GB2454490A - Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas - Google Patents

Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2454490A
GB2454490A GB0721912A GB0721912A GB2454490A GB 2454490 A GB2454490 A GB 2454490A GB 0721912 A GB0721912 A GB 0721912A GB 0721912 A GB0721912 A GB 0721912A GB 2454490 A GB2454490 A GB 2454490A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
ferric hydroxide
reactor
ferric
gas
iron
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB0721912A
Other versions
GB0721912D0 (en
Inventor
Minh Son Le
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
United Utilities PLC
Original Assignee
United Utilities PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by United Utilities PLC filed Critical United Utilities PLC
Priority to GB0721912A priority Critical patent/GB2454490A/en
Publication of GB0721912D0 publication Critical patent/GB0721912D0/en
Publication of GB2454490A publication Critical patent/GB2454490A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/14Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by absorption
    • B01D53/1412Controlling the absorption process
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/14Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by absorption
    • B01D53/1456Removing acid components
    • B01D53/1468Removing hydrogen sulfide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/14Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by absorption
    • B01D53/1493Selection of liquid materials for use as absorbents
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/52Hydrogen sulfide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/77Liquid phase processes
    • B01D53/78Liquid phase processes with gas-liquid contact
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F11/00Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
    • C02F11/02Biological treatment
    • C02F11/04Anaerobic treatment; Production of methane by such processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M1/00Apparatus for enzymology or microbiology
    • C12M1/107Apparatus for enzymology or microbiology with means for collecting fermentation gases, e.g. methane
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M21/00Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses
    • C12M21/04Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses for producing gas, e.g. biogas
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M43/00Combinations of bioreactors or fermenters with other apparatus
    • C12M43/08Bioreactors or fermenters combined with devices or plants for production of electricity
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M47/00Means for after-treatment of the produced biomass or of the fermentation or metabolic products, e.g. storage of biomass
    • C12M47/18Gas cleaning, e.g. scrubbers; Separation of different gases
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P5/00Preparation of hydrocarbons or halogenated hydrocarbons
    • C12P5/02Preparation of hydrocarbons or halogenated hydrocarbons acyclic
    • C12P5/023Methane
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/60Inorganic bases or salts
    • B01D2251/604Hydroxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2258/00Sources of waste gases
    • B01D2258/05Biogas
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/52Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
    • C02F1/5236Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using inorganic agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2303/00Specific treatment goals
    • C02F2303/02Odour removal or prevention of malodour
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W10/00Technologies for wastewater treatment
    • Y02W10/20Sludge processing

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)

Abstract

A method for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from a gas comprises the steps of (i) contacting the gas with ferric hydroxide in water within a reactor under anaerobic conditions at a suitable pH and (ii) maintaining the ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor at a predetermined value. The gas may be biogas generated during the digestion process of sewage sludge, and may be contacted with the iron hydroxide in situ. The pH may range from 5.5 to 9.0. The concentration of the ferric hydroxide in the reactor may by at least 5g/m3 and maintained by feeding additional amounts into the reactor at least once every 60 days. Also disclosed is a composition for use with the method which comprises a solution of ferric hydroxide in water wherein the solution comprises at least 8% ferric hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis and a minimum of 0.5% solids on a weight/volume basis.

