GB2283629A - Splatter-reduced training for adaptive pre-distortion or cartesian feedback linearizers - Google Patents

Splatter-reduced training for adaptive pre-distortion or cartesian feedback linearizers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2283629A
GB2283629A GB9322006A GB9322006A GB2283629A GB 2283629 A GB2283629 A GB 2283629A GB 9322006 A GB9322006 A GB 9322006A GB 9322006 A GB9322006 A GB 9322006A GB 2283629 A GB2283629 A GB 2283629A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
modulator
signals
data rate
baseband signals
radio
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB9322006A
Other versions
GB2283629B (en
GB9322006D0 (en
Inventor
Stephen Thomas Valentine
Anthony John Wray
Terence Edwin Dodgson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Motorola Solutions UK Ltd
Original Assignee
Motorola Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motorola Ltd filed Critical Motorola Ltd
Priority to GB9322006A priority Critical patent/GB2283629B/en
Publication of GB9322006D0 publication Critical patent/GB9322006D0/en
Publication of GB2283629A publication Critical patent/GB2283629A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2283629B publication Critical patent/GB2283629B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/62Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission for providing a predistortion of the signal in the transmitter and corresponding correction in the receiver, e.g. for improving the signal/noise ratio
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03FAMPLIFIERS
    • H03F1/00Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
    • H03F1/32Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion
    • H03F1/3241Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits
    • H03F1/3247Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits using feedback acting on predistortion circuits
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L27/00Modulated-carrier systems
    • H04L27/32Carrier systems characterised by combinations of two or more of the types covered by groups H04L27/02, H04L27/10, H04L27/18 or H04L27/26
    • H04L27/34Amplitude- and phase-modulated carrier systems, e.g. quadrature-amplitude modulated carrier systems
    • H04L27/36Modulator circuits; Transmitter circuits
    • H04L27/366Arrangements for compensating undesirable properties of the transmission path between the modulator and the demodulator
    • H04L27/367Arrangements for compensating undesirable properties of the transmission path between the modulator and the demodulator using predistortion
    • H04L27/368Arrangements for compensating undesirable properties of the transmission path between the modulator and the demodulator using predistortion adaptive predistortion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03FAMPLIFIERS
    • H03F2200/00Indexing scheme relating to amplifiers
    • H03F2200/57Separate feedback of real and complex signals being present

Abstract

A radio communications apparatus employs a training routine for optimising performance and has a modulator (64) to modulate a radio channel with digital information, to provide baseband signals (I, Q) at a first data rate. A power amplifier (36) amplifies signals fed from the modulator. A feedback loop (40, 42, 44, 30) samples the output signals of the power amplifier and adjusts amplitude and phase of the baseband signals to compensate for distortion introduced by the power amplifier. The data rate of the baseband signals is reduced (66) during the training routine to reduce adjacent channel interference. <IMAGE>

Description

Radio Communications Apparatus Field of the Invention This invention relates to radio communication apparatus and in particular to digital apparatus.
Background of the Invention Digital radio standards require a number of radio channels to coexist together without one radio channel producing an unacceptable level of interference in an adjacent channel. This requirement dictates that each radio has a substantially linear spectrum. In other words the radio operates in a region of its power transfer characteristic which is linear.
Radios generally have a characteristic of output power various input power which is linear at low power levels, but which becomes nonlinear as the output power exceeds a predetermined threshold.
If the radio is operated in a linear region of its characteristic then the output of the radio will have relatively low products in adjacent channels.
As the output power of the radio increases, so that it begins to operate in a non-linear region, the non-linearity generates intermodulation products, which appear in adjacent channels and are commonly known as adjacent channel splatter. The main intermodulation products creating interference in radio systems are 3rd order and to a lesser extent 5th order.
Current digital radio communications standards set stringent requirements for the level of adjacent channel intermodulation products, typically 60dB below the level of the main signal in the channel.
One way of reducing the adjacent channel splatter would be to operate the radio at low power levels so that it remains within the linear region. This would however conflict with another important requirement of operating the radio efficiently to prolong battery life. To operate efficiently the radio needs to be run at higher power levels which encroach on the region of non-linearity.
In order to achieve both linearity and efficiency linearisation techniques must be employed.
In a digital radio, digital baseband signals are fed to a modulator in two phase quadrature channels known as Q and I. The output of the modulator is amplified in a power amplifier before being broadcast from the antenna.
Two systems of linearizing are commonly used, adaptive predistortion and cartesian feedback. Both linearisation systems employ a feedback loop which samples a portion of the output signals from the power amplifier and adjusts the amplitude and phase of the baseband input signals to compensate for distortion.
The predistortion and cartesian feedback systems are very similar to one another. In the predistortion system a training signal, generated by baseband digital circuitry is fed through the radio transmitter path where it is amplified, sampled, demodulated and fed back to a baseband processor.
From the fed-back signal the gain and phase distortion of the amplifier chain is fully characterised and stored in memory as a table of values. These values are then fed to a predistortion circuit, which distorts the baseband signals in a complementary way to compensate the distortion and produce a substantially linear transmitter characteristic.
In the cartesian feedback system the sampled, amplified signal has its phase adjusted to maintain a 1800 phase shift between the output of the power amplifier and the baseband input signals. The fedback signals are added to the baseband input signals to optimise the output power of the amplifier at a level which maintains linearity.
A problem arises in both systems during training periods when linearity is being obtained. The predistortion system is iterative and may take a number of iterations before converging on the final predistortion characteristic. During this relatively long period, typically of the order of 4 to 10 msecs, the radio will be non-linear and will produce unacceptable levels of adjacent channel splatter.
The cartesian feedback system is generally much quicker in achieving linearisation but nevertheless in order to achieve output power optimisation the radio needs to be ramped up to power outputs outside its linear operating region, once again leading to unacceptable levels of adjacent channel splatter.
This invention seeks to provide radio communications apparatus in which the above mentioned problems are mitigated.
Summary of the Invention According to the invention there is provided a radio communications apparatus employing a training routine for optimising performance , the apparatus including; a modulator for modulating a radio channel with digital information, the modulator having an input for receiving digital data and providing first and second baseband signals at a first data rate; a power amplifier for amplifying output signals fed from the modulator; a feedback loop for sampling a portion of the output signals provided by the power amplifier and for adjusting the amplitude and phase of the baseband signals to compensate for distortion introduced by the power amplifier and means for reducing the data rate of the first and second baseband signals during the training routine to reduce adjacent channel interference.
Preferably the means for reducing the data rate of the first and second baseband signals comprises a second modulator operating at a second data rate lower then the first data rate, and having an output for selectably providing the first and second baseband signals during the training routine.
Filter means may be coupled to the output of the second modulator for further constraining the spectrum of the reduced rate signals.
Advantageously the filter means is an adaptive filter having a bandwidth which is adaptable in dependence upon the data rate of the second modulator.
The filter means is preferably a root raised cosine filter Preferably the means for reducing the data rate of the first and second baseband signals is operative to provide signals at one half of the first data rate.
Brief Description of the Drawings An exemplary embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the drawings in which; Fig. 1 shows a basic schematic block diagram of a known radio communications transceiver; Fig. 2 is a schematic block diagram of one known form of transmitter for use in the transceiver of Fig. 1; Fig. 3 is a spectral performance diagram for the transmitter of Fig. 2; Fig 4 is a schematic block diagram of part of a radio communications apparatus in accordance with the invention; Fig. 5 is a spectral performance diagram for the apparatus of Fig.
4; and Fig. 6 illustrates the frequency response of the reduce rate spectrum constraining filter of the embodiment of Fig. 4.
Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment Referring to Fig. 1 a digital radio communications apparatus 10 comprises essentially a transmitter 12 and a receiver 14 which respectively provide signals to and receive signals from an antenna 16.
Continuing with respect to Fig. 2 the transmitter 12, which in this embodiment includes adaptive predistortion linearisation, comprises a modulator 20 having a data input 22 and outputs 24 and 26 supplying first and second baseband signals, generally known as I and Q.
In a typical digital radio standard the data input and the I and Q baseband signals have a data rate of 36Kbits per sec.
The I and Q signals are fed in parallel to a pre-distortion circuit 28 and a baseband processor 30. As is well known the predistortion circuit 28 predistorts the baseband signals in a manner which is complementary to that introduced in the transmitter amplifier chain so that distortion is substantially cancelled and the radio meets the required level of adjacent channel performance.
The predistorted signal is fed via digital to analog converter 32 and up converter 34 to power amplifier 36 where it is amplified to the final output level for supplying to the antenna 38.
In order to characterise the amplifier chain to program the predistortion circuit, a portion of the output signal of the power amplifier 36 is sampled by a coupler 40 and fed via down converter 42 and analog to digital converter 44, to the baseband processor 30.
The baseband processor 30 compares the original (undistorted) I and Q signals with the fed back signals and derives information on the gain and phase changes introduced into the amplified signal in passing through the transmitter chain. From this information, which is stored in memory in the form of a table of values, digital processing in the baseband processor 30 applies a curve-fit routine to the predistortion circuit 28 to predistort the baseband signals as previously described.
As discussed, the transmitter must be trained by means of a training routine while a number iterations of predistortion are completed to achieve full linearisation performance. The training is accomplished by means of a training signal fed to the data input of the modulator.
During training the amplifier operates non-linearly and generates intermodulation products, which fall in adjacent channels and which may be outside the level set by digital radio standards specifications.
Fig. 3 shows the spectral performance of the transmitter of Fig. 2 during training. f1 and f2 are frequencies generated in the I and Q channels and separated by a frequency fE,. The dashed line 50 shows the boundaries of the bandwidth of the radio channel.
When the transmitter operates non-linearly during training intermodulation products are produced above and below the frequencies f1 and f2. In particular 3rd order products occur at a spacing of fb above f2 and fb below f1. 5th order products are spaced above and below the third order products by the same frequency step fb.
The 3rd order products can be typically about 30 dB below the level of f1 and f2 and the 5th order products of the order of 60 dB below.
As can be seen both the 3rd and 5th order products fall within adjacent channels.
Current standards for the level of such intermodulation products are very severe, typically - 60dB or more. A level of - 30 dB in an adjacent channel would clearly not meet such a specification.
This problem is solved in by the present invention an embodiment of which will now be described with reference to Fig. 4 where like parts to those of Fig. 2 have like reference numbers.
Data is received at an input terminal 60 and coupled via a switch 62 either to a full rate modem 64, operating at the normal full data rate of the radio transmission channel, typically 36 Kbits per sec, or to a reduced rate modem 66 operating at typically half the full data rate of 18 Kbits per second. The full rate modem is coupled to a further switch 68, to which is also coupled the half-rate modem 66 via a root raised cosine filter 70.
The switch 68 operates in conjunction with the switch 60 to couple the output of the selected modem to the predistortion circuit 28. The selected modem 64 or 66 is coupled via a switch 68 to the predistortion circuit 28 where it is processed in the transmitter chain, passing through a filter 72, to constrain the spectral spreading at the full rate bandwidth, digital to analog converter 32 and finally fed to the antenna and feedback loop as described with reference to Fig. 2.
The full rate modem is employed during normal operation, after training, when full linearisation has been achieved, for transmitting normal channel traffic.
During training the reduced rate modem is selected so that modulated signals are transmitted at reduced, and in this example halfrate.
The advantages that using this reduced rate coding during training can be seen with reference to Fig. 5. At this reduced rate, the I and Q signals, now referenced fl' and n' will be more closely spaced.
The 3rd order and 5th order intermodulation products, generated during this 'non-linear' training period will also be spaced from fl' and 12' and from one another, by the reduced value fb';.
By optimising the reduced rate, the dominant 3rd order intermodulation products can be brought within the bandwidth limit 50 of the radio channel so that they no longer fall in an adjacent channel to cause interference.
The 5th order products still lie in an adjacent channel, but these will be below the -60dB level and accordingly within specification.
Because the frequencies fl' and 12' are now closer together the additional filter 70 is incorporated to further limit spectral spreading and help match the reduced rate modem 66 to the predistortion circuit 28, enabling useful signalling information to be transmitted during the training period.
The frequency responses of a full-rate transmit filter and the halfrate root raised cosine filter are shown in Fig. 6 by curves a and b respectively.
A further significant advantage of the invention is that it allows full training of the lineariser by using the inherent modulation scheme, rather than by means of a special training signal, while still conforming to limits for adjacent channel coupled power.
The benefit of this is that, although the data rate is reduced, all potential signal transmissions occur thus fully training the transmitter.
Because the normal modulation scheme is used, some necessary signalling data can be transmitted during the training period avoiding wasted transmission time.
Although the invention has been described by way of example with reference to using half-rate as the reduced coding rate, other reduced rates may be used to optimise the constraining of the intermodulation products. In this case the filter 70 coupled to the output of the reduced rate modem can advantageously be adaptive to adjust its frequency to the optimised reduced rate.
The filter 70 need not necessarily be a root-raised cosine filter.
This is merely preferred due to its ease of implementation.
The invention, although particularly described with reference to the adaptive predistortion system of linearisation is equally applicable to cartesian feedback in which the sampled output power is demodulated to recover quadrature cartesian components of the modulation. These signals are then used to provide negative feedback subtracting from the I and Q modulated signals to generate a loop error signal which is used to drive the modulator.
The lineariser may be trained by operating open loop to ascertain the phase shift of transmitted signals around the loop and correct to equal 1800 for stable operation.
The reduced rate data is used during the period to provide loop phase information in open loop configuration. The loop is then closed and the remaining training period at reduced data rate is used to optimise the transmitter drive level to achieve maximum overall efficiency of the transmitter.

Claims (7)

Claims
1. Radio communications apparatus employing a training routine for optimising performance , the apparatus including; a modulator for modulating a radio channel with digital information, the modulator having an input for receiving digital data and providing first and second baseband signals at a first data rate; a power amplifier for amplifying output signals fed from the modulator; a feedback loop for sampling a portion of the output signals provided by the power amplifier and for adjusting the amplitude and phase of the baseband signals to compensate for distortion introduced by the power amplifier and means for reducing the data rate of the first and second baseband signals during the training routine to reduce adjacent channel interference.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the means for reducing the data rate of the first and second baseband signals comprises a second modulator operating at a second data rate lower than the first data rate, and having an output for selectably providing the first and second baseband signals during the training routine.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 comprising filter means coupled to the output of the second modulator for further constraining the spectrum of the reduced rate signals.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the filter means is an adaptive filter having a bandwidth which is adaptable in dependence upon the data rate of the second modulator.
5. The apparatus of claim 3 or 4 wherein the filter means is a root raised cosine filter.
6. The apparatus of any preceding claim wherein the means for reducing the date rate of the first and second baseband signals is operative to provide signals at one half of the first date rate.
7. Radio communication apparatus substantially as herein described with reference to Fig. 4 of the drawings.
GB9322006A 1993-10-26 1993-10-26 Radio communications apparatus Expired - Fee Related GB2283629B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9322006A GB2283629B (en) 1993-10-26 1993-10-26 Radio communications apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9322006A GB2283629B (en) 1993-10-26 1993-10-26 Radio communications apparatus

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9322006D0 GB9322006D0 (en) 1993-12-15
GB2283629A true GB2283629A (en) 1995-05-10
GB2283629B GB2283629B (en) 1997-08-27

Family

ID=10744100

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9322006A Expired - Fee Related GB2283629B (en) 1993-10-26 1993-10-26 Radio communications apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2283629B (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0797293A1 (en) * 1996-03-22 1997-09-24 Matra Communication Method for correcting non-linear distortion of an amplifier and radio transmitter using such method
WO1998005127A1 (en) * 1996-07-31 1998-02-05 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Linearizing the transmitter of a mobile station
WO1998024211A1 (en) * 1996-11-27 1998-06-04 Sierra Wireless, Inc. Modulation signal calibration between modem and radio using loopback
DE19650388A1 (en) * 1996-12-05 1998-06-18 Bosch Gmbh Robert Circuit for linearizing an amplifier
US5903611A (en) * 1996-03-22 1999-05-11 Matra Communication Method of correcting nonlinearities of an amplifier, and radio transmitter employing a method of this type
FR2773423A1 (en) * 1998-01-06 1999-07-09 Alsthom Cge Alcatel METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL LINEARIZATION OF AN AMPLIFIER
WO2000060732A1 (en) * 1999-04-01 2000-10-12 Wireless Systems International Limited Signal processing
EP1226651A1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2002-07-31 Tait Electronics Limited Improvements relating to eer transmitters
US6687312B1 (en) 1997-07-18 2004-02-03 Cambridge Consultants Limited Signal processing system
GB2394374A (en) * 2002-10-17 2004-04-21 Roke Manor Research An IQ feedback predistortion loop comprising a power amplifier (PA) and a PA model
US6954621B2 (en) * 2001-06-14 2005-10-11 Alcatel Method of and apparatus for predistorting a transmit signal
EP1701451A2 (en) 2005-03-07 2006-09-13 Fujitsu Limited Distortion compensation apparatus
CN104009717B (en) * 2013-02-21 2017-03-22 京信通信系统(中国)有限公司 Self-adaptive pre-distortion processing method and device

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993018602A1 (en) * 1992-03-02 1993-09-16 Motorola Limited Radio transmitter with linearization training sequence

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993018602A1 (en) * 1992-03-02 1993-09-16 Motorola Limited Radio transmitter with linearization training sequence
GB2265269A (en) * 1992-03-02 1993-09-22 Motorola Ltd Radio transmitter with linearization training sequence

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0797293A1 (en) * 1996-03-22 1997-09-24 Matra Communication Method for correcting non-linear distortion of an amplifier and radio transmitter using such method
FR2746563A1 (en) * 1996-03-22 1997-09-26 Matra Communication PROCEDURE FOR CORRECTING NON-LINEARITIES OF AN AMPLIFIER, AND RADIO TRANSMITTER IMPLEMENTING SUCH A PROCESS
US5903611A (en) * 1996-03-22 1999-05-11 Matra Communication Method of correcting nonlinearities of an amplifier, and radio transmitter employing a method of this type
US5905760A (en) * 1996-03-22 1999-05-18 Matra Communication Method of correcting nonlinearities of an amplifier, and radio transmitter employing a method of this type
WO1998005127A1 (en) * 1996-07-31 1998-02-05 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Linearizing the transmitter of a mobile station
WO1998024211A1 (en) * 1996-11-27 1998-06-04 Sierra Wireless, Inc. Modulation signal calibration between modem and radio using loopback
US5890057A (en) * 1996-11-27 1999-03-30 Sierra Wireless, Inc. Modulation signal calibration between modem and radio using loopback
DE19650388A1 (en) * 1996-12-05 1998-06-18 Bosch Gmbh Robert Circuit for linearizing an amplifier
US6687312B1 (en) 1997-07-18 2004-02-03 Cambridge Consultants Limited Signal processing system
FR2773423A1 (en) * 1998-01-06 1999-07-09 Alsthom Cge Alcatel METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL LINEARIZATION OF AN AMPLIFIER
US6400775B1 (en) 1998-01-06 2002-06-04 Alcatel Method and a system for digitally linearizing an amplifier
EP0929148A1 (en) * 1998-01-06 1999-07-14 Alcatel Method and apparatus for digitally linearising an amplifier
WO2000060732A1 (en) * 1999-04-01 2000-10-12 Wireless Systems International Limited Signal processing
US6549067B1 (en) 1999-04-01 2003-04-15 Andrew Corporation Method and apparatus for linearizing an output signal
EP1226651A1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2002-07-31 Tait Electronics Limited Improvements relating to eer transmitters
EP1226651A4 (en) * 1999-09-29 2003-04-23 Tait Electronics Ltd Improvements relating to eer transmitters
US6954621B2 (en) * 2001-06-14 2005-10-11 Alcatel Method of and apparatus for predistorting a transmit signal
GB2394374A (en) * 2002-10-17 2004-04-21 Roke Manor Research An IQ feedback predistortion loop comprising a power amplifier (PA) and a PA model
GB2394374B (en) * 2002-10-17 2006-06-14 Roke Manor Research Improvements in or relating to RF transmitters
EP1701451A2 (en) 2005-03-07 2006-09-13 Fujitsu Limited Distortion compensation apparatus
EP1701451A3 (en) * 2005-03-07 2007-07-25 Fujitsu Limited Distortion compensation apparatus
US7613250B2 (en) 2005-03-07 2009-11-03 Fujitsu Limited Distortion compensation apparatus
CN104009717B (en) * 2013-02-21 2017-03-22 京信通信系统(中国)有限公司 Self-adaptive pre-distortion processing method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2283629B (en) 1997-08-27
GB9322006D0 (en) 1993-12-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5748678A (en) Radio communications apparatus
JP2881187B2 (en) Radio frequency power amplifier clipping control method and transmitter for radio frequency communication system
KR100326176B1 (en) Apparatus and method for linearizing power amplification using predistortion and feedfoward method in rf communicaiton
US6614854B1 (en) System and method for adaptive predistortion
EP1224733B1 (en) Adaptive linearization of power amplifiers
US6314142B1 (en) Pre-distortion for a non-linear transmission path in the high frequency range
US5740520A (en) Channel correction transceiver
US7346122B1 (en) Direct modulation of a power amplifier with adaptive digital predistortion
EP0850509B2 (en) Linearized digital automatic gain control
US7561636B2 (en) Digital predistortion apparatus and method in power amplifier
EP0982849B1 (en) Predistorter
EP0360178B1 (en) Transmitter circuit for efficiently transmitting communication traffic via phase modulated carrier signals
US5507014A (en) Radio transmitter circuit with time dependant inhibited transmissions
US5745006A (en) Method of compensating for distortion in an amplifier
KR100548763B1 (en) Base station transmit unit with feed-forward mode linearization unit
GB2283629A (en) Splatter-reduced training for adaptive pre-distortion or cartesian feedback linearizers
EP1612933A1 (en) Distortion compensation device
US6680648B2 (en) High power amplifier predistorter system
CN101233683B (en) Data processing method, transmitter, device, network element and base station
US6392482B1 (en) Method for linearizing, over a wide frequency band a transmission chain comprising a power amplifier
US20100081397A1 (en) Time alignment methods and apparatus for polar modulation transmitters
GB2337169A (en) An adaptive predistorter for an amplifier
KR20050064485A (en) Predistortion apparatus and method for compensating non-linearility of the power amplifier
GB2321574A (en) Training multiple transmitter units during allocated time slots
Banelli et al. Mixed BB-IF predistortion of OFDM signals in non-linear channels

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19981026