GB2306035A - Differential weight security alarm - Google Patents

Differential weight security alarm Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2306035A
GB2306035A GB9520571A GB9520571A GB2306035A GB 2306035 A GB2306035 A GB 2306035A GB 9520571 A GB9520571 A GB 9520571A GB 9520571 A GB9520571 A GB 9520571A GB 2306035 A GB2306035 A GB 2306035A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
sensors
weight
deflection
objects
shelf
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB9520571A
Other versions
GB9520571D0 (en
GB2306035B (en
Inventor
Philip Elphee Williams
Peter John Jones
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to GB9520571A priority Critical patent/GB2306035B/en
Publication of GB9520571D0 publication Critical patent/GB9520571D0/en
Publication of GB2306035A publication Critical patent/GB2306035A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2306035B publication Critical patent/GB2306035B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02Mechanical actuation
    • G08B13/14Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles
    • G08B13/1472Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles with force or weight detection

Abstract

The differential weight security alarm consists of a rigid surface A bearing on piezo-electric sensors C under deflection which provide an output signal as a result of the rate of change of weight experienced by the placement on or removal of an object from the surface. This signal is sent to an electronic unit (Fig. 7) which filters, amplifies and produces an output signal as well as resetting the apparatus in preparation for a subsequent event. The phase of the output signal may also be determined to tell whether an item has been placed on or removed from the surface.

Description

Differential weight security alarm.
The apparatus described is particularly effective as a security alarm input device where a large number of shelves or surfaces are to be monitored which can then effectively protect many hundreds of individual objects from pilferage or by alerting staff that an object has been removed.
The alarm is activated by a change of weight, either by adding or subtracting weight about a steady state weight datum condition. The datum operating point is the steady state condition regardless of the total weight of the surface plus objects. A maximum safe operating weight limit depends on the application in hand and the choice of materials.
The apparatus described does not need to allow for the absolute weight as voltage is only generated when the amount of deflection is changing. This is distinct from capacitive, piezo-resistive, strain-guage spring-balance and load cell arrangements where the absolute weight determines their actual value.
The overall weight of the objects to be protected and the surface on which they are placed is supported by a sensor or number of sensors on which the total weight is bearing.
In practise it is convenient to use 4 sensors per surface but any number of sensors connected together could be used to achieve the desired result.
It is the nature of the sensors, which are piezoelectric, and their subsequent electronic signal handling processes which give the arrangement its specific importance.
In practise it has been found to provide a very sensitive characteristic together with a good degree of immunity to unwanted events such as vibration and external noise.
The construction and principle of operation of the sensor or sensors on which the weight bears is consistent and important to the correct performance of the system.
For the purposes of the description, the example of a shelf is used. It should be appreciated that the shelf could equally be a tray, a table or any surface whether flat or irregular in nature which could be arranged so that the total weight of the surface and objects on the surface bear on the sensors.
In the description the shelf is supported by 4 sensors so that the weight is evenly distributed amongst them and that the sensors in turn rest on fixed shelf supports.
With reference to Fig 1 and Fig 4 and 5 The shelf A rests directly on the resilient mount B which acts as a controlling op position to the piezoelectric transducer C. A bearing pad D fits between C and the shelf support E. This bearing pad may be fixed to C by adhesive or similar means.
The bearing pad D must be different in diameter from B in order for the piezoelectric sensor C to deflect. If B and D were of the same physical diameter then the piezoelectric transducer C would be subject to compression and not deflection and little or no output would result. Connections from the Transducer consist of wires F & G which convey the signals generated by the rate of change of deflection of C to the electronic circuitry.
The weight of the shelf and objects on the shelf causes C to physically deflect from its unladen state, the amount of deflection depends on the amount of weight and the coefficient of stiffness of the resilient mounts B & D from which the mounts are made. In practise the resilient mount B is made from a rubber with a suitable characteristic of stiffness and recovery from compression. Thus the sensitivity of the system, or the voltage generated per unit of weight change is dependent on the coefficient of stiffness of the resilient mount B and the bearing pad D. In practise, D is made from a hard rubber material but could be made from a rigid material such as nylon.
When weight is placed on, or removed from the shelf the characteristic of the piezoelectric transducer under these conditions is to generate a linear voltage proportional to the rate of change of displacement of the piezo crystal profile from its previous profile. After the event has occurred the sensor takes up a new physical position, and although it may be subject to deflection the state is steady and the output falls zero.
A second factor which determines the sensitivity is the relative areas of the resilient pad B and the bearing pad D. The greater the difference in relative areas, the greater the sensitivity. In practise a ratio of 2:1 results in good sensitivity together with good mechanical stability.
Fig 3 shows an alternative arrangement where the shelf A rests directly on the bearing pad D and the resilient pad B sits on the fixed support E. This arrangement is functionally identical to the one described above.
It is a characteristic of Piezoelectric transducers that the polarity of the voltage generated by the deflection depends on the direction of deflection. Thus it is possible to identify whether an object has been placed on, or removed from the surface. The polarity, sometimes referred to as the phase of the signal generated will indicate whether the overall weight has been increased or decreased by the event.
Figure 5 shows the effect of weight bearing on the shelf and although exaggerated in the drawing, shows the deflection moment acting on the sensor C The electronic circuitry must perform an integration function on the sensor output in order to interpret the event as genuine. ie Vo =df dt Where + = the change due to deflection and Vo = voltage produced by the sensor.
Change in profile = Vo x t = Volts x time after integration.
Fig 2 shows the arrangement where the shelf A is supported by 4 resilient mounts B and these supports are of the type illustrated by Fig 1.
The 4 sensors are connected together and in the same phase by wires F & G this wire consisting of 2 or more cores and conveys the combined output signals as an input to the electronic unit. Additional cores may be used as cut-cable supervision.
When more than one shelf is used, the sensors on alternate shelves may be connected in the opposite phase. This has the advantage of cancelling the effects of temperature change to which all the shelves in the system are subjected. Temperature changes can produce small deflections as the shelf, and the sensors themselves expand and contract. The disadvantage of reversing the phase of alternate shelves is that, if the sensors are all connected to a common input point then the electronics can no longer determine whether the phase of the event signal is as a result of an object being removed from one shelf or being placed on a shelf of opposite phase. In practise it is necessary to determine the requirements of the application and whether phase indication is required.
The arrangement described allows 20 or more shelves to be collectively connected to an electronic unit and a sensitivity of 20grams in 20Kg can be achieved per shelf or 0.1% of the total weight.
Fig 6 shows the block diagram of the electronic unit up to the point where the event has been detected. It can be appreciated that once an event has been detected then standard practises apply to the electronics which receive this signal.
The outputs from the sensors 1 are all connected in parallel from n shelves.
These are applied to an input filter 2 which removes the effect of high frequency vibration signals. The cut off frequency of this filter is in the order of 2 Hz This filter is also effective in improving the immunity to unwanted signals such as noise spikes and mains hum which may be induced into the sensor cables.
The output of the sensors must be integrated from Rate of Change of sensor profile or deflection to actual change of profile or deflection and this is achieved in block 3 Therefore the output from the integrator is proportional to the change in profile of the sensors subjected to the event, ie change in weight.
A second filter in block 4 further removes unwanted vibration and short term small weight disturbances. The output of this filter is fed to block 5 which amplifies the signal to a level which may be compared to a preset threshold.
The comparator 6 as shown will generate an output signal at 12 for an event which represents a placement of an object on, or removal of an object from a surface. If required, the phase of the event is available at 13. Preset voltages at 10 and 11 determine the operating parameters of the comparator.
After a valid event detection, a time delay circuit 7 is initiated. After a preset period, in practise approximately 1 second is suitable, the timer initiates a reset action. The reset is provided by the circuit 8 and discharges the stored charge in the integrator and filter circuits in preparation for a subsequent event. The action of resetting, is to restore the steady state condition.
An additional circuit 9 is arranged to detect disconnections or short circuits or non characteristic changes in the input circuitry which would indicate faults or tampering.
Fig 7 shows the waveforms associated with the block diagram. It shows the steady state condition follwed by an event equal to an object being removed from a surface. This generates the voltage waveform shown at 1 which is fed to the integrator 3. The integrator sums the rate of change of voltage in time and generates the signal at 3. Providing a preset level is exceeded, the comparator triggers producing the output signal at 12. The phase line at 13 is arranged in the example to go high if an item is placed on the surface. After a preset period the reset circuit 8 resets the charge in the Integrator and filters to datum steady state.
Fig 7 then shows the effect of placing an object on the surface, the polarity of the signal at 1 is reversed, and the integrator again responds in the negative phase this in turn generates a phase output at 13 which reflects the placing of an object on the surface. Finally the second reset occurs and the datum is restored.

Claims (3)

Claims
1) A shelf or similar surface is partially or wholly supported by one or more piezoelectric sensors subjected to deflection by the overall weight of the shelf or similar surface and the object or objects thereon. The piezoelectric devices are mounted between two pads of different diameters, at least one of which has a resilient nature to allow the piezoelectric device to be deflected by the weight to which it is subjected. Any object or objects placed on or removed from the surface will cause a change of deflection in the sensors and an output voltage proportional to the rate of change of weight will occur. At all other times a steady state exists regardless of the overall weight to which the sensors are subjected up to a preset operational limit.
This voltage is then integrated filtered and amplified to produce a signal which represents placement on or removal of the object or objects. More than one surface may be used and their associated sensors may be connected collectively to the electronics input. The sensitivity of the apparatus is determined by the relative diameters and stiffness of two pads which support the piezoelectric sensors and allow the deflection of the piezoelectric sensors to take place together with the parameters of the electronic unit. The application allows a large number of objects to be collectively and individually protected in a single or multi surface environment.
2) The effect of temperature change experienced by a series of surfaces referred to in 1 may be greatly reduced by reversing the polarity of alternate surfaces in a multi surface system.
3) Following the detection of an object being placed on or removed from a surface the electronics resets the integrator and filter circuitry to the original steady state so that the system is ready for a subsequent event. This eliminates the effects of any previous activity.
GB9520571A 1995-10-07 1995-10-07 Differential weight security alarm Expired - Lifetime GB2306035B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9520571A GB2306035B (en) 1995-10-07 1995-10-07 Differential weight security alarm

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9520571A GB2306035B (en) 1995-10-07 1995-10-07 Differential weight security alarm

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9520571D0 GB9520571D0 (en) 1995-12-13
GB2306035A true GB2306035A (en) 1997-04-23
GB2306035B GB2306035B (en) 1998-12-30

Family

ID=10781998

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9520571A Expired - Lifetime GB2306035B (en) 1995-10-07 1995-10-07 Differential weight security alarm

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2306035B (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000019048A1 (en) * 1998-09-30 2000-04-06 Egbert Veen A device consisting of a rail which is provided with switches and/or recording elements by means of which the presence or absence, position and/or the weight of goods hung on said rail can be determined, the various features serving for security of or stock management of the above mentioned goods
GB2365187A (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-02-13 Staplethorne Xtra Sense Ltd Piezo-electric sensor and alarm system
US20090255292A1 (en) * 2005-09-12 2009-10-15 Bsh Bosch Und Siemens Husgerate Gmbh Refrigeration Device having a Height-Adjustable Carrier for Refrigerated Goods and a Safety Cut-Off System
CN101350124B (en) * 2007-07-18 2012-02-15 北京银融科技有限责任公司 Surveillance alarm system
GB2483096A (en) * 2010-08-27 2012-02-29 Tag Company Uk Ltd System for detecting theft and/or unauthorised removal of items from storage shelves
EP2814011A1 (en) 2013-06-13 2014-12-17 Xtra-sense Limited A cabinet alarm system and method
DE202014106128U1 (en) 2014-12-17 2015-02-02 Xtra-Sense Ltd. Cabinet Alarm System
WO2021028238A1 (en) * 2019-08-12 2021-02-18 ADECK Systems GmbH Method, evaluation apparatus, presentation apparatus, presentation device, computer program product and storage medium for the automated detection of shoplifting

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1244134A (en) * 1968-07-03 1971-08-25 Cerberus Ag Electrical installation for detecting displacements of movable objects
US5258743A (en) * 1991-07-29 1993-11-02 Uniplex Corporation Piezoelectric motion sensor

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1244134A (en) * 1968-07-03 1971-08-25 Cerberus Ag Electrical installation for detecting displacements of movable objects
US5258743A (en) * 1991-07-29 1993-11-02 Uniplex Corporation Piezoelectric motion sensor

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000019048A1 (en) * 1998-09-30 2000-04-06 Egbert Veen A device consisting of a rail which is provided with switches and/or recording elements by means of which the presence or absence, position and/or the weight of goods hung on said rail can be determined, the various features serving for security of or stock management of the above mentioned goods
GB2365187A (en) * 2000-03-16 2002-02-13 Staplethorne Xtra Sense Ltd Piezo-electric sensor and alarm system
US20090255292A1 (en) * 2005-09-12 2009-10-15 Bsh Bosch Und Siemens Husgerate Gmbh Refrigeration Device having a Height-Adjustable Carrier for Refrigerated Goods and a Safety Cut-Off System
CN101350124B (en) * 2007-07-18 2012-02-15 北京银融科技有限责任公司 Surveillance alarm system
GB2483096A (en) * 2010-08-27 2012-02-29 Tag Company Uk Ltd System for detecting theft and/or unauthorised removal of items from storage shelves
EP2814011A1 (en) 2013-06-13 2014-12-17 Xtra-sense Limited A cabinet alarm system and method
DE202014106128U1 (en) 2014-12-17 2015-02-02 Xtra-Sense Ltd. Cabinet Alarm System
WO2021028238A1 (en) * 2019-08-12 2021-02-18 ADECK Systems GmbH Method, evaluation apparatus, presentation apparatus, presentation device, computer program product and storage medium for the automated detection of shoplifting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9520571D0 (en) 1995-12-13
GB2306035B (en) 1998-12-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4862298A (en) Shock load detection device
US5211051A (en) Methods and apparatus for improving sensor performance
US6252512B1 (en) Monitoring system and method
US4839872A (en) Geophone with a sensitive element made of piezoelectric polymer
US4643385A (en) Anti-vibration system
EP0434314A2 (en) Touch sensitive display
US4209779A (en) Method of monitoring equipment and system for carrying out the method
GB2306035A (en) Differential weight security alarm
US4928264A (en) Noise-suppressing hydrophones
EP0280436A3 (en) Monitoring system
US4085349A (en) Piezo electric transducer for measuring instantaneous vibration velocity
GB2180346A (en) Inertia sensitive device
EP1122514A4 (en) Anglular velocity sensor
US3060333A (en) High capacity accelerometer
JPS56122931A (en) Method and device for checking tire
US3979670A (en) Apparatus for detecting and measuring peak-to-peak values in electrical signals
US3349629A (en) Frequency damped transucer
JP6814213B2 (en) Eakring detector for plasma processing
JP3075180B2 (en) Seismic device
US3448621A (en) Electric gating system to eliminate contact interference
JP2699403B2 (en) Seismic device
JPH06138019A (en) Method for detecting static friction coefficient and its detector
GB2170008A (en) Vibration detecting device
JP3250085B2 (en) Acceleration sensor
JPH08334447A (en) Hardness tester with measurement maintenance mechanism

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PE20 Patent expired after termination of 20 years

Expiry date: 20151006