GB2531318A - Tracers - Google Patents

Tracers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2531318A
GB2531318A GB1418365.1A GB201418365A GB2531318A GB 2531318 A GB2531318 A GB 2531318A GB 201418365 A GB201418365 A GB 201418365A GB 2531318 A GB2531318 A GB 2531318A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
tracer
tracers
partition coefficient
dependent
partitioning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB1418365.1A
Other versions
GB201418365D0 (en
Inventor
Stephen Sayfritz
Helge Stray
Alexander Krivokapic
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Institutt for Energiteknikk IFE
Original Assignee
Institutt for Energiteknikk IFE
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Institutt for Energiteknikk IFE filed Critical Institutt for Energiteknikk IFE
Priority to GB1418365.1A priority Critical patent/GB2531318A/en
Publication of GB201418365D0 publication Critical patent/GB201418365D0/en
Priority to GB1707862.7A priority patent/GB2547161B/en
Priority to PCT/EP2015/074069 priority patent/WO2016059242A2/en
Publication of GB2531318A publication Critical patent/GB2531318A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/58Compositions for enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons, i.e. for improving the mobility of the oil, e.g. displacing fluids
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/26Oils; Viscous liquids; Paints; Inks
    • G01N33/28Oils, i.e. hydrocarbon liquids
    • G01N33/2823Raw oil, drilling fluid or polyphasic mixtures
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/02Well-drilling compositions
    • C09K8/03Specific additives for general use in well-drilling compositions
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/10Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements
    • E21B47/11Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements using tracers; using radioactivity
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)

Abstract

A method for assessing the pH of a subterranean petroleum reservoir having an injection well and a production well, comprises (a) determining the residual oil saturation (S) of the petroleum reservoir; (b) injecting at least a first tracer having a first, pH dependent partition coefficient and a second tracer having a second pH independent partition coefficient into the injection well; (c) measuring the presence and/or concentration over time of the first tracer and the second tracer in produced water from the production well; (d) determining the retention times for each of the first tracer and the second tracer; (e) relating the residual oil saturation and the retention times and partition coefficients of each of the first and second tracers to the pH of the petroleum reservoir, where step (e) is conducted prior to step (e). Also disclosed is use as a pH dependent partitioning tracer in a petroleum reservoir of a phenol of formula (i): OH wherein each of R1 to R5 is independently selected from H, F, CI, Br, I, CF3 CF2CI, CFCI2 and CCl3 and wherein at least one of R, to R 5 is not H.

Description

TRACERS
RELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the measurement of pH in petroleum reservoirs. In particular, the present invention relates to methods for making such pH measurements and tracers suitable for use in such methods.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Institute for Energy Technology in Norway (lEE) has. since the nineteen sixties, worked with development of tracer technology for industrial apphcations. Since the beginning of the nineteen eighties the focus has been on the oil and gas industry. Many passive inter-well (welkto-well) tracers have been tested and qualified and in recent years some families of partitioning tracers have also been tested in laboratory and field experiments.[1] Partitioning tracers are simultaneously injected with a passive (non-partitioning) tracer as a pulse in partitioning inter-well tracer tests (PITT). Due to the solubility of the parbtioning tracers in the oil phase, these tracers will move more slowly through the reservoir than the non-retained passive tracer. When the oil/water partition coefficient for the partitioning tracer is known, the residual oil saturation can he calculated when tn e difference in migration times for the passive and the partitioning tracers have been measured.
The Partitioning inter-well Tracer Test (PITT) technology has potential to become a standard method for identifying enhanced oil recovery (EOR) targets, and for evaluation of performance of EOR operations. PITTs have successfully been applied to estimate non-aqueous phase liquid contamination in the context of groundwater studies, as well as in some oil fields producing at marginal oil rates. The Partitioning Inter-well Tracers Tests to determine residual oil saturation is based on chromatographic separation of tracers in the reservoir [2],[3],[4]. Passive tracers (soluble only in water) and tracers with different oil/water partition coefficients are introduced with injection water, and samples of water are collected from the production stream for anaiys!s. The tracers will move through the reservoir at different velocities depending on the partition coeffidents and the oil saturation in the volume between injection and production wells. The oil saturation for a field with negligible oil flow rates compared to the water flow rates (a field close to residual oil saturation) can be described by chromatographic theory and calculated from the following equation: 6.-s P T K 1' R -F-B 1 (equation 1) Here TR and TpW are the retention times of the partitioning and passive water tracer, respectively, S is the residual oU saturation, and K is the partition coefficient of the partitioning tracer. K is defined by the equation below: = [Trjor,geq [i j aq,eq where [Tr]0. = the concentration of the tracer compound in the oil phase at distribution equilibrEum [Tr]aq.eq = the concentration of the tracer compound in the aqueous phase at distribution equihbrium If the partition coeffident (K) is known, the residual oil saturation can be calculated from the measured difference in the arrival times between a non-partitioning (passive) and a partitioning tracer. This equation is only vahd as long as the tracers do not interact with the rock material. If other fedora such as interactions or non-ideal behaviour are Known then they can potentially be corrected for by theory and/or testing.
It is also possible to measure oil saturation using two pH independent partitioning tracers, as shown in equation 2,
F
-1-7-iK2±7K1 (equation 2) -see [5] Here T1 and T2are the retention times of the ph independent partitioning tracers, respectively, S is the residual oH saturation, and K and K2 are the partition coefficient of the pH independent partitioning tracers respectively, Although the Partitioning Inter-well Tracer Test (PITT) is potentially the most effective method for the assessment of residual oil saturation, there has previously been no method by which other information about the conditions of a petroleum reservoir, such as pH conditions, could be conveniently assessed, either independently or as part of such a test.
Since factors such as pH provide valuable information on conditions in a petroleum reservoir, it would be of considerable value to provide a method by which pH could be assessed, either simultaneously with a PITT, or as a follow-up in reservoirs where residual oil saturation is known.
SUMMARY OF IN\/ENTION
The present inventor has now estahUshed that by use of tracers with pH dependent partitioning coeffidents (K values) in combination with knowledge of residual oil saturation, a useful measurement of the pH of a subterranean petroleum reservoir can be made.
Furthermore, the inventor has established a family of tracer molecules which provide many of the desirable charactenstics of petroleum reservoir tracers but have partitioning coefficients whch are dependent upon pH in an appropriate range.
In a first aspect, the present invention therefore provides a method for assessing the pH of a subterranean petroleum reservoir having an injection well and a production well, said method comprising: a) determining the residual oil saturation (5) of said petroleum reservoir; b) injecting at least a first tracer having a first, pH dependent, partition coefficient and a second tracer having a second, pH independent, partition coefficient into said irection well; c) measuring the presence and/or concentration over time ol said first tracer and said second tracer in produced water from said production well; d) determining the retention times for each of said first tracer and said second tracer; e) relating the residual oil saturation and the retention tmes arid partition coefficients of each of said first and second tracers to the pH of the petroleum reservoir; wherein step a) is conducted prior step e). The residual oil saturation is required for determining pH in the method of the invention but may be calculated at any stage. For example, it may be pre-known or pre-measured, or it may be determined as part of the method of the invention. In the latter case, S may be determ!ned simultaneously with any of steps b) to d).
In particular, it is preferable that the "second" tracer will be a "passive" water tracer having a very low partition coefficient, such as 0.1 or below, Use of such a passive tracer as the second tracer allows for the effective partition coefficient of th.e first (pH dependent) tracer under the conditions of the reservoir to be calculated. Such a calculation can be made, for example, by means of equation, 3 below: / (jP2 fW)*us) pK (equation 3) wherein S is the residual oil saturation, it and T' are the retention times of the pH dependent partitioning and passive tracer, respectively and K is the partition coefficient of the pH dependent tracer.
In analogy with equation 2 above, K can also be determined using one pH-dependent tracer and one pH-independent tracer even if the latter is not a "passive" water tracer with very low K value. A generalisation of equation 3 to account for the partitioning of the pH-independent tracer will then be derived, in the way that equation 2 above is a generalisation of equation 1.
Kncmledge of the K value then allows establishment of the pH under reservoir conditions by known methods, such as laboratory testing of K11 variation with pH. Thus1 by additionally determining the variation of K, with pH, the pH conditions corresponding to the K calculated from equation 3 can be established. In general, the pH determined in the various aspects of the present invention will be the average pH to which the tracers are exposed. Thus, where pH of a petroleum reservoir is referred to herein, this will be the average pH of the volume to which a tracer is exposed.
This may be the average pH over the flow between an injection point and a production point.
It is also possible to determine the pH in the reservoir using two pH-dependent tracers (providing these have pKa values which are different by at least 0.5 pH units).
For this method, S should be known and the variation of K-value ratio between the two pH dependant tracers with varying pH should be known.
The methods of the invention are applied primarily to a petroleum reservoir having an injection well and a production well, although certain other embodiments are also possible (see below). It is preferred that the injection well and the production well are separate wells, although it is possible to conduct the method of the invention where the injection well and the production well are a single well, running with opposite flow directions for the two functions. In such a situation, the well will be run to inject the tracers (preferably in a form that generates a pH dependent tracer in-situ) there may then be a pause to allow for generation of a pH-dependent tracer (e.g. from a pH-
S
independent form or precursor such as a esterWied form). The weU would then be run in production mode and the various tracers measured in the produced fluid.
The present inventors have further estahhshed that certain substituted phenols are highly effective as pH dependent tracers, having a pKa around the typical pH of a petroleum reservoir. In a further aspect, the present invention therefore provides the use of at east one phenol of formula) as a pH dependent partitioning tracer in a petroieum reservoir.
OH :c I)
wherein each of R1 to R5 is independently selected from H, F! Cl, Br, I, CF3 CF2CI, CFCI2 and Cd3 and wherein at least one of R1 to R is not H. Thus! at east one of groups R1, R2, R3, R4 andior R5 is a halogenated group such as F, Cl, Br! I, CF3 CF2CI, CFCI2 or CCI3.
More than one of groups of R to R5 may be a halogenated group and any two may he the same or different. Preferred groups R1 to R5 include H. Cl, F! Br, CF3 CF2CI, CFCI2 and CCI3. Particularly preferred groups R1 to R5 include H, F and Ci. it is preferred that at least one of groups ft to R is hydrogen! preferably at least two of groups R1 to R are hydrogen.
In one preferred embodiment, at least one of groups R1 to R5 is F! CF2CI. CFCI2 or CF3 and in particular! none embodiment! 1, 2 or 3 of groups R1 to R5 are F. It is believed that compounds of formula) wherein at least one of R, R3 and/or R5 is F are highly effective.
The tracers of the present invention may advantageously be used in combination with other tracers to assess the pH in a petroleum reservoir and described herein, It is preferred that the tracers of the invention are used with passivefl tracers. They may also be used in combination with both passive tracers and non-pH dependent partitioning tracers in order to assess both pH and residual oil saturation in a single test.
BRIEF DESCRIFTION OF THE DRAWINGS AND TABLES
FIGURE 1 shows examples of chemical structures of compounds from the groups: monofluoro difluoro, thfluoro. trifluoromethyl, monochloro, and cUchioro, phenols.
FIGURE 2 shows how Kvalues (measured in North Sea oH and a synthetic formation water) vanes wth pH for two fluorinated phenols.
FIGURE 3. Shows the protonated (right) and de-protonated (left) forms of 2*-fluorophenol.
FIGURE 4. Shows the calculated octanol/water Log K of several compounds against pH.
FIGURE: 5 Shows a chrornatographic separation and detection of several fluorinated phenols using LC-HRMS. The peaks shown are as follows, 3.23 mins is 2-fluorophenol, 3.42 mins is 2,6-difluorophenol, 3,57 mins is 4-fluorophenol, 3.76 mm is 34luorophenol, 3.91 mins is 2,4,6-trifiuorophenol. 3.99 mins is 23,6- trifluorophenol, 4.54 mins is 3,5-difluorophenol and 5.54 mins is 4- (trifluoromethyphenol.
TABLE 1 Shows examples of pKa values (calculated) for phenols and benzyl alcohols.
TABLE 2 Shows the calculated partition coefficients from static experiments (North sea oil and a synthetic formation water) varies with pH for 6 halogenated phenols.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Alcohols have been used as partitioning tracers to estimate amounts of non-aqueous phase hquid in porous media and remaining oil in the swept area between wells (e.g. McClesky sandstone field test, Landmark method, Leduc test, Ranger field test [5], [6]). However, all previous uses of partitioning tracers have been with pH independent compounds. Some highly effective benzyl alcohol tracers are disclosed, for example, in W020141096459.
These are based upon benzyl alcohols, which are pH independent under the conditions of a typical petroleum reservoir, The use of passive water tracers and pH dependent tracers to determine the pH in the swept volume between wells (with or without simultaneous use of pH independent oil/water partitioning tracers to determine residual oil saturation) is not known. Furthermore there have been no specific proposals of classes of compounds suitable for such a method. The use of phenols, especiay halogenated phenols as pH dependent tracers is thus also unique.
Phenols are a suitable choice pH dependent tracers since they generafly have pKa's within two pH units of the expected reservoir conditions. Adding a halogenated moiety such as a fluorine to the phenol ring wiH reduce the pKa of the phenol tracer. This wifi generafly bring the pKa closer to pH of the reservoir. Addng further halogenated (e.g. fluorine) moieties will further reduced the pKa see Table 1. This variation will give a range of tracers with different pKa's suitable for different petroleum reservoirs conditions, e.g. sandstone or limestone. The K values of several of these compounds are also suitable for interwell tracer tests Table 2.
In one embodiment applicable to all aspects of the present invention, the pH dependent tracers (the first tracer in the method described above) wifi show K-values in the system to be investigated of between 0.05 and 15, preferably 0.05 and 10 and mostly preferably 0.1 and 8.
In one embodiment, the pH dependent tracers show these ranges of K values at their respective pKa. In an alternative embodiment, the pH dependent tracers show these ranges of K values at pH 7.
In general the pH in a sandstone reservoir will typically be 6.0 +1-0.5 and for a limestone reservoir around 7.3 +1-0.5.
Preferably, pH-dependent partitioning tracers should have a pKa within 3 pH units, more preferably within 2 pH units, of the reservoir in which they are to be used. This will result in K-values that will vary significantly with pH in the range of th.e reservoir. It is the nature of the pH scale that a compound will he mostly protonated (to around 99%) at two pH units under their pKa and at a pH of two pH units above their pKa will be largely de-protonated (again to around 99%). Thus the partitioning into the oil phase, which will be dependent upon charge, will change most markedly at a pH around the pKa of the tracer. Several substituted phenols are ideal for either sandstone or limestone reservoirs or both. Table 1 shows pKa values for the hydroxyl group in a range of substituted phenols, as well as phenol. benzyl alcohol and a substituted benzyl alcohol for comparison. Table 2 shows some K-values of halogenated phenols at representative pH conditions.
Table 1. Examples of pKa values (calculated) for phenols and benzyl alcohols.
Compound pKa 2-Fluorophenol 8.4 3-Fluorophenol 8.6 26-Difluorophenol 7.6 2,4,6-Trifluorophenol 7.3 23S-ThHuorophenol 6.7 2-Chlorophenol 8.0 2,6-Dichlorophenol 6.5 Phenol 10.0 Benzyl alcohol 15.4 2,6-Difiuorobenzyl alcohol 14.1 It can be seen that both fluorinated and chlorinated phenols have pKas in a useful range. In particularly, phenols with one or two fluonne or chlorine moieties are highly appropriate.
Substitution with at east one chlorine arid/or fluorine at one or more of the 2, 4, and/or 6,-positions provides tracers with highly appropriate pKa values. Thus, the compounds used in all aspects of the invention may have these properties. 2,6-Difluorophenol is especially useful for both sandstone or limestone reservoirs as it has both a relatively low pKa and K-value.
Table 2. Examples of measured partition coefficients, K-values, between a North sea o and a synthetic formation water at 70CC, and how they vary with pH
K
Compound pH 6.2 pH 7 pH 8 2-Fluorophenol 3.1 2.7 1.9 3-Huorophenol ii 2.9 2.7 2,6-Difluorophenol 2.6 1.5 0.5 3,5-Difluorophenol 9.0 8.1 5.2 2-Chlorophenol 14.9 13.9 10.8 2,6-Dichbrophenol 51.4 21.4 4.4 pH independent tracers, which may be used in the PITT method to determine residual oil saturation either prior to the methods of the present invention or as a part of such methods, are compounds that do not change their oil/water partitioning properties significantly over the pH region of interest. A change of more than 5% in the oil/water distribution coefficients (k-value) over 0.5 pH unit would be considered significant. The range of interest in petroleum reservoirs is between pH 5.5 arid pH 7.8. Figure 4 shows how the Log K-values (calculated in an octanol/water system) vary with pH. It shows that 2,6-difluorobenzyl alcohol (pH independent oil/water partitioning tracerli]) has a stable log K over the pH range of interest, whereas the log K values of 2-fluorophenol and 2,6-difluorophenol vary with pH n the pH range of interest(pH dependent oillwater partitioning tracers). Studies of this type: in combination with equation 2, can be used to determine the average pH conditions of the petroleum reservoir by correlating the KPH value calculated from equation 2 with pH. This is illustrated in Figure 4.
The oil/water distribution coefficients (K-values) of pH dependent tracers should be between 0.05 and 15 when the pH of the oil/water system is the same as the tracer's pKa, preferably, 0.05 and 10 and ideally 0.1 and 8.
The pKa of the pH dependent tracers should be wthin 3 pH units of the system to be investigated, preferably 2 units and ideally 1 pH unit. The pH ranges of systems of interest are between pH 4 and pH 10, preferably 5 and 9, ideally 5,5 and 7.8.
It s a considerable advantage lithe tracers used ri inter-weD tracer tests of aD types (including aD methods and uses of the invention) are detectable at ow concentratons and can be distinguished from compounds naturafly present in the petroleum reservoir. However, many phenols are naturally present in oil reservoirs. Furthermore, radiolabeled compounds (which are easy to detect and might historically have been used) should be avoided due to regulatory restrictons in many areas. Halogenated phenols are both unique in the reservoir environment and more chemically and biologicafly stable than corresponding molecules without halogen atoms. They can, furthermore, be detected to a high sensitivity in th.e produced fluids (such as produced water) from.. the reservoir.
Structural formulas of examples of compounds from four groups of fluorinated phenols tested are shown in Figure 1. The compounds could be analyzed using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS) in synthetic produced water, Figure 5. Detection limits of 50 ng/l (ppt) could be obtained depending on the level of interlerences from the sample matrix. Some results from the laboratory tests of these compounds are shown in Table 2.
In one embodiment, the tracers used in all embodiments of the present invention are detectable down to a level of bOng/I or less! preferably SOng/I or less and more preferably 2Ong/l or less.
Isomers from the two groups of fluorinated phenols have been tested successfully as pH dependent partitioning tracers. Two types of chlorinated phenols have also been tested but the combinations of chlorinated and fluorinated benzyl alcohols may function equally well due to similar chemical properties.
In one aspect, the present invention relates to the use of certain substituted phenols of fomiula i) as pH-dependent partitioning tracers in a petroleum reservoir, as well as to the corresponding compounds for that use. Compounds of formula i) have the general formula:
OH :: i) ii t 2'
:0 11 fl mn 7J : )r:0:/O mo rn mO 3H I (9 3:!:-;1 9 I I! 33? :0 33 0 C) Q rn t © C. () --, ., -S C) 20 20 P.)-' CD 12o CD cp 20* *20* 0 lUll " / -U j C 20 20 -2 01) \/ I \ / :12 u 13 0t 20-----0 <CD ii, 1) \r?1/' Oy;/° \ I CL) -20 0 /n\ u 20 3< 0. j \C/ 20 20 C) on 73 4y 20 II 92. -00
Cl --Cl) t C) 7) 20 2073 agr
CD --r
P 73 p 20
OH OH
c:)c xt:
R R
wherein each R group is independenty selected from H, F, Br, CF2C, CFC2 and CC3.
Preferab'y each R group is independently seected from H and F. In one embodiment, a R groups in formulae CM to C126, are hydrogen. in another embodiment 1, 2 or 3 R groups of any of formulae CM to C126, are F. The remaining R groups may be any specified herein but wifi preferaby be H. Further particular examples of compounds of formula i) which are suitable for use in aD aspects of the present invention include at east one of the following chlorinated fluorinated phenols; a' To ° w CD go c2 r -cc CD a' a rn tHU
U U U
MO C 11 m £2 £2 41a p -n t u tHThD o CD £2 r pr\ -,-P P m I!!! m 11 a y_it -rJ-- Ag -jil (11 r -0 C 9, C -CO o,-- CD
CL -P -
a' C; -U C) ii U U
C
Difluorophenol, 2,6-Difluorophenol, 3,5-Dffiuorophenoi, 2,4,6-Trifluorophenol, 2-Chiorophenol, 3-Chbrophenoi, 4-Chiorophenol, 2,4-Dichlorophenol, 26-Dichbrophenol, 3,5-Dichiorophenol and 2,z1,6-TrichlorophenoL The halogenated phenols for use in the various aspects of the present invention are typically highly stable in aqueous solution and such stabifity is a considerable advantage since degradation reduces the concentration of tracer available for detection.
Preferably, the compounds of formula i) (and the preferred compounds as indicated herein) are stable in water at concentration levels typical in water samples from oil reservoirs (typical concentration level is 50 ppt to 100 ppb) for at east 4 weeks at reservoir temperatures.
Preferably such compounds are stable for at east 6 weeks) preferably at east 8 weeks under such conditions. Preferably, this stabifity will be exhibited at temperatures of at east 80°C, more preferably at east 100°C, most preferably at temperatures of at east 150°C.
Stable" in thEs context may be taken as having a concentration of tracer compound within 20% of the startng concentration as measured by GC-MS, more preferably within 10%.
A further feature of the compounds used in the various aspects of the present invention is their high detectabihty. Specftically, the compounds of formula i) (and the preferred compounds as indicated herein) are preferably detectable by GC-MS down to a concentration of 500 ppt (parts per trillion) or lower. Preferably this detection limit will be 100 ppt or ower, more preferably 50 ppt or lower, It is possible Lor the detection limit to be still lower, such as I ppt or 100 ppo..
A still further important feature of the compounds used in the various aspects of the present invention is their relatively low environmental impact. Specifically, the compounds of formula i) (and the preferred compounds as indicated herein) may be classified as red" or better (e.g. "red" or "yellow) according to the HOCNF (Harmonized Offshore Chemical Notification Format for chemicals released to the North Sea) testing criteria.
A yet further feature of the compounds used in the various aspects of the present invention is their ow reaction with and sorption onto materials typically found in oil fields such as rock, particularly limestone and/or sandstone. Specifically, the compounds o formula i)(and the preferred compounds as indicated herein) will typically be stable in the presence of sandstone and/or limestone for at least a month, more preferably at least o months under aqueous conditions at temperatures corresponding to oil reservoir temperatures. Preferably) this stability will he exhibited at temperatures of at least 80°C, more preferably at least 100°C, most preferably at temperatures of at least 150°C. Stable" in this context may be taken as having a concentration of tracer compound within 20% of the starting concentration as measured by CC-MS, more preferably within 10%.
In the various methods of the invention, as disclosed herein, any tracer molecule that satisfies the requirements of a tracer and has a pKa/pKb around the pH of the reservoir may be used. Thus, any molecule which is detectable (preferably as discussed herein) and has a suitable onisable group (such as a protonatable or de-protonatable group) with a suitable pKa/pKb (as discussed herein) may he used. Alcohols, particularly phenols and other aromatic alcohols are highly suitable, as may be certain organic acids or amines.
Preferable pH-dependent tracers for use in any of the method embodiments of the invention will he compounds of formula I) as described herein, particularly any of the preferred compounds.
In the various methods, first tracer will be a ph-dependent partitioning tracer".. This will typically have any of the features described herein for such tracers and preferred tracers. In particular, this may be a tracer of formula Q or any of the preferred disclosures herein. The second tracer will be a non-pH dependent tracer. This can have any known K-value hut wHI preferably be effectively a passive" tracer, having a low K value. For example, a passive tracer may have a K value below 001, such as 10's to 0.005.
In one embodiment a passive" tracer may have a partition coefficient of less than 10.2, e.g. less than io', such as less than io', less than io' or less than 10's (between seawater and oil at 80°C)'.
Where the residual oil saturation, S, is known, only the first and second tracers are required for the functionng of the method of the present invention, Conveniently, however, this saturation may be measured simultaneously with the pH measurement. This has the advantage of determining two parameters by injection of only three tracers, optionally as a single injection. Furthermore, it means that the various tracers are exposed to the same sweep volume between the injection well and the production well, thereby providing a more reliable pH measurement.
Where a partitioning tracer (non-pH dependent) is also used or generally where the residual oil saturation is measured as a part of the method of the present inventon, a third tracer will be used. This is compared with the second tracer to derive the saturation (5). Suitable methods for this are disclosed, for example in W020141096459, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Methods of the invention where residua' o saturation are determined as part of the method may be carried out as follows: i) injecting at east a first tracer having a. pH dependent. first parhtion coefficient, a second tracer having a, pH independent, second pafttion coefficient (typically of ess than 0.1) and a third tracer having a pH independent, third partition coefficient (typically of at east 0.25) into said inecton well; ii) measuring the presence and/or concentration over time of said first tracer, said second tracer and said third tracer in produced water from said production well; Hi) determining the retention times for each of said first tracer, said second tracer and said third tracer; iv) relating the retention times and partition coefficients of each of said second and third tracers to oi saturation of reservoir; v) relating the residual oH saturation and the retention t!mes arid partition coefficients of each of said first and second tracers to the pH of the petroleum reservoir.
Where the second tracer is a passive tracer and the third tracer is a partitioning tracer then equation 1 above may he used in step iv) to re]ate the retention times and partition coefficients of each of said second and third tracers to oil saturation of reservoir.
Where the second and third tracers are partitioning tracers (independent of pH) then equation 2 above may be used in step iv) to reate the retention times and partition coefficients of each of said second and third tracers to oil saturation of reservoir Where the second tracer is a passive tracer and the residual oH saturation has been determined in step iv) then equation 3 above may be used in step v) to relate the residual oil saturation and the retention times and partition coefficients of each of sad first and second tracers to the pH of the petroleum reservoir Where one passive tracer and more than one parUtioning tracer and/or more than one pH-dependent tracer is used then equations I and 2 may be used vo or more times as appropriate, or a genera] equation deveioped.
Where a non-pH depen dent partitioning tracer (e.g. third tracer) is used in any aspect or embodiment of the present invention then this may be a benzyl alcohol of formula B1: : 31) wherein each of R1 to R5 is independenfly s&ected from H, F, Cl, Br, I, CF3 CF2CI. CEO2 and CO3 and wherein at east one of R1 to R is not H. Although described herein as "first", second" and in some embodiments third" tracers (as weU as subsequent tracers) for linguistic clarity, the order of njection of the tracers need not be according to this nomenclature. For example, in one embodiment, all tracers may be injected simultaneously. Alternatively, the first. second and optionaUy third tracers may be injected sequentiay in any order or combination. Where more than two tracers are used, any two or more may be injected simultaneously. In one embodiment, the first tracer injected is the tracer with lowest partition coefficient (e.g. a "passive' tracer).
Although referred to herein as separate tracers, any two or more tracers described herein may be injected simultaneously. Furthermore, any two or more such tracers may be fomiulated as a single molecule that may be cleaved into separate tracers under the conditions of the injection or reservoir. It is preferred that each. tracer is formulated as a separate chemical entity but such generation "in si/il' may take place and could be rendered more effectively by halting production from the reservoir for a period after injection of such a tracer precursor to allow the cleavage reaction(s) to occur.
The methods and uses of the present invention have been presented in the context of a petroleum reservoir, and this forms the primary use of such methods, uses and compounds.
However, such a method may also be used in any situation where two phases, particularly a mobile aqueous phase and a comparatively stationary organic phase exist. Groundwater reservoirs contaminated with. hydrocarbons, for example, form a further situation where the methods of the invention could be used analogously. Similarly, the methods and i ses may be applicable to the flow of water through coalbearing rocks and deposits. Such methods and uses evidently form further aspects of the present invention and all of the disclosures and preferred disclosures made herein apply equally to these.
REFERENCES: 1. Ducjstad øyvind eta!., TRACERS, N020121558, 2014-06-23 and W02014!096459 2. Cooke, C.EJ., Method of Determining Fluid Saturation in Reservoirs, 1971.
3. Jin, M, et al, Partitioning tracer test for detecflon, estimation and remediation performance assessment of subsurface nonaquecus phase iquids, Water resources research, 199531(5): p. 1201-1211.
4. Deans, H.H., Using chemica! tracers to measure fractiona flow and saturation insitu, in Fitih Symposium on Improved Methods for O Recovery of the Sodely of Petroleum Engineers of AME held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 16-19, 1978.1978. SPE: Tulsa, Oklahoma,.
Lichtenberger, G.J., Field Applications of nterwefl Tracers for Reservoir Characterization of Enhanced Oil Recovery Pilot Areas, in SPE Production Operations Symposiumi99l. Society of Petroleum Engineers: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Zemel, a, Tracers in Oil Field 1994, New York: Elsevier.

Claims (1)

  1. What is claimed is 1. A method for assessing the pH of a subterranean petroleum reservoir having an injection wefl and a production weD, said method comprising: a) determining the residua oil saturation (S) of said petroleum reservoir; b) injecting at east a first tracer having a first, pH dependent, partition coefficient and a second tracer havng a second, pH independent, partition coefficient into said injection we c) measuring the presence and/or concentration over time of said first tracer and said second tracer in produced water from said production weD; d) determining the retention times for each of said first tracer arid said second tracer; e) relating the residual oil saturat!on and the retention times and partition coefficients of each of said first arid second tracers to the pH. of the petroleum reservoir; wherein step a) s conducted prior to step e), optionaDy simuitaneousiy with steps b) to d).
    2. The method of claim 1 wherein said second tracer having a second, pH independent, partition coefficient is a passive tracer having a partition coefficient of less than 0.1.
    3. The method of claim 2 wherein said relating in step d) is carried out by means of equation 3 below:K ViiR (equatIon 3) wherein S is the residual oil saturation, TR and TRW are the retention times of the pH dependent partitioning and passive tracer. respectively and Kp is the partition coefficient of the pH dependent tracer.
    4 The method of claim 3 further comprising determining the variation of with pH and thereby establishing the pH conditions corresponding to the K calculated from equation 2.
    The method of claim I wherein said second tracer having a second, pH independent, partition coefficient and said third tracer having a third, pH independent, partition coefficient are both partitioning tracers having different partition coefficients, both in the range of 0.1 to 10, but preferably at east 0.5 different.
    6. The method of any of claims Ito 5 wherein step a) is conducted by a Partitioning Inter-weD Tracer Test (PITT), which may be carried out prior to or simultaneously with the assessment of pH.
    7 The method of any of claims I t.o 6 comprising: i) injecting at east a first tracer having a first, pH dependent, partition coefficient, a second tracer having a second, pH independent, partition coefficient (optionafly of less than 0.1) and a third tracer having a pH independent, partition coefficient (optionafly of at east 025) into said injection weD; ii) measuring the presence and/or concentration over time of said first tracer, aid second tracer and said third tracer in produced water from said production weD; iii) determ!ning the retention times for each of sad first tracer, said second tracer and said thrd tracer; iv) relating the retention times and partition coefficients of each of said second and third tracers to oi saturation of reservoir, whereby to calculate residual oil saturation, S; v) relating the residual oil saturation and the retention times and partition coefficients of each of said first and second tracers to the pH of the petroleum reservoir.
    $ Use of at east one phenoh of formua) as a pH dependent partitioning tracer in a petroleum reservoir.
    OHwherein each of R1 to R5 is independently selected from H, F, Cl, Br, I, CF3 CF2Cl, CFCI2 and CCi3 and wherein at least one of R1 to R is not H. 9. Use as daimed in claim 8 wherein at east one of groups R1 to R5 is F, CF2CL CFCI2 or CF3.
    10. Use as claimed in claim 8 or claim 9 wherein 1, 2 or 3 of groups R to R5 are F. 11. Use as claimed in and of claims 8 to 10 wherein at least one of R1, R3 and/or R5 is F. 12. Use as claimed in any of claims 8 to 11 wherein said at least one phenol of formula i) is at east one fluorinated phenol of any of formulae El to F26:A* -ii Ti ii m I %/ I I * mo -J 23 i I H m m Th$1 H:i I mo m -n *1 m a c dP -a (riCD c \/ 02] 9 fn'o 2] C-) 9 7j 0 CD 9 n\;/Y g.In * ItH U2] -, 2]I I I I 2]2]$4 * D ci: 9 0 2 - \ / \ I 2 g p /0 9 2] 2) 2] 2]± aCC a a ii-. 0) n P (1) C C (Dc bIII 0) C) 2 1 m 2 a T U I' a rn £2 -d/4 wherein the Cl and F groups in the above molecules may he exchanged such that F may he present in place of Cl and vice versa.19. The method of any of claims 1 toYO wherein said first tracer is a phenol as defined ri any of claims 8 to 18 20. The method of claim 7 wherein said first tracer is a phenol as defined in any of claims 8 to 18 and wherein said third tracer is a benzyi alcohol oF formula BI: : BI) wherein each of R1 to R5 is independently selected from H, F, Ci, Br, I, CF3 CF2CL CFCI2 and CCi3 and wherein at least one of R1 to R is not ft
GB1418365.1A 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Tracers Withdrawn GB2531318A (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1418365.1A GB2531318A (en) 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Tracers
GB1707862.7A GB2547161B (en) 2014-10-16 2015-10-16 Method for assessing the Ph of a subterranean reservoir
PCT/EP2015/074069 WO2016059242A2 (en) 2014-10-16 2015-10-16 Tracers

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1418365.1A GB2531318A (en) 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Tracers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB201418365D0 GB201418365D0 (en) 2014-12-03
GB2531318A true GB2531318A (en) 2016-04-20

Family

ID=52013079

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB1418365.1A Withdrawn GB2531318A (en) 2014-10-16 2014-10-16 Tracers

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2531318A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2548674A (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-09-27 Johnson Matthey Plc Tracer and method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2412171A (en) * 2004-02-19 2005-09-21 Schlumberger Holdings Spectroscopic pH measurement using optimised mixtures of reagents to extend measurement range
US20070178595A1 (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Spectroscopic pH measurement at high-temperature and/or high-pressure

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2412171A (en) * 2004-02-19 2005-09-21 Schlumberger Holdings Spectroscopic pH measurement using optimised mixtures of reagents to extend measurement range
US20070178595A1 (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Spectroscopic pH measurement at high-temperature and/or high-pressure

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2548674A (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-09-27 Johnson Matthey Plc Tracer and method
GB2548674B (en) * 2016-01-25 2018-05-09 Johnson Matthey Plc A sulfone partitioning tracer and method of use
US11098238B2 (en) 2016-01-25 2021-08-24 Johnson Mattey Public Limited Company Tracer and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201418365D0 (en) 2014-12-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2935508B1 (en) Tracers
Mohammadian et al. Measurement of CO2 solubility in NaCl brine solutions at different temperatures and pressures using the potentiometric titration method
Ingram et al. Noble gas excess air applied to distinguish groundwater recharge conditions
Serres-Piole et al. New passive water tracers for oil field applications
Busenberg et al. A rapid method for the measurement of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), trifluoromethyl sulfur pentafluoride (SF5CF3), and Halon 1211 (CF2ClBr) in hydrologic tracer studies
Cowie et al. Determination of the stable isotope composition and total dissolved solids of Athabasca oil sands reservoir porewater: Part 1. A new tool for aqueous fluid characterization in oil sands reservoirs
Dean et al. Use of partitioning tracers to estimate oil saturation distribution in heterogeneous reservoirs
Cowie et al. Determination of the stable isotope composition and total dissolved solids of Athabasca oil sands reservoir porewater: Part 2. Characterization of McMurray Formation waters in the Suncor–Firebag field
GB2531318A (en) Tracers
Rane et al. New Dynamic-Surface-Tension Analysis Yields Improved Residual Surfactant Measurements in Flowback and Produced Waters
Rane et al. Monitoring Residual Surfactant in the Flowback and Produced Water: A Way Forward to Improve Well Productivity
WO2016059242A2 (en) Tracers
AlAbbad et al. Single-well chemical tracer test for residual oil measurement: field trial and case study
EP3149103B1 (en) Tracers
Nagarajan et al. Rock-fluid characterization using OBM contaminated samples issues, challenges, and solutions
Taylor et al. Development and field application of a new measurement technique for organic acid additives in stimulation fluids
Knaepen et al. Experimental aspects of partitioning tracer tests for residual oil saturation determination with FIA-based laboratory equipment
NO20170801A1 (en) Tracers
Cubillos et al. The Value of Inter-well and Single Well Tracer Technology for De-Risking and Optimizing a CEOR Process-Caracara Field Case
Hy-Billiot et al. Getting the best from formation tester sampling
Evans et al. Groundwater chemistry in the vicinity of the Puna Geothermal Venture Power Plant, Hawai ‘i, after two decades of production
Lorenz et al. A postflood evaluation test of the North Burbank surfactant/polymer pilot
Jones et al. The Evaluation of Wellsite Gas Data from Lateral Development Wells–A Comparison Between Petrophysical Pay and Wellsite Gas Defined Pay, A Case Study from the Inner Moray Firth UK
GB2526624A (en) Tracers
US11994020B2 (en) Mapping inter-well porosity using tracers with different transport properties

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)