GB2454804A

GB2454804A - Fire door

Info

Publication number: GB2454804A
Application number: GB0820977A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Eugene Francis Thomas Casey
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2007-11-15
Filing date: 2008-11-17
Publication date: 2009-05-20
Anticipated expiration: 2028-11-17
Also published as: IES20070833A2; IE20080919A1; GB0810669D0; GB0820977D0; GB2454804B; GB2454760A

Abstract

A fire door comprises at least two panels 3a, 3b, an internal core 2 between the panels 3a, 3b, an internal supporting fibreboard framework 4 set in a U-shaped channel formed by the panels 3a, 3b and the core 2, and a hardwood edging member 5. The supporting framework 4 comprises at least two elongate vertical stiles (4a, 4c, Fig 2) and at least two elongate horizontal rails (4b, 4d), preferably of MDF or plywood, and may frame openings in the door for vision panels (11, Fig 2). Preferably the hardwood edging member 5 comprises at least two elongate vertical stiles (5a, 5b) and at least two elongate horizontal rails (5b, 5d), which preferably have a density of 520 kg/m3, but may be in the range 350 kg/m3 to 700 kg/m3. The internal core 2, which may be may be formed using several core pieces, may comprise two or three sheets, which may have different depths. The core 2 is preferably composed of fire resistant material, which may comprise one of more of flaxboard, particleboard, and chipboard or laminated chipboard. Strips of intumescent material may be disposed in the hardwood edging or the frame supporting the door. A method is also disclosed.

Description

1 2454804

AN IMPROVED FIRE DOOR

The present invention relates to an improved fire door.

Other than for access, fire doors provide a vital function closing openings within a building to control spread of fires. In order to do this effectively each fire door must perform to a certain standard in the presence of a fire. A fire doors performance is certified if it achieves a predetermined performance level while being subjected to strictly controlled criteria under test. Various authorities carefully control and provide the basis for legislation for test criteria to determine the level of performance of a fire door. For example, in the United Kingdom, British Standard BS 8214:1990 which outlines the code of practice for fire door assemblies with non-metallic leaves is controlled by the Timber Standards Policy Committee. BS EN 1634-1:2000 is a new European Standard prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 Fire Safety in Buildings', the secretariat of which is held by British Standards Institute. BS EN 1634-1:2000 will supersede British standard BS 476 Pt 8 in due course.

It is known to make fire doors using door blanks wherein the door blank corresponds to a door panel. Typically a door blank is manufactured in large sheets of fire resistant material. The sheets are converted into the type and style of door by cutting the sheet to size and finishing it with lippings, adding door furniture including ironmongery and intumescent seals as required. Waste generated is dependant on the door configuration, naturally if the size of the blank supplied is close to the final door size smaller amounts of waste are generated. Generally the waste factor is at its highest when doors are of 25 bespoke design which may incorporate doors of uncommon size or overpanels. It is not uncommon to discard 15% to 45% of the door blank material when making bespoke a..

doors. Bespoke doors are required in most industrial and commercial offices and many municipal type buildings such as hospitals and colleges where doors with overpanels and * : off size standard leaves are present. *.

A known door blank comprises a solid timber laminate core between two facings.

Typically the core comprises hardwood strips laminated together. The facings are commonly formed from plywood. This type of door leaf can only be manufactured using specialised plants and machinery. It is uneconomical to produce such a door leaf in small or medium quantities thus it can only be effectively manufactured in high volume.

Use of hardwood in the core of the door leads to further problems including telegraphing. Telegraphing is when core materials move independently of each other causing a pattern of irregularities to develop on the facings of the fire door. Each individual piece of timber in the hardwood core has its own individual stiffness and grain characteristic which accentuates movement hence irregularities. Furthermore, it is not uncommon for timber of the same density and species to have marked differing fire performance when tested. To ensure that a fire door with a hardwood core performs to the correct standard in the presence of a fire, it is essential that the door is conditioned properly, it is stored correctly and that the final environment is maintained in order to prevent telegraphing. If consistent performance is to be achieved between hardwood core fire doors tested and the subsequent doors manufactured there must be a high level of quality control employed. Regardless, performances of these types of doors are less predictable than when manufactured board is used in the core.

Use of manufactured board in the form of thick particleboard or chipboard has other problems associated with it. Particleboard or chipboard does not provide sufficient support for retaining screws which in turn causes problems when trying to fix door furniture such as locks and hinges in place. This type of door blank is also manufactured using specialised plant and machinery which causes it to be uneconomical to produce in small or medium quantities.

