GB2115836A - Improvements in or relating to aluminium alloys - Google Patents

Description

1 GB 2 115 836 A 1

SPECIFICATION Improvements in or relating to aluminium alloys

This invention relates to aluminium alloys containing lithium, in particular to those alloys suitable for aerospace applications.

It is known that the addition of lithium to aluminium alloys reduces their density and increases their elastic moduli producing significant improvements in specific stiffnesses. Furthermore the rapid increase in solid solubility of lithium in aluminium over the temperature range 01 to 5OWC results in an alloy system with is amenable to precipitation hardening to achieve strength levels comparable with some of the existing commercially produced aluminium alloys.

Up to the present time demonstrable advantages of lithium containing alloys have been offset by 10 difficulties inherent in the actual alloy compositions hitherto developed and the conventional methods used to produce these compositions. Only two lithium containing alloys have achieved significant usage in the aerospace field. These are an American alloy, X2020 having a composition

A]-4.5Cu-1.1 Li-0.5Mn-0.2-Cd (all figures relating to composition now and hereinafter are in wt%) and a Russian alloy, 01420, described in UKP No 1,172,736 by Fridlyander et a] and containing Al-4 to 7 Mg-1.5 to 2.6 Li-0.2 to 1.0 Mn-0.05 to 0.3 Zr (either or both of Mn and Zr being present).

The reduction in density associated with the 1. 1 % lithium addition to X2020 was 3% and although the alloy developed very high strengths it also possessed very low levels of fracture toughness making its efficient use at high stresses inadvisable. Further ductility related problems were also 20 discovered during forming operations.

The Russian alloy 01420 possesses specific moduli better than those of conventional alloys but its specific strength levels are only comparable with the commonly used 2000 series aluminium alloys so that weight savings can only be achieved in stiffness critical applications.

Both the above alloys were developed during the 1950's and '60's a more recent alloy published in the technical press has the composition AI-21V1g-1.5Cu-31-i-0.1 8Zr.

Whilst this alloy possesses high strength and stiffness the fracture toughness is still too low for many aerospace applications. In attempts to overcome problems associated with high solute contents such as, for example, cracking of the ingot during casting or subsequent rolling, many workers in the field 30 have turned their attention to powder metallurgy techniques. These techniques whilst solving some of the problems of a casting route have themselves many inherent disadvantages and thus the problems of one technique have been exchanged for the problems of another. Problems of a powder route include those of removal of residual porosity, contamination of powder particles by oxides and practical limitations on size of material which can be produced. 35 It has now been found that relatively much lower additions of the alloying elements magnesium and copper may be made and by optimising the production process parameters and subsequent heat treatments alloys possessing adequate properties including a much higher fracture toughness may be produced.

In the prestant alloys, the alloy composition has been developed to produce an optimum balance 40 between reduced density, increased stiffness and adequate strength, ductility and fracture toughness to maximise the possible weight savings that accrue from both the reduced density and the increased stiffness.

According to the present invention, therefore, an aluminium based alloy has a composition within the following ranges, the ranges being in weight per cent:

Lithium Magnesium Copper 2.0 to 2.8 0.4 to 1.0 1.0 to 1.5 Zirconium Manganese Nickel 0 to 0.2 0 to 0.5 0 to 0.5 2 GB 2 115 836 A 2 Chromium 0 to 0.5 Aluminium Balance Optional additions of one or more of the elements zirconium, manganese, chromium. and nickel may be made to control other metallurgical parameters such as grain size and grain growth on 5 recrystallisation.

A preferred range for a zirconium addition would be 0.1 to 0.15 weight per cent.

A major advantage of the more dilute lithium containing alloys is that production and processing are greatly facilitated. Alloys according to the present invention may be produced by conventional casting techniques such as, for example, direct chill semi-continuous casting. The casting problems associated with known alloys have led many workers to use production techniques based on powder 10 metallurgy routes.

Owing to their lower solute contents the present alloys are more easily homogenised and subsequently worked than previous alloys having relatively high solute contents Because of their advantageous mechanical and physical properties including low density and excellent corrosion resistance, the latter property also being partly attributable to the lower solute 15 content, the alloys are particularly suitable for aerospace airframe applications. The density of an alloy having the composition AI-2.44Li-0.56Mg-1.1 8Cu-0.1 Ur is 2.54 9/mi this compares favourably with the density of 2014 alloy, for example, whi. ch is 2.8 91m I.

This is a density reduction of over 9% on a conventional alloy having comparable properties. It will be 20 appreciated that alloys of the present invention also enjoy an additional advantage by virtue of their lower solute content in that they have less of the heavier elements which increase density.

In sheet applications a preferred magnesium content is approximately 0.7%. It has been found that the magnesium level is critical in terms of precipitating phases and subsequent strength levels.

Examples of alloys according to the present invention will now be given together with properties 25 and corresponding heat treatment data.

EXAMPLE No 1

Composition AI-2.32Li-0.5M9-1.22Cu-0.1 2Zr The alloy ingot was homogenised, hot-worked to 3 mm thickness and cold rolled to 1.6 mm with inter stage annealing.

