GB2314865A - Removal of sulphate scale from surfaces - Google Patents

Removal of sulphate scale from surfaces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2314865A
GB2314865A GB9713383A GB9713383A GB2314865A GB 2314865 A GB2314865 A GB 2314865A GB 9713383 A GB9713383 A GB 9713383A GB 9713383 A GB9713383 A GB 9713383A GB 2314865 A GB2314865 A GB 2314865A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
scale
sulphate
barium
dissolver
potassium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB9713383A
Other versions
GB9713383D0 (en
GB2314865B (en
Inventor
Richard William Keatch
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of GB9713383D0 publication Critical patent/GB9713383D0/en
Publication of GB2314865A publication Critical patent/GB2314865A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2314865B publication Critical patent/GB2314865B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/14Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with alkaline solutions
    • C23G1/19Iron or steel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/52Compositions for preventing, limiting or eliminating depositions, e.g. for cleaning
    • C09K8/528Compositions for preventing, limiting or eliminating depositions, e.g. for cleaning inorganic depositions, e.g. sulfates or carbonates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/24Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with neutral solutions

Abstract

A method for dissolving sulphate scale comprises contacting the sulphate scale with a solution containing a scale convertor, e.g. potassium carbonate; a catalyst, e.g. potassium formate; and a chelating agent.

Description

REMOVAL OF SCALE FROM SURFACES This invention relates to the removal of scale from surfaces and provides a method of removing scale from a surface, and solutions for treatment of a surface to remove scale. The invention is particularly, but not exclusively for use in oil and gas wells.
In oil and gas well operations, water insoluble scale is formed in tubing, casings and associated equipment, as well as the wellbore and the subterranean formation itself which carry at least in part, water or brine waters. These waters have the potential to form water insoluble mineral scale species such as barium sulphate, strontium sulphate, calcium carbonate, iron carbonate, iron oxides, iron sulphides and magnesium salts.
There is also a potential for water insoluble scale to be produced by the introduction of various treating chemicals such as phosphonic acid and polycarboxylic acid scale inhibitors which can form damaging calcium and iron salts if applied incorrectly.
Scale formation can occur as a result of a change in pressure or temperature or both in the system or can result from the mixing of incompatible waters such as formation water containing barium, strontium and calcium with sulphate rich seawater associated with water flooding methods of secondary recovery where water in injected into the formation rock to maintain reservoir pressure as oil is produced.
Formation water is the natural water found within the pores of the formation rock along with the oil and gas. The water is rich in metal ions such as calcium, barium and strontium which have been leached from the naturally occurring minerals in the rock.
The precipitation of scale can occur in the pores of the reservoir rock and throughout the entire process train.
The process train is a series of pipes, separators, coolers, pumps and other equipment on the oil platform involved in processing the mixture of oii, water and gas flowing from the wells so that dry gas and oil can be extracted from the mixture and individually exported via sub sea pipelines to refineries.
Scale build up decreases reservoir production and efficiency of process equipment operation. The need to maintain high production rates makes scale formation a serious problem and remedial action is required in the form of preventative action involving scale inhibitor treatment or removal when scale has already formed.
The chemical removal of carbonate scale has traditionally been carried out using acids, either mineral acid or carboxylic acids which react with the scale rapidly to form carbon dioxide and a solution of calcium salt.
The chemical removal of sulphate scale is more difficult since the scale has to be dissolved using chelating agents and both the rate of dissolution and the levels of scaling cation which can be sequestered is limited.
According to the present invention there is provided a method for dissolving sulphate scale, the method comprising the steps of: contacting the sulphate scale with a solution containing scale converter, catalyst and chelating agent.
The scale converter ionises the insoluble scale. The catalyst increases the efficiency of sequestration of the scaling cation. The chelating agent complexes with cations of the scale in solution.
Preferably, the catalyst is potassium formate.
The preferred salt of each component is the potassium salt although caesium salts may in some circumstances offer benefits due in large to their greater solubility in water.
The preferred alkalinity for barium and strontium sulphate dissolution is in the range 10 to 13.
Advantageously the alkalinity is pH 12.
The preferred alkalinity for calcium sulphate is in the range 7 to 9 and advantageously pH 8.5 when DTPA is used as the chelating agent.
Other carboxylic acids have been found to have a catalytic effect, for example, oxalic acid and salicylic acid but the effect of these other carboxylic acids is not so great as the formic acid salt.
The low molecular weight of the formate, and the high solubility of alkali metal and divalent formate salts result in the formate being the most effective catalytic carboxylate.
Alternative converters include bicarbonate. The effectiveness of bicarbonates particularly on barium and strontium sulphate scale has been found to be much less than that of potassium carbonate, however in some instances bicarbonate could be used for calcium sulphate scale conversion.
Alternative chelating agents could be selected from the groups comprising the polyaminopolycarboxylic acids and the crown ethers. The choice is related to the specificity of the chelating agent towards the particular scaling cation, the logK value, the optimum pH for sequestering and the commercial availability of the chelating agent. More specifically, for strontium sulphate there are certain performance advantages in using 1,2-Diaminocyclohexanetetraacetic acid or triethylene, triaminetetraacetic acid or triethylenetetraminehexaacetic acid. For calcium sulphate, ethylenediaminetetraacectic acid is an alternative although the dipotassium salt is preferred over the tetra potassium salt.
The use of chelating agents for the dissolution of sulphate scale was first accomplished using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) sodium salts. The development of more efficient scale dissolvers addressed the use of potassium salts and other chelating agents. To this end, the most cost effective current treatments involve the application of pentapotassium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) solutions.
The inventor has surprisingly found that the use of potassium carbonate as a converting agent can markedly improve the dissolution rate of sulphate scale, although the overall sequestering capacity of the chelating agent is unaffected.
Potassium carbonate when used as a converting agent acts on barium sulphate scale such that surface barium sulphate is converted to form barium carbonate (in solid form) and potassium sulphate (aqueous form) The solubility of barium sulphate in boiling water is only 0.0004g/lOOmls. The conversion to barium carbonate by exposure of the sulphate scale surface to a high concentration of potassium carbonate increases the solubility to approximately 0.0065g/lOOmls at lOOC so that at any one time there should be a barium ion concentration of 45mg/L available for the chelating agent to sequester.
Since the barium ion concentration associated with barium sulphate is only about 2.35mg/L the barium can be sequestered at a rate up to 19 times higher in the presence of the carbonate converting agent.
The increased dissolution rate afforded by the incorporation of converting agents into dissolver formulations by means of the present invention has allowed downhole sulphate scale to be removed in a time efficient manner where the scale accumulations have been of moderate thickness (1-lOmm) , but the limited sequestering capacity of chelating agents has restricted the number of applications where chemical removal alone can be used as a remedial treatment.
The use of carbonate converting agent has an additional beneficial effect on the amount of scale which can be removed with a given volume of dissolver particularly where scale exists in a particulate form and downhole conditions of carbon dioxide partial pressure and / or organic acids provide acid conditions for produced water which allows converted, unchelated scale to be removed after the well has been returned to flowing conditions.
Produced water refers to commingled seawater and formation water. This mixing of waters can result in mineral scale deposition since the seawater is rich in sulphate and the formation water rich in cations.
The inventor has found that certain carboxylic acids can be used together with converting agents to increase the efficiency of chelation of cations by the sequestering agent so that the effective sequestering capacity of the dissolver is increased.
The efficiency of sequestration is measured as the percentage of total chelating agent which at equilibrium is present as the scale metal chelate. Typically, the sequestering efficiency is only of the order of 30-50k under usual chelating agent application concentrations (5-20k w/w).
We have found potassium formate to be particularly effective in increasing the efficiency of chelation of barium by DTPA so that efficiencies of over eighty five percent can be achieved.
It is believed that the mechanism by which the formate ion achieves this effect is that two formate ions bind with a barium ion transiently and increase the subsequent efficiency of chelation by DTPA. Under high surface area to volume ratio conditions with converting agent and chelating agent only present, it has been observed that the release of potassium sulphate outstrips the sequestration of barium ion. It is further believed that there comes a time during dissolution when the alkali metal sulphate concentration is sufficient to prevent further barium ion chelation due to the effects of mass action so that despite the high logK value for the chelate the tendency for barium sulphate to reform is higher and the full sequestering capacity of the chelating agent is never utilised.
The presence of excess formate ion may push the equilibrium in favour of barium chelate formation so that the increasing dissolved sulphate cannot effectively compete with the formate and chelating agent for the available barium ions in solution. By careful choice of the relative amounts of chelating agent, converting agent and catalyst the optimum dissolution rate and sequestering capacity of the dissolver can be achieved for a particular application.
The situation with field scale is different since the surface area of layered scale accumulations on pipework offers a limited surface area for the converting agent to attack.
Fresh surface to convert will only become available as the chelating agent sequesters the barium ion.
The term field scale is used to identify the mineral scale found in the oil field as opposed to pure analytical grade reagent powdered mineral. The scale that forms in "the field" tends to consist of cylindrical crystalline layers of varying chemical composition, morphology and permeability. The crystalline layers are generally cylindrical because they are most often encountered on internal surfaces of pipes.
In this instance, therefore, the rate limiting step is the chelation of barium ions and the chelating efficiency of a solution comprising converting agent and chelating agent for this type of scale is likely to be higher than for powdered analytical grade reagent barium sulphate particularly at high temperature and high dissolver concentration where the conversion process is enhanced.
In other words, although the dissolution rate of layered crystaline scale will be slower due to the lower surface area when compared with particulate scale, the efficiency of sequestration will be relatively higher due to the converting agent being restricted in its effect.
The damage caused to production downhole is most frequently attributable to a limited amount of scale in the critical oil producing zone in the near wellbore. This scale will typically consist of a thin layer of scale and scale particles in the formation rock pores. In these instances, the advantage of the new scale dissolver formulation will be significant. In the removal of scale in production tubulars the amount of scale required to form a significant flow restriction is much greater and the improved sequestering capacity of the new dissolver will enable the scale to be removed with less chemical and fewer soak/displacement operations.
The term "near wellbore" refers to the area of the reservoir where oil is being produced. A well usually consists of a steel lined hole which is several inches in diameter and which has been drilled through oil bearing rock down to a depth of several thousand feet. The steel casing is perforated using explosive charges in the layers where oil is situated to allow the oil to flow up the tubing to the surface platform. Near wellbore refers to the area around the perforations and a few feet into the reservoir.
An additional benefit of the new dissolver has been noticed during a new dissolver application method involving the use of ultrasound.
An ultrasonic tool may be used which will enhance dissolution rates by increasing surface agitation and also increasing the contact of fresh dissolver in pores within the scale by creating a pressure wave which forces dissolver in and out of the scale and prevents dissolver becoming saturated in the low mixing potential areas. The increased effective surface area during sonication of scale allows the new dissolver to act much more efficiently, resulting in dissolution solution rates fifteen times greater than that of non-sonicated solutions with layered crystalline scale accumulations. The benefits of the dual converter, catalyst action in promoting faster dissolution and increased sequestering capacity are maximised under ultrasonic conditions.
Experiments The following experiments were carried out to show the unexpected performance advantages of combining both converting agent and catalyst with chelating agent according to the present invention and to identify the preferred proportions of the various chemical components.
The pattern of solubilisation of barium sulphate has been examined by plasma emission analysis of barium, potassium and sulphate levels in dissolver solutions as a function of time, temperature dissolver concentration and scale mass to dissolver volume ratio. The scale mass has been determined as a function of time and the solubility of the deposit in both water and weak acid examined following treatment with scale dissolver.
1. Comparison of sequestering capacity of DTPA penta potassium salt, in the presence of potassium carbonate, potassium formate, and both potassium carbonate and potassium formate at 60 degrees Centigrade.
2. The pattern of solubilisation of barium and sulphate ions of powdered barium sulphate with the new dissolver formulation as a function of temperature 3. The effect of potassium hydroxide concentration on the performance of the dissolver formulation in dissolving powdered barium sulphate. The addition of alkali allows firstly the formation of the penta potassium salt of DTPA acid and any excess allows the effect of the free potassium hydroxide on dissolution performance to be compared.
4. Optimum concentration of catalyst in the new dissolver. The effect of a range of potassium formate concentrations on the efficiency of dissolution was studied by incubating the various solutions at 60C and taking samples for barium and sulphate ion analysis. At the end of the experiment the remaining precipitate was filtered through a 0.45 micron Millipore filter, dried at lOOC and weighed. This deposit was then water washed, filtered, dried and weighed before acid washing in 10% formic acid, filtering, drying and reweighing.
5. Optimum concentration of converter in the new dissolver. A range of different molarity solutions of potassium carbonate solution were prepared and a mass of powdered barium sulphate added to the solution to give a 1M mixture. The conversion of barium sulphate to potassium sulphate and barium carbonate was measured at regular time intervals.
6. Optimum concentration of chelating agent in the new dissolver. The sequestering capacity of a range of chelating agent solutions was compared with the sequestering efficiency up to the solubility limit of the dissolver components. Each component was added at its optimum concentration as measured in the previous tests. The sequestering efficiency was measured as the proportion of barium chelate to the total chelate concentration.
The invention will now be further described by way of example only with reference to the following drawings in which: Figure 1 is a graph showing the dissolution rate and sequestering capacity of DTPAK5, DTPAK5/K2C03, DTPAKs/KHCO2 and DTPAK5/K2C03/KHC02 respectively. The speed of dissolution and the sequestering capacity of the combined converting agent / catalyst formulation is much greater than for any of the other solutions; Figure 2 is a graph showing the rate of dissolution as a function of temperature. The rate of dissolution is seen to increase with increasing temperature but the rate of solubilisation at lower temperatures is much greater than has been achieved in the past with existing formulations; Figure 3 is a graph showing that at lower dissolver concentrations there is a benefit in having an excess of around 2% w/w KOH. With neat dissolver there appears to be some advantage in having a reduced excess of 1% w/w or perhaps no excess at all in terms of sequestering capacity but the rate of dissolution of powdered barium sulphate in all cases increases with increasing potassium hydroxide concentration.
It has been found however that the effect of potassium hydroxide is highly variable with oil field scale samples and each case needs to be looked at independently where possible in order to optimise the pH for a particular scale problem; Figure 4 is a graph showing details of the effect of a range of catalyst concentrations on the dissolution rate and the sequestering capacity of the various dissolver solutions and the effect on soluble salt speciation during the treatment.
It can be seen that at low catalyst concentrations there is a weight loss of solids whereas for higher concentrations of potassium formate there appears to be an overall weight gain.
The increased mass represents precipitated potassium sulphate which is water soluble but forms as a by-product of the conversion and chelation reactions as its solubility limit is exceeded. There appears to be a peak in total sequestering capacity at around 7kw/w which is further enhanced when acid soluble barium carbonate material is taken into account; Figures 5(a) and (b) are graphs showing the degree of conversion of barium sulphate to barium carbonate at a range of potassium carbonate concentrations. At all temperatures there appears to be a benefit in having high concentrations of converting agent. The effect is however greater at lower temperature and the problem of incorporating many water soluble active components all competing for the available water into one formulation requires the solubility limit of each of the components and their effectiveness in solubilising the sulphate scale to be balanced; and Figure 6 is a graph showing the sequestering capacity and efficiency as a function of chelating agent concentration related to optimum converter and catalyst concentrations. The sequestering capacity of the dissolver appears to peak close to the solubility limit of DTPA in the formulation whilst the efficiency of sequestration peaks at a DTPA concentration of around 0.44M under the adopted test conditions.
The effect of a range of potassium formate concentrations on barium sulphate conversion to potassium sulphate and barium formate was studied and found not to be significant at a pH of 11 and a temperature of 60 degrees Centigrade.
A preferred formulation for the new barium sulphate scale dissolver is by weight: 20.00 percent Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid 16.33 percent potassium hydroxide 14.85 percent potassium carbonate 10.39 percent potassium formate 38.43 percent water.

Claims (7)

CLAIMS:
1. A method for dissolving sulphate scale, the method comprising the steps of: contacting the sulphate scale with a solution containing scale converter, catalyst and chelating agent.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the catalyst is potassium formate.
3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the preferred alkalinity for barium and strontium sulphate dissolution is in the range 10:13.
4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the alkalinity is pH 12.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the preferred alkalinity for calcium sulphate is in the range 7 to 9.
6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the alkalinity or calcium sulphate is pH 8.5 when DTPA is used as the chelating agent.
7. A method as substantially hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
GB9713383A 1996-06-29 1997-06-26 Removal of scale from surfaces Expired - Lifetime GB2314865B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9613714.6A GB9613714D0 (en) 1996-06-29 1996-06-29 Removal of scale from surfaces

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9713383D0 GB9713383D0 (en) 1997-08-27
GB2314865A true GB2314865A (en) 1998-01-14
GB2314865B GB2314865B (en) 2000-12-13

Family

ID=10796122

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GBGB9613714.6A Pending GB9613714D0 (en) 1996-06-29 1996-06-29 Removal of scale from surfaces
GB9713383A Expired - Lifetime GB2314865B (en) 1996-06-29 1997-06-26 Removal of scale from surfaces

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GBGB9613714.6A Pending GB9613714D0 (en) 1996-06-29 1996-06-29 Removal of scale from surfaces

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (2) GB9613714D0 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002006422A2 (en) * 2000-07-14 2002-01-24 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Compositions for controlling scaling and completion fluids
WO2003018708A3 (en) * 2001-08-10 2003-08-21 Cabot Specialty Fluids Inc Alkali metal tungstate compositions and uses thereof
US6818595B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2004-11-16 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Drilling fluids containing an alkali metal formate
WO2007109798A1 (en) 2006-03-23 2007-09-27 Oilfield Mineral Solutions Limited A method for dissolving oilfield scale
AU2003264890B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2009-08-20 Systagenix Wound Management Ip Co. B.V. Wound dressing compositions comprising chitosan and an oxidised cellulose
US9783728B2 (en) 2016-01-12 2017-10-10 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method for removing iron sulfide scale
EP3997037A4 (en) * 2019-07-11 2023-08-16 Dorf Ketal Chemicals Fze Composition useful in sulfate scale removal

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1293440A (en) * 1970-09-08 1972-10-18 Frank Joseph Quattrini Improvements in or relating to scale removal solvents and processes
GB1469460A (en) * 1973-12-03 1977-04-06 Borg Warner Composition and method for removing insoluble scale deposits from surfaces
US5183112A (en) * 1991-08-16 1993-02-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for scale removal in a wellbore
US5366016A (en) * 1993-12-10 1994-11-22 Mobil Oil Corporation Use of variable density carrier fluids to improve the efficiency of scale dissolution

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1293440A (en) * 1970-09-08 1972-10-18 Frank Joseph Quattrini Improvements in or relating to scale removal solvents and processes
GB1469460A (en) * 1973-12-03 1977-04-06 Borg Warner Composition and method for removing insoluble scale deposits from surfaces
US5183112A (en) * 1991-08-16 1993-02-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for scale removal in a wellbore
US5366016A (en) * 1993-12-10 1994-11-22 Mobil Oil Corporation Use of variable density carrier fluids to improve the efficiency of scale dissolution

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002006422A3 (en) * 2000-07-14 2002-05-23 Cabot Specialty Fluids Inc Compositions for controlling scaling and completion fluids
AU2001273291B2 (en) * 2000-07-14 2007-03-01 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Compositions for controlling scaling and completion fluids
US7211550B2 (en) 2000-07-14 2007-05-01 Cabot Corporation Compositions for controlling scaling and completion fluids
WO2002006422A2 (en) * 2000-07-14 2002-01-24 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Compositions for controlling scaling and completion fluids
US6818595B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2004-11-16 Cabot Specialty Fluids, Inc. Drilling fluids containing an alkali metal formate
WO2003018708A3 (en) * 2001-08-10 2003-08-21 Cabot Specialty Fluids Inc Alkali metal tungstate compositions and uses thereof
US7273832B2 (en) 2001-08-10 2007-09-25 Cabot Corporation Alkali metal tungstate compositions and uses thereof
NO342806B1 (en) * 2001-08-10 2018-08-06 Cabot Specialty Fluids Inc Alkali metal tungsten materials and their use.
US9675728B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2017-06-13 Kci Usa, Inc. Compositions for wound treatment
AU2003264890B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2009-08-20 Systagenix Wound Management Ip Co. B.V. Wound dressing compositions comprising chitosan and an oxidised cellulose
AU2003264890B8 (en) * 2002-09-18 2009-10-15 Systagenix Wound Management Ip Co. B.V. Wound dressing compositions comprising chitosan and an oxidised cellulose
US7470330B2 (en) 2006-03-23 2008-12-30 M-1 Production Chemicals Uk Limited Method for dissolving oilfield scale
WO2007109798A1 (en) 2006-03-23 2007-09-27 Oilfield Mineral Solutions Limited A method for dissolving oilfield scale
US9783728B2 (en) 2016-01-12 2017-10-10 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method for removing iron sulfide scale
US10323173B2 (en) 2016-01-12 2019-06-18 King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals Method for removing iron sulfide scale from oil well equipment
EP3997037A4 (en) * 2019-07-11 2023-08-16 Dorf Ketal Chemicals Fze Composition useful in sulfate scale removal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9713383D0 (en) 1997-08-27
GB9613714D0 (en) 1996-08-28
GB2314865B (en) 2000-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101432464B (en) A method for dissolving oilfield scale
US4016075A (en) Process for removal of silica from geothermal brine
US4675120A (en) Methods of using strong acids modified with acid solutions
US5190656A (en) Method for removing scale via a liquid membrane in combination with an amino carboxylic acid and a catalyst
US4980077A (en) Method for removing alkaline sulfate scale
US4030548A (en) Economically dissolving barium sulfate scale with a chelating agent
US3951827A (en) Composition and method for removing insoluble scale deposits from surfaces
US5082492A (en) Recovery of precious metals from aqueous media
US5762821A (en) Compound for removing alkaline earth metal scale deposits and silica-based scale deposits
Shi et al. Effects of L-glutamic acid, N, N-diacetic acid as chelating agent on acidification of carbonate reservoirs in acidic environments
MXPA01007767A (en) Well drilling and servicing fluids and methods of removing filter cake deposited thereby.
WO2018026436A1 (en) Composition and method for making converter-dissolver composition for dissolving metal sulfate scales from surfaces
US5259980A (en) Compositions for dissolution of sulfate scales
EP0418374B1 (en) Sulfate scale dissolution
GB2314865A (en) Removal of sulphate scale from surfaces
US5059333A (en) Dissolution of sulfate scales
US5049297A (en) Sulfate scale dissolution
US5200117A (en) Sulfate scale dissolution
US5068042A (en) Dissolution of sulfate scales
CA1074091A (en) Converter type scale remover
US11136491B2 (en) Iron sulfide removal in oilfield applications
US6032747A (en) Water-based drilling fluid deacidification process and apparatus
US20140066351A1 (en) Stabilized Pipe Scaling Remover and Inhibitor Compound
RU2232879C1 (en) Method for processing of formation face zone
US5111887A (en) Method for reducing radioactivity of oilfield tubular goods contaminated with radioactive scale

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
732E Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)
732E Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)
PE20 Patent expired after termination of 20 years

Expiry date: 20170625