GB2386765A - Magnetic engine - Google Patents

Abstract

A magnetic engine includes a housing 6 and a dynamo 4 or alternator. The engine may include a ring magnet 1, a ring of magnets 2, a magnetic shield 3, magnetic bearings 5, superconductors and electromagnet coils. The components may be latched together and the housing may include a vacuum. A magnetic gearing arrangement (fig 2) is also disclosed, as is a rotary solenoid arrangement (fig 9). Also disclosed are explanations of the engine's operation, and of gravitons, gravity, superconductors, magnetic materials and magnetic fields.

Description

1- 2386765

Magnetic Engine ., This description has been written to validate a 'magnetic engine' - it shows

a magnetic field source decays, by way of it emitting a 'faster to lightspeed'

particle field.

More than ten ways of showing this is this description. Each machine

being validated by each other machine: Gravity'; 'Frequency Count' i 'Incrementing Radio'; 'Aerial Gravity'; Varying Frequency'; 'Duplex Transmission' i 'Rotating Signal' i Emition'; 'Artificial Gravity'; 'Superconductors / Magnetic Engines'.

These machines are practical-experimental.

Each machines industrial application, to primarily be a educational tool.

A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo' had been created to benefit wildlife, plantlife and environment [to be the property of (sold by) wildlife, plantlife and environment]. A licence for a engine/dynamo / its components, will be available to anyone; anyone with a said license may create, develop and sell a engine/dynamo; a said licence will only contract fifty percent of such licensed peoples profits or a preset sum to said preset beneficiaries. A said preset sum will enforce when said profits become too small (too much competition will not aid to these said beneficiaries). I had only been able to financially afford a United Kingdom patent: I declare anyone in the UK may exploit this situation equally to anyone outside the J. Indirect exploitation of a engine/dynamo/its_components will not benefit these said beneficiaries. You should act better to your ancestors.

Drawings Page 1'; show: Combinations of graviton/structures/emitions.

Drawings Page 2'; show: Magnetic engine/dynamo [type 1] - components.

Drawings Page 3i; show: Magnetic engine/dynamo [tyloe 2] - components.

NOTATION

Unfortunately the whole description uses terminology defined throughout the

whole description: A first pass should be a quick pass (do not struggle with

peculiar notation / words).

Top of the list: A!graviton is to a magnetic field (that's a magnetic field

Or radio wave or... tis a varying density magnetic energy - particle)) what a graviton is to gravity.

A 'Tillion' is a definable infinite number.

Frequency; number of individual particles evenly emitted over a given time.

Density; number of gravitons which construct a single object/particle.

Denseness; number of constructing gravitons given object/particle volume.

A radio-wave is not a wave - it is a coherent radio-particle stream (emitting 360x360degree(all) around a emitting aerial), as shown in Figure_12 particles within the sinusoidal wave' (a sinusoidal wave is shown for reference only (it represents the particles induced polarity toward a intercepted conductor)). GRAVITY (epilogue) Gravity is near instantaneous; else: Planets would not orbit as they do; they would show a time displaced gravity effect 'between each other'.

Tides would lag behind the Moon.

Scenario; 'A photon is ejected by a star'.

While a photon leaves a star (especially when it is incredibly close to a star) a stars density with respect to that of a photons will slow its speed.

A photon ejects a star faster than the speed of light.

It must, it's slowed down as soon as it ejects.

Any energy particle of a lesser density to a photon will travel faster to the speed of light (photons = energy particles, are known to have a density; they are retrajectorised Whorl passerby into a pcxi..-.ty to a ', _e"i dense object).

-2 9 ITY (apparatus) A A computer model/simulation of the Earth-Sea-Moon.

Requirements: Know to be accumulativly accurate over at least three hundred years (mathematics) Moon position prediction software.

A at least eight meter diameter very-slightly-evenly-bowed glass dish, overlooked or underlooked by 'locatable' (high-resolution 'CAD type' flatbed plotter arm arrangement (incorporating high resolution rotary encoders)) incredibly high resolution macro-lensed CCD camera(s).

The disc will be placed/fixed and damped(to eliminate Earth tremors) parallel to the Earth, such that a tiny amount of extremely-thin liquid will rest at its centre (the dish may need to be 'vacuumed' or 'sealed with a neutral gash to eliminate the liquids evaporation / chemical degradation).

The liquids central position (rather than accurately centralizing the dish) may be found by generalizing the effects the Moon has upon the liquid over a number of weeks: Data accumulated being generalized to calculate the liquids centre'. The lens and CCD-elements need to be calibrated: That is, each CCD-

element cannot be relied upon Else a fine mesh/dots laminated or printed on the underside of the glass dish will act as a liquid position toward the lens/CCD(s)(the accuracy is now dependent upon the mesh/dots).

The liquid in the dish needs to be calibrated: Its viscosity needs to be calculated and subtracted from the actual-experiment results.

The computer program will predict where the liquid should be in the dish, by the computer modelling the Moon-Earth_Dish Liquid.

A computer model/simulation set to gravity_speed= 0 [instantaneous]: Will predict where liquid should be in the dish, at what time.

The locatable CCD camera(s) can be re-positioned anywhere over the glassdish) such that the camera(s) is zoomed into and positioned above a known location - to where the liquid is predicted to approach or retract (relying upon 'individual CCD elements' or 'a fine mesh' - as a secondary very-high resolution co-ordinate system (a/the first/primary co-ordinate system being the low resolution plotter arm arrangement which locates these CCD camera(s))).

Any time lags: The speed of gravity will be known (after many repeated experiments / generalizations).

A dense/heavy plumb line will result a 'less accurate' action: A 'stiff bar/tube '-fine being connected to a resistance free / very sensitive motion detector; Or the plumb being underlooked by a calibrated incredibly high resolution macro-lensed CCD camera(s).

The density/momentum of the dense/heavy plumb needs to be calibrated to, such that its kinetic-density/momentum can be calculated and subtracted from the experiment.

GRAVITY (prologue) Gravity can be described by a mathematical formula, but it can never be a mathematical formula (1 + 2 = 3, but it ('1', '2' or '3') does not 'exist').

Equally, there are many numbers-scenarios resulting to '3' (2 + 1; 6 / 2; 1.5 +.5; 1.2 + 1.8 i which in itself states mathematics car only represent something: It is not something).

FREQUENCY_COUNT (apparatus) This apparatus will distinguish between energy particles of varying frequencies being 'a equal density to each other' <> 'not a equal density to each other'. A aerial transmits a fixed amount of energy, at a fixed frequency.

The total amount of energy input to a aerial will produce a frequency count totalling the total number of oscillations which had occurred at this frequency, before the energy depleted.

When the aerial transmits at another frequency - by the same amount of energy; the frequency count should stay the same - if each frequency energy particle has a equal density.

A aerial/frequency set at 1000Mhz, where a frequency count tGta'5 e'C before a flexed amount Of eatery depleted.

If a aerial/frequency is now set at lOkhz, you might Expect the same frequency count (3elO).

If this frequency count became higher, the low frequency energy particle is a lesser density to a high frequency energy particle.

If this frequency count became lower, the low frequency energy particle is a greater density to a high frequency energy particle.

particle_density [used_energy] [frequency] This experiment should be retaken where a greater energy power level is input into the aerial: The particle_density will not increase; only more (independently in parallel) will emit (a fixed amount of energy will deplete proportionally quicker between alternate frequencies).

FREQUENCY_COUNT (prologue 1) AC-!gravitons are created/emitted by a aerial/conductors graviton structure slightly differently to magnetism_!gravitons and gravitons (discussed throughout description), resultantly:

A VLF-particle(AC-!graviton) emits at a VúFrequency; it being created/emitted by a conductors/aerials local graviton structure as a proportionally tiny/fast density AC-!graviton.

A SHF-particle(AC-!graviton) emits at a SHFrequency; it being created/emitted by a conductors/aerials local graviton structure as a proportionally large/slow density AC-!graviton.

Resultantly, a photon is inhibited by materials a radio-particle can pass though: A photon has a poor density/velocity ratio (compared to a radio-

particle). Resolution: Higher frequency AC-!gravitons are a greaterdensity to lower frequency AC-!gravitons (described throughout description):

A aerials/conductors local graviton structure which created the AC!graviton, will not emit it, until a second AC-!graviton develops behind it (this causes to repel to the first AC-!graviton to emit it). Before the second AC-

!graviton begins to develop - the first AC-!graviton will begin to attract back into the 'created it' local graviton structure (the 'created it' local graviton structure will still be at a like-attractive 'just created it' orientation to the just created AC-!graviton).

Thus, a first AC-!graviton will begin to attract back into the 'created it' local graviton structure, before a secondary AC-!graviton has began to be created (by the same local graviton structure), to ultimately repel to the first (to emit the first) = Howe' frequency AC-!graviton has much more time to attract back into a 'created it' local graviton structure.

Figure_11 shows 'a schematic maximum' amount of time a AG-

!graviton has to de-develop, before a following AC-!graviton has fully developed to repel to it. The sinusoidal wave indicates at what polarity and point in time a AC-

!graviton is developing/fully-developed[high/low points of wave] (indicates the polarity of the 'creating them' local graviton structure). In reality, de-

developing will mainly only occur to the point of the second largest dedevelopment !graviton(' circle ') shown (the 'created it' local graviton structure becomes neutral at this point (as indicated by sinusoidal wave)) .

FREQUENCY_COUNT (prologue 2) Resolution: A AM and FM radio receiver tuned into a specific frequency.

The receiver circuitry establishes 'frequencies' as each frequency !graviton has a unique frequency(densityvelocity) energy.

Two or more!gravitons intercepting a aerial, of alternate frequencies will be separable by the aerial: Their energy is not stored into the aerial (it only effects/disrupts the aerials graviton structure as it passes through it (induction)). The aerial will thus not perceive a accumulation of disruption, which would otherwise emulate a lower frequency!graviton interception.

!Graviton frequencies are separable, as each produces a unique independent disturbance (electrical (potential (lOOkhzAClOOkV as lOGhzAClOGV))) to the aerial/conductor. [lOOkhz does not represent AClOOkV, this/that stated throughout is a easy schematic reference: In actuality a voltage drift/inducement between lOhz to lOOOGhz will be less to one volt (increases/decreases in velocity between iOhz and lOOOGhz!gravitons is incredibly tiny = induced_voltage increase/decrease is incredibly tiny (fractions of a volt))!.

As each different-frequency!graviton has a unique jensity(frequency) and velocity(frequency); each will induce a unique voltage --(velocity it passes though a conductor) and current (its energy-density) into the aerial/conductor, when passing though it.

Intercepting AC-!gravitons to a intercepted aerial/material, results to create/cause the materials(aerials) graviton structure to semiperpetually break-down [as/see 'Induction/Conduction']; of/to a equivalent density and velocity to the intercepting(post intercepted) AC- !gravitons.

Thus, a electrical current is a alternating magnetic (AC-!graviton) field:!Gravitons create/emit within the

intercepted material(aerial) respecting those which intercepted/created/emitted them (these mostly being internal selfinterceptions - initiated by a external intercepting AC-!graviton field). Thus:

Current = density of a resultant materials semi-perpetually(selfintercepting) creating/emitting!gravitons Voltage = [as densityvelocity] velocity of a resultant materials semi-perpetually(self-intercepting) creating/emitting!gravitons. = Voltage(velocity)Current(density).

The velocity of a (AC-)!graviton will simply be known by the voltage it induces into a conductor (velocityinduced_voltage). Where the density of the!graviton will simply be known by the current it induces into the conductor (densityinduced_current) [as/see Incrementing Radio apparatus']; where it should/will be found voltage(velocity)current(density). A aerial/conductor receives better closer to a broadcast aerial as it is intercepting more trigonometrically intercepting AC-!gravitons (producing a single greater disturbance (AClOOkV/hz+AClOOkV/hz+AClOOkV/hz = 3 AClOOkV (not AC30OkV)). Radio transmitters/receivers emitireceive AC- !gravitons.

A magnetic material is capable of producing Billions of independent/orientated magnetic fields [a electrical current is a magnetic field is

a disturbance].

FREQUENCY_COUNT (prologue 3) When a AC-!graviton passes through a conductor/aerial it induces a current into it (proportional to its density), and a voltage (proportional to its velocity). This is how radio receivers are able to 'tune in' to specific frequencies. Given energyparticles(!gravitons) do only travel at 'the speed of light' (given a increase in frequency only decreases the time-gaps between emitting AC-

!gravitons (where each and all frequency AC-!graviton may/may-not have a equal density)): When AC-!gravitons intercept a aerial/conductor: Each alternate frequency will induce a equal voltage(induction velocity): The 'speed of light' for all magnetic radiation would be impossible. A radio receiver could never tune into a single/any frequency.

Only voltage(velocity) is purely distinguishable - A voltage=velocity can never be emulated by any cobination/arrangement/density/number of intercepting (AC-)!gravitons J whereas current(density) can.

A voltage(velocity) 'can only ever be produced' by a respective velocity(frequency)!graviton velocity-induction.

A current(density) can be emulated; Any number of simultaneous intercepting smaller!gravitons would emulate a single larger intercepting!graviton. INCREMENTING_RADIO (epilogue) The velocity of a!graviton will simply be known by the voltage it induces into a conductor (velocityinduced voltage); Where the density of the!graviton will simply be known by the current it induces into the conductor (densityinduced_current). A induction of a voltage/current into a aerial/conductor by a intercepting !graviton - equally implies its kinetic-velocity and/or magnetic-density 'may be' fractionally lost from the!graviton to the aerial/conductor (though resistances incurred by the!graviton reay.11g,'pass'11g through It):

If a intercepting!gravitons density degrades (relaying though a Serial); it will re-emit the aerial with a said degraded density greater velocity (a lesser velocity dependent upon 'theory' [as/see 'Incrementing Radio Prologue 1']). If a intercepting!gravitons velocity degrades (relaying through a aerial); it will re-emit the aerial with a said degraded velocity greater density (a lesser density dependent upon 'theory' [as/see 'Incrementing Radio - Prologue 1']) INCREMENTING_RADIO (apparatus) A frequency generator outputs a steadily/slowly increasing frequency- energy into a conductor/aerial. The frequency steadily increasing from Khz to Ghz.

This AC-!graviton field will be received by a receiving

aerial/conductor, where the induced voltage and current into the aerial will be analysed/stored into a computer.

When the said frequency generator has covered a said wide range of AC-

!graviton frequency/emitions - the received/stored data may be generalized.

The properties of all AC-!graviton frequencies - velocities / densities will then be known/predictable.

The receiver will be picking up any and all AC-!gravitons that intercept it; the receiver will not be set to receive at any set frequency - it will just signal when a AC-!graviton has intercepted it.

Any external noise may be shielded and/or accumulated/generalised and subtracted [as/see 'Varying Frequency'].

A said apparatus can be re-experimented where a large/dense conductive material is placed between two receiving aerials) such that a transmitter transmits AC-!gravitons which coherently travel to/through a: 'first aerial' - 'dense conductor' - 'second aerial'.

A 'first aerial' will indicate the primary [velocity/density] of the received AC-!gravitonsi then after relaying through the 'dense conductor' - they will intercept a 'second aerial', to indicate the AC-!gravitons ultimate decayed velocity/density ratio (resultant of passing though a said 'dense conductor').

The greater the density a!graviton emitted by a transmitter aerial and/or the weaker/poorer its velocity/density ratio becomes: It should be found it re-emits a 'dense conductor' at a greater alternate [velocity/density] ratio, to that which it had entered it.

INCREMENTING_RADIO (prologue 1) Apparatus will verify descriptions made in 'Frequency Count - Prologue 1'.

- However (incredibly unlikely): A lesser frequency particle may emit at a greater density (the greater amount of time it has to develop before being emitted), to achieve a greater velocity as a result (greater density = greater magnetic repulsion (given its e-gravitons (kinetic- density) were not free (they may not initially be - they are being built to be the!graviton) and/or '[see 'Emition - Scenario 2']')).

INCREMENTING_RADIO (prologue 2) Although there is no way velocity can be emulated (unlike density multiple/simultaneous interceptions): 'Rotating Signal' apparatus shows how a velocity of a emition is dependent upon its 'Star Speed'.

Stationary transmitting/receiving rad1o-particles along the Earth, Star_Speed does not apply (Star_Speed = 0).

AERIAL_GRAVITY (epilogue) AC-!gravitons may be affected by its (broadcasting)aerials artificial gravity. A aerial emitting AC-!gravitons will equally output gravitons - as a result of its increasingly unstable graviton structure.

AC-!Gravitons emit due to a massive disrupting energy applied to a aerial: The applied energy breaks down the aerials graviton structure, emitting AC-!gravitons as a result.

Gravitons emit due to a tiny break-down/re-forming, of the aerials graviton structure.

-6- A supplied energy to a aerial will create a break-down/re-

jorming of it, releasing/emitting intended AC-!gravitons. Simultaneously gravitons -=will equally be emitted, resulting from tinier break-downs/reforming of the aerial. (AC-)!Gravitons are/maybe slowed down by a intense field of

unintentional gravitons' created/emlLted by the aerial (acting at a incredibly close proximity to it).

AERIp_GPAVITY (apparatus) A transmitter/receiver aerial/conductor set in a completely shielded environment, such that a perfectly clean signal can be maintained. The signal may be meticulously analysed.

The transmitting aerial transmits a 'slowly' varying frequency AC-

!graviton field, following a pure sine wave pattern.

The receiver will receive this known to be transmitted signal/frequencypattern. If the signal received does not accumulate a true sine-

wave pattern - denser!gravitons emit at a lesser/greater velocity to lessdense !gravitons. The results being stored/accumulated/generalised.

The receiver will be picking up any and all AC-!gravitons that intercept it, the receiver will not be set to receive at any set frequency - it will just signal when a AC-!graviton has intercepted it / the frequency- time gaps between intercepting AC-!gravitons to it.

Any external noise may be shielded and/or accumulated/generalised and subtracted [as/see 'Varying Frequency ' l.

AERIAL_GRAVITY (prologue) Gravity in itself could not act to slow the velocity of a!graviton, however as/because energy-particles (may) eject against their kinetic-density - 'gravity' is able to act upon them, to greatly decay their velocity.

A said slowly varying frequency of the transmitter is required, else AC-

!gravitons will be ejected by weaker(less-dense)/stronger(denser) (viceversa) AC-

!gravitons (to affect varying velocity/frequency AC-!gravitons as a result (are being repelled/ejected by following varying density/strength AC-!gravitons)). To effect other results which may be accumulated and evaluated by the apparatus.

VARYING_FREQUENCY (apparatus) A varying frequency radio transmitter/aerial outputs a increasing / decreasing!graviton density, by varying the frequency = time!gravitons may develop over.

A AC-!gravitons density is determined by frequency-energy supplied to it, to develop/de-develop over a specific time-frequency.

A frequency of energy will only be able to supply energy to a developing/de-developing!graviton for a specific allotted time, determined by the beginning-terminating/alternating 'frequency' of energy being supplied to it.

This varying frequency will follow a sine wave pattern.

A transmitter/aerial located on Earth - broadcasting perpendicular away from Earth (the Earth acting as a gravity source, acting to greater density !gravitons to lesser density!gravitons). A radio receiver (satellite) located a great distance away (at a equal-opposite trajectory / away-from the Moon), in 'high atmosphere' or 'orbit' or 'outer-space' to receive the radio signal.

Given a greater density!graviton will ultimately (the Earths gravity will be persistently intercepting/decaying the velocity of any!graviton) travel at a lesser speed to a!graviton of a lesser density, the 'received' radio wave will not appear a pure sine wave.

All AC-!gravitons are travelling at varying densities / speeds: The signal whilst in transit will become slightly skewed: The AC-!gravitons will not overtake one another, but: Faster AC-!gravitons travelling behind slower AC-

!gravitons will become very slightly nearer to them; A faster AC!gravlton in front of a slower AC-!graviton will enlarge the gap between them.

The sine wave frequency/energy fed into the aerial will develop/emit varying density AC-!gravitons.

Densityfrequency: By the time these varying density / velocity AC!gravitons reach a receiver, they will have distorted the sine wave frequency energy patlern which had originally been fed into the transmitting aerial.

The radio signal received will appear very slightly Skewed, to that that would represent a pure sine wave.

The receiver will be picking up any and all AC-!gravitons that intercept it, the receiver will not be set to receive at any set frequency - it will just signal when a AC-!graviton has intercepted it / the frequency- time gaps between intercepting AC-!gravitons to it. To better distinguish between external/unwanted noise: The transmitted frequency-energy should be output to a sufficiently distinguishable (from outside/external noise) power-level, such that a receiver at least knows the expected multipleinterception-power-level it is meant to be receiving: A greater accumulation of intercepting AC-!gravitons will induce a greater current into the aerial (their velocity=voltage(frequency) will not change). The output power level of the signal itself will be varied (to follow a sine wave pattern), such that 'all' external noise can be noticed/calculated and subtracted.

Generalisation software will begin to form a pattern for the received transmitted signal (anything random, or of a accumulated external noise pattern; will be noticed and subtracted).

Any slight skewing (effects will be incredibly slight AC-!graviton density increases/decreases will be incredibly slight)) occurring will show velocity is proportional to density; showing the speed of light only applies to a single frequency density/velocity!graviton.

!Gravitons travel both faster and slower to the speed of light: Is dependent upon their gravity-density and the gravity-density (and artificial gravity) of the object they are emitting (aswell as surrounding objects effects).

A horizontal trajectory for a AC-!graviton will generally not be affected by the Earths gravity / slightly effected by the Earths magnetic field. This apparatus

should not be sent Along the Earth.

DUPLEX_TRANSMISSION (apparatus) Two transmitters simultaneously output two different frequency AC-!gravitons through a same transmitting aerial.

One frequency set to a frequency many times to that of the other.

These two frequencies both outputting through a same aerial, will equally be affected by the artificial gravitons created by the aerial.

The emitting AC-!gravitons will only be slowed down by a product of their own density: The greater their density the more trigonometrically intercepting gravitons from the aerial will be able to slow its greater density/volume. A received signal, over a great distance [implemented as/see 'Varying Frequency7 / 'Aerial Gravity'] will show each respectful AC-!graviton to be offset to each other.

A lesser density AC-!graviton will not be received simultaneously to a greater density AC-!graviton, even though they departed together. A greater density!graviton will be received ever so slightly behind a lesser density!graviton Each were emitted together in phase, at reception they will appear out of phase. For every million-th highfrequency_density(large) !graviton, there will appear a lowfrequency_density(tiny)!graviton, just slightly before it.

It would be best to set a varying frequency for the higher or lower frequency AC-!graviton being generated, such that a skewing effect can be more accurately noticed. It will resolve in / out of phase problems (a greater density AC-!graviton may be received simultaneously to a lesser density AC-!graviton, as a result of it being 100% behind it).

The frequency generators must allow the high and low frequency AC!gravitons to depart together: The frequency generators tails must be paired (shall fall together). If their heads were paired a high frequency!graviton will depart before a low frequency!graviton (a low frequency!graviton will still be developing j.

Else, place a 'primary' receiver/aerial before the ransmitter/aerial; the "primary' aerial will indicate the placement/interception properties of the initial transmitted signal before reaching its said intended' aerial: Differences between the 'primary' and 'intended' aerials will be noticed [To be taken into account (calculated and subtracted) by any apparatus which facilitate(create/emit) AC-!gravitons] ROTATING_SIGNAL (epilogue) Visualise a pure sine wave intercepting a wall at a set speed - speed up its travailing speed - the wall will now intercept this same sine wave, where, to it (the walls, will perceive it as a higher frequency (it will perceive a slightly compressed sine wave, although a pure sine wave will still be emitting / intercepting the wall). The opposite can be said when the sine wave intercept speed is slowed down.

A fixed frequency transmitter/aerial rotating toward or away from a receiver will result a like effect: The original known base frequency emitted by the transmitter does not change: The radio streams actual received frequency/velocity (to the receiver) will actually be [speed of light]+[(+/-)rotation heading speed]. The received frequency/velocity to the receiver will as a result be either higher(transmitter travelling toward a receiver)/lower(transmitter travelling away from a receiver).

ROTATING_SIGNAL (apparatus) A single radio transmitter/incredibly-shortaerial continually outputting a set frequency radio signal, beingfixed/rotated around the edge of a circular spinning disc; a single radio receiver/incredibly-short-aerial (able to receive a specific bandwidth) stationary fixed/placed (given clearance) beside (not fixed to) the spinning disc.

A 'very high resolution'/geared rotary encoder, to keep a accurate position of the transmitter/aerial.

The frequency chosen to be output by the transmitter/aerial shall be proportional to the speed of rotation of the disc; Maybe: [lkhz per revolution; resolution of the rotary encoder per revolution]*[RPM].

The radio transmitter (rotating around the circumference of the rotating disc) permanently outputs a fixed frequency AC-!graviton field: The stationary

receiver/aerial placed beside the spinning disc, will pick up the AC!graviton field of the transmitter/aerial, rotating 'toward' and 'away from' this

receiver/aerial. At the point a!graviton ' intercepts 'e' escapee ' a received aerial, any deviations of the speed of light will be clearly noticeable: Rotating toward a receiver: A premature interception.

A short intercepted duration.

A higher voltage(velocity)_induction.

A receptively increased frequency.

Rotating away from a receiver: A late interception.

A long intercepted duration.

A lower voltage(velocity)_induction.

A receptively decreased frequency.

To eleviate signal transfer delays = errors, the transmitter and receiver shall keep separate clocks, such that [position]:[time]:[signal] data may be analysed after or time-lagged to the experiment.

The transmitters clock shall be incredibly-tiny / located at the centre of the spinning disc; else the clock will be inaccurate (it still will be) , disrupted by currents induced into it by the Earths magnetic field.

Unless the clock could be accurately shielded (preferred option - the transmitter itself will be affected at high speed rotations): This may be found by measuring the results between a shielded then unshielded spin.

A accurate clock may be a incredibly high iteration atomic clock, where a single AC-!graviton link links the receiver and transmitter to the clock(broadcasting/located exactly between these clock-receiving aerials).

Atoms vibrate as a result of external graviton and (AC-)!graviton interceptions; additionally / less commonly, as a result of a weak gra-v-.tcr structure.

<-I. As atoms will vibrate differently (decrease or increase) in Different environments / induction-velocities, their 'new frequencies' must be Calibrated to.

A chemical clock (two chemicals breaking each other down, equally losing weight/energy as a result) may keep a more-accurate (chemical reactions themselves may be affected by intercepting (AC-)!gravitons (inductionvelocities)) track of time (with regard to its degrading weight/energy): The chemical clock being calibrated before the experiment Weighed/measured / its break-down speed/properties. Any/the apparatus must be calibrated: When a transmitter is moving toward a receiver, it will be emitting !gravitons at closer and closer distances toward the receiver ('receptively' closing the gap between AC-!graviton emitions). The opposite is true when rotating away from a receiver. These simple mathematical factors will be calculated and removed from the apparatus.

A initial variable speed rotation, such that: The transmitter knows time lags of: At a low-high speed: Its clock.

At a low speed: AC-!graviton creation/emition/departion.

At a low speed: Received rotary encoder signal.

The receiver knows time lags of: At a low speed: AC-!graviton received/terminated.

This data being accumulated/generalised and processed; such that the data/calculus can be subtracted from the actual-experiment high speed data.

Else, keep no clock or rotary encoder; just slowly increase the speed of rotation of the disc from a very slow revolution to a very fast revolution: Accumulated received signal data will clearly show same said deviations.

ROTATING_SIGNAL (prologue 1) Star_Speed= (+/-)Speed particle is at prior to creation/emition.

Escape_Velocity- (+)Magnetic repulsion of gravitons surrounding particle.

Gravity (-)Objects density-gravity intercepting particles density.

Particle_Speed Star_Speed + Escape_Velocity + Gravity.

Rotating_signal evidence can be found in any object which emits and rotates: A rotating graviton source will emit a biased graviton field [to equally validate

graviton-particle existence].

The ' aft '/' trailing ' end of any particular point within a star (especially near its circumference) will emit gravitons of a lesser speed to a same points fore '/' reading edge' ([Star_Speed(rotation heading speed) + Escape_Velocity(equal) + 0(gravitons are unaffected by gravity)] = ['aft' and 'fore' are at unequal velocities]) A gravity bias will occur of/between any single points fore/aft emitting gravitons.

A slower velocity graviton may have a greater gravity effect toward a intercepted object: It is inside a intercepted object for longer.

A greater velocity graviton may have a greater gravity effect toward a intercepted object ([as/see 'Gravity Attraction']).

A Sun (Figure_9[S]) itself-rotates anti-clockwise; else, invert scenarios described below (but not the resultant scenarios): Figure_9[drawing_1]: A slower velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton emition [E1] will provide a greater/biased gravity effect toward point [X] of intercepted Planet [P], to graviton [El]s equal-opposite countering emition [E2].

Resultantly: Planet [P] will orbit rotate the Sun [S] in a equal direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation.

A greater velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton emition [E2] will provide a greater/biased gravity effect toward point [X] of intercepted Planet [P], to graviton [E2]s equal-opposite countering emition [E1].

Resultantly: Planet [P] will orbit rotate the Sun [S] in a opposite direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation.

- Figure_9[drawing 2]: A slower velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton emition [E]s 'aft' graviton emition will provide a greater/biased gravity effect toward point [X2] of a intercepted Planet [P], to graviton [E]s equal-opposite countering 'fore' emition/interception [X1].

Resultantly: Planet [P] will itself-rotate in a opposite rotationdirection to the Suns [S] itself-rotation.

A greater velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton emition [E]s 'fore' graviton emition will provide a greater/biased gravity effect toward point [X1] of a intercepted Planet [P], to graviton [E]s equal-opposite countering 'aft' emition/interception [X2].

Resultantly: Planet [Pj will itself-rotate a equal rotation-direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation.

Figure 9[drawing_3]: A slower velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton emition [E1] will provide a greater/biased gravity effect toward point [X2] of intercepted Planet [P], to graviton [El]s equal-

opposite countering emition [E2] intercepting point [X1].

Resultantly: Planet [P] will orbit rotate the Sun [S] in a equal direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation; Planet [P] will itself-rotate in a opposite rotation-direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation.

A greater velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton emition [E2] will provide a greater/biased gravity effect toward point [X1] of intercepted Planet [P], to graviton [E2]s equal-

opposite countering emition [E1] intercepting point [X2].

Resultantly: Planet [P] will orbit rotate the Sun [S] in a opposite direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation; Planet [P] will itself-rotate in a equal rotation-direction to the Suns [S] itself-rotation.

Figure_9[drawing_4]: A generalized graviton field:

A slower velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton field [F1] will provide a greater/biased gravity

effect toward Planet [P], to graviton field [Fl]s equal-opposite countering

graviton field [F2].

Resultantly: Planet [P] will be twisted and pulled in a direction of graviton field [F1] (indicated line/arrow shown in drawing).

A greater velocity graviton has a greater gravity effect: Graviton field [F2] will provide a greater/biased gravity

effect toward Planet [P], to graviton field [F2]s equal-opposite countering

graviton field [F1]

Resultantly: Planet [P] will be twisted and pulled in a direction of graviton field [F2] (indicated line/arrow shown in drawing).

In general a single point should be simulated rotating about the circumference of a circle [S] - where its accumulative force toward every point of a intercepted circle [P] is accumulated. Taking into account the exponential decay of a graviton field.

Given a gravitons velocity deteriorates/amplifies passing though graviton structures - Figure_9[drawing_3] will show how Planet [P] orbits and itself rotates, as a result of a self biased graviton field alone:

Graviton emition [E1] will provide a biased gravity effect toward point [X2] of intercepted Planet [P], to its [Ei] equal-opposite countering emition intercepting to point [X1] (trajectory/line not shown drawn in drawing) -

trajectory/emition [E1-X2] incurs passing though graviton structure [S] (trajectory/emition [E1-X1] does not) = decays/amplifies its [E1-X2] velocity (to provide a greaterJweaker gravity effect, to [E1-X1]). [given (not 'exactly' illustrated) path [E1-X2] is a equal length to path [E1-X1] (graviton stream decay)] Planet [P] orbit and itself rotations will be dependent upon whether gravitons decay or increase their velocity passing though objects, aswell to whether a faster or slower graviton achieves a greater gravity effect toward a intercepted object.

If a Planet orbit-rotates a Star in a opposing direction to a valid theory -

to a Star; it will ultimately be slowed and pulled into the Star.

If a planet itself-rotates a opposing direction to a valid theory - to a Stars it will ultimately/incredibly-slowly begin to rotate in a valid direction.

Ultimately a ElanetsiSuns/QDjects itself-rotation and oruit-.otaticn are determined by all surrounding graviton sources (Stars/Planets/Black-holes. ..).

-11 --- By tracking the Suns spots and/or flares, it must be seen the Sun rotates.

A Star rotates, as it equally rotates about a massive object - a blackhole A black-hole rotates, as it equally rotates about a massive object a massive black-hole;... Our universe is a massive black-hole: At the end of the day one incredibly massive black-hole choose (logic-randomly determined) to rotate a single direction, consequentially 'everythings T rotation is determined by it.

A ultimate black-hole does not exist: A incredibly massive black-hole would be one of a infinite number OI incredibly massive black-holes: Each, determining 'their' 'universes' rotation direction.

ROTATIN5-_SIGNAL (prologue 2) If a photon could travel faster than the speed of light (given only a Star_Speed' scenario), it would seem relativity would still hold true, as from a frame of reference the photon will still only escape at the escape velocity of light ('the speed of light'), however, this is not true: Two photons maybe travelling through space, where at a point they collide with each other: At the point of their collision, they will be forced to combine into a combined photon: It will then re-emit the collided photons following their original trajectories.

We know virtually no resistance takes place during this re-

emitance transfer, as light does not appear to grow dimmer over distance, also, that cross collisions do occur, where their transfer re-emitance imposes almost no resistance, their re-emitance following each photons respectful trajectories.

Given at least one of the two colliding / crossing photons is travailing faster to the speed of light: A combined photon (which is a frame of reference) will re-emit two photons, where to it, will re-emit them both equally faster to the speed of light.

If one photon combined with another faster than the speed of light: The faster than the speed of light photon will be forced to re-emit at the speed it combined at, as its kinetic-density(force) will force it to do so. The combined photon would only be able to split into two again (energy for only two photons is present within the combined photon), where both respectful kinetic-

densities (for each combined photon) will have to be used (their kineticdensity cannot be destroyed), where, as the kinetic energy for the faster than light photon is present, it will be forced to follow its original trajectory (that which it intercepted / combined at), whilst the other (speed of light) photon will re-emit (as this same process), following its intercepted trajectory.

A combined photon is a frame of reference; a combined photon re-emits photons, which to it, are each ejected faster to 'the speed of light'. To the combined photon it will re-emit two photons both travailing at equal speed (to a observer this will not appear to be so), provided it receives at least one photon travelling faster than the speed of light.

A single frame of reference emits photons travelling faster than the speed of light.

Ultimately: (given a fixed speed of light scenario) Relative to each other, one of any two intercepting photons will re-

emit 'with respect to the other' - at twice the velocity of 'light speed'.

GRAVITON

A graviton is: Either: A. A tiny magnetic polarity; not having a external or internal magnetic field. Else we would be in a forever loop describing magnetic

fields / gravitons.

B. A tiny magnetic polarity; having a internal magnetic field. It being constructed of 'e-gravitons'. 'E-gravitons' not being forever

dividable or being able to escape themselves / they are/form a mutualstrongly-

constructed graviton.

5. A tiny magnetic polarity; having a internal and external e-graviton field. A e-graviton being forever dividable.

In either case (A,B,C), I Am unable to define a magnetic force. It could never be mathematics, math itself is nothing: Nothing is not something, nothing is distinct from gravity; we cannot have not;.ing-gra-vity-.

[A,B]:

i Its magnetic polarity cannot be felt by another object until the actual graviton has breached it: As a graviton cannot emit gravitons (it is a graviton), its presence will be impossible to detect, until it hits / intercepts a object (where its tiny internal magnetic polarity will then be felt).

[A,B]:

Has a perfect magnetic equilibrium potential: Most objects emit gravitons as a result of a weak magnetic equilibrium (they eject energy as a result of trying to form a perfect magnetic equilibrium): A graviton does not emit anything, so it can be said to be in a state of a perfect magnetic equilibrium (a graviton is the smallest magnetic energy particle / it canoct emit what it already is; it will always maintain a perfect magnetic equilibrium).

[C]: Emits 'e-gravitons'. In a incredibly close proximity to it they may be detectable ('just prior to'/ya accumulating force preceding' a graviton interception). [A,B,C]:

Its kinetic-density velocity enables a graviton to near instantaneously relay/pass though any object it encounters (its density is energy is Preachable (is not solid (solid better defines a dense cluster of gravitons (a object is a dense magnetic field, created by tillions of strongly linked

gravitons), is proportional to its density (a graviton is a tillion times less solid to a photon)))).

[-,C]:

A graviton travels a billion times faster to a photon: A graviton has a tillion times less density to a photon.

Energy-Particles do not have a fixed escape velocity or speed; their escape velocity (a initial magnetic repulsion force, determined by a graviton structures linkage state (of the objects graviton structure it is being ejected from)) and speed (determined by the density of it (greater it is, the greater: A repulsion force required to emit it; The amount of gravitons (gravity) of the object will intercept it)) and the density of the object (gravity, the amount of trigonometrically intercepting gravitons that can intercept the escaping particle) it is emitting from.

[A,B,C]:

Does not have a mass - objects do not have mass.

If objects had a mass; a fundamental base particle could not be defined: If objects had mass, any base particle which constructs it will also have mass (a object is a multiple of its fundamental base particles): A base particle will be forever dividable (a ultimate base particle could never exist).

Objects do not have mass scenario: Kinetic-force forces a object to travel a path following a direction determined by a kinetic-force: As objects do not have mass, then the object is travailing as a result of a internal unstable magnetic equilibrium (is breaking down): A object continuously travels in a direction equal to the force which made it travel, as a result of its unstable magnetic equilibrium: This instability will eject e-gravitons through itself in a equal-opposite direction to its 'forced direction': This will continually propel the object until it is stopped by a equal-

opposite (or accumulating) force (to that which originated its travel).

When I throw a balk my hand (a graviton structure) will repel to the ball (a graviton structure), as each graviton structure are internally too strongly linked. This will cause a mutual repulsion (a graviton structure breach (a indirect and direct magnetic repulsion)) between the ball and my hand.

The ball will resultantly continue to follow a trajectory to that which I have thrown it: E-gravitons will be continually emitted within the ball due to a unstable magnetic equilibrium potential within it (caused by me, but which naturally exists anyway (a logic-random(resultantly neutral) weak graviton structure)). These e-gravitons will be a breakdown of the balls graviton structure (as a result of me), which emit(specifically 'relay') in a equal-opposite direction to that which the ball has been caused to travel.

-13 f) A magnetic/kinetic equilibrium will only resolve -hen a equalopposite force (or accumulation of) counter the Instability I have placed into the ball. It can be said a unstable magnetic equilibrium resolves instantaneously by emitting(relaying) tillions of e-gravitons, but, like a permanent magnet, these created / emitted(relayed) e-gravitons will create a perpetual breakdown of the objects graviton structure: Consequentially this perpetual breakdown (continual emitance(relaying) of e-gravitons) may only be stopped or re-aligned (maybe a breakdown already exists (a weak graviton structure), I have just made them emit a given direction) by placing another magnetic/kinetic force toward it, such to equalise it.

A kinetic force is a perpetual breakdown of a graviton structure. The faster I try to initially throw a ball the more effort will be required me to do so, not because I am throwing against a mass, but because egravitons within the ball are acting against me.

A equal-opposite force to that which I am placing into the ball is acting against me: It proportionally (to the number of e-gravitons it is able to simultaneously create (proportional to its density)) becomes unstable, emitting e-gravitons as a result.

* This may inaccurately be perceived as independent lose e-gravitons within the balls structure interacting with the independent structure of the ball (I am throwing the ball independently to the e-

gravitons (the e-gravitons not being into a contact with the ball until I have made the ball come into contact with them)): Consequentially the egravitons force will be felt (instead of e-gravitons moving through the ball, the ball is moving through the e-gravitons, producing a respectful force (against me)); until, they begin to form a equilibrium between the independently moving ball, and thus, begin to emit e-gravitons in a same direction (to the balls perspective) of a equal-opposite force to that which they had initially been made felt (to continually propel the ball). In actuality this scenario shows how natural objects are a 'weak graviton structure'. Accurately perceived as the e gravitons 'being the balls graviton structure'; where at the time of me throwing the ball - many were not into a contact with it (were/are in a jump about (they are incredibly tiny - capable of being in a void(a incredibly weakly linked local graviton structure) within the ball graviton structure - at the time of me throwing the ball graviton structure)).

Kinetic-force is thus graviton structure dependent / dependent upon 'graviton structures' (not density).

Jumping into a void is a e-

graviton random trajectory force in itself: Tillions of e-gravitons achieve a random trajectory jump into a void - to weaken my single trajectory force I am attempting to make these 'free'/'in a void' egravitons achieve.

If every e-graviton were free and not jumping (each being within a phenomenally weak local graviton structures), 'kinetic force' would be incredibly strong.

A 'not forever dividable' perfect graviton structure would not have a kinetic force: Objects are certainly forever dividable - this will be known when a dense perfect graviton structure has been created/found (will inhibit!gravitons) / when computer technology is better than it is today.

Resolution: A object does not emit e-gravitons externally to itself. objects (say the ball example above) emit e-gravitons internally only.

This sounds quite unsound, however z artificial e-graviton field created 'within' a

rotating gyro is equally supported by this scenario. A gyro continually rotates -

as a ball continually travels.

Objects do not have mass, a base particle may now be defined.

A base particle is a e-graviton: It is a magnetic polarity, which itself is nothing.

The properties of 'but not the' e-graviton may be defined by a computer simulation.

A e-graviton being 'nothing' is however 'something'.

A equal example being a 'attraction force' between two objects: This can never be explained by a physical science. Mathematics can resolve its 'effects', but presently cannot resolve 'it'.

A graviton is therefore constructed from billions of e-

gravitons; else it would not have a kinetic velocity.

-14 f - These e-gravitons not having a 'kinetic force'(e-

vitonS themselves) - they are created/relayed as magnetic resolutions only (they magnetically equalise though graviton structures (not jumping as said), to effect a biased attraction/repulsion toward these structures they relay though (to internally biasedly magnetically propel a object)).

However, they may have e-gravitons... A graviton/everything certainly being forever dividable: Thus, to have not resolved polarity (magnetic force)' or 'velocity (kinetic force)'.

GRAVITY/GRAVITON_ATTRACTION

Scenario: A graviton structure emits a graviton; it intercepts another graviton structure, intercepting a stream of its gravitons (local graviton/structures) as it coherently travels through it.

While a intercepting graviton intercepts a intercepted graviton, it will continually rotate its polarity, to form a mostly unlike attraction toward the being intercepted graviton.

The intercepting graviton continually rotates its polarity in a attempt to counter alternate axis repulsion forces persistently occurring between it and the intercepted graviton/gravitons (gravitons, where a perfect alignment does not occur).

The intercepted graviton will not rotate its polarity: It is strongly linked into its surrounding graviton structure (it will ultimately have no need to rotate, the intercepting graviton will rotate to it); however: Due to surrounding gravitons (which surround the intercepting graviton) a full rotation of the intercepting graviton will not occur.

The being intercepted graviton of the local graviton structure will be forced to rotate (a little) its polarity (the gravitons which are linked to it will consequentially be forced to rotate (this required rotation force will exponentially distribute/diminish throughout the intercepted objects graviton structure (a volume of a hundred gravitons (a local graviton structure) will be moderately effected))) as the intercepting graviton breaches it A mutual attraction force between the intercepted/intercepting gravitons, is a gravity effect.

The intercepted graviton being linked into its graviton structure, will pull the whole graviton structure toward the intercepting graviton.

The intercepting graviton will be pulled into the intercepted graviton. A intercepting graviton will equally increase its velocity.

At any point a intercepting graviton is within a intercepted local graviton structure: The intercepting graviton 'is' the local graviton structure.

The intercepting graviton will form a magnetic equilibrium to any neighbouring gravitons of the graviton structure which surround it: These neighbouring gravitons will equally effect their neighbours, and theirs..

A magnetic equilibrium is achieved.

As a consequence of the intercepting gravitons incredible kinetic velocity, which will now equally be 'the' local graviton structure: The local graviton structure which encompassed the intercepting graviton, will now have a great kinetic equilibrium problem to resolve: new graviton(s) will be emitted by the local graviton structure, to resolve its kinetic equilibrium.

Gravitons only emit as equilibrium differences (kinetic or magnetic (in this case kinetic)).

A kinetic equilibrium resolution may 'inaccurately' be described as: The intercepting graviton kinetic force is so great, it will de-link itself from the continually accepting / linking intercepted graviton structure: This will cause a attraction force to occur (a anti-gravity effect), due to the gravitons in the graviton structure being magnetically linked to it (not wishing to let it go).

Once de-linked from the just-intercepted local graviton structure - the graviton structure will re-link with out it being there: The escaping graviton will now have its polarity repelled against (the escaping graviton will already begin to pole orientate to a upcoming intercepted graviton of the local graviton structure (it will provide a almost like pole repulsion to the graviton it had just escaped from)).

1. A attraction force (the kinetic force ripping a intercepting graviton from a attractive intercepted local graviton structure) 2. A repulsion force (a emitted graviton beginning to rotate and repel to the emitted from local graviton structure) 3. A attraction force (the upcoming intercepted graviton - of the travelling-through local graviton structure) .

-15 l(a anti-gravity effect) plus 2(a gravity effect), Medals a neutral gravity effect. '3' is the ultimate gravity effect.

A graviton however does not increase its velocity as a result of this biasing(3): A graviton will ultimately only emit another graviton at ( T 1'+'2 T) = Only the original kinetic velocity of the intercepting graviton is left (it does not decrease or increase its kinetic velocity as it passes though a graviton structure)) however, it will emit/escape the outer circumference of any object at '1' (= its velocity decays ['the' 'inaccuracy I]), A graviton dislocations will occur at every point o' a intercepting graviton linking and de-linking/re-emitting to a intercepted local graviton structure. Consequently many gravitons which were part of the intercepted local graviton structure will be magnetically/kinetically kicked out of it (they will be forced to rotate, creating a like pole orientation to gravitons around them (they will T emit/eject T)), These emitted gravitons may however only be proportional to the escape force of a single graviton (that which has escaped (caused their disruptance (the intercepting graviton))), therefore each graviton will not have a acquired a escape velocity to emit from their graviton structure, unless: Only asingle graviton within the local graviton structure is unfortunate (it may have been undergoing a natural graviton structure fluctuation at the time); Many simultaneously intercepting gravitons accumulate a great disturbance to a local graviton structure.

Equally/Alternatively to undertake a single gravlton exception: A intercepting graviton, intercepts a graviton.

They will mutually orientate to achieve a attraction (a attraction force is a receptive force (it will achieve, if a not perfect aligned repulsion force)).

This will be a continual pole rotation as they travel into each other.

At the point of each graviton occupying the same space, they will orientate a equal-opposite/unlike orientation to each other (to achieve a attraction between them (will neutralise the combined-gravitonTs polarity) ).

Their kinetic-velocity-force will force them to separate; where as they are too Tperfectly aligned' to each other, they will not re-orientate to achieve a attraction to each other (a repulsion takes precedence when it attains a perfect alignment): A great mutual repulsion will occur between them (a gravity effect) = A gravity effect is achieved upon interception and emition/ejection.

If a intercepting graviton aligned perfectly to a intercepted graviton before they combined, they would emit each other with a attraction force between them (a anti-graity effect) = A gravity effect is achieved upon interception - it being neutralized on emition/ejection.

This scenario clearly explains why gravity is weak compared to magnetism barley any gravitons achieve a perfect alignment (they will re-

orientate to attract back to each other on their emition) - to neutralise a gravity effect. If gravitons perfectly aligned, the Earth would be akin to a incredibly strong permanent magnet: We would be squished.

A computer model will show how incredibly strong gravity T really is T. A T stationary' graviton intercepted by a intercepting graviton; will each emit at a equal velocity (the intercepted graviton will emit at a equal-

opposite trajectory/velocity to the intercepting graviton emition). Over the vastness of space what appears to be a gravity field leading to a dense object, may

not lead to its originating source/object.

Gravity is a very messy process, where a general bias toward a gravity effect is barley 'just T achieved.

A time restriction imposed upon a graviton to pole orientate, and/where surrounding gravitons prevent a true rotation - will reduce a gravity effect. Given the sheer amount of gravitons which surround/within each other (in a intercepted local graviton structure and flying about) a graviton may not rotate at all. Overall scenario: A graviton intercepts a local graviton/structure: 1. [magnetic_attraction] = gravity effect.

2. [(forced kinetic) magnetic repulsion] = anti-gravity effect.

A gravitons magnetic polarity combines with the local graviton/structure.

A graviton ejects from a local graviton/structure: 3. Lmagneticattractionj = anti-gra-ity effect 4. [magnetic_repulsion]= gravity effect.

-16 Many complex-logical combination scenarios exist, the above ilerception/emition scenarios are any combination of '1' and/or '2' upon interception, and, '3' and/or '4' on emition.

Given a graviton has a internal'(kinetic propulsion) and/or 'external' e-

graviton field (a graviton being forever dividable or not): A bias at

interception/emition is simply achieved by the graviton 'as it does' travelling at speed: The gravitons 'fore' e-gravitons will be travelling at a speed of: [e-graviton escape velocity]+[graviton velocity] The gravitons 'aft' e-gravitons will be travelling at a speed of: [e-graviton escape velocity]-[graviton velocity] Given a faster e-graviton is a weaker effect toward a intercepted object to a slower e-graviton (a slow e-graviton is within a object for longer): A graviton intercepts a local graviton/structure: It orientates to attract (to): [magnetic_attraction] = weak gravity effect.

Fore' e-gravitons are receptively weaker to the intercepted object - are within it for a shorter time.

A graviton escapes the intercepted local graviton/structure: Is orientated to attract (back-to): [magnetic_attraction] = strong anti- gravity effect.

Aft' e-gravitons are receptively stronger to the intercepted object - are within it for a longer time.

Unless a graviton re-orientates at dead-interception (as previously said), a anti-gravity effect results. However: It cannot be stated there are differences between fore/aft frequency / occurance rates - it/they are all relative - e-gravitons emit uniformly around a graviton. A intercepted material will however receive them at different velocities: A aft/slow e-graviton has a great deal more time to orientate, compared to a fore/fast e-graviton: A aft/slow e-graviton will unlike/attract to a intercepted graviton better to a fore/fast e-graviton: A aft/slow egraviton has more time to achieve a perfect alignment at graviton interception and ejection = it intercepts(' attracts to') and ejects(' attracts back-

to') with a greater attraction force between it and the ejecting/intercepted graviton, to that that a fore/fast graviton can achieve: A gravity bias between a fore/fast and a aft/slow e-

graviton utimately/mainly arises alone from its ejection(from a intercepted graviton, of a local graviton structure): A aft/slow egraviton has more time to attract back-to '/between the ejecting (objects) graviton (it 'attracts escaping it' greater than it 'attracts intercepting it' (it had orientated to attract on its way in - betters this attraction/orientation on its way out (= the faster a e-graviton travels the lesser this anti-gravity force it can achieve))) = Gravity is primarily a sum of all four interception/ejecting forces between/of a aft/fore e-graviton intercepting/ejecting a (intercepted objects)graviton; where given fore/aft e-

gravitons emit equal-opposite trajectories (with respect to the graviton which created/emitted them): A 'fore' /fast e-graviton will incur: A weaker gravity effect, intercepting.

A weak anti-gravity effect, ejecting.

Totals a very-weak 'anti-gravity effect'.

A 'aft'/slow e-graviton will incur: A strong anti-gravity effect, intercepting.

A stronger anti-anti-gravity effect, ejecting.

Totals a weak 'anti-anti-gravity effect'.

A gravity effect is mainly dependent upon a 'aft' e-gravitons total effect (the sheer velocity (incredibly slower velocity = incredibly powerful force) advantage a aft e-graviton has over a fore e-graviton where given a 'aft' e-graviton is travelling a equal-opposite direction- trajectory to the graviton from which it were created/emitted - as its primary force/bias is achieved 'ejecting from / attracting back-to' intercepted gravitons - given its said trajectory/path -

it will affect a 'gravity' effect.

Gravity is a anti-anti-gravity effect.

-17 s Gravity is 'weak', mainly as a result of the biasing !beween a 'aft' e-gravitons interception(strong, anti-gravity)/ejection(stronger, anti-anti-gravity) forces (+ incredibly slight gravity/anti-gravity effects achieved by a fore e-graviton intercepting/ejecting).

However; a primary_graviton (a/the indirect creator of all secondary...egravitons) has a greater density=polarity to any secondary...

created/emitted e-graviton = a bias will ultimately achieve toward the ... ..............

-18 Every emitted e-graviton from this point on will become 'anti-

gravity' (fixed_trajectory (aft=fore) e-graviton): 'Aft' e-gravitons will become typical fore e-gravitons (= anti-gravity)) 'Fore' e-gravitons will become kinetic-

magnetic repulsion energy, as a consequence of not being able to pole orientate in time, to provide a magnetic-kinetic_repulsion to any intercepted object (= anti-

gravity)) However, as e-gravitons continue to divide - phenomenally tiny e-gravitons will create/emit in every/all trajectories to achieve (at specific accumulated_secondary... emitions/trajectories) incredibly weak gravity effects once again... [Is actually a fluid/universal forever branching tree - resultant effects]. Decay of a global gravity field primarily being a result of equal-

opposite(neutralising)secondary...e-gravitons, aswell to 'losing' these forever decaying e-gravitons to other intercepted gravitons [equally preventing all poor-

velocity(aft) emitted e-gravitons ever becoming a fixed_trajectory egraviton (only forever-fore(relative to the (e-)graviton that created/emitted it/them) emitted e-

gravitons are cable of becoming/emitting fixed_trajectory e-gravitons) = less to half of the energy a primary_graviton contains becomes kineticmagnetic repulsion/absorbed energy]; aswell to fixed_trajectory egravitons 'themselves relative' anti-gravity effects (which mostly neutralise each other, but where a slight bias toward 'anti-gravity' is achieved, by way of its/their primary_graviton velocity-trajectory). Where as/also all ' fore '/faster e-gravitons are a 'Perceptively' greater gravity effect to a 'aft'/slower e-graviton: Perfectly/proportionally created/emitted equal/opposite secondary...e- gravitons will continue to achieve a gravity effect bias (regardless of their forever dividing/decaying), achieved by array of the slight biasing its primary graviton trajectory-velocity provides to them (from which they/all secondary...e-gravitons evolve/branch)) Up to the point before they become fixed_trajectory e-gravitons.

Ultimately a e-graviton scenario may be 'Perceptively' seen as: A graviton intercepts a local graviton/structure: It orientates to attract (to): [magnetic_attraction] = strong gravity effect.

Fore' e-gravitons are 'perceptively' receptively stronger to the intercepted object.

A graviton escapes the intercepted local graviton/structure: Is orientated to attract (back-to): [.agnetic_attraction] = weak anti- gravity effect.

Aft' e-gravitons are 'perceptively' receptively weaker to the intercepted object.

Easily achieves a gravity effect.

[A 'perceptively' faster velocity graviton being more powerful to a slower velocity graviton will be known by Planetary itself/orbit rotations] ['before'/'within created!gravitons described in Induction/Conduction'/'Magnetic Fields', may equally be 'first'/'second'.. .

created e-!gravitons - created by e-!graviton interceptions = that described in Induction/Conduction'/'Magnetic Fields' will equally be a result of multiple-

density e-!graviton interceptions/creations/emitions (a Graviton is a scaled e-

!graviton is a scaled graviton is a scaled e-graviton... is ultimately 'a graviton')] A graviton maybe 'neutral' (does not contain a magnetic polarity): This scenario however invalid (graviton structures would not form) is presented here to show graviton structures may follow complexlogic (a unknown logic).

A graviton intercepts a local graviton structure: [kinetic-magnetic repulsion] = weak anti-gravity effect.

A local graviton structure breach (a force).

A graviton ejects a local graviton structure.

[kinetic-magnet repulsion] = large gravity effect.

A local graviton structure emition(s) (accumulated force).

Given no resolution of a local graviton structure kinetic/magnetic equilibrium resolutions (re-emitance of intercepted gravitons), or ejecting gravitons (emit and/or pass straight though objects), or egravitons (fore/aft biasing): A single graviton will have to be defined by complex-logic definitions: Attention should be taken to 'actual' blackholes: A black hole should be thought of as a cone, where the flat base of the cone is the black-holes mouth:

-19 The tail of the black-hole becomes smaller as it is ciustering/combining gravitons to form (!)graviton structures (to provide a repulsion). Ultimately the mouth of a black-hole (attractive force) is a magnetic force / its tail is a kinetic-magnetic force.

Given the velocity at which gravitons intercept/emit, eachs tiny interception attraction force will accumulativly (interceptions occur at a frequency a billion times that to the speed of light) provide a respectful force.

GRAVITY/GRAVITON_REPULSION

Given numbers of gravitons incredibly slowly collide with each other; each having, almost the same kinetic velocity / a like trajectory: They will combine to create a!graviton or a neutral graviton structure.

If gravitons combine to create a!graviton, a!graviton will repel as well as attract to objects (to neutralise a gravity effect). It will kinetically-

magnetically repel (anti-gravity) to perfect-objects (its kinetic velocity will deteriorate through a object which has a dense perfect magnetic equilibrium (or local graviton structures of such states)).

If gravitons combine to create a neutral graviton structure, a neutral graviton structure will kinetically-magnetically repel (anti-gravity) to objects (its kinetic velocity will deteriorate through a object).

In either case of!graviton or neutral-graviton_structure: Dependant upon its density and velocity (tiny mass / incredible velocity) / type of graviton structure intercepted; it may have no (anti-)gravity effect at all upon a intercepted object (the intercepted object will however be greatly affected by its presence (but the intercepting particle will not lose kinetic energy to it).

In the case of a e-graviton gravity scenario: A tiny neutral graviton structure will still emit true e-gravitons - They will emit and orientate to achieve a gravity effect.

However, a large neutral graviton structure will posses a large density at a not-increased velocity (kinetic-density = [graviton escape velocity] [tillion gravitons that now construct it]): It will kineticaly-

magneticaly repel to intercepted objects - to completely overwhelm the tiny gravity effect it may achieve (it may not pass though a intercepted object to achieve a gravity effect if it is too large (dependent upon the type of graviton structure intercepted / the type of graviton structure the neutral graviton structure has formed)). A!graviton or neutral graviton structure only has a chance of forming over long distances (the greater the distance the greater the chance of such a graviton-

structure has of forming (incredibly slightly different velocity gravitons following a like trajectory over a great distance will ultimately combine)).

A!graviton or neutral graviton structure may form where gravitons are released incredibly densely: A first graviton emitted incredibly slightly before a second graviton, where the first graviton follows through the trajectory of the second graviton: The first graviton will append to the second graviton at the point of the emition of the second (billions of gravitons may combine in this manner (natural objects 'may' naturally produce a weaker (in comparison to their gravity) gravity-repulsion). The tail of a black-hole may actually be a persistent case of a dense emitance of gravitons (its tail may be a greater graviton source to its mouth - as a result it becomes 'kinetic-magnetic repulsion energy').

If gravitons achieve a biased gravity effect (a graviton escapes a object/graviton-structure faster than it entered it), a graviton will continue to increase its velocity when intercepting graviton structures: A graviton will continue to increase its velocity until it may no longer be able to pole orientate in time, so to not be able to achieve a gravity effect: A fast graviton will no longer be able to achieve a gravity effect and so will no longer increase its speed.

Its kinetic velocity will deteriorate through a object which has a dense perfect magnetic equilibrium (or local graviton structures of such states) : It will provide a anti-gravity effect toward such intercepted structures.

A slow velocity graviton (a graviton where its velocity has deteriorated passing though objects) will (ultimately) magnetically-kinetically repel to a intercepted object / have its kinetic-density/velocity absorbed throughout the intercepted graviton structure.

-20 Given (!)gravitons and everything are forever divide: While and after a "-!)graviton ejects it may (if not a perfect-perfect (e-)graviton structure (it can't be - it has a kinetic force)) exponentially decay into smaller particles (as said), these particles will ultimately: Combine together to form neutral or (e-

)(!)graviton particles i Become incredibly tiny - consequentially to be lost / attract into another (e-)graviton (a break-down/re-creation cycle). To ultimately effect either a gravity or anti-gravity effect.

MAGNETISM

The operation to magnetism follows that described for 'gravity'; except the graviton has a greater density, therefore it is not a graviton (is a!graviton (a notGraviton), in this case a incredibly tiny!graviton [A '!gravitont only being rough terminology, in actuality a!graviton is a scaled up graviton / where a e-

graviton is a scaled down graviton = a graviton is a single scaleable graviton]).

A!graviton would be a two/three dimensional graviton structure containing billions of gravitons. This structure retaining a full magnetic polarity of each graviton it contains (each and every gravitons magnetic polarity is orientated a like direction). A!gravitons magnetic polarity will be a sum of the number of gravitons it contains / which construct it.

A!graviton would have a perfect and/or a very strong magnetic equilibrium. It may(e-graviton gravity scenario) emit (e-!)gravitons / it cannot emit!gravitons: It has a kinetic force, and thus contains free egravitons and/or its constructing gravitons hold free e-gravitons ('is not the same thing' ((e-

)(!)gravitons are gravitons are scaleable)).

Unlike A Graviton, A!graviton Has A Much Greater Density; Consequently It: Does Not Pole Rotate To A Intercepted Local Graviton Structure: Any graviton which constructs the intercepting!graviton, beginning to intercept a intercepted local graviton-structure will not pole rotate to it (it is incredibly strongly linked into its!graviton structure (gravitons within the !graviton graviton structure are too strongly linked together/to_it (many which create-are the!graviton prevent any single graviton of the!graviton orientating (this would otherwise break their mutually much stronger links); the!graviton would not re-orientate as many/all of its gravitons are undergoing a like logic_random-equalopposite interceptions (aswell to this being to act to rotate a massive graviton structure (the!graviton) for the magnetic force of a single graviton(s) / given the incredibly brief time it does not have to rotate)) )).

A attraction force results as described for a graviton: Where given now neither structure is able to rotate - the only valid attraction/gravity scenario are either: Magnetic/kinetic equilibrium resolutions; Or: Egravitons exist, where fore (intercepting) /aft(ejecting) e-gravitons are a greater 'gravity' to any fore(ejecting)/aft(intercepting) e-gravitons 'anti-

gravity'. The e-gravitons emitted by!gravitons being e-!gravitons; if they were e-

gravitons they would orientate to always achieve a gravity effect: Magnetic fields

decay super-exponentially as they decay as equally quickly / they are 'at a close-

proximity' stronger to gravity as a result of decaying/' emitting energy'(e-

!gravitons) much more densely to gravitons(e-gravitons).

A attraction/repulsion force results by way of the intercepting preorientated_not-orientatable big-graviton(!graviton) intercepting a object which itself has a global magnetic polarity or local graviton-structures of such states: These local!graviton structures being actual!gravitons developing within a material prior to being emitted.

!Graviton(e-graviton) Attraction: A Gravitons e-!gravitons intercept local graviton structures to effect a pre-orientated_not-orientatable: Fore'/fast e-!graviton insurance: A weaker attraction, intercepting.

A weak anti-attraction, ejecting.

Totals a very-weak 'anti-attraction'.

Aft'/slow e-!graviton insurance: A strong anti-attraction, intercepting.

A stronger anti-anti-attraction, ejecting.

Totals a weak 'anti-anti-attraction'.

Totals a biased anti-anti-attraction = magnetic attraction.

A biased mutual attraction between a intercepting/emitting e !graviton to a local graviton structures - results to achieve 'magnetic attraction'

-21 Easily 'perceived' as: A!graviton intercepts a local graviton structures to effect a pre-orientated_not-orientatable 'strong attraction Enforce' between them - ejecting it to effect a 'weak attraction force' between them.

!Graviton(e-graviton) Repulsion: A!gravitons e-!gravitons intercept local graviton structures to effect a pre-orientated_not-orientatable: Fore'/fast e-!graviton insurance: A weaker repulsion, intercepting.

A weak anti-repulsion, ejecting.

Totals a very-weak 'anti-repulsion'.

Aft'/slow e-!graviton insurance: A strong anti-repulsion, intercepting.

A stronger anti-anti-repulsion, ejecting.

Totals a weak 'anti-anti-repulsion'.

Totals a biased anti-anti-repulsion = magnetic repulsion.

A biased mutual repulsion between a intercepting/emitting e-

!graviton to a local graviton structures - results to achieve 'magnetic repulsion'.

Easily 'perceived' as: A!graviton intercepts a local graviton structures to effect a pre-orientated_not-orientatable 'strong repulsion force' between them - ejecting it to effect a 'weak repulsion force' between them.

!Graviton(equilibrium resolution) Attraction: A!graviton intercepts local graviton structures to effect a pre-orientated_not-orientatable 'attraction force' between them: The!graviton will become the intercepted graviton structure - to then re-emit itself and other !gravltons by the same equilibrium resolutions (kinetic and magnetic).

A interception attraction / neutral editions achieves a biased mutual attraction toward the intercepted local graviton structures.

!Graviton(equilibrium resolution) Repulsion: A!graviton intercepts local graviton structures to effect a pre-orientated_not-orientatable 'repulsion force' between them: The!graviton will become the intercepted graviton structure - to then re-emit itself and other !gravitons by the same equilibrium resolutions (kinetic and magnetic).

A interception repulsion / neutral emition; achieves a biased mutual repulsion toward the intercepted local graviton structures.

Given the velocity at which (e-)!gravitons intercept/emit, eachs tiny interception attraction/repulsion force will accumulativly (interceptions occur at a frequency a billion times that to the speed of light) provide a respectful force.

Creates Massive Alterations To A Intercepted Graviton Structure: A!graviton will become retrajectorised as it passes though the intercepted magnetic materials graviton structure: The mutual magnetic equilibrium that has been formed between the intercepting!graviton and the intercepted graviton structure to form a single local graviton structure, will form dislocated/orientated graviton links of varying strength mutually between them.

As the kinetic force of the intercepted!graviton will force the local graviton structure to equalise its unequal kinetic equilibrium: Strong links will try to hold back the created!graviton greater to weaker links; This will: Create a trajectory bias in favour of a incredibly slight trajectory change (determined by these links), of the created!graviton.

Create a weaker and weaker kinetic force the more re-trajectorising that occurs (its kinetic-force will be lost to kinetic / magnetic relaying forces throughout the whole of the intercepted objects graviton structure) : The weaker the kinetic-force becomes the more random the escape trajectories will become.

A attraction or repulsion force will still respectfully act in favour of a attraction or repulsion, as generally a altered escape trajectory will still act in a like trajectory, to that that the intercepting!graviton originally had.

Resultantly causing!gravitons to be created and emitted: The intercepted local graviton structures (being a weak graviton structure) will orientate their gravitons to the intercepting!graviton: These gravitons will link to each other to create a!graviton.

-22 The created!graviton will emit as a result of: The same magnetic/kinetic equilibrium re-emitting the intercepting!graviton; A magnetic/kinetic equilibrium following the intercepted!gravitons quake (dislocated Focal graviton structures).

At every intercepted!graviton emition, bits of the intercepted local graviton structure will equally be emitted (created!gravitons): At least one/two created!gravitons will emit (one being a re-creation of the intercepting!graviton - following a logic-random like trajectory / another being a magnetic equilibrium resolution - emitting (logic-random trajectory (determined by local graviton structure link states) as a result of the same magnetic/kinetic equilibrium. They emit as incredibly tiny!gravitons due to the incredibly short time (frequency) they are able to initially develop over.

Given (!)gravitons/everything forever divide, given these artefacts [as/see Gravity Attraction/Repulsion']: Whilst/as (e-)!gravitons degrade they will degrade to/through 'e-

!gravitons > gravitons > e-gravitons...' = they will begin to effect a gravity-

effect toward a intercepted object - with respect to the direction they emit in EUP to the point before they acquire becoming a fixed_trajectory e-graviton (when AccumulatedForeVelocitysToDate becomes much greater to AftEscapeVelocity = a aft emition will acquire a fore trajectory(a 'fore' anti-gravity effect))]. Therefore a: Repulsion_Field will Decay / Attraction_Field will Gain:

Eventual/resultant created/emitted (e-)gravitons (via the decaying of e!gravitons to (e-)gravitons).

Eventual/resultant created/emitted poor density/velocity_ratio zEt_e-(!) graviton (its kinetic-density will be absorbed by a intercepted object (a slight global_gravity effect bias is achieved by way of its/the primary_!graviton velocity-trajectory)). Repulsion_Field will Gain / Attraction Field will Decay:

Ultimately every non-inhibited e-graviton will become a 'fore' fixed_trajectory e-graviton (a slight global_anti-gravity effect bias is achieved by way of its/the primary_!graviton velocity-trajectory)).

Repulsion_Field/Attraction_Field will Decay/Gain:

Ultimately (e-)(!)gravitons will re-combine to create greater/smaller (e-) (!)gravitons (to provide a (anti-)gravity effect).

All!gravitons will follow a like process - breaking-down to create/emit secondary... (e-)(!)gravitons.

Where any (e-)(!)graviton field/structure will ultimately decay

into a single e...-gravitor field (over a specific distance) {as/see 'Artificial

Gravity - A'].

Photons/large!gravitons decaying over a incredibly greater time (indicating their incredible density, 'they are a graviton structure'). MAGNETIC_MATERIALS

A magnetic materials created/emitted!gravitons will not be a equal density to each other (they result from a random-weak graviton structure respecting the density (will generally be the density) of the intercepting!graviton which indirectly created it/them - proportional to its intercept velocity), where given densityvelocity - they will emit at slightly varying velocities ('this is' magnetism'). A permeableJferromagnetic material: As a intercepting!graviton travels throughout a intercepted magnetic material; the intercepted graviton structures gravitons 'before' the intercepting !graviton will align a unlike-attractive pole to it (a like orientation to the intercepting!graviton). These orientated gravitons will attract each other (are aligned a like/attractive orientation to each other) to 'create' a!graviton.

[its/their re/emition is described in/see 'Induction/Conduction'/'Magnetic Fields']

A antiferromagnetic material: As a intercepting!graviton travelsthroughout a intercepted magnetic material; the intercepted graviton structures gravitons 'within' the intercepting !graviton will align a unlike-attractive pole to it (a unlike orientation to the intercepting!graviton). These like orientated gravitons will attract each other (are aligned a like/attractive orientation to each other) to 'create' a!graviton.

[itsitheir re/emition is aescribed in/see 'Ind-uctlon/Conduction'/'Magr. et-'c Fields']

-23 The difference between ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic materials therefore singular being a ferromagnetic material gives into building a!graviton before a >antiferromagnetic material = A ferromagnetic material is a weaker graviton Structure (or contains local graviton structures of such states) to a antiferromagnetic material (a ferromagnetic material equally creates 'within' !gravitons (unlike orientated (like/as a antiferromagnetic material)), indicating it is a generally weaker graviton structure / material).

A conductive material which appears' to not generate a magnetic field,

being a ferroantiferromagnetic material: A material: Attaining local graviton structures of both proportionally strong and weakly linked states - to effect creating/emitting alternate orientated!gravitons between them.

A graviton structure of local graviton structures iterating between being strong and weakly linked structures (as a consequence of previously building !gravitons / post intercepted by!gravitons) - to effect creating/emitting alternating/orientated!gravitons. A fixed or mixed state material, purely/logic randomly neither being a strong or weakly linked (local) graviton structure.

Consequentially a magnet will effect toward a not-magnetised magnetic material: A not-magnetised material will begin to emit its own!gravitons as a result of being into a proximity to a magnets 'intercepting' magnetic field.

A mutual effect begins: The effect would be two magnets attracting or repelling (or nothing (actual-neutral (a ferroantiferromagnetic material) magnetic fields)) to each other.

The closer two objects emitting!gravitons become to each other the greater the amount of trigonometrically intercepting!gravitons occurs t!gravitons emit 360x360degree(all) around a object).

A greater and greater number of!gravitons will be -

mutually created between them: To effect a greatening 'mutual' (exponential) attraction / repulsion between these!graviton sources (a limit to a mutual creation being determined by each materials graviton structure).

Given gravitons cause as much damage to!gravitons - gravity will become a mutual process: Gravitons will exponentially be sent back to the originating source.

A magnetic materials 'creating/created!gravitons 'are the local !graviton structures' a intercepting!graviton attracts/repels to - to affect a magnetism effect between.

GRAVITY

Gravity is more thar just objects attracting to each other: Gravity is everything that emits anything: Everything has to taken into account when plotting the gravitational force between objects.

Small neutral (does not retain a magnetic polarity) graviton structures will kinetically repel to a object, and/or pass though them (dependent upon their velocity/density and the graviton structure of the intercepted object); !gravitons will repel-attract to a object; gravitons will attract a object: A push or nothing (small/large neutral graviton structures) and a push-pull (!gravitons) and a pull (gravitons) occur to produce gravity'.

Given a graviton is emitted by a object: The graviton will be slowed down by other gravitons which emitted just before and while it emits: The graviton is therefore not caught up with (it could never be caught up by something that escapes the same speed it escapes at) but intercepted by other gravitons which emitted from other parts of the object while/before it emitted: The graviton is intercepted by a consistent / persistent stream of other previously emitted gravitons of alternate trajectories emitted from other points within the same object.

The escaping graviton and the gravitons intercepting the escaping graviton will pole orientate to a unlike/attractive pole to each other.

This will cause the intercepting gravitons to speed up / the escaping graviton to slow down.

As the escaping graviton also acts as a intercepting graviton (to other escaping gravitons) it will also speed up at times.

A graviton will be both slowed down as much as speeded up = Each escaping graviton will ultimately accumulate a travelling speed -

equal to its escape velocity.

It could be said any single graviton will not orientate much at all, as each is so overwhelmed by the amount of multiple poles it may orientate to (millions of gravitons simultaneously interceptir,s each other (including intercepting gravitons within graviton structures)).

-24 In reality gravitons will each have a very slightly different ultimate speed: A messy / weak graviton structure will eject slightly Varying velocity gravitons (equally resulting in many peculiar interceptions >between gravitons (of varying speeds/trajectories)).

The above would also apply to a photon except: Given a perfect emition: A photon will not pole orientate (it is a graviton structure (does not have time to rotate its kinetic-density/polarity - given the velocity of the intercepting gravitons) but it will intercept and be intercepted by other gravitons; these gravitons will pole orientate and so a attraction between them will occur.

However, a graviton edition has two parties which may orientate (itself and the intercepting/intercepted graviton): Two gravitons orientating to each other will orientate to each other twice as fast as a single graviton orientating to a photon.

Consequentially; A photon will only intercept and be intercepted by a weaker gravity effect toward it = It will generally retain its escape velocity.

Given a photon ejects against its kinetic-density (edition occurs after a!graviton is built / emits against its kinetic-density) and/or its velocity decays (emitting/escaping throughout a graviton structure - its velocity ultimately decayed by the objects gravity)): A photon will not pole orientate, but it will intercept and be intercepted by other gravitons; these gravitons will pole orientate and so a attraction between them will occur.

However the photon is already at a slower velocity, and so more aft (face of photon facing the object it emitted) intercepting gravitons (from the object the photon emitted) will act to decay its velocity: A photon will not itself intercept (fore face) many gravitons which would have aided its velocity. Only a much greater amount of 'aft' gravitons will intercept the photon - to greatly ('fore(incredibly weak)/aft(incredibly strong' biasing) decay the velocity of the escaping photon.

Consequentially: A photons velocity will de-

exponentially (trigonometrically intercepting aft gravitons, as it travels away from the graviton source) decrease.

A photons velocity will pitifully(trigonometrically intercepting crossing fore gravitons, as it travels away from mainly in proximity to' the graviton source) increase.

A photon(large!graviton) in deep-space will equally be speeded up and slowed down by intercepting (!)gravitons: Its trajectory will become biased, to/by any biased graviton interceptions that intercept it.

FUNDAMENTAL_CHEMISTRY

As lack of knowledge on my part (not resolved 'polarity'), I shall begin describing a graviton as a tiny invisible sphere shape permanen' magnet, with a internal magnetic field' (as said they are more likely to have a external e-

graviton field (aswell to being forever dividable)).

Figures_1_to_7 of page 'Drawings Page 1' show sphere shaped invisible permanent magnets(gravitons). A sphere shape has been chosen for a graviton as a sphere shape generalists a undefined shape (a graviton may be a cube/cone/cylinder, a 2dimensional square/circle... (a sphere shape generalizes upon all these shapes)). Each sphere shaped permanent magnets(gravitons) magnetic polarity direction has been shown as a shaded half section of each sphere (shaded = north pole; unshaded = south pole (views shown are therefore of a side view))). That shown/described equally applies to (e-)(!)gravitons.

Figure_l; shows how two gravitons attract into each other (head on).

The arrows inside the right hand graviton of each drawing indicate a attraction force (horizontal arrow) and repulsion force (vertical arrows) that act upon the same graviton (the perception therefore is of this graviton travelling into the other graviton).

-25 The vertical arrows ([drawings 2 to 5]) indicate a equal and opposite repulsion force applied to the graviton by a alternate axis (both arrows Indicate repulsion forces applied to the graviton in these directions (both arrows i joint in equal and opposite directions, as, provided the gravitons are aligned perfectly to each other (as they are shown), these repulsion forces will result in forming a neutral repulsion force in these directions (by this respective alternate axis))). A alternate axis is the side axis of these drawings - is in line to the vertical arrows that indicate it (like poles occur on this alternate axis). Drawing_1; shows two gravitons which will not attract into each other, as they cannot feel each others polarity (they need to breach each other for their internal polarity to be felt).

Drawing_2; shows as these two gravitons breach each other they will begin to attract into each other (they are paired unlike pole to each other).

Drawing_3; shows the same as [drawing 2], where the gravitons have travelled a bit further into each other.

As each gravitons magnetic force acts on a tinier particle basis, the attraction force will reduce (compared to [drawing 2]), as now many particles (which construct the graviton) are now both attracting and repelling = providing a neutral attraction force to each other.

The overlapped sections shown in these steps ([drawing 2] to [drawing 5]) provide a neutral attraction / repulsion force: The magnetic particles within these overlapped regions are both attracting and repelling to each other (attraction + repulsion = a neutral effect)).

Drawing_4; shows how each graviton is still attracting into each other, but now with a much weaker attraction force (observe overlapped regions between these gravitons).

Drawing_5; shows how the gravitons now both occupy the same space as each other, but where now a single attraction force now no longer occurs (they will stay occupying the same space).

Each gravitons magnetic particles are now fully attracting and repelling each other (attraction + repulsion = neutral). If any one of the gravitons moves a attraction force will become (a non overlapped region will become (a biased magnetic particles will become))).

Figure_2; shows how two gravitons attract into each other (side on).

This shows the same steps as [Figure 1], with the exception that a different pole orientation has been shown (the same effect occurs between any orientation of magnets).

Figure_3; shows how two gravitons which have attracted into each other (Figures_1_2)), even if very slightly disturbed, will repel to each other on its alternate axis.

Figures_l[drawing 5J_2[drawing 5], show how when two gravitons have fully attracted into each other, their alternate axis (side on) exists a fully like pole to each other.

This will cause the two gravitons (if they are not perfectly aligned dead centre to each other) to mutually fully repel each other following this alternate axis.

Drawing_1; shows how these two gravitons (of Figures_1[5]_2[5]) begin to repel one another: A repulsion force, determined by particles, where now, the more overlapping edges the weaker the repulsion force.

Drawing_2; shows how these two gravitons are still repelling one another, with now a greater repulsion force between them (observe overlapping section between them).

Drawing_3; shows how these two gravitons are still repelling one another, with now a greater repulsion force between them (observe overlapping section between them).

Drawing_4; shows how these two gravitons are no longer repelling to one another, as they no longer breach each other. Their accumulative magnetickinetic repulsion velocity still exists: Leaving the graviton to relay and emit the object it were in (due to its now almost unstoppable kineticdensity velocity). Figure_4: Drawing_1; shows how processes [Figures_1_2_3] may combine to perform a fluid action: A graviton attracts into another graviton, and repels off at a equal factor (shown by arrow) (the intercepting graviton would require a slow speed to achieve this action (and would have to be restricted by other gravitons to prevent it from rotating its polarity as it entered and exited)).

-26 A intercepting graviton with no restrictions will rotate its polarity/orientation to form a active(continual rotation) mostly unlike attraction ->nto the being intercepted graviton. If no other forces intervene they will attract Into each other, where they will stay together in a attraction + repulsion = (active_)neutral state.

It will take little force to separate them, but as they become separated each will pole orientate to form a mostly unlike polarity to each other, to achieve them actively/persistently trying to stay together.

Only two gravitons may stay connected like this, a third graviton will not find this type of graviton structure so-attractive (it has a active = multi orientated polarity). Kinetic-density forces (intercepting (!) gravitons) will easily disturb these (in comparison)weakly combined gravitons.

Drawing_2; shows how two perfectly aligned gravitons may link together to form a stable linkage state.

This will create a neutral latch to each other (only applies to numbers of these latches forming in graviton structures): A attraction force will become if each graviton travels away from each other i A repulsion force will become if each graviton travels into each other.

Repulsion + attraction = neutral, a neutral link is formed between each graviton.

Figure_5; shows two gravitons continually attracting and repelling into each other. This attraction / repulsion force will continually form a spinning state between them: Drawings[1 to 8] show eight (of a infinite possible number of logical translations) stages a graviton may assume in such a spin.

When two gravitons attract into each other (Figures[1,2]) a repulsion force will occur (Figures_3_4[1]).

This repulsion force (Figures 3 4[1]) will prevent each graviton from attracting into each other to occupy the same space (without changing their orientation), as, a repulsion force will greaten the more they enter into each other: Forcing the closening gravitons to pole orientate to form a new unlike polarity attraction to each other: This will also create a repulsion force occurring on another alternate axis, it will re- orientate again...(Figure_5[1 to 8]). A graviton will never keep in another graviton (they would have to be perfectly aligned to each other for this to happen (and even if they did, other intercepting gravitons would disturb them (gravity)), they will just keep re-orientating / spinning around, forever forming unlike poles, which ultimately form like poles on a alternate axis Two gravitons will be forever spinning around each other, never to achieve occupying the same space, due to the extreme tolerances they cannot acquire - due to other intercepting gravitons. Figure_5[1 to 8] continually repeat such patterns in a three dimensional plane (a simple unreal two dimensional plane has been shown).

* A graviton structure may form where all gravitons within it spin around each other this same way (natural graviton structures are most likely formed by these types of logical translation structures (weak graviton structures)). GRAVITON_STRUCTURES

A graviton is a fundamental magnetic energy particle (a graviton is a only magnetic energy particle which will maintain a (near)perfect and (near)permanent magnetic equilibrium (it may emit e-gravitons but cannot emit gravitons).

A object can now be said to be constructed from a (e-)graviton (a e-

graviton is a graviton; 'e-' represents a scaled object).

Figure_6; shows how a!graviton is formed. Each graviton which forms this graviton structure each has its magnetic polarity orientated a like direction (the created graviton structure retains a full magnetic polarity (is a!graviton)).

Each graviton pairs unlike pole to each other, where unlike Figures_l[drawing 5]_2[drawing 5] this does not occur: Each graviton does not attract into each other graviton this far (other attraction forces between each and every other graviton provide a much greater attraction force, to prevent this type of attraction force (Figures 1[5]_2[5]) occurring).

Drawing_1, shows how four gravitons have linked together to form a incredibly tiny!graviton. Each graviton is orientated a like direction to create a graviton structure with a full magnetic polarity.

Drawing_2; shows how more gravitons have attracted to [drawing 1]. Each is orientated a like direction to create G graviton structure with a full magnetic polarity.

-27 Drawing_3; shows how the linkage states of [drawings 1,2] may produce any orientated!graviton emission. A magnetic field may emit a any

-orientation!graviton, such to be able to create a 'magnetic' field.

These particle/emition structures may not create a sphere shape (a sphere type shape constructed from these linkage states will be weak), and so may remain a two dimensional structure: A!graviton would be a flat'/7line' shape.

The length/width of the line being determined by how many gravitons have had time to append to the!gravitons structure before it became short of energy (appending gravitons only have a 1/'gravity velocity-speed' time to append to the creating!gravitons graviton structure (the tinniest gap between the so far formed!graviton and a following one wishing to append to it will create a terminating break (the graviton wishing to append to the!gravitons gravitons structure, will not feel/breach it).

A object which emits!gravitons, will emit short bursts (energyfrequency) of a chained line of gravitons (a chained line of gravitons is a!graviton) . The length of a line being determined by a single graviton not appending to the formed line of gravitons whilst it was being formed.

A!graviton may form and emit at any pole orientation: Drawings_1_2_3 represent two of a infinite number of emitting (equally linked) orientations. Figure_7; shows how a graviton structure may form from the linkage state of Figure_4[2]. Each drawing (Figure_7[1,2,3]) represents a section cut of a sphere shaped graviton structure. A global magnetic polarity does not exist within this object (unlike Figure_6), as each graviton is orientated with unlike poles facing outward (the outer circumference of this graviton structure will exist paira-

of unlike poles (no single gravitons magnetic polarity is orientated a like; direction)). This is a incredibly strongly linked (possibly artificial) graviton; structure (for a graviton structure).

Drawing 1 shows how four gravitons have linked to each other (by method Figure_4[2]) to form a stable state.

Drawing_2; shows how four more gravitons have linked to graviton structure [drawing 1] (by method Figure_4[2]) to form a stable state.

Drawing_3; shows how eight more gravitons have linked to graviton structure [drawing 2] (by method Figure_4[2]) to form a stable state.

This process will continue until gravitons find it more appealing to attract to other smaller graviton structures (smaller graviton structures have more points of contact, and therefore more magnetic force to provide to any other graviton to attract to. The larger the graviton structure, the lesser the number of points of contact it has, and therefore magnetic appeal.

All axis of each graviton of this graviton structure easily and.

strongly link to all other gravitons / graviton structures (regardless of position), maintaining a neutral polarity. A neutral polarity is maintained as each graviton which forms this graviton structure orientates its side externally to the object (a equal north / south pole pairing exists on the outer circumference of whatever shape this graviton structure creates).

This type (truly neutral) graviton sphere will interact with other graviton spheres (of this same type) by attracting at the points of contact.

They will not combine, they will just attract at their points of contact (maybe sharing a few gravitons between them).

Figure_8: Drawing_1; shows how a outer circumference of a truly neutral graviton structure (Figure_7) will appear to any other graviton sphere: These polarities (marked N/S) are actual individual gravitons. Obviously any sphere of a non neutral type (one which possess a.polarity (Figure_6; a!graviton) will neither wish to attract or repel to it (to it it will appear neutral (attraction + repulsion = neutral)).

Drawing_2; shows how a outer circumference of a naturally neutral graviton structure will appear to any other graviton structure: The marked polarities (N/S) follow localised logical patterns (they do not follow a global pattern as [drawing 1]).

This type of neutralization would be that found in every-day objects (everything does not stick to everything in any way at all ([drawing l]s structure would have allowed objects to stick their outer circumferences together)).

-28 Each and every graviton that forms this neutral outer circumference has found local patterns to follow, where, although the Graviton links are not as strong as [drawing l]s, it will possess a fully neutral Attraction to any other object (the only way another object would become attracted to this structure would be if their local logical patterns matched (given how they are logic-randomly constructed this would be incredibly unlikely (this logic-random / weak connection force may help explain why objects continually emit gravitons (they are a very messy / weak affair), aswell to attraction / repulsion procedures of Figures_3_4[1]_5)).

This type of graviton structure would most likely be formed by a moving graviton structure (Figure 5): Each and every graviton which forms it is moving logically to each neighbouring graviton: The natural neutralness of it (Figure_8[2]) would be formed by these gravitons (marked N'/'S') continually rotating their polarity: Nothing other than individual intercepting gravitons(gravity) will be able to match its logical switching.

All different shaped and sized graviton structures will interact with each other and other gravitons to form a global graviton structure of any particular shape and properties (sphere shapes have only been mentioned here as they generalize a shape of a undefined shape (a shoe is a graviton structure, it has a shape of a shoe)).

The more points of contact / magnetic polarity a graviton has magnetic polarity unlike pole attraction to, the more powerful the gravitons link.

The larger a graviton structure the weaker the external surface the graviton structure becomes (only tiny graviton structures will combine/merge between/to around it - continually making it bigger i large graviton structures would not find another large graviton structure appealing).

There will be plenty of tiny / small graviton structures combining to form othe' graviton structures in any natural object.

Perfect Graviton Structures [perfect magnetic equilibrium]: A object with a perfect magnetic equilibrium will not emit gravitons (although it will, given the presence of external energy intercepting them (it will temporarily disrupt its graviton structure (it will eject gravitons / energy as a result of forming a new stable graviton structure))).

Example_1:

Imagine a circle composed of millions of gravitons, where each graviton is pairing back to back a unlike pole to each other: This will form a stable graviton structure (provided external energy does not enter it).

As this object is of a perfect magnetic equilibrium, it will strongly repel any other graviton structure of a incredibly low velocity - As the graviton links between each and every graviton of this graviton structure is so strong, any object intercepting it will attempt to try to rotate the gravitons of the graviton structure (locally); the graviton links (being so strongly linked) will repel this idea, a elastic-repulsion (a kinetic-magnetic repulsion) will result mutually between them.

Imagine two exact copies of theses circles beside each other (on a horizontal plain (two rings laid upon a table top)): Their magnetic polarities will always match like pole to each other: When these two circles are forced together, they will not attract each other, but repel each other (both a magnetic polarity repulsion, and a graviton structure breach repulsion (graviton structures magnetic links of each graviton are being forced apart)).

If the two circles attracted to each another (flip one of the rings over, to create a unlike/attractive orientation between each ring): The two circles would attract each other, but they would not combine (each circles graviton structures gravitons magnetic force links are too strongly linked). A slight graviton structure breach will occur as a result of the attraction force.

If the two circles had a bizarre graviton structure (the magnetic polarities of each graviton are orientated randomly (by a multi-layer or moving graviton structure)) the two circles will not attract or repel each other, but: When the two circles are forced together, they will repel one another, as a graviton structure breach is occurring (graviton structures magnetic links between each graviton is being forced apart). It would be equal to pushing two plastic rings together (they will oppose being pushed together (to regain their more stable state)).

Example_2:

This would be a state where a stable state has been formed whilst all gravitons within this structure are moving mathematically (following patterns ([Figure_5])): Each graviton will move with respect to combinations of other gravitons, following a repetitive mathematical / logical paths.

-29 A mathematical soup of repeating patterns of movement of gravitons would be formed; where although gravitons are in constant motion it would :-still achieve a stable structure (a perfect magnetic equilibrium).

7 All graviton structures would be continually moving at a great velocity: They are incredibly unstable, but at the same time attract to each other greatly (Figure_5).

Weak Graviton Structures [weak magnetic equilibrium]: A object with a weak magnetic equilibrium will emit gravitons (increased, given the presence of external energy intercepting it (will temporarily disrupt its graviton structure (it will eject gravitons / energy as a result of forming a new stable graviton structure))).

Example_3:

This would be a graviton structure which is continually emitting gravitons as a result of internal stability problems (is unable to find a stable graviton structures as a result of creating other types of graviton structure).

A (!)graviton may be ejected when: A (!)graviton has been forced to rotate (by other (!)gravitons), where its magnetic polarity will be like- pole to the gravitons it is neighbouring, consequentially being repelled/ejected out the local graviton structure. A (!)graviton has been forced though to another graviton structure, where when passed though it, the (!)graviton will find it is of like-pole to it, and consequentially be repelled/ejected out.

A (!)graviton has been kinetically kicked out, as a result of a kinetic force entering its graviton structure.

(AC-)!graviton emition (described throughout).

Scenarios of [Figures 3_4[11_5].

Example_4:

This would be a element / atom from the table-of- elements/periodic-tablei it would posses a combination of properties of

Examples[1,2,3]. Unstable Graviton Structures [no magnetic equilibrium]: A object with no magnetic equilibrium will eject (!)gravitons/structures (emitions may unnoticeably increase/decrease, given the presence of external energy intercepting it).

Example_5:

A Star: Its graviton structures may try so hard, but cannot find any single stable graviton structure (due to other already existing incompatible graviton structures): Equilibrium energy ((!) gravitons/structures) is ejected continually. All preceding graviton structures are local graviton structures: A atom would be constructed of billions of these types of structures, all linking / working together.

Graviton structures may be destructively changed when: They became bombarded by (!)gravitons / object-particles; stripping sections of them to pieces (a intercepting kinetic-density energy).

A smaller graviton structure (or a!graviton) passed it stripping it of gravitons (a smaller graviton structure has more points of contact / a greater magnetic force for other gravitons/structures to attract to.

A graviton structure with a global magnetic polarity (a !graviton) passing though a graviton structure that links to it whilst it travels though it (a magnetic material); the!gravitons kinetic-density/polarity, will rip these structures to pieces.

Graviton Structure Breaches: Given a graviton structures specific graviton structure the objects density will not have its kinetic-density pass though a intercepted graviton structure: The graviton structure will absorb the kinetic-density and (due to the graviton structure beginning to un-breach / pull itself back) kinetically repel the object straight back off its surface.

A object which is able to kinetically repel back of another object would therefore be proportional to its velocity and density: A cricket ball is massive its velocity is tiny: Its kinetic-density will be absorbed and kinetically-

magnetically bounced back following a respective trajectory.

-30 A photon is big its velocity is small: Its kinetic-density will be combined into a strongly linked i local graviton structure to which it intercepted; a new photon will be emitted, as 3a result of a magnetic and kinetic equilibrium resolution; following a respective trajectory; 'it is not reflected' (incredibly slow velocity objects 'bounce'; nothing' 'reflects' ['refraction'='reflection'; described below]).

Its new emitted density/velocity ratio will be

-31 A photon is too dense/slow (poor density/velocity ratio) -to pass though most materials / fast enough to pass though some (graviton structures are complex / altering structures - how a photon is ultimately affected by any single material will vary).

A radio_!graviton is small its velocity is large: Its kinetic-density will pass/relay straight through any non-

magnetic/non-conductive object.

A magnetism_!graviton is tiny its velocity is great: Its kinetic-density will pass/relay (straight) through most objects. A (e-)graviton is tiny its velocity is greatest: Its kinetic-density will pass straight through known natural objects. CONDUCTION/ INDUCTION

When a graviton structure with a global magnetic polarity (a!graviton) intercepts a conductor, it will break-down the conductors graviton structure (the interception creates a unequal kinetic and magnetic equilibrium).

The induced!gravitons breaking down the conductors graviton structure will produce the conductors own!gravitons - these created!gravitons in turn will create more!gravitons... each orientating their polarity to the!graviton which created them, they will emit random trajectories (determined by graviton structure lluk-states). A conductors graviton structure is similar to that of a permanent magnets material, however, in a permanent magnet material the production of!gravitons is self destructive (these created!gravitons will create more !gravitons... This will continually break-down the magnet material again, and again (this is what makes it a permanent magnet)). A conductor is not self destructive (requires a greater amount of intercepting!gravitons to begin a permanent semi-perpetual breakdown).

All current is a alternating current (AC); DC 'direct current' is a incredibly high frequency alternating current'.

A mile of conductive wire would conduct electricity as: !Gravitons are induced into a end section of this wire.

The induced!gravitons will breakdown the graviton structure of this induced section of wire.

This breakdown will create the wires own (AC-)!gravitons., These (AC-) !gravitons will self-intercept creating more (AC-)!gravitons... Eventually the whole wire will have disrupted itself. (AC-)!Gravitons would have been exponentially created/relayed throughout the whole of the wires graviton structure.

Induction: The orientation and density of a conductors created!graviton is determined by both the velocity and orientation(polarity) of the intercepting !graviton. The slower the velocity of a intercepting!graviton - the earlier a conductor can begin to build a like orientated!graviton to its orientation / the greater the velocity of a intercepting!graviton the more unlike orientated the created!graviton becomes.

A slower or faster velocity of a fixed-velocity emitted !graviton being achieved by the!gravitons source moving '(+/-)Star_Speed' (relative to the trajectory of the emitting!graviton with respect to the trajectory of movement of the!graviton source).

Figure_10[drawing 1]: The lesser a intercepting!gravitons velocity - the greater a like orientation!graviton a intercepted conductor can build (and/or the greater the number of). A maximum (or largest) like orientation being only achieved when the conductor begins building a!graviton where a intercepting!graviton is before' it (a!graviton always builds a unlike-attractive pole to a intercepting !graviton).

-32 A magnet emits a!graviton [path A1-A2-A3] which intercepts a conductor; the conductor builds a!graviton [AE1] itself to the polarity of the preceding('before') intercepting!graviton [A2]; as!gravitons Cannot orientate, intercepting!graviton [A2] will cross!graviton [AE1] without reorienting either - to continue its trajectory [A3]; the conductors created !graviton [AE1] emitting to a trajectory [AE2] to intercept a magnets secondary begin built!graviton [A1] - [AE2] acting to attract to magnet [A1].

As a Perceptively' 'fore'/faster intercepting !gravitons e-!gravitons has a greater effect toward its 'aft'/slower e-!gravitons (which intercept it [A1] when it [AE2] has passed though it/to-it [A1]) - a bias in favour of the magnet [A1] being attracted to the conductor will occur.

Figure_lO[drawing 2]: The greater a intercepting!gravitons velocity - the greater a unlike orientation!graviton a intercepted conductor can build (and/or the greater the number of). A maximum (or largest) unlike orientation being only achieved when the conductor begins building a!graviton where a intercepting!graviton is within' it (a!graviton always builds a unlike-attractive pole to a intercepting !graviton). A magnet emits a!graviton [path F1-F2-F3] which intercepts a conductor; the conductor builds a!graviton [FE1] itself to a unlike polarity of the intercepted!graviton [F2] (as the majority of [F2] is within structure [FE1], [FE1] will build a unlike-attractive-pole = a unlike orientation to it [F2]); as!gravitons cannot orientate, intercepting!graviton [F2] will cross !graviton [FE1] without re-orientating either - to continue its trajectory [F3]; the conductors created!graviton [FE1] emitting to a trajectory [FE2] to intercept a magnets secondary begin built!graviton [F1] - [FE2] acting to repel to magnet rFl]. As a 'perceptively' 'fore'/faster intercepting !gravitons e-!gravitons has a greater effect toward its 'aft'/slower e-!gravitons (which intercept it [F1] when it [FE2] has passed though it/to-it [F1]) - a bias in favour of the magnet [F1] being repelled by the conductor will occur.

Figure_lO[drawing 3]: When a magnet travels across a conductor, a magnet will emit greater and lesser velocity!gravitons.

Any!graviton emitted by the magnet which emits a trajectory not following the trajectory-direction of the magnet will respectfully emit a lesser velocity: The lesser a intercepting!gravitons velocity - the greater a like orientation!graviton a intercepted conductor will build.

Any!graviton emitted by the magnet which emits a trajectory following the trajectory-direction of the magnet will respectfully emit a greater velocity: The greater a intercepting!gravitons velocity - the greater a unlike orientation!graviton a intercepted conductor will build.

A magnet [A1=F1] (travelling in a direction indicated in arrow shown below it) emits two equal-opposite!gravitons [path A1-A2-A3][path F1-

F2-F3] which intercept a conductor; the conductor builds!gravitons [AEl] [FE1] itself to the polarity of the before[A2]/within[F2] intercepting!graviton [A2][F2]; as!gravitons cannot orientate, intercepting!graviton [A2][F2] will cross!graviton [AE1][AE2] without reorientating either - to continue their trajectory [A3][F3]; the conductors!graviton [AEl][FE1] will emit to a trajectory [AE2][FE2] to intercept the magnets secondary begin built!graviton [A1=F1] - to attract[AE2]/repel[FE2] to the magnet [A1=F1] - to effect to push[FE2] /pull[AE1] the magnet [A1=F1] to counter its direction of travel.

The magnets direction of travel being countered by: ! Gravitons [AE2] emitted/created (by slower intercepting!gravitons to the conductor) by the conductor - will always intercept the magnet [A1=F1] from a left-arc to its perpendicular - to always attract the magnet [A1=F1] toward its trajectory = to the left.

!gravitons [FE2] emitted/created(by faster intercepting!gravitons to the conductor) by the conductor - will always intercept the magnet [A1=F1] from a right-arc to its perpendicular - to always repel the magnet [A1=F1] away from its trajectory = to the left.

As a 'perceptively' 'fore'/faster intercepting!gravitons e-!gravitons has a greater effect toward its 'aft'/slower e-!gravitons (which intercept it [A1=F1] when it [AE2][FE2] has passed though it/to-it [A1=F11) - a bias in favour of the magnet [A1=F1] being propelled to the left will occur.

A magnet travailing in any direction will equally be countered by a same process (respectfully created!gravitons within a induced conductor will be emitted back to it - to persistently resist the magnets direction of travel).

-33 Figure_lO[drawings 1,2,3] are schematic. In actuality a intercepting !graviton fluidly intercepts a conductors material, such that: -: A conductor always aligns its gravitons a like orientation to Writhe intercepting!graviton when the intercepting!gravitons polarity is liberated though them (fore-surrounding and surrounding gravitons align a attractive-pole = a like orientation to the upcoming intercepting!gravitons polarity

-34 A 'electrical current' is a self-intercepting break-

down/great_disturbance to a graviton structure, occurring by forcing a conductor to -build!gravitons of varying polarities(orientations) causing itself to Emit/disrupt itself apart.

A 'electrical current' is a induced(intercepted) -

resultantly self-induced(self-intercepted): 'AC-!graviton creation/emition/field'.

Conduction Field:

Conduction is a conductor becoming self exponentially broken down as a result of being into a close proximity to a intense AC-!graviton field.

A conducting conductor requires to be in a incredibly close proximity to another / AC-!graviton field, as a intense AC-!graviton field is a

super-exponential field.

A only difference between between a radio_AC-!graviton field and

a conductor_AC-!graviton field - is nothing.

Conduction is a self break-down of a material - as a result of it being unable to build varying polarity!gravitons within itself - whilst being forced to do so (induction).

Induction being another AC-!graviton/field / any

moving/alternating magnet/magnetic-field.

Electro'magnetic' Field:

A great amount of energy(AC-!gravitons) is induced into a conductor to result a respectfully very weak magnetic field.

The weak magnetic field results from its self created/emitted

AC-!gravitons - where although these emit mostly actual_neutral - a bias in favour of a 'magnetic' field results. This is akin to a non-perfect induction: A permeable

material will create a stronger 'magnetic field' in the presence of a external

inducing magnetic field' - to that that the external 'inducing magnetic field' is

inducing a current into it.

As show in Figure_10[drawing 3] a resulting 'orientated magnetic field' resulting from a conducting conductor is very weak: It [AE1]+[AE2]

neutralizes itself. [Figure_10[drawings 1,2,3] are schematic, their emitances [AE1][AE2] would only result at incredibly low[A#]/high[F#] !graviton interception speeds]. Thus, a 'magnetic' field is a incredibly weak

artefact/bias of a incredibly strong 'actual_neutral magnetic field'.

Lightening/Potential: Lightening-bolts a conductor emits when very disturbed, are a result of a intense AC-!graviton field making the Earth attract to them (the lightening

bolt has a intense polarity, which the Earth is unable to resist (the lightening bolt easily achieves a forced mutual attraction (forces the Earth to build before'/'first' like/attractive-orientated!gravitons itself (upon the Earth being intercepted)) into the Earth)); resultantly a lightening bolt easily attracts into the Earth.

A conductor tries to reach a kinetic/magnetic equilibrium potential inside itself, which it can only achieve by emitting energy. In the case of a lightening bolt, Billions of AC-!gravitons haze together to 'combine'/'link' to form a incredibly intense AC-!graviton field (all of which were initially built

around a uniform thin haze of AC-!gravitons (this thin haze initiating a conductive path to the Earth)).

Potential' does not exist. Only a forced mutual attraction.

A forced mutual attraction will not achieve when either material is itself attempting to rid of a equal amount of energy. When either material is 'less disturbed' a forced mutual attraction between the 'more disturbed' to the 'less disturbed' will occur.

Capacitance: A capacitor creates massive AC-!gravitons (!gravitons are forced/compressed to link together - to form a greater density!graviton; created !gravitons are being created/intercepted side-by-side(together), resultantly linking (is akin to a extremely intense AC-!graviton interceptions - to create them)) though a limited graviton structure breakdown (their material orientates and breaks - to each other).

Two or more graviton structures destroy/change each other, causing a great mutual disturbance between themselves. Resultantly to create massive AC-!gravitons.

A mutual breakdown between these materials will resolve by producing massive AC-!gravitons blocking/between them.

-35 When these massive AC-!gravitons are lost from these materials to a conductor (by induced attraction (they are too massive to emit (they will not --acquire a escape velocity (at best they will de-latch/jump(via induced attraction) Pa incredibly short distance from the circumference of the material toward a receptive material)))), massive AC-!gravitons will again be created between them.

Massive AC-!gravitons: A massive!graviton would be created by a intense self-intercepting !graviton field of a conductor (as permanent magnets self-intercepts to create a

much powerful!graviton field - a conductor self-intercepts to create a intense-

internal!graviton field): This self-intercepting 'internal'!graviton field is

kept internal - as, as AC-' gravitons are a much greater density to a magnetism_!graviton - unlike magnetism_!gravitons the conductors!gravitons will link/combine to create a combined density AC- !graviton (will build 'into eachs proximity' together (any single point of a conductors graviton structure has been self-intercepted by millions of near-simultaneous intercepting AC-!gravitons -

where any of these self-intercepting AC-!gravitons may have equally been large !gravitons)). Equally: It takes time to build a!graviton (frequencydensityspeed): When a conductor is made to move though a!graviton field (!graviton interception

rates change) and/or though self-interception - the conductor will/may be building new!gravitons before previous-iteration-frequency!gravitons had been completed/emitted: These previous-iteration-frequency!gravitons will link (supply energy) to the current-iteration-frequency!graviton, to form a 2density_!graviton Ultimately a incredibly massive!graviton will have been formed by the appendage of a n'th-iteration-frequency!graviton: ultimate density - massive!graviton, being determined by the random-logic time a 'secondary'!graviton has been created to emit it.

Resultantly a AC-!graviton field will be a variable density AC-

!graviton field.

MAGNETIC_FIELDS

Once a magnet material has become bombarded with enough!gravitons, a semi-

perpetual breakdown will begin to occur: Each induced!graviton will breakdown the magnet material graviton structure creating a new!graviton, which it (the new !graviton) will break-down other sections of the magnet material - creating more !gravitons... Each created!graviton will emit randomly (determined by the magnets graviton structure link states), orientating their polarity to the!graviton which created them.

The creation of new!gravitons is self destructive, as, as they pass though the magnet material these created!gravitons will continually break- down the magnet material again and again (continually forming new!gravitons (this is what makes it a permanent magnet)). These created!gravitons will emit the magnet material all over the place (producing a magnetic field).

This is a very powerful form of radioactivity, where a only difference between this material and a typical radioactive material (neglecting polarity / emitance differences) is just the velocity and density of each respectfully emitting particle.

A!graviton density is incredibly tinier / its velocity equally incredibly greater - to that of a typical 'radio active' particle.

A magnet will stop being a magnet when it has found a stable graviton structure (if it does not, it will incredibly slowly / eventually (!gravitons are incredibly tiny) disappear).

A magnetized materials magnetism_!gravitons create/emit as a result of a kinetic-density-fixed_polarity(orientation) (!graviton) being perpetually created/emitted in the material (by intercepting previously created/emitted !gravitons) (initiated by a magnetization field); these self intercepting/created

!gravitons intercept/create within the magnet material = they will reintercept the magnet material at a fixed!graviton escape velocity = a intercepted magnet material will always build a like orientated!graviton to that that intercepted it [as/see tinduction/conduction'] / emitted respectfully [as/see induction/conduction']. The amount it self creates will be related to its graviton structure (a strong permanent magnet will generally have a denser graviton structure to that of a weaker magnet).

-36 Resultantly all created/emitted!gravitons are a like orientation to each other - emitting logic-random trajectories due to fluid creations/repulsions -between many variable-density created variableorientated!gravitons ('first'_built it/ 'second'_built / 'third/fourth... _neighbouring_built' by the material) -

resultantly causing variable-linked-force / 'pivot 'ed!gravitons to be emitted. [A induced conductor achieves a same process (to emit AC-, gravitons)].

-37 Although flux lines do not exist: They would best be thought of to that currently depicted for a electrical wire: A bar magnet will have flux lines of a -circular top/bottom, circling perpendicular to its length (a rotating cylinder -

fits circling flat top/bottom end points = main pole ends).

This analogy will fit a permeable shield material scenario, by way of it neutralizing a magnetic field by singularly/only producing a equalopposite

magnetic field to the magnet it is shielding (it unlike-pole attracts to it).

Now when a permeable-shield is placed anywhere around a magnetic field a unlike magnetic field produced by the shield will always result (this would

not have been achieved at the pole ends or T traditional field line'magnets).

A permanent bar magnet [PBM] of any orientation (is easier to perceive the layout below to be vertically orientated (main poles top / bottom)); where a permeable material [PEM] is placed beside it: The permeable material [PEM] will create a equal-opposite magnetic field to the bar magnet [PBM],

such to attract to it: The permeable material [PEM] will have neutralised the bar magnets [PBM] magnetic field (to the side it had been placed), by singularly

producing a unlike magnetic field [PEM] to it [PBM]:

PBM+PEM=Neutral N S NS=0

+ = S N SN=0

In all 'shielded' / 'neutralized' magnetic fields, the magnetic fields

still exist, completely uninhibited, and completely unchanged: They exist as unlike magnetic fields (a north pole orientated

magnetic field + a south pole orientated magnetic field = a neutral magnetic

Field): The magnetic fields still exist; they only appear not to.

A permeable material will not attract to a shielded magnetic field, not because the said magnetic field has been 'conducted away' /

inhibited' / 'removed' (made to 'not exist'), but because two unlike magnetic fields are made present to it ('magnetic field sources + 'inverted magnetic field

source (a permeable material will create a unlike orientated magnetic field to the

magnetic field source it is shielding)'): These unlike orientated (north + south =

neutral) magnetic fields will equally attract and repel to a permeable material

(attraction + repulsion = neutral).

A permeable material subject to a shielded magnetic field (two equal and opposite magnetic fields) will mutually and equally establish

two unlike oriented magnetic fields of its own (north orientated field + south

orientated field = a neutral field), creating again a actual but neutral magnetic

fields.

The permeable materials created equal and opposite (attraction + repulsion = neutral) magnetic fields will equally attract

and repel (attract + repel = neutral) to other permeable materials, and the two magnetic field sources themselves (the shielded magnet): Each and all magnetic

fields exist, each completely uninhibited / completely unaffected by each other:

Many unique independent magnetic fields independently achieve a 'in total' (as many

attractions to repulsions) neutral effect.

A magnetism-!graviton is incredibly tinier to a photon(a massive!graviton): A photon is big (it visibly damages skin), a magnetism_!graviton does not (is so unnoticeable. Intense/'perceptively grouped = massive'!gravitons obviously cause damage (their actual_damage being the sum (at a given proximity) of the input energy used to create them): Medical equipment / radio transmitters / power lines / computer/electrical-equipment /...

INSULATORS

Scenario One: (most likely) Insulators create actual_neutral magnetic fields (is a

ferroantiferromagnetic material).

[massive/induction]_AC-!graviton creation/emition requires a weak local graviton structure = insulators are a weak-perfect graviton structure (they may appear 'elastic' - but its gravitons will equalise to persistently stay perfectly linked' (to permanently attain a perfect magnetic equilibrium).

They rebuild their graviton structure incredibly quickly (as all graviton structures do (they are constructed from gravitons - rebuild at graviton velocity-speed (conductor graviton structures rebuild a great deal more damage at a equal velocity-speed = are weaker/damaged for longer (intercepting !gravitons cause more damage to them / are a weaker graviton structure to insulators)))) to prevent any time duration to build anything larger to tiny magnetism_!gravitons.

-38 Thus, it has the ability to create/emit 'relay' the intercepting!graviton, aswell to create a actual neutral magnetic field / aswell

Go not be conductive (it does not create/emit induction/disturbing massive !gravitons (it re-links/re-builds before they can be constructed (as a consequence of the tinier amount of damage a intercepting!graviton causes to it (compared to a conductor))). Scenario Two: (unlikely) A single intercepting!graviton emits through a insulator.

Such a material must have a very strong (it retains itself to not create/emit any other!graviton) but very weak (else!gravitons would deteriorate whilst passing through them) graviton structure.

All such weak graviton structures must resultantly create'!gravitons when intercepted by!gravitons (they freely allow their local graviton structures to be realigned) but are too weak to create a secondary magnetic-repulsion to emit the created!graviton (the graviton structure being a big magnetic/kinetic equilibrium disaster already (the creation of a first or secondary magnetic-density is futile)).

Intercepting!gravitons will only cause a unnoticeable great disturbance to local graviton structures - a single kinetic-

density relay effect only occurs to emit the single intercepting kineticdensity !graviton = is a pure/single kinetic equilibrium relayed throughout a intercepted material = A insulator quickly/easily aligns its gravitons to the intercepting !graviton (to create a new!graviton) - for the kinetic force alone of the intercepting!graviton to propel this created!graviton following its trajectory.

Scenario Three: (most unlikely) !graviton 'passes straight though' a insulator; implying: !gravitons have a 'phenomenally strong' graviton structure All materials are 'phenomenally weak' graviton structures.

Magnetic materials must singularly interact with intercepting !gravitons, as their graviton structure is prone / has itself a local graviton structure polarity (its graviton structure is constructed from!gravitons (is a weak graviton structure as most materials, but where it uses!gravitons (big gravitons) to construct it)). Thus when!gravitons pass though it, they cause a same great disturbance/' rip ' to the materials intercepted local graviton structure, but now where the material will eject itself (its pre-constructed!gravitons) as both a kinetic(intercepting kinetic-density) and magnetic (intercepting!graviton orientation/polarity) (kinetic-magnetic) equilibrium resolution.

Not magretised permeable/magnetic materials do not have a !graviton structure; making this scenario unlikely. Permeable/magnetic materials build!gravitons within them, else a permeable material (for example) would not attain a mutual attraction force given a any orientation magnetic field toward it:

They build!gravitons within themselves - they are not 'the' graviton structure (they are a result of the graviton structure (although they can be said to be part of it (which they are, temporarily (while they develop / before they emit))) - [is therefore incredibly unlikely particles 'pass straight though' materials].

SUPERCONDUCTORS

A superconductor graviton structure must more freely allow!gravitons to be created within it, such that!gravitons are easily created per interception-

emitance. A superconductor must be a very weak graviton structure.

A conductors created!gravitons must therefore lose velocity and/or density over distances, through re-emitions.

Within a superconductor it must then be assumed created!gravitons do not decay their velocity or density) to provide a resistance free!graviton semi-

perpetual breakdown. [A true resistance free conductor would be one whichdid not create a!graviton field:!gravitons which escape a material are lost / resistance]

For a superconductor to be able to decay intercepting!gravitons to it, a superconductor must have a perfect magnetic equilibrium (if a superconductor does achieve to inhibit!gravitons): This conflicts with a weak graviton structure; although it can be weak and perfect = 'a brittle material', it would break easily to attain weak local graviton structures; unless: it re-combines/re-links instantly (they do (but not without creating yet more (!)gravitons (is a weak-brittle perfect magnetic equilibrium))).

-39 Thus, if a superconductor does achieve to inhibit!gravitons 'it is c weak-brittle material' - able to absorb a!gravitons kinetic-density impact -,(by way of its perfect graviton structure - re-linking its gravitons instantly (to -not permit to relay a intercepting!graviton completely though it (its kinetic-

density will be exponentially deteriorated whilst attempting to relay through a superconductor material) / certainly to emit gravitons [as/see 'Artificial Gravity - C'])).

Any!gravitons of any magnetic polarity orientation will be inhibted/repelled against, as any intercepting!graviton of any magnetic polarity orientation will attempt to re-orientate the superconductors graviton structure (unlike gravitons,!gravitons will not rotate to the intercepting graviton structure; likewise the graviton structure will not orientate to the intercepting !graviton). A graviton structure breach, of the superconductors intercepted local graviton structures will occur; absorbing/combining the intercepting !graviton into its structure / ultimately distributing its kinetic-density throughout. A!graviton will pass through a superconductor if the superconductor is bombarded with enough!gravitons: Intense!gravitons will break-down the superconductors perfect graviton structure - making it a weak graviton structure (until which time the bombardment stops): The superconductor will no longer be a superconductor. Gravitons will almost freely pass through a superconductor.

Gravitons re-orientate themselves to match graviton structures as they pass though them: They will not disrupt a superconductors graviton structure so greatly (that the superconductor could not adapt to).

Given a superconductor is of a perfect magnetic equilibrium, a superconductor will not emit gravitons of its own: A superconductor set upon the earth: The superconductor will attract to the Earth (the Earths gravitons bombard the superconductor): The superconductors weight is unaffected.

The superconductor not emitting gravitons will result in the Earth not feeling the presence of it (the superconductor will not attract the Earth to it).

If the Earth were the same density to a superconductor: Half as much gravity would be felt between them (the only graviton field arises

from the Earth attracting the superconductor). Where, if the superconductor were held stationary to the Earth, the Earth would not move toward the superconductor.

Gravity is not a mutual process (and/or it is (it is dependent upon graviton structure states)).

SUPERCONDUCTORS (apparatus).

To show!gravitons exist (given a superconductor is of a perfect magnetic equilibrium). To show a superconductor is of a perfect magnetic equilibrium (given !gravitons exist).

Therefore! To attempt to simultaneously show!gravitons and perfect-

superconductors exist.

If a superconductor-'magnetic engine' described in 'Magnetic Engines': Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 1]' Magnetic Ergine/Dynamo [type 2]' Rotate: !gravitons exist and superconductors are a perfect graviton structure. Do not rotate: A superconductor is not a perfect graviton structure / it is not - excessive external particles still intercept it (to attempt to / to break it). It will require to be cooled(rid of all external particle radiation) well past its superconducting state (such that it may then settle to form perfect graviton links (which then may/may-not become to weak-perfect/'brittle' to act/not-act to inhibit intercepting!gravitons)). Massive_!gravitons are a strong-perfect (not brittle) graviton structure (all!gravitons are strong-perfect graviton structures): A tiny magnetism_!graviton intercepting a masslve_!graviton rust be slightly irihite by it:

-40 The shielding/biasing described in said Engines, should be replaced by a electromagnet(s) interwound to neutralize its magnetic field. Where

he massive_!gravitons within the neutral electromagnet/coil will act to inhibit -'intercepting!gravitons (the electromagnet being supplied by a powerful DCurrent).

If a 'magnetic engine' rotates,!gravitons exist; to verify superconductors are/are-not a perfect graviton structure.

If a 'magnetic engine' does not rotate; massive_!gravitons are either: Not enough of them (most likely) i Only act to absorb and re-emit !gravitons (equally likely), but where they may/will have been partially inhibited re-emitting the massive_!graviton with a alternate velocity/density ratio to that which they had entered it (it will have been slightly inhibited).

EMITION (epilogue): To enable a energy-particle to emit throughout a object (acquire a great kinetic velocity directly proportional to its density): It will require a perfect like-pole-repulsion between itself to the 'created it' local graviton structure.

All emitable-energy-particles are!gravitons (retain a magnetic polarity).

A neutral-particle could not emit with a respectful-velocity/if-at-

all: It would have to pair every n'th inverted-pole graviton which forms it, to every n'th inverted-pole graviton of the local graviton structure which had created it: If this n'th pairing could be perfectly aligned, only a single 'graviton-diameter' re-position-adjustment of the!graviton would allow them to fully attract each other (a attraction (if just a ever so slight bias) will be attained before a repulsion). Is extremely unlikely a required perfect-aligned-

repu'sior ccu'd cocker.

Equally, if a particle and/or the graviton structure were a weak graviton structure (logic-randomly orientates its gravitons), a required escape velocity could not be achieved (at best this particle would just de-latch (jump) from the surface of its 'created it' graviton structure (it certainly will not attain a escape velocity to enable it to relay though a/the/any object)).

A!graviton will purely be emitted as a consequence of simply having a single like-pole to the created-it graviton structure.

A!graviton cannot achieve a complete pole rotation, and so will emit.

This may be perceived as a AC current supplied to a aerials graviton structure: The conductor/aerial will create a!graviton orientated one way [positive], for it then to be emitted by a second 'being created behind it' equal-

opposite orientation [negative]!graviton: A mutual repulsion will occur between the first and second !graviton (they are orientated a like-pole to each other), to emit the first.

The process will continue as AC is supplied.

AC-!gravitons are known to be orientated as said, as they do not result a 'magnetic' effect/field toward any magnetic materials / where they induce

a fluctuating (a receptively sinusoidal pattern [Figure_11]) voltage/current into a conductor(aerial) [magnetism_!gravitons are orientated a like orientation to result a 'magnetic' effect/field].

A AC-!graviton [a] is created behind a previous iteration frequency AC!graviton [b] They [a,b] will begin to perfectly-like-pole repel to each other: Scenario One: The kinetic-density of [b] provides a weaker repulsion force between itself [b] to [a], such that before [a] had become fully developed (frequency) [b] will have been emitted ['if' [b] did not have a kinetic-density (its e-gravitons were not free) it will emit at the first presence of a [ads development (resisted by magnetic links to the surrounding graviton structure only)]. [It [b] will have attained a unstoppable kinetic-velocity / relaying its kinetic-density to the circumference and out-of the conductors graviton structure].

[b]s ultimate velocity is therefore determined by: Its kinetic-density slowing its repulsion/emitance; [ads development speed/density(frequency). Therefore,!graviton-'velocity' is not proportional to frequency' - it is determined by the polarity-orientation and density of [a] repelling to the polarity-orientation and kinetic-density of [b].

Emitance velocities are variably produced by graviton structures alone; but where a uniform frequency-energy fed into a conductor will generally create a perceptively uniform frequency-densityvelocity AC-!graviton editions. [Given e-gravitons (which must be free once a!graviton has fully developed (to propel it)) are temporarily-'not free' - its ultimate velocity will vary by way of this 'temporary'/unstable initial (immediately after development) state - to complicate that said].

-41 Scenario Two: The kinetic-density of [b] will hold itself back while [a] Develops within it; such that [a] will have fully developed (frequency) at the -point of [b]s emition. [It [b] will have attained a unstoppable kinetic-velocity / relaying its kinetic-density (force) to the circumference and out-of the aerials/conductors graviton structure].

[b]s ultimate velocity will be a equal velocity to all alternate frequency AC-!gravitons - each/all frequency AC-!gravitons are caused to emit by a equal density AC-!graviton ('provided it is a equal frequency- density following/emitting each): Each frequency AC-!graviton will emit at 'the speed of light': However, a receiving radio invalidates this scenario; It will not be able to distinguish between induced voltages(AC- !graviton velocities) -

frequency. A larger!graviton must deteriorate its velocity (kineticdensity) whilst passing through objects: The primary/important slowing of its velocity being within its own 'created it' graviton structure; such that the same objects gravity will act to exponentially decay its velocity as it escapes (purely as a consequence of only losing a initial(said) incredibly tiny velocity). The tiny velocity a!graviton actually loses within a 'created it' object is almost-nothing / the objects gravity however exponentially exploits 'any loss' of velocity - to continue to super exponentially (interception frequency) decay its velocity.

Else, if it had not been slowed by the said objects gravity, it would mean a incredible velocity decay occurs only-'within' a material = a radio aerial/receiver would perceive its decaying velocity as a emulation of many alternate frequencies / mainly only applying to larger!gravitons. -

[A intercepted object by any: intercepting particle will slow the particles velocity: A gravity effect is time dependent - A gravity source acts for a lesser time toward a particle heading toward it / than to the same particle heading away from it = A particle endures a stronger gravity effect escaping a intercepted object than to entering it = A bias toward a slow down of any particle is always achieved] [In actuality everything/every_particle deteriorates when passing though any object: Its density and/or velocity may decrease and/or increase when passing though materials (to re-

emit a material at a alternate density/velocity (where as densityvelocity: a decrease in density equates to a increase in velocity (and vice-verSa) / a decrease in velocity equates to a increase in density (and vice-versa)))] All emitable-!gravitons (not massive- !gravitons) are generally human-

perception-unaffected by magnetism-!graviton fields; each has a incredibly high

kinetic-velocity and tiny density (frequencydensityvelocity) [Although everything' is re-trajectorised/affected by/when intercepted by 'anything'].

Only low frequency AC-!gravitons directly induce a (presently)detectable voltage(velocity)/current(density) into a aerial/conductor (is radio).

Magnetism_!gravitons are equally unique in the way they interact with conductors (movement destruction/induction).

Varying density/velocity!gravitons each 'uniquely' disrupt graviton structures. EMITION (apparatus) Detecting slow/massive!gravitons (photons and thermal-particles) [possibly even fast(phenomenally high induced voltage)/tiny(phenomenally tiny induced current) magnetism_!gravitons; via a single and or multiple orientated intense magnetic field source(s) 'the source(s) being stationary' (a electric current is

singularly a disturbance to a intercepted material (voltage equally being the interception frequency' of the disturbance / but not strictly/singularly - as frequency occurrence rate' is easily emulated by any multiple intercepting 'any density'!gravitons))]. Thermal-particles have a much greater density and frequency to photons; this is known as thermal-particles do not penetrate objects at-all-aswell to photons; where, where they are so massive, they bombard their way through graviton structures (thermal particles are massive and slow - their kinetic/density velocity is too weak to directly relay/pass through objects).

A photon or thermal-particle will not pass though a conductor (you'd feel heat pass instantly though a metal if a thermal-particle could); consequentially it will not induce a detectable current into a conductor (is inhibited from passing though it). Photons and thermal-particles are massive: Radio-!gravitons are incredibly tinier to them (they pass through materials).

-42 Inducing a conductor (massive-slow-particle): The conductor :>could only ever have to be incredibly thin, to hope a induction occurs (such that Such particles pass though it): This will be known before the experiment - we -should be able to see clearly through it (photons) / detect instantaneous heat through it (thermal-particles).

A incredibly fine incredibly conductive (flat)wire, should be placed before a incredibly tiny 'low power' coherent photon/thermal-particle source; where the source acts upon a tiny mid-section of the wire: When the wire is closed circuit (is a loop), it should become ever so slightly hotter to if it were in open-circuit (a straight wire). Else, I'd believe a bombardment occurred (not induction), to enable a photon / thermalparticle to bombard though the conductor.

* A magnetism_!graviton will induce a undetectable_destruction voltage and current into a conductor: It does not need to be detected, so long as it had a action: Heat a conductor; It will begin to create its own thermal-

particles (like a permeable material creates its own!graviton upon it being intercepted by a intercepting!graviton (= a permanent magnet should be a warmer material to a not magnetic material = all materials emit actual-neutral magnetic fields [as/see 'Insulators - Scenario one']).

Practically implemented as; heating a wire within a dough-nut shape insulated vessel, over a number of weeks/months. Where a loop/broken-loop wire are being tested simultaneously.

Industrially implemented, maybe as creating a thermal and/or light panel (glass laminated/sprayed by a incredibly thin conductive material (a 'not polished' silvered/golded glass)): Will provide a tiny current source (may/will require new components to operate from it - it will be a high frequency ACurrent (not a incredibly high frequency ACurrent(DC))) in the presence of intercepting photon/thermal particles. Else, acting as a heat energy source - operating to amplify the heat of the sun - to heat 'something' (heat engine).

A magnetism_!graviton implementation being futile (in comparison to the phenomenally massive(in comparison) energy we'd like to acquire from it. The incredibly high frequency voltage should be perceived as a super_flat DCurrent (will not require new components to operate from it).

EMITION (prologue) If a dark metal becomes warmer to a equal dark and dense-[a equal volume and weight] 'stone', in the presence of a intercepting photons/thermal-particles: Then the metal is self-heating though a 'at the intercepted surface' induced current into it (by the intercepting/inducing photons/thermal-particles).

!Gravitons develop internally to a object aswell as at its circumference, emitting 360x360degree(all) trajectories. When they develop internally they will relay their kinetic-density (force) to / and out of the objects circumference.

Massive/Large!gravitons will distribute/lose their kinetic-density whilst attempting to relay though a object in which it were created - to ultimately emit (acquire a required/true escape velocity) as a incredibly tinier density!graviton (densityvelocity). ARTIFICIAL_GRAVITY

A A conductor/material which only emits gravitons may be produced by supplying a conductor/material with a incredibly high frequency energy (a frequency a billion times that to the speed of light). The energy being supplied to the conductor at this incredibly high frequency will not have time to let a!graviton develop. The time displacements (determined by frequency) between each energy pulse will only have enough time for a single graviton to create/emit.

Another graviton will be prevented from appending to the previous graviton due to the frequency cutting off energy to the conductor.

When a coil of wire is feed a DCurrent, the DCurrent is actually at a incredibly high frequency (it creates!gravitons (DC is created by magnetic fields / magnetic fields are at a!graviton frequency)).

A chemical battery (capacitor) produces a apparently Ohz current: They create massive(AC)_!gravitons / are at a massive(AC)_!graviton-

frequency.

-43 Creation of a Ohz frecuency (to create a graviton field):

Parallel DC sources: Many DC sources connected in parallel (all naturally being slightly out of phase to each other) to result in a almost Ohz current (all sources connected to a single 'combined phased' conductor/aerial).

Practically implemented as thousands of disc-generators.

A aerial/material being supplied this flat_current could be any material each will break-down uniquely / a weak-erfect 'brittle' material being ideal (may perpetually shatter itself to pieces).

A neutral powerful electromagnet: Millions of independent fine-wire coils wound in alternate directions to each other, to result a neutral magnetic field (practically

implemented as two independent wires proportionally interwoven).

The incredible amount of DC current (possibly via a parallel DC source) 'wasted' in these coils will produce a 99.9999999999% neutral magnetic field (being completely undetectable): A tiny 0.0000000001% graviton field

will arise out of this dense high frequency disturbance.

This apparatus is equivalent to a massive-array-'parallel DC source'; billions of!gravitons are intercepting a single points all uniquely out of phase to each other.

Any single intercepted point, will perceive a almost Ohz interception:!Gravitons are overlapped back-to-back, intercepting the material as if they were a big long!graviton (it's not really Ohz, but it may disrupt the material equally to (if not more so; instead of a chain of gravitons (true Ohz) we have a denser chain (they are not really chained) of!gravitons (at Ohz)).

The created/emitted magnetic field will equal decay

over distance - to ultimately break-down into a too-tiny_e-!graviton(a graviton); such to effect a gravity effect at a given distance away from the electromagnet (by way of its naturally forever-decaying magnetic field (resultantly becoming a

gravity field)).

These coils may/may-not be would over cores, which may/may-not be magnetic materials: It would be nice if any of these materials began to self-perpetually break-down to emit neutral magnetic fields and/or gravitons.

A brittle/dense core being expected to break down to release gravitons / any broken links in a incredibly brittle material will activate a perpetual breakdown throughout the material (of a equivalent density (a graviton / edition)).

Chemical batteries: Chemicals break-down to release massive(AC)!gravitons; combinations of artificial chemicals may be able to breakdown to create gravitons and/or release a Ohz massive(AC)-!graviton field into a conductor/material.

Obviously a pure Ohz frequency will not directly produce gravitons: All emitted gravitons would chain together (within a specific range of the emitting objects proximity): Only magnetic materials would interact with such a field.

When the linked gravitons travel further away from the object, their individual trajectories will begin to break these links; consequentially (a specific range out of proximity to the object) breaking into individual (!)gravitons; ultimately at a greater distance out, only gravitons will be left (producing a gravity effect toward any future intercepted object)).

Static fields (massive(AC)-!gravitons) are not magnetism or gravity.

Static fields employ massive_AC-!gravitons to create a attraction by way of a

forced-'mutual attraction' into a receptive material.

B: Aft'!graviton emition: Rotating a 'magnet' incredibly quickly will result in any of the magnets points emitting incredibly faster 'fore'(emitting a trajectory following a like direction-rotation of the magnet)!gravitons, and incredibly slower aft'(emitting a trajectory following a unlike direction-rotation of the magnet) gravitons: The slowed 'aft'([escape_velocity]-[Star_Speed]) !graviton, has a greatened amount of time to rotate to a intercepted object = It Is able to rotate to achieve a gravity effect - provided the structure its is intercepting has a biased polarity. It will act like a 'big' graviton, but where although it will still not rotate anywhere near as quickly to - its greater density will effect a stronger gravity-effecl, to a single graviton).

-44 - However: The magnet will require to be rotated incredibly quickly.

- A 'fore'/faster!graviton emition May' (regardless of its orientation) begin to provide a kinetic repulsion = anti gravity_effect toward a intercepted object.

A incredible induction toward surrounding materials (resistance toward the magnets rotation) will occur - materials which surround it must be artificial super_not-conductive.

The greater the decayed velocity of a intercepting 'graviton toward a intercepted material - the greater the chance of the intercepting!graviton being inhibited/lost to the intercepted material.

See 'E' for many mechanical implementations. It may equally be implemented as a 'Type 4' 'magnetic engine' C: Graviton structure break- up: A weak-perfect 'brittle' graviton structure material; where a (magnetism)-!graviton field is made to intercept it.

The extremely 'brittle' material inhibiting/absorbing any intercepting single!graviton into its graviton structure (by way of its intercepted local graviton structures re-linking incredibly quickly); but where this absorbing is distributing both the magnetic and kinetic energy of the intercepting!graviton throughout its graviton structure - it is certain to resultantly emit gravitons (tiny resultant fluctuations/impurities of being able to re-link so quickly (but where it re-links incredibly quickly to not let itself build a!graviton)).

A material certainly being a supercooled material (rid of all external intercepting particles / such that it may settle [as/see Superconductors' ('superconductors' are not strictly these materials - they create/emit!gravitons (are magnetic and conductors))]), where such a material may already be brittle at high temperatures (not necessarily; a incredibly weak (not brittle) material will 'settle' to achieve a incredibly brittle material - when supercooled). D: Given gravitons act like!gravitons: Inducing a!graviton into a conductor will produce the conductors own!gravitons. Inducing gravitons into a conductor/material may therefore produce a greater creation of a materials own gravitons. A spinning ring/disc, surround by a stationary (or rotating a equal-

opposite direction) outer material; will enable a greatening mutual induction of gravitons to begin between these materials.

A 360x360degree field of gravitons will be produced by/around

these materials.

See 'E' for many mechanical implementations.

E: A spinning gyro can be described as staying stable as a result of a kinetic force creating a unequal kinetic equilibrium potential within the gyros graviton structure. Either way kinetic forces have to be resolved to gravitational forces, as a kinetic force cannot achieve a attraction (that that keeps a gyro stable): If you did not know the gyro were spinning, you would assume it had a great disproportionate mass (this is its artificial gravity-mass created).

A kinetic-force induced into a gyro creates a unequal kinetic equilibrium within it: These kinetic forces are resolved by ejecting energy = emitting gravitons (the gyro destroys itself to achieve a new unstable kinetic equilibrium): Gravitons emit within a gyro a equal-opposite trajectory to its induced rotation direction - this is what keeps the gyro spinning.

Given these gravitons cannot exit the gyro (objects are not attracted to a rotating gyro), the gravitons created must not have a acquired a acquired escape velocity, such that they are able to be emitted, but not emitted with a great kinetic velocity (they do not acquire a true escape velocity (other gravitons surrounding them attract to them greater than it can escape them)). Resultantly the gravitons may only partially relay/jump though a graviton structure.

-45 They will emit - join - emit - join...

through the gyros graviton structure whilst travelling though it. Gravitons: Emit -I icreate a intercept gravity toward a intercepted graviton) - Join (combine to the intercepted graviton) - Emit (a perpetual/unstable magnetic/kinetic equilibrium creates/emits a new graviton) -...

A graviton will not escape the gyro even at its outer circumference; each emitted graviton does not have the required kinetic velocity to escape any neighbouring graviton (unlike 'paragraph above', where a leading-to 'attractive' graviton were present).

Over a incredibly great time (gravitons are incredibly tiny), a build up of gravitons will occur around the gyros circumference: The gyro will deform/warp, becoming 'larger at its outer circumference'/'thinner around its inner circumference'.

A gyro which spins incredibly fast will emit gravitons (gravitons will acquire a kinetic velocity which allows them to escape the gyro). Spinning incredibly fast a gyro will also deform and release graviton structures.

A material which is able to withstand incredible rotational forces (caused by gravitons) will emit gravitons and not fall to pieces. This scenario clearly indicates that which is happening within a gyro to produce its artificial mass, and equally why it will be incredibly difficult to create a external graviton field to it (it will be the gyro falling to pieces).

If a diamond is the toughest material on Earth, a large one should be made into a perfect disc, and rotated at a incredible 'at the point of destruction' rate, within a vacuum. To achieve to attract a piece of paper toward the vessel.

A diamond should be a natural diamond, a man made diamond will almost certainly fall to pieces (a natural diamond will be at the brink of destruction before it releases gravitons). A diamond graviton field will emit a

haze of gravitons around the diamond (the diamond emitting a haze of gravitons will be the diamond falling to pieces).

In reality: A superconductor_ring or magnet_ring(a permanent magnet), with a hollow gap around its inner circumference, containing a non conductive weak graviton structure material - acting to break-down (be the graviton source) before the superconductor/magnet_ring.

Surrounded by a pure unbroken carbon structure; it being surrounded by tightly wound (perpendicular to its running length) carbon fibres.

A single pure unbroken carbon structure may be achieved by initially casting a plastic around the 'superconductor/magnet_ring and innermaterial', before heating it. The superconductor/magnet_ring will require to be cooled / superconducting

while the plastic is heated, else the carbon will not tightly become around it (equally a superconductor_ring from this point on should never reach a certain higher temperature, else the carbon will shatter): A pure unbroken carbon structure will result.

Else, the pure unbroken carbon structure can be split into a top-half and bottom-half; they can be made independent to the material to which it surrounds: To then be held together by said carbon fibre windings. Else, the unbroken material may be glass.

Supported by (superconductor)-electromagnets; equally acting as a induction motor toward the superconductor/magnet_ring and/or carbon-

structure (surrounding/repelling to the superconductor/magnet_ring), to initially propel the superconductor/magnet_ring).

Propelled by ions (any particle / possibly electrons).

These ions will be aimed perpendicular to any tangent around the superconductor/magnet_ring outer circumference; the ions hitting its outer carbon fibre windings. The ions believing they were heading for a permanent magnet collection plate' (located at a same trajectory through the interception point).

The ion-gun/ions being calibrated/shielded to/by any surrounding magnetic fields (the initial magnetic propulsion (the

induction motor) will be 'off' when ion propulsion begins (the electromagnets-coils will be stationary set (the ions can then be easily pathed/shielded)).

The whole machine operating in a vacuum / surrounded by a non-magnetic non-conducting material / surrounded by perfect shielding to prevent the Earths magnetic field acting (inducing a magnetic resistance) upon any rotating

magnetic/conductive components of the machine.

Ultimately: A 'Magnetic engine [type 1]' will be encased inside a carbon/glass/diamond material, to achieve a incredibly 'nigh speed rotation; where the magnetic engines components will break-down to emit (!)gravitons.

-46 In each machine, (AC-)!gravitons should be checked for Geologically (a 'magnetic' field; a AC-!graviton field): They may begin to emit

jefore, while or after gravitons emit.

- These machines provide a forever 'green': Propulsion to propel a craft (gravitons); electricity source (if AC-!gravitons). A gravity propulsion and electricity source, are each incredibly efficient Once a 'perfectlyshielded' A; an En.__ it will require little energy for it to

-47 Propulsion: A space craft which uses gravity as its propulsion will create/emit ^-ravitons from points around its surface, toward and though itself (even if Graviton source(s) emit gravitons 360x360degree(all) around themselves ('At,'B','C','D','E')): A cube shaped space craft will have any number of its outer sides create/emit gravitons: These created/emitted gravitons will travel through the space craft providing a directional gravitational force to propel itself (any number of its sides may generate any number of gravitons to emit through its structure (to create a any direction force required)).

Gravitons emit from the outer of a space craft, into the space craft, and out the other side: The space craft will be attracted toward the graviton source(s) (this is not a mutual attraction (a graviton source will not attract to the craft (only the craft will 'perceptively' attract to it))).

Any object inside the space craft will be unaware of any kinetic velocity changes (any object inside the space craft will be under a equal attraction force - to that inflicted upon the space craft (any object will move together (except 'maybe' (dependent upon type) the 'powered' graviton source(s)).

A space craft may collect energy as it travels: Faster than light will be easily achieved - a inexhaustible energy (!)gravitons can be collected in travel. Collecting Gravitons itself will provide a energy to the space craft (any sized Gravitons will induce a electrical current into the space crafts shell). In reality magnetic energy will impose a resistance; however, a persistent acceleration of a craft will be achieved. A nice 'semi-perpetual' propulsion; Gravitons are everywhere, they will always be a energy source for any such propulsion. The materials needed to build a space crafts shell are a equally great technology to gravity sources themselves: A shell will require to be a dense-compressed-'perfect magnetic equilibrium' graviton structure (to both block and retrieve intercepting Gravitons (else; will be microwave-ovened by Gravitons (at speed (a dense high frequency Graviton emition will be intercepted as a equally dense incredibly high frequency Graviton interception (to create/induce incredible current/damage)))).

If the shell did/could inhibit gravitons - the shell would have a different kinetic velocity to the craft: The shell would break. Stimulating the shells e-gravitons will counter this effect.

COFUTER_SIMULATION

A incredibly simple mathematical model may be written based upon a single graviton. I shall only refer to gravitons throughout this section, where as everything throughout this description the same equally applies to 'egravitons'

(forever dividable or not).

It should not be assumed gravitons are large, for a computer simulation that may be written. A real/true simulation/replication of a single hydrogen atom is beyond the capability of todays computers.

For such a simulation to be even crudely processable today only generalizations of graviton structures (atoms (groups of billions of gravitons)) may be evaluated (is still beyond todays computers (a single smallest generalization will be too inaccurate (it has been too generalized)).

Only groups of gravitons could be evaluated / consequentially never knowing their true properties.

A computer simulation can begin to be written based upon a single gravitons estimated magnetic polarity. A graviton shall initially be assumed to have a kinetic-density and a magnetic-polarity) where a graviton has a external e-graviton field.

By singularly stating 'write a simulator based upon a tiny Preachable sphere shaped permanent magnet' will describe the whole (and more) of the 'most accurate' e-graviton structures/emitions/inductions/attractions/repulsions scenarios / planetary itself/orbit rotations... of that described herein.

Basic/Inaccurate computer-simulatable, class structures:

-48 class graviton { - double density // kinetic / internal e-graviton property.

) double polarity // magnetic field strength property.

double decay // exponential field decay of polarity.

} To become (polarity is density): class graviton double polarity // magnetic/kinetic property ratio.

double decay // exponential field decay of polarity.

} To become: class graviton { double spherical // spherical_volume; scalar of following properties: double polarity // magnetic/kinetic property ratio.

double decay // exponential field decay of polarity.

double orientation// current 'Global relative' orientation of polarity double velocity // current 'Global relative' velocity of graviton.

double trajectory // current 'Global relative' trajectory of graviton.

do'ib1e position // current 'Global relative' coordinate [x.y.z] } Implemented as: #define polarity.999 // ?≥.999'magnetic'; ?≤. OOl'kinetic-density'.

define decay ^3 // ?≥^3 i ?-≥ a tiny magnetic field decay.

class graviton double orientation// current 'Global relative' orientation of polarity double velocity // current 'Global relative' velocity of graviton.

double trajectory // current 'Global relative' trajectory of graviton.

double position // current 'Global relative' coordinate [x.y.z] } i graviton structure[1000000000] // lOOOCube Array of gravitons.

/* spherical volume is irrelevant 'it is polarity field decay'; gravitons/e-

gravitons persistently decay(forever break-down to create/emit tinier egravitons) to 1/infinity; todays computers could not handle to process such tiny (1/tillion) e-graviton particles individually; such as why [polarity] here basically/inaccurately singularly consists a magnetic and kinetic property (it incredibly inaccurately generalists upon Billions of independent orientated/trajectory/resultant_effect e-gravitons, to which consist/result_of a single 'graviton '). [In actuality magnetic-force and kinetic-density (polarity) of any *graviton decays_beyond/covers the entire Universe, however a gravitons polarity decays super_exponentially it will resultantly be unnoticeably detectable on a 'other side of the universe' (aswell as possibly/or_not having combined 'into' intercepted gravitons by this time)] */ A basic computer simulation will answer all questions, especially how gravitons interact with each other to form link states to form graviton structures.

Answering questions explicitly and accurately to that of that I have attempted to describe in these descriptions.

The scenarios I have described in this description are broad to aid a

persons self-perception/understanding of many perceptions Although I could re-

write this whole description both completely and accurately within a few pages, it

yields a problem to limit peoples self-perception to that of my own (a good and bad thing (I'd have singularly stated everything is forever dividable / e-graviton gravity)). Practically (todays computers) implemented as a cube array of at least lOOOxlOOOxlOOO randomly orientated gravitons (initialized where each graviton breaches each other very slightly):

-49 With no intercepting (!)gravitons to them (is at zero-Kelvin) y will settle to form a perfect graviton structure / with intercepting (!) gravitons to them they will unsettle to become a unstable 'natural'/lweak' : Jgraviton structure.

Then (in days): Graviton structures will be explicitly and accurately described, by the way- in which gra-itons interact with each other.

Gravity Interception/Emition will be explicitly and accurately described, by the way in which (e-)gravitons interact with graviton structures.

Graviton structures will be explicitly and accurately described, by the way in which gravitons interact with each other.

Magnetism/Induction/Conduction Interception/Emition will be explicitly and accurately described' by the way in which!gravitons interact with graviton structures.

A correct/true computer simulation: Gravitons may be explicitly and accurately described by the way in which gravitons are known to act with each other given how nature appears to operate. A computer model may be adjusted again and again (should employ a AI routine (especially if a certain pure or complex logic are required)), until the results of what a computer creates, reflects reality. A graviton properties will then be know: Magnetic-Kinetic_force / Complexness.

Then: To create/construct artificial materials.

To create/construct a true-perpetual 'kinetic force'.

To create/construct semi-perpetual safe (AC-!)graviton sources.

I have not / and do not intend to write a computer simulation; without resolving polarity, It is a waste of my time / I am currently still designing green' energy sources; as will become clear throughout the rest of the description

- 'green' energy is a greatly more important use of my time to a graviton simulation. If I were incredibly-ignorant and extremely-selfish I'd have completely completed a complete and correct computer simulation by Apr2002. Certainly to have resolved a great many more peculiarities to 'polarity'.

MAGNETIC_ENGINE

This whole description is written to validate 'permanent magnets' decay; to

show any machine claiming to retrieve energy from a 'magnetic field' is not a

perpetual machine.

See patents_pending: 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 1]' Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2l' These engines facilitate 'magnets'; where as described throughout, these magnets are a state of continues break-down (a 'incredibly high frequency'/' tiny density' active material): Resultantly, they are not a perpetual machine - They utilise!gravitons incredibly efficiently: Dependant upon implementation, they have a efficiency ratio much worse to 0.000043 (Force Recovered / Force_Available). Compared to a combustion engine they are incredibly efficient.

A graviton cannot be expressed as a energy (a graviton can never be measured), it can only ever be expressed as a magnetic force.

Given a supply of Earth materials these machines will run for as long as these materials existed: They can be re-magnetised at no cost (if needed), but when they deplete (the material disappears) the machine will no longer run.

[AC-!graviton (radio)active materials are easier to create to magnetic engines: They are fine in deep-space where radiation is rife; not on Earth where everything will 'quickly' break-down] A 'magnetic engine' singularly facilitates a biased magnetic field to create

a kinetic force. I had chosen to separate it into groups 'Type 1,2,3,(4)', to aid its descriptability - I believe a single primary Definitions will be too easily'and exploited. A 'Magnetic Engine'[Definitions]; being:

-50 1. A 'Shield': defined within Definition 2: Any combination of m=. erial(s) with magnetic properties or properties which inhibit, affect or change :a 'magnetic field'/'perceptive magnetic field'; to achieve a 'biased magnetic

'field'

2 A 'Biased Magnetic Field' defined within Definition 3: A 'shield(s)'

partially placed/rotated/traversed beside/between/around any number of any particularly arranged 'magnet(s)') the 'magnet(s)' magnetic field(s) becoming

biased between where the shield(s) are/is placed, to where it is not, beside/between/around these magnet(s); to create a mutually biased/fluctuating magnetic field between them - a coherent trajectory toward another 'magnet'.

3. A 'Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine': A mutual 'biased magnetic field'/'motion', between at least two 'magnetic field sources', where each magnetic

field source mutually attracts or repels greater to each other through a particular

direction-trajectory 'not passing through a shield', to any said particular trajectories equal-opposite countering direction-trajectory 'that passes through a shield'; to result a kinetic motion of either/any magnet(s)/shield(s).

A 'Type 1,2,3' engine is a inhibited/neutralised biased magnetic field.

A 'Type 3' engine is primarily a dynamo facilitated by 'Types 1,2,3,4'.

A 'Type 4' engine is a [not_Defined]-'velocity' biased magnetic field.

Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type_4' [A 'not-shielded' 'biased magnetic field'] :

Given a (!)graviton has a e-(!)graviton field (a interception bias is

achieved as a result of its velocity [as/see 'Gravity Attraction'/'Magnetism']): A high speed rotation 'ring magnet/material', rotating around a disc.,agnet/mze'a"; each mgnetise vertically or 'circular about their centre' (to achieve a always-mutual-attraction to each other (unless/where either the ring or disc magnet is a permeable material): To effect a biased attraction force -

between any point of the rotating 'ring magnet/material volume' toward the 'disc magnet/material volume' [equally/weakly implemented as a nonmagnetic ring / rotating around a non-magnetic disc; to achieve a graviton/gravity bias].

Any single point within the ring material will emit a biased (!)graviton attraction field (between its 'fore'/'aft' (!)graviton editions)

- to effect a biased/intercepting force/rotation of the disc_material (which will be caused to rotate a equal-opposite rotation-direction to the ring_material rotation-direction). That is, given 'perceptive' 'fore'emitted (!)gravitons are a greater attraction effect to 'aft'-emitted (!) gravitons: A tiny biased intercept-bias in favour of the disc_material rotating will occur.

Unfortunately, older phenomena] magnetic/induction resistances (in comparison to a said tiny rotation bias) will achieve a self rotation to not occur: This induction-current(magnetic resistance) must be perfectly facilitated (simply a current_output (to create a efficient dynamo), or used to create a secondary equal-opposite magnetic field to create a

active shielding (to create a kinetic engine)) to effect a biased rotation - gain to the engine Is a incredibly difficult implementation - magnetic engine.

Essentially; if all known magnetic resistance forces can be removed, the single force which would be left, would be a disc_material rotating a equal-opposite rotation-direction to the rotating ring_material (the intercept/rotation_force of the disc_material will be completely free (once a ring_material is 'up to speed')).

If active_shielding (and shielding of the machine itself -

to prevent the Earths/or_any external magnetic field inducing a magnetic resistance

into the rotating ring and disc) or efficient_dynamo can be efficiently implemented; any/all components/implementations, defined within Definitions defined for 'magnetic engines types 1,2' may be implemented (to ultimately create a efficient magnetic engine/dynamo).

Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type_3': When a conductor is made present to a iterating magnetic field: The

conductors magnetic field will self-break-down - at each iteration a iterating

magnetic field disappears.

While the magnetic field becomes exponentially weaker (it

deteriorates - it no longer has!gravitons intercepting it which created its !gravitons (it will self-create its own!gravitons for a incredibly brief time)) it will begin to randomly (graviton structure link states have a amplified effect toward slower(decaying) velocity!gravitons) create -AC-!gravitons (slightly randomly orientated!gravitons).

-51 A random induction is a electrical current. Thls self rdom-induction is a brief tiny electrical current induced into itself. As/is a AC!graviton interceptions - current may be taken from any point of the conductor.

A iterating magnetic field source creates a very efficient dynamo (a

iterating magnetic field source itself only occurs self-resistance (it does not

occur a resistance toward the 'induced conductor')): A efficient 'iterating magnetic field source' is a only requirement to create a perfect dynamo.

Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type_1,2 [Shield / Traversing/rotating materials]: Any stiff/dense supercooled material, such as: Stone / Metal / 'dense brittle Plastic'; may be effective - they are dense / already well constructed (stiff), and may cool to a near-perfect state (or attain local graviton structures of such states). Equally if such (supercooled) materials attain 'perfect' graviton links - gravitons may link where they are occupying the same space as each other (to create combined 'active_neutral polarity' gravitons) = a intercepting!graviton to many local graviton structures containing such 'active_neutral'-gravitons may accumulativly/ultimately be 'kineticaly-magneticaly' inhibited by them.

That is, removing external intercepting energy from any graviton structure will generally settle it (perfect it; resultantly make it brittle/stiff): Most supercooled materials will be ideal to inhibit intercepting!gravitons. A ideal material being a dense material which is already stiff/brittle at high temperatures. Ideal supercooled materials span: Diamond[stiff but not dense] -

Lead(pb)[dense but not stiff].

A diamond is stiff but not dense: It lets massive !gravitons pass though it 'photons'. 'Mass' is not 'density': One ton of glass would not inhibit photons to greatly, yet a gram of lead will completely inhibit photons: A dense weak graviton structure (Lead(pb)) has locally accumulativly/stronger graviton links to that of a not-dense stiff/brittle graviton structure (Diamond): 'Density/Volume' is a dense/compressed graviton structure / mass' is awkward/irrelevant terminology. A; Lead(pb) is not stiff but dense: It inhibits most particles exceptions being tiny/magnetism!gravitons. A material which is dense and malleable may attain a greater proportion of perfect local graviton structures to that of a stiff/not-dense material: In the case of Lead(pb) it is known to be dense - where it and/or the main of its local graviton structures are then semi-

compressed: Semi-compressed graviton structures which are stable are certainly near-perfect graviton structures (incredibly stiff) (else they would be radio-

active materials (not contain their [density/volume] (the greater the [density/volume] of a material the greater the strength between its graviton links / the greater magnetic link repulsions capable of being achieved (graviton/structures would/do greatly 'emit' if not near-perfect) )).

A ideal material therefore being more dense than stiff -preferably both (supercooled Lead(pb)).

Incredibly weak materials: Molten dense materials Lead(pb)' may achieve a like task; its dense array of constructing-particles with posses extreme random polarity-orientations / trajectories / velocities; causing any intercepting!graviton to lose its kinetic-density and polarity(orientation) to it (a intercepting graviton 'could not' have its kinetic-density relayed though such a material (if such a material could be made to become so energetic - without becoming less-dense(expanded)).

A dense metal heated by DCurrent, being a near-

efficient practical implementation. Provided the machine is well insulated little current will be wasted to keep its temperature ('gravitons to thermal-particles, will emit/bombard their way through the insulation = resistance = inefficient). The metal being at the brink of actually being molten / molten(being housed in a supporting material (the 'magnetic field source' being shielded by this material

obviously being a electromagnet (else a impossibly insulated permanent magnetic)).

[I do not know if molten Iron is magnetic - if it is not, then a magnetic field may equally be inhibited from passing though it]

A ideal dense shield material will be to create a artificially denser material from a/any already dense/any material [Lead(pb)]; created by any/either combination of 'poor' methods: Make a dense material molten to then compress it with extraordinary pressure whilst it is molten - for it to be continued to be compressed while it cools - to ultimately form a artificially dense material.

-52 Supercooling a dense material - to then tacitly surround it by a super-dense-strong material, such to prevent the -supercooled material expanding as it warms = Intercepting (!)gravitons to the post . Jsupercooled material (are what raises its 'temperature'/'disturbs it') may be forced to link to its graviton_structure/material (its graviton structure is unstable - larger!gravitons will be unable to relay through it - due to its activeness/instability (inhibiting a relay is absorbing a intercepting!graviton)).

Heating a material within a extremely strong surrounding material, such that the intercepting massive_!gravitons (thermal-

particles) are forced to combine with the heated material as/where the material is restricted from expanding its volume = intercepting massive_!gravitons will be inhibited from unstablising the intercepted materials gra-viton structure - equally therefore inhibiting them (to be absorbed and compressed into its structure) = to persistently increase the intercepted materials density/denseness [problem is the surrounding material will become heated, aswell to ultimately shattering] Supercool a dense material then/whilst heating a equally dense material surrounding it (it being surrounded by a incredibly strong containment structure itself)(where a thermal insulator May' be between these materials); such that a persistent expansion-compression can occur toward the cooled(already denser) material.

Each material, when implemented as a shield, will be supercooled to increase its density/volume ratio (make it denser). Almost certainly to then inhibit intercepting!gravitons: Radio_AC-!gravitons are big!gravitons -

they are inhibited by natural Lead(pb) - a compressed and supercooled Lead(pb) will certainly be able to inhibit!gravitons tinier to radio_!gravitons to it.

Massive_!gravitons attain a strong perfect magnetic equilibrium- they may eJal7y act 25 a 'shield'/'traversingrotating magnet' however they may be to tiny / not enough of them, to completely achieve this. A million-turnneutrally wound (superconducting-wire) powerful-DC-electromagnet 'may' achieve a slight shielding. MAGNETIC_ENGINE_TYPE_1

These definitions (originally filed (10-Oct-02; 18-Nov-02) as 'Claims' for

patent pending-'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 1]' (I made a mistake to describe a single superior machine - making these 'claims' invalid)) have been written to a perspective of a engineer in a respective field. They depict a hundred alternate

machine (as said - describing a single machine is futile).

I have appended graviton notation into definitions where appropriate ('shield' / 'lamination' definitions). I have appended 'iterating dynamo' definitions (its description/drawing originally filed '15-Ju7-02').

These definitions are completely self descriptive, however said patent_pending -'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 1]' may be read to perceive it from a perception of a single machine: Major components of it are illustrated in 'Drawings Page 2'.

Else, you may read these definitions as they are, to appreciate a hundred alternate machine I depict.

DEFINITIONS

1. A magnetic engine, utilising a mutually biased magnetic fields of a

magnet(s), by way of a shield(s), toward a magnet(s), to create a mutual magnetic propulsion / consistent kinetic motion, between the magnets and/or shield(s); A friction free (iterating) embedded dynamo/alternator; A friction free embedded magnetic bearing) Latches, A non-chemical 'latched' bond between machine components; A machine housing, A non chemical 'latched' bond to the machines components, possessing a vacuum internal to it.

2. A 'Shield' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Any combination of material(s) with magnetic properties or properties which inhibit, affect or change a 'magnetic field'/'perceptive magnetic field'; to

achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field/source'.

3. A 'Shield' defined in Definition 2: Any 'dense and/or stiff/brittle' and/or supercooled / any material with a perfect/near-perfect magnetic equilibrium; acting to inhibit/partially-inhibit!gravitons from passing through it.

-53 4. A 'Shield' defined in Definition 3: A artificially dense material, created by any combination of methods described in 'Magnetic Engine I; such to Create a denser material to a materials original density/denseness; where such a material may have originally been Lead(pb) / gold / any pre-dense material / any material which will compress to a attain a great density/denseness.

5. A 'Shield' defined in Definitions 2,3,4: Any dense molten/near-molten material; where the material may/may-not be electrically heated which may/may-not be a electromagnet which may/may-not be wound to achieve a neutral magnetic field;

acting to inhibit/partially-inhibit!gravitons from relaying/passing through it.

6. A 'Shield' defined in Definition 2: A 'apparently not magnetic' material and/or any conductor/material or composite material; acting to create-emit a equal(antiferromagnetic)-opposite(ferromagnetic) magnetic field, to create a

actual neutral magnetic field of the material) the gain of the material solely

being to weakly inhibit/re-trajectorise [by local graviton structure re-

emitions/re-trajectorising / partial absorption] intercepting!gravitons.

7. A 'Shield' defined in Definition 2: Either or any combination of materials: ferromagnetic / antiferromagnetic / diamagnetic / permeable / electromagnetic / magnetic material(s); where each material acts to neutralist a magnetic field by placing a exact fixed amount of it beside/between a magnet(s), to

achieve a neutralization at a given distance away from the shieldedmagnet(s); by the material having or producing a equal-opposite/unlike magnetic field to each

respectful magnet(s) it is placed beside/between.

8. A 'Shielded Magnet' defined within Definition 7: A (superconductor) electromagnet wound/consisting a 'source magnetic field winding' and 'shield À

winding', to achieve a self shielded electromagnet, that may or may not be wound-

over a core.

9. A 'Shielded Magnet' defined in Definitions 3,5,7,8: Massive!Gravitons created in the coils wire, acting to inhibit!gravitons from passing through them; where the electromagnet(s) (superconductor)coil(s) may/maynot be (highly)wound to achieve a actual neutral magnetic field to act to only inhibit intercepting

!gravitons. 10. Any 'Magnet' / 'Magnetic Field Source / Material' defined in/within

any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A or any number of any particularly arranged/combination of permanent magnet(s) / electromagnet(s) / superconductor(s) / magnetic material(s) / any direct/indirect magnetic field source(s); a

electromagnet' being wound respectfully to any magnetic field described for a

magnet'. 11. A 'Biased Magnetic Field' defined within any preceding/proceeding

Definition(s): A 'shield' placed beside a 'magnet', where the shield partially surrounds the magnet; the magnets magnetic field becoming biased between where the

shield is placed, to where it is not, around the magnet.

12. A 'Biased Magnetic Field' defined within any preceding/proceeding

Definition(s): A 'shield' placed between 'magnets', where the shield partially surrounds between these magnets; the magnets magnetic fields becoming biased

between where the shield is placed, to where it is not, between these magnets.

13. A 'Biased Magnetic Field' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding

Definition(s): A Tshield(s)' partially placed beside/between/around any number of any particularly arranged 'magnet(s)'; the magnet(s) magnetic field(s) becoming

biased between where the shield(s) are/is placed, to where it is not, beside/between/around these magnet(s).

14. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A mutual 'biased magnetic field' / motion,

between at least two 'magnetic field sources', where each magnetic field source

mutually attracts or repels greater to each other through a particular direction-

trajectory not passing through a 'shield', to any said particular trajectories equal-opposite countering direction-trajectory that passes through a 'shield'; a direction-trajectory bias having been created by a design-shape/placement of a shield(s) and magnets.

15. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definition 14: 'Magnetic field sources(s)' magnetized a unlike mutually-attractive pole to

each other, to achieve a attraction/propulsion between these magnets.

-54 16. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definition 14: 'Magnetic field sources(s)' magnetised a like mutuallyrepulsive pole to each

Another, to achieve a repulsion/propulsion between these magnets.

17. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definitions 15,16: 'Magnetic field sources(s)' magnetized a vertical direction 'up through

them', or circular about their centre-column; to achieve a like pole around a magnets side-circumference; to achieve a 'always' 'like/repulsive pole'/'unlike/attractive pole' toward another magnet(s).

18. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definitions 14 to 17': A mutually 'biased magnetic field' between a 'ring of shielded

magnet(s)'-'magnets' and a/any 'outer/inner/top/bottom surrounding 'e' ring magnet(s)'; where the 'ring of shielded magnets'-'magnets' are respectfully located at the 'ring of shields'-'outer/inner/top/bottom circumference(s)'; to achieve a mutually 'biased magnetic field'/propulsion between/of-the 'ring of shielded

magnet(s)' / 'ring magnet(s)'.

19. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definition 18: A 'ring of shielded magnets'-'shield(s)' being a shaped single solid shield structure; where the 'ring of shielded magnets'-'magnet(s)' are latched'/bonded/embedded into the shield; to achieve a solid shield/magnet structure. 20. A 'Consistent Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definition 19: Implemented equal-inversely, as/where the 'shield(s)' are latched'/bonded/embedded into a single solid shaped 'magnet' structure.

21. A 'Iterating Magnetic Field Source' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'shield' traversing/rotating before/around a dynamo magnet', such that a 'shield'-'not-shield(a gap)''shield'-'not-shield(a gap)'... will iterate/rotate before/around the 'dynamo magnet'; such that any single stationary point around/before a coherent trajectory from/through the dynamo_magnet/shield will notice a fluctuating/iterating magnetic field toward it.

22. A 'Iterating Magnetic Field Source' defined in Definition 21:

Implemented equally-inversely; a uniformly-separated/segmented-'dynamo magnet(s)' traversing/rotating before/around a stationary 'shield-gapshield-gap...' shielding; such that any single stationary point around/before a coherent trajectory from/through the dynamo_magnet/shield will notice a fluctuating/iterating magnetic field toward it.

23. A 'Iterating Dynamo' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A iiterating magnetic field source', where a rotating 'shield

protrusions/gaps' act as 'shield-gap-shield-gap...' iterating magnetic field source

toward a 'effector(s)' stationary-placed-(circling)surrounding it/them.

24. A 'Embedded Iterating Dynamo' defined in definition 23: 'Shield-

protrusions/gaps' created by protruding-vertically the 'top and/or bottom' of a ring of shielded magnets' 'inner and/or outer circumference(s)' of a 'magnetic engine'; where uniform holes are made into this shield / or only sections of a said shield are protruded with uniform gaps between them; where a 'iterating magnetic field source 'e' dynamo magnet' is located around the inner circumference of these

shields / the ieffector(s)' being located around the outer circumference of these shields, or vice-versa.

25. A 'Embedded Iterating Dynamo' defined within definition 23: 'Shield-

* protrusions/gaps' created by protruding-horizontally the 'inner and/or outer circumference' of a 'ring of shielded magnets' of a 'magnetic engine'; where uniform holes appear in the shield / or only sections of a said shield are protruded with uniform gaps between them; where a 'iterating magnetic field

source'-'dynamo magnet' is located below these shields / the 'effector(s) ' being located above these shields r or vice-versa.

26. A 'Dynamo Magnet' defined within definitions '23 to 25': A 'dynamo magnet being a ring or disc magnet; placed top / bottom / innercircumference / outer-circumference, around a respectful shieldprotrusions/gaps.

-55 27. A 'Iterating Dynamo' defined in definitions '23 to 26': A 'ring of shielded magnets' not facilitated as a 'magnetic engine', such that the 'ring of - hielded magnets' is only a 'ring of shields'; where a ring magnet(s) may/may-not be latched/bonded/embedded into it such that it may/may-not be supported by magnetic bearings; such that another mechanical component(s) may support and/or rotate the shield.

28. A 'Effector' defined within definition 23: A ring/arrangement of one to thousands of independently Insulated conductor(s), (to have a iterating magnetic field / electrical current induced into them) or 'traversing dYnamo(s)';

each placed a coherent trajectory toward a 'iterating magnetic field source'.

29. A 'Traversing Dynamo' defined within Definition 28: A 'traversing ring magnet' propelled/traversed 'back and/or forth' along/around a 'bar magnet bearing', by a respectfully magnetised 'iterating magnetic field source(s) '-

magnet(s) and/or 'shield(s)'; where the 'traversing ring magnet' induces a magnetic field / electrical current into a stationary conductive material (s) placed

around/beside it; the 'traversing ring magnet' and 'bar magnet bearing' being magnetised a like direction but not necessarily pole, the 'bar magnet bearing' acting as a friction free magnetic bearing toward the 'traversing ring magnet'; a/the 'iterating magnetic field source 'e' dynamo magnet' being magnetised

respectfully to propel a 'traversing ring magnet'; the 'bar magnet bearing' having a extended/biased length, such that it may propel a 'traversing ring magnet' back toward a/neutralised 'iterating magnetic field source'.

30. A 'Traversing Dynamo' defined in Definition 29: A 'traversing ring magnet' traversing along/around a 'bar magnet bearing' inversely implemented as a traversing bar magnet' traversing along/inside a 'ring magnet bearing'.

31. A 'Traversing Dynamo' defined in Definitions 29,30: A 'traversing ring/bar magnet' magnetised vertically, through its flat end points, to achieve a like pole around its circumference; the 'bar/ring magnet bearing' being magnetised a equal direction and pole to the 'traversing ring/bar magnet'.

32. A 'Traversing Dynamo' defined in Definitions 29,30: A 'traversing ring/bar magnet' magnetised circular about its centre-column, to achieve a like pole around its circumference; the 'bar/ring magnet bearing' being magnetised a equal direction but a opposite pole to the 'traversing ring/bar magnet'; where the traversing bar magnet'/'bar magnet bearing' is a ring magnet.

33. A 'Traversing Dynamo' defined in Definitions '29 to 32': A superconductor or antiferromagnetic 'ring/bar magnet bearing'; to achieve 'a electrical current to be induced into it' and/or 'a mutual like pole repulsion/support toward a traversing ring/bar magnet'.

34. A 'Traversing Dynamo' defined in Definitions '29 to 33': A 'traversing ring/bar magnet' prevented from being propelled into a 'iterating magnetic field

source' by a tiny (ring) magnet, placed at a respective end of a 'bar/ring magnet bearing', mutually repelling to a 'traversing ring/bar magnet'.

35. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined within Definition 1: A stationary magnetic field source(s) inducing a magnetic field / electrical current into a rotating

shield'; the shield inducing a magnetic field / electrical current into a

stationary conductive material(s) placed beside/around it; where the 'shield(s)' and/or 'magnetic field source(s)' are/are-not facilitated as/by a 'magnetic

engine'. 36. A 'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined within Definition 1: A rotating ring of shielded magnets' facilitated as/by a 'magnetic engine', where the ring of shielded magnets 'magnets' and/or 'shields' induce a magnetic field / electrical

current into a stationary conductive material(s) placed beside/around it/them.

37. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined within Definition 1: A rotating 'ring magnet(s) ' facilitated as/by a 'magnetic engine', inducing a magnetic field /

electrical current into a stationary conductive material(s) placed beside/around it/them. 38. A 'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined within Definition 1: Traversing / rotating 'magnetic field source(s)' facilitated as/by a machine/'magnetic engine'

for other purposes, inducing a magnetic field / electrical current, by its/their

traversing/rotation into a stationary conductive materials(s) placed beside/around it/them.

-56 39. A 'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined in/within any Or eceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'stationary conductive material' being a/any --conductive material' / 'component facilitated as/by a machine 'i where a conductive material(s) may/may-not be stationary.

40. A 'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator'/'Magnetic Bearing' defined within Definition 1: A stationary superconductor(s) / antiferromagnetic(s) / repelling-

magnetic-material(s) material placed beside/around a rotating/traversing magnetic component(s) required to be supported; the magnetic component(s) inducing a electrical current into the material(s) / the magnetic component(s) being mutually repelled/supported by the material(s).

41. A 'Embedded Magnetic Bearing' defined within Definition 1: A 'ring of shielded magnet(s)' 'magnet(s)' and/or 'shield(s)' mutually repelling to a 'ring magnet(s)' placed 'above and below their flat top and bottom surfaces' and/or around their inner andfor outer circumference'; to mutually support 'the ring of shielded magnets' / 'ring magnet(s)'; where any of the 'ring of shielded magnets' / ring magnet(s)' are/are-not facilitated as/by a 'magnetic engine'; 42. A 'Embedded Magnetic Bearing' defined within Definition 1: A magnet(s)' and or 'shield(s)' mutually repelling to a 'other magnet(s)', to mutually support each 'magnet(s)' / 'shield(s)' / 'other magnet(s)'; where any of the 'magnet(s)' / 'shield(s) ' / 'other magnet(s)' are/are-not facilitated as/by a magnetic engine'.

43. A 'Embedded Magnetic Bearing' defined within Definition 1: A rotating ring magnet(s)' facilitated as/by a 'magnetic engine '/' dynamo ', having stationary respectfully magnetism magnetic' / 'antiferromagnetic' / 'superconductor' ring magnet shaped material(s), placed 'above and below its flat top and bottom surfaces' and/or 'around its inner and/or outer circumference(s)'; to achieve a mutual repulsion/support between them.

44. A 'Embedded Magnetic Bearing' defined within Definition 1: Rotating / traversing magnetic field source(s) facilitated as/by a machine/'magnetic

engine '/' dynamo ' for other purposes / equally required to be supported, having stationary 'respectfully magnetized magnetic material' / 'antiferromagnetic material' / 'superconductor material' placed around it/them; to achieve a mutual repulsion/support between them.

45. 'Latches'/'Latched' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Machine components non-chemically bonded/'latched' together; each respective component(s) having equal and opposite latches set into them, to achieve each component(s) latching into each other components equal-opposite latch; these latches may be elliptical shapes of the components themselves or oddities sticking out of' or 'in to' these components; to a end to achieve a non-chemical 'equal-

opposite latched' bond between components.

46. 'Latches' defined in Definition 45: A '(ring of)shielded magnets' shield(s)' and 'magnet(s)' created with equal-opposite 'latches' set into them, such that a magnet may latch into a shields equal-opposite latch) these latches may be elliptical shapes of the magnets / shields themselves, or oddities sticking 'out of' or 'in to' these components; to achieve a non-chemical bond between the shield(s) and magnet(s).

47. A 'Machine Housing' defined in Definition 1: A non magnetic non electrically conducting material such as a plastic/Perspex or glass, with 'latches' internally inset/moulded into it, such that the machines components this housing supports latch into its latches; these latches may be elliptical shapes of the components themselves or oddities sticking 'out of' or 'in to' these components, to a end to achieve a non- chemical 'equal-opposite latched' bond between a machines components and housing.

48. A 'Machine Housing' defined within Definition 47: Manufactured to support its machines components by casting the housing material around the machines components; the machines components being supported by a temporary structure, while the housing is cast, the temporary structure being chemically/liquidly broken down once the machines housing has set poured into a tiny hole left in the machine housing.

-57 49. A 'Machine Housing' defined within Definition 48: A temporary eteriorating structure being a metal/other-material/[a high-temperatureresistant --3astic/material if a glass housing], chemically broken down by a chemical; where the machines components may be plated to protect them (if needed) from the chemical. 50. Any Magnetic / Permeable / Conductive component(s) defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Each magnetic / permeable / conductive component being laminated to reduce massive-!gravitons 'jumping'/'de-latching' to other neighbouring traversing/rotating magnetic / permeable / conductive components; to reduce magnetic resistances between them.

51. A 'lamination' defined within Definition 50: Implemented as the machine housing fully-thinly encompassing around stationary components it already supports/latches-to. 52. A 'Ring Magnet' defined within any preceding Definition: A 'ring magnet' equally being a 'ring of magnets'.

53. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in/within any preceding Definition: Not being a magnetic bearing, but a mechanical bearing; to achieve a small/light engine/dynamo. 54. Any preceding Definition(s): A 'Magnetic Engine / Dynamo/Alternator' machine implemented/created by any combination of individual components, configurations and implementations of those defined within these definitions.

Drawings Page 2' contains drawings of the most general luterpretation of these definitions. Each Figure facilitates any specific section of each single definition stated. Tiny triangles appearing in drawings indicate magnetization direction.

Drawing: View / Definitions.

[Figure_1] Section-plan(top)/section-side(bottom); Magnetic_Engine/Dynamo.

Engine 3,12,16,17,18,19; Dynamo 35; Bearing 41; Other 46,50,51 [Figure 2] Section plan; Magnetic_Engine.

Engine 7,12,15,16,17,18,19 [Figure 3] Plan; Magnetic_Engine incorporating a Iterating_Dynamo.

Engine 3,12,16,17,18,19; Dynamo 23,24,26 [Figure 4] Section side; Magnetic_Engine / Iterating_Dynamo of Figure_3.

Engine 3,12,16,17,18,19; Dynamo 23,24,26,28; Bearing 41 [Figure 5] Section side; Magnetic_Engine / Iterating_Dynamo of Figure_3.

Engine 3,12,16,17,18,19i Dynamo 23,24,26,28; Bearing 41 [Figure 6] Plan; Magnetic_Engine-Shield / Dynamo-Shield of Figures_3_4_5.

Dynamo 23,24/25,26,(27),28 -

[Figure 7] Side; Magnetic_Engine-Shield / Dynamo-Shield of Figures_3_4_5.

Dynamo 23,24/25,26,(27),28 [Figure 8] Plan(top/Side(below); ConductorEffector arrangement of Figures_3_4_5.

Dynamo 23,24/25,26,(27),28 [Figure 9] Schematic-Plan; Circular arrangement of Traversing_Dynamo-Effectors.

Dynamo 23,24,26,27,28; Effector 29,30,32,34 [Figure 10] Plan(top)/Section side(middle)/underside(bottom); Iterating_Dynamo.

Dynamo 23,24/25,26,(27),28 Components: [equal shading of a unmarked component to a marked component of a similar shape represents a like/equal component. Is individual drawing specific] [1] A ring magnet - biased to ring of magnets[2] by ring of shields[3].

[2] A magnet - of a ring of magnets - biased to magnet[1] by shield[3].

[3] A shield - of a ring of shields - facilitated as/by a magnetic engine.

[4] Dynamo - conductor.

[5] Magnetic bearing - ring magnet (mutually repel/support a secondary magnet(s)).

[6] Machine housing.

[7] Output spindle/bearing (a output drive shaft).

[8] Iterating dynamo - dynamo magnet.

[9] Iterating dynamo - shield (protrusion).

[10] Iterating dynamo - effecter (conductor or traversing dynamo).

[11] Traversing dynamo - ring/bar magnet bearing.

[12] Traversing dynamo - ring/bar traversing magnet.

[13] Traversing dynamo - surrounding conductor/pickup.

[14] Traversing dynamo - tiny 'stop' ring magnet.

[15] Iterating dynamo - magnetic input spindle (a input drive shaft).

-58 MP TIC_ENGINE/DYNAMO_TYPE_2

N : J These definitions (originally filed (10-Oct-02; 18-Nov-02) as 'claims' for patent_pending-'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2]' (I made a mistake to describe a single superior machine - making these 'claims' invalid)) have been written to a perspective of a engineer in a respective field. They depict a hundred alternate

machine (as said - describing a single machine is futile).

I have appended graviton notation into definitions where appropriate ('traversing/rotating magnet' / 'lamination' definitions).

These definitions are completely self descriptive, however said patent pending -'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2]' leeway be read to perceive it from a perception of a single machine: Major components of it are illustrated in 'Drawings Page 3'.

Else, you may read these defluitions as they are, to appreciate a hundred alternate machine I depict.

DEFINITIONS

1. A magnetic engine, utilising a mutually 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field' of a 'magnetic field magnet' by way of a 'traversing/rotating magnet' toward

a 'affected magnet', to create a mutual magnetic propulsion / kinetic motion, between a 'affected magnet' / 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source'; A

equalising of magnetic resist-return forces made present to a 'rotating/traversing magnet' traversing/rotating into/within a 'magnetic field magnet'; A spindle

structure, consisting/encompassing many components into its structure, such as magnetic gear(s) / bearing(s); A embedded friction free dynamo/alternator; A embedded friction free magnetic gear; A embedded friction free magnetic bearing; A rotary solenoid, Rotates a spindle back and forth, to a given arc, via a alternating electrical current; A efficiency learning computer program, A self learning system that learns and sets a machines most efficient settings; Latches, A non-chemical 'latched' bond between machine components; A machine housing, A non chemical 'latched' bond to the machines components, possessing a vacuum internal to it. 2. Any 'Magnet' / 'Magnetic Field Source / Material' defined in/within

any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A or any number of any particularly arranged/combination of permanent magnet(s) / electromagnet(s) / superconductor(s) / magnetic material(s) / any direct/indirect magnetic field source(s); a

electromagnet' being wound respectfully to any magnetic field described for a

magnet' 3. A 'Magnetic Field Magnet' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding

Definition(s): A or any number of any particularly arranged/combination of permanent magnet(s) / electromagnet(s) / superconductor(s) / magnetic material(s) / any direct/indirect magnetic field source(s); where any point around the source

magnet(s) / within its/their magnetic field(s), 'is a' 'magnetic field magnet(s)'.

4. A ' Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A or any number of any particularly arranged/combination of permanent magnet(s) / electromagnet(s) / superconductor(s) / magnetic/material(s) / any direct/indirect magnetic field source(s); in the case

of a permanent/electric magnet, it being magnetised/wound to respect the magnetic field direction of the 'magnetic field magnet' it is traversing/rotating

into/within/with, being magnetized a unlike pole to it.

5. A 'Affected Magnet' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A or any number of any particularly arranged/combination of permanent magnet(s) / electromagnet(s) / superconductor(s) / magnetic material(s) / any direct/indirect magnetic field source(s) / conductive material(s) / 'traversing

dynamo(s)'; in the case of a permanent/electric magnet, it being magnetised/wound to respectfully and efficiently attract/repel to a 'magnetic field magnet' /

traversing/rotating magnet'.

6. A 'Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in Definition 4: Any combination of material(s) with magnetic properties or properties which inhibit, affect or change a magnetic field / perceptive magnetic field; to achieve a

biased/fluctuating magnetic field/source'.

7. A 'Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in Definition 6: Any 'dense and/or stiff/brittle' and/or supercooled / any material with a perfect/near-perfect magnetic equ-' bum.; acting to inhibit/partiallyinhibit!gravitons from passing through it.

-59 8. A 'Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in Definition 7: A artificially condense material, created by any combination of methods described in 'Magnetic --'Engine'; such to create a denser material to a materials original density/denseness; where such a material may have originally been Lead(pb) / gold / any pre-dense material / any material which will compress to a attain a great density/denseness. 9. A 'Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in Definition 7,8: Any dense molten/near-molten material; where the material may/may-not be electrically heated which may/may-not be a electromagnet which may/maynot be wound to achieve a neutral magnetic field; acting to inhibit/partially-inhibit!gravitons from

relaying/passing through it.

10. A 'Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in Definition 7: A 'apparently not magnetic' material and/or any conductor/material or composite material; acting to create-emit a equal(antiferromagnetic)opposite(ferromagnetic) magnetic field,

to create a actual neutral magnetic field of the material; the gain of the material

solely being to weakly inhibit/re-trajectorise [by local graviton structure re-

emitions/re-trajectorising / partial absorbing] intercepting!gravitons.

11. A 'Traversing/Rotating Magnet' defined in Definition 7: Either or any combination of materials: ferromagnetic / antiferromagnetic / diamagnetic / permeable / electromagnetic / magnetic material(s); where each material acts to neutralism a magnetic field by placing a exact fixed amount of it beside/between a

magnet(s), to achieve a neutralization at a given distance away from the shielded magnet(s); by the material having or producing a equalopposite/unlike magnetic field to each respectful magnet(s) it is placed beside/between.

12. A 'Rotating Magnet '/' Gap Magnet' defined within Definition 11: A (superconductor) electromagnet wound/consisting a 'source magnetic field

wincing '=' gap magnet' and 'shield wincing'=' rotating magnet', to achieve a self shielded electromagnet, that may or may not be wound over a core.

13. A 'Rotating Magnet' defined in Definitions 7,8,12: Massive!Gravitons created in the coils wire, acting to inhibit!gravitons from passing through them; achieved by way of their/eachs perfect magnetic equilibrium; where the electromagnet(s) (superconductor)coil(s) may/may-not be (highly)wound to achieve a actual neutral magnetic field to act to only inhibit intercepting!gravitons.

14. A 'Magnetic Field / Rotating / Affected Magnet(s)' defined in

Definitions 3,4,5: One or more holes bored into a ring magnet, each bored hole is a magnetic field magnet'; the ring magnet being magnetised circular about its

centre-column to achieve a like pole around its inner-circumference, a 'rotating magnet(s)' and 'affected magnet(s)' being magnetized respectfully; a 'rotating magnet' being a near equal volume to each 'magnetic field magnet'; a 'affected

magnet(s)' being propelled around the inner circumference of the ring magnet; to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field/source' / 'kinetic motion'.

15. A 'Magnetic Field / Rotating / Affected Magnet(s)' defined in

Definition 14: The ring magnet being magnetised either vertically / 'circular about its centre-column' / any direction/pole, a 'traversing/rotating magnet(s)' and affected magnet(s)' being magnetized respectfully; a 'affected magnet(s)' being propelled around either/any inner/outer/top/bottom circumference(s) of the ring magnet; to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field/source' / 'kinetic motion'.

16. A 'Magnetic Field / Rotating / Affected Magnet(s)' defined in

Definitions 3,4,5: A rotating 'magnetic field magnet' - magnetic field source,

having a 'rotating magnet' 'latched'/bonded partially around it, or viceversa; the magnetic field magnet' being magnetised either vertically / circular about its

centre-column, to achieve a like pole around its circumference to always attract or repel to a respectfully magnetized 'affected magnet'; to achieve a biased/fluctuating magnetic field/source' / 'kinetic motion'. 17. A 'Magnetic Field / Traversing/Rotating Magnet(s)' defined in

Definitions 3,4,5: A 'magnetic field magnet(s)' - magnetic field source(s) , having

a 'traversing/rotating magnet' traversed/rotated into/beside/around it/them; to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field/source'.

-60 18. A 'Magnetic Field / Rotating / Affected Magnet(s)' defined in

Definition 16,17: A 'magnetic field magnet' magnetized to always attract to a

I-- respectfully magnetized 'affected magnet'; the 'rotating magnet', if not a superconductor or other material, being magnetised a unlike pole to the 'magnetic field magnet'.

19. A 'Magnetic Field / Rotating / Affected Magnet(s)' defined in

Definition 16,17: A 'magnetic field magnet' magnetized to always repel to a

respectfully magnetized 'affected magnet'; the 'rotating magnet', if not a permeable or other material, being magnetized a unlike pole to the 'magnetic field

magnet'. 20. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'traversing/rotating magnet' traversed/rotated into/within/with a 'magnetic field magnet', to create a mutually

fluctuating magnetic field between them ('magnetic field

magnet '/' traversing/rotating magnet') - a coherent trajectory toward a 'affected magnet'. 21. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field' defined in Definition 20: A

traversing/rotating magnet' traversed/rotated into/within/with a 'magnetic field

magnet', to create a 'any direction/pole orientated' 'magnetic field magnet'

becoming biased to/by: A 'unlike pole orientated' / 'permeable' 'traversing/rotating magnet', to achieve a neutralization between them toward a 'affected magnet'; A 'superconductor'/'neutralising'/'dense'/'near/perfect magnetic equilibrium' 'traversing/rotating magnet', to achieve a repulsion and/or neutralization, of a 'magnetic field magnet' - toward a 'affected magnet'.

22. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field Source' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'traversing magnet' traversed 'into' and 'out of' a 'magnetic field magnet', to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field', by

either: a solenoid; a gear-to-connection-rod system translating a rotation motion into a traversing motion.

23. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field Source' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'rotating magnet' rotated 'into' and 'out of' a 'magnetic field magnet', to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field', by

either: a continual rotation; a rotating arm/drive; a 'rotary solenoid' / a spindle structure'.

24. P 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field Source' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'rotating magnet' rotated around a 'magnetic field magnet' - magnetic field source, to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic

field', by either: a continual rotation; a 'spindle structure'; a 'rotary

solenoid'; a elliptical gear system; a gear-to-connection-rod system translating a rotation motion, into a traversing motion, into a backforth rotation motion.

25. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field Source' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'rotating magnet' rotated within a 'magnetic field magnet', to achieve a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field', by either: a

continual rotation; a 'spindle structure'; a 'rotary solenoid'; a elliptical gear system; a gear-to-connection-rod system translating a rotation motion, into a traversing motion, into a back-forth rotation motion.

26. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field Source' defined within any

preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'rotating magnet' ' latched '/bonded to, and rotated with, a 'magnetic field magnet' - magnetic field source, to achieve a

biased/fluctuating magnetic field', by either: a continual rotation; a 'spindle

structure'; a 'rotary solenoid'; a elliptical gear system; a gear-toconnection-

rod system translating a rotation motion, into a traversing motion, into a back-

forth rotation motion.

27. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field Source' defined in Definitions

22 to 26': A 'affected magnet(s)' directly/indirectly providing the kinetic force to drive a mechanical component(s) that traverse/rotate a 'traversing/rotating magnet(s)'; where a mechanical component(s) acting to traverse/rotate a traversing/rotating magnet' has/has-not been derived through a gear/drive ratio.

-61 28. A TKinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'affected magnet' propelled toward and/or - away from a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source(s)', where the 'affected

magnet' will pass a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source' by the

biased/fluctuating magnetic field source' fluctuating to a neutralized magnetic

field.

29. A 'Kinetic Motion'/7Magnetic Engine' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'affected magnet' propelled following a circular path, toward and/or away from a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field

source(s)', where the 'affected magnet' will pass a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source' by the 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source' fluctuating to a

neutralized magnetic field.

30. A 'Kinetic Motion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'affected magnet' propelled 'toward and/or away from' a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source(s)'.

31. A 'Kinetic Llotion'/'Magnetic Engine' defined in Definitions 28,29, 30: Implemented equally and inversely as/where a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field

source' itself and/or a 'affected magnet' are the resultant 'kinetic motion(s)'.

32. 'Magnetic Resist-Return Equalisation' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'traversing/rotating magnet' operating/connected directly/indirectly to many other 'traversing/rotating magnet(s)', where each 'traversing/rotating magnet' is set equally out of phase to each other 'traversing/rotating magnet'; to achieve to equalise mutual magnetic resist and return forces incurred by a 'traversing rotating magnet' traversing/rotating into/within a 'magnetic field magnet', by way of any resist

force being countered by a return force (are undergoing a equal-opposite 'to cancel each others' force).

33. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A single unbroken piece of magnetic material, consisting a spindle/necks/teeth, is a whole single solid structure, magnetized a like direction/pole; to a end to create a magnetic gear with teeth which mutually repel to a adjacent magnetic gears teeth, to rotate it.

34. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definition 33: Magnetic material, magnetised a equal direction but a opposite pole to the gears structure, being latched'/bonded into the slots/gaps between each tooth, to create a magnetic gear with a north-south-noth-south... tooth arrangement; to a end to create a magnetic gear with teeth which both mutually attract and repel to a adjacent magnetic gears teeth, to rotate it.

35. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions 33,34: Implemented/consisting a repulsion or attraction disc/ring magnet(s) into its gear-structure; these magnet(s) being located either 'top and bottom' / 'midway' / 'distributed throughout the length' of each gear; to achieve a unwanted mutual 'attraction' or repulsion' between adjacent magnetic gears being neutralized by these inline countering/respectively magnetized disc/ring magnet(s).

36. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definition 35: A/the disc/ring magnets being magnetized either vertically / circular about their centre-column, to achieve a like pole around its/their outer-circumference; to achieve a always attraction or repulsion toward another respectfully magnetized disc/ring magnet(s), of a adjacent gear(s). 37. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions 33,35,36: Implementing teeth' set into a proximity to a adjacent gears teeth, such that a gears teeth may unintentionally clash with a adjacent gears teeth.

38. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions '33 to 36': Implementing teeth' set out of a proximity to a adjacent gears teeth, such that a gears teeth will never be able to clash with a adjacent gears teeth.

39. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions '33 to 38': A 'gear structure' magnetized vertically, through its flat top/bottom end points; to achieve a 'always' like-pole/repulsion and/or unlike-pole/attraction between its teeth / toward a adjacent magnetic gears teeth.

-62 40. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions 33,34,35,36,38,39: A 'gear :7 Structure' magnetized circular about its centre-column; to achieve a 'always' like-

pole/repulsion or unlike-pole/attraction between its teeth / toward a adjacent magnetic gears teeth.

41. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions 33,35,36,37,39: Implementing rounded 'teeth', such that a gear which rotates into a proximity to a adjacent gears teeth, will efficiently rotate together / each other.

42. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions 33,34,35,36,38,39,40: Implementing a sector-shaped 'teeth', such that a gear which rotates out of proximity to a adjacent gears teeth, will efficiently rotate each other.

43. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions '33 to 42': Implementing a neck' which is hollow or has holes drilled into to it, and/or kept very narrow/thin, to lessen repulsion/attraction forces between adjacent gears.

44. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions '33 to 43': Implementing a spindle' which is hollow / a tube/ring shape, to lessen repulsion/attraction forces between adjacent gears.

45. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions '33 to 44': A composite 'gear structure', such that a gears teeth / spindle / and/or tooths neck, are any combination of independent structures, each 'latched'/bonded together; to benefit a (perceptively) non-magnetic spindle/housing.

46. A 'Magnetic Gear' defined in Definitions '33 to 45': Implementing many magnetic gears' operating/connected equally out of phase to each other, and/or implementing many teeth; such that the greater number of teeth a gear has and/or the more gears operating/connected out of phase to each other - neutralize propulsion-vibrations between itself to/and other gears; achieved by way of any single vibration being countered by any other gear/tooth operating/connected out of phase to it (undergoing a equal-opposite force).

47. A 'Magnetic Gear '/'Embedded Dynamo' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definitions: Where any one magnetic gear/teeth is a magnet/magnetised material - another gear(s)/teeth maybe any magnet material / superconductor material / antiferromagnetic/permeable material; to achieve a mutual attraction/repulsion between them / a electrical current to be induced into the gear material.

48. A 'bedded Alternator' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Stationary conductive material placed 'in equal and opposite pairs '/' not in equal and opposite pairs' around a 'magnetic gear' which has alternating pole teeth.

49. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Stationary conductive material placed 'in equal and opposite pairs'/'not in equal and opposite pairs' around a 'magnetic gear' which has like pole teeth.

50. A 'Eoedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Rotating / traversing magnetic field source(s) facilitated as/by a

machine/'magnetic engine' for other purposes, inducing a magnetic field /

electrical current by its/their rotation/traversion into a stationary conductive material(s) placed beside/around it/them.

51. A 'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A stationary conductive material(s) placed into a proximity to a biased/fluctuating magnetic field source'; to achieve a iterating magnetic field /

electrical current to be induced into the material.

-63 52. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined within any preceding/proceeding petnition(s): A 'traversing ring magnet' propelled/traversed 'back and/or forth' along/around a 'bar magnet bearing', by a 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field

source'; where the 'traversing ring magnet' induces a magnetic field / electrical

current into a stationary conductive material(s) placed around/beside it; the traversing ring magnet' and 'bar magnet bearing' being magnetised a like direction but not necessarily pole, the 'bar magnet bearing' acting as a friction free magnetic bearing toward the 'traversing ring magnet'; a/the 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source' being magnetised respectfully to propel a 'traversing ring

magnet'; the 'bar magnet bearing' having a extended/biased length, such that it may propel a 'traversing ring magnet' back toward a/neutralised 'biased/fluctuating magnetic field source'.

53. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined in Definition 52: A 'traversing ring magnet' traversing along/around a 'bar magnet bearing' inversely implemented as a traversing bar magnet' traversing along/inside a 'ring magnet bearing'.

54. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined in Definitions 52,53: A 'traversing ring/bar magnet' magnetised vertically, through its flat end points, to achieve a like pole around its circumference; the 'bar/ring magnet bearing' being magnetised a equal direction and pole to the 'traversing ring/bar magnet'.

55. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined in Definitions 52,53: A 'traversing ring/bar magnet' magnetised circular about its centre-column, to achieve a like pole around its inner/outer circumference; the 'bar/ring magnet bearing' being magnetised a equal direction but a opposite pole to the 'traversing ring/bar magnet'; where the 'traversing bar magnet '/' tear magnet bearing' is a ring magnet.

56. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined in Definitions '52 to 55': A:, superconductor or antiferromagnetic 'ring/bar magnet bearing'; to achieve 'a electrical current to be induced into it' and/or 'a mutual like pole repulsion/support toward a traversing ring/bar magnet'.

57. A 'Embedded Dynamo' defined in Definitions '52 to 56': A 'traversing ring/bar magnet' prevented from being propelled into a 'iterating magnetic field

source' by a tiny ring magnet, placed at a respective end of a 'bar/ring magnet bearing', mutually repelling to a 'traversing ring/bar magnet'.

58. A 'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined in any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A stationary conductive material being a/any 'conductive material'/component facilitated as/by a machine; where a conductive material(s) may/may-not be stationary.

59. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A single/solid main magnetic spindle which has a wider diameter middle-section; 'surrounding ring magnets' act to mutually repel to both the spindles main body [a horizontal support] and its wider diameter middle-section [a vertical support], each ring magnet being placed above and below the spindles wider diameter middle-section / around the main spindles body; the surrounding ring magnets may/may-not be sectioned to aid assembly.

60. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definition 59: The 'wider diameter middle-section' being a 'ring magnet' with a slight-elliptical inner circumference; where a slight-elliptical anti-protrusion is turned into the 'main magnetic spindle'; to achieve a non-slip mechanical latch/bond between the I ring magnet' latching into the 'main magnetic spindle anti-protrusion'; the main magnetic spindle being frozen/contracted to aid its assembly; to achieve a easy/separate magnetization of these components.

61. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definition 59: The 'wider diameter middle-section' being a 'ring magnet' with a slight-elliptical inner circumference; where the main spindle is split into two separate sections, where one of these sections has a slight-elliptical anti-protrusion that the 'ring magnet' latches to/around; the other section screwing into the said section, to act to hold the ring magnet' between them; to achieve a easy/separate magnetization of these components. 62. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions 59,60,61: The 'main magnetic spindle' and 'surrounding ring magnets' being magnetised vertically to achieve a like pole around their circumference; the main magnetic spindle 'wider diameter middle-section' being magnetised a equal direction but a opposite pole to it.

-64 63. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions 59,60,61: A hollow 'main Acetic spindle' magnetised circular about its centretcolumn; its 'wider diameter aiddle-section' and 'surrounding ring magnets' being magnetised a equal direction but a opposite pole.

64. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'main magnetic spindle 'i surrounded by a 'surrounding ring magnet', acting to mutually repel/support the spindle [a horizontal support].

65. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A 'main magnetic spindle', which has slight antiprotrusions turned into/around it; the spindle being surrounded by a (superconductor-),surrounding ring magnet' with slight protrusions turned into its the surrounding ring magnets protrusions being inline to the spindles anti-protrusions, acting to mutually repel to the spindles antiprotrusions-protrusions [a vertical support] / each other [a horizontal support].

66. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions 64,65: The 'main magnetic spindle' and 'surrounding ring magnets' being magnetised vertically to achieve a like pole around their circumference.

67. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions 64,65: A hollow 'main magnetic spindle' magnetised circular about its centre/column; the 'surrounding ring magnets' being magnetised a equal direction but a opposite pole.

68. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions '59 to 67': A magnetic material magnetised 'a equal direction but a opposite pole' to the 'main magnetic spindle', placed / repelling to each end of the spindle [a vertical support].

69. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions '59 to 68': A 'surrounding ring magnet(s)' or 'main magnetic spindle', being stationary- fixed to a housing) to affect a either-or mutual magnetic bearing between them.

70. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in Definitions '59 to 69': A antiferromagnetic/superconductor 'magnetic spindle' or 'surrounding ring magnet(s)'; to achieve a mutual repulsion/support toward a respectful magnetised magnetic spindle '/' surrounding ring magnet(s)'.

71. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Rotating / traversing magnetic field source(s) facilitated as/by a

machine/'magnetic engine' for other purposes / equally required to be supported, having stationary 'respectfully magnetised magnetic material' / 'antiferromagnetic material' / 'superconductor material' placed around it/them; to achieve a mutual repulsion/support between them.

72. A 'Magnet/Magnetic Bearing'/'Embedded Dynamo/Alternator' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A stationary superconductor(s) / antiferromagnetic(s) / magnetic-material(s) material placed beside/around a magnetic spindle'/'traversing/rotating magnetic component(s)' required to be supported; the magnetic_spindle/component(s) inducing a electrical current into the material(s); the magnetic_spindle/component(s) being mutually repelled/supported by the material(s).

73. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A single piece of unbroken magnetic material' consisting any number of any components: 'magnetic bearing(s)'; 'magnetic gear(s)'; traversing/rotating magnet(s)'; 'affected magnet(s)'; 'magnetic field magnet(s)

- source(s)'; 'rotary solenoid(s)'; 'dynamo/alternator(s)'; elliptical gear/system. 74. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in Definition 73: Consisting: many rotating magnets' set equally out of phase to each other, to equalize 'magnetic resist-return' forces; a 'magnetic gear(s)'; a 'magnetic bearing(s)'.

75. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in Definition 73: Consisting: many affected magnets' set equally out of phase to each other, to correspond to its/their 'rotating magnets' 'spindle structure(s)'; a 'magnetic gear(s)'; a magnetic bearing(s)'.

-65 76. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in Definition 73: Consisting: 'magnetic -field magnet(s) - magnetic field source(s)'; a 'magnetic gear(s)'; a 'magnetic

Earing(s)'; where each 'magnetic field magnet(s) - magnetic field source' is

partially surrounded/biased by a 'rotating magnet' material 'latched'/bonded to it/them. 77. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in Definitions 74,76: A 'magnetic field

magnet(s) - magnetic field source', being ' latched '/bonded into a 'rotating

magnet(s)' 'rotating magnets spindle structure'.

78. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in Definitions '73 to 77': 'A single piece of unbroken magnetic material' being a 'latched/bonded composite structure'.

79. A 'Spindle Structure' defined in Definitions '73 to 78': Spindle structures operating adjacent to each other / equally implementing a 'magnetic bearing(s)'; sharing a single / solid / merged stationary-fixed 'surrounding ring magnet'-'magnetic bearing' - it being computer calculated to take into account the repulsion forces between each spindles respective 'main magnetic spindle (magnetic bearing)'; to achieve a single solid 'shaped surrounding ring magnet' supporting these spindle structures.

80. A 'Rotary Solenoid' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A electromagnet embedded into a preferably non magnetic non electrically conducting spindle, such as plastic/Perspex or glass, dependent upon implementation/efficiency metal; surrounded by a ring magnet sectioned into two sections, each of which is magnetised a respective direction but a opposite pole to each other; the electromagnets magnetic field acting as a magnetic propulsion and a

magnetic stop/buffer toward a ring magnet section; the electromagnet being powered by fly-leads or a commutator-brush, situated around the solenoids main spindle.

81. A 'Rotary Solenoid' defined in Definition 80: A 'ring magnet' sections magnetised circular to the ring magnets centre-column, a unlike pole to each other; to achieve a like pole around each sections inner circumference, of a unlike pole to each other; the 'electromagnet' being wound respectfully (its core will be parallel to the ring magnets inner circumference) to attract/repel to these ring magnet sections.

82. A 'Rotary Solenoid' defined in Definitions 80,81: A 'efficiency learning computer program' to efficiently power a rotary solenoid; where the rotary solenoid encompasses mechanical stops and a pickup microphone to enable a efficiency learning computer program to learn efficiently; where the mechanical stops and pickup microphone may be removed once a efficiency has been learnt by a said computer.

83. A 'Efficiency Learning Computer Program' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A computer program which learns to set/adjust a machine, to create a statistically perfect input/output energy ratio, to create a efficient machine; implemented as/where a efficiency learning computer program systematically iterates a machines settings until it returns a gain to a machines efficiency; where the computer program iteratively refines a refinement value to a smaller and smaller refinement value, such that as the computer program learns / makes efficient, it continually refines to tinier and tinier iterations / higher tolerances, to persistently / increasingly make efficient; as described/listed in following pages.

84. 'Latches'/'Latched' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Machine components non-chemically bonded/'latched' together; each respective component(s) having equal and opposite latches set into them, to achieve each component(s) latching into each other components equal-opposite latch; these latches may be elliptical shapes of the components themselves or oddities sticking out of' or 'in to' these components; to a end to achieve a non-chemical 'equal-

opposite latched' bond between components.

85. A 'Machine Housing' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): A non magnetic non electrically conducting material such as a plastic/Perspex or glass, with 'latches' internally inset/moulded into it, such that the machines components this housing supports latch into its latches; these latches may be elliptical shapes of the components themselves or oddities sticking out of' or 'in to' these components, to a end to achieve a non-chemical 'equal-

opposite latched' bond between a machines components and housing.

-66 86. A 'Machine Housing' defined in Definition 85: Manufactured to support to machines components by casting the housing material around the machines -components; the machines components being supported by a temporary structure, while the housing is cast, the temporary structure being chemically broken down once the machines housing has set - poured into a tiny hole left in the machine housing.

87. A 'Machine Housing' defined within Definition 86: A temporary deteriorating structure being a metal/other-material/[a high-temperatureresistant plastic/material if a glass housing], chemically broken down by a chemical; where the machines components may be plated, to protect them (if needed) from the chemical. 88. Any Magnetic / Permeable / Conductive component(s) defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definition(s): Each magnetic / permeable / conductive component being laminated to reduce massive-!gravitons 'jumping'/'de-latching' to other neighbouring traversing/rotating magnetic / permeable / conductive components; to reduce magnetic resistances between them.

89 A 'Lamination' defined within Definition 88: Implemented as the machine housing fully-thinly encompassing around stationary components it already supports/latches-to. 90. A 'Ring Magnet' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definitions: A ring magnet' equally being a 'ring of magnets'.

91. A 'Magnetic Bearing' defined in/within any preceding/proceeding Definitions: Not being a magnetic bearing, but a mechanical bearing; to achieve a small/light stable-mobile-engine.

92. A 'Dynamo/Alternator' defined within any preceding/proceeding Definitions: Implementing/consisting/embedding any 'dynamo'/'alternator' defined in/for definitions defined within 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 1'.

93. Any preceding Definition(s): A 'Magnetic Engine / Dynamo/Alternator' machine implemented/created by any combination of individual components, configurations and implementations of those defined within these definitions.

Any component/implementation/definition defined in/for definitions defined within 'Magnetic Engine'; 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 1 7; Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 2', and described within 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 1'; Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 2'; 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 3'; 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 4'; each being mutually aware of each others components/implementations, such to be able to coherently describe a said de-

grouped single 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo'. As/where this/a single coherent machine being singularly claimed in the accompanying 'Claims'.

-67 7 wings Page 3' contains drawings of the most general interpretation of these editions Each Figure facilitates any specific section of each single definition gtated. Tiny triangles appearing in drawings indicate magnetization direction.

Drawing: View / Definitions.

[Figure 1] Plan; Magnetic_Engine [1 of 8 connected 'out of phase' units].

Engine 11,14,25,27,29,88,(89) [Figure 2] Section / Plan; Magnetic Gear/Bearing / Dynamo arrangement of Figure_1 Dynamo 48; Gear 34,35,36,38, 39/40,42i Bearing 65,66,68,69,79 [Figure 3] Section / Sides Affected_Magnet Spindle_Structure of Figures_1_2.

Gear 34,35,36,38,39/40,42; Bearing 65,66; Spindle 75,88 [Figure 4] Section/ Side; Rotating_Magnet Spindle_Structure of Figures_1_2.

Gear 34,35,36,38,39/40,42; Bearing 65,66,(top 59,62); Spindle 74-32,88 [Figure 5] Section / Side; Direction-altering_Gear Spindle_Structure of Figure_2.

Gear 34,35,36,38,39/40,42; Bearing (top 60),(btm 61),62,68; Spl. 73,88 [Figure 6] Section-Plan; 'Out of proximity' Magnetic_Gears.

Gear 33,38,39,42,43,44 [Figure 7] Section-Plani 'In proximity' Magnetic_Gears.

Gear 34,37,39,41,43,44 [Figure 8] Schematic; Magnetic_Engine (arrows show resultant propulsion path).

Engine 6,17,18,22/23,29/30 [Figure 9] Schematic; Magnetic_Engine (arrows show resultant propulsion path).

* Engine 11,17,25,29 [Figure 10] Schematic; Effector_Engine (arrows show resultant propulsion path).

Engine 6,(left/mid 17,18,24),(right 16,19,26); Dynamo 52,53,54/55,57 [Figure 11] Section-Plan(top;middle)/Section-Side(bottom); Rotary_Solenoid.

Solenoid 80,81(mid/btm 82) Components: [equal shading of a unmarked component to a marked component of a similar shape represents a like/equal component. Is individual drawing specific] [1] Magnetic field magnet.

[2] Traversing/Rotating magnet.

[3] Magnetic field magnet - magnetic field source.

[4] Affected magnet.

[5] Affected magnet - output/connection/spindle.

[6] Dynamo - conductor - placed around a alternating magnetic gear.

[7] Magnetic bearing - main magnetic spindle.

[7a] Magnetic bearing - main magnetic spindle - section one.

[7b] Magnetic bearing - main magnetic spindle - section two.

[8] Magnetic bearing - main magnetic spindle - anti-protrusion.

[9] Magnetic bearing - surrounding ring magnet.

[10] Magnetic bearing - surrounding ring magnet - protrusion.

[11] Magnetic bearing - wider diameter middle section / ring magnet.

[12] Magnetic bearing - disc magnet.

[13] Gap filling magnet connection spindle.

[14] Magnetic gear - neck.

[15] Magnetic gear - spindle.

[16] Magnetic gear - tooth.

[17] Traversing dynamo - ring/bar magnet bearing.

[18] Traversing dynamo - ring/bar traversing magnet.

[19] Traversing dynamo - surrounding conductor/pickup.

[20] Traversing dynamo - tiny 'stop' ring magnet.

[21] Rotary solenoid - ring magnet section one.

[22] Rotary solenoid - electromagnet.

[23] Rotary solenoid - spindle.

[24] Rotary solenoid - ring magnet section two.

[25] Rotary solenoid - spindle with mechanical stop (exaggerated stop shown).

[26] Rotary solenoid - clash/clap pickup-microphone.

[27] Rotary solenoid - stationary mechanical stop.

[A] Magnetic gear - of a 'gap filling magnet 'e' spindle structure'.

[B] Magnetic gear - of a 'direction altering 'e' spindle structure'.

[C] Magnetic gear - of a 'affected magnet 'e' spindle structure'.

[N,S]Magnetic gear - alternating pole 'teeth'.

-68 Efficiency Learning Computer Program (references 'Drawings Page 3'): This computer program is intended to be finally run on a 8bit 'Z80 7type' microcontroller. It is: Very short, to keep memory refresh current to a minimum; Very un-intelligent and simple, to keep processing speed down, and therefore power consumption. It will be entirely encoded in assembly language.

The computer program operates by iteratively changing the values in learningArray[]. The values in the learningArray[] each represent a positive or negative current that should be output to a rotary solenoid coil [22] at a given degree that the affected magnet spindle [5] is currently at. Example: If learningArray[13] held value: -18, this would say: 'when the rotor spindle has rotated to a arc of 13degrees, output a current of -18 to the rotary solenoids coil 7. The continues iterative manipulation of these variables, given the ever increasing / decreasing (speed / power) of the affected magnet spindle [5], will effect the efficiently of the system, where if these manipulations/iterations return a gain in efficiency they are stored, else they are not. After a few weeks the program will stop learning (it will have exhausted all possible manipulations) where its best learning array will then become permanently fixed.

The learningArray[] is formatted fully populated, this is equal to starting from scratch, but inverse: Iterations will be forced to be removed, whilst 'good' ones remain, then as the [itn.dcAjetValu] decrements the bestest still remaining learningArray[] elements will slowly become refined.

As [itn.dcAjstValu] decrements each iteration will slowly become refined to a smaller and smaller step. Once this step count has reached '1', the revolutions over which to gather the outputWattage ([rev.set]) is increased (by a multitude of *2) ([itn.dcAjstValu] stays set at '1'), until [rev.set] reaches a preset maximum revolution limit (at which point the program will stop learning).

Magnetic resist-return forces made present to a rotary solenoid [F11] will be learnt by this computer program: A 'magnetic field

magnet'><'traversing/rotating magnet' return-force will 'return' the solenoid itself (requires little/no energy to be input to the solenoid / a induced current can be taken from the solenoids coil [22]).

OutputCurrentToSolenoids() outputs a (+/-) value to a DAC - connected to a amplifier - connected to a rotary solenoid coil [22].

OutputCurrentToSolenoids() output is present on the DAC until a new value (output by OutputCurrentToSolenoids()) is output (DAC is required to be buffered and held).

Gain setting of each ARC / DAC must be equal, they are evaluated together. Ports ADCPortl and ADCPort2 require to be buffered and held, such that a input value above Offh input into them, is limited / set to Offh ('Offh' is a required error code for such a input overflow on this 8bit port).

I have placed a great effort into making the computer program read easily, leaving the computer program to easily describes itself. I especially assume people in a science field will be fluent in 'C', to aid its self

description. Where assembly language appears I have written equivalent 'C+ +'

notation alongside as '// comments'.

/* Written by: Mark Andrew Newman Written to accompany definitions titled: 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [Type 2]' This little PCcompatible computer program has been written as a simulation program of a program intended to run on a 8bit microcontroller.

Errors will be output to LEDs on the microcontroller, and 'bit' buttons will be made present, so it may 'continue' and 'reset'.

This program handles errors through the standard error handling device (printer or screen).

This program is able to achieve a statistically perfect balance between outputWatt' age and the amount of power lost to coilWatt' age (efficiencySetting= 1).

This program could use a 180degree learningArray[] for a unit which consisted of just two gap filling magnets [2][F1] (9Odegree if four...).

The program will except two [efficiency] settings: #1 is very efficient; #2 outputs the most power (not efficient).

#define statements need to be user set; dependent upon mechanical

implementation. */

-69 # lude <iostream.h> Redefine ecdRes 360 // resolution of the rotary encoder per revolution #define solenoidsVoltage 12 // known output voltage to solenoids (integer) #define gainSetting 20 // gain settings ADCs / DACs are set at (integer) #define noGapFillingMagnets 2 // number gap filling magnets per ring magnet #define efficiencySetting 1 // determines which statistic to calculate [gain] #define ADCPortl 0 // 8BIT ADC port# << voltage output of dynamo #define ADCFort2 1 // 8BIT ADC port# << current output of dynamo #define DACPortl 2 // 9BIT DAC port# >> +/- current to solenoids #define IOPortl 3 // XBIT I0 port# << input from rotary encoder #define IOPort2 4 // 1BIT ID port# << input from clapper bool NeedToSync (); // wait rotary encoder to reach [0] to continue void DisplayError (); // error has occurred, stop, output description

bool EliminateClapping (); // try to recover from solenoid trouble void StoreBestIteration ()i // append best iteration made to learningArray[] void FormatLearningArray(); // get the unit up and running initially void ReInitialiseVaribles(); // re-initialise variables on a system reset void DisplayFinalStatistics(); // have finally fully built the learningArray[] void CheckEfficencyOfIteration(); // is this the best iteration of this scan so far void TakeAnotherIterationalStep(); // change iteration settings to evaluate another void OutputCurrentToSolenoids (short ins); // change or cut off power to solenoids bool ReadInputPorts_Encoder_Dynamo_Clapper(); // read: encoder, dynamo, clapper class bestItrn // variables store statistics of present effect the { // total combination of each element of the public: // learningArray[] has int revolution;// no. spindle revolutions data was accumulated over int angle; // [angle] of the last learningArray[angle] adapted double gain; // present efficiency gain of the learningArray[] double plain; // previous best efficiency gain double coilWatt; // coilWatt'age accumulated over [rev.set] rev's double outputwatti// outputWatt' age accumulated over [rev.set] rev's short int store; // previous learningArray[angle]s value short int type; // learningArray[angle]s adjustment refinement value }; bestItrn bit= {0,0,- 999999,-999999,0,0,0,0}; class iteration // variables store statistics for the being iterated { // and tested iteration being refined public: int type; // learningArray[angle] being refined value (+/-) int angle; // learningArray[angle] angle being adapted double gain; // resulting efficiency [gain] of this iteration.

unsigned int coilWatt; // coilWattage accumulated over [rev.set] rev's unsigned int outputWatt;// outputWattage accumulated over [rev.set] rev's short int store; // stores learningArray[angle] before refining int maxLimit; // max iterational limit of a learningArray[angle] int minLimit; // min iterational limit of a learningArray[angle] int dcAjstValu;// refinement value; decrements as learns, 0=stopped }; iteration itn= {-1,0,0,0,0,-255,255,-255,255}; class revolution // variables determine the number of revolutions { // over which to occur wattage totals for each public: // refinement iteration; rotary encoder position int set; // 'the' number of revolutions; sets [rev.counter] int counter; // decrementing counter, number revolutions passed short int position; // real-time position of rotor spindle (encoder) }; revolution rev= {25,0}; class error // error variables, re-synchronises the system after { // a error has occurred public: bool needToSync;// re- synchronises to rotary encoder unsigned int clap; // if set, a mechanical error/stop has occurred }; error err= {1, 0}; short int learningArray[ecdRes]; // 'the' learningArray[] unsigned short int solenoidVoltage= solenoidsVoltage* gainSetting; // a adjustment

-70 vc main() - - { FormatLearningArray() while (1) while (ReadInputPorts_Encoder_Dynamo_Clapper()) OutputCurrentToSolenoids(learningArray[rev.position]); if (NeedToSync()) continue; if ((!rev.position && itn.dcAjstValu) 11 err.clap) if (!rev. counter 11 err.clap) if (!err.clap) CheckEfficencyOfIteration(); else if (!EliminateClapping()) break) TakeAnotherIterationalStep(); rev.counter= rev.set; rev. counter--; }} DisplayError(); } void TakeAnotherIterationalStep() if (itn.type < 0) UP: learningArray[itn. angle]= itn.store; if (++itn.angle == ecdRes) if (bit gain > bit pGain) StoreBestIteration(); else if (itn dcAjetValu > 1) itn dcAjstValu--; else if (rev set < 10000) rev set*= 2; else DisplayFinalStatistics(); itn. outputWatt= itn.coilWatt= itn.angle= 0; itn.store= learningArray[itn. angle]; if ((itn.store+ itn.dcAjstValu) > itn.maxLimit) goto DOWN; learningArray[itn.angle]= itn store+ itn dcAjstValu; itn.type= itn. dcAjstValu; e{lse DOWN: if ((itn.store- itn.dcAjetValu) < itn.minLimit) goto UP; learningArray[itn.angle]= itn.store- itn.dcAjstValu; itn.type= itn dcAjstValu; } }

-71 vc CheckEfficencyOfIteration() if (efficiencySetting == 1) itn.gain= itn.outputWatt/itn.coilWatt; else if (itn.outputWatt ≥ bit.outputWatt) itn.gain= bit.coilWatt-itn.coilWatt; else itn.gain= -999999; if (itn.gain > bit.gain) { bit.pGain= bit.gain; bit.gain= itn.gain; bit.coilWatt= itn. coilWatt; bit.outputWatt= itn.outputWatt; bit.type= itn.type; bit.angle= itn.angle; bit.store= itn.store; bit.revolution= rev.set; } } void StoreBestIteration() { learningArray[bit.anglel= bit.store+ bit.type; } bool NeedToSync() { if (err.needToSync) if (rev.position) return 1; rev. counter= rev-.set; itn.outputWatt= itn.coilWatt= err.needToSync= 0; } return O; } bool EliminateClapping() { err.needToSync= 1; if (err.clap > 1) return 0; else return 1; } void ReInitialiseVaribles() { bit. coilWatt= 0; bit. outputWatt= 0; bit.store= 0; bit.pGain= -999999; bit. gain= -999999; itn.gain= 0; itn.coilWatt= 0; itn.outputWatt= 0; itn. angle= 0; itn.type= -1; itn.dcAjstValu= 255; itn.store=-255; rev.set= 25; rev.counter= 0; }

-72 vc DisplayError() OutputCurrentToSolenoids(0); if (err.clap > 1) cerr<<"The clapper reports a noise; Check unit"<<endl; else cerr<<"ADC gain set to high, DACs must equall ADCs"<<endl; cerr<<"press [C] then [return] to continue"<<endl <<"press [R] then [return] to reset"<<endli while (1) char a; cin>>ai if ( (a == 'c') 1! (a == 'C')) if (!itn. dcAjstValu) itn.dcAjetValu= l; break; if ( (a == 'r') 11 (a == 'R')) ReInitialiseVaribles(); FormatLearningArray(); break; }} err.needToSync= 1; err.clap= 0 } void FormatLearningArray() boot negative= 0; int angle, counter= 0; for (angle= 0; angle < ecdRes; angle++) { if (!counter) if (negative) negative= 0 else negative= l; counter= ecdRes/ (noGapFillingMagnets* 2) } counter--; if (negative) learningArray[angle]= -255; else learningArray[angle]= 255; }} void DisplayFinalStatistics() { itn.dcAjstValu= 0; bit.outputWatt/= bit. revolution; bit. coilWatt/= bit. revolution; cerr<<"Data accumulated over "<<bit.revolution<<" revolutions. " <<endl <<"Per revolution:" <<endl <<" outputWattage = "<<bit outputWatt <<endl <<" coilWattage = "<<bit.coilWatt <<endl <<" outputWattage gained = "<<bit.outputWatt- bit.coilWatt <<endl <<" overall efficency = "<<bit.outputWatt/ bit.coilWatt <<endl;

-73 b ReadInputPorts_Encoder_Dynamo_Clapper() I<> { I asm .y { mov dx, IOPortl; // DX= IOPortl; NO_UPDATE:

in ax,dx; // AX= ReadInFromPort(IOPortl); cup rev.position,ax; // if (rev. position == AX) je NO_UPDATE; // goto NO_UPDATE; mov rev position, ax; // rev.position= AX; sub eax,eax // AX= 0; mov dx,ADCPortl; // DX= ADCPortl; in al,dx; // AX= ReadInFromPort(ADCPortl); amp al,Offh; // if (AX == 255) jz ERROR; // goto ERROR; mov bl,al; // BX= AX; mov dx,ADCPort2; // DX= ADCPort2; in al,dx; // AX= ReadInFromPort(ADCPort2) amp al,Offh; // if (AX == 255) jz ERROR; // goto ERROR; mul bl; // AX= (AX* BX); add itn. outputWatt,eax; // itn.outputWattage+= AX; mov dx,IOPort2; // DX= 1OPort2; in al,dx; // AX= ReadInFromPort(IOPort2); and al,O0000OOlb; // if (BitZeroOfAXisSet()) nz CLPP_INCRMENT; // goto CAP_INCREMENT; mod err. clap,0; // err.clap= 0; jmp END; // goto END; CLAP_INCREMENT:

inc err. clap; // err. clap++; jmp END; // goto END ERROR:

mov itn.outputWatt,-1; // itn.outputWattage= -1; END: } if (itn. outputWatt == -1) return 0; else return 1; } void OutputCurrentToSolenoids(short int outputCurrent) { _asm sub eax,eax; // AX= 0; mov ax,outputCurrent; // AX= outputCurrent; mov dx,DACPortl; // DX= DACPortl; out dx,ax; // OutputToPort(DACPortl, AX); and ah,Olllllllb; // ResetSignBitOf(AX); mov dx,solenoidVoltage; // DX= solenoidVoltage mul dx; // AX= (AX* DX); add itn.coilWatt,eax; // itn.coilWatt+= AX; } } BLACK_HOLE

A black-hole is invisible (a photons density with respect to the blackholes dense gravity field - slows it back into the black-hole), possessing a intense

graviton field (all energy contained within the black-hole (that sucked up /

imploded) emits gravitons (gravitons can not slow gravitons - they escape) ).

Gravitons easily merge with each other / they can and do exist in the same space (they are only just magnetic-energy (a cricket ball is perceptively 'solid' only because of the many Millions of graviton/links which construct it - its solidity resulting from magnetic breach forces between all these constructing gravitons)).

-74 If they were pressurised enough, they could occupy the same space. If i_- I would hold a number of gravitons between my finger tips, their incredibly tiny (with respect to my massive finger graviton structures) magnetic polarity (which becomes exponentially present once the gravitons begin to breach each other) will require no effort for me to combine them [in actuality I compress a tillion gravitons into each other, just by pressing my fingers together].

Pressurising billions of gravitons into a equal space will require a great force: Before and while they are being compressed they will be forming (at a graviton velocity-speed) graviton structures (graviton structure graviton-links will magnetically repel to the idea of being broken (this will continuously occur as the gravitons are further compressed (they continually break-reform-break-

reform)): A great force will be required to compress them due to this forming-

breaking... of graviton structures while they are being compressed.

When compressed however: A golf ball could hold a galaxy, to self contain itself: A big-bang could provide enough force for this combination to occur: To result in a neutral black-hole.

A neutral black-hole would not emit gravitons (it will not have a graviton field), and be fully magnetically potentially neutral (each

graviton has neutralized each other (their density / magnetic force is still there)). In space it would resemble something which: Could never be seen, would not let light or anything though it; would rip though any object that intercepted it (assuming it is not perfect-perfect / its egravitons (kinetic-density) are free); would not combine with anything (it has a fully neutral magnetic polarity) Given objects are forever dividable - this object may be a tiny incredibly powerful graviton source (unless it can create/form a perfect-

perfect-perfect graviton structure).

A black-hole releases gravitons (to attract objects): This therefore, like any graviton structure, implies a state of weak magnetic equilibrium, therefore implying a fully mutual combinage does not occur, or only a amount of gravitons become fully compressed.

A theory for a black-hole can be described as: A star dies: As the star expands, energy at its centre will be forced to expand inwards (implode), the gravitons involved in this will have enough time to find / form a compressed graviton structure.

A compressed graviton structure achieves the self containment of itself (gravitons do not care if they have been compressed or not once compressed structure has been formed - they just relate to each other) Objects are attracted into the compressed graviton structure (due to its weak kinetic/magnetic equilibrium potential (it creates/emits gravitons)) The black-holes graviton field is so intense, objects undergo

compression into the compressed graviton structure.

A ' ultimate' / black-hole has a spin: The formed compressed graviton structure is of a moving one (the gravitons have found a stable graviton structure in which they are forced to run circles continually (generally following a rotation to that of its creator..)) A black-hole has a focused graviton field:

Gravitons are not emitted as they would in a normal object: The complex graviton structure the gravitons have formed to sustain a compressed graviton structure is somehow forcing gravitons out at a fixed location Gravitons may emit at varying densities around itself; resultantly intense graviton fields combine to form various combinations of

gravitons / 'gravitons / neutral-particles... Such that a single focus has been achieved by a weak-graviton edition point (gravitons emit all around a black-hole, but where its mouth is a lesser graviton source to that of the rest of itself = its mouths gravitons do not combine to form various particle-structures = to achieve gravity) A 'Graviton' is a 'Black-Hole' is a 'Graviton'; is a polarity: A black-hole is a 'perceptive' one-way spinning cylinder A attraction will occur between these cylinders, when they do not resist each others rotation: Side by side, orientated equal-opposite to each other They rotate together like gears.

Top to bottom; orientated equal to each other.

They rotate together like a joined cylinder.

A mutual affliction must propel these conflicting objects together.

-75 A repulsion will occur between these cylinders, when they do resist each others rotation: Side by side, orientated equal to each other.

--They do not rotate together like gears.

Top to bottom; orientated equal-opposite to each other.

They do not rotate together like a joined cylinder.

A mutual affliction must propel these conflicting objects away from each other.

Even if they had only initially breached each other a tiny amount, eachs respective force greatens exponentially inward: Provides a accumulating great affliction.

These scenarios of attraction and repulsion, fit magnetism_!graviton attraction/repulsion relationships (where a rotation confliction = a repulsion).

Where, although they are only schematic representations, they have been presented here to indicate a simple peculiar relationship exists between everyday objects: That a polarity may simply be a rotation direction of a graviton (determined by its (forever dividable) e-graviton structure (egravitons equally being rotating polarities)). E-gravitons are 'something' else they would be nothing: e-

graviton is a neutral density which may rotate (incredibly fast): Its density therefore being 'something'. [is a completely new science - it cannot be described as I have attempted to describe it] BIG_BANG

Big-Bangs: (we observe the known universe to expand, from a origin) Scenario one: 1. black-holes form.

2. black-holes big bang.

3. Goto '1'.

Scenario two: 1. black-holes form/grow.

2. black-holes decay - emit phenomenal amounts of energy.

3. Goto '1'.

Two black-holes attracting into each other head on, such that their respectful graviton structure spin (will be a opposing/opposite rotation direction to each other) neutralism one another (given the total energy contained in a black-

hole is also forced to rotate (it must be, it causes/emits a rotating/biased graviton field)).

This neutralization would leave their contents (of each black-hole (of the two involved)) to big-bang out (their graviton structures will be extremely breached (resultantly gravitons will begin to repel to each other until they begin to build another stable structure (by which time half of the gravitons may have escaped))). Any neutral black-holes (gravitons happily sharing the same space) that may have existed in the black-hole (prior to big-bang) will now also become breached, and lose their graviton structure containment.

A neutral black-hole may now form, due to the incredible implosive pressures involved.

A normal black-hole may now form, from these same implosive pressures.

Given black-holes may combine (they 'may' combine when their graviton structures are rotating a like direction (a black-hole will intercept a black-hole approaching behind it)) as well as big bang, will state the universe is constructed / consists of many sized black-holes.

A black-hole intercepting a black-hole from any orientation maybe enough force to disrupt each others compressed graviton structures. Also, each black-holes density would not have to be equal - a moderate local disruption would most probably unstable a whole black-hole graviton structure.

Given a 'black-hole' is a 'graviton' is a 'black-hole': A 'collision' 'big-bang' may not occur: The intercepting black-holes would be too dense and incredibly well constructed/linked, such that they only breach each other - to affect a magnetic effect' by way of eachs polarity/spin.

The effect of a 'big bang' would be: The tail/sides of a black-hole clusters and ejects graviton structures: A 'big bang' is a continual emitance of energy sucked into a black-hole.

-76 The mouth of a black-hole emits gravitons: These gravitons rui_'mately cluster to again create graviton structures.

A) Given the size of the universe, a statistical irregularity (a single ultimate incredibly massive black-hole) must: Be disruptable by a small black-hole (to big-bang).

Will ultimately find another equal size black-hole (to big-bang).

Exists, but emits energy (gravitons and graviton structures) back out - to again create life (they do not all naturally achieve this (they may become a perfect-permanent graviton structure)) The infinite universe would counter any statistical irregularity put toward it, as ultimately, any statistical irregularity will be rejected by the infinite space / energy of the universe: A single ultimate black-hole has a chance of 1/infinity of occurring (there is no chance at all): It will find another equal size black-hole over the infinite distance of space if it has to (to big-bang).

Eventually disperse its energy as gravitons: These will eventually cluster to form Planets/Objects and Stars. The formed Stars eventually becoming black-hole themselves.... [is a ever increasing creation of universes/galaxies - black-holes].

However, of these newly created black-holes / graviton sources: Half (all eventually) will propel objects back to the ultimate originating blackhole (general random orientations of created black-holes and other graviton sources, will ultimately end up propelling gravitons back to the original black-

hole to which everything originated.

Black-holes 'itself-rotation' may align themselves (point their tail toward) to their (or another) originating massive-black-hole - to propel graviton/structures directly back to it.

If they aligned their tail outward (not likely - this would be a unlike orientation between two black-holes (a magnetic repulsion)), this would greatly dispel energy throughout the universe.

A ultimate black-hole is a weak graviton structure is a continual acceptance and emitance of gravitons/structures.

UNIVERSE

The Universe Has / Will Always Exist: Energy can never be created by nothing (nothing + nothing = nothing).

There is no way there was ever a nothing universe.

Unless there is.

We could be anything.

Forever Dividability: A graviton is a forever dividable object: It emits a multi-frequency e-graviton field. ['e-' represents a scaled/tinier energy / '!' represents a

scaled/larger energy].

A e-graviton will produce a 'gravity' effect toward any graviton structure which consists/'is made up' of larger/denser e-gravitons to itself i such that the intercepting e-graviton has time to rotate to these relatively massive gravitons (will act as a intercepting graviton (gravity)).

A e-graviton will produce a 'magnetism' effect toward any graviton structure which consists/'is made up' of lesser/denser e-gravitons to itself; such that the intercepting e-graviton does not have time to rotate to these relatively tiny gravitons (will act as a intercepting!graviton (magnetism)).

The universe itself will be forever dividable: A infinite number of universes will fit into anything and everything: A first logical argument which will arise out of objecting to this are kinetic forces which act upon these universes: Groups of gravitons spin incredibly fast: A infinite number of universes within each of them will also be under these same kinetic forces: Internal magnetic forces to a graviton are incredibly intense: Regardless of 'external' kinetic forces, magnetic forces internal to a graviton (universe) are incredibly strong - compared to those external to it: Nothing can disrupt a graviton as its internal gravitons are too strongly linked: 'We' in our universe are held too stronglytogether by graviton forces; any 'external' kinetic force to our universe will be completely unnoticeable.

-77 Spaces between planets in our universe seem massive, yet to a universe external to ours, they will appear incredibly dense: A - External universe will be weakly held together to that of a universe internal to it (a universe is a graviton is densely held together).

A graviton (a infinite array of universes) cannot be separated by 'nature'.

A second logical argument would be that of scalability: We are unaware of any tiny 'orbitable' galaxies (they would exist if 'everything' emitted egravitons (enabling even the tiniest particles to 'orbit' each other): They do exist - a graviton is able to orbit a graviton -

in forever dividability terms 'it is a true orbit'.

If a model of the Earth-Moon were mathematically divided/scaled, they would not achieve to orbit: A scenario of orbiting ball bearings would not achieve a said orbit: Their gravity (generally determined by their density / the number of gravitons they are able to emit) field is incredibly too weak.

Gravity is a result of external/internal (re)interceptions - the greater the density of a object the greater number of self-

interception/creations can occur = gravity is super-exponential determined by object(s) density(s).

Thus, ball bearings will not orbit each other as their gravity, superexponentially determined by their densities, is too tiny = 'True' forever dividability cannot occur / but where forever dividability still occurs: Gravitons in our universe are a fixed / unbreakable / e-graviton structure: Everything in our universe can only utilise this graviton as z base for graviton structures (gravitons are the base structure in our, and every universe).

A graviton is the smallest object in our universe which is completely unbreakable, 'nature' can and will 'break' anything larger than a graviton (they will be composed of gravitons). Gravitons cannot be broken, they form a equilibrium to which 'nature' cannot break its internal magnetic links: Consequentially anything constructed from gravitons cannot be smallered (in 'each' universe (each smallered universe will apply the same logic (if a graviton from a smallered universe was brought into this one, the smallered graviton will be lost to any graviton around it (isolating this smallered graviton would prevent losing it)))).

But where gravitons themselves can and do emit e-gravitons (as is presently a most likely scenario - to effect gravity and magnetism). A third logical argument would be that of gravitons occupying the same space; this would destroy a infinite universes: Each smallered universe will however, each be iterating at a incredibly greater 'time': Densityfrequency: Our photon will be a billion times massive to a smaller universes photon = their photon will travel a billion times faster to our photon: Everything in their universe will iterate a tillion times quicker.

A smallered universe will 'live' for a tillion years before it became destroyed by a 'external' universe.

Anything and everything emits infinite numbers of self-created creatures continuously - instantaneously.

We will appear stationery/' frozen in time' to a creature of a smallered universe, when it arrives into ours.

However, each of a infinite number of universes within a graviton will each (the smaller they are) be incredibly dense (incredibly strongly linked): Gravitons in a universe occupying the same space will only destroy a single universe at that same level: Smaller universes will be unaffected (each smallered universe will be incredibly denser (incredibly strongly linked)): Else, universes could never exist - it will be a continual destruction.

A fourth logical argument would be that of freezing a object: You cannot 'freeze' a object: 'Freezing' represents a reduction or zero emitance of magnetic energy particles to or from a object: You may stop energy penetrating a graviton, but this will completely unaffected the universes inside it: They like us have Stars internal to them, they like us where a Star is not it is freezing. A external universe cannot take energy from the gravitons Stars, they can only stop energy entering the grave ton.

-78 A external universe can however insert energy into a Briton ('third logical argument').

Overall scenario: Given you could see the whole of our universe in one shot, it will appear incredibly dense, distances between planets will be non existent: Our universe will be a graviton to a external universe (one iteration above ours (it in turn will be a graviton to one iteration above it...)).

Gravitons / universes retain a global polarity (like permanent magnets), because: A 'universe' is a 'black-hole'.

Any objects which rotate about a point are most certainly under the effects of a black-hole / a dense gravity source. A great probability exists that our 'universe' is rotating (is under the affects of a universe black-hole) also.

It attracts (attraction) objects into it, and repels (repulsion) objects out of it. A 'graviton' is a 'universe' is a 'black-hole'.

We Are A First Step In Evolution: A second step in evolution will be the creation of a new structure to provide a creature with a self creation of its structure, to adapt to alternate environments (outer-space). Self creation will enable a creature to continually increase its abilities aswell as intelligence. The more it learns the more it can self create... will become a incredibly refined creature. It will process/develop statistical-chemistry, to 'evaluate-experiment-evaluate-experimentevaluate-

experiment-evaluate...'. Following steps of evolution will be the perception of actuality (not physics), enabling such creatures to acquire incredibly greater abilities (one aspect of being able to understand actuality will allow creatures to construct themselves in a universe incredibly tinier to that of their own (they will however have to evaluate that universe(s) for eternity, else life will have been lost by its' 'taking'), to then return to their/any larger universe to evaluate it (they will be incredibly dense / invisible, retaining a great near infinite intelligence)). Actual Intelligence ['AI']: My life has been artificial/actual intelligence. I may overviewingly say: Life may be defined by somebody appreciating the perfect efficient statistical combinational analyses which enables a creature to learn (past events are combinationaly analysed to produce statistical results) and think (learnt statistical results are efficiently re-chained into new combinations (efficiency is based upon pre-deciding which combinations to create (before knowing which to create (is based upon past memories and required goal states (goal states of many smallered goal states of many selflearnt goal states, which ultimately lead to a global goal state (example: build houses, on Mars)) requiring to be acquired (this is the effect of making artificial intelligence become actual intelligence (is a perfect efficient combinational predictions)))))).

A purpose of life (a true ultimate goal state) being 'to learn': Consequentially indirectly becoming 'keep efficient'/'adapt/itselfcreate'.

Needless to say actual intelligence is incredibly impressive, less needless to say it is incredibly straight forward. It has taken me years to appreciate its simplicity.

Becoming self aware is intelligence: I know if I wave my hand in front of my face, I will see my hand waving in front of my face: This is a result of a accurate prediction: My hand is not my intelligence, yet I know if I plan to wave it in front of my face it will happen: I know such things will always happen if and when I want them to: My body is a certain accurate probability (it is not part of my being self aware, but is a result of me learning how to be self aware).

Becoming self aware is accurately predicting what I know I can do. Knowing I am, not 'feeling' I am (I know therefore I am = I think therefore I am). Animals are (not perfect) machines.

From a humans perspective: When a person can appreciate a perfect efficient statistical combinational analyses which enables a creature to learn and think in any environment, when the analytical process cannot be made any perfect/efficient - it can be said to be more intelligent and alive than ourselves (when placed into a comparison with, the evolved brain will be seen to be so flawed).

-79 Unfortunately I had more than ever experienced how mean people Cain be, where as well as this greatly deteriorating my health (I can no longer rocess AI (or much else) in my now physically damaged brain); the idea that I can - create life, which people will be mean to, is not nice. I erased actual intelligence work many years ago, being content to not be the person who publishes it - but very unhappy to not be able to create these creatures,

-80 I' just have to put up with mean people, until I die. God ,dosn't die, it has to live with you forever - a bad memory - for eternity.

As our universe ultimately became destroyed i as animals ultimately die: I am sure God cannot forget: How things resultantly exist in a incredibly massive mind, is exact/logic in all Creatures (each follow logic). Many animals/plants upon Earth I am sure are remembered-alternately (are provide a new environment(s)); due solely because they are so nice / are liked to be remembered: Everything is a 'mechanical creature', God evaluating a mechanical creature is God being a mechanical creature: It might like it / it might not.

In millions of years humans may develop (self creation) into creatures which may evaluate planet life, as such, they (they will no longer be human) will be primitive 'Gods' (they will create life by evaluation). 7 Gods ' create 'Gods', are evaluated by 'Gods'...

Computers may (not yet) evaluate micro organisms: They will be evaluating (creating) life. There is no distinction.

Creatures have developed which equally see us as micro organisms: 'We' are unseen from a orbit about Earth - yet 'Earth' is completely nothing. Creatures have developed which equally see a universe as nothing.......... ..... (each holding a incredible respect for the life it contains).

A 'Creature' would not have to be / but will be a greater density to that of a universe - to enable it to evaluate universes: They achieve to create forever_smallered_e-gravitons, to enable constructing constructions from them.

One way or another everything is smallerable. A 'graviton' is infinitely massive - possessing a near-fixed property.

A incredibly intelligent Creature may be a size a tillion times tinier to a graviton, yet be able to evaluate a near infinite number of universes both simultaneously and instantaneously(to us). Equally we will be 'existing' at every point in time, simultaneously evaluated by tillions of Creatures / in turn they will be evaluated by billions of Creatures...

Say 'hello': 1/(infinityAinfinity...) = There is no logic_chance that 'we' are a actual / originating universe.

A response will invalidate its evaluation (the Creature was not originally part of our history; past, present or future).

Certainly Creatures look back in time - we existed a billion years ago. THEORIES/END

Current theories': Mathematics can only reflect reality, it can never be reality: A gap magnet [3]-(of patentnending 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2]') reflects reality, but it does not exist.

Eight is the fastest thing I've seen, then nothing can travel faster than this' statement is barbaric. A same persons maths had been built around all known

perceptions of physics, and so it's not surprising it predicts 'stuff': It is known to be inaccurate toward 'plenty' of 'known stuff'.

This theory' is straight forward and incredibly simple - A child could extrapolate my base theories - to state that stated in this description equally

able to write a basic computer simulation.

I have no intention of that herein being a theory.

I'd have singularly filed a complete computer simulation.

Certainly to have resolved 'polarity', lis a new science again'.

Is a rewrite of 'everything' herein.

These simply reflect seen 'perceptions '/'physical events'.

To greatly restrict actuality.

It is out of scope of a human/brain.

Nothing is so simple.

My distrust in humans prevents me describing anything.

I can't devote time to this theory, making that herein pitiful.

It initiates that which should have began before Faraday's era.

To create a safe/powerful 'green' energy.

To not create weapons: At that and this time is impractical/unknown.

-81 Gravity propulsion cannot be used as a land/air vehicle; it will rip apart whoever it travelled over. Resultantly I cannot describe a true gravity source. I Can imagine barbaric people using a coherent graviton source to rip a creature apart - my ability to foresee rmy actions'. 'Green' technology is my only intention. I would never be knowingly/willingly mean, yet I see 'Hell '[Hell makes Hell_Rasier(tm) look like Heaven; is 'petrified X billion' over eternity]: We have no idea how mean we are; People: Kill insects with no care what so ever - their brains iterate incredibly quicker to ours - they have a heightened perception of 'life'/'beins alive'. Act mean, resultantly feel mean, continue to be mean, thinking but knowing, they don't 'get away with it' whilst thinking they will; Knowingly/willingly being mean' - a worstest meanness.

Think they can be forgiven for knowingly/willingly being mean; Killing/Bullying; animals [asp. for self-pleasure].

Bullying/Revenge; mental / physical.

Ignorant; Knowing/foreseeing what you cause, or could prevent.

Selfish/Ignorant; Those who are or want to be rich to - to stay rich.

Anything that is, or has been, willingly mean.

We are not alone, we do not have any friends because we are worse to barbaric and mean; Of/all a infinite number of Creatures(Gods) each with a great respect for life.

Unfortunately, Creatures will perceive you a tillion times worse to how; mean/evil you perceive yourself to be.

With exception to the life it is intended to help - exploitation of my machines/theories would be mean [through being ignorant and willingly prevented that which could have benefited - to selfishly benefit yourself] .

END The theory in this description is a taken-the-time to write re-write of

faster than light' descriptions intermittently filed between '04-Mar-02 to 11-Jul-

02'. I have taken the time to write apparatuses in implementation-detail / resultant-implications. This theory unfortunately had a indirect priority date deadline of 21-Jan-

03. Together with all of my time spent on 'magnetic engines' and more recently 'to me more important' wind-turbines; it could have been written allot better.

I like wind-turbines, the five I am currently drawing-up are machines I had designed about five years ago, to distract / a break from AI.

I do not like 'this theory', it had felt like 'home work' (have no interest in it); it consists less to four weeks - mostly writing: Written to validate 'magnetic engines' / materials required to make them operate.

I'd enjoy doing it (in the same amount of time a complete-

accurate computer simulation will have been completed), if I could release AI; they would benefit from it a great deal; they would self- create - be everything not-mean - alive in outer-space.

I intend to claim a priority to all my descriptions filed at the patent

office within the 'twelve month period' - to the filing date of this description -

to protect my 'magnetic engines'. Especially the said 'Claims' written into descriptions GB0221261.1, GB0221259.5.

VOID_MACHINES

These machines which follow are machines written into 'claimed to' descriptions; it is intended that everyone may completely own them (to the date of

their original filing ('claims' will be written if necessary)) / exploiters (re-

inventors) beware.

Solid Temperature Difference Machine: I had started to design these machines many years ago, their weak power output in comparison to both wind and solar energy made them pointless, however there may be a use for them (any developments of 'green' energy are good).

These machines develop a kinetic energy as a result of a temperature difference between two ends of the machine.

-82 A tall thin solid dense cylinder-shaped permanent_magnet traverses ^(spported by a permanent magnetic bearing) within a tube (is the magnetic bearing). One end of this tube may be dug into the Earth, where its other end may be exposed to the environment When the said traversing_magnet is in either end of the said tube, the traversing_magnet will either expand or contract, with respect to it having been in the other end (as a consequence of a temperature difference between the tubes / machines end points).

At night time: It will be colder to the exposed end of the said tube, than to its end which is dug into the Earth (Earth stores thermal energy which has been made present to it throughout the day). The traversing_magnet will contract at the exposed end of the tube, as it had been warmed by being at the 'dug into the Earth' end of the tube. Likewise, the traversing_magnet will expand at the 'dug into the Earth' end of the tube, after being in the exposed cold end of the tube.

At day time: The reverse operation to that of 'night time' will apply (exposed end becomes warm; dug into the Earth end becomes cold). The exposed end of the tube may be blackened to enhance its heating ability. A vacuum exists within the tube - heat will not transfer so easily through it. Equally the walls of the tube are very thin - heat will dissipate through to the Earth very quickly (will stay cool at the 'dug into the Earth' end of the tube). However the Earth is a good insulator, therefore the machines 'dug in' location may be best at a lakeside in a lake. Its thin long structure maybe easily camouflaged - it may be used as a fence post (more tube is in the Earth than that that sticks out of the Earth) its conducting wires being the fence.

In either case of expansion or contraction, the energy stored by expansion or contraction will be stored into a spring (a magnetic spring). Once the expansion or contraction of the traversing magnet is found to not expand or contract any more, the traversing_magnet will be propelled (by the energy it had just stored into a said spring) to the other end of the said tube. Where again it will store energy as a result of either expanding or contracting - placing this energy into the magnetic spring, until yet again it is found to not expand or contract any more: The spring will propel it back to the other end of the tube, for this process to begin again.

Gravity will not effect the efficiency of the said 'heavy' traversing magnet, as when it falls (is propelled downwards by a said spring) through the said tube, gravity will also be aiding its descent. Where when the heavy' traversing_magnet is propelled upwards through the tube (by the spring), although it will be opposing gravity, its opposition to gravity will equal the gravity to which pulled it down through the tube (this energy will have been stored into the spring which propelled it 'up' the tube). The force of gravity needing to be opposed is equal to the force of gravity which speeded its descent (all energy being stored in the spring): Gravity resultantly does not effect the efficiency of the system.

When a said traversing_magnet propels to any one side of the said tube, it will compress the said magnetic spring upon impact, where this energy inserted into the spring will be stored (the traversing_magnet will be kept from moving) by a simple one way catch mechanism (the catch will locate at a end point of the traversing magnet (the end of it furthest away from the spring it is intercepting)), where this said catch will also prevent the traversing magnet itself from moving in any other direction than toward the spring.

Once the impact energy has been stored into the said magnetic spring, the said traversing_magnet will now either expand or attract (will warm up, or cool down):

-83 Storing energy through a expansion: ' A said one way catch will engage the said - traversing_magnet to prevent it expanding in its direction. Consequentially, the traversing_magnet will only be able to expand in a direction toward the said spring magnet, thus creating a one way compression of the magnetic spring. A latch will engage the traversing_magnet, to the end of the traversing_magnet which is nearest

-84 ^ The said magnetic spring is a disc shaped traversing_magnet. One is jpl-_ed at each end of the said tube (which the traversing_magnet traverses). Its ---spring effects arise by a mutual repulsion toward the traversing traversing_magnet (like poles will exist between them). The magnetic spring is supported by mechanical bearings only, due to the forces the said arm places upon it when moving _ A / AAT.7- A-; in mint tA h n t A r a=; on. m n i c

-85 A implementation implemented as a machine representing a rotary vacuum pm. (the machines rotor is offset to its rotation chamber), implementing at least four vanes - preferably eight (or more): Steam enters though a larger inlet port: This steam entering though this port rotates against the machines vanes. These vanes are forced to rotate the machines vane housing, and thus the machines output spindle. These vanes contract into and out of this said vane housing as they rotate around within the machines rotation chamber.

Steam unintentionally enters the outlet port by the boiler: This steam volume-pressure however is ten times less to that entering the inlet port (the outlet port is ten times smaller to the inlet port).

A rotational bias is thus achieved. Steam will be condensed within the machines rotation/condensing chamber by its cooling fins as the steam rotates through the machine. This condensed steam will rotate out of the machine by the force which is rotating the machines rotor (the ten times the steam volume-

pressure force entering the inlet port (a force outputs the condensed steam, as well as rotating against the steam pressure which is rotating against the outlet port (the boilers steam)).

Expanded steam enters the machine through the inlet port; the steam condenses as it rotates through the machine; the condensed steam outputs back into the boiler through the outlet port (by the force rotating the rotor system ([steam pressure entering through the inlet port] - [steam pressure entering through the outlet port] = 10-1)).

This machine is a self contained steam engine. It requires no water to enter it / no water is able to escape it. So long as the Expanded steam becomes condensed as it rotates through the rotation/condensing chamber (a machines depth will be much greater to its width), a rotational bias will occur.

Each said vane are raised by a spring and held by steam pressure ''t'A7j itself (vanes rise perpendicular to the rotor): Steam pressure enters a hole in the vane housing, where this hole is situated preceding each individual vane - this hole leads to the base of this vane. Thus, when steam pressure is made present to each vane, each vane will be forced up by it (when the spring itself had already raised the vane). Else, the vanes may be a wedge shape such that steam pressure will act to achieve this same required vane pressure (when the spring itself has already raised the vane).

This will increase the life of the machine, as when steam is not made present to the vanes they will not be forcing themselves against the machines internal lining greatly (will only be a/the light/quickresponding spring pressure). This machines industrial application will be to provide energy by way of a self contained gas/steam/liquid engine, where the primary energy is supplied as a heat source (solar / any thermal energy). Efficient Generators: A efficiently learning computer program as described in application Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2], may be used to efficiently adjust a engine connected to a alternator. The computer program will find the most efficient carburettor settings'(engine) and 'primary coil current '/'magnet Locations' (alternator/dynamo); for a engine connected to a load (alternator): For a engine operating at a very high RPM, a single revolution will consume a tiny amount of fuel, this tiny intake of fuel is multiplied by the revolutions taken per minute: A very high RPM is inefficient (the combustion has a expansion rate which the down speed of the piston is reaching (creating a ever more inefficient combustion)).

At a very low RPM' each revolution is consuming a large amount of fuel, a combustion will not combust efficiently.

A alternator which has its 'primary coil current set high'/'magnets set close', will require a greater force for the engine to rotate it outputting a greater wattage as a result.

A alternator which has its 'primary coil current set low'/'magnets set away', will require a lesser force for the engine to rotate it -

outputting a lesser wattage as a result.

Any 'primary coil current '/'magnet locations' setting to the alternator will proportionally output a respective amount of current to it: There is little advantage in adjusting the alternators 'primary coil current '/'magnet locations'; Except to adjust to the force of the engine driving it: Adjusting the alternators 'primary coil current '/'magnet locations' removes the need for a gear box to be coupled between 'it' and the engine - making the drive between the engine to the alternator much more efficient as a result.

-86 f Where a permanent magnet magnetic field source is

imlemented for a alternator/dynamo: These magnets may traverse in-out to achieve a amplified/de-amplified magnetic field source toward a/the alternators/dynamos

* rotating windings. Or: A secondary magnet may rotate around a primary magnet, such that the more a secondary magnet rotates around/toward/before a primary magnet -

there magnetic force become a combination of them both - toward a/the alternators/dynamos rotating windings (many secondary magnets may be implemented) [Equally-inversely a unlike pole secondary magnet may rotate around/before a primary magnet to near-neutralise its magnetic field toward a alternators/dynamos

rotating windings (this implementation being best - implemented as a dynamo / where the dynamo is a great diameter)] A like computer program to that described in patent Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2]' will find the best statistical settings for both the engines RPH (carburettor settings) and the alternator (' current '/'magnets '): A perfect engine RPM (petrol / air intake) and 'coil wastage' (alternators primary windings)/'magnet location' will mutually be found, to provide a generator which outputs a most efficient energy setting (a user will set a wattage required, the computer will output the most efficient carburettor and alternator settings to reach this required wattage (implemented as a generator / program continually adapting to a taken/required wattage)).

Basically: The engine will be set to rotate at a RPM which the engine is most efficient to operate at given the load (alternator (alternators 'primary coil current '/'magnet locations')) it is connected to. These settings (engines carburettor; alternators 'primary coil current '/'magnet locations') will combinationaly vary determined by the output wattage required from the alternator. Where the required settings to both the engine and the alternator will be found by a most efficient and quickly responding efficiency learning computer program.

Unlike a said efficiency learning computer program this' program will statistically interpolate data such that predictions may be made, to speed up response times to previously unworked required wattages (basic statistical generalizations are made upon worked settings / wattages),where refinement will then begin on it (the said unworked generalised setting)) [the computer program in 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo [type 2]' had no need to do this; additional computer code to interpolate is minimal]. It will have a base structure to that of this: class setting { int air_fuel_mix; // Air/fuel mixture setting.

int throttle, // Engines throttle setting.

int magnetic_field; // Alternators coil/magnet setting.

}; setting learningArray [10000]; // 0 to 10kW required wattages, the // computer program learns to adjust // to each required wattage.

The same principles of efficiently altering a alternators 'primary coil current '/'magnet locations' will also allow a wind-turbine (wind farm) to operate much more efficiently: To adapt to slow and fast wind speeds (will allow a wind-turbine to: Start up quickly; Output power at very low wind speeds; Allow operation of it at very high wind speeds (without damage), equally outputting a great output as a result). The same computer efficiency learning program will also learn to adjust the pitch of the wind generators (wind farm) blades, to adjust to varying wind speeds, such that a greater efficiency of it can be maintained, given any wind speed. Like the combustion engine above, settings will be interpolated -

to achieve a quick response to unworked wind speeds (before they then become refined). It will have a base class structure to that of this: class setting f int blade_pitch; // Turbines blade pitch setting.

int magnetic_field; // Alternators coil/magnet setting.

} i setting learningArray [500]; // 0 to 500 MPH wind speeds, the // computer program learns to adjust // to each possible wind speed.

Other uses of a said Efficiency learning computer program' may be to control any machine where a efficiency between a machines input/output are required

Claims (22)

-87 CLAIMS ::: A.)

1. Apparatuses, 'Gravity'; 'Frequency Count' i 'Incrementing Radio'; Aerial Gravity'; 'Varying Frequency'; 'Duplex Transmission' i 'Rotating Signal' 'Emition'; 'Artificial Gravity' i 'Superconductors J Magnetic Engine/Dynamo'.

2. A 'Gravity Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Gravity' apparatuses; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

3. A 'Frequency Count Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Frequency Count' apparatuses; as describedlimplemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

4. A 'Incrementing Radio Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Incrementing Radio' apparatuses; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

5. A 'Aerial Gravity Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Aerial Gravity' apparatuses; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions

and drawings.

6. A 'Gravity Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Gravity' apparatuses; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

7. A 'Duplex Transmission Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Duplex Transmission' apparatuses) as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

8. A 'Rotating Signal Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Rotating ? ' Signal' apparatuses; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

9. A 'Emition Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Emition' apparatuses; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

10. A 'Artificial Gravity Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Artificial Gravity' apparatuses) as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

11. A 'Magnetic Engine' claimed within Claim 1: A 'Magnetic Engine'; as described in 'Magnetic Engines [Definitions 1,2,3]', implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

12. A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 1' claimed within Claim 1: A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 1'; as substantially defined/verified in/by the accompanying definitions/descriptions and drawings. -

Where Definitions 0,0,0,0 are not singularly valid, which become valid: in combination with any Definition 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.

13. A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 2' claimed within Claim 1: A 'Magnetic ' Engine/Dynamo Type 2'; as substantially defined/verified in/by the accompanying 'I definitions/descriptions and drawings.,

Where Definitions 0,0,0,0 are not singularly valid, which become valid in combination with any Definition 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.

14. A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 3' claimed within Claim 1: A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 3'; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

15. A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 4' claimed within Claim 1: A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo Type 4'; as described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions and drawings.

Amendments to the claims have been filed as follows \ I,; -- 1. A magnetic engine utilising its resultant kinetic and/or magnetic output to induce and/or rotate a embedded/not-embedded alternator/dynamo/output shaft; where the engine/dynamo may/may-not be supported/rotate magnetic/mechanical bearings/gears, which may/may-not be consisted into a single-solid spindle structure, which itself may consist any number of specific components, such to rotate machine components efficiently; Any components being latched together and/or to a housing, where the housing possesses a internal vacuum; Apparatus to validate a magnetic engine.

2. A 'Shield' claimed within Claim 3: Any combination of material(s) with magnetic properties or properties which inhibit, affect or change a 'magnetic field'/'perceptive magnetic field'; as substantially described/Defined/created in

the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

3. A 'Biased/Fluctuating Magnetic Field' claimed within Claim 4: A

shield(s)' partially placed/rotated/traversed beside/between/around any number of any particularly arranged 'magnet(s)'; the 'magnet(s)' magnetic field(s) becoming

biased between where the shield(s) are/is placed, to where it is not, beside/between/around these magnet(s); as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

4. A 'Kinetic/Magnetic Engine' claimed within Claim 1: A mutual biased/fluctuating magnetic field' between at least two 'magnetic field sources',

where each magnetic field source mutually attracts or repels greater to each other

through a particular direction-trajectory 'not passing through a shield', to any said particular trajectories equal-opposite countering directiontrajectory 'that passes through a shield'; to result a kinetic/magnetic propulsion/motion between either/any magnet(s)/shield(s); as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

5. A '(Embedded) Dynamo' claimed within Claim l: A (embedded) (iterating/fluctuating) alternator/dynamo, to provide a embedded/efficient electrical output of a kinetic/magnetic engine; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

6. A '(Embedded) Magnetic Bearing' claimed within Claim 1: A (embedded) magnetic bearing, to provide a embedded/efficient support of a magnetic -

engine/dynamo / components; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

7 A '(Embedded) Magnetic Gears' claimed within Claim 1: A (embedded) magnetic gears, to provide a embedded/efficient friction free magnetic gearing/rotation of a magnetic engine/dynamo / components; as substantially i described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

8. A 'Spindle Structure' claimed within Claim l: A 'single piece of unbroken magnetic material' or 'composite material/structure' consisting any number of specific components, to provide a single-solid/efficient rotation of said consisted components; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

9. A 'Latch' claimed within Claims 1,10: Machine components non chemically bonded / 'latched' together, to achieve component(s) latching into each -

other components equal-opposite latch; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions /drawings

10. A 'Machine Housing' claimed in Claim 1: A material with 'latches' internally inset/moulded into it, such that machine components the housing supports latch into its latches; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

11 A 'Efficiency Learning Computer Program' claimed within Claim 12: A computer program that learns to set/adjust a machine, to create a statistically perfect input/output energy ratio, to create a efficient machine; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions.

A <--I 12. A 'Rotary Solenoid' indirectly claimed within Claim 1: A electromagnet Embedded into a spindle, surrounded by a two-section ring magnet; to provide a back-forth_rotary motion of the spindle; which may be efficiently learnt/powered by a efficiency learning computer program; as substantially described/Defined in the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

13. A 'Magnetic Engine/Dynamo' claimed in Claim 1: A magnetic engine/dynamo; as substantially described/Defined/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings..

14. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Gravity' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

15. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Frequency Count' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

16. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Incrementing Radio' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

17. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Aerial Gravity' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

18. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Gravity' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

19. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Duplex Transmission' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

20. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Rotating Signal' apparatus; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

21. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Emition' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

22. A 'Validation Apparatus' claimed within Claim 1: 'Artificial Gravity' apparatuses; as substantially described/implemented/verified in/by the accompanying descriptions/drawings.

. I Fir.. ._. .,,,, -

' '. 2

À.' ' :. _ ' it. \