GB 2186015 discloses a fire door that includes an internal manufactured core with a surrounding framework of fibreboard. The framework surrounding the internal core comprises two vertical stiles and two horizontal rails of elongate members of fiberboard *:*::* 25 having cross sectional dimensions of 48mm x 50mm. The horizontal stiles at the top and bottom of the door in GB 2186015 are encapsulated by an internal 25mm hardwood rail. I...

This is a complicated structure which is time consuming and expensive to manufacture.

* : * This structure is also susceptible to considerable telegraphing if not stored correctly * ****** * * When a material is exposed to flames the outside edges are affected most **** :: vigorously and erosion at a radius corner on the outermost edges develops, this is known as the burn curve. When this radius meets the radius at the opposing corner erosion of the thickness of the material becomes much more rapid. This effect occurs most prominently on the corners at the head or top and bottom of a door. At the top and bottom of the door of GB 2186015 panels cover the hardwood thus the panels are exposed to ---a-more vigorous burning in the presence of a fire. When this occurs the panels tend to curl and peel away from the hardwood and internal frame, which would ultimately lead to exposure of the internal core. Once the frame and core are exposed on more than one face the door begins to breakdown more rapidly. A significant problem with current fire doors is that it is not possible to use fire doors of the type disclosed in GB 2186015 with steel door frames due to the effect of the burn curve. The intensity of the heat from the metal frame causes the door to burn more vigorously thus accelerating breakdown of the door.

An object of the present invention is to overcome the problems associated with known fire doors and their construction.

The present invention provides a fire door in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped having a top, a bottom and two sides, The fire door comprising at least two panels and an internal core interposed between the panels, in a plane transverse to the top, bottom and two sides of the door, each panel comprising an inner and outer planar surface and at least one peripheral edge extending around the top, bottom and two sides of the door, the internal core comprising at least two planar surfaces and at least one peripheral edge surface intermediate the planar surfaces, the inner planar surface of each panel being arranged relative to the internal core to form a U-shaped channel comprising two parallel elements and a connecting element, which extends around the peripheral edge surface of the internal core, such that the peripheral edge surface of the internal core forms the connecting element of the U-shaped *:*::* 25 channel, the U-shaped channel is adapted to receive an internal supporting framework S...

comprising two parallel vertical stiles and two parallel horizontal rails of fibreboard arranged to surround the internal core such that the internal supporting framework together with the panels surrounds and encloses the internal core at the top, bottom and two sides, the internal supporting framework of fibreboard and the peripheral edge of the *.. panels being juxtaposed to form a planar edge surface extending around the top, bottom and sides of the door and a hardwood edging member surrounding the planar edge surfaces at the top, bottom and sides of the door.

Advantageously the hardwood edging member covers the internal supporting framework and protects the edges of the panels at each of the corners. This significantly improves the capacity of the fire door of the invention to resist erosion at the radius corners thus reducing the effect of the burn curve on the corners at the head or top and bottom of a door. This also removes the need for the hardwood rail as disclosed in GB 2186015 which in turn has both cost and production advantages over the previous design.

Ideally when forming the internal supporting framework the at least two vertical stiles and at least two horizontal rails of fibreboard are spaced apart from each other to form opposing sides of a rectangular parrallelpiped. Thus when surrounding the internal core in the door, the internal supporting framework comprises a single vertical stile at each side of the fire door and a single horizontal rail at the top and bottom of the fire door respectively. Advantageously reducing the size of the internal supporting framework reduces the effect of telegraphing. This advantage maintains the integrity of the fire door of the invention even if the fire door is stored or used in less suitable environmental conditions.

Advantageously the fire door of the present invention is designed and constructed to meet current safety standards as set out in Standard BS 476 Pt 8 and Standard BS EN 1634-1:2000. Both of these standards involve exposure to a controlled fire within laboratory conditions where the door sample is tested to destruction. Advantageously the fire door of the present invention has FD3O and FD6O performance, wherein the fire door maintains its integrity when exposed to a fire under standard testing conditions for 30 minutes and 60 minutes respectively. Furthermore the unique construction of the fire door *:*::* 25 of the present invention ensures that this fire door is suitable for use in a metal door frame and meets the current safety standards as set out above when used is such a door frame. * S..

A further significant advantage of the invention is that the fire door can be * :.. . manufactured using simple construction processes. It does not require extensive setting up times and is suitable for all size production runs. When the door size and design is *...

known the internal supporting framework is cut to size and filled with internal core material *.. of the appropriate type. Accordingly there are significant production savings when manufacturing this fire door over the fire door which is disclosed in GB 2186015.

The present invention further provides a method for making a fire door in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped having a top, a bottom and two sides comprising the steps of: (a) sizing an internal core; (b) surrounding the internal core with at least two vertical stiles and at least two horizontal rails of fibreboard to form an internal supporting framework of fibreboard, the internal supporting framework having a peripheral edge member remote from the internal core; (c) interposing the internal core and internal supporting framework between two panels in a plane transverse to the top, bottom and sides of the door, wherein, each of the panels comprises an inner and outer planar surface and at least one peripheral edge extending around the top, bottom and sides of the door, and wherein the inner planar surface of each panel is arranged relative to the internal core and the internal supporting framework of fibreboard such that the peripheral edge of the panels are juxtaposed to the peripheral edge of the internal supporting framework to form a planar edge surface extending around the top, bottom and sides of the door; and (d) surrounding the planar edge surfaces at the top, bottom and sides of the door In the preferred embodiment of the invention the panels and internal supporting framework form the door shape and size. This is in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped wherein the panels are substantially the size of the opening to be closed and the internal supporting framework is substantially the depth of the opening to be closed. Conveniently the panels support the entire door construction. Ideally the fire door *:*::* 25 is supported in the opening to be closed by a doorway frame. * *

In the preferred embodiment of the invention the stiles and rails of the internal supporting framework comprise an elongate fibreboard element. Conveniently the fibreboard comprises medium density fibreboard (MDF) or plywood. Ideally in the preferred embodiment the stiles and rails comprise MDF which is approximately 25 mm wide and which is then cut to the appropriate length. Reducing the size of the internal supporting framework reduces the effect of telegraphing even if the fire door is stored or used in less suitable environmental conditions.

Ideally in the preferred embodiment the hardwood edging member comprises at least two vertical stiles and at least two horizontal rails of elongate members.

Advantageously in the preferred embodiment the hardwood edging member completely surrounds the planar edge surfaces at the top, bottom and sides of the door. Optionally the hardwood edging member is a 10mm strip cut to the appropriate length. Ideally the density of the hardwood used to form the edging member is in the range 350kgm3 to 700kgm3. More preferably the density of the hardwood used to form the hardwood edging member is in the region of approximately 520kgm3.

Ideally the panels are chosen to prevent erosion of the door which can be a weakness of many door designs when subjected to fire testing. Conveniently the panels also support the door construction, as in the event of a fire the facing on the unexposed side remains functional and provides necessary support for the door. Optionally the panels can be further faced with either decorative veneer, laminates or prepared for painting as required by the user.

Preferably the internal core is composed of fire resistant material, for example, flaxboard, particleboard, chipboard or laminated chipboard. It is of course understood that.

any suitable fire resistant material known to the person skilled in the art may also be used.

Preferably in one embodiment the internal core comprises two sheets of fire resistant material, each of which is 18mm in thickness. Advantageously this embodiment of the fire door has FD3O performance characteristics. In a further embodiment of the fire door the internal core comprises three sheets of fire resistant material, which are 18mm, 12mm and 18mm in thickness respectively. Advantageously this embodiment of the door has *:*::* 25 FD6O performance characteristics. Conveniently this results in a door thickness of ... approximately 44mm and 56mm respectfully, which coincides with the standard thickness of doors of each performance characteristic. * S

A further advantage of this invention is that the internal core is composed of manufactured material. This removes the effects of fire performance on the variable 5..

characteristics of natural wood materials. It is not uncommon for timber of the same density and species to have marked differing fire tested performances. The fire door of the present invention achieves consistent performance when tested.

Conveniently the panels and internal supporting framework may also be used to frame openings in doors such as vision panels and facilitate formation of ancillary openings for vision panels and the like within the door or over-sized doors, It is of course understood by the person skilled in the art that the number and size of openings and/or view panels within a door is not limited.

The door is constructed using panels to conceal the core. Optionally the core can be formed using several core pieces rather than one full size piece. Advantageously this further facilitates the inclusion of vision panels and formation of ancillary or over-sized doors.

Failure of door designs when fire tested is often attributable to door deflection or warping while under test. Forming the core using several parts can benefit fire performance. In the presence of a fire each piece of core deflects independently, thereby ensuring that the door, although deflecting, does so in a series of small movements rather than in one continuous curve and therefore is more likely to remain within the door frame increasing the door's performance.

A further advantage of this invention is that the internal supporting framework together with the hardwood edging member provide sufficient support for the retention of screws used for fixing hinges and locks. In the preferred embodiment the internal frame is a 25mm strip and the hardwood edging member is a 10mm strip, together providing a depth of 35mm. Conveniently if a 30mm screw fixing is used, it remains completely within the internal supporting framework of the door thereby ensuring quality screw retention.

**:* 25 Advantageously 30mm is the most commonly used size screw for the purpose. *... * * * ***

Responsibility for fire performance certification lies with the door manufacturer or the company whom convert door blanks to a fire door. This can lead to difficulties and : * improper product being incorporated within the marketplace. A further advantage of the invention is that it provides the option to extend the range of sizes available for the fire **** door whilst retaining the certification of fire performance through testing. This is not *..: possible with fire doors constructed from door blanks.

Advantageously the manufacturer of the fire door of the invention is identifiable by the mere fact that the entire door is constructed at one location. For example in common practice when currently constructing fire doors at multiple locations, ambiguity can arise when it comes to certification as to which company is actually responsible for the manufacture of the door. Furthermore control over the product as tested can be misrepresented or misinterpreted, thus it is not an uncommon experience to find construction details being transferred with less than correct detail, rendering the door ineffective as a fire door. With this in mind it can be understood that a single source with responsibility for the fire doors performance is preferable to conversion of door blanks which is current practice with prior art fire doors.

Optionally one or more strips of intumescent material are disposed in the hardwood edging member and/or the doorway frame supporting the door. In the presence of a heat the intumescent strip expands thereby sealing the opening between the door and the doorway frame. This is the widely employed method of preventing the fire passing through the clearance gaps between door and frame, which are required to allow door and frame to function. Advantageously the fire door of the invention requires less intumescent material than the fire door known in the prior art.

Advantageously the fire door of the present invention is cheaper and easier to manufacture than those currently on the market whilst improving performance and product quality.

The invention will hereinafter be more particularly described with reference to the accompanying drawings which illustrate by way of example only, an embodiment of the invention. * **

* * * 25 * ** *::::* In the drawings; Figure 1 is a sectional top view of a portion of a fire door of the invention; * ****.S * * Figure 2 is a sectional view of the fire door of the invention; * * ***.

*..: Figure 3 is a enlarged sectional view I of a portion of the fire door of Figure 2; and Figure 4 is a cut away perspective view of a corner of the fire door of Figure 1; Figure 5 is a side view of Doorsets 1A and lB showing the measuring points for Doorset Clearance Gaps in the Fire Resistance Performance Tests.

Figure 6 is a graph showing mean furnace temperature, together with the temperature/time relationship specified in the Standard BS EN 1634-1:2000; Figure 7 is a graph showing mean temperatures recorded on the unexposed surface of Doorset 1A; and Figure 8 is a graph showing mean temperatures recorded on the unexposed surface of Doorset lB.

Referring to the drawings and initially to Figure 1 there is shown a sectional top view of a portion of fire door 1. Fire door I comprises panels 3a and 3b and internal core member 2 interposed between the panels 3a and 3b. The internal core is surrounded by an internal supporting frame member 4. The internal supporting framework member and the panels are juxtaposed to form a planar edge surface, fire door 1 further comprising a hardwood edging member 5, which extends around the planar edge surface surrounding and enclosing the planar edge surface.

The door is mounted by means of hinges 9 to a timber or metal doorframe 7. Door stop 8 forms part of the doorframe 7. The hinges 9 are secured to both the doorframe 7 and the fire door 1 by means of screws 10. The screw penetrates the hardwood edging member 5 and internal supporting framework member 4 thereby ensuring quality screw retention.

In Figure 2, there is shown a sectional view of fire door 1. Figure 3 is an enlarged section view of portion I of fire door 1 showing the arrangement of the internal supporting framework 4 arid hardwood edging member 5 around internal core 2.

*...s.. * .

Fire door 1 comprises internal core 2 which is divided into a number of individual pieces which are then fixed together by appropriate means such as gluing. This facilitates the insertion of a viewing panel 11. The viewing panel 11 is composed of any suitable transparent material for example glass or Perspex (RTM) and so forth. The viewing panel 11 is further supported by framing strips of fibreboard 6a to 6d respectively. The strips of fibreboard typically comprise two 25mm horizontal rails 6a and 6d, and two 25mm vertical stiles 6b and 6c of MDF. The framing strips 6a to 6d provide further protection in the event of a fire for the internal core 2 due to their fire retardant properties.

The internal core 2 is surrounded by the internal supporting framework 4, which comprises two 25mm vertical stiles 4a and 4c and two 25mm horizontal rails 4b and 4d.

The panels 3a and 3b (not shown) cover in effect the front and back panels of fire door 1 such that the internal supporting framework 4 and the peripheral edge of the panels 3a and 3b form a planar edge surface. The planar edge surface is completely surrounded and enclosed by the hardwood edging member 5. Hardwood edging member 5 comprises two 10mm vertical stiles 5a and 5c and two 10mm horizontal rails 5b and 5d. The hardwood edging member protects the peripheral edge surfaces of the panels 3a and 3b from immediate exposure to flames in the event of a fire. This slows down the burn curve at the corners of fire door I and thereby improves the performance characteristics of fire door 1 even though there is reduced volume of fire retardant material in the internal supporting framework 4.

Figure 4 shows a cut-away perspective view of a corner of fire door 1. Figure 4 shows a vertical stile 5a and horizontal rail 5b of hardwood engaging member 5 surrounding the planar edge surface thus surrounding and enclosing the internal supporting framework 4 and the edges of the panels 3a and 3b (3b not seen). This protects the edges of the panels 3a and 3b from succumbing as quickly to the effects of the fire.

Referring now specifically to Figures 5 to 7. Fire Door 1 was subjected to a fire *:::* 25 resistance performance test in accordance with European Standard BS EN 1634-1:2000.

For the purpose of the test two samples of fire door 1, samples 1A and lB respectively, were hung within mild steel frames using four stainless steel hinges and were mounted within a low density rigid supporting construction. It is understood by the person skilled in the art that hanging the fire door for testing within a mild steel frame provides a more onerous test scenario than if a timber frame is used. The overall dimensions of each doorset, comprising fire door samples 1A and lB and the frames were 2443 mm x 1016 mm x 45 mm whilst the overall dimensions of each fire door sample 1 A and 16 were 2400 mm x 930 mm x 45 mm. Fire door samples IA and lB comprised Medium density fibreboard stiles and rails, a chipboard core, Medium density fibreboard inner facings with a decorative laminate outer facing and harc' vood lippings on the vertical edges.

Doorset 1A was fitted with a surface mounted overhead door closer, this was mounted on the exposed face in projecting arm configuration. Doorset 1 B was fitted with a surface mounted overhead door closer mounted on the unexposed face in projecting arm configuration. 000rset 1A was also fitted with a glazed aperture comprising of Medium density fibreboard framing, Pilkington Pyroshield (RTM) Polished Wired Glass' and hardwood beading. Doorset 1A was mounted such that it opened towards the heating conditions of the test and Doorset 1 B was mounted such that it opened away from the heating conditions of the test, both doorset were unlatched for the duration of the test.

Schedule of Components for Fire Resistance Performance Test

Item Description

1. Door Frame Material Mild steel, painted finish.

Thickness 1.5 mm.

Overall section size 125 mm x 60 mm.

Jambs to head jointing method Butt joined and fixed together with 2 no. 8 mm diameter bolts.

Fixings to masonry i. method Countersunk steel screws into plastic plugs fixed through a mild steel *:*::* 25 reinforcing plate welded to the back of the frame. lntumescent mastic was applied *S.

around the edges of the frame to the masonry wall.

ii. fixing size 6 mm diameter x 75 mm long.

iii. reinforcing plates 50 mm deep x 3 mm thick plates.

iv. frequency 4 No. fixings tojambs, positioned 100mm up from the bottom edge then 740 mm centres.

2. Door Leaf Stiles and Rails Material Medium density fibreboard (MDF) Density 720 kg/rn3 Overall section size 25 mm x 36 mm.

Jointing method Stiles and rails butt joined and fixed with steel staples, 15 mm x 25 mm x 1 mm.

Adhesive Urea formaldehyde.

3. Door Leaf Core Material Chipboards.

Density 550 to 600 kg/rn3.

Thickness 2 layers each being 18 mm thick.

Fixing method The core to door leaf B was butt joined horizontally and the joints were coincident.

The chipboards layers were glue fixed Together.

Adhesive Urea formaldehyde.

4. Door Leaf Inner Facings Material Medium density fibreboard (MOE).

Thickness 3.6 mm.

Fixing method Glue fixed.

Adhesive Polyvinyl acetate (PVA).

5. Door Leaf Outer Facings Material Decorative laminate.

Thickness 0.6 mm.

Fixing method Glue fixed.

Adhesive Polyvinyl acetate (PVA).

6. Aperture Framing to Door A Material Medium density fibreboard (MDF).

Density 720 kg/rn3 * * Overall section size 25 mm x 36 mm.

*:::* Jointing method Butt joined and fixed with steel staples, *. : l5mmx25mmxlmm. * **

7. Lippings Material Sapele hardwood.

Density 550 to 650 kg/rn3 Thickness 16 mm.

Size 45 mm wide.

8. Door Leaf Intumescent Seal Manufacturer Mann McGowan.

Reference ioop.

Material Palusol (RTM).

Overall section size 20 mm x 4 mm.

Fixing method Self adhesive to perimeter edge of door leaf.

9. Glass Manufacturer Pilkington.

Reference Pyroshield (RIM) Polished Wired Glass.

Thickness 6.4 mm.

Glass sight size 200 mm wide x 400 mm high.

Nominal edge clearances 5 mm.

10. Glazing Beads Material Sapele hardwood.

Density 550 to 650 kg/rn3 Size 29 mm by 23 mm with 5 mm bolection return.

Fixings i. type Steel nail pins.

ii. size i mm diameter by 50 mm.

iii. skew angle approximately 30 degrees.

: 30 iv. frequency 3 No. to horizontal edges at 75 mm centres.

7 No. to vertical edges at 65 mm centres.

S..... * . **..

11. Glass Edge Seal * . Manufacturer and reference Not stated. * *.

Material Intumescent mastic.

12. Hinges Manufacturer Not stated.

Reference CE Mark BS EN 1935 Grade E13.

Primary material Stainless steel.

Overall size i. knuckle 14mm diameter x 110 mm.

ii. blades 30 mm x 100 mm x 2.5 mm thick.

Details of fixings to frame i. type Steel allen head screws into a steel reinforcing plate welded to the frame.

ii. material Steel.

iii. size 6 mm diameter x 32 mm long.

iv. quantity per blade 4.

Details of fixings to leaf i. type Countersunk steel screws.

ii. material Steel.

iii. size 6 mm diameter x 70 mm.

iv. quantity per blade 4.

Bedding material None.

13. Lock and Handleset Lock reference CF Cli 21.

Primary material Polished mild steel lock and plates with stainless steel throw.

Overall sizes i. forend 24 mm wide x 35 mm deep.

ii. strike plate 24 mm wide x 235 mm deep with a 28 mm SI..

deep box for the lock.

iii. casing 88 mm wide x 165 mm deep.

iv. latch bolt throw 10 mm.

S.....

Barrel manufacturer ISEO (Italy).

*:::* Barrel type Door A fitted with knob on unexposed face . : and keyslotto exposed face.

Door B fitted with turn knob on exposed face and key slot to unexposed face.

Barrel material Stainless steel.

Lever handle and escutcheon material Stainless steel with mild steel backing plate to Escutcheon.

Lever handle size 18 mm diameter x 135 mm long with 52 mm diameter escutcheon.

Operation of latch Disengaged.

Bedding material None.

14. Overhead Door Closer Reference FRD Closer, F6424BC, size ADJ EN2-4.

Material Aluminium body with steel arms.

Location Exposed face of door leaf 1A.

Unexposed face of door leaf 1 B. Body size 208 mm x 60 mm x 40 mm deep.

Maximum opening moments i. Doorset IA' 70 Newton metres (Nm).

ii. Doorset 1B' 59 Nm.

Maximum closing moments i. Doorset IA' 20 Nm.

ii. Doorset 1B' 20 Nm.

Storage of fire door 1A and 16, construction of fire doorset 1A and lB and test preparation took place in the test laboratory over a total, combined time of 6 days.

Throughout this period of time both the temperature and the humidity of the laboratory were measured and recorded as being within a range of from 12°C to 22°C and 34% to 64% respectively. S... * * S...

Doorset clearance gaps * S.... * *

Door Gap Dimension in mm at Positions Ref S... ______________________________________ A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8* 9* 10* 11 12 13 14 : 1.9 1.4 1.2 3.1 2.5 3.0 2.4 5.9 6.0 5.8 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.5 *.

B 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22* 23* 24* 25 26 27 28 1.5 2.0 1.7 2.7 3.2 3.1 2.4 5.1 5.2 5.0 J 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.1 A Mean 2.2 Maximum 3.1 Minimum 1.2 B Mean 2.4 Maximum 3.0 Minimum 1.5 Door Gap Between Face of Leaf and Doorstop in mm at Position Ref A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 8# i 10 11 12 13 14 3.9 3.1 2.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.9 2.4 3.8 4.5 4.9 B 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22# 24# 25 26 27 28 1.2 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.9 3.8 4.2 4.7 3.4 *Dimension not included in calculations # Gap not measured Instrumentation General The instrumentation was provided in accordance with the requirements of the Standard.

Furnace The furnace was controlled so that its mean temperature complied with the requirements of the testing standard using six plate thermometers, distributed over a plane 100 mm from the surface of the test construction.

General Thermocouples were provided to monitor the unexposed surface of the specimen and the output of all instrumentation was recorded at *:*::* no less than one minute intervals. * * * S..