The alloy sheet was then solution treated, cold water quenched and stretched 3%.

Table 1 below gives average test results for the various ageing times at 1701'C.

TABLE 1

Ageing 0.2% Proof Tensile Elastic Fracture Example time Stress Strength Elong Modulus Toughness No (h rs) MPa MPa E.GPa Ke, MPaVrn 1 1 -11 326 414 6.5 76.7 87.9 381 450 4.5 80.0 68.3 8 389 458 4.5 79.5 79.7 24 426 489 3.5 80.2 64.8 64 455 503 6.0 83.0 46.5 EXAMPLE No 2 35 Composition AI-2.441-i-0.56Mg-1.1 8Cu-0.1 Ur Alloy processing details as for Example No 1. Test results are given below in Table 2.

3 GB 2 115 836 A 3 TABLE 2

Example No

Ageing 0.2% Proof Tensile Elastic time Stress Strength Elong Modulus (h rs) Mpa Mpa % E.GPa J.L 313 389 7.2 78.8 2 8 391 464 6.2 78.0 Fracture Toughness Kc, MPa/m 2 EXAMPLE No 3

79.2 Composition A]-2.56Li-0.73M9-1.1 7Cu-0.08Zr Alloy processing details as for Example No 1 except that the stretching was 2%. Test results are 5 given below in Table 3.

TABLE 3

Example No

11 EXAMPLE No 4

Ageing 0.2% Proof Tensile time Stress Strength Elong (h rs) MPa MPa % 8 409 489 6.6 24 416 477 5.5 457 518 5.5 Elastic Modulus E.GPa 79.8 Composition AI-2.21 Li-0.6 7 M g- 1. 1 2Cu-0. 1 Wr Alloy procesing details as for Example No 3. Test results are given below in Table 4.

TABLE 4

Example No

4 Ageing time (h rs) 8 24 0.2% Proof Stress MPa 378 399 Tensile Elastic Strength Elong Modulus MPa % E.GPa 447 6.5 78.7 468 6.0 78.0 Fracture Toughness Kc, MPa m 71.3 62.9 EXAMPLE No 5 Composition AI-2.37Li-0.48Mg-1.1 8Cu-0. 11 Zr The alloy of this example was tested in the form of 11 mm thick plate.

Average figures are given of longitudinal and transverse test pieces in Table 5 below.

The alloy has not been cross-rolled.

4 GB 2 115 836 A 4 TABLE 5

Ageing 0.2% Proof Tensile Example time Stress Strength Elong No (hrs) MPa MPa % 8 340 431 7.8 16 389 458 7.1 24 399 469 7.0 48 422 490 6.9 72 432 497 6.5 Elastic Modulus E.GPa 82.9 82.4 82.0 80.6 81.6 EXAMPLE No 6

Composition AI-2.48Li-0.54Mg-1.09Cu-0.31 Ni-0.1 2Zr The alloy of this example was tested in the form of 25 mm hot-rolled plate solution treated at 55301, water quenched and stretched 2%. Test results are given below in Table 6.

TABLE 6

Ageing Ageing 0.2% Proof Tensile Example Temp Time Stress Strength Elong No (0 C) (hrs) MPa MPa % 6 170 16 324- 405 6.5 48 389 444 4.8 72 393 462 4.8 16 358 433 7.1 48 433 482 5.5 Although all of the material for the examples given above was produced by conventional water cooled chill casting processes the alloy system is however amenable to processing by powder metallurgy techinques. It is considered, however, that a major advantage of the alloys of the present invention lies in the ability to cast large ingots. From such ingots it is possible to supply the aerospace 10 industry with sizes of sheet and plate comparable with those already produced in conventional aluminium alloy. The examples given above have been limited to material produced in sheet and plate form. However, alloys of the present invention are also suitable for the production of material in the form of extrusions, forgings and castings.

Alloys of the present invention are not limited to aerospace applications. They may be used wherever light weight is necessary such as, for example, in some applications in land and sea vehicles.

Claims (6)

1. An aluminium based alloy having a composition within the ranges expressed in weight per cent; Lithium

2.0 to 2.8 Magnesium 0.4 to 1.0 Copper 1.0 to.1.5 Zirconium 0 to 0.2 GB 2 115 836 A 5 Manganese Nickel Chromium 0 to 0.5 0 to 0.5 0 to 0.5 Aluminium Balance (apart from incidental impurities) 2. An aluminium alloy according to claim 1 produced by an ingot metallurgy route.

3. An aluminium alloy according to claim 1 or claim 2 having a magnesium content in the range 0.7 to 1.0 weight per cent.

4. An aerospace airframe structure produced from an aluminium alloy according to any preceding 10 claim from 1 to 3.

5. An alluminium alloy substantially as hereinbefore described in the specification in any of the examples numbered 1 to

6.

Printed for Her Majesty's Stationery Office by the Courier Press, Leamington Spa, 1983. Published by the Patent Office, 25 Southampton Buildings, London, WC2A lAY, from which copies may be obtained.