GB2081305A - Bacterial ethanol production - Google Patents
Bacterial ethanol production Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2081305A GB2081305A GB8120631A GB8120631A GB2081305A GB 2081305 A GB2081305 A GB 2081305A GB 8120631 A GB8120631 A GB 8120631A GB 8120631 A GB8120631 A GB 8120631A GB 2081305 A GB2081305 A GB 2081305A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- ethanol
- immobilized
- gel
- glucose
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
- C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
- C12P7/02—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
- C12P7/04—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
- C12P7/06—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage
- C12P7/065—Ethanol, i.e. non-beverage with microorganisms other than yeasts
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N11/00—Carrier-bound or immobilised enzymes; Carrier-bound or immobilised microbial cells; Preparation thereof
- C12N11/02—Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier
- C12N11/04—Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier entrapped within the carrier, e.g. gel or hollow fibres
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels, e.g. bio-diesel
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Immobilizing And Processing Of Enzymes And Microorganisms (AREA)
Abstract
Carbohydrates are converted to ethanol using immobilized bacterial cells under conditions which prevent growth of the cells.
Description
SPECIFICATION
Bacterial ethanol production
The present invention relates to ethanol production, and in particular to the production of ethanol using bacteria.
It is well known that yeasts can be used to produce ethanol, i.e. alcohol, from glucose or related carbohydrate substrates by a fermentation (that is, by a decomposition using the growing microorganisms). Such fermentations form the basis of the production of beer and other alcoholic drinks, and are now the subject of increasing interest with a view to producing industrial alcohol and power alcohol.
In contrast to the production of ethanol by yeasts, the production of ethanol by bacteria has received very much less study.
Strains of the bacterium Zymomonas mobilis are sometimes used in tropical countries for making alcoholic drinks, and the possible use of Zymomonas spp in the production of alcohol-containing fuels by fermentation is under academic investigation by P. L. Rogers and others at the School of Biological
Technology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Rogers and his co-workers have reported that Z. mobilis can efficiently and rapidly ferment glucose to ethanol: in Biotechnology Letters, 1979, 1(10), 165 they report work on batch culture of Z. mobilis ATCC 10988, while in the same journal at 1(4), 421 they report work on continuous culture.
We have been investigating the industrial production of ethanol using microorganisms, and have found a novel process for producing ethanol from bacteria which process is not one of bacterial fermentation as described by Rogers et al.
According to the present invention we provide a process for producing ethanol which process employs immobilized cells of an ethanol-producing bacterium to convert a carbohydrate or other substrate into ethanol. The substrate employed is one which could be utilized for growth by the bacterium, but growth is minimized by presenting the substrate to the immobilized bacterium as a nutritionally-deficient medium. Thus, we regard the present process as essentially relaying upon nongrowing cells of the bacterium.
For the present process, an ethanol-producing bacterium is immobilized by means of a suitable technique, such as entrapment within a gel. Ethanol is then produced on a batch or continuous basis by supplying carbohydrate to the immobilized bacterium but without supplying all the nutrients required for growth of the bacterium. The bacterium then effects the conversion of the carbohydrate to ethanol, acting as an immobilized enzyme system rather than as a proliferating microorganism.
Compared with the known fermentations using Zymomonas spp, the present, principally nonfermentative process has the substantial advantage that assimilated carbon does not have to be channelled into production of new cells: in principle all the carbohydrate can follow the metabolic pathway through to ethanol.
In a paper presented in March 1 980 at the "Symposium on Bioconversion and Biochemical
Engineering" held in New Delhi, India, Dr. Rogers and co-workers reviewed the progress which they hjd made in evaluating fermentations using: mobilis. The medium they used has the composition given in
Table 1.
TABLE 1
Component Amount (g/l)
glucose 100
yeast extract 5 (NH4)2So4
KH2PO4
MgS047H20 In passing, mention was made that good productivities and half-life periods were demonstrated with immobilized cell reactors. The mode of immobilization was not apparent. When we attempted an actual fermentation using cells of Z. mobilis immobilized by our techniques, we found that appreciable gas was evolved during growth of the bacteria and that cells tended to leak from the immobilized system out into the nutrient medium. Clearly these are disadvantages relative to the present, non-fermentative process.
More generally, the use of immobilized cells has appreciable advantages over the more usual use of free cells. A continuous process is facilitated, less power is required relative to that for fermentation, and a higher cell density is possible. The present process is especially suited to continuous operation:
the cells are retained in the reactor and are not lost to contaminate the product stream; there is no need
for cell separation. Furthermore, since the medium is nutritionally deficient, there is less risk of
contamination by other microorganisms and there is no need to employ strictly sterile equipment.
It will also be appreciated that the use of ethanol-producing bacteria leads to improvements
compared with the use of yeasts. In particular, when compared with the yeast Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, bacteria such as Zymomonas mobilis have a high rate of specific glucose uptake (2.6 fold increase in glucose uptake, also a 2.9 fold in ethanol production) and use a more efficient metabolic
pathway (Swings J. and De Ley J. (1977) Bact. Reviews, 41, 1-46).
For the best results in the process of the invention the cells of the ethanol-producing bacterium
should be immobilized by entrapment within a substrate-permeable material. This form of
immobilization is particularly suited to the anaerobic bacteria such as Z. mobilis since it is then easier to
maintain a local environment for the bacterial cells which has a suitably low oxygen concentration. The
immobilization can be carried out in a manner known per se, and is preferably carried out by the
entrapment of the bacterial cells within a gel.
Suitable gel materials include alginate, polyacrylamide, agar, xanthan gum/locust bean gum, kappa-carrageenan or kappa-carrageenan/locust bean gum.
Of these gel materials, we find an alginate gel, in particular a calcium alginate gel, is most satisfactory. Other alginate gels can be used, such as those formed with other group II metals, but we
much prefer calcium alginate. In this way the cells are trapped in an inert, three-dimensional polymer
network with relatively large interstitial spaces in the gel.
For immobilization of the bacterial cells in alginate gel we prefer first to slurry the cells with an
aqueous solution of a soluble alginate, for example sodium alginate. The concentration of cells in the
slurry is in no way critical to the success of the present process, but by trying various concentrations an optimum can readily be found for a particular system. Typically the concentration of cells is between 1 and 90% wet weight/volume (ww/v), although preferably it is from 10 to 40% ww/v, more preferably about 20% ww/v. Equally, the concentration of soluble alginate is not critical. A particularly suitable concentration is between 1 and 20% w/v, more especially between 0.5 and 10% w/v, e.g. 2% w/v.
The resultant slurry of cells in alginate is then metered into a solution of a metal salt with which the soluble alginate forms a gel. As mentioned, the preferred gel is calcium alginate,and suitable salts then include calcium chloride. In particular, we prefer to use a calcium chloride solution whose molarity is from 0.01 to 1 M, more preferably from 0.05 to 0.5M, most preferably around 0.1 M. The metal salt solution is preferably at 15--400C, more especially around 300C, as the slurry is metered in, and it is
also advantageous if the solution is stirred. The stability of the product is enhanced if the metal salt solution further contains some dissolved glucose, e.g. 5 to 20% (w/v) glucose, preferably about
10% (w/v) glucose.
By metering in the slurry as discrete droplets it is a simple matter to produce perfectly spherical
pellets of gel entrapping the cells. The pellet size can be varied, but for ease of handling and for efficient
mass transfer properties in use, it is preferred to generate pellets which are about 3 to 5 mm in
diameter. It is readily possible also to immobilize the cells in a block of gel (which is then divided for use)
or in rope of gel (which for use can be wound on a former or cut into sections). Generally, the larger
immobilized pellets or other shapes are preferred with anaerobic bacteria since inward oxygen diffusion
is low.
Similar techniques can be used for immobilizing the cells in other gel systems. Procedures for forming gelled products are available in the literature, and it is a simple matter to adapt them to the present purposes.
If desired, the enzyme system can be co-immobilized with other materials, particularly but not exclusively inert materials. An inert material can act as a core, and more generally can impart desirable properties to the product.
Preferably any inert material which is used consists of particles with dimensions of from 250 to
1 500 micron. A maximum dimension less than about 1 50 micron is undesirable if the product is to be used in a fluidized bed reactor.
Examples of insert materials which can be used include porous particles of either naturallyoccurring or manufactured materials.
Bone char, otherwise known as bone black, bone charcoal or animal charcoal, is a particularly inert material for the present invention. Bone char offers a combination of advantageous properties which is not met by the materials which have previously been suggested for use as support material.
Bone char is obtained at an economically favourable cost from a naturally-occurring raw material, and consists principally of a hydroxyapatite structure over which there is a thin, evenly-dispersed coating of active carbon, which the particles being of an irregular form and providing a suitable 'key' for adhesion of the external deposit. In addition, it has been used for many years in sugar refining throughout the world, and it is well established that its use entails not hazardous problems in the food industry. It exhibits a good degree of thermal stability and ordinarily contains no artificial additives which might give rise to further problems even when used in mildly acidic conditions.
The particle size of the bone char is not critical for a successful immobilization. We prefer to use particles with a minimum dimension of less than 2 mm, more preferably less than 1 mm, and with a maximum dimension of less than 6 mm, more preferably less than 2 mm.
After formation of the gel-immobilized product, the gel can be dried. The dried products may be prepared for example by drying the gel to less than 70% of the original volume, preferably to less than 50% of the original volume, and more preferably to less than 40% of the original volume.
Despite the loss of water occasioned by the drying, the dried, cell-containing gels retain enzyme activity. Often the activity of the gel will be less after drying when expressed in terms of amount of substrate which is converted in unit time by a given sample of gel. On the other hand, the reduction in gel volume will usually mean that the activity per unit volume will be greater after drying. Some uptake of water may occur when the dried gels of the invention are used to effect an enzyme-catalyzed reaction in aqueous solution, but normally some reduction in gel volume is maintained. Thus the increase in activity per unit volume is normally maintained.
Apart from retention of enzyme activity, the dried gels have other beneficial properties. Thus, they are typically stronger, more resistant to compression and abrasion, and easier to handle and to transport. Moreover, they represent a very convenient way in which enzymatically-active cells may be stored prior to use.
The drying technique is not particularly critical, though simple air drying at or near room temperature using a current of air appears to give the best results. Freeze-drying can be used, though there is often a greater loss in enzyme activity than with air drying and moreover the reduction in volume may not be substantial. Drying in a vacuum oven and drying through dewatering using ethanol exchange are also possible, though again there will usually be a greater loss in activity than with air drying.
Air drying is suitably effected at 20 to 500C for 1 to 20 hours, with 2 to 5 hours at 30 to 350C representing preferred conditions. Gentle turning over of the gel during drying is helpful as also is the use of air with low humidity.
The dried gel preferably has a volume less than 70% of that of undried gel, and preferably weighs less than 70% of the undried gel.
The retention of enzymatic activity after drying is sometimes enhanced if the gel contains a solute or substrate. Such additives can also be used to modify the stability of the dry product, and may be incorporated during the formation of the gel. To give one example, sucrose is a solute which can beneficially be added to the metal salt solution (usually a calcium salt) during formation of an alginate gel. -
The cells employed in the immobilization are preferably of an ethanol-producing microorganism of the genuszymomonas. Bacteria of other genera can be utilized. Of the species belonging to the genus
Zymomonas we prefer. mobilis. Especially suitable strains of Z. mobilis include those deposited at the
American Type Culture Collection under the Accession Numbers ATCC 10988 and ATCC 29501.
Processes in accordance with the present invention are preferably carried out as a continuous process, suitably by loading the immobilized cells in to a column and passing the substrate as a solution through the column. Notwithstanding the preference for continuity, the present process can also be performed batch-wise.
Whereas the known fermentations of Z. mobilis employ a glucose-based nutrient medium to provide the substrate, the present process employs a nutritionally deficient medium containing glucose or other substrate such as fructose or sucrose. For most purposes, we prefer to use an aqueous solution of a carbohydrate alone, without any other nutrients or assimilable materials. More specifically, we prefer to use qn aqueous solution of glucose containing from 5 to 20% (w/v) glucose, more preferably a solution of about 10% glucose.
It was surprising to discover that with ethanol-producing bacteria the conversion of glucose or other carbohydrate to ethanol could be effected using a nutritionally deficient medium, such that appreciable growth of the bacterium does not occur during ethanol production. The available literature concerning ethanol-producing bacteria always describes the use of media permitting growth of the bacterium. Moreover, with yeasts it is now known that ethanol production is possible with immobilized systems but only when a balanced medium is supplied. In this respect, reference is made to an article by
Wada eft at concerning immobilization of yeast cells with carrageenan gel (European J. Appl. Microbial.
Biotechol. 8, 241-247 (1979)):- at page 246 is is explained "the supply of nutrient medium for growth was essential for continuous production... The depletion of nutrients caused death of cells and decrease of productivity".
The present invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting examples, where 'ww' indicates a wet weight of cells (dry weights being about one-fifth the figure):
EXAMPLES 1 to 7
Zymomonas mobiles ATCC 10988 was inoculated in 500 ml shake-flasks containing 200 ml aliquots of medium of the composition given in Table 2 below:
TABLE 2
Compound Amount (g/l)
glucose 100
yeast extract 10 (NH4)2SO4 1
KH2PO4
MgSO47H2O 0.5 dilute acid to pH 5
The flasks were then briefly degassed using a vacuum line, sealed in polythene bags, and incubated with minimal agitation at 300C.
After 70 hours the pH had fallen to 3.85. The cell concentration was then 7 gww/l with a yield of
0.07 gww/g glucose supplied. Cells were harvested using centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 15 minutes
at 300 C. The harvested mass of cells from the centrifuge was slurried with 5% (w/v) sodium alginate
solution to give a 20% (ww/v) slurry. Pellets containing the cells were then formed by extruding the slurry into 0.1 M calcium chloride containing 1 5% (w/v) glucose.
The pellets were then assayed in batch by shaking in substrate solutions at 300 C, or continuously by packing into columns, theremostatted at 300C, with the substrate pumped up the column. Ethanol and remaining glucose were measured by chemical assay. The theoretical maximum yield of ethanol/g glucose is 55% and in all cases the mass balance was completed on the basis that any deficiencies were due to unused glucose.
BATCH ASSAYS
Measurements were taken when the ethanol concentration was around 50 g/l. The activities of the immobilized cells assayed with various substrate solutions were as follows in Table 3:
TABLE 3
Example Activity
No. Substrate (g ethanol/gww/h)
1 100 g/l glucose 0.49
2 175 g/l glucose 0.38
3 250 g/l glucose 0.53
4* growth medium (100g/l glucose) 0.51
* Example 4 is a comparison example
Cell leakage was observed when the growth medium of Table 2 was used in Example 4 as the substrate, due to cell growth inside the pellets.
CONTINUOUS ASSAYS
Substrate was pumped through the column at a constant rate of about 0.085 ecv/h. There was typically a lag time of about one day before equilibrium was reached. The activities were then measured, giving the results shown in Table 4:
TABLE 4
Example Activity
No. Substrate (g ethanol/gww/h)
5 100 g/l glucose 0.47
6 250 g/l glucose 0.33
The half-life for the activity was about 90 h. No gas accumulation was observed in the column, nor was any disruption of the pellets. Moreover, microscopic examination of pellets in cross-section before and after use showed that no division of the cells occurred during use. As with the batch experiments, when a complete growth medium was used as substrate, it was noticed that the product liquid contained cells of the bacterium, these cells arising from growth of the immobilized cells.
EXAMPLE 7
Pellets were dried with a stream of air at ambient temperature. Tpically 22% of the original activity was lost by drying to 35% of the original weight. Pellets dried to 45% of original weight lost 73% of their activity after 288 h storage in a sealed container at room temperature.
Dried pellets were packed in a column. Under this mode of operation the initial activity of the cells, using 250 gl ' glucose as substrate, was reduced to 45% of that of the equivalent column of undried pellets.
EXAMPLE 8
The procedure of Examples 1 to 7 was repeated except that the harvested mass of cells was slurried together with bone char, sieved to 25 to 46 mesh, in the solution of sodium alginate, thereby giving 20% (ww/v) of cells and 20% (dry w/v) of bone char. The slurry was then extruded as before, giving pellets containing bone char particles.
When assessed on a continuous basis, the activity of the immobilized cells was substantially the same as pellets without bone char. However, the pH of the eluate was increased.
EXAMPLE 9
Cells of Z. mobilis ATCC 10988 were immobilized in kappa-carrageenan by mixing the wet cells with a 4.5% w/v carrageenan solution in phosphate-buffered saline at 500C so as to give a final cell concentration of 20% v/v cells. The slurry was then extruded drop-wise into a 0.3M potassium chloride bath at 1 0CC and incubated for 4 hours.
The resultant immobilized cells were assayed on a continuous basis against 100 g/l glucose solution. The activity was 0.32 g ethanol/gww cells/hour. Again there was the advantage that the converted solution was cell-free.
EXAMPLE 10
Example 6 was repeated using a glucose-fructose mixed solution containing 250 g/l of total sugar.
The activity was 0.187 g ethanol/gww/hour.
Claims (8)
1. A process for producing ethanol, wherein a carbohydrate is converted by immobilized cells of an ethanol-producing bacterium into ethanol, the carbohydrate being presented to said cells in a medium which is nutritionally inadequate for growth of said cells.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the cells are immobilized in a gel.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the gel is dried after immobilization of the cells.
4. A process according to claim 2 or 3, wherein the cells are co-immobilized with another material.
5. A process according to claim 4, wherein the material comprises particles of bone char.
6. A process for producing ethanol by conversion of a substrate using cells of a bacterium, characterized in that the substrate is converted in a non-fermentative manner, using immobilized cells.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein the substrate is dissolved in water to give a medium which lacks at least one factor required for growth of the bacterium, and the medium is contacted with the immobilized cells to effect the conversion.
8. A process according to claim 6 or 7, when effected on a continuous basis.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8120631A GB2081305B (en) | 1980-07-08 | 1981-07-03 | Bacterial ethanol production |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8022243 | 1980-07-08 | ||
GB8120631A GB2081305B (en) | 1980-07-08 | 1981-07-03 | Bacterial ethanol production |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB2081305A true GB2081305A (en) | 1982-02-17 |
GB2081305B GB2081305B (en) | 1984-05-23 |
Family
ID=26276145
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB8120631A Expired GB2081305B (en) | 1980-07-08 | 1981-07-03 | Bacterial ethanol production |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2081305B (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0199499A2 (en) * | 1985-04-12 | 1986-10-29 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation |
US4812410A (en) * | 1985-04-12 | 1989-03-14 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation |
AT388174B (en) * | 1987-03-10 | 1989-05-10 | Vogelbusch Gmbh | METHOD FOR THE FERMENTATION OF CARBOHYDRATE-CONTAINING MEDIA USING BACTERIA |
US4840902A (en) * | 1987-05-04 | 1989-06-20 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation using pH control |
-
1981
- 1981-07-03 GB GB8120631A patent/GB2081305B/en not_active Expired
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0199499A2 (en) * | 1985-04-12 | 1986-10-29 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation |
EP0199499A3 (en) * | 1985-04-12 | 1987-09-30 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation |
US4812410A (en) * | 1985-04-12 | 1989-03-14 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation |
AT388174B (en) * | 1987-03-10 | 1989-05-10 | Vogelbusch Gmbh | METHOD FOR THE FERMENTATION OF CARBOHYDRATE-CONTAINING MEDIA USING BACTERIA |
US4840902A (en) * | 1987-05-04 | 1989-06-20 | George Weston Limited | Continuous process for ethanol production by bacterial fermentation using pH control |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2081305B (en) | 1984-05-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4393136A (en) | Bacterial ethanol production | |
Lee et al. | Enhanced production of bioethanol and ultrastructural characteristics of reused Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized calcium alginate beads | |
Wada et al. | Continuous production of ethanol using immobilized growing yeast cells | |
Karube et al. | Continous hydrogen production by immobilized whole cells of Clostridium butyricum | |
KR950012803B1 (en) | Method for preparation of novel immobilized biocatalysts | |
Suresh et al. | Utilization of prawn waste for chitinase production by the marine fungus Beauveria bassiana by solid state fermentation | |
CA1143307A (en) | Method for producing ethanol in high concentration by using immobilized microorganism | |
Ogbonna et al. | Loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge as a carrier for microbial cell immobilization | |
Grootwassink et al. | Non-specific β-fructofuranosidase (inulase) from Kluyveromyces fragilis: Batch and continous fermentation, simple recovery method and some industrial properties | |
Kar et al. | Statistical optimization of α-amylase production by Streptomyces erumpens MTCC 7317 cells in calcium alginate beads using response surface methodology | |
Suresh et al. | Utilization of damaged sorghum and rice grains for ethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation | |
McGhee et al. | Ethanol production by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces uvarum, and Zymomonas mobilis | |
CA1211729A (en) | Production of organic acids by a continuous fermentation process | |
JPS6163287A (en) | Biological group composite and its production | |
Ogbonna et al. | Efficient production of ethanol by cells immobilized in loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge | |
CN107460188A (en) | A kind of compound immobilization method and its application of nitrilase producing strains mutant | |
JPS6215198B2 (en) | ||
Slininger et al. | Continuous conversion of d‐xylose to ethanol by immobilized pachysolen tannophilus | |
Jain et al. | Continuous production of ethanol from fructose by immobilized growing cells of Zymomonas mobilis | |
Swamy et al. | β‐Amylase from Clostridium thermocellum SS8‐a thermophilic, anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium | |
Linko et al. | Alcoholic fermentation of D-xylose by immobilized Pichia stipitis yeast | |
Love et al. | Continuous ethanol fermentation at 45 C using Kluyveromyces marxianus IMB3 immobilized in calcium alginate and kissiris | |
Gunasekaran et al. | High ethanol productivity from lactose by immobilized cells of Kluyveromyces fragilis and Zymomonas mobilis | |
GB2081305A (en) | Bacterial ethanol production | |
Matthews et al. | Culture systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PCNP | Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |