GB2025341A - Canard wings - Google Patents

Canard wings Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2025341A
GB2025341A GB7922943A GB7922943A GB2025341A GB 2025341 A GB2025341 A GB 2025341A GB 7922943 A GB7922943 A GB 7922943A GB 7922943 A GB7922943 A GB 7922943A GB 2025341 A GB2025341 A GB 2025341A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
aircraft
control surface
axis
control
strake
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB7922943A
Other versions
GB2025341B (en
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Defence and Space GmbH
Original Assignee
Messerschmitt Bolkow Blohm AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Messerschmitt Bolkow Blohm AG filed Critical Messerschmitt Bolkow Blohm AG
Publication of GB2025341A publication Critical patent/GB2025341A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2025341B publication Critical patent/GB2025341B/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C5/00Stabilising surfaces
    • B64C5/04Noseplanes
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10Drag reduction

Abstract

A canard control surface 10 is forward mounted on an aircraft fuselage 11 and has an inboard fixed strake part 12 with high aspect ratio or sweep back and an outboard control surface part 13 of lower aspect ratio. The part 13 is movable about an axis 15 almost perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 14 of the aircraft. The control surface may be pivotable about the junction line 16 and the strake part may pivot about axis 17 almost parallel to the axis 14. <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Aircraft control surfaces This invention relates to aircraft control surfaces which are located in a forward zone in front of the main wings and mostly in the zone of the cockpit.
Control surfaces are known which are positioned in the region of the cockpit and which can be locked in any desired intermediate position between a fully retracted and an extended state.
The surfaces are movable about an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and also about an axis transverse to the longitudinal axis and are designed so that they can be moved and locked independently. This system ensures that the surfaces can be used both for longitudinal and for transverse control and maintain stability in these directions. In the case of large angles of incidence the system adversely affects the stability and controllability of flight.
It is known also to provide each wing unit pivotable about an axis which lies at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and which sweeps back. This arrangement is intended to reduce buffeting or vibration, but does not enable control at large angles of incidence to be effected.
This invention seeks to provide a control surface arrangement on which the,strake air flow is maintained at large angles of incidence.
According to this invention there is provided a forward mounted (canard) control surface arrangement on an aircraft with a high sweep back fixed inboard part and a movable outboard control surface part rotatable about an axis nearly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft.
An-embodiment of the invention is shown diagrammatically in the accompanying drawings by way of example and further explanation. The drawing shows only one half of a forward part of an aircraft.
The fuselage of an aircraft 11 has in the region of the cockpit, a canard control surface 10. One surface is provided each side of the aircraft fuselage. The control surfaces 10 have a greatly swept-back strake part 12 which is fixed in position on the fuselage and a lesser swept-back control surface part 13, which latter is rotatable about an axis 1 5 nearly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 14 of the aircraft. The sweptback strake 12 continues as far as the trailing edge of the control surface 10 at substantially the same angle and forms a joint 1 6 with the rotatable control surface 13 and lying at an acute angle c4 extending towards the nose of the aircraft.
In a further embodiment the control surface 10 and the strake 1 2 are movable in relation to the fuselage about an axis 17 and through which the control unit 12 and 13 can swing into a vertical position. Since the control surfaces 13 are primarily designed to rotate about an element Yparallel axis 1 5 (transverse or pitch axis parallel), so that two axes 15 and 1 7 are situated perpendicular or at an angle to each other, any desired combination of angles about the x (longitudinal) and Y--parallel axis can be obtained.
The rear edge of the strake part 12 may include an additional control surface 1 8.
This arrangement described provides a canard control system in which the strake air flow is maintained at high angles of incidence when it is necessary to relieve the canard surface for trimming, this being done by a negative setting of the surface in relation to the fuselage. In contrast with known systems of rotatable control surfaces the angle of incidence and the boundary flow of the strake is maintained.
Apart from this, fewer difficulties are encountered in adjusting the part of the control unit which is located on the outside, due to the smaller dimensions and lesser forces occurring.
The preservation of the strake air flow, despite the reduction in the lift of the canard surface, is important for stability and control at high angles of incidence.
1. A forward mounted (canard) control surface arrangement on an aircraft with a high sweep back fixed inboard part and a movable outboard control surface part rotatable about an axis nearly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft.
2. A control surface arrangement in accordance with Claim 1, wherein the junction between the inboard strake part and the outboard control surface part lies at an acute angle (a) -directed towards the nose of the aircraft.
3. A control surface arrangement in accordance with Claim 2, wherein the junction between the strake and the fuselage forms a rotation axis nearly parallel with the longitudinal axis of the aircraft (x-parallel).
4. A control surface arrangement in accordance with Claim 3, wherein the rotation axis of thecontrol surface part and the rotation axis of the strake part can be combined to produce any desired combination of angular adjustments.
5. A control surface arrangement in accordance with any preceding claim, wherein an additional control surface is provided on the trailing edge of the fixed inboard strake part.
6. A control surface arrangement for an aircraft or an aircraft encorporating same, substantially as herein described with reference to and as shown in the accompanying drawing.
**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.

Claims (6)

**WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **. SPECIFICATION Aircraft control surfaces This invention relates to aircraft control surfaces which are located in a forward zone in front of the main wings and mostly in the zone of the cockpit. Control surfaces are known which are positioned in the region of the cockpit and which can be locked in any desired intermediate position between a fully retracted and an extended state. The surfaces are movable about an axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and also about an axis transverse to the longitudinal axis and are designed so that they can be moved and locked independently. This system ensures that the surfaces can be used both for longitudinal and for transverse control and maintain stability in these directions. In the case of large angles of incidence the system adversely affects the stability and controllability of flight. It is known also to provide each wing unit pivotable about an axis which lies at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and which sweeps back. This arrangement is intended to reduce buffeting or vibration, but does not enable control at large angles of incidence to be effected. This invention seeks to provide a control surface arrangement on which the,strake air flow is maintained at large angles of incidence. According to this invention there is provided a forward mounted (canard) control surface arrangement on an aircraft with a high sweep back fixed inboard part and a movable outboard control surface part rotatable about an axis nearly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. An-embodiment of the invention is shown diagrammatically in the accompanying drawings by way of example and further explanation. The drawing shows only one half of a forward part of an aircraft. The fuselage of an aircraft 11 has in the region of the cockpit, a canard control surface 10. One surface is provided each side of the aircraft fuselage. The control surfaces 10 have a greatly swept-back strake part 12 which is fixed in position on the fuselage and a lesser swept-back control surface part 13, which latter is rotatable about an axis 1 5 nearly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis 14 of the aircraft. The sweptback strake 12 continues as far as the trailing edge of the control surface 10 at substantially the same angle and forms a joint 1 6 with the rotatable control surface 13 and lying at an acute angle c4 extending towards the nose of the aircraft. In a further embodiment the control surface 10 and the strake 1 2 are movable in relation to the fuselage about an axis 17 and through which the control unit 12 and 13 can swing into a vertical position. Since the control surfaces 13 are primarily designed to rotate about an element Yparallel axis 1 5 (transverse or pitch axis parallel), so that two axes 15 and 1 7 are situated perpendicular or at an angle to each other, any desired combination of angles about the x (longitudinal) and Y--parallel axis can be obtained. The rear edge of the strake part 12 may include an additional control surface 1 8. This arrangement described provides a canard control system in which the strake air flow is maintained at high angles of incidence when it is necessary to relieve the canard surface for trimming, this being done by a negative setting of the surface in relation to the fuselage. In contrast with known systems of rotatable control surfaces the angle of incidence and the boundary flow of the strake is maintained. Apart from this, fewer difficulties are encountered in adjusting the part of the control unit which is located on the outside, due to the smaller dimensions and lesser forces occurring. The preservation of the strake air flow, despite the reduction in the lift of the canard surface, is important for stability and control at high angles of incidence. CLAIMS
1. A forward mounted (canard) control surface arrangement on an aircraft with a high sweep back fixed inboard part and a movable outboard control surface part rotatable about an axis nearly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft.
2. A control surface arrangement in accordance with Claim 1, wherein the junction between the inboard strake part and the outboard control surface part lies at an acute angle (a) -directed towards the nose of the aircraft.
3. A control surface arrangement in accordance with Claim 2, wherein the junction between the strake and the fuselage forms a rotation axis nearly parallel with the longitudinal axis of the aircraft (x-parallel).
4. A control surface arrangement in accordance with Claim 3, wherein the rotation axis of thecontrol surface part and the rotation axis of the strake part can be combined to produce any desired combination of angular adjustments.
5. A control surface arrangement in accordance with any preceding claim, wherein an additional control surface is provided on the trailing edge of the fixed inboard strake part.
6. A control surface arrangement for an aircraft or an aircraft encorporating same, substantially as herein described with reference to and as shown in the accompanying drawing.
GB7922943A 1978-07-15 1979-07-02 Canard wings Expired GB2025341B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE2831185A DE2831185C2 (en) 1978-07-15 1978-07-15 Tail surfaces of an aircraft

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2025341A true GB2025341A (en) 1980-01-23
GB2025341B GB2025341B (en) 1982-11-24

Family

ID=6044490

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB7922943A Expired GB2025341B (en) 1978-07-15 1979-07-02 Canard wings

Country Status (3)

Country Link
DE (1) DE2831185C2 (en)
FR (1) FR2430884A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2025341B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2496595A1 (en) * 1980-10-24 1982-06-25 British Aerospace ARRANGEMENT FOR MOUNTING A PROBE ON AN AIRCRAFT
US4542866A (en) * 1983-09-30 1985-09-24 The Boeing Company Aircraft with directional controlling canards
RU2471674C2 (en) * 2010-09-17 2013-01-10 Открытое Акционерное Общество "Государственное Машиностроительное Конструкторское Бюро "Радуга" Имени А.Я. Березняка" Airborne vehicle aerodynamic focus control element
EP2687437A1 (en) * 2012-07-16 2014-01-22 Airbus Operations, S.L. Aircraft lifting surface with variable sweep distribution along the span

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3103095C2 (en) * 1981-01-30 1985-05-09 Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8000 München Aircraft with negative sweep wings and a tailplane
FR2747773B1 (en) * 1995-11-21 1998-08-07 Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale) ORIENTABLE CONTROL SURFACE FOR AIRCRAFT
DE10202021C1 (en) * 2002-01-18 2003-06-12 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Aerodynamic control surface for aircraft has whole surface or tip of surface rotating about axis passing behind center of pressure and rotation is restrained by spring

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR437044A (en) * 1911-11-30 1912-04-11 Paul Rime Bruneau Monoplane airplane, duck type, with automatic longitudinal and lateral stability
GB437044A (en) * 1934-05-05 1935-10-23 George Gatton Melhuish Harding Improvements in fishing-reels
DE888367C (en) * 1950-12-07 1953-08-31 Francois Victor Andre Joseph R Airplane with a swiveling wing
DE1244586B (en) * 1963-07-05 1967-07-13 Dornier System Gmbh Aircraft with flexible wing areas
DE1956173C3 (en) * 1969-11-07 1975-07-03 Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh, 8000 Muenchen Jet-controlled aircraft with control flaps arranged in the area of the pilot's room
DE2656692C2 (en) * 1976-12-15 1982-07-29 Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8000 München Duck plane

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2496595A1 (en) * 1980-10-24 1982-06-25 British Aerospace ARRANGEMENT FOR MOUNTING A PROBE ON AN AIRCRAFT
US4542866A (en) * 1983-09-30 1985-09-24 The Boeing Company Aircraft with directional controlling canards
RU2471674C2 (en) * 2010-09-17 2013-01-10 Открытое Акционерное Общество "Государственное Машиностроительное Конструкторское Бюро "Радуга" Имени А.Я. Березняка" Airborne vehicle aerodynamic focus control element
EP2687437A1 (en) * 2012-07-16 2014-01-22 Airbus Operations, S.L. Aircraft lifting surface with variable sweep distribution along the span
CN103538717A (en) * 2012-07-16 2014-01-29 空中客车西班牙运营有限责任公司 Aircraft lifting surface with variable sweep distribution along the span
US9718534B2 (en) 2012-07-16 2017-08-01 Airbus Operations S.L. Aircraft lifting surface with variable sweep distribution along the span

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2430884A1 (en) 1980-02-08
DE2831185C2 (en) 1983-03-03
FR2430884B1 (en) 1984-10-19
DE2831185A1 (en) 1980-01-31
GB2025341B (en) 1982-11-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4247062A (en) High efficiency vertical tail assembly combined with a variable wing geometry
US4161300A (en) Canard type aircraft
US4427168A (en) Variable camber leading edge mechanism with Krueger flap
US4354646A (en) Variable dihedral angle tail unit for supersonic aircraft
US4448375A (en) Folding truss mechanism for trailing edge flaps
CA1113070A (en) Deployable wing mechanism
US6089503A (en) Selectively rotatable and torsionally flexible aerodynamic control apparatus
EP0075966A2 (en) Aileron system for aircraft and method of operating the same
US2734701A (en) William j
US4542866A (en) Aircraft with directional controlling canards
US4466586A (en) Directional control device for aircraft
US6129308A (en) Delta-shaped aircraft with variable camber fuselage and wing
US2702676A (en) Slat mechanism for airplanes with sweptback wings
US4132375A (en) Vortex-lift roll-control device
US5366180A (en) High-lift device for aircraft
US3206146A (en) Aeroplanes having wings capable of adjustment in sweep
US4667898A (en) Aircraft with single surface membranous airfoils
US2559827A (en) Means for stabilization of airplanes having highly swept-back wings
US3924826A (en) Rotatable window means
US4139172A (en) Staggerwing aircraft
US4336913A (en) Compound wing aircraft
GB2025341A (en) Canard wings
US2794608A (en) Airplane with variable swept wings
US3279723A (en) Aircraft having flexible wing surfaces
US4358077A (en) Transverse wing actuation system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee