GB2328675A - Patch bag comprising homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer - Google Patents

Abstract

A patch bag has a heat-shrinkable patch 24 adhered to a heat-shrinkable bag 22, the patch comprising film which comprises two substantially identical outer layers and two substantially identical inner layers. Each inner layer comprises homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer in an amount of from about 1 to 100 % of its weight. The outer layers each comprise homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer, optionally consisting solely thereof.

Description

2328675 1 PATCH EAG COMPRISING E0MOGEVEOUS ETHYLENE /ALPHA-OLEFIN

COPOLYMER

1. Field of. the Invention

The Dresent invention relates to packages for the packaging of bone-in meat products. more, particularly, the present invention relates to a bag having a protective patch adhered directly thereto, the protective patch preventing, or reducing, puncture of the bag by exposed bone from a meat product within the bag.

2. Background of the Invention

Heat-shrinkable thermoplastics are known to be useful as flexible packaging materials for vacuum packaging various f oodstuf fs, including meat. Such plas tic materials, however, while is generally suitable for packaging meat, understandably have difficulties in successfully packaging sharp or bony products. For example, attempts to package bone-in primal cuts of meat usually result in an unsatisfactorily large number of bag failures due to exposed bone puncturing the bag.

The use of cushioning materials such as paper, paper laminates, wax impregnated cloth,- and various types of plastic inserts have proved to be less than totally satisfactory in solving the problem, as they require large expenditure of materials and labor, and are subject to shifting off of protruding bones. The preparation of special cuts of meat or close bone trim with removal of protruding bones has also been attempted. However, this is at best only a limited solution to the problem since it does not offer the positive protection necessary for a wide variety of commercial bone-in types of meati. Furthermore, removal of the bone is a relatively expensive and time-consuming procedure.

Some time ago, the use of a bag having a patch theron, i.e., upatch bag, became a commercial ly-pre f erred manner of packaging number of bone-in meat products. One of the first commercially- 2 utilize,--' z)atch-bacs utilized a heat shrinkable bag and a patch comDosed of two laminated VALERON (TIM) high density polyethylene ("EDPE") -films, each film having been hichl" oriented in the y machine direction. In the laminated patch, the machine direction of a first HDPE lamina was oriented about 90 degrees with respect to the machine direction of a second patch lamina.

The VALERON (M) HDPE patch performed well in preventing punctures from exposed bone. However, upon packaging a meat product -i-- a heatshrinkable bag having such a patch thereon, the io corners c-E -%he iDatch delaminated from the bag upon shrinkage of the bag, due to the f act that the patch would not shrink -as the bag shrunk. Customers perceived the delamination of the patch corners from the baa to be highly undesirable. Furthermore, the highly oriented FIDPE films were opaque white due to the formation of voids is during the orientation process.

Thus, the need arose for a patch which would provide the patch bag with a desired level of puncture -res istanc e, while at the same time being heat-shrinkable so that there would be no substantial delamination at the corners of the patch. Furthermore, although for some use s it was desirable to use an opaque patch, for other uses it. was desirable to provide a substantially translucent or transparent patch.

Although ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer (OMW) was known to have the desired heat shrink properties for use in patches, it was discovered to lack the desired level- of puncture-resistance obtainablemsing the VALERON (M) HDPE patch. That is,, EVA patches had to be much thicker than an EDPE patch in order to provide the same level of puncture-resistance. Furthermore, in addition to lacking the desired puncture-resistant characterr EVA lacked abrasion-resistance, further diminishing its utility as-,.the bulk polymer in the patch.

Surprisingly, linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) was found to provide the combination of puncture-resistance, heat- 3 shrinkability, abrasion-resistance, and even transzarency, desired for use in a patch for patch bacs. Within the last 10 years, patch bags having patches composed of LLDPE have come into widespread commercial use in the united States.

However, LLDPE has several drawbacks. For examole, LLDPE is not easily processable as it causes high extruder back pressure if extrusion is atte=ted at relatively high speeds. Furthermore, because of its stiffness, LLDPE is difficult to orient, which necessitates that another polymer be blended with the LLDPE in 0 order to permit the desired orientation of the LLDPE to provide a shrinkable patch. Furthermore, LLDPE will not heat-seal to itself, necessitating the use of another type of polymer if the patch is to be formed from a collapsed film tube, as is one of the most desirable processes for manufacturing patches.

is Thus, it would be desirable to locate another polymer which can provide the combination of puncture-res!stance and heatshrinkability. Furthermore, it would be desirable that this other polymer also be capable of being manufactured as a substantially transparent film. Furthermore, it would be desirable if this other polymer was easier to extrude than LLDPE, had a stiffness low-enough to avoid the- need to blend a stif fnes s -reducing- -polymer therewith, and had the ability to be heat-sealed to itself. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIOU

The present invention is directed to the use of homogeneous ethyleneialpha-olefin copolymer in a patch for a patch bag. This homogeneous polymer has surprisingly been found to provide a combination of puncture-res istance and heat-shrinkability which is at least the eauivalent of LLDPE. Furthermore, it has also surprisingly been found that this homogeneous polymer has about the same abrasion-resistance as LLDPE.. and can be used to form a substantially transparent heat shrinkable patch. Thus, this homogeneous polymer has been discovered to provide an alternative to the use of LLDPE in patches f or patch bags. At least some Species of this homogeneous polymer are considerably easier to extrude than LLDPE. Furthermore, some species have a stiffness low enough to avoid the need to blend a stiffness reducing polymer therewith. Finally, at least some species of the polymer, when extruded into a tubular film, offer the further advantage of substantially better sealing to itself, relative to LLDPE.

The present invention provides a patch bag comprising a heat-shrinkable patch adhered to a heat-shrinkable bag, the heat-shrinkable patch comprising a first heatshrinkable film and the heat-shrinkable bag comprising a second heat-shrinkable film, the first heat-shrinkable film comprising homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer; wherein the first heat-shrinkable film comprises two outer is layers and two inner layers, the two outer layers being identical in chemical composition and thickness, and the two inner layers being substantially identical in chemical composition and thickness; wherein each of the two inner layers comprises the homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin in an amount of from about 1 to 100 weight percent, based on the weight of the inner layers; and wherein the second heat-shrinkable film consists essentially of homogeneous ethylene/ alpha-o 1 e fin copolymer.

substantiallv :. Preferably, the meat product comprIses at least one member selected from - the group consisting of ham, spareribs, picnic, back rib, sho.-L, lain, short rib, whole turkey, pork loin.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 illustrates a schematic view of a preferred end-seal patch bag according to the present invention, in a lay-flat view.

Figure 2 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the end-seal patch bag illustrated in Figure 1, taken through section 2-2 of Figure 1.

Figure 3A illustrates a cross-sectional view of a preferred multilayer film suitable for use as the patch in the patch-bag according to Figure 1.

Figure 3B illustrates an enlarged cross-sectional view of the multilayer film of Figure 3A.

Figure 3C illustrates a schematic cross-sectional view of a multilayer film described in Patch Film No. 19.

Figure 4 illustrates a schematic view of a preferred process for.making the multilayer film of Fig-are 3.

Figure 5 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a preferred multilayer film suitable for use as the bag in the patchbag according to Figure 1.

Figure 6 illustrates a schematic view of a preferred process for making the multilayer film of Figure 5.

Figure 7 illustrates a schematic view of a preferred process for making the patch bag of Figure 1, using the films of Figures 3 and 5, as respectively produced by the processes of Figures 4 and 6.

Figure 8 illustrates a perspective view of a shrunken patch bag containing a pair of fresh, bone-in whole pork loins, each viewed from the ham end.

4 6 Figure 9 illust.ates a cross -sec t ional view taken through section 9-9 of Figure 8, with the addition of a patch bag within which the pair of bon-e-in pork loins are packaged.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INMENTION

A film seal layer, i.e., sealing layer or heat seal layer, is an outer film layer, or layers, involved in the sealing of the film to itself, another film layer of the same or another film, and/or another article which is not a film. In ceneral, up to the outer 3 mils of a film can be involved in the sealing of the film to itself or another layer. with respect to packages ha7ing only fin type seals, as opposed to lap-type seals, the sealant layer includes the inside film layer of a package, as well as supporting layers adjacent. this sealant layer, the inside layer frecuently is also serving as a food contact layer in the packaging of foods.

In general, a sealant layer to be sealed by heat-sealing can comprise any thermoplastic polymer; preferably, the heat-sealing layer comprises, for example, thermoplastic polyolefin, th ermoplastic polyamide, thermoplastic polyester, and thermoplastic polyvinyl chloride; more preferably, thermoplastic polyolefin; still more preferably, thermoplastic polyolef in having less than 60 weight percent crystallinity. Preferred sealant compositions are the same as the compositions for the abuse layer, as set forth below.

A bag, seal is a seal of a f irst region of a f ilm, surf ace to a second region of a film surface, wherein the seal is formed by heating the regions to at least. their respective seal initiation ----"temperatures. The heating can be performed by any one or more of a wide variety of manners, such as using a heated bar, hot air, infrared radiation, ultrasonic sealing, etc.

A film barrier layer is a layer which serves as a barrier to one or more gases. oxygen (i.e., 0.) barrier layers can comprise, for example, ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymer, polyvinyl chloride, 7 polyvinylidene chloride, polyamide, polyester, polyacrylonitrile, etc., as known to those of skill in the art.; preferably, the oxygen barrier layer comprises ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymer. poly-vinylidene chloride, and polyamide; more preferably, vinylidene chloride/methyl acrylate copolymer, as known to those of skill in the art.

As used herein, "EVOW refers to ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymer. EVOH includes saponified or hydrolyzed ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers, and refers to a vinyl alcohol copolymer having an ethylene comonomer, and prepared by, for example, hydrolysis of -vinyl acetate copolymers, or by chemical reactions with polyvinyl alcohol. The degree of hydrolysis is preferably at least 50% and more preferably at least 85%.

A film abuse layer is a film layer which serves to resist abrasion, puncture, and other potential causes of reduction of package integrity, as well as potential causes of reduction of package appearance quality. Abuse layers can comprise any polymer, so long as the polymer contributes to achieving an integrity goal and/or an appearance- goal; preferably, the abuse layer comprises polymer comprising at least one member selected from the group consisting.of ethylenelalpha-olefin copolymer having a density of from about 0.85 to 0.951 propylene/ethylene copolymer, polyamider ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer, ethylenelmethyl acrylate copolymer, andethylenelbutyl acrylate copolymer, etc. as known to those of skill in the art; more preferably, in the patch bag of the present invention the abuse layer of the patch comprises homogeneous ethylenelalpha olefin copolymer.

A film core layer is an inner film layer, i.e., internal film layer, which has a primary function oter than serving as. an adhesive or compatibilizer for adhering.two layers to one another. Usually, the core layer, or lay'ers. provides the multilayer f ilm. with a desired level of strength, I.e., modulus, and/or optics, and/or added abuse resistance, and/or specific impermeability.

8 A film skin layer is an outside film layer, in a multilayer f ilm used in the packaging of a product. The skin layer is subject to abuse. Accordingly, the preferred polymers for the skin layer are the same as the preferred polymers for the abuse layer.

A film tielayer is an inner layer of a multilayer film, this inner layer having the primary purpose of adhering two layers of the film to one another. Tie layers generally comprise any polymer having a polar group grafted thereon, so that the polymer is capable of covalent bonding to polar polymers such as polyamide and ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymer; preferably, tie layers comprise at least one member selected from the group consisting of polyolefin, modified polyolefin, ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer, modified ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer, and homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer; more preferably, tie layers is comorise at least one member selected from the group consisting of anhydride modified grafted linear low density polyethylene, anhydride grafted low density polyethylene, homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olefin copolymer, and anhydride grafted ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer.

A film laminate is a film made by bonding together two or more layers of film or other materials. Lami nation can be accomplished by joining layers with adhesives, joining with heat and pressure, and even spread coating and extrusion coating. Film 1;RTninates also include coextruded multilayer films comprising one or more tie layers..

A heat-shrinkable film is typically made by first being stretched at an elevated temperature (the orientation temperature) which is below the melt temperature of at least one polymer present in the film. During the orientation process, the film is generally. biaxially oriented by being Ostretched' in the transverse direction, and adrawn in the machine direction. Preferably, the anDlication of substantial cooling occurs at some point downstream of the umstream. roller, the point of cooling being dependent upon 9 material croperties and cooling rates. Ultimately, this type of process results in a film which is heat-shrinkable in both th e transverse and longitudinal directions. Upon subsequently heating unrestrained, unannealed. oriented polymer-containing material to its orientation temperature, heat shrinkage is produced almost to the oriainal. unstretched, i.e., pre-oriented dimensions. The orientation in oriented films can be produced in one or more of a variety of manners.

The orientation ratio of a film is the multiplication product of the extent to which the plastic film material is expanded in several directions, usually two directions perpendicular to one another. "Drawing" is orientation in the machine direction, while "stretching" is orientation in the transverse direction. For films extruded throuch an annular die, stretching is obtained by "blowing" the film to produce a bubble. Drawing is obtained by passing the film through two sets of powered nip rolls, with the downstream set having a higher surface speed than the upstream set, with the resulting draw ratio being the surface speed of the downstream set of nip rolls divided by the surface speed of the upstream set of nip rolls. The degree of orientation is also referred to as the orientation ratio, or sometimes as the racking ration.

As used herein, the term Opolymero refers to the product of a polymerization reaction,- and is inclusive of homopolymers, copolymers.i. terpolymers, etc. In general, the layers of a film can consist essentially of a single polymer, or can have still additional polymers together therewith, i.e., blended therewith.

As used herein, the term Ocopolymer refers to polymers formed by the polymerization reaction 6f at least two different monomers.

For example., the term Ocopolymera includes the copolymerization reaction product of ethylene and an alpha-olefin, such as 1-hexene. However, the term Ocopolymer" is also inclusive of, for example, the copolymerization of a mixture of ethylene, propylene, 1-hexener and 1-octene.

As used herein. the term "polymerization" is inclusive of homopo lymerizat.ons, copolymerizations, terpolymerizations, etc., and includes all'types of copolymerizations such as random, graft, block, etc. 1'n general, the polymers in the films used in accordance with the present invention, can be prepared in accordance with any suitable polymerization process, including slurry polymerization, gas phase polymerization, and high pressure polymerization processes.

Slur-Y polymerization processes generally use superatmospheric:

pressures and temperatures in the range of 40-100C. In a slurry polymerization, a suspension of solid, particulate polymer is f armed in a liquid polymerization medium to which are added ethylene and comonomers, and often hydrogen along with catalyst.

is The liquid employed in the polymerization medium can be an alkane, cycloalkane, or an aromatic hydrocarbon such as toluene, ethylbenzene or. xylene. The medium employed should be liquid under the conditions of polymerization, and relatively inert.

Preferably, hexane or toluene is employed.

Alternatively, gas-phase polymerization processes utilize superatmospheric pressure and temperature in the range of about 500-1200C. Gas phase polymerization can be performed in a stirred or fluidized bed of catalyst and product particles. in a pressure vessel adapted to permit the separation of product particles from unreacted gases. Ethylene, 'comonomer, hydrogen and an inert-.

diluent gas such as nitrogen can be introduced or recirculated so as to maintain the particles at temperatures of 50-120'C.

Triethylaluminum may be added as needed as a scavenger of water, oxygen, and other impurities. Polymer product can be withdrawn continuously or semicontinuously, at a rate such as to maintain a constant product inventory in the reactor. After polymerization and deactivation of the catalyst, the product polymer can be recovered by any suitable means. In commercial practice, the 11 polymer product can be recovered directly from the cras phase reactor, freed of residual monomer with a nitrogen purge, and us d I- - ed without further deactivation or catalyst removal.

High pressure polymerization processes utilize a catalyst system comprising a cyclopentadienyl-transition metal compound and an alumoxarle commound. It is important, in the high-pressure process, that the polymerization temperature be above about 1200C., but below the decomposition temperature of the polymer product. it is also i=mortant that the polymerization pressure be above abou 500 bar (ka/cm2). In those situations wherein the molecular weight of the polymer product that would be produced at a given set of operating conditions is higher than desired, any of the techniques known in the art for control of molecular weight, such as the use of hydrogen or reactor temperature, may be used in the process of is this invention.

A heterogeneous polymer is a polymerization reaction product having a relatively wide variation in molecular weight and relatively wide variation in composition distribution, i.e., typical polymers prepared, for example, using conventional Ziegler- gatta cataly'sts. Although there are a few exceptions (such as Ziecler- Natta catalyzed' T=R (M) linear homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olefin copolymers produced by Mitsui Petrochemical Corporation), heterogeneous polymers typically contain a relatively wide variety of chain lengths and comonomer percentages.

in contrast to heterogeneous polymers, homogeneous polymers are polymerization reaction products of relatively narrow molecular weight distribution and relatively narrow composition distribution. Homogeneous polymers are useful in various layers of the patch bag of the present invention. Homogeneous polymers are structurally different from heterogeneous polymers, in that homogeneous polymers exhibit a relatively even sequencing of comonomers within a chain, a mirroring of sequence distribution in all chains, and a of length of all chains, i.e., a narrower molecular s=i - 12 weight dist=:bution. Furthermore, homogeneous polymers are typically prepared using metallocene, or other single-site type catalysis, rather than using Ziegler Natta catalysts.

More par-ticula-.!--1y, homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olef-in copolymers may be characterized by one or more methods known to those of skill in the art, such as molecular weight distribution composition distribution breadth index (CDBI), and narrow rrielting point range and single melt point behavior. The molecular weight distribution (RjM,), also known as polydispersity, may be determined by gel permeation chromatography.The homoceneous ethylene/alpha-clef in copolymers useful in this invention generally has of less than 2.7; preferably from about 1.9 to 2.5; more preferably, from about 1.9 to 2.3. The composition distribution breadth index (CDBI) of such homogeneous is ethylene /alpha-o lef in copolymers will generally be greater than about 70 percent. The CDBI is defined as the weight percent of the copolymer molecules having a comonomer content within 50 percent (i.e., plus or minus 50%) of the median total molar comonomer content. The CDBI of linear polyethylene, which does not contain a comonomer, is defined to be 100%. The Composition Distribution Breadth Index (CDBI) is determined via the technique of Temerature: Rising Elution Fractionation (TREF). CDBI determination clearly distinguishes the homogeneous copolymers used in the present invention (narrow composition distribution as assessed by CDBI t5 values generally above 70%) from VLDPEs av ' allable commercially which generally have a broad composition distribution as assessed by CDBI values generally less than 55%. The CDBI of a copolymer is readily calculated from data obtained from techniques known in the art, such as, for example, temperature rising elution fractionation as described, for example, in Wild et. al., J. Poly. Sci. Poly. Phys. Ed, Vol. 20, p.441 (1982). Preferably, the homogeneous ethylene/ alpha-o 1 ef in copolymers have a CDBI greater than about 70%, i.e., a CDBI of from about 70% to 99%. In general, the 13 homogeneous ethylene /aloha-a lef in copolymers in the mul-tilayer films cf- the 'present invention also exh.,lbJ- a relatively narrow melting point range, in comr)ar-ison with "heterogeneous copolymers,,, i.e., polymers having a CDBI of less than 55%. Pref erably, the homogeneous ethylene/al-Dha-olef in copolymers exhib.Lt an ess6ntially singular melting point characteristic, with a peak melting point (T.), as determined by D-4..&'.loerential Scanning Colorimetry (DSC), of from about 600C to 1100C. Preferably the homogeneous copolymer has a DSC peak T. of from about 800C to 1000C. As used herein, the phrase "essentially single melting point" means that at least about 80%, by weight, of the material corresponds to a single T. peak at a temperature within the range of from about 6VC to 110'C, and essentially no substantial fraction of the material has a peak melting point in excess of about 1150C., as determined by DSC is analysis. DSC measurements are made on a Perkin Elmer System 7 Thermal Analysis System. Melting information reported are second melting data, i. e., the sample is heated at a programmed rate of 100C.1min. to a temperature below its critical range. The sample is then reheated (2nd melting) at a programmed rate of 101C/m_in.

The presence of higher melting peaks is detrimental to film properties such as haze, and- compromises the chances for meaningful reduction in the seal initiation temperature of the final film.

A homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olef in copolymer can, in general, be prepared by the copolymerization of ethylene and any one or more alpha-olefin. Preferably., the alpha-olefin is a C3-C, alphamonoolef-In, more preferably, a C4-C12 alpha-monoolefin, still more preferably, a C,_C, alpha-monoolef-n. Still more preferably, the alpha-olefin comprises at least one member selected from the group consisting of butene-1, hexene-1, and octene-1, i.e., 1-butene,. 1- hexene, and 1-octene, respectively. Most preferably, the alphaolefin comnrises octene-1, andlor a blend of hexene-1 and butene-1 - Processes for preparing and using homogeneous polymers are disclosed in U. S. Patent No. 5,206,075, U.S. Patent No. 5,241,031, 14 and PCT International Application WO 93/03093, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in its entirety. Further details regarding the production and use of homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha-a lef in copolymers are disclosed in PCT International Publicaticn Number WO 90103414, and PCT International Publication Number WO 93/03093, both of which designate Fxxon Chemical Patents, Inc. as the Applicant, and both of which are hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in their respective entireties.

Still another genus of homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha-ol ef in copolymers is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,272,236, to LAI, et. al., and U.S. Patent No. 5,278,272, to LAI, et. al., both of which are hereby incorporated by refference thereto, in their respective entireties.

The term upolyolefinu refers to any polymerized olefin, which can be linear, branched, cyclic, aliphatic, aromatic, substituted, or unsubstituted. More specifically, included in the term polyolefin are hamopolymers of olefin, copolymers of olefin, copolymers of an olefin and an non-olefinic comonomer copolymerizable with the olefin, such as vinyl monomers, modified polymers thereof, and the like. Specific examples include polyethylene homopolymer, polypropylene homopolymer, polybutene, ethylenefalpha-olefin copolymer, propylene /alpha-olef in copolymert butene/alpha-olefin copolymer, ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer, ethylene/ethyl acrylate copolymer, ethylenel.butyl acrylate copolymer,.. ethylenelmethyl acrylate copolymet, ethylene /acrylic acid copolymer, ethylenelmethacrylic acid copolymer, modified polyolefin resin, lonomer resin, polymethylpentene. etc. Modified polyolefin resin is inclusive of modified polymer prepared by capolymerizing the homopolymer of the olefin or copolymer th ereof with an unsaturated carboxylic acid, e.g., acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, isobutyl acrylate, or the like, or a derivative thereof such as the anhydride, ester, metal salt, or the like. It could also be obtained by incorporating into the olefin homopolymer is or copolymer, an unsaturated carboxylic acid, e. g., maleic' acid, fumaric acid' or the like, or a derivative thereo'.PL such as the anhydride, ester or metal salt or the like.

As used herein, terms identifying polymers, such as.ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymero, gpolyamide", Wpolyesterm, "polyurethane", etc. are inclusive of not only polymers comprising repeating units derived from monomers known to polymerize to form a polymer of the named type, but are also inclusive of comonomers, derivatives, etc. which can copolvffierize with monomers known to polymerize to produce the named polymer. For example, the te= "polyamide" encomnasses both polymers comprising repeating units derived from monomers, such as caDrolactam, which polymerize to form a polyamide, as well as copolymers derived from the copolymerization of. caprolactam with a comonomer which when is polymerized alone does not result in the formation of a polyamide. Furthermore, terms identifying polymers are also inclusive of mixtures. blends, etc, of such polymers with other polymers of a different type.

Modified polymers, such as 0modified ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymero, and "modified polyolefino include such polymers having an anhydrid'functionally grafted thereon andlor copolymerized therewith and/or blended therewith. Preferably, such modified polymers have the anhydride functionality grafted on or polymerized therewith, as opposed to merely blended. therewith.

The homogene ous ethylene/ alpha-o lefin copolymers useful in the bag f ilm and patch film of the patch bag of the present invention include, for example, metallocene catalyzed polymers such as EXACT (TM) linear homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olef in copolymers obtainable from the Exxon Chemical Company, and TAFEER (TY.) linear homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin resin obtainable from the Mitsui Petrochemical Corporatiou. All these homogeneous copolymers generally include copolymers of ethylene with one or more comonomers selected from C4 to Cl. alDha-olefin such as butene-1 16 (i.e., 1._butene), hexene-1, octene-1, etc. in which the molecules of the copolymers comprise long chains with relatively few side chain branches or cross-linked structures. This molecular structure is to be contrasted with conventional low or medium density polyethylenes which are more highly branched than their respective counterparts. For example, LLDPE has a density usually in the rance of from about 0.91 grams per cubic centimeter to about 0.94 grams per cubic centimeter.

Another group of homogeneous ethylenelaloha-olefin copolymers are available from The Dow Chemical Company, and are known as AFFINITY (M) long chain branched homogeneous ethyl:ene/alpha-olef in copolymers. It has been discovered that AFFINITY (M) long chain branch homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olefin copolymers are easier to pro cess into films. relative to'other homogeneous ethylene/alphaolefin copolymers, such as EXACT (TM). linear h omogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymers obtained from the Exxon Chemical.Company. For this reason. among others. AFFINITY (TX) long chain branched homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olef in copolymers are preferred over EXACT (TM) linear homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olefin copolymers. Preferred long chain branched homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha-o lef in copolymers have are those having a density of from about 0.87 to 0. 94 glcc, more preferably 0.89 to 0.92 glcc. Long chain branched homogeneous ethylenelaipha-olefin copolymers are preferably produced using a metallocene-catalyzed polymerization reaction.

Although in the patch bag of the present invention the patch comprises homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha-ole fin copolymer, the patch andlor the bag may further comprise heterogeneous ethylenelalphaolefin copolymer. Several preferred heterogeneous.ethylenelalpha olef in copolymer include: linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) t very low density polyethylene (VLDPE).. and ultra low density polyethylene PE).

17 In general, both homogeneous and heterogeneous ethylen.--/alohaolef in conol ers result f rom the copolymerizat J on cf: f rom abo YM L. U t 8 0 to 99 weight percent ethylene and from 1 to 20 weight -percent alphaolefin; preferably, from the copolymerization of from about 85 to 95 weight percent ethylene with 5 to 15 weight Percent almhaolef in.

As used herein, the phrases "inner layer' and "internal layer" refer to any layer, of a multilayer film, having both of its principal surfaces directly adhered to another- layer of the film.

As used herein, the phrase outer layer" refers to any film layer of tilm having less than two its principal surfaces directly adhered to another layer of the film. The phrase is inclusive of monolayer and multilayer films. In multilayer films, there are two outer layers, each of which has a principal surface adhered to only one other layer of the multilayer film. In monolayer films, there is only one layer, which, of course, is an outer layer in that neither of its two principal surfaces are adhered to another layer of the film" -' As used herein, the phrase "iniide layero refers to the outer layer, - of a multilayer film packaging a product, which is closest to the product,- relativ to the other layers of the multilayer film.

As used herein, the phrase outside layera refers to the outer layer, of a multilayer film packaging a product, which is furthest from the product relative to the other layers of the Multilayer f ilm.

As used herein, the term "adheredo is inclusive of films which are directly adhered to one another using a heat seal -or other means, as well as films which are adhered to one another using an adhesive which is between the two films.

As used herein, the phrase Odirectly adheredo, as applied to film layers, is defined as adhesion of the subject film layer to the object film layer, without a tie layer, adhesive, or other 18 layer.- therebetween. In contrast, as used herein, the word "between", as applied to a film laver expressed as being between two ot-her specif _Jed layers, includes both direct adherence of the subject layer between to the two other layers it is between, as well as including a lack of direct adherence to either or both of is the two other layers the subject layer is between, i.e., one or more additional layers can be imposed between the subject layer and one or more of the layers the subject layer is between.

Extrusion is the crocess of forming continuous shaDes bv forcing a molten plastic material through a die, followed by cooling or chemical hardening. Immediately prior'to extrusion through the die, the relatively high-viscosity polymeric material is fed into a rotating screw of variable pitch, i.e., an extruder, which forces the polymeric material through the die.

Coextrusion is the process of extruding two or more materials through a single die with two or more orifices arranged so that the extrudates merge and weld together into a laminar structure before chilling, i.e., quenching. Coextrusion can be employed in film blowing, free film extrusion, and extrusion coating processes.

The "machine direction of a film is a direction along the length of the film, i.e., the direction in which the film is f ormed during extrusion and coating. In contrast, the atransverse directiono of a film is a direction across the film, perpendicular to the machine or longitudinal direction.

As used herein, the phrase a free shrinko ref ers to the percent dimensional change in a 10 cm, x 10 cm. specimen of film, when subjected to selected heat, as measured by ASTM D 2732, as known to those of skill in the art. ASTM D 2732 is described in the 1990 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 8, Plastics. Vol. 08.02, pp.368-371, which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in its entirety.' Although the films used in the patch bag according to the present. invention can be monolayer films or multilayer films, the 19 is patch bag comprises at least two films laminated together. Preferably, the patch bag is comprised of films which tocether co=rise a total of from 2 to 20 layers; more preferably, from 2 to 12 layers; and still more preferably, from 4 to 9 layers.

In general, the monolayer or multilayer films used in the patch bag of the present invention can have any total thickness desired, so long as the films provide the desired propertJes for the particular packagJnc operation in which the film is used, e.g. abuse-resistance (especially puncture-resistance), modulus, seal strength, optics, etc. However, for efficiency and conservation of resources, it is desirable to obtain the necessary punctureresistance using the minim= patch thickness. Preferably, the film stock from which the patches are cut has a total. thickness of from about 2 to 8 mils; more preferably, from about 3 to 6 mils. Furthermore, the patch film can be a monolayer f ilm or a multilayer film. Several patch f ilms described in detail below contain a total of 4, 6, and 14 layers.

Figure 1 is. a side-view illustration of a preferred end-seal patch bag 20, in a lay-f lat position, this patch bag being in accord with the present invention; Figure 2 is a cross-sectional view of patch bag 2O taken ttrough section 2-2 of Figure 1.

Viewing Figures 1 and 2 together, patch bag 20 comprises bag 22, front patch 24 (i.e., first patch 24), and rear patch 26 (i.e., second patch 26), open top 28, and end-seal 30. The designations of Ofronto. and obackw/rear" are merely with respect to that side of patch bag 20 which is up when patch bag 20 is in its lay-flat position.

Figure 3A illustrates a cross-sectional view of preferred 3layer film 36 for use as the stock material from which patches 24 and 2 6 can be cut. First layer 38 serves as an outside and puncture -re s i stant layer; second layer 40 serves as a tie layer and is preferably made up of two identical layers bonded to one another; third layer 42 serves as an inside layer and a Puncture resistant layer.