Description

MATERIAL AND METHOD
The present invention relates to a method for the removal of hydrogen suiphide from a gas, particularly but not limited to for example the in situ removal of hydrogen suiphide from a biogas during the digestion process of sewage sludge and the like.
The digestion of sewage sludge produces useful biogas that can be used to generate hot water for process heating requirements. Until recently, surplus biogas produced in such processes was disposed of by simply burning in flare stacks. However, concerns over global warming have provided a significant economic stimulus to utilise the generation of biogas in more useful applications, for example as a resource for generating electricity.
Unfortunately, there exists a significant barrier to the utilisation of biogas in combined heat and power, or co-generation plants due to the high levels of hydrogen sulphide commonly associated with the biogas.
Hydrogen sulphide is a major problem as it is dangerous to health; corrosive to gas handling equipment and the product of combustion of hydrogen sulphide, namely sulphur dioxide is harmful to the environment. The removal of hydrogen sulphide from S..
generated biogas is however necessary in order to reduce environmental emissions and reduce engine maintenance costs. Therefore, whilst biogas clean-up' involves financial
S S
costs for the operator, it is essential for the biogas supply to conform to the requirements laid down by the engine manufacturer and/or to achieve emission standards set by industry regulators.
Hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas is commonly carried out as a pre-treatment, that is, after the production of the biogas but before its utilisation. Current pre-
I
treatment processes include a number of methods of removing or stripping hydrogen sulphide from gas streams, involving both wet and dry scrubbing techniques.
An early solid chemical treatment for hydrogen suiphide (H2S) removal, which was employed widely for coke-oven gas, was the use of an iron sponge'. In this treatment, hydrogen sulphide present within the gas reacted with the iron sponge' to form iron sulphide. This process achieved clean-up efficiencies of up to 99.98 per cent.
Furthermore, the spent adsorption beds resulting from the process could be re-activated by air injection, which converted the iron sulphide back into iron oxide and elemental sulphur.
Activated carbon filters (in the form of powder, granules or fibres) have also been used for the physical adsorption of hydrogen suiphide (H2S) (in addition to water, carbon dioxide and halogenated compounds). The carbon filters are most effectively used for polishing' gases after other treatment(s). However, the high cost of filter replacement or regeneration and the associated cost of disposing of spent carbon means that such schemes are too expensive for biogas clean-up operations for hydrogen sulphide.
S S..
::::* Chemicals used in the wet scrubbing of hydrogen suiphide (H2S) can be solid or liquid, and may be applied in either batch contactor towers or alternatively injected directly into a gas pipeline. The chemical by-products of the reaction are usually :::: separated and disposed of as a waste. In chemical clean-up' procedures the active * chemical is often consumed and the absorbent can often be regenerated. For the large-*..
S
scale treatment of natural gas, water-soluble alkanolamines are often employed to selectively absorb hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (C02). The biogas is purified via contact with the amine solution in an absorber under high pressure. The resultant solution is then released from absorbers under low pressure, which allows any dissolved hydrocarbons that are usually passed to the fuel gas system to escape. The amine solution is then regenerated by contact with steam in a stripping column; that is, the solvent is raised to its boiling point (110°C) and stripped by the steam.
The use of ferric iron in water systems for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from gases and liquids has also been previously described. However, since ferric iron is not soluble in water at the correct pH of application, the iron compounds are normally utilised in conjunction with for example a chelating agent or as a catalyst. For example, Thompson (1980) described the catalytic removal of hydrogen sulphide from gases in an oxidation-reduction process using a water-soluble ferric iron salt and at least two water-soluble iron-chelating agents. Similarly, Tajiri et al. (1985) proposed contacting a gas with a solution of ferric ions and ferrous ions wherein the solution further contained ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and triethanolamine. Whilst the removal of sulphide from water could be achieved using a solution of non-chelated iron, this process involved the liquid phase oxidation of the dissolved hydrogen sulphide to sulphur by means of dissolved oxygen (Hardison, 1994). In yet another example of an iron- based process for catalytic oxidation of a sulphide compound from a gas, Rai (1999) promoted the use a *...
*..*. biologically assisted redox system with a ferric compound and at least one organic :" chelating agent capable of holding ferric and ferrous ions in solution.
I
It is apparent from the foregoing that the pre-treatment of biogas with dry scrubbing techniques involves using expensive chemicals that generate large volumes of wastes. On the other hand, wet-scrubbing techniques involve highly complicated process technologies that are more suitable for very large scale industrial operations. In many cases, the pre-treatment involves compressing and recirculation of large volumes of a potentially explosive gas. It is therefore desirable for the formation of hydrogen
S
sulphide (H2S) to either be prevented or alternatively for the gas removed in situ.
Currently, there are no known commercial processes for which the removal of hydrogen suiphide (H2S) takes place in situ. The main difficulty associated with any in situ reactions to remove hydrogen sulphide is the unknown consequences of introducing new reactants such as those already mentioned above into for example a digestion process that generates hydrogen sulphide (H2S). Nevertheless, it is known that some workers have attempted to remove hydrogen suiphide (H2S) in situ by dosing digesters with a solution of ferric chloride (FeCI3). Such attempts have not however resulted in a successful application either because the technique was found to be inefficient or because the application was not cost effective. Furthermore, some workers have suggested the use of water sludge for the in situ removal of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) but to date no detail of such processes are available and no successful application has been reported.
It is therefore an aim of the present invention to provide a method for the removal of hydrogen suiphide from a gas. More particularly it is an aim of the present invention to provide a method for the in situ removal of hydrogen sulphide from a biogas during the *. digestion process of sewage sludge and the like. Such a method would overcome the *.: disadvantages of methods described prior hereto. I... *
It is a further aim of the present invention is provide a low cost chemical composition or reagent suitable for use in the removal of hydrogen sulphide from a gas, more particularly for the in situ removal of hydrogen sulphide from a biogas during the digestion process of sewage sludge and the like. Such a chemical composition or reagent being safe and yet simple to use and can be disposed off readily after use.
Therefore according to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method suitable for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from a gas, the method comprising the steps of: (i) contacting the gas with ferric hydroxide in water within a reactor under anaerobic conditions at a suitable pH; and (ii) maintaining the ferric hydroxide concentration in said reactor at a pre-determined value.
In accordance with the present invention the hydrogen suiphide is removed form a biogas wherein the biogas is produced for example during a water or waste water treatment process. The method of the present invention finds particular application however in the removal of hydrogen suiphide from a gas preferably a biogas generated during the digestion process of sewage sludge.
Also in the method of the present invention the ferric hydroxide is contacted with the gas or biogas in situ.
It is desirable for the efficiency of the method for the pH of the system in the ***, reactor to be maintained in a range of between 5.5 and 9.0, more preferably between pH *..
6.0 and 8.0, and most preferably between pH 7.0 and 8.0.
It is also preferred that the minimum ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is at least 5g/m3 expressed as the concentration of iron, more preferably at least 20g1m3 expressed as the concentration of iron.
Likewise, it is preferred that the maximum ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is at least 500g/m3 expressed as the concentration of iron, more preferably at least I,000g/m3 expressed as the concentration of iron.
The ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is preferably maintained at a pre-determined value by feeding the reactor with ferric hydroxide at least once every 60 days, preferably at least once every 15 days.
More preferably the ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is maintained at a pre-determined value by feeding the reactor with ferric hydroxide continuously.
With regard to the ferric hydroxide, the ferric hydroxide is preferably derived from ferric chloride or ferric sulphate in a water purification application and most importantly, the ferric hydroxide can be recovered when the application is complete.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a composition suitable for the removal of hydrogen suiphide from a gas, wherein the composition comprises: a solution of ferric hydroxide in water wherein the solution comprises at least 8% femc hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis; and a minimum of 0.5% solids on weight/volume basis.
It is more preferred that the solution of ferric hydroxide in water comprises at least 15% femc hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis, and most preferred that the solution comprises at least 20% femc hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis.
Furthermore, it is preferred that the solution comprises a minimum of 2% solids on weight/volume basis.
S
Finally, according to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided the use of a composition according to the second aspect of the present invention wherein either ferric chloride or ferric sulphate in a water or wastewater treatment process
