GB1576531A - Recovery of tin from ores or other material - Google Patents
Recovery of tin from ores or other material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB1576531A GB1576531A GB33564/77A GB3356477A GB1576531A GB 1576531 A GB1576531 A GB 1576531A GB 33564/77 A GB33564/77 A GB 33564/77A GB 3356477 A GB3356477 A GB 3356477A GB 1576531 A GB1576531 A GB 1576531A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- tin
- matte
- slag
- ore
- iron
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tin Chemical compound [Sn] ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims description 100
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title claims description 9
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 title description 6
- 239000011135 tin Substances 0.000 claims description 147
- 229910052718 tin Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 147
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 claims description 111
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 105
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 97
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 60
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 53
- UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron oxide Chemical compound [Fe]=O UQSXHKLRYXJYBZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 38
- 239000005864 Sulphur Substances 0.000 claims description 35
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 32
- MBMLMWLHJBBADN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ferrous sulfide Chemical compound [Fe]=S MBMLMWLHJBBADN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 31
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000003517 fume Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 229910052952 pyrrhotite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910052683 pyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 10
- NIFIFKQPDTWWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyrite Chemical compound [Fe+2].[S-][S-] NIFIFKQPDTWWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011028 pyrite Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Orthosilicate Chemical compound [O-][Si]([O-])([O-])[O-] BPQQTUXANYXVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000007664 blowing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 150000004763 sulfides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 241001062472 Stokellia anisodon Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- XOLBLPGZBRYERU-UHFFFAOYSA-N tin dioxide Chemical compound O=[Sn]=O XOLBLPGZBRYERU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 24
- RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphur dioxide Chemical compound O=S=O RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 19
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 15
- 235000013980 iron oxide Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 238000003723 Smelting Methods 0.000 description 10
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000003039 volatile agent Substances 0.000 description 9
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910052681 coesite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 229910052906 cristobalite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 229910052682 stishovite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- AFNRRBXCCXDRPS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tin(ii) sulfide Chemical class [Sn]=S AFNRRBXCCXDRPS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 229910052905 tridymite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 4
- VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(2+);oxygen(2-) Chemical class [O-2].[Fe+2] VBMVTYDPPZVILR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- QHGNHLZPVBIIPX-UHFFFAOYSA-N tin(ii) oxide Chemical compound [Sn]=O QHGNHLZPVBIIPX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 3
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WUKWITHWXAAZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium difluoride Chemical compound [F-].[F-].[Ca+2] WUKWITHWXAAZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 3
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052840 fayalite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010436 fluorite Substances 0.000 description 3
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910000015 iron(II) carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000004094 preconcentration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000010453 quartz Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000002505 Centaurea nigra Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000003323 Centaurea nigra Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005054 agglomeration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000004649 carbonic acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- JJWKPURADFRFRB-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbonyl sulfide Chemical compound O=C=S JJWKPURADFRFRB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- -1 iron silicates Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229910052960 marcasite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- NDLPOXTZKUMGOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N oxo(oxoferriooxy)iron hydrate Chemical compound O.O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O NDLPOXTZKUMGOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910021646 siderite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000004291 sulphur dioxide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000010269 sulphur dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910001887 tin oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- WKBPZYKAUNRMKP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)pentyl]1,2,4-triazole Chemical compound C=1C=C(Cl)C=C(Cl)C=1C(CCC)CN1C=NC=N1 WKBPZYKAUNRMKP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010011416 Croup infectious Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000512 ankerite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052586 apatite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- CXUJOBCFZQGUGO-UHFFFAOYSA-F calcium trimagnesium tetracarbonate Chemical compound [Mg++].[Mg++].[Mg++].[Ca++].[O-]C([O-])=O.[O-]C([O-])=O.[O-]C([O-])=O.[O-]C([O-])=O CXUJOBCFZQGUGO-UHFFFAOYSA-F 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052951 chalcopyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- DVRDHUBQLOKMHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N chalcopyrite Chemical compound [S-2].[S-2].[Fe+2].[Cu+2] DVRDHUBQLOKMHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001919 chlorite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052619 chlorite group Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- QBWCMBCROVPCKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N chlorous acid Chemical compound OCl=O QBWCMBCROVPCKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000567 combustion gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- KYRUBSWVBPYWEF-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper;iron;sulfane;tin Chemical compound S.S.S.S.[Fe].[Cu].[Cu].[Sn] KYRUBSWVBPYWEF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004821 distillation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000514 dolomite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010459 dolomite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011067 equilibration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009852 extractive metallurgy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052949 galena Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000515 huntite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- NNIPDXPTJYIMKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron tin Chemical compound [Fe].[Sn] NNIPDXPTJYIMKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SZVJSHCCFOBDDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(II,III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]O[Fe]=O SZVJSHCCFOBDDC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XCAUINMIESBTBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N lead(ii) sulfide Chemical compound [Pb]=S XCAUINMIESBTBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005272 metallurgy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- VSIIXMUUUJUKCM-UHFFFAOYSA-D pentacalcium;fluoride;triphosphate Chemical compound [F-].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O VSIIXMUUUJUKCM-UHFFFAOYSA-D 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005191 phase separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010970 precious metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005201 scrubbing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000004760 silicates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052950 sphalerite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002889 sympathetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N titanium dioxide Inorganic materials O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011031 topaz Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052853 topaz Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002918 waste heat Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B25/00—Obtaining tin
- C22B25/02—Obtaining tin by dry processes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B5/00—General methods of reducing to metals
- C22B5/02—Dry methods smelting of sulfides or formation of mattes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Description
(54) RECOVERY OF TIN FROM ORES OR OTHER MATERIALS
(71) We, COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
ORGANIZATION, a body corporate established under the Science and Industry Research
Act 1949, of Limestone Avenue, Campbell, Australian Capital Territory, Commonwealth of
Australia, and ABMINCO N.L. a company incorporated under the laws of the State of
Victoria, of 233 Collins Street, Melbourne, in the State of Victoria, Commonwealth of
Australia, do hereby declare the invention, for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:
This invention relates to an improved process for recovering tin or other non-ferrous metal values from low-grade ores, concentrates, or mineral mixes which consist mainly of iron sulphide minerals.
