GB2401523A - Artificial bait comprising gelable binder - Google Patents
Artificial bait comprising gelable binder Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2401523A GB2401523A GB0410172A GB0410172A GB2401523A GB 2401523 A GB2401523 A GB 2401523A GB 0410172 A GB0410172 A GB 0410172A GB 0410172 A GB0410172 A GB 0410172A GB 2401523 A GB2401523 A GB 2401523A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- artificial fish
- fish bait
- bait
- binder
- fibre
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 claims abstract description 96
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 71
- 229940025902 konjac mannan Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 229920001285 xanthan gum Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 239000000679 carrageenan Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 229920001525 carrageenan Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 229940113118 carrageenan Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 210000003746 feather Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 235000012766 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. sativa Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 235000012765 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. spontanea Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 235000004431 Linum usitatissimum Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 235000009120 camo Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 235000005607 chanvre indien Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000011487 hemp Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 235000010418 carrageenan Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- UHVMMEOXYDMDKI-JKYCWFKZSA-L zinc;1-(5-cyanopyridin-2-yl)-3-[(1s,2s)-2-(6-fluoro-2-hydroxy-3-propanoylphenyl)cyclopropyl]urea;diacetate Chemical compound [Zn+2].CC([O-])=O.CC([O-])=O.CCC(=O)C1=CC=C(F)C([C@H]2[C@H](C2)NC(=O)NC=2N=CC(=CC=2)C#N)=C1O UHVMMEOXYDMDKI-JKYCWFKZSA-L 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 235000011777 Corchorus aestuans Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 235000010862 Corchorus capsularis Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 240000000491 Corchorus aestuans Species 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000005667 attractant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000003755 preservative agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 241000238366 Cephalopoda Species 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000000230 xanthan gum Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 235000010493 xanthan gum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 19
- 229940082509 xanthan gum Drugs 0.000 claims description 19
- 241000208202 Linaceae Species 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000002657 fibrous material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- GJCOSYZMQJWQCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9H-xanthene Chemical compound C1=CC=C2CC3=CC=CC=C3OC2=C1 GJCOSYZMQJWQCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 6
- ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Proline Natural products OC(=O)C1CCCN1 ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 2
- 240000006240 Linum usitatissimum Species 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 54
- 235000019688 fish Nutrition 0.000 description 36
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 36
- 241000269821 Scombridae Species 0.000 description 20
- 235000020640 mackerel Nutrition 0.000 description 20
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 19
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 19
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 17
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 16
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000018044 dehydration Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- WPYMKLBDIGXBTP-UHFFFAOYSA-N benzoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1 WPYMKLBDIGXBTP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000013535 sea water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000005711 Benzoic acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 240000004792 Corchorus capsularis Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 description 2
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 235000010233 benzoic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003349 gelling agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005057 refrigeration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 244000247812 Amorphophallus rivieri Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000001206 Amorphophallus rivieri Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001474374 Blennius Species 0.000 description 1
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 229920002752 Konjac Polymers 0.000 description 1
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000589636 Xanthomonas campestris Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000001015 abdomen Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000035508 accumulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008953 bacterial degradation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007767 bonding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000887 hydrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002427 irreversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001206 natural gum Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002335 preservative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000741 silica gel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910002027 silica gel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009461 vacuum packaging Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K97/00—Accessories for angling
- A01K97/04—Containers for bait; Preparation of bait
- A01K97/045—Preparation of bait; Ingredients
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
Abstract
An artificial fish bait comprising a ge lable binder of at least two polysaccharides (including xanthan or carrageenan gum), one being Konjac Mannan and a material randomly dispersed through said binder that provides resistance to tearing of the binder. The binder may include natural fibres or feathers. The fibre is at least one selected from hemp fibre, flax fibre and jute fibre. The bait may further comprise additional attractants and/or preservatives. Attractants include freeze-dried squid, and amino acids such as proline.
Description
Title: An Artificial Fish Bait.
DESCRTT'TION The present invention relates to an artificial fish bait for use in both commercial and sports fishing applications.
Long line fishing employs baited monofilament lines. Each line may be thousands of metres in length, carrying a hook every meire or so. The baited lines are fed out from the stern of the fishing vessel and remain in the water for up to 5 hours, prior to retrieval. Currently, prime mackerel is employed as the bait in the majority of longlining operations, with each hook being baited with 10-15g of fish. The process of baiting the hooks is highly automated and involves slicing each fish into pieces of the required size, hooking each piece of bait and propelling each baited hook clear of the stern.
The use of mackerel as the bait suffers from several negative attributes.
Firstly, the bait must be frozen in order to prevent spoilage. This results in a significant proportion of the fuel consumption of fishing vessels arising from the Operation of bait freezers. Secondly, the price of prime, whole mackerel fluctuates significantly.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an artificial fish bait that has texture and surface characteristics that are similar to a whole mackerel and that may be used in current automatic baiting equipment.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an artificial fish bait that has a greater tendency than mackerel to stay on a hook during use as bait but is removable therefrom prior to rc-baiting.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an artificial fish bait that Is stable to ambient storage conditions.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an artificial fish bait comprising a gettable binder comprising a mix of at least two types of polysaccharide, one of the polysaccharides being Konjac Mannan or a derivative thereof, and a material randomly dispersed through said binder that provides resistance to tearing of the binder.
The gellable binder preferably is a mix of Konjac Mannan with another natural polysaccharide, preferably Carrageenan and/or Xanthan gum, especially Xanthan gum. In this respect, it has surprisingly been found that Xanthan-Konjac mannan gels that have been dried may be rehydrated readily within approximately 30 minutes by immersion in water and regain their properties. Preferably, the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysaccharide in the binder is in the range 10:90 to 90:10 more preferably 40:60 to 60:40, especially 50:50.
The polysaccharides preferably make up 0.5-3% concentration by weight of the total gel, more preferably 1-2%, especially l.4%.
The fish bait should also include one or more further materials to enhance the binder's resistance to tearing. A fibrous material may be used, more preferably natural fibres, such as hemp fibre, flax fibre or jute fibre. Preferably, only a single type of natural fibre is used.
Preferably, fibre of uniform length is contained within the binder, preferably being less than or equal to l Smm in length, more preferably from 1 Omm to 1 5mm in length, especially 1 3mm in length. Preferably, the fish bait system contains at least 1% by weight of fibres, more preferably 1.4%.
Alternatively, feathers, such as chicken feathers, may be incorporated into the binder to enhance its resistance to tearing. Preferably, the feathers are washed and dried prior to their incorporation into the binder. Preferably, the ratio of feathers to binder is 1:1. Preferably, the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1- 2%, more preferably 1.2-1.8 X,, especially 1.4 to 1.6%.
Additiona] attractants and preservatives may be incorporated into the bait.
Preferably, freeze-dried squid or amino acids such as proline are included within the bait to act as a phagostimulant. Preferably, this is included in amount equal to or less than 3 /0 by weight.
The present invention will now be further illustrated by means of the following Examples in which: Example 1 analyses the texture of various artificial fish bait systems of the present invention containing various proportions of k-Carrageenan and Konjac Mannan with different fibrous materials, Example 2 investigates the bite texture and hook pull responses of fish bait systems of the present invention containing k- Carrageenan and Konjac Mannan or Xanthan Gum and Konjac Mannan in different ratios with or without added fibre, Example 3 studies the effect of immersing the fish bait systems of the present invention in seawater, Example 4 investigates the effect of fibre length and concentration in the fish bait systems of the present invention, Example 5 compares the bite texture and hook pull responses of fish bait systems of the present invention containing different fibre types at fixed length and concentration; Example 6 investigates the effect of different storage regimes on two fish bait systems of the present invention and Example 7 investigates the properties of another fish bait of the present invention that incorporates feathers into the binder system, and with reference to the accompanying drawings in which: Figure I is a graph of load (g) against penetration depth (mm) for artificial fish baits comprising various proportions of k-Carrageenan and Konjac Mannan with different fibre materials in differing proportions; Figure 2 is a graph of load (g) against distance (mm) for the bite texture testing of fresh mackerel; Figure 3 is a graph of load (g) against distance (mm) for the hook pull testing of fresh mackerel; Figure 4 is a plot of maximum load (g) against percentage Carrageenan for a 1% (Carrageenan/Konjac Mannan) fish bait system to assess bite texture and hook pull (no fibre) and hook pull (1% flax); Figure 5 is a plot of maximum load (g) against percentage Xanthan Gum in a 1% (Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan) fish bait system to assess bite texture (with and without fibre) and hook pull (with and without fibre); Figure 6 is a graph illustrating the effect of one-hour saline immersion on 1% (Carragcenan/Konjac Mannan) system; Figure 7 is a graph illustrating the effect of one-hour saline immersion on 1% (Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan); Figure 8 is a block diagram illustrating the effect of fibre length on bite texture values of 0.8% 60:40 Carrageenan:Konjac Mannan system, 1M KCl with 0.6% flax; Figure 9 is a block diagram illustrating the effect of fibre length on bite texture values of 1.2% 50:50 Xanthan Gum:Konjac Mannan system with 0.6% flax; Figure 10 is a block diagram illustrating the effect of fibre length on hook pull maximum load for a Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan system and a Canrageenan/Konjac Mannan system; Figure 11 is a plot of four texture parameters against time for a Xanthan Gum /Konjac Mannan system stored at room temperature; and Figure 12 is a bar chart depicting the effect of four different storage regimes upon the four texture parameters for a Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan system following one month of storage.
Example 1
The texture of examples of artificial fish bait systems according to the present invention containing various proportions of k-Carrageenan (bleached cottonii, natural grade 29.1.02) and Konjac Mannan (Zairai-Shu 1993 viscosity 151 colour 62.7) with different fibrous materials were investigated.
The get texture of the bait was determined using a Stevens Texture Analyser consisting of a stage onto which the sample is placed, an electromechanical drive onto which probes of various geometry can be attached and a load cell that measures the force being applied to the sample during analysis.