The locations and reference numbers of the various unexposed surface thermocouples are shown in Figure 1. * SS.*. * .

Roving Thermocouple A roving thermocouple was available to measure temperatures on *.*. 25 the unexposed surface of the specimen at any position, which might appear to be hotter than the temperatures indicated by the fixed thermocouples.

Integrity Criteria Cotton pads and gap gauges were available to evaluate the integrity of the specimen.

Radiation A water-cooled foil heat-flux meter was used to record the heat radiation from Doorset A. The heat flux meter was positioned at a distance of 1 metre from the unexposed surface of the Doorset A. Furnace Pressure The furnace atmospheric pressure was controlled so that it complied with the requirements of the testing standard. Clause 5.2.

The calculated pressure differential relative to the laboratory atmosphere at the top of the specimens was 16.5 (�3) Pa.

Test Observations Time All observations are from the unexposed face unless noted otherwise.

The ambient air temperature in the vicinity at the test construction was 14°C at the start of the test with no variation during the test.

mins secs 00 00 The test commences.

00 38 The glass pane starts to crack on Doorset IA.

00 58 Smoke release starts at the head of both doorsets.

01 40 The exposed faces of both doorsets have ignited; the * ** laminate face on both doorsets is starting to come away.

03 38 Smoke release increases form the top two hinge positions *....: 30 on Doorset lB. Smoke release also starts to increase from *.i the two top corners of Doorset IA.

00 Smoke release starts around the latch positions on both *.** **** doorsets.

*. : 06 20 Viewed from the exposed side remnants of the laminated * S. face are still attached to both doorsets, the exposed faces appear blackened.

07 56 Black residue runs down the trailing edge of Doorset 1 B from the second to top hinge position downwards.

09 56 Smoke release is visible and a dark patch of discolouration forming on the trailing edge of Doorset 1A. Just above % height.

11 00 Thermocouple 27 on the left hand vertical edge of the frame on Doorset 16, exceeds a 360°C rise. Insulation failure is deemed to have occurred.

12 00 A dark brown residue is running down the leading edge of the Doorset 1 B from the head down to just below mid-height.

14 00 A dark brown residue can be seen running on the leading edge of Doorset 1A, from the top of the door and from around mid-height.

17 00 Discolouration increase at the top of the trailing edge of Doorset 1A, roughly equivalent to the hinge positions.

19 00 The laminate has now totally fallen away from the exposed faces of both doorsets.

00 The frame of Doorset I B has discoloured black on both its vertical faces.

21 00 A black residue can be seen bubbling out at a couple of locations on the trailing edge of Doorset IA.

22 00 Overall there has been very little deflection of both doorsets.

Doorset 16 is proud of the frame by a couple of mm along its leading edge.

23 00 The upping at the bottom of Doorset 1 B starts to deteriorate around mid-span. * **

00 Only the arm of the exposed closer remains on Doorset 1A.

26 30 Discolouration starts to increase at the head of Doorset 1A.

*....: 30 28 50 A cotton wool pad is tested in the top trailing edge corner * * of Doorset 1A, around an area of dark discolouration, the cotton fails to ignite.

*::::* 30 00 Doorset IA continues to satisfy the test criteria, Doorset lB continues to satisfy the integrity criteria of the test.

31 00 The upping falls way at the bottom of Doorset 1A, at its leading edge corner.

31 30 Intermittent flaming seen in the top leading edge corner of Doorset 1A.

32 00 Sustained flaming seen in the trailing edge corner of Doorset IA. Sustained flaming failure deemed to have occurred.

33 00 Smoke starts to issue from the closer on Doorset 1 B. 33 40 Intermittent flaming seen along the threshold of Doorset 1 B. 00 Glowing can now be seen around the frame at mid-height of the trailing edge on Doorset 1 B. 36 00 Sustained flaming seen along the leading edge of Doorset lB starting at the bottom. Sustained flaming failure is deemed to have occurred.

37 00 The test is discontinued at the sponsor's request.

Performance Criteria and Test Results Integrity It is required that the specimen retains its separating function, without either causing ignition of a cotton pad when applied, or permitting the penetration of a gap gauge as specified in testing standard or resulting in sustained flaming on the unexposed surface. These requirements were satisfied for the periods shown below: Doorset IA Doorset I B Sustained flaming 32 minutes 36 minutes * ** ***. * I *S.. Gap

*.... 30 gauge 37 minutes* 37 minutes* * 0 * 0*sII0 * S Cotton pad 32 minutes 36 minutes *I.. * * I...

Insulation The mean temperature rise of the unexposed surface shall not be greater than 140°C and that the maximum temperature rise shall not be greater than 180°C (except on the door frame, where the maximum temperature rise shall not exceed 360°C). Insulation failure also occurs simultaneously with integrity failure as specified in testing standard These requirements were satisfied for the periods shown below: Doorset A Doorset B Insulation 33 minutes 11 minutes *The test duration. The test was discontinued after a period of 37 minutes.

It will of course be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific details described herein, which are given by way of example only, and that various modifications and alterations are possible within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. * ** * * * * S. S... * S SI..

S..... * S

S

S..... * . S... * . *S. I. *

II

Claims

CLAIMS: 1. A fire door in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped having a top, a bottom and two sides, the fire door comprising at least two panels and an internal core interposed between the panels, in a plane transverse to the top, bottom and two sides of the door, each panel comprising an inner and outer planar surface and at least one peripheral edge extending around the top, bottom and two sides of the door, the internal core comprising at least two planar surfaces and at least one peripheral edge surface intermediate the planar surfaces, the inner planar surface of each panel being arranged relative to the internal core to form a U-shaped channel comprising two parallel elements and a connecting element, which extends around the peripheral edge surface of the internal core, such that the peripheral edge surface of the internal core forms the connecting element of the U-shaped channel, the U-shaped channel is adapted to receive an internal supporting framework comprising two parallel vertical stiles and two parallel horizontal rails of fibreboard arranged to surround the internal core such that the internal supporting framework together with the panels surrounds and encloses the internal core at the top, bottom and two sides, the internal supporting framework of fibreboard and the peripheral edge of the panels being juxtaposed to form a planar edge surface extending around the top, bottom and sides of the door and a hardwood edging member surrounding the planar edge surfaces at the top, bottom and sides of the door.
2. A fire door as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the at least two vertical stiles and at least two horizontal rails of the internal supporting framework comprises medium density * *S fibreboard (MDF). * * * S..

: 30
3. A fire door as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the at least two vertical stiles and at * * : least two horizontal rails of the internal supporting framework comprises plywood. * . S...
4. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the hardwood *. edging member comprises at least two vertical stiles and at least two horizontal rails.
5. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the density of the hardwood edging member is in the range 35Okgm3to 700kgm3,
6 A fire door as claimed in Claim 5, wherein the density of the hardwood edging member is approximately 520kgm3.
7. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the internal core is composed of fire resistant material.
8. A fire door as claimed in Claim 6, wherein fire resistant material is selected from one or more groups comprising flaxboard, particleboard, chipboard or laminated chipboard.
9. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the internal core comprises two sheets of fire resistant material.
10. A fire door as claimed in claim 9, wherein the sheets of fire resistant material have a depth of 18mm.
11. A fire door as claimed in any one of Claims 1 to 8, wherein the internal core comprises three sheets of fire resistant material.
12. A fire door as claimed in claim 11, wherein two sheets of the fire resistant material have a depth of approximately 18mm and one of the sheets has a depth of approximately 12mm.
13. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the depth of the * S. fire door is approximately 44mm or 56mm. * .55
14. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the panels and internal supporting frame work frame openings in the fire door thereby facilitating formation of ancillary openings for vision panels and the like within the door or over-sized S...

doors. ** S * S S * 5*
15. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein the core is formed using several core pieces rather than one full size piece
16. A fire door as claimed in any one of the previous claims, wherein one or more strips of intumescent material are disposed in the hardwood edging member and/or the doorway frame supporting the door.
17. A method for making a fire door in the form of a rectangular parallelepiped having a top, a bottom and two sides comprising the steps of: (a) sizing an internal core; (b) surrounding the internal core with at least two vertical stiles and at least two horizontal rails of fibreboard to form an internal supporting framework of fibreboard, the internal supporting framework having a peripheral edge member remote from the internal core; (c) interposing the internal core and internal supporting framework between two panels in a plane transverse to the top, bottom and sides of the door, wherein, each of the panels comprises an inner and outer planar surface and at least one peripheral edge extending around the top, bottom and sides of the door, and wherein the inner planar surface of each panel is arranged relative to the internal core and the internal supporting framework of fibreboard such that the peripheral edge of the panels are juxtaposed to the peripheral edge of the internal supporting framework to form a planar edge surface extending around the top, bottom and sides of the door; and (d) surrounding the planar edge surfaces at the top, bottom and sides of the door with a hardwood edging member.
18. A fire door substantially as herein described with reference to and as shown in the * ** accompanying drawings.
19. A method for making a fire door substantially as herein described with reference to and as shown in the accompanying drawings. * * S... S. * S* * ..