GB1565754A - Selective hydrogenation - Google Patents
Selective hydrogenation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB1565754A GB1565754A GB1220777A GB1220777A GB1565754A GB 1565754 A GB1565754 A GB 1565754A GB 1220777 A GB1220777 A GB 1220777A GB 1220777 A GB1220777 A GB 1220777A GB 1565754 A GB1565754 A GB 1565754A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- hydrogen
- temperature
- sepiolite
- nickel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G45/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
- C10G45/32—Selective hydrogenation of the diolefin or acetylene compounds
- C10G45/34—Selective hydrogenation of the diolefin or acetylene compounds characterised by the catalyst used
- C10G45/40—Selective hydrogenation of the diolefin or acetylene compounds characterised by the catalyst used containing platinum group metals or compounds thereof
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
- B01J23/89—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with noble metals
- B01J23/892—Nickel and noble metals
Description
(54) IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO SELECTIVE HYDROGENATION
(71) We, THE BRITISH PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED, of Britannic House,
Moor Lane, London, EC2Y 9BU, a British Company, do hereby declare the invention for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed to be particularly described in and by the following statement:
This invention relates to a process for the selective hydrogenation of di-olefins and/or acetylenes in the presence of mono-olefins utilising a modified supported nickel catalyst.
The catalytic selective hydrogenation of di-olefins and/or acetylenes in unsaturated hydrocarbon fractions containing them and also mono-olefins is a well established process.
The hydrocarbon fractions may be C3 and/or C4 fractions or gasoline fractions boiling in the range 15 to 2250C. Because of the gum-forming characteristics of these highly unsaturated materials the process is carried out at temperatures below 250"C in the liquid phase.
Aromatics, if present, remain unhydrogenated as do at least a proportion of the mono-olefins, these being hydrogenated, if necessary, in a second higher temperature stage. A particularly suitable catalyst is a supported, predominantly elemental, nickel catalyst, the use of such a catalyst being described and claimed in UK Patent No. 848232.
Other patents describing improvements or modifications to the process are UK Patent Nos.
899652, 972245 and 1301477.
The process is particularly suitable for gasoline produced by thermal cracking above 593"C, in the presence of diluent steam and/or an inert heat transfer agent such as sand.
Such thermal cracking processes are designed primarily for the production of light olefins e.g., ethylene and propylene, the gasoline produced being a by-product.
C3 and/or C4 fractions from the steam cracking may also be selectively hydrogenated to remove dienes or acetylenes depending on the use to which these fractions are to be put.
The presence of highly unsaturated gum-forming hydrocarbons leads to the gradual deposition of polymeric material on the catalyst and eventually to a high pressure drop across the reactor. To increase the catalyst life, treatment with hydrogen, as described and claimed in UK Patent No. 907348, has been used. The combination of reactivation, careful control of the hydrogenation to minimise gum formation, and the relative cheapness of the catalyst has, up till now, made it unnecessary to consider catalyst regeneration on a commercial scale.
However, the increasing cost of nickel has increased the cost of the catalyst. Further, the severity of steam cracking has been steadily increasing giving more highly unsaturated gasolines and a consequent shortening of the overall catalyst life. Regeneration of the catalyst has, in fact, already been proposed as a solution.
Our British Patent Specification No. 1455030 (BP Case 3711) discloses a process for regenerating a supported nickel catalyst which has been used for the selective hydrogenation of di-olefins and/or acetylenes in the presence of mono-olefins which comprises the steps of purging the catalyst of volatile hydrocarbon material with an inert gas at a temperature of from 120 to 350"C, burning off hydrocarbonaceous deposits with an oxygen/inert gas mixture at a temperature of from 350 to 4500C, initiating the reduction of the oxidised catalyst with an hydrogen-inert gas mixture at 350 - 450"C and completing the reduction with hydrogen at 350 - 450"C.
The optimum temperature range for the reduction procedure is 390"C to 4300C.
At temperatures below 390"C, and more particularly below 350"C, the catalyst is not reactivated to its full potential. At temperatures above 430"C and more particularly above 450"C, the nickel is reduced to the form of relatively large crystallites of diminished activity.
In practice, control of the relatively narrow temperature range necessary for optimum reduction can be difficult to achieve.
We have now discovered that the addition of a modifying quantity of a platinum group metal to the nickel catalyst results in improved reducibility of the nickel catalyst and enables satisfactory reduction to take place over a wider range than hitherto.
Thus according to the present invention there is provided a process for the selective hydrogenation of di-olefins and/or acetylenes in a hydrocarbon fraction which process comprises contacting the hydrocarbon fraction in the presence of a supported nickel catalyst comprising in addition 1-50 ppm by weight of a platinum group metal at a temperature in the range 0 - 250"C, a pressure in the range 7-100 bars gauge, a liquid hourly space velocity in the range 0.2-5 v/v/hr, a hydrogen treatment rate of 70 - 360 m3/m3 and a hydrogen consumption rate of 5-100 m3/m3 a supported nickel catalyst comprising in addition from 1 50 ppm by weight of a platinum group metal.
The catalyst may contain from 1 to 50% wt of nickel, preferably 5 to 30% wt, by weight of total catalyst. The support may be any support stable up to 4500C, particularly one having a low activity for cracking and polymerising reactions. It may be a refractory oxide or other refractory compound of a Group II, III or IV element for example alumina, silica, or preferably, sepiolite.
The nickel catalyst may be prepared by impregnating the support with a solution of a complex of ammonia with a substantially water-insoluble nickel salt of an aliphatic monocarboxylic acid followed by reduction of the complex to elemental nickel to activate the catalyst.
The platinum group metal may be added in the form of an aqueous solution together with the nickel salt or in a subsequent second impregnation stage.
The platinum group metals are ruthenium, rhodium. palladium, osmium, iridium and platinum, with palladium being particularly preferred. Suitable salts of these metals include palladium chloride.
Although the nickel of the catalyst is predominantly present as elemental nickel during the selective hydrogenation, the selectivity is conferred by a partial sulphiding of the nickel, the sulphur:nickel atomic ratio being normally in the range 0.01 - 0.4:1. more particularly 0.01 - 0.2:1. The sulphur may be added by reaction with thiophene normally present in the feedstock or by presulphiding with a thiophene, thiacyclo-alkane having at least 4 carbon atoms in the ring, or dialkyl monosulphide at a temperature below 250"C. The aforementioned sulphur compounds may also be added to the feedstock to accelerate the partial sulphiding during the early stages of the selective hydrogenation.
The preferred feedstocks are gasoline fractions boiling in the range 15 to 225"C having the following characteristics:
Di-olefin content % wt 4- 35, preferably 5-15
Mono-olefin content Wo wt 1- 20, preferably 1-10
Aromatic content Wo wt 30- 85, preferably 45-75
Diene content % wt 5- 30, preferably 10-15
Bromine number 10-100, preferably 30-80
Total sulphur content Wo wt 0.005-1.5, preferably 0.005-0.4
Mercaptan sulphur ppm wt 1-300, preferably 1-30
The di-olefin, mono-olefin and aromatic contents may be determined by chromatography. The diene value is measured by UOP Test Method No. 326 - 65.
The preferred ranges above are those likely to be found in steam cracked gasolines produced by high severity steam cracking (i.e., cracking to product ethylene yields of 20 40% wt on feed). As previously indicated these highly unsaturated gasolines are particularly liable to deposit gum and polymer on the catalyst.
The selective hydrogenation process is a relatively low temperature process which is operated under the following conditions.
Temperature "C 0-250, preferably 30-180
Pressure bars gauge 7-100. preferably 20-70
Space velocity v/v/hr 0.2- 5, preferably 0.5-3
Hydrogen treating rate m3/m3 70-360, preferably 70-150
Hydrogen consumption m3/m3 5-100, preferably 10-90
In initiating the regeneration the flow of feedstock is stopped but preferably the hydrogen flow is continued for 1 to 24 hours at the reaction conditions to purge the catalyst bed of feedstock. The need for regeneration may be seen from an increasing pressure drop of from 0.5 to 7 bars across the catalyst bed, by failure to maintain the desired hydrogen consumption by increasing the temperature, or by failure of known reactivation techniques to restore activity. Preferably regeneration is initiated when the pressure drop is still moderate, e.g., 0.5 to 2 bars, to reduce the amount of hydrocarbonaceous deposits required to be burnt off.
The regeneration may be preceded by specific techniques to reduce the amount of hydrocarbonaceous deposits on the catalyst, as will be discussed in more detail hereafter. In its simplest form the regeneration may be started by stopping the flow of feedstock and hydrogen and purging the catalyst with an inert gas, preferably steam, at 120 to 350"C. The pressure is preferably reduced to 1 - 10 bars gauge and the temperature may be gradually increased, e.g., at 50 C/hr to a maximum of 350"C. The inert gas flow rate may be from 100 - 2000 v/v/hr and the total purging time from 1 to 24 hours.
The burn off may be carried out at 300 to 500"C. The temperature is controlled by control of the oxygen content of the gas which may be from 0.2 - 5% mol. The inert gas used and the flow rate may be as for the purging, oxygen, preferably as air, being added to the purge gas. Preferably the burning is carried out in two or more stages.
Suitable stages may thus be:
Inlet gas at 350 - 370"C with a maximum bed temperature of 390 - 410"C.
Inlet gas at 390 - 410"C with a maximum bed temperature of 420 - 450"C.
The stages are considered to be complete when the oxygen content of the exit gas is the same as that of the inlet gas.
Preferably there is no recycle of the gas, this being unnecessary when using steam. If recycle is contemplated care should be taken to eliminate CO from the recycled gas.
At the completion of the burn off, the oxygen is shut off while maintaining the flow of inert gas. Preferably, the temperature of the inlet gas is reduced to 350 - 370"C.
It is believed that during the burn-off most, if not all, of the sulphur on the catalyst is oxidised to sulphate. Since reduction of nickel sulphate to nickel sulphide is highly exothermic an important feature of the present invention is the use of a hydrogen-inert gas mixture to initiate the reduction. The insert gas, preferably steam, helps to control the reduction and carry away the heat of reaction.
Preferably the initial gas contains from 15 to 85 mol % hydrogen the balance being inert gas. The hydrogen content is controlled to keep the temperature within the 300 - 450"C, preferably within the range 350 - 400"C. The total gas flow rate may be from 100 to 2000 v/v/hr and the overall time for this initial reduction from 1 to 10 hours.
Preferably the inert gas content of the gas is gradually reduced to zero within this time, while ensuring that the specified temperature is not exceeded. Suitably 20% reductions in inert gas flow are made hourly.
The final reduction is made with hydrogen alone at 1500 - 450"C but preferably at 350 430"C. The hydrogen flow rate may be from 100 to 2000 v/v/hr and the time from 1 to 50 hours. Suitably the inlet hydrogen may be at 420 - 450"C with the maximum bed temperature at 410 - 430"C.
The catalyst may be cooled back to the normal operating temperature in a flow of hydrogen preparatory to recommencing the selective hydrogenation in standard manner.
The pressure during the various steps of the regeneration may be from 1 to 35 bars gauge, preferably 1 to 10 bars gauge. The term "inert gas" means a gas inert to the catalyst under the conditions of regeneration. It may, for example, be nitrogen but it is preferably steam.
Since liquid water may harm nickel catalysts, the temperature of the regeneration should be such that no liquid water forms and care should be exercised in this respect. Preferably the gases used flow downwardly through the catalyst bed rather than upwardly.
As previously indicated, the quantity of hydrocarbonaceous deposits on the catalyst can be reduced, prior to the regeneration, by special techniques used singly or in combination.
The catalyst may be washed with a hydrocarbon liquid which may consist of or contain aromatics, naphthenes or paraffins. Preferably it contains at least 50% wt of aromatics.
Preferably the liquid boils within the range 50 - 250"C and is substantially free of sulphur compounds. Suitable liquids include benzene, toluene, reformate, straight-run gasoline, or even steam cracker gasoline.
The wash liquid may be distilled to remove the dissolved polymer and recycled.
The washing may be carried out under the following ranges of conditions.
Temperature* "C ambient - 300, preferably 50 - 250
Pressure bars gauge 7 - 100, preferably 20 - 70
Space velocity v/v/hr **0 - 10, preferably 0 - 5
Hydrogen rate m3/m3 0 - 360, preferably 0 - 150
The catalyst can also be treated with hydrogen under the following ranges of conditions.
Temperature "C 150 - 450, preferable 200 - 400
Pressure bars gauge 7 - 100, preferably 20 - 70
Space velocity v/v/hr 20 - 2000, preferably 100 - 1000
* Selected so that the wash liquid remains substantially in the liquid phase.
** Corresponds to filling reactor under no-flow conditions, i.e., a static soak.
The invention is illustrated by the following examples.
Example I
A nickel on sepiolite catalyst containing nominally 10 ppm wt palladium was prepared by adding 250 ml (186 grammes) of a standard Ni/sepiolite catalyst (containing 10% wt nickel) to a solution containing 0.001 grammes of PdCl2 in 250 ml of deionised water. The catalyst was left in the solution for 24 hours at ambient temperature. Excess solution was then removed using a rotary evaporator. The catalyst was dried overnight at 1200C.
Example 2
An evaluation of the reducibility of the Ni/sepiolite catalyst containing the trace of palladium was carried out on a small pilot plant. The reactor was packed with 50 ml (36.0 grammes) of thePd doped Ni/sepiolite catalyst, which was reduced by heating the catalysts to 3500C for 4 hours under a once-through hydrogen flow of 50 litres/hour. Following reduction the catalyst was cooled back to and maintained at 80"C under hydrogen flow and then sulphided by passing over it n-heptane containing nominally 0.13% wt thiophene at 200 ml/hr, for 12 hours. The catalyst was then oxidised in a flow of nitrogen containing 1% oxygen at 450"C for 5 hours, after the unit had been purged of hydrogen.
After oxidative regeneration of the catalyst, the unit was purged with nitrogen and then hydrogen and the catalyst was reduced successively at 250 , 300 and 350"C in flowing hydrogen at 50 litres/hour for 4 hours at each temperature. A sample of the catalyst was taken after each stage of reduction. To prevent oxidation of the reduced catalyst precautions were taken to avoid contact with the air. The catalyst was sampled under a nitrogen purge and samples were stored under water.
The metallic nickel content of the catalyst samples were determined by treating the samples with hydrochloric acid and by measuring the volume of hydrogen evolved in a gas burette.
The same procedure was repeated on 50 ml (34.3 grammes) of the standard nickel on sepiolite catalyst.
Results
Reduction % Ni Reduced
Temperature
Standard "C Ni/sepiolite Pd/Ni/sepiolite
250 12 31
300 35 48
350 50 67
This shows that following a simulated regeneration the catalyst containing the precious metal is more readily reduced.
WHAT WE CLAIM IS:
1. A process for the selective hydrogenation of di-olefins and/or acetylenes in a hydrocarbon fraction which process comprises contacting the hydrocarbon fraction in the
presence of a supported nickel catalyst comprising in addition 1 - 50 ppm by weight of a platinum group metal at a temperature in the range 0 - 250"C, a pressure in the range 7
100 bars gauge, a liquid hourly space velocity in the range 0.2 - 5 v/v/hr, a hydrogen
treatment rate of 70 - 360 m3/m3 and a hydrogen consumption rate of 5 - 100 m3/m3.
2. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the catalyst contains from 1 to 50% by
weight of nickel.
**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.
Claims (8)
- **WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **.Temperature* "C ambient - 300, preferably 50 - 250 Pressure bars gauge 7 - 100, preferably 20 - 70 Space velocity v/v/hr **0 - 10, preferably 0 - 5 Hydrogen rate m3/m3 0 - 360, preferably 0 - 150 The catalyst can also be treated with hydrogen under the following ranges of conditions.Temperature "C 150 - 450, preferable 200 - 400 Pressure bars gauge 7 - 100, preferably 20 - 70 Space velocity v/v/hr 20 - 2000, preferably 100 - 1000 * Selected so that the wash liquid remains substantially in the liquid phase.** Corresponds to filling reactor under no-flow conditions, i.e., a static soak.The invention is illustrated by the following examples.Example I A nickel on sepiolite catalyst containing nominally 10 ppm wt palladium was prepared by adding 250 ml (186 grammes) of a standard Ni/sepiolite catalyst (containing 10% wt nickel) to a solution containing 0.001 grammes of PdCl2 in 250 ml of deionised water. The catalyst was left in the solution for 24 hours at ambient temperature. Excess solution was then removed using a rotary evaporator. The catalyst was dried overnight at 1200C.Example 2 An evaluation of the reducibility of the Ni/sepiolite catalyst containing the trace of palladium was carried out on a small pilot plant. The reactor was packed with 50 ml (36.0 grammes) of thePd doped Ni/sepiolite catalyst, which was reduced by heating the catalysts to 3500C for 4 hours under a once-through hydrogen flow of 50 litres/hour. Following reduction the catalyst was cooled back to and maintained at 80"C under hydrogen flow and then sulphided by passing over it n-heptane containing nominally 0.13% wt thiophene at 200 ml/hr, for 12 hours. The catalyst was then oxidised in a flow of nitrogen containing 1% oxygen at 450"C for 5 hours, after the unit had been purged of hydrogen.After oxidative regeneration of the catalyst, the unit was purged with nitrogen and then hydrogen and the catalyst was reduced successively at 250 , 300 and 350"C in flowing hydrogen at 50 litres/hour for 4 hours at each temperature. A sample of the catalyst was taken after each stage of reduction. To prevent oxidation of the reduced catalyst precautions were taken to avoid contact with the air. The catalyst was sampled under a nitrogen purge and samples were stored under water.The metallic nickel content of the catalyst samples were determined by treating the samples with hydrochloric acid and by measuring the volume of hydrogen evolved in a gas burette.The same procedure was repeated on 50 ml (34.3 grammes) of the standard nickel on sepiolite catalyst.Results Reduction % Ni Reduced Temperature Standard "C Ni/sepiolite Pd/Ni/sepiolite250 12 31300 35 48350 50 67 This shows that following a simulated regeneration the catalyst containing the precious metal is more readily reduced.WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. A process for the selective hydrogenation of di-olefins and/or acetylenes in a hydrocarbon fraction which process comprises contacting the hydrocarbon fraction in the presence of a supported nickel catalyst comprising in addition 1 - 50 ppm by weight of a platinum group metal at a temperature in the range 0 - 250"C, a pressure in the range 7100 bars gauge, a liquid hourly space velocity in the range 0.2 - 5 v/v/hr, a hydrogen treatment rate of 70 - 360 m3/m3 and a hydrogen consumption rate of 5 - 100 m3/m3.
- 2. A process according to Claim 1 wherein the catalyst contains from 1 to 50% by weight of nickel.
- 3. A process according to either of the preceding claims wherein the support is arefractory oxide or other refractory compound of a Group II, III or IV element.
- 4. A process according to Claim 3 wherein the support is sepiolite.
- 5. A process according to any of the preceding claims wherein the platinum group metal is palladium.
- 6. A process according to any of the preceding claims wherein an oxidised catalyst is reduced with hydrogen at a temperature in the range 150 to 4500C prior to selective hydrogenation.
- 7. A process according to any of the preceding claims wherein contacting is effected at a temperature in the range 30 - 1800C, a pressure in the range 20 - 70 bars gauge, a liquid hourly space velocity in the range 0.5 - 3, a hydrogen treatment rate of 70 - 150 m3/m3and a hydrogen consumption rate of 10 - 90 m3/m3.
- 8. A process as hereinbefore described with reference to the Examples.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1220777A GB1565754A (en) | 1978-03-08 | 1978-03-08 | Selective hydrogenation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1220777A GB1565754A (en) | 1978-03-08 | 1978-03-08 | Selective hydrogenation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB1565754A true GB1565754A (en) | 1980-04-23 |
Family
ID=10000304
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB1220777A Expired GB1565754A (en) | 1978-03-08 | 1978-03-08 | Selective hydrogenation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB1565754A (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0049804A1 (en) * | 1980-10-09 | 1982-04-21 | Ec Erdölchemie Gmbh | Process for the production of motor fuel fractions |
EP0319116A1 (en) * | 1987-11-27 | 1989-06-07 | Isp Investments Inc. | Hydrogenation catalyst |
EP0520887A1 (en) * | 1991-06-26 | 1992-12-30 | Elf Antar France | Hydrorefining catalyst and process |
EP0685552A1 (en) * | 1994-06-01 | 1995-12-06 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and installation for the selective hydrogenation of catalytic cracking gasoline |
EP0831140A1 (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-25 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for the purification of catalytically cracked gasolines |
FR2753717A1 (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-27 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | PROCESS AND PLANT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CATALYTIC CRACKS WITH LOW SULFUR CONTENT |
US6709639B1 (en) | 1996-09-24 | 2004-03-23 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Apparatus for purification of raw gasoline from catalytic cracking |
EP2287274A1 (en) | 2009-08-17 | 2011-02-23 | IFP Energies nouvelles | Method for preparing a Ni/Sn support catalyst for selective hydrogenation of polyunsaturated hydrocarbons |
EP2287275A1 (en) | 2009-08-17 | 2011-02-23 | IFP Energies nouvelles | Method for preparing a support catalyst made from Ni and a metal of the IB group for selective hydrogenation of polyunsaturated hydrocarbons |
CN109772474A (en) * | 2017-11-14 | 2019-05-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of start-up method of hydrotreating catalyst |
-
1978
- 1978-03-08 GB GB1220777A patent/GB1565754A/en not_active Expired
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0049804A1 (en) * | 1980-10-09 | 1982-04-21 | Ec Erdölchemie Gmbh | Process for the production of motor fuel fractions |
EP0319116A1 (en) * | 1987-11-27 | 1989-06-07 | Isp Investments Inc. | Hydrogenation catalyst |
EP0520887A1 (en) * | 1991-06-26 | 1992-12-30 | Elf Antar France | Hydrorefining catalyst and process |
FR2678179A1 (en) * | 1991-06-26 | 1992-12-31 | Elf Antar France | HYDRORAFFINAGE CATALYST CONTAINING RUTHENIUM SULFIDES AND AT LEAST ONE OTHER METAL ON A SUPPORT OF REFRACTORY OXIDES AND HYDRO-REFINING METHOD USING THE SAME. |
US5248648A (en) * | 1991-06-26 | 1993-09-28 | Elf France | Hydrorefining catalyst containing sulphides of ruthenium and of at least one other metal on a refractory |
EP0685552A1 (en) * | 1994-06-01 | 1995-12-06 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and installation for the selective hydrogenation of catalytic cracking gasoline |
FR2720754A1 (en) * | 1994-06-01 | 1995-12-08 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | Process and installation for the selective hydrogenation treatment of a catalytic cracking gasoline |
EP0831140A1 (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-25 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for the purification of catalytically cracked gasolines |
FR2753718A1 (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-27 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | PROCESS AND PLANT FOR PURIFYING CRUDE GASOLINE FROM CATALYTIC CRACKING |
FR2753717A1 (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-03-27 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | PROCESS AND PLANT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CATALYTIC CRACKS WITH LOW SULFUR CONTENT |
EP0832958A1 (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1998-04-01 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process and apparatus for the production of low sulphur catalytically cracked gasolines |
US6007704A (en) * | 1996-09-24 | 1999-12-28 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process for the production of catalytic cracking gasoline with a low sulphur content |
US6187173B1 (en) | 1996-09-24 | 2001-02-13 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process for purification of raw gasoline from catalytic cracking |
US6709639B1 (en) | 1996-09-24 | 2004-03-23 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Apparatus for purification of raw gasoline from catalytic cracking |
US6838060B1 (en) | 1996-09-24 | 2005-01-04 | Institut Francais Dupetrole | Process and apparatus for the production of catalytic cracking gasoline with a low sulphur content |
EP2287274A1 (en) | 2009-08-17 | 2011-02-23 | IFP Energies nouvelles | Method for preparing a Ni/Sn support catalyst for selective hydrogenation of polyunsaturated hydrocarbons |
EP2287275A1 (en) | 2009-08-17 | 2011-02-23 | IFP Energies nouvelles | Method for preparing a support catalyst made from Ni and a metal of the IB group for selective hydrogenation of polyunsaturated hydrocarbons |
CN109772474A (en) * | 2017-11-14 | 2019-05-21 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of start-up method of hydrotreating catalyst |
CN109772474B (en) * | 2017-11-14 | 2021-08-06 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Startup method of hydrotreating catalyst |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4983558A (en) | Process for presulfurizing a hydrocarbon treatment catalyst | |
EP0228163B1 (en) | A catalytic reforming process employing an improved nickel adsorbant for sulfur removal | |
JPS6041114B2 (en) | Selective hydrogenation method for gasoline | |
US2542970A (en) | Refining of cracked naphthas by selective hydrogenation | |
JP7431169B2 (en) | Catalyst for hydrogenation reaction and method for producing the same | |
US3691066A (en) | Hydrogenation of unsaturated gasolines | |
GB1565754A (en) | Selective hydrogenation | |
US3884797A (en) | Hydrofining-reforming process | |
US3221078A (en) | Selective hydrogenation of olefins in dripolene | |
US4446005A (en) | Guard bed for the removal of sulfur and nickel from feeds previously contacted with nickel containing sulfur adsorption catalysts | |
US4192771A (en) | Process for dispersal and redispersal of platinum group metals comprising sulphiding in a stream of inert gas | |
US4125454A (en) | Process for suppression of catalyst deactivation and C5 + liquid yield loss in a cyclic reforming unit | |
US3309307A (en) | Selective hydrogenation of hydrocarbons | |
US3441500A (en) | Process for activating a fixed bed of hydrorefining catalyst | |
US3269939A (en) | Process for the reduction of the aromatic content of petroleum distillates | |
US3702291A (en) | Process for selectively hydrogenating petroleum cuts of the gasoline range in several steps | |
US2944012A (en) | Process for stabilizing jet fuels | |
US3051647A (en) | Hydrogenation of gasolines | |
CA1152926A (en) | Catalytic reforming and hydrocracking of organic compounds employing zinc titanate as the catalytic agent | |
US1932369A (en) | Removal of sulphur compounds from crude hydrocarbons | |
EP0018808B1 (en) | Pd/pt catalyst composition for hydrocarbon reforming and reforming process using same | |
US3491019A (en) | Hydrotreating of light cycle oils | |
Pieck et al. | Recovering of the catalytic functions of naphtha reforming catalysts by partial coke burning | |
US3793183A (en) | Method for starting up a reforming process employing a catalyst containing a group viii metal, rhenium, and selenium | |
US2867581A (en) | Desulfurization of petroleum hydrocarbons with impregnated catalysts |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
CSNS | Application of which complete specification have been accepted and published, but patent is not sealed |