In use the probe approaches the sample from above and compresses the sample before a load is achieved that allows it to penetrate the sample (depending upon the relative size of probe and sample). The speed of the probe can be selected from a number of different settings (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mm/second). The distance it travels after coming into contact with the sample can be selected between 1 and 99 mm (or until a resistance to the probe of 1 kg is sensed). The load cell within the probe drive unit measures the force (load) being experienced by the sample. The load value is recorded via an interfaced PC and software package at a rate of 18 measurements per second with a resolution of lg (The data collection rate being independent of probe speed of distance).
To investigate a particular gel system, the gel is initially prepared by dispersion of gelling agents in water with high shear stirring at temperatures above 80 Cfor 30 minutes. The resultant gel is heated to above its "elation temperature and poured into a cylindrical acrylic mould that is 1 6mm in depth with a diameter of 62 mm. The surface of the solution is made level with the top of the mould and a cover fitted to limit evaporation during cooling. The volume of the test pieces is approx. 48 ml (assuming no shrinkage).
The test pieces are submitted to texture analysis in two ways, i.e. by penetration and by a simulated hook pull test.
For texture analysis by penetration, a slightly rounded probe 4mm in diameter is pushed into the sample. At first the gel defonns until the applied load is sufficient to fracture the gel, the probe then continues to penetrate the gel.
The following parameters were chosen in order to obtain data that would relate to the texture experienced by the fish upon biting the bait ("bite texture").
Probe = 4 mm slightly rounded cylinder Speed = 0.2 mm/see Distance = 13 mm The typical plot of load vs. distance was that of an increasing slope up to the point at which the gel yields, shown by a sudden drop, which then tends to be followed by a rough saw tooth pattern as the probe continues through the gel.
A test rig was also constructed and the following parameters chosen in order to obtain data that would relate to the tendency of the hook to rip through the gel bait.
Probe = barbed fishhook with approx. thickness of lmm and a hook radius of 6 mm Speed = 2.0 mm/see Distance = 30 mm The typical plot of load vs distance was that of an increasing slope up to the point at which the gel yields which then tends to be followed by a plateau as the hook is ripped through the gel and a sharp drop as the hook leaves the gel.
Test pieces were prepared by dispersing Carrageenan and Konjac Mannan into hot (80 C) KCI solution using high shear mixing. The mixture is heated for a further minutes while maintaining high shear mixing. After 30 minutes water was added to adjust for losses due to evaporation. At this point the fibre was added by sprinkling the chopped fbrcs onto the surface of the mixture and stirring with a wide spatula (use of a wide spatula avoids accumulations of fibre around the mixing implement).
Details of the systems prepared are given in Table 1 below. The hemp fibre was obtained by boiling hemp thermal insulation in water to remove the bonding agent, then chopping the fibrous mat produced into squares with scissors. The tissue fibre was obtained by soaking Kimberly-Clark_ white tissue in water prior to addition of the gelling agent.
Table 1. Composition of the gel systems prepared.
/0 k-Carrageenan % Konjac Mannan M KCI Fibre Type % Fibre 1 1 0.1 none O 1 1 0.1 12mm Hemp 3 1 1 0.1 12mm Hemp 1.5 1 I O.1 Tissue 1 0.5 0.5 0.05 12mm Hemp 3 0.5 0.5 0.05 12mm Hemp 1.5 The gels were subjected to penetrative texture analysis and assessment of resistance to tearing as described above. The texture analysis data is shown in Figure I and summarised in Table 2 below.
Table 2. Summary of results for preliminary trial gels.
0, o/o M Fibre 'M0 First Slope at Fish like Resistance k- KM KCI 'type Fibre Yield 4mm texture? to tear Cgn Force (g) (g/mm) (subjective) from hook I O O.1 none none N/A N/A brittle v.poor I I 0. 1 none none 575 65 fair Poor I I 0.1 Hemp 3 >1000 159 too tough Good 1 1 O. I Hemp I.5 567 103 fair Fair 1 I 0.1 Tissue I 562 162 Too Finn Poor 0.5 0.5 0.05 3 865 69 good Good 0.5 0.5 0.05 Hemp I.5 183 44 good Fair From these results it has been noted that the incorporation of Konjac Mannan does increase the elasticity of the gel. With regard to the fibre content, at l.5% the hemp fibre does not greatly affect the overall texture of the gel but does greatly improve resistance to tearing. At 3% the hemp fibre dramatically changes the overall texture of the gel, not just the resistance to tearing. The tissue paper fibre increased the firmness of the gel, but did not improve the resistance to tearing (this is probably due to the shortness of the individual fibres).
The most appealing texture and performance came from gels containing 1% total gel and 3% hemp fibre.
Example 2
The bite texture and hook pull responses of various compositions of fish bait systems of the present invention were compared with the bite texture and hook pull responses of fresh mackerel.