S
followed by recovering the resulting ferric hydroxide as a sludge, and wherein the sludge contains a minimum of 0.5% solids on wlv basis.
More preferably the use of the composition can be applied for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from a gas, and most preferably the gas is a biogas and the biogas is generated during the digestion process of sewage sludge.
Furthermore, the ferric hydroxide is derived from ferric chloride and/or ferric sulphate and the most importantly the ferric hydroxide is recoverable.
Water sludge is produced in abundance by the water industry. It is a by-product that arises from the use of heavy metal salts (both chloride and sulphate) for water treatment, particularly for colour and cryptosporidium removal applications. Aluminium and iron are the most commonly used coagulant chemicals in water purification. When such a metal salt is dissolved in water positively charged metal-ions are generated which attract impurities in the water such as colloids, humus and suspended particles which are all negatively charged. At the same time metal hydroxide flocs are formed by hydrolysis.
Impurities are captured by the flocs and a sludge consisting of metal hydroxide and p..
impurities is formed. Practically all coagulant added during water purification treatments remains in the sludge. The coagulant content of sludge is typically between 100 to 300 kg metal/tonne dry solids. The dry solids content of drinking water sludge is typically :: only about 0.1%. By adding a polyelectrolyte followed by sedimentation it is possible to raise the dry solids content to about 3.0%. By performing further mechanical dewatering, the dry solids content of the drinking water sludge can be further increased to a level of 5 to 20 % (as a slurry or cake). The water sludge is a waste material and its disposal normally incurs a considerable cost to the operator. Dewatered sludge may be disposed of in land fill sites but is often more commonly disposed of by means of utilisation as a soil conditioner in agriculture. Untreated water sludge may also be disposed of by discharging into the municipal sewerage networks.
Although the chemical formula for ferric hydroxide is often written in the literature as Fe(OH)3, this form is not found in nature. Ferric hydroxide is also known as ferric hydroxide oxide; that is iron (Ill) oxide hydrated and is given the molecular formula FeOOH. With time, ferric hydroxide is mineralized. The principal forms of mineralized ferric iron found in soils are: * amorphous hydrous ferric oxide (Fe203*XH2O), * maghemite ( gamma Fe203), * lepidocrocite (gamma FeOOH), * hematite (alpha Fe203), and * Goethite (alpha FeOOH).
Sewage sludge typically contains between 1 to 2% iron on a dry basis. Iron may enter the sewerage networks through infiltration, surface run offs, scale from rusting iron pipes or from industrial discharges. The chemical forms and make up of iron in sewage sludge are unknown. In general, however, they are found to be un-reactive towards hydrogen sulphide under normal digester operating conditions. S. *
The most commonly used method of removing soluble metal ions for example 5.5.
aluminium, iron, copper and cadmium etc (Al3, Fe3, Cu, Cd, etc.) from solution is to 55...
* precipitate the ions as a metal hydroxide or sulphide. The fact that according to the S.....
* present invention ferric hydroxide of water sludge origin was found to be reactive toward S...
hydrogen sulphide under certain conditions was surprising because ferric hydroxide is *a.
S not soluble, and does not normally react with hydrogen sulphide. This fact is even more
I
surprising when one considers that aluminium hydroxide from water purification processes was found to be un-reactive toward hydrogen suiphide. Aluminium hydroxide with a solubility product constant of 4.6 x i0 is considerably more soluble than ferric hydroxide with a solubility product constant of 4.0 x 1038. The differences in the reactivity between ferric hydroxide and aluminium hydroxide may be due to the ability of ferric iron to undergo a reduction process to form ferrous iron which is soluble.
Table I shows a comparison in the literature of the solubility of ferrous and ferric hydroxide in water at different pH.
Table 1 -Solubility of ferrous and ferric hydroxide in water at different pH PH Maximum concentration of pH Maximum concentration of ________ ferric iron, ppm ________ ferrous iron, ppm 2 60,000 below 6 greater than 90,000,very high 3 60 7 90,000 4 0.05 8 900 above5 0 9 9 The transformation of iron from the ferric form to ferrous form is only possible under a reduced or anaerobic condition and is strongly influenced by the solution pH. Since mineralized ferric iron seems incapable of reacting with hydrogen suiphide, it can be assumed that the kinetics of the ferric / ferrous transformation for the mineralized fernc iron is not favourable. The present inventor believes, although not wishing to be bound :. by any particular theory, that ferric hydroxide and hydrogen suiphide undergo a series of chemical reactions which ultimately result in the formation of pyrrhotite (FeS). The I...
reactions may be described as follows: * *
S * *
Under reduced conditions *SSS Fe34 + e 4 Fe2 Equation (1) 5..
Fe (OH)2 + H2S 3 FeS + 2H20 Equation (2) pyrrhotite Another important factor affecting the formation of pyrrhotite is the solubility of hydrogen suiphide in water. Hydrogen sulphide is only slightly soluble in acidic water, but in alkaline solutions (high pH), the solubility is dramatically increased. Thus it should be clear that the formation of pyrrhotite is limited to a pH range in the region of 5.5 to 9.0 The kinetics of pyrrhotite formation is therefore most favourable in the pH range in the region of 7 to 8. It should be noted that the formation of pyrite (FeS2) under the same condition may be possible also.
Since the formation of pyrrhotite is virtually irreversible, the final concentration of hydrogen sulphide in the treated biogas can reach an extremely low level. The actual hydrogen sulphide removal efficiency would be dictated by the initial concentration of the ferric hydroxide in the reactor and the hydrogen sulphide concentration in the biogas and the contact time between the ferrous form of the iron and the hydrogen sulphide.
For the in situ removal of hydrogen sulphide from a biogas during the digestion process of sewage sludge, the ferric hydroxide is conveniently dispersed in the sewage sludge.
The transformation of iron from the ferric form to ferrous form takes place naturally in the digester which acts as a reactor and provides the anaerobic conditions. The nascent :.:: hydrogen sulphide reacts with the iron as it rises to the gas space at the top of the IS..
digester. The contact time between the hydrogen suiphide and the iron is therefore only
S S....
* a matter of a few seconds. For improved suiphide removal efficiency the contact time * may be extended by re-injecting the gas in the said gas space back into the sludge in the *SS.
digester. Alternatively, the biogas containing hydrogen sulphide may be contacted with IS.
the ferric hydroxide suspension in a separate reactor, as a form of pre-treatment before its utilisation.
In order to specify the quality of the gas supply with respect to the hydrogen suiphide content, it is important to be aware of the requirements laid down by gas engine manufacturers and the emission standards set by industry regulators. Currently most gas engines are designed to tolerate hydrogen sulphide level up to 500ppm, but to achieve (local) environmental emission standards the levels are often not allowed to exceed 1 5Oppm. These requirements may be even more stringent in the future.
Once a target hydrogen sulphide level is set, the level may be monitored and controlled by any conventional feedback control loops using appropriate instrumentation in conjunction with the proper fernc hydroxide storage and dosing equipment. This arrangement may however be very costly to install and may not be compatible with the operation of a sewage treatment works.
In contrast, in line with the present invention, it has been found that the hydrogen sulphide in the gas may be conveniently maintained below a set level by a method as to be described in the following paragraph. Such a method is both practical and simple to implement on a large scale without the need for sophisticated instrumentation and is therefore may be provided at a much reduced cost. S.
:..::. According to equations (1) and (2) above, one mole of ferric hydroxide is required to S...
remove one mole of hydrogen sulphide from the gas to be treated. On a mass basis, * : 55.8g of ferric hydroxide expressed as iron is required to remove 34g of hydrogen * **..
* sulphide from the gas to be treated or, 1.64 kg iron per kg of hydrogen suiphide (H2S). It * S..
* should be noted that, if the reactions resulted in the formation of pyrite (FeS2) instead of **.
S
I
of pyrrhotite, the requirement for ferric hydroxide would be 0.82kg iron per kg of hydrogen suiphide (H2S).
In order to maintain the hydrogen suiphide below a set level an operator has to ensure that the available quantity of iron in the reactor on any particular day must exceed the amount required for hydrogen suiphide removal on a daily basis. This relationship may be expressed as: VRCFe> pKVG (C0 C,) Equation (3) Where VR is the reactor volume CFe is the ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor expressed as iron.
V is the daily gas volume to be treated.
C0 is the hydrogen suiphide concentration in the gas before treatment.
C1 is the hydrogen suiphide concentration in the gas after treatment.
p is the biogas density (kg/rn3).
K is the iron: sulphide mass ratio (0.82 -1.64) As mentioned previously, there may be many forms of iron in the sewage sludge and there are no practical means to discriminate them, therefore the value CFe must be S. estimated from a known amount of ferric hydroxide fed to the reactor and the predicted S S....
* consumption rate by the hydrogen sulphide removal process. Furthermore, where the *.***. a *
reactor is a continuous flow stirred tank reactor, a certain amount of the un-reacted ferric *5** hydroxide will also be washed out with the flow. The value CFe at any point in time may *S.
therefore be approximated as follows: VRCFe = VRCFeO K E p VG(CSO -C81) -E QCFeA t Equation (4) Where HRT is the reactor hydraulic retention time 1) t is the elapsed time since the ferric hydroxide was added to the reactor.
2) CFeO is the value CFe at t0.
3) K Z p VG (C80 C81) is the summation of amount of iron consumed by the hydrogen sulphide reaction over period t, and 4) QCFe i t is the summation of amount of iron washed out of the reactor over period t.
For a better understanding of the present invention and to show more clearly how it may be carried into effect, the invention will now be described by way of the following examples shown below.
EXAMPLE 1
A water purification plant used 2.3 tonnes of Fe2(S04)3 per day to treat 49,170 m3/d of river water and produces 4,620 m3/d of sludge which had 0.43 gIL dry solids content.
After polymer treatment and settlement 68m3/d of a thickened sludge was recovered.
* * The thickened sludge had the following analysis (Table 2). S... * * *..S
Table 2 -Analysis of the ferric hydroxide recovered from a water purification process *.SS*.
* . _________________________ Determinant Value Units * S Dry solids (DS) 2.93 % Volatile solids 55 % Sulphur content 7.800 mg/kg OS Aluminium content 3.5 g Al/kg DS Iron content 293 g Fe/kg DS
I
EXAMPLE 2
The thickened sludge from example 1 was further treated in a filter press to make a ferric hydroxide cake. The cake was found to have dry solid content 15% w/w.
E)kAMPLE 3 Sewage sludge was fermented in two separate reactors under anaerobic conditions at 41.5 °C. Each reactor contained I OL of sewage sludge. The reactors were identical in all respects except that reactor A contained 1 3.5g of ferric hydroxide expressed as iron.
The ferric hydroxide was in the form of a cake that was recovered from a water treatment works as described in Example 2. The results from the tests were as shown by Tables 3 and 4. The composition of biogas from both reactors was approximately 20% methane and 80% carbon dioxide.
Table 3 -Hydrogen suiphide in biogas during the fermentation of sewage sludge with ferric hydroxide treatment (reactor A).
Run Time H Ammonia m Il' Gas production H2S level (Days) p g / (L) (ppm) 0 5.87 680 0 0 1 6.01 860 3.630 50 2 6.32 910 6.138 50 3 6.61 1,330 7.194 50 4 6.84 1,370 7.194 50 6.74 1,530 7.326 50 6 6.92 1,510 7.326 50 * * ______________ _____________ **** Table 4-Hydrogen sulphide in biogas during the fermentation of sewage sludge without ferric hydroxide treatment (reactor B).
*:. Run Time H Ammonia Gas production H2S level * (Days) p (mg/I) (L) (ppm) 0 5.87 680 0 1 5.32 840 1.235 2,000 2 5.33 1,300 3.380 2,000 3 5.45 1,096 4.485 2,000 4 5.53 1,100 4.940 2,000 5.45 1,230 6.240 2,000 6 5.51 1,230 6.565 2,000
EXAMPLE 4
A sewage sludge digester in the form of a stirred tank reactor with a working volume of 2500 m3 was operated at 35 °C under anaerobic conditions for a number of days (period A) as follows: Parameters Units Values VR m3 2500 Throughput rate m3lday 150 HRT days 16.6 V m3/day 3,000 C0 (H2S concentration) Part per million by weight (ppm) 1.100 Biogas methane % 65 Biogas CO2 % 35 Digester pH pH 7.5 During the second period (period B with 28 days) 4.28 m3 of the ferric hydroxide from Example 1 (Table 2) was added daily to the digester feed. The concentration of ferric hydroxide expressed as iron in the feed was estimated to be 246g/m3. During period B the hydrogen suiphide in the biogas was found to be approximately 20ppm, a reduction of 98.2% from the previous level (during period A). The amount of hydrogen sulphide removed was estimated to be 3.3kg/d. The amount of iron consumed by the hydrogen sulphide according to equation (2) above was 5.4kg/d. The steady state concentration of ferric hydroxide expressed as iron in the digester was therefore 209g/m3. S...
During a further period (period C) no ferric hydroxide was added to the digester feed and the concentration of the ferric hydroxide (CFe) in the reactor was allowed to decline due * to natural displacement by the digester feed and consumption by the hydrogen suiphide. *.. *
The concentration of the ferric hydroxide (CFe) in the reactor for period C was estimated using equation (4) with a K value of 1.0. The operating parameters of the digester during period C were as follows: ElaDsed time t Q4t (days) (ppm) kg H2S removed Estimated (g/m3) kg iron washout - 0 20 3.24 209.00 27.17 2 30 9.68 185.31 76.85 4 20 16.16 164.03 120.84 6 20 22.64 144.89 159.72 8 25 29.10 127.69 194.01 20 35.55 112.24 224.17 14 20 48.51 85.86 273.74 18 20 61.43 64.57 311.28 22 26 74.34 47. 37 339.11 26 26 87.20 33.50 359.12 50 99.92 22.33 372.81 34 80 112.26 13.44 381.45 38 185 123.59 6.56 386.12 44 400 135.44 0.55 387.87 The above results show that during the first 26 days of period C the hydrogen sulphide level in the biogas remained very low. Thereafter the hydrogen suiphide level in the biogas rose rapidly corresponding to an accelerated rate of decline in the calculated concentration of ferric hydroxide (CFe) in the reactor. The results also show that a concentration of ferric hydroxide (CFe) as iron of at least 22g/m3 in the reactor must be maintained in order to keep the hydrogen suiphide level in the biogas below 50ppm.
It will be appreciated that many modifications and enhancements may be made to the S...
basic treatment process outlined herein. For instance, methods for introducing the ferric hydroxide into the reactor may be varied. The biogas may be recirculated through the .5 reactor. The biogas may be treated in a series of reactors some of which may not be generating gases at all. Other possible modifications or applications will be readily apparent to the appropriately skilled person.
References United States Patent 4,218,342 (Thompson, 1980) United States Patent 4,532,118 (Tajiri, et al., 1985) United States Patent 5,286,389 (Hardison, 1994) United States Patent 5,989,513 (Rai, 1999) * * * *** *** 0 * * **.* * S..... * S
S..... * . *..S S * S SS *
S S.. p

Claims (25)

1. A method suitable for the removal of hydrogen suiphide from a gas, the method comprising the steps of (I) contacting the gas with ferric hydroxide in water within a reactor under anaerobic conditions at a suitable pH; and (ii) maintaining the femc hydroxide concentration in said reactor at a pre-determined value.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the gas is a biogas.
3. A method according to claims 1 or 2 wherein the femc hydroxide is contacted with the gas in situ.
4. A method according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the pH is maintained in a range of between 5.5 and 9.0.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the pH is in a range of between 6.0 and 8.0. * *
6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the pH is in a **** range of between
7.0 and 8.0.
****** * I * I.....
* 7. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the minimum **..
: ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is at least 5g/m3 expressed as the *I.
concentration of iron.
8. A method according to any one of preceding claims 1 to 6 wherein the minimum ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is at least 20g1m3 expressed as the concentration of iron.
9. A method according to any one of the prebeding claims wherein the maximum ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is at least 500g/m3 expressed as the concentration of iron.
10. A method according to any one of preceding claims I to 8 wherein the maximum ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is at least I,000g/m3 expressed as the concentration of iron.
11. A method according to claims 11 wherein the femc hydroxide concentration in the reactor is maintained at a pre-determined value by feeding the reactor with ferric hydroxide at least once every 60 days, preferably at least once every 15 days.
12. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the ferric hydroxide concentration in the reactor is maintained at a pre-determined value by feeding the reactor with ferric hydroxide continuously. S...
13. A method according to any of claims 1 to 12 wherein the ferric hydroxide is * derived from ferric chloride or ferric sulphate.
***... * * S...
14. A method according to any of claims 1 to 13 wherein the gas is generated during S..
the digestion process of sewage sludge.
15. A method according to any of claims 1 to 14 wherein the gas is generated in a water or waste water treatment process.
16. A method according to any of the preceding claims wherein the fernc hydroxide is recovered from a water treatment process and is recoverable.
17. A composition suitable for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from a gas, wherein the composition comprises: a solution of ferric hydroxide in water wherein the solution comprises at least 8% ferric hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis; and a minimum of 0.5% solids on weight/volume basis.
18. A composition according to claims 17 wherein the solution comprises at least 15% ferric hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis.
19. A composition according to claims 17 wherein the solution comprises at least 20% ferric hydroxide expressed as iron on a dry basis.
:.
20. A composition according to claims 17, 18 or 19 wherein the solution comprises a :..::: minimum of 2% solids on weight/volume basis. S...
S
S.....
*
21. Use of a composition according to any of claims 17 to 20 for the removal of *SSS..
* hydrogen sulphide from a gas. S... S S* *. S
S S..
S
S
22. Use of a composition according to claim 21 wherein the gas is a biogas and the biogas is generated during the digestion process of sewage sludge.
23. Use of a composition according to claim 21 wherein the ferric hydroxide is derived from ferric chloride and/or ferric sulphate.
24. Use of a composition according to claim 21 wherein the ferric hydroxide is recoverable.
25. Use of a composition according to claim 21 wherein the ferric hydroxide is denved from ferric chloride or fernc sulphate and wherein the composition is applied in a water or waste water treatment process. * * * *** **** * S
S
*.**** * *
S
***S** * S I.,. * * S S. S *
S
GB0721912A 2007-11-08 2007-11-08 Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas Withdrawn GB2454490A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0721912A GB2454490A (en) 2007-11-08 2007-11-08 Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0721912A GB2454490A (en) 2007-11-08 2007-11-08 Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB0721912D0 GB0721912D0 (en) 2007-12-19
GB2454490A true GB2454490A (en) 2009-05-13

Family

ID=38858347

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB0721912A Withdrawn GB2454490A (en) 2007-11-08 2007-11-08 Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2454490A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3009686A1 (en) * 2013-08-19 2015-02-20 Ovive PROCESS FOR REMOVING HYDROGEN SULFIDE FROM A NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE FACILITY

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS54100975A (en) * 1978-01-27 1979-08-09 Shinagawa Furnace Selective absorption removal method of hydrogen sulfide in gas
SU1065029A1 (en) * 1982-03-10 1984-01-07 Институт нефтехимического синтеза им.А.В.Топчиева Method of cleaning gases from hydrogen sulfide
DD226552A1 (en) * 1984-09-21 1985-08-28 Dresden Komplette Chemieanlag PROCESS FOR OBTAINING SULFUR-HYDROGEN BIOGAS
US5004588A (en) * 1988-01-15 1991-04-02 Chevron Research & Technology Company Process for removal of hydrogen sulfide from gaseous stream
DE4104873A1 (en) * 1991-02-18 1992-08-20 Forsch Aufbereitung Gas purifier moulding compsn. prodn. for dry removal of hydrogen sulphide - comprises mill drying, classifying and granulating ferric hydroxide slurry from water works
FR2675057A1 (en) * 1991-03-22 1992-10-16 Joassin Luc Process and reactant for in-situ desulphurisation of biogas and for the elimination of corrosion and nauseating odour problems in anaerobic digesters and in any other mixtures or plants producing them
US5976373A (en) * 1994-07-01 1999-11-02 International Fuel Cells, Llc Removal of hydrogen sulfide from anaerobic digester gas

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS54100975A (en) * 1978-01-27 1979-08-09 Shinagawa Furnace Selective absorption removal method of hydrogen sulfide in gas
SU1065029A1 (en) * 1982-03-10 1984-01-07 Институт нефтехимического синтеза им.А.В.Топчиева Method of cleaning gases from hydrogen sulfide
DD226552A1 (en) * 1984-09-21 1985-08-28 Dresden Komplette Chemieanlag PROCESS FOR OBTAINING SULFUR-HYDROGEN BIOGAS
US5004588A (en) * 1988-01-15 1991-04-02 Chevron Research & Technology Company Process for removal of hydrogen sulfide from gaseous stream
DE4104873A1 (en) * 1991-02-18 1992-08-20 Forsch Aufbereitung Gas purifier moulding compsn. prodn. for dry removal of hydrogen sulphide - comprises mill drying, classifying and granulating ferric hydroxide slurry from water works
FR2675057A1 (en) * 1991-03-22 1992-10-16 Joassin Luc Process and reactant for in-situ desulphurisation of biogas and for the elimination of corrosion and nauseating odour problems in anaerobic digesters and in any other mixtures or plants producing them
US5976373A (en) * 1994-07-01 1999-11-02 International Fuel Cells, Llc Removal of hydrogen sulfide from anaerobic digester gas

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3009686A1 (en) * 2013-08-19 2015-02-20 Ovive PROCESS FOR REMOVING HYDROGEN SULFIDE FROM A NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE FACILITY

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0721912D0 (en) 2007-12-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI583635B (en) Treatment System of Coal Gasification Wastewater and Treatment Method of Coal Gasification Wastewater
Li et al. A review on the migration and transformation of heavy metals in the process of sludge pyrolysis
CN100537458C (en) Method for removing ammonia and nitrogen in garbage percolate
WO2011118808A1 (en) Treatment method of wastewater containing persistent substances
CN101774678A (en) Treatment method of garbage percolate
WO2009024014A1 (en) Method for removing ammonia from coking waste water
CN108793551B (en) Treatment method and treatment device for high-salt high-COD organic wastewater
CN102452763B (en) Method for treating ethylene waste alkali liquor
JP2003200199A (en) Sewage treatment method
KR20060094334A (en) Method for treating and recycling sludge using waste resources
CN103214124B (en) Gas production wastewater desulfurization purification pretreatment technology
CN105664701A (en) Method for resourcefully using coking wastewater for preparing ammonia-hydrocarbon denitrifying agent
CN112759143A (en) Device and process for preparing high-molecular aluminum salt coagulant by utilizing high-salinity wastewater zero-discharge system sludge
WO2019214839A1 (en) Method for operating a wastewater treatment plant for phosphorus treatment of effluent
KR102053884B1 (en) Method of improving filtration property of sewage sludge using ferric sulfate and method of treating sewage using the same
Wang et al. Treatment of thiocyanate-containing wastewater: a critical review of thiocyanate destruction in industrial effluents
Hakeem et al. Investigations into the closed-loop hydrometallurgical process for heavy metals removal and recovery from biosolids via mild acid pre-treatment
CN103214139B (en) Gas production wastewater comprehensive treatment technology
CN116002935B (en) Comprehensive treatment method for ferrite-containing water
CN102070263A (en) Coking phenol cyanogen sewage treating method
GB2454490A (en) Method and composition for removal of hydrogen sulphide from gas
KR20000065415A (en) Biological Treatment Method of Wastewater Containing Heavy Metals
KR101086076B1 (en) The system for treating wastewater which cotain ammonia
CN110272146B (en) Method for treating landfill leachate by coupling high-aluminum-iron sludge and industrial waste of water plant
Elgarahy et al. Biosolids management and utilizations: A review

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)