GB2471884A

GB2471884A - Loudspeaker driver surround with at least one stiffening tab

Info

Publication number: GB2471884A
Application number: GB0912381A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Jack Oclee-Brown
Original assignee: GP Acoustics UK Ltd
Current assignee: GP Acoustics UK Ltd
Priority date: 2009-07-17
Filing date: 2009-07-17
Publication date: 2011-01-19
Also published as: CN102726062A; JP5739884B2; JP2012533919A; US9271082B2; NO20120051A1; NO340767B1; GB0912381D0; GB2471924A; GB201003997D0; WO2011007151A3; WO2011007151A2; EP2454890B1; CA2768097A1; CN102726062B; HK1176774A1; EP2454890A2; US20120114164A1

Abstract

A surround for a loudspeaker driver comprises an inner flange 24 and an outer flange 22 and a collar of flexible material 26 extending from the inner flange 24 to the outer flange 22. The surround includes at least one tab 34, 36 extending from the collar in a transverse manner. The tabs 34, 36 affect the resonant behaviour of the surround and can be sized and positioned so as to remedy undesirable resonances without necessarily affecting the geometry of surrounding items. The surround may be of the half-roll type and the tab is attached to the collar within the arcuate half-roll section for maximum effect on the resonant behaviour. Tabs 34, 36 can be located on an inner concave section or an outer concave section of the collar or can be provided in both locations. There can be a plurality of tabs 34, 36 in order to provide the necessary effect, distributed radially around the surround with a high degree of rotational symmetry. The surround may be used in a driver arrangement for a loudspeaker.

Description

Improvements in or relating to Surrounds for Audio Drivers

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a surround for an audio driver.

BACKGROUND ART

The surround is a component on a conventional cone driver. Cone drivers are widely used particularly for the low (20-500Hz) and midrange (500-3000Hz) parts of the audio spectrum. The surround provides a flexible air seal between the cone and chassis.

Clearly, the surround must be designed so that it does not impede the motion of the cone -even under large excursions. A common design of surround is the half-roll layout, as depicted in Figures 1 and 2. This consists of a annular flange 10, which fits around the (circular) cone and forms a bridge to the (substantially circular) aperture in the chassis into which the cone fits. A flat circular flange 12 extends around the outer circumference of the surround, and allows it to be fixed to the chassis. An inner circumferential flange 14 defines a truncated cone and substantially matches the outer rim of the cone (not shown), allowing the surround to be attached to the cone.

A "half-roll" 16 is provided between (and bridging) the inner flange 14 and the outer flange 12. This is an approximately semi-circular (in section) length of material which initially extends from the inner flange 14 away from the cone and forward of the driver before curving back towards a junction 18 with the outer flange 12. The length of rubber material around the roll shape 16 is greater than the gap 20 between the chassis edge and the cone edge; thus, as the cone moves, the increase in the gap between the cone edge and the chassis edge is accommodated by the extra material around the roll shape 16. Hence, the half roll design impedes the cone very little at low frequencies, when the cone and surround are moving in a simple manner.

The surround is commonly manufactured in a flexible material such as rubber. It is necessary for the material to have a low elasticity, so that the surround does not impede the motion of the cone. However, because of this low elasticity, the bending wavespeed in the material is typically very low. This can cause problems at mid frequencies, where the surround can resonate quite severely. As the surround is quite large in surface area -typically a significant proportion of the cone area -this surround resonance will normally radiate quite effectively. Additionally with a soft cone, such as those made from paper, polypropylene or Keviar, where the cone is used partly in "breakup" mode, i.e. where the cone is bending in its bandwidth of usage, the surround behaviour has a great effect on the cone motion. In addition, in these modes the surround resonances commonly coincide with bending of the cone edge, which further degrades the radiated frequency response. This is partly because the mechanical impedance presented to the cone edge by the surround typically varies widely with frequency when the surround is close to resonance.

There are a number of techniques which are conventionally employed to try and avoid these issues: * careful material selection for the surround * small flat areas on the inner edge of the surround * changing the thickness of the surround material * adjusting the roll height and width on the surround However, none of these techniques are guaranteed to be successful in every case. None of these techniques completely eliminate the surround resonance (in the majority of cases); they operate by modifying the behaviour so as to alleviate the problem so that the resonance is not evident in the radiated sound. This approach commonly results in designs which are finely balanced, meaning that if it proves necessary to make a small change of geometry or material for other reasons, the surround resonance problems can re-emerge.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention therefore provides a surround for a loudspeaker driver, comprising an inner flange and an outer flange and a collar of flexible material extending from the inner flange to the outer flange, and at least one tab extending from the collar transversely thereto. The tabs affect the resonant behaviour of the surround, and can be sized and positioned so as to remedy undesirable resonances without necessarily affecting the geometry of surrounding items.

The collar preferably includes at least one arcuate section, meaning that the surround will be a half-roll type. In this case, the tab is ideally attached to the collar either side of the arcuate section for maximum effect on the resonant behaviour. It can be located on an inner concave section of the collar, or an outer concave section of the collar, or tabs can be provided in both locations.

Indeed, it will be preferred that there is a plurality of tabs in order to provide the necessary effect. These can be distributed radially around the surround, ideally with a high degree of rotational symmetry.

Typically, the outer flange will be flat and the inner flange part-conical as described above.

In a further aspect, the invention relates to a driver for a loudspeaker, comprising a driven cone set in a chassis, and a surround bridging a gap between the cone and the chassis, the surround being as set out above.

In a still further aspect, the invention relates to a loudspeaker including such a driver.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

An embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example, with reference to the accompanying figures in which; Figure 1 shows a side view of a known half-roll surround; Figure 2 shows a section through one edge of a known half-roll surround; Figure 3 shows an isometric view of a surround according to the present invention; Figure 4 shows a sectional view from the side of a surround according to the present invention; Figure 5 shows an enlarged sectional view of an edge of a surround according to the present invention; Figures 6, 7 and 8 show a short section of a surround according to the present invention, in various states of deflection; and Figure 8 compares the frequency response of a driver with a known half-roll surround and a driver with a surround according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

This invention seeks to add significant damping and bending stiffness to the surround for complex deformations, such as those that occur in resonance, but to have little effect on simple deformations, such as those occurring when the cone moves bodily back and forth at low frequencies.

The new surround is manufactured using conventional techniques. Its new geometry consists of two parts; firstly a thin air-sealing surface as seen on a conventional surround, and secondly thick blocks of material attached to the thin surface which stiffen the air-sealing surface. The air-sealing surface alone, without the attached blocks, would behave like a conventional surround and have the inherent resonance problems previously discussed. The blocks on the surface of this thin air-sealing part add significant local resistance to bending.

The blocks are arranged so that they are not attached to each other directly, they are only joined by the thin membrane. In this way they do not impede the overall flex of the surround, as they can pivot and move with respect to one another. It has been found helpful to overlap the blocks so that the radial section of the air seal is supported by blocks over its entire width.

With some designs it is advantageous to add the blocks only to the part of the surround, where a large motion at resonance is seen. By adjusting the position, number and geometry of the blocks a great deal of control is available over the behaviour of the surround. The presence of the blocks significantly increases the damping and stiffness of the surround to the problematic resonances yet has little effect on the performance of the surround at low frequencies; the cone remains free to move bodily back and forth with little resistance.

The new geometry can be manufactured in one piece, typically by a process such as compression moulding or injection moulding. The blocks can be placed on either side of the air-sealing membrane; this does not appear to affect their behaviour.

It should be understood that the above sets out a design principle in relation to surrounds for cone drivers that can be applied to substantially any surround design and any driver. The projections (tabs, blocks, etc) from the surface of the air-sealing membrane serve to provide a mass, stiffness and damping which affect the manner in which the surround resonates. Thus, previous approaches of adjusting the external shape of the surround become unnecessary as the resonant behaviour of the surround can be affected directly.

As noted above, the specific design modifications which were previously carried out in order to cure the surround of undesirable resonances were specific to the design of surround that was being considered. A similar situation exists in this case in relation to the design of the blocks, and therefore it should be understood that the specific embodiment to be described hereafter is one that works for the shape illustrated when used in the context for which it is intended, but which may need to be adjusted depending on the precise shape and context of a different surround. Nevertheless, the principle remains the same.

Notwithstanding this, the invention is particularly advantageous both in terms of the desirable resonant properties which are acquired by a properly designed surround according to the present invention, but also in that the resonant properties of the surround are no longer dependent on the size and shape of the items surrounding it. Therefore, minor changes to those items do not have as dramatic an effect on the resonant properties of the surround as is the case in known driver surrounds. Thus, the surround design is less sensitive to changes in other items, thereby providing a surround whose design is more robust to unrelated design changes.

