GB2217716A - Vitamin d homologs - Google Patents

Abstract

This invention provides novel vitamin D-related compounds characterized by extended unsaturated side chain structures. Such compounds exhibit increased activity in arresting the proliferation and promoting the differentiation of malignant cells with only minimal calcemic activity and thus represents new therapeutic agents applicable and uniquely useful in differentiation therapy of malignant diseases. The activity characteristics of these compounds provide the basis of a method for the treatment of neoplastic diseases, specifically leukemoid diseases.

Description

Side Chain Unsaturated la-Hydroxyvitamin D Homologs This invention was made in the course of work supported by grants or awards from the Department of Health and Human Services. The Government has certain rights in this invention.

This invention relates to novel vitamin D compounds which are specifically active in inducing the differentiation of malignant cells to normal cells. More specifically, this invention relates to side chain unsaturated and side chain extended analogs of la,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3), which show selectivity of action as antineoplastic agents by virtue of increased activity in differentiating malignant cells and much reduced activity on calcium metabolism.

Background The activity of the D vitamins (vitamins D3 or D2) in regulating calcium metabolism and normal bone growth and development is known to require metabolism of parent vitamin to certain hydroxylated forms. Specifically, it has been established that la,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3), the dihydroxylated metabolite normally formed from vitamin D3 in the animal or human, is the active species responsible for stimulating calcium transport in the intestine, and calcium resorption from bone (bone mobilization), thereby regulating the overall blood calcium level of the organism. (These calcium-related activities of vitamin D metabolites or analogs will, in the following description, be referred to collectively as the 'calcemic activity' or 'calcemic action' of the compounds.) Certain structural analogs of 1,25-(OH)2D3, such as for example, la-hydroxyvitamin D3, la-bydroxyvitamin D2, la,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2, or fluoro-substituted derivatives of 1,25-(OH)2D3, are also known as highly active calcemic agents, and as a result 1,25- (OH) 2D3 and its active analogs have been used, or proposed, as pharmaceuticals in the propylaxis or treatment of various calcium metabolism and bone disorders, such as renal osteodystrophy, vitamin D-resistant rickets, or osteoporosis and related diseases.

More recently, it has been discovered that 1,25-(OH)2D3, in addition to its well-known 'calcemic action' discussed above, also expresses other biological functions. For example, it has been found that 1,25-(OH) < D3 anc ciosely related analogs (la-OX-D3, 1,25-(OH)2D2, fluoro-substit ted analogs, etc.) are capable of inducing cellular differentiation [Abe e= al., Proc.

Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 4990 (1981); Honma et al., Proc. Natl.

Acad. Sci USA 80, 201 (1983)]. Specifically, 1,25-(OH)2D3 and its analogs has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of malignant cells grown in culture (e.g. human leukemia celis) and induce their differentiation to normal macrophage-type cells. (These types of activities will henceforth be referred to collectively as the '1differentiation activity" of vitamin D compounds.) Because of their remarkable potency as differentiation-inducing agents, these vitamin D derivatives are potentially useful for anticancer agents, and their use for the treatment of human leukemias has indeed been proposed (Suda t al., U.S.Patent No. 45391,802). Hcwever, even though these compounds are highly effective in differentiating malignant cells in culture, their equally high calcemic action in vivo limits or precludes their use as practical anticancer agents.

Thus, 1,25-(0E)2D3 or its fluorinated derivatives are exceedingly potent cell differentiation agents, but they also are the most potent compounds with respect to calcemic activity, and at the levels required i vivo for effective use as anticancer (e.g. antileukemic) agents, these same compounds can produce dangerously elevated blood calcium levels by virtue of their inherent calcemic activity. Other known vitamin D derivatives show a similar correspondeace between differentiation activity and calcemic activity, and their practical use as potential anticancer agents, therefore, is subject to the same limitations-and hazard.

These observations clearly indicated a need, and have stimulated a search, for compounds with greater specificity and selectivity of action as anticancer agents, i.e. for compounds with an improved differentiation/calcemic activity ratio, and recent work has, indeed, led to the preparation of several vitamin D analogs with enhanced differentiation activities. It has been found for example, that certain 1,25- (OH) 2D3 homologs, in which the side chain is extended by one carbon (either within the chain or at its terminus) exhibit a markedly higher differentiation activity (about 10 times) for leukemia cells in culture than l,25-(OH)2D3 itself [DeLuca et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,717,721; Ostrem and DeLuca, Steroids 49, 73-102 (1988); Ostrem et al., J. Biol.Chem. 262, 1486 & (1987)]. However, these homologs are still extremely potent calcemic agents, exhibiting calcemic activities approximately equal to that of 1,25-(OH)2D3. These compounds, therefore, are characterized by an improved differentiation/calcemic activity ratio, but they do not overcome the problem of the undesired potent calcemic action discussed above. Other vitamin D-related compounds, reported to have preferential differentiation activity, have been prepared [see Ostrem et al., supra; Kubodera et al. Chem.

Pharm. Bull. 34, 2286-89 (1986); Ikekawa et al. Chem. Pharm.

Bull 35, 4362 (1987)], but these are structurally distinct and different from the compounds of the present invention.

Summary of the Invention Vitamin D-related compounds have now been found which exhibit a desired and very advantageous activity pattern in terms of their differentiation vs. calcemic responses. These new vitamin analogs exhibit very pronounced activity in inhibiting the proliferation of malignant cells and inducing their differentiation to normal monocyte-type cells (similar to or greater than that of 1,25-(OH)2D3), but they are much less active than 1,25-(OH)'2D3, as far as their calcemic action is concerned. Thus, these new compounds exhibit a dramatically improved differentiation/calcemic activity ratio, and by virtue of this characteristic, the compounds represent preferred agents for the treatment of neoplastic diseases. In being highly active in inducing differentiation, and much less active as calcemic agents, these compounds can be administered without inducing excessively elevated blood calcium levels, thereby overcoming a major practical problem associated with high calcemic activity.

The novel compounds are characterized structurally as side chain unsaturated homologs of 1,25-(OH)D in which the side chain is elongated by insertion of two or three methylene units into the carbon chain. They may be represented, therefore, by the following general structure:

where X, Y and X, which may be the same or different, are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and a hydroxy- protecting group and where n has the values 3 or 4.

