GB2127722A - Cutting insert with chip control - Google Patents

Abstract

A cutting insert (10) having an improved material removal efficiency at relatively high speeds comprises top and bottom chipbreaking faces joined by flank walls (7). For indexable cutting edges are defined by the intersection of flank surface (7) with a peripheral land area (1). Extending downwardly from the land (1) at an angle (a1) to the chipbreaking face is a first ramp surface (2a). A second ramp surface (3) extends downwardly from the first ramp surface at an angle (a2) to the chipbreaking face. At each insert cutting corner, the first ramp surface (2a) is partially interrupted by a corner control surface (4). The ramp and control surfaces facilitate chip flow at relatively high feed rates, thereby reducing the cutting forces and friction. In addition, the corner control surfaces prevent chip convergence at the cutting corners of the insert. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Cutting insert with chip control The present invention relates generally to cutting tools for machining chip forming materials.

More particularly, the invention concerns cutting inserts incorporating chip control geometry particularly advantageous at relatively high feed rates.

Conventional chip control inserts exhibit performance problems when used at relatively high feed rates, for example, rates exceeding .020 inches per revolution. These problems are caused by collision of chips produced by the cutting process colliding with one or more portions of such prior art insert faces resulting in excess friction and wear which, in turn, leads to premature wear and/or fracture of the cutting insert material.

Examples of prior art disclosing chip control cutting inserts which, at higher feed rates, present geometries resulting in adverse chip flow impediment are: U.S Patent 4,288,179-Kruger et al U.S. Patent 3,395,434-Wirfelt U.S. Patent 3,381,349-Newcomer U.S. Patent 3,213,71 6-Getts It is an object of this invention to provide a cutting tool for use at relatively high feed rates and utilizing chip control geometry effective to overcome the above problems with the prior art.

According to the present invention there is provided a tool for cutting chip forming materials having a cutting corner defined by the intersection of a chipbreaker surface and two flank surfaces, the tool comprising: a land surface extending inwardly from the cutting corner; a first control surface extending from an inner boundary of the land surface downwardly at a first angle to the plane of the chipbreaker surface; a corner control surface extending inwardly from an inner boundary of the first control surface; a second control surface extending from an inner boundary of the corner control surface downwardly at a second angle to the plane; and a third control surface extending from an inner boundary of the second control surface downwardly at a third angle to the plane.

The invention is embodied in a preferred form as an indexable cutting insert for machining chip forming materials, the insert incorporating improved chip control when used at relatively high feed rates. A land extends around at least one chip breaking or rake face of the insert adjacent the insert cutting edges and cutting corners. Connected to the land is a first ramp or chip control surface extending downwardly and away from the peripheral insert land. The first ramp surface is interrupted at each cutting corner of the insert by a corner control plateau or surface to prevent damage caused by chip convergence to the trailing side of the active cutting corner. A second ramp or control surface lies adjacent the first ramp surface and extends downwardly and inwardly from the first ramp, preferably at a smaller inclination angle than that of the first ramp.A third ramp surface connects an inner boundary of the corner control surfaces to the second ramp surface at each insert corner region.

The combined ramp and control surfaces effect relatively facile chip flow at relatively high feed rates, thereby lessening attendant cutting forces and friction.

The combined geometries of the various insert face portions also enable better control of chips at relatively high feeds, due to causing formation of chips having convex shaped cross sections.

Polygonal inserts designed in accordance with this invention will exhibit prolonged useful life, since their chip handling capability will more effectively combat edge crater and washout.

Embodiments of the present invention will hereinafter be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Figs.1,2,3 and 4 show cross sectional views of various prior art chip control configurations used in the chipbreaking or rake face of known cutting inserts; Fig. 5 is a perspective view of an insert of the invention; Fig. 6 is a view of the insert taken along line 6-6 of Fig. 5; Fig. 7 is a view of the insert taken along line 7-7 of Fig. 5; Fig. 8 shows a cross sectional view of an alternative embodiment of an insert; Fig. 9 shows a cross sectional view of a further embodiment of an insert; Fig. 10 shows a top plan view of a further embodiment of a cutting insert of the invention; and Fig. 11 shows a view of the insert taken along line 11~11 1 of Fig. 10.

To better point out the advantages of the invention, reference is first made to various chip control configurations of the prior art which are shown in Figs. 1 to 4. Prior art inserts incorporating the chipcontrol geometries depicted in Figs. 1,2 and 4 each depend upon shoulders as 102 of Fig.

1,204 of Fig. 2 and 404 of Fig. 4, to curl and direct chips generated by respective cutting edges 100, 200, 400 of Figs. 1, 2, and 4. Each such insert is adequate at relatively low feed rates, for example, on the order of about 0.51 mm (.020 inches) per revolution, or less. However, such shoulders become detrimental at thick-chipproducing high feed rates. Collision of thicker chips with these shoulders generates excessive friction (therefore heat) and wear. Excessive heat, in turn, causes chemical reaction between the workpiece chips and insert material (such reaction also known as edge build-up). Such chip deflection shoulders therefore, under heavv feed rate conditions, soon wear away resulting in diminished insert useful life.

The prior art insert of Fig. 3 has a cutting edge 300 defined by the intersection of flank surface 308 and land 302 followed by sloping surface 304 and flat inner floor surface 306. The insert of Fig. 3 is more efficient at higher feed rates, but since the insert must be mounted in a negative attitude (i.e. with face 306 tilted upwards with respect to edge 300) to achieve flank clearance between the insert surface 308 and the workpiece being machined, a friction generated surface is still presented to disrupt the chip flow.

Another disadvantage to using chip control inserts designed in accordance with Figs. 2, 3 and 4 at high feed rates arises from use of an internal cup-shaped depression within the insert nose radius. During the material cutting process, the chip is forced down into such a depression while simultaneously attempting to curl at 90 degrees to the direction of feed. The compound chip motion subjects the insert's chip control contour geometry to excessive forces caused by attempting to bend a relatively thick chip in two different directions simultaneously. Such excessive force in the nose radius area tends to wash out, or fracture, the trailing edge of the nose radius at the insert's active cutting corner, thus shortening useful insert life.

A cutting tool of the invention, such as the insert shown in Figs. 5 to 7, includes rake face contouring which overcomes the above-described problems with prior art inserts used at relatively high feed rates. With reference to Figs. 5 to 7, cutting insert 10 has, for example, substantially square top and bottom chip breaking faces joined by flank or side walls 7, which are substantially perpendicular to planes containing the top and bottom faces. Four indexable cutting edges are defined by the intersection of flank surface 7 with a land area 1 extending about the periphery of a chipbreaking face. As seen in Fig. 6, angle a5 between land 1 and flank surface 7 is substantially 90 degrees.

Adjacent an inner boundary of land 1 and extending downwardly therefrom at an angle a 1 to the plane of the chipbreaking face is a first ramp or control surface designated 2a extending between the insert cutting corners, a narrower portion 2 continuing from portion 2a and extending around each radiused cutting corner of insert 10.

Adjacent an inner boundary of each ramp surface 2a and extending downwardly therefrom at an angle a2 to the plane of the chipbreaking face is a second ramp or control surface 3, which terminates at a floor surface 6 substantially parallel to the plane of the chipbreaking face.

Insert 10 may be advantageously clamped in cutting position in a variety of known manners utilizing central aperture 11.

At each insert cutting corner, ramp surface 2a is partially interrupted by a recessed plateau or corner control surface 4, which, in this embodiment, is susbtantially parallel to the plane of the chipbreaking face. An inner boundary of each pedestal surface 4 is, in turn, connected to control surface 3 via third ramp surfaces 5 which extend downwardly at angle a3 to the plane of the chipbreaking face.

The width L1 of land 1 may lie in the range of about 0.38 mm (.015 inches) to about 0.89 mm (.035 inches), with a preferred range of about 0.45 mm (.018 inches) to about 0.77 mm (.030 inches), thereby providing sufficient corner mass to resist deformation.

Surface 2 and surface 2a extend downwardly at angle a1 having a range of about 10 degrees to about 20 degrees, with a preferred range of about 1 5 degrees to about 20 degrees, in order to provide a smooth, non-resistant chip flow path. A major portion of chips resulting from relatively large depths of cut then proceeds down ramp surface 3 which extends downwardly at an angle a2 having a range of about 5 degrees to about 1 5 degrees, with a prefered range of about 5 degrees to about 10 degrees. Preferably, angle a 1 is greater than angle a2. With such configuration, surface 3 offers little or no resistance to chip flow, unlike the prior art flat-bottomed insert of Fig. 3 discussed above. Even if crater wear were to occur on surface 3, no detrimental results affecting insert life should result, since surface 3 is spaced sufficiently inwardly of the insert cutting edge.

