GB2066370A - Rotational wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils - Google Patents

Rotational wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2066370A
GB2066370A GB8030921A GB8030921A GB2066370A GB 2066370 A GB2066370 A GB 2066370A GB 8030921 A GB8030921 A GB 8030921A GB 8030921 A GB8030921 A GB 8030921A GB 2066370 A GB2066370 A GB 2066370A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
foil
stage
relative
downstream
upstream
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB8030921A
Other versions
GB2066370B (en
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Levine E M
Original Assignee
Levine E M
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Levine E M filed Critical Levine E M
Publication of GB2066370A publication Critical patent/GB2066370A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2066370B publication Critical patent/GB2066370B/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/66Combating cavitation, whirls, noise, vibration or the like; Balancing
    • F04D29/661Combating cavitation, whirls, noise, vibration or the like; Balancing especially adapted for elastic fluid pumps
    • F04D29/663Sound attenuation
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/26Rotors specially for elastic fluids
    • F04D29/32Rotors specially for elastic fluids for axial flow pumps
    • F04D29/325Rotors specially for elastic fluids for axial flow pumps for axial flow fans

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)

Abstract

The action of upstream I and downstream foil sets II rotating on a common shaft III within a fluid is enhanced by fixing certain interrelations of the foils such as the axial distance between the foils, the radial index between foils and pitch of one foil relative to the other so that the foil stages have their location determined and may be fixedly mounted with the foils of each stage being symmetrically and equidistantly spaced from one another and from the foils of the next adjacent foil stage so that the interacting uniform adjacent foil pressures and the upstream foil wake beneficially interacts optimally with at least one of the surfaces or boundary layers of the foils of the next adjacent downstream foil stage. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Rotational wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils This invention relates to a system for fixing co-rotating axial flow blades with twist and staged so that both wake interceptions for a variety of relative velocities and adjacent equidistant blade spacing are realized so as to provide acoustic and/or efficiency benefit.
Given that blades with twist, tending to uniform advance in axial flow, normally produce swirling wake sheets, one for each blade. And given that such propagation generally represents swirling energy loss and a source of noise radiation. And given that co-rotating discs of blades with roots fixed to a common axis of rotation and with uniformly advancing swirling wakes of upstream blades that are substantially capable, when staged, of intercepting or interacting with downstream blades.
While such interactions are generally thought to be detrimental, if all other things were equal, it seems desirable to reduce net wake production. By equidistantly spacing separate blades in adjacent stages coincident with effective near wake interception the invention realizes a complex of beneficial wake interactions hitherto unsuspected. Virtual wake reduction here realizes an acoustic benefit. Many acoustic reduction systems incurring general efficiency losses are known, and despite the general belief that wake interactions are detrimental, it is a feature of this invention that increased efficiency is realized whereby some of the energy of the swirling wakes is harnessed to beneficially work upon the following blades under a range of some practical conditions.
That is, by critically locating uniformly advancing co-rotating staged blades to realize the synergizing complex of interactions described herein, the sum of the blades can practically be made to produce less noise and to often act more energy efficiently than conventional single disc embodiments, or than any of the factors taken separately. In this specification and claims, synergy means that the combination of factors realizing benefits greater than any of the factors acting separately.
Historically, work by Eiffel Tietjens Prandtl and others has led erroneously to a general belief in the inefficiency of staged foils due to interactions thought detrimental.
This invention relates to an improved geometry for fixing blade root locations for fans and propellors that operate with substantially uniform wake producing blades and multiple stages fixed to a common axis of rotation.
Any array of blades with at least two stages will initially generate a swirling wake, one for each blade, that represents energy loss and generates an acoustic signature, that can, because uniformly advancing, be intercepted by a downstream blade. In this case wakes will be shared or absorbed. Such interception can also beneficially reload the system where the axial distance between the discs allows the free stream blades to handle an increased effective streamtube inflow or volume of fluid for added efficiency. Where the axial spacing is small or the inflow restricted, this latter effect is denied and the separate blades, if in interaction, tend to act as if they were a single compound.
