GB2492978A - Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement - Google Patents

Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2492978A
GB2492978A GB1112316.3A GB201112316A GB2492978A GB 2492978 A GB2492978 A GB 2492978A GB 201112316 A GB201112316 A GB 201112316A GB 2492978 A GB2492978 A GB 2492978A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
reinforcement
component
design
optimising
models
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB1112316.3A
Other versions
GB201112316D0 (en
Inventor
David Sketchley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Global Composites Group Ltd
Original Assignee
Global Composites Group Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Global Composites Group Ltd filed Critical Global Composites Group Ltd
Priority to GB1112316.3A priority Critical patent/GB2492978A/en
Publication of GB201112316D0 publication Critical patent/GB201112316D0/en
Publication of GB2492978A publication Critical patent/GB2492978A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/23Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Injection Moulding Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
  • Reinforced Plastic Materials (AREA)

Abstract

A model of the component without reinforcement is prepared (10) and simulated loads are applied to the model (11). Fibre reinforcement is then added to the model in regions of unacceptable stress (12, 13) and simulated loads are then reapplied. The quantity and location of the reinforcement fibres are modified and the steps of re-simulating and modifying (15) are repeated as necessary. Identifying stress of the component may be carried out by finite element analysis. The component may be made from injection moulded polypropylene with glass or carbon fibre reinforcement.

Description

Reinforced Components
Background
The current invention relates to the design and manufacture of composite materials utilising selective reinforcement.
Composite materials are formed of multiple layers of aligned fibres within a matrix material. Fibres within each layer are aligned with each other, and the number of layers and their orientation are selected to provide the required structural properties and to prevent distortion during manufacture and use.
Such composite materials approximate amorphous materials and are often referred to as Quasi Isotropic Laminates.
Such composite components have extremely good strength to weight properties and are therefore very attractive for high-performance applications such as aerospace. However, reinforcing fibres, particularly carbon fibre, are expensive leading to a high cost of manufacture, which may preclude the use of composite technology in lower cost markets.
Summary
Aspects of the invention are set out in the claims.
Description of the drawings
Embodiments of the present invention will now be further described, by way of example, with reference to the drawing, wherein:-Figure 1 shows a flow-chart of a method of designing a composite componet.
Detailed description
The detailed description provided below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of the present examples and is not intended to represent the only forms in which the present example may be constructed or utilized. The description sets forth the functions of the example and the sequence of steps for constructing and operating the example.
However, the same or equivalent functions and sequences may be accomplished by different examples.
Figure 1 shows a method of designing a composite component which enables the cost of manufacture to be reduced compared to conventional design utilising layers of parallel fibres.
At block 10 a mathematical model of the component to be formed is composed for use in a finite element stress analysis. The component is defined in an amorphous material without any reinforcement and having material properties worse than the intended manufacture material to enable analysis of stresses.
At block 11 a stress analysis is performed applying the design loads to the model. At block 12 the resulting stress plot is analysed and overloaded regions identified. Directional reinforcement is added to the model in the overloaded regions at block 13 and the process returns to block 12 to re-run the analysis. The reinforcement may comprise fibres running in arbitrary non-parallel directions as required to provide the required strength for the component when loaded according to the component design parameters.
The steps of blocks 12 and 13 are repeated; adding, changing or removing reinforcement at each re-run, until a reinforcement design which achieves the designers objectives is achieved which reduces component stresses to within acceptable limits. The resulting design is a substantially amorphous carrier with a skeleton of reinforcement fibres present only where and in the particular directions required to provide the required performance.
At block 14 the properties of the carrier material are changed to the properties of the actual material to be used in production. For example, a low-cost glass fibre composite may be utilised. At block 15 the analysis is re-run and at block 16 optimisation of the component is performed to minimise material usage (both matrix and reinforcement) and ensure suitable performance.
At block 16 the component is manufactured according to the design using conventional fabrication techniques. For example, a flat form of the glass-fibre may be produced and the shape cut from glass fibre pre-preg material.
The material is laid up in the required layout, and the reinforcement skeleton added using carbon fibre pre-preg. A second layer of glass fibre may be placed over the carbon fibre. The component is then cured. Any conventional fabrication technique may be utilised.
This design technique enables a component to be manufactured principally from low-cost materials such as glass-reinforced polyester resin. Selective, directional, reinforcement utilising high-performance fibres is positioned within, or on, the low-cost materials to provide the required structural properties.
Such components utilise smaller quantities of expensive material than conventional composites as they avoid the use of reinforcement material where it is not providing a benefit to the performance of the component. The removal of unneeded reinforcement reduces cost, weight, and recycling difficulties at the end of the component's life.
In a particular method of manufacture the reinforcement skeleton is formed from polypropylene impregnated fibres which are laid up in an injection moulding tool. Once the tool is closed, the mould is injected with liquid polypropylene, optionally filled with short lengths of fibre. The heat of the liquid polypropylene partially melts the polypropylene of the skeleton material resulting in a contiguous component. This manufacture method allows the use of injection moulding to produce reinforced components. This method of manufacture may also be suitable for manufacturing composite components designed in any way other than that described hereinbefore.
Elements of the above design and fabrication techniques may be combined with elements of any other design and fabrication technique discussed herein or known elsewhere. For example, the materials used may be any material system suitable for the required application. To further improve component performance auxetic materials may be utilised for the reinforcement and/or matrix. Rather than utilising pre-preg materials, dry cloth or fibres may be utilised and infused with the matrix material, for example by utilising a vacuum bag system.
It will be understood that the benefits and advantages described above may relate to one embodiment or may relate to several embodiments. It will further be understood that reference to an' item refers to one or more of those items.
The steps of the methods described herein may be carried out in any suitable order, or simultaneously where appropriate. Additionally, individual blocks may be deleted from any of the methods without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject matter described herein. Aspects of any of the examples described above may be combined with aspects of any of the other examples described to form further examples without losing the effect sought.
It will be understood that the above description of a preferred embodiment is given by way of example only and that various modifications may be made by those skilled in the art. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments of the invention. Although various embodiments of the invention have been described above with a certain degree of particularity, or with reference to one or more individual embodiments, those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of this invention.
GB1112316.3A 2011-07-18 2011-07-18 Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement Withdrawn GB2492978A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1112316.3A GB2492978A (en) 2011-07-18 2011-07-18 Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1112316.3A GB2492978A (en) 2011-07-18 2011-07-18 Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB201112316D0 GB201112316D0 (en) 2011-08-31
GB2492978A true GB2492978A (en) 2013-01-23

Family

ID=44586771

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB1112316.3A Withdrawn GB2492978A (en) 2011-07-18 2011-07-18 Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2492978A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2522245A (en) * 2014-01-20 2015-07-22 Airbus Operations Ltd A curved winglet

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0229861A (en) * 1988-07-20 1990-01-31 Fujitsu Ltd Data access subroutine
JP2004093530A (en) * 2002-09-04 2004-03-25 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Dynamic characteristics simulation method of composite material

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0229861A (en) * 1988-07-20 1990-01-31 Fujitsu Ltd Data access subroutine
JP2004093530A (en) * 2002-09-04 2004-03-25 Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The Dynamic characteristics simulation method of composite material

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2522245A (en) * 2014-01-20 2015-07-22 Airbus Operations Ltd A curved winglet
US10336440B2 (en) 2014-01-20 2019-07-02 Airbus Operations Limited Curved winglet

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201112316D0 (en) 2011-08-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6356339B2 (en) Multi-ply laminated composites with low unit area weight
AU2020201610B2 (en) Fabrication of composite laminates using temporarily stitched preforms
Kuwata et al. Interlaminar toughness of interleaved CFRP using non-woven veils: Part 1. Mode-I testing
Sorrentino et al. Design and manufacturing of an isogrid structure in composite material: Numerical and experimental results
AL-Oqla et al. Design and fabrication of green biocomposites
Luqman et al. Manufacturing process selection of composite bicycle’s crank arm using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
US20100147460A1 (en) Process for manufacturing a complex piece made of composite material with long fibers and thermosetting matrix
CN104669640A (en) Method And Apparatus For Compression Molding Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Parts
Tucker et al. An introduction to automotive composites
Poorzeinolabedin et al. Resin infusion under flexible tooling process and structural design optimization of the complex composite part
Kazan et al. Feasibility study for manufacturing CF/epoxy–thermoplastic hybrid structures in a single operation
Ghiasi et al. Optimum structural and manufacturing design of a braided hollow composite part
Stewart Carbon fibre composites poised for dramatic growth
CN105189093B (en) Multicompartment composite material structure
Younes et al. Optimal weaving for 2.5 D interlocks
Park et al. An integrated optimisation for the weight, the structural performance and the cost of composite structures
Duleba et al. Simulation and evaluation of carbon/epoxy composite systems using FEM and tensile test
Shaik et al. A review on fabrication of thermoset prepreg composites using out-of-autoclave technology
GB2492978A (en) Method for optimising design of fibre reinforced component using models with and without reinforcement
Zhong et al. Meta-materials of Re-entrant Negative Poisson’s Ratio Structures Made from Fiber-Reinforced Plastics: A Short Review
Qian et al. Structural optimisation of random discontinuous fibre composites: Part 2–Case study
Chen et al. Effect of process parameters on properties of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites
Rakshit et al. Development of High specific strength acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) structure using fused filament fabrication
DE102014119160A1 (en) molding compound
Ahmad et al. Introduction to polymer composites

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)