GB2201799A - An electromagnetic test method - Google Patents

An electromagnetic test method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2201799A
GB2201799A GB08807151A GB8807151A GB2201799A GB 2201799 A GB2201799 A GB 2201799A GB 08807151 A GB08807151 A GB 08807151A GB 8807151 A GB8807151 A GB 8807151A GB 2201799 A GB2201799 A GB 2201799A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
conducting
plane
illumination
conducting sheet
current
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB08807151A
Other versions
GB2201799B (en
GB8807151D0 (en
Inventor
Ian Peter Macdiarmid
Carl Peter Loller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BAE Systems PLC
Original Assignee
British Aerospace PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB868625203A external-priority patent/GB8625203D0/en
Application filed by British Aerospace PLC filed Critical British Aerospace PLC
Publication of GB8807151D0 publication Critical patent/GB8807151D0/en
Publication of GB2201799A publication Critical patent/GB2201799A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2201799B publication Critical patent/GB2201799B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R29/00Arrangements for measuring or indicating electric quantities not covered by groups G01R19/00 - G01R27/00
    • G01R29/08Measuring electromagnetic field characteristics
    • G01R29/0807Measuring electromagnetic field characteristics characterised by the application
    • G01R29/0814Field measurements related to measuring influence on or from apparatus, components or humans, e.g. in ESD, EMI, EMC, EMP testing, measuring radiation leakage; detecting presence of micro- or radiowave emitters; dosimetry; testing shielding; measurements related to lightning

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
  • Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)

Abstract

To test the effect of plane electromagnetic wave illumination on a conducting body (4) e.g. an aircraft fuselage, a grounded conductive sheet (3) is placed in the vicinity of the body and high frequency alternating current from a generator (1) is injected into the conducting body (4) via electrodes (2) on the surface of the body. The fields generated by the injected currents and the mirror currents in the grounded conducting sheet create an overall current distribution in the conducting body (4) substantially identical with that resulting from the incidence of a plane electromagnetic wave upon the body. <IMAGE>

Description

AN ELECTROMAGNETIC TEST METHOD The present invention relates to a test technique to simulate the plane electromagnetic (EM) wave illumination of a conducting body and an apparatus for use in the performing the technique. Such techniques are used in the testing of military vehicles such as aircraft for resistance to the effects of high intensity wide-band electromagnetic radiation. In the past such testing has been carried out simply by using antennae and appropriate generating equipment. In order to generate high intensity fields around a body as large as an aircraft such systems have necessarily been physically large and have had very high power consumption levels. In addition to being expensive to build and run such systems suffer the further disadvantage that they create high levels of radio frequency interference.
Illumination of conducting bodies at radio frequencies extending up to substantially 30MHz is particularly difficult because of the large size of efficient radiation structures for these frequencies and the difficulty of focusing the radiated power on the body to be illuminated. Moreover it is found that at frequencies where the wavelength is 10's or 100's of metres that inductive coupling between the antenna and the aircraft occurs thereby distorting the electromagnetic field creating fields with spherical wavefronts and non-uniform field strengths. This distortion of the field severly restricts the diagnostic value of the test procedure.
According to the present invention, a test technique for the simulation of plane electromagnetic wave (EM) illumination of a conducting body includes the step of connecting a high frequency current to said body via a multi-point feed system arranged to produce a distribution of surface current on the body substantially identical to that generated by the body's exposure to a plain electromagnetic wave. In order to provide the required field characteristics a suitably shaped conducting sheet is placed close to the body but not in electrical contact with the body.
If the surface current distribution on the body is the same as that obtained during illumination by a plane electromagnetic wave then the internal electromagnetic environment will be identical. The coupling of energy from the external field to currents induced on internal wiring within the conducting body is therefore simulated accurately. Any apertures in the body may be ignored from the point of view of electric field polarizibility where the materials concerned are moderate to good shields in the frequency bands used. If this is not the case then the value of normal field strength around the body must also be arranged to be equal to the scattered normal field in addition to the current distribution.
A particular example of an apparatus in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which; Figure 1 is a diagram of an apparatus in accordance with the present invention in use in testing an aircraft fuselage; and Figure 2 is a partially sectioned end elevation of an apparatus in accordance with the present invention in use.
An apparatus for testing conducting bodies to simulate the effects of plane electromagnetic illumination of such bodies includes an alternating current generator capable of generating current at frequencies up to 30MHz and electrodes 2 connected to the generator. The apparatus further comprises a planar metal sheet 3 having dimensions of substantially the same order of magnitude as the body to be tested.
In use the electrodes 2 are placed on an outer surface of the body to be tested. This body will typically be an aircraft fuselage 4. The conducting sheet 3 is placed close to the fuselage 4 but spaced apart from the fuselage 4 so that it is not in electrical contact.
The conducting sheet 3 is then electrically grounded.
Current from the generator 1 is injected via the electrodes 2 into the surface of the fuselage 4, These currents in turn induce mirror currents in the conducting sheet 3. These in turn modify the current flow in the surface of the fuselage 4 to produce the desired current distribution in the surface corresponding to that produced by a plane electromagnetic wave impinging on the surface. For given boundary conditions around a closed surface there is a unique solution for the electric field within the surface. Therefore by creating the boundary conditions on the surface of the fuselage 4 characteristic of those produced by a plane electromagnetic wave a field is created within the fuselage 4 which is substantially identical to that resulting from illumination by a plain electromagnetic wave.The present apparatus is therefore able to simulate, for example, the effects of such a wave on components of the aircraft such as internal wiring routes 5.
Although in the example described the conducting sheet 3 is flat other forms, such as a sheet configured to follow the curvature of the body being tested, may be used. Equally although only two electrodes are used in the described embodiment as many as half a dozen or more electrodes arranged in a suitable configuration may be used. The relationship between the conducting sheet 3 and the position and magnitude of the injected current necessary to effectively simulate a plane electromagnetic wave are discussed more fully in the detailed theoretical discussion contained in the appendix.
APPENDIX 1. Introduction The purpose of this document is to describe the @ @@@@ @@ @@@@ @@@@@@@ is to describe the exact purpose of direct current injection (DCI), the concept of the DCI technique and the underlying mathematical theorv.
2. The Concept of bCf The tollo In6 sections will explain; (a) the idea of natural impedance paths on a conducting body (b) how these impedance values may be used to compute the current distributions on a body undergolng EM illumination (c) how the presence of a nearby conducting ground plane affects the impendances on a body (d) a mathematical statement or the objective ot DCt in terms of the above (e) considerations ror an injection arrangement to achieve the simulation or plane wave illumination for two and three dimensional shapes 2.1. Natural Impedance Paths Consider the cross section through a rectangular conductor (such as the CFC cylinder) as shown in Figure ( ). Let RF current be introduced so that it flows along the length (z-axis, into the paper) of the conductor. It is known that the current will distribute itself circumferentially around the perimeter or the rectangle, and that at high frequencies () lOOEZz) the majority of the current will flow along the sharp corner regions. The reason for this is easily explained using elementary physics.
Take the cross section and divide it into N equal width strips. The applied voltage along the unit length (into the paper) of any one of the strips is equal for each and every incremental strip, yet the current flowing along each will differ according to position. The impedance presented by each strip is therefore dependent upon position. The impedance or any conducting path at bigh frequency will be determined by the magnitude of the TOTAL magnetic flux density linking that path. This is aimply a statement of Lenz*s law V 2 - L di t dt dt Thus, those paths linking fewest lines of magnetic flux, C, will have the lowest impedance (inductive reactance).It can be easily seen therefore that the coroer regions will link the smallest amount of total flux as they are the furthest removed regions on the body and flux-fields fll away with increased spacing.
The impedance of any general strip, m, Is given by Z(m) = L(m) + M(1,m) + M(2,m) + M(3,m) + .......
St = L + S'M(n,m) ati where L(m) is the self-inductive reactance or path m, and is the same for each of the equal strip widths and may be written as L, and M(n,m) is the mutual inductive coupling reactance between strip n and strip .
the form of L and M(n,m) has been given in rererence [31 and is given by
and
where P is the total perimeter length of the body (m) X is the number or strip segments t is the wave number for the frequency (a) n is the tree space wave impedance (Ohm) Y is @ulers constant and field or flux quantity at vector position ;n to the specified point RI.
is is a complex comblnation of Bessel functions and is a teri most suitable for representing the damped and sinusoidally-varying real and complex terms or an emanating wave field.
Thus the term that actually determines whether a path will have high or low impedance is the second summation in equation (2) and each of those terms are realted to the spscing, #Rn-Rm#. The larger #Rn-Rm#, the smaller the magnitude or Ho(@)(K#Rn-Rm#).
Equation (2) will yield a value of Z for each and everyone or the N paths and we say write this in the atrix form below for the total surface impedance linking matrix
L(1) M(2,1) M(3,1) .......... M(N,1) H(1,2) L(2) M(3,2) .......... M(N,2) [ Zn ] = N(1,3) M(2,3) L(3) .......... H(N,3) ....(5) .................
N(1,N) H(2,N) M(3,N) .......... L(N) This may be termed the 'natural' impedance of the body (portioned into R segments) and will allow us to calculate the (N) induced surface current values distributed on the body via either plane wave EM illumination of indeed by end- current injection.
It is this natural impedance compounded with the incident field conditions that determines the surface currents induced on the exterior or the body when illuminated by $ plane wave EH field.
2.2. Current Induced By EM Illumination Ye have computed the 'natural' impedance of the body. Without entering the reals of the numerical technique in too great a detail, the induced surface currents on the exterior or the conducting body may be computed from the simple matrix equation [ g@ ] = [ Zn ]. [ Js ] where [E] is a matrix of values of the incident plane wave EM field over the surface [Z] is the natural impedance matrix tJJ] is the induced currents Hence, we can solve for the plane-uave induced surface currents at the N segment locations simply by inverting the [Z] astrix and producting with the tEl matrix:: t t").( Zn a s t Js # .3. Modifications to Natural Impendance Paths It is possible to modify or perturb the natural impedance path values for all, or some1 or the segments or the body by the use or a ground or earthed plane.
When we site a conducting body above an earthed plane, and induce RF current flow on the body a scattered EM field will be set up around the object with the provision that the TOTAL electric field tangential to the surface of the earth plane will be zero for all points on its surface.
The most common and simplest way of visualising this is to imagine creation of a virtual image or the conducting object created an equal depth away from the ground plane but on the opposite side to the real object. See Figure (2). This concept is identical to that used in mirror optics.
The plane-tangential currents in the virtual image will flow in the opposite sense to those in the actual oonductor and hence the total electric field at the mid point between them (ie. the earth plane) is entirely cancelled.
This also has the effect that the flux coupling with each of the N segmental paths on the real conducting body is modified since the effective flux coupling with each now takes the form; (m) = L(m) + H(1,m) + M(2,m) + .... M(N,m) + M'(1,m) + M'(2,
where H'(n,) is the inductive coupling reactance with the image in the carth plane, and Z'(m) refers to the modified impedance of path m, and differs from the natural impedance Zn(m) by the third term in equation (8).
It should be noted that the magnitude or this new third term is dependent upon the closeness of the conducting body to the earth plane: it is a function or the spacing, R.
Now consider what would happen if we did not use a planar ground sheet, but an arbitrary surface instead. The currents flowing on the conducting body would still form an image, of distorted shape certainly, to counteract the scattered fields so that at the ground plane, the total tangential electric field components remained zero. The impedance paths on the -body will be some other value, 2"(m), different from those both in equations (2) and (8), and the current distribution for a given EM stress will be distinctly different once again.
We now begin to see that we may manipulate, in theory at least, the impedance paths on the body to be ANY value we so choose, thus controlling the current distribution on the body for any given EM stress conditions, whether that may be plane wave illumination or current injection.
. The Objective of DCI: A Mathematical Statement It is the stated objective of the Direct Current Injection (DCI) technique to simulate the external surface current distribution on the conducting body by means other than by free-field HF band plane-wave illumination wbich is very demanding to reproduce at the field strength levels required in the EF band (far field).
From a consideration of the previous three sections, it ahould now be clear that given we can stimulate or excite the airframe at a specified, and limited, number of points on the body, the exciting matrix set [@e] is thus set.
If we are to achieve the desired current distribution, represented in it's matris form at the n locations on the body as [Js], then we must achieve the balance given by -I ( Js ) = [ Zn ]. @ @ @ = [ Zp ]. [ @@ ] which is a statenent or
Desired Plane Natural Perturbed Surface = Wave = Impedance = Impedance Currents Excitation matrix matrix The perturbed impedance matrix set, [2p], to be sought is therefore mathematically defined in equation (9), 2.5. Considerations for an Injection System We are free to choose either the ground plane shape and then accept the injection point positions, levels and relative phases so defined, or alternatively, fix the injection system and thus accept the ground plane shape defined.
It is more than likely that the injection arrangement and ground plane shape will vary with frequency, but in the light of experience from RAE predictions on the CPC fuselage, we do not expect the shape or distribution of either to vary considerably over the LIMITED frequency range (1-30 MHz) of our interest.
We believe that a a 'secsible' choice of ground plane should be chosen to envelop the body, compute the perturbed impedances and hence the injection levels. This may need to be an iterative process.

Claims (6)

1. A method of testing a conducting body to simulate plane EM illumination of the body comprising placing a conducting sheet at a fixed reference voltage adjacent the body, placing electrodes in contact with the outer surface of the body at spatially separated points on the body, and injecting alternating currents into the body via the electrodes, creating a current distribution in the surface of the body characteristic of plane EM wave illumination.
2. A method according to claim 1, in which the alternating current has frequencies in the range 1 to 30 MHz.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the conducting sheet is earthed.
4. An apparatus for testing a conducting body to simulate plane EM illumination of the body comprising a high frequency alternating current generator(l), electrodes (2) connected to the generator, and a conducting sheet (3) at a fixed reference voltage positioned adjacent the body, the electrodes (2) being fixed on the outer surface of the body and arranged to inject alternating current into the body to create in conjunction with the conducting sheet (3) a current distribution in the surface of the body characteristic of plane electromagnetic wave illumination.
5. An apparatus according to claim 4, in which the conducting sheet (3) is substantially flat.
6. An apparatus according to claim 4, in which the conducting sheet (3) is curved, in use different regions of the sheet being substantially at a single fixed distance from the outer surface of the body.
GB8807151A 1986-10-21 1987-10-20 An electromagnetic test method Expired - Lifetime GB2201799B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB868625203A GB8625203D0 (en) 1986-10-21 1986-10-21 Test technique
GB878723817A GB8723817D0 (en) 1986-10-21 1987-10-15 Electromagnetic test method

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB8807151D0 GB8807151D0 (en) 1988-04-27
GB2201799A true GB2201799A (en) 1988-09-07
GB2201799B GB2201799B (en) 1991-03-13

Family

ID=26291441

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8807151A Expired - Lifetime GB2201799B (en) 1986-10-21 1987-10-20 An electromagnetic test method

Country Status (4)

Country Link
ES (1) ES2013336A6 (en)
GB (1) GB2201799B (en)
IT (1) IT1223706B (en)
SE (1) SE8802630L (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116879664B (en) * 2023-09-06 2023-11-24 合肥航太电物理技术有限公司 Low-level direct drive testing device and testing method for high-intensity radiation field

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2201799B (en) 1991-03-13
ES2013336A6 (en) 1990-05-01
SE8802630L (en) 1990-01-15
GB8807151D0 (en) 1988-04-27
IT8867681A0 (en) 1988-07-21
SE8802630D0 (en) 1988-07-14
IT1223706B (en) 1990-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Perez Handbook of electromagnetic compatibility
Hatamzadeh et al. A moment method simulation of electromagnetic scattering from conducting bodies
Selvanayagam et al. An active electromagnetic cloak using the equivalence principle
Junker et al. Input impedance of aperture-coupled dielectric resonator antennas
Albertsen et al. Computation of radiation from wire antennas on conducting bodies
Rodriguez Automotive component EMC testing: CISPR 25, ISO 11452–2 and equivalent standards
US5302960A (en) Multi-element susceptibility room
Xiao et al. Generalized transition matrix for arbitrarily shaped scatterers or scatterer groups
US4910522A (en) Electromagnetic test method
GB2201799A (en) An electromagnetic test method
Aunchaleevarapan et al. Novel method for predicting PCB configurations for near-field and far-field radiated EMI using a neural network
Paker et al. FDTD evaluation of the SAR distribution in a human head near a mobile cellular phone
Li et al. Design of airflow aperture arrays in shielding enclosures
Lebaric et al. Ultra-wideband, zero visual signature RF vest antenna for man-portable radios
Canicattì et al. A numerical exposure assessment of portable self-protection, high-range, and broadband electromagnetic devices
Blackburn et al. On the electromagnetic fields from a hybrid type of EMP simulator
Singer et al. State of the art in the method of moments
Kay EMC test site validations for 1m automotive and military emissions tests
Prather et al. CW measurements of electromagnetic shields
Bruns et al. Computation of interference in cables close to metal surfaces
Weiland et al. EMC modeling for large electronic systems
Happ et al. Numerical computation of lightning transfer functions for layered, anisotropically conducting shielding structures by the method of moments
Shifman et al. Analysis of electromagnetic scattering by cylinders with edges using a hybrid moment method
Liu et al. Transient response analysis of the monopole antenna illuminated by an external EMP source
Walters et al. Assessment of TEM cells for whole aircraft EMV testing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19921020

728C Application made for restoration (sect. 28/1977)
728A Order made restoring the patent (sect. 28/1977)
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19941020