GB2165948A - Gas or vapour monitor - Google Patents

Gas or vapour monitor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2165948A
GB2165948A GB08426766A GB8426766A GB2165948A GB 2165948 A GB2165948 A GB 2165948A GB 08426766 A GB08426766 A GB 08426766A GB 8426766 A GB8426766 A GB 8426766A GB 2165948 A GB2165948 A GB 2165948A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
formaldehyde
humidity
vapour
fumigation
monitor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB08426766A
Other versions
GB2165948B (en
GB8426766D0 (en
Inventor
Vian Hamilton Lach
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HEALTH LAB SERVICE BOARD
Public Health Laboratory Service Board
Original Assignee
HEALTH LAB SERVICE BOARD
Public Health Laboratory Service Board
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by HEALTH LAB SERVICE BOARD, Public Health Laboratory Service Board filed Critical HEALTH LAB SERVICE BOARD
Priority to GB08426766A priority Critical patent/GB2165948B/en
Publication of GB8426766D0 publication Critical patent/GB8426766D0/en
Publication of GB2165948A publication Critical patent/GB2165948A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2165948B publication Critical patent/GB2165948B/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0009General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
    • G01N33/0027General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector
    • G01N33/0036Specially adapted to detect a particular component
    • G01N33/0047Specially adapted to detect a particular component for organic compounds
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0009General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
    • G01N33/0027General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector
    • G01N33/0031General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector comprising two or more sensors, e.g. a sensor array
    • G01N33/0032General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector comprising two or more sensors, e.g. a sensor array using two or more different physical functioning modes

Abstract

A gas or vapour (e.g. Formaldehyde) monitor senses gas at vapour concentration together with temperature and humidity. By comparison with the known lethal effect of formaldehyde at particular levels of humidity, a fumigation process can be controlled automatically to produce a desired reduction in micro- organism population. Excess usage of formaldehyde can thereby be avoided. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Formaldehyde monitor This invention relates to the monitoring of gas or vapour concentration and in one important example to the monitoring of formaldehyde in fumigation or decontamination procedures.
Fumigation of rooms or chambers in laboratories, hospitals, pharmaceutical production areas and the like is used routinely for the reduction of microbial levels. It may take place after known contamination with infectious microorganisms or as a precaution before commencing work requiring "clean" conditions. Formaldehyde vapour is the most commonly employed chemical in microbiological decontamination. It is effective against a wide range of microorganisms and is easily produced as a vapour phase. Formaldehyde is relatively inexpensive and easily available.
There are, however, a number of disadvantages in using formaldehyde. The vapour is irritant and toxic and the low threshold limit value (TLV) which is currently recognised as 2 ppm-is very much lower than the levels required for fumigation. There are difficulties in removing formaldehyde vapour after fumigation as paraformaldehyde polymers are often deposited on surfaces during the fumigation procedure. The gradual vapourization of formaldehyde from these deposits will give a background level of formaldehyde vapour which may exceed the TLV unless excellent ventilation is provided. This situation is complicated by the use of added water to raise the humidity levels during fumigation.It is known that the lethal effect of formaldehyde on microorganisms is usually greater in increased relative humidity but the presence of water vapour increases the tendency for the formaldehyde to polymerise and the presence of condensation may effectively remove the formaldehyde as the vapour is readily soluble in water.
The currently accepted practices for fumigation with formaldehyde involve a calculation of the required amount of formaldehyde from the known room volume. The relative humidity is usually artificially increased but there is little quantitative evidence to support the accepted amounts of formaldehyde per unit volume and little knowledge of the quantitative effects of increasing relative humidity. There is necessarily a tendency to "play safe" and this has resulted in gradually escalating quantities of formaldehyde being used. From a cost viewpoint this is probably not significant but it does severely aggravate the problems arising from the toxicity of the vapour and the difficulties of removing the vapour to return to safe levels as quickly as possible after the end of the fumigation process.
A controlled formaldehyde fumigation system has been suggested (Applied and Environmental Microbiology March 1980 pages 480-487) in which an electric formaldehyde vapour generator is controlled from the output of an electronic formaldehyde monitor. This monitor is based on a direct adsorption semiconductor sensor, the conductivity of which changes on exposure to reactive vapours such as formaldehyde. Such a monitor has considerable advantages over other assay methods such as direct chemical estimation (with for example Draeger tubes); indirect chemical estimation using air samples collected for later analysis; infra red spectrophotometry and gas chromatography.Chemical estimation, whether direct or indirect, is impractical where continuous monitoring is required, whilst both infra red spectrophotometry and gas chromatography involve the considerable expense of piping samples from the room which is being fumigated to the measuring instrument. Such pipes may need to be heated to avoid polymerisation. A difficulty with the semiconductor sensing device is that the output is dependent upon relative humidity levels. This introduces an error in the monitor output. A further, and more important, disadvantage of this prior system is that no account is taken of the artificially increased relative humidity level on the fumigation process itself. Lack of knowledge of the actual relative humidity level may result in an over-estimate of the formaldehyde level required.
Under certain conditions, excess water may be being added thus unnecessarily aggravating the difficulties mentioned above of polymerisation and solubility of formaldehyde in condensed water.
It is an object of one aspect of this invention to provide an improved formaldehyde monitor for use in fumigation procedures which enjoys the advantages of a direct electrically reading sensor device whilst reducing errors arising from variations in relative humidity.
It is an object of this invention in a further aspect to provide a formaldehyde monitor and control device, and a fumigation method, by which the amount of formaldehyde used may be brought to the minimum consistent with the desired lethal effect of microorganisms, and with operational constraints on humidity and the like.
Accordingly, the present invention consists in one aspect in a formaldehyde monitor for use in fumigation procedures, comprising a formaldehyde sensor device providing an electrical indication of formaldehyde vapour concentration; a humidity measurement device providing an electrical indication of relative humidity; a temperature responsive electrical circuit device and a processor connected to receive inputs from said devices and arranged when calibrated to provide an output value for formaldehyde vapour concentration corrected for humidity and temperature dependent variations in the formaldehyde sensor device.
In another aspect, the present invention consists in a formaldehyde monitor and control device providing an output for the control of a formaldehyde vapour generator in a fumigation procedure effective against microorganisms, comprising a formaldehyde sensor device providing an electrical indication of formaldehyde vapour concentration; a humidity measurement device providing an electrical indication of relative humidity; a temperature responsive electrical circuit device and a processor connected to receive inputs from said devices and arranged when calibrated to provide an output value for formaldehyde vapour concentration corrected for humidity and temperature dependent variations in the formaldehyde sensor device and further arranged to generate a formaldehyde vapour control output derived from the measured formaldehyde vapour concentration value, the measured relative humidity, the previously known lethal effect of the said concentration at the said relative humidity and the predetermined desired reduction in microorganism population.
In yet a further aspect, the present invention consists in a fumigation method for killing microorganisms in a volume, comprising the steps of generating formaldehyde vapour in said volume; measuring the formaldehyde vapour concentration; measuring the relative humidity in said volume; deriving a control signal based on the measured formaldehyde vapour concentration, the measured humidity and the known fumigation effectiveness of formaldehyde at the said humidity level and controlling said vapour generation step in response to said control signal.
Although particularly useful for monitoring formaldehyde, this invention will have application to other gas or vapour monitors where environmental factors introduce errors in the output of an electrical sensor device.
Accordingly, the present invention consists, in yet a further aspect, in a monitor comprising a sensor device providing an electrical indication of a gas or vapour concentration; a humidity measurement device providing an electrical indication of relative humidity; a temperature responsive electrical circuit device and a processor connected to receive inputs from said devices and arranged when calibrated to provide an output value for the said concentration corrected for humidity and temperature dependent variations in the sensor device.
Advantageously, the sensor device comprises a semiconductor sensor.
The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figure 1 shows a formaldehyde monitor and control device according to this invention, partly in block form and partly diagrammatic, Figures 2a), b) and c) are circuit diagrams of respectively formaldehyde, humidity and temperature measuring circuits contained within the metering unit of Fig. 1, Figure 3 is a graph showing the decline in population of a microorganism on exposure to formaldehyde, Figure 4 is a graph showing the variation in lethal effect with formaldehyde concentration of differing relative humidities, and Figure 5 is a block diagram illustrating a modification to the monitor and control device shown in Fig. 1.
Referring to Fig. 1, a probe 10 is connected through multichannel cable 12 to a metering unit 14. As will be described, the probe 10 contains sensing devices which are connected through the cable 12 with respective measuring circuits in the unit 14. In the practical embodiment the monitor would include a number of identical probes each connected to its own metering unit. In this particular example, five probes are provided, though for clarity only one is shown in the drawing. The five metering units 14 are each connected to a common distribution board 16.
This distribution board serves to connect the various metering units with a power supply unit 18 and a multichannel analogue to digital convertor 20. The power supply unit provides various direct and alternating power supplies details of which are best given in the description of the metering units which follows. The analogue to digital convertor is a commercially available circuit board providing sixteen channels of eight bit analogue to digital conversion.The A/D convertor is connected with a microprocessor 22 which conveniently takes the form of a commercially available microcomputer. This microcomputer is provided with peripherals shown generally at 24 which may include a- VDU, disc storage and a printer.
Referring additionally to Fig. 2a), the formalhyde sensing device 24 is a direct adsorption semiconductor sensor based on sintered tin oxide (Figaro 812 sensor, Figaro Engineering Inc, Osaka, Japan). Exposure to reactive vapours causes a change in the sensor conductivity which can be used as a measure of vapour concentration. The sensor is not specific for formaldehyde vapour but this is not a problem since the formaldehyde levels to be monitored are normally hundreds of times greater than those of any interferant. The sensor incorporates a heater and receives a regulated five volt heater supply from the power supply unit. This is achieved using a constant current source which minimises the effect of cable resistances. As shown in Fig. 1, the portion of the probe containing the formaldehyde sensing device is separated from the remainder of the probe by a finned heat sink 26. As can be seen in Fig. 2a, the measurement circuit comprises a current/voltage convertor input stage followed by an operational amplifier to increase the output voltage and provide span adjustment. The circuitry has an output range of O to 2.5 volts corresponding to the range 0 to 3000 ppm formaldehyde.
The humidity sensor 28 is of the type formed of specially treated plastics material which undergoes a large change of impedance as the water content of the surrounding air is altered (PCRC 32 Physical Chemical Research Corporation.) The sensor receives a low frequency (60 Hz) AC supply from the power supply unit and, as shown in Fig. 2b, is connected with a high impedance input stage followed by a precision rectifier and span and zero adjustment stages.
The measurement circuitry gives an output of O to 2.5 volts over the range of humidity from 25% to 100% rH.
The temperature responsive element 30 is an NTC thermistor connected, as shown in Fig. 2c), in a standard bridge circuit. A single operational amplifier stage is used to provide zero and span adjustment and an output range of O to 2.5 volts is provided corresponding with a temperature range of O to 50"C.
The outputs of the Fig. 2a), b) and c) circuits, each comprising a voltage in the range 0 to 2.5 V are passed via the distribution board 16 to respective channels in the A/D convertor 18. In this way the microprocessor receives 8-bit digital signals indicative of apparent temperature, humidity and formaldehyde levels as directly measured at each probe. These digital signals may be referred to as XT, XH and x,.
In the microprocessor, the actual temperature T"C is calculated from the expression: log,, T C T"C=m,x,+C, where mT and CT are slope and intercept constants determined by calibration. With multiple sampling and averaging to reduce errors in the A/D conversion, a resolution of about +/ 0.2"C should be obtainable. The humidity measurement is calibrated using saturated solutions of various organic salts to give humidity controlled atmospheres in the range 33% to 98% rH.
Because of the moderate temperature coefficient of the humidity sensor, it is necessary to repeat the calibrations at a range of temperatures. When calibrated, the microprocessor can calculate the humidity levels rH from the expression: rH%=mHX"+CH+(0.62[25 T C]) The formaldehyde sensing device is calibrated using chemically determined vapour concentrations under controlled humidity and temperature conditions. The concentration of formaldehyde (mgm HCHO) may be calculated by the microprocessor according to the expression: log",(mgm 3 HCHO)=(mr/rH%+C").X,+C', Using apparatus as described above, experiments can be carried out to determine the effects of differing humidities and formaldehyde levels on the survival of microorganisms.The graph of Fig. 3 shows the decline in population of B. globigii spores on exposure to a known formaldehyde concentration at a known relative humidity. The curve has an initial plateau followed by a linear section which tails off as the surviving fraction becomes very small. The initial plateau indicates that some time is necessary for formaldehyde to effect cells and this lag phase is found to be most apparent under those conditions which give the highest death rate.
The slope of the logarithmic portion of the graph can be used to calculate the decimal reduction time for the particular conditions of exposure. This is defined as the time required to reduce the population by one logarithmic decade. The logarithmic phase corresponds with the period of maximum death rate during which the decimal reduction time is the shortest; that is to say Dmin. A series of experiments can then be performed and Dmin measured for differing formaldehyde concentrations at different relative humidity levels. The results of one series of such experiments is shown in Fig. 4 where the Dmin value in minutes is plotted against formaldehyde concentration for differing relative humidities.From such work a relationship has been established between Dmin and the formaldehyde concentration: A D . min= B+mgm 3HCHO where B is a constant and A is related to relative humidity in accordance with the formula: A=a-b rH% Experimental values have been determined as a=12471 b=108 A number of conclusions can be drawn from the experimental work. There is a minimum level below which formaldehyde vapour is not lethal. This level can be calculated to be about 40 mgm3. In practice some small effect is likely but the resulting very long decimal reduction times make the use of such low levels unrealistic. There is then a range of levels of formaldehyde (about 50 to 150 mgm3) over which small changes in concentration give very marked alterations in Dmin.Above 200 mgm 3, the change in Dmin is small with increasing levels of formaldehyde. "Dry formaldehyde" is still effective as a decontaminant at 30% humidity although the Dmin value for a given concentration is longer than for high humidities.
Whiist the quoted experiments have been carried out on only one microorganisms, the biological spore chosen (B. globigli) is more resistant than most infectious agents and use of the relationships given should allow a generous safety margin in relation to other microorganism.
Returning to the apparatus which is shown in Fig. 1, the microprocessor 22 is arranged to calculate values of Dmin at, say, one minute intervals using the measured and corrected values of formaldehyde and relative humidity. The total lethal effect D can then be calculated using the expression
where To is a starting time chosen to exclude the initial lag period and TF is the total exposure time. The value D is then indicative of the reduction achieved in the microorganism population.
Using apparatus according to the invention in one mode, the described continuous monitoring enables a calculation to be made of D for the fumigation procedure. In a preferred mode of operation, a desired value of D is preset in the microprocessor together with information on operational constraints such as limits on humidity and time. The microprocessor provides a signal for controlling a formaldehyde vapour generator which may usefully comprise an oil bath containing a controlled amount of paraformaldehyde powder in suspension. In this way apparatus according to the invention will achieve the desired reduction in microorganism population without using excessive formaldehyde. In, for example, a routine fumigation procedure in a pharmaceutical production area, the desired reduction may be only 3 or 4 log cycles.Apparatus according to this invention will enable that reduction to be achieved with confidence at significantly reduced formaldehyde concentrations, enabling the area to be made ready for use much more quickly. In an area known to be heavily contaminated a reduction in microorganism population of, say 12 to 14 cycies may be necessary. Again, however, the invention enables that reduction to be achieved under optimum conditions.
It is relevant that whilst the experiments that have been described indicte that there is little gain in raising the formaldehyde level above 400 mgm 3, typical calculated values using current recommendations would be between 7000 and 14000 mgm3.
In a modification, illustrated in Fig. 5, a single metering circuit is provided, comprising a formaldehyde measuring circuit 50, a humidity measuring circuit 52 and a temperature measuring circuit 54. Each measuring circuit receives its input from a respective analogue multiplexer 56 which is in turn connected to the appropriate probe sensing devices. Each multiplexer receives a channel select signal from the processor on line 58.
This modified embodiment will be advantageous where there are many probes and also has the benefit of requiring only a three channel analogue to digital converter.
This invention has been described by way of example only and a variety of modifications are possible without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the accompanying claims. Thus, whilst the invention has been described with particular reference to formaldehyde, the skilled man will appreciate that it has application to other gases or vapours monitored with the same or similar detection devices.

Claims (8)

1. A formaldehyde monitor for use in fumigation procedures, comprising a formaldehyde sensor device providing an electrical indication of formaldehyde vapour concentration; a humidity measurement device providing an electrical indication of relative humidity; a temperature responsive electrical circuit device and a processor connected to receive inputs from said devices and arranged when calibrated to provide an output value for formaldehyde vapour concentration corrected for humidity and temperature dependent variations in the formaldehyde sensor device.
2. A monitor according to Claim 1 wherein the formaldehyde sensor comprises a direct adsorption semiconductor sensor.
3. A monitor according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 further comprising a processor adapted to calculate an indication D of the lethal effect of the fumigation according to
4. A formaldehyde monitor and control device providing an output for the control of a formaldehyde vapour generator in a fumigation procedure effective against microorganisms, comprising a formaldehyde sensor device providing an electrical indication of formaldehyde vapour concentration; a humidity mesurement device providing an electrical indication of relative humidity; a temperature responsive electrical circuit device and a processor connected to receive inputs from said devices and arranged when calibrated to provide an output value for formaldehyde vapour concentration corrected for humidity and temperature dependent variations in the formaldehyde sensor device and further arranged to generate a formaldehyde vapour control output derived from the measured formaldehyde vapour concentration value, the measured relative humidity, the previously known lethal effect of the said concentration at the said relative humidity and the predetermined desired reduction in microorganism population.
5. A fumigation method for killing microorganisms in a volume, comprising the steps of generating formaldehyde vapour in said volume; measuring the formaldehyde vapour concentration; measuring the relative humidity in said volume; deriving a control signal based on the measured formaldehyde vapour concentration, the measured humidity and the known fumigation effectiveness of formaldehyde at the said humidity level and controlling said vapour generation step in response to said control signal.
6. A monitor comprising a sensor device providing an electrical indication of a gas or a vapour concentration; a humidity measurement device providing an electrical indication of relative humidity; a temperature responsive electrical circuit device and a processor connected to receive inputs from said devices and arranged when calibrated to provide an output value for said concentration corrected for humidity and temperature dependent variations in the sensor device.
7. A formaldehyde monitor and control device substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in Figs. 1 and 2 or Figs. 2 and 5 of the accompanying drawings.
8. A fumigation method substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the drawings.
GB08426766A 1984-10-23 1984-10-23 Formaldehyde monitor Expired GB2165948B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08426766A GB2165948B (en) 1984-10-23 1984-10-23 Formaldehyde monitor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08426766A GB2165948B (en) 1984-10-23 1984-10-23 Formaldehyde monitor

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB8426766D0 GB8426766D0 (en) 1984-11-28
GB2165948A true GB2165948A (en) 1986-04-23
GB2165948B GB2165948B (en) 1988-12-07

Family

ID=10568606

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB08426766A Expired GB2165948B (en) 1984-10-23 1984-10-23 Formaldehyde monitor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2165948B (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4730478A (en) * 1985-06-18 1988-03-15 Icor Ab Gas analyzer
FR2616226A1 (en) * 1987-06-05 1988-12-09 Mine Safety Appliances Co MOISTURE COMPENSATION DEVICE FOR A PHOTO-IONIZATION DETECTOR, AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME
US4817414A (en) * 1986-07-03 1989-04-04 Dragerwerk Aktiengesellschaft Measuring arrangement for detecting the level of combustible gases mixed with air
GB2219397A (en) * 1988-05-24 1989-12-06 Sando Bela Nagy Gas analysis
EP0701123A1 (en) * 1994-09-10 1996-03-13 United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Formaldehyde vapour detector
GB2293015A (en) * 1994-09-10 1996-03-13 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Formaldehyde vapour detector
WO1998000176A1 (en) * 1996-07-03 1998-01-08 American Sterilizer Company Monitoring and control of sterilization processes with semiconductor sensor modules
GB2331810A (en) * 1997-11-28 1999-06-02 Taiyo Toyo Sanso Co Ltd Temperature and humidity compensation for a semiconductor gas sensor
FR2790088A1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2000-08-25 Daimler Chrysler Ag METHOD FOR CORRECTING THE INFLUENCE OF WATER ON THE SIGNAL OF A SENSOR TO DETECT THE CONCENTRATION OF REDUCER IN THE EXHAUST GAS OF AN ENGINE
WO2001067092A2 (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-09-13 Electricite De France Service National Continuous analyzer of volatile organic compounds, device and method for continuously assessing the quality of inside ambient air and use of said device for monitoring a ventilation installation
WO2002068953A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2002-09-06 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for detecting fumigants in air samples
EP2012837A1 (en) 2006-04-28 2009-01-14 Infection Control B.V. Method and device for disinfecting a space

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112415141B (en) * 2020-11-06 2022-02-08 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Compensation method and compensation device for formaldehyde measurement concentration display value

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB953665A (en) * 1961-03-02 1964-03-25 Gas Detector S P A Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of hydrogen-containing combustible gases or vapors
GB1412026A (en) * 1972-12-26 1975-10-29 Borg Warner Anti-evasion system for a breath alcohol tester
GB1425685A (en) * 1973-06-08 1976-02-18 Sybron Corp Sterility analyzer
GB1505726A (en) * 1974-05-27 1978-03-30 Philips Ltd Sensor for gas or smoke detection
GB1518470A (en) * 1976-01-29 1978-07-19 Nittan Co Ltd Gas sensing element
GB1591372A (en) * 1976-08-27 1981-06-24 British Steel Corp Gas monitors
EP0031156A1 (en) * 1979-12-24 1981-07-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Cooking oven with a ceramic humidity sensor
EP0056752A1 (en) * 1981-01-21 1982-07-28 Allied Corporation Titania oxygen sensor with chrome oxide compensator

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB953665A (en) * 1961-03-02 1964-03-25 Gas Detector S P A Method and apparatus for detecting the presence of hydrogen-containing combustible gases or vapors
GB1412026A (en) * 1972-12-26 1975-10-29 Borg Warner Anti-evasion system for a breath alcohol tester
GB1425685A (en) * 1973-06-08 1976-02-18 Sybron Corp Sterility analyzer
GB1505726A (en) * 1974-05-27 1978-03-30 Philips Ltd Sensor for gas or smoke detection
GB1518470A (en) * 1976-01-29 1978-07-19 Nittan Co Ltd Gas sensing element
GB1591372A (en) * 1976-08-27 1981-06-24 British Steel Corp Gas monitors
EP0031156A1 (en) * 1979-12-24 1981-07-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Cooking oven with a ceramic humidity sensor
EP0056752A1 (en) * 1981-01-21 1982-07-28 Allied Corporation Titania oxygen sensor with chrome oxide compensator

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4730478A (en) * 1985-06-18 1988-03-15 Icor Ab Gas analyzer
US4817414A (en) * 1986-07-03 1989-04-04 Dragerwerk Aktiengesellschaft Measuring arrangement for detecting the level of combustible gases mixed with air
FR2616226A1 (en) * 1987-06-05 1988-12-09 Mine Safety Appliances Co MOISTURE COMPENSATION DEVICE FOR A PHOTO-IONIZATION DETECTOR, AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME
GB2205652A (en) * 1987-06-05 1988-12-14 Mine Safety Appliances Co Humidity compensation for a photoionization type detector
GB2205652B (en) * 1987-06-05 1991-05-22 Mine Safety Appliances Co Humidity compensation for a photoionization type detector
GB2219397A (en) * 1988-05-24 1989-12-06 Sando Bela Nagy Gas analysis
GB2219397B (en) * 1988-05-24 1992-09-23 Sandor Bela Nagy Gas analysis
EP0701123A1 (en) * 1994-09-10 1996-03-13 United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Formaldehyde vapour detector
GB2293015A (en) * 1994-09-10 1996-03-13 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Formaldehyde vapour detector
GB2293015B (en) * 1994-09-10 1998-09-02 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Formaldehyde vapour detector
WO1998000176A1 (en) * 1996-07-03 1998-01-08 American Sterilizer Company Monitoring and control of sterilization processes with semiconductor sensor modules
US5882590A (en) * 1996-07-03 1999-03-16 American Sterilizer Company Monitoring and control of sterilization processes with semiconductor sensor modules
GB2331810A (en) * 1997-11-28 1999-06-02 Taiyo Toyo Sanso Co Ltd Temperature and humidity compensation for a semiconductor gas sensor
GB2331810B (en) * 1997-11-28 2000-07-12 Taiyo Toyo Sanso Co Ltd Method and apparatus for detection of concentration of hydrogen peroxide vapor
US6189368B1 (en) * 1997-11-28 2001-02-20 Taiyo Toyo Sanso Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for detection of concentration of hydrogen peroxide vapor
DE19855120C2 (en) * 1997-11-28 2003-05-22 Taiyo Toyo Sanso Co Method and device for determining a concentration of hydrogen peroxide vapor
FR2790088A1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2000-08-25 Daimler Chrysler Ag METHOD FOR CORRECTING THE INFLUENCE OF WATER ON THE SIGNAL OF A SENSOR TO DETECT THE CONCENTRATION OF REDUCER IN THE EXHAUST GAS OF AN ENGINE
WO2001067092A2 (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-09-13 Electricite De France Service National Continuous analyzer of volatile organic compounds, device and method for continuously assessing the quality of inside ambient air and use of said device for monitoring a ventilation installation
FR2806163A1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-09-14 Electricite De France Continuously operating analyzer for volatile organic compounds to monitor air quality
WO2001067092A3 (en) * 2000-03-09 2002-06-06 Electricite De France Continuous analyzer of volatile organic compounds, device and method for continuously assessing the quality of inside ambient air and use of said device for monitoring a ventilation installation
WO2002068953A1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2002-09-06 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for detecting fumigants in air samples
JP2004530116A (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-09-30 ビーエーエスエフ アクチェンゲゼルシャフト Method and apparatus for detecting fumigants in air samples
US7459483B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2008-12-02 Kanesho Soil Treatment Sprl/Bvba Method and device for detecting fumigants in air samples
EP2012837A1 (en) 2006-04-28 2009-01-14 Infection Control B.V. Method and device for disinfecting a space
US9616148B2 (en) 2006-04-28 2017-04-11 Infection Control B.V. Method and device for disinfecting a space

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2165948B (en) 1988-12-07
GB8426766D0 (en) 1984-11-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4290716B2 (en) Method and apparatus for calibration of a device for monitoring sterilant concentration in a system
JP2924912B2 (en) Monitor system for disinfectant vapor concentration
GB2165948A (en) Gas or vapour monitor
US4896143A (en) Gas concentration sensor with dose monitoring
JP3291227B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting hydrogen peroxide vapor concentration in a processing system using hydrogen peroxide vapor
Schweizer-Berberich et al. Characterisation of food freshness with sensor arrays
EP1377814B1 (en) Monitor and control using mid-infrared spectroscopy for vapor hydrogen peroxide processing techniques
US5932791A (en) Method and apparatus for the continuous determination of gaseous oxidation products
KR20070083738A (en) Vaporized hydrogen peroxide concentration detector
EP0001611A3 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting substances and for regulating current
WO2009023658A1 (en) Method and apparatus for decontaminating a region without dehumidification
GB2191585A (en) Sensor indicating and controlling substance concentration
US5305231A (en) Multiple K factor, selectable gas detector
CA1148218A (en) Apparatus for oxygen partial pressure measurement
Ödman et al. Data acquisition and information processing in MDO oxygen electrode measurement of tissue oxygen pressure
EP0041562A1 (en) Apparatus and method for temperature compensated transcutaneous carbon dioxide measurement
Decker et al. Time temperature studies of spore penetration through an electric air sterilizer
Baba et al. Development of measurement equipment of half life of ozone
JPS59208447A (en) Method of adjusting zero point in thermal conductance measuring cell in aeration culture tank
DE59904033D1 (en) Steriliser with a sensor and method for monitoring the sensor
US3600134A (en) Method for the determination of alcohol and other oxidizable organic compounds in respired air and body fluids
EP3625553B1 (en) Monitoring of steam quality during sterilization
US6220076B1 (en) Differential gas analyzer
SE438736B (en) REFERENCE ELECTRODE FOR LOST ACID DETECTION IN A HIGH TEMPERATURE REDUCING ATMOSPHERE, ABOVE 205? 59C AND META DEVICE COVERING THIS ELECTRODE
Övrum et al. Exposure to toluene in a photogravure printing plant: Concentration in ambient air and uptake in the body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19921023