Although the insert of Figs. 5 to 7 must be mounted in a negative rake attitude, the disclosed configuration allows for facile, smooth chip flow over surfaces 1,2 and 3 with minimal resistance, yet allows chips to curl and break due to their inherent thickness and dynamics. The arrangement of surfaces 1, 2 and 3 thereby overcomes the shoulder and floor generated friction problems encountered with prior art designs. This result is obtained, because the chip, after passing over land 1, confronts positively orented (i.e.

sloping downwardly from a plane of feed direction) surfaces 2 and 3.

The innermost boundary of surface 2a lies a distance H1 below the plane of land 1. Distance H1 has a range of from about 0.10 mm (.004 inches) to about 0.26 mm (.010 inches), with a preferred range of from about 0.10 mm (.004 inches) to about 0.21 mm (.008 inches). The innermost boundary of surface 3 lies a distance H2 below the plane of land 1. Distance H2 has a range of from about 0.30 mm (.012 inches) to a maximum depth limited principally by the required diameter of mounting aperture 11 with a preferred range of from about 0.30 mm (.012 inches) to about 0.51 mm (.020 inches).

In order to overcome the above discussed problem of chip convergence and resultant high pressure in the vicinity of the cutting corner nose radius, pedestal or corner control surface 4 with connecting ramp surface 5 is placed inwardly of each insert cutting corner. Surface 4 lies at a depth H3 below the plane of land 1. Depth H3 preferably is on the order of one-half the depth Hi. Surface 5 extends downwardly from an inner boundary of surface 4 at an angle a3 having a useable range of from about 10 degrees to about 25 degrees, with a preferred range of from about 15 degrees to about 20 degrees.

With this configuration, stress is reduced in the area of the cutting corner. Another benefit of a corner control surface or pedestal is the ability to effect good chip control at relatively shallow depths of cut. Control surface 4 deflects and breaks chips when the depth of cut is mostly directed to surface 4. Beyond this depth of cut, chips will flow freely due to the configuration of surface 2 and 3. Such free flow, along with the influence of corner control surface 4, creates a barrel-shaped or convex, somewhat embrittled chip conductive to easier breaking. Dimension L2 (Fig. 5) is governed by the radius of curvature of the cutting corner, L2 lying in the preferred range of about one to about one and one-half times such radius.

Fig. 8 depicts an alternative configuration for a land surface 1' which intersects flank surface 7 at an obtuse angle a5' (i.e. land 1' slopes downwardly toward the cutting edge at an angle a4). This alternative embodiment is beneficial in those applications requiring greater edge strength, such as where hardened materials are being machined. Angle a5 may lie in the range of from about 90 degrees to about 120 degrees, with a prefererd range of from about 90 degrees to about 100 degrees.

Fig. 9 shows another alternative to the embodiment of Figs. 5 to 7, wherein each corner pedestal or control surface 4' extends downwardly at angle a6 to the plane of the chipbreaking face. Angle a6 is selected to be less than angle a 1 of first ramp surface 2 (Fig. 7). With a downward slope, corner control surface 4' may offer less resistance to free flowing chips in the insert cutting corner region.

A triangular insert of the invention is illustrated in Figs. 10 and 11. In a prototype triangular insert tested under relatively heavy feed rates in excess of 0.51 mm (.020 inches) per revolution, insert 20 equipped with conventional mounting apertures 29 includes land 23, preferably about 0.45 mm (.018 inches) wide, intersecting flank surfaces 22 at an angle of about 90 degrees to thereby define cutting edge 21. First ramp surface 24A, 24B extends downwardly from an inner boundary of land 23 at an angle of about 15 degrees to an inner boundary located about 0.15 mm (.006 inches) below the plane of land 23. Second ramp surface 27 extends downwardly from the inner boundary of surface 24A at an angle of about 7 degrees to a floor surface 28 located at a depth of about 0.40 mm (.016 inches) below the plane of land 23. In each corner, pedestal surface 25 interrupts surface 24B at a depth of about 0.08 mm (.003 inches) below the plane of land 23.

Third ramp surface 26 extends downwardly at an angle of about 20 degrees to connect the inner boundary of pedestal 25 to ramp surface 27.

The invention had been described with reference to preferred embodiments solely for the sake of example and without exclusion of those alternatives which will become apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, the various control and ramp surfaces described could be arcuate rather than planar, so long as the intersections of the various surfaces are tangentially joined in a manner such that will eliminate chip impinging barriers.

Claims (16)

Claims

1. A tool for cutting chip forming materials having a cutting corner defined by the intersection of a chipbreaker surface and two flank surfaces, the tool comprising: a land surface extending inwardly from the cutting corner; a first control surface extending from an inner boundary of the land surface downwardly at a first angle to the plane of the chipbreaker surface; a corner control surface extending inwardly from an inner boundary of the first control surface; a second control surface extending from an inner boundary of the corner control surface downwardly at a second angle to the plane; and a third control surface extending from an inner boundary of the second control surface downwardly at a third angle to the plane.

2. A tool as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the land surface further extends from the cutting corner and intersects at least one of the flank surfaces to define a cutting edge, the first control surface further extends parallel to the cutting edge and adjacent to an inner boundary of the land surface, the third control surface further extends parallel to the cutting edge and adjacent to an inner boundary of the first control surface, and an intersection of the first and third control surfaces is interrupted at the cutting corner by a boundary of the second control surface.

3. A tool as claimed in Claim 2, wherein the corner control surface extends substantially parallel to the plane of the chipbreaker surface.

4. A tool as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the land surface extends substantially parallel to the plane of the chipbreaker surface.

5. A tool as claimed in claim 3 or 4, wherein the land surface intersects the at least one flank surface at an obtuse angle.

6. A tool as claimed in any of claims 2 to 5, wherein the corner control surface extends downwardly from a boundary of the first control surface at an angle to the plane which is less than the first angle.

7. A cutting insert comprising a polygonal body having opposed top and bottom faces lying in substantially parallel planes and a polygonal peripheral surface formed by side surfaces substantially perpendicular to the planes and joining conjunctively at cutting corners of the polygon, wherein at least one of the top and bottom faces includes:: a substantially planar land intersecting each of the side surfaces to define peripheral cutting edges extending between the cutting corners; a substantially planar first ramp surface extending downwardly at a first angle to the planes from an inner boundary of the land; a substantially planar second ramp surface extending downwardly at a second angle to the planes from an inner boundary of the first ramp surface; substantially planar control surfaces, one positioned at each cutting corner so as to interrupt a portion of the first ramp surface; and substantially planar third ramp surfaces, one of each connecting an inner boundary of a corresponding control surface to the second ramp surface.

8. A cutting insert as claimed in Claim 7, wherein the land is substantially perpendicular to the side surfaces.

9. A cutting insert as claimed in Claim 8, wherein the control surfaces are substantially parallel to the planes.

10. A cutting insert as claimed in Claim 8 or 9, wherein the land extends inwardly from the cutting edge a distance on the order of 0.38 mm to 0.89 mm.

11. A cutting insert as claimed in any of Claims 7 to 10, wherein the first ramp surface extends downwardly with the first angle on the order of 10 degrees to 20 degrees to an intersection with the second ramp surface on the order of 0.10 mm to 0.26 mm below a plane containing the land.

12. A cutting insert as claimed in any of Claims 7 to 11, wherein the second ramp surface extends downwardly with the second angle on the order of 5 degrees to 15 degrees to a distance on the order of at least 0.30 mm below a plane containing the land.

13. A cutting insert as claimed in any of Claims 7 to 12, wherein the control surfaces each intersect the first ramp surface at a distance on the order of 0.05 mm to 0.13 mm below a plane containing the land.

14. A cutting insert as claimed in any of Claims 7 to 13, wherein the third ramp surfaces each extend downward at an angle to the parallel planes of the top and bottom faces on the order of 10 degrees to 25 degrees.

1 5. a cutting insert as claimed in any of Claims 7 to 9, wherein the land extends inwardly from the cutting edge a distance on the order of 0.45 mm, the first ramp surface extends downwardly with the first angle on the order of 15 degrees to an intersection with the second ramp surface on the order of 0.1 5 mm below a plane containing the land, the second ramp surface extends downwardly with the second angle on the order of 7 degrees to a distance on the order of 0.40 mm below the plane containing the land, the control surfaces each intersect the first ramp surface on the order of 0.08 mm below the plane containing the land, and the third ramp surfaces each extend downwardly at an angle to the parallel planes of the top and bottom faces on the order of 20 degrees.

16. A cutting insert substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as illustrated in Figs. 5 to 11 of the accompanying drawings.