GB2393409A

GB2393409A - Supplying method of spectacle lenses

Info

Publication number: GB2393409A
Application number: GB0329244A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Moriyasu Shirayanagi; Yoshimi Obara
Original assignee: Pentax Corp
Current assignee: Pentax Corp
Priority date: 2000-07-05
Filing date: 2001-07-05
Publication date: 2004-03-31
Anticipated expiration: 2021-07-05
Also published as: GB2393409B; GB0329244D0

Abstract

In a supplying method of a spectacle lens, a plurality of types (series A, B, C, D) of finished lenses that are different in base curve (D1m) are prepared for each of a plurality of vertex powers (SPH), the average power errors and astigmatisms of said finished lenses being approximately identical within 30 degrees of visual angle. One type of said finished lens is then selected from the plurality based on a required specification for the spectacle lens and weighting of optical performance and outward appearance.

Description

GB 2393409 A continuation (74) Agent and/or Address for Service: Ablett &

Stebbing Caparo House, 101-103 Baker Street, LONDON, W1 U 6FQ, United Kingdom

SUPPLYING METHOD OF SPECTACLE LENSES

The present invention relates to a manufacturing method of a spectacle lens to correct eyesight.

5 In general, a spectacle lens is custom-made to meet the customer's specification. However, it takes a long time to

process both the front and back surfaces after receiving the customer's order. Therefore, semi-finished lens blanks whose front surfaces are finished are stockpiled and a back surface 10 of the selected semifinished lens blank is processed according to the customer's specification in order to shorten

delivery times. Furthermore, the entire range of available vertex powers of a spectacle lens is divided into about ten sections, and one type of semi-finished lens blank is prepared 15 for each of the sections.

Aspherical spectacle lenses, with at least one of the front and back surfaces aspherical, have come into wide use.

When the spectacle lens employs an aspherical surface, the base curve becomes slower or more gentle/gradual (i.e., the 20 absolute value of the front vertex power decreases) and the maximum thickness becomes shorter as compared with a spherical lens having both of the front and back surfaces spherical.

A conventional semi-finished lens blank prepared for an aspherical spectacle lens has an aspherical finished front 25 surface. A back surface thereof will be processed to be

- 2 spherical or toric to meet the customer's specification.

Figs. 27A through 27C show a sample of the sections of the vertex power, Fig. 27A shows a range of minus diopter, Fig. 27B shows a range of plus diopter and Fig. 27C shows a 5 range of mixed diopter. The entire range of the available vertex power, which is a combination of a spherical power SPH and a cylindrical power CYL, is divided into nine sections I through IX. One type of semi-finished lens blank is prepared for each of the sections. The relationship between the 10 sections and the base curves of the semi-finished lens blank is shown in TABLE 1 and Fig. 28 in diopters.

TABLE 1

Section Base curve(D) Section Base curve(D) I 0.50 VI 5.00

II 1.25 VII 6.00

III 2.00 VIII 7.00

IV 3.00 IX 8.00

V 4.00 _ _

20 Although the aspherical spectacle lens has advantages of a more gentle base curve and thin maximum thickness, it has disadvantages of larger distortion at the periphery and larger degradation of optical performance when the lens deviates from a regular position as compared with the 25 spherical spectacle lens. In general, when the average power error and the astigmatism are well corrected, the gentler the base curve is, the larger the distortion is. Namely, the

- 3 optical performance in the periphery will be degraded as the base curve becomes gentler to save weight. However, there are individual personal differences for permissible distortion, that is to say, one person may feel normal when he or she 5 wears an aspherical spectacle lens having a gentle base curve, while another person may feel abnormal and may not be able to stand to wear the same aspherical spectacle lens.

In the conventional manufacturing method of the aspherical spectacle lens, the base curve is determined based 10 on the vertex power alone without considerations of a problem of customer's taste such as weighting of optical performance and outward appearance, and a problem of customer's adaptability such as a permissible distortion. If the customer cannot be satisfied with the optical performance of 15 the aspherical spectacle lens having the determined base curve, he or she has no other choice but to select a heavy spherical spectacle lens having a sharp base curve.

Therefore, it is difficult to supply the most suitable spectacle lens for a customer without consideration of the 20 customer's taste and adaptability.

Further, when the vertex powers of the right and left spectacle lenses belong to different sections, the outward appearance lacks balance between the right and left lenses because of the difference between the base curves. On the 25 other hand, when a finished lens having a predetermined

- 4 vertex power belonging to the predetermined section is manufactured using a semi-finished lens blank prepared for a different section in order to make the lenses the same outward appearance, the optical performance becomes significantly 5 worse, because the each aspherical front surface of the semi-

finished lens blank is designed so as to keep an optical performance for the vertex power within the specific section.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a manufacturing method, which is capable of 10 manufacturing spectacle lenses whilst considering the customer's taste and adaptability. Further, the present invention also aims to supply spectacle lenses that are balanced in an outward appearance while keeping the optical performance when the vertex powers of right and left lenses 15 belong to the different sections.

According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a manufacturing method comprising a plurality of types of semi-finished lens blanks that are different in the base curve are prepared for each of predetermined vertex 20 powers. When the entire range of the vertex power is divided into a plurality of sections, the plurality of types of semi-

finished lens blanks are prepared for each of the sections.

For instance, if there are nine sections and four types of semi-finished lens blanks are prepared for each section, 25 thirty-six types of semifinished lens blanks will be

- 5 prepared. On the basis of required vertex power, choices of lens blanks are narrowed down. The plurality of types, four types for example, of the semi-finished lens blanks can be selected 5 for a specific vertex power. A customer selects one type of the semi-finished lens blank based on weighting of optical performance and outward appearance. Further, a back surface of the selected semi-finished lens blank is processed to form a finished lens according to a required specification for the

10 spectacle lens.

With this method, since a customer can select a favourite base curve with considering his or her taste and adaptability, a lens maker is able to supply a spectacle lens that is adapted to the customer's needs. Further, according 15 to the invention, since the semi-finished lens blanks whose base curves are approximately identical and vertex powers are different can be selected, it is able to make right and left lenses the approximately identical outward appearance while keeping the optical performance even when the vertex powers 20 of right and left lenses are different to each other.

Three or more types of the semi-finished lens blanks are preferably prepared for each of the predetermined vertex powers. Further, any pair of the finished lenses, which are made 25 from the semi-finished lens blanks prepared for the same

- 6 vertex power (i.e., for the same section if available), preferably satisfy the following condition (1) when SPH < 0, CYL < 0 and satisfy the condition (2) when SPH > 0, CYL 2 0 in order to keep high optical performances (average power 5 error and astigmatism) of the finished lenses made from any types of the semi-finished lens blanks: (1) ADlm(15) i + AD2m(15)i > ADlm(15)j + LD2m(15) (2) ADlm(15)i + AD2m(15)i < LDlm(15) j + AD2m(15) where 10 SHP is a spherical power (unit: diopter), CYL is a cylindrical power (unit: diopter), Dlm(h) and D2m(h) are surface powers of the front and back surfaces (unit: diopter) at the point whose distance from the optical axis of the finished lens is h (unit: mm) in 15 a plane that contains the optical axis, ADlm(h) is a variation of surface power of the front surface and is obtained by Dlm(h) - Dlm(O), AD2m(h) is a variation of surface power of the back surface and is obtained by D2m(h) D2m(0), and 20 the subscript "i" represents the values of the finished lens that has smaller base curve and the subscript "j" represents the values of the finished lens that has larger baser curve as described by Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j.

The front surface of the finished lens may be a 25 rotationallysymmetrical aspherical surface, an atoroidal

- 7 surface, a spherical surface or a toric surface. The back surface may be also a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical surface, an atoroidal surface, a spherical surface or a toric surface. When one of the front and back surface is a 5 spherical surface or a toric surface, the other surface must be a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical surface or an atoroidal surface. An atoroidal surface is defined that paraxial radii of curvatures in the cross-sections along orthogonal main meridians are different from each other and 10 a cross-section is not a circular arc but a non-circular arc.

Further, it is preferable that average power errors and astigmatisms of the finished lenses, which are made from the semi-finished lens blanks having different base curves prepared for the same vertex power, are approximately 15 identical within 30 degrees of visual angle. Particularly, the differences of average power errors and differences of astigmatisms among the lenses may be not greater than 0.1 diopter (D) within 30 degrees of visual angle.

Still further, it is preferable that one type of the 20 semi-finished lens blanks prepared for one vertex power has an approximately identical base curve with one type of the semi-finished lens blanks prepared for another vertex power.

Particularly, the differences of the vertex powers may be not greater than 0.2 diopter.

25 According to another definition, the manufacturing

l - 8 method of the present invention includes dividing the entire range of available vertex power of a spectacle lens into a plurality of sections, preparing a plurality of types of semi-finished lens blanks that are different in base curve 5 for each of the sections, determining one of the sections according to a required specification of the spectacle lens,

selecting one type of the semi-finished lens blank among the plurality of types of the semi-finished lens blanks that are prepared for the same sections based on weights of optical 10 performance and of outward appearance, and processing a back surface of the selected semi-finished lens blank to form a finished lens according to a required specification for the

spectacle lens.

Examples of the present invention will now be described 15 with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1A is a block diagram showing a manufacturing system of a spectacle lens embodying the invention; Fig. 1B is a flowchart showing a manufacturing method of a spectacle lens embodying the invention; 20 Fig. 2 is a graph showing variations of base curves of four series of the semi-finished lens blanks of a first embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 3 shows graphs of front surface powers Dlm(h) of four series of the semi-finished lens blanks of the first 25 embodiment in cross-section containing the optical axis, each

- 9 - graph shows Dlm(h) of lens blanks of nine sections) Fig. 4 shows graphs of variations of front surface powers LDlm(h) of the semi-finished lens blanks of the nine sections of the first embodiment, each graph shows ADlm(h) of 5 the four series of lens blanks) Fig. 5 shows cross- sections of the finished lenses (SPH -6.00 D) made from the four series of semi-finished lens blanks of the first embodiment) Fig. 6 shows graphs of average power errors AP of the 10 finished lenses of Fig. 5i Fig. 7 shows graphs of astigmatisms AS of the finished lenses of Fig. 5i Fig. 8 shows cross-sections of right and left finished lenses made from the semifinished lens blanks of the first 15 embodiment to balance in outward appearance) Fig. 9 shows graphs of average power errors AP of the finished lenses of Fig. 8i Fig. 10 shows graphs of astigmatism AS of the finished lenses of Fig. 8; 20 Fig. 11 shows graphs of back surface powers D2m(h) of finished lenses made from four series of the semi-finished lens blanks of a second embodiment of the present invention in cross-section containing the optical axis, each graph shows D2m(h) of the finished lenses of nine sections; 25 Fig. 12 shows graphs of variations of back surface

- 10 powers AD2m(h) of the finished lenses of the nine sections of the second embodiment, each graph shows AD2m(h) of the finished lens made from four series of lens blanks; Fig. 13 shows cross-sections of the finished lenses (SPH 5 +3.00D) made from the four series of semi-finished lens blanks of the second embodiment; Fig. 14 shows graphs of average power errors AP of the finished lenses of Fig. 13; Fig. 15 shows graphs of astigmatisms AS of the finished 10 lenses of Fig. 13; Fig. 16 is a schematic view showing azimuth angle in a plane perpendicular to the optical axis; Fig. 17 shows graphs of back surface powers D2m(h) of finished lenses (SPH -4.00D, CYL -2.00D, AX 180 degrees) made 15 from four series of semi-finished lens blanks of the second embodiment in four different cross-sections containing the optical axis; Fig. 18 shows graphs of variation of back surface powers AD2m(h) of the finished lenses of Fig. 17 in the four 20 different cross-sections; Fig. 19 is a graph showing variations of base curves of three series of the semi-finished lens blanks of a third embodiment of the present invention; Figs. 20A, 20B and 20C show the sections of the base 25 curve for semi-finished lens blanks of the third embodiment;

- 11 Fig. 21 is a graph showing front surface powers Dlm(h) of the semifinished lens blanks of the third embodiment in cross-section containing the optical axis; Fig. 22 shows graphs of back surface powers D2m(h) of the 5 finished lenses made from three series of the semi-finished lens blanks of the third embodiment) Fig. 23 shows graphs of the sum of the variations of front and back surface powers ADlm(h) + AD2m(h)i Fig. 24 shows cross-sections of the finished lenses (SPH 10 -4.00D) made from the three series of semi-finished lens blanks of the third embodiment) Fig. 25 shows graphs of average power errors AP of the finished lenses of Fig. 24; Fig. 26 shows graphs of astigmatisms AS of the finished 15 lenses of Fig. 24i Figs. 27A, 27B and 27C show the sections of the base curve for semi-finished lens blanks of the prior arts and

Fig. 28 is a graph showing variation of base curve of the semi-finished lens blanks of the prior art.

20 A manufacturing method of a spectacle lens embodying the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. First, the outline of the invention is described with reference to Figs. 1A and 1B, and then embodiments thereof will be described.

25 Fig. 1A is a block diagram showing the manufacturing

- 12 system of a spectacle lens and Fig. 1B is a flowchart showing the manufacturing method embodying the invention.

As shown in Fig. 1A, a manufacturing system 10 of spectacle lenses is provided comprising a computer 11 on 5 which a computer program, discussed later, is installed, an input device 12 such as a keyboard to input data to the computer 11, a display 13 such as a CRT that is connected to the computer 11, and an aspherical surface processing machine 14 that is controlled by the computer 11.

10 When an order from a customer is received, a spectacle lens is manufactured in a manufacturing factory according to the steps of Fig. 1B. In step S1, an operator inputs the customer's data (i.e., the specifications or prescription of

the required spectacle lens) into the computer 11 with the 15 input device 12. The specifications include a vertex power

(a spherical power SPH and a cylindrical power CYL) and a product type that determines the refractive index of the lens material. The customer's data may be input to a terminal computer placed in an opticians. In such a case, the 20 customer's data is transmitted to the factory through a computer network.

In step S2, the computer 11 determines a section of the vertex power based on the spherical power SPH and the cylindrical power CYL. The entire range of available vertex 25 power of a spectacle lens is divided into nine sections I

- 13 through IX as shown in Figs. 27A through 27C. A plurality of types of semi-finished lens blanks that are different in base curve are prepared for each section. In the following embodiments, three or four types of semi-finished lens blanks 5 are prepared.

In step S3, the computer 11 lists up the base curves that are prepared for the determined section on the display 13.

It is not absolutely necessary to divide the vertex powers into the sections for the present invention. A 10 plurality of types of semifinished lens blanks having different base curves may be prepared for each vertex power without defining the sections.

As described above, the weight of the spectacle lens becomes small as the base curve becomes gentler, while the 15 optical performance at the periphery is degraded. In step S4, the most suitable base curve is selected whilst weighting the optical performance and the outward appearance in considerations of the customer's taste and adaptability. If a customer requires a lightweight spectacle lens with 20 performance penalty, the gentlest base curve should be selected. On the contrary, when a customer places emphasis on the optical performance rather than lightening the weight, the sharpest base curve should be selected.

After the base curve is selected, the computer 11 25 calculates the shape data of the back surface based on the

l 14 -

selected base curve and the specification according to a

calculating program in step S5. The calculating program finds the shape data of the back surface based on the selected base curve as a precondition with an optimization algorithm 5 such as a damping least squares method so as to optimize the optical performance while keeping the required vertex power.

Next, the operator places the semi-finished lens blank having the selected base curve on the aspherical surface processing machine 14. After the placement, when the 10 operator enters a start command from the input device 12, the computer 11 controls the aspherical surface processing machine 14 to process (grind) the back surface of the semi-

finished lens blank based on the shape data found in step S5.

Next, three embodiments of the series of semi-finished 15 lens blanks employed in the manufacturing method of the invention and the series of finished lenses will be described. First Embodiment 20 In a first embodiment, a refractive index of the lens material is 1.6, a diameter of the finished lens is 70 mm, the minimum thickness (the center thickness for a minus lens and the edge thickness for a plus lens) is 1.0 mm, the front surface is a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical surface and 25 a back surface is processed to be a spherical surface or a

- 15 -

toric surface. Further, the entire range of the available vertex powers of a spectacle lens is divided into nine sections I through IX in the same manner as the prior art

shown in Figs. 27A, 27B and 27C. Four types of semi-finished 5 lens blanks that are different in base curve are prepared for each section. Therefore, thirty-six types of semi-finished lens blanks are prepared. In the following description, the

unit "diopter" is indicated by "D".

Fig. 2 is a graph showing variations of base curves of 10 the semifinished lens blanks of the first embodiment. A group of the semifinished lens blanks with base curves that are gentlest in every section is referred to as a "series A".

A second group of the lens blanks with base curves that are gentlest, except one, is referred to as a "series B", and a 15 third group is referred to as a "series C". A group of the lens blanks with base curves that are sharpest or least gentle is referred to as a "series D". The following TABLE 2 shows numerical values of the base curve of the semifinished lens blanks of the series A to series D. For instance, in the 20 section II (SPH -5.25 D to -7.00 D, CYL 0.00 D to -2.00 D), the base curves of the series A, B. C and D are 0.50 D, 1.25 D, 2.00 D and 3.00 D, respectively.

TABLE 2

- 16 Section Series A Series B 0.00 0.50 1

II 0.50 1.25

5 III 1.25 2.00 3.004.00

IV 2.00 3.00 4.005.00

3.00 4.00 5.006.00

VI 4.00 5.00 6.007.00

VII 5.00 6.00 7.008.00

10 VIII 6.00 7.00 8.009.00

IX 7.00 8.00 9.0010.00

In any sections, the most lightweight and thinnest spectacle lens can be obtained by employing the semi-finished 15 lens blank of the series A, and the spectacle lens having the best optical performance can be obtained by employing the semi-finished lens blank of the series D. The spectacle lens made from the semi-finished lens blank of the series B or C has middle weight and middle optical performance. Between 20 the series B and C, if the customer assigns weight to the advantage of lightweight, the series B should be selected, else if the customer assigns weight to the optical performance, the series C should be selected.

Further, in the first embodiment, the base curve of the 25 series D in each section is equal to that of the series C in the next higher section (whose Roman numeral is larger). In the same manner, the base curves of the series C and B are equal to that of the series B and A in the next higher sections, respectively. Such a selection or setting of the

- 17 base curves is advantageous to balance the outward appearances of the right and left lenses whose required vertex powers belong to different sections. For instance, assuming that the required vertex powers of right and left 5 lenses are SPH -6.00 D and SPH -2.00 D, respectively, the semi-finished lens blank of the series D in the section II should be selected to make the right lens and the semi-

finished lens blank of the series B in the section IV should be selected to make the left lens in order to make the lenses 10 the same outward appearance. For such a balancing, the base curve of the specific series in the specific section is preferably identical with the base curve of the corresponding series in the corresponding section. When the difference between the base curves is not greater than 0.2 diopter, the 15 difference in the outward appearance presents no substantial problem. Next, the shape of the aspherical surfaces of the finished lenses made from the semi-finished lens blanks of various series in various sections will be described.

20 Any pair of the finished lenses of the first embodiment, which are made from the semi-finished lens blanks prepared for the same section, satisfy the following condition (1) when SPH < 0, CYL < 0 and satisfy the condition (2) when SPH > 0, CYL 2 0:

25 (1) ADlm(15)i + LD2m(15)i > ADlm(15)j + LD2m(15)

- 18 (2) ADlm(15)i + AD2m(15)i < ADlm(15)j + LD2m(15) where SHE is a spherical power, CYL is a cylindrical power, 5 Dlm(h) and D2m(h) are surface powers of the front and back surfaces at the point whose distance from the optical axis of the finished lens is h (units: mm) in a plane that contains the optical axis, ADlm(h) is a variation of surface power of the front 10 surface and is obtained by Dlm(h) - Dlm(O), LD2m(h) is a variation of surface power of the back surface and is obtained by D2m(h) D2m(0), and the subscript "i" represents the values of the finished lens that has a smaller base curve and the subscript "j" 15 represents the values of the finished lens that has a larger base curve as described by Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j.

When the condition (1) or (2) is satisfied, the optical performances (average power error and astigmatism) of the finished lenses made from any type of the semi-finished lens 20 blanks can be kept high.

The front surface powers Dlm(h) of the semi-finished lens blanks of various series in various sections in the cross-section containing the optical axis are shown in graphs in Fig. 3. Further, Fig. 4 shows graphs of variations of 25 front surface powers ADlm(h) of the semi-finished lens blanks

of the nine sections. Since the back surface is spherical or toric, LD2m(h) equals 0 in spite of the height h. With reference to Fig. 4, LDlm(15)i > LDlm(15)j holds for Dlm(O) < Dlm(O)j in the minus lens (sections I, II, III and IV), 5 ADlm(15)i < ADlm(15)j holds for Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j in the plus lens (sections VI, VII, VIII and IX). That is, the conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied in either case.

Fig. 5 shows cross-sections of the finished lenses (SPH -6.00 D) made from the semi-finished lens blanks of the series 10 A, B. C and D in the section II. The shapes of the finished lenses are different from one another. The gentler the base curve is, the thinner the edge thickness is and the shorter the jutting amount of the front surface is. The finished lens made from the semi-finished lens blank of the series A is the 15 lightest in weight. The lens made from the series B is heavier than the series A, and the lens made from the series C is heavier than the series B. The finished lens made from the semi-finished lens blank of the series D is the heaviest in weight.

20 Average power errors AP of these finished lenses with respect to visual angle VA are shown by graphs in Fig. 6 and astigmatisms AS thereof are shown by graphs in Fig. 7. In each graph a solid line represents the aberration for distance vision (object distance: A) and a dotted line 25 represents the aberration for near vision (object distance:

- 20 300 mm).

It is preferable that the average power errors AP and astigmatisms AS of the finished lenses, which are made from the semi-finished lens blanks having different base curves 5 prepared for the same vertex power, are approximately identical within 30 degrees of visual angle. The differences of average power errors and differences of astigmatisms among the lenses may be not greater than 0.1 diopter within 30 degrees of visual angle.

10 In the first embodiment, since the variations of the front surface power ADlm(h) are different according to the series as shown in Fig. 4, the optical performance (the average power error and the astigmatism) of the finished lens becomes substantially constant when the finished lens is made 15 from any one of the semi-finished lens blanks of the series A, B. C and D. For the vertex power SPH -6.00 D both of the differences of the average power errors AP and the differences of the astigmatisms AS are not greater than 0.1 diopter within 30 degrees of visual angle as shown in Figs. 20 6 and 7. That is, the optical performances are approximately identical in spite of the difference in the series.

On the other hand, distortions at 50 degrees of visual angle are -37.0 % in the series A, -35.1 % in the series B. -33.2 % in the series C and -31. 1 % in the series D. The 25 distortion decreases as the base curve becomes sharper.

- 21 Further, sensitivities LAP(30 )/LY of the variation of the average power error at 30 degrees of visual angle with respect to the lens deviation in the upward direction are -0.089 D/mm in the series A, -0.078 D/mm in the series B. -0.068 D/mm in 5 the series C and -0.054 D/mm in the series D. Still further, sensitivities LAS(30 )/AY of the variation of the astigmatism at 30 degrees of visual angle with respect to the lens deviation in the upward direction are -0.099 D/mm in the series A, -0.088 D/mm in the series B. -0.077 D/mm in the 10 series C and -0.063 D/mm in the series D. The sensitivity decreases as the base curve becomes sharper.

When the required vertex powers of right and left lenses belong to different sections, for example, when the required vertex power of the right lens is SPH -4.00 D and that of the 15 left lens is SPH -8.00 D, the semi-finished lens blank of the series C in section I (base curve 1. 25 D) selected to make the left lens and the semi-finished lens blank of the series A in the section III (base curve 1.25 D) is selected to make the right lens. Fig. 8 shows cross-sections of a right finished 20 lens (R)and a left finished lens (L), and Figs. 9 and 10 show the average power error AP and the astigmatism AS of the finished lenses, respectively. With the first embodiment, the finished lenses are balanced not only in the outward appearance as shown in Fig. 8 but also in the optical 25 performance as shown in Figs. 9 and 10.

- 22 Second Embodiment In a second embodiment, a refractive index of the lens material is 1.6, a diameter of the finished lens is 70 mm, the minimum thickness is 1.0 mm, the front surface is a 5 spherical surface and the back surface is a rotationally-

symmetrical aspherical surface or an atoroidal surface.

Further, the relationship between the vertex power and the sections is the same as the prior art shown in Figs. 27A,

27B and 27C. Four series A, B. C and D of semi-finished 10 lens blanks that are different in base curve are prepared in the same manner as the first embodiment.

The spherical base curves of the four series A, B. C and D are assigned to the front surfaces, and the shapes of the back surfaces are determined so as to have the most 15 suitable optical performance with the combination of the shapes of the front surfaces.

Fig. 11 shows graphs of back surface powers D2m(h) of finished lenses made from the semi-finished lens blanks in cross-section containing the optical axis. Each graph 20 shows D2m(h) of the finished lenses of the nine sections of the specific series. There are finished lenses whose vertex powers are SPH -8.00 D in the section I, SPH -6.00 D in the section II, SPH -4.00 D in the section III, SPH -

2.00 D in the section IV, SPH 0.00 D in the section V, SPH 25 +2.00 D in the section IV, SPH +3.00 D in the section VII,

- 23 SPH +4.00 D in the section VIII and SPH +5.00 in the section IX.

Fig. 12 shows graphs of variations of back surface powers AD2m(h) of the finished lenses of the nine sections.

5 Each graph shows AD2m(h) of the finished lenses made from four series of lens blanks. Since the front surface is spherical, ADlm(h) equals O in spite of the height h. With reference to Fig. 12, LD2m(15)i > AD2m(15)j holds for Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j in the minus lens (sections I, II, III and 10 IV), AD2m(15)i < AD2m(15)j holds for Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j in the plus lens (sections VI, VII, VIII and IX). That is, the conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied in either case.

Fig. 13 shows cross-sections of the finished lenses (SPH +3.00 D) made from the semi-finished lens blanks of 15 the series A, B. C and D in the section VII. The shapes of the finished lenses are different from one another. The gentler the base curve is, the thinner the center thickness is. The finished lens made form the semi-finished lens blank of the series A is the lightest in weight. The lens 20 made from the series B is heavier than the series A, and the lens made from the series C is heavier than the series B. The finished lens made from the semi-finished lens blank of the series D is the heaviest in weight.

Average power errors AP of these finished lenses with 25 respect to visual angle VA are shown by graphs in Fig. 14

- 24 -

and astigmatisms AS thereof are shown by graphs in Fig. 15.

In each graph a solid line represents the aberration for distance vision (object distance: A) and a dotted line represents the aberration for near vision (object distance: 5 300 mm).

In the second embodiment, since the variations of the back surface power LD2m(h) are different according to the series as shown in Fig. 12, the optical performance (the average power error and the astigmatism) of the finished 10 lens becomes substantially constant when the finished lens is made from any one of the semi-finished lens blanks of the series A, B. C and D. For the vertex power SPH +3.00 both of the differences of the average power errors AP and the differences of the astigmatisms AS are not greater than 15 0.05 diopter within 30 degrees of visual angle as shown in Figs. 14 and 15. That is, the optical performances are approximately identical in spite of the difference in the series. On the other hand, distortions at 50 degrees of visual 20 angle are +14.7 % in the series A, +14.3 % in the series B. +14.0 % in the series C and +13.7 % in the series D. The distortion decreases as the base curve becomes sharper.

Further, sensitivities LAP(30 )/AY of the variation of the average power error at 30 degrees of visual angle with 25 respect to the lens deviation in the upward direction are

- 25 +0.056 D/mm in the series A, +0.046 D/mm in the series B. +0.036 D/mm in the series C and +0.026 D/mm in the series D. Still further, sensitivities LAS(30 )/LY of the variation of the astigmatism at 30 degrees of visual angle 5 with respect to the lens deviation in the upward direction are +0.055 D/mm in the series A, +0.045 D/mm in the series B. +0.034 D/mm in the series C and +0.024 D/mm in the series D. The sensitivity decreases as the base curve becomes sharper.

10 When the specification of the spectacle lens includes

a cylindrical power CYL, the back surface is processed to be an atoroidal surface, and the variation of the back surface power AD2m(h) varies depending on the orientation of the cross-section. The orientation of the cross-section 15 that contains the optical axis is defined as azimuth angle in an x-y plane perpendicular to the optical axis as shown in Fig. 16. The azimuth angle is an amount of rotation in counterclockwise direction with respect to the horizontal x-axis.

20 For instance, Fig. 17 shows graphs of the back surface powers D2m(h) of the finished lenses (SPH -4.00 D, CYL 2.00 D, AX 180 ) made from four series of semi-finished lens blanks of the second embodiment at 0 , 30 , 60 and 90 of the azimuth angle O. Further, Fig. 18 shows graphs 25 of variation of back surface powers AD2m(h) of the finished

- 26 lenses at 0 , 30 , 60 and 90 of the azimuth angle 8. In any crosssections, AD2m(15)i > AD2m(15)j holds for Dlm(O) < Dlm(O)j.

5 Third Embodiment In a third embodiment, a refractive index of the lens material is 1.67, a diameter of the finished lens is Q70 mm, the minimum thickness is 1.0 mm, the front surface is a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical surface and the 10 back surface is a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical surface or an atoroidal surface. Further, the entire range of the available vertex powers of a spectacle lens is divided into six sections I through VI as shown in Figs. 20A, 20B and 20C. Fig. 20A shows a range of minus diopter, 15 Fig. 20B shows a range of plus diopter and Fig. 20C shows a range of mixed diopter. Three types of semi-finished lens blanks (series A, B and C) that are different in base curve are prepared for each section. Therefore, eighteen types of semi-finished lens blanks are prepared. The following 20 TABLE 3 shows numerical values of the base curve of the semi-finished lens blanks of the series A, B and C. TABLE 3

- 27 Section Base Curve (units: D) Series A Series B Series C I 0.50 1. 25 2.00

II 1.25 2.00 3.00

5 III 2.00 3.00 4.00

IV 3.00 4.00 5.00

4.00 5.00 6.00

VI 5.00 6.00 7.00

10 The aspherical base curves of the series A, B and C are assigned to the front surfaces, and the shapes of the back surfaces are determined so as to have the most suitable optical performance with the combination of the shapes of the front surfaces.

15 Fig. 21 shows graphs of front surface powers Dlm(h) of the semifinished lens blanks in cross-section containing the optical axis. In the third embodiment, common aspherical surfaces are employed for the front surface having the same base curve. For example, the aspherical front surfaces of the 20 series A in the section III, the series B in the section II and the series C in the section I are identical. In the first embodiment, the aspherical front surface of the specific series is different from that of other series even when the base curve is identical. On the contrary, in the third 25 embodiment, the aspherical surface of the specific series is identical to that of the other series when the base curve is identical. Therefore, the values of the base curves are used as labels in the graph of Fig. 21.

- 28 Fig. 22 shows graphs of back surface powers D2m(h) of the finished lenses made from three series of the semi-finished lens blanks in the cross-section containing the optical axis.

Each graph shows D2m(h) of the finished lenses of the six 5 sections of the specific series. There are finished lenses whose vertex powers are SPH -6.00 in the section I, SPH -4.00 in the section II, SPH -2.00 in the section III, SPH 0.00 in the section IV, SPH +2.00 in the section V and SPH +4.00 in the section VI.

10 Further, Fig. 23 shows graphs of the sum of the variations of front and back surface powers ADlm(h) + AD2m(h). With reference to Fig. 23, ADlm(15)i + LD2m(15)i > LDlm(15)j + AD2m(15)j holds for Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j in the minus lens (sections I, II and III), ADlm(15)i + LD2m(15)i < 15 ADlm(15), + LD2m(15)j holds for Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j in the plus lens (sections V and VI). That is, the conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied in either case.

Fig. 24 shows cross-sections of the finished lenses (SPH -4.00D) made from the semi-finished lens blanks of the series 20 A, B and C in the section II. The shapes of the finished lenses are different to one another. The gentler the base curve is, the thinner the edge thickness is and the shorter the jutting amount of the front surface is. The finished lens made from the semi-finished lens blank of the series A is the 25 lightest in weight. The lens made from the series B is

l - 29 heavier than the series A, and the lens made from the series C is heavier than the series B. Average power errors AP of these finished lenses with respect to visual angle VA are shown by graphs in Fig. 25 and 5 astigmatisms AS thereof are shown by graphs in Fig. 26. In each graph a solid line represents the aberration for distance vision (object distance: A) and a dotted line represents the aberration for near vision (object distance: 300 mm).

10 In the third embodiment, since the sum of the variations of the front and back surface powers LDlm(h) + AD2m(h) are different according to the series as shown in Fig. 23, the optical performance (the average power error and the astigmatism) of the finished lens becomes substantially 15 constant when the finished lens is made from any one of the semi-finished lens blanks of the series A, B and C. For the vertex power SPH -4.00 both of the differences of the average power errors AP and the differences of the astigmatisms AS are not greater than 0.05 diopter within 30 degrees of visual 20 angle as shown in Figs. 25 and 26. That is, the optical performances are approximately identical in spite of the difference in the series.

On the other hand, distortions at 50 degrees of visual angle are -23.8 % in the series A, -22.5 % in the series B and 25 -21.0 % in the series C. The distortion decreases as the base

- 30 curve becomes sharper. Further, sensitivities LAP(30 )/LY of the variation of the average power error at 30 degrees of visual angle with respect to the lens deviation in the upward direction are -0.076 D/mm in the series A, -0.068 D/mm in the 5 series B and -0.058 D/mm in the series C. Still further, sensitivities LAS(30 )/LY of the variation of the astigmatism at 30 degrees of visual angle with respect to the lens deviation in the upward direction are -0.083 D/mm in the series A, -0.074 D/mm in the series B and -0.064 D/mm in the 10 series C. The sensitivity decreases as the base curve becomes sharper. A finished lens with both front and back surfaces spherical or toric may be included in any one series. For example, since the variations of the surface powers of the 15 finished lenses of the series A-D in the section V in the first embodiment are relatively small, it is unnecessary to employ aspherical surfaces to keep the optical performance, which allows the use of finished lenses with both front and back surfaces spherical or toric. In the same manner, since 20 the base curves of the finished lenses of the series C and D in the any sections are relatively sharp, the required optical performance can be achieved without employing aspherical surfaces, which allows the use of finished lenses with both front and back surfaces spherical or toric.

25 In the above embodiments, the most suitable semi

- 31 finished lens blank is selected according to a customer's order among the prepared semi-finished lens blanks. However, a plurality of finished lens that are different in the base curve may be prepared for vertex powers that are frequently 5 ordered. In such a case, the lens maker can supply the most suitable lens by selecting from among the stockpiled finished lenses. This kind of supplying method is included in the scope of the invention.

Claims

- 32 CLAIMS

1. A supplying method of spectacle lens having at least one of front and back surfaces aspherical, the method 5 comprising:-

preparing for each of a plurality of vertex powers a plurality of types of finished lenses that are different in base curve, wherein average power errors and astigmatisms of said finished lenses are approximately identical within 30 10 degrees of visual angle; and selecting one type of said finished lenses from among said plurality of types of said finished lenses based on: weighting of optical performance and of outward appearance; and 15 a required specification for the spectacle lens.

2. A supplying method according to claim 1 wherein any pair of said finished lenses which are prepared for the same vertex power satisfy the following condition (1) when SPH < 20 0, CYL < 0 and satisfy the condition (2) when SPH > 0, CYL 2 O: (1) ADlm(15)i + AD2m(15)i > ADlm(15) j + AD2m(15) (2) ADlm(15)i + AD2m(15)i < ADlm(15)j + AD2m(15) where 25 SHP is a spherical power (units: diopter),

- 33 CYL is a cylindrical power (units: diopter), Dlm(h) and D2m(h) are surface powers of the front and back surfaces (units: diopter) at the point whose distance from the optical axis of said finished lens is h (units: mm) 5 in a plane that contains said optical axis, ADlm(h) is a variation of surface power of the front surface and is obtained by Dlm(h) - Dlm(O), AD2m(h) is a variation of surface power of the back surface and is obtained by D2m(h) - D2m(0), and 10 the subscript "i" represents the values of the finished lens that has smaller base curve and the subscript "j" represents the values of the finished lens that has larger baser curve as described by Dlm(O)i < Dlm(O)j.

15

3. A supplying method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the front surface of said finished lens is a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical surface and the back surface is selected from among a spherical surface and a toric surface.

4. A supplying method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the front surface of said finished lens is selected from among a spherical surface and a toric surface and the back surface is a rotationally-symmetrical aspherical 25 surface.

- 34 5. A supplying method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein both of the front and back surfaces of said finished lens are aspherical surfaces.

5

6. A supplying method according to any preceding claim wherein differences of average power errors and differences of astigmatisms among any said finished lenses having different base curves which are prepared for the same vertex power are not greater than 0.1 diopter within 30 degrees of 10 visual angle.

7. A supplying method according to any preceding claim wherein one type of said finished lenses prepared for one vertex power has an approximately identical base curve with 15 one type of said semi-finished lenses prepared for other vertex powers.

8. A supplying method according to any preceding claim wherein differences of base curves between one type of said 20 finished lenses prepared for one vertex power and one type of finished lenses prepared for other vertex powers is not greater than 0.2 diopter.

9. A supplying method according to any proceeding 25 claim wherein said plurality of types of finished lenses are

r - 35 -

formed from a plurality of types of semi-finished lens blanks that are different in base curve for each of predetermined vertex powers by processing back surfaces of said semi-

finished lens blanks to form said finished lenses.

10. A supplying method according to claim 9 wherein three or more types of the semi-finished lens blanks are prepared for each of said predetermined vertex powers.

10

11. A supplying method of spectacle lens having at least one of front and back surfaces aspherical, the method substantially as herein described with reference to figures 1 to 26.

15

12. A spectacle lens produced according a supplying method according to any preceding claim.