GB2284413A - Sludge biocombustion - Google Patents

Sludge biocombustion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2284413A
GB2284413A GB9324916A GB9324916A GB2284413A GB 2284413 A GB2284413 A GB 2284413A GB 9324916 A GB9324916 A GB 9324916A GB 9324916 A GB9324916 A GB 9324916A GB 2284413 A GB2284413 A GB 2284413A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
digester
sludge
biocombustion
partially digested
thermophilic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB9324916A
Other versions
GB9324916D0 (en
Inventor
Michael O'neill
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North West Water Group PLC
Original Assignee
North West Water Group PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North West Water Group PLC filed Critical North West Water Group PLC
Priority to GB9324916A priority Critical patent/GB2284413A/en
Publication of GB9324916D0 publication Critical patent/GB9324916D0/en
Publication of GB2284413A publication Critical patent/GB2284413A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/30Aerobic and anaerobic processes

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)

Abstract

A sludge biocombustion system comprising a thermophilic aerobic first digester connected in a closed loop to a mesophilic anaerobic digester. Sludge is delivered to the first digester from a settling tank and partially digested sludge is passed from the first digester to the second digester. Partially digested sludge is then returned from the second digester to the first, the partially digested sludge being thickened to maintain the carbon content of the first digester sufficiently high to sustain autothermic operation. Inorganic material is removed from the system. The two digesters are operated so as to maintain a mixed continuous culture.

Description

SLUDGE BIOCOMBUSTION The present invention relates to a process and apparatus for the biocombustion of sludge.
The water treatment industry processes large volumes of wastewater in the form of domestic sewage, domestic sewage mixed with industrial wastewater, and industrial wastewater. Conventional treatment processes result in the production of large volumes of sludge which must be disposed of, and accordingly there is a need for a wastewater treatment process which greatly reduces the amount of sludge that has to be disposed of and which can be built and operated economically at small and medium sized sites.
It is known to use various biological sludge treatment techniques to convert the organic matter in sludge to gaseous products. These known techniques utilise combinations of thermophilic, mesophilic, anaerobic and aerobic treatments. No operational system has yet been developed, however, which can destroy substantially all of the organic component of sludge so as to leave an inorganic, pathogen-free slurry of relatively small volume for disposal.
Mesophilic anaerobic digestion has found widespread application in the water treatment industry. Broadly speaking the process can be divided into three phases, that is hydrolysis/liquefaction of the particulate organic matter to higher organic acids, acetogenesis of the products of hydrolysis/liquefaction to form acetic acid and hydrogen, and methanogenesis of acetic acid to form methane. Typically these three stages occur concurrently in a broth made up of the sludge and organisms. For the process to achieve maximum reduction in the organic solids fraction, all three stages must be working under nearoptimum conditions. Proposals have been made to separate the hydrolysis/acetogenesis stage from the methanogenesis stage to allow optimisation of each stage of the process. Unfortunately this approach does not work as the hydrogen formed during the acetogenesis stage is toxic to many of the organisms required for the hydrolysis stage. When all three stages of the process occur simultaneously in a broth the hydrogen content is regulated by the methenogenic organisms which use it as an energy source.
A major problem with anaerobic digestion processes is the production of a liquor with a very high concentration of ammonia.
The liquors have to be treated either in a dedicated plant or within the wastewater treatment plant by dilution with the main wastewater flow. The production of liquors is unavoidable as ammonia undergoes only limited biodegradation in an anaerobic system.
Heat treatment of sludges in thermophilic biological reactors has been shown to have a number of process advantages. For example, the destruction of pathogenic organisms at higher temperatures allows shorter retention times prior to disposal to agricultural land.
Furthermore, sludge is easier to digest after heat treatment, and thermophilic digestion appears to improve the de-watering characteristics of a sludge.
Thermophilic organisms occur naturally in sludge and these organisms can be grown by simply heating the sludge to 650 and aerating. Laboratory experiments on thermophilic reactions indicate that thermophiles preferentially use a particulate substrate.
Consequently thermophilic aerobic digestion can be used to advantage in conjunction with mesophilic systems which utilise soluble substrates. Thermophilic aerobic digestion works by using a high intensity aerator (using air or oxygen enriched air) to aerate the sludge. The oxidation process generates heat and the temperature rises. The process may be autothermic, releasing up to 12 kWh of biochemical energy for every kWh of electrical energy consumed.
Accordingly this process has found widespread application at small sites.
Clearly there are benefits to both thermophilic and mesophilic digestion, and there are indications that they can complement each other when dealing with a complex substrate like organic sludge. This has led a number of researchers to combine the two processes to form dual digestion systems. One commercially available system has an aerobic thermophilic first stage with a retention time of from 18 to 24 hours followed by an anaerobic mesophilic second stage with a retention time of 8 to 10 days. Such a system is described in the publication "Metcalf and Eddy Inc. 1591, Waste Water Engineering, Treatment, Disposal, Re-Use, 3rd Edition, Published by AqcGraw-Hill Inc.". Dual digestion systems have the benefit of pasteurising the sludge and sctlubilising particulate organic matter in the first stage and the generation of increased volumes of gas in the second stage.
An alternative form of dual digestion has been implemented for treating the sludge from New York. Details are published in Carrio L.A., Lopez A.R., Krasnoff P.J. and Donnellon, (1985), "Sludge Reduction by In-Plant Process Modification: New York City's Experiences", Jour.
Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed., 57, 2, 116-121. The system used in New York relies upon a mesophilic first stage followed by an anaerobic thermophilic second stage. A portion of the sludge from the second stage is then returned to the aeration plant for further aerobic digestion. This process was reported to achieve a reduction in sludge quantity and volume at 47% and 50% respectively. As a result the United States Environmental Protection Agency funded a four year full evaluation of the process, the results of which were published in USEPA, (1990), "Effect of Recycling Thermophilic Sludge on the Activated Sludge Process", Report Reference: EPA/600/2-90/037. The USEPA study was carried out with the use of a control and with rigorous chemical and biological monitoring of each stage of the process. The results of this study contradicted the work carried out in New York, and showed that there was no reduction in sludge quantity.
A multi-stage digestion system has been proposed which it is claimed will result in almost total destruction of organic sludge. That system is described in International Patent Application No. W093/04988.
This document describes a cyclical process for degrading waste organic matter to gaseous products and substantially zero volume of solid matter by subjecting the waste alternately and cyclically to stages of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion in which the organisms from one stage are inactivated and become a substrate for the organisms in the next stage. Inactivation results from the temperature shift between the mesophilic and thermophilic stages. Solids remaining at the end of the cycle are collected and returned to the first microbiodigestion stage for recycling together with a fresh input of waste. In all of the numerous embodiments of the system described, fresh inoculum must be added at the beginning of each digestion stage in order to reseed the process. Reseeding is necessary as the active biomass produced in the thermophilic stage cannot survive under mesophilic conditions.
Patent Specification W093/04988 describes two examples to illustrate the proposed cyclical system, one having two stages and one having four stages. The two stage system comprises a first mesophilic plug flow stage and a second thermophilic plug flow stage. The four stage system, which appears only to have been implemented in a laboratory by using 250 ml flasks for the fermenter vessels, comprised first and third thermophilic aerobic stages and second and fourth mesophilic aerobic stages. It appears that the two stage proposal is essentially the same process as that which was found not to work in the above mentioned USEPA survey.
U.S. Patent Specification No. 4582607 describes another known waste water treatment system in which partially digested wastewater is circulated between an aerobic thermophilic digester and an aerobic mesophilic digester, but the system is claimed to produce an activated sludge with good sedimentation, rather than converting substantially all of the organic material to gaseous degradation products.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a sludge biocombustion process which obviates or mitigates the problems outlined above.
According to the present invention, there is provided a sludge biocombustion system, comprising a thermophilic aerobic first digester, means for delivering sludge to the first digester, means for passing partially digested sludge including a substantial mesophilic microorganism population from the first digester to a mesophilic anaerobic second digester, means for passing partially digested sludge including a substantial thermophilic micro-organism population from the second digester to the first digester, means for thickening the partially digested sludge to maintain the carbon content of the first digester sufficiently high to sustain autothermic operation, and means for removing inorganic material from the system.
Thus, the present invention differs from the system described in International Patent Specification W093/04988 in that it is a two stage system with the first stage being a thermophilic aerobic digester and the second stage being a mesophilic anaerobic digester, and in that the output from each of the stages is only partially digested, obviating the need for the injection of an inoculum. Furthermore, by ensuring the thickening of the material fed back to the thermophilic digester, autothermic operation is ensured. The system in accordance with the present invention differs from that described in l--.S. Patent 4582607 in that the mesophilic digester is anaerobic rather than aerobic. The result of these differences is that the process in accordance with the present invention enables the biocombustion of substantially all of the sludge entering into the system, the processes being applicable in the field rather than in the laboratory.
The present invention also provides a method for reducing the volume of sludge by biocombustion, wherein sludge is delivered to a first thermophilic aerobic digester, partially digested sludge including a substantial mesophilic micro-organism population is passed from the first digester to a second mesophilic anaerobic digester, partially digested sludge including a substantial thermophilic micro-organism population is passed from the second digester to the first, the partially digested sludge is thickened to maintain the carbon content of the first digester sufficiently high to sustain autothermic operation, and inorganic material is removed from the system.
Preferably, the digesters are operated so as to maintain mixed continuous cultures.
The means for removing inorganic material may comprise a degritter through which the contents of the first digester is pumped.
The pump may be a venturi aerator arranged in a closed pumping loop connected to the first digester, the degritter being connected in the closed loop. Any convenient alternative aerator could be used however, for example a jet aerator or a pure oxygen system.
Furthermore, alternative degritter positions are possible. For example, the degritter may be located downstream of the first digester and upstream of the second digester. The degritter may be a cyclone degritter.
The thickening means may comprise a membrane separator located downstream of the first digester and upstream of the second digester, or a gravity thickener located downstream of the second digester and upstream of the first digester.
Means may be provided for adding acid to the flow of partially digested sludge upstream of the thickening means and for adding alkali to the flow of partially digested sludge downstream of the thickening means. The degritter is preferably located between the means for adding acid and the thickening means.
The system may comprise an aerator to which a flow of wastewater is delivered, means for separating sludge from the wastewater flow, means for delivering the separated sludge to the first digester, and means for passing liquor separated from the partially digested sludge by the thickening means to the aerator.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a first embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of a second embodiment of the present invention; and Fig. 3 is a schematic representation of third embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to Fig. 1, a flow of raw wastewater indicated by arrow 1 is delivered to a primary settling tank 2. The resultant sludge is passed to an aerobic thermophilic digester 3, and the liquid from which the sludge has been separated in the tank 2 is passed to a biological reactor in the form of a conventional aeration basin 4. The output of the aeration basin 4 is passed to a final settling tank 5 from which the final effluent of the plant is delivered as a flow indicated by arrow 6. Sludge separated out in the final settling tank 5 is delivered to the sludge flow passed to the digester 3, liquor produced in the final settling tank being returned to the input of the aeration basin 4 along the path indicated by line 7.
The digester 3 is aerated using a venturi aerator (not shown) with a grit removal cyclone 8 connected in the aerator pumped loop 9. The grit from the cyclone is passed to a gravity settling tank 10, the supernatant liquor being returned to the biological stage of the treatment plant along the path indicated by line 11. Inorganic solids are removed from the settling tank 10 as indicated by arrow 12 for disposal.
The thermophilic aerobic digester 3 is operated so as to maintain a mixed continuous culture such that the output of the digester 3 is only partially digested and includes mesophilic micro-organisms which have not been inactivated. The output of the digester 3 is passed as indicated by line 13 to a membrane separator 14. The membrane separator 14 thickens the partially digested sludge that it receives from the digester 3, the thickened sludge being passed as indicated by line 15 to an anaerobic mesophilic digester 16, and liquors being returned as indicated by line 17 to the biological stage of the treatment plant.
The anaerobic mesophilic digester 16 is operated so as to maintain a mixed continuous culture, gas generated as a result of the biological processes within the digester 16 being removed as indicated by arrow 18. Partially digested sludge including active thermophilic micro-organisms is then returned from the digester 16 to the digester 3.
Thus the only outputs from the system are the stable, pathogen free inert material removed from the settling tank 10, gas from the digesters, and the final effluent of the treatment plant which flows from the final settling tank 5. Because neither of the digesters inactivates all of the micro-organisms required by the other digester, the system can be operated in steady state conditions which are relatively easy to sustain. It is essential for the process to work, however, that sufficient liquor is removed from the circulating partially digested sludge to ensure that the carbon content of the digester 3 is high enough to sustain autothermic operation. It would not be possible to sustain autothermic operation if, for example, alternate thermophilic and mesophilic digesters were arranged in a serial array of four digesters, two of each type.
Referring to Fig. 2, an embodiment of the invention similar to that of Fig. 1 will now be described. The systems of Fig. 1 and Fig.
2 are very similar and accordingly the same reference numerals are used where appropriate. The only substantial difference between the arrangements of Figs. 1 and 2 is the replacement of the membrane separator 14 of Fig. 1 by the gravity thickener 19 of Fig. 2. Membrane separators have not been widely used in the past in water treatment plants and accordingly it may be preferred to use a gravity thickener such as that shown in Fig. 2 so that all the components of the system are entirely conventional, the operation of such components being well known. In the arrangement of Fig. 2, the partially digested output of the thermophilic aerobic digester 3 is delivered directly to the anaerobic mesophilic digester 16. Thickened partially digested sludge is then passed from the thickener 19 to the thermophilic aerobic digester 3, liquor being returned from the thickener to the biological stage of the treatment plant. The gravity thickener 19 is used downstream of the anaerobic digester because the sludge from the aerobic stage would be almost totally deflocculated and would not therefore settle readily.
The systems described with reference to Figs. 1 and 2 both rely on the assumption that the biological portion of the sludge is used as a substrate for the following stage, that is aerobic organisms are consumed in the anaerobic phase and vice versa, and that the recalcitrant portion of the solids is "softened" in the thermophilic stage so as to become biodegradable. Depending on the nature of the sludge this may not be the case, and if it is not it would be appropriate to use a more vigorous hydrolysing stage such as that used in the conventional thermic sludge treatment process. In addition, there is the possible problem that materials such as heavy metals would build up in the system. Consequently it may be beneficial to use acid as an aid to hydrolysis in a system such as that illustrated in Fig. 3.
The reference numerals in Fig. 3 correspond to those used in Fig.
1 where appropriate. Sludge is delivered to the thermophilic aerobic digester 3 and partially digested, the resultant partially digested sludge being passed to a tank 20 which is agitated and into which acid is injected as indicated schematically by arrow 21. The acidified partially digested sludge may be heated by the addition of energy indicated by line 22, that energy being derived, for example, by burning gas produced by the anaerobic digester 16. The heated and acidified partially digested sludge is then passed through a cyclone 23 to the membrane separator 14. Organic solids are settled out in a settling tank 24, liquor being returned to the treatment plant via a path indicated by line 25 and the final inorganic solids being removed by a path indicated by line 26.
Downstream of the membrane separator, the acidity would be readjusted by injection of alkali as indicated by arrow 27 and delivered to the anaerobic mesophilic digester 16. The partially digested content of the digester 16 would then be returned directly to the thermophilic aerobic digester 3. If the plant operates with chemical addition to the primary settling tanks the liquor returned from the membrane separator would carry with it the precipitant which would thus be effectively recycled.

Claims (13)

1. A sludge biocombustion system, comprising a thermophilic aerobic first digester, means for delivering sludge to the first digester, means for passing partially digested sludge including a substantial mesophilic micro-organism population from the first digester to a mesophilic anaerobic second digester, means for passing partially digested sludge including a substantial thermophilic microorganism population from the second digester to the first digester.
means for thickening the partially digested sludge to maintain the carbon content of the first digester sufficiently high to sustain autothermic operation, and means for removing inorganic material from the system.
2. A sludge biocombustion system according to claim 1, wherein the first digester is operated so as to maintain a mixed continuous culture.
3. A sludge biocombustion system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the second digester is operated so as to maintain a mixed continuous culture.
4. A sludge biocombustion system according to any preceding claim, wherein the means for removing inorganic material comprises a degritter and means for pumping the contents of the first digester through the degritter.
5. A sludge biocombustion system according to claim 4, wherein the pumping means comprises an aerator arranged in a closed pumping loop connected to the first digester, the degritter being connected in the closed loop.
6. A sludge biocombustion system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the means for removing inorganic material comprises a degritter located downstream of the first digester and upstream of the second digester.
7. A sludge biocombustion system according to any preceding claim, wherein the means for removing inorganic material comprises a cyclone degritter.
8. A sludge biocombustion system according to any preceding claim, wherein the thickening means comprises a membrane separator located downstream of the first digester and upstream of the second digester.
9. A sludge biocombustion system according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the thickening means comprises a gravity thickener located downstream of the second digester and upstream of the first digester.
10. A sludge biocombustion system according to any preceding claim, comprising means for adding acid to the flow of partially digested sludge upstream of the thickening means and means for adding alkali to the flow of partially digested sludge downstream of the thickening means.
11. A sludge biocombustion system according to claim 10, as dependent on claim 1, 2, 3, 6 or 7, wherein the means for removing inorganic material is located between the means for adding acid and the thickening means.
12. A sludge biocombustion system according to any preceding claim, comprising an aerator to which a flow of wastewater is delivered, means for separating sludge from the wastewater flow, means for delivering the separated sludge to the first digester, and means for passing liquor separated from the partially digested sludge by the thickening means to the aerator.
13. A method for reducing the volume of sludge by biocombustion, wherein sludge is delivered to a first thermophilic aerobic digester, partially digested sludge, including a substantial mesophilic micro-organism population, is passed from the first digester to a second mesophilic anaerobic digester, partially digested sludge, including a substantial thermophilic micro-organism population, is passed from the second digester to the first, the partially digested sludge is thickened to maintain the carbon content of the first digester sufficiently high to sustain autothermic operation, and inorganic material is removed from the system.
GB9324916A 1993-12-04 1993-12-04 Sludge biocombustion Withdrawn GB2284413A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9324916A GB2284413A (en) 1993-12-04 1993-12-04 Sludge biocombustion

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9324916A GB2284413A (en) 1993-12-04 1993-12-04 Sludge biocombustion

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9324916D0 GB9324916D0 (en) 1994-01-26
GB2284413A true GB2284413A (en) 1995-06-07

Family

ID=10746148

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9324916A Withdrawn GB2284413A (en) 1993-12-04 1993-12-04 Sludge biocombustion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2284413A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6929744B2 (en) 2000-05-12 2005-08-16 United Utilites Plc Sludge treatment at a mesophilic temperature

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993004988A1 (en) * 1991-08-30 1993-03-18 Pirtferm Limited Process for degrading organic matter

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993004988A1 (en) * 1991-08-30 1993-03-18 Pirtferm Limited Process for degrading organic matter

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6929744B2 (en) 2000-05-12 2005-08-16 United Utilites Plc Sludge treatment at a mesophilic temperature

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9324916D0 (en) 1994-01-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6887692B2 (en) Method and apparatus for hydrogen production from organic wastes and manure
EP0641296B1 (en) Process for degrading organic matter
EP1212262B1 (en) Method for treating sludge in a wastewater facility
CN100371270C (en) Combined treatment process for manioc producing effluent
EP0642470B1 (en) Biological waste water treatment
Show et al. Anaerobic treatment versus aerobic treatment
CN105753270B (en) A kind of water purification system suitable for high ammonia nitrogen livestock breeding wastewater
EP1102726B1 (en) Method of liquefying microorganisms derived from biological wastewater treatment processes
CN101704615B (en) Method for reducing sludge by adopting ultrasound-magnetic field coupling to disrupt sludge
US6033571A (en) Activated sludge treatment method and apparatus
WO1988004282A1 (en) Sludge restructuring and conversion method
EP0220647A1 (en) Sludge restructuring and conversion method
LaPara et al. Autothermal thermophilic aerobic waste treatment systems: A state-of-the-art review
JP2004501739A (en) Wastewater treatment method with additional sludge treatment by ozone treatment and plant thereof
KR100274534B1 (en) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal methods with using fermented organic wastes
KR20220096414A (en) Apparatus for treating waste water using iron oxide powder
KR100304544B1 (en) Method for removing nitrogen and phosphorus using anaerobic digestion
CN100355674C (en) Waste activated sludge anaerobic contact waste stream treatment process
CN212050998U (en) Cassava starch effluent treatment plant
KR102340961B1 (en) Apparatus for treating waste water using iron oxide powder
JP2007021367A (en) Method and apparatus for treating organic sludge
GB2284413A (en) Sludge biocombustion
KR100227186B1 (en) Anaerobic treatment method of organic wastewater and fermenter using it
CN113045160A (en) Sludge treatment method for improving residual sludge methane yield through reflux of digestive fluid
KR20010078472A (en) Production of Carbon Source from Sewage Sludge and Denitrification Technologies for Advanced Treatment of Wastewater

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)