GB2128447A - Telephone exchange system test equipment - Google Patents

Telephone exchange system test equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2128447A
GB2128447A GB08228609A GB8228609A GB2128447A GB 2128447 A GB2128447 A GB 2128447A GB 08228609 A GB08228609 A GB 08228609A GB 8228609 A GB8228609 A GB 8228609A GB 2128447 A GB2128447 A GB 2128447A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
monostable
input signal
time
occurrence
telephone exchange
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB08228609A
Other versions
GB2128447B (en
Inventor
Gary Alfred Sarson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
STC PLC
Original Assignee
Standard Telephone and Cables PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Standard Telephone and Cables PLC filed Critical Standard Telephone and Cables PLC
Priority to GB08228609A priority Critical patent/GB2128447B/en
Publication of GB2128447A publication Critical patent/GB2128447A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2128447B publication Critical patent/GB2128447B/en
Priority to SG39887A priority patent/SG39887G/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G06F11/0703Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation
    • G06F11/0751Error or fault detection not based on redundancy
    • G06F11/0754Error or fault detection not based on redundancy by exceeding limits
    • G06F11/0757Error or fault detection not based on redundancy by exceeding limits by exceeding a time limit, i.e. time-out, e.g. watchdogs
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/22Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing
    • H04M3/24Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing with provision for checking the normal operation
    • H04M3/241Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing with provision for checking the normal operation for stored program controlled exchanges

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Monitoring And Testing Of Exchanges (AREA)

Abstract

An electronic monitoring device monitors the operation of a device which functions regularly at preset intervals, e.g. a cyclic polling operation as in the telephone exchange of our Application No. 82 28206 (G. A. Sarson et al 5-4-1). This device includes a first monostable (MS1) which is polled at a 100 ms rate, and if a poll is missed the monostable changes condition to give the processor a "soft fault" input. Such a fault indication can be ignored if it is isolated, or recorded for future reference. There is a second monostable (MS2) whose period is longer, i.e. 1 second, and is polled at the same rate as the first. If there is a period of one second with no poll, the second bistable changes state to give a fault indication. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Telephone exchange system test equipment This invention relates to an electronic monitoring device, for continuously monitoring the operation of an electronic system, such as a telephone exchange.
According to the invention there is provided an electronic monitoring device for monitoring the occurrence of an operation intended to occur at preset intervals of time, wherein there is a first monostable device which receives an input signal on each occurrence of said operation, which input signal sets the monostable device to, or maintains it in, a first non-stable state, wherein if a first preset interval of time elapses without the occurrence of said operation the monostable switches to the second stable state, wherein the switching of the monostable to said second state is noted as a fault condition, wherein a second monostable device is provided which receives said input signal on each occurrence of said operation, which input signal sets the second monostable device to, or maintains it in, its first non-stable state, wherein the time-out period of said second monostable is long compared with that of the first monostable circuit, and wherein if said longer time-out period elapses without a said input signal the second monostable times-out and an alarm is given in response to it assuming its second state, which alarm indicates that the operation being monitored has not occurred for said second and relatively long period.
An embodiment of the invention, developed for use in a small telephone exchange, will now be described with reference to the accompanying highly schematic drawing.
The monitoring device to be described herein is suitable for use in conjunction with a variety of electronic systems of type in which during correct operation certain operations occur regularly at specified intervals. However, the invention is described herein as applied to a telephone exchange, and especially to an exchange such as that described and claimed in an Application No.
82 28206 (G. A. Sarson et al 5-4-1).
The exchange for which the monitoring device is described is as small "business-type" exchange in which calls are set up in TDM manner using PCM to convey speech, and also data if the exchange serves any data terminals. It has subscriber line ports each of which serves two subscriber lines and a smaller number of trunk line ports each of which serves a trunk to a local exchange. Each port has a local processor with, in the case of analogue lines and trunks, analogueto-digital and digital-to-analogue conversion circuitry. Where a line or trunk is of the digital type, naturally no conversion circuitry is needed.
The exchange has a central processor, with its associated memories and interfaces.
The ports and the central processor are interconnected by an intelligence bus, referred to as the PCM bus, and by a signalling bus. The PCM bus has separate conductors for the two directions of transmission. The central processor and the port processors co-operate in call setting, with all inter-processor communications taking place over the signalling bus. During operation, the central processor polls the ports' processors via the signalling bus in search of ports needing the services of the central processor. This polling technique is also used for transmission of information from the central processor to the ports, this of course including call setting information.
To set up a call between two lines, or a line and a trunk, two time slots in the TDM cycle are allocated to that call by the central processor, one for each direction of transmission. By this time the central processor will have identified the calling line from the time slot in the polling cycle in which the calling line was identified. It will also have received the identity of the wanted line or trunk.
Note that the operation is similar if the calling condition was detected on a trunk. Call release is effected when, in the course of polling, the central processor detects that one of the parties to the call has hung up.
With the use of a standard 32 time slot PCM system, two of the time slots are permanently allocated to the emission of tones (e.g. calling tone, busy tone, etc.) and the other 30 slots are available for call setting. Thus if the system is to be non-blocking the total number of lines and trunks served is 15, e.g. 10 lines and 5 trunks.
Two such exchanges can be coupled by linking their busses to give a double capacity exchange.
Note that the number of lines and/or trunks served can be increased of some blocking is tolerated.
As will have been seen, a major feature of the above-described exchange is that call signalling and other transmissions needed for call setting and control are effected over the signalling bus.
Thus the intelligence bus only conveys the PCM codes for speech (or data if there are data terminals) and tones.
The exchange is provided with two conference circuits, each of which can be used to set up a three-party conference, as will be described later.
It also has a so-called watch dog controller which continuously monitors the working of the exchange and gives an alarm if certain fault conditions are detected. The operation of the conference circuit is described and claimed in our Application No. 82 28844 (G. A. Sarson 1-1).
The watch dog controller monitors the operation of the exchange's central processor by checking for regular ones of the polls, which should occur within a preset time-out period. If the time-out period is exceeded, the watch-dog controller generates a hardware reset, and if an indication that a poll has occurred is still not received, a second time-out occurs, and an alarm lamp is lit.
The watch dog controller includes two retriggerabie monstable circuits MS1 and MS2. Of these MS1 has a time out period of 100ms, and is polled by the main processor via its SOD (Serial Output Data) pin. The output from this pin occurs at the same time at the commencement of a polling cycle for the exchange, as mentioned above. This output resets the monostable MS 1 to its rest state. Hence if a polling cycle is missed, the monostable MS 1 has time to change its state to its stable state, which gives an output to the processor's TRAP input. Hence the failure of the exchange to poll within 1 OOms causes a TRAP interrupt of the central processor. If only one such poll is missed, MS 1 returns to its other state. Thus the omission of one poll is noted in the processor, and this can be used to give an indication, e.g. by lighting an error indication lamp and/or recording that an error has happened. However, if the error only occurs once in isolation it is regarded as a "soft" error and ignored.
The second monostable MS2 has a one-second time out period, and is kept on by the polling signals from the processor's SOD pin. This monostable is connected to an alarm, such as a fault lamp. Hence if there is no poll for one second, MS2 times out and operates the fault lamp to indicate the presence of the fault to the maintenance personnel. The monostable MS2 is also provided with a reset button, to reset it when the fault has been cleared.
The watch dog controller also includes an RC network (not shown) via which a power-on reset is provided for the processor.

Claims (3)

1. An electronic monitoring device for monitoring the occurrence of an operation intended to occur at preset intervals of time, wherein there is a first monostable device which receives an input signal on each occurrence of said operations, which input signal sets the monostable device to, or maintains it in, a first non-stable state, wherein if a first preset interval of time elapses without the occurrence of said operation the monostable switches to the second stable state, wherein the switching of the monostable to said second state is noted as a fault condition, wherein a second monostable device is provided which receives said input signal on each occurrence of said operation, which input signal sets the second monostable device to, or maintains it in, its first non-stable state, wherein the time-out period of said second monostable is long compared with that of the first monostable circuit, and wherein if said longer time-out period elapses without a said input signal the second monostable times-out and an alarm is given in response to it assuming its second state, which alarm indicates that the operation being monitored has not occurred for said second and relatively long period.
2. A device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the monitored operation is a sequential poll of a number of portions of a telephone exchange.
3. An electronic monitoring device substantially as described with reference to the accompanying drawing.
GB08228609A 1982-10-06 1982-10-06 Telephone exchange system test equipment Expired GB2128447B (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08228609A GB2128447B (en) 1982-10-06 1982-10-06 Telephone exchange system test equipment
SG39887A SG39887G (en) 1982-10-06 1987-05-04 Telephone exchange system test equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB08228609A GB2128447B (en) 1982-10-06 1982-10-06 Telephone exchange system test equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2128447A true GB2128447A (en) 1984-04-26
GB2128447B GB2128447B (en) 1986-10-29