Conventional tin smelting processes are applied to essentially sulphide-free, high grade concentrates such as those derived from alluvial sources, containing tin in excess of 60%.
These concentrates, which are prepared by conventional mineral dressing methods are treated in a two stage reverberatory furnace operation. The concentrates are charged to the reverberatory furnace at 12000C with fluxing materials to cause the charge to melt and form a fluid slag which is reduced by a suitable reductant such as coal to produce crude tin. The tin product from the first stage is sufficiently low in iron and other impurities to permit refining by conventional methods. The slag which contains typically 5 to 10% tin, must be granulated and treated in the second stage to recover this tin.It is mixed with additional reductant and treated at approx. 1400"C, to produce a discard slag containing 1.5 to 3 percent tin and a metallic product with a high iron content (hard-head) which is recycled to the first stage.
Low grade concentrates from hard-rock sources not only contain larger quantities of gangue minerals (and therefore produce large volumes of slag per unit of crude tin produced) but usually have higher iron-to-tin ratios, which leads to the formation of large quantities of high melting point hard-head with high iron content which cannot be dealt with in the normal two stage recycle. These two factors make it uneconomical to treat low grade concentrates in conventional smelters.
In the treatment of low grade concentrates it is usual to employ processes which involve a slag fuming operation to remove tin from the system either as a fume or stannous oxide SnO (by appropriate control of oxidation/ reduction conditions) or as a fume of stannous sulphide
SnS (by injection of sulphur or pyrites to control sulphidizing conditions, together with coal or a hydrocarbon fuel to control reduction conditions). Careful control of the charge composition and rates of addition of reagents is required to maintain fuming conditions without matte formation. Any matte which is formed is treated separately to recover its tin values or recycled as a sulphidizing agent. This type of slag-fuming operation is generally employed as a slag cleaning stage for slags derived from the first stage of conventional smelting operations.
It allows the iron entering the smelter to be discharged in the discard slag, and thus avoids the buildup and excessive recycle of iron. In all such slag fuming processes the fuel and sulphidizing agent are injected into the slag layer, below its surface, and matte formation is avoided where possible. It is possible, though not usual, to charge concentrates which may or may not contain iron sulphides, to the fuming furnace.
This type of process is represented in the prior art by: 1. United States Patent 2,304,197 Dec. 8, 1942, W.H. Osborn.
2. D.V. Belyayev, The Metallurgy of Tin, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1963, p. 88.
An alternative approach dispenses with both the preconcentration step and the conventional smelting step; it is basically an ore fuming process which is applicable to ores or blends which consist mainly of iron sulphide minerals with relatively small quantities of other minerals, including cassiterite.
It will be appreciated that the avoidance of the preconcentration stage and the use of a high-temperature fuming process on the whole of the ore as mined introduces some very special economic restraints. For a given production of tin from a 1 % tin ore, as distinct from say a 20% concentrate, the total material throughput will be twenty times greater. Thus capital costs must be optimized and the specific throughput of the plant must be as great as possible, to retain economic viability.
Of even greater importance from the economic point of view is the cost of the energy required to heat the whole of the ore to the fuming temperature. In an ideal ore fuming process this heat must be supplied by burning of the components of the ore without the need for additional fuel. These processes are in general therefore only applicable to ores containing sufficient iron sulphides to provide all the process heat from their combustion. (Of course, if the ore is supplemented by concentrates containing a greater proportion of tin, it may become economical to use some supplementary fuel).
In brief, an ore fuming process should be a high intensity process with high specific throughput, and should be autogenous.
Two distinct variants of sulphide ore fuming processes have been described in the prior art.
These are: (1) Non-slagging processes which are applied to iron sulphide ores of the type for which the present invention is intended. In these processes the essential feature is that the temperature is maintained at a sufficiently high level to permit volatilization of tin sulphides to occur, but at a sufficiently low level to avoid incipient melting of the charge. The processes may thus be carried out in fluidized beds, multihearth roasters or shaft furnaces and the residues are free-flowing particulate solids. Such processes are represented in the prior art by the following patents:
1. United States Patent 2,600,351 - Wells, Thompson & Roberts, Dorr Company 1952
2. United States Patent 1,847,991 - Sulman & Picard 1932.
3. Australian Patent 3735/26 - Krupp 1926.
(2) Slag forming processes applied to sulphide ores. This group of processes like group 1 is also applied to ores consisting mainly of iron sulphide minerals. In this group the temperature of the charge is allowed to rise sufficiently due to burning of the iron sulphide minerals that melting and slag formation occur and the final residue is an iron silicate slag. Formation of a matte is avoided if possible, but if it does form, it is collected in the hearth, tapped from time to time and treated to recover its tin content. This type of process is represented in the prior art by Trostler and Carlsson, United States Patent 2,219,411 (1940) and Australian Patent
109,112 (1939).
The present invention falls into this group, and is related to the process of Carlsson and
Trostler, in that it is intended for the treatment of ores or concentrates consisting largely of iron sulphides with sufficient silica naturally occurring or deliberately added to cause all the iron produced in the residue from burning of the iron sulphides to form an iron silicate
(fayalite) slag. The molten slag is the residue from the process and is tapped for discard.
In the treatment of certain sulphidic tin ores from the West Coast of Tasmania, conventional mineral dressing treatments failed to achieve recoveries better than 30% with a concentrate grade of 30 percent tin. Thus conventional treatment involving preconcentration
and smelting (even those smelting processes applicable to low grade concentrates) could not
be applied.
Our early attempts towards development of an autogenous ore fuming process for treat
ment of these pyritic tin ores, involved the non-slagging approach, i.e. heating the ore in such
a way that the tin was sulphidized and volatilized without allowing the temperature to rise to
the level where slagging reactions could cause agglomeration and sticking of the charge. In
this process, the volatilization and recovery of tin is achieved in the following way:
(1) The ore is fed to a shaft or multi-hearth furnace co-currently with hot gases derived from
combustion of residues in later stage (3). Co-current operation retains the partial pressure of
sulphur released from the pyrite as the temperature of the ore rises.
(2) The gases from the co-current volatilization (stage (1)) containing sulphur, sulphur
dioxide, carbonyl sulphide (COS), nitrogen, carbon dioxide and stannous sulphide, are
collected and burnt to convert all sulphur and SnS to SO2 and SnO2. The gases are cooled and
the SnO2 fume collected.
(3) The heated residue from stage (1) which contains pyrrhotite, silica and minor amounts
of other minerals is passed through a suitable lock system into a reactor where it is burned (by
counter-current contact in a separate compartment) with air diluted by cooled tail gases from
stage (2). The proportion of diluent is adjusted to limit the temperature of the burning mass to below the temperature of incipient fusion, while producing a sufficient volume of combustion gases of sufficiently high temperature to carry out the co-current heating of the ore.
When attempts were made to conduct this process autogenously in a simulated practical reactor system it was found to be impossible to achieve a suitable combination of gas temperature and gas volume from stage (3) without causing slagging reactions and consequent sticking and agglomeration of the reacting mass. Furthermore, even in the absence of these problems the practical difficulties associated with (a) balancing of reaction rates in the two stages, (b) transfer of gases at very high temperatures from stage (3) to stage (1) and pressure balancing between reaction zones, and (c) collecting fume from excessively large volumes of recycled gas, rendered the process unattractive.
The blast furnace pyritic smelting process described by Carlsson and Trostler appeared to offer the only remaining possibility in the prior art for the treatment of these ores. However tests conducted in a small shaft reactor showed that incipient fusion above the melting zone caused bridging of the charge, and the process could not be made to operate. There is no evidence in the literature that this blast furnace process was ever operated commercially.
The problem accordingly remained of finding a process for concentrating cassiterite from the ore which is not subject to the disadvantages of the prior art process discussed above.
It has now been surprisingly found that the problems of heat and mass transfer described above can be overcome in a process in which the ore is added to a refractory-lined reactor containing a, pool of liquid iron sulphide matte overlain by a liquid iron silicate slag, and the tin sulphide volatilization is achieved by a process akin to matte conversion. Such a process may be referred to as "matte fuming".
Thus, the present invention provides a process for extracting tin values from a tin bearing iron sulphide ore or mineral-mix, comprising charging said ore or mix in particulate form into a refractory-lined reactor containing a pool of molten matte so that said iron sulphides in said ore or mix become molten and enter the matte pool, blowing air or other oxidizing gas through the matte pool to oxidize said iron sulphides thus producing iron oxide and generating the heat required to smelt the charge and drive off the tin values from the charge in the form of volatile sulphides and oxides, said iron oxide combining with silica added in the charge to form a layer of molten slag which floats on the matte bath, the conditions in the reacting mass being such that the oxidizing gas blown into the reactor comes first into contact with the pool of molten matte, thus stabilizing the oxygen and sulphur pressures of the gases, after contacting the matte, in a suitable range to sulphidize and volatilize the tin in the charge without the need to add a carbonaceous reductant.
The iron oxide produced by the combustion of the matte combines at the surface of the matte with silica from the charge to produce an iron silicate slag which is maintained saturated with silica. This slag is the final residue from the process, and is discarded when its tin content has been lowered sufficiently by the fuming reactions.
The large quantity of gas which passes through the matte to bring about its oxidation sweeps out or scavenges the tin sulphide, which collects in the matte, by maintaining a very low partial pressure of tin sulphide in the large volume of gas bubbles. Our observations have shown that a substantial fraction of the tin contained in the particles of charge can be sulphidized and volatilized while the particles are actually being heated up in the reactor to the temperature of the bath and before they are incorporated into the slag or matte phases.
Thus, although published studies of the vapour pressure of tin sulphides over tin-iron mattes would lead to the expectation of a substantial build up of tin in the matte and a corresponding equilibrium partition of tin in the slag, it is possible by correct operation of the present process and by correct sizing of charge particles to limit the extent to which the tin enters the matte.
However, this does not set a limit on the production rate since the tin which does enter the matte is removed during the conversion of the matte. Furthermore, the gas has its oxygen and sulphur partial pressures fixed by the fact that it has equilibrated with the matte which is in turn equilibrated with the silica-saturated slag. Partial pressure for oxygen is approximately 10-s atm and that for sulphur 10.1.5 atm and, therefore, very efficient fuming of tin from the slag is promoted as the large volume of gas passes through it, maintaining a very low tin concentration in the slag.
Some of the reactions involved in the process are as follows.
Heating of the charge of ore or concentrate: FeS2 = FeS + x) + (1 - x)S (1) FeCO3 = "Fev" + C02 (2)
SnO2 + S2 = SnS + SO2 3 2FeO + 1-S2 = 2"FeS" + SO2 4 Oxidation and slagging reactions: "FeS" + 1102 = "FeO" + SO2 (5) "FeO'-' + SiO2 = 2FeO. SiO2 (6) 2"FeS" + SiO2 + 302 = 2FeO. SiO2 + 2SO2 (7)
C + O2 = CO2 8 2FeS + 3402 = Fe2O3 + 2SO2 (9)
Reaction (7) is a combination of reactions (5) and (6) and is written for simplicity in stoichiometric form.However, experimental observations of a number of workers have established that some labile sulphur will always be evolved principally due to the nonstoichiometry of the slag formed.
In the operation of the actual process the matte and slag phases are much more complex than simple ferrous sulphide and ferrous silicate. Both are in fact "oxysulphide" phases containing ferrous oxide, ferric oxide, silicon and sulphur. The oxidation potentials of the matte and slag are related to their ferric oxide activities.
Our experiments have shown that the oxidation of some of the iron to the ferric state results in an enhancement of the heat released by the process, and it is advantageous to drive the process at a high rate to optimize the degree of oxidation of iron to the ferric state. The limit to the permissible extent of oxidation is set by the requirement to maintain phase separation between the matte and slag phases.
A typical process according to the invention may be carried out as follows:
Stage (1): A bath of iron sulphide matte saturated with ferrous oxide is maintained at a temperature of 12500C in a refractory-lined vessel equipped with lances or tuyeres to permit air to be blown through the matte. At the start of a new batch this matte, overlain by a thin layer of slag, remains from the previous batch. Its iron oxide content is fixed by equilibration with a silica saturated slag. Air is blown through the matte via the lances or tuyeres to convert iron sulphide to iron oxide which enters the slag.
Stage (2): Pyritic tin ore or a blended mixture of tin-bearing materials containing appropriate amounts of silica and iron sulphides (hereinafter referred to for convenience as "ore") is crushed to say -5mm and added slowly to the reactor while maintaining the air blast to generate heat by combustion of the matte. In the preferred method of operation the ore is screened to separate the - 1 mm fraction which is injected directly into the matte layer through the lances or tuyeres along with the air and supplementary fuel as required. The + 1 mm fraction is charged onto the surface of the slag by means of an appropriate feeder. The rate of charge addition is adjusted to match the rate of production of heat and so maintain the matte and slag in the molten condition.The iron sulphide in the charge enters the matte, and during heating to the melting temperature, labile sulphur in the pyrite fraction of the charge is released. This is partly evolved as elemental sulphur and partly consumed in sulphidizing the iron oxides and carbonates and tin oxide in the ore particles and in the matte and slag baths.
The net result is a large increase in the amount of matte consequent upon the addition of the charge. The silica fraction of the ore particles combines with the iron oxide which is produced by conversion of the matte, forming more slag which gradually increases in volume at the expense of the matte. If the charge is not self-fluxing, additions of pyrrhotite (which may contain tin) or siliceous materials may be made to adjust the iron-to-silica ratio to produce a suitable slag. The violent agitation of the bath causes the matte and slag to splash over the added ore particles and provides rapid heat transfer.
Stage (3): After completion of ore addition, blowing is continued until the stoichiometric oxygen has been supplied to convert all the new iron sulphide matte resulting from the addition of the charge of ore. During this stage the tin which enters the slag and matte is fumed off.
Stage (4): -The bulk of the slag is tapped for discard leaving the original quantity of matte overlain by some slag for the next batch.
During all the above stages the air blast may be continued to maintain a continuous SO2 feed to an acid or sulphur plant.
The gases leaving the bath contain N2, S2, SO2, CO2, SnS and SnO. These gases would usually be burned with stoichiometric air above the slag and pass through a waste heat boiler
and fume collection system (as in conventional slag fuming) to an acid plant.
The matte gradually accumulates copper and precious metals and is tapped from time to time to bleed these metals from the system.
In an alternate mode of operation the ore is added continuously at a location as far as
possible from the slag exit point. A sufficient volume of slag is maintained in the reactor to
ensure a residence time such that fuming proceeds to the stage that the level of tin in the slag is
sufficiently low for discard. The slag may be tapped either continuously or intermittently.
Although this process is autogenous when treating the ores for which it was developed, it is possible to supply extra heat by burning carbonaceous fuel in cases where the heat balance may not be favourable.
Irrespective of the mode of operation chosen, it is a simple matter to adjust the heat balance and the oxygen balance of the reactor by injection of mixtures of fuel and air in an appropriate ratio. Thus if the sulphur content of the matte becomes depleted but more gas needs to be swept through the system to ensure that fuming goes to completion, this gas and the required heat can be supplied by burning a carbonaceous fuel or pyrrhotite concentrate and adjusting the fuel/air ratio to balance the oxygen-to-sulphur ratio in the matte, thus maintaining the necessary conditions of stirring and gas stoichiometry for effective fuming.
Whether a sulphide or a carbonaceous fuel is used depends in turn on the iron-to-silica ratio in the feed to the process.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that the process described above is most closely related to the blast furnace pyritic smelting process described by Carlsson and Trostler.
However the present process differs in three important respects from the blast furnace process, namely: 1. The present process is a pneumatic matte conversion process conducted in a converter in which a bath of matte is continuously maintained and the air is blown through lances or tuyeres below the surface of the matte layer, which plays a predominant role in the chemistry, the heat transfer and the mass transfer processes taking place. In the blast furnace pyritic smelting operation it was not desirable to produce a matte, and the matte, if formed, did not play a prominent part in the reactions occurring in the bosh of the blast furnace.
2. In the blast furnace process it was necessary to carry out careful blending and preparation of the charge to promote conditions in the tuyere zone of the blast furnace such that combustion of the iron sulphides and formation of the slag could occur without causing bridging. In the present process the physical nature of the charge is not important. It is necessary only to crush the ore to a size suitable for easy handling and feeding onto the surface of the slag. Mixing of the charge with the matte and slag is assisted by the violent agitation in the bath.
3. In the earlier blast furnace process the matte, if it is produced, and slag, once formed, drip into the hearth below the tuyeres and are not subject to any further fuming reactions in the furnace. Both products must be collected and treated separately. The inventors claim a subsequent slag treatment stage and describe a separate treatment of matte if it should form.
In the present process the matte and slag are both subjected to the scrubbing action of a large volume of sulphidizing gas (generated by "conversion" of the matte and buffered chemically by the matte) during the entire residence time of the charge, and this reduces the tin content of both slag and matte to a low level and maintains a sulphidizing atmosphere around the charge particles. This buffering of the gas by its contact with a permanently maintained volume of matte distinguishes the present process from the prior art.
With regard to the rate at which the reactions occur, the present process may be likened to the new group of high-intensity processes which have been introduced for the smelting of copper, to replace the conventional blast furnace and reverberatory furnace, namely, the
Noranda Process (see Extractive Metallurgy of Copper, Ed. Yannopoulis and Agarwal,
AIM, New York 1975, Ch. 23, the Mitsubishi process (Ibid. chap. 22), both of which employ a type of converter. A recently published patent for continuous lead smelting also follows the same trend (United States Patent 3,663,207). Similar intense processes employing submerged combustion to supply heat and reductant have been described, e.g. zinc fuming (Australian Patent 429,266) and recovery of tin from slags (Australian Patent 465,531).
The following non-limitative examples illustrate features of the process:
Example 1
300 grams of an iron sulphide matte of the approximate composition 67% iron, 29% sulphur, 4% oxygen was melted in an induction furnace in a non-oxidizing atmosphere. The furnace was instrumented to act as a reaction calorimeter that could measure net heats of reaction, with the intention of determining if the process described was autogenously heated.
When the temperature of the molten matte reached 12500C, 300 g of a pyritic tin ore, crushed to -4", was added slowly to the matte surface over a period of five minutes. Pyrite constitutes about 50% by weight of the ore composition. Other sulphides present are sphalerite, pyrrhotite, galena, chalcopyrite and stannite. Quartz and chert make up about 20% of the ore, other silicates present in minor amounts being chlorite, iron silicates and topaz. Carbonates which make up about 14% of the ore are represented by siderite, ankerite and huntite. Iron oxides make up about 4.0% of the ore, while small amounts of rutile, fluorite and apatite are also present. Cassiterite is present in an amount of about 2% by weight.
During the ore addition stage, some labile sulphur and stannous sulphide were evolved.
Once the ore had been added, air was admitted to the matte at a rate of 3 litres/minute via a ceramic lance that had been inserted in the bath. Vigorous oxidation occurred and the rate of tin sulphide evolution increased markedly. Minor amounts of sulphur were continuously evolved. The amount of air required was calculated on the basis that all iron in the ore would be oxidized to FeO, which would then combine with silica from the ore to form a fayalite slag.
In the present example, the ore analysed 26.3 % iron, from which 41.3 % iron sulphide could be formed.
In 300 g of ore, therefore, 300 x 0.413 = 123.9 gm of FeS = 1.40 moles /300 g ore.
The oxidation reaction is
FeS + 14 O2 = FeO + 802 (5) therefore, 1.4 x 12 moles of oxygen is required to oxidize the available iron in the ore.
Amount of oxygen = 1.4 x 1.5
= 2.11 moles
The amount of air is therefore: 2.11 x 0.21 = 10.05 moles
At S.T.P., the volume required is 10.05 x 22.4 = 225.3 litres
Therefore, at the addition rate of 3f/min., 75 minutes of oxidation would deliver the stoichiometric amount of oxygen required. This amount of air was then added to the bath and at the end of this time, the net heat of reaction was measured and found to be exothermic, therefore demonstrating the autogeneity of the process. The air was then stopped and the system cooled to room temperature under non-oxidizing conditions. The crucible was sectioned and the contents examined and analysed.Two distinct phases were present: 1) A matte phase that weighed 340 gm and analysed 26% S,2% SiO2, 65% Fe and 7%
Oxygen, which was similar in composition to the original matte. The matte analysed 0.15%
Sn.
2) A slag phase weighing 168 g which was silica saturated fayalite containing particles of silica and analysed 20% Si and 32%Fe. The tin analysis of the slag was 0.11%, thusenalbing an extraction efficiency to be calculated.
Results
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt %Sn Distribution
Matte 340 56.7 0.15 5.3
Slag 168 28.0 0.11 1.9
Volatiles 92 15.3 * 92.8
Feed 600 100.0 1.6 100.0 * A sample of tin oxide analysed 59.2% Sn.
The above example illustrated that high extractions of tin can be obtained from pyritic tin ores using the sulphur in the ore as a heat source.
Example 2
300g of matte from the previous example, which contained 0.1% Sn, was used as the starting material for the second example. A similar procedure was followed and the same quantity of air added. The purpose of this experiment was to determine if any buildup or decrease of metals, such as copper, tin and gold occurred in the matte phase, and if any detrimental decrease of sulphur or iron occurred, that would change the exothermic character of the overall reactions.
Measurements indicated that the net heat of reaction was still exothermic, but slightly less than in the previous example.
No buildup of tin in slag or matte had occurred. Copper and gold concentrations in the matte had increased from 0.02 to 0.04% Cu and 3 ppm to 5 ppm Au respectively.
Results
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt %Sn Distribution
Matte 302 50.3 0.15 4.7
Slag 207.4 34.6 0.11 2.3
Volatiles 90.6 15.1 - 94.0
Feed 600.0 100.0 1.60 100.0
Examples 3 & 4
Two more tests using recycled matte were conducted to show the effect of using matte that had been recycled four times.
The net overall heat of reaction was still exothermic, but only very slightly. In addition, the weight of matte had decreased, with a sympathetic increase in slag weight.
Concentrations of tin in the slag had decreased to 0.09% Sn in the case of example 3 and 0.07 % Sn in the case of example 4. Concentration of tin in the matte had decreased to 0.22% Sn after the fourth cycle.
Results (Test 4)
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 273.0 45.5 0.12 3.4
Slag 232.0 38.7 0.07 1.7
Volatiles 94.8 15.8 - 94.9
Feed 600.0 100.0 1.6 100.0
Copper and gold in the matte and built up to 0.1% and 9 ppm respectively.
The above experiments demonstrated that a batch-type system would be suitable provided that levels of tin in the slag and matte were acceptable and could be reduced if required. It was also clear that valuable metals could gradually be concentrated in the matte phase.
Example 5
Matte and slag from experiment 4 were both recycled and heated to 12500C under a non-oxidizing atmosphere.
The feed materials were therefore 250 g of matte assaying 0.12% Sn and 220 g of slag assaying 0.07 % Sn. In this experiment no fresh ore was added and 100 litres of air were added at 3e/min. to further oxidize the matte. The net heat of reaction was exothermic and the level of tin was reduced markedly in both slag and matte.
Results
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 194.1 41.3 0.04 16.5
Slag 215.3 45.8 0.03 13.7
Volatiles 60.6 12.9 - 69.8
Feed 470.0 100.0 0.10 100.0
This test showed that any buildup in tin in slag or matte could be overcome by addition of extra air. However, the gradual loss in weight of matte may eventually result in the reactions being net consumers of heat, with the periodic make-up of fresh matte then being an essential requirement in batch type processes.
Example 6
Using 300 g of a fresh matte sample, and 300 g of ore, the air flowrate was doubled to 6 litres/min. Consequently, oxidation time was halved to 37 minutes.
Results: were as follows
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 354.0 59.0 0.12 4.4
Slag 166.2 27.7 0.07 1.2
Volatiles 79.8 13.3 - 94.4
Feed 600.0 100.0 1.60 100.0
This test showed that equally good extraction could be obtained using double the air addition rate. The net reaction was measured as exothermic.
'Micrographic examination of the slags and mattes from the above series of tests showed that a considerable quantity of magnetite was present in all samples.
Example 7
Experiment 1 was repeated using a finer sized ore feed (-12 + 30# B.S.S.) to indicate if reactions were increased with a finer crushed ore. Results show that an improvement in recovery is possible with finer feed.
Results
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 353.4 58.9 0.08 3.0
Slag 156.6 26.1 0.03 0.5
Volatiles 90.0 15.0 - 96.5
Feed 600.0 100.0 1.60 100.0
Example 8
As the process had been successfully tested using a pyritic tin ore, it was decided to test a different type of ore. The ore selected was a pyrrhotitic tin ore of the following approximate composition: 1.2% Sn
36.0% Fe
22.0% S
0.9% C02
21.0% SiO2
The mineralogical composition of the ore was:
55 - 60% FeS (pyrrhotite) 1 - 2% SnO2 (cassiterite)
3% FeCO3 (siderite)
21 - 25% sio2 (quartz)
5% Iron Oxides
5% Gangue and other minerals such as fluorite, dolomite and iron silicates.
The cassiterite was mainly combined with quartz and was considerably coarser in grainsize than the pyritic tin ore. The ore was crushed and screened to -121F + 36# B.S.S. The stoichiometric amount of air required was calculated on the basis of 22.0% S in the ore.
Therefore, in 300 g based on sulphur analysis, 60.5% FeS is possible = 2.06 moles.
Oxygen required = 3.09 moles
Air required = 3.09 22.4
0.21 x 1
= 330 litres at S. T.P.
A similar experimental procedure to that described in example 1 was used. Once again labile sulphur and stannous sulphide were evolved prior to and during addition of air. SO2 was also detected in the off gases. The net reaction was very exothermic. This was principally due to the extra heat evolved from the extra available pyrrhotite, and elimination of heat required to remove the labile sulphur from pyrite.
Extraction of tin into the volatile fumes was comparable to the pyritic ore.
Results
Weight % Sn
Product gm % wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 427.2 71.2 0.10 5.9
Slag 139.8 23.3 0.08 1.5
Volatiles 33.0 5.5 - 92.6
Feed 600.0 100.0 1.20 100.0
This test demonstrated that pyrite was not essential for the success of the process and that satisfactory tin extraction could be achieved from a pyrrhotitic tin ore. However, the increase of matte in the process indicated that more oxidation air, or alternatively more silica, would be required to balance the Fe/Si ratio in the slag.
Example 9.
A third ore type, largely siliceous, was tested. The ore analysis was:
0.98% Sn
4.0% S (as pyrite and pyrrhotite)
15.0% Fe
29.0% Si
2.0% CO2
The ore mineralogical composition was approximately 1.3% SnO2 7-8% FeS2 and FeS
60% SiO2
4% FeCO3 10-15% Iron oxides 5% Fluorite 5-19% Other minerals
100.0 % Ore size was 12# B.S.S.
The test procedure was similar to Example 1. 300 g of matte was melted and maintained at 1250"C, to which 300 g of the siliceous tin ore was added and the stoichiometric amount of air added to oxidize all sulphur in the ore, assuming that all of it sulphidized some iron to iron sulphide. This was calculated at 41 litres of air and this was bubbled through the bath at 36/mien. Once again, stannous sulphide and sulphur vapour were evolved, but after 5 minutes of oxidation, the amount of sulphur decreased in favour of an increase in sulphur dioxide.
The net heat of reaction was endothermic due to the low sulphur levels in the ore. However tin extraction was reasonably good.
Results
Weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 308.4 51.4 0.23 12.0
Slag 229.1 38.1 0.12 4.7
Volatiles 62.9 10.5 - 83.3
Feed 600.0 100.0 0.98 100.0
This indicated that a largely siliceous tin ore, of relatively large cassiterite grainsize could be treated using the matte fuming technique. However, a fuel source such as pyrrhotite or carbonaceous fuel would be required to provide heat. The pyrrhotitic tin ore described above would be a suitable fuel and fluxing agent for the siliceous ore. Alternatively, the siliceous ore could be added to the pyritic or pyrrhotitic ores to aid fluxing and adjust the iron-silica ratio of the feed to suit process requirements.
Example 10
The next logical step was to blend the pyrrhotitic and siliceous ores to present a suitable feed from both a heat balance and fluxing viewpoint.
A mixture of 75% pyrrhotitic ore and 25% siliceous ore resulted in a feed assaying:
1.15% Sn 17.5% S 30.8% -Fe 16.5% Si The size of the composite ore was - 12# B.S.S. Using the normal procedure, it was calculated that the stoichiometric amount of air required (based on 17.5% S) was 262.5 litres. This was bubbled through a mixture of 300 g of ore and 300 g of matte and the net heat of reaction was measured as exothermic. The fluidity of the slag was noticeably better than any previous experiment, and fuming rates of tin sulphide and sulphur were substantial.
Results
weight % Sn
Product gm % Wt % Sn Distribution
Matte 373.2 62.2 0.09 5.0
Slag 171.6 28.6 0.15 3.8
Volatiles 55.2 9.2 - 91.2
600.0 100.0 1.15 100.0
This experiment demonstrated that by blending ores to obtain a suitable feed from both a
slag-forming and heating viewpoint, good extractions of tin were possible and reactions could
be made exothermic.
Example 11
Previous tests demonstrated the features of the process on a batch basis, by recycling cold
matte.
However, the gradual decrease in matte weight indicated slight overoxidation due to the
distillation of sulphur when adding ore. Consequently, less than the theoretical amount of sulphur was available as fuel, so it was decided to reduce the amount of air by 10%, the aim being to maintain a constant matte weight and autogeneous heating.
Two kilograms of iron sulphide was melted under nitrogen in a crucible and the tempera
ture maintained at 12300C. Air was added at 10 litres/min. to the bath and 2 Kg of pyritic tin
ore added as 200 g batches every two minutes. The calculated amount of air, 1600 1, was
added and the matte and slag then allowed to settle for ten minutes under nitrogen cover gas.
Slag was then poured from the crucible via an attached spout and the matte and a thin slag
layer retained in the crucible as the starting matte for the next cycle. This initial slag analysed
0.12% tin.
In all, the above cycle was repeated eight times and after the final cycle, matte was also poured from the crucible. Clearly, this test was a more realistic demonstration of the process capabilities under semi-continuous conditions. All slags and matte were weighed and assayed for tin, sulphur and iron.
The amount of slag tapped varied from 30% to 40% of the weight and the tin level decreased from 0.12% Sn to 0.0s Ojo Sn after three cycles and levelled off at about 0.06-0.08% Sn for the remaining cycles. Losses to slag were always less than 5% of the tin distribution.
Sulphur levels in slag were always less than 4% S and iron levels between 30-40%.
The matte assayed 0.09% Sn, 64.1% Fe and 20.9% S and represented 52.3%of the weight, thus showing that the matte bath could be maintained over a long run. Less than 4% of the tin from the last cycle was retained in the matte.
Overall, the heat balance was slightly exothermic indicating that the process was potentially autogeneous.
Example 12
A large scale test was carried out in which 90 Kg of pyritic tin ore (0.93 % Sn) was treated in a 50 Kg capacity refractory lined vessel similar to that described by J.M. Floyd in Paper 3.5,
Fourth World Conference on Tin, Kuala Lumpar 1974. Oil to cover furnace heat losses and air sufficient for oil and ore oxidation were delivered into the bath via a lance, thus utilizing the submerged combustion technique to overcome heat losses. Ore crushed to -a" was fed onto the surface of the bath of 30 Kg/hr for the first hour and then at twice the rate for the remainder of the test.Significant heat was generated and the temperature was maintained above 1300"C, and approached 1400"C when the addition rate was doubled, indicating that the process was close to being autogeneously heated.
Two quantities of slag were tapped and the fume was collected after the test. Over 95 % of the tin was extracted and slag tin levels were lower than in any previous tests, indicating that continuous, small increment feeding was at least as good as batch feeding. The rate of tin elimination was obviously very fast.
Maximum tin concentration in slags was 0.09% Sn and the average slag assayed 0.063%sun.
Fume analysed 45% Sn and was contaminated to some extent by ore and slag dust.
Example 13
A second large scale test was conducted in which the ore, crushed to -3/8" was screened through a 10 mesh BSS screen. The fine fraction amounting to 20% of the feed was injected into the matte bath through the lance, while the coarse fraction was fed at a constant rate onto the surface of the molten bath. In other respects the test was identical with example 12.
The maximum tin concentration in the slag was .08% Sn and average slag assayed 0.05%
Sn.
The fume from this test was noticeably cleaner, and contained 55% Sn.
This example shows the improvement resulting from the avoidance of loss of fines during feeding of the ore.
In the following claims the term "ore" is to be understood as including concentrates or other mineral mixes.
WHAT WE CLAIM IS:
1. A process for extracting tin values from a tin bearing iron sulphide ore, comprising charging said ore in particulate form into a refractory-lined reactor containing a pool of molten matte so that said iron sulphides in said ore become molten and enter the matte pool, blowing air or other oxidizing gas through the matte pool to oxidize said iron sulphides thus producing iron oxide and generating the heat required to smelt the charge and drive off the tin values from the charge in the form of volatile sulphides and oxides, said iron oxide combining with silica added in the charge to form a layer of molten slag which floats on the matte bath, the conditions in the reacting mass being such that the oxidizing gas blown into the reactor comes first into contact with the pool of molten matte, thus stabilizing the oxygen and sulphur pressures of the gases, after contacting the matte, in a suitable range to sulphidize and volatilize the tin in the charge without the need to add a carbonaceous reductant.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein additions of iron-bearing or siliceous materials are made in order to adjust the iron-to-silica ratio in the slag.
3. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein pyrrhotite is added to adjust the iron-to-silica ratio in the slag.
4. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein, after the completion of the ore addition, blowing is continued until the stoichiometric oxygen has been supplied to convert all the new iron sulphide matte resulting from the addition of the charge of ore.
5. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein fuel is burnt to offset heat losses from the reaction.
6. A process according to claim 5, wherein the fuel is a carbonaceous fuel.
7. A process according to claim 5, wherein the fuel is pyrrhotite or pyrite.
8. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the gases containing the volatile sulphides are burnt and the tin values collected in a fume collection system.
**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.
Claims (12)
1. A process for extracting tin values from a tin bearing iron sulphide ore, comprising charging said ore in particulate form into a refractory-lined reactor containing a pool of molten matte so that said iron sulphides in said ore become molten and enter the matte pool, blowing air or other oxidizing gas through the matte pool to oxidize said iron sulphides thus producing iron oxide and generating the heat required to smelt the charge and drive off the tin values from the charge in the form of volatile sulphides and oxides, said iron oxide combining with silica added in the charge to form a layer of molten slag which floats on the matte bath, the conditions in the reacting mass being such that the oxidizing gas blown into the reactor comes first into contact with the pool of molten matte, thus stabilizing the oxygen and sulphur pressures of the gases, after contacting the matte, in a suitable range to sulphidize and volatilize the tin in the charge without the need to add a carbonaceous reductant.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein additions of iron-bearing or siliceous materials are made in order to adjust the iron-to-silica ratio in the slag.
3. A process as claimed in claim 2, wherein pyrrhotite is added to adjust the iron-to-silica ratio in the slag.
4. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein, after the completion of the ore addition, blowing is continued until the stoichiometric oxygen has been supplied to convert all the new iron sulphide matte resulting from the addition of the charge of ore.
5. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein fuel is burnt to offset heat losses from the reaction.
6. A process according to claim 5, wherein the fuel is a carbonaceous fuel.
7. A process according to claim 5, wherein the fuel is pyrrhotite or pyrite.
8. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the gases containing the volatile sulphides are burnt and the tin values collected in a fume collection system.
9. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the matte is tapped from time to
time to recover copper and/or other metals which accumulate therein.
10. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the ore is added continuously and a sufficient volume of liquid iron silicate slag is maintained in the reactor to ensure a residence time such that fuming proceeds to the stage that the level of any tin that may enter the slag is sufficiently low for discard.
11. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the air is blown through tuyeres or lances below the surface of the matte layer.
12. A process for extracting tin values from a tin-bearing ore substantially as hereinbefore described in any one of the Examples.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AUPC697476 | 1976-08-12 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB1576531A true GB1576531A (en) | 1980-10-08 |
Family
ID=3766733
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB33564/77A Expired GB1576531A (en) | 1976-08-12 | 1977-08-10 | Recovery of tin from ores or other material |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
DE (1) | DE2736511C2 (en) |
GB (1) | GB1576531A (en) |
MY (1) | MY8300246A (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4274868A (en) | 1977-10-12 | 1981-06-23 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organization | Recovery of tin from ores or other materials |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2219411A (en) * | 1938-05-16 | 1940-10-29 | Carlsson Fredrik | Method of treating tin containing materials |
-
1977
- 1977-08-10 GB GB33564/77A patent/GB1576531A/en not_active Expired
- 1977-08-12 DE DE2736511A patent/DE2736511C2/en not_active Expired
-
1983
- 1983-12-30 MY MY246/83A patent/MY8300246A/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE2736511C2 (en) | 1984-06-20 |
DE2736511A1 (en) | 1978-02-16 |
MY8300246A (en) | 1983-12-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU598237B2 (en) | Recovery of values from antimony ores and concentrates | |
US4588436A (en) | Method of recovering metals from liquid slag | |
US3892559A (en) | Submerged smelting | |
US4036636A (en) | Pyrometallurgical process for smelting nickel and nickel-copper concentrates including slag treatment | |
US4741770A (en) | Zinc smelting process using oxidation zone and reduction zone | |
US3857700A (en) | Pyrometallurgical recovery of copper values from converter slags | |
CA1279198C (en) | Zinc smelting process using oxidation zone and reduction zone | |
US5372630A (en) | Direct sulphidization fuming of zinc | |
US4487628A (en) | Selective reduction of heavy metals | |
US5492554A (en) | Method for producing high-grade nickel matte from at least partly pyrometallurgically refined nickel-bearing raw materials | |
US3506435A (en) | Liquid-liquid extraction of reverberatory and converter slags by iron sulphide solutions | |
US4135912A (en) | Electric smelting of lead sulphate residues | |
US3847595A (en) | Lead smelting process | |
US4388110A (en) | Method for recovering the metal content of complex sulphidic metal raw materials | |
US4521245A (en) | Method of processing sulphide copper- and/or sulphide copper-zinc concentrates | |
US4274868A (en) | Recovery of tin from ores or other materials | |
US2816022A (en) | Smelting of lead-containing ores | |
JPS6247931B2 (en) | ||
GB1576531A (en) | Recovery of tin from ores or other material | |
RU2055922C1 (en) | Method for reprocessing sulfide noble metal-containing antimonial raw material | |
US4120697A (en) | Segregation-separation of copper from nickel in copper-nickel sulfide concentrates | |
US4334925A (en) | Combined carburization and sulfurization/desulfurization of molybdenum-rich matte | |
Dube | The extraction of lead from its ores by the iron-reduction process: A historical perspective | |
US4814004A (en) | Non-ferrous metal recovery | |
US2111789A (en) | Treatment of sulphide ores |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PS | Patent sealed [section 19, patents act 1949] | ||
732 | Registration of transactions, instruments or events in the register (sect. 32/1977) | ||
PE20 | Patent expired after termination of 20 years |
Effective date: 19970809 |