In order to establish a benchmark for bite texture and hook pull responses, a fresh mackerel (gutted) was studied using the two techniques. The fish was cut into 4 sections; head, mid body section, tail body section and tail fin. The head and tail fin were discarded and tests then carried out on various parts of the remaining fish.
Figure 2 shows a plot of load vs distance for the bite texture testing of the fresh mackerel. The slope (taking the points +/-0.5mm) of the graph at 3mm distance and the first load at which yield occurs are shown below in Table 3.
Table 3. Summary of penetrative texture analysis data for fresh mackerel.
Sample Slope at 3mm Load of first yield mid body (skin side) 55 >1000 mid body (skin side) 55 >1000 mid body (skin side) 26 332 mid body (flesh side) 29 108 mid body (flesh side)* 14* 37* mid body (flesh side) 28 112 (* Discounted - probe suspected of going between layers, of flesh) From these results, a texture profile was generated that represents the "feel" of the bait as experienced by the biting fish. This profile was used as a benchmark for prototype gel baits that could then be further refined by the use of field trials. This benchmark could now be described as follows; À Bite Texture slope at 3mm (taking the points +/- 0.5mm) = >25 g/mm, <55 glmm À Bite Texture load at first yield >1 OOg Figure 3 shows a plot of load vs distance for the hook pull testing of fresh mackerel. Table 4 below shows the load at first significant yield. In three of the cases a "tearing" plateau was established after a major yield point. The approximate level of this tear plateau is also given.
Table 4. Summary of hook pull texture analysis data for fresh mackerel.
Sample Load of first Level of tearing yield (g) plateau (g) mid belly wall (skin) 500 480 Tail outside (skin) 200/880* >1000** tail inside (0esh) 290 100 mid inside (flesh) 530 700 * Minor yield at 200g ** No plateau seen, continued increase in load >lOOOg Note - A maximum slope of 11 Og/mm was present as a major part of each graph prior to the first significant yield.
The aim of carrying out the hook pull test on fresh mackerel was to establish a benchmark hook pull profile. This profile represents the general tendency of mackerel to stay on a hook during use as bait. The tendency of mackerel to fall off, or be sucked off the hook is one of the problems that the gel bait system of the present invention is trying to overcome. The successful gel system should outperform mackerel in this respect (it should be noted that the bait should also be removable from the hook prior to re-baiting).
The hook pull benchmark could now be described as follows; À First significant yield at 500g or more À "Tear Plateau" at 500g or more À (Optional) a slope of Al lOg mm during initial extension A gel bait that conforms to this benchmark should outperform the average mackerel bait piece with respect to remaining on the hook during use.
With the success of the k-Carrageenan/Konjac Mannan system (in mostly subjective terms) studied in Example l, it was decided to characterize the system further, as well as the similar system of Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan (Glucovis obtained from Chesham Chemicals Ltd) by penetrative texture analysis (Bite Texture) and by the Hook Pull test.
In both systems the individual polysaccharide components of the gels were prepared at 1 % concentration by weight. These gels were then combined and heated at bout 85 C for 30 min to produce gels with component ratios of 20:80, 30:70, 40:60, 45:55, 50:50, 55:45, 60:40, 70:30 & 80:20 (with a total gel concentration of 1 %).
Flax fibre (Grimm in length) was added to portions ofthe samples at 1% by weight producing a further set of samples.
A fish bait containing a mix of Carrageenan/Konjac Mannan according to the present invention (see Figure 4) showed maximum load values for bite and hook pull (no fibre) at the ratio of 60:40 Carrageenan: Konjac mannan.
The hook pull values were off scale (>l OOOg) for most of these samples where fibre had been added.
A fish bait containing a mix of Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan according to the present invention (see Figure 5) showed maximum load values for bite texture at the ratio of 55:45 Xanthan Gum: Konjac Mannan. Maximum load values were found at the ratio of 40:60 for the hook pull test where no fibrc was present, however the samples containing fibre showed a maximum hook pull value at 50:50. The bite texture maxima are shown to be relatively unaffected by the addition of 1% fibre.
Example 3
The effect of immersing the fish bait systems of the present invention in seawater was investigated in relation to a Carragecnan/Konjac Mannan fish bait and a Xanthan Gum/Konjac Mannan fish bait. The results are shown in Figures 6 and 7 of the accompanying drawings.
Immersion in seawater for I hour lowered the bite texture slope at 3mm and the load at first yield in the Carrageenan/Konjac Mannan system by an average of 7% in both cases (Figure 6).
In the case of the Xanthan/Konjac Mannan system the bite texture slope at 3mm and the load at first yield values were more variable, however, they both increased by about 45% on average (Figure 7).
These effects may be due to the hydration/dehydration of the surface of the gel via osmosis and/or the effect of the sodium and chloride ions upon the gel structure.
Example 4
The effect of the length and concentration of fibres in the fish bait systems of the present invention was studied by preparing a large batch of the relevant polysaccharide combination and incorporating flax fibres of a range of lengths at a fixed concentration and then at a range of concentrations with a fixed length. Flax was chosen for the investigation because of the availability of a sample, though the apparent uniformity of the fibre was also an appealing factor.
The fibres were prepared by first pulling a loop of the flax sliver (French linen grade supplied by Biocomoposites Centre, University of Wales, Bangor having aligned fibres up to 40cm in length) through a truncated syringe barrel. A scalpel was then used to cut the looped portion away from the end of the barrel. The flax could then be pushed through the barrel until the required length protrudes, this was cut off neatly with a scalpel giving fibres of relatively uniform length.
The fibre lengths chosen were 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 & 21 mm, the concentrations were chosen as 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 & 1.2%.
In order to incorporate the fibres into the gel, the gel was first produced in the usual way, dissolving the polysaccharide in hot water (80 C) with high shear stirring.
A portion of the gel was then placed in a screw cap jar in a water bath maintained at a temperature of 80 C. The fibre is then manually "teased out" in order to separate the "bundles" of fibres and added to the jar. The jar was capped and shaken, taking care to release any pressure build-up by loosening the cap often. Shaking was repeated periodically until the fibre was uniformly dispersed and no fibre "bundles" remained.
It was noted that in the Xanthan Gum/ Konjac Mannan system the fibres distributed quite evenly especially at lengths <I 5mm, whereas the fibres in the Carrageenan/Konjac Mannan system seemed more prone to accumulate into clumps (particularly at fibre lengths >9mm) or to settle slightly before the gel had cooled.
This left areas of fibre free gel in the sample and must contribute to increased variance in the test results. Figures 8, 9 and l 0 of the accompanying drawings show the effect of fibre length upon the physical characteristics of the gel bait.
Example 5
A comparison of fibre type at fixed length and concentration was made. Gel test pieces were prepared from the same batch of 1.2% Glucovis (50:50 Xanthan Gum: Konjac Mannan). 14mm Jute (aligned fibres, supplied by Biocomoposites Centre, University of Wales, Bangor), hemp and flax fibres were incorporated into the gels at a concentration of 1.4%. A composite sample containing 0.47% of each fibre was also produced.
The samples were tested in the usual manner for both texture and hookpull values and the results shown in Table 5 below: Table 5. Texture analysis data for different fibre types Flax 14mm Jute 14 mm Hemp 14 mm Composite 1.4'!/o 1.4% 1.4% 1:1:1 (1.4%) Bite texture slope 102 38 31 42 at 3 mm (g/mm) Bite texture First 210 230 150 150 Yield (g) Hook Pull 565 532 571 439 Maximum (g) Hook Pull First 452 438 559 378 Yield (g) The jute and hemp compare favourably to the flax in that hook pull maxima of >500g are obtained. The bite texture slope of the flax suggests that this particular sample is "firmer" than previous samples of the same composition (average 51 g/mm). The low slope (firmness) for the jute and hemp samples is likely to be due to the thicker and hence sparser fibres leaving larger uninterrupted volumes of gel within the sample. This suggests an opportunity to increase the hookpull value further by increasing the fibre concentration while keeping the bite texture low by using thicker fibres.
The composite sample (1.4% flax, jute & hemp) performed surprisingly poorly, the results not even being rough averages of the results from the individual components.
Example 6
Investigations were carried out to assess the effect of different storage regimes on two fish bait systems of the present invention. The two fish bait systems selected had the following formulations: T: ].3% 50:50 Carrageenan: Konjac Mannan 1.3% flax fibre of 1 3mm length 0.1 M KCl II: 1.3% 50:50 Xanthan: KonJac Mannan ("Glucovis") 1.3% flax fibre of Al 3mm length.
The initial work programme of the present study included visual assessment of microbial spoilage. In practice the effect of microbial degradation of the gel bait is seen in one or both of the following effects: À Colonies of microbes (seemingly moulds) of various colours become visible in the gel.
À The sudden onset of a rapid breakdown of the gel into a viscous liquid (probable bacterial degradation of polysaccharide chain).
The fibre, present to provide resistance to tearing, remains relatively intact.
The gel, which is mostly responsible for the bite texture, is the part of the bait that is effected by microbial degradation.
The storage regimes in relation to which Formulations 1 and II were studied were as follows: À Refrigeration À Freezing À Addition of preservative À Dehydration Visual monitoring of these regimes is a simple task. Monitoring the effect of storage on the physical properties was carried out using the texture analysis tests as used for the development of the formulation. Because of the destructive nature of the texture analysis testing, sufficient test pieces needed to be prepared to enable assessment of a particular storage regime over an extended period of time.
Tria] bait test pieces (62mm discs as used for texture analysis) were prepared using formulations I and II with the addition of benzoic acid (0. 05%) to the water at the start of the mixing. The details of each storage regime were as follows: Storage at room temperature - Sample discs were sealed in plastic bags and kept in the laboratory. No steps were made to remove any air from the bag as would be the case in vacuum packing.
