GB2494186A - Roll Stripper Device and Method - Google Patents

Abstract

A roll stripper device comprises a stripper (26, 27) mounted on a stripper support ; a sensor (47, 47a); and a processor. The sensor is adapted to provide a measure of distance to a work roll (21) and the processor is adapted to determine the position of a tip of the stripper (26, 27) relative to the work roll, using the distance provided by the sensor (47).

Description

ROLL STRIPPER DEVICE AND METHOD

This invention relates to a roll stripper device and method, in particular for aluminium rolling mills.

S In the field of metal rolling it is well known that the metal being rolled can stick to the suiface of the roll and therefore a device known as a stripper is used to peel, or strip the metal away from the surface of the roll and guide it out of the rolling mill.

In some types of mills contact between the stripper and the work roll is acceptable, but in aluminium coiling for example, it is important that the stripper does not contact the roll surface otherwise it will damage the surface layer of the roll. Therefore the stipper has to be set with a small gap between the stripper and the roll surface. The gap needs to be small enough to ensure that even the thinnest material that is rolled cannot force its way between the stripper and the roll and therefore precise alignment and positioning of the stripper is required. Even on a large plate mill it is common for the gap between the stripper and the roll to be only about 2mm.

In many rolling wilts the strippers are fixed between the roll chocks. An example is shown in US3258953. The gap between the strippers and the work roll surface is preset when the rolls and chocks are assembled. Various means are used to set the position of the strippers relative to the work roll including shims, bolts and eccentrics, but, whatever the means used to adjust the stripper positions, they are fixed relative to the roll chocks and therefore the gap stays constant when the roll assembly moves in the mill. Consequently, in this type of design, the movement of the chocks relative to the housing due to the clearances does not affect the stripper to roll gap.

However there are some designs for strippers in which the stripper is not attached to the roll chocks, but is attached to equipment -usually the feed roller assembly -which is in turn attached to the mill housing. Examples are DE 102007048747 and our co-pending patent application GB 11061138.9. These designs have certain advantages over chock mounted strippers, but a significant disadvantage is that any movement of the chocks within the housing clearances, or any inaccuracy in the calculated position of the roll, either vertically, or horizontally, leads to inaccurate setting of' the stripper to roll gap. Since the clearances are of a similar size to the desired gap it would be possible to end up with either no gap at all, which would lead to damage to the surface layer of the roll, or with a gap which is much larger than desired and which would allow thin material to force itself between the stripper and the roll.

DE102007048747 discloses a design in which the strippers are mounted on the feed roller assembly and the whole stripper and feed roll assembly can be moved horizontally. By linking horizontal movement of the feed roller and stripper assembly with the vertical movement of the bottom work roll, it is possible to set the position of the stripper relative to the work roll and thus set the gap between the stripper and the roll.

Co-pending patent application GRI 1061 l3.9 relates to a design in which the strippers are mounted on the feed roller assembly and the whole stripper and feed roll assembly can be moved vertically, or pivoted on its support making it possible to set the entry and exit side strippers at different heights relative to the top of the work roll and also to set the gaps between the strippers and the roll. This design is illusu-ated in Figs, 1 and 2.

However, as mentioned, in these types of prior art design, particu arly where the stripper is attached to the feed roll assembly, inaccuracies can arise in setting the stripper to roll gap.

In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention a roll stripper device comprises a stripper mounted on a stripper support; a sensor; and a processor; wherein the sensor is adapted to provide a measure of distance to a work roll; and wherein the processor is adapted to determine the position of a tip of the stripper relative to the work roll, using the distance provided by the sensor.

Preferab]y, the sensor is mounted at a predetermined distance from a tip of the stripper.

Preferably, the sensor is mounted on one of the stripper, stripper support, a feed i-oil assembly, feed roller support, mill housing or a roll chock.

Preferably, at least one sensor is mounted at the centre of the device.

This allows bending of the work roll to be determined and compensated for.

Preferably, a sensor is mounted facing one or more roll grinding support areas of a work roll.

Preferably, the device comprises two or more sensors, spaced apart along the length of the device.

Preferably, a sensor is mounted at each end of the device.

Preferably, the device comprises two or more sensors spaced apart around a circumference of the work roll.

Preferably, the or each sensor is adapted to determine distance from a lower work roll of a pair of work rolls.

Preferably, the sensor comprises one of a contact or non-contact inductive or capacitive sensor, a. mechanical distance sensor, a transducer, or an optical range finder.

In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention, a method of determining distance of a stripper from a work roll comprises us(ng a sensor to determine a distance of the sensor from a. point on the work roll; extracting stored data.

relating to the relative position of the sensor and the stripper; and calculating a position of the stripper, relative to the work roll, from the determined distance and the stored location of the sensor.

In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention method of controlling a relative position of a stripper and a work roll comprises determining a gap representing the distance of the stripper from the work roll according to the method of the second aspect; comparing the gap with a required gap; determining if the result of the comparison is outside an acceptable range of tolerance and, if so, adapting the position of the stripper according to the result of the comparison.

The invention enables the position of the stripper to be determined, checked for compliance with preset tolerances and corrected, if required, whatever the cause of the non-compliance may be, so it is useful both at set up and during operation, if outside influences change the stripper position after set-up.

Preferably, the method further comprises placing a sensor at each end of the work roll; and adapting the position of the stripper at each end accordingly.

Preferably, the method comprises determining the distance for each of the sensors; calculating an average, minimum or maximuni distance using each of the determined distances; and adapting the position of the stripper based on the result of the comparison between the required distance and the average, minimum or maximum distance.

Preferably, the method comprises automatically repeating the steps of determining and comparing the distance and adapting the position of the stripper.

This helps maintain accuracy, even if the loading changes during the roiling process.

Preferably, the method further comprises applying a delay between repeats when the result of the comparison is within an acceptable range of tolerance.

Preferably, the method comprises determining when a head end of an article being rolled has passed the stripper onto the feed roll assembly on the exit side and then causing an actuator to move the stripper thither from the work roll than the maximum range of tolerance of the required gap.

The maximum range of tolerance is the maximum gap that is acceptable during strip threading to prevent the strip forcing itself between the stripper and the roll, but once the head end has passed the stripper, the gap can be increased beyond this limit without risk of the article getting between the stripper and the work roll. This means that the risk of the stripper coming into contact with the work roll due to unexpected forces is reduced.

Preferably, deflection of the stripper is calculated from load measurements and the position of the stripper is adjusted in response to the determined distance and the load measurement.

Preferably, the method further comprises measuring roll load cylinder position in combination with determining distance from sensor measurement.

Preferably, the method further comprises one or more actuators for adjusting the position of the stripper.

Preferably, the device further comprises load sensors to calculate deflection of the stripper.

Preferably, the toad sensors comprise one of pressure transducers in the actuators or loadeells.

An example of a roll stripper device and an associated method in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which: Figure 1 illustrates the overall arrangement of a millstand to which the invention can be applied; Figure 2 illustrates in more detail the type of feed roll assembly to which the invention can be applied; Figure 3 is a detailed view of one implementation of the present invention in the assembly of Fig. 1; Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the method of operating the device of the present invention; and, Figure 5 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a device according to the present invention.

Figure 1 illustrates a milistand and feed roll assembly in which the present invention may be applied. The millstand comprises a housing having top and bottom beams 33a, 33b and side posts 38a, 38b. Roll chocks 41 42 arc fitted within the milistand for the back-up rolls. The roll assemblies in a rolling mill have to be able to move vertically in the mill housings for the purpose of accommodating different roll diameters, setting the roll gap, controlling the thickness and setting the pass line height etc. Upper and lower back-up rolls 39,40 are mounted in chocks 41,42 and wear plates 31a, Jib are provided on the outside faces of the roll chocks. On the inside facings of the mill housing corresponding wear plates 35a, 35b are provided and the chocks are allowed to slide on these wear plates. Similarly, for the work roll assemblies, with work rolls 21, 22, work roll chocks 43, 44 have wear plates 36a, 36b on their outer surface and corresponding supports 45, 46 (in this example, roll bend/balance blocks) fixed to the millstand housing with wear plates 37 on their inside facing surfaces. In practice, there has to be a certain amount of clearance 32a, 32b. 32c, 32d between the dimensions of the chocks and the mill housings or chock supports. This clearance is necessary for several reasons including housing nip, allowance for thermal expansion and the fact that the roll assemblies need to be changed regularly. Rousing nip is the phenomenon whereby the shape of the housing window changes slightly between the unloaded and loaded states. For most mills, the inner faces of the housings move inwards when the rolling load is applied, i.e. top and bottom beams 33a, 33b bend and so cause the side posts 38a, 38b to bend as well and if there is insufficient clearance between the chocks and the housing then the housing will nip the chock and prevent free movement. Typically the design clearances between the chocks and the mill housings are 1 to 2mm, but if the wear plates are allowed to wear excessively the clearance can easily become more than 2mm.

Typically, the wear plates have a few millimetres clearance between them. In the example shown in Fig. 2, a stripper 27 is provided on the exit side of a bottom worlcoll 21. Normally. the stripper to roll gap is only 2mm to satis' the twin requirements of preventing thin materials getting between the stripper and the work roll and avoiding contact of the stripper with the work roll, which may cause damage to the surface. It can be seen that if the work roll moves by 2mm or more, then, depending upon the direction of movement, this can result in either no clearance, or 4mm clearance, both of which may cause problems.

Auiother aspect is that when roll change takes place, the wear plates after the change may be more or less worn than a previous set, so it is not possible to guarantee the corect clearance of the stripper has been maintained.

Fig. 2 illustrates in more detail, the example of Fig. 1. hi this embodiment, the strippers 26 and 27 are fixed to feed roller assemblies 3 and 4, supporting feed rollers 25, 28. The feed roller assemblies 3 and 4 are mounted on slides 5 and 6 so that the assemblies can move relative to feed roller supports 7 and 8. In this example, this movement is achieved by hydraulic cylinders 9 and 10, although other types of actuators can be used and the invention is not limited to this specific example. The hydraulic cylinders 9 and 10 also contain external position transducers (although either internal or external transducers may be used) and the stroke of each of these cylinders may be independently position controlled by hydraulic servo-valves and controllers (not shown). The feed roller supports 7 and 8 arc pivoted about pivots 11 and 12 which are fixed to the mill housing. The feed roller supports 7 and 8 can be moved about the pivots 11 and 12 by hydraulic cylinders 13 and 14. Clevises 15 and 16 of the hydraulic cylinders 13 and 14 ace connected to pivots which arc mounted on the mill housing.

The hydraulic cylinders 13 and 14 also contain position transducers and the strokes of these cylinders are independently controlled by hydraulic servo-valves and controllers which are not shown.

With stripper designs such as those in 0E102007048747 and GB1 1061138.9, in order to set the stripper to roll gap accurately, the position of the work roll must be known accurately.

To address this problem, it is necessary to determine the distance of the stripper tip from the work roll. The vertical position of the work roil is known with reasonably good accuracy from the stroke of the roll load cylinder 30, the ioll diameters and the dimensions of any packers 34 ctc., but cnn if thc stripper to roll gap is calibrated, e.g. by a manual measurement when the equipment is first installed, it is difficult to be certain that the vertical position of the roll is known absolutely accurately after roll changes, roll wear etc. This is why mills still have to do a mill zeroing calibration after a roll change. In theoçy it should be possible to calculate the new zero position accurately, but in practice a calibration is required.

The horizontal position of the roll assembly within the housing clearances is not known accurately and therefore it has to be assumed. Generally mills have an offset between the vertical centre lines of the backup rolls and the work rolls in order to force the rolls across to one side of the mill. Some mills even have small hydraulic cylinders to push the roll chocks across onto one side of the housing. l-Iowever, even if it is assumed that the roll chocks are up against one side of the housint there are still unknowns such as exactly how much the chock and the mill wear plates have worn, whether the dimensions ait exactly the same between different sets of rolls, thermal growth of both work rolls and chocks, etc.. and so there is still some uncertainty with regard to the horizontal position of the roll chock. Any horizontal movement of the work roll 21 due to clearances, or wear of the wear plates, or differences between different sets of chocks and any inaccuracy in the assumed vertical position of the work roll may lead to errors in the stripper to roll gap.

Currently, for the stripper designs similar to DE102007048747 and GB1 10611 3&9 the control system which controls the position of the strippers has to make certain assumptions. For the vertical position the control system assumes that this can be accurately determined from the measured roll load cylinder position, the roll diameters and the nominal dimensions of any packers etc. For the horizontal position of the roll the control system assumes that this is constant. In general these systems assume that the chock is up against one side of the mill all the dme A manual check on the snipper to roll gap is done during the initial installation, or during maintenance and an offset is incorporated into the control system, but subsequently the control system has to assume that the horizontal position does not change. En general, it is too time consuming to do a manual check of the stripper to roll gap after a roll change so either the system has to assume that the new roll assembly has exactly the same dimensions between the roll centre and the chock wear plates as the old roll assembly, or a manual measurement might be made in the roll shw and entered into the system.

B

Another solution which has been considered for sethng the stripper to roll gap is to move the stripper in until it touches the roll and then move it out by the right distance to set the gap. The contact between the stripper and the roll can be detected by force measurement in the cylinders which move the stripper assembly, for example, or by a force sensor or contact sensor in the stripper. This method has the disadvantage that the stripper can damage the roll surface.

In the present invention, the distance of the stripper tip from the work roll may be derived by a control system of the mill from data from a sensor at a known position relative to the stripper tip and the geometry of the assembly. This allows the control system to calculate the stripper to roll gap 25 much more accurately than is cunently possible. The sensor may be of any convenient type from which distance can be derived or obtained directly, such as a mechanical distance sensor, transducer, linear variable differential transducer (LVDT) in contacting or non-contacting configuration, an ultrasonic range meter, or optical or laser distance sensor. For example, the transducer may be a mechanical device with, for example. a roller on the end, or an optical device, but for reasons of robustness and the environment it is preferable to use either an inductive, or a capacitive type device. Examples of other possible transducers include eddy-current, magneto-inductive or laser sensors.

From the sensor data, the distance to the roll, or a known point relative to the surface of the coil, froni a known point relative to the tip of the stripper, is determined.

As indicated, the measurement of distance from the sensor does not have to be to the roll itself, but could be made to some other part of the roll assembly with a known relationship to the roll, such as the grinding surfaces.

Although the actual gap is between the tip of the stripper and the work roll, a sensor put on the tip may be wiped off by the passing plate, so the sensor is put in a safer position, a known distance away from the tip, rather than putting the sensor right at the tip of the stripper in order to measure the roll gap directly. Another practical problem with putting the sensor at the tip is that there is not much space in this region and the sensor could easily be damaged, so it is preferred that the sensor is mounted away from the tip. By combining the sensor measurement with the known geometry of the assembly and the sensor and the vertical position of the work roll, it is then possible to determine the actual stripper to roll gap at the tip with good accuracy. In cases where the geometry of the stripper is well known, the sensor may be mounted on the feed roller assembly 4, instead of on the stripper assembly 27, so that the stripper can be changed without disturbing the sensor.

An initial manual checking and setting of the stripper to roll gap may still be done, if desired, but subsequently the sensor allows the system to antomatkally maintain the correct stripper to roll gap distance even if the roll moves within the clearances, or the wear plates become worn, or a new roll assembly is installed with different dimensions.

It is preferable to have at least two sensors on each stripper. stripper support assembly, or feed roll assembly -one at each end -because the horizontal movements of thc rolls may be different at each end of the roll, If the sensors measure different gaps at each end of the stripper then the control system may be setup to either adjust each end independently, orto set the average, or the minimum gap. The control system may also be set up to give an alann if there is an excessive stripper to roll gap, or an excessive difference between the two ends of the stripper, or a stripper to roll distance which is too small.

In general, it is preferable for the sensor to measure the distance between the stripper and the roll at the edges of the roll outside of the area where the metal is normally rolled because this part of the roll is less affected by metal deposits etc. However, on certain types of mill it might be desirable to measure the stripper to roll gap in the centre, or elsewhere across the roll width, in order to correct the gap for roll wear, or for metal build up on the surface of the roll.

As mentioned above, another option is for the sensors to measure the distance to the roll grinding support areas. Many work rolls are manufactured with areas outside of the roll barrel (i.e. outside of the working area) which are accurately ground for use as support areas during roll grinding. If the gap to these grinding support areas is measured by the sensor then it is simple to ealcu]ate the roll to stripper gap from the geometry.

Providing a sensor in the centre of the roll, instead of, or as well as, at the edges, may be useful, but a sensor in this position may be difficult to maintain. Therefore, a further enhancement of the invention is to use the loads measured in some or all of the cylinders 9, 13, 10, 1 4 to compensate for deflection of the stripper and stripper support assembly under load. It is possible that the stripper to roll gap is not the same in the centre of the stripper as at the edges, because the load from material being rolled on the entry side, or the exit side causes deflection of the stripper 26, 27 and stripper support assembly. The calculation of the deflection for a given load and width of material may be done using finite element calSations, or similar methods providing that some assumptions about the load distribution are made. By using the loads measured at the cylinders the system can therefore estimate how much the stripper has deflected in the centre compared to the deflection where the sensors are positioned and thereby make an adjustment to get the correct gap in the centre. In this way the system can estimate the stripper to roll gap in the centre of the roll, whilst only having sensors at the edges.

Using the cylinder loads is simple because the pressures can be easily measured, but it would also be possible to usc loadeclls, or other load incasurcment devices.

For the purpose of this application, the preferred embodiment and the detailed descriptions havc referred to the bottom roll and stripper, but the invention is equally applicable in embodiments which use a similar sensor arrangement on the stripper for the top roll.

The sensor (toes not necessarily have to be mounted on the stripper assembly or feed roller assembly itself in order to provide information about the position of the roll.

In principle, the sensor may be mounted on the housing or some other point so long as the geometry between the sensor and the roll and the sensor and the stripper is known.

Further, the sensor could be mounted on the roll assembly e.g. on the chock and detect the distance to the stripper or stripper support, but this solution is not ideal because the roll assembly would then have to have cables or some other method of getting the signal from the sensor to the controller.

A further enhancement is to use two or more sensors at the each end of the roll as illustrated in Fig 5. Provided that the two sensors 47 and 47a are arranged to detect different points around the roll circumference, then the system can determine both the horizontal and vertical position of the roll accurately.

hi view of the limits on space in the stripper area and concerns about damage to the roll when the tolerances are not coliect, operation of the rolling mill may be further enhanced by positioning the stripper at the minimum gap only long enough for the head end of the matenal to pass through the svork roll gap. Once the stripper is threaded and the head end has been safely passed through the roll gap, then the stripper is backed off out of the way. The sensor of the present invention enables this enhancement because the stripper can be accurately placed back near the work roll with the required gap for each subsequent pass, but moved out of the way of the work roll other than during passage of the head end. This protects the work roll against adverse loading which occurs after the head end of the article being rolled has been safely threaded. The determination of the correct time to back-off the stripper may be based on tracking the article, detection of load on the mill stand or the stripper, tracking speed and time for the article to determine when the head end has passed through or some combination of these parameters. The gap is then actively opened sufficiently, once the head end has passed the stripping point, to give additional protection against roll contact in case of adverse loading.

Of the various methods which may be used for determining the state for feedtable retraction to safer state, the simplest is to apply a time delay after load detection on the milistand, after which the stripper is retracted. The alternatives, that after load detection on tile milistand, a calculation is made of slab nose end position based on mill speed and time from load detect such that slab nose is determined to be past the stripper nose and thereafter, the stripper is retracted; or the option of using a sensor, such as a laser, photo-cell or hot metal detector, to detect slab nose at a safe distance from the roll bite are not essential, but may be useftll.

In one embodiment, the exit stripper may be reset to the correct vertical location for the next pass, once the stripper has been retracted, but this is optional. Usually, final positioning, ready for the next pass, particularly for the stripper on the exit side of the pass, takes place after the roll load cylinder is in gap set state. However, if by positioning the stripper on the entry side of the pass well clear of the work roll, then fi]lal positioning can take place immediately following slab exit from the roll bite (load detection lost).

This backoff on entry or exit side may be implemented solely by vertical movement of respective cylinders 13, 14 to move the stripper away from the work roll surface. Alternatively, movement of cylinders 9. lOis possible. A combination of movement caused by pairs of cylinders c, 13; 10, 14 is also practical. it is not essential for this feature to be provided at both entry and exit side, as typically the entry side can be set up to have a larger safe gap than on the exit side, so the back off is only implemented on the exit side. However, an embodiment which implements back-off on either or both sides is not excluded.

The stripper is returned to the,small gap' position when the mill reverses for the next pass or when the mill reverses for the next but one pass when this stripper will be on the exit side again. On the entry side the gap is less critical so this could be set to a larger gap even before the strip threads. On the exit side it is important that the gap is signifIcantly smaller than the strip exit thickness for that pass initially, but once the head end has gone past the stripper then the gap can be increased.

In summary, the invention provides one or more sensors, mounted in the stripper, or on the stripper support assembly or in another location whose position relative to the stripper is known, which measure the distance between the stripper, or the stripper support assembly or the known location and the roll surface, or the roll grinding area, or any other part of the roll assembly whose geometry relative to the work roll surface is known. The measurement by the sensor in combination with the geometry of the arrangement may then be used to adjust the position of the stripper in order to set the optimum stripper to roll gap. A sensor at each end of the mull may be used and the system may either set the gap at each end separately, or use a combination of the two measurements to set the optimum gap. The sensors may be mounted at the edges of the roll outside of the normal rolling width so that they are not affected by metal build up on the roll etc. Where one or more sensors axe mourned within the normal rolling width, this enables detection of roll wear, or metal build up. The loads on the stripper assembly may be measured by either the pressures in the cylinders, or by loadeells and the deflection of the stripper assembly due to these loads is calculated and the stripper position is adjusted to compensate for this deflection.

Fig. 4 illustrates an example of bow the device is used to determine and maintain a stripper gap. Either during an initial set-up, or after a work roll change 50, the system needs to check that the stripper gap is set at an acceptable distance away from the work roll to prevent damage to the surface of the roll, or the head end of the article being rolled from getting between the stripper and the work roll on the exit side.

The controller 49 receives 51 a signal from sensor 47 and knowing the geometry of the device on which the sensor is mounted, this intbmiation is used to determine the distance of the sensor from the work roB 21. The controller then derives the position of the snipper 27 from known data about its position in relation to the sensor 47 to determine a gap 4K between the work roll 21 and the tip of the stripper 42. This then allows the current work roll to snipper gap to be calculated. This gap is compared 53 with a known maximum and minimum permitted vaLue of the gap and if the result of the comparison is outside a preset range 54, then the controller sends a siial to an actuator to cause 55 the position of the stripper tip to be modified. Typically, for this example, this involves operating cylinders 10 and/or 14 to move the tip by the required amount, either closer to or further from the work roll.

Having carried out the requisite adjustment, the steps 51 to 54 are repeated to check that the new position is acceptable. If the method is only used during set-tip, then it terminates at this point. However, it is preferred that there should be checks, either in response to a specific issue, such as an adverse load being sensed as part of general roll or mill movement, or as part of a regular check. For example, when there is a change in the derived distance of the tip to the work roll, compared with the desired separation, for example when a load first comes on, then suitable adjustment of their relative positions may be applied to compensate for the change. In the case where the gap is not outside the range of tolerance tested at step 53, then the cycle may be repeated. The repeat may have a delay applied 56, or may be related to specific events such as movement of the strippers iii readiness for a reverse pass of the article in a reversing mill.

Claims (1)

1. <claim-text>CLAIMSI. A roll stripper device, the device comprising a stripper mounted on a stripper support; a sensor; and a processor; wherein the sensor is adapted to provide a measure S of distance to a work roll; and wherein the processor is adapted to determine the position of a tip of the stripper relative to the work roll, using the distance provided by the sensor.</claim-text> <claim-text>2. A device according to claim I, wherein the sensor is mounted at a predetermined distance from a tip of the stripper.</claim-text> <claim-text>3. A device according to claim I or claim 2, wherein the sensor is mounted on one of the stripper, stripper support, a feed roll assembly, feed roller support, mill housing or a roll chock.</claim-text> <claim-text>4. A device according to any preceding claim, wherein at least one sensor is mounted at the centre of the device.</claim-text> <claim-text>5. A device according to any preceding claim, wherein a sensor is mounted facing one or more roll grinding support areas of a work roLl.</claim-text> <claim-text>6. A device according to any preceding claim, wherein the device comprises two or more sensors, spaced apart along the length of the device.</claim-text> <claim-text>7. A device according to claim 6, wherein a sensor is mounted at each end of the device.</claim-text> <claim-text>8. A device according to any preceding claim, wherein the device comprises two or more sensors spaced apart around a circumference of the work roll.</claim-text> <claim-text>9. A device according to any preceding claim, wherein the or each sensor is adapted to deterni inc distance from a lower work roll of a pal r of work rolls.</claim-text> <claim-text>10. A device according to any preceding claim, wherein the sensor comprises one of a contact or non-contact inductive or capacita.tive sensor, a mechanical distance sensor, a transducer, or an optical range finder.</claim-text> <claim-text>11. A method of determining distance of a stripper from a work roll, the method comprising using a sensor to deteimine a distance of the sensor from a point on the work roll; extracting stored data relating to the relative position of the sensor and the stripper; and calculating a position of the stripper, relative to the work roll, from the determined distance and the stored location of the sensor.</claim-text> <claim-text>12. A method of controlling a relative position of a stripper and a work roll, the method comprising determining a gap representing the distance of the stripper from the work roll according to the method of claim 11; comparing the gap with a required gap; determining if thc result of the comparison is outside an acceptable range of tolerance and, if so, adapting the position of the stripper according to the result of the comparison.</claim-text> <claim-text>13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the method further comprises placing a sensor at each end of the work roll: and adapting the position of the stripper at each end accordingly.</claim-text> <claim-text>14. A mcthod according to claim 12 or claim 13, wherein the method comprises determining the distance for each of the sensors; calculating an average, minimum or maximum dktancc using each of the determined distances; and adapting the position of the stripper based on the result of the comparison between the required distance and the average, minimum or maximum distance.</claim-text> <claim-text>15. A method according to any of claims 12 to 14, wherein the method comprises automatically repeating the steps ofdetermining and comparing the distance and adapting the position of the stripper.</claim-text> <claim-text>16. A method according to any of claims 12 to 15, wherein the method further comprises applying a delay between repeats when the result of the comparison is within an acceptable range of tolerance.</claim-text> <claim-text>17. A method according to any of claims 12 to 16, wherein the method comprises determining when a head end of an article being rolled has passed the stripper onto the feed roll assembly on the exit side and then causing an actuator to move the stripper further from the work roll than the maximum range of tolerance of the required gap.The maximum range of tolerance is the maximum gap that is acceptable during strip threading to prevent the strip forcing itself between the stripper and the roll, but once the head end has passed the stripper, the gap can be increased beyond this limit without risk of the article getting between the stripper and the work roll. This means that the risk of the stripper coming into contact with the work roll due to unexpected forces is reduced.</claim-text> <claim-text>18. A method according to any of claims 12 to 17, wherein deflection of the stripper is calculated from load measurements and the position of the stripper is adjusted in response to the determined distance and the load measurement.</claim-text> <claim-text>19. A method according to any of claims 12 to 17, further comprising measuring roll load cylinder position in combination with determining distance from sensor measurement.</claim-text> <claim-text>20. A device according to any of claims ito 10, further comprising one or more actuators for adjusting the position of the stripper.23. A device according to claim 20, wherein the device further comprises load sensors to calculate deflection of the stripper.22. A device according to claim 21, wherein the load sensors comprise one of pressure transducers in the actuators or loadeells.</claim-text>