GB2039940A - Coal digestion control - Google Patents

Description

1

SPECIFICATION

Coal digestion control GB 2 039 940 A 1 This invention is concerned with the liquid extraction of coal, more especially with the control of certain 5 aspects of the extraction conditions in order to facilitate the separation of undissolved particles from the extract and to increase extraction yield.

The technique of dissolving coal in liquid extractants, usually a heavy aromatic oil such as a coal tar fraction e.g. anthracene oil, or a highly aromatic petroleum fraction, is well established. Considerable research has been effected on this technique in countries having indigenous coal reserves, especially since 10 awareness of the impending "energy gap" became general. There is no great difficulty in achieving high extraction rates of coal in oil, of the order of 80 to 90% with hydrogenation. Without hydrogenation, such high yields are more diff icult to achieve due to the repolymerization of the dissolved coal. For the process to be economically viable it is important to obtain a high extraction yield. It is generally desirable to separate the undissolved matter before further processing, thus lowering the ash content and the sulphur content. 15 The undissolved matter is mainly composed of mineral matter (ash) and certain insoluble carbonaceous substances especially that known as fusain. Considerable difficulty, however, is experienced in this separation and a variety of methods have been advocated, including filtration, anti-solvent precipitation, centrifuges and gravity settling. The applicants believe that filtration offers the best compromise between processing costs, time and equipment costs.

It has previously been suggested in British Patent Specification No. 1, 090,556 that the extraction step in a hydrogenative liquid extraction of coal be controlled by considering the relative viscosity of the solution of coal and the solvent itself, and ceasing extraction, and hence transferring to a filtration step, at a minimum value of said relative viscosity. The viscosity of coal extracts or solutions varies considerably with time of extraction. The present applicants, in British Patent Specification No. 1, 492,739, disclosed for the first time 25 that the viscosity of coal extract was not necessarily the best criterion for deciding on extraction time, but filtration could be improved by controlling the digestion conditions to ensure that the filter cake had a constant and low specific resistivity. This had in general a more important effect on the ease of filtration than the viscosity of the coal extract.

The applicants have now confirmed that good control over extraction is extremely important if rapid 30 filtration is to be achieved. It has now been discovered that with a continuous coal extraction process, which would invariably be adopted in large scale commercial practice, there is a very substantial variation in residence time in a coal extraction reactor (digester). This is shown by Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings which clearly illustrates the distribution of residence time for a nominal 173 minute residence time, and it is important to note the peak at about 60 minutes. Figure 1 was the result of tests using radioactive tracers injected into a pilot plant digester feed. It has also been established that there is a strong time dependence factor on filter cake resistivity, the shorter the residence time the greater the filter cake resistivity and the longer the residence time the lower the cake resistivity. Unfortunately, with non-hydrogenative digestion the reduction in cake resistivity is at least partially caused by a polymerisation of the dissolved coal species which reduces the yield. This information is illustrated in Table 1 and Figure 11. Figure 11 shows the 40 influence of digestion time on yield and filter cake resistivity, using a hydrogenated anthracene oil, which is a hydrogen donor solvent, and Annesley coal (see below) at a 1:3 coal to solvent ratio and at a temperature of 430'C.

Reconsidering Figure 1, the spread of residence time produces some short residence time material with a very high cake resistivity and some longer residence time material with a low cake resistivity. In fact, the short residence time component, having high cake resistivity, tends to dominate the filtration process. This is demonstrated by a comparison of filter cake resistivities obtained for the filtration of coal extracts produced from the same coal under similar conditions but from different process systems, i.e. continuous flow extraction and batch extraction. A batch extract of Beynon coal (400'C, 60 min residence time) had a cake resistivity 2 GB 2 039 940 A 2 TABLE 1

Influence of extraction time and temperature on cake resistivity, Batch process Coal: Beynon' Coal: Solvent ratio 1:4 Filtered at 2000C and 138KN M-2 Digestion Conditions Filtrate Extraction Cake visc. at Resistivity 10 Time (min) Temp.('C) 200'C (cp) % Gas % Coal Extracted m Kg x 1011 0 - - 0 12 0.3 400 2.1 0 61 4 30 2.4 2 66 4.2 15 1.4 3 67 4.2 1.8 2 68 5.3 1.3 3 4.2 1.6 3 66 2.9 180 - 2 66 1.5 20 240 1.4 2 66 1.4 360 1.2 7 51 0.2 720 1.1 6 27 0.3 430 1.0 2 45 0.04 120 430 1.0 5 36 0.09 25 1 Prime coking coal from Beynon colliery, National Coal Board, S. Wales Area CRC 301a according to "The Coal Classification System used by the National Coal Board" National Coal Board Scientific 30 Control, London, 1964. 26.2% Volatile matter, 9.8% ash. Slurry mixed below 100'C.

of 53 x 1010 m Kg-1 and at 430'C the resistivity had fallen to 0.4 x 1010m Kg (see Table 1). However, using the same coal, oil etc. except using a continuous digester for a nominal 60 min residence time at 410 to 420'C gave a filter cake resistivity under identical filtration conditions of 60 X 101% Kg-1. The difference is more 35 easily marked in a further experiment using a high volatile coal from Annesley colliery (CRC 702,34% volatile matter, 3% ash), which gave cake resistivities of 20 X 101' and 90 x 1 010m Kg-1 for the batch and continuous systems under otherwise identical digestion and filtration conditions.

The present inventors concluded that the spread of residence times is a crucial factor in achieving lowfilter cake resistivity and hence rapid filtration. This spread would be avoided if the reactor used for extraction 40 gave plug flow, but this would be essentially impossible to achieve on the large scale at which commercial coal extraction plants would operate.

This invention provides a method for the continuous extraction of coal in an aromatic solvent oil under conditions at which the solvent oil is liquid, wherein the extraction is carried out in at least two stirred reactors in series. Preferably, from 3 to 10 stirred reactors in series are used, more preferably 4 to 7, 45 especially 5, stirred reactors in series are used. Conveniently, all the reactors are of equal size and the same conditions obtain in each but this need not be so, and individual designs may use different sizes andlor conditions in some, or all, of the reactors.

The use of a plurality of stirred reactors in series amounts to a close approximation to plug flow in a single so reactor. The actual number of reactors will depend upon economic aspects, especially on the materials being 50 processed and capital costs. It is economically viable to increase the number of reactors until the extra extraction costs become equal to the cost saving in filtration, that is considering each reactor relative to the previous reactor so that the saving in filtration cost -increased digester costs.

The choice of reactors and the method of stirring is a matter for normal chemical engineering design. It may be convenient, for example, to construct theoretical reactors within a single reactor shell, thereby minimising costs allied to the maintenance of elevated pressure and temperature.

In theory, a turbulent flow reactor should provide plug flow and sufficient mixing, butthis is not achieved in practice, so that stirring is required. It is important that adequate mixing occurs in the digestion, if this is insufficient, a much slower filtration will result. This is illustrated in Table 11 below, in which identical reaction conditions were used, in the same digester, with and without stirring.

p z 3 GB 2 039 940 A 3 1 TABLE 11 % Extraction Cake Resistivity Digest Stirring Yield (m Kg-1 X 1010) Beynon coal/anthracene oil Yes 68 53 No 60 1.94 Annesley coal/hydrogenated Yes 88 26 anthracene oil No 84 423 10 In the method of the present invention, the solvent oil is preferably a coal tarfraction or a highly aromatic petroleum fraction or a hydrogen donor solvent, and these classes of solvent are well known in the art. The coal is suitably a high to low rank bituminous coal, but the invention may be applied to other coals such as 15 brown coal. Reaction conditions may be selected within those known in the art after consideration of filter cake resistivity and extraction yield.

It will be understood that the process of the invention may take place in the presence or absence of free gaseous hydrogen. It is believed, although this invention is not to be limited by the theories expressed herein, that the initial and primary action of hydrogen is to hydrogenate the solvent oil, which then transfers 20 the hydrogen to the coal substance. That is, the solvent acts as a hydrogen donor, it is therefore believed that the experimental work which formed the basis of the present invention illustrates the applicability of the method to both hydrogenative and non-hydrogenative extraction of coal.

In general, in the temperature range of 350 to 450'C, higher temperatures require lower residence times.

To illustrate the invention, the prime coking Beynon coal is extracted in anthracene oil at 430'C for a 20 25 minute residence time, then filtered at 200'C and 138 KN M-2.

The filtration rate for a number of extractions, using a varying number of identical reactors in series, with identical conditions otherwise, has been plotted as total flow against time, in Figure 3, using log scales. It will be observed that there is a substantial improvement in using two reactors compared to a single reactor, also that little additional improvement can be expected beyond 10 reactors.

With a non-hydrogenated system the extraction yield is dependent on the time of digestion. A longer digestion time results in the polymerization of the dissolved coal and a reduced yield. Therefore, a spread of residence time will reduce the extraction yield since repolymerised material is formed. By using several stirred reactors almost plug flow can be achieved and an increased extraction yield. Extraction yield is of considerable importance in the overall economics of a coal digestion process, and even small improvements 35 are worthwhile. Repolymerisation of coal moieties is relatively slow with high rank coals (cf Table 1) or when using a hydrogen donor, but is relatively fast when digesting low rank coals. Thus, especially with low rank coals, the use of several stirred reactors according to the invention has the additional benefit of increased extraction yield.

It is therefore shown that the mere increase in the number of reactors according to the invention can lead 40 to a substantial and unexpected increase in the rate of filtration; the overall throughput of a coal extraction can be increased or the filter reduced in size. An increase in extraction yield flows as a further benefit from the invention.

Claims (7)

1. A method for the continuous extraction of coal in an aromatic solvent oil under conditions at which the solvent oil is liquid, wherein the extraction is carried out in at least two stirred reactors in series.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein from 3 to 10 stirred reactors in series are used.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein from 4to 7 stirred reactors in series are used.

4. A method according to anyone of the preceding claims, wherein the extraction is carried out in the temperature range of 350 to 450'C.

5. A method according to anyone of the preceding claims, wherein the aromatic solvent oil is a coal tar fraction, a highly aromatic petroleum fraction or a hydrogen donor solvent oil.

6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the solvent oil is anthracene oil or hydrogenated anthracene 55 oil.

7. A method according to claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described.

Printed for Her Majesty's Stationery Office, by Croydon Printing Company Limited, Croydon Surrey, 1980.

Published by the Patent Office, 25 Southampton Buildings, London, WC2A lAY, from which copies may be obtained.