GB2193578A - Method of operating an electromagnet arrangement - Google Patents

Method of operating an electromagnet arrangement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2193578A
GB2193578A GB08718003A GB8718003A GB2193578A GB 2193578 A GB2193578 A GB 2193578A GB 08718003 A GB08718003 A GB 08718003A GB 8718003 A GB8718003 A GB 8718003A GB 2193578 A GB2193578 A GB 2193578A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
coil
electromagnet
correction
currents
values
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB08718003A
Other versions
GB2193578B (en
GB8718003D0 (en
Inventor
Frederick Thomas David Goldie
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Philips Design Ltd
Original Assignee
Picker International Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB868619012A external-priority patent/GB8619012D0/en
Application filed by Picker International Ltd filed Critical Picker International Ltd
Priority to GB8718003A priority Critical patent/GB2193578B/en
Publication of GB8718003D0 publication Critical patent/GB8718003D0/en
Publication of GB2193578A publication Critical patent/GB2193578A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2193578B publication Critical patent/GB2193578B/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/20Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables involving magnetic resonance
    • G01R33/28Details of apparatus provided for in groups G01R33/44 - G01R33/64
    • G01R33/38Systems for generation, homogenisation or stabilisation of the main or gradient magnetic field
    • G01R33/387Compensation of inhomogeneities
    • G01R33/3875Compensation of inhomogeneities using correction coil assemblies, e.g. active shimming

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

A method of operating an electromagnet arrangement comprising a main electromagnet and a number of correction coils for applying correction fields to the field produced by the main electromagnet to produce a resultant desired homogeneous magneti field in a given volume. The method comprises obtaining the least squares fit values for the correction coil currents and, if the required current in any coil lies outside a range of permissible values for that coil current, following a special procedure to find the selection of coil currents providing the lowest squared deviation between the desired and actual fields consistent with the permissible currents in the coils. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Electromagnet arrangements This invention relates to electromagnet arrangements.
More particularly the invention relates to electromagnet arrangements for producing a magnetic field of high homogeneity in a volume, such as is required, for example, in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging apparatus to establish an equilibrium axis of magnetic alignment in a body being imaged.
Such electromagnet arrangements conventionally comprise a main electromagnet, together with a number of correction coils. Typically the arrangement is of cylindrical form and the correction coils include both axisymmetric coils and transverse correction coils. The axisymmetric coils are generally disposed in a helical pattern on a cylindrical coil former and the transverse correction coils in a so-called saddle shape on the former.
In use of such an electromagnet arrangement various methods have been employed for calculating the best values for the correction coil currents. One such method comprises calculating the values of the coil currents required to minimise the sum of the squares of the difference between a desired correction field and the correction field produced by the current values so calculated at each point of a number of points in a volume of interest. Such a procedure is known as obtaining the least squares fit values for the correction coil currents.
However, when this has been done, it is often found that the current required in one or more of the correction coils is outside the permissible range of value for the current in that coil.
Consequently some procedure is required to find the best selection of coil currents consistent with the permissible currents in the coils.
It is an object of the present invention to provide such a procedure.
According to the present invention a method of operating an electromagnet arrangement comprising a main electromagnet together with a number of correction coils intended to apply correction fields to the field produced by the main electromagnet to produce a resultant desired homogeneous magnetic field in a given volume comprises the steps of: calculating the values of the currents in the correction coils required to give the least possible value for the sum of the squares of the difference between a desired correction field and the correction field given by the coil currents so calculated at each of a number of points in said volume; and if any of the coil current values so calculated is outside a predetermined permissible range of value for that coil current; determining whether for the least increase of said sum over said least possible value which is possible when any coil current has a respective limit permissible value, the other coil currents all have values within their respective permissible ranges of value, and if they do, setting the coil currents at the values giving the smallest increase of said sum; and if they do not, repeating the determination for any two coil currents having respective limit permissible values, and then for any three coil currents having respective limit permissible values, and so on, until a said setting of the coil currents is permissible.
One method in accordance with the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawing which is a diagram illustrating a step of the method.
The method comprises a procedure for setting up an electromagnet arrangement comprising a main electromagnet and a number of correction coils so as to optimise the homogeneity of the field in an arbitrarily chosen volume within the magnet arrangement. The procedure is especially suitable for use with electromagnet arrangements for use in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging apparatus. In such apparatus the electromagnet arrangement is conventionally designed to produce a field of maximum homogeneity around the magnet isocentre. The method provided by the invention enables highly homogeneous fields to be produced in a region of interest of a body being examined displaced from the magnet isocentre.
In carrying out the method, the first step is to define a region of interest. For example, a cube of side 10cms is used. The uncorrected field at a regular grid of points in the region of interest is measured, or calculated from an existing field analysis. A 6 by 6 cubic grid of points is typically used giving 216 points in all.
To obtain an expression for the correction field due to the correction coils at each point, we collect all the spatial variation into one label i, denoting a point, and distinguish individual correction coils by the label q, thus obtaining an expression for the correction fields at each point:
where a (q) is the current in coil q, and f (i,q) is shorthand for the field generated at point i by unit current in coil q.
The coefficients a(q) are to be chosen to minimise the squared deviation (e2) of the desired correction field (Bj) for field homogeneity from the actual correction field. That is
must be minimised with respect to the a(q).
When minimised, the partial derivative of e2 with respect to each of the a(q) will be zero. This leads to a set of linear equations in the a(q) which can be solved by standard matrix methods.
To be specific, minimise with respect to one term, a(s).
In matrix terms, the equation to be solved is: LA = b where
The corrections to the various coil currents are computed, and the new r.m.s. error in field is computed from the matrix components.
It can readily be shown that the third and higher partial derivatives of the squared error with respect to the fitting parameters are zero. Therefore the squared error can be expressed exactly as a Taylor series about its absolute minimum, as determined above. Only second derivatives are involved, and the expression for the squared error as a function of vector displacement r from the absolute minimum is an n-dimensional quadratic form involving no linear terms. The coefficients are contained in the fitting matrix F above: = r F r + constant Contours of constant squared error have the form of n-dimensional ellipsoids. Our task is to seek a compromise fit, subject to the current limitations of the correction coils.
To obtain the compromise fit the surface of an n-dimensional constraining box defining the limits of the permissible currents in the correction coils must be searched for the smallest ellipsoid to touch it. As a first guess, assume that a solution exists in which only one coil is driven to its limits. The compromise fit will be the ellipsoid that is tangential to the appropriate surface of constrained current, i.e. the normal to the ellipsoid, given by the grad of e2, will be parallel to the unit basis vector vim for the constrained current.Using subscript notation, and the symmetry of array F, (o S a (rl F1j rj) km #rk == > 2 Fkj rj '6km = > rj t Fjk dkm The vector r is proportional to the mth column of the inverse of F. We call this the "tangent vector" corresponding to this constraint.
This technique can be generalised to the case where several currents are saturated together.
Write r = k + x where k is a constant vector and x contains the remaining currents that are free to vary. If a component of k is non-zero, the corresponding component of x is fixed at zero.
k = (O, O, k3, O, ...k"" ...0) x = (x1, x2, O, x4, ... O, ...xn) We attegQt to minimise #2, # = (k + x) F (t + x) + constant Using subscript notation, differentiate with respect to each of the components that are free to vary. At a constrained minimum,
for all Xj that are free to vary " > F1jkj + Fr,jxj = 0 This result may be expressed in words: In the constrained solution, the grad of g2 has no components parallel to the unconstrained currents.Therefore any such proposed solution may be expressed as a linear combination of the tangent vectors found above for the constrained terms.
The search for an acceptable constrained solution is performed by first fixing just one current at its maximum or minimum, searching for the constrained minimum of 62 and checking whether the remaining currents are within bounds. If so, the solution is provisionally accepted. If not, it is rejected. This is repeated for all the constraints in turn. If more than one is acceptable, the solution with the lowest squared error is chosen, and if none are acceptable the process is repeated with two coil currents at a time set at maximum or minimum, and then three coil currents, and so on.
It is unnecessary, however, to perform the least squares fitting process each time. Instead the linear combination of tangent vectors satisfying the chosen set of limit currents may be found by solving a set of linear equations. There are as many equations as there are limit currents, so that the search is rapid at first. Normally the search terminates before the slower case of many limit currents needs to be considered.
The squared error in each case is most readily found using the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the fitting matrix. The vector from the centre of the ellipsoid representing the compromise fit is resolved into eigenvector components, and the squared error us expressed as:
where the lr are the eigenvalues, and the or are the eigenvector components of the compromise fitting vector.
Since the technique starts with one current constraint and works upwards, it is far preferable to the alternative of explicit least-squares fitting, which would involve starting with an (no 1) by (no 1) problem and working down.
A further advantage of the technique is that the matrix F only needs to be inverted once, and that, having computed the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of F, the search of the constraining surface can be performed without explicit re-fitting. Hence the technique is potentially faster than empirical methods of homogeneity enhancement, being a one-shot computed solution to the problem.
The above described procedure may be visualised by considering the case of just two correction coils.
Referring to the drawing, the rectangle 1 defines the maximum permissible currents in the two coils, the lines 3 and 5 being the current axes for the two coils X and Y. Thus the current in coil X must be between limits indicated by lines lx and lx amd the current in coil Y between limits indicated by lines ly and zero A point 7 indicates the currents required in coils X and Y to give the least possible value of the squared error e2, and shows that both these currents are outside the permissible limits.
The contours of constant increase of e2 over the least possible value of e2 are ellipsoids centred on point 7, such as ellipsoid 9.
The minimum possible increase of e2 with the current in coil Y at limit --C is given by the ellipsoid 9 which is tangential to the line ly, line 11 indicating the required changes in the currents in coils X and Y to achieve this condition, i.e. the tangent vector corresponding to the constraint. The current in coil X at tangent point 13 is within limits, and the currents in coils X and Y are therefore set at the values indicated by point 13.
It will be appreciated that further ellipsoids (not shown) can be drawn tangential to all of the other current limit lines lv, lx and Ix, but all of these either give a value of e2 higher than that given by ellipsoid 9 or require a coil current value outside permissible limits.

Claims (5)

1. A method of operating an electromagnet arrangement comprising a main electromagnet together with a number of correction coils for applying correction fields to the field produced by the main electromagnet to produce a resultant desired homogeneous magnetic field in a given volume, the method comprising the steps of: calculating the values of the currents in the correction coils required to give the least possible value for the sum of the squares of the difference between a desired correction field and the correction field given by the coil currents so calculated at each of a number of points in said volume; and if any of the coil current values so calculated is outside a predetermined permissible range of value for that coil current; determining whether for the least increase of said sum over said least possible value which is possible when any one coil current has a respective limit permissible value, the other coil currents all have values within their respective permissible ranges of value, and if they do, setting the coil currents at the values giving the smallest increase of said sum; and if they do not, repeating the determination for any two coil currents having respective limit permissible values, and then for any three coil currents having respective limit permissible values, and so on, until a said setting of the coil currents is permissible.
2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein said least possible value for the sum of the squares is calculated using eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a fitting matrix for a set of equations defining said sum of the squares.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 wherein said electromagnet arrangement is designed to produce a field of maximum homogeneity around the electromagnet isocentre and said given volume is displaced from said isocentre.
4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein said electromagnet arrangement comprises an electromagnet arrangement in a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging apparatus for establishing an equilibrium axis of magnetic aligment in a body being imaged.
5. A method of operating an electromagnet arrangement comprising a main electromagnet together with a number of correction coils intended to apply correction field to the field produced by the main electromagnet substantially as hereinbefore described by way of example.
GB8718003A 1986-08-04 1987-07-29 Electromagnet arrangements Expired GB2193578B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8718003A GB2193578B (en) 1986-08-04 1987-07-29 Electromagnet arrangements

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB868619012A GB8619012D0 (en) 1986-08-04 1986-08-04 Electromagnet arrangements
GB8718003A GB2193578B (en) 1986-08-04 1987-07-29 Electromagnet arrangements

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB8718003D0 GB8718003D0 (en) 1987-09-03
GB2193578A true GB2193578A (en) 1988-02-10
GB2193578B GB2193578B (en) 1989-12-20

Family

ID=26291129

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8718003A Expired GB2193578B (en) 1986-08-04 1987-07-29 Electromagnet arrangements

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2193578B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0431849A2 (en) * 1989-12-04 1991-06-12 General Electric Company Method of optimizing shim coil current selections in magnetic resonance magnets

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2155642A (en) * 1984-03-09 1985-09-25 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Apparatus for generating highly homogeneous magnetic field

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2155642A (en) * 1984-03-09 1985-09-25 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Apparatus for generating highly homogeneous magnetic field

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0431849A2 (en) * 1989-12-04 1991-06-12 General Electric Company Method of optimizing shim coil current selections in magnetic resonance magnets
EP0431849A3 (en) * 1989-12-04 1991-10-30 General Electric Company Method of optimizing shim coil current selections in magnetic resonance magnets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2193578B (en) 1989-12-20
GB8718003D0 (en) 1987-09-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5006804A (en) Method of optimizing shim coil current selection in magnetic resonance magnets
Turner Gradient coil design: a review of methods
US4737716A (en) Self-shielded gradient coils for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
CN107110922B (en) Solenoid structure and system and method of operation
EP0431848A2 (en) Method of optimizing passive shim placement in magnetic resonance magnets
US5166619A (en) Gradient coil assembly for a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus
US5418462A (en) Method for determining shim placement on tubular magnet
US20080164878A1 (en) Minimum Energy Shim Coils For Magnetic Resonance
EP0179370B1 (en) Optimal field inhomogeneity correction coil operation for nmr magnets
US4812797A (en) Compensation coil for temporal drift of a superconducting magnet
US20050242815A1 (en) Magnetic gradient field projection
US4468622A (en) Gradient coil system for nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus
EP0521660A1 (en) Transverse gradient coils for imaging the head
JP3682627B2 (en) Magnetic resonance imaging device
US5084677A (en) Magnetic field generating apparatus
US4931733A (en) Method and apparatus for determining shim coil current in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
US6664879B2 (en) Asymmetric tesseral shim coils for magnetic resonance
US5942898A (en) Thrust balanced bi-planar gradient set for MRI scanners
US4633179A (en) Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus using shim coil correction
JP2005144187A (en) Two-dimensional coil assembly for generating particular magnetic field
US4737754A (en) Method of operating an electromagnetic arrangement
US5602480A (en) Inspection method and apparatus using nuclear magnetic resonance
EP0106551B1 (en) Nuclear magnetic resonance method
EP0563647B1 (en) Method for the construction of an optimized magnet coil
GB2193578A (en) Method of operating an electromagnet arrangement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19920729