Where the blades are also relatively slender and somewhat distantly spaced, a second and complementary action is generated such that alternate blades interact to cancel or dampen the amplitude of their interacting partner to either side in adjacent disc(s). This is because, as independent and equidistant, they are optimally spaced to neutralize the initial blade passing frequency of these partners. Thus it is useful for such blades to be substantially similar although some variation because of local operating condition may be found useful. At the same time however the initial set of wake spirals generated by the first or most upstream disc is virtually shared by the downstream disc blades.Thus instead of the conventionally high amplitude associated with the lowered blades passing frequency signature (and approached by alignment/near alignment configurations) we now have a condition whereby a given system of co-rotating blades co-operate to effect a self dampening acoustic system of virtually lower frequency while simultaneously increasing it's output efficiency for a range of load and velocity conditions.
It should be noted that systems effecting one but not both of these conditions, of swirl interception and symmetrical/equidistant spacing, critically fail to realize the benefits of the synergizing co-operation.
It is thus a purpose of this invention to sustain swirling wake near interceptions for co-rotating discs of uniform wake-producing equidistantly spaced blades to effect virtual wake frequency reduction often with increased efficiency due to blades reioading combined with increased effective inflow streamtube and sound reduction coincident with said near interception. This effect is sustained over a series of relative velocities and their vicinity for a given fixed set of foil roots as defined by the formula developed below. That is, a single configuration can be useful at least partially for a variety and range of relative velocities. Still air, or zero relative velocity is included though of course some consideration should be given to the immediate environment as it affects the free air stream.Increased efficiency benefit will be maximal for relatively low velocities and loadings.
In accordance with the invention there is provided a rotary foil system acting upon a medium or fluid like air and rotating in the same direction comprising in combination at least two foil stages, an upstream foil stage and a downstream foil stage, an axis of rotation, said foil stages being fixedly mounted relative to said axis for common rotation, therewith and with one another and in the same direction, the foils of each stage being substantially equidistantly spaced from one another and from the foils of the next adjacent foil stage whereby substantially uniform pressures are produced, so that the interacting uniform adjacent foil pressures and the upstream foil wake beneficially interacts optimally with at least one of the surfaces or boundary layers of the foils of the next adjacent downstream foil stage to a distance beyond which benefit ceases.
Figure 1 illustrates a typical, but not limiting case, example showing two stage planform symmetry.
Figure 2 shows side view of Figure 1.
Figure 3 shows flow analysis of Figure 2.
Figure 4 shows downstream shift of blade wake due to relative velocity consideration acting upon forward advance through a relevant index advance.
Figure 5, 1, m and n shows wave form considerations comparing single discs 1 and m with critical staged conditions n.
Figure 6 shows critical typical interactions, available from Figures 1 and 2, as determined by calculating angles and axial spaces given by the formulae given herein.
In the drawings like characters of reference indicate corresponding parts in the different figures.
Considering first the general case for substantially uniform wake producing axial flow blades fixed to a common axis of rotation. For a single stage rotating disc of N blades the critical blade passing frequency (B.P.F.), or maximum sound output, will occur at N times revolutions over time interval, as in Figure 51. An increase, for example, a doubling, of initial blade numbers will realize cancellation/substitution of the original B.P.F. and typically produce a new B.P.F. of 2N with a lower sound output for a common/constant energy input, as in Figure 5--m. Unfortunately the number of swirling wakes has been doubled to 2N in this case.The doubling of the frequency generally is accompanied by a reduction in amplitude energy or load (see Figures 5-1 and 5-m; o vs p) of each of the beats that along with lowered tip velocity conventionally effects some acoustic benefit. Incremental area "r" with amplitude p, while large compared to 5-n is generally acceptable and masked for 5-1 of amplitude o.
If we now consider the case for n disc where additional foils N, per disc, are staged downstream in subsequent disc(s) of rotation and upon the common shaft of rotation but with the index advance angle (I.A.) as determined by the following or like formaula: 3600 nN that establishes substantially equidistant spacing of all blades in the system; we find a series of critical locations for placing the disc(s) where the N upstream swirling wakes will intercept the N downstream blade locations. These locations will have index advance angles amongst co-operating blades for small odd numbered values M times the l.A. as determined and illustrated herein for two staged embodiments.
The blades of the added disc(s) thus interact with a flow beneficially pre-aligned as compared to a single disc condition and substantially generate no new wakes for the added disc(s) despite the fact that downstream foils are clearly acting behind and "separate" from their upstream partners. Such "separation" is required to realize effective increased inflow stream and equidistant adjacent foil damping. Two considerations show why the range of l.A.s and accompanying axial spacings is functionally broad. Given that swirling wakes are stronger closer to their propagating source, smaller values M.x I.A. (Figure 6) are indicated. However, consideration of free air flows shows that additional fluid is added to the volume handled in the initial streamtube (Figure 3), the greater the addition the better.Thus within limits, a larger axial distance between discs offers benefit. (Ignorance of this factor led Prandtl and others to erroneously judge staged systems to be generally inefficient.) These two considerations counter each other such that a beneficial range of M.x. I.A.s emerges. This is an especially interesting situation for it provides a useful series of interaction regions for a series of relative velocities such that a single fixed array of blades (Figures 1 and 2) can be staged to critically interact quite simply and without addition of a complex mechanism, that is of course possible, over a range of conditions (Figure 6). While blade sections velocities and the like will affect interactions, tests have shown useful values for M.x l.A. to range from under 500 to over 3000.
It we now examine the condition where nN spatially separate blades substantially produce the B.P.F. of an N bladed set we see that this condition may be thought of as a virtual wake absorption.
Were the blades not equidistant, relatively increased amplitude would substantially cancel any altered B.P.F. benefit but here the blades are equidistant such that amplitude/sound output is greatly reduced.
Generally 10 db is taken to be a radical quantum equivalent to a shift between observer and source several times distant. The improvement realized by such equidistant stanging has shown itself to range up to 8 to 12 db at the critical B.P.F.s and in general to be observable over a zero relative velocity polar plot and at significant relative velocities. A given array of nN blades can thus be made to both dampen and realize frequency cancellation so as to reduce noise output and blade passing frequency outputs as compared to conventional single disc arrays. Excessively distant spacings will approach non-critical conventional performance while excessively close spacing will tend to conventional performance albeit with possible altered frequency.
Relative thrust benefit at zero to moderate significant relative velocities, loadings, and pitch coarseness, approximately coincides with the acoustic effect noted above. In this regard it should be noted that, due to the interaction amongst the stages, optimally different forward advance ratios from disc to disc sould pertain. Thus for static, zero relative velocity operation, a relatively fine pitch upstream disc has been found to operate more effectively where the relatively reloaded downstream disc pitch has been coarsened, an increased forward advance ratio of 0.2 blade diameters being useful. While similar sections amongst discs have proven useful it is thus obvious that alterations to blades as a function of the interaction conditions might effect further benefit and be worthwhile.The coarsened downstream disc described above allows the system to rotate at lower velocity for a given output energy level; this provides incremental thrust and acoustic benefit. Blade element analysis will show those skilled in the art that downstream blade reloading can beneficially occur. In practise the optimal benefit occurs in the near vicinity of the intercept of the upstream blade wake with the relevant interacting downstream blade rather than at the exact point of direct intercept. That is significant marginal benefit or optimization occurs where the upstream blade wake is calculated to wash a surface of its downstream partner. In practice the net benefit varies within the region extending to either side of the downstream foil axial location, (Figure 6, #26), with some significant benefit at point of direct intercept.It is therefore reasonable to believe that at high velocities and under certain conditions, a fine pitch downstream should provide additional benefits.
This invention relates to fans and propeller acting in a medium or fluid such as normal air. The potentiating geometry above referred to can be embodied by a wide variety of axial flow staged co rotating uniform wake producing blade systems with all blades in the system similar. Preferred embodiments will be for free air fans operating at zero relative velocity with residual benefit holding for propellers at significant relative velocities to the point beyond which trade off benefits cease.
Modification and application of the embodiment that maintains the critical aspect of the invention as will be obvious to those skilled in the art is included within this specification.