Family

ID=10533441

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB08228609A Expired GB2128447B (en) 1982-10-06 1982-10-06 Telephone exchange system test equipment

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2128447B (en)
SG (1) SG39887G (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0190370A1 (en) * 1984-12-31 1986-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Device for improving the detection of non-operational states in a non-attended interrupt-driven processor
WO1989011195A1 (en) * 1988-05-05 1989-11-16 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface and enhanced integrity features
US4991199A (en) * 1988-05-05 1991-02-05 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface and enhanced integrity features
US5195130A (en) * 1988-05-05 1993-03-16 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface and enhanced integrity features
US7693790B2 (en) 1989-12-08 2010-04-06 Online Resources Corporation Method and system for remote delivery of retail banking services

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5572572A (en) 1988-05-05 1996-11-05 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly interface and enhanced integrity features
US5485370A (en) 1988-05-05 1996-01-16 Transaction Technology, Inc. Home services delivery system with intelligent terminal emulator
US5796832A (en) 1995-11-13 1998-08-18 Transaction Technology, Inc. Wireless transaction and information system

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0190370A1 (en) * 1984-12-31 1986-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Device for improving the detection of non-operational states in a non-attended interrupt-driven processor
WO1989011195A1 (en) * 1988-05-05 1989-11-16 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface and enhanced integrity features
GR890100296A (en) * 1988-05-05 1990-03-12 Transaction Technology Inc Computer and telephone set apparatus
US4991199A (en) * 1988-05-05 1991-02-05 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface and enhanced integrity features
US5008927A (en) * 1988-05-05 1991-04-16 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface integrity features
US5195130A (en) * 1988-05-05 1993-03-16 Transaction Technology, Inc. Computer and telephone apparatus with user friendly computer interface and enhanced integrity features
US7693790B2 (en) 1989-12-08 2010-04-06 Online Resources Corporation Method and system for remote delivery of retail banking services

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SG39887G (en) 1987-07-24
GB2128447B (en) 1986-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0190198B1 (en) Time division switching system control arrangement and method
US4943999A (en) Switching system reliability
EP0125604B1 (en) Switching system having remote switching capability
US4484323A (en) Communication arrangements for distributed control systems
US4500985A (en) Communication path continuity verification arrangement
US4979164A (en) Switching system reliability
GB2128447A (en) Telephone exchange system test equipment
JPS59190768A (en) Circuit device for communication equipment
JPH05260046A (en) Device for adapting interface to digital communication network
US3492436A (en) Ringing arrangement with variable intervals
US3280262A (en) Time-division multiplex telephone system
US5222130A (en) Message arrangement and method for implementing a digital telephone system
US4972465A (en) Switching system reliability
US4689783A (en) Digital satellite exchange
US3684833A (en) Key telephone system having wideband capability
US5283827A (en) Digital line card for interfacing a remotely located digital telephone to a central office system
US3283082A (en) Telephone switching system incorporating selectively controlled ringback
EP0399723B1 (en) Improvement in switching system reliability
US3578917A (en) Security circuit for multi-exchange telecommunication network
Corby IBM 2750 voice and data switching system: Organization and functions
US3417204A (en) Telephone trunk circuit
JPH03274952A (en) Modem pooling system
US3135833A (en) Transmission loss pad control system
RU29430U1 (en) Telephone exchange system
RU2106008C1 (en) Telecommunication system which is controlled by computer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
746 Register noted 'licences of right' (sect. 46/1977)
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee