GB1563196A

GB1563196A - Permanent magnet electrical machines

Info

Publication number: GB1563196A
Application number: GB3584775A
Authority: GB
Original assignee: LUCUS IND Ltd
Current assignee: LUCUS IND Ltd
Priority date: 1975-08-30
Filing date: 1975-08-30
Publication date: 1980-03-19

Description

(54) PERMANENT MAGNET ELECTRICAL MACHINES (71) We, LUCAS INDUSTRIES LIMITED, a British Company of Great King Street, Birmingham, B19 2XF, do hereby dedare the invention for which we pray that a Patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement: This invention relates to permanent magnet electrical machines, particularly (but not exclusively) permanent magnet motors.

A conventional permanent magnet motor is known which is provided with a permanent magnet field assembly including two permanent magnets magnetically coupled by a housing of magnetic materiaL Each magnet is in the form of a part-cylindrical shell magnetised radially so that one magnet has an inner pole face of one polarity and the other has an inner pole face of opposite polarity.

Motors of this type present a number of difficulties in manufacture. Firstly to minimise "cogging" it has been proposed to relieve the edges of the pole faces and this involves difficulty both in making the magnets and in magnetising them. Secondly, in order to ensure accurate location of the magnet in the housing it has been proposed to make the external radius of each magnet larger than the radius of the locating face in the housing so that the magnet rests on its two edges in the hous-ing. This involves providing the inner and outer faces of the magnet with radii struck from different axes, which creates difficulty in manufacture.Finally radial magnetisation, which is ideal, is difficult to obtain with modern magnetic materials and diametral magnetisation (where the flux in the magnet is parallel to a single radius rather than radial at all points) reduces the efficiency of the motor.

It is an object of the invention to provide a permanent magnet electrical machine which has a permanent magnet arrangement such that these manufacturing difficulties are avoided.

A permanent magnet electrical machine in accordance with the invention includes a housing of magnetic material, a plurality of groups of magnets in the housing and magnetically coupled thereby, each magnet of each group having flat spaced parallel pole faces, the magnets of each group being arranged side by side with pole faces of the same polarity innermost to form the internal face of a stator pole, and an armature rotatably supported in the housing and incorporating a rotor having teeth and windings on said rotor, the magnets of each group being spaced around the armature axis at an angle different from the angular pitch of the teeth of the rotor.

An example of the invention is shown in the accompanying drawings, in which Figures 1 and 2 are sections through a motor on lines PB in Figure 2 and A-A in Figure 1 respectively; Figure 3 is a section on line C-C in Figure 1 with some detail omitted for clarity, and Figures 4 and 5 are enlarged portions like part of Figure 3, but showing two possible modifications.

The motor shown includes a housing 10 of magnetic material in which there are mounted two groups of three magnets 11, 12. Each magnet is in the form of a length of rectangular section strip magnetised in a direction perpendicular to its larger faces. These faces therefore form pole faces of opposite polarity. The three magnets of each group are arranged side by side with their lengths parallel to, and their inner pole faces substantially equidistant from, the axis of the housing. To this end three shallow rectangular locating grooves are formed in the housing for each group of magnets, for example by broaching.

It will be noted from Figure 3 that the arrangement described automatically provides the type of relief required at the edges of each group of magnets to overcome "cogging" problems and it will be appreciated that this is a direct result of utilising a group of flat faced magnets for each pole. In addition since there are three magnets in each group, the group approximates to a truly radially magnetised magnet.

The motor also includes an armature 13 which is rotatably supported by bearings on end caps 14, 15 at opposite ends of the hous ing 10. The end cap 14 is of electrically insu lating material slidably supporting brushes 16 coacting with a commutator 17 on the armature.

The motor has a nine-pole armature 13 so that its teeth occur at an angular pitch of 40".

The magnets of each group are arranged at an angular pitch of 42/30.

It will be appreciated that cogging occurs in an electric motor of this general type because there are sharply defined positions of minimum potential energy. With the arrangement described, however, with the angular pitch of the magnets different from the angular pitch of the armature teeth, these minima are less sharply defined.Thus, taking, for example, the armature pole at the right of the drawing this is at its closest approach to the centre magnet 12 whereas the tooth above is still 6-2/3" short of its closest approach and the tooth below has passed its closest approach by 6-2/3" (assuming the direction of rotation to be antl-dockwise). The torque required to move the armature out of one of its stable 'cog' positions is reduced, since the six magnets making up the stator poles act sequentially on the armature instead of acting simultaneously as in the case where a single arcuate magnet is used for each pole.

Generally speaking for an n-pole rotor, the spacing of the magnets which are arranged in two groups of m each will be

In the example shown in Figure 3 the innermost pole face of each magnet is tangential at its centre line to an imaginary circle struck from the axis of the housing. Thus each pole face is equidistant from the axis.

In the modification shown in Figure 4 the pole faces are still tangential at their centre lines to circles struck from the axis but in this case the outer pole faces of each group are tangential to a slightly larger circle than that to which the middle pole faces are tangentiaL As shown the pole faces of the outer magnets 12a, 12b are tangential to a circle of radius Rop whereas the pole face of the remaining magnet 12c is tangential to a circle of radius Rcp where Rop is larger than Rcp. Figure 4 also shows a circle Rr which represents the maximum radius of the rotor. The minimum thickness of the air gap between the outer pole faces and the rotor (i.e. the difference between Rop and Rr) is no more than four times the minimum gap between the centre pole piece and the rotor (i.e. the difference between Rcp and Rr).

Turning now to Figure 5, the magnets 12a, 12b and 12c all have their inner pole faces tangential to the same circle, but in the case of the two outer magnets 12a and 12b the point of tangency is not at the centre line of pole face, but closer to the centre magnet 12c.

Thus, at the centre line of each outer magnet 12a, 12b, the pole face is not tangential to the circle intersecting the centre line but inclined to such a tangent (T) at an angle zz. Thus the inner edges of the pole faces of the magnets 12a and 12b are closer to the axis than the outer edges (i.e. RiRo) but each is of course further from the axis than the centre line of the pole face of the centre magnet 12a The outer magnets 12a and 12c may, of course, be both inclined as shown in Figure 5 and further from the axis than the centre magnet as shown in Figure 4.

The modifications shown in Figures 4 and 5 both assist in preventing cogging.

WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. A permanent magnet electrical machine including a housing of magnetic material, a plurality of groups of magnets in the housing and magnetically coupled thereby, each magnet of each group having flat spaced parallel pole faces, the magnets of each group being arranged side by side with pole faces of the same polarity innermost to form the internal face of a stator pole, and an armature rotatably supported in the housing and incorporating a rotor having teeth and windings on said rotor, the magnets of each group being spaced around the armature axis at an angle different from the angular pitch of the teeth of the rotor.

2. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which the magnets are seated in rectangular locating grooves in the housing.

3. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which said angle is given by the expression 360 1 (1+ ) n 2m where n is the number of teeth on the rotor and m is number of magnets in each group, there being only two groups of magnets.

4. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which the centre lines of the innermost pole faces of the magnets are equidistant from the axis of the housing.

5. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which there are at least three magnets in each group, the outermost magnets of each group having the centre lines of the innermost pole faces spaced from the axis of the housing by a distance greater than the spacing from the axis of the housing of the centre line of the innermost pole face of the or each other magnet in the group, the difference between the maximum radius of the rotor and the spacing from the axis of the housing of the centre line of the innermost pole face of

**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.

Claims

**WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **.

end caps 14, 15 at opposite ends of the hous ing 10. The end cap 14 is of electrically insu lating material slidably supporting brushes

16 coacting with a commutator 17 on the armature.

The motor has a nine-pole armature 13 so that its teeth occur at an angular pitch of 40".

The magnets of each group are arranged at an angular pitch of 42/30.

It will be appreciated that cogging occurs in an electric motor of this general type because there are sharply defined positions of minimum potential energy. With the arrangement described, however, with the angular pitch of the magnets different from the angular pitch of the armature teeth, these minima are less sharply defined.Thus, taking, for example, the armature pole at the right of the drawing this is at its closest approach to the centre magnet 12 whereas the tooth above is still 6-2/3" short of its closest approach and the tooth below has passed its closest approach by 6-2/3" (assuming the direction of rotation to be antl-dockwise). The torque required to move the armature out of one of its stable 'cog' positions is reduced, since the six magnets making up the stator poles act sequentially on the armature instead of acting simultaneously as in the case where a single arcuate magnet is used for each pole.

Generally speaking for an n-pole rotor, the spacing of the magnets which are arranged in two groups of m each will be

In the example shown in Figure 3 the innermost pole face of each magnet is tangential at its centre line to an imaginary circle struck from the axis of the housing. Thus each pole face is equidistant from the axis.

In the modification shown in Figure 4 the pole faces are still tangential at their centre lines to circles struck from the axis but in this case the outer pole faces of each group are tangential to a slightly larger circle than that to which the middle pole faces are tangentiaL As shown the pole faces of the outer magnets 12a, 12b are tangential to a circle of radius Rop whereas the pole face of the remaining magnet 12c is tangential to a circle of radius Rcp where Rop is larger than Rcp. Figure 4 also shows a circle Rr which represents the maximum radius of the rotor. The minimum thickness of the air gap between the outer pole faces and the rotor (i.e. the difference between Rop and Rr) is no more than four times the minimum gap between the centre pole piece and the rotor (i.e. the difference between Rcp and Rr).

Turning now to Figure 5, the magnets 12a, 12b and 12c all have their inner pole faces tangential to the same circle, but in the case of the two outer magnets 12a and 12b the point of tangency is not at the centre line of pole face, but closer to the centre magnet 12c.

Thus, at the centre line of each outer magnet 12a, 12b, the pole face is not tangential to the circle intersecting the centre line but inclined to such a tangent (T) at an angle zz. Thus the inner edges of the pole faces of the magnets 12a and 12b are closer to the axis than the outer edges (i.e. RiRo) but each is of course further from the axis than the centre line of the pole face of the centre magnet 12a The outer magnets 12a and 12c may, of course, be both inclined as shown in Figure 5 and further from the axis than the centre magnet as shown in Figure 4.

The modifications shown in Figures 4 and 5 both assist in preventing cogging.

WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. A permanent magnet electrical machine including a housing of magnetic material, a plurality of groups of magnets in the housing and magnetically coupled thereby, each magnet of each group having flat spaced parallel pole faces, the magnets of each group being arranged side by side with pole faces of the same polarity innermost to form the internal face of a stator pole, and an armature rotatably supported in the housing and incorporating a rotor having teeth and windings on said rotor, the magnets of each group being spaced around the armature axis at an angle different from the angular pitch of the teeth of the rotor.
2. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which the magnets are seated in rectangular locating grooves in the housing.
3. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which said angle is given by the expression

360 1 (1+ ) n 2m where n is the number of teeth on the rotor and m is number of magnets in each group, there being only two groups of magnets.
4. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which the centre lines of the innermost pole faces of the magnets are equidistant from the axis of the housing.
5. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which there are at least three magnets in each group, the outermost magnets of each group having the centre lines of the innermost pole faces spaced from the axis of the housing by a distance greater than the spacing from the axis of the housing of the centre line of the innermost pole face of the or each other magnet in the group, the difference between the maximum radius of the rotor and the spacing from the axis of the housing of the centre line of the innermost pole face of

each outermost magnet being no more than four times the difference between the maximum radius of the rotor and the spacing from the axis of the housing of the centre line of the innermost pole face of the or each other magnet in the group.
6. A machine as claimed in Claim 1, in which there are at least three magnets in each group, the outermost magnets of each group each having its innermost pole face inclined to a tangent to an imaginary circle struck from the axis of the housing and passing through the centre line of the innermost pole face so that the outer edge of said innermost pole face is further from the axis of the housing than the inner edge thereof.
7. A permanent magnet electrical machine substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in Figures 1 to 3 in the accompanying drawings.
8. A permanent magnet electrical machine substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in Figures 1 to 3 as modified by Figure 4 of the accompanying drawings.
9. A permanent magnet electrical machine substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to and as shown in Figures 1 to 3 as modified by Figure 5 of the accompanying drawings.