Turning to the illustrated environment, figure 3 shows a view of the surround. As with the known surround illustrated in figures 1 and 2, this comprises an outer flange 22 which can be fixed to a chassis (not shown) and an inner flange 24 which can be fitted to the driver cone (not shown). An air-sealing membrane 26 is provided extending from the inner flange 24 to the outer flange 22. As with the classical half roll design illustrated in figures 1 and 2, this initially extends upward and outward relative to the speaker cone, before reaching an outermost extent 30 at which it curves back down and a side wall 32 extends towards the outer flange 22 which it joins at an approximate right angle 28.

The surround of figures 3-5 has two sets of tabs or blocks. A first set of blocks 34 are located opposite the joint 28, on the outer concave section of the relevant curve. They thus extend upward from the outer flange 22 and bridge the angle between the outer flange 22 and the air-sealing membrane 26.

A second set of blocks 36 are located on the inner side of the air-sealing membrane 26, on the concave section behind the curve at the outermost extent 30. They are each elongate in nature, extending from the outer extent 30 of the air-sealing membrane alongside the side wall 32 to which they are also attached.

Both sets of blocks 34, 36 extend around the (circular) surround, with individual blocks separated by approximately 100 intervals.

Figure 6 to 8 show instantaneous points in the movement of the surround as the cone vibrates. The inner flange 24 moves as required with the movement of the cone. The tabs 34, 36 stretch and flex to permit the surround to accommodate this movement; hence this surround provides the necessary functional requirements of a cone surround, i.e. to provide a continuous air seal around the cone notwithstanding its movement. However, the stiffness of the blocks 34, 36 will impart some additional stiffness to the surround at the locations where the blocks 34, 36 are attached. In addition, the mass of the blocks will affect the inertia of the surround. Both effects will thus affect the dynamic response of the surround.

The stiffness of the blocks will be governed by the material, thickness, and other shape factors of the block. The mass of the block will be determined by its overall size and its material. Thus, by varying the shape and size of the block a high degree of control can be exerted on the dynamic response of the surround.

In practice, the material choice will of course often be dictated by the material choice of the remainder of the surround, but some moulding techniques may permit a composite surround.

With this new approach, the surround resonance problem is alleviated to such an extent that it is possible to use shapes of surround which would be very problematic if a conventional approach was taken. For example with the case of a coincident source loudspeaker such as that outlined in W089/11201, it is advantageous for the surround of the cone driver to be a continuation of the cone shape so that it does not affect the sound radiated from the tweeter. A conventional half roll geometry is not ideal for this situation. If the approach of the present invention is used, it is possible to use a shape of surround which would ordinarily perform very poorly, but does not as a result of the supporting sections. The supporting sections are able to modify the surround performance so that the surround resonance problem is not present.

Figure 9 shows the frequency response of a driver with and without blocks on the surround as illustrated in figures 3 to 8. This was obtained via a FEM/BEM simulation, calculating the pressure response im from the surround, on its central axis, with a 2.83V input. The surround without blocks shows a distinct anomaly at 38, over a significant portion of the response curve. This is entirely eliminated in the curve for the surround with blocks. As a result, the surround without blocks is usable up to about 300 Hz whereas the surround with blocks is usable up to about 1 kHz.

It will of course be understood that many variations may be made to the above-described embodiment without departing from the scope of the present invention. -.9.-

Claims

CLAIMS1. A surround for a loudspeaker driver, comprising an inner flange and an outer flange and a collar of flexible material extending from the inner flange to the outer flange, and at least one tab extending from the collar transversely thereto.
2. A surround according to claim 1 in which the collar includes at least one arcuate section.
3. A surround according to claim 2, in which the tab is attached to the collar either side of the arcuate section.
4. A surround according to claim 2 or claim 3 in which the tab is located on an inner concave section of the collar.
5. A surround according to claim 2 or claim 3 in which the tab is located on an outer concave section of the collar.
6. A surround according to any one of the preceding claims in which there are a plurality of tabs.
7. A surround according to claim 6 in which the plurality of tabs are distributed radially around the surround.
8. A surround according to any one of the preceding claims in which the outer flange is flat.
9. A surround according to any one of the preceding claims in which the inner flange is part-conical.
10. A driver for a loudspeaker, comprising a driven cone set in a chassis, and a surround bridging a gap between the cone and the chassis, the surround being according to any one of the preceding claims.
11. A loudspeaker including a driver according to claim 10.
12. A surround for a loudspeaker driver, substantially as disclosed herein with reference to and/or as illustrated in figures 3 to 9.