GB2380128A

GB2380128A - Definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS

Info

Publication number: GB2380128A
Application number: GB0123185A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Oladiran Lawoye
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2001-09-26
Filing date: 2001-09-26
Publication date: 2003-04-02
Also published as: GB0123185D0

Abstract

This definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS is based on facts that, in several biting and bloodsucking insects, HIV can neither reproduce nor survive. Therefore these insects never transmit HIV or AIDS from an infected host to the humans they next feed on or bite. Irrespective of the quantity of HIV in the bloodstreams of an infected host, and of whether insect mouthparts do or do not retain large amounts of blood on their surfaces, these antibodies or similar substances in the saliva or salivary glands of these insects will always render HIV inactive thereby making HIV unable to reproduce or survive, i.e. these substances will always destroy HIV outright. These substances are extracted and tested on HIV and AIDS. Following a successful result, extracted and / or artificially synthesized forms of the substances are used in preparing vaccines against HIV and medicines against AIDS.

Description

DEFINITE AND ABSOLUTE CURE AGAINST HIV AND AIDS This inventive idea relates to vaccines against the HIV virus and medicines for the cure of AIDS.

Results of experiments and observations on biting and bloodsucking insects have shown that insects do not transmit the HIV virus. Studies conducted by researchers all over the world have shown no evidence of HIV transmission through insects. Lack of outbreaks of AIDS, even in areas where there are many cases of AIDS and large populations of insects such as mosquitoes is enough evidence that insects do not transmit the HIV virus.

Scientists and researchers all over the world have also time and time again published results of experiments and observations of insect biting and sucking behaviours and come forward with the conclusion as regards such diseases as yellow fever and malaria that are transmitted through the saliva of specific species of mosquitoes. The scientists conclude that HIV lives for only a short time inside an insect and, unlike organisms that are transmitted via insect bites, HIV does not reproduce, and neither does it survive in insects. Further they conclude that even if the virus enters a mosquito or another bloodsucking or biting insect, the insect does not become infected and cannot transmit HIV to the next human it feeds on or bites.

Summing up, they reinforce public confidence that a biting or bloodsucking insect, such as a mosquito, could never transmit HIV from one person to another through HIV-infected blood left on its mouthparts. They produce two factors, which serve to explain why this is so. First, they claim that infected people do not have constant, high levels of HIV in their bloodstreams and, second, that insect mouthparts do not retain large amounts of blood on their surfaces. Further, scientists who study insects have determined that bloodsucking insects normally do not travel from one person to the next immediately after ingesting blood. Rather, they fly to a resting place to digest this blood meal.

All this is good news. But there are certain conclusions in these results that run contradictory to known facts. And these conclusions and their consequences are creating serious setbacks and hindrances to progress in finding the cure against both the HIV virus and AIDS. The solution seems in fact to be already here with us, and right in front of our own eyes to see, but unfortunately no one seems to be aware of it, while thousands still continue to die from AIDS and millions are still suffering from it - unnecessarily all over the world. Groups such as the pharmaceutical companies, herbalists and faith healers all over the world have tried so many ways to find a lasting and reliable cure but no one has as yet come out with any cure worthy to be taken seriously.

The object of this inventive idea, is therefore to clear up the contradictions and then pave the way for the possibilities of finding cure against the HIV virus and AIDS.

According to this inventive idea definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS could be realized if the particular substance or substances, antibodies or similar, from the saliva or salivary glands of as many biting and bloodsucking insects as possibleany substance or substances that are definitely responsible for rendering the HIV virus inactive thereby making it unable to live long, reproduce or survive, that is to say, destroying the HIV virus outright-are extracted, purified in order to remove any contamination with other diseases such as yellow fever and malaria, and then tested on the HIV virus and the disease AIDS, and following a successful result, to be used in the preparation of vaccines against the HIV virus and also in the preparation of medicines for the cure of AIDS, and further, having such substance or substances, if possible, and if it is safe to do so, also artificially synthesized for use in the preparation of vaccines against HIV and medicines for the cure of AIDS.

As mentioned above, the solution seems in fact to be already here with us-because the reasons are very obvious.

First, we are dealing with virus, and the quantity of this in the bloodstreams does not matter and neither does it matter whether insect mouthparts do or do not retain large amounts of blood on their surfaces. Fact is that viruses, when their time is due to start reproducing, do so at an alarming rate and speed. And with what is already known

about the spread of viruses, and diseases in general, high levels or large quantities of a virus are not necessary to trigger a chain reaction for their reproduction. In the health care service, workers have been infected with HIV after being stuck with needles containing even only minute traces of HIV-infected blood and then later developed the disease AIDS. This situation is exactly similar to that of someone being stuck with the mouthpart of a biting or bloodsucking insect, which had, at one time been infected with the HIV virus but now totally free from the virus-simply because the HIV has meanwhile been totally destroyed by some agent present in the saliva or salivary glands of the biting or bloodsucking insect. It must be borne in mind that a bloodsucking insect like the mosquito, stays on the skin of its host during feeding even much longer than the period taken when a health care worker, by accident momentarily sticks himself or herself with a needle. And if the HIV were still retained on the mouthparts of the insect-active and not destroyed, as in the case with the transmitted diseases like yellow fever and malaria, then these insects would, with absolute certainty, transmit the HIV virus as well, irrespective of any levels of HIV in the bloodstreams of infected persons whom these insects got the infected blood from, and also irrespective of the amount of blood retained on the insect mouthparts. This could have spelt far more trouble, and therefore unimaginable disaster for the whole world by now.

Second, the further suggestion that biting and bloodsucking insects normally do not travel from one person to the next immediately after ingesting blood, and that they would rather fly to a resting place to digest their blood meal, offers no reasons why for instance, the same mosquito, that would transmit viruses like yellow fever, malaria, and who knows what else-would fail to transmit that one particular virus, the HIV. How come this then? And why should the HIV be an exception? And as mentioned above, why should the HIV live for only a short time inside an insect and, why unlike organisms that are transmitted via insect bites, does the HIV not reproduce, and not survive in insects? What would then happen if a mosquito bites a person suffering from both malaria and the disease AIDS. It would get its mouthparts infected with both the malaria virus and the HIV virus. And whether or not the mosquito has a time lapse to digest its meal before meeting its next host, it would still certainly sort out the HIV virus for outright destruction and retain only the malaria virus. The same will happen whether the mosquito collects the two different

infections from the same host or not, i. e. it will always and constantly sort out the HIV virus as poison, which must be destroyed. This means that viruses like yellow fever and malaria etc. that are harmless to mosquitoes are allowed to survive while the HIV virus, which is fatal to them is killed off, i. e. destroyed outright.

As mentioned below, the destruction of all those things this insect recognizes as poisonous contaminations to its food, could occur at that same instant during blood finding and blood feeding-limited only to a small area on the skin of the host the mosquito is feeding on. Destruction of these poisonous contaminations could be happening simultaneously as the mosquito is siphoning blood from its host or could also occur later, i. e. after ingestion of the poison.

So the HIV virus should definitely be treatable by the same substance or substances in the saliva or salivary glands of biting and bloodsucking insects-the same substance or substances in the saliva or salivary glands that are definitely responsible for rendering the HIV virus inactive thereby making it unable to live long, reproduce or survive, that is to say, destroying it outright. It is the particular substance or substances in the saliva or salivary glands of as many biting and bloodsucking insects as possible that this idea wants extracted, purified and tested on the HIV virus and the disease AIDS, and. then following a successful result, to be used in the preparation of vaccines against the HIV virus and also in the preparation of medicines for the cure of AIDS. Such substance or substances may, if possible, and if it is safe to do so, also be artificially synthesized for use in the preparation of vaccines against HIV and medicines for the cure of AIDS.

As indicated above, a very strong possibility is that the HIV virus could also be fatality to these biting and sucking insects themselves-just as it is for humans. And just as with humans, they also need some immunity against harmful elements and therefore possess in their bodies, be it in their saliva or salivary glands, some antibodies or similar substances to fight and destroy these harmful elements. So when these insects happen to ingest, or during their blood finding and blood feeding processes, recognize any contamination with their food, what for them is poison and fatality, the antibodies, or similar substances in their saliva or salivary glands, then

react in the usual way and set upon the poison to render it inactive and harmless i. e. destroying the poison outright, which in this case happens to be the HIV virus.

For instance, according to the findings of scientists, a species of the adult female Anopheles mosquitoes is said to possess a type of salivary peroxidase that functions during blood finding and blood feeding by destroying haemostatically active biogenic amines released by the vertebrate host during tissue destruction. In similar way the HIV virus should also be victim to such destructive activity. And no wonder the HIV lives for only a short time inside an insect and does not reproduce, and neither does it survive in them.

The undisputable fact is that the HIV virus is surely killed off, i. e. destroyed outright in these insects, but other viruses like yellow fever and malaria etc. that are harmless to them are, so to say"given free passage"and are even allowed to survive.

Further, the HIV does not seem capable ever, of developing anything like antibody or antitoxin to build up resistance against the ever more powerful and destructive antibody substances in the saliva and salivary glands of these insects, unlike the case we have with humans when diseases like malaria and tuberculosis are often building up antibodies and resistances against our man-made drugs thus reinforcing themselves again and staging comebacks and reappearances. So it is quite obvious that, no fight back or comeback of any kind by the HIV virus against these insects is ever likely to happen.

What seems to be the case is that these insects and we humans happen to have a common enemy in the HIV virus. But because these insects happen to possess very powerful antibodies or similar substances, against the HIV virus, and we humans definitely have not, even not in the slightest, the insects have therefore very quickly found clever solutions to their problems leaving us to find solution to ours-while seeming at the same time to be giving us a lead and a clue. It would be enormously rewarding if we humans, with humility follow their lead. Or are our herbalists and pharmaceutical companies going to, out of sheer pride keep on beating about the bushes and the labs?

Claims

CLAIMS 1. A definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS brought about by having the particular substance or substances, antibodies or similar, present in the saliva and/or salivary glands of biting and bloodsucking insects, extracted and the extraction tested on HIV and the disease AIDS (the test being e. g. for its effectiveness and/or potency and also for any side-effects), and following a successful result, used in the preparation of vaccines against HIV and medicines for the cure of AIDS, the particular substance or substances, antibodies or similar, being the agent or agents in these insects responsible for rendering the HIV inactive, thereby making HIV unable to live long, reproduce or survive, that is to say, destroying HIV outright.
2. A definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS as claimed in Claiml, in which the same particular substance or substances, antibodies or similar are, if it is safe to do so (e. g. in case of side-effects), artificially synthesized in vast quantities, and used in the preparation of vaccines against the HIV and in medicines for the cure of AIDS, the particular substance or substances, antibodies or similar, being the agent or agents in the saliva and/or salivary glands, responsible for destroying the HIV outright.
3. A definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS as claimed in Claim1 or Claim 2, in which any extracted forms of the particular substance or substances, antibodies or similar, obtained by extraction from the saliva and/ or salivary glands of biting or bloodsucking insects, are purified, in order to rid the extracted forms of any contaminations with other diseases, such as malaria or yellow fever, before these extracted forms are used on humans for any healing or curative purposes.
4. A definite and absolute cure against HIV and AIDS substantially as herein described.