Formulae The following or like formulae serves to define the critical potentiating geometry whose essence resides in fixing the blade root locations for staged axial flow blades with twist that are substantially uniform wake producing, both with regard to determining axial spacing between stages and index advance angles between blades, said blades being either fixed or movable about their axis and hence commonly referred to as variable pitch blades. (For simplicity sake, a two staged embodiment is cited.
This is a practical condition but more stages can be embodied requiring more complex calculation but observing the same principles cited herein with systems whose blade spacings approach symmetry/equidistance and near wash interactions.) It is to be noted that for the synergy to be effected conditions of: (A) symmetry,'equidistance amongst adjacent blades and (B) swirling wake near wash interception beween interacting axially separated blades must both be substantially realized.
The first of these conditions is established by equation (A) and the second by equation (BO) or, where appropriate, equation (BV) following.
(A) nN (BO) | Sfa (BV) l Sa+SV establishes the common planform l.A. Where n > 2 some adjustment to approach equidistance, should be considered.
establishes the A.S. or disc separation where V=O, as in fans etcetra. Optimal adjustment is discussed below.
establishes the A.S. or disc separation where VLO. Optimal adjustment is discussed below.
That is (A) + (BO) or (BV) will establish critical blade root locations.
Where: (1) N, is the total number of blades in each stage (-2) n, is the total number of blade stages (3) I.A., is the index advance angle, 3600 nN (4) M.x l.A., the virtual interaction angle between blades where M. for n=2, is a reasonably small odd number(1,3,5, etc.) with M.x IA. usually less than 3150
(5) 1 Mxfa nN the axial shift due to forward advance ratio (fa),
(6) the axial shift expressed in inches due to significant relative velocity V expressed in feet per second (fps) with shaft rotation expressed in revolutions per minute (R.P.M.), 2x M. xl.A. x R.P.M.
Notice, SO where relative velocity is zero.
Then (7) A.S. for V > O With l.A. established the axial locations in the near vicinity to either side of disc stage distances, Sfa+Sv, establish the critical blade root locations, with A.S. the axial distance center to center between the discs of rotation.
That is, with the upstream blade resultant at the downstream blade interaction angle now determined, a small shift to optimize the wash distance and to allow for slip, if any, will be required. In some tests, a net near wash of the downstream blade by the calculated resultant of the upstream blade has proven optimal for fans at V=O. The precise optimal distance may vary with the particular embodiment but the general principles are as determined by the above formulae.
Illustrated is a typical, but not limiting, example of the invention embodying two stages of four blades each. It is required that all stages have the same number of blades. The blades are similar and fixed to a common shaft of rotation Ill (motor not shown). Optionally some or all of the blade stages may be fitted with variable pitch controls. The blades have twist such that all elements of the blade tend to approach uniform advance as they rotate. Figure 1 shows planform symmetry amongst the upstream blades disc 1ABED and the downstream blades disc 11abcd' said index advance angle of symmetry given by the formula 3600 r nN where n is the number of stages and N is the number of blades in any stage.Useful interaction angles, as discussed above for values of M, occur at 450, 1350, 21 50, 31 50.
Figure 2 shows a side view of Figure 1 with axial space between discs I and II center to center determined as per the formula given above.
Figure 3, not to scale, shows some streamflow considerations of Figure 2, 2,111 being the axis of rotation E1-E1 the streamtube diameter of the upstream disc upstream of disc I.
E2~E2 is the diameter of the disc I streamtube acting at disc II blades.
E3-E3 is the diameter of disc I streamtube downstream of disc II. Notice that F2-F2 operates with a stream greater than E2~E2 thus F3-F3 carries more energy than E3-E3. If all blades acted at I the resultant would be the E-E and not the F-F series. However, the inner area of disc II has been reloaded by the resultant of disc I acting over area of disc II with diameter E2-E2. The energy thus redirected can be used to power the added load at outer portion of disc II, can reduce input energy required for a given (R.P.M., or can run the system at lower R.P.M.) output.
The local condition at disc II (especially for disc diameter E2~E2) indicates a desired incremental coarsening of blades for zero to moderate velocities of approximately 0.2 blade diameters over forward advance ratio of blades at disc I. Such and other values have proven useful and further allows the system to carry a given load at lower R.P.M. Additionally a relatively less coarse pitch, as per disc I, is an optional refinement for outer area G of blades at disc II.
Figure 4 shows the wake of a blade at disc I analytically, with the forward advance angle, fa, acting through the index advance angle I.A. at M., shifting downstream due to the relative velocity V. of the stream so that axial space calculation for the intercept of blade wake during rotation through the I.A.
may be identified. The significance of such shift is illustrated in Figure 6.
Figure 5 shows three theoretical acoustic curves, 5-1 being a normal single stage configuration of N blades and relatively large amplitude o. This amplitude is reduced to p by the addition of equidistantly spaced blades to the disc so that nN blades act as in curve m. If these additional blades are staged so as to share, or effectively absorb alternate wakes as in the illustration of this invention, then waveforms 5-n with amplitude g will result. However, area r is virtually absent from 5-n as compared to 5-m, such area representing energy and hence sound output which is reduced for 5-n.
While 5-m may be thought louder at the wavelength represented by r overall it is quieter than 1.
Tests show values up to 1 Odb separation between 5-n and 5-m, and 5-m and 5-1 respectively.
Where the staged configuration lacks the critical features of both interception and symmetry it is both louder and generally less efficient as compared to 5-n. Generally it then behaves somewhat like 5-m and when blades of disc II are aligned behind/near disc I blades, the output approaches 5-1 for loudness.
Figure 6 can now be understood a the plot, not to scale, of the factors given in the above or like formulae that will determine the critical A.S. of Figure 2. The relative velocity shift at a given index advance angle M. x l.A. is given by weighted arrows at V1 and V2. The shift being nil, VO for V=O. The vertical scale I.A.s locates disc I and blades A,B,C,D, and graphs the significant index advance angles of Figure 1. Vertical at II locates blades a,b,c,d, axially spaced along the horizontal A.S. as determined by addition of Sfa+SV. Two forward advance ratios fa: and fa2 are illustrated. Since all blades similarly interact only one blade of disc I will be discussed.
Blade A is shown to beneficially interact in near underwash with blade c where relative velocity is zero, here fa' is the resultant. RO or Sfa1 occurs at location 5 along A.S., a critical interaction near c with M.x l.A. = 2250, M=5.
This same embodiment is then shown to shift to R', where V > O, due to V' acting at M.x l.A.=1 350 for a beneficial interaction in near overwash with blade b. If we now consider the same blade root locations but a relatively coarser forward advance ratio for blades in disc I, and greater velocity V2, then blades A and a are in beneficial interaction in near overwash. Sfa2 at 1 along A.S. plus Sv(V2) identifying intercept at 3 on A.S., blade root Il-a being located at 4 along A.S.
It is thus apparent that a single fixed l.A. and axial space can be calculated to provide for a series of beneficial interactions over a range of relative velocities, and be affected by variations in blade pitch and rotational speed. Note: distances (C-b)=(B-b) the common condition amongst adjacent blades, and that blade near wake interceptions may, but need not, be with the immediately adjacent downstream blades. With regard to line A.S.: O to 1 is Sfa2, at M=l the distance between 2-6 being the region of beneficial intercept, that is useful locations for disc II given that location 3 is known. This region of benefit may vary according to various conditions.
3 and 5 are optimal overwash and underwash near intercept locations (with 5 often preferred for acoustic and for compactness best benefit). No slip allowance calculation has been allowed for here and in tests has not been required.
Figure 6 thus illustrates the relationships of the critical complex of synergizing factors embodied in Figures 1 and 2 as determined by the formulae. While additional complexity may be generally uneconomic these principles may be applied to more than two stages or fitted with variable shaft control, for further marginal benefit.

Claims (23)

1. An axial flow foil system acting upon a medium or fluid like air comprising in combination at least two co-rotating foil stages, an upstream foil stage and a downstream foil stage, a shaft, said foil stages being determinately mounted upon said shaft for common rotation therewith and with one another, the foils of each stage being substantially symmetrically and substantially equidistantly spaced from one another and from the foils of the next adjacent foil stage in substantially uniform wake producing relationship so that the interacting substantially uniform adjacent foil pressures and the upstream foil wakes beneficially interact optimumly with at least one of the surface or boundary layers of the foils, not necessarily the nearest ones of the next adjacent downstream foil stage, in which the substantially common planform index advance angle together with the disc separation establishes the critical determinate, usually fixed blade root locations upon said shaft.
2. The device according to Claim 1 in which the common planform index advance angle l.A. is combined with the disc separation BO where V=O.
3. The device according to Claim 1 in which the common planform index advance angle l.A. is combined with the disc separation BV where V > O.
4. The device according to Claim 2 where l.A. equals 3600 nN where n is the total number of blade stages and N is the total number of blades in each stage and where BO equals Sfa where Sfa is the axial shift due to the forward advance ratio of the upstream blade (fa) acting through M x l.A. the actual wake interaction angle between foils to establish the near intercept region that locates the downstream disc, that is M x fa Sfa Mxfa nN
5.The device according to Claim 3 where I.A. equals 3600 nN where n equals the total number of blade stages and N is the total number of blades in each stage and where Bv equals Sfa plus Sy where Sfa is the axial shift due to the forward advance ratio (fa) acting through M.x l.A. the actual wake interaction angle between foils and Sy is the axial shift expressed in inches due to significant relative velocity V expressed in feet per second wish shaft rotation expressed in revolutions per minute where 2xMxl.A.xV Sy= R.P.M.
with M x l.A. equalling the virtual interaction angle between blades.
6. The invention according to Claims 1, 2 or 3 which includes means to vary the pitch of at least one of said foil stages.
7. The invention according to Claim 6 whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a coarser pitch than the relative upstream foil stage.
8. The invention according to Claims 4 or 5 which includes means to vary the pitch of at least one of said foil stages.
9. The invention according to Claim 8 whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a coarser pitch than the relative upstream foil stage.
10. The invention according to Claim 6 whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a finer pitch than the relative upstream ioil stage.
1 The invention according to Claim 8 which includes means to vary the pitch of at least one of said foil stages relative to any other foil stage whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a finer pitch than the relative upstream foil stage.
12. The invention according to Claims 1, 2 or 4 where V=O, which includes means to vary the pitch of at least one of said foil stages relative to any other foil stage whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a coarser pitch than the relative upstream foil stage.
13. The invention according to Claims 1, 3 or 5 where VO, which includes means to vary the pitch of at least one of said foil stages relative to any other foil stage whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a coarser pitch than the relative upstream foil stage.
14. The invention according to Claims 1 or 3, where V > O, which includes means to vary the pitch of at least one of said foil stages relative to any other foil stage whereby the relative downstream foil stage is provided with a finer pitch than the relative upstream foil stage.
1 5. The invention according to any of the preceeding claims in which the relevant upstream blade wakes interact in an overwash relation with its cooperating downstream blade partners.
16. The invention according to any of the preceeding claims in which the relevant upstream blade wakes interact in an underwash relation with its cooperating downstream blade partners.
17. The invention according to any of the preceeding claims in which the relevant upstream blade wakes interact with its cooperating downstream partners by directly intercepting same.
18. The invention according to any of the preceeding claims whereby the fixed blade roots of at least one of the stages is provided with a pitch varying mechanism.
1 9. The device according to any of the preceeding claims in which staged wake interceptions, or near wake interceptions, are combined with substantially equidistant blade phasing.
20. The device according to any of the preceeding claims in which staged wake interceptions, or near wake interceptions, are combined with substantially equidistant blade spacing.
21. The device according to any of the preceeding claims in which staged wake interceptions, or near wake interceptions, are combined with substantially symmetrical blade spacing.
22. Rotary wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
23. An axial flow foil system for acting in a fluid medium comprising an upstream foil stage and at least one downstream foil stage which stages are arranged to rotate together in the same direction, the foils of each stage being substantially symmetrical and being arranged so that in use, the interacting substantially uniform adjacent foil pressures and the upstream foil wakes interact with surfaces of the next adjacent downstream foils or with fluid layers adjacent thereto.
GB8030921A 1979-12-11 1980-09-25 Rotational wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils Expired GB2066370B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10239879A 1979-12-11 1979-12-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2066370A true GB2066370A (en) 1981-07-08
GB2066370B GB2066370B (en) 1983-09-14

Family

ID=22289631

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8030921A Expired GB2066370B (en) 1979-12-11 1980-09-25 Rotational wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2066370B (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2622170A1 (en) * 1987-10-26 1989-04-28 Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt AIRPLANE PROPELLER
FR2728028A1 (en) * 1994-12-07 1996-06-14 Sardou Max Device for transferring energy from motor to pressurise gas, used e.g. for vehicle ventilation
GB2382382A (en) * 2001-11-23 2003-05-28 Rolls Royce Plc A fan having two rows of blades of differing diameters
GB2462921A (en) * 2008-08-27 2010-03-03 Snecma Method for reducing the vibration levels of a propfan of contrarotating bladed disks of a turbine engine
GB2482545A (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-08 Ge Aviat Systems Ltd Aircraft propellers with composite blades

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2622170A1 (en) * 1987-10-26 1989-04-28 Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt AIRPLANE PROPELLER
GB2211558A (en) * 1987-10-26 1989-07-05 Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt Bladed rotor
GB2211558B (en) * 1987-10-26 1992-07-08 Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt Propeller
FR2728028A1 (en) * 1994-12-07 1996-06-14 Sardou Max Device for transferring energy from motor to pressurise gas, used e.g. for vehicle ventilation
GB2382382A (en) * 2001-11-23 2003-05-28 Rolls Royce Plc A fan having two rows of blades of differing diameters
US6722847B2 (en) 2001-11-23 2004-04-20 Rolls-Royce Plc Fan for a turbofan gas turbine engine
GB2382382B (en) * 2001-11-23 2005-08-10 Rolls Royce Plc A fan for a turbofan gas turbine engine
GB2462921A (en) * 2008-08-27 2010-03-03 Snecma Method for reducing the vibration levels of a propfan of contrarotating bladed disks of a turbine engine
GB2462921B (en) * 2008-08-27 2012-09-05 Snecma Method for reducing the vibration levels of a propfan of contrarotating bladed discs of a turbine engine
GB2482545A (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-02-08 Ge Aviat Systems Ltd Aircraft propellers with composite blades
US9527578B2 (en) 2010-08-06 2016-12-27 Ge Aviation Systems Limited Propellers for aircraft
GB2482545B (en) * 2010-08-06 2017-05-03 Ge Aviat Systems Ltd Aircraft propellers with composite blades mounted to a single propeller hub

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2066370B (en) 1983-09-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5306119A (en) Ducted tail rotor for rotor craft
US4483658A (en) Rotational wake reaction steps for Foils
US2805818A (en) Stator for axial flow compressor with supersonic velocity at entrance
US3819008A (en) Broad band acoustic barrier
US3574477A (en) Noise attenuating system for rotary engines
US5266007A (en) Impeller for transverse fan
Lowson Reduction of compressor noise radiation
US2991929A (en) Supersonic compressors
JPH0830479B2 (en) Fan assembly for gas turbine engine
EP0861377B1 (en) Optimization of turbomachinery harmonics
GB2076049A (en) Variable acoustic impedance lining
US2755628A (en) Hydraulic torque converter
US10494086B2 (en) Turbomachine with multi-diameter propeller
EP0676546B1 (en) Impeller for tranverse fan
US2974858A (en) High pressure ratio axial flow supersonic compressor
GB2066370A (en) Rotational wake reaction synergetic staging for axial flow foils
JPH0319366B2 (en)
Filleul An investigation of axial flow fan noise
US5449271A (en) Transverse fan with randomly varying I-shaped tongue
US3471080A (en) Low noise generation fan
US2721693A (en) Supersonic compressor
EP2913269B1 (en) Rotorcraft with at least one main rotor and at least one counter-torque rotor
CA1223854A (en) Rotational wake reaction steps for foils
US5297930A (en) Rotating stall suppression
US2772538A (en) Blade formations for turbo-machines

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
727 Application made for amendment of specification (sect. 27/1977)
727A Application for amendment of specification now open to opposition (sect. 27/1977)
727B Case decided by the comptroller ** specification amended (sect. 27/1977)
SP Amendment (slips) printed
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19980925