GB2377013A

GB2377013A - Toxicity measurement

Info

Publication number: GB2377013A
Application number: GB0113793A
Authority: GB
Inventors: Timothy David Hart; Nigel John Bainton
Original assignee: University of Surrey
Current assignee: University of Surrey
Priority date: 2001-06-06
Filing date: 2001-06-06
Publication date: 2002-12-31
Anticipated expiration: 2021-06-06
Also published as: DE60221385D1; WO2002099121A3; ATE368217T1; GB0113793D0; US20040248283A1; GB2377013B; DE60221385T2; EP1393049B1; EP1393049A2; AU2002304411A1; WO2002099121A2

Abstract

A device for measuring toxicity in solids or liquids, eg soil or water samples, includes one or more modular inspection trays (14) having an array of cells (15), each with a transparent base, for holding bioluminescent bacteria and to receive pollutants separated from the samples. Soil samples are placed in the cells of a feed tray having an array of cells, each cell having a porous base and being complementary to an inspection cell. Air pressure is applied to the feed cells to force soil extracts into the cells (15) of the inspection tray (14). The level of bioluminescence is detected by inserting an inspection tray into a measuring zone (31) having an optoelectronic unit including an array (24) of light sensors (36) arranged in a configuration complementary to the inspection cells (15). Before measurement, the inspection trays (14) may be incubated in a zone (41) using a heater (43).

Description

Toxicity Measurement This invention relates to a method and an instrument for measuring toxicity, with particular reference to measuring the toxicity of soil samples.

Increasing demand for redevelopment of so-called"brownfield"sites, i. e. disused sites previously employed for other purposes, increasingly requires checks to be made for whether the activities of previous occupants of the site have left any toxic residues in its soil. In preparing and redeveloping the site the developer must ensure the health and safety of site workers and visitors during preparation and construction phases and must also have regard to the health and safety of members of the public who will subsequently visit or use the finished project. The need for checks is especially important for projects including new agricultural use or including domestic gardens, given that subsequent use of contaminated soil to grow crops could result in toxic material entering the food chain.

A wide variety of methods and systems for toxicity testing have been proposed and used for many years, although they have largely been concerned with detection of toxic contaminants in air or water rather than in soil. The present invention relates to a detection method and system for use with soil and is based on the measurement of changes in bacterial bioluminescence caused by exposure of the luminescent bacterial microorganisms to a toxic material in an observed cell, where light production is directly correlated to the metabolic health of the cell.

Because the light-generating activity of the microorganisms is adversely affected by the toxic material their luminescence provides a measure of the degree of contamination.

US Patent No. 3,370, 175 provides an early example of the use of luminescent microorganisms for detection of toxic substances in air.

Sensors are employed to detect changes in the light output from the microorganisms and thus to indicate the presence and relative concentration of the toxic materials.

GB Patent No. 2,005, 018 describes a method in which a material suspected of containing a toxic substance is intermixed with an aqueous suspension of luminous microorganisms of known light output, and the output of light from the luminous microorganisms is sensed after contact with the material is compared with a base line output of the luminous microorganisms before the intermixing.

More recent disclosures relate to specific configurations of detection units or of the procedures used in them. US Patent No. 5,082, 628 relates to a laboratory instrument comprising multiple wells to receive samples of material to be tested. A light detector is located beneath the wells, which have transparent bases, and the wells are passed in turn into alignment with the detector. US Patent No. 5,919, 645 describes a method for the direct determination of the toxicity of a solid material by direct contact with a luminous microorganism.

The present invention is concerned with the provision of a robust, reliable detection method and unit suitable for measuring the generic toxicity of soil samples in the field.

According to the invention there is provided a device for measuring the generic toxicity of soil samples which comprises extraction means to separate pollutants from soil, a container to hold bioluminescent bacteria and to receive pollutants separated from the soil, and an opto-electronic unit to detect the level of bioluminescence from the container, characterised in that the extraction means comprises one or more modular feed trays each containing an array of cells which each have a porous

base, the container for bacteria and pollutants comprises one or more modular inspection trays each containing an array of cells which each have a transparent or translucent base and which are arranged in a configuration complementary to that of the feed trays, and the optoelectronic unit includes an array of light sensors arranged in a configuration complementary to those of the feed and inspection trays.

The invention further provides a method for measuring the generic toxicity of soil samples in which pollutants are first separated from the soil, are then brought into contact with bioluminescent bacteria and the level of bioluminescence is then detected and monitored, characterised in that the soil samples are placed together with a pollutant-extracting liquid into one or more modular feed trays each containing an array of cells which each have a porous base, extracted pollutants pass through the porous bases into a modular inspection tray containing an array of cells containing bioluminescent material which each have a transparent or translucent base and which are arranged in a configuration complementary to that of the feed trays, and the level of luminescence from the inspection cells is detected by an array of light sensors arranged in a configuration complementary to those of the feed and inspection trays.

The invention is advantageous in providing a rapid on-site toxicity audit system (ROTAIS'). A particular advantage of the invention is that the system can be produced in a portable form, permitting ready on-site use.

The system provides a simple one-step extraction process to facilitate use by unskilled operators in the field. It can be used as a tool for both toxicity audit and routine safety assessment.

The toxins detectable by the system are necessarily those that are extractable from the soil, from which they can be introduced into a biological cell. The extractable toxins, otherwise known as mobile or

bioavailable toxins, are not firmly bound to the soil minerals and can therefore be leached therefrom, especially in the aqueous phase.

A further advantage of the invention is that the multi-cellular configuration of the trays enables simultaneous analysis of multiple samples, some of which can beneficially be control samples of known properties so as to permit accurate comparisons with control values, for example of zero pollution or of permissible threshold levels of pollution.

The feed trays can be used for the supply to the inspection trays of either soil extracts for testing or activating agents used in preparing bacteria for use. The peripheral lower edge of the feed trays and the peripheral upper edge of the inspection trays preferably have complementary tongue and groove configurations so that when the trays are brought together for transfer of material from the upper (feed) tray to the lower (inspection) tray a seal is formed between the respective peripheries. The tongue and groove configurations are preferably asymmetrical so that the trays can only be fitted together in one direction, thereby avoiding confusion over the cell contents.

The feed and inspection trays are preferably constructed of moulded plastic material. The base of each of the cells in the feed trays is preferably constructed of porous plastic so as to permit transfer of material from the cells. The base of each of the cells in the inspection trays is preferably constructed of optical-grade transparent plastic to provide for inspection of light activity within the cells.

The feed trays and the inspection trays preferably include salable but detachable lids. A sealed lid allows for a tray to be pre-filled with required materials, for example extractant fluid for soil samples or activating agent for bacteria.

The lids employed for the feed trays preferably include a shaped orifice to receive a pressurising syringe to create an excess pressure in the feed trays to assist transfer of material to the inspection trays.

The opto-electrical unit according to the invention should include a measurement zone to receive an inspection tray containing bacteria and soil extracts.

In one convenient embodiment of the invention the opto-electrical unit further includes an incubation zone to store one or more inspection trays for activation of the bacteria prior to addition of soil extracts. The incubation zone preferably includes a heating element to apply to the zone an optimum level of heating for the incubation.

The opto-electrical unit is preferably battery powered so as to facilitate on-site working when no mains power is available. The battery is preferably of a rechargeable type.

Light sensors, for example programmable light-to-frequency converting photodiodes, need to be located at the base of the measurement zone, preferably at least one sensor per inspection cell, to receive bioluminescence from the inspection cells. Preferably each sensor has an associated lens to focus the bioluminescence from each of the cells.

The opto-electrical unit preferably includes a micro-controller to mediate data acquisition and storage. It may be desirable and convenient to employ programmed algorithms to assist its data analysis. A typical output display for each dataset is a two-dimensional representation of the inspection tray, with toxicity values expressed as percentage reduction in bioluminescence with respect to control values. The micro-controller can be linked to another electronic device for further processing of the received data.

Various bioluminescent bacteria can be employed for the toxicity measurement. Vibrio fischeri has proved to be particularly suitable but other bacteria to use include Vibrio harveyi, Photorhabdus luminoscens, Photobacterium phosphoreum, or any genetically engineered bacterium which displays luminescence. The bacteria can be stored in freeze-dried form, reactivated when required, for example by addition of an activation medium, and incubated at slightly elevated temperatures (for example 25OC) for a sufficient period (typically about 60 minutes) until they reach a sufficient level of bioluminescent activity. A defined amount of the activated bacteria is then added to the soil extract to be tested.

Suitable activation media, and typical concentrations in which they can be employed, include tryptone (5.0 g/l), yeast extract (2.5 g/l), ammonium chloride (0.3 gll), calcium carbonate (1/0 g/l), magnesium sulphate (0.3 gel), ferric chloride (0.01 gel), monopotassium phosphate (3.0 g/l), sodium glycerol phosphate (23.5 g/1) and sodium chloride (30.0 gel).

For certain pollutants, for example benzene, it may be advantageous to include in the activation medium a substance that increases the sensitivity of the bacteria to that pollutant. The substance may be surfactant-based or be any other substance capable of increasing the rate of transport of the pollutant into the inspection cells.

The soil samples for analysis will usually be collected by hand. The soil should preferably be crushed and/or sieved to a particle size sufficiently small (for example less than 50 um) to facilitate extraction of toxic residues, and homogenised to give samples of a relatively uniform composition. Suitable extractant liquids include surfactants, solutions based on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and mixtures thereof.

Agitation of the cell contents is desirable at various stages of the testing procedure to ensure thorough mixing of the materials in the cell. The

agitation can be facilitated by placing over the respective tray a lid which seals each of the individual cells and thus allows the tray as a whole to be shaken or vibrated for a required period without loss of material from any of the cells.

For control purposes some of the cells in the inspection trays may comprise the following standard contents: a cell with no soil extract, producing 100% bioluminescence (positive control). a cell with a standard toxin, for example sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) or lysozyme, to reduce bioluminescence by 100% (negative control). cells with standard toxins corresponding to pollutant trigger levels relevant to the site under investigation and the risk assessment system followed.

Possible standard toxins to include are benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX), representative of aromatics; benzopyrene, representative of polyaromatic hydrocarbons; aroclors (commercial mixtures of polychlorinated biphenols); and heavy metals such as copper, lead, mercury or cadmium.

The invention is further described, by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying figures, in which: Figure 1 shows an end view of modular cellular feed trays and inspection trays according to the invention, and Figure 2 shows a perspective view of a detection unit according to the invention, including a slightly different version of modular cellular inspection trays according to the invention.

Figure 3 is a chart showing the relationship of various electronic components to each other in an opto-electronics unit according to the invention.

In Figure 1 the visible sides of the trays and in Figure 2 the visible fronts of the trays are shown in section so as to indicate their internal configuration.

Figure 1 shows a feed tray 10 mounted above an inspection tray 14. The peripheral lower edge of tray 10 and the peripheral upper edge of tray 14 have complementary tongue and groove configurations so that when the trays are brought together as shown in Figure 1 the upper tray 10 fits snugly into the lower tray 14 to form a seal between the respective peripheries. The tongue and groove configurations are asymmetrical so that the trays 10 and 14 can only be fitted together in one direction.

The tray 10 has multiple internal cells 11 each with a porous base 12 to provide for feed of material to tray 14. The tray 14 has multiple internal cells 15 each with a base 16 of optical-grade transparent plastic to provide for inspection of light activity within the cells 15. The illustrated trays 10 and 14 each have 24 cells, arranged in four rows of six and of complementary configuration and shape to each other so that the inspection cells 15 are aligned beneath the corresponding feed cells 11 when the trays 10 and 14 are fitted together.

Internal walls of the cells 11 and 15 are of lesser height than the side walls of the respective trays 10 and 14 to allow for a uniform vapour pressure in the head space above the cells in the respective trays.

Figure 2 shows an opto-electrical unit according to the invention and containing several inspection trays 14. It has a casing 30 made from heat-, water-and solvent-resistant insulating plastic to provide a durable covering and minimise heat loss. The unit includes two tray-receiving

zones, an upper zone 31 and a lower zone 41. The upper zone 31 is a measurement zone to receive an inspection tray 14 containing bacteria and soil extracts. The lower zone 41 is an incubation zone to store up to four inspection trays 14 at optimum temperature for activation of the bacteria prior to addition of soil extracts.

The opto-electrical unit is powered by a rechargeable battery, capable of being charged from a 12 V car cigar lighter socket or transformer linked to a 240 V mains supply.

The measurement zone 31 has an opaque hinged flap 33 (shown as transparent in Figure 2 so as to indicate its contents) which is opened by an eject button 34 to permit an inspection tray 14 to be inserted and locked in position. The flap 33 is then firmly closed so as prevent the entry of any extraneous light source into the zone 31. The eject button 34 allows release and removal of the tray after measurement.

An array of 24 light sensors 36 (programmable light-to-frequency converting photodiodes) is located at the base of the measurement zone 31, with each sensor being positioned to be in alignment with a cell 15 in an inserted inspection tray 14. The array of light sensors 36 is fitted with a corresponding array of lenses 37 to focus bioluminescence from each of the cells 15 to its respective sensor 36.

The incubation zone 41 has a hinged closure flap 42. It further includes a thermostatically-controlled heating pad 43 located in the base so as to create and sustain the optimum incubation temperature.

The upper part of the opto-electrical unit, above the measurement zone 31, houses a micro-controller which includes a soft-touch control keypad 51 and an LCD display screen 52 as a graphical interface for user interaction. The micro-controller mediates data acquisition and storage, and performs data analysis with the aid of programmed algorithms. The

LCD display allows datasets to be displayed in the field and operation of the unit to be customised via a series of menus, accessible by the keypad 51. A typical output display for each dataset is a two-dimensional representation of the inspection tray 14 with toxicity values expressed as percentage reduction in bioluminescence with respect to control values.

A wire or wireless port (infra-red) 53 from the micro-controller provides for downloading of data, for example stored multiple data sets, to another electronic device. Data can then be incorporated into customised software to show toxicity over time and space for the site under investigation. Figure 3 shows how the various electronic components relate to each other.

As supplied prior to use each feed tray 10 to receive soil samples contains in each of its cells 11 a specified volume of extractant liquid and is covered by a disposable sealing lid (not shown) extending over all the cells 11. A flexible plastic sheet (not shown) covers the sealing lid and together with it seals each cell 11. The sealing lid is held in place by easy-release plastic lugs 18.

In use of feed trays 10 to receive soil samples the sealing lid is removed and, after insertion of soil samples into the cells 11, is replaced by a pressurising lid 17 which is sealed to the rim of the tray 10 by a resilient plastic gasket 19 but does not seal the individual cells 11. The lid 17, which is also held in place by the plastic lugs 18, has a shaped orifice 24 to receive a pressurising syringe 25 and hold it in place with a Luer-lock fitting.

Further feed trays 10 are supplied with measured quantities of activation medium in each cell 11 to be used in activating bioluminescent bacteria.

Prior to use of the inspection tray 14, a defined quantity of freeze-dried bioluminescent bacteria is introduced into each of the cells 15. The

bacteria must be activated for a defined time (typically about 60 minutes) prior to addition of soil extracts. Activation is achieved by use of a further feed tray 10, pre-filled with a prescribed volume of activation medium and sealed with a disposable sealing lid and flexible plastic sheet.

This activation tray 10 is first placed over the inspection tray 14, the sealing lid and sheet are removed and replaced by the pressurising lid 17.

The syringe 25 is then employed to introduce air to pressurise the head space over the cells 11 and force activation medium through the porous bases to each cell 15 in the inspection tray 14.

The plastic sealing sheet is then put back onto the inspection tray 14 and the well-sealing lid clicked into place. The contents of the tray 14 are agitated for up to about 5 minutes. The plastic sheet is then removed and the well-sealing lid repositioned producing a less tight seal to allow gas exchange for the cells 15 to become metabolically active.

The tray 14 is then placed into the incubation zone 41 within the optoelectronic unit until the bacteria have reached a sufficient level of bioluminescent activity, typically after about 60 minutes. After this time the tray 14 is withdrawn from the incubation zone 41.

While incubation of the bacteria is in progress the user obtains a soil sample, for example by filling a hand-operated soil homogeniser with fresh soil, crushing the soil through a coarse filter into a plastic beaker, and using a spatula to transfer a specific volume of crushed soil into a cell 11 in a feed tray 10. A specific volume of extractant liquid is also introduced into the cell 11.

The first row of six cells 15 in the inspection tray 14 may comprise the following controls and standards (supplied with the tray): a cell with no soil extract ; a cell with a standard toxin to reduce bioluminescence to zero; and four cells with standard toxins corresponding to pollutant

trigger levels relevant to the site under investigation and the risk assessment system followed.

When all cells 11 contain either soil samples and extractant liquid or relevant control solutions a cell-sealing lid is placed back on the feed tray 10 which is then agitated by hand for a prescribed time. The cell-sealing lid is then replaced with the pressurising lid 17 and the tray 10 is placed on top of the inspection tray 14, from which the loose-fitting lid has been removed. The head space in the tray 10 is pressurised as before by a syringe 25 to inject extracts separated from the soil and control solutions into each cell 15 in the inspection tray 14. A cell-sealing lid is then placed on the inspection tray 14, which is then agitated for a period of time.

When agitation is complete the cell-sealing lid is replaced by a loose fitting lid and the tray 14 is docked in the measurement zone 31 of the opto-electronic unit. The opto-electronic unit then simultaneously measures and records the level of bioluminescence emitted from each cell 15 over a specified time. The levels are displayed on the LCD screen 52 as a two dimensional representation of the tray 14 with toxicity values expressed as percentage reduction in bioluminescence with respect to the control values.

Claims

1. A device for measuring the generic toxicity of soil samples which comprises extraction means to separate pollutants from soil, a container to hold bioluminescent bacteria and to receive pollutants separated from the soil, and an opto-electronic unit to detect the level of bioluminescence from the container, characterised in that the extraction means comprises one or more modular feed trays each containing an array of cells which each have a porous base, the container for bacteria and pollutants comprises one or more modular inspection trays each containing an array of cells which each have a transparent or translucent base and which are arranged in a configuration complementary to that of the feed trays, and the opto-electronic unit includes an array of light sensors arranged in a configuration complementary to those of the feed and inspection trays.

2. A device as claimed in claim 1, in which the feed trays have shaped peripheral lower edges and the inspection trays have shaped peripheral upper edges of complementary tongue and groove configurations so that when the trays are brought together for transfer of material from the upper (feed) tray to the lower (inspection) tray a seal is formed between the respective peripheries.

3. A device as claimed in claim 2, in which the tongue and groove configurations are asymmetrical so that the trays can only be fitted together in one direction.

4. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the feed and inspection trays are constructed of moulded plastic material.

5. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the base of each of the cells in the feed trays is constructed of porous plastic.

6. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the base of each of the cells in the inspection trays is constructed of opticalgrade transparent plastic.

7. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the feed trays and the inspection trays include salable but detachable lids.

8. A device as claimed in claim 7, in which the lids employed for the feed trays include a shaped orifice to receive a pressurising syringe to create an excess pressure in the feed trays.

9. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the opto-electrical unit includes a measurement zone to receive an inspection tray containing bacteria and soil extracts.

10. A device as claimed in claim 9, in which the opto-electrical unit further includes an incubation zone to store one or more inspection trays for activation of the bacteria prior to addition of soil extracts.

11. A device as claimed in claim 10, in which the incubation zone includes a heating element to apply to the zone an optimum level of heating for the incubation.

12. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the opto-electrical unit is battery powered.

13. A device as claimed in claim 12, in which the battery is of a rechargeable type.

14. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the light sensors are programmable light-to-frequency converting photodiodes.

15. A device as claimed in claim 9, in which the light sensors are located at the base of the measurement zone, with at least one sensor per inspection cell.

16. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which each of the light sensors has an associated lens to focus the bioluminescence from each of the cells.

17. A device as claimed in any preceding claim, in which the opto-electrical unit includes a micro-controller to mediate data acquisition and storage.

18. A method for measuring the generic toxicity of soil samples in which pollutants are first separated from the soil, are then brought into contact with bioluminescent bacteria and the level of bioluminescence is then detected and monitored, characterised in that the soil samples are placed together with a pollutant-extracting liquid into one or more modular feed trays each containing an array of cells which each have a porous base, extracted pollutants pass through the porous bases into a modular inspection tray containing an array of cells containing bioluminescent material which each have a transparent or translucent base and which are arranged in a configuration complementary to that of the feed trays, and the level of luminescence from the inspection cells is detected by an array of light sensors arranged in a configuration complementary to those of the feed and inspection trays.

19. A method as claimed in claim 18, in which the bioluminescent bacteria are selected from Vibrio fischeri, Vibrio harveyi, Photorhabdus luminoscens, Photobacterium phosphoreum, or any genetically engineered bacterium which displays luminescence.

20. A method as claimed in claim 18 or claim 19, in which the bacteria are stored in freeze-dried form, and activated when required, by addition of an activation medium.

21. A method as claimed in claim 20, in which the activation medium includes a substance that increases the sensitivity of the bacteria a given pollutant.

22. A method as claimed in claim 20 or claim 21, in which the bacteria are selected from tryptone (5.0 gll), yeast extract (2.5 gll), ammonium chloride (0.3 gll), calcium carbonate (1/0 g/l), magnesium sulphate (0.3 gilL ferric chloride (0.01 g/1), monopotassium phosphate (3.0 g/l), sodium glycerol phosphate (23.5 gll) and sodium chloride (30.0 g/1).

23. A method as claimed in one of claims 20 to 22, in which the activation is effected by incubation at a temperature in the range 20 to 37 C.

24. A method as claimed in claim 23, in which the incubation is conducted for a period in the range 60 to 120 minutes).

25. A method as claimed in any of claims 18 to 24, in which the soil samples for analysis are crushed to a particle size in the range 10 to 500 hum.

26. A method as claimed in any of claims 18 to 25, in which the extractant liquid is selected from surfactants, solutions based on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and mixtures thereof.

27. A method as claimed in any of claims 18 to 26, in which for control purposes some of the cells in the inspection trays may comprise one or more of the following standard contents: (a) no soil extract;

(b) a standard toxin to reduce bioluminescence by 100%; (c) one or more standard toxins corresponding to pollutant trigger levels relevant to the site under investigation and the risk assessment system followed.

28. A method as claimed in claim 27, in which the standard toxin corresponding to a pollutant trigger level is selected from one or more of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenols and heavy metals such as copper, lead, mercury or cadmium.