Storage by refrigeration - Sample discs were sealed in plastic bags and kept in a laboratory refrigerator at a temperature of approximately 4 C, with the exclusion of light. The discs were allowed to reach ambient temperature prior to texture analysis.
Storage by freezing- Sample discs were sealed in plastic bags and kept in a laboratory deep freeze at a temperature of approximately -5 C, with the exclusion of light. The discs were allowed to thaw by exposure to the ambient temperature of the laboratory prior to texture analysis.
Storage by dehydration - Sample discs were allowed to dry in air and stored over silica gel in a glass desiccator at ambient temperature. Hydration of the sample before texture analysis was carried out by submersion ofthe sample disc in distilled water for 30 minutes.
Figure 11 gives a plot of four texture parameters against time for Formulation II stored at room temperature. The data suggests that the structure of the gel improves during the first day of storage, thereafter no great change is seen in the following montll. Previously, gels containing no benzoic acid would visibly lose structure and liquefy after a few days.
Figure 12 shows a bar chart depicting the effect of the four different storage regimes of storage upon the four texture parameters for Formulation II following one month of storage.
Dehydration of the Carrageenan based gel was found to be impractical as it was effectively irreversible. The Xanthan based gel however, rehydrated with improved characteristics due to the outside of the gel bait hydrating more than the mside, giving a soft, gel rich outer layer and tough, fibre rich core.
Freezing made both gels more resistant to tearing, but a change in bite texture was seen in both (i.e. the samples became less elastic).
Out of all the options investigated the most promising storage regimes were freezing for the Carrageenan/Konjac Mannan based formulation (I) and dehydration for the Xanthan/Konjac Mannan based formulation (II).
Example 7
Artificial fish baits were prepared that incorporated feathers instead of fibres to investigate their ability to impart tear resistance to the bait. The baits comprised 1.4% Glucovis (50:50 Xanthum Gum:Konjac Mannan) and 1.4% chicken feathers which had been washed and dried and were obtained from an upholstery manufacturer. The gels were tested in duplicate and the results are summarized below: First yield force (g) = 211,160 Slope at 4mm (g/mm) = 38,31 Fish-like texture = Good Resistance to tear from hook = Good These figures are within the required benchmark figures to provide a profile akin to fresh mackerel indicating that feathers may be a suitable substitute for fibres within the bait system.
The artificial fish bait systems of the present invention mimic mackerel but have improved resistance to being torn off a hook. Additionally, the bait is biodegradeable, being formed of non-toxic, natural raw materials. Konjac Mannan is a natura] co-polymer of glucose produced in the root tubers of Amorphophallus KonJac, K Koch. Xanthan gum is a natural gum produced by culture fermentation of glucose by Xanthomonas campestris and Carrageenan Is a linear sulphated polysaccharide obtained from red seaweeds. The Xanthan/Konjac Mannan bait is particularly appealing in that it can be dried for storage and rapidly re-hydrated for use.
Claims (27)
1. An artificial fish bait comprising a gellable binder comprising a mix of at least two types of polysaccharide, one of the polysaccharides being Konjac Mannan or a derivative thereof, and a material randomly dispersed through said binder that provides resistance to tearing of the binder.
2. An artificial fish bait as claimed h1 claim I wherein the gellable binder is a mix of Konjac Mannan and another natural polysaccharide.
3. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 2 wherein the gettable binder is a mix of Konjac Mannan and Carrageenan gum.
4. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 2 wherein the gellable binder is a mix of Konjac Mannan and Xanthan gum.
5. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 4 wherein the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysaccharide in the binder is in the range 10:90 to 90:10.
6. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 5 wherein the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysaccharide in the binder is in the range 40:60 to 60:40.
7. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 6 wherein the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysaccharide in the binder is 50:50.
8. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the polysaccharides make up 0.5 to 3% by weight of the total gel.
9. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 8 wherein the polysaccharides make up 1 - 2% by weight of the total gel.
10. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 9 wherein the polysaccharides make up 1.4% by weight of the total gel.
11. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein a fibrous material is included within the bait to enhance the binder's resistance to tearing.
12. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 11 wherein the fibrous material comprises natural fibres.
13. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 12 wherein the fibre is at least one selected from the group consisting of hemp fibre, flax fibre and jute fibre.
14. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 11 or claim 12 wherein a single type of natural fibre is included in the binder.
15. An artificial] fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 14 wherein the fibre is of uniform length.
16. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 15 wherein the fibre length is less than or equal to 1 5mm in length.
17. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 16 wherein the fibre length is 1 Omm to 1 5mm.
18. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 17 wherein the fibre length is 13mm.
19. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 18 wherein the bait contains at least 1 % by weight of fibres.
20. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 19 wherein the bait contains 1.4 /0 by weight of fibres.
21. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein feathers are incorporated within the binder to enhance the binder's resistance to tearing.
22. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 21 wherein the feathers are washed and dried prior to their incorporation into the binder.
23. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 21 or claim 22 wherein the ratio of feathers to binder is 1:1.
24. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 21, claim 22 or claim 23 wherein the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1-2%.
25. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 24 wherein the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1.2 - 1.8%.
26. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 25 wherein the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1.4 - 1.6%.
27. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of the preceding claims further comprising additional attractants and/or preservatives.
28 An artificial fish bait substantially as hereinbefore described and with reference to the accompanying Examples.
27. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of the preceding claims further comprising additional attractants and/or preservatives.
28. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 27 wherein freeze-dried squid is included in the bait to act as a phagostimulant.
29. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 27 or claim 28 wherein amino acids are included in the bait to act as a phagostimulant.
30. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 29 wherein the amino acid is praline.
31. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 28, claim 29 or claim 30 wherein the phagostimulant Is included in amount equal to or less than 3% by weight.
32. An artificial fish bait substantially as hereinbefore described and with reference to the accompanying Examples.
Amendments to the claims have been filed as follows
AS
1. An artificial fish bait comprising a gettable binder comprising a mix of at least two types of polysaccharide, one of the polysaccharides being Konjac Mannan or a derivative thereof, and a material randomly dispersed through said binder that provides resistance to tearing of the binder.
2. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 1 wherein the gettable binder is a mix of Konjac Mannan and another natural polysaccharide.
3. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 2 wherein the gettable binder is a mix of Konjac Mannan and Carrageenan gum.
4. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 2 wherein the gettable binder Is a mix of Konjac Mannan and Xanthan gum.
5. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 4 wherein the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysaccharide in the binder is in the range 10:90 to 90:10.
6. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 5 wherein the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysacchande in the binder Is in the range 40:60 to 60:40.
7. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 6 wherein the ratio of Konjac Mannan to the other polysaccharide in the binder is 50:50.
8. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the polysacchardes make up 0.5 to 3% by weight of the total gel. em
9. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 8 wherein the polysaccharides make up l - 2% by weight of the total gel.
10. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 9 wherein the polysaccharides make up 1.4% by weight of the total gel.
11. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein a fibrous material is included within the bait to enhance the binder's resistance to tearing.
12. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 11 wherein the fibrous material comprises natural fibres.
13. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 12 wherein the fibre is at least one selected from the group consisting of hemp fibre, flax fibre and jute fibre.
14. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 11 or claim 12 wherein a single type of natural fibre is included in the binder.
15. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 14 wherein the fibre is of uniform length.
16. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 15 wherein the fibre length is less than or equal to lSmm in length.
17. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 16 wherein the fibre length is 1 Omm to 1 5mm.
18. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 17 wherein the fibre length is 13mm.
l 9. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 11 to 18 wherein the bait contains at least 1% by weight of fibres.
20. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 19 wherein the bait contains 1.4% by weight of fibres.
21. An artificial fish bait as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein feathers are incorporated within the binder to enhance the binder's resistance to tearing.
22. An artificial] fish bait as claimed in claim 21 wherein the feathers are washed and dried prior to their incorporation into the binder.
23 An artificial fish bait as claimed m claim 21 or claim 22 wherein the ratio of feathers to binder is l: l.
24. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 21, claim 22 or claim 23 wherein the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1-2%.
25. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 24 wherein the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1.2 - 1.8%.
26. An artificial fish bait as claimed in claim 25 wherein the concentration by weight of feathers within the bait is 1.4 - 1.6%.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0310790A GB0310790D0 (en) | 2003-05-10 | 2003-05-10 | An artificial fish bait |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB0410172D0 GB0410172D0 (en) | 2004-06-09 |
GB2401523A true GB2401523A (en) | 2004-11-17 |
Family
ID=9957835
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB0310790A Ceased GB0310790D0 (en) | 2003-05-10 | 2003-05-10 | An artificial fish bait |
GB0410172A Withdrawn GB2401523A (en) | 2003-05-10 | 2004-05-07 | Artificial bait comprising gelable binder |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB0310790A Ceased GB0310790D0 (en) | 2003-05-10 | 2003-05-10 | An artificial fish bait |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (2) | GB0310790D0 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102257998A (en) * | 2011-09-07 | 2011-11-30 | 福建农林大学 | Konjac bait and preparation method thereof |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112604593A (en) * | 2021-01-05 | 2021-04-06 | 南京文魅绘贸易有限公司 | Bait stirring and making equipment for fishing |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3333249A1 (en) * | 1982-09-14 | 1984-03-15 | Bernd Dr. 8000 München Frenzel | Artificial bait for fish and process for producing such a bait |
US4676976A (en) * | 1985-03-08 | 1987-06-30 | Ajinomoto Co., Inc. | Konjak mannan-containing reversible gel |
JPH01289435A (en) * | 1988-05-17 | 1989-11-21 | Kunio Matsumoto | Devil's tongue-based fishing bait and preparation thereof |
FR2638608A1 (en) * | 1988-11-04 | 1990-05-11 | Charzat Jean Claude | Product for fishing for small white fish |
DK171690A (en) * | 1988-01-29 | 1990-07-17 | Dow Chemical Co | Imitation bait, and process for producing it |
JPH0494652A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1992-03-26 | Ishihara Kaken:Kk | Pisciculture feed and fishing bait |
JPH06113700A (en) * | 1992-10-02 | 1994-04-26 | Kenzo Horiguchi | Lure made of 'konjak' and its production |
JPH07115876A (en) * | 1993-10-25 | 1995-05-09 | Kenzo Horiguchi | False bait made of devil's tongue and its production |
WO1995017086A1 (en) * | 1992-06-23 | 1995-06-29 | William Marks Bromilow | A method for manufacturing a shaped edible fish bait |
US6174525B1 (en) * | 1998-04-27 | 2001-01-16 | Donald W. Kelley | Recreational fishing lure |
-
2003
- 2003-05-10 GB GB0310790A patent/GB0310790D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2004
- 2004-05-07 GB GB0410172A patent/GB2401523A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3333249A1 (en) * | 1982-09-14 | 1984-03-15 | Bernd Dr. 8000 München Frenzel | Artificial bait for fish and process for producing such a bait |
US4676976A (en) * | 1985-03-08 | 1987-06-30 | Ajinomoto Co., Inc. | Konjak mannan-containing reversible gel |
DK171690A (en) * | 1988-01-29 | 1990-07-17 | Dow Chemical Co | Imitation bait, and process for producing it |
JPH01289435A (en) * | 1988-05-17 | 1989-11-21 | Kunio Matsumoto | Devil's tongue-based fishing bait and preparation thereof |
FR2638608A1 (en) * | 1988-11-04 | 1990-05-11 | Charzat Jean Claude | Product for fishing for small white fish |
JPH0494652A (en) * | 1990-08-09 | 1992-03-26 | Ishihara Kaken:Kk | Pisciculture feed and fishing bait |
WO1995017086A1 (en) * | 1992-06-23 | 1995-06-29 | William Marks Bromilow | A method for manufacturing a shaped edible fish bait |
JPH06113700A (en) * | 1992-10-02 | 1994-04-26 | Kenzo Horiguchi | Lure made of 'konjak' and its production |
JPH07115876A (en) * | 1993-10-25 | 1995-05-09 | Kenzo Horiguchi | False bait made of devil's tongue and its production |
US6174525B1 (en) * | 1998-04-27 | 2001-01-16 | Donald W. Kelley | Recreational fishing lure |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102257998A (en) * | 2011-09-07 | 2011-11-30 | 福建农林大学 | Konjac bait and preparation method thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB0310790D0 (en) | 2003-06-18 |
GB0410172D0 (en) | 2004-06-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sigurgisladottir et al. | Effects of freezing/thawing on the microstructure and the texture of smoked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) | |
Ofstad et al. | Liquid holding capacity and structural changes during heating of fish muscle: cod (Gadus morhua L.) and salmon (Salmo salar) | |
AU2002329946B2 (en) | Biodegradable fishing lure and material | |
Sikorski et al. | The role of collagen in the quality and processing of fish | |
Ayala et al. | Structural and ultrastructural changes on muscle tissue of sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L., after cooking and freezing | |
Lin et al. | Different changes in mastication between crisp grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus C. et V) and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) after heating: The relationship between texture and ultrastructure in muscle tissue | |
US5197219A (en) | Artificial bait for fish and shellfish | |
Dey et al. | Suitability of chitosan as cryoprotectant on croaker fish (Johnius gangeticus) surimi during frozen storage | |
AU2002329946A1 (en) | Biodegradable fishing lure and material | |
US7208184B2 (en) | Gelatinous food elastomer compositions and articles for use as fishing bait | |
Ofstad et al. | Ultramicroscopical structures and liquid loss in heated cod (gadus morhual) and salmon (salmo salar) muscle | |
Macchi et al. | Spawning frequency and batch fecundity of Brazilian menhaden, Brevoortia aurea, in the Río de la Plata estuary off Argentina and Uruguay | |
Fletcher et al. | Changes in the fine structure of the myocommata–muscle fibre junction related to gaping in rested and exercised muscle from king salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) | |
CA2390410C (en) | Gelled feed products, means for making the products and method for manufacture of said products | |
US8173116B1 (en) | Biodegradable biocompatible carrier for use in artificial fish bait | |
GB2401523A (en) | Artificial bait comprising gelable binder | |
JP6589025B1 (en) | Fishing bait and method for producing fishing bait | |
WO2006037934A1 (en) | An artificial fish bait | |
GB2276302A (en) | Fishing bait | |
JP2020036583A (en) | Fishing bait and fishing bait production method | |
CN1178448A (en) | Fish Bait | |
Gomez-Guillen et al. | Rheological and microstructural changes in gels made from high and low quality sardine mince with added egg white during frozen storage | |
Ando et al. | Effect of inhabited sea area on meat firmness and its postmortem change in chub mackerel during chilled storage | |
Vincent | The composite structure of biological tissue used for food | |
JP7096280B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of fishing bait that can be stored at room temperature |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |