sectional side view. Thinning of the cornea has resulted in the formation of the domed or conical protrusion 2. The regions 3a and 3b represents healthy cornea, in the current example, the corneal protrusion is a central lilppbe protrusion, with healthy regions of cornea 3a arid 3b of equal radius, on both the vertical and horizontal axis. The apex 1 of the protrusion is also central within the circular margin 7 of the protrusion, creating identical semi-meridians on all axes.
Figure 1b shows the same eye with keratoconus of the cornea in front view. The comeal protrusion 2 is centred in the cornea and has a circular margin 7. in most cases of keratoconus, however, the corneal protrusion is asymmetrical The entire protrusion could be off centred in regard to the eye, being closer to the sclera on one axis than the other. The circumference of the protrusion could be circular, elliptical ovate or irregular in shape. The apex of the corneal protrusion could also be off centred within the circumference of the protrusion, creating one shorter and one longer semi-meridian.
Figure 2a shows a second eye with keratoconus of the cornea in cross-sectional side view. This example is known as an inferior protrusion 4 and is characterised by an apex 6 off centred in the circumference 5 of the protrusion 4 creating a longer superior semi-meridian and a shorter inferior semi-meridian.
Figure 2b shows a second eye with keratoconus of the cornea in front view. The inferior protrusion 4 is also characterised by the protrusions inferior location in the cornea, creating a shorter radius of healthy cornea at the inferior and a greater radius of healthy cornea at the superior of the protrusion 4, The circumference 5 of the protrusion 4 is ovate in shape.
Figure 3 shows an embodiment of a contact lens 10 in vertical cross-section. The contact lens IQ has an anterior surface 12 and a posterior surface 11, The anterior surface 12 is a substantially continuous arcuate surface, of curvature required to provide the correct power of refraction for dear vision at ail distances. The posterior surface 11 incorporates several distinct regions designed to follow the contours of the user's eye to provide the greatest fit. The central domed region 15 is of diameter slightly larger Chari that of the: conical diseased portion of the user's cornea, with identical radius of curvature. For example, if the diameter of the corneal protrusion was 5 mm, then the central domed region 15 would be 6 mm in diameter. In use, the central domed region 15 would be centred on the corneal protrusion creating a 0.5 mm gap between the corneal protrusion and the central domed region 15 on either side. In use, this space would be filled with a thin layer of tears which would sppport the lens.
Inpractice, the specific topology of the eye and corneal protrusion would be measured to ensure optimal fit of the lens. These measurements include at least; the location of the corneal protrusion, the shape and parameters of the margin of the protrusion, the height and location of the apex of the protrusion and the length and radius of curvature of each of the semi-meridians.
The outer zone 13 is a substantially circular region with a consistent arcuate face, The radius of curvature is much less than the central domes region 15 and is the same as the region of the eye on 'which it lies. The outer tone 13 bears the weight of the lens and is supported by a thin layer of tears which prevent it from contacting the surface of the eye.
An intermediate region 14 connects the outer z||e 13 with the central domed region 15, The intermediate region 14 has an arcuate face of greater radius of curvature than the outer zone 13 but less radius of curvature than the central domed region IS. This intermediate region 14 provides a smooth transition between the steep radius of curvature of the central domes region 15 and the shallow radius of curvature of the outer zone 13. In the displayed embodiment, the lens is corneo-sderai lens in which the outer zone 13 overlays the sclera and the intermediate region 14 overlays regions of healthy cornea, to provide greater comfort. In a preferred embodiment these lenses are of diameter 13 to 15 mm, The radius of curvature of the intermediate zone 14 is the same as the healthy region of cornea in which it overlays.
Figure I shows a second embodiment of a contact lens in front and side views. The regions 21 and M incorporate a thickness differential to create dynamic stabilisation and maintain correct orientation of the toric posterior surface. The regions 21 and 22 are thinner than the intermediate region 14 at thei peripheries but become thicker towards the medial locations. The action of the user’s epllds on these chamfered regions 21 and 22, serves to stabilize the lens in the correct orientation. Those skilled in the art will realise that this is only one method of maintaining toric orientation,, alternative embodiments could incorporate one or more of; prism ballasts, peri-ballasts, truncated inferior and superior portions or any other suitable technique. fn a preferred embodiment, the anterior surface 12 can incorporate one or more refractive surfaces to correct for visual conditions distinct from keretooonus.
The contact lenses of the current embodiment are made ism a soli polymer material such as silicone hydrogels. Alternatively, the contact lenses could be any combination of; a rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens, a hard or soft contact lens, or some combination thereof, made of a plastics, polycarbonate, hydrophilic material, and/or hybrid material. The contact lenses of the current embodiment could be; pressed, formed, moulded milled or otherwise cut on a lathe.

Claims (8)

Cla ms
1. A contact iens fsSr a patient with keratoconus of the cornea, the lens having a substantially continuous arcuate anterior surface and a posterior surface comprising at least three distinct zones: a substantially circular outer zone with a consistent arcuate surface, a central domed zone with greater radius of curvature than said outer zone, said central domed zone of dimensions suitable for accommodating the patient's comeal protrusion, and an arcuate intermediate region connecting said outer zone with said central zone.
2. A contact iens according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the iens and/or the central domed zone is rotationally asymmetrical, due to one or both of: * the central domed zone is offset from the centre of the iens in the horizontal and/or vertical axis. ® the circumference of the central domed zone is not spherical. * the apex of the central domed zone is offset from the centre of the circumference of the dome, defining a shorter semi-meridian and a longer semi-meridian.
3. A contact lens according to claim 2, with the added feature of an unbalanced element to the lens ensuring that the lens maintains its angular orfentation relative to the eye whilst in use.
4. A contact lens according to claim 3, wherein said unbalanced element is one or more truncated portions of the outer zone, intended in use to occupy^ the upper and tower per ipheries of the lens creating a weight imbalance
5. A contact lens according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the contact lens is one or more of: ® a rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens, « a hard or soft contact lens, or some combination thereof, * made of a plastics, polycarbonate, hydrophilic material, and/or hybrid material • pressed, formed, moulded milled or otherwise cut on a lathe
6. A contact lens according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the anterior surface incorporates one or more zones for bifocal or multifocal correction.
7. A contact hns «ccoidingto any of the preceding claims, wherein the lens is a corneoscleral lens.
8. A contact lens according to claim 7, wherein said corneo-scleral lens is of diameter within the range of from about 13 mm to about 15 mm.
GB1617189.4A 2016-10-10 2016-10-10 Improvements to contact lenses Withdrawn GB2554763A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1617189.4A GB2554763A (en) 2016-10-10 2016-10-10 Improvements to contact lenses
PCT/GB2017/052601 WO2018069665A1 (en) 2016-10-10 2017-09-06 Contact lens for an eye with keratoconus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1617189.4A GB2554763A (en) 2016-10-10 2016-10-10 Improvements to contact lenses

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB201617189D0 GB201617189D0 (en) 2016-11-23
GB2554763A true GB2554763A (en) 2018-04-11

Family

ID=57610526

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB1617189.4A Withdrawn GB2554763A (en) 2016-10-10 2016-10-10 Improvements to contact lenses

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2554763A (en)
WO (1) WO2018069665A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11493783B2 (en) 2018-07-31 2022-11-08 Visionary Optics LLC Method of fitting scleral and corneo-scleral lenses

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4525043A (en) * 1977-11-11 1985-06-25 Leonard Bronstein Contact lens
EP0235328A1 (en) * 1986-03-03 1987-09-09 Nick Siviglia Contact lens for the eye of a patient with keratoconus disease and method of making the same
US20020186344A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-12-12 Hsiao-Ching Tung Orthokeratology and bi-focal contact lens
WO2013110059A1 (en) * 2012-01-20 2013-07-25 University Of Rochester System and method for designing wavefront-guided ophthalmic lenses

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2641161A (en) * 1950-12-13 1953-06-09 Samuel W Silverstein Contact lens
US6241355B1 (en) * 1996-03-29 2001-06-05 Brian A. Barsky Computer aided contact lens design and fabrication using spline surfaces

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4525043A (en) * 1977-11-11 1985-06-25 Leonard Bronstein Contact lens
EP0235328A1 (en) * 1986-03-03 1987-09-09 Nick Siviglia Contact lens for the eye of a patient with keratoconus disease and method of making the same
US20020186344A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-12-12 Hsiao-Ching Tung Orthokeratology and bi-focal contact lens
WO2013110059A1 (en) * 2012-01-20 2013-07-25 University Of Rochester System and method for designing wavefront-guided ophthalmic lenses

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2018069665A1 (en) 2018-04-19
GB201617189D0 (en) 2016-11-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6467903B1 (en) Contact lens having a uniform horizontal thickness profile
KR102145171B1 (en) Contact lens with improved fitting characteristics
US11774780B2 (en) Comfort-optimized contact lens system for non-rotationally symmetric eye aberration
AU2004246631A1 (en) Contact lens with shaped periphery
CN107627635B (en) Molds for contact lenses having non-rotationally symmetric edges or rims
GB2554763A (en) Improvements to contact lenses
CN116583779A (en) Contact lens for correcting astigmatism
WO2017013644A2 (en) Contact lens for vision correction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)