GB2344974A - Fair packet discard in networks - Google Patents

Fair packet discard in networks Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2344974A
GB2344974A GB9827491A GB9827491A GB2344974A GB 2344974 A GB2344974 A GB 2344974A GB 9827491 A GB9827491 A GB 9827491A GB 9827491 A GB9827491 A GB 9827491A GB 2344974 A GB2344974 A GB 2344974A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
discard
buffer
packet
packets
connections
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB9827491A
Other versions
GB9827491D0 (en
GB2344974B (en
Inventor
Kathryn Gratland
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Roke Manor Research Ltd
Original Assignee
Roke Manor Research Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Roke Manor Research Ltd filed Critical Roke Manor Research Ltd
Priority to GB9827491A priority Critical patent/GB2344974B/en
Publication of GB9827491D0 publication Critical patent/GB9827491D0/en
Publication of GB2344974A publication Critical patent/GB2344974A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2344974B publication Critical patent/GB2344974B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q11/00Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems
    • H04Q11/04Selecting arrangements for multiplex systems for time-division multiplexing
    • H04Q11/0428Integrated services digital network, i.e. systems for transmission of different types of digitised signals, e.g. speech, data, telecentral, television signals
    • H04Q11/0478Provisions for broadband connections
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5638Services, e.g. multimedia, GOS, QOS
    • H04L2012/5646Cell characteristics, e.g. loss, delay, jitter, sequence integrity
    • H04L2012/5647Cell loss
    • H04L2012/5648Packet discarding, e.g. EPD, PTD
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/54Store-and-forward switching systems 
    • H04L12/56Packet switching systems
    • H04L12/5601Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
    • H04L2012/5678Traffic aspects, e.g. arbitration, load balancing, smoothing, buffer management
    • H04L2012/5681Buffer or queue management
    • H04L2012/5682Threshold; Watermark

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

In a method of implementing a fair packet discard in an unspecified bit rate (UBR) network, packets 30-44 to be transmitted on a link in the network are queued in a FIFO buffer 10 in their order of arrival in the buffer. Connections 20-28 are chosen for discard by making a list of connection numbers for the packets arriving in the buffer, Fig. 3, (not shown), selecting the first n connection numbers for discard in accordance with a threshold level 50-56, and updating the list. Discard is primarily achieved using early packet discard but partial packet discard may also be applied if the buffer fills to its maximum capacity 56.

Description

IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO NETWORKS The present invention relates to improvements in or relating to networks.
Asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) networks typically support a mixture of all traffic types, including'bursty'traffic.'Bursty'traffic requires high peak bit rates for a portion of the time that the connection is active and usually little or no bandwidth for the remaining time. For example, data flow on an active connection may be on for 100 bits, off for 300 bits and on again for 100 bits giving a 25% usage. In order to efficiently allocate the network resources with respect to buffer and bandwidth in an ATM network, the 'bursty'traffic statistically shares the resources among multiple'bursty'data flows. Due to the statistical allocation, it is possible that the instantaneous aggregate bit rate of the traffic may exceed the peak bit rate of the link. This leads to buffers filling and a congestion state occurring in the network. During a prolonged congestion state, cells may be dropped due to buffer overflow.
It is, however, preferred that the cells be discarded in accordance with a predetermined regime and there are several regimes which may be employed for discarding cells. The simplest discard regime is to'queue tail discard'. In this regime, the network element discards single cells when the buffer becomes full. However, this typically results in poor performance for frame (or packet) based traffic streams as a single cell discard will result in the entire packet being discarded at the end of the system. If only one cell out of every ten packets is discarded (a low loss rate), this will cause the end system to discard one in ten packets which is not acceptable.
One solution to this problem is to identify each data packet and if a cell must be discarded from a packet, discard all cells from that packet thereby freeing up a large amount of buffer space. In a packet based protocol for data ('bursty') traffic, a special'payload type identifier' (PTI) field value is assigned to each packet. The PTI indicates which cell is the end of a packet for each connection and therefore allows the use of packet discard regimes.
Packet discard makes the network utilisation more efficient as it no longer carries cells which will be discarded at the end system.
Two known regimes for discarding packet based traffic are'early packet discard' (EPD) and'partial packet discard' (PPD). The PPD regime maintains a threshold region in the buffer which indicates that the buffer is nearly full. This threshold region is allocated on a per connection basis or on an entire buffer basis. When the buffer occupancy exceeds the threshold, PPD drops cells from a connection. The decision on which connection to discard cells from is made either by selecting the next cell to arrive in the buffer or by using a more fair mechanism which discards based on which connection is the highest user of buffer space.
The EPD regime employs a similar mechanism to that employed by PPD, but it is more proactive. The threshold region for triggering EPD is lower than that for PPD, and when crossed, EPD drops complete incoming packets to the buffer. EPD avoids the transmission of incomplete packets and increases throughput over'queue tail discarding'. As with PPD, the discard regime can be tailored to suit the fairness and complexity requirements of a network system. EPD may choose to discard packets from connections that are the highest users of buffer space or by selecting the connection of the next incoming cell.
In conventional implementations of EPD and PPD, a fair discard policy is based on per connection utilisation figures. In this way, an accurate choice can be made for which connections are the highest users of limited buffer space of the system. However, in a small system, for example, an access network, it is not always possible to provide per connection queuing or statistics on a per connection basis.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an alternative mechanism for marking connections for discard in a fair manner without the large overhead required by conventional implementations of EPD and PPD.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of implementing fair packet discard in an unspecified bit rate system, the method comprising the steps of : a) receiving a plurality of packets into a buffer; b) selecting one or more packets for discard when a threshold has been reached for the buffer; and c) implementing discard for the selected packet (s); characterised in that step a) comprises forming a queue for the received packets in order of their arrival in the buffer and step b) comprises making a list of connection numbers for the plurality of packets in the buffer, selecting the first n connection numbers for discard, and updating the list.
Advantageously, step c) comprises implementing early packet discard.
Additionally, step c) may also comprise implementing partial packet discard.
For a better understanding of the present invention, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings in which: Figure 1 illustrates five possible unspecified bit rate (UBR) connections on a single link; Figure 2 illustrates queuing architecture for fair packet discard (FPD) in accordance with the present invention; and Figure 3 illustrates a discard list from which fair packet discard is implemented.
Figure 1 illustrates five possible UBR connections 1,2,3,4,5 on a single link. If, at time T, it is necessary to discard some cells because the limited resources are exhausted, a decision must be made about which connection is to have cells discarded therefrom. If there is no requirement that the discard mechanism is fair, then any connection may have the discard regime applied to it. However, if a fair discard mechanism is required, an informed choice must be made.
For the purposes of the present invention, connections with the highest utilisation will be selected for discard where several UBR connections are sharing a finite bandwidth and buffer space. However, it will be appreciated that other mechanisms can be selected to determine which connections are discarded.
Connections with the highest utilisation have been chosen for discard in this instance because: a) The UBR traffic does not have any weighting towards more important connections. This implies that no one connection should absorb all bandwidth and buffer space at the expense of other connections. b) It has been shown that transmission control protocol (TCP) traffic reacts better under network congestion if a small amount of users experience high discard rather than all users experience small average discard.
In Figure 2, a shared buffer 10 comprises a single first in, first out (FIFO) device. As shown, five UBR connections 20,22,24,26,28 are directed into the buffer 10 for storage, the connections being read out in the same order that they are read in. A plurality of data packets 30,32,34,36,38, 40, 42,44 which have already been received by the buffer 10 are also shown.
In accordance with the present invention, a method of recording the highest users on a particular link is required. A discard list as shown in Figure 3 is used to achieve this. The discard list is in the form of a ring buffer which records the connections on which he most recent cell arrivals have occurred.
As shown, the least recent arrival is indicated at'X'and the most recent arrival at'Y'with the maximum length of the list between these two points being'M' entries.
When the buffer 10 fills up and an EPD threshold is crossed, the first 'n'connections from the most recent list are taken and EPD are triggered for these connections. It will be appreciated that'n'is less than'M'and that the discards are taken from the head of the list. For example, if'n'is 5, connections 2, 64, 19, 34 and 8 as shown in Figure 3 will be discarded. In Figure 2, a first EPD point is indicated at 50. Similarly, two further EPD points are indicated at 52,54. A PPD point is also indicated at 56.
As discard is performed on a per connection basis, certain parameters must be kept on a per connection basis. An example of the per connection information is shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Connection No. Discard Flag EPD/PPD 1 True Inactive 2 False Active 3 False Inactive N True Inactive It is to be noted that the method of the present invention does not require information relating to the number of cells currently in the buffer for any particular connection. The information held only indicates if there is discard active or pending for each of the connections.
For each of the'n'connections chosen from the discard list, the 'Discard Flag'is set to'True'. When the last cell of a packet (end of packet EOP) enters the buffer for this connection, the EPD is started by setting the 'EPD/PPD Flag'to'Active'and resets the'Discard Flag'. EPD is continued on each of these connections until the next EOP cell arrives. The'EPD/PPD Flag'is then reset to'Inactive'.
Although the present invention implements discard using EPD, it will be appreciated that the buffer queue may still fill up to near its maximum capacity. This is because the threshold for EPD is lower than that for PPD and although EPD may be in progress, more connections may still be sent to the buffer 10. When the threshold for PPD is reached, a reactive PPD is started.
When full, the buffer must discard the next cell that enters it, and set the 'EPD/PPD Flag'to'Active'for that connection. As with EPD, discard is 'Active'until the next EOP cell arrives in the buffer. The'EPD/PPD Flag'is then set to'Inactive'.

Claims (3)

CLAIMS:
1. A method of implementing fair packet discard in an unspecified bit rate system, the method comprising the steps of : a) receiving a plurality of packets into a buffer; b) selecting one or more packets for discard when a threshold has been reached for the buffer; and c) implementing discard for the selected packet (s); characterised in that step a) comprises forming a queue for the received packets in order of their arrival in the buffer and step b) comprises making a list of connection numbers for the plurality of packets in the buffer, selecting the first n connection numbers for discard, and updating the list.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein step c) comprises implementing early packet discard.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein step c) comprises implementing partial packet discard.
GB9827491A 1998-12-15 1998-12-15 Improvements in or relating to networks Expired - Fee Related GB2344974B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9827491A GB2344974B (en) 1998-12-15 1998-12-15 Improvements in or relating to networks

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9827491A GB2344974B (en) 1998-12-15 1998-12-15 Improvements in or relating to networks

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9827491D0 GB9827491D0 (en) 1999-02-10
GB2344974A true GB2344974A (en) 2000-06-21
GB2344974B GB2344974B (en) 2003-07-23

Family

ID=10844187

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9827491A Expired - Fee Related GB2344974B (en) 1998-12-15 1998-12-15 Improvements in or relating to networks

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2344974B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1170975A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-09 Roke Manor Research Limited Method of operating a packet reassembly buffer
GB2367713A (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-04-10 Nec Corp Transmission queue managing system
EP1322074A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-06-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method of fair queueing of data packets

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0744850A2 (en) * 1995-05-22 1996-11-27 Fore Systems, Inc. Digital network including early packet discard mechanism with adjustable threshold
US5764641A (en) * 1995-09-08 1998-06-09 Cisco Systems, Inc. Early and integrated tail packet discard system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0744850A2 (en) * 1995-05-22 1996-11-27 Fore Systems, Inc. Digital network including early packet discard mechanism with adjustable threshold
US5764641A (en) * 1995-09-08 1998-06-09 Cisco Systems, Inc. Early and integrated tail packet discard system

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1170975A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-09 Roke Manor Research Limited Method of operating a packet reassembly buffer
GB2367713A (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-04-10 Nec Corp Transmission queue managing system
GB2367713B (en) * 2000-07-05 2004-12-01 Nec Corp Transmission queue managing system
US6888835B2 (en) 2000-07-05 2005-05-03 Roke Manor Research Limited Buffer management
US7009937B2 (en) 2000-07-05 2006-03-07 Nec Corporation Transmission queue managing system capable of efficiently controlling traffic congestion
EP1322074A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-06-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method of fair queueing of data packets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9827491D0 (en) 1999-02-10
GB2344974B (en) 2003-07-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1279392C (en) Packet switching system arranged for congestion control
AU602379B2 (en) Packet switching system arranged for congestion control through bandwidth management
CA2065043C (en) Method for prioritizing selectively discarding and multiplexing differing traffic type fast packets
US6092115A (en) Method for supporting per-connection queuing for feedback-controlled traffic
US6535484B1 (en) Method and apparatus for per traffic flow buffer management
EP0763915B1 (en) Packet transfer device and method adaptive to a large number of input ports
US5629928A (en) Dynamic fair queuing to support best effort traffic in an ATM network
US5712851A (en) Adaptive time slot scheduling apparatus and method utilizing a linked list mechanism
EP0810809B1 (en) A scheduling method and apparatus for supporting ATM connections having a guaranteed minimum bandwidth
US5278828A (en) Method and system for managing queued cells
EP0533900B1 (en) Low delay or low loss cell switch for atm
EP0473330A1 (en) Serving constant bit rate traffic in a broadband data switch
EP0892574A2 (en) Buffer control apparatus and method
US6246687B1 (en) Network switching system supporting guaranteed data rates
US7680043B2 (en) Network processor having fast flow queue disable process
US6990115B2 (en) Queue control method and system
US6501762B1 (en) Scheduler implementing weighted fair queuing by a weight limited first in-first out methodology
US6980513B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for the fair allocation of bandwidth among MCR and best effort service connections in an ATM switch
GB2344974A (en) Fair packet discard in networks
GB2305576A (en) ATM network having a plurality of input buffers for congestion avoidance
KR100482687B1 (en) Congestion Control Apparatus And Method For UBR Service In ATM Switch
KR100204493B1 (en) Traffic scheduler apparatus by 2x1 switch with static priority queueing discipline of atm networks
KR100204492B1 (en) Method for ensuring the jitter in hrr queueing service of atm networks
Pao Efficient buffer management and selective packet discard for TCP over ATM
WO2001052075A1 (en) Simplified packet discard in atm switch

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20031023