Specific and preferred examples of these compounds are 24-dihomo-1,25-dihydroxy-22-dehydrovitamin L3, i.e. the compound shown above, where X, Y and Z are hydrogen and n equals 3, and 24-trihomo-1,25-dihydroxy-22-dehydrovitamin D3, i.e. the compound having the structure shown above, where X, Y and Z are hydrogen and n equals 4.

It is apparent that these new compounds are related to the side chain unsaturated 24-homo-vitamin D compound shown in U.S.

Patent 4,717,71. However, the new compounds have distinguishing structural and biological characteristics. Structurally, the distinguishing feature is an unsaturated side cain homologized by insertion of two or three methylene units, and biologically, the compounds are highly potent cell differentiating agents, without, or with much reduced, calcemic activity.

Preparation of New Compounds The synthesis of examples of the new compounds of this invention is shown diagrammaticall in Process Schemes 1, 2 and 3. Scheme 1 shows the preparation of the required la-hydroxyvitamin D-22-aldehyde intermediate, which, when coupled with the appropriate alkylphenyl sulfone side chain unit, as shown in Process Scheme 2, provides the desired vitamin D homologs after reductively desulfonating the side-chain (e.q. compounds (25) and (25), respectively).

Scheme 3 illustrates the preparation of the alkylohenylsulfone units required for side chain coupling.

Experimental details for the chemical process steps depicted in the schemes are provided in the specific examples which follow. Compound designations by arabic numerals (e.g. compound 1,2 3, etc.) as used in these examples refer to the structures so numbered in the schemes.

General Procedures 3ss-Acetoxy-22,23,-bisnor-5-cholenic acid (1) was purchased from Steraloids (Wilton, NH). All other chemicals were of the best quality from commercially available sources. Solvents were purified by standard methods.

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using precoated aluminum silica gel sheets with UV indicator from EM Science (Gibbstown, Nut). Solvent systems used: A: chloroformethanol 85:15 (v/v); B: hexane-ethyl acetate 1:1 and C: hexane-ethyl acetate 3:1.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed using a Waters Associates liquid chromatograph equipped with a Model 6000A solvent delivery system, a Model 6 LTK Universal injector and a Model 450 variable wavelength detector. Zorbax-Sil (Phenomenex) columns (6.2 mm x 25 cm and 10 mm x 25 cm) were used. Solvent systems: A: 3% 2-propanol in hexane; B: 2% 2-propanol in hexane; C: 6% 2-propanol in hexane; D: 10% 2-propanol in hexane; E: 20,ó 2-propanol in hexane. Silica gel Sep-Pak (Waters Associates) cartridges were used for the prefiltration of HPLC samples.

Electron impact mass spectra (MS) were recorded-a't 70 eV with Kratos MS-50 TC Mass Spectrometer equipped with Kratos DS-55 Data System.

Ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectra were recorded with a Hitachi Model 60-100 W-Vis spectrophotometer.

Infrared spectra were recorded on a Nicolet MX-1 FT-IR spectrometer using films of oily substances or carbon tetrachloride solutions.

Proton magnetic resonance spectra (1P-QER) were taken with Bruker 270, 400 or 500 MHz spectrometers in CDC13 solutions containing tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard.

Example 1 Synthesis of protected C-22-aldehyde (Compound ~ 18; Scheme 1) This aldehyde is prepared according to the general procedure of Kutner et al. (Tet. Letters 28, 6129-32, 1987).

Compound (1) (10 g) was dissolved in 420 mL of 5% KOH in methanol and the solution was stirred at ambient temperature for 15 min until none of the starting material was detected by TLC (solvent system A). To this solution, 160 mL of 10% sulfuric acid in methanol was added dropwise with stirring and the resulting suspension was diluted with 400 mE of 1% sulfuric acid in methanol. The mixture was heated under reflux for 48 h to complete the esterification (TLC, solvent system A).

Compound (2) (the ester) was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic phase was washed with 5% NaHC03, saturated NaCl and dried over magnesium sulfate. The product, compound (2), (9.0 g, 88%) was used for the next step without further purification.

To a solutionvof compound (2) (4.4 g, 12 mmol) in 135 mL of dry dimethylformamide (DMF) was added imidazole (3.6 g, 52.8 mmol), followed by tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (4.0 g, 26.4 mmol). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 5 min until the bulky precipitate was formed and then stirring was continued for additional 15 min. The reaction mixture was extracted with hexane (400 mL), washed with water, saturated NaCl solution, and dried over magnesium sulfate. Evaporation of the solvent provided TLC pure (solvent system B) product, compound (3) (5.3 g, 91%), that was used for the next step without further purification. An analytical sample was obtained by flash chromatography using 2, ethyl acetate in hexane.

A mixture of compound (3) (1.0 g, 2.1 mmol), dibromantin (0.42 g, 1.5 mmol) and anhydrous sodium bicarbonate (0.91 g, 10 mmol) in 20 mL of hexane was heated under reflux in a nitrogen atmosphere for 30 min until no starting compound (3) was detected (TLC, system C). The precipitate was filtered off and the solution dried down under reduced pressure. The residue was redissolved in 5 mL of anhydrous THF, tetrabutylammonium bromide (0.06 g, 0.19 mmol) was added, and the mixture stirred at room temperature for 30 min under nitrogen. A solution of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (10 mL, 1 in THF) was then added, followed by 0.7 mL of s-collidine, and the mixture was stirred under nitrogen at room temperature for 1 h. Another 5 mL of tetrabutylammonium fluoride solution was added and stirring was continued for 3 h.Ether (50 mL) was added and the organic phase was washed with water, cold 1 N HC1, 10 NaHC03 and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The product, compound (4), dissolved in benzene, was chromatographed on silica gel 70-230 mesh (30 g). Compound (4) (0.44 g, 58%) was eluted using ethyl acetate in hexane. An analytical sample was obtained by HPLC (system A, RV 77 mL): IR (film) 1737, 1604, 1495, 1082, 1030 -l cm ; W (3X 2-propanol in hexane) A 262 nm (e 7,000), A 272 nm (9,800), A 282 nm max 272 nm (# 9,800), A 282 nm ( A #maX 293 max ma NMR (CDC13) 5 0.54 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 0.94 (3H, s, l9-CH3), 1.22 (3H, d, J=6 Hz, 2-CH3), 3.6 (IH, m, 3-H), 3.68 (3H, s, CO2CH3), 5.42 (1H, m, 6-H), 5.58 (1H, m, 7-H); MS m/z (relative intensity) 358 (61), 340 (12), 325 (100), 299 (68), 271 (7), 253 (17), 237 (26), 211 (27), 143 (72), 119 (35).

A solution of compound (4) (830 mg, 2.3 mmol) in 350 mL of benzene-ethyl ether, 1:4 (v/v) was irradiated with stirring under nitrogen in a water-cooled quartz immersion well equipped with a nitrogen bubbler and a Vycor filter using Hanovia 608A36 medium-pressure W lamp for 40 min (4x10 min). The reaction was monitored by HPLC using 2% 2-propanol in hexane at 265 nm.

The solution was dried down under reduced pressure, redissolved in 100 mL of absolute ethanol and heated under reflux in a nitrogen atmosphere for 3 h. Then the solution was concentrated, redissolved in 1 mL of 10% ethyl acetate in hexane and chromatographed on silica gel 70-230 mesh (30 g).

Vitamin ester (5) (298 mg, 36%) was eluted using a mixture of 15% ethyl acetate in hexane. An analytical sample was obtained -1 by HPLC (system B, RV 94 mL): IR (film) 1738 cm ; U\T. (EtOH) max 264 nm, Amin 228 nm; H NMR (CDC13) 6, 0.56 (3E, s, 18-CH3), 1.20 (3H, d, J=7 Hz, 21-CH3), 3.66 (3H, s, C02CH3), 3.95 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.80 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, 19Z-H), 5.05 (lH, d, J=1.2 Hz, l9E-R), 6.03 (lH, d, J=ll Hz, 7-H), 6.23 (1H, d, J=ll Hz, 6-H); MS m/z (relative intensity), M 358 (45), 340 (9), 325 (45), 299 (22), 253 (19), 237 (18), 136 (60), 118 (100).

A solution of compound (5) (10 mg, 0.028 mmol) in 5 mL of dry toluene was cooled under nitrogen to -700C in a dry ice-acetone bath. To this solution, diisobutylalum num hydride (DIBAL-H, 50 ,T, 25% solution in toluene, 0.088 mmol) was added dropwise with stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred at -70 C for -10 min and then methanol (2 mL) was slcwly added.

The mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature, diluted with ethyl ether and washed with 5% HC1, 5% NaHCO3, water, saturated NaCl and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate.

Silica gel chromatography (15% ethyl acetate in hexane) afforded compound (6) (4.9 mg, 54%), with the following spectral data: MS: 328 (M+, 29), 310 (5), 295 (31), 269 (11), 253 (6), 136 (47), li8 (86), 29 (100); 1H-NMR (CDC13) : 0.59 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 1.14 (3H, d, J=7 Hz, 2l-CH3), 4.0 (lah, m, 3-H), 4.81 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, l9E-H), 5.05 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, 19Z-H), 6.05 (1H, d, J=ll Hz, 7-H), 6.23 (1H, d, J=ll Hz, 6-H), 9.58 (1H, d, J=3.8 Hz, 22-H).

Further elution of the silica gel column with 5% 2-propanol in hexane yielded the C-22-alcohol, compound (7) (2.7 mg, 29%).

Compound (5) was converted into compound (8) by using p-toluenesulfonyl chloride in pyridine at 4 C for 20 h.

Compound (8) (102 mg, 0.2 mmol) dissolved in 2 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane was added to the methanol solution (15 mL) of anhydrous potassium bicarbonate (250 mg) with stirring at 550C.

The mixture was stirred under nitrogen at 550C for 24 h. The solvents were then removed under reduced pressure and the residue extracted with ether. The organic phase was washed with water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The product, compound (9), was purified by silica gel chromatography using 20% ethyl acetate in hexane (50 mg, 68%).

Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (112 V 3.0 M solution in toluene, 0.34 mmol) was added to a suspension of selenium dioxide (9 mg, 0.8 mmol) in 2 mL of dry methylene chloride.

The mixture was stirred at room temperature under nitrogen until a clear solution was formed. Anhydrous pyridine (12 uL, 0.15 mmol) was then added followed by compound (9) (50 mg) dissolved in 2 1 of anhyd-ous dichloromethane. The mixture was stirred under nitrogen for 30 min. Cold 10% sodium bicarbonate (2 mL) was added and the mixture extracted with ether. The organic phase was washed with cold 10% sodium bicarbonate, ice water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate.Silica gel chromatography (10-20% ethyl acetate in hexane) afforded 12.5 mg of compound (10). The product was then immediately dissolved in 0.5 mL of glacial acetic acid and the solution was heated at 55 0C with stirring under nitrogen for 15 min. The reaction mixture was poured over ice, extracted with ether and washed with ice-cold saturated sodium bicarbonate. The combined ether extracts were washed with water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Analytical samples of (5Z,7E) and (5E,7E) isomers, (11) and (12), respectively were obtained by preparative HPLC in a ratio of 2.5:1.

Compound 11: HPLC, N 68 mL; UV (EtOH) #max 264 nm, #min 227 A264 1H 2.07; 1H NMR (CDCl3) a, 0.56 max s, 18-CH3), min nm, A227 = 2.07; 1H NMR (CDCl3) # 0.56 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 1.20 (3H, d, J=6.j Hz, 21-CH3), 2.04 (3H, s, 3ss-acetyl), 3.66 (3H, s, 22-CO2CE3), 4.4 (1H, m, 1-H), 5.2 (1H, m, 3-H), 5.01 (1H, br s, l9E-H), 5.34 (1H, br s, 19Z-H), 6.01 (1H, d, J=10 Hz, 7-H), 6.33 (lH, d, J=10 Hz, 6-H); MS m/z (relative intensity), 416 (M+, 4), 356 (100), 338 (21), 251 (13), 134 (95).

Compound 12: HPLC, N 78 ml; LW (EtOH) A 267 nm, A ; 227 A267 1 max min nm, A227 = 3.51; H NMR (CDCl3) 6, 0.56 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 1.20 (3H, d, J=6.5 Hz , 21-CH3), 2.04 (3H, s, 3R-OAc), 3.66 (3H, s, 22-CO2CH3), 4.5 (1H, m, 1-H), 5.3 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.99 (1E, br s, 19E-H), 5.13 (1H, br s, l9Z-H), 5.81 (1E, d, J=10 Hz, 7-H), 6.56 (1H, d, J=10 Hz, 6-H).

For large scale preparations, isomers (11) and (12) can also be effectively and advantageously separated by the maleic anhydride procedure described in U.S. Patent 4,554,106.

Disobutylaluminumhydride (15 uL, 1.5 M solution toluene) was added with stirring to a solution of compound (11) (2 mg) in 0.5 mL of anhydrous toluene at -700C under nitrogen. The mixture was stirred at -700C for 10 min and 0.2 mL of methanol was slowly added to decompose the organometallic complex. The mixture was warmed up to room temperature and extracted with ethyl ether. The organic phase was washed with water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Preparative HPLC, using a solvent system E afforded compound (13) and compound (14).

Compound (13) gave the following spectral data: 344 (M+, 22), 326 (13), 311 (2), 285 (4), 269 (4), 152 (29), 134 (100); 1H-NMR (CDC13) 6, 0.59 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 1.15 (3H, d, J=7 Hz, 21-CH3), 4.2 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.4 (1H, m, 1-H), 4.99 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, l9Z-H), 5.31 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, 19E-H), 6.02 (1H, d, J=ll Hz, 7-H), 6.36 (1H, d, J-ll Hz, 6-H), 9.56 (1H, d, J=4 Hz, 22-H).

A 0.1 N solution of KOH in methanol (10 mL) was added to a stirred solution of compound (1~) (100 mg, 0.24 mmol) in ethyl ether (10 mL). The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for 90 min until no starting material was detected by TLC (solvent system B). Compound (15) was isolated by standard extraction procedure (ethyl acetate, saturated NaCl, anhydrous magnesium sulfate) to give colorless oil (86.2 mg, 96X).

A mixture of imidazole (250 mg, 3.6 smol) and tert-butyldimethylsslyl chloride (250 mg, 1.6 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was added to a stirred solution of compound (15) (86.2 mg, 0.23 mmol) in 4 mL of dimethylformamide. The resulting homogenous mixture was stirred for 15 min at 55 C until no starting material was detected by TLC (solvent system B). The product was isolated by hexane extraction of the reaction mixture. Organic extract was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Hexane solution of the crude product was filtered through silica gel Sep-Pak cartridge tc give compound (16) (136 mg, 98%).IR (film) 2974, 2930, 1736, -l 1447, 1286, 1258, 1150, 1085 cm ; UV (hexane), #max 264 nm, max Amin 227 nm, A264 = 1.91; 1H NMR (CDC13), 8 0.07 [12H, s, A227 (CDCl3), Si(CH3)2], 0.55 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 0.86 [18H, s, C(CH3)3], 1.20 (3H, d, J=6.8 Hz, 21-CH3), 3.65 (3H, s, 0-CH3), 4.18 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.36 (lH, m, 1-H), 4.84 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, 19Z-H), 5.16 (1H, d, J=1.2 Hz, l9E-H), 5.96 (1H, d, J=11.2 Hz, 7-H), 6.19 (1H, d, J=11.2 Hz, 6-H); MS m/z (intensities normalized to m/e 248) 602 (M+, 10), 470 (59), 413 (7), 338 (10), 248 (100).

Lithium aluminum hydride (25 mg, 0.65 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of compound (16) (136.2 mg, 0.23 mmol) in anhydrous THF (5 mL) under argon at OOC. The suspension was stirred for 15 min at 0 0C and the excess of lithium aluminum hydride was decomposed by the dropwise addition of 10% water in THF. The suspension was diluted with 10 mL of THF and the stirring was continued for an additional 15 min at room temperature. The product was isolated by the standard extraction with ethyl acetate. Compound (17) was obtained as a colorless oil (118.4 mg) in 91% yield.IR (film) 3450, 2952, -l 2886, 1447, 1258, 1105, 1085, 834 cm ; UV (EtOH) A 264 nm, A264 1H NMR a 0.00 max Amin 227 nm, A227 = 1.57; H NMR (CDCl3) # 0.00 (12H, s, Si-CH3), 0.53 (3H, s, 18-CH3), 0.85 [18H, s, Si-C(CH3)3], 1.04 (3H, d, J=6.4 Hz, 21-CH3), 3.37 and 3.63 (1H and lH, each m, 22-CH2), 4.17 (1H,m, 3-H), 4.35 (1H, m, 1-H), 4.84 (1H, br s, 19Z-H), 5.16 (1H, br s, 19E-H), 6.00 (1H, d, J=12.2 Hz, 7-H), 6.21 (1H, d, J=12.2 Hz, 6-H); MS M/z (intensities normalized to m/z 248), 574 (M+, 17), 442 (67), 383 (11), 308 (17), 248 (100).

A solution of oxalyl chloride (30 pL, 0.34 mmol) in 0.5 mL of dichloromethane was added dropwise to a stirred solution of DMSO (50 uL, 0.7 mmol) in 3 mL of dichloromethane at -600C under nitrogen. The resulting solution was stirred at -600C for 10 min and the solution of compound (17) (27 mg, 0.05 mmol) in 1 mL of dichloromethane was slowly added. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at -600C. Then 0.2 mL of triethylamine was added and the solution was stirred for another 5 min. The product, compound (18), was extracted with ethyl ether and the organic extract was washed with saturated NaCl and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Silica gel Sep-Pak filtration afforded TLC pure product (17 mg, 62%).IR (film) 2954, 2929, 2884, 2857, 1727, 1472, 1375, 1256, 1085, 909, 880, 835 cm NMR (CHCl3) a 0.00 (12H, s, Si-CH3), 0.60 (3H, s, 18-CH3),-0.88 [18H, s, Si-C(CH3)3], 1.11 (3H, d, J=6.9 Hz, 21-CH3), 4.23 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.43 (1H, m, 1-H), 4.93 (lH, br s, 19Z-H), 5.19 (1H, br s, l9E-H), 6.07 (1H, d, J=10.0 Hz, 7-H), 6.26 (1H, d, J=10.0 Hz, 6-H), 9.54 (1E, d, J=3 Hz, 22-H); UV (hexane) A 264 nm, A264 max nin 227 nm, A227 = 1.9;MS m/z (intensities relative to m/z 248) 572 (! , 13), 440 (53), 383 (11), 308 (14), 248 (100); exact mass calculated for C34H6003 Si2 57.4081, found 572.4117.

An improved yield of aldehyde (18) was obtained when the oxidation step was conducted under the following conditions: A solution of 15 uL (0.17 mmol) oxalyl chloride in 0.75 ml anhydrous dichloromethane was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 25 L (0.36 mmol) dimethyl sulfoxide in 0.25 mL anhydrous dichloromethane at -600C under an argon atmosphere.

After the mixture was stirred for 10 min at -60 C, the solution of 20.3 mg (0.035 mmol) of alcohol (17) in 0.5 mL of anhdrous dichloromethane was slowly added, and the flash rinsed with an additional 0.2 mL anhydrous dichloromethane. The mixture was stirred for 30 min at -60 C and 0.3 mL (2.15 mmol) of triethylamine was added at -60 0C. The mixture was stirred for 5 min and warmed to 0 C and extracted with ether. The ether phase was washed with brine and dried (MgS04). Silica gel Sep-Pak filtration afforded (18) as a colorless oil which was purified by HPLC (Zorbax-Sil 9.4 x 25 cm, 10 EtOAc in hexane) to give the pure aldehyde (18) (19 mg, 96%); only a trace of alcohol was recovered (0.12 mg).

Example 2 Side chain attachment: Synthesis of 24-dihomo-la,25-dihydroxy- 22-dehydrovitamin D (compound 25, Scheme 2) (a) Preparation of hydroxysulfone (19) To a stirred solution of 31 mg (84 vmol) 2-methyl-6 (phenylsulfonyl)-2-(triethylsilyloxy)-hexane (compound 31, Scheme 3) in 300 uL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (containing 1.10 phenanthroline as indicator) under argon atmosphere at -78 C was added 13 wL (90 umol) diisopropylamine followed by 70 uL of n-BuLi (1.30 molar in hexane) (91 umol). The solution was stirred under argon atmosphere at -780C for 30 min, then 6 mg of C-22-aldehyde (compound 18) (10 umol) in 300 uL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was added and stirred at -78 0C for 1 h. The mixture was decomposed by the addition of 1 mL of saturated NH4C1 solution, warmed to OOC, and extracted with ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate was washed with water and brine, dried over anhydrous MgS04, filtered and evaporated.

Preparation HPLC (ZorbaxSil column 9.6 x 25 cm, Solvent system: 10% ethyl acetate in hexane) gave 0.6 mg unreacted aldehyde and 6.6 mg of the hydroxysulfone (19) as a mixture of epimers (77% yield).

(b) 24-Dihomo-la, 25-dihydroxy-22-dehydro-vitamin D3 (25) A saturated solution of Na2E.PO4 in methanol (1.0 mL) was added to a stirred solution of hydroxysulfone (19) (3.3 mg) in 1.0 mL of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran followed by powdered anhydrous Na2HPO4 (160 mg). The mixture was stirred under Argon for 30 min and cooled to OOC. Fresh 5 sodium amalgam (ca. 400 mg) was then added and the mixture was stirred for 16 h at 5 0C. The mixture was diluted with 5 mL hexane and stirring was continued for 15 min. Solvents were decanted and the solid material was washed with hexane (3 x 5 mL). Ice and saturated NaCl solution was added to the combined organic solution.The organic layer was separated and passed through a Sep-Pak cartridge in hexane. HPLC purification gave 2.0 mg (71Xó) protected A22-24-dihomo-1,25-(OH)2D3 (21), and a small amount of the 22-hydroxylated product (22) (Zorbax-Sil 9.4 x 25 column, 10% EtOAC in hexane). Protected triol (21) (2 mg) was dissolved inl.O mL of anhydrous THF and to this solution tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF (50 L), 1 M solution) was added. The mixture was stirred under argon for 1 h at 50 C.

Ether (8 mL) was then added and the organic phase was washed with saturated NaCl. Solvents were removed and the residue was dissolved in 10% 2-propanol in hexane and filtered through silica Sep Pak. HPLC (2070 2-propanol in hexane Zorbax-Sil 9.4 x 25 cm) gave 0.6 mg of the desired product, the dihomo A264 compound (25).W (EtOH) A 264 nm, A 228 nm, A228 1H NMR 0.55 max min 1.87; H NMR (CDC13), 0.55 (3H, s, 18-CE3), 1.00 (3H, d, J=6.6 Hz, 21-CH3), 1.23 (6E, s, 26,27-CH3) 4.23 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.43 (1H, ni, 1-H), 5.00 (lH, brs, l9Z-H), 5.32 (1H, brs, 19E-H), 5.29 (2, m, 22H and 23H), 6.01 (1H, d, J=11.3 Hz, 7-H); MS m/z (relative intensity) 442 (M+, 15), 424 (23), 406 (33), 391 (7), 287 (11), 285 (10), 269 (27), 251 (23), 152 (33), 134 (100), 116 (6), 59 (20); exact mass calcd. for C29H4603 442.3446, found 442.3441.

Example 3 Side chain attachment: Synthesis of 24-trihomo-la,25- dihydro--y-22-dehydrovitamin D3 (compound 26, Scheme 2) (a) Preparation of hydroxysulfone (20) To a stirred solution of 58 mg (151 vmol) 2-methyl 7(phenylsulfonyl)-2-(triethylsilnloxy)-heptane (compound 35, Scheme 3) in 500 uL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (containing 1,10-phenanthroline as indicator) under argon atmosphere at -780C was added 23 pL (160 vmol) diisopropylamine followed by 106 uL n-BuLi (1.5 molar in hexane) (160 umol). The solution was stirred under argon atmosphere at -780C for 30 min, then 7 mg of C-22-aldehyde (compound 18) (12 umol) in 300 uL anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was added and stirred for 1 h. The mixture was decomposed at that temperature by the addition of 1 mL of saturated NH4C1 solution, warmed to OOC and extracted with ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate was washed with water and brine, dried over anhvdrous MgSO4, filtered and evaporated.

Preparative HPLC (Zorbax-Sil 9.4 x 25 cm, solvent system 10% ethyl acetate in hexane) gave 0.4 mg of unreacted aldehyde and 7.5 mg of the hydroxysulfone (20) as a mixture of epimers (78%).

(b) 2L-trihomo-1,25-dihydroxv-22-dehydrovitamin D (26) A saturated solution of Na2HPO4 in ethanol (1.0 mL) was added to a stirred solution of the hydroxysulfone (20) (7.5 mg) in 1.0 mL of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran followed by powdered anhydrous Na2HPO4 (160 mg). The mixture was stirred under argon for 30 min and cooled to 0 C. Fresh sodium amalgam 5% (ca. 400 mg) was then added and the mixture was stirred for 6 h at 50C. The mixture was diluted with 5 mL hexane and stirring was continued for 15 min. Solvents were decanted and the solid material was washed with hexane (3 x 5 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with brine, separated, dried and evaporated. The residue was passed through a Sep Pak cartridge in 10% ethyl acetate in hexane. HPLC purification gave 2.12 mg of protected 22-24-trihomo-1,25-(0H)2D3 (23) and 1.33 mg 22-hydroxylated product (24) (Zorbax-Sil 9.4 x 25 column, 10% ethyl acetate in hexane). Compound 23 (2.1 mg) was dissolved in 1.0 mL of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran and to this solution 50 uL tetrabutylammonium fluoride in tetrahydrofuran (1 M solution) was added. The mixture was stirred under argon for 1 h at 50 C. Ether was then added and the organic phase was washed with brine.The ether phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and evaporated. The residue was dissolved in 30% 2-propanol in hexane and passed through a Sep Pak. HPLC purification (20%, 2-propanol in hexane, Zorbax-Sil 9.4 x 25 cm column) gave the desired trihomo product, compound 26 (0.8 mg).

UV (EtOH) A 264 nm A . 228, A264 = 81; 1H NMR: (CDCl) max min A228 3 0.56 (3H, s, 18-CE3), 1.00 (3H, d, J=6.6 Hz, 21-CE3), 1.23 (6H, s, 26,27-CX3), 4.23 (1H, m, 3-H), 4.43 (1H, m, 1-H), 5.00 (lH, brs, l9Z-E), 5.32 (lye, brs, 19E-H), 5.29 (2H, m, 22H and 23E), 6.01 (lye, d, J=11.3 Hz, 7-H); MS m/z (relative intensity) 456 (M ) (11) 438 (50), 420 (30), 402 (8), 287 (10), 269 (23), 251 (23), 152 (35), 134 (100).

Example 4 Synthesis of sulfone side chain units (Scheme 3) (a) Preparation of sulfone side chain residue (32) A solution of 4-chlorovaleryl chloride 27 (Aldrich; 3 g, 19.2 mmol) in anhydrous TEF (25 mL) was added dropwise with vigorous stirring, over 30 min, under argon, to a solution of methylmagnesium bromide (12.9 mL of a 3 M solution inether) in 25 mL of dry TEF at -1O C. The reaction mixture was then allowed to warm up to room temperature within 2 h, then quenched with water and neutralized with diluted hydrochloric acid. The mixture was extracted with ether, the combined organic layers were washed with water and dried with sodium sulfate.After removal of the solvent, the residue was distilled in vacuo to give chloro-alcohol 28 as a colorless liquid (2.1 g, 70%). Chloro-alcohol 28 (1.5 g, 10 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylformamide (5 mL) was then added to a stirred solution of thiophenol (1.32 g, 12 mmol) and potassium t-butoxide (1.32 g, 11.3 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylformamide (25 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and the solution was partitioned between dichloromethane and water. The organic layer was washed with aqueous sodium carbonate, water and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo and the crude oil was purified by silica gel flash chromatography with hexane-ethyl acetate. Sulfide 29 (2.2 g, 98%) was obtained as a colorless liquid.Sulfide 29 (1.01 g, 4.5 mmol) was then dissolved in dry dichloromethane (40 mL) and 3-chloroperbenzoic acid (2.5 g, 11.6 mmol; Aldrich 80-85%) was added in portions with stirring and occasional cooling. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h and then quenched with 10% sodium bicarbonate.

The combined organic extracts were washed with aqueous sodium sulfite and brine and dired over magnesium sulfate. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude oil was purified by silica gel flash chromatography using hexane-ethyl acetate mixtures to afford sulfone 30 (1.1 g, 97%) as a colorless liquid. To a stirred solution of sulfone 30 (1.3 g, 5.1 trjnol) and imidazole (1.5 g, 22.7 mmol) in dry dimethylformamide (50 mL), triethylsilyl chloride (1.15 g, 7.7 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was kept at room temperature for 2 h and then diluted with dichloromethane. The mixture was washed with aqueous ammonium chloride solution and water. The organic layers were dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography. Hexaethyldisiloxane was first eluted with hexane.The triethylsily-protected sulfone 31 (1.8 g, 97%) was eluted with hexane-ethyl acetate 9:1 as a colorless liquid: IR -l 1 (neat): 3045, 2940, 1440, 1360, 1130, 1020 cm ; H NMR (400 MHz, CDC13) b 0.518 (6H, q, J=6.2 Hz, Si-CH2), 0.899 (9H, t, J=6.2 Hz, Si-C-CH3) 6 0.518 (6H, q, J=6.2 Hz, Si-CH2),-0.899 (9H, t, J=6.2 Hz, Si-C-CE3), 1.142 (6H, s, CH3), 1.307-1.462 (4H, m), 1.655-1.738 (2H, m, H-4), 3.080-3.122 (2H, m, H-2), 7.567 (2H, t, J=6.8 Hz, H-aryl meta), 7.648 (lH, t, J=6.8 Hz, H-aryl para), 7.916 (2H, d, J=6.83 Hz, H-aryl ortho);MS (El, 70 eV): m/z (relative intensity) 372 (M , 2), 341 (100), 229 (2), 227 (18), 173 (24), 103 (22), 75 (45), 55 (33).

(b) Preparation of sulfone side chain unit (35) A solution of 6-bromohexanoyl chloride (32) (3.8 g, 2.8 nL, 18 mmol) in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (10 mL) was added dropwise with vigorous stirring over 15-20 min under argon atmosphere to a solution of methylmagnesium bromide (14 mL of 3 M solution in ether) in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (15 mL) at -100C. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, cooled to 0 C and carefully decomposed with 1:1 diluted hydrochloric acid. The mixture was extracted with ether, the combined organic layers were washed with water, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated to give the bromo alcohol (33) as a colorless oil (3.6 g) (94ago).

The bromo-alcohol (3.4 g, 16 mmol) was treated with benzene sulfinic acid sodium salt (3.3 g, 20 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylformamide at 70 0C for 4-1/2 h. The mixture was poured on ice, extracted with dichloromethane, washed with 1 N HCl, water, 10% NaHC03 solution, dried over anhydrous MgS04, filtered and evaporated to give the sulfone (34) which was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel and eluted with 40-50% ethyl acetate in hexane to obtain the sulfone containing some of the corresponding sulfinate ester (4.18 g, 98v) MS, m/z 270 (M+), 255 (M±15), 77, 59.

To a stirred solution of the sulfone (34) (4 g, 14 mmol) and imidazole (3.8 g, 55 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylformamide (13 mL) triethylsilyl chloride (4.6 g, 5.1 mL, 30 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h, poured on ice water, extracted with ether, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography. Hexaethyldisiloxane was first eluted with hexane; 3% ethyl acetate in hexane eluted the sulfinate ester with some of the sulfone, and 10% ethyl acetate in hexane eluted the protected pure sulfone (35) (3,4 g, 6070).

Anal. calcd. for C20H-603SSi C, 62.45X, H, 9.43%, S 38.347' Found C, 61.97%, H, 9.45X, S, 8.33% MS, m/z (relative intensity) 355 (100) (M -29), 227 (15), 173 (35), 103 (43), 75 (95), 55 (23), NMR (400 MHz, CDC13), 0.54 (6H, q, J=7 Hz, Si-CH2), 0.94 (9H, t, J=8 Hz, Si-C-CB3), 1.15 (6E, s, CH3), 1.31-1.36 (4H, m), 3.08-3.12 (2H, m, H=2), 7.57 (2H, t, J=6.8 Hz, E-aryl-meta), 7.66 (1H, t), H-aryl para), 7.92 (2H, d, J=6.8 Hz, H-aryl ortho)...

Biological Activity The new homolog (95) was tested for both differentiation active and calcemic activity, using established assays known in the art. The assay procedures and results obtained are described in more detail in the following examples.

Example 5 Measurement of differentiation activity of dihomo compound (25) in HL-60 cells (Table 1).

Degree of differentiation of HL-60 cells (human leukemia cells) in response to test compounds was assessed by three different assays: NBT-reduction, phagocytosis and esterase activity. The first two assays were carried out according to the general procedures given by DeLuca et al. in U.S. patent no. 4,717,721. The third assay, measuring nonspecific acid esterase activity as a marker for differentiation, was conducted according to the method given in Sigma Kit No. 90 availabie from Sigma Chemical Corp., St. Louis, MO [see also Ostrem et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 2610-2614 (1987); Ostrem et al. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14164-14171 (1987)1. Results are shown in Table 1, below.Data are presented as the percent of differentiated cells resulting from treatment with various concentrations of 1,25-(OH)2D3 (used as comparison standard) or vitamin D test compound.

Table 1 Comparison of Differentiation Activity of 1,25- (OH) 2D3 and Side Chain Dihomo Compound in HL-6C Cells in Culture % Differentiated Cells Compound Concentration Esterase Phagocytosis NBT Administered (molar) 1,25-(OH)2D3 1 x 10 7 M 91 + 2 90 + 3 90 + 2 1 x 10 8 M 61 + 4 56 + 2 55 + 4 -o 1 x 10 9 M 30 + 3 31 + 2 34 + 4 24-Dihomo-1,25- 5 x 10-8 M 92 + 2 93 + 3 92 + 2 (OH) 2-22-dehydro- 1 x 10 M 78 + 4 77 + 3 78 + 3 vitamin D3 5 x 10 M 67 + 4 69 + 2 69 + 3 (compound 25) 1 x 10 M 49 + 2 50 + 3 48 + 3 5 x 10 10M 36 + 4 36 + 4 40 + 3 Example 6 Calcemic activity of dihomo compound (25) (a) Intestinal calcium transport activity (Table 2) Male weanling rats were obtained from the Harlan-Sprague Dawley Company of Madison, Wisconsin, and fed the low calcium, rachitogenic diet (0.02% Ca, 0.3% P) described by Suda et al.

(J. Nutr. 100, 1049-1052, 1970). They were fed on this diet for a total of 4 weeks ad libitum. At the end of the third week the animals were divided into groups of 6 rats each. One group received a daily injection of vehicle (.1 mL of 95% propylene glycol, 5% ethanol) interperitoneally for 7 days.

The remaining groups received the same amount of vehicle over the same period of time but containing one of the following doses: 12.5 ng or 25 ng of 1,25-(OH)2D3 or 125 ng of 24 dihomo-1a,25-dihydroxy-22-dehydrovitamin D3 (compound 25). The animals were killed 24 h after the last dose, the intestines removed, and the duodenal segments were used to measure intestinal calcium transport as described by Halloran and DeLuca (Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 208, 477-486, 1981). Results are given in Table 2 below.

Table 2 Intestinal Calcium Transport Activity of 1,25- (OH) 2D3 and Side Chain Homolog in Rats Compound Amount Ca Transport Administered (ng/d/7 days) (Mean + S.E.M.) D-deficient (control) 0 4.8 + 0.2 1,25-(0)2D3 12.5 11.2 + 0.6 25.0 13.L 1.2 2t-Dihomo-1,25-(OH)2- 195.0 6.8 0.45 22-dehyerovitamin D3 (compound 25) (b) Measurement of bone calcium mobilization (Table 3) Male weanling rats were obtained from the Harlan Sprague Dawley Company and fed the low calcium (0.02% Ca, 0.3% P) vitamin D-deficient diet described by Suda et al. (J. Nutr.

100, 1049-1052, 1970) for a period of 4 weeks. At the end of the third week the animals were divided into groups of 6 animals each and received the indicated doses (see Table 3) dissolved in 0.1 mL 95% propylene glycol and 5% ethanol. The control group received the solvent vehicle only. The other groups received the indicated dosage of 1,25-(OH)2D3 or the dihomo compound (25) each day for 7 days. Serum calcium was measured at the end of 7 days of dosing by atomic absorption.

Results of two such experiments are given in Table 3 below.

Table 3 Bone Calcium Mobilization Activity (Serum Calcium Levels) of 1,25-(OH)2D3 and Side Chain Homolog in Rats Compound Amount Serum Calcium Administered (ng/d/7 days) (Mean + S.E.M.) mg % Experiment 1 Experiment 2 D-Deficient (control) 0 3.4 + 0.07 4.1 + 0.05 l,25-(OH)2D3 12.5 3.7 + 0.17 4.8 + 0.08 25.0 4.1 + 0.07 4.8 + 0.08 75.0 4.6 + 0.09 24-Dihomo-1,25-(OH)2- 25.0 3.6 + 0.16 22-dehydrovitamin D3 125.0 3.7 + 0.13 4.36 + 0.15 (Compound 25) 250.0 4.1 + 0.05 - 500.0 3.8 + 0.11 - The results presented in Table 1 clearly indicate that the dihomo analog 25 is distinctly more potent than 1,25- (OH) 2D3 in inducing the differentiation of leukemic cells to normal monocyte cells. For example, at a concentration of 1 x 10 molar, 1,25-(OH)2D3 produces 55-61% differentiated cells, whereas compound (25) at the same concentration gives 78% differentiation. Considering that a concentration of 1 x 10 molar of 1,25- (OH) 2D3 is required to achieve the same degree of differentiation (~90%), as produced by a concentration of 5 x 1-8 molar of the dihomo analog (ca. 92%), one can conclude that the analog 25 is in the order of 5 times more potent than 1,25- (OH) 2D3 as a differentiation agent.

In sharp contrast, the dihomo compound shows very low calcemic activity compared to 1,25-(OH)2D3. This conclusion is supported by the results of Tables 2 and 3. The intestinal calcium transport assay, represented by Table 2, for example, shows the known active metabolite, 1,25-(OH)2D3 to elicit, as expected, very pronounced responses (compared to control) when administered at doses of 12.5 or 25 ng/day for 7 days. In thecase of the new dihomo compound (25), however, doses of 125.

ng/day for 7 days are required to elicit a response, and even at such high dosage levels the response is modest, being slightly better than half that induced by 1,25- (OH) 2D3 at a 10-fold lower dose. In this assay, therefore, the new dihomo analog is at least 10 times less active than 1,25- (OH) 2D3.

The same conclusion can be drawn from the results of the bone calcium mobilization assay shown in Table 3. Here doses of 125 and 250 ng/day (administered for 7 days) of the dihomo analog (25) are required to achieve the same degree of response as that produced by 12.5 and 25 ng, respectively, of 1,25- (OH)2D3. Notable, too, is the fact that a further increase in the dose of the dihomo compound (to 500 ng/day) does not further increase, but, if anything supresses, the bone calcium mobilization response (see Table 3). In a second experiment -- also tabulated in Table 3 -- in which 1,25-(OH)2D3 again elicited a very significant response (compared to control) at doses of 12.5 and 25 ng/day, the dihomo analog showed no activity at a dose of 125 ng/day.In a third experiment, in which the dihomo analog 25 was tested over a dosage range up to 1000 ng/day, the compound elicited no calcium mobilization response at any dose level, showing the material to be essentially without activity in raising serum calcium at the expense of bone. These bone mobilization assay, therefore, are in full accord with the calcium transport data of Table 2, and show clearly that the new dihomo analog 25 is many times less potent than 1,25- (OH) 2D3 in its calcemic action.

The same type of activity pattern is observed for the trihomo compound 26 of this invention. This substance also exhibits a highly favorable and dramatically enhanced differentiation/calcemic activity ratio, by virtue of showing pronounced activity in inducing HL-60 cell differentiation, while eliciting no significant response (compared to control) on serum calcium levels in rats.

This type of activity pattern is, of course, exactly what is desired for a compound designed for use as a differentiation agent in the treatment of neoplastic diseases. The desired activity, the cellular differentiation of malignant cells, is highly pronounced, while the undesired activity, the calcemic action, is dramatically reduced, thus giving a very greatly enhanced differentlation/calcemic activity ratio. Yvnown la-hydroxyvitamin D compounds have been shown to be effective therapeutic agents for the treatment of leukemic diseases (Suda et al., U.S. Patent 4,391,802).Based on the bioassay data cited herein, one can conclude that the new side chain hono compounds of this invention, when administered at the same dosage level as the prior art compounds, would exhibit none or less than one-tenth of the undesired calcemic activity of the prior art compounds, thereby largely eliminating the problem of producing excessively elevated blood calcium levels in the treated subjects. Furthermore, based on the results presented in Table 1, one can expect the new homo compounds to exhibit a very high differentiation activity against malignant cells, especially leukemic cells, thus further enhancing their therapeutic benefit.Hence, the new compounds of this invention represent an effective practical embodiment of the concept of differentiation therapy of malignant diseases, and their activity patterns clearly suggest that they would be preferred therapeutic agents for such treatment.

For treatment purposes, these compounds can be formulated as solutions in innocuous solvents, or as emulsions, suspensions or dispersions in suitable and innocuous solvents or carriers, or as pills, tablets or capsules by conventional methods known in the art. Such formulations may also contain other pharmaceutically-acceptable and non-toxic excipients, such as stabilizers, anti-oxidants, binders, coloring agents or emulsifying or taste-modifying agents.

The compounds are advantageously administered by injection, or by intravenous infusion of suitable sterile solutions, or in the form of oral doses via the alimentary canal. For the treatment of human leukemia, the homovitamin D compounds of this invention are administered to subjects in dosages sufficient to induce the differentiation of leukemic cells to macrophages. Suitable dosage amounts are from 0.5 ug to 50 ug per day, it being understood that dosages can be adjusted (i.e. still further increased) according to the severity of the disease or the response or the condition of subject as well-understood in the art.

Claims (12)

1. A compound having the structure

wherein each of X, Y and Z, which may be the same or different, is hydrogen or a hydroxy-protecting group, and n is 3 or 4.

2. A compound according to claim 1 where each of X, Y and Z is hyrogen.

3. 2#-dihomo-1&alpha;,25-dihydroxy-22-dehydrovitamin 3-

4. ?t-trihomo-1 ,25-dihydroxy-22-dehydrovitamin D3.

5. A compound having the structure

wherein each of X, Y and , which may be the same or different, is bvdrogen or a hvdroxy-crotecting group, and n is 3 or 4.

6. tharmaceutical comPosition which comprises at least one compound as claims in any one of claims 1 to 4 together with a charmaceutically acceptable excipient.

7. A composition according to claim 6 which comprises 24-dihomo-lR,25-dihydroxy-22-dehyArovitamin D3.

5. A composition according to claim .6 which comprises 24-trihomo-12,25-dihydroxy-22-dehydrovitamin D3.

9. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 8 in which the compound is present in an amount from 0.5 uq to 50 ug.

10. A composition according to claim 6 substantially as hereinbefore described.

11. A compound as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 for use in inducing and enhancing cell differentiation in malignant cells.

12. A compound as claimed in any one of claims I to 4 for use in treating a neoplastic disease.