GB2484261A - Water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination - Google Patents
Water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2484261A GB2484261A GB1016271.7A GB201016271A GB2484261A GB 2484261 A GB2484261 A GB 2484261A GB 201016271 A GB201016271 A GB 201016271A GB 2484261 A GB2484261 A GB 2484261A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- sampling
- water
- tape
- adhesive tape
- microbial contamination
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 239000002390 adhesive tape Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 210000004666 bacterial spore Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910000679 solder Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 28
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000003125 aqueous solvent Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 27
- 210000004215 spore Anatomy 0.000 description 25
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 15
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 8
- 229920000742 Cotton Polymers 0.000 description 7
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000012620 biological material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 6
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000007995 HEPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 241000920330 Alexeter Species 0.000 description 4
- 241001251094 Formica Species 0.000 description 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 4
- 235000010482 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 229920000053 polysorbate 80 Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 238000003260 vortexing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000007853 buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000006150 trypticase soy agar Substances 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920005439 Perspex® Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000010162 Tukey test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002745 absorbent Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002250 absorbent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 244000144992 flock Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012125 lateral flow test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 240000005020 Acaciella glauca Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000193410 Bacillus atrophaeus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 229920004934 Dacron® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000001134 F-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000008331 Pinus X rigitaeda Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000011613 Pinus brutia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000018646 Pinus brutia Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012062 aqueous buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010410 calcium alginate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000648 calcium alginate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960002681 calcium alginate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OKHHGHGGPDJQHR-YMOPUZKJSA-L calcium;(2s,3s,4s,5s,6r)-6-[(2r,3s,4r,5s,6r)-2-carboxy-6-[(2r,3s,4r,5s,6r)-2-carboxylato-4,5,6-trihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-4,5-dihydroxyoxan-3-yl]oxy-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylate Chemical compound [Ca+2].O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)O[C@@H](C([O-])=O)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O2)C([O-])=O)O)[C@H](C(O)=O)O1 OKHHGHGGPDJQHR-YMOPUZKJSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005202 decontamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003588 decontaminative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000005224 forefinger Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012569 microbial contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002906 microbiologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000003973 paint Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005020 polyethylene terephthalate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000136 polysorbate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000003499 redwood Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- GCLGEJMYGQKIIW-UHFFFAOYSA-H sodium hexametaphosphate Chemical compound [Na]OP1(=O)OP(=O)(O[Na])OP(=O)(O[Na])OP(=O)(O[Na])OP(=O)(O[Na])OP(=O)(O[Na])O1 GCLGEJMYGQKIIW-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 235000019982 sodium hexametaphosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005476 soldering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013179 statistical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001059 synthetic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000001577 tetrasodium phosphonato phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009210 therapy by ultrasound Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920003169 water-soluble polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12M—APPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
- C12M1/00—Apparatus for enzymology or microbiology
- C12M1/26—Inoculator or sampler
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/483—Physical analysis of biological material
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/02—Devices for withdrawing samples
- G01N2001/028—Sampling from a surface, swabbing, vaporising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/28—Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
- G01N1/2813—Producing thin layers of samples on a substrate, e.g. smearing, spinning-on
- G01N2001/2833—Collecting samples on a sticky, tacky, adhesive surface
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
- Hematology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
Use of water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface, preferably a porous surface for microbial contamination, in particular, bacterial cells and/or bacterial spores. Preferably, the water-soluble tape is wave solder tape and the porous surface is preferably wood, concrete or fabric. Preferably, after sampling the surface the water-soluble adhesive tape is dissolved in an aqueous solvent to release the collected material for analysis.
Description
t V.' INTELLECTUAL ..* PROPERTY OFFICE Application No. GB 1016271.7 RTM Date:4 January 2011 The following terms are registered trademarks and should be read as such wherever they occur in this document: Perspex Tween ProtoCOL Intellectual Properly Office is an operating name of the Patent Office www.ipo.gov.uk
SURFACE SAMPLING METHOD
The present invention is concerned with use of a water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination, collecting microbial contaminants, and the detection and/or identification of microbial contamination.
Sampling protocols for the recovery of biological material from surfaces have remained relatively unchanged since the swab-rinsing sampling method was described in 1917. Improvements in the sampling efficiency or recovery of microorganisms from non porous surfaces, for example steel and plastic, have benefited from the development of novel man made materials. Synthetic polymers for example polyester and nylon can replace natural fibres, like cotton, in some commercially available bud or cloth type samplers. Polyurethane macrofoams, similar to those used in domestic sponges, have also been evaluated as swabs and shown to be effective sampling materials for the recovery of spores from steel surfaces. Porous surfaces in particular present significant additional challenges to materials used for surface collectors. They are usually rougher and have a greater surface area than non-porous materials, with deep crevices in which microorganisms can be deposited. They are also more likely to present a more heterogeneous surface topology and composition. Both these factors can reduce the efficiency and precision of swabbing for surface sampling. Porous surface can be categorised into hard porous surfaces, such as wood and concrete, and soft porous surfaces such as fabric and skin. The absorbency of the surfaces may also interfere with sampling. For example, concrete is a highly absorbent surface.
It has been clearly demonstrated that pre-moistening swabs, with an aqueous buffer containing surfactant, prior to sampling maximises the recovery of spores from non
I
porous surfaces. However, porous and/or absorbent surfaces wet unevenly, and most of the buffer is absorbed into the surface on the first few strokes of the swab, further reducing the efficiency and precision of the technique.
Sampling, recovery and measurement of biological material from surfaces is an important means for evaluating contamination of surfaces, and also evaluation of clean' surfaces following decontamination. Surface swabbing, and efficient collection and detection of contamination, is of major importance in the healthcare industry and in food manufacturing. Sampling for contamination in hospitals and other public areas is a growing market, with the requirement for more sensitive and accurate and reliable tests ever on the increase.
Traditionally, microbiological swabbing has utilised a cotton wool swab typically requiring the steps of immersing a swab in a suitable buffer solution, swabbing a surface, re-immersing the swab in a buffer solution, processing to release biological material from the swab, and applying an aliquot of the buffer solution to a biological assay for example culturing or a lateral flow test strip.
The present invention thus generally aims to provide an alternative and improved method for sampling surfaces for microbial contamination, especially bacterial cells and spores, and thereby collecting, detecting and/or identifying microbial contamination., The Applicant has now found that a water-soluble adhesive tape is an ideal material for sampling, collecting and recovering microbial contamination from surfaces, and is especially efficient at collecting contamination from porous surfaces. Moreover, its ability to dissolve in aqueous solvents enables efficient release of the collected material for downstream analysis, and thereby detection and/or identification of the contaminant.
Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention provides use of a water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination. The microbial contamination is preferably bacterial cells and bacterial spores which are traditionally very difficult to efficiently sample, collect and identify from surfaces, especially from porous surfaces such as concrete, wood and fabrics.
The Applicant has surprisingly found that a water-soluble adhesive tape is an excellent means of sampling bacterial cells and spores from surfaces, and especially porous surfaces such as concrete and wood. The water-soluble tape is particularly good at sampling vegetative cells which are much less robust than spores and are more likely to lose viability if the sampling method is too physical.
Water soluble tape is used in the electronics industry to mask contacts on printed circuit boards prior to soldering. The tape is designed to be easily removed by immersing in warm water for less than one minute. The tape is made from a water soluble polymer backing and water soluble adhesive.
Adhesive materials have been used for aerobiological sampling for pollen and spores, however the adhesives were water-insoluble. In fact it was stipulated that the adhesives should not be water-soluble (Kapyla M., Grana 1989, 28, 2 15-218).
Hydrophilic adhesive tape has been used in the past for collection of human DNA through removal of surface cells from hairless areas on the body (Li R.C. and Harris H.A., J. Forensic Science 2003, 48, 1-4).
The discovery that water-soluble adhesive tape can be used for efficiently sampling a surface for microbial contamination will lead to the development of low cost systems for interrogating all types of surfaces and terrains, capable of collecting and subsequently analysing a high percentage of all contamination, thus providing improved limits of detection and a high level of confidence in any result. The tape is also an inexpensive alternative to many commercially available swabs.
The water soluble tape has a percentage recovery between 5 and 10 times greater than most commercially available swabs on the majority of surfaces tested.
Microbial contamination from a surface is preferably collected and then the specific contamination detected and/or identified by a suitable biological assay. The identification may for example use a lateral flow test strip or nucleic acid amplification device.
Accordingly, in a second aspect, the present invention provides use of water-soluble adhesive tape in the detection and/or identification of microbial contamination.
The present invention will now be described with reference to the following non-limiting examples and drawings in which Figure 1 is a graph representing the percentage recovery of bacterial spores from a selection of porous and non-porous surfaces. Each point on the graph represents the mean of four replicates for an experimental trial.
Example 1.
Spore preparation. Bacillus atrophaeus (sub species globigii) (BG) spores were prepared by washing three times in sterile distilled water. After the final wash, spores were suspended in 20 ml of water, heat treated to 70°C for 60 mm and then cold shocked on ice, to kill any vegetative cells. The concentration of spores was determined to be 4.7 x 1010 Colony Forming Units (CFU) / ml. This stock suspension was diluted in sterile distilled water to produce 10 ml of a 4.7 x l0 CFU / ml suspension to be used in all the aerosolised deposition experiments.
Swabs and tape. In this study five different sampling materials were used to determine the efficiency of recovery from a variety of porous and non porous surfaces. The materials were cotton tipped swab (Fisher Scientific, UK; cat. no. FB57830), nylon flock tipped swab (Fisher Scientific, UK: cat. no. DIS-275-070G), polyurethane macrofoam-tipped swab (critical swab VWR, UK; cat. no. 149-0269), Dacron tipped Alexeter collection swabTM (Alexeter Technology LLC Chicago, USA; cat. no. K-2025) and a hydrophilic water soluble adhesive tape (3M St. Paul, USA: cat. no. 5414) Surface description. Six different porous and non porous surface materials served as samples on which the BC spores were to be deposited: glass, stainless steel, polyester/cotton fabric, concrete, wood and Formica®. Glass slides (2.5 cm x 8.0 cm) were from Coming Scientific Glassware. Stainless steel coupons (2.5 cm x 8.0 cm) were laser cut from stainless steel 316, fabric pieces (2.5 cm x 8.0 cm) were cut from a laboratory coat (35% cotton, 65% polyester mix), concrete blocks (7.0 cm x 4.5 cm x 3.0 cm) were water jet cut from runway material, wooden blocks (2.5 cmx 8.0 cm) were cut from redwood pine and pieces of Formica® (3.5 cm x 8.0 cm x 1.5 cm) were cut from a standard office desk. A 20 cm2 area, equivalent to the area of the control glass slide, was marked out using a pencil, on the concrete blocks and the desktop pieces. Prior to deposition the glass, steel, fabric and concrete materials were autoclaved whilst the wood and Formica® materials were surface cleaned with 70% (v/v) ethanol.
Deposition chamber. In order to achieve an even deposition of spores on each of the surface types an aerosol deposition chamber was used. This chamber was a 0.5 m3 stainless steel box with a removable Perspex front panel. Aerosols of BG spores were introduced into the chamber via a hand held airbrush paint sprayer (AB-119) through a sealable opening on one side of the box. Samples to be contaminated were placed on removable stainless steel plates within the box.
Preparation of surfaces. The materials to be aerosol deposited were laid in groups of seven on five steel plates placed at pre-determined positions on the floor of the chamber. A total of thirty five individual surfaces were used to test each swab type. In a separate experiment, 15 control glass slides were subjected to aerosol deposition.
For aerosol deposition 10 mL of a 4.7 x i07 CFU / ml suspension was sprayed into the chamber over a 2 mm period. After spraying the chamber was sealed and left for one hour after which the sprayed materials were removed and dried for two hours at 30°C prior to sampling.
Sampling. Each of the 15 control glass slides was placed in a 50 ml Sterilin conical tube containing 10 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer-0.1% (w/v) Tween 80. All the other sample surfaces were then swabbed with each swab type or sampled with the hydrophilic adhesive tape. All swabs were premoistened with 75 tl of the HEPES buffer prior to sampling. Each test surface was swabbed with a single swab, 5 times along the length, rotated 90 degrees, swabbed 12 times along the width, rotated again 90 degrees, and swabbed an additional 5 times along the length. After swabbing, the swab heads were either removed into individual 50 ml Sterilin tubes containing 10 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer -0.1% (w/v) Tween 80 or in the case of the Alexeter swab, were returned to the swab sleeve and the rinse buffer from the liquid filled bulb released to cover the swab. For sampling using the adhesive tape, two 1.25 cm x 8.0 cm strips, covering a surface area equivalent to the glass slide were applied to the test surfaces and pressed down firmly using a sterile gloved forefinger. Both strips were then immediately removed using sterile forceps into individual 50 ml Falcon tubes containing 10 ml of 10 mM HEPES buffer-0.1% (w/v) Tween 80. After sampling all the tubes containing either glass slides, cotton bud, macrofoam or flock tips were shaken by hand for 30 s and then subjected to 30 s of vortexing. The Alexeter swab/sleeve was shaken vigorously by hand for 10 s as per the manufacture's instructions. Tubes containing the adhesive tape were incubated for 10 mm at 45°C followed by vortexing for 30 s to completely dissolve the tape. After processing, the recovered BO pores were plated in quadruplicate onto Tryptone Soya Agar (TSA) plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke UK). Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C and colonies were counted the next day using a colony counting instrument (ProtoCol, Synoptics Ltd UK).
Analysis and statistics. Thirty five test surfaces were used in each deposition experiment and seven experimental replicates were performed for each swab type and the adhesive tape. Samples from each test surface were collected and plated in quadruplicate and the mean of each quadruplicate recorded. Percent recovery from a surface was calculated by dividing the mean CPU count from the sampling material by the mean CPU count from the glass slide control samples. Only culturable spores were recorded and no attempt was made to determine the number of non culturable viable spores recovered.
A linear statistical model was used to investigate differences in percent recovery for the surfaces and sampling materials. The R statistical software system was used for the analysis and the model was fitted with a logit transformation of the percent recovery to stabilise the variance within each sampling material and surface.
The linear model included parameters for the surface, sampling material and an interaction between the surface and swab. This interaction was included in the linear model to cover situations where one swab may be more efficient than the other swabs on a particular surface. The importance of each of these model terms was investigated using F-tests and where the results of the test was statistically significant, where the p-value was less than 0.01, a post-hoc Tukey test was subsequently used to identify where the differences occurred. For example, if there was a statistically significant difference in percentage recovery based on the sampling material then the Tukey test would identify the relative performance of the sampling material. The model assumptions were investigated using residual diagnostic plots.
Water-soluble adhesive tape (YR-54l4 water soluble wave solder tape; 3M) was evaluated alongside commercially available swabs for the collection of bacterial spores from a multitude of surfaces. Spores were recovered from swabs by aggressive vortexing and/or shaking, or from the adhesive tape by dissolving in water at 45°C for mm, followed by growth on agar plates.
Having regard to Figure 1 the soluble tape is significantly better at recovering spores from both porous and non porous surfaces than a comprehensive selection of commercially available swabs, especially from porous surfaces such as concrete and This study shows that water soluble hydrophilic adhesive tape is very effective at recovering spores from a range of porous and non porous surfaces. The tape was significantly more effective than any of the swabs tested on all the non porous surfaces and steel. Overall, for all the sampling materials tested the highest recoveries were from the Formica® and steel surfaces. In contrast, the fabric and wood surfaces had low recoveries for all sample materials except the tape.
The tape has some significant advantages over the swabs. For a swab to be effective it must be efficient at both recovering the spores from the surface and subsequently releasing them for analysis. Aggressive recovery techniques, including extensive vortexing or ultrasonic treatment are routinely used to efficiently recover spores from swabs for further analysis. The water soluble adhesive tape however will release all the spore material collected and consequently make available 100% of the material for subsequent analysis. Calcium alginate swabs function in a similar way, and are completely soluble in sodium hexametaphosphate, but their ability to recover culturable bacteria and spores from surfaces is reported to be equivalent to or even poorer than cotton swabs.
The development of environmental sampling techniques for surface swabbing, over many years, has focused entirely on the effective recovery of microorganisms from hard non porous surfaces. Where commercially available swabs have been tested on porous surfaces the recoveries of biological material have been very low.
Consequently, validated protocols for the recovery of microorganisms from surfaces have been restricted to non porous surfaces and this in turn limits the choice of surface to be tested in a contaminated area. This study has identified a novel use for a commercially available soluble adhesive tape for the effective recovery of spores from a variety of porous and non porous surfaces. For recoveries from porous surfaces this material significantly exceeded the performance obtained for the commercially available swabs and for any other previously reported sampling method, including contact plates.
The use of water soluble tapes and adhesives like the one used in this study provides a universal, simple and cost effective way to recover spores and other biological material from a wide range of porous and non porous surfaces. The ability to use a single sampling method on all surfaces simplifies the development and validation of protocols for the recovery and identification of biological material in contaminated environments.
Example 2.
The tape is also better at sampling environmentally sensitive vegetative bacterial cells than the conventional swabs, and especially results in the recovery of fewer non culturable cells Vegetative cells (1.0 x l0), were pipetted, in lO0uL of 10 mM HEPES buffer-0.1% (w/v) Tween 80, onto six concrete blocks similar to those used in Example 1. The concrete blocks were then dried for 2 hours at 30°C. After drying the blocks were divided into 2 sets of three and sampled using either macrofoam swabs or the hydrophilic adhesive tape. Cells were recovered from the swabs and tape as described in Example 1. Cells eluted from the swab and the tape were serially diluted and plated onto TSA plates and incubated, at 37°C, overnight. Colonies were counted as described in Example 1. Percent recovery from a surface was calculated by dividing the mean CFU count from the sampling material by total number of vegetative cells added to each concrete block. Only culturable spores were recorded and no attempt was made to determine the number of non culturable viable cells recovered. The percent recovery of culturable vegetative cells from each of 3 concrete blocks is reported in Table 1. Recoveries using the tape are between 4 and 200X greater than those using the macrofoam swabs.
Table 1. Percent recovery of vegetative cells from concrete. Cells were aliquoted onto each of 3 blocks and dried at 30C prior to sampling.
Percent recovery from concrete blocks Sampling material 1 2 3 tape 0.07 0.03 0.015 macrofoam 0.0003 0.0003 0.004
Claims (10)
- CLAIMSI. Use of a water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination.
- 2. The use according to Claim 1, wherein the microbial contamination is bacterial cells and/or bacterial spores.
- 3. The use according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 for sampling a porous surface.
- 4. The use according to Claim 3, wherein the porous surface is wood, concrete or fabric.
- 5. The use according to Claims 1 to 4, wherein the water-soluble tape is wave solder tape.
- 6. Use of water-soluble adhesive tape in the detection and/or identification of microbial contamination.
- 7. The use according to Claim 6, wherein the microbial contamination is bacterial cells and/or bacterial spores.
- 8. The use according to Claim 6 or Claim 7 for detection and/or identification of microbial contamination on a porous surface.
- 9. The use according to Claim 8, wherein the porous surface is wood, concrete or fabric.
- 10. The use according to Claims 6 to 9, wherein the water-soluble tape is wave solder tape.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1016271.7A GB2484261A (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2010-09-28 | Water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1016271.7A GB2484261A (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2010-09-28 | Water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB201016271D0 GB201016271D0 (en) | 2010-11-10 |
GB2484261A true GB2484261A (en) | 2012-04-11 |
Family
ID=43128067
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB1016271.7A Withdrawn GB2484261A (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2010-09-28 | Water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2484261A (en) |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4144760A (en) * | 1976-09-30 | 1979-03-20 | Battelle-Institut E.V. | Method and implement to take and collect sample material, especially for scientific or diagnostic examination |
JPS63198869A (en) * | 1987-02-13 | 1988-08-17 | Kao Corp | Method for inspecting horny cell |
EP0816513A1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1998-01-07 | Nitto Denko Corporation | Pressure sensitive adhesive sheet for detection of microorganism and method for detection of microorganism |
US20050008536A1 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2005-01-13 | Cumorah, Inc. D/B/A The Provident Group | Method and apparatus for surface sampling |
JP2006136274A (en) * | 2004-11-15 | 2006-06-01 | Nitto Denko Corp | Adhesive sheet for examining microorganism, method for producing the same, and method and kit for examining the microorganism by using the adhesive sheet |
-
2010
- 2010-09-28 GB GB1016271.7A patent/GB2484261A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4144760A (en) * | 1976-09-30 | 1979-03-20 | Battelle-Institut E.V. | Method and implement to take and collect sample material, especially for scientific or diagnostic examination |
JPS63198869A (en) * | 1987-02-13 | 1988-08-17 | Kao Corp | Method for inspecting horny cell |
EP0816513A1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1998-01-07 | Nitto Denko Corporation | Pressure sensitive adhesive sheet for detection of microorganism and method for detection of microorganism |
US20050008536A1 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2005-01-13 | Cumorah, Inc. D/B/A The Provident Group | Method and apparatus for surface sampling |
JP2006136274A (en) * | 2004-11-15 | 2006-06-01 | Nitto Denko Corp | Adhesive sheet for examining microorganism, method for producing the same, and method and kit for examining the microorganism by using the adhesive sheet |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Journal of Forensic Science, vol. 48, No. 6, 2003, pages 1318-1321 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB201016271D0 (en) | 2010-11-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6033914B2 (en) | Environmental sampling articles and methods | |
Uhrbrand et al. | Assessment of airborne bacteria and noroviruses in air emission from a new highly-advanced hospital wastewater treatment plant | |
Peccia et al. | Incorporating polymerase chain reaction-based identification, population characterization, and quantification of microorganisms into aerosol science: a review | |
Buttner et al. | Evaluation of the biological sampling kit (BiSKit) for large-area surface sampling | |
EP1573295A2 (en) | Gelatine-based materials as swabs | |
US20200181675A1 (en) | Method for screening antimicrobial agent | |
Zhen et al. | Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: potential bias due to air sampling stress | |
Estill et al. | Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from environmental surface samples | |
Buttner et al. | Evaluation of two surface sampling methods for detection of Erwinia herbicola on a variety of materials by culture and quantitative PCR | |
Zhao et al. | Modeling and experimental validation of microbial transfer via surface touch | |
US20050216291A1 (en) | Complete mold system | |
Heikkinen et al. | Bioaerosols | |
JP2022524637A (en) | New sampling method for long-term monitoring of microorganisms | |
GB2484261A (en) | Water-soluble adhesive tape for sampling a surface for microbial contamination | |
US20160376628A1 (en) | Method for screening antimicrobial agent | |
RU2731991C2 (en) | Antimicrobial agents screening method | |
Stobnicka-Kupiec et al. | Prevalence of Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV) and Bovine Adenovirus (BAdV) genomes among air and surface samples in dairy production | |
Thedell et al. | Comparisons of a novel air sampling filter material, wash buffers and extraction methods in the detection and quantification of influenza virus | |
Rose et al. | Surface sampling | |
Yun et al. | Quantitative and qualitative estimation of bacteria contaminating human hairs | |
Samaké et al. | High levels of primary biogenic organic aerosols in the atmosphere in summer are driven by only a few microbial taxa from the leaves of surrounding plants | |
US20220315977A1 (en) | Article useable for sampling surfaces for microorganisms and methods of use | |
WO2023150650A2 (en) | Compositions for exposing film-forming microbes and methods for use of the compositions | |
Buttner et al. | Evaluation of two surface sampling methods for the detection of Bacillus atrophaeus aerosolized in a test chamber | |
Gadiraju | Redefining microbial forensics: a broader scope of applications |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |