GB2373671A - Telecommunications systems and methods - Google Patents

Telecommunications systems and methods Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2373671A
GB2373671A GB0107356A GB0107356A GB2373671A GB 2373671 A GB2373671 A GB 2373671A GB 0107356 A GB0107356 A GB 0107356A GB 0107356 A GB0107356 A GB 0107356A GB 2373671 A GB2373671 A GB 2373671A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
packets
flow
information
information packets
rate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB0107356A
Other versions
GB0107356D0 (en
GB2373671B (en
Inventor
Martinez Jose Luis Carrizo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vodafone Ltd
Original Assignee
Vodafone Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vodafone Ltd filed Critical Vodafone Ltd
Priority to GB0107356A priority Critical patent/GB2373671B/en
Publication of GB0107356D0 publication Critical patent/GB0107356D0/en
Publication of GB2373671A publication Critical patent/GB2373671A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2373671B publication Critical patent/GB2373671B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/24Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
    • H04L47/2416Real-time traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/22Traffic shaping
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/24Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
    • H04L47/245Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS using preemption
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/32Flow control; Congestion control by discarding or delaying data units, e.g. packets or frames

Abstract

In a telecommunications system, an input flow (10) of speech packets arrives. In addition, an input flow (20) of high priority packets (e.g. signalling packets) arrives intermittently. The high priority packets are to be inserted into the flow of speech packets to produce an output flow (18), in which the high priority packets are inserted into time slots previously occupied by speech packets. A "leaky bucket" algorithm (30,32) is used to control the insertion of the high priority packets into the output flow so that a burst of the high priority packets, up to a predetermined maximum size, can be inserted. In addition, it is ensured that at least N speech packets remain in the output flow between two consecutive higher priority packets therein. Insertion of a high priority packet can cause a speech packet to be discarded (deleted) or, instead, can simply delay all the speech packets by one time slot.

Description

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND METHODS The invention relates to telecommunications systems and methods. In embodiments of the invention to be described in more detail below, by way of example only, the transmission of information of a first type is interrupted in a controlled way to allow the transmission of information of a second type (for example, having a higher priority).
According to the invention, there is provided a telecommunications system, having a first input for receiving a flow of first information packets serially presented in consecutive time slots occurring at a first predetermined rate, a second input for receiving a second flow of information packets intermittently presented, and control means responsive to the second information packets for inserting each one into the flow of first packets in a respective time slot therein instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot to produce an output flow, the control means comprising feeding means for normally so inserting the second information packets at a rate not more than a predetermined maximum rate but permitting not more than a predetermined plurality of successive second information packets to be so inserted at an enhanced rate higher than the predetermined maximum.
According to the invention, there is also provided a telecommunications method, comprising the steps of (a) receiving a flow of first information packets serially presented in consecutive time slots occurring at a first predetermined rate, (b) receiving a second flow of information packets intermittently presented, and (c) responding to the second information packets by inserting each one into the flow of first packets in a respective time slot therein instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot to produce an output flow, the second information packets being normally so inserted at a rate not more than a predetermined maximum rate but not more than a predetermined plurality of successive second information packets being permitted to be so inserted at an enhanced rate higher than the predetermined maximum.
Telecommunications systems and methods according to the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings in which: Figure 1 shows packets of service information being transmitted in one of the systems; Figure 2 shows packets of higher priority information being transmitted in the system; Figure 3 is a block diagram of one of the systems, receiving flows of information packets of the types shown in Figures 1 and 2; and Figure 4 is a block diagram of a modified form of the system of Figure 3.
Figure 1 shows a typical flow of information packets in a telecommunications system, in particular in a telephone system such as a cellular telephone system of the GSM type.
The information packets in Figure 1 are"service"packets-that is, they are packets of the information which the system is designed to transmit to perform the service required by its users. For example, they can represent speech. These packets will be transmitted at a constant rate (S) during periods A, B, C....... of variable length separated (in the case of speech) by periods of silence as shown at D, E............. ; that is, the system defines a series of time slots occurring at a rate S, each time slot comprising one speech packet during a period of speech transmission.
In such a system, it is also necessary to transmit higher priority information packets intermittently, and this higher priority information is shown diagrammatically in Figure 2. This higher priority information may comprise signalling or control information, for example, and will arrive intermittently and possibly in bursts.
The systems and methods to be described enable the transmission of the lower priority packets shown in Figure 1 to be interrupted to allow transmission of the higher priority packets shown in Figure 2. It is implicit in this process that the system can be tolerant to a limited loss of the packets shown in Figure 1, and this is true in the case where the information shown in Figure 1 comprises speech packets. However, the amount of loss of speech packets information which can be permitted is limited. The systems and methods to be described facilitate the control of the amount of such loss, at the same time optimising the transmission of the higher priority information packets of the type shown in Figure 2. Although the following description refers to the lower priority packets as speech packets, it will be understood that they need not be packets of this type.
As shown in Figure 3, the system has an input 10 which receives the service information packets (that is, the speech packets in this example), which arrive at the constant rate (S) during the periods of activity A, B, C..., separated by periods D, E... of inactivity or silence.
The speech packets arriving on the input 10 are fed to one input 12 of a gate device 14. The gate device 14 has a second input 16 which receives the higher priority packets. The gate device responds to receipt of each higher priority packet by discarding one speech packet and replacing it with the higher priority packet. The gate device 14 therefore produces an output flow 18 comprising packets occurring in respective time slots having the same rate (S) as in the input flow but which includes high priority packets interspersed with the speech packets.
The higher priority packets arrive intermittently on an input 20. In view of their priority, it is desirable that each such packet be transmitted within the output flow 18 as soon as possible. However, each such packet will displace one of the speech packets, thus at least slightly degrading the speech output. The degree of such degradation must be limited and it is therefore necessary to control the manner in which the high priority packets displace the speech packets. This control is performed by a control arrangement 22, now to be described. The control arrangement 22 operates using a so-called"leaky bucket"algorithm. The higher priority packets arriving on the input 20 are fed into an input queueing arrangement 24. A gating arrangement 26, controlled by the leaky bucket algorithm in a manner to be explained, controls the onward passage of each high priority packet from the queueing arrangement 24 to an output queue 28 and thence to the gate device 14.
The leaky bucket algorithm comprises a dynamic store or"bucket"30 which receives and holds"tokens". Tokens are produced at a constant rate R by a token generator 32.
Normally, R will be a sub-multiple of S. The store 30 has a maximum capacity Bx-that is, this is the maximum number of tokens which it can store at any time. If it is full, further tokens arriving from the token generator 32 are simply discarded. The gating arrangement 26 requires one token from the store or bucket 30 to allow one higher priority packet in the queueing arrangement 24 to pass through to the output queue 28, and each such packet passing through the gating arrangement 26"consumes"or removes that token from the store 30. If the store 30 contains several tokens, and a corresponding number of high priority packets arrive on the input 20, they can thus be passed rapidly through the gating arrangement 26 (that is, their rate of transmission is not restricted to R). Thus, the maximum number of higher priority packets which can be passed through in this manner will correspond to Bmax. When the bucket 30 has been completely emptied, the next higher priority packet arriving on the input 20, or already present in the queueing arrangement 24, cannot be passed through the gating arrangement 26 until the next token arrives from the token generator 32. In this way, therefore, a"burst"of high priority data packets queued in the queueing arrangement 24 or arriving there if the queueing arrangement is wholly or partially empty, can be passed rapidly through the gating arrangement 26 if there are sufficient tokens already held in the store 30, but once the bucket has been emptied by such a burst of higher priority packets, they can thereafter pass through the gate 26 at a maximum rate corresponding to the rate R at which the tokens are produced by the token generator 32. Of course, if there is a sufficiently long period in which no higher priority packets arrive on the input 20, the bucket 30 will become re-filled with tokens, or at least partially re-filled, ready to allow another burst of data packets to pass through the gating arrangement if such a burst occurs.
Higher priority packets pass from the output queue 28 to the control unit 32 and each replaces a respective one of the speech packets in the output flow 18. The higher priority packets exiting the output queue 28 are thus in phase with the time slots in the output flow 18. The output queue 28 could be arranged (if it receives sufficiently frequent higher priority packets) to allow such higher priority packets to replace consecutive speech packets in the output flow 18. However, this is unlikely to be acceptable in practice because it could result in the discarding of several consecutive speech packets, which might render the speech output unintelligible or at least unsatisfactory. It is therefore desirable that a limit be placed on the minimum number (N) of time slots between any two speech packets into which higher priority packets can be inserted. For example, N may equal 1, so that it is not possible for two consecutive speech packets to be deletedin other words, there is always at least one speech packet between two consecutive high priority packets in the output flow. In effect, this means that higher priority packets cannot be supplied to the gate 14 at a rate higher than half the rate of occurrence of the time slots in the output flow 18. This can be ensured by means of the output queue 28.
The output queue 28 can be considered as having a number of queueing locations, the content of each of which is passed in turn to the gate 14, at the rate S. If, under operation of the store 30 in the manner explained above, a higher priority packet is placed into a queueing location in the output queue 28, the output queue automatically ensures that the immediately following N queueing locations are empty-so that they do not become filled with another higher priority packet even if one is immediately output by the gate 26. In this way, therefore, it is ensured that two consecutive speech packets cannot be discarded.
In principle, though, N could be 0 if the flow of lower priority packets is not significantly prejudiced.
The operations described above are the operations applicable during a period when speech packets are arriving-such as shown at A, B or C in Figure 1. During"silence"periods as shown at D and E for example, there need be no limitation on the insertion of the high priority packets into the output flow 18. In other words, the control arrangement 22 is "inactive". In addition, the bucket 30 is considered to be full at the end of each silence period (corresponding to the beginning of the next speech period). The bucket can also be considered to be full when the system is initialised.
In the system as described above, each higher priority packet arriving at the gate 14 causes one of the speech packets to be discarded (or deleted). Figure 4 shows a modified arrangement in which items corresponding to those in Figure 3 are similarly referenced.
In the system of Figure 4, the incoming lower priority packets are not fed directly to the gate 14 but are fed to the gate 14 via a queue 36 from which they are fed in turn to the gate 14. Each higher priority packet arriving at the gate 14 from the output queue 28 in this case does not discard the next-arriving lower priority packet but instead causes that packet to be held temporarily (for a period liS) in the first queueing location in the queueing arrangement 36, the immediately following packet similarly being delayed. In effect, all the packets in the queueing arrangement 36 are moved backwards by one queueing location. It may not be possible to operate such a queueing and delaying system with some types of lower priority packets; indeed it may not be possible when the lower priority packets are speech packets.
The systems and methods described are advantageous in that they control how the higher priority packets discard or delay lower priority packets. In particular, the systems and methods enable a"burst"of higher priority packets (up to the maximum capacity of the bucket 30) to be inserted into the output flow. In addition, it is ensured that the output flow always contains at least N lower priority packets following each inserted higher priority packet.
In a modification of the systems described, the higher priority packets could be of different types, perhaps arriving in parallel with each other, and each such type may be allocated different values of one or more of the control parameters Bmax, R and N.

Claims (26)

  1. CLAIMS 1. A telecommunications system, having a first input for receiving a flow of first information packets serially presented in consecutive time slots occurring at a first predetermined rate, a second input for receiving a second flow of information packets intermittently presented, and control means responsive to the second information packets for inserting each one into the flow of first packets in a respective time slot therein instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot to produce an output flow, the control means comprising feeding means for normally so inserting the second information packets at a rate not more than a predetermined maximum rate but permitting not more than a predetermined plurality of successive second information packets to be so inserted at an enhanced rate higher than the predetermined maximum.
  2. 2. A system according to claim 1, in which the predetermined maximum rate is less than the said first predetermined rate.
  3. 3. A system according to claim 2, in which the enhanced rate is not more than the first predetermined rate.
  4. 4. A system according to claim 2 or 3, in which the predetermined maximum is a submultiple of the first predetermined rate and defines time slots each of which is in phase with a respective time slot in the first flow.
  5. 5. A system according to any preceding claim, in which the control means includes limiting means for ensuring that second information packets are not present in consecutive ones of the time slots in the output flow.
  6. 6. A system according to claim 5, in which the limiting means comprises means for ensuring at least N time slots occupied by first information packets in the output flow between any two time slots therein respectively occupied by second information packets.
  7. 7. A system according to any preceding claim, in which the control means comprises timing means defining gating time slots occurring at a rate corresponding to the said predetermined maximum rate, the feeding means comprising gating means for receiving the second information packets and controlled by the timing means to be open for each gating time slot to allow the passage of a respective one of the second information packets, and override means operative in the absence of any second information packets during the occurrence of not more than a number of the gating time slots corresponding to the said predetermined plurality to open the gating means and allow the passage therethrough of not more than that number of second information packets at the enhanced rate.
  8. 8. A system according to claim 7, in which the gating means is operative under control of a leaky bucket algorithm.
  9. 9. A system according to any preceding claim, in which the said flow of first information packets is followed by a period during which no first information packets are presented, and in which the feeding means is operative during that period to permit any plurality of successive second packets to be inserted into the first flow.
  10. 10. A system according to any preceding claim, in which any first information packet in a time slot in the first flow into which a said second information packet is inserted instead of that first information packet never appears in the output flow.
  11. 11. A system according to any one of claims 1 to 9, in which the insertion of a said second information packet into the time slot in the first flow instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot causes that first information packet to be delayed until a later time slot.
  12. 12. A system according to any preceding claim, in which the first information packets are speech packets and the second information packets are signalling information packets.
  13. 13. A telecommunications system, substantially described with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawing.
  14. 14. A telecommunications method, comprising the steps of (a) receiving a flow of first information packets serially presented in consecutive time slots occurring at a first predetermined rate, (b) receiving a second flow of information packets intermittently presented, and (c) responding to the second information packets by inserting each one into the flow of first packets in a respective time slot therein instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot to produce an output flow, the second information packets being normally so inserted at a rate not more than a predetermined maximum rate but not more than a predetermined plurality of successive second information packets being permitted to be so inserted at an enhanced rate higher than the predetermined maximum.
  15. 15. A method according to claim 14 in which the predetermined maximum rate is less than the first predetermined rate.
  16. 16. A method according to claim 15, in which the enhanced rate is not more than the first predetermined rate.
  17. 17. A method according to claim 15 or 16, in which the predetermined maximum is a sub-multiple of the first predetermined rate and defines time slots each of which is in phase with a respective time slot in the first flow.
  18. 18. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 17, including the step of ensuring that second information packets are not present in consecutive ones of the time slots in the output flow.
  19. 19. A method according to any one of claims 13 to 17, including the step of ensuring at least N time slots occupied by first information packets in the output flow between any two time slots therein respectively occupied by second information packets.
  20. 20. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 19, in which step (c) comprises the steps of defining gating time slots occurring at a rate corresponding to the said predetermined maximum rate, permitting the passage of a respective one of the second information packets for each gating time slot, and in the absence of any second information packets presented during the occurrence of not more than a number of the gating time slots corresponding to the said predetermined plurality permitting the passage of not more than that number of second information packets at the enhanced rate, each second information packet whose passage is permitted being inserted into the flow of first packets in a respective time slot therein instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot to produce the output flow.
  21. 21. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 19, in which step (c) is controlled by a leaky bucket algorithm.
  22. 22. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 21, in which the said flow of first information packets is followed by a period during which no first information packets are presented, and including the step operative during that period to permit any plurality of successive second packets to be inserted into the first flow.
  23. 23. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 22, in which any first information packet in a time slot in the first flow into which a said second information packet is inserted instead of that first information packet never appears in the output flow.
  24. 24. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 22, in which the insertion of a said second information packet into the time slot in the first flow instead of the first information packet occupying that time slot causes that first information packet to be delayed until a later time slot.
  25. 25. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 24, in which the first information packets are speech packets and the second information packets are signalling information packets.
  26. 26. A telecommunications method, substantially as described with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings.
GB0107356A 2001-03-23 2001-03-23 Telecommunications systems and methods Expired - Fee Related GB2373671B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0107356A GB2373671B (en) 2001-03-23 2001-03-23 Telecommunications systems and methods

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0107356A GB2373671B (en) 2001-03-23 2001-03-23 Telecommunications systems and methods

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB0107356D0 GB0107356D0 (en) 2001-05-16
GB2373671A true GB2373671A (en) 2002-09-25
GB2373671B GB2373671B (en) 2004-04-07

Family

ID=9911444

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB0107356A Expired - Fee Related GB2373671B (en) 2001-03-23 2001-03-23 Telecommunications systems and methods

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2373671B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1524807A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2005-04-20 Agilent Technologies Creating a low bandwidth channel within a high bandwidth packet stream
WO2005112366A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2005-11-24 Nokia Corporation Rate shaper algorithm

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2166320A (en) * 1984-10-25 1986-04-30 Stc Plc Packet switching system
WO1995012265A1 (en) * 1993-10-26 1995-05-04 Northern Telecom Limited Digital telecommunication link for efficiently transporting mixed classes of packets
WO2000020876A1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2000-04-13 General Datacomm, Inc. Communication network
GB2348344A (en) * 1999-01-27 2000-09-27 Motorola Inc Serial bus messaging protocol with priority interrupt

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2166320A (en) * 1984-10-25 1986-04-30 Stc Plc Packet switching system
WO1995012265A1 (en) * 1993-10-26 1995-05-04 Northern Telecom Limited Digital telecommunication link for efficiently transporting mixed classes of packets
WO2000020876A1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2000-04-13 General Datacomm, Inc. Communication network
GB2348344A (en) * 1999-01-27 2000-09-27 Motorola Inc Serial bus messaging protocol with priority interrupt

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JP2001024702 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1524807A1 (en) * 2003-10-17 2005-04-20 Agilent Technologies Creating a low bandwidth channel within a high bandwidth packet stream
US7336673B2 (en) 2003-10-17 2008-02-26 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Creating a low bandwidth channel within a high bandwidth packet stream
WO2005112366A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2005-11-24 Nokia Corporation Rate shaper algorithm

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0107356D0 (en) 2001-05-16
GB2373671B (en) 2004-04-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1327335B1 (en) Prioritising data with flow control
US4769810A (en) Packet switching system arranged for congestion control through bandwidth management
US5835494A (en) Multi-level rate scheduler
US4769811A (en) Packet switching system arranged for congestion control
US6058109A (en) Combined uniform rate and burst rate transmission system
JP3319827B2 (en) Asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) transmission test cell generator
US8861362B2 (en) Data flow control
US6771601B1 (en) Network switch having source port queuing and methods, systems and computer program products for flow level congestion control suitable for use with a network switch having source port queuing
WO2008009111A1 (en) Expedited communication traffic handling apparatus and methods
KR100258157B1 (en) Priority control method of virtual clrcuit and device thereof
US4443875A (en) Apparatus and methods of call clearing in a packet switched data communications network
US6952739B2 (en) Method and device for parameter independent buffer underrun prevention
US5606553A (en) Cell processing for voice transmission
EP0621710B1 (en) Traffic intermixing mechanism for fast circuit switching
US20040022246A1 (en) Packet sequence control
US7499400B2 (en) Information flow control in a packet network based on variable conceptual packet lengths
US6721825B1 (en) Method to control data reception buffers for packetized voice channels
US6735191B1 (en) Method and apparatus for transporting TDM voice traffic over an ATM network
GB2373671A (en) Telecommunications systems and methods
US20070263542A1 (en) Method for Transmitting Data Available in the Form of Data Packets
US8743687B2 (en) Filtering data flows
US7573817B2 (en) Policing data based on data load profile
US6151303A (en) Method of asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) switching and an ATM switching equipment
JPH06338905A (en) Priority controller in atm exchange network
Wu et al. A comparative study of some leaky bucket network access schemes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170323