F4c-rure 3B illustrates an enlarged cross-sectional view of the film of Figure 3A, including second layer 40 illustrated as beina composed of identical film inner layers 44 and 46 adhering to one another. Inner layers 44 and 46 are preferably formed by collapsing a multilayer film tube having an inside layer which can be adhered to itself, resulting in what can be considered to be either a single central film layer, or a pair of identical filli layers which are adhering to one another. Hence Figure 3A illustrates p,tch film 36 as a three layer film, whereas Figure '3B illustrates the same film as a four layer film, with the two inner layers being adhered to one another as represented by dotted line 48 because layers 44 and 46 can be considered to form a single is layer since they are identical in thickness and chemical composition, due to the process used to make the film. The process illustrated in Figure 4, described in detail below, can be used to produce the film of Figure 3B.

Figure 3C illustrates a cross-sectional view of_an.alternative -20 multilayer film 200 which can be used as stock material for preparing a patch for the patch bag of the present invention.

Multilayer film 200 is a 7-layer film, and is described.in detail in Patch Film No. 19, below. Multilayer film 200 is composed of outer layer 202, bulk layer 204, tie layer 206, 0,-barrier layer 208, tie layer 210, bulk layer 2.12. and outer layer 214.

Figure 4 illustrates a schematic of a preferred process for producing the multilayer films of Figures 3A, 3B, and 3C. In the process illustrated in Figure 4, solid polymer beads (.not illustrated) are fed to a plurality of extruders 52 (for simplicity, only one extruder is illustrated). Inside extruders 52, the polymer beads are forwarded, melted, and degassedr following which the resulting bubble-free melt is forwarded into die head 54, and extruded through annular die, resulting in tubing 21 56 whicbL is 5-40 mils thick, more preferably 20-30 mils thick, still more preferably, about 25 mils thick.

After cooling or quenching by water spray from cooling ring 58, tubing 56 is collapsed by pinch rolls 60, and ib thereafter fed throuch irradiation vault 62 surrounded by shielding 64, where S (i..

tubing 56 is irradiated with high energy electron -.e... ionizing radiation) from iron core transformer accelerator 66. Tubing 56 is guided through i=adiation vault 62 on rolls 68. Preferably, the irradiation of tubing 56 is at a level of from about 2 to 10 mecarads (hereinafter.MLR").

After irradiation, irradiated tubing 70 is directed over guide roll 72, after which i--,-adiated tubing 70 passes into hot water bath tank 74 containing water.76. The now collapsed irradiated tubincr 70 is submersed in the hot water for a retention time of at is least about 5 seconds, i.e., for a time period in order to bring the film up to the desired temperature, following which supplemental heating means (not illustrated) including a plurality of steam rolls around which irradiated tubing 70 is partially wound, and optional hot air blowers, elevate the temperature of 20- irradiated tubing 70 to a desired orientation temperature of from ao4t -lfr-al'C (24o -Z!CO"F Thereafter, film 70 is directed through nip rolls 78, and.bubble 80 is blown. thereby transversely stretching irradiated tubing 70. Furthermore, while being blownt i.e., transversely stretched, irradiated film 70 is drawn (i.e., in the longitudinal direction) between nip rolls 78 and nip rolls 86f as nip rolls 86 have a higher surface speed than the surface speed of nip rolls 78. As a result of the transverse stretching and longitudinal drawing, irradiated, biaxially-oriented, blown tubing film 82 is produced, this blown tubing preferably having been both stretched at a ratio of from about 1: 1. 5 - 1: 6, and drawn at a ratio of from about 1:1.5-1:6. More preferably, the stretching and drawing are each perf ormed at a ratio of from about 1: 2 - 1: 4. The 1 22 is i -'result is a biaxial orientation of from about 1:2.25 - 1:36, more preferably, 1:4 1:16.

While bubble 80 is maintained between pinch rolls 78 and 86, blown tubing 82 is collapsed by rolls 84, and thereafter conveyed through pinch rolls 86 and across guide roll 88, and then rolled onto wind-up roller 90. Idler roll 92 assures a good wind-up.

The invention is illustrated by the following examples, i.e., patch films, which are provided for the purpose of representation, and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of. the invention. Unless stated otherwise, all percentaces, parts, etc. are by weight.

Patch Film Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6-14, 16-17, and 19 are patch f ilms which can be used to make a patch f or a patch bag according to the present invention. Patch Film Nos. 3, 4., 15, and 18 are comparative patch f ilms to be contrasted to patch films which can be used to make the patch bag of the present invention.

Patch Film No. 1 A coextruded, two-ply tubular tape was cast, the tape having a thickness of 29 mils. the tape having an A layer making up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer making up 15 percent of the tape thickness.. The A Layer was composed of: (a) 87 weight percent DOWLEX 2045 (M) linear low density polyethylene having a density of 0.920 g/ " cc, obtained from The Dow Chemical Companyf of Midland, Michigan (hereinafter "LLDPE flw), (b) 10 weight percent ELVAX 3128 (TM) ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer having a vinyl acetate content of 10 percent, obtained from DuPont, of Wilr i ngton, Delaware, hereinafter OEVA #1, and (c) 3 weight percent TEKNOR EPE-9621C (TM) antiblock agent, obtained from Teknor Apex Plastics Division, of Pawtucket, R.I., hereinafter "Antiblock ilrlw. The B Layer contained 100 weight percent EXACT SW 4008 linear homogeneous ethylene /alpha-o 1 ef in plastomer having a density of 23 0.885 a/cc, obtained from the Exxon ChemicalCompany, of Baytown, Texas (hereinafter, "linear homogeneous ethyle. ne/alpha olef in fl") The two-ply tubing was cooled to a solid.phase in a water bath and then electronically crosslinked with a 50b Kev beam to a level of from about 2 to 10 MR. The resulting crosslinked two-ply tubing was heated by steam cans and hot air at about 99-'104C (210-220OF), and was subsequently oriented by being drawn and stretched approximately 350%, ii n each of the machine and transverse directions, respectively, using a trapped bubble of air held between two nip rolls. The orientation produced a 2.25 mil two-ply film in the fo= of a tube...

After drawing, the resulting tube of hot-water-shrinkable flat film was passed through a pair of nip rolls, causing the inside B layer to bond to itself upon tube collapse, rendering a final four- is ply film, with the Omiddlew plies being the inside B layer bonded to itself (i.e., resulting in a "4-plym film having a thickness of 4.5 mils), as follows:

B B Blend A SLP 4008 SLP 4008 Blend A Table I, i=ediately below, includes the chemical composition and thickness of each of the layers, together with the function which the layer serves in the patch.

-------------- 24 TABLE I

Fig. 3 layer layer desig- thickness nation layer function chemical identitv (mils) 38 outside layer 87% LLDPE #l; 10% EVA 41; Ir 2.0 puncture- 3% Antiblock Arl resistant layer tie layer homogeneous ethylene/ 0.7 alpha-olef -i-- #_1 is 42 inside layer 87% LLDPE '71; 10% EVA '=l; 2.0 & puncture- 3% Antiblock Irl resistant layer Patch Film No. 1 was composed of the above three layers, the middle layer being composed of the inside tube layer adhered to itself. Patch Film No. 1 was determined to have a free shrink at 185OF (via ASTM 2732), and an instrumented impact, as set forth below in Table II, below. Instrumented impact was measured by a procedure substantially eauivalent to ASTH D.3763. ASTM D 3763 is described in the 1990 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 8, Plastics, Vol. 08.03, pp. 174-178, which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in its entirety.

An alternative to Patch Film No. 1 is a two-layer film having a thickness -of about 4.5 mils. with about 85 weight percent of this film having a composition corresponding to layer 38 described in Table I above, and with 15 weight percent of this f ilm having a composition corresponding to layer 40 above. This film could be produced using a flat die, rather than a circular die - Patch Film No. 2 Patch Film No. 2 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 1, with the exception that in Patch Film No.

2, the A Layer was comDosed of a blend a---: (a) 87 weight percent LLDPE #1, (b) 10 we-Jaht percent EXACT 3032 (M) linear homogeneous ethylene/alpha-clefin Dlastomer having- a.density of 0.900 g/cc, also obtained from the Exxon Chemical Commany (hereinafter, 'linear homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha-c lef in conalym.dr '72), and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock #1. In Patch Film No. 2, the B Layer remained identical to the B Layer of Patch Film No. 1. Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 1, in Patch Film No. 2 the A Layer made up 85 iDercent of the tape thickness, and a B layer made up 15 percent of the tape thickness. The Patch Film No. 2 free shrink and instrumented impact -are Provided in Table I!, below.

Patch Film No. 3 (Comoaratlve) Patch Film No. 3 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 1, except that in Patch Film No. 3, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 87 weight percent LLDPE Irl, (b) 10 weight percent ELVAX 3128 (M) ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer having a vinyl acetate content of 9 percent and a density of 0.928 g/cc, and a melt index of 2.0. obtained from the DuPont Chemical Co., of Wilmington, Delaware (hereinafter referred to as EVA #2), and (c) 3 weight percent Antib16ck Arl. In Patch Film NO - 3, the B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent ELVAX 3175 (M) ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer having a vinyl acetate content of 28 percent and a density of 0. 950 glcc, and a melt index, of 6. 01 obtained from the DuPont Chemical Co., of Wilmington, Delaware (hereinafter referred to as EVA V42). Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 1, in Patch Film No. 3 the A Layer made up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and A B layer made up 15 percent of the tape thickness.

The Patch Film No. 3 free shrink and instrumented imDact are provided in Table II, below. Patch Film No. 3 is a comparative patch film because it does not comprise any homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha70 lef in copolymer.

i i i i 1 26 Patch Film No. 4 (Comparative) Patch Film No - 4 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 1, except that in Patch Film No. 4, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 82 weight percent LLDPE (b) 15 weight percent EVA 11,1, and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock #1 - In Patch Film No. 4, the B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA 1r12. Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 1, in Patch Film No. 4 the A Layer made up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B laver made up 15 percent of the tape thickness.

The Patch Film No. 4 free shrink and instrumented imDact are provided in Table II, below. Patch Film No. 4 is a comzarative patch film because it does not comprise any homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer.

Patch Film No. 5 Patch Film No. 5 was prepared by the same proc ess employed to produce Patch Film No. 1, except that in Patch Film No. 5, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 67 weight percent LLDPE Arl; (b) 30 weight percent XU59220.01, a proprietary experimental long chain branched homogeneous ethylene/ alpha-o lefin -copolymer (hereinafter referred to as homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olef in 'r3") having a density of 0.901 glcc and a melt index of 0.9, obtained under a development agreement with The Dow Chemical Company of Midland, Michigan; and, (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock 11. The nfo=ation concerning XU59220. 01 and the evaluation results of f ilm/bag containing the experimental polymer which are set forth in this examDle have been approved for release by Dow.

In Patch Film No. 5, the B Laye-r was composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2. Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 1, in Patch Film No. 5 the A Layer made up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer made up 15 percent of the tape thickness..

The Patch Film No. 5 free shrink and instrumented impact are provided in Table II, below.

27 TABLE II

Film No. Free ShrJnkat Free Shrinkat Impact Energy to WC 01 8 5 0 F) grC (2 0 5 OF) Strength Break MD, %TD M, %TD (1bs) (ft-lbs) 11 16 20 30 97 4.8 2 11 18 21 32 109 5.7 3 io 17 20 30 100 5.0 (comparative) is 4 13 18 25 32 87 3.1 (comparative) 14 20 88 3.2 As can be seen from Table II, the impact strength of various patch films according to the present invention, e.g., Patch Film Nos. 1, 2, and 5, were f ound to be comparable to the impact strength exhibited by comparative Patch Film No. 3 and comparative Patch Film No. 4, both of which utilize LLDPE as the polymer which provides the patch f ilm with high impact strength. Thus, it has been found that the use of homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olef in copolymers., in accordance with the present invention, can result in a patch film having an impact strength substantially equivalent to, and in some instances even better than, the impact strength of LLDPE-based patch films.

Patch Film No. 6 A coextruded, two-ply, tubular tape was. cast., the tape having a thickness of 9 mils, the tape.having an A layer making up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer making up 15 percent of the tape thickness. The.A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) weight percent of a resin composition referred to as ECD 103 linear homogeneous ethylene/hexene copolymer, also obtained from the E=on Chemical Company (hereinaft-er referred to as,linear homogeneous ethylene /alpha-o lef in 14r4_), (b) 37 weight percent ECD 28 106 linear horaccenecus ethylene/hexene copolymer, having a density of about 0.917a/cc, and a melt index of about 3, also obtained from the Exxon Chemical Co. (hereinafter referred to as 'linear homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin (c) 10 weight percent LD 200.48 (T114) low density polyethylene having a density of 0.917 g/cc and a melt index of 6.7, this low density polyethylene also obtained from the Exxon Chemical Cc., and (d) 3 weight percent Antiblock #1. In Patch _Film No. 6, the B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2.

The two-ply sheet was cooled to a solid Dhase using a chilled roll. and then electronically crosslinked with a 500 Kev beam to a level of approximately 2 to 10 MR. The resulting crosslinked two ply sheet was heated with hot air a'M-IoiblO-220 F). and was subsequently oriented by drawing and stretching approximately 300 is percent in each of the machine and transverse directions, respectively, using a tenter frame., to.produce a biaxially oriented film having a thickness of about 1 mil. The impact strength of the resulting Film No. 6 is provided in Table III, below.

Patch Film No. 7 A coextruded, two-ply sheet is cast, the sheet having a thickness of 18 mils, the sheet having an A layer making up 85 percent of the sheet thickness, and a B layer making up 15 percent of the sheet thickness. The A. Layer is composed of a blend of: (a) 97 weight percent linear homogeneous ethyl enelalpha-olefin #4, and (b) 3 weight percent Antiblock #l. In Patch Film No. 7,, the B Laver is composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2.

The two-ply sheet is cooled to a solid phase using a chilled roll, and then electronically crosslinkedwith a 500 Kev beam to a level of approximately 2 to 10. VIR. The resulting crosslinked twoply sheet is heated with hot air af'IR-M,k10-220.F), and is subsequently oriented by drawing and stretching approximately 300 percent in each of the machine and transverse directions, 29 respectively, using a teinter frame, to produce a biaxially-oriented film having a thickness of about 2 mils.

Patch Film No. 8 A single ply sheet is cast, the sheet having a thickness of is mils, the sheet being composed of a blend of: (a) 97 weight percent linear homogeneous ethyl ene/alpha-o 1 ef in -r"4, and (b) 3 weight percent Antiblock #1. After the sheet is cast, the tape is cooled to a solid phase using a. chilled roll, and then electronically crosslinked with a 500 Kev beam to a level of approximately 2 to 10 YR. The resulting crosslinked two-ply sheet is heated with hot a-5ratli-b4OZ(210-220F), and is subsequently or.L.ented, using a tenter frame. to impart longitudinal orientation in an amount of about 300 percent, and transverse orientation in an amount of about 300 percent, to result in a biaxially oriented film having a thickness of about 2 mils.

Patch Film No. 9 A single ply tubular tape is cast, the tape having a thickness of 27 mils, the tape being composed of a blend of: (a) 97 weight percent linear homogeneous ethylenejalpha-orfin-' 'r4, and (b) 3 weight percent Antiblock 11. After the tape is cast, the tape is cooled to a solid phase using chilled air or chilled water, and then electronically crosslinked with a 500 Kev beam to a level of approximately 2 to 10 n. The resulting crosslinked tape is then d ii-r,4".c heated with hot air i at-1210-220F), and is subsequently oriented by drawing' and stretching approximately 300 percent in each of the machine and transverse directions, respectively, using a trapped bubble process,, to produce a biaxial ly-oriented film having a thickness of about 3 mils. The tubular film is. thereafter slit to f orm a f lat f ilm suitable f or use as a patch on a patch bag.

Patch Film No. 10 Patch Film No. 10 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 6, except that in Patch Film No. 10, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 67 weight percent LLDPE i.'r'l, (b) 30 weight percent ENGAGE EG 8100 (TV-) long chain branched homogeneous ethylene jalpha-o 1 ef in copolymer, also obtained from The Dow Chemical Comnany (hereinafter referred to as 'homogeneous ethylene/almha-olef-3n 11r.6), and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock Irll.

In Patch Film No. 10, the B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2. Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 6, in Patch Film No. 10 the A Layer made up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer made up 15 percent of the tape thickness.

The Patch Film No. 10 instrumented imoact is provided in Table III, below.

Patch Film No. 11 Patch Film No. 11 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 6, except that in Patch Film No. 11, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 67 weight percent.LLDPE #l, (b) 30 weight percent ENGAGE EG 8150 (TX) long chain branched homogeneous ethylene /alpha-o lef in copolymer, also obtained from The Dow Chemical Company (hereinafter referred to as homogeneous ethylene/alpha-clef in IV), and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock #l.

In Patch Film No. 11. the B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2. Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 6, in Patch Film No. 11 the A Layer made up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer made up 15 percent of the tape thickness.

The Patch Film No. 11 instrumented impact is provided in Table III, below.

Patch Film No. 12 Patch Film No. 12 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Filn No. 6, except that in Patch Film No. 12, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 50 weight percent of a resin 31 referred to as SLP _9042 linear homogeneous ethylene/aliDha-cle-f in copolymer, obtained from the Exxon Chemical Company (hereinafter referred to as "linear homogeneous ethylene/alpha olefin 178"), (b) 47 weightpercent LLbPE 'V1, and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock Irl-1. In Patch Film No. 12, the B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2. Furthermore, as with Patch Film No. 6, in Patch Film No. 12 the A Layer made up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer made up 15 percent of the tape thickness The Patch Film No. 12 instrumented impact is provided in Table 111. below.

Patch Film No. 13 Patch Film No. 13 was prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 6, except Film No. 13 was a three-ply tubular f ilm in which the A Layer made up 35 percent of the thickness of the film, the B Layer made up 50 percent of the thickness of the film, and the C Layer made up 15 percent.of the thickness of the film. The A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 94 weight percent AFFINITY EF 1031 - (TX) long chain branched homogeneous ethylenelalpha-olefin also obtained from The Dow Chemical Company (hereinafter referred to as--"long chain branched homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olef in copolymer 19 0), and (b) 6 percent Antiblock Irll. The B Layer was composed of 100 percent AFFINITY 1570 (M) long chain branched homogeneous ethylerielalpha-olefin copolymer,., obtained from The Dow Chemical Company (hereinafter, ethyl ene/alpha-o lefin #100). The C Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2.

The Patch Film No. 13 instrumented impact is provided in Table III, below.

Patch Film No. 14 Patch Film No. 14 was a three-ply film prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 13, except that in Patch 32 Film No. 14, the A Layer was comDosed of a blend of: (a) 67 weight percent LLDPE T2rl, (b) 30 weight percent homogeneous ethylene/alphaolefin r17, and (c) 3 percent Antiblock rill. The B Layer was composed of 100 percent homogeneous ethylene/alpha olefin #7, the C Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA 1.2.

The Patch Film No. 14 instrumented imDact is provided in Table III, below.

Patch Film No. 15 (Commarative) 10. Patch Film No. 15 was a two-ply film prepared by the same process employed to produce Patch Film No. 6, except that in Patch Film No. 15, the A Layer was composed of a blend of: (a) 87 weight percent LLDPE 1T11, (b) 10 weight percent EVAL Arl, and (c) 3 percent Antiblock #rl. The B Layer was composed of 100 weight percent EVA is #2. Patch Film No. 15 is a comparative patch film because it does not comprise any homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer.

The Patch Film No. 15 inst=ented i=act is provided in Table III, below.

TABLE III

Film NO 6 10 11 12 13 14 (comparative) Impact Strength (lbs) 19 16 17 is 14 13 19 As can be seen from Table III, the impact strength of various patch films according to the present invention, e.g., Patch Film Nos. 6 and 10-15, range from a low of 13 lbs to a high of 20 pounds, whereas comparative Patch Film No. 15 had an impact strength of 19 pounds.

t 33 Patch Film No. 16 Patch Film No. 16 was prepared by a process similar to the process employed in the production of Patch Film No. 1. Patch Film No. 16 was made by coextruding a tubular film which had an A/B/C structure in the thickness ratio of 15/70/15, respectively. The A Layer was an outside layer composed of: (a) 87 weight percent LLDPE 11; r and (c) 3 weight percent r (b) 10 weight percent EVA Ill; Antiblock Irl. The B Layer was a core layer composed of (a) 97 weight percent homogeneous ethylene /alDha-o 1 ef in copolymer #10; and, (b) 3 weight percent Antiblock Irl. The C Layer was an inside layer composed of 100 weight percent EVA #2.

The coextruded, three-ply tubular tace was castt the tape havina a thickness of 20 mils. The two-ply tubing was cooled to a solid Dhase in a water bath and then electronically crosslinked with a 500 Kev beam to a level of approximately 12 bR.

The resulting crosslinked two-ply tubing was heated by immersion in a hot water bath having a temperature of about,210E), and was subsequently oriented by being drawn and stretched approximately 370%, in each of the machine and transverse directions, respectively, using a trapped bubble of air held between two nip rolls, resulting in a three-ply_film having i thickness of about 1.46 mils, in the form of a tube.

After drawing, the resulting tube of hot-water-shrinkable flat film was passed through a pair of nip rolls, causing the inside C layer to bond to itself upon tube collapse, rendering a final six ply patch film having a thickness of about 2.9 mils. Patch Film Irc No. 16 was determined to have a free shrink at(185F) (determined using ASTM 2732) of about 48 percent, and the instrumented impact of Patch Film No. 16 (determined using ASTM D 3763), was determined to be about 110 pounds.

34 Patch Film No. 17 Patch Film No. 17 was prepared by a process similar to the process employed in the production of Patch Film No. 16. Patch Film No. 17 was made by coextruding a tubular f ilm which had an A/B/C structure in the thickness ratio of 35/50/15, respectively.

The A Layer was an outside layer composed of: (a) 87 weight percent LLDPE llrl; (b) 10 weight percent EVA '#1; and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock #11. The B Layer was a core layer composed of (a) 97 weight percent long chain branched homogeneous ethylenelaipha olefin copolymer 1C3; and, (b) 3 weight percent Antiblock #1. The -C Layer was an inside layer composed of 100 weight percent EVA.12.

The coextruded, three-ply tubular taDe was cast, the tape having a thickness of 20 mils. The two-ply tubing was cooled to a solid phase in a water bath and then electronically crosslinked is with a 500 Kev beam to a level of from about 2 to 10 MR.

The resulting crosslinked two-ply tubing was heated by ersion in a hot water bath having a temperature of abou,t(208'F), and was subsequently oriented by being drawn approximately 340% in the machine direction and stretched approximately 370%, in the transverse direction, using a trapped bubble of air held between --two nip rolls, -resulting in a three-ply film having a thickness of about 1.6 mils, in the form of a tube.

After drawing, the resulting tube of hot-water-shrinkable flat film was passed through a pair of nip rolls, causing the inside C layer to bond to itself upon tube collapse, rendering a final sixply patch. film having a thickness of about 3.2 ails. Patch Film M_ No. 17 was determined to have a free shrink at(185OF) (determined using ASTM 2732) of about 57 percent, and the instrumented impact of Patch Film No. 17 (determined usingASTM D 3763), was dete=ined to be about 63 pounds. It is believed that Patch Film No. 17 would have been considerably greater if the orientation had been carried out at a temmerature of abou 9SIF), as the homogeneous polymer's density of 0.9016 permitted the lower orientation temmerature.

Patch Film No. 18 (Comparative) Patch Film No. 18 was a comparative with respect to Patch Film Nos. 16 and 17. Patch Film No. 18 was prepared by a process similar to the crocess employed in the production of Patch Film Nos. 16 and 17. Patch Film No. 18 was made by coextruding a tubular film which had an A1B/C structure in the thickness ratio of 15/70/15, respectively. The A Layer was an outside layer composed of: (a) 87 weight percent LLDPE 1.1rl; (b) 10 weight percent EVA 'W1; and (c) 3 weight percent Antiblock ilr-l. The B Layer was identical.' in chemical composition, to the A Layer. The C Layer was an inside layer composed of 100 weight percent EVA Ir-2.

The coextruded, -#-hree-zly tubular tar)e was cast, the tape having a thickness of 20 mils. The two-ply tubing was cooled to a solid phase in a water bath and then electronically crosslinked with a 500 Kev beam to a level of from about 2 to 10 MR.

The resulting crosslinked two-ply tubing was heated by immersion in a hot water bath having a temperature of abou';121()CF), and was subsequently oriented by being drawn approximately 360% in the machine direction and stretched approximately 370%, in the transverse direction, using a trapped bubble of air held between two nip rolls, resulting in a three-ply film having a thickness of about 1.5 milst in the form of a tube.

After drawing, the resulting tube of hot-water-shrinkable flat film was passed through a pair of nip rolls, causing the inside C layer to bond to itself upon tube collapse, rendering a final sixply patch film having a thickness of about-.3..O mils. Patch Film No. 18 was determined to have a free shrink- atla8SOF) (determined using ASTM 2732) of about 50 percent, and the instrumented impact of Patch Film No. 18 (determined using ASTM D 3763), was determined to be about 100 pounds.

A commarison of Patch Film No. 16 with Patch Film No. 18 reveals that the use of the homogeneous ethylene /alpha-olef in copolymer in the core layer of Patch Film No. 16 produces a patch 1 1 36 film having an inupact st--en=bL of about 10 perce.at c--eazer than the control. The control is the substantial equivalent of patch films which have been used corzimercially. The 10 percent increase in the impact strength, which is directly attributable to the use of a homogeneous ethyl ene/ainha-o lef in copolymer, is'considered to be a substantial increase over the immact strength of Comparative Patch Film No. 18.

Patch Film No. 19 A coextruded, seven-ply tubular tape was cast, the taDe havinc r a thickness of 18.6 mils, the tape having an A layer making up 85 percent of the tape thickness, and a B layer making up 15 percent. of the tape thickness. The three-ply tubing was cooled to a solid phase in a water bath and then electronically crosslinked with a 500 Kev beam to a level of from about 2 to 10 VIR. The resulting crosslinked three-ply tubing was extrusion coated with four additional polymer layers extruded through an annular die, in a process as illustrated in Figure 6. The resulting 26.5 mil extrusion-coated tape was thereafter immersed in a hot water bath 9q 1 rl- have a temperature of aboutX(19 2 0 and was subsequently. oriented by being drawn approximately 300% in the machine direction, andstret7ched approximately 325% in the transverse direction, using a trapped bubble of air held between two nip rolls. The orientation produced an approximately 2.7 =11 two-ply film in the form of a tube. Figure 3C is a schematic cross-sectional view of Patch Film No. 19.

Table' IV, below, includes the chemical commosition and thickness of each of the layers, together with the function which the layer serves in the patch.

is 37 TABLE IV

Fig. 3C layer layer desig- thickness nation laver function chemical identitv (Mils) 202 inside layer 90% EVA #3 0.36 10% LLDPE IWI 204 bulk homogeneous ethylene/ 1.39 alpha-olefin copolymer 111 Z 206 t_le EVA #4. 0.15 is 208 0 ir -barr4er PVDC Blend al 0.18 210 tie 100% EVA #2 0.15 212 bulk homogeneous ethylene/ 0.30 alpha-olefin copolymer #11 214 outside layer 92.5% EVA rAS 0.17 7.5% LLDPE Arl EVA Or-3 was PE 3507-2 (TM) ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer having a vinyl acetate content of 6.2%, a melt index of 2-5, and a density of 0.93 71 __ g/cc. and was obtained from DuPont. EVA '4 was EP 4062-2 (TY1) ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer having a vinyl acetate content of 15%, a melt index of 2.5, and a density of 0.938 g/cc.

and was also obtained from DuPont. EVA #5 was LD-318.92 (TM) ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer having a vinyl acetate content of 9%, a melt ' index of 2.0, and a density of 0.93 glcc, and was obtained from Exxon. PVDC Blend 11 was a composition comprising:

(a) about 9 6 weight percent DOW MA134 (m) vinylidene chloridelmethyl acrylate copolymer having a methyl acrylate content of 8.5%, obtained from The Dow Chemical Company, of Midland, Michigan; (b) about 2 weight percent PLAS CHEE 775 (TM) epoxidized soybean oil, obtained from Ferro Chemicals, of Bedford, Ohio; and, (c) about 2 weight percent I.IETABLEN L1000 (TM) acrylate blend, obtained from Elf Atochem, cl' Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. METABLEN :.;:.:-: -- -- L1000 (M114) comprises about 53 weight percen methyl methacr, ylate 29 weicht percent butyl methacrylate ("BMA"), and 19 weicht percent butyl acrylate ("BAn).

For Patch Film No. 19, which was composed of two films each of which had a thickness of about 2.7 mils (i.e.17 a total thickness of about 5.4 mils) and each of which was--cc=csed of the above XST described seven layers, the free shrink.t;t85. (determIned using ASITIM1 2732) was about 75 percent, and the instrumented impact was about 112 pounds of force, and an energy to break of about 5 ft- lbs.

Preferably, the s tack f ilm f rom which the bag is f ormed has a total thickness of from about 1.5 to 5 mils; more preferably, about 2.5 mils. Although the film stock from which the bag is formed can be a monolayer film, preferably the film stock from which the bag is f ormed is a multilayer f ilm having f rom 3 to 7 layers; more preferably, 4 layers. Preferably, the bag film comprises an 0._ barrier layer, preferably as a core layer.

In a preferred patch bag according to the present invention, the bag film, i.e., the second heat-shrinkable film,.comprises:

(A) an outside layer comprising at least one member selected from the group consisting of ethylenelalpha-olefin copolymer having-a density of from about 0.85 to 0.95, propylenelethylene copolymer, polyamide, ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer, ethylenelmethyl acrylate copolymer, and ethylenelbutyl acrylate copolymer;.

(B) a core 0. barrier layer comprising at least one member selected from the group consisting of ethylene/vinyl alcohol copolymer, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polyamide, polyester, polyacrylonitrile; and (C) an inside layer comprising at least one memb er selected from the group consisting of thermoplastic polyolefin, thermoplastic polyamide, thermoplastic polyester, and ther--- moplastic polyvinyl chloride.

Ficrure 5 illustrates a cross-sectional view of. preferred fourlayer film 51 for use as the tubing film stock from which, from 39 which, for example, bag portion 22 of preferred end-seal patch bag 20 (illustrated in Figures 1 and 2), can be formed. Multilayer film 51 can have, for example, a physical structure, in terms of number of layers, layer thickness, and layer arrangement and orientation in the patch bag, and a chemical composition in terms of the various polymers, etc. present in each of the layers, as set for-th in Table V, below.

TABLE V

Fig. 5 layer layer desig- thickness nation!aver funct;on chemical identitv (mils) is 53 57 59 outside layer & abuse layer barrier layer puncture-resistant layer sealant layer & inside layer EVA ar 1 96% VDC/MA Arl; 2% epoxidized soybean oil; 2% butyl acrylate/methyl acrylatelbutyl methacrylate terpolymer 80% LLDPE #1 20% EBA fl EVA Irl 1 0.56 0.2 1.25 O.W EVA 14rl was the same ethylenelvinyl acetate copolymer described above. VDC/MA #I was SARAN MA-134 (TM) vinylidene chloridelmethyl acrylate copolymer, obtained from The Dow Chemical Company. The epoxidized soybean oil was PLAS-CEEK 775 (TX) epoxidized soybean oil, obtained from the Bedf ord Chemical Division of Ferro Corporation, of Walton Hills, Ohio. Bu-AIMA/bu-MA. terpolymer was METABLEN L-1000 (TX) butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylatelbutyl methacrylate terpolymer, obtained from Elf Atochem North America, Inc., of 2000 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. EBA Alrl was EA 705-009 (TM) ethylene/butyl acrylate copolymer containing 5% butyl acrylate, obtained from the Quantum Chemical Company o= Cincinnati, Ohio. Alternatively, EBA 11,1 can be EA 719-009 (m) ethylenelbutyl ac-.ylate copolymer, having butyl acrylate content of 18. 5%, also obtained from Quantum Chemical Company. Optionally, the linear low- density polyethylene of the bag film can be replaced with a homogeneous ethylene /alpha-o lef in copolymer.

Figure 6 illustrates a schematic of a preferred process for producing the multilayer film o:E Figure 5. In the process illustrated in Figure 6, solid polymer beads (not illustrated) are fed to a plurality of extruders 52 (for simplicity, only one extruder is illustrated). Inside extruders 52, the polymer beads are forwarded, melted, and degassed, following which the resulting bubble-free melt is forwarded into die head 54, and extruded throuch an annular die, resulting in tubing 94 which is 10-30 mils is thick, more preferably 15-25 mils thick.

After cooling or quenching by water spray from cooling ring 58, tubing 94 is collapsed by pinch rolls 60, and is thereafter fed through irradiation vault 62 surrounded by shielding 64, where tubing 94 is irradiated with high energy electrons (i.e., ionizing radiation) from iron core transformer accelerator 66. Tubing 94 is guided through. irradiation vault 62 on rolls 68. Preferably, tubing 94 is irradiated to a level of from about 2 to 10 MR.

After irradiation, irradiated tubing 96 is directed through pinch rolls 98, following which tubing 96 is slightly inflated, resulting in trapped bubble 100. However, at trapped bubble 100, the tubing is not significantly drawn longitudinally, as the surf ace speed of nip rolls 102 are about the same speed as nip rolls 98. Furthermore, irradiated tubing 96 is inflated only enough to provide a- substantially circular tubing without significant transverse orientation, i.e., without stretching.

Slightly inflated, irradiated tubing 96 is passed through vacuum chamber 104, and thereafter forwarded through coating die 106. Second tubular film 108 is melt extruded from coating die 106 41 and coated onto slightly inflated, irradiated tube 96, to fornia two ply tubular film 110. Second tubular film 108 preferably comprises an 02 barrier layer, which does not pass through the ionizing radiation. Further details of the above-described coating step are generally as set forth in U.S. Patent No. 4,278,738, to BRAX et.

al., which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in its entirety.

After irradiation and coating, two-ply tubing film 110 is wound up onto windup roll 112. Thereafter, windup roll 112 is removed and installed as unwind roll 114, on a second stage in the process of making the tubing film as ultimately desired. Two-ply tubular film 110, from unwind roll 114, is unwound and passed over guide roll 72, af ter which two-ply tubular film 110 passes into hot water bath tank 74 containing water 76. The now collapsed, is irradiated, coated tubular film 110 is submersed in hot water 76 (having a temperature of aboutl210F) for a retention time of at least about 5 seconds, i.e., for a time period in order to bring the film up to the desired temperature for biaxial orientation.

Thereafter, irradiated tubular film 110 is directed through nip rolls 78, and bubble 80 is blown, thereby transversely stretching tubular film 110. Furth76rmore, while being blown, i.e.;" transversely stretched, nip rolls 86 draw tubular film 110 in the longitudinal direction, as nip rolls 86 have a surface speed higher than the surface speed of nip rolls 78. As a result of the transverse stretching and longitudinal drawing, irradiated, coated biaxially-o:riented blown tubing film 112 is produced, this blown tubing preferably having been both stretched in a ratio of from about 1:1.5 - 1:6, and drawn in a ratio of from about 1:1.5-1:6.

More preferably, the stretching and drawing are each performed a ratio of from about 1:2 - 1:4. The result is a biaxial orientation of from about 1:2.25 - 1:36, more preferably, 1:4 - 1:16. While bubble 80 is maintained between pinch rolls 78 and 86, blown tubing 112 is collapsed by rolls 84, and thereafter conveyed through pinch 42 rolls 86 and across. guide roll 88, and then. rolled onto wind-up roller 90. Idler roll 92 assures a good wind-up.

The polymer components used to fabricate multilayer films according to the present invention may also- contain appropriate amounts of other additives normally included in such compositions. These include slip agents such as talc, antioxidants, fillers, dyes, pigments and dyes, radiation stabilizers, antistatic agents, elastomers, and the like additives known to those of skill in the art of packaging films.

The multilayer films used to make the patch bag of the present invention are preferably irradiated to induce crosslinking, as well as corona treated to roughen the surface of the films which are to be adhered to one another. In the irradiation process, the film is subjected to an energetic radiation treatment, such as corona discharge, plasma, flame, ultraviolet, X-ray, gamma ray, beta ray, and high energy electron treatment,, which induce cross-linking between molecules of the irradiated material. The irradiation of polymeric films is disclosed in U. S. Patent---No. 4,064,296, to BORNSTEIN, et. al., which is hereby incorporated in Its entirety, by reference thereto. BORNSTEIN., et. al. discloses the use of ionizing radiation for crosslinUng the polymer present in the film.

To produce crosslinking, a suitable radiation dosage of high energy electrons is applied to the film. Preferably. i=adiation, is carried out by an electron accelerator and the dosage level is determined by standard dosimetry methods. Other accelerators such as a Vander Graff or resonating transformer may be used. The radiation is not limited to electrons from an accelerator since any ionizing radiation may be used. The ionizing radiation crosslinks the polymers in the film. Preferably, the film is irradiated at a level of from 2-15 MR, more preferably 2-10 MR. As can be seen from the descriptions of preferred films for use in the present

43 invention, -he most prefFerred amount of radiation is dependent upon the film and its end use.

The corona treatment of a film is preformed by subjecting the surfaces of the film to corona discharge, i.e., the ionization of a gas such as air in close proximity to a film surface, the ionization initiated by a high voltage passed through a nearby electrode, and causina oxidation and other changes to the film surface, such as surface roughness. Corona treatment of polymeric materials is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,120, 716, to BONETir issued October 17, 1978, herein incorporated in its ent'irety by reference thereto, disdioses improved adherence characteristics of the surface of polyethylene by corona treatment, to oxidize the polyethylene surface. U.S. Patent No. 4,879,430, to HOFFY-AIn, also hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference thereto, discloses is the use of corona discharge for the treatment of plastic webs for use in meat cook-in packaging, with the corona treatment of the inside surface of the web to increase the adhesion of the meat to the adhesion of the meat to the proteinaceous material.

Although corona treatment is a preferred treatment of the muitilayer films used to make the patch bag of the present invention, plasma treatment of the fil:m may also be used.

A preferred patch bag of the present invention, as illustrated for example in Figures 1 and 2, can be manufactured by a preferred 'llustrated in Figure 7. The process of Figure 7 can be process as i summarized as follows.

In general, a patch bag can be manufactured by carrying out the following process. First, a thermoplastic' film is extruded., and thereafter oriented in a machine direction and a transverse direction, so that a first biaxial ly-oriented, heat-shrinkable, thermoplastic patch film is produced. Then, the patch film is cut into a plurality of patches which are then adhered to a tubing, following which the tubing, having the patch adhered thereto, is 44 ? 20 i formed into a bag. Alternatively, but less preferably, the patch can be adhered to a pre-formed bag- A preferred process for producinc the patch bag of 1Che present invention is as follows. First. a heat-shrinkable patch is produced by a process comprising the steps of: (i) coextruding a multilaver, thermoplastic patch tubing, comprising an outside layer and an inside layer, the outside layer comprising homogeneous ethyl ene/alr)ha-o lef in copolymer and the inside layer comprising a polymer capable of sealing to itself; (ii) applying a sufficient amount of at least one member selected from the groulp consisting of an inert dust and an inert powder, to an inside surface of the patch tubing, so that upon collapsing the tubing after extrusion, the tubing does not self-adhere; (iii) collaDsing the patch tubing; (iv) irradiating'the collapsed patch tubing so that polymers making is up the patch tubing are crosslinked by the irradiation; (v) opening, inflating, heating, and stretching the patch tubing so that a biaxial ly-oriented, heat-shrinkable patch tubing is formed; (vi) simultaneously cooling, collapsing, and flattening the biaxially-oriented, heat-shrinkable patch tubing, -whereupon the inside layer of the biax ially-oriented, heat-shrinkable patch tubing adheres to itself, resulting in patch film s.tock. Secondly, a heat-shrinkable bag tubing is prepared in a manner as known to those of skill in the art, for example, by the method illustrated in Figure 6, described above. Third, adhesive is applied to one side of the patch film stock, and the resulting adhesive-coated patch film stock is cut into a plurality of' patches, following which the resulting adhesive-coated patch is adhered to the heat shrinkable bag tubing. Fourth, the heat-shrinkable bag tubing, having the patch adhered thereto, is cut and sealed, so that a patch bag is f ormed bag is formed from a portion of the heat shrinkable bag film tubing having the patch adhered thereto.

In this process, preferably the patch tubing is irradiated at a level of from about 2 to 15 MR. The adhesive can comprise any suitable adhesive as known to those of skill in the art. Preferably, two patches are adhered to the heat-shrinkable bag tubing.

Preferably, the tubing having the first and second patches adhered thereto is produced by the process illustrated in Figure 6, discussed above. In Figure 7, patch film roll 116 supplies patch film 118. Patch film 118 is directed, by idler roll 120, to corona treatment devices 131 which subject the upper surface of patch film 118 to corona treatment as Datch f_4_1m 1-18 masses over corona treatment roll 122. After corona treatmenti patch film 118 is directed, by idler rolls 124 and 126, into (optional) printing roll 128.

Patch film 118 is thereafter directed over idler rolls 130, 132, 134, and 136, af ter which patch film '118 is passed through a small gap (i.e., a gap wide enough to. accommodate patch film 118 passing therethrough while receiving an amount of adhesive which corresponds with a dry coating, i.e. .,.weight after drying, of about 45 m_illigrams per 10 square inches of patch film) between adhesive application roll 138 and adhesive metering roll 140. Adhesive application roll 138 is partially immersed in adhesive 142 supplied to trough 144. As adhesive roll 138 rotates---counter-C lociwi s e, adhesive 142, picked up by the immersed surface of adhesive roll 138, moves upward, contacts, and is metered onto, the full width of one side of patch film 118, moving in the same direction as the surface of adhesive roll 138. [Examples of suitable types of adhesiv es include thermoplastic acrylic emulsions, solvent based adhesives and high solids adhesives, ultravio, 1 et- cured adhesive, and electron-beam cured adhesive, as known to those of skill in the art: A preferred adhesive is RHOPLEX N619 (TM) thermoplastic acrylic emulsion, obtained from the Rohm Haas Company., at Dominion Plaza Suite 545, 17304 Preston Rd., Dallas, Texas 75252, Rohm & Haas having headquarters at 7th floor, Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, Penn. 19105.] Patch film 118 thereafter passes 46 C so far around adhesive metering roll 140 (rotating clockwise) that the adhesive-coated side of patch film 118 is in an orientation wherein the adhesive is on the top surface of patch film 118, as adhesive-coated patch film 118 moves between adhesive metering roll and idler roll 146 Thereafter, adhesive-coated patch film 118 is directed over drying oven entrance ' idler roll 146, and passed through oven 148 within which patch film 118 is dried to a decree that adhesive 142 an oatch film 118 becomes tacky. Upon exiting oven 148, patch film 118 is directed partially around oven-exit idler roll 150, following which patch. film 118 is cooled on chill rolls 152 and 154, each of which has a surface temperature ofaboutX(40-45.F), and a diameter of about 12 inches. The cooling of patch film 118 is carried out in order to stabilize patch film 118 from further is shrinkage.

Thereafter, patch film 118 is directed, by idler rolls 156 and 158, onto a belt of pre-cutting vacuum conveyor assembly 160, and thereafter forwarded to a rotary scissor- type knife having upper rotary blade assembly 162 and lower blade 164, the. knife -cutting across the width of patch film 118 in order to form patches 166.

Patches 166 are forwarded and held on top of a belt of post-cutting vacu= conveyor assembly 168. While patches 166 are held on the belt of post-cutting vacuum conveyor assembly 168, tubing-supply roll 170 supplies biaxially oriented, lay-flat film -tubing 172, which is directed, by idler roll 174, to corona treatment devices 176 which subject the upper surface' of lay-flat tubing film 172 to corona treatment as lay-flat tubing film 172 passes over corona treatment roll 178. After corona treatment, lay-flat tubing fil-M 172 is directed, by idler roll 180, par-tially around the surface of upper pre-lamination nip roll 182, and through the nip between upper prelazinating nip roll 182 and lower prelaminating nip roll 184, the pre-laminating nip rolls being above and. below the postcutting vacuum conveyor belt. Prelaminating nip rolls 182 and 184 47 0 0 3 position patches 166 onzo the now lower, corona- treated outside surface of lay-flat film tubing 172. After passing through the n-ir) between prelaminating nip rolls 182 and 184, lay-flat tubing 172, having patches 166 laminated intermittently thereon, exits off the downstream end c-E the post-cutting vacuum conveyor asserribly 168, and is directed through the nip between upper laminating nip roll 186 and lower laminati.-ng nip roll 188, these rolls exerting pressure (about 75 psi) I_. order to secure patches 166 to lay-flat tubing 172, to result in patch- laminated lay-flat tubing 190. Thereaf ter.. patch-laminated lay-f lat tubing 190 is wound up to f c= rewind roller 192, with rewind roll 192 having the laminated patches thereon oriented towards the outer- facing surface of rewind roll 192.

in a subseauent process not separately illustrated, rewind roll 192 is re.mcved from its winder and is positioned in the place of tubing supply roll 170, and the process of Figure 7, described immediately above, is repeated, wherein a second set of patches is laminated to patch-laminated lay-flat tubing 192, this second set of patches being applied to the other side of patch-laminated layflat tubing 192. of course, the second set of patches are accurately aligned and registered so that they are substantially aligned with the positioning of the first set of patches laminated to lay-flat tubing film 172. in order to achieve accurate alig=ent, photosensors (i.e., photoeyes, etc.), not illustrated, are used to detect the location of the patch. An appropriate location for such a photosensor is upstream of upper pre-lamination roll 182, below the patch-laminated lay-flat tubing.

T1Lroughout the process described above, patches 166 can have a width less thanefecual to the width of lay-flat tubing film 172, so that the patches respectively: leave uncovered regions along the sides of the bag, go to the edge of the lay-flat tubing. J_.

48 Once both sets af patches have beer, applied to lay-flat tubing film 172, the resulting two-patch tubing is directed into a bagmak-4zg machine, in a process not illustrated.

In general, sealing of film to produce' a bag can be performed us; ng a hat bar (heat seal) or a nichrome wire f ixed to a chilled metal bar (impulse seal), as is known to those of skill in the art, or any other sealing means known to those of skill in the art, such as ultrasonic radiation, radio frecn-,ency radiation, and laser.

The preferred sealing means is an imDulse seale-- Films which are predominantly polyethylene aregenerally sealed using impulse sealing or'hot bar sealing. Both linear and shaped seals can be formed, as is known to those of skill in the art.

in general, sealing and cuttina of tubing to produce bags is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,552,090, U.S. Patent No. 3,383,746, and U S -A - 362 U76,: ". filed July 25, 1969, to OWEEN, each of these two U.S. Patents as well as the u.S. Patent application, hereby being incorporated by reference thereto, in their entireties.

Another alternative patch bag which can be used in the present invention is disclosed in U 5 in the names of G.K. WILLIAMS and S.A.-BRADY, filed ADril 21, 1993, which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto, in its entirety. This application discloses an end-seal patch bag having at least one patch thereon, preferably two patches thereon, wherein the patches are in a orotated position when the patch bag is in its lay-flat position. In accordance with the present invention, one or more supplemental seals are made inward of the primary seal in the patch bag disclosed in the WILLIAMS, et. al. US-A-T4og6.

The patch bag according to the present invention can also comprise a plurality of overhanging bonded patches, as disclosed in coperiding U.S.S.N. 081268,087, filed June 28, 1994, entitled "PATCE BAG HAVING OVERILA-NGING BONDED PATCE-ES', filed June 28, 1994, in the 49 is hereby name of S. BRADY, et. al., the entirety of whJcil incorporated by reference thereto.

The patch bag according to the present invention can further comprise a primary seal across a portion of the bag which is not covered by a patch, and a secondary seal inward of the primary seal, as disclosed in copending U.S. gatb j. entitled "PATCH BAG WITH SUPPLEMENTAL SEAL", filed July 21, 1994, in the name of S. BRADY, et. al., the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference thereto.

A more detailed disclosure of this patch bag can be f ound in comendina U. S. Patent Application to OBER.LE et. al., eiltitl"ed wPATCH BAG HAVING CONTINUOUS PATCH". Of course, this feature is useful recardless ofwhether the patches are overhancing and bonded to one another.

Although in general the bag according to the present invention can be used in the packaging of any product, the bag of the present invention is especially advantageous for the packaging of food products, especially fresh meat products comprising bone. Among the meat products which can be packaged in the films and.packages accorcLing to the present invention are poultry, pork, beef, lamb, goat, horse, and f ish. More specifically, preferred meat products to be packaged in the patch bag of the present invention include ham, spareribs, picnic, back rib, short loin, short rib, whole turkey, and pork loin. The patch bag of the present invention is especially:useful for the packaging of a pair of bone-in whole pork loins.

Figwe 8 illustrates a perspective view of a pair of bone-in whole pork loins 244, each viewed from the ham end, aligned together in a preferred position for packaging in a preferred patch bag as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, as described in detail above. The pair of pork loins as illustrated in Figure 8 are placed in the patch bag illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, with the so patch bag thereafter being evacuated- sealed, and shrunken, to result in a packaced product according to the present invention.

Figure 9 illustrates a cross-sactional view taken through section 9-9 of Figure 8, together with the addition of a cross- sectional view of a patch bag 20, i.e., tile patch bag illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, described above. Each of park loins 244 contains rib bone 248, chine bone 250, and feather bone 252. it has been found that using a patch bag in which the patches do not extend to the side edges of the bag, but rather extend only up to about one-hal-f inch from the edge of the bag, allow one or more of rib bone 248, c - hine bone 250, and feather bone 252 to cause bone punctures.

Although the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and variations may be utilized without departing from the principles and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the ar-t will readily understand.. Accordingly, such modif ications may be practiced within the scope of the following claims..

is -51

Claims (2)

C L A I M S

1. A patch bag comprising a heat-shrinkable patch adhered to a heatshrinkable bag, the heat-shrinkable patch comprising a first heatshrinkable film and the heatshrinkable bag comprising a second heatshrinkable film, the first heat-shrinkable film comprising homogeneous ethylene/ alpha-ole fin copolymer; wherein the first heatshrinkable film comprises two outer layers and two inner layers, the two outer layers being substantially identical in chemical composition and thickness, and the two inner layers being substantially identical in chemical composition and thickness; wherein each of the two inner layers comprises the homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin in an amount of from about 1 to 100 weight percent, based on the weight of the inner layers; and wherein each of the two outer layers comprises homogeneous ethylene/ alpha-o le fin copolymer.

2. A patch bag according to claim 1-1, wherein each of e outer layers consists sole-1v 0.1 homogeneous ethvlene/alphaolefin copolymer.

is 23

2. A patch bag according to claim 1, wherein each of the outer layers consists solely of homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer.

Amendments to the claims have been filed as follows C L A I M S 1. A patch bag comprising a heat-shrinkable patch adhered to a heat- shrinkable bag, the heat-shrinkable patch comprising a first heat- shrinkable film and the heatshrinkable bag comprising a second heat- shrinkable film, the first heat-shrinkable film comprising homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olef-in copolymer; wherein 'the first heatshrinkable film comnrises two outer lavers and two inner lavers, the two outer layers being substantially identical in. chemical composition and thickness, and the two inner lavers being substantially identical in chemical composition and thickness; wherein each of the two inner layers comprises the homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin in an amount of from about 1 to 100 weight percent, based on the weight of the inner lavers; and wherein the outer layers of the first heat-shr-inkable film, comprise homogeneous ethylene/alpha-olefin copolymer.